Catcher Mitch Garver is headed into free agency after his mutual option with the Mariners was declined, according to an announcement by the Major League Baseball Players Association this morning. The union didn’t specify which side declined its half of the option, though MLBTR has confirmed that it was (rather unsurprisingly) the Mariners who turned down their half. Garver will be paid a $1MM buyout rather than a $12MM salary for 2026.
That the option was declined is hardly a surprise; mutual options are very rarely exercised to begin with, and the Mariners have long been expected to decline their end of the option. Garver initially signed in Seattle on a two-year, $24MM deal. That remains the club’s largest expenditure on a free agent hitter under president of baseball operations Jerry Dipoto, though they’ve invested significantly more than that on extensions for players like Julio Rodriguez and Cal Raleigh.
Unfortunately, Garver’s deal with the Mariners did not go especially well. He slashed a lackluster .187/.290/.341 in 201 games as a Mariner, good for a wRC+ of just 88. While he did slug 24 homers in 720 plate appearances and walk at a healthy 11.5% clip, he struck out 29.6% of the time while posting a line drive rate well below his career norms. That combination of an elevated strikeout rate and deflated BABIP was simply too much for his power and discipline to overcome when it came to being an above-average hitter with Seattle.
While an 88 wRC+ is below average, it’s still generally acceptable offensive production from a backup catcher, which is the role Garver found himself in this year for the most part. He had not been paid as a backup, however, and the Mariners envisioned him as a primary DH who could also take occasional starts behind the plate at the time of the signing. There was some logic in signing Garver for that role, given that he had just put together an explosive 2023 season with the Rangers where he slashed .270/.370/.500 with 19 homers in just 87 games, but the results of that deal are undeniably disappointing.
Now entering his age-35 season, Garver returns to free agency in a very different spot than last time. No team is going to invest in a multi-year deal to make him their starting DH. That doesn’t mean a big league deal is off the table, however, and Garver should benefit substantially from a weak catching market. While Garver grades out as a below-average defender behind the plate across the board, the pop he’s displayed in his bat over the years could be enticing to a team that needs to add power to the lineup and has a hole behind the plate. The veteran is far from the first hitter to struggle in the pitching-friendly environment of T-Mobile Park, and teams might think that getting him out of Seattle could help him rebound somewhat offensively.
In a market with virtually no depth behind J.T. Realmuto, Danny Jansen, and Victor Caratini, it’s not at all hard to see a catching-hungry team bringing Garver into the fold. The Padres, Astros, and Rays are known to be in need of catching help, and they could be joined by teams like the Rangers and Red Sox depending on the decisions those clubs make on arbitration-level players who could be possible non-tender or trade candidates.

wow he’s been streaky
Mitch still has some game left as a backup catcher. Someone should sign him to a minor league deal with a ST invite.
Tbh I’d give him low money major league deal. Some team like the Red Sox or Phillies.
I think he ends up getting a few major league offers.. nowhere near $12 million but still major league offers.
Looking at his numbers, it’s not obvious who declined their part of the mutual option?
He’s got a TON of self confidence
His signing was a good idea that just didnt work out. He hit well in Texas the year before, but was totally lost in Seattle. Good luck in FA.
I disagree that the signing was a good idea. Garver historically was a horrible hitter at T-Mobile park… on top of that he was historically a horrible hitter when DHing and we brought him in as a primary DH. This signing had bust written all over it before it even began.
If the Mariners trade Harry Ford, I would think that they would want Mitch Garver back. He knows the Mariner pitching staff well he did a nice job as a back up catcher, though he was not signed to and was not paid to be a back up catcher (2 years @ $12 million a year) In that regards, he was a bust, that being said, what would he get to sign a one year deal? $2 million?
Pretty sure this move says they aren’t trading Ford.
Disagree. This decision has much more to do with not paying Mitch Garver $12 million dollars for a third straight season that it does about anything else. They just need a back-up catcher if they trade H. Ford. If Ford could bring the right Bat back to the Mariners, they would consider trading him I believe.
Disagree. They have a backup catcher his name is Harry Ford. He and Cal can cover DH/C for years to come. No need for a backup catcher who can only backup catch when you have one who can actually hit the ball some.
I truly hope that Harry Ford is such a strong hitter that he and Cal switch off between Catcher and DH more frequently and Cal can get a little more rest and we are a better team because of Harry Fords bat. I still think they would trade Harry Ford if the right opportunity came about. Just having a light hitting back up catcher that does not allow Cal to take a lot of days off would stink but it may happen and that is where brining Mitch G back may be an option.
If they make Ford a backup it is a disservice to both him and Seattle. He has more value as a trade chip. He will bring back a couple nice pieces at least.
Making him a back up is not fair to him. He has the talent to be a starter is it fair to make him a backup until his contract expires? I can guarantee you that he will not resign with us if we do that. He will also lose value. They can make him a backup for a year maybe. Sit and talk with him tell him the plan. Be honest with him.
