The Diamondbacks officially announced a reunion with Merrill Kelly on a two-year contract with a 2028 vesting option. The Apex Baseball client is reportedly guaranteed $40MM. He receives a $2MM signing bonus and will make successive $17MM and $21MM salaries. If Kelly reaches 170 innings in 2027, he’ll lock in a $12MM salary for the 2028 season. If he reaches 185 innings in ’27, that ’28 guarantee will jump to $14MM. The D-Backs cleared a roster spot earlier by flipping Kyle Backhus to the Phillies.
The 37-year-old Kelly returns to the team with which he has spent nearly his entire major league career. Though initially drafted by the Rays in the eighth-round of the 2010 draft, Kelly made his big league debut with the Diamondbacks back in 2019 after a four-season stay in Korea as a member of the KBO’s SK Wyverns (now known as the SSG Landers). After a pedestrian rookie campaign in the majors where he pitched to a league-average ERA in 32 starts, Kelly managed to fashion a role for himself as one of the better mid-rotation arms in the majors.
Since the start of the 2022 campaign, Kelly has pitched to a 3.47 ERA in 108 starts. He’s struck out 23.1% of his opponents while walking 7.7% in that time, leaving him with a 3.81 FIP. Although a 4.03 SIERA and other so-so peripherals cast him as a step down from your prototypical front-end starter, the veteran has managed to remain a durable and productive rotation piece. Kelly particularly endeared himself to Arizona fans when he delivered a brilliant 2.25 ERA over 24 postseason innings during the club’s run to the World Series in 2023.
Amid a disappointing 2025 season where the Diamondbacks were ravaged by injuries to everyone from star closers Justin Martinez and A.J. Puk to newly-signed ace Corbin Burnes, the team engaged in a sell-off at trade deadline and shipped Kelly to the Rangers in exchange for a trio of pitching prospects. Kelly put up fairly pedestrian numbers across ten starts with the Rangers: a 4.23 ERA and near-matching 4.18 FIP across 55 1/3 innings of work.
Even while the veteran was in Texas, an offseason reunion with the Diamondbacks was already being speculated upon. Kelly spoke fondly of Arizona and expressed an openness to re-signing when asked about the possibility while the Rangers were visiting Chase Field in the season’s final few weeks. “Definite” interest in a reunion with Kelly was reported on Arizona’s side shortly before last week’s Winter Meetings, and now the sides have come together on a deal.
Turning to the deal itself, Kelly’s $40MM guarantee clocks in just ahead of the two years and $36MM MLBTR predicted for the right-hander when ranking him as the #25 free agent in this offseason’s Top 50 MLB Free Agents list. The Snakes were aggressive both in their offer and the timing of the deal; while the free agent market for position players and especially relievers has kicked into gear already, Kelly is just the third starting pitcher from MLBTR’s Top 50 to sign a contract this offseason. He joins Dylan Cease and Cody Ponce, both of whom received guarantees that slightly eclipsed MLBTR’s predictions.
Now that he’s set to return to Arizona, Kelly stands as the favorite to start for the Diamondbacks on Opening Day this year. He’ll join a rotation that already added Michael Soroka and will reunite with former teammates Eduardo Rodriguez, Brandon Pfaadt, and Ryne Nelson. Burnes could be a factor later in the season but is not expected to pitch until sometime in the second half after undergoing Tommy John surgery in June. While the team’s rotation certainly looks much more complete with Kelly back in the fold, bringing the right-hander back shouldn’t stop the team from pursuing other rotation additions after the club’s pitching staff finished 19th in the majors with a 4.29 ERA last year.
Of course, adding beyond this could prove to be easier said than done. The Diamondbacks are projected for a payroll just north of $171MM in 2026, according to RosterResource. That rises to north of $205MM for luxury tax purposes. GM Mike Hazen has suggested that, while Arizona’s payroll would likely be moving downward from its 2025 level, that would still leave the team with room to spend. The club spent $188MM on its payroll last season, however, meaning they currently sit less than $17MM from that mark.
