Headlines

  • Dodgers To Sign Kyle Tucker
  • Rays, Angels, Reds Agree To Three-Team Trade Involving Josh Lowe, Gavin Lux
  • Red Sox To Sign Ranger Suárez
  • Rockies To Sign Willi Castro To Two-Year Deal
  • Rockies Sign Michael Lorenzen
  • Latest On Mets’, Blue Jays’ Pursuit Of Kyle Tucker
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers To Sign Kyle Tucker

By Anthony Franco | January 15, 2026 at 9:04pm CDT

9:04pm: It’s a four-year, $240MM contract, reports Robert Murray of FanSided. Tucker can opt out after the 2027 season. There’s also an opt out after 2028, according to Passan.

8:53pm: Kyle Tucker is in agreement on a deal with the Dodgers, reports ESPN’s Jeff Passan. It’s a short-term contract, reports Jon Heyman of The New York Post.

The two-time defending champions have done it again. Tucker is the latest superstar addition to what was already MLB’s most feared offense. Tucker slots into a lineup that already included Shohei Ohtani, Freddie Freeman, Mookie Betts, Will Smith, Max Muncy, Teoscar Hernández and Tommy Edman. He’ll join Hernández and Andy Pages as the primary outfielders, with Edman also capable of logging center field action when he’s not at second base.

Los Angeles has four outfield prospects who rank prominently near the top of their farm system rankings. They reportedly wanted to avoid locking in long-term commitments as a result. They’ve accomplished that with one of the biggest annual values in the sport’s history. A four-year, $240MM deal would come with a $60MM AAV on the surface. It’s not yet clear to what extent, if any, potential deferred money will knock that number down in terms of net present value.

As it stands, Tucker’s deal contains the second-highest annual value in history. Ohtani technically landed a $70MM AAV on his 10-year, $700MM guarantee, though the massive deferrals involved meant it had a “true” annual value closer to $46MM. One should therefore view the $51MM annual salary on Juan Soto’s 15-year, $765M deal as the more accurate record holder.

Although Tucker was this offseason’s top free agent, he’s a clear step below the likes of Aaron Judge, Ohtani and Soto of the previous three winters. Tucker has been a consistent All-Star caliber player who’s a little outside the top tier of players in MLB. The fifth overall pick by the Astros in 2015, Tucker broke out in the shortened 2020 season after logging limited big league action in the two preceding years. He connected on 29 or 30 home runs in each of his first three full MLB campaigns, improving his offensive approach along the way.

Tucker was already a great hitter and seemed to be on his way to pulling closer to Judge, Soto and Ohtani with a monster start to the 2024 season. Tucker was out to a .266/.395/.584 slash with more walks than strikeouts through the first two months. He fouled a ball off his right leg and was placed on the injured list with what the Astros initially termed a shin contusion. It turned out to be much more serious, as subsequent testing revealed a fracture that kept him out of action for three months.

The four-time All-Star returned no worse for wear and had a monster finish in September. The Astros nevertheless decided to field trade calls after the season. They were never going to meet Tucker’s asking price on an extension and felt they could cash him in for help elsewhere on the roster. They lined up a deal with the Cubs around the Winter Meetings that sent Isaac Paredes, Hayden Wesneski, and prospect Cam Smith to Houston for Tucker’s final year of arbitration.

Tucker’s lone season in Chicago had its ups and downs. He got out to another blistering start, running a .284/.359/.524 slash with 12 homers through the first day of June. Tucker jammed his right thumb diving into second base on a stolen base attempt that day. He avoided the injured list, but subsequent testing revealed that he sustained a tiny fracture at the top of his hand between his ring finger and pinky.

The hand injury wasn’t viewed as a serious issue until Tucker’s performance began to suffer. That didn’t occur right away. His next few weeks were the finest of the season, in fact. Tucker slashed .311/.404/.578 across 25 games that month. Things went off the rails in July, as he batted .189/.325/.235 with just one home run over the next six weeks.

The existence of the hairline fracture wasn’t reported until the middle of August. Cubs officials acknowledged that Tucker had been injured in June but said  that he was fully healthy by the time the injury was revealed publicly. Maybe the thumb became a retroactive explanation for what was actually a simple slump, though it’s possible he developed some subtle bad habits in June as he tried to mitigate the pain of hitting through the break. Manager Craig Counsell gave Tucker a three-game mental reset towards the end of August before plugging him back into the middle of the order.

More to come.

Share Repost Send via email

Chicago Cubs Los Angeles Dodgers New York Mets Newsstand Toronto Blue Jays Transactions Kyle Tucker

Rays, Angels, Reds Agree To Three-Team Trade Involving Josh Lowe, Gavin Lux
Main
View Comments (530)
Post a Comment

530 Comments

  1. madduxm

    58 mins ago

    BANGGGGG

    10
    Reply
    • LordD99

      47 mins ago

      I’m pleased a down-and-out organization like the Dodgers finally landed a big fish.

      75
      Reply
      • Mondesi’s Cannon

        44 mins ago

        Flags fly forever baby! Go DODGERS!!!!!!!!!

        7
        Reply
        • i like al conin

          26 mins ago

          #Tainted

          1
          Reply
        • Michael Can Fart? Oh!

          13 mins ago

          that referring to the astros? Only team I know of deserving that mark.

          3
          Reply
        • Mr. Pessimist

          12 mins ago

          Fcking cheaters!!

          LAD 100% responsible for the upcoming multi year lockout. When mlb returns in like 2028 they’ll be forced to give up half their roster.

          5
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          47 seconds ago

          #Love

          Reply
      • LordD99

        43 mins ago

        4/240. $60MM AAV? I’m guessing deferrals to be announced.

        16
        Reply
        • Led Hoyer

          40 mins ago

          60 million AAV is crazy.

          25
          Reply
        • NineChampionships

          38 mins ago

          Tucker is good but he is not 60M AAV good, Jesus Christ 😂

          27
          Reply
        • bedbathandbiyombo

          38 mins ago

          Ya, has to be. Otherwise with luxury tax you’re looking at 4y/$504M. Insane.

          4
          Reply
        • Anthony maresca

          30 mins ago

          Won’t matter cause Dodgers payroll now moves to a whopping $440 million and will decrease by whatever deferred amount is. Most important that $240 million goes to $504 million for 4 yrs when factoring in 110% penalty. The rest of mlb should not even bother playing the games. Dodgers are making George Steinbrenner of the 90’s look stupid with their reckless spending

          5
          Reply
        • cwsOverhaul

          28 mins ago

          LAD figures they may only have to pay a portion of ’27 season that is played….and then he opts out.

          1
          Reply
        • seamaholic 2

          27 mins ago

          Deferrals won’t help that much unless it’s a huge percentage of the total, because they’re only deferring a few years.

          Reply
        • Cardsfanatik redux

          26 mins ago

          Don’t worry. 58 million a year is deferred

          Reply
        • NineChampionships

          25 mins ago

          Outside of any catastrophic injury he’s definitely opting out after year 2. They really want him for ’26 and ’27 to get their 4 rings before their entire spending model blows up on them.

          1
          Reply
        • Netflix&RichHill

          22 mins ago

          he wouldn’t get 60 per year if it was an 8 or 10 year contract, but he is a 4 to 5 win player, and likely projects to be worth 16 to 20 WAR over the next 4 years, so 60m AAV is probably a slight overpay if WAR is purchased at 11 – 12m per win on the open market, but the is pretty dang close

          Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          20 mins ago

          Yeah Ohtani and Tucker are probably making only $2 million dollars each in 2026 with all the $ being deferred.

          Reply
        • budman_63755

          20 mins ago

          Do you really see him leaving a $60MM guaranteed contract?🤣

          2
          Reply
        • LouWhitakerHOF

          17 mins ago

          25-30 homers and .270-.275 BA a season gets you $60M? Wow!! Ohtani is a bargain at $70M.

          Reply
        • metslvt17

          15 mins ago

          $120m? Yeah definitely. He can get way more in two years.

          1
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          12 mins ago

          And they’d find the principal of that $ that would accrue to that $58M by time of payment. So they would be paying much much more than $2M this year, so the savings you are implying do not happen in reality.

          Reply
        • luclusciano

          8 mins ago

          reckless is a word, but not sure it applies here. if they keep winning world series it becomes worth the dollars

          2
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          7 mins ago

          Only collecting $2M per year. That does not allow !allow a team to only have to pay $2M . Teams have to fund these deferrals as they are happening so they are ultimately paying and funding these deferred contracts as they happen. The caveat is they are funding it at the value of that $ now and said funding accrues to future value until time player realizes the gain.

          Reply
        • LaBellaVita

          2 mins ago

          Agreed about the details of deferment. If I were a player, I would make it over 20 years even if the NPV would be significantly less.

          Reply
        • NineChampionships

          1 min ago

          Yes, because he’ll still be just 30 years old and it becomes 120M vs the 300-400M he’s gonna be offered.

          Reply
    • i like al conin

      41 mins ago

      World Series titles don’t mean what they used to.

      16
      Reply
      • Jaggy

        37 mins ago

        Say what? To us life long Dodgers fans they do !!! 😂😎👍👋🤛🤔😁🤣🤗🙏🏼

        2
        Reply
        • EndinStealth

          30 mins ago

          Enjoy them, you should. Its become outrageous though. The 2027 season may not even happen.

          3
          Reply
        • scurvyrickets

          20 mins ago

          Jaggy = faggy

          2
          Reply
        • SportsBum

          16 mins ago

          I agree with scurvyrickets

          Reply
      • yogineely

        35 mins ago

        No, they still do. 2 and counting

        1
        Reply
        • i like al conin

          23 mins ago

          They buy the best talent where most other teams can’t. Totally dilutes the value of the titles.

          4
          Reply
      • walterpatrick

        33 mins ago

        Nope… they cost a hell of a lot more than they used too… present value or deferred…

        Reply
      • s8n666

        26 mins ago

        yeah. I miss the days of the Yankees and Cardinals swiping up all the amateur talent, keeping them indefinitely, and winning like 40 WS in a 70 year span while half the league couldn’t even sniff contention. Things were way better back in the day.

        2
        Reply
      • Netflix&RichHill

        20 mins ago

        the dodgers have a top farm system, too. they haven’t sacrificed the future at the expense of the present, they’re just using the money hack that shohei ohtani is the way a team should

        Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        4 mins ago

        @ conin

        Said the fan of a team that doesn’t win.

        Reply
    • simonkiller

      40 mins ago

      Hahaha

      1
      Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      22 mins ago

      As much as I HATE this (mainly because Hal is not committed to winning first and foremost), I congratulate Dodgers fans, yet again. Top-tier organization that continues to push forward to ensure they WIN, which should be the primary goal; not ensure a playoff appearance, which is the new Yankees standard.

      Bottom line is that if the Dodgers can figure out how to spend and add, yet still keep making money (even if it’s mainly on deferred money), then Hal should be able to as well.

      2
      Reply
      • LordD99

        20 mins ago

        They’re committed to championships. I remember a team we both know once had a similar approach.

        2
        Reply
  2. DarkSide830

    58 mins ago

    [Everyone disliked that]

    96
    Reply
    • chandlerbing

      41 mins ago

      Tucker is nowhere near worth $60mil a year

      24
      Reply
      • O'sSayCanYouSee

        5 mins ago

        60 mill?? With the tax bracket, aren’t the Dodgers paying total for him like $110 AAV???!!!?!

        Reply
    • differentbears

      18 mins ago

      [I liked it]

      Reply
    • cwsOverhaul

      16 mins ago

      Let’s see if Cohen gets mad and goes overboard outbidding NYY for Bellinger. Boras is gleeful at this development.

      Reply
      • Kermit The Frog

        7 mins ago

        I’m hoping someone tells them Bichette is available. I don’t think they noticed.