I know many disagree but is it better to have a player that has only good things to say about their former team or negative. A FA might be more inclined to sign here if they only hear good things about their former team tam they are looking at signing with. Keep him 1 year as a backup then trade him. There is one problem with that tactic. If he proves he can’t hit MLB pitching he loses much of his value. Seattle should know by now if he can hit or not though.
I understand what you are saying but if he is hitting well, and we all hope he is great, then wouldn’t he be an every day play splitting time between DH and catcher?
Given his (excellent) mobility, the M’s positional needs, and of course, his arm, I would at least be intrigued by the idea of making Harry Ford the backup catcher and part-time right fielder. I know he didn’t excel in the outfield in the 5 games he played there in 2024, but over the off-season, he could learn the position….
Why bring back a light hitting catcher when at worst you have a light hitting catcher at a fraction of the cost already?
I am not sure how many Arb years he will have but let’s say 5. You are going to make him be a back up C for all 5 years? He is stuck playing at the discretion of the Ms. You are limiting the money he can make. How much does an ASC make compared to a backup? Is it fair to him to not pay him his true value?
These team draft a player and say play here do this go here. Pretty much total control of their playing time and position they play. I feel the team that drafts/trades for them has an obligation to help that player be the best he can be. To help them capitalize on their true potential. Harry Ford loses a ton of money signs with another team at the end of his contract. He also will not have a good word to say about the Ms. How would you feel if at your job you boss decided you needed to stay at a lower paying job when you had all or more qualifications to do the higher paying job? The difference is you can leave and get another job they can’t.
Do what is right for the player. Treat them well so when they leave they only have good things to say about the club. If a FA is looking for a team and the players all get good vibes from previous players they are likely to pick that team over one that players didn’t have good things to say. Do the right thing get a couple of good players for them and let that player see his potential play out.
How about do the right thing for the team and DH Ford when he’s not catching? Do a deep dive on his minors stats he has 25-30 stolen base potential as a catcher. Why am I trading that when I have somewhere else for him to play when he’s not catching?
They are not trading Ford. He needs time at the MLB level as they all do. Let him learn from the best as Cal’s understudy and work his bat into the lineup without the pressure of a starting gig. He will be better for it and move valuable later if they decide to trade him
I’d like it if the Twins brought GarvSauce back. With Vazquez entering free agency and Jeffers being arguably one of the top catchers on the trade market this offseason, a reunion on a cheap contract seems plausible.
1 year, $2-3MM should get the job done?
Austin Hedges just signed for $4 million, so that seems like the floor for Garver if he can catch even a little bit
If the mariners weren’t cheap maybe they could get over the hump one of these years. 2/26 biggest contract for a position player? That’s a joke right?
It’s the biggest contract to a free agent position player in the Dipoto-era. They’ve spent considerably more on extensions.
And how long has Jerry been there? Since 2015 which is 10 years. That’s more than enough time to add a free agent impact bat. They have the best rotation in baseball now’s the time to go for it!
Geno Suarez was mashing the ball until he came here
Teo Hernandez was mashing the ball before and after coming here.
Mitch Garver mashed the ball before…..
See a trend? Maybe it’s Jerry being smart with his resources. Hitters don’t hit here.
josh…..
That’s one and if you wanna make a list of who’s hit here and who hasn’t it’s well documented my list will be much longer.
Teoscar Hernandez says it’s the worst batters eye he’s ever seen. His Dodger rebound lends some belief to his statement.
I agree. It was time to go for it after the 2022 season.
I’d love to see them maybe a run at maybe the 2nd tier free agents. I don’t see them in the Tucker/bregman/alonso race but even as an Astros fan I think the mariners deserve a title with that rotation. Come on Seattle the division is yours for the taking!
Mutual rejection.
Unlikely Garver rejected his end of it he’s gonna get 1/4 of that in FA
@TheGreatOne
For the love of the game.
$12m? Gee I wonder who declined the option lol
KBO
129 PA/3hr/5rbi’s @ home.
He did hit well in Tex and Hou
If I’m the M’s, I’m offering 2 years, 10 mil. 5 mil to be a backup catcher/DH, and also using him at 1st once in a while. He’s a solid player that can cover a few positions giving more flexibility to the team, Then, they can ship off Ford and/or package him with Castillo and see what they can bring back to us for other areas needed to fill.. Even with Garver back at 5 Mil, castillo shipped off saving 24 mil, and we have approx 30-35 already, that gives us basically 55 mil. Add naylor at 5/90, Polanco at 2/20, and we can still add a RF and RP. I’m happy rolling out Williamson/Emerson for 3rd. and Evans in the 5th spot in the rotation.. Maybe add Devin Williams and trade a few prospect and get a proper RF and call it an offseason.
That’s a start, and I wish him well. The park unnerved him, clearly. Just as it did for Geno, HOFer Adrian Beltre, Justin Smoak, Teo, and numerous others. Probably killed the careers of Ackley, Kelenic, and Zunino. Josh Naylor is a happy outlier, so give him whatever he wants. Always curious why the FO never looked at Manuel Margot, who had a career BA over .300 at T-Mobile. Retired now, but in his day…
Ackley, Kelenic, and Zunino all had shots with other teams and failed with them as well.. So probably a player thing, not the Mariners.