Perhaps that leaves enough wiggle room to reunite with Paul Goldschmidt on an affordable one-year deal, a move the Diamondbacks have been said to be contemplating, but Kelly will surely go down as the team’s biggest expenditure unless an increase in payroll is approved or the team makes a trade that clears salary. To that latter point, the hot stove has been burning with Ketel Marte trade buzz in recent weeks. Moving Marte would certainly clear payroll off the books (and simultaneously add some young rotation options as part of the return), though Hazen has consistently downplayed the likelihood of a deal surrounding Marte actually coming together.
Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic first reported the Diamondbacks and Kelly were finalizing a two-year, $40MM deal. Nick Piecoro of The Arizona Republic reported the option specifics. David Brandt of The Associated Press had the salary structure.


This feels right, Kelly belongs in Arizona
Sure does Career 0-11 and ERA of almost 6 vs Dodgers, glad to see the signing.
2 or 3 Dodger wins/yr.
Dodgers ain’t done yet they still have that Skubal trade and Kyle Tucker signing to do lol
Uh, didnt AZ buy Burnes, Montgomery, Kelly, etc? Thats what teams do in free agency. Especially ones that want to win.
You brag about the Dodgers but they are going to be the reason Baseball strikes and it wont be a short strike! Ruining Baseball all on their own
Signed all those players and gave extensions to their young core and still spend half what the dodgers do
Aged whine is the best.
A team paying market value to elite talent to try to win for their fans ruins baseball way more than jagoff owners who refuse to invest in talent? Got it
I argue the crap going on in places like Pittsburgh is doing more to ruin baseball. Put it this way: how many seats are full in dodgers stadium for their games? How many seats are taken during a Pirates game. One team inspires fans to engage, the other breeds complete apathy and cynicism. Which of those two scenarios ruins baseball? Certainly not the model putting fannies in seats.
“Went to the chip.” What happen when you got there bud ? More importantly what has happened to you guys since ? Lmao. Dodgers WON the “chip” in 2020, 2024, and 2025 and they will probably win it in 2026. Don’t worry though. You guys are a solid 3rd place in the NL West/ not making the playoffs franchise. Keep up the great work.
Gotta have some strong mute game here and mute everyone in the right order so I get everyone.
Hate this kind of sportsfan.
Junior: I’ll just throw out that players aren’t going to strike over the one team that’s throwing money at them left and right. I’m pretty sure the MLBPA is perfectly happy with how much the Dodgers spend on player salaries.
Was dodgers stadium empty before their payroll got insane?
Is that before or after they sign Babe Ruth and Cy Young?
Its neither. What’s ruining baseball is market imbalance. When one market is 9x the size of another, parity is never going to happen. You can expect Pittsburgh to pay more than they are, but they will never be financially able to spend as New York or LA. There are the haves and the have nots.
That is what is ruining baseball.
A period can be your friend. Run on sentences are difficult to read. Punctuate, please.
Man, I didn’t realize how bad MLBTR comments are now. This stuff is below Twitter/Facebook tier. This place used to be a cool place to talk ball.
💯
Most comment threads here are better than this one.
And what could be more FB/ Twitter tier than that comment?
@rhandome It is. Don’t bother reading the unfettered random emotional response. They will say anything and just copy/paste partial stats to align with their nonsense. There are good folks here who know when and when not to respond to rubbish.
I remember the early days of the site, 2005, seeing news about Ryan Zimmerman, Hanley Ramirez, and David Wright as young players. The amount of meatheads on this site now is staggering
Why can’t both be true? Deferrals and teams that don’t spend are both the problem, imo.
Taker backs
Snakes spent $210 million on Corbin Burnes. Instead of blaming Dodgers, maybe they should blame their scouts and physicians.
Gapper
As someone versed in economics and finance, it is market size and not deferrals that give an edge.
