Headlines

  • White Sox, Brewers Swap Aaron Civale, Andrew Vaughn
  • Brewers’ Aaron Civale Requests Trade
  • Angels To Promote Christian Moore
  • Brewers Promote Jacob Misiorowski
  • Red Sox Acquire Jorge Alcala
  • Jackson Jobe To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Transaction Retrospection: The Charlie Blackmon Extension

By Mark Polishuk | February 24, 2019 at 10:56am CDT

Throughout the Rockies’ franchise history, the team hasn’t been shy about extending key members of the roster.  Colorado’s biggest extension yet could be in the offing, as the Rockies continue to talk with All-Star third baseman Nolan Arenado about a long-term deal that would keep Arenado away from free agency next winter.

If such a contract is worked out, it would easily be the most expensive deal in Rockies’ history, not to mention one of the pricier deals in Major League history.  It would also be the second major extension completed by Jeff Bridich in his time as Colorado’s general manager, coming on the heels of the club’s five-year extension with Charlie Blackmon last spring.  That deal is worth revisiting now, given what we’ve seen about the free agent outfield market (or, really, just the free agent market in general) after a second consecutive slow offseason of signing activity.

Blackmon was 31 at the time of the extension (he turned 32 last July 1), and, like Arenado is now, also a year away from reaching free agency.  Blackmon had posted solid numbers as a part-time player and then as a regular with Colorado in 2013-15, though he stood a big step forward to hit .327/.390/.578 with 66 homers over 1366 plate appearances in 2016-17.  That performance saw Blackmon earn a Silver Slugger Award in both seasons, as well as a fifth-place finish in NL MVP voting in 2017.

With the Rockies coming off a postseason appearance in 2017, the team moved to lock up a top performer, agreeing to an extension that guarantees Blackmon at least $94MM from 2019-23.  Blackmon earns $21MM in each of the next three seasons, and then has a player option for another $21MM season in 2022.  He then has another player option year for 2023 worth $10MM in guaranteed money, though another $8MM is available via escalators based plate-appearance thresholds that seem rather readily achievable, or on MVP finishes.  (The deal also technically adjusted Blackmon’s previously agreed-upon $14MM arbitration salary for 2018, turning $2MM of that figure into a signing bonus.)  All told, the extension could max out at $102MM in new money for Blackmon once all is said and done.

Even sticking to the guaranteed $94MM figure, however, Blackmon’s contract already looks like an outlier in the wake of how baseball’s free agent marketplace has evolved over the last two winters.  Manny Machado and Patrick Corbin are the only 2018-19 free agents who earned more than $94MM in guaranteed money this winter.  Bryce Harper will be the third name on this list once he eventually signs, and it’s doubtful that Dallas Keuchel will meet even MLBTR’s four-year/$82MM projected contract, let alone a $94MM deal.

Blackmon’s production also took a bit of a step back in 2018, as he hit .291/.358/.502 with 29 homers over 696 plate appearances.  Still strong numbers, to be sure, though more in the vein of a solidly above-average hitter (116 wRC+, 115 OPS+) than his more elite production (137 wRC+, 136 OPS+) in 2016-17.  On the defensive side, Blackmon had been a below-average but playable center fielder throughout his career, though his glovework fell off (-28 Defensive Runs Saved, -12.6 UZR.150) to such an extent in 2018 that the Rockies will now deploy him as a right fielder this season.

Had Blackmon been a free agent this winter, his most natural comp was another center fielder, A.J. Pollock.  The newly-signed member of the Dodgers outfield lacks Blackmon’s durability and longer track record of production, but Pollock is also 17 months younger, a more stable defender, and more of a sure thing to produce in a new ballpark (Blackmon has a career .970 OPS at Coors Field, and only a .745 OPS on the road).  Pollock landed a five-year deal from the Dodgers worth $60MM in guaranteed money, so even if some teams felt that Blackmon was the better free agent bet, the gap between the two players surely wouldn’t have been $34MM.

With all this in mind, it’s fair to say that Blackmon and his representatives at ACES did a good job in landing that extension last spring.  As a soon-to-be 33-year-old headed for corner outfield duty, as hard to imagine Blackmon would’ve found five years and $94MM in free agency if he had tested the market this winter.

