The Blue Jays have been the most aggressive team in free agency by far this winter. Their offseason so far has been headlined by a seven-year deal for Dylan Cease. That hasn’t stopped them from remaining aggressive at the top of the market, however, and the Jays remain the team that’s been most clearly connected to the winter’s top two free agents: outfielder Kyle Tucker and infielder Bo Bichette. Bichette, of course, has spent his entire career with the Blue Jays and has not been shy about his desire to remain with Toronto going forward. Tucker, meanwhile, seems all but certain to depart from the incumbent Cubs for greener pastures and just yesterday met with the Jays at the club’s Spring Training complex in Dunedin.
While Toronto is very clearly involved in the markets for both players, it’s worth remembering that the Blue Jays already have a luxury tax payroll of around $282MM, according to RosterResource. Adding Tucker or Bichette and a $25-40MM annual salary to the books would push them past the highest threshold of the luxury tax, which sits at $304MM and carries with it the steepest penalties for going over. They might not be willing or able to both re-sign Bichette and also bring Tucker into the fold. If the Jays are only able to land one of the offseason’s top two hitters, then, who would be the better fit for their roster?
Bichette is the familiar pick, and it’s hard to argue with his impact on the team. A three-run homer off Shohei Ohtani Bichette hit while playing through injury in Game 7 of this year’s World Series nearly made the Jays champions and that was just one piece of the .348/.444/.478 performance he turned in across seven Fall Classic games despite being hobbled on the bases and in the field. While an injury-marred and deeply disappointing season for Bichette in 2024 soured some on his overall profile, he’s still turned in a wRC+ of 120 or higher in six of his seven MLB seasons with a career mark of 122. That he’s done all that while typically playing a generally adequate shortstop is all the more impressive.
With that being said, Bichette isn’t exactly a perennial MVP candidate. His defense on the infield has never been great and a disastrous defensive season by the metrics this year has made it all the more clear that his future is likely at second or third base. For as consistently impressive as Bichette has been when healthy, he was only the third-best hitter on the Jays in 2025. Vladimir Guerrero Jr. has, of course, stood head and shoulders above the rest of the team in terms of star power and overall offensive impact, but there have been years where Bichette was outperformed by George Springer, Alejandro Kirk, Brandon Belt, Marcus Semien, and Teoscar Hernandez in the Jays’ lineup over the years. None of those players come close to matching Bichette’s consistency, but it’s fair to argue that he doesn’t offer the sort of six-plus win upside offered by many of the recent top free agents available.
That’s where Tucker stands out. The 28-year-old (29 in January) is a simply a cut above Bichette as a hitter. Tucker’s career 138 wRC+ is four points higher than the mark Bichette posted this year, which was his career-best in a season, outside of his 46-game rookie campaign in 2019. Since the start of the 2021 season, Tucker has hit .277/.365/.514 with 23.4 fWAR, a greater total than Bichette has accumulated across his entire career. Tucker is also a perennial threat to steal 25 to 30 bases, while Bichette has swiped more than 13 bags just once before in his career. Tucker’s status as a left-handed bat would also make him a strong complement to the Jays’ cache of impressive right-handed hitters, which includes not only Guerrero but also Springer and Kirk.
As perfect as the fit between Tucker and the Jays might seem, however, it’s worth considering the fact that Bichette could prove to be a better long-term investment. Both have dealt with injuries over the past two years, with 214 games played for Tucker and 220 for Bichette. With that said, Bichette is a year younger than Tucker and also figures to command the shorter (and cheaper) deal of the two; MLBTR predicts an eight-year, $208MM deal for Bichette, while Tucker is predicted to land a $400MM deal across 11 years. Paying Bichette through his age-35 season certainly sounds more appealing than paying Tucker through his age-39 campaign in terms of the team’s long-term prospects. At the same time, Tucker would undoubtedly offer more near-term impact to a team that just came just a few outs within a World Series title and has already made it as clear as can be that they’re all-in on their current window.
There’s also the positional fit to consider. Bichette could either return to his shortstop position or take second, with Andres Gimenez taking the other middle infield spot. That would leave every other position player in a similar spot to 2025. Addison Barger and Davis Schneider both played some infield and some outfield while Ernie Clement played all around the infield.