I am ok with eliminating future deferrals but not because they are unfair, but only because apparently so many fans don’t understand that it is the same concept as using a mortgage to buy a home.
Stymeedome
Market size does give an advantage. You get it.
Market size is not ruining baseball. Baseball is measured by popularity and gross receipts and big market teams winning in proportion to their population is good for ratings and fan accumulation.
Baseball has more surprise winners and champions than other professional sports. Baseball is thriving. Fans love hating the Dodgers and that is marketable.
TDB
Muted
Top 100: It’s odd that nobody cared about the Nationals when they pioneered using deferrals. I guess it’s okay as long as you lose.
Muleor
True. Nationals and Mets.
But if baseball gets rid of deferrals as a PR move it is no big loss, it really changes very little.
To me, people would due better whining about the rule change that lets Ohtani go from starting pitcher to DH.
Team owners in large cities have always been in a position to get better revenue. Changing that is changing the value of what team owners acquired. This is nothing new. The only thing that is new is that the Dodgers have effectively combined good scouting and development with big spending.
I am ok with changing how non-Latin American young free agents like Sasaki are acquired. I am ok with a team spending over $400 million losing their first round pick the next year. But baseball is basically doing well except for half a dozen bottom dweller owners who are underspending.
You are so full of yourself and full of s***. Everyone who disagrees with you is a troll.
” Dodger fans don’t show up when the team loses.” How would you know? They don’t lose. LAD is in the postseason every year.
“no one cares.” Obviously you do. A lot. All you do is complain about the way the Dodgers do business. And “no one cares”? Look at the TV ratings, the home and road attendance. 51 million watched Game 7, widely praised as one of the great games in WS history.
“2020 doesn’t count.” Why? Because you didn’t win? Hilarious.
Yeah the Dodgers had a horrific, long drought from ’88 through 2020 as Dodger fans were suffering with crap ownership after crap ownership. Now that they have the best ownership group in the game and have built the best organization in the game we are supposed to be sorry for it? Get used to it pal.
This. Sal said what I was thinking exactly. True, Dodgers are a large market. However every MLB team owner is a billionaire. Some want to win more than others. Some spend, others line their pockets. Thats the difference.
“2020 doesn’t count ” “mickey mouse trophy” those words are what fueled the juggernaut that is making whimps like you cry in your cereal. Are u really trying to compare your world series to the Dodgers ?? The reining back to back champions ???? Lmao. The irony of your “homegrown” team comment is fkn hilarious. How many WS have you guys won in the last 24 years with “homegrown” talent ? Thanks for stopping by. Curt Schilling and Randy Johnson 2001. Homegrown talent ?? 👏 🏆 enjoy another 3rd place in the NL West finish. 24 years and counting ⏰️
Deferral also help the players dodge state taxes
So Randy Johnson, Kurt Schilling, Luis Gonzalez, were home grown?
Great pitcher? More like a solid rotation piece.
I remember when Ted Turner gave Bruce Sutter a lot of deferred money in a contract from the early 1980’s. Nothing new here.
Doubt that. I could see Tucker on a short term deal though.
“Jagoff owners”
Nice to see a bunch of successful economists here lol
Let’s not pretend Dodgers fans are model baseball fans…they are just Dodgers fans. I recently had an interaction with one who was travelling outside of LA that included the following.
“That Shohei guy is amazing. He just came out of nowhere to help us win”. I am thinking to myself, not only has he been the best player in baseball long before he joined the dodgers but he even played right next door. So not wanting to be rude I just say “yeah, it’s hard to believe him and Trout played together for years and didn’t win any playoff games”…I am quite certain they had no idea who Trout was.
