In MLB, the five-man rotation has been the standard for more than 50 years. Things have slowly begun to shift in that regard, however. Several teams have experimented with a six-man rotation over the years, and it’s virtually a requirement for the Dodgers thanks to the presence of Shohei Ohtani and his unique needs as a two-way player. It’s become increasingly common for teams aside from the one that employs Ohtani, however. MLB.com’s Mike Petriello wrote prior to the 2025 campaign that starts on five days of rest have become more common than the traditional four days of rest associated with a standard five-man rotation.
Of course, a start can happen on five days of rest for more reasons than the use of a six-man rotation. A team’s off-days, the deployment of bullpen games, and even something like a starter returning from the IL or being promoted from the minors can push a pitcher’s regularly scheduled start back organically without there being a long-term plan to use a six-man rotation. Regardless of how it’s done, extra rest for pitchers can generally only be a good thing.
The vast majority of pitchers perform better and have an easier time pitching deeper into games when they get extra rest. For teams carrying pitchers used to the schedule used in Nippon Professional Baseball, a six-man rotation comes with the added benefit of keeping those players on a schedule they’re familiar with. That extra rest could also help prevent against injury and late-season fatigue, helping teams confident in their chances of making it to October enter the playoffs in tip-top shape.
The main arguments against using a six-man rotation in the past have mainly been about volume. The greater the size of the rotation, the less often your best pitchers are out there. It’s difficult for some teams to find even five quality starters, much less six. Even those that do have six decent starters would have to be willing to cut into their bullpen, due to the 13-pitcher roster limit. Despite the drawbacks, the tide may be turning regardless.
The 2025 campaign saw teams like the Red Sox and Mets enter the season with more starters than they could fit into the rotation on paper, though injuries left those teams to use six-man rotations only sparingly throughout the year. They have just as much (if not more) starting depth this year, however, and other teams have begun to follow suit. Looking at the depth charts of certain teams, some would struggle not to use a six-man rotation if everyone is healthy concurrently. The Cubs and Orioles both added more starters to their roster this offseason than will fit into a fully-healthy rotation, while the aforementioned Red Sox have an on-paper starting five that fails to include two consensus top-50 prospects in the sport (Payton Tolle and Connelly Early) plus two starters expected to return from injuries early in the year (Patrick Sandoval and Kutter Crawford).
These aren’t the only teams facing a potential surplus of arms. Even with Shane Bieber set to start the year on the injured list, the Blue Jays will be pushing one of Jose Berrios or Eric Lauer to the bullpen—and that’s before considering longtime top prospect Ricky Tiedemann. Gerrit Cole and Carlos Rodon could push impressive young arms like Will Warren and Luis Gil out of the Yankees’ rotation before the end of the first half if the injury bug doesn’t do so before then. The Mets currently figure to use a six-man rotation even with Tobias Myers in a relief role and Jonah Tong at Triple-A. Even a team like the Astros that struggled to field a healthy rotation at all last year currently has upwards of ten arms in the conversation for starts headed into Opening Day, with reinforcements from the injured list likely at some point.
Of course, it should be remembered that pitching injuries have always been inevitable and have only become increasingly common over the years. Some of these teams will struggle to field even a five-man rotation at one point or another this year, and a few will likely never have enough healthy starting depth that a six-man rotation becomes a realistic possibility for more than a couple of weeks at a time. With so many clubs loaded in pitching depth, however, it becomes easier and easier to see rival front offices looking towards the example of the reigning back-to-back World Series champions and adopting some of their tactics.
If the Dodgers open the season with Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Tyler Glasnow, Blake Snell, Ohtani, Emmet Sheehan, and Roki Sasaki all ready to start games, that group of six will be backed up by an incredibly deep group that also includes Ben Casparius, River Ryan, Kyle Hurt, Justin Wrobleski, Gavin Stone, Landon Knack, and Bobby Miller (not to mention non-roster invitees like Cole Irvin and Nick Frasso). That’s the sort of depth that would make it easy to field a six-man rotation all throughout the year even in spite of injuries, and while no team quite matches that level of depth, teams like those in Boston, Queens, and on the north side of Chicago do come close.
