Headlines

  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Rob Manfred Elected Next MLB Commissioner

By Steve Adams and Jeff Todd | August 15, 2014 at 7:59am CDT

FRIDAY: Manfred’s initial contract will be a three-year deal, tweets Nightengale.

THURSDAY, 5:58pm: Jon Heyman of CBS Sports tweets that Manfred’s support vacillated between 20, 21 and 22 voters over the course of the day. The Brewers and Rays pushed the vote to 21 and 22. Of the final eight holdouts, the Nationals were the team that eventually changed their vote and put Manfred over the top, Heyman adds.

5:14pm: Bill Shaikin of the L.A. Times tweets that Manfred passed 30-0 in the final vote. Presumably, once one owner flipped his vote, the other seven conceded the defeat and made the decision unanimous. Indeed, in a follow-up tweet, Shaikin calls the 30-0 vote “an olive branch for posterity” by the seven owners who were still opposed to Manfred.

5:01pm: Major League Baseball owners have elected Rob Manfred as the next commissioner of MLB, according to Michael S. Schmidt of the New York Times (Twitter link).

Manfred, 55, will succeed Selig, who had announced that he would step down after the season. The former Brewers’ owner has been at the helm since 1992, when he was named acting Commissioner, taking over for Fay Vincent. His seat was formalized in 1998. During his tenure, baseball went through a devastating strike and still-lingering PED crisis, and also saw significant economic growth.

Manfred has been along for much of that ride, as Lynn Zinser of the New York Times wrote yesterday. After representing MLB as part of his practice with a large firm, Manfred entered league employment full-time in 1998 and spent fifteen years running point on many of the key labor issues that defined Selig’s stint.

The Harvard Law graduate’s ability to work with the MLB Player’s Association was perhaps seen as both a strength and weakness, as a minority group of owners emerged recently to challenge his assumed ascension. Red Sox chairman and part owner Tom Werner arose as the most plausible alternative, and managed to win the initial support off a reported eight owners during the early rounds of voting.

As Bob Nightengale of USA Today wrote yesterday, Manfred supporters will point to his status as head of labor negotiations and the 19 years of peace between MLB and the MLBPA. He also helped to implement baseball’s current drug testing system and headed last year’s Biogenesis investigation. His detractors, Nightengale notes, will point to the fact that baseball is the only sport without a salary cap. They also credit the drug testing agreement to the MLBPA for changing its stance and criticize Manfred for allowing all but $2 billion of the Dodgers’ $8.35 billion TV deal to be protected from revenue sharing.

After the first two rounds of voting, Manfred had just 22 of the necessary 23 votes of support, with the White Sox, Red Sox, Blue Jays, Angels, Nationals, Athletics, Diamondbacks and Reds all opposing. It’s unclear which of the eight opposing teams owners flipped his vote and tipped the scale in Manfred’s favor.

Share 24 Retweet 82 Send via email0

Newsstand Bud Selig Rob Manfred

Carlos Gonzalez To Undergo Season-Ending Surgery
Main
AL East Notes: Lester, Norris, Blue Jays, Cashman
View Comments (61)
Post a Comment

61 Comments

  1. xHoratiox

    11 years ago

    Backroom deal with Seligula. As expected…

    Reply
    • Jeff Hill

      11 years ago

      I agree with the backroom deal part but not with Selig and Manfred. But with Manfred and one of the 8 teams that voted for Tom Werner. I only say that because I don’t see how the votes can change so quickly when they have been deadlocked at 22-8. I also thought I remembered reading that at one point that Werner had 10 votes.

      Reply
      • jb226 2

        11 years ago

        There was a report that his supporters were saying he had 10 votes, but that same report included the other camp saying they had at least 21. Being as there are not 31 teams, something there was clearly unreliable.

        Reply
  2. Chris Vinnit

    11 years ago

    Sounds like Goodell 2.0 Hopefully he’s not as hypocritical, malicious, or corrupt.

    Reply
    • Bob George

      11 years ago

      From everything I’ve read the last 10 years, he seems to be much more of those, other than corrupt. He’s been very personal and hot tempered. Hopefully he calms down. Leaders can’t be vindictive and certainly the commissioner can’t be as rude and arrogant as Manfred has been with the media.

      Reply
  3. Christopher Hoffa

    11 years ago

    dumb question, but does he take over immediately or in the offseason?

    Reply
    • Vmmercan

      11 years ago

      January

      Reply
  4. mlbaustin

    11 years ago

    I’m honestly just glad it wasn’t George W. Bush

    Reply
    • MadmanTX 2

      11 years ago

      Bush would be one of the best commissioners ever.

      Reply
  5. ChrisM

    11 years ago

    Now can we please get rid of the awful Wild Card one-game playoff and go back to how it was before and then make the division series 7 games?

