Today’s collective bargaining agreement officially introduced the designated hitter to the National League, tweets Mark Feinsand of MLB.com. That’s certainly not a surprise, as the universal DH had been one of the earlier principles for MLB and the Players Association to settle.
The union has sought a universal DH for quite some time, with more possibility for aging or defensively-limited players to have regular roles. AL teams have increasingly used the position as a quasi-rest day for regular players rather than committing to a true full-time DH, but six players (Nelson Cruz, Shohei Ohtani, J.D. Martinez, Giancarlo Stanton, Franmil Reyes and Yordan Álvarez) tallied at least 400 plate appearances in the role last season.
Cruz, in particular, could be the most immediate beneficiary of the universal DH’s implementation. He’s a free agent but is unlikely to see much, if any, time in the field next year. The universal DH opens up the opportunity for NL teams that may have otherwise been wary to bid on Cruz. Other bat-first free agents like Eddie Rosario and Jorge Soler could also see their respective leaguewide demand propped up a bit.
The league, meanwhile, embraced the universal DH as a means of aiding offense. The sport’s ever-increasing strikeout rate has drawn plenty of consternation. The leaguewide strikeout percentage ticked upwards every year between 2005 and 2020, setting an all-time record each season. Last year finally marked a stop to the record-breaking streak, as the strikeout rate marginally slipped from 23.4% to 23.2%. That’s perhaps a bit encouraging, but last year’s number still checked in almost seven percentage points above 2005’s 16.4% mark.
Pitchers aren’t the only culprit for the decrease in balls in play, but they’ve had real issues making contact. Last year, pitcher-hitters fanned at a 44.2% clip. Overall, they hit .110/.150/.142 across 4,830 plate appearances. That’s ghastly production, even by the historically low standards at the position. Their five highest all-time strikeout rates have come in the last five years of pitcher hitting. Four of the five lowest pitcher-hitters’ wRC+ (which compares their overall offensive output to that season’s league average marks) have come since 2017. However one wants to explain that trend — improved leaguewide velocities, specialization that leads to less practice for pitcher hitting, etc. — pitchers were putting up less of a fight at the plate than ever before.
The development figures to receive varying reception from fans of Senior Circuit teams (although many likely considered it an inevitability some time ago). Aside from its implementation as a pandemic protocol in the shortened 2020 season, the NL has never had the position. Most MLBTR readers, however, seem to favor its introduction. In a December poll, 62% of respondents expressed support for an NL DH; 26% were against the possibility, while 12% were generally apathetic.
The universal DH is the only official on-field rules change for 2022, but two recent pandemic protocols did not survive the CBA. Jesse Rogers of ESPN reports (on Twitter) that the nine-inning doubleheader returns, as do standard rules for extra innings. The “ghost runner” provision has been scrapped.
The seven-inning doubleheaders and the extra-innings runner proved divisive provisions among baseball fans in their two years in place. They’d been implemented as part of the COVID-19 protocols, with both provisions designed to lessen player workloads during seasons that could be massively impacted by virus-related postponements. Those concerns aren’t expected to be as prominent in 2022, and it seems neither party was motivated enough to agree to implement them permanently. The league may look to reinstitute those rules at some point down the line, but they won’t be in effect for the upcoming season at the very least.
As part of the CBA, a rules committee will be created in 2023, Feinsand tweets. That committee — a group of four active players, six league appointees and an MLB umpire — will have the authority to implement an on-rules change within 45 days of recommending it to the MLBPA. Previously, the league had to wait one year between asking the union’s approval on a rules change and having the right to implement it in the event the MLBPA refused a bilateral agreement.
MLB technically no longer has sole authority to implement those changes, though its appointees will outnumber the player reps on the rules committee. That probably gives the league de facto control over rules, and it’s expected the league will try to implement three in particular — the implementation of a pitch clock, limits on defensive shifting, and larger bases — for the 2023 campaign. Feinsand suggests the automatic strike zone could also be a topic of discussion at that point, although that’ll become clearer next offseason.
BabyBoyBlueDiamond
Thank the lord. (Most) Pitchers hitting was a stain on the present game in my opinion.
allweatherfan
It was painful to watch.
48-team MLB
Max Fried was a huge exception.
socalblake
So was Big Sexy.
socraticgadfly
Per the piece, how bout a little rumor or speculation, or pot-stirring about a particular DH trading leagues and no, not Cruz. Shohei Ohtani doesn’t cost a lot now, but will in a couple of years, and Arte Moreno is a hardline owner. So ….. chance of some NL GM making a run at him? twitter.com/real_gadfly/status/1502290604587458561
luckyh
Agreed. Watching a guy stand there with a bat on his shoulder is insulting to everyone.
