Headlines

  • Yankees Promote Gleyber Torres
  • Mets To Move Matt Harvey To Bullpen
  • Reds Fire Bryan Price, Mack Jenkins
  • Taijuan Walker To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Sign Jose Bautista
  • Taijuan Walker Diagnosed With “UCL Injury”
  • Previous
  • Next
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Indians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2018 Arbitration Tracker
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2018
    • 2017-18 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2017-18 MLB Free Agent List
    • Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • MLB Depth Charts
    • Transaction Tracker
    • DFA Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • Last 100 Comments
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Cubs Sign Yu Darvish

By Kyle Downing | February 13, 2018 at 11:45am CDT

TUESDAY: The Cubs have announced the deal.

It breaks down as follows, per Bob Nightengale of USA Today (via Twitter): $25MM in 2018, $20MM in 2019, $22MM apiece in 2020 and 2021, $19MM in 2022, and $18MM in 2023. That allocation means that Darvish will face at least a four-year, $81MM decision (depending upon escalators) when his opt-out opportunity arises.

Per Nightengale, also, the full no-trade protection extends through the first four years of the contract.

SUNDAY, 4:05pm: Darvish has a full no-trade clause for part of the deal, then it switches to a 12-team list, per Jon Heyman of FanRag (Twitter link).

1:50pm: Darvish has the ability to block a trade to nearly every team, Bob Nightengale of USA Today tweets. Additionally, in any year of the contract, he could earn $2MM extra with a Cy Young Award or $1MM if he finishes second to fifth in the voting.

SATURDAY, 6:02pm: Darvish’s opt-out comes after the 2019 season, Jeff Passan of Yahoo Sports tweets.

5:17pm: The Cubs and Yu Darvish have agreed to terms on a contract that will bring the righty to Chicago, Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reports on Twitter. The deal guarantees the Wasserman client $126MM over six years (though the total value can reportedly reach $150MM via escalators), and is pending a physical. ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick tweets that the contract also includes both an opt-out clause “earlier than three years into his contract” and no-trade protection (Twitter link).

DarvishInsta

With Darvish in the fold alongside Jon Lester, Jose Quintana, Kyle Hendricks and Tyler Chatwood, the reigning NL Central champs will have one of the more complete (and formidable) rotations in all of baseball. Thanks in part to that group, they should enter the upcoming season as the favorites to win the division again, despite the aggressive moves the rival Brewers have made this winter.

In Darvish, who divided last year between the Rangers and Dodgers, the Cubs are getting a hurler who in 2017 ranked as the majors’ 16th-best pitcher by fWAR (3.5) and 12th-best in terms of strikeouts per nine innings (10.08). He also racked up 186 2/3 innings, his most since 2013, and pitched to a 3.86 ERA/3.83 FIP. He figures to replace Jake Arrieta near the front of the Cubs’ rotation. Because Darvish was part of a midseason trade, the Dodgers could not issue him a qualifying offer to begin the winter. Consequently, reeling him in won’t cost Chicago any draft-pick compensation or international bonus pool money.

Of course, the impact of this signing sends ripples far beyond the NL Central alone. MLBTR had ranked Darvish as the best available free agent among our top 50 (Tim Dierkes & Co. actually predicted he’d end up with the Cubs). This deal could well mean that many other free agent dominoes will begin to fall soon. In particular, many have theorized that teams may have been waiting for Darvish to sign before moving onto lesser free agents such as Arrieta, Alex Cobb and Lance Lynn. The Dodgers, Twins, and Brewers had all reportedly made serious offers for Darvish; they’ll now have to set their sights on other options.

The contract itself is by far the largest ever given to a free agent in February. Although the total guarantee is significantly south of the $160MM we predicted he’d receive back in November, the deal itself could perhaps ease some of the ongoing tension between the players union and MLB, which has escalated to a boiling point in recent weeks due to teams’ unwillingness to meet the asking prices of many top free agents. There has perhaps been as much focus on the glacial pace of the offseason as there has been on the free agents themselves, and the Darvish signing is certainly a step in the right direction.

On the other hand, the top four remaining free agents are now J.D. Martinez, Eric Hosmer, Jake Arrieta and Mike Moustakas – all of whom are clients of Scott Boras. With the super-agent firmly in control of the top of the market, there’s no guarantee that other pieces will fall into place any time soon.

[RELATED: Updated Cubs Depth Chart/Team Payroll]

Darvish’s major league career started out in spectacular fashion. After the Rangers spent over $100MM between salary guarantees and posting fees in order to sign him out of Japan prior to 2012, he rewarded them by delivering two consecutive seasons of at least 4.5 fWAR. The talented righty was on his way to another fantastic campaign in 2014, but had to be shut down in August due to elbow issues. Those issues ultimately led to a Tommy John surgery in March of the following year, meaning the ace didn’t take the mound for the Rangers for nearly two years.

When Darvish made his return on May 28, 2016, he picked up right where he left off. In 287 innings since that date, all Darvish has done is strike out 341 hitters while walking just 89. His 3.70 ERA and 3.49 xFIP during that span are among the best marks in the major leagues, and he’s posted the 14th-best soft contact rate in the major leagues during that span.

Of course, Darvish’s solid 2017 season was unfortunately covered in shadow by his dreadful World Series performance with the Dodgers. He faced 22 Astros hitters across his two starts while recording just 10 outs and allowing eight earned runs. Darvish was saddled with the loss for both of those games, one of which was the seventh and final game of the series.

However, while his bellyflop is perhaps the most prominent impression left in the minds of Dodgers fans, there are a number of important factors to consider. The first and perhaps most obvious is that 3 1/3 innings is an incredibly small sample size, particularly against a juggernaut Astros offense that also tore through pitchers like Chris Sale in the same postseason. Another is that many Astros hitters went on record saying that Darvish was tipping his pitches in Game Seven; they could tell whether he was going to throw a cutter or a breaking ball by watching whether he adjusted his grip on the ball before bringing it to his glove. Finally, the two World Series starts were Darvish’s 36th and 37th of the season, which is especially notable because he hadn’t pitched a more than 150 innings in a season since 2013.

Darvish’s pitch arsenal is one of his most unique assets. According to Brooks Baseball, he threw a four-seamer, slider, sinker, curve, cutter, change-up and splitter during the 2017 season. While the sinker and change-up were each utilized less than 2% of the time, such an expansive repertoire sets Darvish apart from other MLB aces. Fortunately for him, he’ll once again be reunited with catcher Chris Gimenez. The two played together during their years with the Rangers, where Gimenez had great success working with Darvish and his arsenal. The Cubs signed Gimenez to a minor-league deal about three weeks ago, though whether that factor had any impact at all on Davish’s decision is a guessing game at this point.

While there’s a chance Darvish will pitch to Gimenez in 2018, it seems likely most of his work will come with starting catcher Willson Contreras. The 25-year-old expressed excitement about the Darvish deal on Twitter, noting that he “can’t wait to catch” the four-time All-Star.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.

Share 0 Retweet 32 Send via email0

Chicago Cubs Newsstand Transactions Yu Darvish

Giants Negotiating With Tony Watson; Phillies & Red Sox Also In Mix
Main
Twins Sign Chris Heisey
732 comments
newest oldest

Comments

  1. xabial

    2 months ago

    My prediction came true!!

    In First post in the bottom link. I predicted exact contract!!!

    link to mlbtraderumors.com

    16
    21
    Reply
    • RaysBaseball4RaysBaseball4

      2 months ago

      Atta way dude!

      4
      1
      Reply
      • bigcubsfan

        2 months ago

        Wow!! Where are those Brewers fans at now, screaming “my Brewers are better than the Cubs. They will win 120 games next season”?

        4
        5
        Reply
        • scottstots

          2 months ago

          Im guessing you are exaggerating I doubt anyone thinks their team will win 120 games… well maybe Cubs fans do.

          6
          9
          Reply
        • chesteraarthur

          2 months ago

          Haha and you say cubs fans are over compensating. Glass house my dude, glass house.

          0
          6
          Reply
        • bigcubsfan

          2 months ago

          Look at the Brewers sign Lorenzo Cain post. There was a guy that said the Cubs would be below .500 if Rizzo or Bryant got injured. Like Brewers players don’t have a chance at being injured too.

          4
          3
          Reply
        • scottstots

          2 months ago

          I remember that thread and it was that Yankee guy who said somewhere in here that the Cubs are now even with the Pirates. Clearly he just hates the Cubs, but claiming he represents Brewers fans is simply untrue as is saying that Brewers fans were saying that the Brewers would win 120 games this year.

          5
          0
          Reply
        • michaelw

          2 months ago

          You couldn’t be more wrong. I don’t know of any Cub fan who said that. I do know a lot of Brewer fans who said they win the division when Yelche came over. Card fans also have been bragging about winning the division and fighting it out with the Brewers. I can show some post were several not 1 but as I counted 6 at least have said the Yankees would not only win 125 games but go unbeaten in post season, win the WS and hot over 900 home runs. I guess the Cubs haters will be out in full force today. Get over it and yourselves.

          2
          3
          Reply
        • brewers1

          2 months ago

          Wow, might want to get a life and stop counting how many posts take a shot at the Cubs. No doubt Cubs are the class of the division until someone proves otherwise

          6
          0
          Reply
        • michaelw

          2 months ago

          Brewers1, I have a life maybe read other post, before defending idiots and child trolls and haters. Then what do I expect from a Milw fan. What is wrong? Tide change a bit.I don’t count how many post. I have a life. Seems like you haters, trolls and idiots are the ones wo a life. Im stating a fact responding to someone who made a statement about Cubs fans saying they would win 120 games. NOT true and I never seen it. But I responded by stating a real fact. So get over it. I knew the haters would come out today. Get over it act like people who talk real baseball. Instead of stupid childish remarks, on jealous people. As someone sated the Cubs could get Harper, Trout, CK and the haters will have something to say that bad. That is my point.

          1
          6
          Reply
        • tjg25

          2 months ago

          0
          0
          Reply
        • Yekatman

          2 months ago

          Can “bigcubsfan” just enjoy signing one of the premiere free agents up for grabs?

          Nope, first impulse is to troll the fans of the other teams in the division.

          Sad.

          5
          2
          Reply
        • cubbies95

          2 months ago

          Way to wise up

          0
          3
          Reply
        • michaelw

          2 months ago

          G Yekatman if the shoe fits ware it. I saw BOTH Card fans why I don’t know and Brewer fans do the same thing when they signed Yelch and Cain. HMMM HYPOCRITE ARE WE?

          0
          4
          Reply
        • Bryzzo2016

          2 months ago

          On top of this bargain AAV, the Cubs also don’t have to give up a pick or international money. Great signing across the board!

          2
          0
          Reply
        • txjags

          2 months ago

          Does no one care that this woman just “bought themselves a Acura” after earning $4812 and a little over 10-k last “munth”? This is incredible!! Hell, I could afford Darvish at that rate!!! Sounds like Darvish my have written this post.

          0
          3
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Oh haha he said Brewer fans said they would win 120 (which was never said) somehow now it must be the Cub fans.

          You are nothing but a jealous troll. Have fun watching the Cubs this year Mr. Hater.

          0
          6
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          He has to get a life because he posts the truth that you cannot handle?

          Get a life Brewer1!

          0
          3
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Oh my lord this deal gets better and better

          0
          4
          Reply
        • snake

          2 months ago

          Prediction, Darvish doesn’t win 40 games as a cub,,,,,too much for 6 years,
          2 yrs/42 maybe,,,,,not 6 years,,,,,

          0
          2
          Reply
        • simschifan

          2 months ago

          Michaelw has a good memory. I said they will win 125 games go undefeated in the playoffs and hit 900 Home runs. However you didn’t take into account I was freaking being sarcastic cause I’m a Cub fan not a yankee fan.

          0
          1
          Reply
        • Mikel Grady

          2 months ago

          That’s ridiculous. We cub fans know it will only be 115 wins

          0
          1
          Reply
        • Varangian

          2 months ago

          I’ll take that bet

          0
          0
          Reply
        • Bryzzo2016

          2 months ago

          Hahaha, I LOVE the transparent, bitter and sad trolls. Keep feeding them! It makes this signing that much sweeter. Keep em coming trolls.

          1
          0
          Reply
        • Ryan Hilson

          2 months ago

          You’re stupid never figured even 100 wins but figured like 92 and knew it would still be close but we aren’t done yet Yu gets you not much of an upgrade over Arrieta so I like our chances

          0
          0
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          What were your REAL facts again?

          0
          0
          Reply
        • justinept

          2 months ago

          Not much of an upgrade over Arrieta? That’s not untrue, but it is misleading. The Cubs rotation had Hendricks, Arrieta, Lester, and Q on the roster and healthy for maybe two weeks of the regular season. Replacing Arrieta with Darvish, having Q for the entire year, and getting Hendricks and Lester healthy is actually a huge upgrade over what they trotted out much of last year.

          1
          0
          Reply
        • pullhitter445

          2 months ago

          Good signing for the cubs, much needed piece for there staff….somebody get this Michaelw a Zoloft

          0
          0
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          Hey Pot! Meet Keetle!

          0
          0
          Reply
    • xabial

      2 months ago

      All that’s missing is opt-out. But overall contract dollars length and team, I had it identical. I’m proud of myself 😉

      Congratulations Cubs fans. You got a hell of a pitcher — on a discount— because of WS.

      6
      4
      Reply
      • SteveSax

        2 months ago

        I am SO proud of you!

        I wanna buy you something. Would you like an ice cream little fella?

        11
        13
        Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          Salty losing Darvish, and the WS, fella?

          Attitudes like this make me not care if you wait another 50 years without a WS, like the Cubs but I won’t generalize your fanbase, like many people mine.

          11
          9
          Reply
        • mackows2

          2 months ago

          how about a cookie for the little guy

          5
          6
          Reply
        • Sheldon Bowen

          2 months ago

          I hated reading your comments.

          2
          7
          Reply
        • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

          2 months ago

          Like your namesake, you are throwing wide of the mark.

          8
          2
          Reply
        • SteveSax

          2 months ago

          No…not at all. I like what the Dodgers have done with their cap. That luxury tax would have been awful. I like Darvish…outstanding human being. But past the days where he’s worth that kind of money. Still makes Chicago a brute force with starting pitching. Ohh…before I forget. Rocky road or mint chocolate chip?

          5
          11
          Reply
        • stratcrowder

          2 months ago

          Bahahaha!!!! And I totally agree with your posts.

          0
          7
          Reply
        • padreforlife

          2 months ago

          Is this the real Steve Sax?

          4
          1
          Reply
        • Syndergaarden Cop

          2 months ago

          lol

          4
          2
          Reply
        • astick

          2 months ago

          I don’t know. Ask him?

          0
          0
          Reply
        • cxcx

          2 months ago

          Past the days where’s he’s worth that money? When was he worth it, when he was missing full seasons? If he’s worth it ever it’s now when he’s healthy.