        Reply
  3. Slightly optimistic twins fan

    58 mins ago

    Wow look at the Dodgers make a splash

    2
    Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      54 mins ago

      At least the “only” splashes this off-season are Tucker and Diaz

      (please don’t sign Bichette too)

      2
      Reply
      • Slightly optimistic twins fan

        53 mins ago

        No kidding I was really rooting for Toronto to get Tucker it will be interesting to see the contract considering he had a long term deal from them.

        1
        Reply
        • walterpatrick

          47 mins ago

          We all know already that it will have about a billion in deferred money… welcome to the lockout in 2027…

          15
          Reply
        • Mark66

          37 mins ago

          I wasn’t rooting for the Blue Jays to get him at all, but I thought a thousand percent that’s where he was going. I was a million percent wrong, and I admit it.

          I’m dying to know what the Blue Jays’ offer was that he turned down and why. If they gave him six or seven years and he turned it down, I was only half right, but only half wrong.

          I knew he wasn’t going to the Mets something about the Mets just smells bad..

          2
          Reply
        • oldgfan

          34 mins ago

          Toronto will sign Bo shortly.
          Probably always the plan B

          Reply
        • NoSaint

          29 mins ago

          @oldgfan

          Maybe… I’m thinking they’re going to have a run at Bellinger first.

          Reply
        • Michael Can Fart? Oh!

          10 mins ago

          I’m sure you are whining equally about Dylan Cease’s deferred money. if not, You hypocrisy is showing.

          Reply
        • Kermit The Frog

          3 mins ago

          One way to have parody is to have all the stars on one team. haha It would be incredible if they didn’t make the playoffs.

          Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        40 mins ago

        Don’t worry. Andrew’s job is done for now.

        Reply
      • vtadave

        35 mins ago

        I am

        1
        Reply
      • yogineely

        34 mins ago

        I’m sure they’ll miss you and your great attitude dearly

        1
        Reply
      • agentx

        32 mins ago

        I don’t believe all the hype around Tucker and Diaz. I’m interested whether either one will meet or exceed expectations.

        Reply
        • WillBaseball

          8 mins ago

          You don’t have to. The guys who won the last two world series just pressed the 60million dollars a year believe button.

          1
          Reply
    • Whifff

      35 mins ago

      Dodgers are the Harlem Globetrotters. Everyone else is the Washington Generals. But they do need each other. 🤣🤣

      3
      Reply
  4. horaceallen

    58 mins ago

    Surprise, surprise

    11
    Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      54 mins ago

      The usual suspects

      4
      Reply
      • LordD99

        42 mins ago

        The only suspect?

        3
        Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      51 mins ago

      Surprise? It was widely reported that it was down to Dodgers, Mets and Jays.

      (Of course, I realize you may have been being ironic, and it went entirely over my head.)

      3
      Reply
      • EatPoo

        46 mins ago

        @Matrac, he was being sarcastic, not ironic. They’re not the same thing.

        6
        Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          42 mins ago

          I was using the term ironic, sarcastically.

          5
          Reply
  5. angt222

    58 mins ago

    New the Dodgers would sneak in. They were way too quiet in the Tucker sweepstakes.

    8
    Reply
    • sadmarinersfan

      45 mins ago

      They were very widely reported as one of the three finalists for him, definitely not quiet.

      4
      Reply
  6. carternico

    58 mins ago

    Salary Cap now. Enough is enough

    95
    Reply
    • mattv

      56 mins ago

      Or other teams could just start spending more

      33
      Reply
      • TakerDbacks!

        54 mins ago

        im sick of this comment! Its depends on cities. No business just spends if your not making the money. Smaller cities cant compete with LA NYC. Its awful!

        50
        Reply
        • mattv

          49 mins ago

          Yawn. Any owner who wanted to sign Tucker could have done so. the only thing limiting some of these “small market” teams from spending is a willingness to do so.

          9
          Reply
        • Candy Maldonado

          48 mins ago

          That’s fundamentally untrue. Teams do not have anywhere near equitable revenues, and they never will. Yes, teams can and should spend more. No, not every team could ever spend like the Dodgers. There’s no reason to pretend otherwise.

          36
          Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          44 mins ago

          Amazing the large market apologists keep trying to sell that. If every team had a local TV deal to pay their entire payroll, sure they could do that. Not the real world of baseball and it’s screwed up system.

          11
          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          43 mins ago

          “Any owner that wanted to sign Tucker could have done so”

          Not really. “Any owner” could have put the offer on the table but a player of his caliber is going to a team they is competitive and that means had other players of his payroll / caliber which not “any owner” can do.

          Not feasible for “any owner” to put out 400 mil payroll – see the crowd sizes for A’s and Miami for example.

          And the ever present decision of the player coming into play.

          This type of fantasy league comment isn’t realistic in the real world.

          9
          Reply
        • marinersfan1977

          40 mins ago

          all the teams are owned now by Billionaires. Don’t buy a professional sports franchise if you don’t wanna spend and just collect the revenue sharing $$

          10
          Reply
        • rolder

          40 mins ago

          Maybe not every team could shoulder the entire Dodgers payroll, but every team in the league could have paid for Kyle Tucker

          2
          Reply
        • Sadler

          31 mins ago

          It’s not sustainable. Maybe you can afford a $30 beer, but most can’t.

          1
          Reply
        • Candy Maldonado

          27 mins ago

          Yes, but Kyle Tucker has to want to *play* for a franchise that has no more money to spend after dropping $60m AAV on him.

          Reply
        • Sadler

          25 mins ago

          Unchecked, this type of spending will eventually bankrupt the league when nobody can afford to go to a game.

          1
          Reply
        • Wren

          20 mins ago

          thing is it cuts into a lucrative number those owners take home every year. has to be a desire to compete as opposed to just blowing up that bottom line.

          Reply
        • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

          16 mins ago

          I mean yeah but outside of Steinbrenner I think all owners are in baseball for the money

          If I had a net worth of 5 billion and tried deferring 1 billion (which just inflates overtime) on top of all of my taxes and other expenses I would probably go bankrupt

          Reply
        • bazbal

          16 mins ago

          That’s right. It’s just a coincidence that the teams with the highest payrolls all happen to be in the biggest media markets. And it’s just a coincidence that all the skin-flint owners happen to be in the smaller markets. Keep deluding yourself.

          Reply
        • rct

          14 mins ago

          @Sadler: player salaries have literally nothing to do with the price of beer/concessions. Teams like the Dodgers don’t sign Tucker and go, ‘well, better re-price our beer to pay for this contract!!!’.

          Beer/concessions, ticket prices, parking, etc are all about supply and demand. Prices are high because people will pay for it. Period. Teams do research and price things as high as demand allows to maximize profit.

          Reply
        • Michael Can Fart? Oh!

          7 mins ago

          And i’m sick of whining fans of teams that won’t spend. Kavetch at your small market minded owners.

          Reply
        • Jays77

          7 mins ago

          That’s the way it should be, but that’s not reality. The owners are billionaires because they like making money. They own a team to make money. If it runs at a deficit they will either trim the budget (not sign big name guys) and/or charge more to you and me. As salaries skyrocket the ones who pay the price are small market teams who can’t compete and folks luck us who are priced out of spending a day at the park with our family

          Reply
        • jbryant0693

          7 mins ago

          Willingness and revenue. Or maybe just entirely a lack of revenue.

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          2 mins ago

          @Sadler MLB has seen 3 consecutive yrs of growth in ticket sales. All 3 seasons eclipsimg 70M, that is in no way indicative of nobody being able to afford going to a game. It may very well price out some fans, that however has in no way harmed ticket sales.

          Reply
        • That name is already taken

          1 min ago

          Exactly, Dodgers owners have more than 10 times the money than the 2nd richest owner Steve Cohen. $60 million per year is like us spending 60 cents on something.

          Reply
      • Oppo nacho

        53 mins ago

        If everyone spent like the dodgers they wouldn’t have a team full of superstars and Merrill Kelly would’ve gotten 5/150

        5
        Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        53 mins ago

        @matt

        How many teams can afford to sirens over a billion in contracts over a 3 year period?

        7
        Reply
        • Michael Can Fart? Oh!

          7 mins ago

          Blue Jays.

          Reply
      • dos centavos

        53 mins ago

        Why bother?

        Reply
      • DroppedBallFour

        53 mins ago

        Or dodgers can actually pay players without deferrals

        Not many teams can defer a billion dollars and offer players extra income post playing days

        4
        Reply
        • Wutntarnation

          50 mins ago

          I’m on board with banning deferred contracts but not salary caps

          4
          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          49 mins ago

          I’m fine banning or capping deferrals

          Like teams can only defer 10% of the 1st cbt threshold every year

          If the dodgers actually paid Ohtani 10 years 700 mill but could only defer 26 mill a year I doubt fans would care how much they spend.

          2
          Reply
        • terry g

          49 mins ago

          Others can use deferrals, too and have.

          1
          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          45 mins ago

          Others literally can’t afford to defer billions of dollars

          You think pirates athletics Rockies or even orioles diamondbacks royals could defer a billion dollars and pay it off? No

          7
          Reply
        • thecheddahbob

          41 mins ago

          I’ve always been anti salary cap. But this is getting out of hand

          2
          Reply
        • Stingray16

          39 mins ago

          Lockout coming, better enjoy this season. Salary cap and floor are both needed.

          8
          Reply
        • neoncactus

          28 mins ago

          Other teams can afford to defer a lot of money. Dodgers aren’t just kicking the can down the road. They are putting that money in an escrow account which is earning money from the market and the Dodgers will most likely receive more from that investment than they put in. Any other owner would benefit in the same way. Each owner certainly has a good team of financial advisors.

          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          22 mins ago

          Others teams literally cannot defer a billion dollars. You have to have the money to put into the account. You can’t put an IOU into the account. You think there’s plenty of teams with 102 million dollars lying around they can put into an escrow account every year? Yeah maybe they should check their dryers and couch cushions and car seats.

          Dodgers have actually deferred more than some teams payrolls and 60-80 percent of other teams payrolls

          I like how people are like those teams are cheap why can’t you come up with 102 million dollars to defer anyone can do this!?!?!?!?!

          Bottom teams like Athletics Rockies Guardians Rays certainly couldn’t

          Even teams that do spend Mariners Dbackd Royals Orioles would struggle to an extent

          So no other teams cannot there’s maybe 5-10 who could but that’s about it

          1
          Reply
      • Candy Maldonado

        51 mins ago

        Yes, they can start spending. Plenty of teams don’t spend enough. But we’re all being silly if we’re going to pretend that market size doesn’t play a *massive* role in how much a team can spend. No franchise owned by rich people is going to operate at a loss just to compete, or even eat away at most of their profit.

        Personally I think the “some rich guy owns each team” business model needs to go away entirely in favor of some sort of player-and-league owned model with regional franchise managers, but obviously the billionaires like their ATMs too much.

        1
        Reply
      • boblowlaw2

        51 mins ago

        No they can’t. MLB won’t allow it. Two years ago the Padres spent slightly more than they are now and MLB said they were out of their debt to server ratio. Sure teams can spend more, but they can’t spend anywhere near that level because they don’t make hundreds of millions from TV

        5
        Reply
      • Tigers in Oakland

        50 mins ago

        So then cut the TV revenue from LA js

        1
        Reply
      • cards81

        46 mins ago

        lol not all teams have the Dodgers market…I don’t understand how people don’t see this

        3
        Reply
      • seth

        36 mins ago

        Most teams got screwed on their current tv deals. FYI, the dodgers aren’t most teams.

        Reply
    • Gbfl23

      55 mins ago

      Salary floor. The problem is that almost half the owners don’t care. The dodgers owners do care

      8
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        52 mins ago

        Floor is a bigger problem than a cap right now and it’s probably impossible to put them in the same collective bargaining deal

        A cap-floor system sounds awesome down the road but it can’t be put in all at once

        1
        Reply
        • thefridge99

          42 mins ago

          Why? That’s exactly what the PA would demand if they somehow agree to a cap

          Reply
      • backstage1

        45 mins ago

        Nonsense. The problem is the Dodgers have $300 million more in TV revenue than the average team.

