Headlines

  • Dodgers To Sign Kyle Tucker
  • Rays, Angels, Reds Agree To Three-Team Trade Involving Josh Lowe, Gavin Lux
  • Red Sox To Sign Ranger Suárez
  • Rockies To Sign Willi Castro To Two-Year Deal
  • Rockies Sign Michael Lorenzen
  • Latest On Mets’, Blue Jays’ Pursuit Of Kyle Tucker
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers To Sign Kyle Tucker

By Anthony Franco | January 15, 2026 at 9:04pm CDT

The two-time defending champions have done it again. The Dodgers are reportedly in agreement with Kyle Tucker on a four-year, $240MM contract. The deal includes $30MM in deferrals and will come with an approximate $57.1MM annual value for luxury tax purposes. Tucker, a client of Excel Sports Management, receives a $64MM signing bonus — all but $10MM of which is paid is upfront — and can opt out after the second or third seasons. The team has not officially announced the signing, pending a physical, and will need to create a 40-man roster spot once it’s official.

Tucker is the latest superstar addition to what was already MLB’s most feared offense. Tucker slots into a lineup that already included Shohei Ohtani, Freddie Freeman, Mookie Betts, Will Smith, Max Muncy, Teoscar Hernández and Tommy Edman. He’ll join Hernández and Andy Pages as the primary outfielders, with Edman also capable of logging center field action when he’s not at second base.

Los Angeles has four outfield prospects who rank prominently near the top of their farm system rankings. They reportedly wanted to avoid locking in long-term commitments as a result. They’ve accomplished that with arguably the biggest annual value in the sport’s history. It’s a $60MM annual value on the surface.

Without adjusting for deferrals, Tucker’s deal would be the second-highest AAV ever. Ohtani technically landed a $70MM AAV on his 10-year, $700MM guarantee, though the massive deferrals involved meant it had a “true” annual value closer to $46MM. One should therefore view the $51MM annual salary on Juan Soto’s 15-year, $765M deal as the more accurate record holder until tonight. Tucker’s adjusted AAV beats that by more than $6MM.

Although Tucker was this offseason’s top free agent, he’s a clear step below the likes of Aaron Judge, Ohtani and Soto of the previous three winters. Tucker has been a consistent All-Star caliber player who’s a little outside the top tier of players in MLB. The fifth overall pick by the Astros in 2015, Tucker broke out in the shortened 2020 season after logging limited big league action in the two preceding years. He connected on 29 or 30 home runs in each of his first three full MLB campaigns, improving his offensive approach along the way.

Tucker was already a great hitter and seemed to be on his way to pulling closer to Judge, Soto and Ohtani with a monster start to the 2024 season. Tucker was out to a .266/.395/.584 slash with more walks than strikeouts through the first two months. He fouled a ball off his right leg and was placed on the injured list with what the Astros initially termed a shin contusion. It turned out to be much more serious, as subsequent testing revealed a fracture that kept him out of action for three months.

The four-time All-Star returned no worse for wear and had a fantastic September. The Astros nevertheless decided to field trade calls after the season. They were never going to meet Tucker’s asking price on an extension and felt they could cash him in for help elsewhere on the roster. They lined up a deal with the Cubs around the Winter Meetings that sent Isaac Paredes, Hayden Wesneski, and prospect Cam Smith to Houston for Tucker’s final year of arbitration.

Tucker’s lone season in Chicago had its ups and downs. He got out to another blistering start, running a .284/.359/.524 slash with 12 homers through the first day of June. Tucker jammed his right thumb diving into second base on a stolen base attempt that day. He avoided the injured list, but subsequent testing revealed that he sustained a tiny fracture at the top of his hand between his ring finger and pinky.

The hand injury wasn’t viewed as a serious issue until Tucker’s performance began to suffer. That didn’t occur right away. His next few weeks were the finest of the season, in fact. Tucker slashed .311/.404/.578 across 25 games that month. Things went off the rails in July, as he batted .189/.325/.235 with just one home run over the next six weeks.