          0
          1
          Reply
        • hiflew

          2 months ago

          I think the real Steve Sax is still in Springfield Prison.

          5
          0
          Reply
        • Marvels1022

          2 months ago

          Stevesax – what flavor ice cream are you handing out?

          0
          0
          Reply
      • kcusgnikcufsregdod

        2 months ago

        150 mill is a discount? Enjoy that horrendous contract.

        4
        9
        Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          126 mill*

          For what it’s worth, Darvish’s was seeking Greinke $200M+ contract, which I think he would’ve gotten closer to, barring that epic WS collapse.

          7
          5
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          2 months ago

          I thought teams were learning. Guess not. Years and one way opt outs will likely cost the Cubbies big time.

          5
          9
          Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          In the thread I linked to, sixth post down Justinept made a compelling argument why opt outs benefit the team. It’s worth a read, and really changed my opinion on it.

          8
          3
          Reply
        • arodgers661

          2 months ago

          Not sure how you call the 2017 ws an epic collapse. That was probably one of the most competitive World Series we’ve seen in a while.

          1
          5
          Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          epic collapse for Darvish— He had 2 chances,

          I think it depreciated his FA contract, to a degree.

          9
          0
          Reply
        • TheWestCoastRyan

          2 months ago

          It’s not a compelling argument genius. He will only opt out if he can get even more money in free agency. Even if his team is trying to cut costs, without the opt out he would figure to draw some trade interest if he were playing well enough to opt out.

          3
          6
          Reply
        • A. Messa

          2 months ago

          Word

          0
          4
          Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          Cubs structure their opt outs differently than most teams.

          Hayward sucks, and has one of the worst contracts in all sports, but not all opt outs are created equal. It really was a fascinating read—

          6
          3
          Reply
        • TheWestCoastRyan

          2 months ago

          Heyward is overpaid so the opt out really has no effect. If he played well and opted out, the Cubs would lose the surplus value from the contract, which hurts them.

          1
          5
          Reply
        • ChiSoxCity

          2 months ago

          The Cubs can print money if they wanted to.

          6
          0
          Reply
        • diehardcubbie

          2 months ago

          We will thanks!

          2
          0
          Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          Np ! 🙂

          1
          0
          Reply
        • justinept

          2 months ago

          You realize that the team wins if the player opts out, right? That’s what people miss. Everyone would want Darvish at 2 years / $45 million. It’s the backend that scares teams away. If Darvish performs at a high level, that’s a win for the Cubs. If someone else can pay for his eventual decline, that’s also a win for the Cubs.

          0
          0
          Reply
      • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

        2 months ago

        Darvish gets not one, but two opt outs in years 2 and 3 along with a full NTC.

        5
        0
        Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          I hope that makes it more impressive and less open to ridicule. —Thank you, I appreciate the update.

          3
          1
          Reply
        • Rocket32

          2 months ago

          Ha, and people said teams were learning not to hand out bad contracts like that anymore.

          2
          2
          Reply
      • yankeeaddictionyankeeaddiction

        2 months ago

        This does little to help the Cubs. They got a pitcher who can’t pitch in October with a history of arm trouble. I don’t see him making more than 20 starts this year and I predict he will have an extended period of time on the dl. The Cubs have a beleaguered infield that will likely have a member sustain an injury that causes them to lose a substantial part of the season, and they have done little to address this depth problem. The Cubs should have jumped on Todd Frazier because he would have provided insurance at both first and third. The 2018 Cubs are a team composed of question marks. Who is the closer- they don’t have one. Will Jon Lester continue to decline? Will Ben Zobrist continue to decline? Will Jason Heywood produce anything at all? Who will be the team leader with John Jay and John Lackey gone? What can the Cubs expect from Kyle Schwarber who has not impressed since his rookie year?

        At most this positions them for a Wild Card run as the Brewers are still clearly the better team.

        8
        21
        Reply
        • lord vincent

          2 months ago

          I predict the Yankees will finish third this year and will have two pitchers with arm problems and this year’s ROY will have trouble hitting the Mendoza line.
          The 2017 NL MVP will spend a fair amount of time on the DL list.

          18
          0
          Reply
        • calibrew

          2 months ago

          The Cubs have now gone from the team everyone kinda roots for, to the team everyone wants to see lose.

          2
          5
          Reply
        • Death

          2 months ago

          Sounds like the first half of that could apply to Severino and the Yankees infield.

          3
          2
          Reply
        • FredBlassie

          2 months ago

          Wow! You managed to spell Zobrist correctly, but that’s about the only thing you got right in that very long post. Frazier? LOL!

          6
          1
          Reply
        • Cubguy13

          2 months ago

          Wow Yankeeaddiction, what an insightful comment! All the question marks the Cubs have! Will Heyward produce? Who will be the team leader now that Jay is gone? Didn’t realize Jay was our leader for one and most of your question marks can be applied to any team. Will a Yankee infielder or outfielder get hurt? Will judge show continued power? Will Didi repeat last years numbers? Will Bird be effective at all? Will your pitching staff hold up? Also, since you love riding the Brewers so hard, maybe there is a Brewer/Yankee post you could be on instead?

          7
          1
          Reply
        • yankeeaddictionyankeeaddiction

          2 months ago

          Lord Vincent, my dear friend. This very well could happen. You can’t count on anything in sports and injuries can destroy the greatest of teams. Judge has had problems with strike outs and must adjust- many worry about his average in future seasons. Both Tanaka and Gray have injury histories and CC will be 38 years old. You are indeed correct that Stanton has had trouble staying healthy in the past.

          While I hope your predictions are in correct, I, unlike most Cubs fans, will admit things can go bad for any team and there is no guarantee players will remain healthy.

          3
          8
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Oh Yankeeaddiction actually fears the Cubs!

          6
          2
          Reply
        • coldgoldenfalstaff

          2 months ago

          Not really, they’re been almost as disliked as the Red Sox and Yankees for overblown media coverage.

          2
          2
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Yankeeaddiction is talking about Tanaka Severino and Gray all making 20 starts or less but Yankees may hang on for another WC birth

          2
          0
          Reply
        • yankeeaddictionyankeeaddiction

          2 months ago

          My dear friend. I believe that there is a chance the Yankees will have to deal with an unforeseen injury. To answer your questions as long as he is healthy Judge will hit 40 homeruns. The question/concern is can he continue to improve and hit for a respectable average. When one looks at Didi’s career he has improved every year. Even if he does not improve and regresses I have no issues with a short stop who puts up the numbers he did in 2016. I don’t get the question about Bird- when he is healthy he has always been effective. The question is can he stay healthy.

          Now the Yankees have an infield of Bird at first, Didi at short and Sanchez behind the plate. They have Torres and Andujar as well as Torreyes and a number of invitees to spring training. I believe they have the infield depth to withstand an injury. As far as the rotation goes there are questions as to whether or not everyone can stay healthy.

          0
          7
          Reply
        • cubbie991@gmail.com

          2 months ago

          the brewers dont have an infield and are short on starting pitching. the only infielder worth his weight is Shaw. he is limited to third tho. arcacia(shortstop) good defense with no offense. they dont have a second baseman and they are talking about platooning Braun at first. the league has figured out thames, dont throw him a curve. he cant hit fastballs. zobrist can only be better than last year, he is healthy. same with russell. baez starting at second. zo will roam with super rookie Ian Happ who had over 20 hrs in half a season as a rookie without a position. last years team also went to the NLCS. no reason they shouldnt do it again or go farther. plus the best rotation in the N.L.

          3
          1
          Reply
        • Vincent2681

          2 months ago

          I do not agree with your assessment of the Cubs. The infield is a strength of this team with plenty of people to fill in. They have their starters and then Zobrist and Happ for spot starts or in case of injury. Brandon Morrow is the closer and the team leaders will be Rizzo and Contreras. You put the brewers are still clearly the better team? Still, as in they were last year? Who won the division last year? The only thing you stated that are valid are what you said about Heyward and Schwarber. Nobody knows how they will fare until they start playing. I like the fact that Schwarber is working out like crazy and eating healthy and hopefully the addition of Chili Davis helps both of them but every team has question marks. The Cubs have very few.

          6
          0
          Reply
        • diehardcubbie

          2 months ago

          Go back to your Tinker Toys…Come back here when you have anything good to add

          1
          0
          Reply
        • fox471

          2 months ago

          “This does little to help the Cubs.” Dumbest post ever! Period.

          3
          0
          Reply
        • twentyforty

          2 months ago

          Which is what Cubs fans wanted for 107 years. Being hated is DELICIOUS.

          5
          0
          Reply
        • michaelw

          2 months ago

          What funny is even after the Brewers got Yelch and Cain they still were no projected to be the favorite to win the Division, that is before thsi trade. Projected to win 86 – 88 games.

          Well were ready let play ball!

          1
          1
          Reply
        • yankeeaddictionyankeeaddiction

          2 months ago

          The Brewers will have a far superior lineup to the Cubs in 2018. Every projected starter had double digit home runs last year and Yelich will continue to get better. I will be the first to admit guys like Cain and Braun have their best days behind them but both likely have two very productive seasons left in them. A bounce back year by Vogt and Shaw will continue to get better will make them one of the most formidable lineups in the NL.

          The Brewers are also not done dealing and I see them adding two arms. I think either Arrieta or Lynn ends up in Milwaukee as a FA and I think they get a starter in a trade from their glut of outfielders.

          I don’t think Morrow will succeed in the closer’s role. Zobrist was a shell of what he was last year and I don’t view it as wise to rely on him to continue producing as he had in the past. Jon Lester is going into his age 34 season. Jake Arrieta was a horse for the Cubs and he has been the rock from the start of this recent run of success. He was a core member of the most successful run since Joe Tinker. His loss will change the chemistry of that team. The 2018 Cubs will be much different from the 2017 version that played well above it’s head and over achieved.

          0
          2
          Reply
        • michaelw

          2 months ago

          Yankee Addition I’m so sick of hearing your BS and all your hate you have for the Cubs. Alls you do is talk BS on every signing they do. Worry about the Yanks. You couldn’t get a pitcher because you couldn’t afford to go over the Lux tax. You got a crazy contract that now restricts you on big signings. You need a 3rd baseman, a second baseball and the Houston Astros are going to tear you apart again, because your rotation is worth;less and your in denial. TYPICAL NYer. ALL TALK N BS. NY fans rather look good and lose than win and look bad. You be happy with hitting 900 home runs but not winning a title. Typical New York fans. A lot of talk. You don’t even talk good baseball, except how good the Yanks are and they will win 125 games and hit 900 home runs. I’m going to call your name on every Yankee loss this year. Trust me. Get over yourself and your ego and take it back to NY where it belongs.

          You know nothing about baseball, and always defending the Yanks. All your prospects are the best. Everyone should over pay for Yank players. The Yanks should get the best deal and under play and be cheap wads like typical NYers are. CHEAP WADS!

          Instead of talking about the Cubs stick with your Yankees. Will the rotation hold up. Doubtful. How will Old Wino CC pitch. Who is playing 2nd, who is playing 3rd. You should have got Todd Frasier, instead of being a CHEAP WAD typical NYer. You need him better than the Cubs. We have 6 players who can play the infield including 1st base. NY not so much. How will Torres do this year. LOL will see. I predict not much over 265 hows that for a prediction.

          No one cares about Lackey, and the Cubs have a lot more dept than you think. You think losing Lackey and JA is a major thing lol.

          Both have been replaced. Remember the Cubs won 92 games last year, that is one better than NY BTW. That with injuries and down years for many of the players.

          If I were you I worry about the NY infield and rotation and not bank on hitting 900 home runs lol.

          Funny how you think the Brewers are a better team. Got news for you hater, the Cubs were still favoured to win the division with the Signing of Cain who is over paid and the Yelch trade. You think that going to put the Brewers over the top. LOL

          ALL the Experts in MLB had the Cubs still better that is wo Darvish. As far as post season guess you can say the same about Price and Sale who was rocked in Post season too. Get over yourself, your a typical New Yorker full of himself, talk a lot BS, cheap wad and nothing good to say.

          Go save a nickel somewhere and get over it and yourself. Your nothing and a waste of time and space.

          4
          5
          Reply
        • Desertbull

          2 months ago

          Blah blah blah blah

          0
          1
          Reply
        • michaelw

          2 months ago

          Lord V – I’ll add to that prediction. The predict CC will go back to rehab and MLB will find out Stranton is on PEDs and gets an 80 game suspension.

          1
          3
          Reply
        • michaelw

          2 months ago

          GET OVER YOURSELF YANKEEADDICTION YOUR A JOKE ON THESE BOARDS!

          3
          1
          Reply
        • yankeeaddictionyankeeaddiction

          2 months ago

          my dear friend, I thank you for the many kind words. Well now considering the Yankees will likely lose at minimum 57 games, if you call me out after every loss there will be 57 days of the Spring and Summer, where you take a little bit of time out of your day to think of me. If for some reason the Yankees fall apart you might think of me 90 to 100 days. I am honored that I will play such a major role in your life in 2018.

          I don’t know if you know this but I am not a member of the Yankees front office. I don’t understand why you think I would take your being critical of their organizational policies as an insult.

          0
          2
          Reply
        • internet1tough1guy

          2 months ago

          Yankeeaddiction, you have alot to talk lmao.. the cubs have alot of questions? They have no depth? They’re known for depth you moron.. Todd fraizer for 1st and 3rd? Worst move ever. Fraizer is trash lmao.. cubs have like 5 players that can play 3rd. Zobrist, Baez and Happ. And zobrist, Contreras and Happ can play first and probably schwarber.. the only question right now for the Cubs is leadoff spot. They could use a more proven center fielder with good obp. That’s it.
          Now let’s talk about the Yankees that has holes after holes on their team.. Stanton will be lucky to play 100 games, judge won’t be as good as last year.. GUARANTEED!! Yanks are prob gonna start 2 rookies and they will suck ass, andujar and Torres. Torres will be a giant bust, that’s why the cubs we’re willing to trade him. Yanks have no 1st baseman. Bird? What he do last year? Hit .190 maybe? Their rotation is over rated after severino. Tanaka with a 5 era? That’s something to brag about.. gray is mediocre. Chapman isn’t the same cuz the cubs over used him and fucked him up in 2016. Mark my words.. YANKEES DONT WIN 85 GAMES THIS COMING SEASON!!?

          1
          0
          Reply
        • CubsRebsSaints

          2 months ago

          Of course you do. Maddon will limit his innings. He won’t make another 37 starts. Unless they’re 5-6 innings. They just added Yu Darvish. They will throw 4 number number 1 or 2’s in any series.

          1
          0
          Reply
        • Varangian

          2 months ago

          yankeeaddict is Donald Trump.

          1
          2
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          The Yankees can’t win titles ? Since when? Seems like 27 leads all of MLB . Definitely more than the Cubs for sure MW!