        5
        Reply
      • Fowlerrc

        44 mins ago

        I don’t disagree, but what’s the solution? They’re not gonna force crappy owners to sell their teams, as much as I’d love to see it happen. I totally understand that the players will never accept a salary cap, too. But something has to be done for the integrity of the game. Having the Mets and Dodgers with $350 million payrolls and the Marlins, A’s, Pirates, Rays etc all having $100 million payrolls just isn’t good for the sport. It’s not good for the fans. I’m not suggesting I have any good solutions either, but nobody is paying me to have good ideas. Something needs to be done. Either at the bottom or the top or both. Because this is getting out of control.

        2
        Reply
        • drprofkevin

          34 mins ago

          If Major League Baseball, higher-revenue teams contribute a portion of their local revenues into a shared revenue-sharing pool, functioning like an escrow account. These funds are redistributed to lower-revenue teams to promote competitive balance and support payroll and player development. In practice, this system allows smaller-market teams to better retain homegrown players as they approach free agency rather than losing them solely due to financial constraints. As a simple way to remember it, big-market teams tithe into the MLB collection plate so smaller-market teams can afford to keep the players they actually developed.

          1
          Reply
      • Led Hoyer

        13 mins ago

        At this point a floor will accomplish nothing. How high can you possibly raise a salary floor to compete with a 500 million dollar roster. I am starting to think the Dodgers are just a front to clean money for a drug cartel. This is insane.

        Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      52 mins ago

      Seriously. Salary cap should be 250 million with no deferrals, or deferrals should count against the cap

      4
      Reply
      • terry g

        46 mins ago

        no cap.

        Reply
      • dezpoo

        21 mins ago

        With how much teams get in revenue sharing (not just salary tax but also media), I think 350M might be the min cap.

        MLB should just fix their media revenue sharing to mimic the NFL in regard to TV rights, etc.

        Reply
    • mkeving

      52 mins ago

      That doesn’t help parity in other sports. mLb hadn’t had a repeat champ until this year since 2001. NFL, NBA has had several. MLB gets low payroll teams in the playoffs every year. Salary cap would hurt the players, help the owners.

      4
      Reply
      • terry g

        44 mins ago

        The sports are not the same. The NFL and NBA don’t really have parity either.

        1
        Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          41 mins ago

          That’s false. NFL in a 14 team playoff field the NFL averages 5-7 teams that didn’t make the playoffs the previous year

          1
          Reply
        • mkeving

          34 mins ago

          That’s what I’m saying, the NBA and NFL aren’t pillars of parity either. The salary cap won’t fix parity.

          Parity also doesn’t equal a healthy league and high viewership. Juggernaut teams like the Dodgers increase viewership and attendance. People either are stoked to watch them or want to hate-watch.

          Reply
        • Sadler

          24 mins ago

          You listen to too much Colin Cowherd.

          1
          Reply
    • Drunkpirate

      51 mins ago

      Dodgers hater here, and this signing does not change my opinion.

      Why does everyone look only at LAD? How much did the Mets spend last year? Oh, right, a crapton…and they didn’t make the playoffs.

      Point is, you can’t just buy a winning team. It takes the right players, the right culture, the right coach, etc.

      I applaud the team I hate for continuing to spend a good chunk of what comes in every year. Most owners cannot say that.

      9
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        47 mins ago

        To be fair the Mets are the Mets and most teams arent that dysfunctional

        However, making the playoffs with 300 million spent is a lot easier than making the playoffs with a third of that payroll

        Reply
        • Drunkpirate

          41 mins ago

          “To be fair, the Mets are the Mets and most teams aren’t that dysfunctional” is moving the goal post so much that it isn’t even in the damn stadium anymore.

          Fact is, Dodgers spent a lot of money last year to build a team. The Mets spent a lot of money last year to build a team. One of them made the playoffs and won the WS by the skin of their teeth. The other missed the playoffs.

          And while I agree that it is likely the higher payroll the more likely you are to make the playoffs, it isn’t a given, as proven by the Mets…and the Dodgers themselves before these last two seasons.

          A salary cap would do to baseball what it has done to every other sport…make the owners richer and prevent them from having to fork over too much of their hard earned money…by convincing fans that it’s the only way to make it a competitive playing field.

          What a joke that would be.

          2
          Reply
        • funkmasta198

          34 mins ago

          It’s already a joke now

          2
          Reply
      • dugdog83

        43 mins ago

        The Mets suck tho

        Reply
      • DroppedBallFour

        35 mins ago

        How much money have the Mets deferred? How about Phillies?

        See problem isn’t spending

        Problem is deferring so much money lowers the cbt tax hit

        If the dodgers paid Ohtani 10 years 700 mill like the Mets paid Soto with no deferrals and had to be taxed at a 70 aav i doubt people would care as much

        But deferrals and using future value lowers the aav of an agreed to contract no matter how you slice it

        No deferrals has a higher aav than deferrals

        So instead of being taxed at 70 mill a year Dodgers can sign Ohtani and other guys using deferral and be taxed at 70 mill .

        That’s the problem fans have issue with

        Using deferrals to create room to sign other players which Ohtani is on record saying he agreed to such an arrangement for that very reason so dodgers could afford others is the main issue fans have.

        Again if dodgers were capped on deferrals and had to pay players like regular contracts nobody would care if their payroll was 500-600 mill cause they are being penalized by the cbt at those rates. But deferrals lowers the aav which lowers the cbt penalties.

        1
        Reply
        • Drunkpirate

          32 mins ago

          That is a fair point. Deferrals are a problem.

          Reply
        • Therealeman

          19 mins ago

          I don’t think the Phillies defer. They have some really long and dubious contracts though.

          Reply
    • DarrenDreifortsContract

      50 mins ago

      A salary cap would force small market owners to spend more money. They aren’t voting for a salary cap.

      Reply
    • sadmarinersfan

      47 mins ago

      Salary cap would only benefit the cheapskate owners while hurting the players. You’d see players earning potential drastically drop from what they are worth, as well as shortening players careers by many years. It’s not fair to punish teams for trying to win, when every team has the same opportunities to sign players . It’s not the dodgers or any teams fault that 2/3rds of the leagues owners aren’t willing to spend the money that they have. So many teams focused on how they can make a profit while spending as minimal as possible, rather than trying to win and profiting off team success

      Reply
      • seth

        28 mins ago

        Or, hear me out, the cheapskate Rays, Royals, Pirates…etc, start offering these kind of contracts, then the big market teams laugh and offer Tucker 4 years $400 million.

        Reply
        • mlb1225

          17 mins ago

          No one is disagreeing that any of those teams could spend more. There’s zero reason any team has a 2026 payroll below $150 million, maybe minus teams who had to play in minor league stadiums last year. But even then, there’s no reason any team should have a sub-$125-$130 million payroll.

          But teams like that can only have one mega contract at a time. The Dodgers make insane revenue and their majority owner is the CEO of a enormous investment firm worth over $300 billion. See my comment below. If the Pirates (as well as the Royals) wanted to spend like the Dodgers did in 2025, they would have had to spend just about 130% of their 2024 revenue. The Rays would have had to spend just about 140% of their 2024 revenue to match the Dodgers’ 2025 payroll. It’s probably a lot higher once you factor in operations costs, employee salaries, and other general expenditures all team pay just to keep the operation running.

          Reply
    • dugdog83

      44 mins ago

      It’s the Dodgers ruining the game dude, the Mets suck

      2
      Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      40 mins ago

      This is how we get a strike and lose out on games. I don’t even care how much stupid money gets spent by these bazillion dollar corporations who own sportsball teams. Still gonna watch these mf’s every summer.

      Reply
      • ChuckyNJ

        38 mins ago

        Would be a lockout, not a strike.

        Reply
    • mlb1225

      38 mins ago

      We need both a cap and a floor. Nearly all teams could totally spend more, but barely any teams can’t even come close to the Dodgers. They have more money tied into 2027 commitments right now, before Tucker, than 11 teams made in total revenue in 2024. The Dodgers’ overall had a payroll in 2025 just over $417 million, which was more than what 20 teams made in revenue alone in 2024. That’s not even factoring in operations costs for the Dodgers, such as how much every non-player employee, from the general manager down to what the ushers are making.

      In no way would I ever defend owners like John Fisher or Bob Nutting. They’re the reason baseball needs a salary floor if they’re not gonna force them out. But Nutting would have had to spend just under 130% of the Pirates’ 2024 revenue to match the Dodgers’ 2025 payroll, and Fisher would have had to spend about 160% of the revenue the A’s made in 2024.

      5
      Reply
    • seth

      35 mins ago

      Mets don’t know how to spend their money. Even the Yankees had a limit to offering Soto money.

      1
      Reply
    • Brettlez

      32 mins ago

      Nah, salary floor is more important. All salary cap will do is make teams cheaper and billionaires richer.

      1
      Reply
    • neoncactus

      19 mins ago

      Carter, salary cap won’t work. What’s the cap? Certainly not under $200 million and more likely closer to the luxury tax line. Only 9 teams spent over $200 million last year.

      Another idea would be to pool the local TV revenue and distribute it equally to the teams. But I’m pretty sure the Dodgers, Yankees, and other teams losing money in that deal would want assurances that the money goes directly to payroll. Basically take current payrolls and shared revenue would be added to those and those teams would be required to spend more.

      The reality is there are a lot of owners – A’s, Marlins, Pirates, and Rockies come to mind – that don’t really care about fielding a competitive team. A salary cap, and likely even local TV revenue sharing, isn’t going to change that.

      Reply
  7. rothlaj

    58 mins ago

    Seems like they set us all up for this surprising news!

    1
    Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      48 mins ago

      This is not at all surprising news. The only surprise was Tucker going for the short term/high AAV.

      Reply
  8. horaceallen

    58 mins ago

    Wow, collect ‘em all I guess

    3
    Reply
  9. GiantsFan81

    57 mins ago

    ..of course they are signing him 🙄🙄

    4
    Reply
  10. Dustyslambchops23

    57 mins ago

    Boring.

    14
    Reply
  11. BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

    57 mins ago

    Well…..break a leg I guess

    3
    Reply
  12. TakerDbacks!

    57 mins ago

    See its disgusting

    5
    Reply
    • Therealeman

      46 mins ago

      I’m not even sure an all star team of the best players from the remaining 29 franchises could beat the Dodgers in a seven game playoff series.

      2
      Reply
    • bucsfan0004

      43 mins ago

      Who cares? Guy never hit more than 30HRs hitting in a small ballpark. Enjoy the .820 OPS LA

      1
      Reply
      • AndyPagesBaserunningClinic

        20 mins ago

        @bucs,

        You’re right. Should have kept Conforto and the Dodgers wouldn’t have needed Tucker.

        Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      38 mins ago

      Hahahahahahah

      Reply
  13. Payne Train

    57 mins ago

    I hate this for baseball !!!

    30
    Reply
  14. octavian8

    57 mins ago

    Wow

    Reply
  15. htbnm57

    57 mins ago

    Limitless money wins again

    15
    Reply
  16. Hate Jerry

    57 mins ago

    Now I want a lockout in 27. Cap and a floor

    37
    Reply
    • Spencer O'Gara

      54 mins ago

      I’d settle for an official edict that says LAD wins at MLB and the league just drops to 29 teams. lol.

      Obviously sarcasm.

      3
      Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      51 mins ago

      100 min. 250 max hard cap, which deferrals count against the cap

      5
      Reply
    • terry g

      43 mins ago

      no cap no floor.

      1
      Reply
    • Chicago Expat

      28 mins ago

      Are you wanting to lock the owners out? Because they’re the ones doing the spending (or not).