2012orioles
Was in Atlanta when zack (then Zach) Britton homered. It takes away oddities which I love. I get why people want universal dh. I’m on the fence and don’t really care, but I’ll miss moments like that.
Dock_Elvis
I really loved the lineup structure of the pitcher batting over time. It used to lead to the NL being a much speedier league. But with game prices…it’s absurd for pitchers to take up 9 outs of every game..often.
Pitchers now haven’t even batted since HS.
BravesCanada
Not sure where you’re getting 9 outs per game for pitchers. Pitchers are not getting 4-5 ABs per team per game. They get pinch hit for.
Also, many pitchers are two way players in college or don’t even start pitching until college. Many have definitely hit since high school.
BabyBoyBlueDiamond
Hitting in college and high school does not equate to being a big league hitter, though. The vast majority of pitchers can, of course, go up and swing a bat. That’s without question. But asking them to be anything close to a decent bat is unrealistic. While a few can, far too many can’t.
fox471 Dave
Nine outs per game because pitchers batted? From whence did that number come? Personally, I think the DH is an abomination. Just my opinion and I do recognize the pros and cons.
socraticgadfly
The real problem? It’s umpired not enforcing pitch clocks and batters in the box like they did back in the day.
Which is too bad.
Simba punching Bill Madlock remains a classic over this issue. youtube.com/watch?v=MQbN1qlFSo8
ctyank7
What about the AL rule (up till now) that if a team moved a DH to a fielding position — as sometimes happens in long games — the pitchers must them hit. Does that still apply?
socraticgadfly
5-hour NL games will be a stain on the present game; they already are in the AL, and Commissioner Corleone’s pitch clock, if implemented, will surely be toothless.
“Swing the bat or wear a dress,” per an old baseball chant.
Samer
Finally!
Enough of the “Slippery Slope” fallacy people hate change.
Pitchers running around the bases, ended many careers.
Worst part, even the best hitting Pitchers, were trash.
itsmeheyhi
Chien-Ming Wang 🙁
Samer
itsmeheyhi, you’ve read my mind.
Probably, the best example.
He was never the same. :-/
Ted
Too bad. Learn to run if you’re calling yourself an athlete.
Samer
Eh, rather have flat bases, but i know i risk outrage.
No one thinks raised bases is awkward?
We’re not asking for players to covered in pillows.
Dock_Elvis
A flat base would lead to a lot of pulled groins and hamstrings and would retain water.
socraticgadfly
Yeah, for 1B, and 2B/SS turning double plays? Would be an issue indeed, flat bases. Ditto for runners at 2nd or 3rd on hard slides, trying to hold their spot on the base.
Not a clever name
Babe Ruth.
prov356
Not my favorite. I’d like to see the DH abolished completely. However, if they do away with the 7 inning double headers and the little league rule of starting a runner on 2b in extras, I can stomach a universal DH.
mikevm3
They did
prov356
Oh, yay!. I still don’t like the universal DH.
Halo11Fan
I’ve said this before, I don’t mind pitchers hitting but the problem with pitchers hitting it allows the defense to pitch around the bottom of the order.
It’s a better game when the defense has to pitch to the bottom of the order.
prov356
I agree Halo, but I don’t think the answer is don’t make the pitchers hit. I think the answer is pitchers need to learn to hit.
ukhalo
They didn’t get any better in 100+ years, time to give up.
ukhalo
They didn’t get any better in 100+ years, time to give up.
Holy Cow!
You can say that again.
48-team MLB
@prov356
The problem is that pitchers don’t pitch every day and they typically don’t pitch complete games. That means that their at-bats are very limited so they can’t get into a rhythm. The main advantage to the DH is that you can have the same nine hitters in the lineup every single game and you don’t have to pinch-hit for them.
Halo11Fan
The reason pitchers can’t hit is you don’t need hand eye coordination with fast twitching muscles to pitch. Baseball players are the quickest athletes. They react more quickly to stimulus than any other group.
That’s why they can hit. Ohtani is a once in a lifetime freak of nature.
socraticgadfly
They weren’t so bad before the DH in the AL.
mgomrjsurf
DH and Pitcher in same Lineup and also 30 man Rosters.
socraticgadfly
NO NO NO … would push games past 5 hours for sure.
Armaments216
The DH instead of pitcher at-bats is fine. But I don’t like the limited DH rules. A team should be able to double-switch when they bring in a new pitcher, just like under the old NL rules.