          0
          0
          Reply
        • cachhubguy

          2 months ago

          You should try stand up comedy.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • Stuemke17

          2 months ago

          Not sure if trolling or hasn’t watched a Cubs game in four years.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • justinept

          2 months ago

          It’s one thing to acknowledge that things can go bad. It’s a whole thing to assume every question mark will be answered in the negative. And then there’s what you did – saying things that are either completely wrong or that are a gross misrepresentation.

          1- Jay wasn’t the Cubs leader. Rizzo was.

          2- Lackey wasn’t even the leader of the pitching staff. Lester was.

          3- Beleaguered infield? They had one guy get hurt over the past three years and they’re suddenly injury prone? Ok…

          4- Schwarber hasn’t impressed since his rookie year? Well, it’s only been two years since then and he missed 156 games in one of them. But you’re kinda ignoring that he not only crushed it in the World Series but that also has an .818 OPS in the second half. Or, as we’d say about most players that hadn’t played for the better part of 18 months, after he shook off the rust.

          5- They have no closer. They’re still improved in the pen over last year. The Astros just won a WS without one. And the Cubs can still acquire one either before the season or at the deadline.

          0
          0
          Reply
      • One Fan

        2 months ago

        Good work

        0
        0
        Reply
      • michaelw

        2 months ago

        Considering it only cost 21 million Cubs still have 12 Million to blow. lol

        JA going to cost someone at least 6 years and 21-24 Million on a cheap count.

        Lynn and Cobb will be around 4-5 at 18-20

        Cubs fans are happy and haters can hate all they want. Just remember Sale was rocked for 6 runs in post season also last year, What has Price done for his 217 Million? I thought he was saving his playoff wins for Boston lol

        1
        1
        Reply
      • brucewayne

        2 months ago

        Guess who gets a gold star today?

        0
        0
        Reply
    • fasbal1

      2 months ago

      Awesome, how much did you make for being so smart.

      1
      6
      Reply
    • 24TheKid

      2 months ago

      Nice!

      1
      0
      Reply
    • Daver520

      2 months ago

      your winning Check is in the mail

      1
      1
      Reply
      • xabial

        2 months ago

        I know you said that to make fun, but winning something reminded me of the contest.

        No contest this year :/ 🙁

        6
        2
        Reply
        • iverbure

          2 months ago

          The amount of people downvoting you because you showed you were in fact right is hilarious. Let’s downvote people for being right because you hate the outcome but not hold people who say stupid crap accountable. Makes perfect sense.

          11
          2
          Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          Thank you, I really appreciate that.

          Would they rather “wow”? I can’t tell you how many times, I’ve seen that as a first post 🙂

          8
          2
          Reply
        • SteveSax

          2 months ago

          Not about being right…it’s about jumping around like an undisciplined child after winning nothing at all. Now, if he predicted an earthquake and warned an elementary school to vacate the building before the earthquake and its subsequent collapse…then by all means, brag away!

          7
          12
          Reply
        • BAINES03

          2 months ago

          Or you can just ignore his post like an adult.

          8
          0
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Xabial deserves credit has he PROVED it. Not like the clowns who always come on here and claim to have “called it”

          10
          2
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Oh so xabial was having fun so you critize him? Oh he has to have won an award you say? The award is being correct.

          Are you 11 little stevie? You play for prizes and trophies and mommy says good boy and here is a little ice cream cone for little Stevie …

          7
          2
          Reply
        • Cubguy13

          2 months ago

          so are you a child then for not being able to ignore the other guys post?

          1
          5
          Reply
        • SteveSax

          2 months ago

          Do you feel left out? Would you also, like an ice cream? Seems like you’ve had a rough day. How about we get you some sprinkles on your ice cream! That’ll cheer ya up!

          2
          9
          Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          In his defense (yes Im defending my most vocal critic in this thread) I was the 1st post in major blockbuster signing, with mlbtr audience starving for one. This thread got 424 comments in 2 hours.

          When you make a first comment in a thread that’ll probably get 600+ comments, you will get a lot of exposure— and expose yourself to much scrutiny.

          I have no regrets, as I will probably never get a FA contract this correct again, from dollars, years, opt out, team and I proved it with link. I guess.. only regret is the exclamation points. It really wasn’t meant to brag… I was happy.

          8
          0
          Reply
        • Cubguy13

          2 months ago

          xabial, do you come on this sight often? all people do is critique peoples comments for the most part. your comment was no different. you dont need to explain yourself or analyze the situation. it is what it is

          1
          0
          Reply
        • fox471

          2 months ago

          What are you, 12? Relax. Happy you are happy.

          0
          6
          Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          People critique yes, but they don’t usually attack other people’s characters. It’s usually a highly civilized baseball conversation even if things get heated.

          I find quality comments, most upvoted be quite high.

          I was defending my integrity, “undisciplined child” because I want people to know why, I posted it, for SteveSax 7+ Upvotes (those of you, who don’t use app)

          Yes there are tolls on the internet who like to upvote insulting comments, but if there really is one person who genuinely believes what he SteveSax said, and I changed their mind, it would be worth it.

          6
          0
          Reply
        • diehardcubbie

          2 months ago

          Wow, like people are trying to say, grow up little fella! The guy made a prediction and it came true. Looks like you love people reading what you think is funny stuff…
          Troll somewhere else. Your posts are idiotic.

          4
          1
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          So you think you were the only one who “predicted” this signing or what? If that was the case, then hers your sign!

          0
          0
          Reply
    • bravesfan88bravesfan88

      2 months ago

      Ehh…pretty round numbers..If you would’ve guessed the actual guaranteed amount, $126 mil, then I’d be a little more impressed…lol

      Alot of people had Darvish pegged at 5-6 years and $125-$150 mil though, just saying, not to burst your little bubble..

      Congrats on the Cubs getting YuDar also…I’ll join the guessing game, and guess that’s your favorite team..??

      1
      3
      Reply
      • Bryzzo2016

        2 months ago

        I loved him at 5/125, 6/126 is fantastic for the top FA starter available. If he hits his incentives and bumps it up to 150 that means he’s earning it. A win/win. That AAV keeps the Cubs away from the luxury tax AGAIN and gives them flexibility moving forward. Way to wait it out and be patient Theo/Jed! Love this deal!!!!

        4
        0
        Reply
        • simschifan

          2 months ago

          He has to win multiple cy Young’s for the 150. I’ll go out on a limb and say that won’t happen

          0
          0
          Reply
    • slideslide

      2 months ago

      you get a wet willie for a prize

      0
      4
      Reply
    • majorflaw

      2 months ago

      “My prediction came true.”

      Doesn’t appear to be an exact match, xabial. The base contract appears to be for $120M with incentives which could make it worth the full $150M. But you estimated the approximate terms rather well. Was this based on something in particular, some calculations you did or just a hunch?

      Also, when patting oneself on the back it’s best to use restraint. Posting the link to your before the fact prediction doesn’t need any gilding.

      0
      4
      Reply
      • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

        2 months ago

        You are late to the party. Initially it was reported as a 6/150 deal.

        4
        0
        Reply
      • xabial

        2 months ago

        I was based on Mlbtr’s prediction, which I felt was a tad generous. (Six years $160MM) and that was before this slow off-season began to take shape.

        The opt out prediction was due to:

        1) The market repercussions of his WS outings — Darvish was clutch up to that point,—He was so close.

        2) Their general increasing popularity in the game (whether you hate to admit it, or not)

        3) Cubs have a history of giving them (gave Heyward 2, more than most, even if 2nd opt out was conditional on Heyward getting 550PA in 2019, I’ve never heard of a team giving a player, 2 player opt outs — have you?)

        4) They were one of the hottest teams linked to Darvish, early in the offseason, and throughout.

        yes, initially it was reported to be 6 year $150M deal

        5
        1
        Reply
    • jbaker3170

      2 months ago

      So like ok, want a cookie??!!

      0
      6
      Reply
      • xabial

        2 months ago

        Whether or not you agree with majorflaw, I like that he goes into depth, in his responses, so I try to do the same, with his comments questions directed at me.

        4
        1
        Reply
    • internet1tough1guy

      2 months ago

      Only 24 mill off lol

      0
      1
      Reply
  2. Alex Graboyes

    2 months ago

    Omfg baseball hot stove heating up

    2
    5
    Reply
    • DimitriInLA

      2 months ago

      Poor move by the Cubs. This will be a strain on their budget. How many very good years are we expecting out of Yu?

      2
      6
      Reply
      • iverbure

        2 months ago

        2. You want him like every other player who gets an opt out to opt out. Opt outs are actually great for teams.

        0
        6
        Reply
        • JDGoat

          2 months ago

          Ah opt outs are only good if the free agent doesn’t have a qualifying offer. I’d give darvish one, only because I wouldn’t be losing a draft pick for potentially 1-2 years of a player

          0
          0
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          Opt outs are not good for the team! It just favors the player!

          0
          0
          Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          In the thread I linked to, eighth post down, justinept wrote a brilliant piece why opt outs benefit the team. Since I know you didn’t read it (Not because didn’t want to, but because my comment directing other people, who thought the same thing about opt outs, to that post, probably got lost in the 700+ responses, most commented article here, of all time)

          This is for many people who think: opt-outs are “not good for the team!” and “just favors the player!” …. Writing this exceptional, deserves to be shared to a wider viewing audience. (Original Source link in first post here, I made my “correct” prediction.) Click that link, Count down, from top, 8th post down, by justinept. Thanks again for sharing this! I don’t know if you’re going to write it again here and I didn’t want to take that risk of this fascinating piece, fading away, in that other thread. It changed my entire opinion on player opt outs, being so “one sided”

          2
          0
          Reply
        • xabial

          2 months ago

          “People look at opt-outs wrong.

          They say that the player will opt out if the contract is undervalued, or he’ll stay if the contract is overvalued. And that both situations hurt the team. While those two statements are true, they fail to take a number of things into account.

          First, opt-outs provide value to the player. People always seem to miss this obvious point.

          Since we’re talking about the Cubs, let’s use Jason Heyward as an example moving forward. He signed with the Cubs for 8 years / $184 million with two opt outs. He turned down 8 years / $200 million with no opt out language from the Nationals. You can deduce from this that the Cubs saved $16 million over 8 years in actual money by offering the opt outs. That isn’t insignificant.

          Smart teams understand this value and use it as leverage to make up the monetary difference from other offers. Desperate teams use it as leverage to make up other issues a player might have with signing with their team (eg. poor team play, poor location, etc.)

          The Cubs play in a major market. They have an historic stadium that’ was recently renovated. They have a top-tier manager. They’ve made three straight NLCS appearances. And they won a World Series 14 months ago. When a team is in the position the Cubs are in (Dodgers, Yankees, BoSox, and a few others are in similar spots), and they offer an opt-out clause, it’s always to make up monetary differences from other offers because the other selling points are off the charts. So if the Cubs offer Darvish an opt-out, it’s because he took a few less dollars to sign.

          Second – people ignore the fact that opt-outs are done one of two ways from a team’s POV.

          1) The team front loads the contract, which protects them against a bigger cap hit if the player doesn’t opt out

          2) They back load the contract, daring the player to opt out of the bigger money portion of the deal.

          Guess which one smart teams do? They front load the contract, protecting themselves against regression. That way, if the player doesn’t utilize the opt-out due to it being an over-market deal, it’s still a smaller hit than they’d have taken if they gave him a LT deal w/ yearly salaries in line with the actual AAV.

          Let’s look at Heyward again,

          His money was front-loaded with 2017 and 2018 representing his biggest pay days ($28 mil per year). That leaves about $106 million over 5 years remaining on the deal. Will he opt-out? Probably not. I mean, the guy has barely hit his weight as a Cubs (.243 average vs a listed weight of 240 points.) But still, w/o the opt-out, the Cubs are likely paying Heyward $125 million over the final 5 years. With the opt-outs, they’re paying him $19 million less.

          If the Cubs were to offer Darvish an opt-out, they’dd likely front load that contract as well, paying him significantly more money in 2019 and 2020 ahead of Bryant and Russell’s free agency year. If Darvish outperforms the contract and opts-out, it provides more money to sign Bryant and Russell. If Darvish underperforms and doesn’t opt out, then you’re at least paying him less than you would’ve had you not offered the opt out clause.

          Seriously – unless a team is desperate and does something stupid, then these things do work out for the team.”

          Thanks for sharing such a quality comment!

          3
          0
          Reply
        • TheWestCoastRyan

          2 months ago

          And there is not even the slightest chance that Heyward opts out. Opt out doesn’t help the Cubs there. If Darvish pitches well and opts out it will hurt them because they lose a player who they had signed for below market value.

          0
          0
          Reply
      • dugdog83

        2 months ago

        3.5

        0
        0
        Reply
      • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

        2 months ago

        This won’t do a anything to their budget. The owners father is the founder of etrade. They have a ton of money to spend if they want. They could lock up Bryant rizzo,Baez and sign Harper for 200 mil each if they wanted too. I don’t think they will. Harper won’t sign for less than 300 mil. Bryants extension would start at 250 mil. Baez will not gset more than 90mil on his nezt deal with the cubs. Rizzo will get upwards of 150mil.

        1
        5
        Reply
        • DimitriInLA

          2 months ago

          I see no indication that they can spend all that on all those players. And no doubt this hinders their capacity to sign all those guys. How could it not? It’s $25mil/year…

          1
          1
          Reply
        • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

          2 months ago

          It doesn’t put a dent in their budget. They could easily sign Harper and extend Bryant for the same amount if they choose too. That would require heyward opting out and trading one or more of Schwarber, Almora and maybe one other. As bad as Schwarber gets hosed for his “horrible D” I’d rather have him over Harper.

          0
          4
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Its $21m a year. Sorry you are a Dodger fan and lost Darvish to the Cubs for just $21m per year but you will have to deal with it

          2
          2
          Reply
        • DimitriInLA

          2 months ago

          *$21mill/year.

          0
          1
          Reply
        • DimitriInLA

          2 months ago

          One Fan: nice assumption re my team, but I’m an O’s fan. I stand by my comments above.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • BlueSkyLABlueSkyLA

          2 months ago

          It’s $21M base plus performance bonuses that could raise it to $25M.

          BTW, I am a Dodger fan who isn’t at all sorry Darvish was “lost” to the Cubs. Trust me, we can deal with it. His coming back here, that would be have been another issue.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • Djones246890

          2 months ago

          Agreed. Also, one thing most people overlook is that teams can nudge (and subtly threaten) players to opt out.

          An opt out doesn’t mean the player has all the control. I mean, if a team didn’t want me, and they tell me my playing time will be cut in half (or more), I would opt out.