    Reply
    • Jaysfan1994 2

      11 years ago

      Why? Trade deadline has become the most intriguing thing in years because more teams are in the race for the playoffs.

      Reply
    • MB923

      11 years ago

      Or keep it and make the WC match a best of 3 instead of a 1 game playoff.

      Reply
      • ChrisM

        11 years ago

        Or this.

        Reply
      • KJ4realz

        11 years ago

        I’ve thought about that but the. How do you do it? Saw you have the braves an dodgers for example. Is it 1-1-1? That’s a lot of travel. Also you wouldn’t do 2-1 or 1-2 because then the better record team gets the first game away or the last. I’d personally do all 3 at the better records park. Or make it best of 5

        Reply
        • MB923

          11 years ago

          I think a best of 5 would be too many off days for the other teams. A 1-2 could actually work but I think a 1-1-1 would be best.

          My friend even had a good suggestion. Make it a best of 2 with either 2 games at one ballpark or 1-1. If the first WC team wins 1 the first or the 2nd game , then they win the series. The 2nd WC team has to win both of the 2 games to win it. Maybe not the best suggestion but it’s not a bad idea.

          Reply
          • BlueSkyLA

            11 years ago

            Yes, the problem with the current system is that it just isn’t complicated enough.

            Reply
        • Vmmercan

          11 years ago

          In 1995, it was a 2-3 with the better “seed” having the latter three games. I don’t see how a 1-2 would be unfair.

          Reply
          • MB923

            11 years ago

            Agreed, and it was like that in 2012 too but that was because Selig wanted the WC game in that season and schedule conflicts forced them to do the LDS 2-3. I believe every LDS that year went 5 games with 3 out of the 4 teams losing the last game.

            Reply
          • rct 2

            11 years ago

            Yeah, and they stopped doing that because it was unfair. Citing a failed and obsolete example isn’t a point your favor. A 1-2 would be unfair. 1-1-1 would be best, but scheduling conflicts/travel/having the other teams waiting around probably also wouldn’t be fair.

            Reply
            • MeowMeow

              11 years ago

              Let’s just have them by a quick 3-game set at the eventual ALDS host city 😛

              Reply
      • MeowMeow

        11 years ago

        The only problem with this idea (because I’ve been an occassional fan of it) is that it would a) push the postseason further back and b) leave the other six teams waiting for 4-6 days between the end of the season and the start of their ALDS, and layoffs like that are typically not ideal (see: 2007 Rockies, 2012 Tigers)

        Reply
        • MB923

          11 years ago

          Yes I understand about the off days which is why I said in response to someone else above who suggested maybe even making it a best of 5. That is Way too many off days.

          Or as I said above this post (or below the one you responded to), make it a 1-1 back to back days in 2 stadiums. 1st WC team has to win 1 of the 2 games (if they win the first, no 2nd game), the 2nd WC team has to win both (they go Away first, and then Home for the 2nd game)

          Though in a way, I can see that being a bit unfair for the 2nd WC team if they are at a disadvantage in the series, but hey it’s like that in other sports like the NFL when some teams have Byes. #1 and #2 seeds in NFL only have to win 3 games to win the super bowl whereas every other team has to win 4

          What do you think about that? (The 1-1 plan)

          Reply
          • MeowMeow

            11 years ago

            The 1-1 idea would make sense in situations like we’ll surely have this season (with the probably-Angels being so much better than the #2 team) but last season Tampa Bay and Cleveland were one game apart at the end of 162, and the year prior Baltimore and Texas had identical records. It strikes me as potentially dramatically unfair in those circumstances (especially where some arbitrary tie breaker defines which team is #1 and which is #2).

            I still think even 3 is too many off days, because there’d have to be at least one day on either side (possibly two after the end of the season to accommodate tiebreakers). And not only does it delay the LDS teams, but it pushes the World Series back, which is already a problem.

            Reply
            • MB923

              11 years ago

              There doesn’t have to be an off day in between the 2 games. I don’t care if it’s East vs. West, East. vs. East, West vs. West, etc. Though in that case, make the games mid day (say 4pm EST) and have them fly overnight after it.

              Good points about the standings, sometimes the record is identical (like Balt/Tex) other times there’s a gap ( like Atlanta and St. Louis last year).

              Anyway I would do it all in the span of 3 days after game 162… WC Game 1 – WC Game 2 (if necc) – LDS Game 1 (between the #2 and #3 division teams, not the WC winner/#1 team)

              Reply
    • Jorge Correa

      11 years ago

      Because there are a lot of problems in not having an incentive for teams to win the division and not giving a bit more of a fair chance to other good teams.