      Reply
      • rhandome

        25 mins ago

        The owners collectively would absolutely vote for a salary cap

        Reply
        • Chicago Expat

          6 mins ago

          The owners don’t collectively want or do anything. Each owners wants to make as much money as they can for themselves and not share it with anyone else… including other team owners.

          Reply
        • rhandome

          24 seconds ago

          @Chicago Expat

          The owners are pushing for a salary cap in the next CBA. This is widely known. Not sure if I can post links here, but:

          amny.com/sports/mlb-lockout-rob-manfred-looming-1-…

          Reply
      • Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

        4 mins ago

        The small market owners who don’t have RSN deals may vote to lock everything out until the Dodgers give everyone their RSN money.

        Reply
  17. LA All Day

    57 mins ago

    LET’S GOOOO!!!! We did it!!!! Welcome to LA, Tucker! Welcoming you with open arms

    6
    Reply
    • dcftw

      54 mins ago

      We did it? Is this guy serious?

      20
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        46 mins ago

        If I was an LA fan I would be happy that the team is so stacked it is going to change the collective bargaining agreement

        This is just like warriors and Kevin Durant in 2016

        3
        Reply
    • himyojimbo

      50 mins ago

      same people that screamed he was a cheater too …right?

      2
      Reply
      • Chin Muzak

        46 mins ago

        Tucker was not with the 2017 Astros

        5
        Reply
      • LA All Day

        43 mins ago

        I only say that about the 2017 team. I never had anything against Tucker, always respected him as a player

        Reply
      • mynameispepe

        34 mins ago

        I mean Mookie Betts acknowledged the 2018 RS were cheating, and they certainly don’t care, so…

        2
        Reply
  18. Joe It All

    57 mins ago

    Hahahaha.. I’m sorry but at this point I have to laugh. I’m by no means a Dodgers fan either but does this really surprise any of us?

    7
    Reply
  19. Tyler McDuffie

    57 mins ago

    TUCKER IS LIKE WHAT THEIR 6TH OR 7TH BEST HITTER? THAT’S INSANE.

    3
    Reply
    • Payne Train

      54 mins ago

      SIX SEVEN

      10
      Reply
      • Joe It All

        45 mins ago

        Tay Kinney approves your message.

        Reply
  20. TakerDbacks!

    56 mins ago

    if your not a dodger fan I told you its disgusting for baseball. They are ruining baseball and MLB is to blame!

    15
    Reply
    • Joe It All

      55 mins ago

      They aren’t ruining baseball. If you want to blame anybody, blame all the top free agents signing there. They have other options but they’re the ones choosing the easiest path to a ring.

      2
      Reply
      • TakerDbacks!

        51 mins ago

        Well my friend why wouldn’t they if the dodgers give them what they want cause they can!! Thats why its bad for baseball. Every free agent will just want to go there. Your a dodger fan and not seeing it from other prospectives.

        Reply
        • Joe It All

          47 mins ago

          I’m a Reds fan not a Dodgers fan. I just choose not to let it bother me like a lot of you all do. You can have all the talent in the world and it doesn’t guarantee anything. They still have to play the game.

          2
          Reply
      • dugdog83

        42 mins ago

        Get in touch with reality

        Reply
      • Fowlerrc

        33 mins ago

        I don’t blame the Dodgers for having bottomless pockets and acting within the rules to dominate the sport. But what’s happening is pretty objectively bad for the game. Blame whoever you want. Analytics, tv contracts, cheap owners who don’t care about winning, corporate greed, it doesn’t matter who you point the finger at, the long term lack of competitiveness with half the teams is making the game much less fun. I don’t know what the answer is, but denying that it’s a problem is ridiculous

        4
        Reply
    • kcmowhoa

      54 mins ago

      Any team could’ve offered him more money or more years. The Dodgers just consistently are more willing

      1
      Reply
      • Simm

        52 mins ago

        That’s not true

        4
        Reply
      • cards81

        48 mins ago

        You really need to stop believing this…the Dodgers are a big market that can sustain spending tons of money…not many teams can do that…the Mets rumored to offer him 50 mil a year lol Tucker just wants a ring

        7
        Reply
        • Simm

          41 mins ago

          No he wanted 60 million

          Reply
        • cards81

          37 mins ago

          Yes 60 mil is nice but that still doesn’t take away that other teams can’t do this…it’s just stupid at this point…when the Dodgers win the next 4 World Series maybe things will change

          Reply
        • seth

          24 mins ago

          I’m waiting for the dislike button. Goa has nothing to do with him wanting a ring.

          Reply
  21. DigglinDickers

    56 mins ago

    I’m here for the comments.

    9
    Reply
    • NoSaint

      23 mins ago

      #DigglinDickers

      This is the comments section? I’m looking for the arguments room.

      Reply
  22. DepressedDodgerFan

    56 mins ago

    HATE US CUZ THEY AINT US

    8
    Reply
    • noquarter89

      50 mins ago

      Yes I do hate the fact that my team can’t support a $400M payroll.

      2
      Reply
    • ChrisP 2

      13 mins ago

      We don’t hate you cuz we ain’t you 🙄.

      We hate you because you are you 😂

      Reply
  23. noquarter89

    56 mins ago

    This is unsustainable.

    9
    Reply
    • differentbears

      41 mins ago

      Your name is no quarter. This is literally no quarter being given.

      Reply
    • terry g

      41 mins ago

      Why?

      Reply
      • noquarter89

        37 mins ago

        Cause how long is there gonna be any interest left in the league if the same team can just buy the championship every year?

        4
        Reply
        • hiflew

          19 mins ago

          It lasted quite a while for the Yankees from the 20s through the 60s. This is not new for baseball, just a different team doing the buying.

          Reply
      • Sadler

        23 mins ago

        Because when it costs $1000 for a family of four to go to a game, nobody will go.

        Reply
  24. mkeving

    56 mins ago

    Woe!

    Reply
  25. Baseballisthebest

    56 mins ago

    One more right in the contest.

    Reply
  26. Ryan W

    56 mins ago

    Wow what a competitor

    8
    Reply
  27. sixpence

    56 mins ago

    Strike incoming 2027.

    17
    Reply
    • 920falcon

      46 mins ago

      Lockout.

      4
      Reply
      • hiflew

        18 mins ago

        Semantics. The 1994 strike was also a lockout, but everyone still called it a strike. The truth never matters, just how people choose to remember it.

        Reply
  28. brocnessmonster

    55 mins ago

    oh is that right?

    2
    Reply
  29. sad tormented neglected mariners fan

    55 mins ago

    I’m going to start getting prepared for no baseball in 2027 now

    16
    Reply
    • DRS(comprehensive)>OAA(range only)

      50 mins ago

      Doesn’t matter to mariner fans if there’s a season because you guys never win a chip anyway

      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        13 mins ago

        That’s with 90% of the league for 2026

        I actually believe my mariners, the blue jays, and a team like the Red Sox or cubs are the only teams that are a threat to LA

        Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      35 mins ago

      That Mariners fan must not live close to a minor league ballpark. The Yankees have their Double-A farm team in the town where I live.

      Reply
  30. Captain_Bigelow

    55 mins ago

    Hilarious

    2
    Reply
  31. Rowsdower

    55 mins ago

    How much is deferred?

    1
    Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      49 mins ago

      Let me guess, half?

      Reply
  32. AndyPagesBaserunningClinic

    55 mins ago

    The Dodgers are ruining baseball.

    There needs to be a salary cap.

    How much is deferred?

    Have I covered them all?

    10
    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      34 mins ago

      @Andy

      You forgot thre-peat

      2
      Reply
  33. NZ Braves Fan

    55 mins ago

    This is why there will be a lockout, the Dodgers have ruined the game with that BS Ohtani contract.

    16
    Reply
    • ❤️ MuteButton

      53 mins ago

      Agree, but I believe the Soto contract was even worse

      1
      Reply
      • kevnames42

        1 min ago

        It wasn’t worse, ohtanis was because of the insane deferrals and all the deferrals the dodgers have done

        Reply
  34. Seattle Blues

    55 mins ago

    Salary cap please.

    18
    Reply
    • ❤️ MuteButton

      52 mins ago

      MLB is the only major sports league without one.

      2
      Reply
      • td272

        28 mins ago

        And it’s worked well in the other leagues – they’re thriving. Hard to understand why baseball fans can’t grasp this.

        Reply
  35. aduncaroo44

    55 mins ago

    Gross for baseball

    12
    Reply
  36. DRS(comprehensive)>OAA(range only)

    55 mins ago

    Tarik Skubal coming to LA next

    6
    Reply
    • Motor City Beach Bum

      51 mins ago

      Get ready to overpay if it happens.

      Reply
      • hiflew

        17 mins ago

        Why would they overpay for him this year when they will just buy him next year. It’s not like they will need him in 2026 or anything.

        Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      50 mins ago

      At the deadline or next year

      1
      Reply
      • Motor City Beach Bum

        47 mins ago

        LA can overpay any time and it won’t matter to them. They’ll just go sign someone else.

        1
        Reply
    • Anthony maresca

      17 mins ago

      Agree. The $30 million hit adds another $64 million with luxury tax adds to payroll to a whopping $500 million! That would be hilarious to see. Steinbrenner family should sell the franchise for $10-12 billion as it’s not worth owning a franchise with the cost of players salaries getting out of control

      Reply
  37. chandlerbing

    55 mins ago

    And the dodgers strike again
    Shocked that its short term tho

    2
    Reply
  38. Baseballisthebest

    55 mins ago

    Any guesses as to how much? Mets were at 4/200. How much higher were Dodgers?

    1
    Reply
    • Joe It All

      52 mins ago

      They could have been lower. If it’s true people play for the Ring over the money he could have taken less for the easier path to a ring.

      Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      48 mins ago

      4/300?

      Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      45 mins ago

      $60 million a year lol. Its a lot regardless of high taxes in LA.

      Reply
  39. cards99

    55 mins ago

    They were an out away from losing the World Series last year btw… Just sayin’!

    3
    Reply
  40. findingnimmo

    55 mins ago

    No respect for anyone signing with them like this. Easy ring no challenge. No respect. He has every right to do this. But I have every right to wish him nothing but embarrassment and regret on this.

    10
    Reply
  41. bkbk

    55 mins ago

    Good to see the small market teams step up finally

    1
    Reply
  42. Just_A_Guy

    54 mins ago

    Looks like everyone is playing for 2nd place for a 3rd year in a row. Broken sport.

    7
    Reply
  43. KnicksFanCavsFan

    54 mins ago

    Ok seriously….. this is getting crazy. I’m a Yankees fan and I get it but this is getting ridiculous. If you aren’t a multi-bilionaire whose money comes from something not related to baseball is going to be tough to sign the amount of talent the Dodgers are collecting. You CAN still compete but the margin for error is thin.

    5
    Reply
    • seth

      21 mins ago

      When a Yankees fan says this Is getting crazy, you know things are out of hand.

      1
      Reply
  44. countryuncle

    54 mins ago

    Let me guess……90% deferred

    8
    Reply
    • Homerfan 2

      45 mins ago

      If I was Tucker I would defer 90% to avoid paying the taxes in California. Tucker lives in Florida so when he gets the deferred money he doesn’t pay state taxes.

      1
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        31 mins ago

        He still pays federal taxes.

        Reply
  45. MetsSchmets!

    54 mins ago

    Lame

    3
    Reply
  46. Joemo

    54 mins ago

    Lol

    Reply
  47. cubbie cole

    54 mins ago

    Why 😢

    Reply
  48. The People's Champ

    54 mins ago

    Wouldn’t be surprised if they announce a Bichette signing some time in the near future as well.

    3
    Reply
    • dcftw

      49 mins ago

      Its like you want a lockout

      1
      Reply
    • drprofkevin

      48 mins ago

      He will be as blue jay!!! Unless Met’s outbid?

      Reply
  49. O'sSayCanYouSee

    53 mins ago

    Yuck

    1
    Reply
  50. Larry D.

    53 mins ago

    Welp,I got ONE right in the FA contest.