A win for Blackmon, however, doesn’t at all mean that the deal was a “loss” for the Rockies.  As noted, Blackmon was still a very productive hitter in 2019 — drastic home/road splits aren’t as big an issue when you’re the team that plays at Coors Field, naturally.  Blackmon also wouldn’t be the first player to improve at the plate after shifting to a less-demanding defensive position, so getting out of center field could help Blackmon’s bat as well as simply drastically elevating his defensive value.

Could Colorado have re-signed Blackmon to a lesser deal as a free agent had they not extended him a year early?  Potentially, though such a “what-if” scenario is easy to create with 20/20 hindsight (plus, you never know if another team might’ve been particularly keen on signing Blackmon).  As it worked out, the Rockies were able to retain a player they liked both on the field and in the clubhouse, even if it may have been a bit of an overpay.

Let’s also not overlook the big-picture ripple effect of the Blackmon extension as it relates to Arenado.  The third baseman now has solid proof that a Bridich-led front office is willing to pay to keep a homegrown star in the fold, and retain members of what has been a winning core group that has reached consecutive postseasons.  Money-wise, Blackmon’s long-term contract presents no real obstacle to the Rockies being able to afford Arenado, given that negotiations are already taking place and the organization is cognizant of the $200MM+ it will surely take to keep Arenado in the fold.  From a return-on-investment standpoint, Blackmon’s contract also looks like much less of a problem for the Rockies’ payroll than the lack of production they’ve received from recent free agent signings like Ian Desmond, Jake McGee, or Bryan Shaw.

It will also be interesting to see how Blackmon’s extension stands in the wider scope of future extensions for star players a season away from free agency.  We’ve already seen some notable extensions this spring, though those deals went to players (Aaron Nola, Luis Severino, Jorge Polanco, etc.) who were still arbitration-controlled for several seasons, rather than pending members of the 2019-20 free agent class.  For some of those scheduled free agents who are already in their 30’s, the thought of an extended stint in free agency and/or a lesser contract than expected have surely crossed these players’ minds in the wake of the last two offseasons.

Blackmon’s contract may represent a best-case scenario for such players if they do pursue extensions, as Blackmon and his camp were able to score at what may be the peak of the outfielder’s value and earning potential.  Of course, it takes two to tango, and it remains to be seen if teams besides the Rockies are willing to pay a premium in an extension for a player who isn’t either a true elite veteran (like a Nolan Arenado) or a younger, arbitration-controlled star who could prove to be a bargain if locked up early.  As a team wanting to both win now and to send an early signal to Arenado that they wanted to win the future, however, the Rockies felt Blackmon’s extension was clearly worth the plunge.

Share 0 Retweet 3 Send via email0

Colorado Rockies MLBTR Originals Transaction Retrospection Charlie Blackmon

Mike Soroka Experiencing Shoulder Discomfort
Main
Cubs Yet To Discuss Extensions With Javy Baez, Kyle Hendricks
View Comments (29)
Post a Comment

29 Comments

  1. Jbigz12

    6 years ago

    I thought Blackmon’s deal looked great the day he inked it. Considering his age and the way we’ve seen the market move even prior to this offseason it looked great for him. Had he been 28 when he signed it might be a different story but him moving off CF was inevitable and at that price it didn’t look very smart for Col from the get go. Particularly with limited dollars available and Arenado a pending FA.

    6
    Reply
    • Vedder80

      6 years ago

      The concept of “limited dollars” is a bit misleading. Basically, before a ticket, concessions, or merchandise is sold, every team in the league is bringing in roughly $100mil in revenue. This does not include any of the aforementioned, or any income from MLB Advanced Media (which doesn’t count as revenue for some reason). Not to mention any corporate partnerships, stadium naming contracts, etc. While every team certainly cannot spend like Boston and LA and the Yankees of past, none of them are hurting for money.

      5
      Reply
      • Jbigz12

        6 years ago

        Limited dollars is a very relative term. They have salary commitments that push them near their “comfort zone” already on the books and have Arenado’s big payday looming on the horizon. I don’t think it was an unfair statement at all.

        3
        Reply
  2. Houston We Have A Solution

    6 years ago

    Blackmon being on the books isnt the problem. Its the horrible Desmond deal and the relief pitchers they tried to sign that are the problem.