      Reply
      • DarthMurph

        11 years ago

        The problem is that the WC team has often had a better record than one of the division winners. Teams don’t need more incentive to win games,

        Reply
    • DanKoff

      11 years ago

      Yes Please. Teams play 162 games to determine who is better. Why do we need them to play one more unless there is a tie break?

      Reply
  6. ilikeike29

    11 years ago

    Tremendous choice.

    Reply
    • Mikenmn

      11 years ago

      quick question. why is it a tremendous choice? What do you see him doing that is a departure from the past? How will be improve the game? That’s not an adversarial question, but I’m curious.

      Reply
      • Jeff Hill

        11 years ago

        I am thinking that the first thing he will fix is the pace of play. Which is a major problem. I am a Red Sox fan and have not watched a full game since the collapse in 2011. That includes the postseason last year and the reason is that I DO NOT have 3-5 hours to watch a baseball game for 6-7 months. I watched bits and pieces of a game, here and there but not a full game.

        Reply
        • JamieFC

          11 years ago

          Then why did you watch up until 2011? The length of games did not drastically change after your Sox collapsed in Sept 2011…

          Reply
          • Jeff Hill

            11 years ago

            That is when I started to not have the time to spend 3-5 hours a night watching baseball games. And the Sox collapse did help a little.

            Reply
          • MeowMeow

            11 years ago

            Yeah, pre-2012 had Papelbon adding ~80 hours over the course of a whole season just by himself.

            Reply
  7. Mikenmn

    11 years ago

    Interesting. what we will never find out, sadly, is what it took to get the votes. In baseball, nothing is free.

    Reply
  8. Jaysfan1994 2

    11 years ago

    Any information leaked by Heyman usually has to go through Scott Boras first, him saying the Nationals were the one’s that flipped might not even be true. Could just be Boras making sure his loyal Nationals get special treatment from Mansfield once he takes the reigns.

    Reply
  9. ba9oriole

    11 years ago

    I wish MLB would balance the schedules and remove the divisions so that only the best teams really make it to the playoffs. How is it fair that my Orioles have to face AL East teams for two-thirds of their schedule and NL Central teams face the weak teams in their division for two-thirds of their schedule?

    Reply
    • Jeff Hill

      11 years ago

      I am just playing devil’s advocate with you. But look at the 2 divisions this year. Your orioles have to play the AL East which has a combined winning percentage of about .511 while the NL Central has played 3 more games and has a winning percentage of about .508. So going just based off of winning percentage the 2 divisions are pretty much equal this season. Even though if you look at the standings the NL Central should be a better division. So this season the NL Central is not facing weak teams. The divisions that I would say just by looking at the standings and not calculating winning percentages are the NL West and AL West because the DBacks and Astros each have less than 50 wins this season and the rest of the division plays those teams more than the other teams not in that division.

      Reply
      • ba9oriole

        11 years ago

        I’m talking about every single year since the three division setup has been in place, not just this season. And you actually helped prove my point for me. Even when the AL East is at it’s weakest point probably in decades, it STILL has a better winning percentage than the NL Central. Put it this way. The Orioles didn’t have even one winning season from 1998-2011. If the Orioles had played in the NL Central, I guarantee you that they would have had at least a few winning seasons during that span. Their offense was always pretty decent, but they could have gotten away with the below average pitching they had if they had been in that division.

        Reply
      • BlueSkyLA

        11 years ago

        You are right about the NLW (#6 .477), but not the ALW (#3 .506). It’s one thing to talk about playing in strong or weak divisions but you should also consider the interleague match-ups. The quality of “local rival” teams varies quite a bit, but either way they are going to play those games with them every year. I think the White Sox are happier playing those games against the Cubs than the Mets are facing the Yankees or the Giants are playing the A’s.

        Reply
    • BlueSkyLA

      11 years ago

      I don’t need to play devil’s advocate to ask if you are really serious about 15-team “divisions” (better known as leagues). In this case, the only “playoffs” left are called the World Series.

      Reply
    • MeowMeow

      11 years ago

      Two thirds of the schedule? Intra-division games, while still a significant
      chunk, are less than half the schedule (Intra-division: 76 games,
      interleague: 20 games, other: 66). Not to mention, if the O’s played in
      the national league that great offense would be weakened by the absence
      of a DH (bye Nelson Cruz).

      Also, what’s the justification for the O’s not doing well from 1998-2007 again? I mean, sure there were a lot of games against strong Boston and New York teams, but an equal number of games against weak Toronto and Tampa Bay teams.

      Not to mention, evening out the schedule would be an awful mess of travel (and 10pm start times).

      Reply
      • ba9oriole

        11 years ago

        Nelson Cruz would play LF and they’d have an advantage with their pinch hitters. Also, their very good pitching would suddenly be great pitching since they’d have a free out every ninth batter. I already explained the Orioles losing season streak in a response to someone else. I don’t feel like repeating myself.