The existence of the hairline fracture wasn’t reported until the middle of August. Cubs officials acknowledged that Tucker had been injured in June but said  that he was fully healthy by the time the injury was revealed publicly. Maybe the thumb became a retroactive explanation for what was actually a simple slump, though it’s possible he developed some subtle bad habits in June as he tried to mitigate the pain of hitting through the break. Manager Craig Counsell gave Tucker a three-game mental reset towards the end of August before plugging him back into the middle of the order.

Tuker appeared to be getting back into a groove when he hit another speed bump. He strained his left calf in early September and landed on the injured list, costing him three weeks in the season’s final month. He finished the regular season with a .266/.377/.464 slash line in a little under 600 trips to the plate. He hit .259 with one homer in eight postseason games as the Cubs advanced to the NL Division Series.

The uneven second half soured some Cubs fans on the Tucker acquisition. His overall numbers were in line with his career marks. Tucker’s offense was 36 percentage points better than league average by wRC+. His lifetime .273/.358/.507 batting line is 38 points above par. Tucker has been in that range in four of the past five seasons. The only exception is his .289/.408/.585 showing over 78 games two years ago.

The ’24 season is probably an outlier, but the Dodgers should feel they’re adding one of the top 10-15 hitters in MLB. He doesn’t expand the strike zone and has a rare blend of plus contact skills and above-average power. Tucker has no issue hitting pitchers of either handedness. He doesn’t have the huge exit velocities of the sport’s premier sluggers, yet he’s a safe bet for 25-30 homers in a healthy season.

Tucker’s glove isn’t as strong at this stage of his career. He won a Gold Glove with Houston in 2022. His defensive grades and sprint speed have declined as he’s gotten into his late-20s. That presumably gave teams pause when considering a long-term investment. That’s especially true of a Dodgers team that wouldn’t be able to move him to designated hitter at any point over an eight-year deal. Tucker’s defense should remain serviceable in the short term. The Dodgers can comfortably plug him into right field and kick Hernández over to left if they don’t trade him.

The Cubs issued Tucker a qualifying offer but made little effort to retain him. The bidding seemingly came down to the Dodgers, Mets and Blue Jays. New York was similarly hesitant to make a long-term commitment, as they reportedly offered a four-year deal at $55MM per season. Toronto was seemingly willing to entertain a longer term at a lower annual value.

Tucker is L.A.’s second qualified free agent signing of the offseason. They added Edwin Díaz on a three-year, $69MM deal around the Winter Meetings. They surrendered their second- and fifth-round draft choices this summer, plus $1MM from their 2027 international bonus pool, to sign Díaz. They’ll forfeit their third- and sixth-round picks for Tucker. The Cubs receive a compensatory pick between Competitive Balance Round B and the start of the third round (currently slated to land 77th overall).

MLBTR had predicted an 11-year, $400MM deal for Tucker at the beginning of the offseason. It’s unclear if any team would have been willing to go to those lengths. He’s giving up some measure of long-term security in exchange for massive salaries over the next couple seasons and the chance to return to free agency at the tail end of his prime.

He’ll have the option of retesting the market before his age-31 and age-32 campaigns — and without being attached to draft compensation barring a change to the qualifying offer rules in the intervening CBA. A five- or six-year guarantee could be well within range at that point. He’ll collect a huge signing bonus, essentially shatter the record for average annual value, and join the team with the best chance to win the World Series in the interim.

While the specific salary breakdown hasn’t been reported, the Dodgers are reportedly paying $54MM of the signing bonus right away. RosterResource estimates their cash payroll obligations close to $428MM for the upcoming season. Tucker’s $57.1MM AAV will push their competitive balance tax projection north of $395MM.