You’re going to want to learn what the word “great” actually means…..he’s solid/serviceable….great is someone like Paul Skenes or Tarik Skubal
And their last WS win, the only WS win, was 25 years ago, and I’m pretty sure the Dodgers won one more recently than that
@Kiss
How much money do you think there is in the Pirates? It’s a mom and pop operation with an owner who’s worth about $1.5 bil, owns a need paper and a ski resort. I’m not going to argue that a person worth $1.5 bill needs to take every dollar of profit out the business but when your worth $1.5 bill in assets and your living like a billionaire, have 3 generations of family living more and would like to provide for the next 3 generations then you DO rely on the profusely from the team unlike the owners of the Dodgers, Mets, and Jays who’s owners are worth 6 to 10x worth the Pirates owner is worth in cities generating a multiple of what Pittsburgh generates. It’s not am even comparison and we have to stop saying it is. Years ago that argument was more valid. What the Dodgers and Mets are doing, being tied to investment firms using deferred money the easy they do, is a game changer and my guess, a new trend. I’m not sure how much the Steinbrenner family owns of the team but I would not be shocked if they sold some of it to a top 10 investment form to allow them to do what the Dodgers do too, but do it with impunity.
That’s not how a business is run, but I get it…. Rich people are bad/ poor people are good. 👍🏼
The player’s union loves teams like the Yankees, Mets, and Dodgers. They pay more. Players don’t want a salary cap. They don’t want a luxury tax. Either do teams in the top markets. We are going to have a lockout because the low budget teams want all of those things and no salary floor.
I don’t know that baseball is being ruined. I think the new playoff format injected a lot of parity. I think the NBA is too easy to reach the playoffs in that regard. How many decades did a few large market teams essentially rule baseball? Now we have small to mid market teams that are run so well the perennially contend. We also have large market teams spending and winning. Small and large market teams that are run poorly. I am not saying things can’t be improved. I would prefer the status quo to a lockout.
Deferrals are a non issue. Anyone can do them. They are just smart.
Excellent points MLB Top 100
It’s just jealousy. If the d’Backs where where LAD was now you wouldn’t hear a peep from posters like this. The Dodgers took years to build to where they are now. Wasn’t the team sold like 15 years ago? They had some rocky playoff seasons early including that pitching clinic Kershaw, Greinke, and deGrom put on in 2015. I respect the org for where they’re at and putting their fans first.
Uh the Dbacks have 1 title and the Dodgers have won 3 since. Math is your friend
I agree.
Last year, is the only year that counts. The rest is history.
I’m sure you’re not intelligent enough to know the reason but how on earth are they bad for baseball. If you say because they win every year how much money have you won by betting them. Surely you’ve found an unlimited money glitch and bet everything you own on dodgers to win the World Series this year right? Put your money where your mouth is and profit from your vast knowledge.
Finally!! I think it’s my first free agent pick I chose correctly since whoever was after Naylor lol.
Surprised the Jays didn’t take a stab honestly
Who says they didn’t?
Snakes Alive!
The Dreadful Snakes.
I got this pick correct but it does feel like this move doesn’t make a ton of sense.
Arizona has no pitching depth and probably would’ve been better off spreading money out to 3 pitchers for the pen and rotation with Burnes done for this season.
Burns going down really hurt them. Sounds like mid season before he returns.
They will need to find a couple more pitchers. Trading marte might get them that but then the offense would take a big hit.
I think they keep marte and sign another starter or two.
Still hope for the dbacks to compete.
Kelly is a solid mid-rotation arm. For $20M spread out, what pitchers are you going to find that are going to give you 175+ “quality” innings cumulatively? A good setup man is going for $10M+ in the open market.
When you don’t have much money to spend do you want 1 36 year old pitcher or the salary flexibility to do more?
There’s no certainties but we’ve seen guys like Preller get creative with a budget constraint. This just feels like a move that falls flat and leaves the team with massive holes.
I think spending $8MM on a 1B like Nate Lowe + $5-6MM on Quintana and another 5-6MM on a reliever could give you a better shot and wouldn’t tie up another $20Mm to a 37 year old pitcher in 2027.
I don’t think the Dbacks are going anywhere this season with Burnes shelved. 2027 I could see them getting back up with a couple young guys breaking in as well.
I like Kelly but not really on this team with all of the other holes that they don’t have funds to plug up.