That is, the new pitcher can take a different spot in the lineup, so that position player in that lineup spot becomes the new DH. The old DH is removed from the game and is replaced with a position player.
Would retain some of the roster strategy that was appealing about the NL rules. Without having to make pitchers bat.
milbclubbie
Good
Al Hirschen
Mets new DH
socraticgadfly
Mr. Met’s gonna be the Mets DH.
bravesnation nc
Deeper lineups I like it.
Inside Out
Thank goodness
bobtillman
It was always totally inane NOT to have a DH in NL, the only league on the planet that didn’t. Both Super Bowl teams get to bring their punter; they don’t need to ask their Free Safety to do something additional. Nuff said.
cowdisciple
The only part I don’t like is banning the shift. The rest of this seems good.
Awesom-O
A couple years ago, I would’ve agreed. But the shift has made baseball less watchable in my opinion. I know, hit it where they ain’t and whatnot, but that’s easier said than done when you’re getting 95 on the inside corner.
ABStract
All infielders have to begin each play on the infield dirt.
There, shifting fixed without banning it.
Skeptical
Wow, I used a favorite saying of my BIL that referred to something and giggles and the comment got flagged for “awaiting moderation”. Guess I will eliminate the offensive saying and repost.
“I think the decline in hitting skill made the game less watchable. Too much emphasis on homers and not enough emphasis on small ball.
The DH will not save baseball nor will make it any more exciting. It will change how teams strategize, fewer lineup changes during games, etc.
I have already heard one multi-sport fan comment that it lends more credence to the argument that baseball players are not athletes. (A long standing argument that we have.)
Oddly, some fans complain about pitchers batting in an era when starting pitchers are pulled early in games and relief pitchers rarely bat. Just for fun, I did a random sample of twenty post-AS NL games last season to see how often pitchers actually batted. On the average, pitchers batted 3.15 times per game or just over 1.5 times per team per game.”
Alex Snow
Or require two infielders on each side of second base. That’d prevent this ridiculous notion of putting the 3B way out in short RF, supposedly “so he doesn’t have to turn the double play,” even if he has experience playing the middle infield anyway. I’ve never understood that. This would also still allow shifting, just not as drastically as teams do it now.
Samer
Never thought they’d go that far too, but i get it…
If i hear “hit against the shift” one more time…
Personally, i’m more excited about the Pitch clock.
Even more-so than the universal DH. Mark my words:
Pitchclock adds more excitement to MLB, than 3 to Nba.
Dock_Elvis
We’ve entered the day and age where baseball needs to ditch the integrity front and learn to market the game. Shifts are amazing from a statistical maneuver…and make the game boring as hell.
socraticgadfly
Somebody on Twitter last week said Mike Trout has the personality of meat loaf. Ohtani’s already indicated he’s not interested in marketing issues, either in the US or Japan.
But, I think the NBA has now officially passed MLB on my overall fan interest.
SheaGoodbye
I’d prefer they limit the number of shifts that could be used in a game rather than outright ban it. It’s the same way I felt about the silly three-batter minimum rule: why not just limit teams to one pitcher a game who can face any number of batters? It would give you the best of both worlds in terms of maintaining strategy, generating more offense, and eliminating the most problematic use cases.
Frankly, I feel like a lot of these rule changes have been implemented rather lazily. There is no need for all or nothing.
resident
Now if we can get blackout restrictions on games lifted!
nostocksjustbonds
YAY…MUCH LONGER GAMES!
delete my account please
AL Games are on average 5 minutes longer than NL games. I’m sure you can find an extra 5 minutes a day …. perhaps give up sex and 4 minutes of sleep.
Holy Cow!
Oh come on now. I can last at least 30 seconds longer.
Dock_Elvis
Says a lot about your sex life..witty.
delete my account please
Says a lot about your nonexistent sense of humor,, Docky
Not a clever name
Sex twice and 4 minutes of sleep maybe.
fox471 Dave
Funny! True probably, but funny.
socraticgadfly
The real problem is umps not enforcing pitch clocks and batters in the box back in the day.
Which is too bad.
Simba punching Bill Madlock remains a classic over this issue. youtube.com/watch?v=MQbN1qlFSo8
beyou02215
So glad we are done seeing (most) pitchers bit. Was a big drag on the game.
30 Parks
I’ll miss NL baseball. Pitch clock and limit shifts? I’m on board. Bigger bases? I don’t get that one. Collective input on rules is a big positive.
Awesom-O
I don’t care much about the bases in general, but it should limit injuries a bit. I’ll take it.
mils100
it might help a bit. I have a feeling we will forget this is even a thing. Maybe teams will run a little more too.
