Headlines

  • Cardinals To Sign Dustin May
  • Mets To Sign Luke Weaver
  • Tigers Sign Kenley Jansen
  • Phillies To Sign Brad Keller
  • Twins Introduce New Minority Owners; Tom Pohlad Named Team’s New Control Person
  • Giants To Sign Adrian Houser
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Poll: Should The Mets Trade Mark Vientos?

By Nick Deeds | December 17, 2025 at 12:51pm CDT

After losing Pete Alonso to the Orioles in free agency and trading Brandon Nimmo to the Rangers, the Mets will need to reconfigure their lineup in a big way this winter. They’ve already added some of the pieces with which they’ll try to do that, bringing in Marcus Semien as the return for Nimmo and following that up by signing Jorge Polanco, but there’s clearly more work to do. It’s with that backdrop that reporting yesterday indicated the Mets could look to trade infielder Mark Vientos this winter, perhaps while eyeing the addition of a big bat to the lineup.

Trading Vientos certainly has some merit. The 26-year-old was a merely league average hitter by the numbers this year, with a 97 wRC+ thanks to his 40 extra-base hits (including 17 homers) propping up a paltry .289 on-base percentage. That sort of production won’t cut it for a poor defensive third baseman who figures to get the majority of his playing time at first base or DH next year, but his youth and power potential could still be enough to catch the eye of some teams in need of right-handed pop in their lineup, with the Mets perhaps getting some pitching back in return.

With that being said, trading Vientos wouldn’t come without risk. Still in his mid-20s, Vientos has already demonstrated the ability to potentially be an All-Star caliber bat. In 2024, he slashed .266/.322/.516 (132 wRC+) with 27 homers in 111 games. It was a strong enough performance to play as a regular at first base or overlook his defensive deficiencies at the hot corner. If the youngster can rediscover that form, he would offer the Mets a major boost. After all, the Mets themselves need additional righty pop in the lineup after losing Alonso. Letting their veteran slugger walk was already tough for fans to stomach and it would surely get even worse if Alonso’s heir apparent was traded away and broke out somewhere else.

How likely is a return to form for Vientos? The underlying metrics are mixed. Vientos didn’t live up to his expected numbers last year, which could be a sign that some positive regression is on the way. He actually lowered his strikeout rate substantially, dropping from 29.7% in 2024 to just 24.8% this year. Those are good signs and his .277 BABIP this season seems likely to improve going forward. With all of that being said, however, there are certainly some red flags. While his BABIP is likely to improve from last year, it’s unlikely to reach the level of his .324 mark from 2024. While his strikeout rate dropped by nearly five points, his once-elite barrel rate dropped by nearly three. In all likelihood, his true talent level lies somewhere between his weak 2025 and his impressive 2024.

The question then becomes about which side of the spectrum Vientos is more likely to fall on. If he figures to offer a bat with a wRC+ of 120 or greater on a consistent basis going forward, that would be hard to part with for a team in need of right-handed power like the Mets. With that said, if Vientos is more likely to be just a touch better than league average this year, it would be fair to wonder if the Mets would be better off focusing on adding a more impactful player like Kazuma Okamoto and Munetaka Murakami to the first base/DH mix.

Perhaps going with a free agent hitter in Vientos’s place and turning Vientos into a trade chip for pitching would be a smart call. Despite his uneven performance, other clubs would surely be interested in him, especially since he’s cheap. He has not yet qualified for arbitration and can be controlled for four full seasons before he’s slated for free agency.

With that said, it’s also worth considering how a more expensive addition like Okamoto or Murakami could impact the Mets’ ability to pursue an impactful outfielder. Cody Bellinger has been tied to the Mets frequently this winter, and while the rumors connecting the club to Kyle Tucker haven’t been nearly as ubiquitous, the possibility of a deal there is worth considering given the club’s need for outfield help and the small numbers of teams that could realistically meet his rumored asking price. If sticking with Vientos gave the Mets a better shot to land a big outfield bat, then perhaps the club would be better off keeping Vientos in the fold and trying to deal other young players and prospects for pitching help.