If they had another $25-30MM to spend, sure. I just don’t think they do and think a more creative use was a better way to allocate those funds.
They could still have the money to make those smaller moves you suggest.
Kelly alone doesn’t make them a competitor in my eyes. They had him last year.
If they do plan on competing then I’d guess this is just one of the moves they will make.
This pushes their payroll north of $185MM. They’ve already said they won’t spend the same as last year. That gives them maybe $10MM left to spend without a trade of Marte.
I just don’t see it.
I don’t really disagree with you. I just don’t think spreading that 20m around would have made me feel any different.
They could look at the trade market other than Marte. To fill some holes with guys not making much.
They are in a tough spot with all the money they have spent on pitching with poor results.
I think this means D-backs go to the trade market to get a closer (unless there are sizable deferrals on this contract)
In this market, Quintana will probably get more than $6 million on a one year deal. Lots of teams could use Quintana as their number four or five starter.
I don’t think it would’ve ultimately mattered much but look at the projected pen here—It doesn’t even look big league caliber.
They should be taking fliers on 3-4 guys. I still think a cheaper starter and a 1B would’ve been a better call here.
Perhaps. They’ll be a couple pitchers who don’t find what they’re looking for at the end of the offseason though. Those are the guys AZ should’ve been on with their budget constraints. Maybe they still will be.
I don’t understand the pessimism here. You keep mentioning his age, it’s not like it’s a 5 year contract.
I’ll take Kelly any day over stiffs like Lowe and Quintana.
I like Kelly, but I also like Quintana. They could use both.
20m is not getting you much (his per).
10m would have given you Ponce- a SP coming back to the US from asia with question marks. 7-8 million will get you a guy with a 5 ERA that can throw 180 innings. or in the pen 10m gets you a quality set up guy.
Kelly is a mid rotation guy that you can keep to only a 2 year deal due to age- not a bad bet.
Another overpay.
Over 180 innings at a 3.55 era for two years.
While it’s more than I thought he would get. His results last year say he is worth it.
Its less than a QO. Seems about right. Even pudds got $15MM last off season.
Every free agent is an overpay. It (sort of) makes up for the six to seven years players are under team control and drastically underpaid.
That is factually incorrect…..at the moment the contract is signed, the player is worth exactly what the contact stipulates…..value and worth is what someone is willing to pay for goods or services…. you can think your house is worth $500,000 but if only one person makes an offer to buy and they offer $250,000 then your house is only worth $250,000….. conversely, someone may make an offer for $750,000 and then your house is worth $750,000
You obviously don’t know the value of innings pitch through the year.
so true. if a team looks at a guy as capable of throwing 180 innings period- they are getting 10m from someone to just eat innings. As the quality of those innings increases, so does the cost.
20m for kelly is what i would have expected, honestly i expected 1/25, but getting 2/40 just means the team is gambling that his age 39 season is still worth 15m. I like this as about the range i would have expected him to sign.
King and the rest of the guys who are also #3 starter types (mid rotation guys) are going to be getting at least 3-4 years, but this sets it as about 20m per vs the 15-18 we have seen the past few years… (king may be a tier above as the maybe a #1 starter with Imai and Frambler, but Kelly is the next teir of mid rotation guys)
Hope the Snakes plan offset some of this contract by dealing Marte to the Rays.
What’s the point if they can’t replace his offense.
you replace offensive production by acquiring run prevention, obviously
The problem is they need to improve.
Switching out one for another doesn’t make them any better.
What pitcher is gonna give them 4.4 war?
His contract aav is so low flipping his money into a free agent isn’t gonna get you much. When dudes like Polanco are getting 20m per.
You don’t sign Kelly if they are looking at rebuilding. Barring an overpay trading Marte doesn’t make much sense to me.
I think they keep Ketel. But they have room for increased output at DH, 1B, 3B and corner outfield. They have Perdomo and Lawler for SS and 2B. The question is whether Ketel’s ability to play 2B makes him marketable enough to get two big bats to replace him. Or one big bat and a pitcher. I think they keep him.
