Click here to read the transcript of tonight’s live baseball chat
By Mark Polishuk | at
Click here to read the transcript of tonight’s live baseball chat
MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com
hide arrows scroll to top
Guest
6:51 what about Arreaz to the Jays? Could be a good fit at 2B…. Would Manoah plus a prospect work?
Good grief people….The guy is a .326 career hitter and 2x recent batting champ. Show him a little respect! Wondering how Mark doesn’t think this guy could instantly carve out a spot on the Yanks because they have a “crowded infield.” Are they all better hitters than Araez or something??
He’s definitely better than anyone in the Yankees infield but five top 100 prospects for him is crazy.
Joe, of course 5 top prospects would be totally nutty nuts. But a schlep like Manoah and 1 other guy certainly won’t cut it either. I have NO idea who the Yanks could trade for him, I just don’t know their players well enough and certainly know very little about their prospects.
I do agree with the premise that the Yankees don’t really need him though. Not sure what it would cost from them but their prospect capital should be spent on pitching. Luzardo would be the preferred target.
And yeah I’ve seen lots of Manoah trade ideas like he’s going to get some big return.
I’m sticking with my “Varsho and Manoah to the cubs for Morel ( and maybe a lottery ticket type prospect ). Never predicted a trade correctly but law of averages says I have to get one right sometime
Cubs laugh and hang
up…..
My favorite was why won’t FA’s sign with the Pirates? Uh, Because maybe they can’t swim and they’re too close to the river? Or like the Goalie in Slapshot said, The Hair is bad here.
Joe says…, I agree. Though Arraez would be an upgrade on the IF, the question is whether that upgrade would be enough to justify the cost. I have to think that it isn’t. Better to put resources toward someone else, like your Luzardo suggestion.
riffraff: Is Christopher “Mushroom” Morel really that good? I don’t watch the cubs so I don’t know. And my friends who are cub fans are, well, cub fans.
Morel is a liability in the field and Cubs fans think his trade value is higher than it really is I believe.
Yes, Christopher Morel is actually really good but also yes, fans are over valuing him.
Morel came up two seasons ago, skipping AAA completely. That kind of shows you what the Cubs think of his talent level. He came up, stayed the season, was clearly over matched but went home, made some adjustments, started in AAA and went off!
Last season Morel came up on fire, hit 9 home runs and continued to hit well until August, made some adjustments again and finished strong. Basically, he showed he can handle himself in the bigs at 23/24 years old. Still has some maturing to do and hopefully with Counsell and Kelly, he improves to round out his game.
Why do Jay’s fans think Manoah has value? He’s injured physically and mentally. He’s headed out of baseball soon…..
Because he stinks and they want them to get rid of him to save the money for something else. Same way us Cub fans would love to get rid of Smyly and his 11 million. Every team basically has at least 1 salary they’d love gone. Ask Yankee fans what it would feel like if Stanton was gone and I bet you get the picture.
LA and TOR work on a Muncy/Manoah trade is fascinating. Wonder what other piece Jays would have to incl for LA to pull the trigger.
We do not want him. Not even a little.
We love Muncy in LA and certainly don’t need Manoah.
Would need to include Vlad Jr. with a guarantee from the Jays that Vlad could handle 3B.
There’s all the confirmation we need to know the deal is dead…
yep
Would be counter productive for LA to even consider that garbage
Is the mute button broken?
One observation- I have noticed fans tend to categorize players in a binary fashion into either ‘underpaid’ or ‘bargain’ or ‘overpaid’ or ‘albatross’ etc. and almost never ever acknowledge that a very well paid player is paid exactly what they’re worth, whether it’s $8M, $12M, $18M, $25M, etc. it seems like people in these comment sections never say that a player is paid exactly or very near their true value.
Case in point from the Q&A: Someone brought up how Lindor has performed decently the past couple of seasons and is thus somehow now a bargain at $68.2M in total salary for a total of 11.5 WAR.
That would indicate he’s been worth $5.93M per 1 WAR the past couple of years, which is approximately average WAR value for position players- perhaps a tiny bit low for the current market, but about average for the past half decade or even a tiny bit longer.
So it seems he’s simply… lived up to the contract. Which, there’s nothing wrong with that. That means it’s been a good deal!
But why do people generally seem to categorize deals as being bargains or overpays and almost never just acknowledge that a player’s price was or is fair- nothing more, nothing less- it’s not a discount, it’s not an overpay, it’s just fair market value.
The cost of a win, while interesting, is limited. It treats all teams and all markets equally, which is a major fault. The cost of a win fighting for a playoff spot is much higher than for a last place team. Teams internally have their own formulas that are much more nuanced than the Fangraphs model. Lindor is delivering 5-6 WAR seasons. He’s valuable.