Headlines

  • Reds Fire Bryan Price, Mack Jenkins
  • Taijuan Walker To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Sign Jose Bautista
  • Taijuan Walker Diagnosed With “UCL Injury”
  • 2018-19 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings
  • Kevin Kiermaier To Undergo Thumb Surgery
  • Previous
  • Next
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Indians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2018 Arbitration Tracker
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2018
    • 2017-18 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2017-18 MLB Free Agent List
    • Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • MLB Depth Charts
    • Transaction Tracker
    • DFA Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • Last 100 Comments
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

MLBTR Poll: Assessing The Matt Wieters Deal

By Jeff Todd | February 22, 2017 at 8:40am CDT

While the deal is still awaiting a physical to be finalized, we learned yesterday that the Nationals had agreed to a two-year, $21MM pact with Matt Wieters that also allows him to opt out of the second season (and second $10.5MM payday). As the Nationals wrap up that move, and begin looking ahead to perhaps one more roster tweak to come, it seemed like an opportune time to take two quick polls.

By most accounts, the Nats paid less than Wieters was expected to earn entering the winter. Despite lower-than-expected demand, there were other suitors still in play, so perhaps also the deal reflects a still-active market. And in the final analysis, it’s an objectively reasonable price tag that reflects Wieters’s abilities but also his limitations.

Still, market-value deals often make more sense for some teams than others. Dave Cameron of Fangraphs isn’t sold that the Nats were the right team to make a play for Wieters, given the presence of Derek Norris, Jose Lobaton, and Pedro Severino. On the other hand, there may well be other considerations — the front office’s assessment of Wieters’s pitcher-handling and pitch-calling abilities, a scouting assessment of his hitting, etc. — that could impact the analysis. (There’s plenty more discussion of Wieters’s overall value in the above-linked post on his signing, as well as in Cameron’s piece.)

Then, there’s the question of what the team does next. This signing would look somewhat different if, as various reports have hinted, the team goes on to move Norris (along with his $4.2MM arbitration salary and remaining season of control) as opposed to Lobaton (a lower-upside veteran who is also cheaper at $1.575MM and set for free agency next winter). And it would be another matter entirely if the move was designed in part to free up Severino, who currently features as a part of the organization’s long-term planning at the position, to a acquire a late-inning reliever.

Regardless of what happens with Severino, it’s likely that the team will still need to decide between Norris and Lobaton as a second backstop. Though both Wieters and Lobaton are switch-hitters, the former has thrived traditionally against lefties, while the latter has been better against right-handed pitching. Norris, meanwhile, has wide platoon splits that suggest he’s most effective against southpaws.

Since the Nats’ next step impacts the assessment of the deal with Wieters (assuming it’s finalized), we won’t ask a simple yes/no on whether it’s a good signing. Indeed, there are alternative viewpoints on which ensuing transaction truly matters most in assessing this deal, since it’s reasonable to argue that any trade involving Severino really isn’t dependent upon the addition of another short-term, non-optionable veteran. Instead, then, we’ll ask: how would you characterize the move at this point?

(Link for app users.)

Share 0 Retweet 3 Send via email0

MLBTR Originals MLBTR Polls Washington Nationals

Quick Hits: Manfred, Rockies, Padres, A-Rod
Main
Injury Notes: Elbow Therapy, Hamilton, Britton, Cishek, Wright, Wheeler, Braves, Gibson
41 comments
newest oldest

Comments

  1. ethan

    1 year ago

    they can’t carry anymore catchers so why did they sign him him

    0
    1
    Reply
  2. EndinStealth

    1 year ago

    Because he is an improvement over Norris. Any fan should be happy to add an improved player.

    0
    0
    Reply
    • cmancoley

      1 year ago

      False. Just because he is an improvement, it doesn’t mean that he is a necessity. The Nationals are in dire need of a closer, and this definitely does not help the situation. I think some fans are overrating Norris and Lobaton. Neither would really bring back a quality closer the Nats are looking for. In addition, Wieters isn’t getting any younger and anyone who has been watching him play, can start to see it. Therefore, your only option left would be to move him to first but he will be incredibly underpowered and just not quite there offensively, that a first baseman should have. Bad signing IMO.

      0
      1
      Reply
      • alexgordonbeckham

        1 year ago

        Agreed. The only way Norris could work in say, a possible Robertson deal, would be to help offset some money owed to Robertson and then 2-3 additional upside players would have to come over for the Sox taking on Norris. The Sox can then hope he bounces back so they can trade him in June/July.

        1
        1
        Reply
      • Just Another Fan

        1 year ago

        You speak as if getting a massive upgrade over Derek Norris is going to impede their search for a closer. Nope.