They’re taxed at a 110% rate on spending above $304MM, so Tucker’s deal comes with a staggering $62.81MM tax hit in the first season. The Dodgers are essentially valuing Tucker’s 2026 season alone at $120MM after taxes. L.A. ended last season with a luxury tax payroll of $417MM, costing them another $169.4MM in taxes. Their tax bill alone was higher than the final payroll calculations of 12 teams. They’re trending towards a similar or potentially even greater amount in 2026 depending on what else they do this offseason and at the trade deadline. The aggressiveness continues as they aim for the first three-peat in MLB since the 1998-2000 Yankees.

Tucker’s deal is going to be the latest example for many fans and smaller-market owners that’ll argue for a salary cap in the upcoming round of collective bargaining negotiations. This level of spending also reaffirms why the MLB Players Association has steadfastly maintained that a cap is a non-starter. Next offseason’s CBA talks are expected to be similarly or even more contentious than those that froze the sport for 99 days during the 2022-23 lockout.

That’s not the concern of the Dodgers or the fans, who’ll be thrilled to add another star as they try to cement their dynastic run in 2026. They’ll be heavy favorites in the NL West, and it’s difficult to imagine a scenario in which this team doesn’t make the playoffs. A championship is far from guaranteed, however. The Jays were one swing away from beating them in Games 6 and 7 of last year’s World Series. An extra quarter-second on Isiah Kiner-Falefa’s dash home or another few feet on Ernie Clement’s fly ball in the bottom of the ninth would have flipped the outcome. L.A. ownership and the front office aren’t getting complacent.

After missing on Tucker, the Jays seem likely to reengage with Bo Bichette. Their longtime shortstop is now the top unsigned player. He has reportedly had a productive meeting with the Phillies, but the Jays and Bichette have long expressed mutual interest in a reunion. Bichette wouldn’t be a great fit for the Mets, but they could conceivably pivot to challenging the Yankees for Cody Bellinger. The Mets still don’t have a left fielder after swapping Brandon Nimmo for Marcus Semien. Their reported offer to Tucker demonstrates that there’s plenty of room for short-term spending, but president of baseball operations David Stearns has shied away from lengthy commitments this winter.

Jeff Passan of ESPN first reported that Tucker was signing with the Dodgers. Jon Heyman of the New York Post had it as a short-term contract, while Robert Murray of FanSided was first on the four-year, $240MM guarantee. Murray reported the opt-out after the second season, and Passan had the third-year out. Heyman reported the $30MM in deferrals. Ari Alexander of Boston 7 News was first on the $57.1MM post-deferral AAV. ESPN’s Jesse Rogers had the signing bonus details.

Image courtesy of Christopher Hanewinckel, Imagn Images.

Share Repost Send via email

Chicago Cubs Los Angeles Dodgers New York Mets Newsstand Toronto Blue Jays Transactions Kyle Tucker

Rays, Angels, Reds Agree To Three-Team Trade Involving Josh Lowe, Gavin Lux
Main
View Comments (809)
Post a Comment

809 Comments

  1. madduxm

    3 hours ago

    BANGGGGG

    17
    Reply
    • LordD99

      2 hours ago

      I’m pleased a down-and-out organization like the Dodgers finally landed a big fish.

      116
      Reply
      • Mondesi’s Cannon

        2 hours ago

        Flags fly forever baby! Go DODGERS!!!!!!!!!

        14
        Reply
        • i like al conin

          2 hours ago

          #Tainted

          8
          Reply
        • Michael Can Fart? Oh!

          2 hours ago

          that referring to the astros? Only team I know of deserving that mark.

          11
          Reply
        • Mr. Pessimist

          2 hours ago

          Fcking cheaters!!

          LAD 100% responsible for the upcoming multi year lockout. When mlb returns in like 2028 they’ll be forced to give up half their roster.

          31
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          2 hours ago

          #Love

          1
          Reply
        • CubsIn25

          2 hours ago

          Buying flags… how impressive

          12
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 hour ago

          Dodgers will trade for Skubal next

          #EmpireStrikesBack

          5
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 hour ago

          It makes it fun to have a villain that everyone will want to take down, great for #MLB Baseball, will be best ratings ever

          7
          Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          1 hour ago

          Flags with an asterisk on them

          3
          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 hour ago

          @Cubsin25

          Remind me…what was the deal for Bregman? Swanson?

