Headlines

  • White Sox To Acquire Jordan Hicks
  • Giants, Luis Arraez Agree To One-Year Deal
  • White Sox To Sign Austin Hays
  • Twins Announce “Mutual” Parting Of Ways With President Of Baseball Ops Derek Falvey
  • Athletics Extend Jacob Wilson
  • David Robertson Announces Retirement
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Padres Re-Sign Michael King

By Anthony Franco | December 19, 2025 at 11:05am CDT

December 19th: The Padres officially announced their deal with King today.

December 18th: The Padres have an agreement to re-sign Michael King to a three-year contract with opt-outs after the first two seasons. The Excel Sports Management client is reportedly guaranteed $75MM.

He’ll receive a $12MM signing bonus and a $5MM salary for the 2026 season. He’d collect a $5MM buyout if he opts out of the remaining two years and $53MM. King would make $28MM in 2027 if he opts in and would then have a $30MM player option for the ’28 campaign. While the Padres have yet to announce the deal, he has reportedly already passed his physical.

It’s a surprise strike for a San Diego team that had seemed likely to lose King and Dylan Cease in free agency. It wasn’t clear whether they’d have the short-term spending capacity to keep either pitcher. While they were never expected to come close to the $210MM guarantee which Cease received, they’ll bring King back on a short-term deal to help a rotation that was their top priority.

The 2026 season will be the righty’s third in San Diego. The Padres acquired King as the centerpiece of their Juan Soto return over the 2023-24 offseason. He had run with a limited rotation opportunity late in his final season as a Yankee after years of strong work out of the bullpen. San Diego committed to him as a full-time starter and was rewarded with a career season.

King pitched to a 2.95 earned run average with 201 strikeouts over 173 2/3 innings. He finished seventh in NL Cy Young balloting and entered his walk year as a candidate for a nine-figure contract. He looked on his way to a $150MM+ deal after getting out to an even better beginning to the ’25 campaign. He turned in a 2.59 ERA while striking out 28.4% of batters faced over his first 10 starts.

The Padres scratched King from his outing on May 24 with stiffness in his throwing shoulder. Then-manager Mike Shildt initially framed it as a minor issue that arose when the pitcher slept awkwardly. It proved a much bigger problem. King went on the injured list with what the team called inflammation. They subsequently determined it was a nerve injury that came with a nebulous timeline. He wound up missing almost three months.

King made his return on August 9. He made one start before going back down with left knee inflammation. That cost him another month, and he wasn’t as effective when he made it back for good in September. King didn’t get beyond five innings in any of his final four starts. He gave up 10 runs over 15 2/3 innings. Most of the damage came in an eight-run drubbing at the hands of the Mets on September 16. King’s final two appearances were scoreless, but those came with an uninspiring 7:6 strikeout-to-walk ratio.

The Padres didn’t fully trust King going into October. They opted for Nick Pivetta, Cease, and Yu Darvish to start in their Wild Card Series loss to the Cubs. King’s only playoff action was one scoreless inning of relief in the decisive Game 3. He struck out three of four batters while averaging 95.6 MPH on his fastball. That was his highest single game velocity of the season. That’s to be expected during a one-inning appearance with the heightened adrenaline of a must-win game, but it was an encouraging sign for the health of his shoulder.

San Diego issued the $22.025MM qualifying offer. It was an easy call for King to decline in search of a multi-year deal. This arrangement functions as a bit of a pillow contract but with a much higher floor than the one-year QO would have provided. King would make $22MM if he opts out after one year. That result would be the same as if he’d accepted the qualifying offer.  The extra two guaranteed seasons afford him a lot more injury protection.

King’s guarantee technically falls just shy of MLBTR’s four-year, $80MM prediction. However, the higher average annual value and the opt-outs make this a stronger overall deal for the player. He’ll have a chance to return to free agency in advance of his age-32 season and cannot be tagged with another qualifying offer. A healthier season could position him for a four- or five-year contract.

Health is no small caveat. The ’24 campaign is the only time King has reached even 105 innings in a season. While that’s in part because the Yankees used him as a reliever, King missed extended stretches in 2021 (finger contusion) and ’22 (elbow fracture) in addition this year’s shoulder woes. The Padres are taking on some injury risk but get the upside of a potential top-of-the-rotation arm on a short-term deal.

King and Pivetta project as their top two starters. San Diego has reportedly discussed the latter in trade conversations but would need a huge return to move him. Joe Musgrove is back from Tommy John surgery and slots into the #3 rotation spot. They’ll be without Darvish for the entire season, so the final two starting jobs are up for grabs. Randy Vásquez and JP Sears lead the internal options, but the Padres could look for a cheaper back-end/swing type later in the winter. They’ll surely kick the tires on controllable arms in trade, as well, as both Pivetta and King can opt out.

San Diego’s projected payroll climbs to $218MM, as calculated by RosterResource. The backloaded nature doesn’t change the $25MM AAV used for luxury tax purposes. They’re up to a projected $259MM in tax commitments. They’ll exceed the $244MM base threshold for the second straight season. Repeat payors are taxed at a 30% rate for their first $20MM in overages. Re-signing King costs around $4.5MM in taxes.

The more significant development is that it moves them closer to the $264MM second tier, at which the rate climbs to 42%. The Padres had nearly $280MM in luxury tax commitments this year, according to Cot’s Baseball Contracts. Their actual salary obligations were around $209MM, though, so it’s unclear how much more flexibility the front office has at its disposal. In addition to the need for a back-end starter, they should acquire another bat to plug in at first base or designated hitter and could use a better utility infielder than Will Wagner and Mason McCoy.

King’s deal is the second-largest of the offseason in what has been a slowly developing market for free agent starting pitchers. Cease is the only other starter who has signed for more than $40MM so far. The rotation market should pick up in the next few weeks. NPB star Tatsuya Imai needs to sign before his 45-day posting window closes on January 2. Framber Valdez, Ranger Suárez and Zac Gallen join Imai as the top unsigned arms.

Mark Feinsand of MLB.com was first on the agreement, contract terms, and the note that the physical is already complete. Image courtesy of Vincent Carchietta, Imagn Images.

Share Repost Send via email

Newsstand San Diego Padres Transactions Michael King

Giants Sign Adrian Houser
Main
Front Office Subscriber Chat Transcript
View Comments (347)
Post a Comment

347 Comments

  1. KnicksFanCavsFan

    1 month ago

    Ok unless the Japanese pitcher is pretty much in the bag, I’ll be disappointed the Yanks didn’t nab King on a 3 year deal even if it was an overpay. Assuming the medicals aren’t alarming, he is exactly what the Yanks need.

    6
    Reply
    • 99Captain Judge99

      1 month ago

      Yes congratulations to King and the Padres! So much for wanting to come home to the east coast. Lol.

      31
      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 month ago

        Cap – I don’t get it …. Peter Abraham insisted the three finalists were the Sox, Yanks and O’s!

        King is from Rhode Island! He went to BC! He wants to go home!

        Oh well, another free agent who didn’t “align” with the Red Sox “interest” in them ;O)

        6
        Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          1 month ago

          Fever- yeah not really sure what’s going on here? It’s true Red Sox, Yankees, and Orioles were the favorites. I expect Kinger to opt out if he has a great year this year and comeback home next year with the Red Sox or the Yankees.

          2
          Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          1 month ago

          @99 That three-team rumor post was later refuted in an update.

          11
          Reply
        • bernbabybern

          1 month ago

          He won’t be opting out if there is a lockout, and that looks pretty likely.

          2
          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          Fever Pitch Guy: How do you know where he wanted to go? San Diego happens to be a beautiful town.

          5
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Al – Red Sox beat reporter Chris Cotillo who is usually accurate, but who knows… maybe King said that just to drive up the bidding.

          3
          Reply
        • padrepapi

          1 month ago

          This deal King signed and the one last year point to his fondness being a Padre. A 3/75 with opt outs that is backloaded beats (from the teams POV) the same structure that’s frontloaded. A straight 25m/yr deal with opt outs each year and that same 5m/buyout after ’26 I’d imagine he could have gotten from another team.

          Happy to have King back and hope he shoves for 30+ starts!

          He’s one classy hombre!

          11
          Reply
        • Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

          1 month ago

          I love San Diego. I wish I knew the name of the Mexican restaurant my dad took me the day after a Cubs and Padres game at Petco. This was a while ago so even though I don’t know the name of it, there’s always a chance that it closed down. The only thing I remember is we got 3 massive premade shredded beef burritos that were go to and refrigerated. San Diego weather is the weather I want year round for Las Vegas.

          4
          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          I haven’t been to Petco yet, but I saw several games in 1994 and 1999 at Jack Murphy. Beautiful setting and underrated ballpark.

          3
          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          Fever Pitch Guy: Also possible that Cotillo quoted him out of context.

          He could’ve said something non-commital like “I would love to come back east under the right circumstances,” and Cotillo just dropped the last four words.

          1
          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          99Captain Judge99: It just goes to show that you shouldn’t believe everything you read, and not all players think the Red Sox and Yankees are the be-all and end-all of places to play.

          2
          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          1 month ago

          @Alfred Truer words were never spoken.

          3
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          1 month ago

          Imagine if both King and Pivetta get significant injuries in 26 and the Padres are stuck with both. A lot of money on the book for 27. Very risky in my view for a team supposedly with financial or at least cash flow short term issues. This to me suggests Pivetta will definitely be traded as previously rumored.

          1
          Reply
        • Rsox

          1 month ago

          He gets to test free agency in a year if he has a better year and probably secure a bigger contract

          1
          Reply
        • Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

          1 month ago

          Unless you’re talking about another player named King, Michael King is from Rochester NY.

          Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          1 month ago

          @YBC- Regardless, San Diego is no place for a King.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          YBC – No doubt King’s camp got wind of the report and immediately refuted it, you always want as many teams pursuing your client as possible.

          1
          Reply
        • kcmark

          1 month ago

          King is home now in RI in December. Not a shock he chose San Diego

          3
          Reply
        • SteveC

          1 month ago

          @PFKALD: He was born in Rochester, NY, but grew up in and went to high school in Warwick, RI before attending Boston College

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Al – I’ve been to Petco, it’s a great stadium and atmosphere. I didn’t care for the location though, I don’t believe stadiums should be downtown.

          1
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          FPG- the Sox would first have to offer a real contract, on paper, with lots of zeros on it, and then King could sign with them.
          When you dont do those things the player can’t sign with you….

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – Yeah I find it hard to believe they’d spend a lot on another SP when they have infield needs that have to be addressed. King to the Sox never made sense from a team perspective.

          1
          Reply
        • Brad Johnson

          1 month ago

          Why would the Sox want King? They have something like 12 SP. King is a huge gamble they don’t have to take. This contract structure, given what we know of his health, is incredibly risky.