    10
    Reply
    • Jbigz12

      6 years ago

      I don’t think Blackmon is going to be a serious problem but it doesn’t mean they gave him what is now and probably was then an over market deal. Desmond/Shaw/McGee aren’t just over market.

      Reply
  3. RedSox4Life4ever

    6 years ago

    I’m glad he signed the deal because I like it when teams keep their stars. I wish long term contracts starting opting for this escalators in the last years of the contract. I wish they start doing more of that, say the last three years with a $10-$15 mil base plus incentives of a 10 year deal. It would help keep franchise players in town and teams are protected in case of declining performance at the end of the deal.

    2
    Reply
  4. njbirdsfan

    6 years ago

    Isn’t it more accurate to say Pollock’s reps failed more than Blackmon’s succeeded?

    Reply
    • nymetsking

      6 years ago

      Not by a longshot.

      Reply
    • CalcetinesBlancos

      6 years ago

      Pollack’s reps pulled off a miracle getting him that contract.

      6
      Reply
      • PhilsPhan

        6 years ago

        Agreed, CB. Pollock had one amazing season and then three injury-shortened, meh ones in a row. He obviously has a ton of potential if he stays healthy, but yeah, his reps really did work some magic

        Reply
  5. johnrealtime

    6 years ago

    I strongly disagree with the Pollock comp. Blackmon doesn’t have his injury history and he has been several notches better offensively. I think that AJ getting 60 million with all of his warts is actually an argument in favor of Charlie getting 94 million as opposed to it being an argument saying that Charlie would have gotten less.

    FWIW I have never been a big Blackmon fan and wouldn’t want him on my team with that extension. I don’t believe in his continued production.

    2
    Reply
    • Jbigz12

      6 years ago

      Pollock is a significantly better defender. Also a year younger. Blackmon has had Coors behind him also. I think it’s a fair comp even though Blackmon has a significantly better injury history.

      2
      Reply
      • exile

        6 years ago

        Pollock’s career away numbers aren’t much better than Blackmon’s.

        AVG, HR, OPS
        Blackmon .262 65 .745

        Pollock .266, 33 .758

        2
        Reply
      • johnrealtime

        6 years ago

        You only listed more differences between them. The only thing they have in common is they both played CF. You can’t understate the impact that a large injury history has on a player’s free agent value. I was shocked that AJ got as much as he did, having basically one full season in 6 tries and a horrible OBP. I’d take Blackmon’s contract over AJ, at least he plays

        1
        Reply
        • Jbigz12

          6 years ago

          Blackmon got nearly 100MM guaranteed while Pollock got 55. Maybe you’re right and they weren’t great comps. But Blackmon got a lot more. And two options to boot so if he was fantastic for the rox they lose some of that upside. Blackmon’s deals is miles better than Pollock’s.

          3
          Reply
        • Jbigz12

          6 years ago

          You could almost sign two AJ pollock’s for blackmon’s Price. In all likelihood Blackmon will take This deal for 5/99 at minimum. Charlie for 5/99 or AJP for 4/55? I’d take AJ for that difference.

          3
          Reply
  6. Yankeepatriot

    6 years ago

    Blackmon was smart because all teams know about his major home road splits. Plus he was over 30 when he signed I think

    Reply
  7. CalcetinesBlancos

    6 years ago

    Blackmon plays hard and is a great guy to have around. People would have been angry if he left and I also think he’s performed well so far.

    4
    Reply
  8. Senioreditor

    6 years ago

    I thought the Blackmon deal was a mistake when they signed it. His splits were crazy and his age would catch up with him. This contract will be problematic for Colorado especially if they attempt to extend Arenado.

    2
    Reply
    • hiflew

      6 years ago

      Why would the splits matter to a team that is RE-SIGNING him? Splits only theoretically matter if you are changing teams. He will be playing in the exact same stadiums this season with the Rockies.

      Reply
  9. its_happening

    6 years ago

    Good for both sides.

    For Colorado they keep a productive player.

    For Blackmon he can maintain solid production in Colorado.

    Reply
  10. exile

    6 years ago

    Quote “Pollock is also 17 months younger, a more stable defender, and more of a sure thing to produce in a new ballpark (Blackmon has a career .970 OPS at Coors Field, and only a .745 OPS on the road)”.