    1
    Reply
  51. vaderzim

    53 mins ago

    Yep

    1
    Reply
  52. Pitt1623

    53 mins ago

    This is why baseball is losing market share and interest.

    13
    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      30 mins ago

      @Pitt
      And yet here you are.

      And you ought to check the attendance figures and tv ratings.

      Reply
      • AssumesFactNotInEvidence

        2 mins ago

        Attendance is down 10% compared to the peak year of 2007. National TV contract is down 5% from its peak adjusting for inflation. Dodgers Yankees Cubs and Red Sox are pulling 100-200M a year from their local tv deals…

        Reply
    • rhandome

      23 mins ago

      100%

      Imagine being, like, a Pirates fan and seeing this crap

      Reply
    • vertigo

      13 mins ago

      Wrong – 2025 Dodgers vs. Blue Jays series generated the most recent massive viewership, with its Game 7 becoming the most-watched MLB game globally in 34 years, drawing 51 million combined viewers across U.S., Canada, and Japan.

      Reply
  53. yanks2009

    53 mins ago

    Talking about buying a championship!!

    4
    Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      32 mins ago

      The Yankees did the same as your username implies.

      1
      Reply
  54. bigalcathey

    53 mins ago

    4yrs/220 mil

    Reply
    • bigalcathey

      52 mins ago

      That’s my prediction anyway lol

      Reply
  55. jfive

    53 mins ago

    salary deferrals have to go, and/or salary caps have to come

    3
    Reply
    • DRS(comprehensive)>OAA(range only)

      47 mins ago

      Almost every team does deferrals and a salary cap would just make the dodger owners wealthier. LA already pays for most of the small markets through shared revenue and luxury taxes. A cap just decreases how much the cheap owners would make.

      2
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        28 mins ago

        @drs

        no… haha… more than half of the teams don’t do deferred payments to FA. You can’t just make stuff up.

        1
        Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        21 mins ago

        @DRS
        Good luck trying to explain that to the knee jerk responders.

        Reply
        • KnicksFanCavsFan

          3 mins ago

          @ Bivouac

          Nothing to explain because it’s not true.

          Reply
  56. mr. sports

    53 mins ago

    well at least we know they’re not buying the 2027 world series

    2
    Reply
  57. sadmarinersfan

    53 mins ago

    I don’t blame the dodgers at all for anything they’re doing, I blame all of the teams that aren’t willing to spend money and try to win. Every team can afford to sign the big guys, but only a select few actually open up their wallets for it. A salary cap would be detrimental to the players and the league. A salary floor is 100% necessary, and is the main factor for the Dodgers signing so many guys

    5
    Reply
    • Ryan W

      50 mins ago

      It’s a partially true argument. Ask what the padres front office thinks.

      Reply
    • MC Tim C

      48 mins ago

      A salary cap would not be detrimental to the players or league. All of the other major professional sports have a cap and they all manage to survive.

      4
      Reply
    • KnicksFanCavsFan

      43 mins ago

      @sad

      How many mlb owners have members worth $20 billion dollars and can afford to not take any money out of the revenue? You think the owner of the Pirates who is worth $1.5 bil and owns the team, a newspaper and a resort can compete? Magic Johnson is one of the “poorest” partners in the Guggenheim Sports Group and HE’S worth more than the Pirates owner(Nuttering?). For him, it’s a mom and pop business. To Mark Walter’s it’s must another revenue stream in addition to the Lakers, Guggenheim Investments, etc. Even Hal Steinbrenner is broke compared to Walters.

      Reply
  58. Motor City Beach Bum

    53 mins ago

    Seriously?

    Reply
  59. Chisox378

    52 mins ago

    He can show Ohtani what a top 7 batter in the game looks like. I was rooting for the jays so much last word series

    Reply
  60. 412_Ryan

    52 mins ago

    The rich get richer :’)

    Reply
  61. DarrenDreifortsContract

    52 mins ago

    We don’t need him. I expect he will be hitting 9th and sharing time in the outfield.

    Reply
    • foppert3

      9 mins ago

      Exactly. That’s the problem.

      Reply
  62. GONEcarlo

    52 mins ago

    Goodbye 2027

    1
    Reply
  63. C5793l

    52 mins ago

    Oh Lord, here we go

    Reply
  64. EuthanizeFlorida

    52 mins ago

    Crabs in a bucket commenters.

    “Make rules to stop this team from succeeding, so my team can maybe succeed by doing what theyve always done. There needs to be a salary cap!” Some of you would take a bullet for billionaires in hopes they spit on you.

    4
    Reply
    • mydogsnameisrayray

      12 mins ago

      you understand clearly.

      Reply
  65. garthvader12

    51 mins ago

    What a shocker. 🙄

    1
    Reply
  66. CarverAndrews

    51 mins ago

    Oh for heaven’s sake.

    Reply
  67. astros4life!

    51 mins ago

    Why? Well, we do see Tucker less.

    Reply
  68. sgord03

    51 mins ago

    Supposedly this guy doesn’t like playing baseball and was always going to sign a short term contract and retire after.

    Reply
    • bucknerkingmansutter

      12 mins ago

      Yeah, being a Cub fan this guy was not all that. Very fragile and absolutely ZERO personality. Good luck with that ridiculous contract.

      Reply
  69. Cheerio

    51 mins ago

    Probably paying him a buck and deferring the rest of the 300 million 38 years down the road.

    1
    Reply
  70. illegitimate son of EK23

    51 mins ago

    It’s getting a bit tiresome at this point. But since the other owners rather line thier pockets….. #thinkblue

    1
    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      48 mins ago

      Mets and Jays are usually in on everyone the same or better $, but most players just choose LA for the “life style” + obviously easiest path

      Reply
  71. Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

    51 mins ago

    Ring Chaser Tucker

    2
    Reply
  72. Steven hempel

    50 mins ago

    Yeah maybe it’s time for 29 other teams fans just to take a break until everyone has the same money to spend

    3
    Reply
  73. lgr34561

    50 mins ago

    What’s the point of watching baseball if you’re not a dodgers fan this year…..

    1
    Reply
    • Chicago Expat

      20 mins ago

      Same as every year… Because you like watching baseball and support your team.

      Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      17 mins ago

      @Igr

      Be sure to let us know how the beach volleyball goes this summer.

      Reply
  74. VonPurpleHayes

    50 mins ago

    Can’t make it up. What a loser.

    4
    Reply
  75. sosaspelledbackwardsisasos

    50 mins ago

    Can’t wait to see how much is deferred…

    Reply
  76. braddy513

    50 mins ago

    This is annoying

    4
    Reply
  77. Tiger22matt

    50 mins ago

    Salary Cap Now

    5
    Reply
  78. Diggydugler

    50 mins ago

    lol

    1
    Reply
  79. peyton161816

    50 mins ago

    4 millions fans through the gates at Dodgers stadium means they can spend money.

    2
    Reply
  80. bummy

    50 mins ago

    Im disgusted, im a nym fan; so i shouldnt be complaining; but this is just getting stupid; I finally have a billionaire owner but why would anyone want to come to nym instead of calif; i hare the lad; screwed bklyn over and still screwing us each and every time; i hate this team, and their fsns can f… off too

    1
    Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      30 mins ago

      Not hard to see “why would anyone want to come to nym”. The answer is in one word … LOLmets.

      Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      16 mins ago

      @ bummy

      well at least you’re enjoying life

      Reply
  81. Dodgers2026

    49 mins ago

    WOW. Even Dodger fans are impressed. Andrew Friedman got his guy. Welcome to Dodger Blue.

    Reply
  82. retsubllab

    49 mins ago

    Hey, remember when the Dodgers won three titles in a row just before the lockout – that changed EVERYTHING. ROBO UMPIRES, ROBO COP, ROBO ICE!!

    2
    Reply
  83. Arnoldpsufan

    49 mins ago

    Do they know that he’s not Japanese?

    3
    Reply
  84. osfandan

    49 mins ago

    Disappointing on multiple levels.

    4
    Reply
  85. Metsfan1 13

    49 mins ago

    10 years for 100 mil a year with 99.5 deferred until 2099

    1
    Reply
  86. Dodgerfan75

    49 mins ago

    As a dodger fan I truly don’t like this signing. We needed to get younger not another guy right at 30. If it’s longer than 4 years I think it was a bad signing.

    1
    Reply
  87. NineChampionships

    49 mins ago

    Called it lol. They going for the threepeat. They know they’re window ain’t that big so they trying to win as many titles as they can before Ohtani, Freeman, Betts, etc. get too close to father time.

    Reply
    • Ryan W

      37 mins ago

      They have enough dollars/farm system to keep the window going for another decade+

      1
      Reply
  88. baseballlover6363

    49 mins ago

    Finally! Maybe the dodgers can compete for a ws within the next few years now.

    Reply
  89. rhandome

    49 mins ago

    I’m at the point where we need a salary cap, no matter what it takes.

    Even if it means breaking the players union.

    5
    Reply
    • EuthanizeFlorida

      43 mins ago

      Bootlicker

      Reply
      • rhandome

        36 mins ago

        @EuthanizeFlorida

        Won;t someone think of the oppressed millionaires? Man shut up

        Reply
    • Chicago Expat

      17 mins ago

      That makes no sense. You want to break the players union because the *owners* spend too much on players? The players union didn’t make the Dodgers sign Tucker… the Dodgers did it all on their own. If you want to break somebody, go after the owners.

      Reply
      • rhandome

        14 mins ago

        The owners want a salary cap. Maybe not the Dodgers owners, but collectively, they are pushing for it.

        Reply
        • Chicago Expat

          11 mins ago

          Some owners want a salary cap, some owners do not, some owners want some teams to spend less, some owners want some teams to spend “more.” This has nothing to do with the players union or the players. It has to do with owners not playing nice with one another. That’s not a reason to punish the players.

          Reply
    • shoelaces

      16 mins ago

      breaking up the union is such an insane take.

      Reply
      • rhandome

        15 mins ago

        The alternative is the sport withers and dies. This is not sustainable. I would hope the players union realizes this.

        Reply
  90. SweetLou

    48 mins ago

    Imagine calling yourself a champ playing in that lineup. What a joke.

    4
    Reply
  91. 920falcon

    48 mins ago

    They arent doing anything illegal or even unethical… but, come on. They make the George Yankees look like a class of first graders.

    5
    Reply
  92. Qwerky

    48 mins ago

    Thought he’d take a longer deal

    Reply
  93. 412_Ryan

    48 mins ago

    Kyle went from banging on trash cans for a ring to pulling a Kevin Durant for another. Shameless.

    Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      27 mins ago

      Tucker never played for the bang on a can Astros.

      Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        13 mins ago

        @Chucky

        Better not to confuse them with facts.

        Reply
  94. Title-less in Seattle

    48 mins ago

    Its not just because they have limitless funds, but because they’re the only team that TRULY prioritizes winning…🙄

    1
    Reply
  95. Chris G.

    48 mins ago

    Finally the Dodgers make a move. /s

    Reply
  96. dcftw

    47 mins ago

    What’s good for the Dodgers is bad for baseball. Baseball is broken at a tike when it can’t afford to be.

    4
    Reply
  97. Zonedeads

    47 mins ago

    Any player signing with the dodgers is soft and has no competitive bone in them.

    5
    Reply
  98. Moonlight Graham

    47 mins ago

    Well, that’s just…stupid.

    4
    Reply
  99. Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

    47 mins ago

    4/240 million opt out after 2 years. 60kil aav is absolutely insane

    1
    Reply
  100. hamandegger777

    46 mins ago

    Flags fly Forever!!

    Go Dodgers!!

    2
    Reply
  101. backstage1

    46 mins ago

    For all those saying that other teams just need to spend like the Dodgers do, you do not understand TV revenue. The Dodgers generate about $334 million a year. A year. For contrast, the Brewers bring in $35 million. Dodgers overall revenue is $750 mil and that will continue to grow with the way their TV deal is structured. So the Dodgers spent $417 in 2025 plus $169.4 in luxury tax with that extra $300 million covering a big chunk of payroll.