          3
          Reply
        • CubsIn25

          1 hour ago

          B-S

          Compared to this, they were reasoned and designed for sustainably, not reckless abandon.

          Reply
        • Avory

          1 hour ago

          @Mondesi’s Cannon

          Nothing like knowing in your heart of hearts that you’ve truly accomplished something.

          The last time my heart swelled with pride like this was while watching Kramer school those children in karate.

          Good times.

          1
          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 hour ago

          See you in the playoffs. I think Reckless Abandon is the band that will play the National Anthem.

          1
          Reply
        • CubsIn25

          1 hour ago

          B-S

          Looking forward to it. Should be fun. Band sounds like a blast.

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 hour ago

          Cubs have had a stellar off-season.

          2
          Reply
        • Jmergs29

          59 mins ago

          No but they will be the ones to blame for the lockout coming up

          Reply
        • atomicfront

          48 mins ago

          Enjoy it while you can. With the next CBA you will be sharing all that local TV money with the rest of the league. I suspect a fire sale in 2028 and you will become a team like the NY Jets or the Raiders.

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          47 mins ago

          48% of the TV revenue is already shared among all teams. Are you in 1987?

          4
          Reply
        • jasonthebuc

          39 mins ago

          Why?

          Reply
        • jasonthebuc

          39 mins ago

          Cheaters how?

          Reply
        • Captain_Bigelow

          32 mins ago

          Not how it works. Any changes will be grandfathered in over a period of time.

          Reply
        • Mengis2

          6 mins ago

          you probably were not saying that back in the day when the Yankees were that team, but it’s benign and great when its your team, innit?

          Reply
        • Sunday Lasagna

          5 mins ago

          Dodgers are the first mlb team in history to reach $1 Billion in annual gross revenue.
          The profits from that gross revenue can go into the owners pockets or in the pockets of the best team they can put in the field.
          Seems like the fans of the other 29 teams would rather it be in the Dodgers owners pockets.
          Maybe the owners of the other 29 teams also wish it was in the Dodgers owners pockets.
          But there are 780 major leaguers and a players union that want that money in players pockets.
          Maximizing the wages paid to the laborers is good. Keep spending LA

          sportico.com/leagues/baseball/2025/los-angeles-dod…

          1
          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          3 mins ago

          I knew I loved lasagna.

          Reply
      • LordD99

        2 hours ago

        4/240. $60MM AAV? I’m guessing deferrals to be announced.

        18
        Reply
        • Led Hoyer

          2 hours ago

          60 million AAV is crazy.

          35
          Reply
        • NineChampionships

          2 hours ago

          Tucker is good but he is not 60M AAV good, Jesus Christ 😂

          42
          Reply
        • bedbathandbiyombo

          2 hours ago

          Ya, has to be. Otherwise with luxury tax you’re looking at 4y/$504M. Insane.

          5
          Reply
        • Anthony maresca

          2 hours ago

          Won’t matter cause Dodgers payroll now moves to a whopping $440 million and will decrease by whatever deferred amount is. Most important that $240 million goes to $504 million for 4 yrs when factoring in 110% penalty. The rest of mlb should not even bother playing the games. Dodgers are making George Steinbrenner of the 90’s look stupid with their reckless spending

          21
          Reply
        • cwsOverhaul

          2 hours ago

          LAD figures they may only have to pay a portion of ’27 season that is played….and then he opts out.

          3
          Reply
        • seamaholic 2

          2 hours ago

          Deferrals won’t help that much unless it’s a huge percentage of the total, because they’re only deferring a few years.