        Norris is worthless on the trade market too, they are best just releasing him.

        0
        1
        Reply
        • lesterdnightfly

          1 year ago

          …Besides, he’s “old”, right?

          0
          0
          Reply
        • bosox90

          1 year ago

          Did you grow up with Derek Norris? Was he really mean to you?

          0
          0
          Reply
      • EndinStealth

        1 year ago

        Lmao. False. It’s a two year deal with an option out. He won’t be around long enough to warrant a move to first. He still has a good arm. Even after the surgery. This in no way at all impedes a potential trade for a closer.

        0
        0
        Reply
  3. natsgm

    1 year ago

    Prior to this unnecessarily expensive deal, I would have bet on Severino being the starter by mid season.

    0
    0
    Reply
    • alexgordonbeckham

      1 year ago

      If he isn’t in a deal for a closer, I bet he starts in AAA for the year.

      0
      0
      Reply
  4. lowtalker1

    1 year ago

    Lol should have just let him sit
    Should let all of boras clients sit

    1
    1
    Reply
    • JDGoat

      1 year ago

      Why because he’s good at his job?

      1
      0
      Reply
  5. Just Another Fan

    1 year ago

    Derek Norris should be at AAA, not MLB. Bad defense bad hitting = give someone else a chance.

    0
    1
    Reply
    • ethan

      1 year ago

      why would anyone do that I mean yes I don’t like it but they did also get them for a discounted price as they sit on the other side I use

      0
      0
      Reply
      • ethan

        1 year ago

        sorry for the errors by the way I meant to say that well I don’t like the deal it was a discount for Washington by the way I am a nationals game

        0
        1
        Reply
        • ethan

          1 year ago

          I meant fan

          0
          1
          Reply
        • dynamite drop in monty

          1 year ago

          I meant the soda

          1
          0
          Reply
        • Just Another Fan

          1 year ago

          ethan – you can edit posts on here, no need to update mistakes!

          1
          0
          Reply
        • SamFuldsFive

          1 year ago

          Not on mobile.

          0
          0
          Reply
    • therealryan

      1 year ago

      Why do you say Norris has bad defense? DRS and BP both rate him as an above average defender and better defensively than the recently signed Wieters. Also, before the second half of last season, he had a track record as a fine hitter for a catcher.

      1
      0
      Reply
  6. freaky55

    1 year ago

    Norris will bring garbage in the trade market. They should trade Wieters for a closer… haha…oh wait…

    0
    1
    Reply
    • ethan

      1 year ago

      they already tried that and look where it got them

      1
      1
      Reply
    • Meh Sheep

      1 year ago

      Why would another team trade a closer for someone they could have just signed a couple of days ago? Not to mention Wieters would have to approve that trade due to league rules about trading newly free agents.

      1
      0
      Reply
  7. thebare

    1 year ago

    It reminds me when Carlton Fisk left the Red Sox for the White Sox oh they a World Series.you see what I see now

    0
    1
    Reply
    • jorleeduf

      1 year ago

      Nope, because that does not make sense.

      2
      0
      Reply
  8. Steven

    1 year ago

    The notion that Norris has any trade value is crazy. The Nats have to make roster moves to fit Wieters as far as I know, so something has to give.

    Wieters is an expensive minor upgrade in my opinion

    2
    0
    Reply
  9. chesteraarthur

    1 year ago

    they should have signed joe blanton

    2
    0
    Reply
  10. therealryan

    1 year ago

    In a vacuum, the signing of Wieters is fine. However, everything I’ve seen talks about how the Nationals are at the top of their spending limits. If this is true and Wieters costs them a chance at signing or trading for more BP help, I would say it is a bad signing. I don’t believe he is that much of an upgrade over Norris for this upcoming season and if the extra $15 million guaranteed over the next 2 seasons limit the Nats from signing or acquiring more BP help I think it was a poor allocation of resources.

    0
    0
    Reply
    • blovy8

      1 year ago

      I agree with that. I also think they will probably not be keeping any reliever that would make over a million like Nathan, Albers or Worley now.

      0
      0
      Reply
  11. old_cheapy_fred

    1 year ago

    Good move. Wieters has had injury issues that have lingered into the past couple of years. But this may be the year he gets fully back, and can play enough games to get in a rhythm. If so, he’s a stud defensively (ignore the idiocy of “advanced” stats and watch a game, and then find out his pitchers and fellow fielders think). That’s what the position is really about when you’re a team relying on its starting pitching staff. His offense has been up and down, but he’s still a power threat from both sides of the plate.