    8
    Reply
    • billy09

      38 mins ago

      This, to me, is an argument against the salary cap. What should the Dodgers do with all that profit?

      2
      Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      10 mins ago

      @backstage1

      At least tell the entire story bud. Or maybe you’re not aware that 48% of all the Dodgers TV revenue, sponsorships, concessions, merchandise, ticket sales, etc go to REVENUE SHARING PAID TO THE HAVE NOT TEAMS.

      Reply
  102. himyojimbo

    46 mins ago

    For a team, and a fan base, that is super pissed that “the astros stole” their WS wins, they sure do love signing former Astros players.

    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      9 mins ago

      Yeah they should be ashamed.

      Tucker wasn’t on the 2017 Astros.

      Reply
  103. SweetLou

    46 mins ago

    Wow is that the biggest overpay in sports?

    3
    Reply
  104. goinshittingcleanup

    46 mins ago

    Can’t wait for Dodgers to be full of pride when their team is the literal only reason a lockout happens.

    2
    Reply
  105. Quinnap89

    46 mins ago

    240 for 4 years. I like Tucker but man he’s not worth that

    4
    Reply
  106. sixpence

    46 mins ago

    Holy cow! 60 million per?

    1
    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      45 mins ago

      lets wait for the deferrals. People still think Ohtani makes $70M a year.

      Reply
      • Quinnap89

        42 mins ago

        That’s true….deferrals or not nobody on earth is worth this kind of dough

        Reply
  107. Wrian Washman

    46 mins ago

    Baseball is ruined

    2
    Reply
    • mkeving

      39 mins ago

      Yep just like all the great teams of the past, ruining baseball. Murderers Row, Big Red Machine…ruined.

      1
      Reply
      • Wrian Washman

        36 mins ago

        Yeah, that’s totally the same thing. (Thumbs up)

        1
        Reply
  108. TakerDbacks!

    45 mins ago

    60 mil!!! omg and fans ask why other teams dont do it

    2
    Reply
  109. SteveFinleyEnthusiast

    45 mins ago

    I am in horrific pain

    1
    Reply
  110. Qwerky

    45 mins ago

    60M IS CRAZY

    1
    Reply
  111. southi

    45 mins ago

    WOW, serious dough

    Reply
  112. Redwolves3

    45 mins ago

    LA Deferrals doing whatever they can to better chances for 3-Peat

    LA Deferrals separating themselves from rest of NL

    Tucker gave himself a chance for a World Series Ring

    Reply
    • robw5555

      5 mins ago

      Tucker wants money. Rings? LOL.

      Reply
  113. SteveFinleyEnthusiast

    44 mins ago

    C’mon man

    2
    Reply
  114. Rays in the Bay

    44 mins ago

    Not shocked at all. Maybe I’m de-sensitized to it. Maybe that’s what Manfred wants

    Reply
  115. fathead0507

    44 mins ago

    $60 mil yr is insane .. can’t wait to see what they will offer Acuna in 2yrs

    2
    Reply
    • Gobraves88

      41 mins ago

      Be quiet.

      Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      38 mins ago

      If Acuna can stay on the field for consecutive years he’ll make b a n k.

      1
      Reply
    • robw5555

      6 mins ago

      Skubal may get 500 million from them.

      Reply
  116. BartoloHRball

    44 mins ago

    $60m AAV?!

    Gross.

    Reply
  117. hockeyjohn

    44 mins ago

    MLB is very broken, I am hoping for a long lock out in 2027 that will save the sport

    6
    Reply
  118. holecamels35

    44 mins ago

    60 million a year? Or another fake contract? Honestly bring on the lockout and a cap. This is getting pathetic at this point.

    5
    Reply
  119. Kubanis427

    44 mins ago

    240 for 4 years is crazy!!! I like that that it is not long term!!!

    1
    Reply
  120. Jaggy

    44 mins ago

    $60 mil a year?? A little too high I hope the team also has opt out options after 1 and 2 years?? I think Bellinger could’ve worked out wonder if they offered him 4 years $120 mil??

    1
    Reply
    • phenomenalajs

      25 mins ago

      The opt-out is for him, not the team.

      Reply
  121. Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

    44 mins ago

    Cohen is gonna panic sign Bellinger to a 10/500 contract now.

    2
    Reply
  122. CC Ryder

    44 mins ago

    And some thought Bregman was overpaid

    2
    Reply
  123. Informed Sportsball Discussion

    43 mins ago

    Getting to where I’m over it.

    Reply
  124. dugmet

    43 mins ago

    Geeeeeezus.

    Reply
  125. Captain_Bigelow

    43 mins ago

    I hope that is a typo. $60m a year for Tucker? Come on. He is decent but not that good.

    1
    Reply
    • Boodge106

      25 mins ago

      As a very disgruntled Mets fan, Tucker is more than “decent.” He is great. But also not worth $60 million AAV.

      Reply
  126. Moff_Nick

    43 mins ago

    I wonder how many teams payrolls are smaller than the Dodgers luxury tax penalty

    Reply
  127. TooToughToScuffle

    43 mins ago

    Salary cap and salary floor. No deferrals. Gotta hate this NBAification of Major League Baseball. No superteams!

    1
    Reply
  128. sad tormented neglected mariners fan

    43 mins ago

    Wait what 4 years 240 million sounds absolutely insane Tucker is not worth 10 million more per year than Soto

    3
    Reply
    • Chin Muzak

      17 mins ago

      that’s why Soto was guaranteed 3X what Tucker is.

      Reply
  129. angryyankeesfan1

    43 mins ago

    $60 million AAV is crazy unless there are deferrals, which there probably are. But even then, it’s still crazy. I don’t know if the Blue Jays or Mets are going to turn to Bellinger since the fit on the Jays is tough and the Mets didn’t want to go long-term for Tucker, so why would they for Bellinger? If not him, though, where do they turn?

    1
    Reply
  130. Greenmachinelickitclean

    43 mins ago

    Still pissed about 2017

    1
    Reply
  131. BuckMcDuck

    43 mins ago

    60M a season! Lmao. RIP MLB. Enjoy this last season.

    5
    Reply
  132. Fantomhamst3r

    42 mins ago

    Ok dude is NOT worth $60 mill a year.

    2
    Reply
  133. yukz

    42 mins ago

    60 millions per season? Nobody is worth that much. Nobody!

    1
    Reply
  134. Joemo

    42 mins ago

    59MM yearly deferred.

    Reply
  135. This one belongs to the Reds

    42 mins ago

    I’m sure it is deferred out the wazoo.

    1
    Reply
  136. Chester Copperpot

    42 mins ago

    What a stupid team.

    1
    Reply
  137. brewsingblue82

    42 mins ago

    What?! The Dodgers weren’t even in on the market people said for a long time. That they weren’t looking to sign him to a long term contract. I’m not surprised at all though. Because they dc an offer that crazy money short term. Mets were THIS close. But probably not.

    Reply
    • robw5555

      7 mins ago

      The Dodgers get every Free agent they want. Bichette?

      Reply
  138. mkeving

    41 mins ago

    With the luxury tax on top they’ll be paying $126M/yr for Tucker….yikes

    4
    Reply
    • NineChampionships

      37 mins ago

      That is crazy 😂😂😂.

      That’s more money than my entire A’s payroll and we don’t even have the lowest payroll this year.

      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        32 mins ago

        And people say the A’s and Dodgers are fair together and nothing should be changed

        1
        Reply
        • NineChampionships

          29 mins ago

          What can you do though its not like you can just tell the Dodgers not to spend the money they earn.

          1
          Reply
  139. Piro

    41 mins ago

    I was right

    Reply
  140. Bryzzo2016

    41 mins ago

    60 mil a year… WOW! I wonder what Pittsburgh TOTAL payroll will be next year. Good for Tucker

    Reply
  141. KnicksFanCavsFan

    40 mins ago

    No freaking way should Tucker be baseballs 1st legit $60 mil dollar player. That’s insane!!!!! Who do they think he is? Chelsea Clinton (Chris Tucker voice).

    2
    Reply
  142. Wren

    40 mins ago

    as a Dodger fan i’m stunned. way beyond anything i could have imagined. in a good way. i think. damn

    Reply
  143. kevin mccane

    40 mins ago

    F the Dodgers

    1
    Reply
  144. 2183281

    40 mins ago

    This sucks for baseball.

    2
    Reply
  145. JTizzle23

    40 mins ago

    Bichette is next.

    1
    Reply
  146. hoof hearted

    40 mins ago

    The new evil empire

    1
    Reply
    • LordD99

      37 mins ago

      As a fan of the former Evil Empire, I do not approve this message!

      1
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        31 mins ago

        Somehow eviler empire than The Evil Empire

        Reply
    • For Love of the Game

      32 mins ago

      Where have you been???

      Reply
  147. nacb55

    39 mins ago

    No offense people- but each market has enough people to fill the seats for each game… some teams just don’t invest in their product.
    Not everyone in LA, NY, SF or Chicago care about baseball- not even close. I’d even argue that there are more distractions and places to spend $ on other than games in those markets- so the teams have to compete with other teams in the MLB as well as Theme parks, Broadway, etc.

    Baseball should make the revenue share teams invest all $ on players. And the small market should be compensated to keep/sign their home grown players in some manner like not counting their salaries towards a cap, insuring the investment to pay teams if their long term commitment is a bust or something like that.

    Teams need to be entertaining… that is the industry. mlb should kick teams out who don’t try or force ownership changes.

    1
    Reply
    • robw5555

      17 mins ago

      Baseball is a business. Who are you to say teams dont try? Nobody is ever kicked out.

      Reply
  148. seth

    39 mins ago

    I know baseball doesn’t want a salary cap but this is getting out of hand.

    1
    Reply
  149. Old York

    38 mins ago

    MLB needs to split into Super League, Normal League and the Junior League. The Super League can have the Dodgers and the… Blue Jays and the… uhh?

    The regular league can have the Mets, Astros, Tigers, etc…

    The Junior League can have teams like the Yankees, A’s Marlins, White Sox Rockies, etc.

    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      36 mins ago

      as long as there is relegation

      Reply
      • Old York

        34 mins ago

        @Diggydugler

        Yes, sir. And the team that finishes last in the Junior league has to sell the team.

        Reply
    • robw5555

      15 mins ago

      Several problems with you leagues. The BLue Jays? Super league? The Marlins swept the Mets out of the playoffs in 2025. Yet the Mets are so special? Soto is a guy out for himself.

      Reply
  150. 412_Ryan

    38 mins ago

    Paying a 5 WAR player 60 mil a year is absolute insanity

    2
    Reply
  151. Charles B

    38 mins ago

    This organization has no shame. I guess if the other billionaire owners are going to sit on the sidelines. Sill hard to believe.

    Reply
  152. Tankathon

    38 mins ago

    I think I hate baseball now

    1
    Reply
  153. Dfan

    38 mins ago

    I’d be more excited if they brought Farmer John’s back

    Reply
    • agentx

      2 mins ago

      I’d love to see the Cool-A-Coo back in the lineup, too.

      Reply
  154. Wrian Washman

    38 mins ago

    Waiting for blue skies to defend this crap:
    Shohei Ohtani: $680 million deferred from 2034-2043.
    Mookie Betts: $115 million in salaries deferred from 2033-2044.
    Blake Snell: $66 million deferred from 2035-2046.
    Freddie Freeman: $57 million deferred from 2028-2040.
    Will Smith: $50 million deferred from 2034-2043.
    Tanner Scott: $21 million deferred from 2035-2046.
    Teoscar Hernández: $32 million deferred from 2030-2039.
    Edwin Díaz: Added to the list with payments extending to 2047.

    2
    Reply
    • vertigo

      26 mins ago

      Defend what? Any team can use deferred payments. Stop crying.