          Reply
        • Cardsfanatik redux

          2 hours ago

          Don’t worry. 58 million a year is deferred

          2
          Reply
        • NineChampionships

          2 hours ago

          Outside of any catastrophic injury he’s definitely opting out after year 2. They really want him for ’26 and ’27 to get their 4 rings before their entire spending model blows up on them.

          3
          Reply
        • Netflix&RichHill

          2 hours ago

          he wouldn’t get 60 per year if it was an 8 or 10 year contract, but he is a 4 to 5 win player, and likely projects to be worth 16 to 20 WAR over the next 4 years, so 60m AAV is probably a slight overpay if WAR is purchased at 11 – 12m per win on the open market, but the is pretty dang close

          4
          Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          2 hours ago

          Yeah Ohtani and Tucker are probably making only $2 million dollars each in 2026 with all the $ being deferred.

          1
          Reply
        • budman_63755

          2 hours ago

          Do you really see him leaving a $60MM guaranteed contract?🤣

          4
          Reply
        • LouWhitakerHOF

          2 hours ago

          25-30 homers and .270-.275 BA a season gets you $60M? Wow!! Ohtani is a bargain at $70M.

          2
          Reply
        • metslvt17

          2 hours ago

          $120m? Yeah definitely. He can get way more in two years.

          1
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          2 hours ago

          And they’d find the principal of that $ that would accrue to that $58M by time of payment. So they would be paying much much more than $2M this year, so the savings you are implying do not happen in reality.

          Reply
        • luclusciano

          2 hours ago

          reckless is a word, but not sure it applies here. if they keep winning world series it becomes worth the dollars

          4
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          2 hours ago

          Only collecting $2M per year. That does not allow !allow a team to only have to pay $2M . Teams have to fund these deferrals as they are happening so they are ultimately paying and funding these deferred contracts as they happen. The caveat is they are funding it at the value of that $ now and said funding accrues to future value until time player realizes the gain.

          1
          Reply
        • LaBellaVita

          2 hours ago

          Agreed about the details of deferment. If I were a player, I would make it over 20 years even if the NPV would be significantly less.

          Reply
        • NineChampionships

          2 hours ago

          Yes, because he’ll still be just 30 years old and it becomes 120M vs the 300-400M he’s gonna be offered.

          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          2 hours ago

          oh, so that is why they are doing it.

          Reply
        • CubsIn25

          1 hour ago

          What nonsense… trying to justify a 60M annual salary for a better than average, but very streaky hitter that can’t stay on the field for a full season anymore.

          Good for him, but there’s no way this will ever be a justified acquisition

          Reply
        • bruinlife33

          1 hour ago

          To add to your point: Tucker has a .176 postseason avg.

          1
          Reply
        • Still in talks

          1 hour ago

          Only $30M is deferred

          1
          Reply
        • Jolie

          1 hour ago

          The other owners could spend too. They aren’t broke

          1
          Reply
        • Sadface

          1 hour ago

          yeah way overpaid, but I guess he got the deal he wanted. Dodgers needed to improve third base though. Maybe Tucker plays some there?

          Reply
        • Qidon71

          1 hour ago

          Dodgers get $250mil per year from their TV deal, Cuts that $504mil in half.

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          58 mins ago

          The Dodgers TV revenue is $330 million not $250 mill. And 48% of that revenue is shared with all teams.

          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          49 mins ago

          It’s totally justified CubsIn25 and the rest of you Cubbies fans. Told ya he’d get paid, ha ha ha ha ha!!! He’s worth it.

          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          47 mins ago

          Nobody cares about his postseason average. It means very little when predicting future performance.

          Reply
        • CubsIn25

          43 mins ago

          HH

          Doesn’t guarantee a prediction, but definitely can indicate he doesn’t perform as effectively under the bright lights of a playoff atmosphere while only facing ace pitching. Others can rise to that challenge.

          Reply
        • Captain_Bigelow

          26 mins ago

          Well he’s really costing $120m a year when you factor in the luxury tax penalty. Crazy hey?