          There’s a lot of psychology involved.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • simschifan

          2 months ago

          Those guys you all mentioned are only making league minimum. The best case scenario is they sign Harper go over the tax next year, and Zobrist goes off the books after next year. There’s some flexibility still there but not a lot. If and that’s a big if they sign Harper next year that’s probably their only move. And honestly they won’t need to make anymore.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • TheWestCoastRyan

          2 months ago

          No you wouldn’t

          0
          0
          Reply
      • One Fan

        2 months ago

        A strain on the budget it is not

        2
        3
        Reply
        • TheWestCoastRyan

          2 months ago

          Talk like Yoda you must

          6
          1
          Reply
  3. Red Ivy

    2 months ago

    Let’s go!!!!!!

    1
    1
    Reply
  4. jrwhite21

    2 months ago

    FINALLY

    4
    0
    Reply
  5. sprado1065

    2 months ago

    Nice

    0
    1
    Reply
    • DimitriInLA

      2 months ago

      Poor move. It’s an overspend ona pitcher who’s actually not that great—and certainly not consistently so.

      1
      15
      Reply
      • JDGoat

        2 months ago

        Whether he’s great or simply just a well above average is splitting hairs. He’s still a top 20 starting pitcher in the game

        4
        2
        Reply
        • DimitriInLA

          2 months ago

          No need to split hairs at all. It’s an overspend on, as you say, a top 20 pitcher.

          1
          6
          Reply
        • spudchukar

          2 months ago

          I would suggest he isn’t. He taxes bull pens, his fastball is straight, and when he loses command of his breaking pitches he is very hittable. When he gets on a roll he is very effective. A #3 guy at this stage of his career. And when the wind is blowing out in Wrigley, or on the road in Milwaukee or GAB look out. As a Cards’ fan I am happy with this deal. With all the Cubs’ salary issues in years to come this deal binds their hands nicely.

          1
          5
          Reply
        • DimitriInLA

          2 months ago

          Yes it does. And, as you added, the guys been less than impressive of late. I’d also add that whether he’s too 20 right now is irrelevant; what will he be over the life of his contract? This I think is where the deal looks quite awful actually.

          0
          4
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Oh domitrilnLA sorry to split hairs its only $21m per year a huge underpay and your dodgers lost out and you are pissed off

          4
          0
          Reply
        • twentyforty

          2 months ago

          My goodness you have no clue. Chicago as a small market team in your rates is hilarious. Enjoy fighting Pittsburgh for 4th place for the next decade.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • woodguy

          2 months ago

          Well said spudchukar

          0
          1
          Reply
        • diehardcubbie

          2 months ago

          People complained about the Zobrist deal, saying he would be too old at the end of the contract. Well I am OK with 3 down years since he was MVP of the 2016 WS.
          The Cubs have an open window to win now. What’s wrong with spending the money now to win? Hey if Yu helps the Cubs win in the next few years and is not worth the contract in the last few years, I am OK with that. True, signing him guarantees nothing. But it at least gives the Cubs a better chance to win now, while their window is open.

          1
          0
          Reply
  6. bluegorilla

    2 months ago

    Sweet

    0
    0
    Reply
  7. marlinsman

    2 months ago

    Finally

    0
    1
    Reply
  8. cubbies95

    2 months ago

    WHOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

    0
    3
    Reply
  9. jklaus37

    2 months ago

    Good signing. Like it

    4
    2
    Reply
    • Coach Him

      2 months ago

      terrible contract. be lucky to get 3 years out of him. lot of money tied up for A player with arm problems and on the down side.

      3
      18
      Reply
      • jklaus37

        2 months ago

        That’s not terrible or even bad. That’s about the right price for a pitcher who’s not quite an ace, but he’s still very good. If he were scherzer or price, he’d get payed a lot more money.

        4
        2
        Reply
        • Bryzzo2016

          2 months ago

          Haha, don’t feed the sad lil trolls. Coach Him is either ignorant, sad or both. I loved him at 5/125. To get him at 6/126 is amazing! That AAV will keep the Cubs below the luxury tax yet again. Theo brilliantly waited out the market and took advantage of the Dodgers/Yankees inability to spend this winter. If he hits all his incentives and maxes the contract out at 150… EVEN better. Still a good AAV for the Cubs AND that means he’s performing well. Great get, the top starter available!

          5
          1
          Reply
        • diehardcubbie

          2 months ago

          Well said. Looks like a lot of green on this board…

          0
          0
          Reply
        • Bryzzo2016

          2 months ago

          Yeah, the best part is seeing the same usernames that wanted their team to sign Yu now acting like they are glad they didn’t. Transparent to say the least. The fact that Theo didn’t panic and got him for WELL below his projected contract back in November was genius!

          0
          0
          Reply
        • Djones246890

          2 months ago

          Completely agree. The incentivized contract is even better. A (potential) extra $25 million will keep this kid hungry for every single year. The move (and the way the contract is written) is brilliant.

          0
          0
          Reply
  10. cubsfan76

    2 months ago

    Yeeeesssss!!!

    0
    2
    Reply
  11. awmadderra

    2 months ago

    Now over pay for Jake. And our staff will be complete!!

    1
    11
    Reply
    • JDGoat

      2 months ago

      There’s no room for him

      6
      0
      Reply
      • Theodore Morgan

        2 months ago

        Don’t think there ever truly was room for Jake. Plan B after Darvish was probably Cobb. Plan C…who knows. Maybe a Lackey reunion (eek)? Or roll with Monty at SP5, add some decent SP depth, and consider a trade later if it doesn’t work out. Jake might’ve interested the Cubs on a short-term deal (1-2 yrs, 3 at most), but that (or a “hometown discount”) was never happening. This wasn’t a Dexter Fowler situation.

        3
        0
        Reply
    • johnrealtime

      2 months ago

      oh god no

      0
      1
      Reply
      • Alex Graboyes

        2 months ago

        Jake arieta to the phils please

        0
        5
        Reply
        • Coast1

          2 months ago

          No way Andy MacPhail would agree to more than a 3 year deal and there’s no way Scott Boras agrees to that.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • Phillies2017

          2 months ago

          No God Please No

          3
          0
          Reply
        • Pax vobiscum

          2 months ago

          Maybe on a one year deal with a high aav…come March 29th.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • raltongo

          2 months ago

          maybe Jake at 4/100 mil now? I really can’t see him getting Darvish money, but then again maybe a team like MIL or MIN goes the extra 5th year after missing out on Yu?

          0
          0
          Reply
        • takeyourbase

          2 months ago

          Twins won’t go to five on Arrietta.
          Haven’t seen an actual report on their offer to Darvish but I’d be surprised if that was a straight 5 year offer. I haven’t heard any concrete interest from the Twins on him, only speculation since they are looking at top tier pitching. It’s possible the Brewers consider him as an option but not MN unless he falls to reasonable terms as in a short deal.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • BlueSkyLABlueSkyLA

          2 months ago

          Your 4/100 for Arrieta is more annually than the guarantee Darvish got from the Cubs. He’ll get over $20M per when he signs, the only real question is how much more, and the number of years.

          2
          0
          Reply
    • pgmitchell

      2 months ago

      staff is complete now …5 solid starters plus Montgomery ….bullpen has 6 solid relievers

      2
      0
      Reply
      • IACub

        2 months ago

        Yup
        Lester, Darvish, Hendricks, Quintana, Chatwood
        Morrow, Strop, Edwards, Cishek, Montgomery, Duensing, Wilson.
        Only question mark is the 8th pen guy (25th man) and there’s some relatively good options there

        1
        2
        Reply
        • diehardcubbie

          2 months ago

          Maples may make a good run for that #8 reliever.

          1
          0
          Reply
    • halos101

      2 months ago

      bad take

      0
      2
      Reply
    • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

      2 months ago

      Their rotation is good to go. They need a Greg Holland. Morrow won’t be the closer the whole year. He could be the 8th inning guy. While CJ can be the 7th inning guy.

      0
      1
      Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Bye bye Jake

      1
      0
      Reply
  12. werfighting

    2 months ago

    Wow

    0
    0
    Reply
  13. nats3256

    2 months ago

    Maybe this Is the domino that needed to fall!!

    2
    1
    Reply
  14. JDGoat

    2 months ago

    The floodgates just bursted

    2
    1
    Reply
  15. Jordan

    2 months ago

    Wow

    0
    0
    Reply
  16. yourcubreporter

    2 months ago

    Yu! Yu got what I neeee-eeeed!

    5
    1
    Reply
    • dugdog83

      2 months ago

      Oh baby Yuuuuu

      1
      0
      Reply
      • raltongo

        2 months ago

        Yuuuuuu say he’s just a friend

        0
        0
        Reply
    • takeyourbase

      2 months ago

      Awesome!

      0
      0
      Reply
  17. 619bird

    2 months ago

    Sort of expected. Waiting on more details on thr contract.

    1
    0
    Reply
  18. acarneglia

    2 months ago

    *Go Cubs Go starts playing*

    1
    1
    Reply
  19. AndyWarpath

    2 months ago

    Hooray! News m!

    0
    0
    Reply
  20. Appbrewers

    2 months ago

    good luck holding onto their core for another couple years. definitely won’t be in on next year’s free agent class. no money left

    1
    17
    Reply
    • JDGoat

      2 months ago

      They’re loaded with cash. If it makes sense, there’s no reason they won’t go over the luxury tax

      6
      1
      Reply
    • thesheriffisnear

      2 months ago

      And the Brewers fans saltiness begins

      15
      2
      Reply
      • Appbrewers

        2 months ago

        of course they can go over luxury tax. they are in a big market that can afford it. I’m proud of the Brewers for having one of the top GMs in baseball. no way Epstein could build a winner without a blank check book. down side of no salary cap. small market teams can realistically compete for a year or two in a row then rebuild. unless they can hit on every draft pick

        2
        8
        Reply
        • Cubguy13

          2 months ago

          No way Epstein could build a winner without a blank checkbook? Maybe you didn’t realize that our core is built up of very young, and cost effective players. Epstein opens the checkbook on occasion but for you to say he can’t build a winner without a blank checkbook sounds flat out stupid or maybe it’s envy that you cheer for a team that uses a piggy bank in comparison to a checking account

          6
          3
          Reply
        • twentyforty

          2 months ago

          The familiar Brewers fan lament. We build better because we’re smaller. Hilarious.

          1
          1
          Reply
        • Appbrewers

          2 months ago

          I have a lot of faith in Stearns. drastically better than Melvin was. as long as Stearns doesn’t give out multiple 5-6 year contracts over $150 million they can compete.

          0
          1
          Reply
        • cubbie991@gmail.com

          2 months ago

          Brewers wont win until they get a new owner. wont spend money. only 1 season in the last 20 under 2 million in attendance. where is the money? they are the mets of the midwest.

          0
          2
          Reply
        • FredBlassie

          2 months ago

          The Brewers couldn’t build a winner without a steroid-guzzling douche nozzle in LF.

          0
          1
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Another brewer fan showing his ignorance. Hey genius what do you think Theo did to win the world series in 2016? You think he had a blank check. Check out the Cubs payroll then. He did it by rebuilding.

          Exactly what your team is now attempting to replicate. Boy what an ignorant comment you made

          2
          0
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Appbrewers … and Theo hit on ever draft pick! Lets see if you can match him

          1
          0
          Reply
        • Djones246890

          2 months ago

          Theo built a winner with MINIMAL $$$. Dude, you’re absolutely clueless. Lol.

          0
          0
          Reply
      • simschifan

        2 months ago

        Not even close buddy, this is chicago not Green Bay South

        2
        0
        Reply
      • Bryzzo2016

        2 months ago

        Haha, exactly. The trolling is sad and quite transparent. The Cubs have not hit the luxury tax yet, meaning they can blow past it NEXT winter and not be a repeat offender. Theo has already stated that’s the plan. He took advantage of the Dodgers and Yanks being repeat offenders and not being able to spend this winter. He also knew that Yu had no desire to go to Milwaukee or Minny. Theo called his bluff and got him at a ridiculous AAV. I liked Yu a lot at 5/125 but I LOVE him at 6/126… WOW!

        2
        3
        Reply
        • BrewCrew54

          2 months ago

          LOL at thinking 6/126 is a great contract. Let’s talk in two years when he’s struggling to even fit into the bullpen for 21 million/yr!

          1
          5
          Reply
        • cub4lyfe

          2 months ago

          I agree! At the AAV they got him at, the extra year is irrelevant.

          1
          0
          Reply
        • Red Ivy

          2 months ago

          Brewcrew54 – Sounds good man. We can talk about Lorenzo Cain’s contract in 2 years too.

          1
          2
          Reply
        • BrewCrew54

          2 months ago

          Cain’s WAR will be much higher than Darvish’s in two years, you can count on that. Positional players performance outlast pitchers, history shows that. FYI

          0
          1
          Reply
        • Bryzzo2016

          2 months ago

          Hahaha, I LOVE IT. BrewCrew54 is the SAME clown that was pining for Stearns to get him signed. NOW, it’s a bad signing for the Cubs?!?!? Hahaha, at a mere 21 mil AAV? Way less than those that ACTUALLY get paid for their opinion projected. YES! Your transparent attempt to troll to hide your disappointment is loud and clear! Thank you, you’re making a great day even sweeter.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • diehardcubbie

          2 months ago

          Haha. If he contributes to a couple WS in the next 3 years, that’s what it’s all about. People criticized Zobrist signing but he ended up 2016 WS MVP. It’s usually the fans of the teams that lose out on a signing that criticize the contract.

          0
          0
          Reply
        • Red Ivy

          2 months ago

          You think Cain’s WAR will be higher than darvish???? Dude your just being a hater at this point. I’d take that bet 100 times out of 100.

          0
          0
          Reply
    • Cubguy13

      2 months ago

      I see you do the accounting for the Cubs! Interesting they let you come on MLB trade rumors to announce that they have no money for next offseason. A year that will include huge merchandise revenue, a seasons worth of sellout crowds, and likely another playoff run. Thank you for leaking that though so soon…

      5
      4
      Reply
      • Bryzzo2016

        2 months ago

        Don’t feed the sad trolls. The Cubs have PLENTY of money. As Theo said, they plan to blow past the luxury tax next winter. To minimize penalties, they don’t want to be a repeat offender, which is why the Yanks and Dodgers couldn’t get in on Yu. Theo played the market perfectly! A HUGE get!!!

        1
        2
        Reply
      • diehardcubbie

        2 months ago

        Add to that an upcoming TV contract…

        0
        0
        Reply
    • amishthunderak

      2 months ago

      Don’t need to be in on next year’s free agent class. New TV deal kicking in in a few years so they should be ok.