That doesn’t work, Exhibit A: Pittsburgh Pirates
$20 million a year for a 37 year old ???
Crazy
I see crazy low trade proposals all the time for starting pitching. (Fans wanting their team to acquire it) It makes a lot more sense when see how expensive it is in free agency. Teams willing to trade it rightfully expect an overpay if they give it up. Either the owner pays in money or prospects; either way, it’s costly.
Silly- true…starter and relievers are getting paid.
Add in the outfield and infield free agent market isn’t gonna help drive down prices for position players either. It’s very thin.
Plus the low spending clubs that are at least pretending that they are gonna spend…raises the floor. Driven by the league cracking down on revenue receiving teams to spend.
Seems like a great rebuild market.
The extra wild card spots have given so many teams hope they can get to 84+ wins and get in.
I think we are gonna see a number of trades for mlb for mlb players. We have already seen a big increase at this time this year vs last year.
And the QO it’s a how much this year? For the amount of innings this guy pitches a year it not a bad deal specially for 2 years deal,
Welp another L for me, but nice to see this reunion.
Same, I think I had going to the Giants.
Pretty sure the giants did too, I’m pretty sure he was wanting to be in Arizona.
lol
Already a career year for me …getting Merrill correct will move my total to 10 (That’s a first!!) and up to 6th overall.
Gets ugly now, tho, since several of my choices are to teams like the Jays who don’t figure to connect on more than one or two. Ah, well, they don’t pay us to do this after all
Moved up to 9 and yes, a career year now. I’ve said it before and it’s seeming to be true – there are more “gimmees” this year. I think numbers should be inflated like the juiced ball era for this year!
Need to move E-rod for a salary dump now. Even saving 10 would be worth it .
Needed to happen. A bit steep, but only for 2 years, so it wont hamstring the organization. I just hope they dont stop trying to address the rotation now that they have a collection of #4-5 starters.
Dang. I really wanted the Giants get him. Although, $20 mil is a pretty healthy AAV. The bar has definitely been raised.
The money for him seems high based on his age and recent injury history…and record vs the Dodgers..
@Poolhall Is it really that high for his age though? The Orioles gave Charlie Morton $15 million last year to be in their rotation and he was 41. Verlander and Scherzer both in their 40’s also got like 15 or 16 million each to start from San Francisco and Toronto.
Honestly I just don’t think we take into account what pitchers are being paid nowadays. We used to think Top 5 highest paid players when we saw somebody getting $20 million a year. It’s just not the same as it used to be. The top guys that used to make $20 million are now making $30-40 million plus a year.
The examples you site arent exactly the same. You name 2 future hall of famers and a guy thats got a long track record of above average seasons at advanced age..nothing against kelly,he is very solid but hes not in mortons league career wise and he shouldn’t even be in the same conversation as Verlander or Scherzer…
Dbacks acquired 3 promising prospects for merrill from tex: Mitch Bratt, Kohl Drake, David Hagaman
And now resign merrill
Win win for AZ
Honestly thought he could get more. Solid deal
I wouldn’t be surprised if he took less to return.
Well either way
with his age, i doubt anyone was offering a 3rd season (his age 40 season i think). I would not be shocked if he turned down close to 30m on a 1 year to take the 2 year.
I mean more AAV wise. 2 years 50 in this market definitely isn’t out of the question
Seems like we knew this was coming after they traded him to begin with. Feels right, he’s a good fit on this team and i hope they make the Goldschmidt signing happen too so he can have his likely “farewell tour” where he belongs
I really wanted him as a brave and that price tag is right in AA’s zone for a guy like him. But I’ll admit, it always felt like he was going back to AZ. Good for them for flipping him for some prospects and being able to bring him back
I wanted him for the Os too- who need 2 mid rotation arms to replace Sugano and Morton- and figured they would want to be in the 15-20m range for those 2 (and figured Kelly was in that range)
Bassit and the less heralded Zack Littel are still available. Someone will get a steal with Zack imo
Justin Martinez and A.J. Puk and their combined 40 career saves are “star closers?”
