Over the next few weeks, I will be discussing some of the higher profile upcoming arbitration cases. I will rely partly on my arbitration model developed exclusively for MLB Trade Rumors, but will also break out some interesting comparables and determine where the model might be wrong.
The reigning Most Valuable Player of the American League enters his second year of arbitration eligibility due for a healthy raise on the $4.3MM he earned in his award-winning season. Josh Donaldson hit .297 with 41 home runs and 123 runs batted in 711 plate appearances, with an All-Star appearance and a Silver Slugger Award to add to his MVP honors.
It was the third baseman’s first year with the Blue Jays after a solid career in Oakland, and he certainly made a great impression on his new employers. Now, they will have to pay up in his second year of arbitration. Our model and several knowledgeable sources have confirmed that after the first year of arbitration eligibility, most players’ cases are treated as raises based almost exclusively on the previous year’s statistics. This helps explain why the model projects that Donaldson will receive a $7.7MM raise to a total of $12MM, which would be a record raise for a second-time eligible player.
The model’s projection of a record raise seems appropriate. The current record belongs to Chris Davis in 2014, who did not win an MVP Award when received a $7.05MM raise. Davis did out-homer Donaldson, 53 to 42, and had 138 RBIs — 15 more than Donaldson — as well. But, Donaldson had a higher average, .297 versus .286, and played a harder defensive position (third base versus first base) and is known for his excellent defense. While defensive performance usually does not matter much in arbitration cases (other than position played), I believe that Donaldson should be able to use his defense and his hardware to argue that he should have a bigger raise than Davis did– probably something in line with the $12MM projection, I would guess.
The last hitter to enter his second year of arbitration eligibility after winning an MVP Award was five years ago, when Josh Hamilton earned a $5.5MM raise. Hamilton had hit .359 with 32 home runs and 100 RBIs, but in only 571 plate appearances. Donaldson’s 140 extra trips to the plate with nine more home runs and 23 more runs knocked in should help him argue for a much larger raise than Hamilton received on the heels of his MVP season in 2010. Even if Donaldson cannot effectively argue that his raise should be larger than Davis’ due to the power gap, he should have less trouble arguing that he is deserving of a bigger raise than Hamilton received five years ago.
Few other players seem likely to make better arbitration cases for Donaldson than Hamilton and Davis. As a result, I think the case will likely come down to an argument about whether Donaldson should get something like a $6MM raise to top Hamilton by a decent margin, or whether Donaldson should get a $7.5MM raise to set a new record beyond Davis. It’s unlikely that Donaldson out-earned the $12MM salary I have projected for him, but I think it is more likely than not that he is close to this range. If he cannot argue that his case is stronger than Davis, though, he might end up around $10.3MM — a hefty raise, to be sure, but a fair margin shy of the current record increase that our model currently projects.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
adyo4552
Pay the man! Then maybe he can work on hitting in the clutch 😉
SFgiantsUK
kash1411
This guy needs a paycheck as big as his ego. Guys like this pull clubhouses apart, ship him!
Owen National
he is still young
jaysfan1994
Yes, ship him to New York! They take guys who shoot guns with their small children present.
/sarcasm
Priggs89
We’ll send you Todd Frazier for him right now. Great clubhouse guy.
cmac420
you sir are crazy, he just won the mvp, is the most clutch player ive ever seen, helped us make the playoffs for first time in 20 years.
Think he is deserving of whatever ego he has,
as far as the clubhouse goes , seemed like he was well loved by all teammates
winning trumps all, and this man is a WINNER
cmac420
you sir are crazy, he just won the mvp, is the most clutch player ive ever seen,
DAKINS
He did hit a few walk-offs this season.
bluejayseveryday
3 walk off home runs and another walk off single this season
vtadave
Agree. Really needs to improve upon last year’s 1.058 OPS with RISP if he wants that nine-figure deal.
adyo4552
I stand corrected
cxcx
I find it weird that a long post about Donaldson’s arbitration would not bother to touch on or recap his arbitration fiasco last year and mention how it would (or wouldn’t) effect his approach this time around.
I also find it exceedingly weird that these arbitration posts seem to never actually discuss arbitration. They just talk about about a projected final figure as if it just came from averaging several similar players raises then adding or subtracting “x”.
Arbitration is a player picking a number and a team picking a number and seeing if they can find a compromise and if not then having a panel pick which of the two raises is more appropriate. The panel doesn”t just come up with the perfect raise amount on it’s own, it picks between two often imperfect choices (see Donaldson last year).
A good arbitration breakdown would examine the filing histories of the involved team and agent and also their frequency of actually going to arbitration. So if both parties are relatively unlikely to seek arbitration then maybe the model projection or the modification of it is a good projection by itself. But if the parties involved are relatively likely to go to arbitration then it would be good to know how much lower than the projection the team tends to file and how much higher than the projection the player is likely to file. And then if panels tend to favor one over the other, like if they tend to pick the team or player salary based on which is absolutely closer to the projection or if one side has slightly more leeway than the other to be off but still win. Also the winning percentages of involved agents and teams. Also if any particular positions or types of players have higher or lower winning percentages in hearings and whether they have a higher or lower likelihood than average to go arbitration at all. And whether how a player’s defeat in a hearing one year effects his negotiations with his team the next year, how likely a player is to go to arbitration again the year after a loss, if players tend to gain or lose leeway in hearings after a loss, etc.
Basically these posts seem to involve looking at raises of previous arbitration eligible players then tweaking those numbers with player stats. There is almost no mention of arbitration.
mattdsmith
These posts have been historically accurate when all the filings come through. But these posts are not meant to continually remind the reader of the process like you suggest. They’re meant to offer an end result. If you are worried about how they’ll get to the end result, you can use your own obvious wealth of writing knowledge and arbitration expertise to develop a model and then write about it.
SoCalShu
No disrespect to MLBTR but it seems that the media shapes what the agents ask for by reporting their opinions long before the process takes place(not specifically this story)
When you see MLB media outlets start speculating about a $500m contract 2yrs before the player becomes a FA…this isn’t a baseball specific issue as all media spins/creates stories to skew or direct public opinion and controversy b/c controversy creates ratings/clicks…
PutMeinCoach88
Who cares as long as you find out the end result. You can speculate and guess all day what hes projected as or talk about it til you’re blue in the face. Who has time to read a big article about one guy’s arb case when there’s so many more articles out there. Not to mention, do you have any idea how busy these guys at MLBTR are?!?!
HibbardsHustler
I think this process should be done sooner. It’s crippling to teams when they don’t know how much they have to spend so they miss out on free agents because the possible outcome may put them over budget.
Owen National
I agree
Rollie's Mustache
I imagine in most cases it’s not a big deal for the team. The gap in figure between what the Jays will submit and what Donaldson will is much, much larger than most other arbitration cases. Like MLBTR, teams have a projection model too and can arrive at a likely estimate based on it. The end result probably won’t differ all that much from the projection.
If a team is “crippled” by having to spend an extra $4-5M in arbitration than they anticipated, then they wouldn’t have been in on big name free agents to begin with.
That said, I’d also be curious to know why the process isn’t done sooner.