If Tucker were signed, he would jump into an outfield mix with Springer, Anthony Santander and Daulton Varsho. It would push Barger and Schneider more firmly into the infield and bump Nathan Lukes to the bench, unless someone were then traded.
Assuming the Blue Jays can only sign one of Bichette or Tucker, which one do MLBTR readers think would be a better fit for the organization? Would Bichette’s status as an anchor of the current team, consistency, and more affordable expected contract make him the better choice? Or does the immediate impact and big lefty bat Tucker offers outweigh those advantages? Or should they skip both and spend their money on relievers or a different bat? Have your say in the poll below:

Neither both would look better in Pinstripes.
The Whitesox do have the best pinstripes around
But have you seen those Rockie pinstripes🤭
Eh, I don’t want Bichette. Heck I’m not even sold on Tucker!
Yeah I’m fine with just Bellinger coming back, and then making a few trades.
Tucker has already proven he is a top 10 batter in the game, wow Bichette made major improvements in the 2025 season and is on the rise, since the Blue Jays are close I’d go with Tucker although Bichette has his home roots so it’s a tough call
Unless they are trading someone, outfield/DH is serious with Springer, Varsho, Santander (and his terrible contract) plus Lukas who deserves a full shot and then Straw who has a contract no-one wants. No point spending more money on an outfielder who has no spot to play.
Springer will play very few games in the OF. He’s a free agent after 2026, as is Varsho. They do need to consider an OF unless they move Barger to RF by signing Bo.
Yeah, no way Tucker would play over Lukes or Straw.
As a Jays fan, give me Tucker.
As a Jays fan i want them both, That should have been an option in the poll.
Bichette, then get a closer. Tucker until he is 41 just has a really bad smell on it.
Would rather Bellinger for 6.
Just because the ask is really high, does not mean he actually signs for the initial ask.!!! He is An Excel client not a Boris client!!!
Purely in terms of “fit” – whatever that means – Bichette would probably be the choice, but Tucker is a significantly better player, both with the glove and the bat.
If the Jays really think they can make it to the WS next season, then they should try to sign Tucker.
Bichette over Tucker. I’m just not sold on a decade long contract worth $400 million for Tucker and i think Bichette could be had for significantly less
I thought that said “Bichette could be BAD for less” and was like well yeah lol.
Bichette at second
Infield is set.
It was obvious in the WS
Tucker. You move BamBam to 3rd, Clement to 2nd Tucker in right. If you can find a taker for Santander, then you try and sign both Tucker and Bichette
Sign Bregman for 6/170ish and then Diaz for closer at 4/90 and call it a successful offseason.
Yeh, pass the pipe this way…
If they believe they can somehow keep Tucker from being hurt all the time, its a no brainrr who to pick.
Problem is, I dont think Tucker is worth 400 million. I wouldn’t go more then 9 years 340-360 range and thats still a lot.
Bo, I would go 6 years 180
I’d pursue Bellinger for less money and fewer years, more flexibility and more complete player.
The New York press and everything coming out of the Winter Meetings prelim has Belli not signing for any less than 6 years…his contract will be around the Bo level also given that his offense is pretty much the same as Bo, but can play multiple positions and is GG or near GG at all of them….
JoJ0 Parker
Blue Jays will need a CF after 2026. Would rather they sign Bo and take a run at Bellinger to play centre after Varsho becomes a free agent.
Bichette, keep Vladdy happy. Outfield is already loaded anyways and it is easier to replace an OF then a power and AVG hitting 2B.
Sign Tucker. That’s bound to be an albatross in my opinion and I’m a red Sox fan. Have at it
Bichette, probably at 2nd. Tucker just doesn’t work at the money and years being tossed around. He feels like an internet creation – there has to be a superstar to drive free agency every year, the once in a lifetime generational game changing player – so that everyone has something to write about every day. It’s not Tucker.
yea that’s a good way of putting it. he’s a really good player, but 400 mil for him is insane
I really would not feel amazing about signing either guy long term, but if I have to choose one I am going with Tucker. Bichette just seems like a huge injury risk to me.
Keep your franchise player, Toronto. I want Bo and Vlady waving that flag together.
Went Tucker because he is the better player.
If you have the money take the better player.
Just sign both now and worry about sustainability later.