I thought that was bizarre too. You could ask a lot of baseball fans, not just casuals, and many wouldn’t know who at least one of those guys are.
Justin Martinez and A.J. Puk are both great relief pitchers. I agree neither are “star closers”, but if you’re a non-casual baseball fan who’s actually invested in watching the mlb, you honestly should’ve at least heard of their names before/know who they are.
There are plenty of fans who are die-hard fans of one particular team who haven’t heard of one or both, I guarantee you. They are invested and not casual. We’re talking about a guy who’s pitched one full season on a non-playoff team and a journeyman whose only closing experience was on Miami, after a few years in Oakland. Both very much teams that don’t get national attention.
I watch a lot of baseball. And while the names sound somewhat familiar, I wouldn’t have any idea who they are.
If a team isn’t competitive I don’t know many players besides their above average players.
Miami? A’s? Outside of a few free agents they signed I couldn’t tell you the rest of the players on those teams.
Not because I don’t love baseball. But if the owner doesn’t care about the product they are putting on the field why should I? If the dodgers or one of their main competitors are interested in a player from those teams I’ll look them up.
And before you say something about rich teams only. I know Milwaukee players. I know Reds players, etc.
as a big baseball fan- i would call Martinez a high end swing guy who should get more run in a rotation- and Puk a former elite prospect who found a home as a quality set up man.
I may be wrong, but that is my off the top of my head opinion of those guys.
imo- diehard baseball fan starts when if you had to sit down and write out the roster for every team in baseball- your average would be at least 15 players per team.
that is honestly lower than that in practice since most would get 25-26 on their favorite team, and 20-25 on their major rivals, so on the Pirates they can make it out with only 5-10 guys.
I pick 15 since that is their starting lineup, rotation and closer. That is 15..
I will admit that if a releiver never was in the rotation, a top 100 prospect, or a closer- i will not know them. I am a big Os fan- and right now- i think i only get 3 or 4 of their bullpen arms (and that is since 2 were big signings this offseason).. The last 2 spots in a bullpen also tend to be really fuild (and for that 15 per team, i would count 30-35 guys on any given team, to include the guys on options that go up and down, the guys on the IL, or other notable guys in the minors- like for the Os if you listed Mayo, i am giving you that even if he is not on the starting lineup)
That is an AA type deal. But I’m glad he’s not in ATL
Now the team needs to sign a CLOSER — we could trade for Skenes and Skubal, but without a shutdown guy the Dbacks would still win 82-86 games.
i always wonder why teams sign mid range releivers. it always feels like if you have a closer, you can find the rest on the scrap heap and figure it out during the season. There are always a lot of solid options out ther.
@James123 Seems like it is about the versatility, injury history (or relative lack thereof) and stuff. If the guy has pitched in a variety of roles or possesses the pitch mix to do so and can go multiple innings, might be more valuable to certain teams without a defined 1-2 starter punch and an all-star worthy closer. Most teams don’t have solid starting pitching beyond two guys (at any point during the season) and are lucky to have a few killer bully arms. It’s a long season and these guys that can consistently go anywhere between 2-5 innings to reset a staff after a rainout, extra-innings game or starter imploding in the 1st or 2nd inning are valuable. Possibly able to give you that spot start on a long road trip. These guys never get paid like a top-notch closer or #1 (or #2) starter but are incredibly valuable to the team. Yes, some of them are former starters trying to reclaim glory with a new pitch (mix) or approach. Gotta be easier to build these guys up into potential starters than reinventing the wheel by trying to successfully convert a Mason Miller or Michael King from set-up guy/closer to starter.