          1
          Reply
        • Astros_fan_in_Aus

          18 mins ago

          Apparently you know better than anyone at the Dodgers front office…..Oh wait, you don’t.

          2
          Reply
        • brocnessmonster

          11 mins ago

          hm yeah maybe kyle tucker will play some third base, why not

          Reply
    • i like al conin

      2 hours ago

      World Series titles don’t mean what they used to.

      23
      Reply
      • Jaggy

        2 hours ago

        Say what? To us life long Dodgers fans they do !!! 😂😎👍👋🤛🤔😁🤣🤗🙏🏼

        3
        Reply
        • EndinStealth

          2 hours ago

          Enjoy them, you should. Its become outrageous though. The 2027 season may not even happen.

          5
          Reply
        • scurvyrickets

          2 hours ago

          Jaggy = faggy

          5
          Reply
        • SportsBum

          2 hours ago

          I agree with scurvyrickets

          1
          Reply
        • dodgers32

          1 hour ago

          The 2027 season will happen, perhaps in some abbreviated fashion. Not all MLB players are millionaires and the need to get back to work will eventually drive a settlement. This will be as much about making sure there is a definitive floor to get the low spending owners to finally be competitive. And if there is a cap involved, it will likely remove or significantly lessen the tax system currently in place. That should be enough to drive the low spending owners to an agreement as the threat of that tax revenue cutting their revenue sharing number down. A’s, White Sox, Pirates, Marlins, Rays, and a few others will be required to comply or be forced to sell. Can those low spending teams really go an entire season without revenue? I’m guessing “no”.

          2
          Reply
        • atomicfront

          47 mins ago

          You better win this year as there will be a lock out in 2027 and a hard cap in 2028. You won’t sniff another World Series

          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          45 mins ago

          It’ll happen. Stop with the gloom and doom.

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          45 mins ago

          You need to read more @atomic. There will not be a salary cap.

          1
          Reply
      • yogineely

        2 hours ago

        No, they still do. 2 and counting

        2
        Reply
        • i like al conin

          2 hours ago

          They buy the best talent where most other teams can’t. Totally dilutes the value of the titles.

          9
          Reply
        • Jilm

          1 hour ago

          Has never stopped Yanks fans from babbling about 27.

          2
          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          44 mins ago

          Nope, the titles still mean the same. Not diluted at all.

          Reply
      • walterpatrick

        2 hours ago

        Nope… they cost a hell of a lot more than they used too… present value or deferred…

        Reply
      • s8n666

        2 hours ago

        yeah. I miss the days of the Yankees and Cardinals swiping up all the amateur talent, keeping them indefinitely, and winning like 40 WS in a 70 year span while half the league couldn’t even sniff contention. Things were way better back in the day.

        5
        Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          42 mins ago

          Yeah s8n666, most of these people don’t know anything about the history of dynasties in MLB. The Yankees had a 40-year run of dominance that’ll never be matched.

          Reply
      • Netflix&RichHill

        2 hours ago

        the dodgers have a top farm system, too. they haven’t sacrificed the future at the expense of the present, they’re just using the money hack that shohei ohtani is the way a team should

        1
        Reply
        • atomicfront

          46 mins ago

          Thats because they can afford all the top scouts.

          Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        2 hours ago

        @ conin

        Said the fan of a team that doesn’t win.

        1
        Reply
      • Enrico Pallazzo

        17 mins ago

        So titles only count for teams that spend an amount that YOU deem to be acceptable? Teams that go all in and spend huge chunks of their revenue to better the team for the enjoyment of their fans are bad? No one seemed to give a crap when the Mets and Padres were outspending everyone a few years ago. No no that was acceptable because a team that you don’t hate was the one doing it. Please keep crying. Your tears are delicious and nourishing to me.

        4
        Reply
        • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

          13 mins ago

          A lot of these folks whining about the Dodgers spending money on good players are the same ones whining about the owners of their teams not spending money on good players. Screw ’em. They’ll never be happy even in the perfect utopia they imagine for themselves.