Dock_Elvis
There hasn’t been NL baseball since the 80s.
PoloGrounds62
Less strategy, more analytics. Ugh!
Awesom-O
More starting pitchers going more than 4 innings.
outhaus33
Goodbye young utility players and hello over the hill hitters that can no longer move about the field
Samer
No other game uses more “analytics” than baseball.
chrismilwaukee
This is a great day.
bjhaas1977
Rule book says every man on the field bats. So we’ll be watching something like baseball.
mils100
Do I prefer pitchers hitting from a baseball history standpoint? yes, but guys hitting .110 isnt fun. I will miss good hitting pitchers or when a pitcher comes through. But, we really talking 2 at bats now. I dont think its impact will be much on offense.
What I think I’ll miss are pinch hitters, double switches, etc. as I like teams having to use the bench. on the flip side, walking the 8 hole hitter for the auto out, can go away…
Honestly, no more ghost runner. 12 team.playoffs is fine. 14 would have been awful. you still need to win 90 and 2 byes so reg season still counts.
once again, no more ghost runner!
BravesCanada
As for pinch hitters, NL benches will be less needed now.
LFGMets (Metsin7)
Gonna miss the pitchers hitting even though this greatly benefits the Mets. Degrom wont get hurt now atleast
themed
This is the most idiotic of all the other idiotic changes they’ve made. They want games to move faster so add offense which makes games longer AND take away all of the remaining strategy out of the game and donks that call themselves baseball fans approve of such nonsense. Ridiculous!
Holy Cow!
The pitch clock next year will speed up the game. There is no strategy when starters are pulled based on pitch count today.
Skeptical
From the research I have seen, do not expect significantly more offense. The last study I read found the league batting average was .002 different between leagues and that the DH contributed to 0.1 runs per game.
Dock_Elvis
I’ve never understood the baseball is too long argument. Not from anyone at games. Pay prices and then say…hurry up. Just play the game. It’s possible to play 3-3.5 hour games or less.
desertbull
Boo
Bill
Speaking as a Mets fan, is there any NL team that this benefits more than the Mets, given the number of excess players who are better hitters than fielders that they have?
I know there was an earlier post about the positives of not having deGrom hit, although he was pretty good.
StudWinfield
Sigh…full dh and no runner on second rule. That’s it I’m done.
desertbull
Pitchers got 2 AB’s in 12% of games last year. The starter is usually out by the 6th inning, a lot of times they are out in the 4th/5th and RP’s almost never hit. Getting a quick out in 2 innings was not hurting the game. It was speeding it up
Sadler
For many, including me, this is the saddest day in baseball history.
Holy Cow!
That’s why you’re Sadler.
delete my account please
That there is funny
junkmale
lol saddest day in baseball history. Get a grip, kiddo
Sadler
You are correct.
For many of those that are a few years older than me, the saddest day occurred in 1973 when the designated hitter rule was instituted in the American League.
JustAGuyNamedHank
Thank the Lord. The NL’s most highly-regarded hitting pitcher, Max Fried, had an amazing 72 OPS+ last season. A mouth-watering .327 SLG and .649 OPS.
Good riddance!
larkraxm
Any team that would like to can still have their pitcher hit. How many will choose that option? None. Pitchers hitting is like Jose Canseco pitching. It’s funny to watch once, but I don’t want to watch it every day.
Sadler
I have a feeling the Angels might let one of their pitchers hit.
Old York
Really unfortunate. Why should pitchers who only have one job to do, get the DH but not the fielders? Fielders have to field and bat. All positions should have a DH if we implement the DH for pitchers.
Holy Cow!
Let’s not get carried away here.
JoeBob33
Something to look forward to….
themed
Less informed fans of the game think the DH is just not watching the pitcher bat anymore. You people don’t understand the strategy of the game at all if that’s what you think. You kids don’t have a clue. Baseball will never be the same. They’ve ruin the game!
Joseph Gonzalez
Less informed ? Having your pitcher bunt with 0 or 1 outs no matter where the base runner is because he can’t hit to save his life is strategy ? Having a auto out in your lineup that the opposing team can take advantage of is strategy ? Am I missing something ???
Things change with time, things evolve. People need to get over it as some changes (like this one) we’re badly needed. If teams are so passionate about this “strategy” have your pitcher DH then
Skeptical
Have you noticed that the decline of interest in baseball during the era of the DH. Um-m, could be a spurious correlation, but maybe not.