    Typical Coors Field bashing. The author completely ignored Pollock’s benefit of playing his home games at hitter friendly Chase Field. Pollock is a great player, but also has had many injury problems in his career unlike Blackmon who hasn’t missed many games in his career from injuries.

    Career Away numbers

    AVG, HR, OPS
    Blackmon .262 65 .745

    Pollock .266, 33 .758

    Reply
    • Jbigz12

      6 years ago

      I agree with you on the park factor but their deals really aren’t similar. Black received at least 95 MM Guaranteed to pollock’s 55. That’s a big time premium for Blackmon who is already not a CF. And Blackmon’s deal has two player options which further limited the upside for Colorado in the deal. if Blackmon was/is an all world player he can up and leave after year 3. Highly unlikely scenario at this point but it’s a factor when comping the deals.

      Reply
  11. johndietz

    6 years ago

    Players and agents need to start recognizing there’s added value to a team to sign players to extensions. Fans and players like to identify players with their teams. They’ll rarely make more in the open market unless they are marketable as a franchise player

    Reply
    • brandons-3

      6 years ago

      I don’t think that blanket statement works in this scenario. Extensions can be a good/bad thing for both the player and the team just as much as entering free agency can lead to more or less money for the player. Braves offered Heyward money similar to what Freeman extended for, but Jason declined and ended up making more on the open market. Kimbrel’s extension with Atlanta pushed his free agency back two years and likely cost him tens of millions of dollars by not entering the market around the time of Chapman and Jensen were getting 80+. Ian Desman was offered 100+MM from the Nationals and declined. And of course, Moose declining 17.5 M on a one year deal to get less total money over the next two years. It’s really about being honest with what you want and getting good advice from your agent on where the market is.

      Reply
  12. rmullig2

    6 years ago

    I thought the Dodgers were crazy to give that contract to Pollock. They have at least three other guys who can play center field so it wasn’t a position of great need for them. They needed to get an elite middle of the order bat to stack up to the AL powerhouse teams.

    2
    Reply
    • thecoffinnail

      6 years ago

      The problem with that is Freidman is their PBO/GM. He has never given out a contract a premium middle of the order bat would command. He isn’t that type of executive. Anyone that actually thought the Dodgers had a chance at Machado or Harper don’t know Freidman’s m.o. very well. Pollock is exactly the type of player he would sign.

      Reply
  13. goldenmisfit

    6 years ago

    Rockies are desperately trying to lock up Nolan because they know if he reaches free agency no way they can compete with other teams if they have to pay market value. They will try and keep him on a “team friendly“ deal.

    1
    Reply
  14. hiflew

    6 years ago

    The best part of this signing was just the notion that the Rockies weren’t going to chuck (see what I did there) it all for 3-4 years and have a tear down rebuild. If you like that sort of thing, more power to you, I’m sure you can find a different team to root for. But I don’t. and I would much rather the Rockies be “naturally bad” while trying like the beginning of this decade versus trading everyone you’ve ever heard of and fielding a AA/AAA team for the next couple of years.

    Just knowing I am going to get to hear The Outfield song “Your Love” at the bottom of the first in every home game is worth it to me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    White Sox, Brewers Swap Aaron Civale, Andrew Vaughn

    Brewers’ Aaron Civale Requests Trade

    Angels To Promote Christian Moore

    Brewers Promote Jacob Misiorowski

    Red Sox Acquire Jorge Alcala

    Jackson Jobe To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Shane McClanahan Pauses Rehab, Seeking Further Opinions On Nerve Issue

    Royals Place Cole Ragans On IL With Rotator Cuff Strain

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    Recent

    Rays To Acquire Forrest Whitley

    Gunnar Hoglund Likely Done For Season Due To Hip Surgery

    Angels Designate Shaun Anderson For Assignment

    Mariners Outright Leody Taveras

    Mets Place Kodai Senga On IL With Hamstring Strain

    Front Office Subscriber Chat With Anthony Franco: TODAY At 2:00pm Central

    Freddy Peralta Has Tried To Get New Extension With Brewers

    White Sox, Brewers Swap Aaron Civale, Andrew Vaughn

    Braves Evaluating Shortstop, Outfield Markets

    The Opener: Paredes, Giants, Dodgers, Pitchers’ Duel

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version