    If the Mets were a big market team, then this would have been an even better move for them with their young pitching staff.

    0
    0
    Reply
  12. JFactor

    1 year ago

    If they can still move a catcher for someone like, sat Robertson. Then the signing will make more sense.

    But not really any point in having 3 MLB catchers with a good backup to that group. And nobody really plays another position like Castillo/Schwarber.

    I think they will receive good value for the money. But I believe in fit over raw talent personally. If Norris can be included in a trade for a closer (or Lobaton) then it would help explain this better.

    They need a closer, not a 4th catcher.

    0
    0
    Reply
  13. jrwhite21

    1 year ago

    Can wieters play first at all? That’d make this deal a bit better

    0
    0
    Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      1 year ago

      Doubt that’s a meaningful consideration. They have Zimmerman and Lind available, as well as Robertson (if he sticks around or ends up in Triple-A after being outrighted).

      0
      0
      Reply
      • jrwhite21

        1 year ago

        I completely forgot that Lind was added. Thanks, Jeff!

        0
        0
        Reply
  14. mike156

    1 year ago

    it’s not a horrible move, but it does indicate the need for another one, with the catching “surplus” and an additional allocation of resources for a closer. So, until we see what’s next, I don’t know how you judge it.

    0
    0
    Reply
    • Jeff Todd

      1 year ago

      That was sort of the point of the post and the way the poll was set up — like, what move would make this make sense? (Or do you think it makes sense regardless, etc.)

      0
      0
      Reply
  15. CNichols

    1 year ago

    I think it makes sense regardless of what the next move is because the money they spent on Wieters is modest for a catcher who is clearly an upgrade over the other three options.

    If they get anything of value for one of the other three catchers its worth it and a huge thing working in their favor is that Norris and Severino both have options remaining. There’s little to no risk of them being forced into DFA’ing someone. If no one is offering anything of value in the short term they can start the year with those two in AAA and wait for something to catch their eye. This is a premium position so its only a matter of time before someone has a need.

    0
    0
    Reply
  16. lowtalker1

    1 year ago

    Didn’t need to be done
    Should of let weiters sit out the season

    0
    0
    Reply
  17. dclivejazz

    1 year ago

    None of the poll options reflect my feelings, which are mixed about acquiring Wieters. It could be a tolerable acquisition if they don’t end up trading away Severino in the aftermath. It’s more important to keep Severino than Norris IMHO, especially if the reliever to be acquired is simply so-so.

    Norris, however, probably has very little trade value and the Nats might end up not being able to further bolster their BP by trading a catcher, presuming they keep Severino. So I’d like a poll option that registers that acquiring Wieters might be OK as long as the Nats don’t boot Severino.

    0
    0
    Reply
  18. ronnyalton

    1 year ago

    As a Braves fan, I like this deal.

    0
    0
    Reply
  19. Will McLaren

    1 year ago

    I think the terms are pretty much right at what was reasonable after this long offseason. I just don’t understand the Nats pursuit of him… feel like the Angels had much more of a need and made sense. I’m biased, but the Nats traded for Norris already… who BTW people are so quick to write off. Norris is a bounce back candidate in my opinion if he can get 350-400 ab’s

    0
    0
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Reds Fire Bryan Price, Mack Jenkins

    Taijuan Walker To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Sign Jose Bautista

    Taijuan Walker Diagnosed With “UCL Injury”

    2018-19 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings

    Kevin Kiermaier To Undergo Thumb Surgery

    Dinelson Lamet To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Travis d’Arnaud To Undergo Tommy John Surgery; Kevin Plawecki Placed On Disabled List

    Elvis Andrus Diagnosed With Elbow Fracture

    Alex Gordon Placed On DL With Labral Tear In Left Hip

    Recent

    NL Roster Notes: Bautista, Perdomo, Gonzalez, Mac/Pence

    White Sox Acquire Trayce Thompson

    Brewers Acquire Tyler Saladino, Designate Alec Asher

    Offseason In Review: Cincinnati Reds

    Rangers Sign Julio Pablo Martinez

    Braves Designate Lane Adams For Assignment

    MLBTR Chat Transcript: Reds, Nats, Jays, Rox, Pence

    AL Central Notes: V-Mart, Buchholz, Eloy, Cordell

    Minor MLB Transactions: 4/19/18

    Mets Sign Vance Worley To Minor League Deal, Release A.J. Griffin

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2017-18 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2017-18 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2018
    • MLB Depth Charts
    • 2018-19 MLB Free Agent List
    • Transaction Tracker
    • DFA Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Twitter/RSS Feeds
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
    • Roster Resource

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Indians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version