How do MLBTR readers think the Mets should proceed with Vientos? Should they keep him, risking an underwhelming 2026 season in order to keep their focus on improving the outfield in free agency? Or should they trade him and risk a breakout elsewhere in order to add more certainty to the lineup? Have your say in the poll below:

Share Repost Send via email

MLBTR Originals MLBTR Polls New York Mets Mark Vientos

Mets To Sign Luke Weaver
Main
Mets Claim Drew Romo, Designate Brandon Waddell
View Comments (61)
Post a Comment

61 Comments

  1. 10centBeerNight

    2 hours ago

    Mets for clicks. It’s the name of the game

    6
    Reply
  2. Day1Mets

    2 hours ago

    Stearns is this you?

    4
    Reply
  3. dugmet

    2 hours ago

    The answer is often, “it depends”. It depends what other teams offer and Mets’ internal assessment of “what went wrong” for Mark in 2025 and why.

    7
    Reply
    • geofft

      1 hour ago

      As you said, it depends on the Mets’ assessment – not mine. Bu it has been hashed that Vientos had a .324 BABiP in 2024, and just .277 in 2025. League average is usually somewhere around .294.
      Last spring, Strearns was asked if he thought Acuna would repeat his success and stick in the majors in ’25. Stearns then volunteered that the same would be the case for Vientos. Teams are going to figure him out and change the way they pitch to him, and Vientos will need to adjust. His second year is going to be harder and he is going to need to keep making adjustments.

      Reply
    • metzfan

      1 hour ago

      metzfan Agreed. it’s a dumb question that’s just clickbait. no way to know how to answer that without knowing what’s being offered. He’s certainly not untouchable

      1
      Reply
  4. good vibes only

    2 hours ago

    The answer to trades yes/no is always yes! Let’s go more trades

    1
    Reply
  5. MLB Top 100 Commenter

    2 hours ago

    How do you vote on whether to trade a player without knowing the return and without knowing how much ownership is willing to spend on the replacement if the trade fills something different?

    6
    Reply
    • Acoss1331

      2 hours ago

      All valid points, especially when the Mets just lost a pretty good power bat in Alonso and the response was getting Polanco.

      1
      Reply
    • King. Of. Cards

      2 hours ago

      In this situation they dont need to replace him because they have plenty of infielders already.

      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        1 hour ago

        I am assuming that Baty and McNeil are already in lineup. Acuna, Mauricio and Williams are internal options. If they trade Vientos, I assume they seek Bergman, Munetaka or Okamoto.

        C Alvarez
        1B/DH Polanco
        1B/DH Vientos
        2B Semien
        SS Lindor
        3B Baty
        Outfield Soto, McNeil
        Bench Starling

        2
        Reply
        • King. Of. Cards

          1 hour ago

          Baty
          McNeil
          Lindor
          Semien
          Polanco
          Acuna
          Mauricio

          How many infielders do you think they need?

          Hopefully you aren’t liking your own comments. Because that’s weird.

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          60 mins ago

          Vientos 2025 OPS+ 97

          superior to

          Maurico 2025 OPS+ 88
          L. Acuna 2025 OPS + 63

          Then take into account that the vacancy by his departture is DH, 1B or 3B, with Polanco and Baty available.

          If Vientos is traded, it is with a plan to replace him with another position player not presently on the roster rather than to run out Mauricio or Luisangel at 3B in 2026.

          1
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          57 mins ago

          We may actually only be saying one thing different here. You think that Mauricio could replace Vientos as a starter on Opening Day 2026.

          1
          Reply
        • geofft

          55 mins ago

          McNeil can be used in the OF – and is probably the starting LF for now. Mauricio has one minor league option remaining. That leaves the normal 6 IFs, and there is still a need for a DH. Not to mention injuries.
          either way, they don’t have to keep him, and they don’t have to trade him.

          Reply
        • King. Of. Cards

          54 mins ago

          His OPS was below average and he isn’t playing defense. Thats not a good player. He’s a negative WAR player. Why cherry pick one stat to pretend hes something hes not?