He probably never wanted to be traded in the first place. Jason Hammel did this too back in 2014 when he was traded with Jeff Samardzija to the A’s for Addison Russell. He returned to the Cubs on a 2 year deal in 2015. He was once told by Cubs team doctors and medical staff to eat potato chips to help with cramps. I think his legs were cramping up or something. Don’t remember where he was having those cramp issues.
Hand and hamstring per Google’s AI
chips to get more salt in their diet- not the worst advice if you fit the correct context.
Quite a steep price for his age and a homecoming to boot. I guess the Cease deal isn’t all that high after all
the mid rotation with question marks last year were in this ballpark last year too- with many of them getting 3 or 4 years..
The price of a #4 starter was about 18m last offseason, and even though he is getting long in the tooth, Kelly is better than a Severino.
Roster full of holes for the snakes. I expect Marte to be moved. Punting into the lockout after bilking the taxpayers.
Yeah I have a sneaky suspicion that’ll be happening too. I wouldn’t even count out another Merrill Kelly trade at the deadline in 2026. 😂
Nice move by the snakes
Sneaky Snakes. They did not have a legit chance last year, so they trade him away for a few months and get some equity in return. Then, just sign him back in the offseason. Well done.
Tom T. Hall approves from the great beyond.
$20m AAV seems way too high for a guy who has never made more than $8.5m, is 37, has only two seasons around 4 WAR, and might be starting to decline.
No PlAyEr EvEr SiGnS wItH a TeAm ThAt TrAdEd HiM aWaY !
Hello? Merrill Kelly does. Rickey Henderson, Yimi Garcia. It’s uncommon but not impossible and not needed to write like that.
This man doesn’t know what AlTeRnAtInG cApS means.
I just researched it.
it is not that no player does, it is just that it is not very common.
Honestly the change in the postseason changed it all around. The Os sort of did it too this offseason.
What you need is a team to be a seller at the deadline one season, and then buying FA that same offseason. That tends to only happen if you think you are a playoff team the year after you were just sellers- and with more playoff spots, more teams think they can get to 85 wins to get in the playoffs with some signings like this.
You just spelled out why it is not very common. It requires a very specific set of circumstances.
Aww man. I was hoping he would go to Houston but Dana Brown is stubborn on only trade targets. Kelly is from Houston so it would’ve been nice to see him return to his hometown but he’s at Arizona AKA his baseball hometown.
Best wishes Merrill
…he’s not from Houston. He’s from IL/PA/AZ. Drafted by TB, Korea, AZ again. Where do you see Houston in his past?
Kelly was born in Houston
I guess we have different definitions of “from” then. I was born in a hospital. I’m not from that hospital. lol. Where you’re from to me is where you grew up and became the person you are today. But fair enough. Today I learned Kelly was born in Texas! Poor guy. Glad he got out.
That’s where he was born
Glad to see Kelly back with the Dbacks.
They spent all November/December negotiating with Kelly while the entire reliever market passed them by. Just sign Murakami at this point.
Not very common anymore to find a starting pitcher who has never appeared in relief during the regular season. His story is also interesting because of when he began his career with Arizona.
Beats signing Emmitt Kelly and the other clowns the Snacks might send to the hill to face the champs
I was hoping this would be ATL’s #3SP signing
I did not see Kelly signing anywhere but AZ, his life roots are in AZ. Born and raised in AZ. Family means a lot to Kelly, D’Backs were the only team to give in a contract on his return from pitching for a couple years in Korea. So yeah, I would say the D’Backs were number one on his FA list.
Given the unlikelihood that 2027 is a full season, that vesting option seems like a pretty savvy concession by the Dbacks!
D-Backs could do a lot worse and $20 mil for a reliable hoss/innings eater seems to be the going rate these days. ARI knows what they have in Kelly. If Burnes comes back by/around the ASG and is decently effective, team could steal that last wild card spot. Still think they could use another starter (a #2 or #3) and the team probably has enough to entice MIL into trading Peralta but it’d be a stiff price and open up other holes in the squad.
Kelly is an Arizona treasure to sign that deal. I love that dude.