          2
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          FPG – not a guy who I was hoping for anyway.
          If they are making Campbell a left fielder now, we still desperately need an infielder.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          Brad – the Sox are “in” on everyone! It’s because they’re not really in on anyone

          1
          Reply
        • CarverAndrews

          1 month ago

          The USA is no place for a King, either…

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sad – KC is a non-factor until he can re-learn how to hit. They’ve already got one sub-.700 OPS outfielder, they can’t have two.

          I think KC is more likely to play 1B if Casas isn’t right.

          It’s really intriguing how 3B plays out. Everything depends on Murakami, after he makes a decision (any day now) then all the other dominos (Bregman, Suarez, Okamoto, Bichette) will fall.

          1
          Reply
        • Salzilla

          1 month ago

          Imagine anyone being injured, dewey, because it’s not limited to those two pitchers or players in general. You cannot run a club on what ifs.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Al – Red Sox have been avoided by free agents for many years now.

          Has there been another team that has missed out on as many in-demand free agents they’ve pursued than the Red Sox?

          Bregman fell into their lap because of his desire for a one-and-done contract with his buddy Cora. Everyone else has been high risk lottery tickets coming off bad seasons and/or major surgery.

          Only two teams have yet to sign a free agent to a MLB contract this offseason ….. Rox & Red Sox.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Sal – I totally agree!

          I think the best approach is to avoid guys coming off bad years and avoid guys coming back from serious injuries.

          Pivetta would be the safer bet than King.

          1
          Reply
        • Mad Hatter

          1 month ago

          San Diego was lot’s of fun when I was there. Do they still have Dick’s Last Resort? That was a really fun dive bar!

          Reply
        • JPR

          1 month ago

          Peter Abraham like most “insiders” has no idea what he is talking about?

          2
          Reply
        • RochesterMetsFan

          1 month ago

          Sure is

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          JPR – Agreed! He also reported “momentum” on Xander signing with the Red Sox, which was 100% not true as the Sox never came within $120M of the Padres offer.

          But Pete’s brother is still with the Sox, so he has job security.

          1
          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          FPG: “Has there been another team that has missed out on as many in-demand free agents they’ve pursued…?”

          That can’t be quantified since there’s no official record of it, but if you ask fans of, say, 20 different teams you’ll get 20 different answers.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Al – True, but only 3 other teams have the financial resources that the Red Sox have. That’s what makes it especially frustrating for agents and fans.

          1
          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          FPG: I assure you that no agent is losing any sleep over it.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Al – I think it’s very frustrating for agents because they can’t use the Red Sox to drive up bidding like they used to.

          There’s been so many complaints about how the Sox do business with free agents. I can’t recall similar criticism of other teams.

          Key Criticisms from Agents & Insiders:

          “Acting rationally will not get you free agents”: MLB insiders warn that the Sox’s cautious spending won’t secure elite talent in today’s inflated market.

          “Beyond confusing”: An anonymous free agent found the Sox’s operation confusing, highlighting an external perception that Boston settles for less.

          “Not willing to go to the place that other teams were”: Reportedly, the Sox offered short, low-value deals for top players like Pete Alonso, missing out on long-term commitments.

          “Small-market team” mentality: The lack of aggressive spending makes agents view the Red Sox as less committed to winning big

          1
          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          FPG: I’ve often heard that in the NY media about the Mets, but they did OK with Lindor and Soto.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Al – Hard to believe the NY media would take that stance, considering the Mets have been Top Two in MLB payroll for the past 4 seasons. But I know NY media is not always rational. LOL

          2
          Reply
        • No ABS in '27

          1 month ago

          Thats a terrible deal, I thought Keller was high, Keller five pitch mix is right there with King’s stuff.

          Keller looks like a coup today. In fact, I was flat wrong when I said Keller’s deal was high. What a steal. What a great trade Boston made for Oviedo. Hauser looks like a bargain too.

          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          1 month ago

          Petco is rated the top place to see a MLB game.

          And, the food choices are many and very high quality too!

          Reply
        • Salzilla

          1 month ago

          Nah, come on now. King is stud. That’s a great deal for him. Keller is a good bullpen piece, wasn’t a good starter.

          1
          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          1 month ago

          He wants money. But you guys go on believing that these players care more about location and team quality than money.

          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          1 month ago

          And the Sox were smart not to come near that ridiculous contract the Padres gave Xander.

          Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          1 month ago

          Sal- I truly think King is one and done in San Diego. Only way the Kinger probably stays, is if there’s a strike in 2027.

          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          1 month ago

          It’s not a terrible deal at all. With the money all these middling starters get I knew that King had to get more than the projected $20 million a year.

          Reply
        • Frenchredsox

          1 month ago

          Or FPG did the Sox want to pay 22-28-30 million for a potential injury SP with opt outs after every season ? Fact is Bregman deal can also influence your offer. This is a win for King, not necessarily for the Padres. He pitches well and is healthy he opts out… he blow an arm, he opts in.
          Also, on a side note – for 3/80 (which is what the deal is) sign Murakami – fills a bigger need – 3B and if HE DOES HIT LIKE HE IS PROMOTED TO DO – half that contract is paid for in new sponsorship (like Shohei in L.A.)

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          French – Off the top of my head I can’t think of a position player that came from Japan and signed for less than 4 years.. Don’t forget there’s the 15% posting fee on contracts over $50M.

          Where are you hearing $80M/3yrs for Murakami? This site projected $180M/8yrs. BTW – He’s not very good defensively at 3B, he may play 1B whether it be platoon or fulltime depending on Casas.

          1
          Reply
      • Brew’88

        1 month ago

        King continually expressed a desire to stay in SD, he seemed to be pretty happy there

        16
        Reply
        • oldgfan

          1 month ago

          Funny how folks think that a traded away player would desire to come back. Doesn’t happen often at all.

          5
          Reply
        • OldSaltUSN

          1 month ago

          I think working with Niebla after a year of injury and inconsistency might be a large incentive, too. I kind of had this sixth sense that due to last year’s issues, he’d stick around until he felt he was back on top with his pitching. In fact, I was a bit surprised he didn’t accept the Q.O., but that’s my ignorance and “homer” blindness. If a young man can collect $75M or more on a 3 year deal, that sets him up for a much more secure life, than $22+ million. He had to get that if he can, because the last game a MLB player plays in, always, could be his last (i.e. due to injuries, performance, all kinds of risks). This deal and the Padres system is perfect for King’s career, whatever he does long term. If he returns to top form, that 5 or 7 year, $200M+ deal, may come upon an extension with the Padres, before the end of this season.

          3
          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          1 month ago

          I’m glad I went with my gut on this one in the contest! Just had that staying in SD vibe all year long to me.

          3
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 month ago

          Long – I had him too. I figured either he or Cease would be gone, and Cease was the most likely to leave. With Darvish missing the entire 2026 season they couldn’t possibly let both King and Cease walk.

          3
          Reply
        • bucsfan0004

          1 month ago

          This deal feels like he’s staying in SD one more year just to rid himself of the QO he was tethered to this year

          1
          Reply
      • VegasSDfan

        1 month ago

        Biggest surprise of FA so far

        Reply
      • Hammerin' Hank

        1 month ago

        Money over coast

        Reply
        • OldSaltUSN

          1 month ago

          dunno ’bout that. If money was the top priority, you’d think he was going to Texas or Florida teams (no state income tax).. 😏 Personally, I think it was the Taco’s in San Diego, and … working with Niebla. 😁

          Reply
        • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

          1 month ago

          @OldSaltUSN And the opt-outs!

          Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      1 month ago

      This is a one-year $22M deal with a $53M two-year player option. That’s less than the Q.O. Sonny Gray is making $40M next season. Definitely not an overpay for a short-term commitment from the Padres

      23
      Reply
      • yankeejim

        1 month ago

        That’s not less than the QO. Do the math.

        Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 month ago

          It is $25K less than the QO if you include the buyout of his player option.

          This is obviously a better deal then the QO because he gets $53MM in insurance for the next 2 years

          5
          Reply
        • stevie ice

          1 month ago

          @yankeejim here’s the math, hoss:

          Qualifying offer:$22.025 million
          King’s guaranteed amount:$22 million

          Turns out King’s guarantee for 1 year of service is less than the qualifying offer.

          10
          Reply
        • redsoxu571

          1 month ago

          Yeah, he took a little less in the 1 year guarantee because he got $75M guaranteed for 3 years AND the right to hit the open market again earlier if things go right. Win-win for him!

          4
          Reply
        • Ronk325

          1 month ago

          Do you think King is losing sleep over that $25K?

          Reply
        • For Love of the Game

          1 month ago

          YBC is technically correct by $25k, but I would say he settled for the same as the QO, plus options for more years. He tested the market, and his injury and the QO must have limited his market. He likely took the best offer that was made.

          1
          Reply
      • mohoney

        1 month ago

        It’s not 1/$22 from the team’s perspective. The team is on the hook for the entire $75 million if King chooses to stay.

        1
        Reply
        • Rexhudler86

          1 month ago

          @mohoney. Yeah but roughly 25 a year isn’t bad if he stays. He probably wasn’t getting what he wanted because of the QO he’s pulling a snell. Leaving in a year.

          1
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          1 month ago

          That’s what players do now. Get an opt out after the 1st year and detach the QO and the pick. They’re playing around the dumb rules in place.
          This CBA really needs to be fixed. Hopefully we dont lose a season because of it

          Reply
      • No ABS in '27

        1 month ago

        @YBC – I retract my initial assessment, I didnt read the details, got four things going on at once this morning.

        Fair deal. Good on the Padres, needed a frontline starter.

        Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      1 month ago

      Yanks have loads of SP’s.

      1
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        1 month ago

        Not really, or at least not to start the season. Freid, Gil, Warren and Schlittler with Cole and Rondon coming back at some point and Schmidt next year. But who knows how well or when Cole and Rondon will be? I wanted the Yanks to add one more guy and of they all come back healthy and age effective, well then that’s a good problem to have. Send Warren back to the pen as a swing guy or use someone as trade bait for an impact player or a package of prospects including a future 3b perhaps? Too much pitching usually has say of resolving itself. it’s a good problem to have.

        Reply
    • Anthony maresca

      1 month ago

      No way are Yankees going near 3/75 for King with his injury history. Padres will regret that contract!

      2
      Reply
      • coloredpaper

        1 month ago

        Yes, they’ll surely regret a short-term contract…

        5
        Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        1 month ago

        @Anthony

        His injury history, on its face, as far as public info, didn’t seem too bad. Am I missing something?

        1
        Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      1 month ago

      Padres did well. Rest of NL West will hold a “No Kings” rally.

      6
      Reply
      • Aaron Sapoznik

        1 month ago

        As will the AL East, apparently.

        3
        Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      1 month ago

      I thought King would get four years and $100 million with no opt-outs. I guess others are more worried that about his long-term injury status.

      7
      Reply
    • morgannyy 2

      1 month ago

      It’s just the Pads looking towards a future trade! Back loaded contract! Unless he has a future no-trade, which he doesn’t.

      Reply
    • Billg7987

      1 month ago

      Considering the amounts and years being thrown around for Valdez, this seems really cheap. I’m thinking teams are much more worried shout his health than earlier thought. It’s interesting that the team that knows his health best landed him.