          Baty is playing 3b.

          If they trade Vientos it wont be for another infielder. They have plenty of those.

          Reply
        • geofft

          53 mins ago

          Who is Starling? Starling Marte is gone as a free agent, and he’s not coming back free agent. Especially not if you’re keeping Vientos since neither one of them can realistically play the field. .

          Reply
  6. Alex O.

    2 hours ago

    I’d say keep him for a bench role and if he hits enough to be the full time DH than that’s even better.

    Reply
    • geofft

      1 hour ago

      Sounds logical at first, but ….. Hard to keep a bench player who is a complete liability in the field and is too slow to pinch run. What are they going to do – just let him sit around waiting for a PH opportunity? And they’re already being forced to carry another limited bench player in Acuna since both he and Vientos are out of options.
      It can work on an incomplete team that can actually put these guys in the lineup once a week each. Or if there are a lot of injures. But chances are they will have to roll the dice on Vientos one way or the other: either give him a role, or trade him. The compromise might be to make 8him part of a 3-way platoon at 1B/DH.

      Reply
      • stymeedone

        35 mins ago

        Aren’t all bench players limited? Isn’t that why they are not starters?

        Reply
    • deweybelongsinthehall

      1 hour ago

      Alex, I agree as I don’t see the return being anything special. If they wait too long, he may not have any value. Bobby Dalbec at one time had value but they waited too long for him to get in form and it never came.

      Reply
      • Alex O.

        1 hour ago

        I see the reasons for and against keeping him. I’d say give him a chance as the DH to start the year. He’s not costing the Mets much at all. If he can’t hit like he did in 2024 they can always try to upgrade at the deadline. I don’t see much of a return for him either.

        Reply
  7. chandlerbing

    2 hours ago

    new poll:
    how should mets move forward after disastrous 2025 collapse and subsequent humiliating offseason?

    A: hire new GM
    B: hire new manager
    C: hire a priest to perform exorcism on this cursed franchise
    D: burn citifield to the ground
    E: all of the above

    2
    Reply
    • Bucco79

      1 hour ago

      I wish I had Mets problems

      1
      Reply
  8. King. Of. Cards

    2 hours ago

    They dont need him. He played terribly laat year so they cant count on him. Of course they should trade him assuming they can get something of at least moderate value back.

    1
    Reply
  9. Fgh

    2 hours ago

    Dude can’t hit a fastball.

    Reply
    • I Like Big Bunts

      1 hour ago

      “Mark Vientos has historically been a strong fastball hitter, but his performance against them dipped in the first half of 2025 before he adjusted, showing a transformation to handle all pitches better; he went from drilling fastballs in his breakout year to struggling initially in 2025, but his coaches emphasized patience, leading to improved overall hitting.”

      2
      Reply
      • geofft

        1 hour ago

        @ Bunts… leading to improved hitting……. for six weeks. Then he collapsed again in September.

        1
        Reply
        • I Like Big Bunts

          21 mins ago

          In his defense, all the Mets did.

          Reply
  10. DarkSide830

    2 hours ago

    Guy sucks, but they should be spensing some of that Cohen bread instead of trading guys.

    Reply
  11. HEHEHATE

    2 hours ago

    They cant trade baty. I think you ride out Mauricio and vientos and move acuna instead.

    Reply
  12. rmullig2

    1 hour ago

    Trade him now while his value is low, that would be a brilliant move by the front office.

    4
    Reply
    • stymeedone

      32 mins ago

      Or, trade him now while he still has value, because another bad season removes any value.

      Reply
  13. Ma4170

    1 hour ago

    Play him. He showed how good a hitter he can be in 2024 and the playoffs. Bad sophomore year but still with upper tier hard contact. I could see a bounce back for sure. No reason to trade him while his value is low.

    Reply
    • King. Of. Cards

      1 hour ago

      Yes there is. He was bad last year. He could be bad this year and if he is it could cost them games. They barely missed the playoffs in 2025 better play from him probably would have been the difference.