      3
      0
      Reply
      • Cubguy13

        2 months ago

        The new tv contract is one reason why the Cubs should be in on next years free agent class. The players who will be available next offseason are not the type of players you get the chance to sign year in and year out

        3
        1
        Reply
    • waxbuddie

      2 months ago

      You’re right, the best part about this signing is it helps to limit their ability to sign players next offseason and beyond. Good signing

      2
      4
      Reply
    • slyfox1908

      2 months ago

      No needs left

      1
      1
      Reply
      • MegaJman

        2 months ago

        Well, at some point it would be nice to have a true lead off hitter. I guess they will have Almora lead off this season, not exactly what you are looking for in that spot. They have a great chance of landing Harper next year, which will be even more interesting because Almora or Heyward would not play if that happens

        0
        0
        Reply
    • twentyforty

      2 months ago

      Haha. Brewers fans acting like the Cubs are small market is so cute.

      1
      3
      Reply
    • cachhubguy

      2 months ago

      They’ll probably have their own Cable station in a couple of years. #Printingmoney.

      1
      0
      Reply
  21. MichaelMichael

    2 months ago

    Looks like a major victory for the players. Holding out did pay off.

    2
    4
    Reply
    • CardsNation5

      2 months ago

      6 years $126 million is what he’s getting

      1
      1
      Reply
      • driftcat28

        2 months ago

        I’m sure he thought he’d get a lot more

        5
        1
        Reply
      • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

        2 months ago

        He got 6/126 with bonuses that an make it 150 and 2 opt outs and an NTC.

        4
        0
        Reply
        • Bryzzo2016

          2 months ago

          That’s an insane AAV for Darvish. I liked him a lot at 5/125, but I LOVE him at 6/126. Even if he dominates, hits ALL his incentives, he’ll still be below market value at 6/150. Theo played this market perfectly.

          1
          4
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          2 months ago

          What market did you have him in? What he got looks about right to me. He’s a solid pitcher with a few flaws (injury prone, failed in WS). If anything, I’m surprised he got 6 years.

          0
          1
          Reply
        • Bryzzo2016

          2 months ago

          Well, those that actually get paid for their opinion had him at 6/160 min, before a bidding war. To get him at a 21 AAV is ridiculous. If he hits ALL his escalators, which means he’s pitching well, he’s STILL a good 10 mil below his projected contract. Great move by Theo being patient and not panicking. The Cubs will once again avoid the luxury tax which will allow them to go well over it NEXT winter with minimal penalties. Something Theo already made clear that he will do. Great get. I liked him a lot at 5/125, I LOVE him at 6/126!!!

          0
          1
          Reply
        • TheWestCoastRyan

          2 months ago

          If he does that he opts out and they have to either greatly up his pay or lose him

          0
          0
          Reply
  22. sully51

    2 months ago

    smh. There’s always a team that comes in and gives Boras what he wants. Always.

    0
    26
    Reply
    • kenly0

      2 months ago

      Boras isn’t Yu’s agent

      22
      0
      Reply
    • gocincy

      2 months ago

      But didn’t Boras’s initial demands come on closer to $30 million/year? He got the years he wanted, but not the dollars.

      1
      17
      Reply
      • Coast1

        2 months ago

        He’s not represented by Boras

        10
        0
        Reply
      • emceecee

        2 months ago

        Is Boras negotiating for other people’s clients this offseason?

        6
        0
        Reply
        • BlueSkyLABlueSkyLA

          2 months ago

          No but Boras can control the entire free agent market with his mind. Or is that his mouth?

          0
          0
          Reply
    • srechter

      2 months ago

      Smh. There’s always a commenter who thinks every big name free agent is repped by Scott Boras. Always.

      14
      0
      Reply
      • sully51

        2 months ago

        Christ almighty. In an off-season where every article mentions that Boras has all the big names and is holding up the off-season, i forgot that one name wasn’t represented by Boras. How will I ever live with myself?

        0
        12
        Reply
        • iverbure

          2 months ago

          By hopefully fact checking before you say stupid crap on the internet so you don’t look like a buffoon

          8
          1
          Reply
        • Dan

          2 months ago

          Next time just do some basic research before posting instead of getting salty with people calling out your inaccuracies.

          6
          1
          Reply
        • swanhenge

          2 months ago

          So many crusty folks on here. Comments need to be 100% on point or you get roasted. Kinda like talking to my wife.

          Lighten up Francis!

          0
          6
          Reply
        • srechter

          2 months ago

          I was just having a laugh, bud. It’s all in good fun. This is a baseball rumors website.

          4
          0
          Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Live with yourself by not posting when you do not know crap. You just talk out of your rear end

          How do you live with yourself as is with your posts that show you know nothing about what you talk about. You just talk out of your ass.

          0
          5
          Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Sully51 is so stupid he does not even know Darvish is not a Boras client.

      Hey Sully51 hahhaha laughing right AT YU! Get it Yu

      0
      5
      Reply
  23. FBA17

    2 months ago

    When’s the first I think we can re-sign Arrieta too! Lol

    0
    2
    Reply
  24. afsooner02

    2 months ago

    Lol….overpay

    1
    7
    Reply
  25. Rondon

    2 months ago

    I guess they really DIDN’T want Jake.

    1
    1
    Reply
  26. osfandan

    2 months ago

    Enjoy that contract in years 5 and 6….

    2
    5
    Reply
    • gocincy

      2 months ago

      Any of those years are dicey, given Yu’s history and the health stats on pitchers in general. This contract is the type of recklessness that a rich team can make.

      1
      2
      Reply
    • cachhubguy

      2 months ago

      We will.

      1
      0
      Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Osfandan the Cubs fans will enjoy years 5 and 6 while competing for world championships

      2
      1
      Reply
  27. dynamite drop in monty

    2 months ago

    Finally the dominos can start to fall. Where will Carl Pavano sign?

    9
    0
    Reply
    • srechter

      2 months ago

      I don’t know why that reference kicks ass, but it totally does.

      6
      0
      Reply
  28. Cubbie75

    2 months ago

    I knew it! So glad someone finally blinked.

    0
    0
    Reply
  29. beisbolista

    2 months ago

    This is good. If the Brewers don’t have the discipline to enter a much needed rebuild the Cubs can be their discipline

    0
    10
    Reply
    • Appbrewers

      2 months ago

      just hope Brewers don’t sign any of the other free agent pitchers. none of them are worth the money and neither was darvish.

      0
      2
      Reply
      • amishthunderak

        2 months ago

        I hope they over pay for Arietta. That would be a double win for the Cubs.

        2
        1
        Reply
      • Cashford64

        2 months ago

        How about missing the playoffs because your rotation wasn’t good enough? How much is that worth?

        1
        1
        Reply
      • cachhubguy

        2 months ago

        That’s a strange hope. You hope they don’t compete with the Cubs and Cards?

        1
        0
        Reply
      • Pixle17

        2 months ago

        Any of the three left can help a ballclub get to the next level. Brewers need to do this. If they can do better by trade, so be it, but it won’t be easy to get playoff-level guys like Arietta – unless Crew lucks out and can swing a trade for Archer.

        2
        1
        Reply
      • One Fan

        2 months ago

        Oh AppBrewers you are so burned. So pisses off. Yu is not worth $21m per year. Haha. Your team offered more then that and got shot down big time!

        2
        2
        Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          It has not stated in any articles that YU was offered more money by any other teams!

          0
          0
          Reply
      • cubbie991@gmail.com

        2 months ago

        it is that same thinking that will keep the brewers from winning. along with a bad owner. brewers are the mets of the midwest.

        1
        1
        Reply
    • pdubs2907

      2 months ago

      Huh? Brewers are already coming out of their rebuild.

      5
      2
      Reply
      • twentyforty

        2 months ago

        Brewers better check that pitiful rotation before claiming to be out of a rebuild….

        3
        3
        Reply
    • gocincy

      2 months ago

      Huh?

      3
      0
      Reply
    • 11Bravo

      2 months ago

      ???

      0
      0
      Reply
    • STLCards33

      2 months ago

      Much needed rebuild?? Wtf do you think they’ve been doing? Obvious troll is obvious

      3
      1
      Reply
      • beisbolista

        2 months ago

        There’s a pretty big difference between rebuilding and just losing a lot.

        0
        1
        Reply
  30. nissan3981

    2 months ago

    Finally ! Who’s next!?!?!

    0
    0
    Reply
  31. yournemesislol

    2 months ago

    I will lol if Yu Darvish dominates in the playoffs against the dodgers.

    5
    1
    Reply
  32. MB923

    2 months ago

    Finally.

    0
    0
    Reply
  33. rivera42

    2 months ago

    Here we go!! 6/150…that’s a very nice deal for Darvish.

    Darvish
    Quintana
    Hendricks
    Lester
    Chatwood

    That’s a very good 1-4 and Chatwood.

    5
    1
    Reply
    • seamaholic

      2 months ago

      Bet Chatwood is better than Lester this year. Think Lester’s close to done.

      4
      7
      Reply
      • Appbrewers

        2 months ago

        I think everyone talked up Chatwood too much this year. I bet he won’t do that great this year.

        0
        5
        Reply
        • driftcat28

          2 months ago

          Agreed! Chatwood will be a reliever by the end of the year. He’s no starter

          0
          4
          Reply
        • twentyforty

          2 months ago

          And Milwaukee is counting on Jimmy Nelson. See Andrew Luck, among others, for how illogical that is.

          0
          1
          Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Rivera its 6/126 not 6/150

      0
      2
      Reply
      • BAINES03

        2 months ago

        depends on the escalators.

        2
        0
        Reply
    • MegaJman

      2 months ago

      Chatwood actually has the best stuff out of all these pitchers if you knew anything. In my opinion, Chatwood is the ace by the end of the season

      0
      0
      Reply
  34. milkman

    2 months ago

    What a bummer

    0
    0
    Reply
  35. Douggy44

    2 months ago

    LETSS GOOOOOO!!!! BOOM BABY

    0
    0
    Reply
  36. brewcrew08

    2 months ago

    6 years might be 2 two many but they needed a starter. I think it’s a good deal for years 1-4 for sure

    8
    0
    Reply
    • ray_derek

      2 months ago

      True, less than I thought he’d get annually though.

      0
      1
      Reply
  37. Yankees1991

    2 months ago

    Took long enough.

    0
    0
    Reply
  38. CompanyAssassin

    2 months ago

    Im going to vomit

    0
    0
    Reply
  39. Cubguy13

    2 months ago

    Ugh! 6 years for Lester was one thing but I don’t like Darvish for more than 4

    4
    1
    Reply
  40. nstale

    2 months ago

    he’ll be great in the regular season for the Cubs.

    1
    4
    Reply
    • BrewersMVP08

      2 months ago

      Key word is regular season

      1
      4
      Reply
      • nstale

        2 months ago

        exactly.

        0
        3
        Reply
      • One Fan

        2 months ago

        Oh haha I get it. Regular season because he tipped his pitches in the world series (while otherwise pitching fantastic in the post season) oh soo funny. Well we shall see next year won’t we. Of course the Brewers will be sitting October out again. Oh hahaha

        1
        2
        Reply
      • twentyforty

        2 months ago

        Hahaha. Get there. Once. Then claim the rebuild is off and running. Fact is, Milwaukee still remains nothing more than average. Let that sink in for a minute.

        0
        2
        Reply
        • citizen

          2 months ago

          A nothing more than average team with no cy young award winners or big payroll gave your team a run the entire last season, and you still got blown out by a Dodgers team Houston was able to figure out. Let that sink in.

          1
          0
          Reply
  41. Coast1

    2 months ago

    The owners suck at colluding. That’s way more years than I thought he’d get. If they’re lucky the first 3 years will be good. If they’re unlucky he goes the way of Zimmermann.

    1
    2
    Reply
    • ray_derek

      2 months ago

      A lot less annually than I thought he’d get though.

      4
      0
      Reply
      • Coast1

        2 months ago

        It’s possible he had an offer of 4 years over $100 million and took the lower AAV to get the extra years that he probably won’t be pitching.

        0
        1
        Reply
        • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

          2 months ago

          Think we are going to find out Cubs offer was not the biggest.

          6
          0
          Reply
    • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

      2 months ago

      Still 100 FA on the market. Read that 1 in 8 players that were on end of season rosters are still unsigned. That is what players are ticked about, not whether Darvish gets his money.

      4
      2
      Reply
    • iverbure

      2 months ago

      Probably because they aren’t colluding.

      0
      3
      Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Its hard to suck at collusion when no one is colluding genius

      0
      3
      Reply
      • SoCalBrave

        2 months ago

        he was obviously making fun at people that were screaming collusion.

        0
        2
        Reply
  42. IronBallsMcGinty

    2 months ago

    BOOM!
    “It’s because they didn’t hold anything back.”

    0
    0
    Reply
  43. CardsNation5

    2 months ago

    The flood gates have opened. This is about to be a weekend to remember with SP training starting Monday

    0
    0
    Reply
  44. Kenleyfornia74

    2 months ago

    Isnt this exactly what mlbtr had in their offseason predictions

    1
    2
    Reply
  45. Thronson5

    2 months ago

    Wow! I know Lester is getting older and isn’t the number 1 he once was but he’s still good and not this rotation got a lot better. Darvish had a up and down season and blew the World Series for the Dodgers (including terrible decisions by our manager) but over all this guy is a great addition to that rotation and makes that team a lot better. As a Dodgers fan I really hate this but as a fan of Baseball I can be mad that a team just got better so congrats to you Cubs fans and congrats to Darvish! He deserves this deal, he’s a good dude and he’s has a good career so far.

    11
    1
    Reply
    • IACub

      2 months ago

      Thanks for the positivity in the comments (doesn’t always happen after a big signing or trade)
      Rumors were that the first team to give him a sixth year would sign him. The last couple years he might not be worth the AAV but overall good signing and I’m super excited to watch the Cubs and Dodgers try outmuscle each other all summer!

      3
      0
      Reply
      • Thronson5

        2 months ago

        I’m just a huge Baseball fan and I love watching good ball. Going to be a very good year. I can’t wait to see my Dodgers and your Cubs battle this year. Should be really good ball. Hope we get to face off in the playoffs again.

        3
        0
        Reply
  46. waxbuddie

    2 months ago

    Love seeing the Cubs waste money on a older pitcher. LOVE IT

    1
    10
    Reply
    • ray_derek

      2 months ago

      Me too, 32 isn’t old, and his annual salary is very affordable.

      5
      2
      Reply
      • One Fan

        2 months ago

        He is 31

        2
        0
        Reply
    • Yankeepatriot

      2 months ago

      The dodgers take a loss with this and not to mention their bullpen isn’t in great shape either. Arazona is pleased with this signing as far as the NL west goes

      2
      0
      Reply
      • Gocubsgo1986

        2 months ago

        Don’t forget morrow. Him and darvish dominated the cubs in the nlcs

        2
        0
        Reply
        • greatdaysport

          2 months ago

          Who’s the #2,3,4 &5 starter after Kershaw. Ouch!

          1
          0
          Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Older pitcher? He is only 31 troll

      0
      1
      Reply
      • stymeedone

        2 months ago

        Most on this site would call that “the wrong side of 30.”