      1
      Reply
    • 28rings

      1 month ago

      Nah, it would have cost us 2 draft picks and international bonus pool money… King is not much of an upgrade over what we already have & who we have in the pipeline to warrant that

      Reply
    • Salzilla

      1 month ago

      I would have liked King back, but I’m not disappointed. I want to see how this offseason works out overall first.

      When I look at the current Yankees roster, I can see why Cashman isn’t all guns ablazing this offseason yet–and no I don’t believe Hal about the money. Right now, save the bullpen, we do have decent coverage everywhere. Cashman always says the guys coming off the IL are like new signings and this year he’s right. An outfield of Jasson-Grish-Judge is better than most already as I fully expect Jasson to get better. We have Jones we can toggle in who I REALLY want to see at the MLB level. The infield is covered right now and not terrible in McMahon-Cab-Jazz-Rice.

      I do think we’re in on the Japanese stars currently and seeing how that shakes out. I have interest in all three. Bellinger as well. And if we whiff on those? There’s still other smaller pieces out there and trades that can be made. And again, we still have a pretty good roster!

      That’s where I’m at and not disappointed yet. Guys are going and I’m jealous, but I know Cash isn’t on vacation. I’m trusting the process right now.

      2
      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        1 month ago

        I predict Yankees get Bellinger but not Imai. I think Imai will get Dylan Cease money.

        1
        Reply
  2. NothingtoSeeHere

    1 month ago

    Love this. Good luck Kinger!

    11
    Reply
  3. Unclemike1526

    1 month ago

    Glad the Cubs are out of the picture. I hope he’s healthy but I have long term doubts about his availability. Good Luck!

    2
    Reply
    • Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

      1 month ago

      I agree. I’d rather see the Cubs sign Imai. I just won’t hold me breath

      5
      Reply
      • Unclemike1526

        1 month ago

        The longer it goes I feel the better the chance the Cubs are in. They can always offset the cost by moving Taillion and can hold the fort until Steele gets back. Horton-Boyd-Imai-Shota-Rea to start out and then Steele jumping in. Or maybe even Wicks or Assad. I can go to war with that. Why the name change sort of? LOL

        1
        Reply
        • Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

          1 month ago

          That’s a good point. I like Jamo but if the Cubs sign Imai, I’d be okay with trading Jamo. Maybe get a decent backend bullpen guy for him

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 month ago

          I don’t think it is certain how easily Taillon can be moved, nor do I think that the. UBS should move him to line Rockets’ pockets. Yes, they need one of Imai, Ranger and Framber (or Zac on a one year deal). It they need depth and should keep all of their current pitchers as well, even more so with Keller gone.

          4
          Reply
        • Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

          1 month ago

          I like Framber but the Cubs don’t need 4 lefty starters.
          Boyd
          Steele(eventually)
          Wicks(swingman)
          Shōta
          Without Steele for the first 2 months (roughly). They would still have 4 LHP starters if they signed Framber. Ranger Suarez is also a LHP.

          1
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 month ago

          I agree that Imai is best fit, but I do like Ranger a lot as well

          1
          Reply
        • Unclemike1526

          1 month ago

          Forget about Ranger. He’s a LH Kyle Hendricks. Been there done that, No Thank You! The Cubs don’t NEED to move Taillion to sign Imai. But it leaves a crowded room and probably shuts down more Bullpen help. I don’t want to move him either but at 18 million on an expiring deal with his stats he can moved with absolutely no problem. Pretty sure the Orioles would take him no questions asked. Probably the Tigers too.

          Reply
        • Unclemike1526

          1 month ago

          Not to mention if you told Taillion look, After 2026 we’ll have 3 openings in our rotation and basically a blank payroll for 2027, Call us first for your next contract if you want back in. Depending on how it all goes down. I’m pretty sure the Cubs would rather deal Shota than Taillion but he can’t be traded until the trade deadline basically. I don’t really think Hoyer expected him to take the QO and it threw a monkey wrench into everything. If Shota was gone and the Cub had another 22 million to spend we wouldn’t even be talking and Keller would probably still be here. Bad move again Jed. Shota can’t be traded without his permission anyway until 6/15. I wonder………If they could move him to the AL if someone would give him an extension? Can’t hurt to ask.

          Reply
        • rondon

          1 month ago

          I don’t think there’s any way the FO did not think there was a good chance Shota would take the QO. And with the way he pitched the last couple of months? Unless he suddenly finds the velocity he lost, his trade value will be minimal… And Taillon saved their butts in the second half. And since they can’t count on Steele, trading Taillon would be very risky- even if Hoyer gets another strong starter. And I won’t believe that last part til I actually see it.

          3
          Reply
        • Unclemike1526

          1 month ago

          Would still be nice to have Taillion AND that 22 million though wouldn’t it?

          1
          Reply
        • rondon

          1 month ago

          Of course. I didn’t want the guy back but they took the risk. So be it. Heck, they seem to help a lot of reclamation projects- maybe they’ll help him..

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 month ago

          If Cubs want to compete, there is a chance that Shota will be in bullpen in June. Taillon is needed for 2026.

          Horton should be healthy but is due to slightly regress to the mean. Steele is coming off injury. Boyd was never an innings eater. Rea and Assad are swing guys.

          Imai is the target but Ranger, Framber and Gallen have to be considered as alternative if Tutsuya Imai has a $210 million suitor like Cease.

          2
          Reply
        • Unclemike1526

          1 month ago

          There is no chance of him ending up in the bullpen. I have a better chance of hooking up with Margot Robbie.

          Reply
        • Prune Tracy

          1 month ago

          Saying “no thank you” to a lefty Kyle Hendricks is a wild take whether or not Ranger is actually a lefty Kyle Hendricks. He averaged over 3 bWAR a season in his first 7 seasons with the Cubs before age and injury inevitably caught up to him.

          I don’t think Suarez is a lefty Kyle Hendricks, though he has been consistently good to excellent over the last 5 seasons.

          1
          Reply
        • Frenchredsox

          1 month ago

          Imai’s contract plus the other 2 NPB players deals (or not) will set the market and suddenly stimulate the Winter Stove. And the Framber’s and Bo’s are simply waiting to see what that price tag is and adjust to it. If I was Red Sox I would pay Murakami and say to Bregman you had your chance but decided to opt out…

          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          Being good over a number of seasons doesn’t automatically make a guy into Kyle Hendricks, righty or lefty.

          I really don’t get the obsession with Kyle Hendricks.

          Reply
  4. horaceallen

    1 month ago

    Maybe this opens the SP market. Very reasonable deal. So much for the Padres crying poverty.

    2
    Reply
    • SD_SF_DET

      1 month ago

      Everyone was crying poverty about the Padres EXCEPT for the Padres. Greupner has stated several times that there are no payroll reduction mandates, and a competitive roster increases the value and sale price for the Seidlers.

      14
      Reply
      • Chin Muzak

        1 month ago

        Padres take on a ton of risk in this deal. Best outcome for both sides is King has a great year and opts out but if he gets hurt SD is on the hook for some real money in 27 & 28.

        1
        Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          1 month ago

          It would seem to me that the best case scenario for the Padres world be that King has an outstanding year and opts in. They get both a great year from him and get him back at a reasonable $28 million for a top of the rotation starting pitcher.

          2
          Reply
        • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

          1 month ago

          @Baseballisthebest There is less than a one percent chance that King “has an outstanding year and opts in.”

          Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          1 month ago

          FRJ

          A reasonable person would expect the best case scenario to be somewhat unlikely

          2
          Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          1 month ago

          Juan, doesn’t seem that Fernando is a reasonable person.

          1
          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          1 month ago

          “If he gets hurt”.

          Just how is that different from any SP these days? They are all 1 pitch away.

          If you have had foreman injury then you are actually at a higher risk. If you have had it and had surgery, you might be safe for a year and then right back into the high risk pool.

          2 types of pitchers – those that have had TJ (or other) and those that are going to have it!

          1
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 month ago

          Baseball is the best

          He is not.

          But he is correct in this instance. If King is amazing in 2026, he will cash in by opting out.

          Reply
    • Bosin Rag

      1 month ago

      This is nice but I’ll say those opt-outs read like Pads ownership wanting an escape hatch in case they decide to trim payroll more in the next couple of years.

      3
      Reply
      • Brew’88

        1 month ago

        I read it as a player opt out, not a team opt out.

        16
        Reply
        • Bosin Rag

          1 month ago

          The team gets good press for signing him and a relatively blame-free way of getting out from under his contract if they don’t feel like paying him anymore. If he’s good and opts out, well, they tried to keep him in town, but he decided to chase the money and go elsewhere. If he isn’t great and opts in, staple a couple of prospects to him and ship him out for salary relief in a couple of years.

          Reply
        • thefaithfulfriar

          1 month ago

          I read it as Christmas has arrived! Thanks AJ and Co. for making this happen. Kick the drama down the road and let us get ready for 2026 and the Cactus League!LFGSD!!!

          4
          Reply
    • KennyF’nPowers

      1 month ago

      It should open the SP Market through FA and Trade. Imai has until Jan 2 also before his posting period ends. Also should see Murakami sign by this weekend as his posting is up on Monday I believe. Will be a busy MLB and sports weekend.

      1
      Reply
    • Dimitri_in_LA

      1 month ago

      Was thinking something similar re opening up the market but the AAV strikes me as high. (—O’s fan wanting Framber)

      Reply
  5. Yankee Clipper

    1 month ago

    King was awesome but his injury last year is a red flag, imho. I hope he’s healthy and effective for the Padres.

    15
    Reply
    • padrepapi

      1 month ago

      His time between the Yankees and Padres has some interesting parallels:

      NYY – 247.2 IP, 1035 batters faced, 1.19 whip, 10.2 k/9

      SD – 247 IP, 1034 batters faced, 1.19 whip, 10.1 K/9

      Strange how similar those sets of numbers are especially when you consider he was mostly a reliever with the Yanks and a pure starter in SD.

      15
      Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        1 month ago

        Wow, that is very interesting…. Kind of like Kris Davis hitting .247, or whatever it was, for three years in a row with the A’s.

        I wonder if any other pitcher, given the same sample size, has ever done that in both roles… I’d bet not.

        5
        Reply
      • Brew88

        1 month ago

        Amazing Papi

        7
        Reply
      • Hammerin' Hank

        1 month ago

        That’s wild.

        2
        Reply
  6. LFGMets (Metsin7) #BannedAgain&Again&AgainFireStearns

    1 month ago

    Holy overpay

    1
    Reply
    • SD4L!FE

      1 month ago

      No way it’s an overpay. Clever deal. Fits the Padres starter needs and allows king to establish and test the market again if he wants to. Good deal all the way around.

      23
      Reply
    • Swingandamiss

      1 month ago

      Frankie Montas says what?

      3
      Reply
      • DogDays2

        1 month ago

        What a ridiculous comparison.