      Reply
  14. Miken31

    1 hour ago

    Whether a player should be traded is dependent upon what a player can be traded for. Obviously his value is not as much this off-season as it was last off-season but the question becomes do they want to try and trade him now while he still has some value or wait when his value could get higher if he has a rebound season or absolutely plummet if he has another bad year. It also depends on if he has a path to playing time or not.

    1
    Reply
    • King. Of. Cards

      1 hour ago

      The last part is the key here. They dont have a place for him to play and probably shouldn’t make one for him because they are in win now mode(I think) and they can’t count on him. He’s better offf going to a non contender and trying to rebuild his value while getting a chance to play.

      Reply
  15. Old York

    1 hour ago

    No. Trading Vientos now would be selling low.

    The 2025 line (97 wRC+) hides real positives: K% dropped nearly 5 points, Hard-Hit% was 50%, Barrel% still well above average, and xwOBA (.318) beat results. BABIP was down, not the bat speed. Projections still see ~115 wRC+ / 25–30 HR at pre-arb cost. With Alonso gone and RH power scarce, moving cheap, controllable power after a down year is how teams lose value.

    Reply
    • King. Of. Cards

      1 hour ago

      Win now teams can’t hold onto players hoping they regain their form. Thats not how it works. And if he doesnt bounce back his trade value will be even lower.

      Reply
      • Old York

        56 mins ago

        @King. Of. Cards

        Mets don’t look to be in ‘win-now’ mode, after losing all those players. They’re in a rebuild mode again.

        Reply
        • King. Of. Cards

          52 mins ago

          I bet they sign Tucker or Bellinger. Probably sign a big name starter too. I dont think they are rebuilding.

          Reply
        • ShaqFoo

          49 mins ago

          hell no. the Mets will be better as their young players will get more opportunities.

          Reply
        • Old York

          46 mins ago

          @King. Of. Cards

          We’ll see… they’ve been quiet so far. Bellinger might be a decent pick up but I’m not soldo n Tucker.

          Reply
        • King. Of. Cards

          45 mins ago

          You think?

          I bet they sign Tucker or Bellinger. I bet they spend more than any other team from today until opening day.

          Reply
        • geofft

          42 mins ago

          They’re already up to $310 million and the team still has multiple holes. They can’t realistically spend enough to fill them all. Just how much do you think they can spend.

          Reply
        • King. Of. Cards

          38 mins ago

          I think they can spend as much or more than any team in baseball.

          Reply
  16. VonPurpleHayes

    1 hour ago

    I said no because he didn’t have a great year and his value took a hit. Gamble that he bounces back.

    Reply
    • King. Of. Cards

      1 hour ago

      Like the Phillies did with Castellanos last year?

      1
      Reply
      • VonPurpleHayes

        7 mins ago

        How is that relevant at all? Casty was a terrible contract from the start. There was no trade value last year or this year.

        Remember when I said the Cards should trade Arenado 2 seasons ago before it was too late and you went crazy? How’s that going for you?

        Reply
  17. WillisVonGillis

    1 hour ago

    If they canget an established reliever for him, I’d do it.

    Otherwise I’d hold onto him. I think Polanco McNeil and Vientos would cover 1B and DH adequately over 162 games.

    Reply
  18. zack novotny

    1 hour ago

    I think that a 3 team trade with the Diamondbacks and Mariners actually makes a lot of sense.

    I would send Marte to Seattle, Erod and Pavin Smith to NY from the Dbacks to play first/DH. Also, Dbacks sending $15m to NY.

    Seattle Sends George Kirby to NY and Cijntje to AZ.

    NY sends Jonah Tong to Az

    Along with that, Az signs Bregman,

    With this, Seattle gets their 2B superstar, NY fills some holes and the Dbacks get back some pitching while offloading some payroll

    Reply
    • xcfan

      33 mins ago

      George Kirby has more trade value than Ketel Marte. No need for Yankees to be involved at all if you include him.

      Reply
  19. ShaqFoo

    50 mins ago

    Makes no sense to sell low, especially while he’s still pre-arb.