Joseph Gonzalez
Declined because fans of AL teams have not been able to see a auto out hit anymore ? I doubt that
Sadler
I don’t know how you define “interest in baseball”, but attendance per game had steadily increased almost every year from 1890 to 2008, where it leveled off and is now in decline. There was no appreciable difference from the introduction of the designated hitter in 1973.
The rule changes are all about trying to reverse the decline; it remains to be seen whether or not they are effective in that regard.
baseball-reference.com/leagues/majors/misc.shtml
themed
Your definitely “missing out” if you think the only thing the DH means is no more pitchers batting. I can’t even begin how much you don’t understand that there a lot more strategy gone from the game than just the pitcher not hitting.
Motown is My Town
Guess you’ve been living under a rock these past 50 years as that’s when the DH came into being.
Pete'sView
Ban the shift!
Joseph Gonzalez
The shift should not have been banned. Why do bad hitters like Gallo and Sanchez (get them both out of here) rewarded for stinking up the joint ? It’s nuts
bronyaur
A sad day for baseball.
junkmale
blah blah blah
Old York
Banning the shift is only rewarding hitters that can’t adjust. No other sport in America tells the defence where they can defend the offense. If you are a professional hitter that can’t adjust, that means you shouldn’t be in the league. I don’t want to see you K 200 times in a season while you hit 35 HRs.
bjtheduck
Other sports have changed defensive rules over the years. The NFL constantly changes rules to favor the offense. The NBA used to ban zone defenses. (Not sure if they still do since I haven’t watched the NBA in years.) Having said that, I completely agree about not wanting to see the 200K/35HR/.220BA hitters either.
DarkSide830
still hate this and don’t ever think I wolnt, but the DH beats 7 inning doubleheaders and ghost runners.
Dock_Elvis
As much as I enjoyed the NL game all these years. It’s hard to justify charging the average fan $200 a game to see HS level hitters take maybe 9 at bats against the best pitchers in the world.
Motown is My Town
Long overdue considering the AL implemented the DH in 1973…50 seasons ago!! It’s been total BS by the NL that the leagues have been playing under different rules for this long, especially when inter-league started. The AL teams have always been negatively impacted in the World Series and interleage play all these years so it’s great to see common sense finally prevailed.
themed
Commen sense would have been never to allow the DH!
raisinsss
Commin*
junkmale
Anyone who doesn’t support universal DH is a flippin’ fool
themed
Anyone who supports the DH is a flipping fool!
wifflemeister
Anyone can be a manager now. All you have to do is squint at a computer logarithm spreadsheet and insert the statistically most probable widget into the line-up at a computer-designated time slot.
We are the Borg.
Resistance is futile
sotaguchi
Goodbye baseball as we knew you.
I’m glad I met you when you were in your prime.
Meeting you now wouldn’t have been the same.
oilers777
The universal DH is a great idea because most pitchers are terrible hitters. If you want to watch strategy, watch chess.
RochesterMetsFan
Lame. Take the brains out of the sport
Wowwwwww
This news could make Kyle Schwarber the next Big Papi
CrikesAlready
Now I wish Franmil Reyes was still with the Padres.
mrpadre19
Nellie Cruz…..first ever DH for the San Diego Padres!
Cleon Jones
While theyre at it, have DH for most SS’s too, and a lot of catchers. Teams should designate 1 or 2 designated fielders per game….theres a few guys who shouldnt be wasting at bats but still are elite defense.
raisinsss
Forever enshrining Bartolo Colon as the best pitcher HR of all time.
I’m for it.
But I’ll miss those 1-0 degrom shutouts where he drives in the only run…
JoeBob33
The end of real baseball. Maybe a good thing for many folks—people are saying why. But a loss, too. With the DH a manager puts nine players on the field and frequently that’s that. Look at the AL box scores. Who needs strategy, pinch hitting, bunting, substituting for a poor fielder, etc. when you can have more dingers?
I plan to watch more pro basketball. Can’t hide bad defenders on the bench there. Even poor free throw shooter have to shoot them. Still a real game. Except for that idiotic three point line….
ctyank7
What about the AL rule (up till now) that if a team moved a DH to a fielding position — as sometimes happens in long games — the pitchers must them hit. Does that still apply?
joew
I’m going to switch off when the DH is hitting for a while at least… unless it is a two way player.
Ball players should be ball players Shohei Ohtani is a perfect example players can do more, to be fair he is kind of a freak.
Hitters should be able to passable defense.
Maybe if there are multiple players shifting between a ball player to DH semi-often i could feel a bit better about it. Maybe a future rule to limit how much a player can DH… maybe i could get into it more.. still want to see pitchers hit though. they should be able to at least give a decent bunt