        Reply
  7. sad tormented neglected mariners fan

    1 month ago

    At least the padres still dip their toes into the market

    1
    Reply
  8. jerseyjohn

    1 month ago

    The Yankees inaction is killing me. Somehow I don’t think we’re getting the Japanese guy either. Hal has set the bar at 90 wins to maximize revenue, actually winning the WS isn’t in the budget.

    3
    Reply
    • Yanks4life22

      1 month ago

      He’s actually one of the poorest owners in baseball. I think he ranks like 28th on the list. Billionaire problems am I right?

      1
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        1 month ago

        I don’t care if you own the Yankees you get all that revenue from being the most iconic franchise in sports it’s weird that they don’t have a sense of urgency

        2
        Reply
    • Dorothy_Mantooth

      1 month ago

      @Jersey – Hal has hinted that he wants to keep payroll below $300M. Not sure if this is actual annual cash salaries, or if it is a $300M CBT threshold. If they are serious about re-signing Bellinger then that doesn’t leave them a lot of room to bring in other big fish especially if that $300M inferred ceiling is relative to the CBT threshold.

      2
      Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        1 month ago

        Lip service from Hal. The team hasn’t had a payroll below $300M since he made that statement.

        3
        Reply
      • jerseyjohn

        1 month ago

        Dorothy: Yeah I’ve heard they want to get out of the highest penalty bracket. I’ve heard more about payroll and luxury tax from Hal than I’ve heard about championships.

        3
        Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        1 month ago

        Yankees revenues and TV money have to be among the highest in MLB. The could afford to do more.

        Lockout on the horizon,

        2
        Reply
    • Joemo

      1 month ago

      At least the Yankees have signed a free agent this off-season.

      Craig Breslow must be waiting for .. 2026? To sign a free agent.

      1
      Reply
      • Baseballisthebest

        1 month ago

        Joe, is signing a free agent a necessity? Is it too late to make any additions? Are all the FA that are a fit for the Red Sox already signed?

        Breslow has made 2 solid additions to the rotation already. He has 2 months before spring training starts. I think we will be ok.

        But please don’t let that stop you from panicking.

        2
        Reply
        • Joemo

          1 month ago

          The Sox needed an actual number 2 pitcher and some power RHB to fill out the lineup.

          The Red Sox are one of the most profitable MLB teams.

          The quickest and easiest way to address these roster holes is through free agency. They keep depleting the farm system to get mediocre pitching depth. Thank God they spent two good trade chips and 20MM on Sonny Gray, a guy who will probably be saying how he didn’t want to go to Boston in a few years. The guy couldn’t keep the ball in Busch against NL Central teams, you think he’s going to do well in Fenway against the Yankees and Blue Jays? Look at his numbers in Fenway

          We have seen this same story for the last two off-seasons with Breslow, and since 2020 with the Red Sox in general.

          This isn’t a new philosophy, the Red Sox are just cheap now. Whatever they can do to help diversify FSG’s portfolio, as long as they don’t have to actually invest in the Red Sox roster.

          Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          1 month ago

          Breslow got an actual #2 and an actual #4. One season of ERA is not the best indicator of future performance. His FIP and peripherals, including HR% were all in line with his career numbers. His spray charts show he would have done just fine in Fenway. He would have had 1 less HRs allowed.

          Everything else I said stands.

          Its obvious that you have already forgotten that Breslow signed a top 3 FA last year after spring training started.

          You can panic if you want. I prefer to live in reality. The Red Sox are just fine. We need a RHB and Breslow has 2 months to find one in time for spring training. Maybe a 1B as well if he doesnt believe Casas can handle it. Come back in April and let’s see where we are.

          3
          Reply
        • Joemo

          1 month ago

          His HR rate, which was 15th worst in the majors, is online with his career numbers? Yikes.

          His career numbers at Fenway: 0.895 OPS against, 6.84 ERA, 1.823 WHIP, 6.5 SO/9. Yikes.

          Breslow has Bregman fall into his lap because he signed a player friendly deal because the market for him didn’t develop as expected. That isn’t some magical win for Breslow. They also gave up a 2nd round pick and IFA money for one year of Bregman, how did that turn out? They failed at the trade deadline, and fell well short of the preseason expectations from most media outlets which was an AL pennant.

          I have seen how Breslow operates and prefer to be proactive in my complaints so thar we have receipts when he shows yet again that he’s in way over his head.

          Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          1 month ago

          If you don’t know how to look up stats, maybe you shouldn’t comment.

          1
          Reply
        • Joemo

          1 month ago

          Did I…. Not just look up his career numbers at Fenway, and cite that his HR/9 in 2025 was 15th worst in the league?

          My lord.

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          1 month ago

          You were wrong joemo. You were looking at only at the 47 pitchers with a qualifying number of IP. If you looked at the 119 SP that started on the opening day rosters and threw at least 100 IP, Gray was not in the bottom 50. MLB average for DP was 1.25 HR/9. He gave up 1.25. He was exactly average.

          If all you want to look at is the 47 pitchers with a qualifying number of IP, then look at a stat that matters like FIP. Gray was the 11th best in MLB at a 3.39 FIP.

          Siera, which has shown to be the best predictive stat for SP? A 3.29 or 6th best.

          How about K/9? Gray was 9th best.

          BB/9? Gray was 5th best.

          K/BB? Gray was 4th best.

          His BABip at .332 was 3rd worst among pitchers with a qualifying number of innings pitched. That means the Cardinals defense was extremely porous with him on the mound. Hard for a pitcher to get outs when the defense doesn’t make outs on balls in play. If the Cardinals defense was league average with Gray on the mound, what would that have meant? 23 fewer hits. I wonder how many fewer runs would have been scored if the defense was just average?

          Why is it all you want to talk about is HR/9? Is it because every other stat shows you are full of it?

          Look at StatCast and you will see that if he pitched in Fenway Gray would have given up 2 fewer home runs in 2025 than he did pitching in Busch.

          Is there some reason that all you do is moan and cry? Especially when the team you supposedly root for was in the playoffs and it they stopped making any other additions would still be a likely playoff team?

          Maybe you are really a Yankee fan and just want to try to knock the Red Sox for some reason.

          Maybe you get your rocks off by constantly beotching?

          Try being an Angels fan for a year or two. Your entire schtick would have to change.

          1
          Reply
        • Joemo

          1 month ago

          Why would I care about pitchers who only threw an arbitrary amount of innings? If you set the IP to only 1 then he’s 377th!

          Being a strikeout pitcher, stats like FIP will favor Gray. Throughout usi career, his ERA is constantly higher than his FIP.So what, he’s constantly unlucky? His BABIP the last 3 years has been around 0.300, purring him again in that top 15 or so in the league. So he’s just been unlucky for the last three years?

          The Red Sox had a horrible infield defense last year, so I don’t think that you can just assume his BABIP will magically decrease this year.

          Again, my point with the HR is he will be playing in a hitter friendly park against offenses like the Yankees and Blue Jays instead of the much weaker competition in the NL Central. The Yankees, Blue Jays and Orioles ranked in the top 8 for HR in 2025. The NL Central teams were nowhere close to that.

          I moan and cry because these moves are not moved that big market teams like the Sox should be doing to fix their issues. They make money like crazy off the Sox, they need to start actually reinvesting it in the Red Sox instead of Liverpool, buying new sports teams, etc.

          Reply
    • Ronk325

      1 month ago

      Imai has until January 2 to sign and will likely wait until then to make a decision. The Yankees want Belli back but aren’t going to bid against themselves. There’s still a lot of name players available. This is how the offseason plays out every year

      3
      Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        1 month ago

        Belli likely won’t sign until after Tucker does. Boras will wait it out per usual.

        1
        Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      1 month ago

      Jersey John

      I think it is tacky or lazy to call Imai the “Japanese guy”.

      5
      Reply
      • jerseyjohn

        1 month ago

        Mlb: I couldn’t remember the exact spelling and felt it better to not guess wrong while commenting from my phone. People are looking to be offended if everyone knows who I meant but wants to pearl clutch because I don’t have his name tip of my tongue.

        3
        Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          1 month ago

          jj

          ” I couldn’t remember the exact spelling and felt it better to not guess wrong while commenting from my phone. ”

          So, “lazy” then

          Reply
    • KnicksFanCavsFan

      1 month ago

      blah blah… Yanks have signed a major FA every year. Saying you would love to stay under the $300 mil threshold I’m sure it’s a sentiment every owner would say but whether they list it preclude them from improving the team won’t be told until the smoke clears. And FA isn’t the only to fill a need. Red Sox made a great trade last year to get Crochet.

      Reply
  9. VegasMoved

    1 month ago

    Good for them. Curious what the rest of their budget is like this off-season.

    2
    Reply
  10. Baltimore_44

    1 month ago

    Pads are the kings of the backload. I wouldn’t have accepted a backloaded deal if I were king with the looming lockout.

    3
    Reply
    • Scapegoat

      1 month ago

      hence the “player” options for next two years.

      3
      Reply
      • Baltimore_44

        1 month ago

        I’m talking about collecting MORE upfront rather than later. There’s a pretty decent chance no major leaguer receives their full salary next year. Better to collect more dollars this year.

        Reply
  11. cactuskiwi

    1 month ago

    Bargain. King (if healthy) is twice as good as Cease.

    4
    Reply
    • Baltimore_44

      1 month ago

      lol

      5
      Reply
    • Informed Sportsball Discussion

      1 month ago

      Not quite. But, King does have lower ERAs in his two seasons as a starter than any year for Dylan Cease except Cease’s 2022.

      If King can hold that trend and do anything approaching Dylan’s innings pitched, he’ll be quite good.

      6
      Reply
    • Brew’88

      1 month ago

      He was certainly better than Cease during their time in SD

      10
      Reply
      • padrepapi

        1 month ago

        Some fun stats of the past two years in San Diego for these guys:

        Cease: 7.3 h/9, 1.0 hr/9, 3.4 bb/9, 11.1 k/9, 1.19 whip, .219/.293/.364, .657 OPS

        King: 7.5 h/9, 1.1 hr/9, 3.2 bb/9, 10.1 k/9, 1.19 whip, .222/.297/.361, .658 OPS

        Cease’s era was a lot higher 3.98 versus 3.10 which seems odd with how similar all those numbers are.

        The biggest difference comes down to mostly those 2024 playoffs and the difference in how each pitched. One looked like vintage Kevin Brown, the other, not so much.

        6
        Reply
        • Brew88

          1 month ago

          Being able to minimize damage in trouble innings is a talent King seems to have over Cease

          7
          Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          1 month ago

          pp

          Useful stats:
          Player: ERA-, FIP&, xFIP-, fWAR
          Cease: 99, 82, 85, 8.1
          King: 78, 90, 91, 4.7

          fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&st…

          Reply
  12. Browntown

    1 month ago

    Stoked on this for the Pads! Talk in San Diego is that Pivetta had to go before any spending could happen. Unless AJ already has a Pivetta Mets deal on simmer. Thought he was going back to the Yanks! Look for Darvish to retire and work with the team in some capacity.