    Reply
    • King. Of. Cards

      46 mins ago

      How do you know this is selling low? Vientos was only good for 1 year otherwise hes been a bum.

      Reply
      • ShaqFoo

        14 mins ago

        Because 25 performance was “lower” than 24’s… hence selling low.

        It’s a low risk choice (financially) to see if he’ll bounce back. We know he’s capable of more.

        Reply
  20. Mr. Pessimist

    44 mins ago

    Who cares the team has been destroyed.

    Reply
    • MetsSchmets!

      23 mins ago

      Whyd you click and comment then?

      Reply
  21. BV

    35 mins ago

    I like Vientos. I expected the sophomore slump last year. I still think he can be a very good offensive player.

    However, right now, they have Baty, Vientos, acuna and mauricio. For roster management, they probably need to teade 2 of them. You can’t keep any of them in the minors at this point.

    None of this even factors in mcneil.

    Reply
    • Brad Johnson

      20 mins ago

      Acuna and Mauricio aren’t starter-caliber players. Acuna is a classic freebie utility dude. Mauricio might be a second-div starter, and I think it makes sense to keep him around as insurance against Baty or Vientos scuffling. Ultimately, Mauricio is the weakest fit of the four and most obvious to be traded/dumped. Problem is, the Mets probably want something, and he doesn’t really merit a return.

      Reply
  22. Brad Johnson

    23 mins ago

    Every contender needs wins from underpaid players.

    Presently, only Vientos, Baty, Benge, McLean, and Tong are in position to fill that role for the Mets. They can’t replace Vientos at below market prices. Maybe Clifford’s ready later in the year, but you can’t count on that now–especially since they already plan to rip the bandaid with Benge, who looks likely to be overexposed.

    Short of it is, sure, they could sign a Rhys Hoskins for $12MM+tax (probably the full $13.2MM by then) to replace Vientos, but I can’t imagine them getting something in trade that justifies them spending ~$23MM to fix the problem.

    Is Vientos probably someone they’ll want to upgrade long-term? Yes. But they have to live with him for now.

    Reply
  23. Rsox

    14 mins ago

    If the Mets had already signed Bellinger or Tucker or even Bregman it would probably help this make sense a little bit more. As of right now they have only signed Jorge Polanco, who may or may not even be able to handle First Base and no one else. Picture is fuzzy right now so not sure what the answer is

    Reply
  24. cplwhite

    17 seconds ago

    Yes get everything you can for him. Even if its a old pair of shoes. He had 1 good half of a season since then its been useless.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Cardinals To Sign Dustin May

    Mets To Sign Luke Weaver

    Tigers Sign Kenley Jansen

    Phillies To Sign Brad Keller

    Twins Introduce New Minority Owners; Tom Pohlad Named Team’s New Control Person

    Giants To Sign Adrian Houser

    Diamondbacks Showing Interest In Alex Bregman

    Rangers To Re-Sign Chris Martin

    Mets Sign Jorge Polanco

    Royals Sign Maikel Garcia To Extension

    Rays Sign Steven Matz

    Nationals To Sign Foster Griffin

    Pirates Sign Gregory Soto

    Diamondbacks To Sign Merrill Kelly

    Phillies Sign Adolis Garcia To One-Year Deal

    Braves Re-Sign Ha-Seong Kim

    Rangers Sign Danny Jansen

    Subscribers On The Benefits Of Trade Rumors Front Office

    Blue Jays Sign Tyler Rogers To Three-Year Deal

    Dodgers Sign Edwin Diaz

    Recent

    Cardinals To Sign Dustin May

    MLB Mailbag: Tucker, Rays, Mariners, Tigers, Dustin May

    Orioles Designate Maverick Handley For Assignment

    Giants Still In The Market For Pitching

    Mets Claim Drew Romo, Designate Brandon Waddell

    Poll: Should The Mets Trade Mark Vientos?

    Mets To Sign Luke Weaver

    Tigers Sign Kenley Jansen

    The Best Fits For Munetaka Murakami

    Phillies To Sign Brad Keller

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version