      1
      Reply
      • Wrian Washman

        10 mins ago

        No not any team can defer over 1 billion dollars, clown. This is worst than when Astros fans were going around saying “everybody cheats”. Not every team can hold a 500 million dollar payroll. Not every team owns their own TV deal or live in large market and city like LA. Not every team can operate like this. Can this fanbase possibly find a different phrase to parrot through their echo chamber besides “EvErY oNe CaN dO iT”

        Reply
    • 920falcon

      24 mins ago

      Thanks for this. Adds some context.

      1
      Reply
    • phenomenalajs

      18 mins ago

      What would be amazing would be if MLB eventually does implement some sort of cap, even $500M, and that the deferred salaries count against the cap in those years. The Dodgers would be forced in the next decade to spend less new money than they do now.

      Reply
  155. DolemiteisMyname

    38 mins ago

    Arte Moreno is livid.The Dodgers stole all his thunder After making a 3 way trade and BOOM!! The Dodgers do this…

    1
    Reply
  156. Champs64

    37 mins ago

    Yawn……..

    1
    Reply
  157. Redsforlife

    37 mins ago

    Lol $60 mil a year for Kyle Tucker.

    1
    Reply
  158. terry g

    37 mins ago

    60 M a year for 4 years.

    Reply
  159. Craviduce

    36 mins ago

    Ridiculously stupid that this can continue. Hey, I know it’s within the current rules, but I pray we can get Cap/Floor to the salary situation. The Dodgers aren’t blinking with the current penalties..

    I love baseball but a work stoppage to fix this mess is needed to save baseball.

    Otherwise it’s Dodgers all the time…. No mid market, small market team can ever compete.

    5
    Reply
  160. bestone

    35 mins ago

    But….but….media was reporting seeing him with some Toronto real estate agents….

    2
    Reply
  161. hyraxwithaflamethrower

    35 mins ago

    “Dodgers aren’t ruining baseball.” Yeah, they kind of are. Nobody can really compete with a team of that many stars. It took a miracle run by the Jays to make it close, and I doubt that happens again. When a team gets close, Dodgers just super-overpay for the best FA’s at whatever position.

    And yeah, I’m ticked at the Bob Nutting’s of the baseball world, too, but guys like him are ruining it for their fans. Dodgers are ruining it for everyone but Dodgers fans.

    2
    Reply
  162. beersy

    35 mins ago

    How on Earth is Kyle Tucker worth $60M a year? And the opt outs are a cute addition.

    1
    Reply
    • 920falcon

      27 mins ago

      I was thinking the same thing. Dont know how the contract is structured, but, who is opting out on 60 million.

      Reply
  163. SportsBum

    35 mins ago

    I’m guessing the Dodgers know there will be or are actively trying to get others on board with a salary cap when the CBA is up by spending like this. It’s not just the high payroll, it’s the deferrals too. Not only are fans outside of (mostly just Dodgers fans) the high spending teams getting more annoyed with them, but I imagine a lot of owners are too. It almost seems like they’re desperate to spend now because they know it’s not gonna last.

    Reply
    • robw5555

      20 mins ago

      Dodgers will get Bichette and Skubal and there will be no salary cap.

      Reply
  164. ChrisP 2

    35 mins ago

    Turning the league into a joke. Which is why a cap is needed. Tucker should be ashamed. Loser

    4
    Reply
    • vertigo

      28 mins ago

      Ashamed for making 60m and playing for a World Series Championship team x2? Don’t think so. I’m sure he is quite happy.

      Reply
    • Chin Muzak

      22 mins ago

      I’m sure the 60 million dollar man will be totally ashamed and devastated that ChrisP 2 called him a loser on mlbtr.

      Reply
    • robw5555

      19 mins ago

      You are funnny.

      Reply
  165. Quinnap89

    34 mins ago

    Imagine this…(regardless of how many WS tiles they win during this period) in the mid 2030’s to mid 2040’s they’ll be rolling with a 500 million dollar payroll and having a Bobby Bonilla day for all these guys

    Reply
    • Thanatos7983

      24 mins ago

      Most likely all that money is collecting interest before they start paying all these guys

      Reply
    • robw5555

      23 mins ago

      Another Yankee or Met fan. Oh well. Cohen is blown away by LA. They eat him for lunch.

      Reply
  166. Jump 84

    34 mins ago

    Good for Mr. Tucker. Whole Baseball season is tough and not for all. Playball, gotta love baseball.

    Reply
  167. dartvard

    34 mins ago

    At this point, I’ll take the Sox if the Yanks can’t get it done.

    Reply
  168. 920falcon

    34 mins ago

    Not being critical one way or the other, just an obsevation: the Dodgers pay more in luxury tax penalties than the Yankees and Mets combined. Amazing.

    2
    Reply
  169. Stretch1994

    34 mins ago

    Yawn… next

    Reply
  170. Dubbs

    33 mins ago

    Gay.

    3
    Reply
  171. Birdie man

    33 mins ago

    F’ing ridiculous

    1
    Reply
  172. Never Remember

    33 mins ago

    Perfect. This is the best spot for him. Good for baseball and for the world

    1
    Reply
  173. Wrian Washman

    33 mins ago

    What a pathetic, disgusting sport this has become.

    2
    Reply
  174. splinkysf

    33 mins ago

    Make it stop

    Reply
  175. ❤️ MuteButton

    33 mins ago

    Lockout? How about fans just boycott this ridiculous spending spree.

    4
    Reply
  176. Well Hung

    33 mins ago

    It probably becomes 40 million a year when deferrals are factored in

    Reply
  177. For Love of the Game

    33 mins ago

    This would cost the Dodgers $120 mill. a seasoned with the luxury tax. Insane!

    1
    Reply
  178. Echopark

    32 mins ago

    Dodgers are not paying Tucker for baseball.
    They are paying Tucker to leave after 4 years of baseball.
    LOL

    2
    Reply
    • Echopark

      29 mins ago

      I humbly submit this comment ^^ for MLB Trade Rumors “2026 comment of the year” award

      1
      Reply
  179. Hank Murphy

    32 mins ago

    Blue Jays better get off their a$$ and sign Bo now.

    Reply
  180. YellowCleats

    32 mins ago

    Might as well give the trophy to the dodgers now. It’s not as fun when it’s not competitive between teams

    Reply
  181. antcell22

    31 mins ago

    Baseball is broken I’m done

    Time for new a new hobby

    6
    Reply
    • vertigo

      30 mins ago

      bye!

      1
      Reply
  182. SteveAdamsEsq

    31 mins ago

    Yet another player to use the Mets to jack up the Dodgers. When will they learn?

    1
    Reply
    • robw5555

      24 mins ago

      The Mets are amatuers. The Dodgers can get any player they want. I think they never wanted Soto. Bichette and Skubal to LA.

      Reply
  183. Astros71

    30 mins ago

    OMG the Dodgers are doing everything. Although Teoscar may be on the block now.

    Reply
  184. Bruce wulff

    30 mins ago

    The heck with any competitive balance! Dodgers all the way for next 10 years plus!

    1
    Reply
  185. goastros123

    30 mins ago

    Can the Astros cheat to beat the Dodgers in the world series once more, thus saving MLB?

    1
    Reply
  186. StreakingBlue

    30 mins ago

    The sour grapes from some people. Who wouldn’t want to go to the Dodgers? They are a well ran organization who has the top payroll, but the top farm system. They do this because they have the smartest ownership along with the best front office in baseball.

    Reply
  187. Jroo

    29 mins ago

    The owners wanted this deal done. People will be screaming for a salary cap now.

    1
    Reply
  188. stuart schlotterbeck

    29 mins ago

    Wow, what a surprise. NOT!!!

    Reply
  189. Skylander

    29 mins ago

    The rest of the owners seem perfectly happy collecting their share of the Dodger tax, while the Dodgers build a staggering juggernaut of a team. I’d prefer more parity but can’t blame the Dodgers for investing so heavily into their player personnel. Other owners need to step up.

    3
    Reply
  190. Shaun's Mom

    28 mins ago

    What a coward

    2
    Reply
  191. jvent

    28 mins ago

    F. U. Tucker
    David Stearns “Wake Up” and sign Bellinger right now, than Suarez, than trade Baty, Sproat, Peterson and Mauricio to Detroit for Skubal. We can still be good IF STEARNS AND COHEN does things for the fans.
    Lindor, Semien, Soto, Suarez, Bellinger, Polanco, Vientos DH, Alvarez and Benge
    Skubal, McLean, Manaea, Holmes, Scott and Tong

    1
    Reply
    • Joel from NY

      4 mins ago

      jvent: I don’t think Bellinger is nearly as good as Tucker and from what’s out there they won’t go past 4 years for anybody. So, I’d be very surprised if that happens. Your deal for Skubal would be laughed at by the Tigers. Me, I don’t want Bader or Austin Hays or another mediocrity. Play the kids and see what shakes out. I’m prepared for the Mets to win 75-80 games this year. It was foolish to let Alonso and Diaz go. My opinion of Stearns has gone way down. btw, please check Suarez’ stats after he was traded.

      Reply
  192. choof

    28 mins ago

    Everybody is complaining but this is awesome. Baseball needs a villain

    Reply
  193. Old York

    28 mins ago

    So, the lineup is looking better. 1 through 5 are all stars but they need to work on that bottom of the lineup. Need an all-star CFer and an all-star 2B man.

    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      26 mins ago

      Bo is still available.

      1
      Reply
  194. CantStop27

    27 mins ago

    Are Dodgers fans booing him still? Lol a former Astro lol first Mookie who cheated with Red Sox in 2018, now Tucker with Astros lol

    Reply
  195. differentbears

    27 mins ago

    lol

    lmao, even.

    The Dodgers love their fans. They want us to be happy.

    Reply
  196. robw5555

    26 mins ago

    When people here were speculating about the Yankees, Mets or Blue Jays, I said one thing. If the Dodgers want him, they have him. If the Dodgers want Bichette. he is theirs. Skubal Dodgers. Skubal gets 500 million from them? Who will win in 2026? Dodgers. They are not finished. The Dodgers didnt want Soto , or he would be there.

    Reply
  197. RichP

    26 mins ago

    Over pay for a third World Series Title.

    3
    Reply
  198. Dean A Bohl

    26 mins ago

    Sad! Glad for him but sad for BB! $60 million a year is unreal!

    1
    Reply
  199. Suitcase Simpson

    25 mins ago

    people were saying 50m is an overpay for a player of his caliber, so why the outrage over a team signing him for even more than that? now he’s dangerous because he’s on the dodgers.

    Reply
  200. Cardsfanatik redux

    25 mins ago

    This just in, Dodgers sign Tucker, All salary deferred until the 2950 season

    Reply
  201. BartoloColonsTightPants

    25 mins ago

    Bring on the lockout. Bye bye baseball.

    2
    Reply
  202. Iacredolo

    24 mins ago

    Baseballs heart loses yet another fragment.
    Say what you want, this is NOT good for the game.
    Some level of competitive balance benefits the sports health overall. Once 15-20 teams fans bases completely drop off the map you will have a hard time getting them back.
    Baseball has already fallen far behind the NBA and NFL, and this kind of stuff further cements it.
    Far and away the biggest competitive imbalance we’ve seen in any of the three major sports in my life time.

    3
    Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      16 mins ago

      Uhhh, soccer IS a major sport even if you live in Murica.

      Reply
  203. andymeyer

    24 mins ago

    Not surprised one bit. And it’s ridiculous nonsense like this that we are staring at a crippling lockout come 2027. Dodgers have no shame in doing it and it’s ruining the game.

    3
    Reply
  204. Emjay

    24 mins ago

    Dodger fan here. I feel like this is an overspend. Tucker’s good, but not $60M AAV good.

    2
    Reply
  205. zacharydmanprin

    23 mins ago

    Gross overpay X 2 not to mention the salary tax.

