After losing Pete Alonso to the Orioles in free agency and trading Brandon Nimmo to the Rangers, the Mets will need to reconfigure their lineup in a big way this winter. They’ve already added some of the pieces with which they’ll try to do that, bringing in Marcus Semien as the return for Nimmo and following that up by signing Jorge Polanco, but there’s clearly more work to do. It’s with that backdrop that reporting yesterday indicated the Mets could look to trade infielder Mark Vientos this winter, perhaps while eyeing the addition of a big bat to the lineup.
Trading Vientos certainly has some merit. The 26-year-old was a merely league average hitter by the numbers this year, with a 97 wRC+ thanks to his 40 extra-base hits (including 17 homers) propping up a paltry .289 on-base percentage. That sort of production won’t cut it for a poor defensive third baseman who figures to get the majority of his playing time at first base or DH next year, but his youth and power potential could still be enough to catch the eye of some teams in need of right-handed pop in their lineup, with the Mets perhaps getting some pitching back in return.
With that being said, trading Vientos wouldn’t come without risk. Still in his mid-20s, Vientos has already demonstrated the ability to potentially be an All-Star caliber bat. In 2024, he slashed .266/.322/.516 (132 wRC+) with 27 homers in 111 games. It was a strong enough performance to play as a regular at first base or overlook his defensive deficiencies at the hot corner. If the youngster can rediscover that form, he would offer the Mets a major boost. After all, the Mets themselves need additional righty pop in the lineup after losing Alonso. Letting their veteran slugger walk was already tough for fans to stomach and it would surely get even worse if Alonso’s heir apparent was traded away and broke out somewhere else.
How likely is a return to form for Vientos? The underlying metrics are mixed. Vientos didn’t live up to his expected numbers last year, which could be a sign that some positive regression is on the way. He actually lowered his strikeout rate substantially, dropping from 29.7% in 2024 to just 24.8% this year. Those are good signs and his .277 BABIP this season seems likely to improve going forward. With all of that being said, however, there are certainly some red flags. While his BABIP is likely to improve from last year, it’s unlikely to reach the level of his .324 mark from 2024. While his strikeout rate dropped by nearly five points, his once-elite barrel rate dropped by nearly three. In all likelihood, his true talent level lies somewhere between his weak 2025 and his impressive 2024.
The question then becomes about which side of the spectrum Vientos is more likely to fall on. If he figures to offer a bat with a wRC+ of 120 or greater on a consistent basis going forward, that would be hard to part with for a team in need of right-handed power like the Mets. With that said, if Vientos is more likely to be just a touch better than league average this year, it would be fair to wonder if the Mets would be better off focusing on adding a more impactful player like Kazuma Okamoto and Munetaka Murakami to the first base/DH mix.
Perhaps going with a free agent hitter in Vientos’s place and turning Vientos into a trade chip for pitching would be a smart call. Despite his uneven performance, other clubs would surely be interested in him, especially since he’s cheap. He has not yet qualified for arbitration and can be controlled for four full seasons before he’s slated for free agency.
With that said, it’s also worth considering how a more expensive addition like Okamoto or Murakami could impact the Mets’ ability to pursue an impactful outfielder. Cody Bellinger has been tied to the Mets frequently this winter, and while the rumors connecting the club to Kyle Tucker haven’t been nearly as ubiquitous, the possibility of a deal there is worth considering given the club’s need for outfield help and the small numbers of teams that could realistically meet his rumored asking price. If sticking with Vientos gave the Mets a better shot to land a big outfield bat, then perhaps the club would be better off keeping Vientos in the fold and trying to deal other young players and prospects for pitching help.
How do MLBTR readers think the Mets should proceed with Vientos? Should they keep him, risking an underwhelming 2026 season in order to keep their focus on improving the outfield in free agency? Or should they trade him and risk a breakout elsewhere in order to add more certainty to the lineup? Have your say in the poll below:

Mets for clicks. It’s the name of the game
Stearns is this you?
The answer is often, “it depends”. It depends what other teams offer and Mets’ internal assessment of “what went wrong” for Mark in 2025 and why.
As you said, it depends on the Mets’ assessment – not mine. Bu it has been hashed that Vientos had a .324 BABiP in 2024, and just .277 in 2025. League average is usually somewhere around .294.
Last spring, Strearns was asked if he thought Acuna would repeat his success and stick in the majors in ’25. Stearns then volunteered that the same would be the case for Vientos. Teams are going to figure him out and change the way they pitch to him, and Vientos will need to adjust. His second year is going to be harder and he is going to need to keep making adjustments.
metzfan Agreed. it’s a dumb question that’s just clickbait. no way to know how to answer that without knowing what’s being offered. He’s certainly not untouchable
The answer to trades yes/no is always yes! Let’s go more trades
How do you vote on whether to trade a player without knowing the return and without knowing how much ownership is willing to spend on the replacement if the trade fills something different?