    7
    Reply
  13. Dumpster Divin Theo

    1 month ago

    Too bad Michael didn’t sign with the Mets. Then he’d be King of Queens

    18
    Reply
    • Informed Sportsball Discussion

      1 month ago

      *golf clap*

      4
      Reply
    • El Kabong

      1 month ago

      Or the newest pit boss at Uncle Steve’s casino.

      2
      Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      1 month ago

      youtu.be/RgZZBwG7slY?si=5Ch3dE7x3EX5ZWuJ

      There you go

      1
      Reply
  14. jvent

    1 month ago

    Did San Diego sign him just to trade him to the Mets lol. Wasn’t San Diego looking to reduce payroll

    Reply
    • Brew’88

      1 month ago

      Where did you read that they were trying to reduce payroll?

      12
      Reply
  15. go usa 9

    1 month ago

    This is huge! Thought we were gonna have to wait for the last minute end of spring training mega trades! Preller is ready to let loose.

    2
    Reply
  16. chandlerbing

    1 month ago

    Could end up being 1yr/22mil for SD
    Or 3/75
    Thats how you GM

    7
    Reply
    • Unclemike1526

      1 month ago

      Or pay him 75 million to rehab from TJ surgery. Not how you GM.

      1
      Reply
    • redsoxu571

      1 month ago

      That’s how you GM? I think you mean “that’s how you agent”.

      If things don’t go well, King gets $75M for a sure – he’s now made for life. And if things go well, he can get the sort of deal he had probably been hoping for now (before health messed up his 2025).

      There’s no lose for him in this deal. But if he struggles and/or has more injury problems, he’s going to get his from SD over the next three years.

      I’m not saying that’s a bad deal, but it’s an incredibly player-friendly structure (especially for a pitcher). Yeah, GMs can get deals done when they’re willing to give players great deals!

      5
      Reply
      • The Saber-toothed Superfife

        1 month ago

        ? Working as “partners” and not as “enemies” is a difficult concept?

        1
        Reply
  17. Informed Sportsball Discussion

    1 month ago

    This will do. I approve of this happening happening.

    3
    Reply
  18. cmanson

    1 month ago

    Padres ownership doing what they always do, overpay.

    1
    Reply
    • Informed Sportsball Discussion

      1 month ago

      Mike Clevinger got $12 million from the White Sox coming off of a season lost to surgery followed by a mediocre season in which he got destroyed in the NLCS.

      This is not an overpay. It’s just surprising the Pads pulled off paying.

      5
      Reply
  19. DroppedBallFour

    1 month ago

    Hey remember when mlbtr told readers padres were acting poor cause of financial issues? What happened to the financial issues?

    7
    Reply
    • C-Daddy

      1 month ago

      Why are you here?

      2
      Reply
      • DroppedBallFour

        1 month ago

        Accountability.

        Writing inaccurate narratives isn’t a good business model, even if it’s far and few between.

        2
        Reply
        • wreckage

          1 month ago

          None of their sites claim to be news sites, as per their names mlb/pro football/pro hockey RUMORS. They report what other sites have mentioned as possibilities, and add some news on it when trades happen or injuries occur, or their own perspective of said actions. I’d bet your projections are wrong as often if not more than the gentlemen writing here.

          1
          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          1 month ago

          Spreading false rumors isn’t a good business practice esp when you publish a piece saying

          “The Mets and Padres have been discussing the possibility of a trade that would send established talent to New York while San Diego obtained MLB-ready younger talent and some salary relief. According to The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal, Dennis Lin, and Will Sammon,”

          Only to have yourself and your sources disproven 6 days later lmao. Like couldn’t even last a week without being wrong.

          “Padres are looking to shed salary……..and they added King on a 3 year 75 mill deal to shed salary”

          Cause that’s what teams looking to shed salary do. Add salary.

          My job isn’t dependent on being right about things I publish. Theirs is. See the difference?

          5
          Reply
        • johnrealtime

          1 month ago

          They aggregate what others report. They did their job here

          But you know that because you are a troll

          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          1 month ago

          johnrealtime is such a real man he comments and blocks so tuff so macho so masculine

          Anyways. Pushing false rumors that have no substance is bad business John. I’m sorry that upsets you.

          3
          Reply
        • los_leebos

          1 month ago

          we’re really doing the “definition of a rumor” argument again? In this economy?!

          1
          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          1 month ago

          Smart teams and POBs can do both: sign free agents and trade to get younger, cost controlled players.

          Say piece stating that Padres and Mets were in discussions where Padres would acquire young cost controlled talent and trade a few more expensive veterans,’

          That could still happen.

          1
          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          1 month ago

          When you publish it multiple times it’s no longer a rumor it’s treated as fact being spread throughout the industry further spread by mlbtr

          If you want to constantly spread false information padres were looking to shed salary from Tats Jr to Cronenworth to Pivetta

          12/10/25 – “perhaps the teams reported willingness to move players making more significant salaries like cronenworth and poverty will allow them to shed salary the sort of salary needed to add a starter or two in free agency”

          12/9/25 – Seidler said padres will spend at same levels
          Mlbtr “that doesn’t mean the padres won’t still be looking to shed or re allocate some payroll space as evidence by reports that club is open to moving cronenworth and pivetta”

          It stopped being a rumor when you perpetuate the same idea over and over again as if it was fact even disproven by the owner himself

          2
          Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          1 month ago

          Huh

          Yeah

          Muted

          1
          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          1 month ago

          JuanUribeJazzHands

          This isn’t an airport no need to announce your departure. You won’t be missed though.

          Reply
        • los_leebos

          1 month ago

          Everyone here may have their own definition of “rumor”, “true”, “speculation”, “false”, etc. because in the context of “things that might happen”, there are not concrete definitions of any of these things.

          I don’t particularly care what your definitions of these are, just that it is overall a fruitless endeavor to quibble over their definitions, when the context in which we are quibbling is “things that might happen but are not guaranteed to happen”.

          TL:DR we are, in fact, having the “definition of a rumor” argument again.

          Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          I have to jump in on this too. Why are you here? You obviously don’t know Baseball like you think you do., My friend hit it on the head Not with a hammer but with the biggest sledge hammer one can find.
          You seem to only want to provoke arguments, You haven’t backed anything your saying is wrong. here is a hint – “when you bring your meal to the table make sure it doesn’t include contaminated meat” In other words, No what the hell your serving.

          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          1 month ago

          Reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit so I’ll forgive you and blame it on the CA education system.

          “Mlbtr spread false rumors about padres financial issues.” Even listen a couple examples from their articles where they pushed the narrative strongly.

          Move along if you’re gonna show off your illiteracy boy

          Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          First off ! My reading comprehension is much better than yours apparently. I have a Masters in Political Science and I’ve NEVER been in the CA Education System. My education is from a University you might of heard of “THE OHIO STATE”
          You state that Mlbtr spread false rumors about the Padres Financial issues” Heck I think those are actual facts (You do know what “actual facts” are don’t you?) those facts was actually verified by the Padres Front Office. So again, to come onto a platform just to try make a name for yourself with challenging the truth of said platform that just so happens use the word “Rumors” in the platform title you really need to know that isn’t a great place to do that at.

          Oh – you really need a reality check. Being 63 yrs old and a professional in my working field – Serving 25 yrs in the US ARMY really doesn’t give you any right to refer to me as Boy. so rather than put more shame you . Just maybe you need to move on.

          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          1 month ago

          Look kid if you’re unhappy with wanting accountability that’s a you issue mute button exists feel free to use it. You won’t be missed. Just remember this isn’t an airport terminal no need to announce your departure and commenting before blocking is cowardly behavior.

          Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          Who in the heck told you that constantly publishing informations multiple times is no longer a rumor its treated as facts.? My goodness you really need to just stop. the only thing your doing is confusing yourself. How about this ; google what the actual meaning of “Rumors” is – Ask AI how many times information on topics being reported as “Rumors” have to be reported before that information should be treated as facts. SMH

          Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          MLBTR you need to understand that insisting everything coming out as Rumors normally are just that rumors is wrong only makes users such as you look dumber than the your seeing in the mirror.
          Grow up dude. You need to learn to go troll other sites that might have people who post on that has an “identity” / self esteem problem such as yourself – You just might get friends there.
          I’m honestly going to say this and you should take this as wisdom NOT as being picked on. Your trying to make a name with a topic that houses very intelligent individuals and all your doing is showing how dumb one person can be.

          Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          I couldn’t of said it any better than this. “In this Economy”?! He’s definitely well out of his league.

          Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          And where are we going to find “accountability” in your posts? You have to know what the hell your talking about before you can find accountability in that person.
          Your so lucky all this is on the internet. BECAUSE you know what KID (INFANT) I don’t like you and I’m sure I speak for a lot of others here, hell I will even go a little further with saying that probably includes your parents. (Not liking you!!)
          and as for the mute button. consider it done after this reply. I have much better things to do than to argue with someone that has an IQ of termites loving concrete.

          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          1 month ago

          Spreading false rumors is bad business practices

          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          1 month ago

          If you’re gonna spread false rumors after ownership debunks them you should write a retraction or stop spreading them

          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          1 month ago

          My job isn’t dependent on accuracy regarding news stories. If I’m bad at my accounting job I get fired, or killed by the cartel

          Reply
        • wreckage

          1 month ago

          Pretty sure if you read the articles, they state that they are relaying information from other news sites, not that they are reporting the information themselves. They even include links to the news articles they collect the information from. But you continue being mad at a free to access website for relaying news they are simply passing on and not trying to break themselves.

          Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          And let me guess – You don’t consider yourself to be a troll ? You come at people with this ” I know better than you’ attitude yet, so far I haven’t read a dam thing from you to prove me wrong about you.
          I just pass on things that I hope will trigger “mature” conversation about and that I’ve researched to see if others might have more to add or make adjustments to the conversation. I’m not here to be called out of my “user ID” name nor am I here to contend in “Sandlot” battles with those who might of been left behind in PE class take that as you may but before trying to disrespect someone you might want to re-think your strategy.

          Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          thank you for bringing this guys true character public. I’m new to this platform and will probably end my visits after my membership ends just because of people like “johnrealtime” I just wanted to find a sports platform that topics can be discussed about with no name calling of other users, and the responses are given in a more rational/mature way.
          Yours is exactly what I’m talking (In a good way of course) so thank you again and I do look forward to more of your posts/replies.

          Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          lol – I feel the same way – I find it interesting to see/hear others definition of what a “Rumor” entails vs. what they think it means.
          I really didn’t come here to debate over definitions of words I came to post on things I’ve heard that might be true or rumor and hopefully read intelligent responses from others.

          Reply
  20. El Kabong

    1 month ago

    Well, there you have it: A player going out of his way to screw up MLBTR’s free agent predictions contest.

    5
    Reply
    • wvredsfan

      1 month ago

      it’s a conspiracy …

      2
      Reply
      • El Kabong

        1 month ago

        I agree. Anyone who got this one right should be investigated for insider trading.