For those clubs, the biggest hangup might end up being the risk of wearing out their bullpens. While the Dodgers have three spots available in their projected bullpen for optionable relievers, the Mets and Cubs both only have two (one of which, in the case of Chicago, belongs to closer Daniel Palencia). Teams with such minimal flexibility in the bullpen can struggle to keep their relief corps fresh throughout the season, and that would surely only get harder with seven spots instead of eight.
How do MLBTR readers think the six-man rotation will fare around the league in 2026? Will we see more teams than just the Dodgers utilize one for most or all of the season? Or will it be more of the same where teams prefer to find other ways to get their starters extra rest, such as occasional spot starts and bullpen games? Have your say in the poll below:

with the crazy amount of injuries to pitchers, and nobody doing a damn thing about it, i’d say teams need to employ 9-man rotations or maybe 12 just to be safe
9 leaves you with just 4 bullpen arms, 12 leaves you with 2. Injuries will happen whatsoever and pitchers will be mad because they can’t play often.
@ Astros…..I do believe the great bing was joking.
I don’t know. Maybe
Short answer. Yes.
If MLB would implement a schedule like milb (every team is off on Monday and plays Tuesday-Sundays), six man rotations would be doable, the norm and injuries would decrease.
Yeah, I think so. However, I think some teams will still push their ace out every 5 days.
I would say it will be more common. More teams are going to use the IL to spell pitchers and I think you will see a good number of young pitchers with options getting those options used a lot this year.
… No. Not a f***in chance. There aren’t 150 competent guys that can keep a rotation spot for an entire year based on skill level alone. That doesn’t even factor in injuries. Now there’s 180 spots? Ew.
That’s why the Angels never made the playoffs with Ohtani. They expected a 6th joker to pitch competently when 3, 4, and 5 were already leading the league in clown make-up.
I could see rebuilding teams doing this to give MLB innings pitched to more guys and figure out who is good or not while easing prospects into the majors.
Some older pitching coaches will tell you the injuries are because guys aren’t pitching enough now with all the four and five inning starts.
What would you have one less guy in the pen when you have to use the pen more? Makes no sense.
Japanese teams might use a six man rotation, but their pitchers are expected to last longer per start. That’s not the case here in the US.
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing about the bullpen. If the idea is to save wear and tear on arms, then the bullpen ends up wearing down with a rotation of another starter that is lucky to go 5 innings on a good day. Most teams that try this end up abandoning it at some point because the starters end up getting injured anyway (despite the extra rest) and then they need more bullpen arms to compensate.
Teams need 8 starters to get through a season. It is too difficult to stretch out a middle reliever and you probably can’t stash three competent starters in the minors. A six man rotation that flexes down to five once the first injury hits is probably the answer most of the time.
Not many teams can employ a 6 man rotation. Maybe a few will. There’s some teams like ATL that will struggle finding 5 guys to start games much less 6.
Injuries always put the kibosh on the idea of a 6-man rotation. But there’ll be plenty load management to keep arms fresh for October….
Why not just have 40 man major league rosters and 10 man rotations?
Instead of a 6-man rotation, I would like to see teams use a hybrid system of starters (usually throw 6+ innings) and piggybacks (usually throw 3-5 innings).
The goal is to create the best structure for the pitchers on the team, and make it flexible enough to adjust as the season goes on.
Dodgers can still have an 8-man bullpen because of Ohtani being a 2-way player. Gives them a huge advantage employing the 6-man rotation. It’s much more difficult on other teams that have to use a 7-man bullpen to employ the 6-man rotation. Taxes the bullpen too much to be a viable 162-game strategy. Just another advantage given to the Dodgers.