All valid points, especially when the Mets just lost a pretty good power bat in Alonso and the response was getting Polanco.
In this situation they dont need to replace him because they have plenty of infielders already.
I am assuming that Baty and McNeil are already in lineup. Acuna, Mauricio and Williams are internal options. If they trade Vientos, I assume they seek Bergman, Munetaka or Okamoto.
C Alvarez
1B/DH Polanco
1B/DH Vientos
2B Semien
SS Lindor
3B Baty
Outfield Soto, McNeil
Bench Starling
Baty
McNeil
Lindor
Semien
Polanco
Acuna
Mauricio
How many infielders do you think they need?
Hopefully you aren’t liking your own comments. Because that’s weird.
Vientos 2025 OPS+ 97
superior to
Maurico 2025 OPS+ 88
L. Acuna 2025 OPS + 63
Then take into account that the vacancy by his departture is DH, 1B or 3B, with Polanco and Baty available.
If Vientos is traded, it is with a plan to replace him with another position player not presently on the roster rather than to run out Mauricio or Luisangel at 3B in 2026.
We may actually only be saying one thing different here. You think that Mauricio could replace Vientos as a starter on Opening Day 2026.
McNeil can be used in the OF – and is probably the starting LF for now. Mauricio has one minor league option remaining. That leaves the normal 6 IFs, and there is still a need for a DH. Not to mention injuries.
either way, they don’t have to keep him, and they don’t have to trade him.
His OPS was below average and he isn’t playing defense. Thats not a good player. He’s a negative WAR player. Why cherry pick one stat to pretend hes something hes not?
Baty is playing 3b.
If they trade Vientos it wont be for another infielder. They have plenty of those.
Who is Starling? Starling Marte is gone as a free agent, and he’s not coming back free agent. Especially not if you’re keeping Vientos since neither one of them can realistically play the field. .
I’d say keep him for a bench role and if he hits enough to be the full time DH than that’s even better.
Sounds logical at first, but ….. Hard to keep a bench player who is a complete liability in the field and is too slow to pinch run. What are they going to do – just let him sit around waiting for a PH opportunity? And they’re already being forced to carry another limited bench player in Acuna since both he and Vientos are out of options.
It can work on an incomplete team that can actually put these guys in the lineup once a week each. Or if there are a lot of injures. But chances are they will have to roll the dice on Vientos one way or the other: either give him a role, or trade him. The compromise might be to make 8him part of a 3-way platoon at 1B/DH.
Aren’t all bench players limited? Isn’t that why they are not starters?
Alex, I agree as I don’t see the return being anything special. If they wait too long, he may not have any value. Bobby Dalbec at one time had value but they waited too long for him to get in form and it never came.
I see the reasons for and against keeping him. I’d say give him a chance as the DH to start the year. He’s not costing the Mets much at all. If he can’t hit like he did in 2024 they can always try to upgrade at the deadline. I don’t see much of a return for him either.
new poll:
how should mets move forward after disastrous 2025 collapse and subsequent humiliating offseason?
A: hire new GM
B: hire new manager
C: hire a priest to perform exorcism on this cursed franchise
D: burn citifield to the ground
E: all of the above
I wish I had Mets problems
They dont need him. He played terribly laat year so they cant count on him. Of course they should trade him assuming they can get something of at least moderate value back.
Dude can’t hit a fastball.
“Mark Vientos has historically been a strong fastball hitter, but his performance against them dipped in the first half of 2025 before he adjusted, showing a transformation to handle all pitches better; he went from drilling fastballs in his breakout year to struggling initially in 2025, but his coaches emphasized patience, leading to improved overall hitting.”
@ Bunts… leading to improved hitting……. for six weeks. Then he collapsed again in September.
In his defense, all the Mets did.
Guy sucks, but they should be spensing some of that Cohen bread instead of trading guys.
They cant trade baty. I think you ride out Mauricio and vientos and move acuna instead.
Trade him now while his value is low, that would be a brilliant move by the front office.
Or, trade him now while he still has value, because another bad season removes any value.
Play him. He showed how good a hitter he can be in 2024 and the playoffs. Bad sophomore year but still with upper tier hard contact. I could see a bounce back for sure. No reason to trade him while his value is low.
Yes there is. He was bad last year. He could be bad this year and if he is it could cost them games. They barely missed the playoffs in 2025 better play from him probably would have been the difference.
Whether a player should be traded is dependent upon what a player can be traded for. Obviously his value is not as much this off-season as it was last off-season but the question becomes do they want to try and trade him now while he still has some value or wait when his value could get higher if he has a rebound season or absolutely plummet if he has another bad year. It also depends on if he has a path to playing time or not.