        0
        1
        Reply
  47. justin-turner overdrive

    2 months ago

    Finally! Cobb and Lynn are on the clock

    1
    0
    Reply
    • bluntforcekarma

      2 months ago

      Cobb could surprise some people this year.

      0
      0
      Reply
  48. CardsNation5

    2 months ago

    With his contract amount, it’s showing that teams are standing on not handing out ridiculous contracts. Even though his contract is for over 6 years, it won’t hurt them when he starts to decline, because 21 million will be a bargain 6 years from now

    3
    2
    Reply
    • Chris

      2 months ago

      Unmm no it’s not. Have you not been paying attention? This move is almost 100% likely to be a problem in the future but the Cubs are definitely in win now mode so it’s worth the risk

      1
      3
      Reply
      • One Fan

        2 months ago

        Oh Chris you are such a troll! 100% to be a problem huh? Wow thats a lot. You know that how? You do not you just hope it is since you are so irate and jealous of the Cubs who are a cash cow and have their own TV network in a few years for a few billion more in dough. So lets see how that 100% idea works out for you troll.

        2
        3
        Reply
        • Chris

          2 months ago

          I’m a Yankees fan. Why would I ever be jealous of the Cubs lol?

          2
          0
          Reply
        • Chris

          2 months ago

          Like I’ve said, I think the move is a good risk for the Cubs. But unless Darvish is an anomaly, it’s gonna be hard for him to be of value at the end of his contract. But if you’re asking me if I’d take almost $60 million in dead money for another World Series championship, I would do it. Especially given the fact that the Cubs are still in a good position in the immediate future with many of their young position players. And probably keeps him away from a division rival in the Brewers

          2
          0
          Reply
    • Priggs89

      2 months ago

      A bargain? Based on what? The massive contracts given out to mediocre players this offseason?

      0
      2
      Reply
  49. brewers214

    2 months ago

    Jake Arrieta to brewers for 4 year 75 million make it happen Stearns

    2
    4
    Reply
    • ray_derek

      2 months ago

      Arrietta isn’t taking that contract, bid higher.

      8
      0
      Reply
      • Coast1

        2 months ago

        I’m sure Boras wanted 7 years for Arrieta but he’ll argue 6 years on Darvish sets the market.

        1
        1
        Reply
    • hawaiiphil

      2 months ago

      Arrieta will get 4
      yr at &100 mil Phillies

      3
      2
      Reply
      • raltongo

        2 months ago

        i think so too, hawaiiphil

        0
        0
        Reply
      • brucewayne

        2 months ago

        No way! He’s a Midwest guy!

        0
        0
        Reply
    • twentyforty

      2 months ago

      Hahaha. Nobody takes that deal to play in Milwaukee. Nobody.

      1
      2
      Reply
      • Appbrewers

        2 months ago

        yep loyal fanbase with potent offense. who wouldn’t want that to pitch with.

        but definitely hope Brewers don’t give a bad contract to any of those guys. much rather they make a trade.

        3
        1
        Reply
        • Cubguy13

          2 months ago

          Arrieta just came from the Cubs who have as loyal of a fanbase as you can get and a very potent offense. Exactly how is Milwaukees fan base and offense going to be a selling point for Arrieta to go to them for 4 years and 75 mil?

          1
          1
          Reply
        • twentyforty

          2 months ago

          Because your park is a joke. Who would ever want to pitch there?

          0
          1
          Reply
    • Tim Newport

      2 months ago

      Please, NO Arrieta – Let’s enjoy at least one season with the Matt Garza salary-sucking, under-performing, skills-diminishing roster spot open…

      3
      1
      Reply
    • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

      2 months ago

      4/84 with bonuses that can take it to 100 and an opt out after 2 years might get it done.

      4
      1
      Reply
    • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

      2 months ago

      5/160 at the least. Money they don’t have.

      0
      5
      Reply
    • cubbie991@gmail.com

      2 months ago

      only way arietta goes to milwaukee is if it is the only offer. who wants to live 6 months of the year in milwaukee? would rather play for marlins now in south beach than milwaukee. yelich may be kicking himself. be careful what you wish for. i live in wisconsin and I wont spend more than 1 day in Milwaukee. there is a joke: if you are in miller park after october 1st, you could get arrested for tresspassing.

      1
      4
      Reply
      • BrewCrew54

        2 months ago

        Because living in Chicago is SO much better. There’s a reason why 3/4 of Chicago’s population vacation in Wisconsin every year.

        3
        0
        Reply
        • dewssox79

          2 months ago

          im from chicago and own a summer home in wisconsin. people are moving out of illinois and chicago. amazing city but cubs fans yappin just ignore.

          3
          0
          Reply
      • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

        2 months ago

        Yelich will get traded mid season 2019. Cain will be flipped within 3 years and they will finally trade Aaron Braun(take a close look at side by side of Braun and Rodgers. They look like twins.

        0
        2
        Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Oh brewer fans are so cute. Now you are getting Jake for $17m huh

      0
      3
      Reply
  50. ReverieDays

    2 months ago

    Excited to read all the salty fans from other teams who wanted him start trashing him and pretending that the Cubs don’t have the money to deal with any downside in the future.

    4
    2
    Reply
  51. Yankeepatriot

    2 months ago

    So he will at least get 21 mill per year for six years. Not a terrible AAV but the one thing that’s worrisome is that he has pitched 150+ innings only once from 2014 forward. Hopefully he doesn’t have durability issues

    Now let the dominoes finally fall !!!!!

    2
    0
    Reply
  52. Jordan

    2 months ago

    They better win now. This is an albatross contract in 3 to 4 years.

    0
    4
    Reply
    • ray_derek

      2 months ago

      LOL, did you think the point of this contract was to win in year 4?

      6
      1
      Reply
  53. opethsdeliverance

    2 months ago

    Dar Yu believe Dar Cubs will vish this deal never happened?

    0
    7
    Reply
  54. radiohead801

    2 months ago

    Guess that Brewers World Series is on hold. Hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    2
    6
    Reply
    • Appbrewers

      2 months ago

      that’s weird. didn’t realize the season started and ended already. can be literally one or two injuries to derail any team.

      1
      1
      Reply
      • megaj

        2 months ago

        Have to admit that the Cubs have some serious depth though. I mean Zobrist and Ian Happ are going to be starting the season on the bench, and Montgomery is always ready to take the role of a starter

        0
        0
        Reply
      • One Fan

        2 months ago

        Appbrewer your team has no pitching. Zero you need to sign the top 3 remaining starters to compete but your team is too cheap

        0
        3
        Reply
        • twentyforty

          2 months ago

          Less than zero pitching…and that’s before they realize that not only isn’t Nelson going to any good this year, he’s NEVER likely to recover from labral surgery at his age. And no, he’s not young for purposes of that brutal surgery.

          0
          2
          Reply
  55. AUTiger7222AUTiger7222

    2 months ago

    #Collusion

    1
    5
    Reply
  56. Phantomofdb

    2 months ago

    Don’t even care who the team was I’m just glad that dragged out crap is done

    4
    0
    Reply
  57. mike156

    2 months ago

    Here’s what’s going to happen: All the rest of the Top 50 free agents are going to be signed in the next ten days……except for Boras clients.
    You have to admit, MLBTR readers and commenters would have a lot of fun with that.

    3
    3
    Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Mike that would be fun

      0
      0
      Reply
  58. Yankeepatriot

    2 months ago

    I will say this much. The cubs swapping darvish with Jake doesn’t really improve them all at from last season but they aren’t weaker either (unless the loss of Davis truly harms them). If anything it’s status quo which is good for the defending no central champs

    3
    1
    Reply
    • cachhubguy

      2 months ago

      Jake sucked for the first 3 months last year. I don’t think Yu will. They have a full year of Quintana. So, of course they are better.

      1
      4
      Reply
    • Pixle17

      2 months ago

      I also see Darvish & Arietta as more similar than different. Yu’s peripherals are a bit better, but Jake’s durability & big game mentality balances that out. I would argue that Chatwood for Lackey looks likely to be an improvement. Chatwood is still an unknown factor, though. I think if Lester & Hendricks stay healthy, they’ll have a better year than last. Overall, I think the rotation is in better shape this year.

      3
      0
      Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Well Yankee I think Chatwood and Darvish will be better then Arrieta and Lackey but we shall see.

      2
      2
      Reply
    • Gocubsgo1986

      2 months ago

      You forget that the offense isn’t near it’s prime yet, still a very young but experienced offense who’s hungry again.

      1
      2
      Reply
  59. fellerms4

    2 months ago

    This was far less than they wanted so I’m excited this should set the trend for the other agents wanting the moon and back. Should start to see a lot more signings in the next week

    0
    0
    Reply
  60. jfive

    2 months ago

    good signing for cubs but im sure we’ll be discussing the albatross of a contract come 2020 season and beyond (6 yrs? ouch! but good for Yu)

    0
    4
    Reply
    • twentyforty

      2 months ago

      You people acting like the Cubs are small market on a shoestring budget makes a Cubs fan’s offseason,

      1
      1
      Reply
      • cachhubguy

        2 months ago

        It is pretty funny.

        0
        0
        Reply
  61. jdodge22

    2 months ago

    Flood gates won’t open till a Boras client signs. Sorry fellas but this will be like when Cain signed.

    0
    0
    Reply
    • Coast1

      2 months ago

      In a week the only top 20 free agents unsigned will all be Boras clients. And he’ll feel like he has the owners where he wants them. They’ll have to meet his demands then.

      1
      0
      Reply
  62. Phillies2017

    2 months ago

    Great move by theo and co. No qo stipulations, a great pitcher and the splash they needed. While the back end might hurt a bit, it’s not a completely crippling amount.

    3
    0
    Reply
  63. twins33

    2 months ago

    Him going to the Cubs has been obvious since December so this really isn’t surprising.

    Wish it was the Twins instead though.

    1
    0
    Reply
  64. Chris

    2 months ago

    The “low” average annual salary of $21 million per season seems like a win for the Cubs but I’d have to be really nervous about the back end of that deal. Paying a 35-38 year old $20+ million is gonna be tough to swallow regardless of ability to pay it. But I guess for another WS ring in the next three years while all the Cubs position players are still cheap is worth the risk

    2
    2
    Reply
    • Desertbull

      2 months ago

      The Cubs window to win is now while Bryant, Russell, Rizzoa,Hendricks, Baez, Contreras, etc are affordable.

      If they win another ring, no one will care about the last 2 years.

      6
      0
      Reply
    • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

      2 months ago

      But paying a TOR starter $21 million to start the deal is a steal. It is not about any single year, its about the value provided over the full length of the deal. If he puts up a 3.5 WAR in 2018 that is worth nearly $30 million.

      9
      1
      Reply
      • czontixhldr

        2 months ago

        outinleftfield, for which sports agency do you work?

        0
        0
        Reply
  65. brewers214

    2 months ago

    6 years is to long the cubs will regret this contract in the last 2 years

    1
    10
    Reply
    • Desertbull

      2 months ago

      All contracts are like that for pitchers. The window to win is now.

      2
      0
      Reply
    • Yankeepatriot

      2 months ago

      The cubs aren’t focusing on years 5 and 6 when it comes to him

      7
      1
      Reply
    • twentyforty

      2 months ago

      Sort of like Year 2 with Cain….

      1
      4
      Reply
    • cachhubguy

      2 months ago

      Doubtful.

      0
      2
      Reply
    • cachhubguy

      2 months ago

      The Cubs might regret it in the last 2 years. But the Brewers are going to regret it in the first 2 years.

      0
      5
      Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Oh Brewer214 you just want it to be true. You were happy when your team offered the samw amount over 5 years and got REJECTED. Cubs pay the same and get basically a free year. You would be singing a different tune had the Brewers signed him

      1
      2
      Reply
    • Gocubsgo1986

      2 months ago

      There’s replacements coming in the farm. Most of Cubs top prospects are pitchers.

      0
      0
      Reply
  66. Desertbull

    2 months ago

    Now get Greg Holland and watch the Brewers and Cardinals fade into the rearview mirror by the All Star break

    1
    6
    Reply
  67. outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

    2 months ago

    Deal includes Full NTC and 2 opt outs in years 2 and 3.

    2
    0
    Reply
  68. rerogers

    2 months ago

    Yes! Potentially two more wins for the Astros in next year’s World Series!

    Seriously though, I think the cubs overpaid but got a really good pitcher. Should be some really fun baseball on the north side.

    Cubs/Astros WS would be a dream for me.

    4
    2
    Reply
    • Yankeepatriot

      2 months ago

      I still want that Astros rematch. We got unfinished business buddy lol

      0
      4
      Reply
      • stroh

        2 months ago

        Welcome the rematch. You guys added Stanton, we added Cole, Smith, Rondon. Both teams better. But you got the RedSox to contend with, and the Angels are better but not as good as us.

        2
        0
        Reply
        • Yankeepatriot

          2 months ago

          You will hold off Anaheim. The Yankees have a whole year of gay and Montgomery in the rotation and bird as well. Plus Tanaka fixed his first half problems and as such I like our chances to win the al east but it’s baseball so I’m not taking anything to the bank lol

          0
          3
          Reply
        • Yankeepatriot

          2 months ago

          *gray

          1
          0
          Reply
    • cub4lyfe

      2 months ago

      I’d welcome any matchup with the Astros if you’re running Rondon out there in the 7th or later.

      0
      1
      Reply
  69. 1090198

    2 months ago

    Pirates should trade Harrison/ Nova and Cerveli . They will have a minor league team against Cubs and Brewers. Fans are going to come anyway

    1
    0
    Reply
  70. Bill Smith

    2 months ago

    I think most expected Darvish to sign with the Cubs and I suspect eventually they will report that the Cubs were not the highest bidder.

    4
    0
    Reply
  71. cubsfan2489

    2 months ago

    And let the dominoes begin to fall!

    0
    1
    Reply
  72. Yankeepatriot

    2 months ago

    Arietta signs a 3-4 year deal with the cards or brew crew next and then the loser of that gets Cobb me thinks

    0
    2
    Reply
    • cachhubguy

      2 months ago

      Jake will insist on 5 years now.

      2
      0
      Reply
      • Yankeepatriot

        2 months ago

        You are correct but it doesn’t mean he won’t cave in either

        0
        0
        Reply
  73. Harry h

    2 months ago

    The cubs are fools for signing this guy ! Can’t wait till the angels face him and pound him to the next universe lol.!!!

    0
    10
    Reply
    • Yankeepatriot

      2 months ago

      They rarely play the cubs though. As a matter of fact when was the last time both teams played each other ? You best be worried about the stros

      7
      0
      Reply
      • cubsfan2489

        2 months ago

        They last played each other in 2016.

        2
        0
        Reply
    • stroh

      2 months ago

      The Angels will have plenty of competition from the As for the wild card spot.