          Reply
    • simonkiller

      2 hours ago

      Hahaha

      3
      Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      2 hours ago

      As much as I HATE this (mainly because Hal is not committed to winning first and foremost), I congratulate Dodgers fans, yet again. Top-tier organization that continues to push forward to ensure they WIN, which should be the primary goal; not ensure a playoff appearance, which is the new Yankees standard.

      Bottom line is that if the Dodgers can figure out how to spend and add, yet still keep making money (even if it’s mainly on deferred money), then Hal should be able to as well.

      9
      Reply
      • LordD99

        2 hours ago

        They’re committed to championships. I remember a team we both know once had a similar approach.

        4
        Reply
      • NewOrleansSaintsFan

        1 hour ago

        Easy to say when the money comes from Hollywood & former sport stars pockets. Im now really hoping for a lockout..

        Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        1 hour ago

        @Yankee

        I’m not going to bother to defend Hal but historically the Yanks reinvested more of their profits back into the team. The Dodgers and Mets have owners worth 4x and 7x what Hal is worth and they both own money investments firms holding hundreds of billions in assets. Figure out on your own what a huge advantage that must be, especially when teams are allowed to USE the money they put into escrow for deferred money to invest and reap the benefits of capital gains. If you have enough personal wealth that you can not only NOT take out any money but in fact, operate at a deficit, AND your an astute investor, let’s just say you can do some things like no other. It’s a whole other economic ballgame. Mark Walters is worth 4x what Hal is worth and not only leads Guggenheim Sports owners of the Dodgers but they also own the Lakers, which by themselves are baked for more than the Yanks. The Yanks are no longer the big bully on the block. In actuality, they were never the wealthiest owners just the ones willing and able to spend more than others fun their revenue. The Jays ownership is worth $16 billion but they just run their business for profit.

        Reply
      • dodgers32

        1 hour ago

        Every big market team can do what the Dodgers do if they choose to. Problem is they don’t. The mechanisms to manage their team financially are there; turning a larger profit and driving up the value of the team is their primary objective. Winning is a bonus.

        3
        Reply
        • KnicksFanCavsFan

          1 hour ago

          @Dodgers

          You have no idea how the business of baseball works. It’s quite clear. You can’t really think that teams like the Pirates, Reds, Marlins can sirens like the Dodgers, Mets, Yanks or Jays do you? Even the Yanks can’t spend like the Mets and Dodgers? And a teams valuation means nothing until they sell it and, the Yanks for example, only own about 58% of the team and would have to pay significant taxes if/ when they still it. The Guggenheim Sports members have at least 3 members who are worth more than Hal and they can easily borrow from the billions of dollars they manage. They can easily borrow $1 billion and allocate that to fund they’re salary deferred contracts and then use those funds for investment purposes over the next 10 years and then reap the capital gains it generates, pay back the loan, satisfy ther deferred contracts and pocket tend of millions for themselves. Please get that thru your head fam. It’s a new day. Teams better hope that the bigger dogs in the money management game don’t decide to buy teams like the Yanks, Angels, Giants, White Sox, etc because a firm like BlackRock would put the Dodgers and Mets firms to shame. Their holdings are in the trillions.

          Reply
        • Throw Like a Girl

          48 mins ago

          I think they can sirens just fine…

          Reply
        • atomicfront

          45 mins ago

          This is outright lies. The Dodgers get $330 million in local TV money. No other MLB team gets close to that.

          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          38 mins ago

          $330M x .52. The rest goes into pool and divvied up.

          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          37 mins ago

          All of these owners could spend a lot more if they chose to. Like when Seidler bought the Padres and they suddenly became a “big-market” team

          Reply
        • mlb fan

          23 mins ago

          “Every big market” …I disagree. Not every “big market” team has the beautiful weather, huge stadium, Uber large population to draw from and the daily, overflow standing room only crowds of Chavez Ravine.