The last part is the key here. They dont have a place for him to play and probably shouldn’t make one for him because they are in win now mode(I think) and they can’t count on him. He’s better offf going to a non contender and trying to rebuild his value while getting a chance to play.
No. Trading Vientos now would be selling low.
The 2025 line (97 wRC+) hides real positives: K% dropped nearly 5 points, Hard-Hit% was 50%, Barrel% still well above average, and xwOBA (.318) beat results. BABIP was down, not the bat speed. Projections still see ~115 wRC+ / 25–30 HR at pre-arb cost. With Alonso gone and RH power scarce, moving cheap, controllable power after a down year is how teams lose value.
Win now teams can’t hold onto players hoping they regain their form. Thats not how it works. And if he doesnt bounce back his trade value will be even lower.
@King. Of. Cards
Mets don’t look to be in ‘win-now’ mode, after losing all those players. They’re in a rebuild mode again.
I bet they sign Tucker or Bellinger. Probably sign a big name starter too. I dont think they are rebuilding.
hell no. the Mets will be better as their young players will get more opportunities.
@King. Of. Cards
We’ll see… they’ve been quiet so far. Bellinger might be a decent pick up but I’m not soldo n Tucker.
You think?
I bet they sign Tucker or Bellinger. I bet they spend more than any other team from today until opening day.
They’re already up to $310 million and the team still has multiple holes. They can’t realistically spend enough to fill them all. Just how much do you think they can spend.
I think they can spend as much or more than any team in baseball.
I said no because he didn’t have a great year and his value took a hit. Gamble that he bounces back.
Like the Phillies did with Castellanos last year?
How is that relevant at all? Casty was a terrible contract from the start. There was no trade value last year or this year.
Remember when I said the Cards should trade Arenado 2 seasons ago before it was too late and you went crazy? How’s that going for you?
If they canget an established reliever for him, I’d do it.
Otherwise I’d hold onto him. I think Polanco McNeil and Vientos would cover 1B and DH adequately over 162 games.
I think that a 3 team trade with the Diamondbacks and Mariners actually makes a lot of sense.
I would send Marte to Seattle, Erod and Pavin Smith to NY from the Dbacks to play first/DH. Also, Dbacks sending $15m to NY.
Seattle Sends George Kirby to NY and Cijntje to AZ.
NY sends Jonah Tong to Az
Along with that, Az signs Bregman,
With this, Seattle gets their 2B superstar, NY fills some holes and the Dbacks get back some pitching while offloading some payroll
George Kirby has more trade value than Ketel Marte. No need for Yankees to be involved at all if you include him.
Makes no sense to sell low, especially while he’s still pre-arb.
How do you know this is selling low? Vientos was only good for 1 year otherwise hes been a bum.
Because 25 performance was “lower” than 24’s… hence selling low.
It’s a low risk choice (financially) to see if he’ll bounce back. We know he’s capable of more.
Who cares the team has been destroyed.
Whyd you click and comment then?
I like Vientos. I expected the sophomore slump last year. I still think he can be a very good offensive player.
However, right now, they have Baty, Vientos, acuna and mauricio. For roster management, they probably need to teade 2 of them. You can’t keep any of them in the minors at this point.
None of this even factors in mcneil.
Acuna and Mauricio aren’t starter-caliber players. Acuna is a classic freebie utility dude. Mauricio might be a second-div starter, and I think it makes sense to keep him around as insurance against Baty or Vientos scuffling. Ultimately, Mauricio is the weakest fit of the four and most obvious to be traded/dumped. Problem is, the Mets probably want something, and he doesn’t really merit a return.
Every contender needs wins from underpaid players.
Presently, only Vientos, Baty, Benge, McLean, and Tong are in position to fill that role for the Mets. They can’t replace Vientos at below market prices. Maybe Clifford’s ready later in the year, but you can’t count on that now–especially since they already plan to rip the bandaid with Benge, who looks likely to be overexposed.
Short of it is, sure, they could sign a Rhys Hoskins for $12MM+tax (probably the full $13.2MM by then) to replace Vientos, but I can’t imagine them getting something in trade that justifies them spending ~$23MM to fix the problem.
Is Vientos probably someone they’ll want to upgrade long-term? Yes. But they have to live with him for now.
If the Mets had already signed Bellinger or Tucker or even Bregman it would probably help this make sense a little bit more. As of right now they have only signed Jorge Polanco, who may or may not even be able to handle First Base and no one else. Picture is fuzzy right now so not sure what the answer is
Yes get everything you can for him. Even if its a old pair of shoes. He had 1 good half of a season since then its been useless.