        Reply
        • stl_cards16

          11 years ago

          You point out the NL Central? Is this 2006 again? Somehow playing against each other in this weak division 4 (of 5) teams are over .500 Makes sense?

          Reply
          • scottastic86

            11 years ago

            I really have gotten sick of so many people still thinking that the NL Central is a joke. ’13- 3 teams with 90+ wins, playoff berths, and division winner represented NL in WS. ’12- 2 playoff teams and wild card came within 1 game of WS. ’11- 2 playoff teams with 90+ wins, both made NLCS and wild card won WS. ’08- 2 playoff teams with 90+ wins. ’06- Division winner wins WS despite finishing with 83 wins. ’05- 2 playoff teams, division winner led MLB in wins (100) and both made NLCS. ’04- 2 playoff teams, division winner led MLB in wins (105), both made NLCS. ’03- Division winner within 1 game of WS. By the look of things 2014 will probably have at least 2 playoff teams again. But yeah, it’s pretty unfair that these teams have to play each other when they’re obviously so weak…

            Reply
    • MS

      11 years ago

      Your view of the NL Central is a few years behind. Currently, 4 of the top 8 teams in the NL are from the Central.

      Reply
  10. Ned L

    11 years ago

    Congrats Mr. Rose and welcome back.

    Reply
    • jamesa-2

      11 years ago

      Unlikely with Manfred.

      Reply
    • northsfbay

      11 years ago

      Rose bet on baseball games. Give it up.

      Reply
      • Ned L

        11 years ago

        My bet is that he will be reinstated very soon. I’m not saying I agree with it, but I think it will happen. As will a revision of the home plate blocking rule by the first playoff game. We’ll see.

        Reply
        • MadmanTX 2

          11 years ago

          I hope you lose your bet–ironic that you are even betting on Pete “Double or nothing on the Reds” Rose.

          Reply
  11. froggy54

    11 years ago

    This guy was right there side by side with the man who turned and looked the other way from steroids. He’s nothing to me. Just more of the same. He wants to do something?Let him wipe out every record set by every cheater and then move forward.

    Reply
    • Ned L

      11 years ago

      The MLBPA wouldn’t allow any action on PEDs, the wasn’t much Bud could do.

      Reply
    • MeowMeow

      11 years ago

      Manfred was the guy who wanted to try to punish Barry Bonds even though there were no rules about it at the time to force the MLBPA to have to protect a cheater in arbitration, actually…….

      Reply
  12. MadmanTX 2

    11 years ago

    Hope to God this new guy doesn’t let Pete Rose or the cheaters into the HOF.

    Reply
    • northsfbay

      11 years ago

      The Baseball Hall of Fame is independent of baseball. It is run by a Board of Directors. They can do anything they want.

      Reply
      • Dock_Elvis

        11 years ago

        But according to the Hall of Fame bylaws, a player must be in good standing with organized baseball.

        Reply
        • northsfbay

          11 years ago

          The Hall of Fame could change their bylaws.

          Reply
          • Dock_Elvis

            11 years ago

            Possible, but it would make little ethical sense to change it. MLB will need to reinstate Pete Rose or Joe Jackson before they will likely ever be enshrined.

            Reply
  13. Mikenmn

    11 years ago

    Love the update “Manfred’s contract will be a three year deal..” I was hoping for the good stuff, like how much, are there incentives for number of press conferences, or players suspended, is their a vesting option, can the owners give Manfred a Qualifying Offer?

    Reply
  14. formerdraftpick 2

    11 years ago

    First order of business. Reinstate Pete Rose.

    Reply
  15. NRD1138 2

    11 years ago

    Unclear who was the leader in the opposition. Scuttlebutt was it was Reinsdorf.
    I just hope he gets rid of the silly Winner of AS game gets home field in the playoffs. It should be who ever has the better record who gets home field for the Series or something like that.
    That and WC should stay, as I think you have seen what it does. Makes a better overall experience for those who could be in the hunt all season long, not just had a change 2 weeks into the season then done for the rest.
    Ye olde days of just division winners was OK when there were not 30 teams in the league. Otherwise revenue will drop and I cannot see a commissioner with a 3 yr contract telling the owners “Guess what? I’m going to cut your revenue!” Then tell the players union “Guess what? Fewer of you have a change to make the playoffs and get you PO bonuses!”
    Unless that is what he was already rumored to be thinking and that is why there was opposition to his promotion.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Blue Jays Notes: Scherzer, Varsho, Francis

    Pirates Reportedly Receiving Interest In Isiah Kiner-Falefa

    Angels Sign Ben Gamel To Minor League Deal

    Blue Jays Recall Spencer Turnbull For Season Debut

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version