      4
      0
      Reply
      • MrStealYoBase

        2 months ago

        Lol

        0
        0
        Reply
  74. mets2424

    2 months ago

    They did it again. First Hayward now darvish two very bad deals. Cubs are nuts

    1
    11
    Reply
    • cachhubguy

      2 months ago

      And yet they won the WS with Heyward.

      4
      0
      Reply
    • cubsfan2489

      2 months ago

      Says the Mets fan. How’s that Wright deal going?

      0
      3
      Reply
      • twentyforty

        2 months ago

        Or that super rotation….

        0
        3
        Reply
  75. angelsfan4life412

    2 months ago

    we’re the cubs better off resigning arrieta or going after a second tier ace like lance lynn or alex cobb?

    0
    1
    Reply
    • Yankeepatriot

      2 months ago

      Lynn is a disaster waiting to happen and Jake has had declining stats the last two seasons

      In short no lol

      4
      0
      Reply
  76. itslonelyatthetrop

    2 months ago

    Theo pulls an Arnold Mr. Freeze, “Allow me to break the ice…”

    1
    0
    Reply
  77. outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

    2 months ago

    Still 100 FA not signed. That one guy signed is not a sign that the market is shifting or that the owners are not colluding, just that Darvish decided to sign.

    3
    1
    Reply
    • Pixle17

      2 months ago

      Unfortunately, I think you are right. I don’t think it’s a sign that anything else is necessarily going to happen. Maybe the Cards or Brewers will respond with a signing or a trade (surprising if they don’t), but the larger market? I wish I thought it would break open now. But I don’t. (And I do think owners are colluding – if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck…. etc.)

      3
      1
      Reply
    • iverbure

      2 months ago

      You aren’t in left field you’re out to another planet if you think the owners are colluding. There’s like a 100 reasons and facts that point to the cause of why the offers aren’t as lucrative BUT still VERY lucrative see jd and Hosmers deals and 1 reason why collusion has been suggested and that’s the agents as a negotiation tactic.

      1
      3
      Reply
      • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

        2 months ago

        One top player signing in no way indicates that it’s not collusion. 1 in 8 players from end of season rosters still not being signed does.

        3
        1
        Reply
        • iverbure

          2 months ago

          I agree there is no collusion at all anyway who thinks so is being paid by agents. Case closed

          0
          0
          Reply
  78. yanks02026

    2 months ago

    Probably takes the cubs out of the harper race for next year. Their payroll will already be pushing 190-200 this year, so doubt they will add another 30-40 for one player.

    1
    6
    Reply
    • angelsfan4life412

      2 months ago

      I thought heyward could opt out?

      0
      0
      Reply
      • yanks02026

        2 months ago

        I don’t think hayward will be opting out of anything

        3
        0
        Reply
      • Yankeepatriot

        2 months ago

        There is no reason for him to opt out

        0
        0
        Reply
      • One Fan

        2 months ago

        Yea he can opt out. What is your point? Why in the world would he opt out?

        0
        0
        Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          Where are all the guys who say that opt outs are good for the team? No they are NOT!

          0
          0
          Reply
    • classicmixup

      2 months ago

      Check your facts

      0
      0
      Reply
    • twentyforty

      2 months ago

      Just watch. Harper to Chicago happens next year and everyone whines about an overpay. Fans of every other team still can’t grasp that the Cubs aren’t the familiar and easy punchline anymore…and it drives them nuts.

      3
      4
      Reply
      • Yankeepatriot

        2 months ago

        The scrubby cubbies had a charm to them despite their tanking but I agree they aren’t a joke in mlb anymore and it’s good for the game. 108 years of futility must have been beyond horrible for your fan base to suffer from and I hope no fan base ever has to go through that again

        1
        0
        Reply
        • Varangian

          2 months ago

          Can it be called tanking when they weren’t trying to suck?

          0
          0
          Reply
    • cubsfan2489

      2 months ago

      Yanks02026, Harper could have his contract structured so it’s backloaded. He’s not dumb. He’s not going to ruin the Cubs payroll.

      0
      2
      Reply
      • yanks02026

        2 months ago

        Pretty sure thats not how the luxury cap works.. It goes by the annual value, not by what he gets paid year 1 to year 2.. if that was the case teams would be giving players 50 million for year 1 and then 5 the next year.

        1
        0
        Reply
        • cubsfan2489

          2 months ago

          That may be, but read northsidecrossrifles comment. The cubs are not hurting for money. They can pretty much do whatever they want and still be profitable.

          0
          1
          Reply
        • bigcubsfan

          2 months ago

          ahhh pickle nickel pickle nickel touch my toes ahhh how tea do see? piggly wiggly is the store for me

          0
          1
          Reply
      • One Fan

        2 months ago

        Backloading does not effect the luxury tax number and backloading is stupid

        1
        0
        Reply
    • northsidecrossrifles

      2 months ago

      Still under the luxury tax, and they’re printing money in wrigleyville. Due to all of the renovations to the stadium, and how the Ricketts are developing other money traps for fans (hotel zachary, numerous Rickett’s owned restaraunts, movie theatre and parking complex, the rooftops), the Cub’s future revenue stream will be ridiculous. Plus they’re the only major market North American sports team without a long term tv deal, and they’re in a prime bargaining position to write their own multi billion dollar deal

      2
      0
      Reply
      • Gocubsgo1986

        2 months ago

        I’m just hoping cubs network is nationwide, like how wgn had cubs games nationwide until a couple seasons ago. Made me a cubs fan in California.

        2
        0
        Reply
  79. ttinsley1434

    2 months ago

    Lol

    0
    0
    Reply
  80. david722

    2 months ago

    Darvish would have been a good short term addition to Dodgers, but glad to see that Dodgers are developing Buherle. Would rather see LA go get someone like Archer. As a Dodger fan who cannot watch them on TV, glad to see LA show some restraint on this one.

    1
    2
    Reply
  81. CubsTroll

    2 months ago

    As a cards fan this just makes it even more frustrating the FO is sitting on their hands. They put all their faith in unproven prospects and a has-been closer while the clubs around them make moves to improve. If the Brewers do end up signing Arrieta it’s over. At this point we are playing for the second wild card

    0
    0
    Reply
    • asdfgh

      2 months ago

      Fellow cards fan dude really? Ozuna was a great pickup but everything on the market is shit and stuff we already have. We have a great outfield, Carpenter healthy, Fowler in better shape, young arms dude are so much better then Holland’s arm and his 2nd half wasn’t bueno. Mozeliak knows what he’s doing, he hasn’t paid attention to fans like you and it’s helped the winning tradition. We were in it still with all of our issues to almost the very end, but I’m more excited about the talent we have coming up then these older guys with arm troubles.

      1
      0
      Reply
    • KB

      2 months ago

      Not going to lie, it’s great watching the fall to mediocrity. IMO you guys are due for a good decade or two of .500 or below .500 baseball. REALLY test your faithfulness and if your fan base really deserves the title of “best fans in the game”…….. which I think you gave yourselves, but whatever. See how loyal and great a fan base the Cards really have after about 15-20 years of living in mediocrity hell. I’m counting down the days until Aaron Rodgers retires too so then Packers fans up north can finally live in football hell too. NO WAY can they possibly have back to back to back HOF caliber QBs….. if they do I’ll cry…. that would be so unfair. haha. Going through a 20 year drought of not making the playoffs is a good thing for a fan base….. builds character and weeds out the pretenders.

      1
      4
      Reply
      • spudchukar

        2 months ago

        I actually like the Red Bird team as it stands right now, even if they sit tight and don’t add Hosmer and/or trade for Archer and Columbe. The move that frightened me was Cubs’ move for Archer. The Cubs roster is now frozen, not just in 2018. but for years to come. A full year of Pham, Reyes, Weaver, Carpenter, Gyorko, and DeJong, the addition of Ozuna,Leone and Mikalos, and the myriad of young outfielders and pitchers makes the Cards not only a threat in the NL central, but in many years to come.

        1
        1
        Reply
      • stymeedone

        2 months ago

        They already did with Favre followed by Rodgers.

        0
        0
        Reply
      • brucewayne

        2 months ago

        A good decade or two? Ha! Really ? The Cards have a great minor league system

        0
        0
        Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          and plenty of new tv money to spend! Lots of good pitching in the pipeline ! Don’t expect many losing years at all !

          0
          0
          Reply
    • brockswipessecond

      2 months ago

      Seriously? You would have been ok with Mo making this same deal? Pass.

      0
      0
      Reply
      • CubsTroll

        2 months ago

        No, not this deal. But are you happy about the cubs making it? Are you happy about gregerson being our closer? I’m not saying they should have made this deal but there are plenty of areas we needed to improve on and we didn’t.

        0
        0
        Reply
  82. steelerbravenation

    2 months ago

    Now watch everybody else fall in line now. At least SP anyway.
    Arrieta to Brewers
    Lynn to Orioles
    Cobb to Twins

    2
    0
    Reply
  83. rusty2489

    2 months ago

    now the cubs have 2 albatross contracts in Darvish and Heyward. Gonna turn out the same. Horrible for the Cubs. They may get 1 good year outta as he is NOT and ACE.

    0
    10
    Reply
    • cubbie991@gmail.com

      2 months ago

      Lester was 6 years 155 million. That one is looking good.

      3
      0
      Reply
    • KB

      2 months ago

      it’s not that horrible of a deal. Do I have my doubts about Darvish, hell yeah. But honestly, it is hard to judge. 2017 was really his first full year coming back from TJ surgery….. and if you look at the numbers he was actually better than a lot of the Cubs starters last year.

      Do I see the possibility for failure in this deal.. sure, pretty much every deal is likely to fail. But I also see the possibility that Darvish returns to form and gives the Cubs a least 3 solid years. If not…. oh well, it’s not my money. Chatwood and the $13M he’ll be making the next 3 years each year is more of a concern to me than Darvish making an AAV of $21M. I mean the Cubs paid Arrieta just over $15.5M last year. This is only $5.5M more than that. And quite honestly, even with this deal and looking at their other signings….. I think their team payroll still might be less or at the very most right at where it was last year. With Montero, Lackey, and Arrieta gone those three alone (not counting the other guys they let go) accounted for like $45M in payroll last year. Who were the “big” signings for the cubs this offseason? Chatwood, Morrow, and Darvish….. $13M, $9M, and $21M….. That’s $43M. The only other FA add I can think of was Cishek. He signed a 2 year $13M deal…. so that’s $6.5M. Wade Davis was paid $10M last year and is gone….. Bam… more savings.

      It always baffles me how hung up people get about contracts…. as if they themselves are paying them, or as if the team can’t afford them. The Cubs payroll is still only like $170-175M…. just like it was last year. They could easily….. EASILY be up there with the Dodgers in the $220-230 neighborhood if they wanted to. Ricketts and the Cubs have so much money oozing out of every orifice they don’t know what to do with it….. and just wait another 2 years or so when they likely get their own TV network…. f**k TV deals, rumor has it they’ll start their own network a la Yankees style. When that happens they’ll literally have billions upon billions of dollars at their disposal. So again, I really don’t get why people get so da** hung up on contracts….. as if this team has the operating capacity of the Marlins or something. And even if they don’t get their own network they WILL definitely get a new TV deal and it WILL be insanely lucrative. So, yeah.

      4
      0
      Reply
      • megaj

        2 months ago

        Its just a shame they wound up with Heyward. 28 million yearly for defense is just dumb. Almora is an excellent outfielder and only costs 500K lol!

        0
        4
        Reply
        • One Fan

          2 months ago

          Cubs are not paying Heyward anywhere near $28 AAV you troll

          0
          3
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          Heywards cap hit for 2017

          0
          0
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          And 2018 is $28 million! Then over $23 million the next 5 years ! Plus a $20 million dollar bonus!

          0
          0
          Reply
    • megaj

      2 months ago

      The Heyward contract is not even comparable to Darvish. Heyward is basically just taking up space that can filled by somebody else. His place on the Cubs might be the one factor that prevents them from getting Harper next year.

      1
      1
      Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Hey Rusty. Aces get $30 million plus fella. No he is not an ace and he is not paid like an ace

      0
      2
      Reply
  84. bradthebluefishbradthebluefish

    2 months ago

    And these players were complaining about not getting paid. $126 million!!! SMH

    0
    5
    Reply
  85. benny

    2 months ago

    as a cubs fan I like it we our still under the tax tv revenue deal up after 2019 to keep the younger players at that point we can go over the luxury tax

    2
    0
    Reply
    • yanks02026

      2 months ago

      They will probably be over the tax… According to baseball reference it estimates them around 159 before Darvish and I don’t think that number includes the insurances and stuff

      1
      2
      Reply
      • benny

        2 months ago

        it depends on the contracts our loaded Hayward a lot where in the first 2 years I say there under because the tax gets to high after each year and we need to stay under for Russell etc in 2 years

        0
        0
        Reply
      • cachhubguy

        2 months ago

        They won’t be over the tax.

        3
        0
        Reply
      • Theodore Morgan

        2 months ago

        Cubs 2018 payroll was ~$164M (for luxury tax purposes) before the Darvish signing (source: Cot’s), That includes estimates for player benefits and other relatively minor expenses. If the AAV of Darvish’s deal is $25M, the Cubs 2018 payroll would currently project at $189M, which is $8M below the luxury tax threshold this year.

        3
        0
        Reply
  86. wrigleyhawkeye

    2 months ago

    $21/year is good deal
    If he only sees 5 years it’s ~$25/year which is still good.
    If he only sees 4 years it ~$31/year which is just above what he was projected to average over 5 years.

    Interested to hear about the incentives, but sounds like there no trade clauses or opt outs.

    0
    2
    Reply
    • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

      2 months ago

      Full NTC and opt outs after year 2 and year 3.

      0
      0
      Reply
  87. KB

    2 months ago

    I like the annual average salary, but 6 years……. yikes. Hopefully it’s FRONT loaded….. you know, a contract that would actually make sense. Never understood why teams backload contracts. Why pay a dude more per year at the end of a deal when they’re likely worthless.