    1
    Reply
  206. gorav114

    23 mins ago

    Im just glad its not Toronto

    Reply
  207. Yoyosoxsox

    23 mins ago

    Haha so lame. This is just stupid. Hope he gets injured

    Reply
  208. King Floch

    23 mins ago

    I’m just happy the Jays or Yankees didn’t get him.

    Reply
  209. splinkysf

    22 mins ago

    Gross

    Reply
  210. Roper

    22 mins ago

    Texas Rangers will go down in history as the last team (not named LA Dodgers) to win a world series until like 2035.

    Reply
  211. Dutch Vander Linde

    21 mins ago

    Dodger Boy Manfred made it happen again.

    Reply
  212. 920falcon

    21 mins ago

    Btw, the Lerners in Washington were deferring before deferring was cool.

    Reply
  213. gr81t2

    21 mins ago

    Opt out? Yea, he’s not opting out

    If this contract doesn’t ultimately lead to a MLB salary cap, they’ve just shot themselves in the foot. There is only so much money to go around for sports/entertainment. And people will lose interest when too many players are getting stupid money. Just look at the NBA. Every 9 point 8 rebound guy is making 9 digits. The product sucks. People will eventually lose interest.

    1
    Reply
    • dasit

      12 mins ago

      people are losing interest in the nba because the style of play has become unwatchable. baseball is as fun to watch as ever

      Reply
  214. TtheG

    20 mins ago

    Might as we be an AI version 2026 World Series at this point. Soul-less dodgers are ruining the league.

    Reply
  215. Ken Card

    20 mins ago

    Yes, this is shocking. Who would’ve thought the Dodgers? I think the lockout’s gonna be a lot longer than people think…

    Reply
  216. bag o ballz

    20 mins ago

    That is ridiculous

    Reply
  217. CaseyAbell

    20 mins ago

    Will be fun to see the deferrals. Meanwhile, I can hate the Dodgers even more, along with almost everybody else.

    Reply
  218. manfraud

    20 mins ago

    Huge overpay that’s going to really mess up contract negotiations in future seasons. Hard to imagine a lockout not happening

    Reply
  219. stingray23

    19 mins ago

    The Doyers remind me of the Steinbrenner Yankees. Just buy everyone to win championships.

    1
    Reply
    • billysbballz

      10 mins ago

      Sorry pal, what the dodgers are doing is nothing close to what the Yankees did and if you don’t believe me look at the salary disparity then and now.

      Reply
  220. RochesterMetsFan

    18 mins ago

    This is disgusting

    2
    Reply
  221. TigerBacker

    17 mins ago

    Next, Skubal to the Dodgers. This is no fun for anyone but Dodger fans. Meanwhile, the superstars are getting their money while the rest of the players fight over the scraps. Many good free agents who have priced themselves out of jobs or get comparatively low pay just to have a job.

    Reply
  222. revolver

    16 mins ago

    Let’s not forget the 66 million the dodgers will have to pay in penalties for each year on top of the 60 million salary.126 million for one player is more than a lot of teams entire roster.

    1
    Reply
  223. yankswang

    16 mins ago

    Dodgers next step is to sign Bo Bichette.
    Baseball died.

    Reply
  224. aragon

    16 mins ago

    Salary cap, baby!

    1
    Reply
  225. retsubllab

    16 mins ago

    I heard the Dodgers are collecting and freezing Tucker’s sperm so that in 2525 they can birth an offspring to pay the deferrals to!!

    Reply
  226. Dojaho

    15 mins ago

    The reason you have to pay $15 for a beer at the park. Salaries have become a damn joke

    1
    Reply
  227. Renotribefan

    14 mins ago

    Am I the only one who WANTS a strike/lockout in 27?

    I’ve been a baseball fan my entire life and watched in 94 when the WS was canceled, but remained a loyal fan throughout. I’ll always love baseball, but MLB is just becoming disgusting to follow anymore. There are a small number of teams that can spend like the Mets, Red Sox, Yankees while NOBODY can spend like the Dodgers.

    Smaller market teams have a choice. Try to be competitive every year like the Indians, Rays, or Brewers and hope that you can get hot in the playoffs or go for it every once in a while and absolutely suck otherwise. Everyone who’s honest and not blinded by fandom knows this is ruining baseball. It’s sad.

    We need a lockout for as long as it takes to get a salary cap and a salary floor. If it takes all of 2027, so be it. If it takes longer, then fine. But something needs to change if baseball wants to survive

    2
    Reply
    • Joel from NY

      12 mins ago

      Interesting. Maybe you’re on to something.

      Reply
  228. billysbballz

    14 mins ago

    I am a true capitalist. I believe in a free market and despise socialism. I cannot stand salary caps in sports because that ultimately hurts the players and I want to see the players who the fans go to watch make money. Yet these small market teams continue to pocket money and never invest back into their team. Some of the small market owners are wealthier then big market owners but do not have tv contracts so they refuse to invest any money to improve their team. So I am a true believer in a salary cap floor at 200m. But watching the dodgers just bully every team they have to have some salary cap ceiling as well (400m) and if you choose to go over you lose the ability to draft players in the first 6 rounds and lose that money as well and also you should not be able to sign international players until you go back under the 400m cap. I don’t think the tax payments should ever go back to the small market teams who don’t invest that money back into their teams but you need to penalize teams like the dodgers by taking away the ability to have a strong farm system to trade from when they continue to spend way more then every team in baseball.

    Reply
    • Rizzutos's_Canoli

      6 mins ago

      I am a true democratic socialist and despise capitalism run amok. Sounds like you’re promoting some forced equity here, and rightly so. I think there should be a floor and cap and ticket prices regulated accordingly so every income level can afford to go to the ball park and partake in concessions, etc.

      Reply
  229. Anthony maresca

    13 mins ago

    Oh boy Bellinger going to get paid now as I imagine Mets offer Bellinger 4/180 at $45 million avv to get their man. Steinbrenner will not touch that and they must now move on. 4th place here they come!

    Reply
    • Kermit The Frog

      8 mins ago

      They’re definitely getting him or Bichette, I think Bo would be a much better move, tbh.

      Reply
  230. Manti§

    13 mins ago

    Who the Fuxx let Max Muncy in here!

    Reply
  231. Mike Hunter

    12 mins ago

    But this is good for baseball lol. What a joke

    Reply
  232. jeff Horton

    12 mins ago

    He is not worth nearly that much

    Reply
  233. rothlaj

    11 mins ago

    It’s like joining the dark side. Is their owner Emperor Palpatine? Hey Tucker you have no respect now.

    Reply
  234. CentralFan71

    11 mins ago

    This right here is exactly why there won’t be a 2027 season. Absolutely out of control. In 5 years, it is likely the Dodgers will be paying deferrals for players that aren’t playing for them in excess of about 10 teams’ total payrolls. They are just playing with Monopoly money. Pretty ridiculous. And as a Cubs fan, I can tell you there is no way Tucker is worth $50 to $60 million per year (whatever the deferrals take it down to in AAV)

    2
    Reply
    • Kermit The Frog

      9 mins ago

      It’s really nuts to pay this guy this level of salary.

      Reply
  235. dasit

    10 mins ago

    would anyone be shocked if they went ahead and signed bichette next?

    Reply
  236. zappaforprez

    10 mins ago

    MLB is boring

    Reply
  237. DavRozNYY

    10 mins ago

    LOLOL at the Mets

    Reply
  238. Kermit The Frog

    9 mins ago

    Gee, what a shock! (sarcastic).

    Reply
  239. bighiggy

    9 mins ago

    Cards need outfield prospects and young pitchers. Would love to see them move romero and donovan to the Dodgers for a young outfielder and a young pitcher. Would give the Dodgers the option to trade toescar for even more upgrades.

    Reply
  240. BartoloColonsTightPants

    8 mins ago

    Dodgers need to sign Bichette now. Please God make it happen. That’ll be the cherry on top of this news.

    Reply
  241. foppert3

    7 mins ago

    Ha ha. That’s a lot of coin.

    Bobby has got some work to do before he rides off into the sunset.

    Reply
  242. AL B DAMNED

    7 mins ago

    The Yankees will always be known as the Evil Empire, the Dodgers should be known as the Evil Enterprise! Both Entirely Evil!
    😈 💰 🤑💲🌟=All Stars at every position!

    Reply
  243. Jose Galvan

    5 mins ago

    This is just STUPID.
    Baseball is a legit JOKE!!!!!
    If I’m an small market team I’ll just play my minor leaguer…

    Reply
  244. Pylon 2

    5 mins ago

    This is why so many other teams have no money. MLB has allowed the Dodgers to make a mockery of a fail payroll system. Welcome to the new Manopoly Looting Billionaires, where competitive balance is preached but some condition apply.

    Reply
  245. longoverdue1977

    5 mins ago

    THIS IS BULL CRAP! MLB needs salary cap.

    Reply
  246. td272

    3 mins ago

    Hard to understand how people who like the sport can’t recognize that a floor and cap would help sustain it. Other major sports with caps are thriving and players are benefitting from that. The massive inequity in resources between MLB teams is absolutely ruining the game.

    Reply
  247. Joel from NY

    1 min ago

    Stearns has crashed and is currently burning. Rebuild year. Look for 78 wins. Hope that either Benge or Williams or Acuna emerges as a star. Scale back your hopes, Mets fans. Way back.

    Reply
  248. Hornysanchez

    40 seconds ago

    You play to win the game. Plain and simple. And year in and year out, the Dodgers prove that. Other teams billionaire owners just don’t care as much. And it’s not just tossing out cash lavishly. The Dodgers are built for success from the ground up. From office jobs to A ball. They are all built on success

    Reply
  249. Lalo says show me

    35 seconds ago

    I like that Tucker has opt outs after’27 and’28
    If he opts out of that salary that would be ballsy

    Reply
  250. bruinlife33

    3 seconds ago

    Enjoy your expensive ball0ark experience Dodger fans.

    Reply
« Older Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Dodgers To Sign Kyle Tucker

    Rays, Angels, Reds Agree To Three-Team Trade Involving Josh Lowe, Gavin Lux

    Red Sox To Sign Ranger Suárez

    Rockies To Sign Willi Castro To Two-Year Deal

    Rockies Sign Michael Lorenzen

    Latest On Mets’, Blue Jays’ Pursuit Of Kyle Tucker

    Cubs Sign Alex Bregman

    Cardinals Trade Nolan Arenado To Diamondbacks

    Marlins Trade Ryan Weathers To Yankees

    Mets Reportedly Offer Kyle Tucker Short-Term Deal With $50MM AAV; Jays Have Made Long-Term Offer

    Giants Aggressively Pursuing Second Base Upgrade

    Yankees, Cody Bellinger “At An Impasse” In Negotiations

    Braves Re-Sign Tyler Kinley

    Rockies Acquire Jake McCarthy From Diamondbacks

    Max Kepler Receives 80-Game PED Suspension

    Pirates Sign Ryan O’Hearn

    Diamondbacks Will Reportedly Not Trade Ketel Marte

    Tigers, Tarik Skubal Likely Headed To Arbitration Hearing With $13MM Gap In Filing Figures

    Yankees’ Offer To Bellinger Reportedly Above $30MM AAV

    2026 Arbitration Tracker

    Recent

    Dodgers To Sign Kyle Tucker

    Rays, Angels, Reds Agree To Three-Team Trade Involving Josh Lowe, Gavin Lux

    Red Sox To Sign Ranger Suárez

    Mariners Designate Samad Taylor For Assignment

    Mariners Acquire Yosver Zulueta

    Diamondbacks Sign Taylor Clarke

    Cubs Could Use Matt Shaw In Outfield

    Yankees Re-Sign Paul Blackburn

    Takahiro Norimoto To Stay In NPB, Sign With Yomiuri Giants

    Angels, Miguel Castro Agree To Minor League Deal

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android iTunes Play Store

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version