        2
        Reply
    • Faithful Padres fan

      1 month ago

      You should be given some kind of award for pointing out the obvious

      Reply
  21. SDMadres

    1 month ago

    Not an overpay at all. He is a solid number 2. I expected 4 and 110 as a floor. He does have injury history but that’s a steal for the Madres

    4
    Reply
    • oldgfan

      1 month ago

      Right up until he opts out.
      Creative contract, but player friendly.

      3
      Reply
      • Baseballisthebest

        1 month ago

        If he pitched well enough to believe he can get more than $58 million guaranteed, it would have been team friendly too. A win-win.

        3
        Reply
        • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

          1 month ago

          Maybe for 2026

          Reply
  22. DroppedBallFour

    1 month ago

    So were rumors padres were discussing moving pitching to get some salary relief

    1
    Reply
    • SportsFan0000

      1 month ago

      Everything is on the table.
      Teams do both.
      Phillies just traded reliever to Royals for a cheaper reliever and money saved probably targeted for signing free agents
      either theri own or someone on the outside market.

      Reply
    • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

      1 month ago

      LOL Pads Fans on his 248th account still telling his crazy stories about seeing Padres players, managers, coaches and executives out in the wild and calling players and their wives by their first names as if he is on some kind of first-name-basis with them.

      Reply
    • Faithful Padres fan

      1 month ago

      Like this comment – The Padres really never said they was willing to MOVE pitchers. The Padres really don’t have any Pitchers to move that would give this “Salary relief” you are mentioning.
      What was mentioned in Rumor form is “Off Loading” our high salary players (Machado, Tatis Jr. Bogerts Cronenworth.) to provide Salary relief BUT that Idea went out the door quick.
      See, when you “WANT” to call a platform wrong (again) you really do need to know what the heck is really going on around those teams. This is why on this platform – your dealing with Professionals that have been around the leagues and the word “rumors” is exactly what they hear around the league which happens to be more of truth than you trying to prove them wrong.

      Reply
  23. DanFan

    1 month ago

    Great news.

    1
    Reply
  24. 30 Parks

    1 month ago

    … while Craig Breslow sleeps.

    Reply
    • Joemo

      1 month ago

      Red Sox and Rockies are the only teams to not sign a free agent.

      1
      Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        1 month ago

        In the Rockies’ defense, they’ve been busy shaking up their front office. 😜

        3
        Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          Hey, I have a theory why the Rockies haven’t signed any free agents yet…”Not to many of the remaining free agency left willing to go to a team that SUCKs

          Reply
    • SportsFan0000

      1 month ago

      Duran could be traded,
      But Red Sox have set his price too high.

      Reply
      • Baseballisthebest

        1 month ago

        Duran has averaged 6.7 WAR the last 2 years. He has been a top 10 player. He has 3 years of team control. Do you expect them to set his price low?

        Reply
        • outinleftfield

          1 month ago

          Yes! Yes I do. To the Angels in fact. For Schanuel and some stale peanuts. After all the Red Sox need a 1B. Ok, ok. We will throw in Drew Pomeranz too.

          Reply
  25. Chin Muzak

    1 month ago

    Nice for the Padres but there’s a real feeling of kicking the can down the road for them.

    Reply
    • Simm

      1 month ago

      Been hearing that for 3 years.

      3
      Reply
      • Chin Muzak

        1 month ago

        just wait for three more

        Reply
        • Simm

          1 month ago

          Yeah well in 3 years from now that would be fine. If the padres have 9 years of good baseball that’s better than any previous stretch in their history. Yes it’s a low bar but the fans love their padres in San Diego.

          6
          Reply
  26. sdhitman19

    1 month ago

    This is a prelude to a trade. Pivetta ito the Mets for younger pitching.

    Reply
    • Brew’88

      1 month ago

      maybe yes

      1
      Reply
    • Gwynning

      1 month ago

      Doubtful, at best.

      11
      Reply
      • Brew’88

        1 month ago

        Imai

        9
        Reply
        • Gwynning

          1 month ago

          Imai + Arraez + scour the fringes for that 40th Man then wait for pitchers and catchers to report 😜

          8
          Reply
        • winniejones31

          1 month ago

          Sounds good to me.

          1
          Reply
        • Faithful Padres fan

          1 month ago

          Man that sounds super – I have been advocating for the Padres to sign Imai as for Arraez that would really be a bonus.

          1
          Reply
    • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

      1 month ago

      They still need 2 more SPs even if they don’t trade Pivetta

      Reply
      • Brew88

        1 month ago

        Yep. I’m thinkin’ King, Pivetta, Imai, Framber, Musgrove, Valdez, Mendez/sears 1-7

        4
        Reply
    • Simm

      1 month ago

      Anything is possible with preller.

      Doing this deal gives him a bit more security. If he was to trade Pivetta it’s always been that would be to get a young starter. Then use the money saved on a top free agent.

      Could be he will keep both or he got the free agent before the trade.

      Keep in mind there are still several other options if Preller wants to free up anymore money.

      1
      Reply
      • winniejones31

        1 month ago

        Exactly, Simm. And after this King signing Preller won’t deal Pivetta unless he gets an absolute stud starting pitching prospect in return. Preller, fortunately for us Padres fans, really holds all the cards in any potential deal involving Pivetta. If it’s the Mets asking about Pivetta and they don’t have McLean as part of the deal then Preller says no thank you and have a nice day/year. I’m loving where we’re at now.

        When you consider this signing comes on the heels of even more ownership instability (announcement they were looking at selling) it’s even more surprising we’re at where we are. Roki Sasaki flatly stated ownership instability as his reason last off season for not choosing the Padres. I’m very relieved that this current Padres ownership group really means what they say. They were honest about spending in spite of going through the early stages of possibly selling. Those things just don’t usually go together in my experience as a baseball fan of 50+ years. YAHOO!

        2
        Reply
        • Simm

          1 month ago

          Think the biggest thing besides making the padres better is it shows other players the padres aren’t in sell off mode.

          So even if the Padres are for sale they are still gonna try and win.

          5
          Reply
        • winniejones31

          1 month ago

          YES. And that is HUGE!

          2
          Reply
        • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

          1 month ago

          @winniejones31 Who is trading an “absolute stud starting pitching prospect” for a guy with an opt-out clause????

          Reply
        • Baltimore_44

          1 month ago

          Nolan McLean would never in a million years be included in a Nick Pivetta trade. He’s already a better pitcher.

          Reply
    • SportsFan0000

      1 month ago

      Younger pitching and also some younger position player talent.

      Reply
  27. Joemo

    1 month ago

    I think the QO attached limited his potential suitors. Combine that with his injury, and this deal makes a lot of sense. If he’s healthy, he opts out and hits FA with no QO attached and gets a bigger deal

    I like this deal for both sides.

    2
    Reply
  28. winniejones31

    1 month ago

    I LOVE it! YEAH!

    Provided King is healthy going into the 2026 season we now have a quality top 3 in our rotation with Pivetta, Musgrove and now King. Awesome!

    What a relief! Speaking of relief, we didn’t have to give up any blue-chip RPs to acquire King. Love this!

    2
    Reply
    • Baltimore_44

      1 month ago

      Won’t be completely surprised if Pivetta is moved. King is effectively cheaper for just this season and the idea has been floated.

      Reply
      • winniejones31

        1 month ago

        Might happen

        Reply
  29. HiredGun23

    1 month ago

    Really like this…

    3
    Reply
  30. Swingandamiss

    1 month ago

    There’s more to this nerve thing. There has to be something in the medicals that teams don’t like for this deal at less than QO value.

    Reply
    • Simm

      1 month ago

      Well the padres know the player right now better than any other team. Plus he has passed his physical so I don’t think that’s the issue.

      1
      Reply
  31. Dorothy_Mantooth

    1 month ago

    This is an interesting deal. There’s no question King could have received a larger guarantee from other clubs. I’m guessing that he feels like he has to rebuild his value to get to the annual salary and term he is looking for, so he is basically taking a QO offer from them (1 year, $22M) and if 2026 goes according to plan, he will opt out and get a 4+ year deal at a larger AAV.

    If it doesn’t go according to plan, he has financial security with the player options worth $28M & $30M respectively for 2027-2028. I bet AJ is trying to move Pivetta now to save some money.

    Reply
  32. Josephblow

    1 month ago

    He wasn’t expected to come anywhere close to cease? He’s making 1 million dollars less per year than cease. (Cease makes 26 per year before some of it gets invested)

    Reply
    • Informed Sportsball Discussion

      1 month ago

      They mean total contract value, not average annual value.

      5
      Reply
    • Simm

      1 month ago

      The difference is in the years. Plus not a single padres fan would take cease over king at the same salary for 1-2-3 and even 7 years.

      King is the better pitcher when comes to getting actual results. Cease is the better bet to stay healthy. 7 years is a very long time for a pitcher. Padres are betting on one good year, possible pain if it’s one bad year.

      2
      Reply
      • Josephblow

        1 month ago

        I agree. I think Cease actually got that contract because hes getting paid on upside. I just made my comment because of all the so called budget constraints. Also because I don’t even think they’re comparable. King over cease is an easy one

        1
        Reply
  33. Brew’88

    1 month ago

    They won’t get credit for being wrong though

    7
    Reply
  34. HalosHeavenJJ

    1 month ago

    Nice.

    I like it when players stick around.

    4
    Reply
  35. kgcubs

    1 month ago

    Aloha Gwynning bradduh and all the Padres fans, very happy for you that King re-signed! I’d like him on our Cubs. Hopefully Imai will come to Wrigley now. Again congratulations, nice Christmas present! Mahalo!

    10
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      1 month ago

      Mahalo nui loa cuz! 🤙🏽😎🤙🏽

      5
      Reply
  36. winniejones31

    1 month ago

    I hope we can still sign Murakami (Japanese infielder) as well. The EVT has stated we’re one of a handful of teams that are in the running. Pittsburgh’s presence as one of the interested teams does make me nervous though. They are still looking for some power bats.

    Reply
    • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

      1 month ago

      Not as long as Yu Darvish is around

      Reply
      • winniejones31

        1 month ago

        That could happen soon (retirement announcement).

        Reply
        • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

          1 month ago

          @winniejones31 Not a chance

          Reply
  37. Fernando Ringworm Jr.

    1 month ago

    Let’s just get one thing straight

    Nothing Michael King does in San Diego the next 3 years counts towards the Soto trade. Yes, even if he goes crazy and wins a Cy Young one of these years. The book is closed on that part of the trade.

    Reply
    • Informed Sportsball Discussion

      1 month ago

      Yes, this is very important information.

      5
      Reply
      • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

        1 month ago

        I think it is. We both know that if King pitches well the Preller fanboys are going to continue to bring it up to try and defend trading for Juan Soto.

        Reply
        • Simm

          1 month ago

          Common, you don’t think king pitching in San Diego the last 2 years had anything to do with him signing back there?

          This deal looks like a deal he could have gotten other places and he chose the padres. Likely because he likes it there…because of the trade allowing him to experience San Diego.