    On paper this is a stellar move. I’m not overly impressed with Darvish’s career though. He had like 1.5 years of top tier, Ace-like pitching. He’s just been mediocre or “just good” the rest of the time. Then for those who don’t understand the term “racist” you can call me that all you want, but it’s hard to ignore the long list of failed Asian baseball players….. especially when it comes to pitchers. I mean Hiroki Kuroda is the best Asian pitcher IMO to play the game. Nomo and Park get a lot of love…. for some reason, but when you go look at their numbers they were insanely mediocre…. #4 quality starters. Hopefully Darvish breaks the trend….. we shall see. I PRAY my skepticism is unwarranted and he dominates. Trust me. I’ll GLADLY admit my concerns were wrong come October if he finishes with 32+ starts and an ERA around 3.00-3.30 or under. If that’s what happens, Darvish, Lester, Hendricks, Quintana, and Chatwood is a pretty solid rotation. Personally, I still would like to see them use my hybrid 6th starter strategy. Use Chatwood and Montgomery in tandem in that 5th starter spot. Have Chatwood start every 5th day like normal, but he only goes, tops, 3-4 innings. Then after that, every time, insert Montgomery to go the next 3-4 innings. That almost guarantees you you’ll get 7-8 innings out of your duo in the 5th starting spot, essentially giving the bullpen the day off other than maybe a setup man and the closer. Then after the start both Chatwood and Montgomery rest until their next tandem start. I think this strategy would give INSANE production and value out of what normally is your weakest starter. Each pitcher would go through the lineup only once or twice. Pitchers, especially those of Chatwood and Montgomery’s caliber, generally have more and more trouble the more times they go through the lineup. In fact, looking at the stats on baseballreference I can roughly guesstimate that Chatwood’s ERA last year through the first three innings of the game was around 3.50. Not bad, especially for a 5th starter. But his ERA in the 4th inning onward was close to 6.00. Montgomery is the same way. I mean we all know this. He’s pretty stellar as a reliever, not so much as a starter. If he only has to face a lineup 1-1.5 times through it I think he’d be great. Then there is the added bonus of the innings each would eat up. With this strategy each guy would roughly pitch 120 innings. That’s 240 innings out of your (tandem) 5th starter. That alone is considerable value added to an otherwise weak roster spot. Not to mention the fact the much lighter workload would likely mean Chatwood does the impossible so far in his career, and actually stay healthy all year.

    We shall see. It’s a pretty “out there” idea…. but not too out there. I mean I’ve heard broadcasters bring up this very strategy and many think it is the future of how pitching will work. I’m not normally keen to out of the box thinking when it comes to baseball….. mainly because the game is so old and the way it is is because it’s a proven method, and the out of the box ideas tried almost always have no effect if not a negative effect. Like most of Maddon’s decisions make me irate because they rarely work, it’s the talent level on this team that always bails his a** out, giving the illusion that Maddon’s decisions are better than they really are. But, Maddon is the right guy to have to try this tandem 5th/6th starter strategy. I see only positives from it and considerable added value to a rotation spot that is often dismissed. Seriously, it’s not too crazy to think that Chatwood/Montgomery “start” 33 games in 2018 with each pitching about 110-120 innings and Chatwwod having, say, a 3.50 ERA, and Montgomery an ERA around 3.00 (in his career Montgomery as a reliever, which is what he’ll essentially be still, owns a 2.29 ERA….. I think him having a 3.00 ERA with this strategy is pretty tame). That’s a 3.25 ERA from your tandem 5th starting spot which also pitches 220-240 innings for you….. that’s Ace-like production from your 5th spot. At least worth a shot IMO. Try it out until June and see how it’s working then and re-evaluate. Again, it’s essentially giving the bullpen a day off. OH YEAH, and with it being Chatwood and montgomery, the first 1-1.5 times through the lineup opponents will be facing a righty in Chatwood. Then in their 2nd and/or 3rd ABs they’ll be facing Montgomery – a lefty. Then if Morrow is the closer, in their 3rd or 4th AB they’ll be back to facing a righty. That would play hell on today’s manager who micromanages the hell out of games and loves to play matchups. not to mention the hell it will play on hitters, constantly changing the spot where the ball leaves the pitcher’s hand going from a righty to a lefty to a righty again. No getting into a groove I’d think for opposing hitters.

    0
    9
    Reply
    • Yankeepride88

      2 months ago

      Whether it’s front or back loaded makes no difference in luxury tax hit. That’s the only thing that really matters when it comes to salary

      7
      0
      Reply
      • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

        2 months ago

        That is one thing that matters and AAV only matters for the 5-6 high revenue teams that are close to the CBT threshold.

        4
        0
        Reply
      • KB

        2 months ago

        Not really. That’s the only thing that matters when it comes to payroll…… and the Cubs payroll is still well under the luxury tax threshhold. Contracts on the individual level I would say the yearly payout does matter….. at least on a logical standpoint. Darvish is going to likely have better years at the beginning of the contract than at the end. LOGICALLY it would make sense to pay him more of that total contract value at the beginning of the deal than at the end. Ideally you want you biggest contributors to team success being the ones making the most money on your team. So in Darvish making, say, $18M in 2018 and posting a statline of, say 18 wins, a 3.10 ERA, and about 10 K/9 IP is great, no doubt. But on year 5 or 6 when he’s winning maybe only 10 games and posts a 4.00 ERA with only 6-7 K/9 but making $25M a year….. it’s just bad money. An inferior player on your team is eating up more payroll space, inching you toward that luxury tax. So yes….. I would say front loaded and backloaded contracts make a difference. Mainly because when the player is making the mot money at the beginning of the deal but also providing a ton of production you don’t really have to make a big addition come the trade deadline, or in that upcoming offseason. But as the player’s production decreases over time – so does his salary, therefore making the decision to add better, more expensive talent via a trade of free agent signing possible due to more payroll space being available, and by that I mean more space until you hit the luxury tax threshold. So while in the grand scheme of it all, front and backloaded deals do effect a team’s payroll inching toward the luxury tax.

        I did a horrible job explaining it, but you saying front and backloaded makes no difference makes zero sense at all. The fact you got 3 up votes tells me there are more nonsensical fools out there too who don’t understand the concept of talent to value ratios. Front loaded vs backloaded makes a MASSIVE difference. Or do you think that Albert Pujols and his backloaded deal isn’t hurting the Angels right now. If you say it isn’t you’ve made it clear….. you’re an idiot. Now if Pujols’ contract was getting smaller and smaller each year because it was front loaded…… it wouldn’t be that bad of a contract. Point is, you want your best players to be paid the most on your team and front loaded contracts almost guarantee that….. almost….. at least they do MUCH more than backloaded deals which are almost guarantees to be horrible contracts. Because a team will need to add more talent and therefore more money down the road, but their now mediocre player (at best) who was a big deal 3-4 years ago is taking up even MORE of the payroll with his backloaded contract, making it difficult to sign that younger, better player and still staying under the luxury tax threshold. I can’t believe people believe otherwise or don’t get the basic principles of cost effective ratios.

        0
        7
        Reply
        • kbarr888

          2 months ago

          Bobby Bonilla is STILL sucking wind out of the Mets financials……..Incredible.

          How’s that looking………LOL

          0
          0
          Reply
        • woodguy

          2 months ago

          KB isn’t the luxury tax threshold going up in dollars with each year? So if that’s the case, it keeps the contracts about the same, give or take on future contracts

          3
          0
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          I think it goes to $209 million next year! But not positive!

          0
          0
          Reply
    • One Fan

      2 months ago

      Does anyone read KB’s eyesore novels? Nope no one does but keep writing the novels no one reads KB

      7
      0
      Reply
      • Varangian

        2 months ago

        His meth musta kicked in, big time.

        0
        0
        Reply
  88. OrangeCrushCity

    2 months ago

    Swapping Arrieta for Darvish seems like a lateral move. Cubs stay status quo, Brewers get better, Dodgers are worse and Giants are better. Should be interesting in the NL this year.

    2
    4
    Reply
    • radiohead801

      2 months ago

      Hahahahaha!!!! “Lateral move.” Everything about this comment is just so wrong. Love it!

      1
      3
      Reply
    • cubbie991@gmail.com

      2 months ago

      cubs added Chatwood to rotation. Clear upgrade from Lackey. Also added Morrow and Cishek. Lost Davis. Russell healthy(for now). On paper a better team than last year.

      2
      2
      Reply
    • twentyforty

      2 months ago

      Hahaha. You realize the Cubs are ridiculously young, right? Their position players will be even better this year. That’s the scary part. Milwaukee has zero pitching. Chicago has a boatload of it. That’s the enormous difference.

      1
      5
      Reply
      • Jack TaddyJack Taddy

        2 months ago

        “Zero pitching”
        How will any opposing teams even get a hit? Bold move, Cotton!

        3
        0
        Reply
      • BrewCrew54

        2 months ago

        This may be the comment of the year. “Milwaukee has zero pitching”. Um, did you notice that both the Cubs and the Brewers had top 10 pitching staffs last year? Do your homework next time before you blurt out a pile of BS, please…

        3
        0
        Reply
        • twentyforty

          2 months ago

          You better check the regression likelihood for Davies and Anderson as well as the track record for returns from labrum surgery which I personally can vouch for. Then realize next in line is Chacin and assorted hot garbage. No, Milwaukee doesn’t have pitching. Let that sink in.

          0
          1
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          You do know that even almighty Cub players can regress

          0
          0
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          2 months ago

          and get hurt too right?

          0
          0
          Reply
    • cachhubguy

      2 months ago

      The only interesting thing in the NL will be the wildcard. Dodgers, Cubs and Nats win their divisions.

      1
      2
      Reply
    • Pixle17

      2 months ago

      It is somewhat lateral-ish. But I don’t think it’s exactly status quo with the swap of Chatwood for Lackey. Young players will get better, moving into their primes. Bullpen has some good arms – not sure what impact losing Davis will have. Brewers played above their ability last year (or so it seems to me), and they have some solid additions this year. Without pitching adds, I think they fall short. Dodgers are NOT worse (lol) – I would put them in the “status quo” category. Being the Dodgers, that means they are still a team with monster-sized talent. And yes, Giants will be interesting this year!

      1
      0
      Reply
      • OrangeCrushCity

        2 months ago

        The Dodgers lost both Darvish and Morrow without adding anybody. How are they not worse than they were?

        2
        0
        Reply
        • Pixle17

          2 months ago

          I forgot about the loss of Morrow, who was a post-season beast for them. I still think they’re okay with the rotation without Darvish. I guess I can’t argue that they lost a step. I still think that they’re probably the best team in the NL even without those two because they’re still loaded! I guess Cubs kind of did a number on them taking both their pitchers. LOL

          1
          0
          Reply
        • BlueSkyLABlueSkyLA

          2 months ago

          The Dodgers probably aren’t going to win 104 games again this year but not because they don’t have Darvish, since he wasn’t really a factor in them wining 104 games last year. The loss of Morrow hurts for sure, but then he wasn’t a factor for the entire season either. The keys for the Dodgers rotation are: Kershaw’s back, Hill starting off the season the way he finished the last one, and pretty much the opposite for Wood.

          1
          0
          Reply
    • KB

      2 months ago

      I don’t get how the Brewers got better. They already had a pretty offensively stout outfield last year. Their problem last year was competent pitching. Their problem this year is still…. competent pitching. Jimmy Nelson is their only semi intimidating pitcher in their rotation and he has a bum shoulder….. yeah. What’s his name, Chase Anderson?, had a SHOCKER of a year last year. The 30 year old journeyman happened to have a career year. If people are expecting that year in and year out they are setting themselves up for heartache. After those two, a DL player and a 30 year old journeyman, their rotation drops off considerably…… and it wasn’t really starting at a high point to drop off from, haha. Knebel out of their pen is the only “star” I’d say on that staff. UNless they have some insanely promising young pitching prospects to debut this year….. it’s the same team as last year pretty much.

      Also, why do people think Lorenzo Cain is this top tier talent? He’s the black Nick Markakis….. or Black Martin Prado. Before you dismiss those comparisons…. actually look at their career numbers…… prepare to be humbled. I don’t recall Braves fans puffing out their chests when they signed Markakis…. yet Brewers fans (and the media….. classic idiots) are acting like Cain is one of the best all around OFers in the game when reality says he’s an average player. Then to top it off….. he’s ALWAYS injured. In the last 5 years this is Cain’s average statline:

      129 GP, .291 BA, .345 OBP, .767 OPS, 10 HRs, 20 SBs. 107 OPS+

      Not bad by any means….. but UNBELIEVABLE like people are making it out to be? No.

      Here is Markakis over the same timespan and his averages

      158 GP, .277 BA, .348 OBP, .728 OPS, 10 HRs, 1 SB. 99 OPS+

      About the same…. maybe a hair worse. Point is, Cain at the very least is BARELY better than Markakis. And whatever Markakis lacks he more than makes up for in reliability in staying on the field…. an area where Cain fails miserably.

      As for Prado, he was injured a good amount last year or was benched most of the time. But in the 5 year span from 2012-2016 here are his 5 year averages

      147 GP, .292 BA, .343 OBP, .759 OPS, 11 HRs, 5 SBs. 108 OPS+

      Damn near identical. What Cain does in SBs, Prado made up for in health and staying on the field.

      Point is….. Cain is hardly this superstar people are making him out to be. Yelich, honestly isn’t the stud people are making him out to be either IMO. Don’t get me wrong here either, he’s a good player. Hits for solid averages across the board….. but it’s not like he’s bashing the ball with the best of them. He’s a fringe 20HR hitter. Hits about 35-40 doubles…. nothing too flashy. People are acting like the Brewers added two dudes who hit well over .300 and can bash 35+ HRs year in and year out. Combined they can’t even hit 35 HRs.

      I’m not saying the Brewers are going to be a bad team. I think predictions are kind of futile honestly. But I DO think they over performed last year, and I honestly don’t see any moves they’ve made this offseason to be significantly better. And for a team supposedly in the middle of a rebuild….. they just traded their best prospect away this offseason….. and are a team full of veterans from other teams. Where are the young, promising prospects on this team?…… and if their farm is so good….. why haven’t I heard any buzz about any of their prospects….. other than the one they just traded away to Miami. I mean on their MLB page they have a kid named Corey Ray as their number 1 prospect….. WHO?! A high single A outfielder who hit a whopping .238 last year in single A. Yeah. Their #2 prospect is Luis Ortiz a RHP who in double A last year possessed a 4.01 ERA…. ooooooh doggy. #3 prospect? Another RHP in Brandon Woodruff who made his MLB debut last year and pitched 43 innings to the tune of a 4.81 ERA… his minors numbers in triple A weren’t much better in 16 starts and 75+ IP….. he had a 4.31 ERA there. None of those guys are top 50 MLB prospects. So again, Milwaukee….. where are these highly touted prospects from your highly ranked farm system? Bleacher Report has/had your system at #7 in MLB. But that was with Brinson…. i can’t imagine he had THAT much value impact on your farm system…… but maybe he did because looking at the top 30 on MLB…. pretty uninspiring.

      0
      5
      Reply
      • twentyforty

        2 months ago

        You win this thread. It won’t be until May u till Brewers fans realize just how bad their pitching is and by July they will have moved on to Packers preseason games. Just like they’ve done every year of their existence.

        0
        5
        Reply
      • outinleftfieldoutinleftfield

        2 months ago

        A tome and you still don’t get how they got better? Yelich and Cain are 8 WAR better than their LF and CF last season. 8 wins better with just two additions. Since both are plus defenders they also make the pitching staff better.

        The Brewers had a top 10 pitching staff. No problem with pitching. They even added depth.

        Didn’t read the rest of your BS after that. Blow two facts so totally and a whole bunch more words won’t help with your sorry argument.

        4
        0
        Reply
      • stymeedone