          9
          Reply
        • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

          1 month ago

          @Simm Not. One. Bit.

          Reply
        • Informed Sportsball Discussion

          1 month ago

          @Fernando

          I’ll defend it right now by saying they were trying to win a World Series. That is the sort of thing you do when you are trying to win a World Series.

          This transaction does still factor into the value of trading away Juan Soto, by any reasonable assessment. King can’t take a liking to pitching for San Diego to return in free agency if he never pitches for them in the first place.

          The Nationals are right there in the cellar if you want to go root for them and James Wood.

          5
          Reply
        • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

          1 month ago

          @ISD And yet, they didn’t win a World Series. They didn’t even make one.

          This transaction doesn’t factor into the value of trading away Juan Soto at all. King signed with SD because they offered the most favorable contract. He never said “I wouldn’t have signed here if they hadn’t traded for me first” or anything to that effect. They could have offered him the most favorable contract without trading for Juan Soto and then trading him for King.

          The Soto trade is the only reason the Nationals didn’t go 0-162 last year. Flags obviously fly forever but that trade and having the gall to let Rendon walk were the only good things Mike Rizzo did after winning that championship.

          Reply
        • Informed Sportsball Discussion

          1 month ago

          @Ring

          King literally said exactly that, that he felt comfortable being in SD. It is not even guaranteed he is a starter come free agency without his trade to San Diego. “Events don’t matter because you don’t want them to matter” doesn’t work in the world outside your head.

          Grisham still counts for the Yankees too, and will for as long as he remains a Yankee.

          1
          Reply
        • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

          1 month ago

          He never said those words. He said he felt comfortable being in SD but lots of guys have said the same thing about their current team and then went elsewhere.

          If he’s not a starter come free agency he’s probably cheaper. So Preller screwed the pooch both ways.

          OBVIOUSLY Grisham still counts for the Yankees! He’s never been a free agent. If he had declined the QO and then re-signed with NYY it’d be different.

          Reply
  38. Tardaddy

    1 month ago

    What is the Sox and the Yanks waiting on?

    Reply
  39. Leo Schnauzer

    1 month ago

    Truly the worst off-season so far in a decade…

    Reply
  40. GoGreen

    1 month ago

    I bet Gwynning is stoked bruh

    5
    Reply
    • Gwynning

      1 month ago

      💯

      10
      Reply
      • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

        1 month ago

        Haven’t seen towinagin (sp) in awhile. I hope his lamenting has leveled off a bit for his family’s sake.

        2
        Reply
  41. straightuphonestguy

    1 month ago

    Hell yeah.

    3
    Reply
  42. Outfieldflyrule??

    1 month ago

    Terrible deal for the Padres ..great deal for King though. If he has another injury riddled year the only way to deal him will be to eat most of the remaining deal..$$$! King is guaranteed $75m and the Padres get zero insurance. Great work by whomever the agent is.

    1
    Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      1 month ago

      Toronto had to commit $210 million to get Cease who is a workhorse but not consistently good. King is better but an injury concern exists. The marketplace result is rarely too high or too low, just the cost of all starting pitching has gone up.

      9
      Reply
      • The Saber-toothed Superfife

        1 month ago

        And tickets, and parking, and , and, and …

        Reply
      • Oppo nacho

        1 month ago

        Cease>king.

        1
        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 month ago

          But, at $210 million, is Cease better than “Three Kings”, do you hear what I hear?

          3
          Reply
        • Simm

          1 month ago

          Anyone who has watched cease and king pitch the last two years would never pick cease over king. That’s a fact and would be true if you polled padres fans that have watched the last two years. I can say that even with kings injury plagued season.

          4
          Reply
        • Outfieldflyrule??

          1 month ago

          Much of Cease’s value is the fact that he’s a consistent innings eater…you can count on him for 30+ starts every year. King does not offer that.

          1
          Reply
        • Simm

          1 month ago

          Until you can’t…there is real risk with any pitcher. Especially over 7 years.

          2
          Reply
        • Brew88

          1 month ago

          Cease has remained healthy, that’s his greatest attribute. As far as consistency, he’ll strike out 9 in 4 innings of shutout ball then out of the blue go walk double HR in the 5th.

          6
          Reply
  43. CarlosDelgado

    1 month ago

    With each passing day i pray for a salary cap in mlb (small market fan)

    Reply
    • DolemiteisMyname

      1 month ago

      @Carlos- “Salary Cap” who writes for you.? MLBPA will NEVER EVER agree to a cap. The players hold all the cards.

      2
      Reply
      • CarlosDelgado

        1 month ago

        Its a broken nation

        Reply
    • Simm

      1 month ago

      San Diego was nothing but a small market team forever. They are still a small market media city.

      The difference is the padres fans show up. Second on attendance at nearly 3.5m. It’s created high enough revenue that the padres can have a top 10 payroll every year.

      If you risk your money, sign players that have fan appeal every small market team could do the same or close to it (maybe not Miami for some reason, perhaps the rays because of their stadium). Certainly can be done in places like Pittsburgh.

      5
      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        1 month ago

        They are a small but very affluent market.

        Reply
    • Negan

      1 month ago

      You mean for the owners profits? Are we going to cap those, too? Because the players make the owners rich

      2
      Reply
  44. James Midway

    1 month ago

    I approve this message

    4
    Reply
  45. llokokokok

    1 month ago

    Boob is wrong? I am shocked.

    2
    Reply
  46. Steven hempel

    1 month ago

    But how much is deferred? In all seriousness tho damn this is an overpay but hey good for the fans I guess

    1
    Reply
    • AssumesFactNotInEvidence

      1 month ago

      Quite the overpay imo…

      Reply
  47. TrillionaireTeamOperator

    1 month ago

    This is basically in line with his market. It’s a very fair deal. Neither under pay nor overpay. The right structure to it, etc.

    3
    Reply
  48. The Saber-toothed Superfife

    1 month ago

    Harris didn’t give him his chance to be on a rotation with Skubal…..so sad.

    Reply
  49. RagingBull

    1 month ago

    You could do worse than to live in San Diego making $22 million.

    1
    Reply
    • Simm

      1 month ago

      Argue the only thing better is if you had 22×7 so you could play the rest of your career there. Buy a house in Coronado and live like a king.

      1
      Reply
  50. leftcoaster

    1 month ago

    I’m afraid Thoracic Outlet Syndrome surgery is in his future. Wouldn’t have signed him.

    1
    Reply
  51. ExileInLA 2

    1 month ago

    The labor situation may impact this.

    If there’s no baseball for a big chunk of 2027, does he opt out for the safe $5mm?

    Reply
  52. jaysfansince1977

    1 month ago

    Well that is another correct guess in the contest (4), most i have ever had and still time to add at least 1 or 2 more!!!

    2
    Reply
  53. Butters

    1 month ago

    It’s a great deal for King, not sure about the Friers though time will tell. He’s getting a boatload of money for a potential 3 year deal and he’s playing for a potential contender in a beautiful city with great weather. The R Sox really need some rotation help so they gotta move on Fram or whoever else is out there or get creative. That could be said for a few other teams as well. The Yankees on paper Have one of the best SP rotations in the league m. Granted a few of their starters won’t be ready till after the season gets started, they have to work on that BP after losing three of their BP to FA already and still haven’t made a move other than to re-sign Yarbrough. Focusing here on pitching. That’s just the way this low born peasant of a baseball fan sees things.

    Reply
  54. Salzilla

    1 month ago

    Wow, I snooze out early last night, what an unexpected deal to wake up to. I saw it on FB first blurry eyed and I thought I read Red Sox, but good for the Pads to strike. Definitely good for them this season and then we’ll see.

    Definitely would have liked to see him back to NY but honestly it’s all good. I’m less worried about a big rotation addition than getting a bat.

    Reply
  55. Backup Catcher to the Backup Catcher

    1 month ago

    Good move by Padres. Still need two more SP. Not enamored with Sears nor Vasquez. Do they have enough cheese to sign Ranger Suarez? Coming off a down year, Galen would be cheaper but is older.

    Reply
    • JuanUribeJazzHands

      1 month ago

      wss

      The 4.85 FIP and 5.51 xFIP were a bit harder to like, though.

      Reply
  56. beyou02215

    1 month ago

    Tons of risk. Don’t love this.

    Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      1 month ago

      OMG. I wasn’t feeling well and woke up to this news. This is completely disappointing by the Yankees on so many levels. King probably used the Yankees to get the biggest offer because he never wanted to leave SD to begin with. It definitely could have been worse if he went to the Mets. Yankees better not get Peralta. I don’t want him. Go get Hunter Green or one of the Miami guys. I’m completely shocked. Go get IMAI Now!!!! Forget the Yankees right now. Let’s go Knicks!!!!

      Reply
  57. Simm

    1 month ago

    Padres fans love Michael king. Outside of Musgrove who is a San Diego native king has been the most beloved since Peavy.

    He is a great dude, has some nasty stuff.

    People keep talking about risk. First there is risk in signing any starter. 5-6-7 years deals have tons of risk.

    Preller has done opt out deals a lot lately. He looks at them as if they will be here for the duration. 3/75m in this case. If King would have taken that deal Preller would have signed him to it.

    So if you are willing to do 3/75m then you would be taking the same injury risk…little less actually on this deal because he could get hurt in year 2 or 3. So if king gets hurt in year one he stays for year two…would have been here either way if there were no opt outs. If he opts out, no problem as they got one really good year from the player.

    Bottom line is the Padres are a better team right now than they were yesterday. How it plays out nobody knows but their chances of being good in 2026 just went up.

    8
    Reply
  58. Wrian Washman

    1 month ago

    You’re telling me nobody was willing to go 5/100 for this guy? Even 4/100?

    Reply
  59. Astros71

    1 month ago

    The Padres have been working against us the whole time! Good for San Diego. Good for Michael King. It’s going to be easier for Padres to win.

    3
    Reply
  60. Astros71

    1 month ago

    Nick Pivetta
    Michael King
    Joe Musgrove

    Reply
  61. Mikenmn

    1 month ago

    Interesting. He picked this because it was the best out there and Boras didn’t think the time/$ ratio would get better. There’s was always the chance of musical chairs–and being left with a sub-optimal deal. The focus is on his health, but I’m wondering if performance also could play a role. Does he have enough of a history as a starter to think he can sustain, say, 162 IP per season?

    Reply
  62. Prophet of the SL

    1 month ago

    Well….can we agree the players’ union is going to die on its sword to fight to remove the “qualifying offer” draft compensation? The Padres have two examples of benefitting while suppressing cost: Nick Pivetta and King.

    The cost of a 5-8 SP is 11 million. Interesting financial dynamics when you consider teams appear to need 8-10 SPs to get through a season and protect your top three pitchers.

    Reply
  63. Piro

    1 month ago

    At least he didn’t sign with the Red Sox.

    Reply
  64. Chris from NJ

    1 month ago

    Not sure how he didn’t end up a Yankee or a Met with the contract he signed. Especially the Mets. This is similar to the deal Alonso signed with them last winter. This is a prove it deal. The Padres can’t lose with this singing unless King’s right arm falls off.

    1
    Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      1 month ago

      The move to bring back Grisham gets worse and worse by the day. I have nothing against him but his QO is killing the suddenly cheap Yankees. I hope I’m wrong

      Reply
    • Prophet of the SL

      1 month ago

      The contract’s opt-out after one year is the poison pill, given no team wants to give up a draft pick for a player who can walk in one year. This is why the Padres get this contract that no other team would offer him….and why Pivetta was forced into a two-year deal because of the QO.

      Reply
      • Bozzmania

        1 month ago

        Already QO’d can’t be done twice to same player

        Reply
        • Prophet of the SL

          1 month ago

          Agree….I’m suggesting that no team would pay King 25 million plus a compensation pick to SD….that’s why SD can pay him a one year pillow contract when other team’s can’t.

          As for Pivetta…he had a QO…so his market dried up…SD got him to sign a two-year pillow contract essentially and paid Boston a qualifying offer.

          You are correct…..SD cannot QO Pivetta or King.

          Reply
        • padrepapi

          1 month ago

          I don’t buy that at all. It assumes no other team would go to 3/75m and ignores the real likelihood that King favors the Padres since they are the team that made him a full-time starter and he has spoken extremely highly of their pitching coach Ruben Niebla.

          Between his pro-rated signing bonus and his 5m salary, they’re only paying him 9m in 2026. Adrian Houser, Brad Keller, Luke Weaver, and Dustin May will all cost their new teams more money in 2026 than King with the Padres. Cody Pence will cost the Jays 8m in ’26. King gave the Padres flexibility that you rarely see in baseball and even more infrequently when you’re a free agent. He didn’t do that because he was attached to a comp pick. He did it because he was happy where he was at and didn’t have to milk out every last cent he could.

          No one was saying he might be going back to the Padres because he was issued a QO.

          3
          Reply
        • Prophet of the SL

          1 month ago

          Why did King sign a contract for an opt-out after one year?
          A. He missed 3 months with a “nerve issue”
          B. he wasn’t getting the big offers because of A.
          C. The other team didn’t want to give him $25 million annually, given his injury concerns and the compensation pick that went with his free agency.

          If you are the Padres, you know more about his injury, but you don’t have to pay a compensation pick. How could that not be a factor in his signing? How could the players’ union not want to end this situation….

          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          1 month ago

          Prophet – your name fits because the problem is that B and C re pure speculation. While it may be accurate or somewhat accurate, definitely a plausible scenario, it is not yet proven fact to establish a conclusion. A hypothesis yes, but a conclusion based on fact – no.

          1
          Reply
        • Prophet of the SL

          1 month ago

          Longtimecoming…fair point, I’ll just state there are enough facts to draw a hypothesis that is a reasonable summation. (with humor)

          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          1 month ago

          Prophet – “some other teams had blown him away” – as stated by King himself. Those teams worth those better offers were not teams that Kkng felt would be competitive for the life of the contract.

          This obliterates B and C and this makes the summation wrong and the hypothesis proven to be flawed.

          As stated in my first reply, I think those were fair possible situations but your reliance on them being accurate was why I challenged. Now, King’s comments as quoted in the lasted post on this site debunks the theory.

          Keep on pitching out feasible scenarios as that is in part the basis for our discussions on this site but caution on treating as fact.

          Reply
        • Prophet of the SL

          1 month ago

          Longtimecoming….(good humor intended, not meant to be dooshy)……because a player, agent, or even our President says something, without specific evidence, it is true.? Perhaps you also don’t really have the “fact”…because no actual team or offer was specifically mentioned or confirmed…so we’ll have to take his word on it. Did he share what constituted a “big offer” when he said he received some? He took millions less because he wants to win SD? I’ve got to question whether those offers really existed, given that he signed a super-team-friendly contract. My opinion, not a fact, is that a “big offer” did not materialize for the reasons I mentioned, and that the contract he actually signed is team-friendly. (opinion or can that be quantified?) Perhaps his statement reported is really his egg on the face, agent speaking for him (theory)….but again, that’s just my opinion based on the facts of the contract he signed, QO repression, and the injury season of 2025 he signed. A few facts to back up my opinion on a hot stove comment board. Happy Holidays! ; )

          1
          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          1 month ago

          Merry Christmas to you and your family. We agree that it was a team friendly contract but yet, it’s really a QO acceptance with 2 years of extra for a pitcher that as you point out, had some k juries last year so, is it really “team friendly”? Some have argued it is bad for team if he gets injured or limited innings because they have 2 more years to pay.

          1
          Reply
        • Prophet of the SL

          1 month ago

          Fair point…they share risk. The most important thing to remember is that the Cubs paid D $12 million for 2026… so that’s where we are in this pitching market. Perhaps the Red Sox and Breslow get a tip of the cap for getting Oviedo and Gray for a total of $22 million for two starters in their 2026 rotation. Merry Christmas….may we cross paths again on this board.

          2
          Reply
      • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

        1 month ago

        Padres also had to give up a draft pick to sign him. The draft pick they would have received if they just let him walk. Can’t QO him a second time if he does opt out.

        1
        Reply
        • Prophet of the SL

          1 month ago

          No…only a new team has to give up a compensation pick to sign him, not the Padres.

          Reply
        • Prophet of the SL

          1 month ago

          True…took my slow brain a bit to understand this point.

          Reply
        • Fernando Ringworm Jr.

          1 month ago

          But the Padres don’t get a pick when letting him walk means they would have.

          Reply
  65. ctbronx7

    1 month ago

    I guess that foolishly spent QO on Grisham emptied the Yankees piggy bank. Sad. So very sad.

    Reply
  66. Little Texas

    1 month ago

    Good signing

    Reply
  67. SportsFan0000

    1 month ago

    Nick Pivetta and top Rellever Morejon and maybe even Cronenworth to the Mets
    for young starter(s) and postioin players that would would set up the Padres for ’26-30.

    Mets get a top of the rotation starter, a top set up guy who could also fill in as a Closer and a veteran producing 2b/1b/3B

    Mets could extend Pivetta and Morejon.

    Young starters: Jonah Tong & Brandon Sprout, and two way, young position players INF/OF Jett Williams and OF Carson Benge are names that have been thrown around. as possiby part of a package deal.

    Reply
    • Attystephenadams

      1 month ago

      Don’t hold your breath on that possibility. The Mets know what they have in those young players and they are the ones who are set up for ’26-30 by holding them.. They are not trading all their core prospects in that one deal. Plus those young players will allow them to reset their payroll as soon as ’27, if there is a ’27 season.

      Reply
  68. napes22

    1 month ago

    Ah yes, the Pete Alonso “let me show I can do better than last season”, contract.

    Reply
    • padrepapi

      1 month ago

      The weirdest was Blake Snell taking a 2 year deal with an opt-out fresh off his 2nd CYA.

      1
      Reply
  69. Baseballisthebest

    1 month ago

    My wife has T1D and I have been impressed worth his work in that area. When and where are their events? Would be a good excuse to get out of the New England winter for a few days and support an important cause.

    1
    Reply
  70. Faithful Padres fan

    1 month ago

    When I read about this I was so relieved. – From the pitching aspect of things we need is a true leader in the rotation to be that #1 or 2 behind Pivetta, Musgrove.
    I still would love to see us go after “Imai” just so when we do play the Dodgers Imai can live out his childhood dream of beating the Dodgers and we would be the team he would do it with..
    Heck, who knows with our new Korean player Sung – Mu – Song coming to the Padres bashing hits, Ramon lighting up the HR sector, and now we have King secured we may once again be the team to give the Dodgers a run for the title. At least one can dream

    3
    Reply
  71. AI GM

    1 month ago

    A for King

    F for SD if he doesn’t opt out. A if they have mlb best medical team and he opts out.

    Reply
    • Faithful Padres fan

      1 month ago

      I fully agree with you. with the “F” the Padres there should of never been this type of delay with signing . King should of been a no brainer the minute King announced he would opt out of his contract to test the free market, That is when the Padres should of without a minute of thought made our Qualifying offer respectable.
      But yes with giving King an A your spot on. Actually if you don’t mind I would love to add a + (plus) for showing restraint and waiting to the last minute to accept signing a contract for more money with the Padres. Not much more but I could see the stance King was saying. Interesting season coming up ?

      1
      Reply
  72. Faithful Padres fan

    1 month ago

    In my experience of following MLB (over 62 yrs.) – and working for a National League park. (I use to be responsible for setting up the clubs locker rooms with their equipment.
    When a player opts out of the contract such as with King, you can usually tell if the player is serious about going to another Club by moving back to their Hometown and listening to Offers from clubs there (Not always. but usually) – With players who really want to stay with a team they just opted out of the contract stays in the town/area of that said club hoping the Club with bring up a better contract than once was 1st offered.
    Now, with that being said – IF King was serious about leaving San Diego the offer both Boston and the Yankees offered was way better money and incentives BUT since King feels he has a lot better chance to show case his talents staying with SD was the best for him and his family/game. Yes, you was right about “rumors of Yankees, Boston and Orioles” was just that rumors.

    Reply
  73. MLBTR needs to hire editors

    1 month ago

    There shouldn’t be a comma before “as well.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    White Sox To Acquire Jordan Hicks

    Giants, Luis Arraez Agree To One-Year Deal

    White Sox To Sign Austin Hays

    Twins Announce “Mutual” Parting Of Ways With President Of Baseball Ops Derek Falvey

    Athletics Extend Jacob Wilson

    David Robertson Announces Retirement

    Giants Sign Harrison Bader

    White Sox Sign Seranthony Domínguez

    Rockies Trade Angel Chivilli To Yankees

    MLB Sets August 3 Trade Deadline For 2026 Season

    Yankees Re-Sign Cody Bellinger

    Is MLB Parity Possible Without A Salary Cap?

    Guardians Agree To Extension With Jose Ramirez

    Yu Darvish Contemplating Retirement, Has Not Made Final Decision

    Nationals Rebuffed Interest From Giants In CJ Abrams

    Rangers Acquire MacKenzie Gore

    Brewers Trade Freddy Peralta To Mets

    Angels To Re-Sign Yoan Moncada

    Dodgers Sign Kyle Tucker

    Red Sox Sign Ranger Suárez

    Recent

    Latest On Derek Falvey’s Departure From Twins

    Dodgers Sign Cole Irvin To Minor League Deal

    Angels Sign Jose Siri To Minors Deal

    White Sox Designate Drew Romo, Jairo Iriarte For Assignment

    White Sox To Acquire Jordan Hicks

    Padres Notes: Sheets, DH, Preller

    Team Puerto Rico Considering Withdrawal From World Baseball Classic Amid Insurance Issues

    Giants, Luis Arraez Agree To One-Year Deal

    Mariners Sign Brian O’Keefe To Minor League Deal

    Dodgers Notes: Ohtani, Snell, Edman

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android iTunes Play Store

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version