          I believe the Dodgers are still hugely profitable at these crazy payroll numbers and it’s been said they’ve already received enough additional revenue from Asia to pay off the Ohtani deal several times over, in cash.

          1
          Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        14 mins ago

        @Clip

        There is still nothing better than a Yanks-Dodgers Series. I hope they can pull it off again. Best of luck to you.

        1
        Reply
      • Mengis2

        2 seconds ago

        Hal is not his dad, when will ppl realize this. I remember George well; fortuitous chain events (in the long run, didn’t seem so at the time) made the dynasty happen, which is now ancient history. I wish for someone who is a combination of Hal who is not impulsively destructive like his dad, but with his father’s all-out, win-first mentality.

        But what we have, Clip, is what we got.

        Reply
    • cajundago19

      25 mins ago

      Prime Tiger Woods vs The Field

      Easy to be enamored with LAD while pulling for someone in the field to get them.

      F’n good times watching a real life fantasy team.

      1
      Reply
  2. DarkSide830

    3 hours ago

    [Everyone disliked that]

    113
    Reply
    • chandlerbing

      2 hours ago

      Tucker is nowhere near worth $60mil a year

      33
      Reply
      • O'sSayCanYouSee

        2 hours ago

        60 mill?? With the tax bracket, aren’t the Dodgers paying total for him like $110 AAV???!!!?!

        Reply
    • differentbears

      2 hours ago

      [I liked it]

      2
      Reply
    • cwsOverhaul

      2 hours ago

      Let’s see if Cohen gets mad and goes overboard outbidding NYY for Bellinger. Boras is gleeful at this development.

      2
      Reply
      • Kermit The Frog

        2 hours ago

        I’m hoping someone tells them Bichette is available. I don’t think they noticed.

        Reply
      • Sadface

        1 hour ago

        doesn’t seem like it. Mets may have been in on all the major free agents but signed none of them and actually got worse with the trades they made.

        1
        Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          33 mins ago

          They signed Devin Williams. $17 million a year for a closer makes him a major free agent, whether you think so or not.

          Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      58 mins ago

      Just reading all the outrage is pretty funny. Dodgers going to pay something like $120M a year for Tucker. That is the entire payroll for some teams. Talk about waving your dingus around.

      2
      Reply
  3. Slightly optimistic twins fan

    3 hours ago

    Wow look at the Dodgers make a splash

    3
    Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      3 hours ago

      At least the “only” splashes this off-season are Tucker and Diaz

      (please don’t sign Bichette too)

      3
      Reply
      • Slightly optimistic twins fan

        2 hours ago

        No kidding I was really rooting for Toronto to get Tucker it will be interesting to see the contract considering he had a long term deal from them.

        1
        Reply
        • walterpatrick

          2 hours ago

          We all know already that it will have about a billion in deferred money… welcome to the lockout in 2027…

          20
          Reply
        • Mark66

          2 hours ago

          I wasn’t rooting for the Blue Jays to get him at all, but I thought a thousand percent that’s where he was going. I was a million percent wrong, and I admit it.

          I’m dying to know what the Blue Jays’ offer was that he turned down and why. If they gave him six or seven years and he turned it down, I was only half right, but only half wrong.

          I knew he wasn’t going to the Mets something about the Mets just smells bad..

          2
          Reply
        • oldgfan

          2 hours ago

          Toronto will sign Bo shortly.
          Probably always the plan B

          Reply
        • NoSaint

          2 hours ago

          @oldgfan

          Maybe… I’m thinking they’re going to have a run at Bellinger first.

          Reply
        • Michael Can Fart? Oh!

          2 hours ago

          I’m sure you are whining equally about Dylan Cease’s deferred money. if not, You hypocrisy is showing.

          1
          Reply
        • Kermit The Frog

          2 hours ago

          One way to have parody is to have all the stars on one team. haha It would be incredible if they didn’t make the playoffs.

          1
          Reply
        • oldgfan

          1 hour ago

          I thought I was wrong once,
          but I was mistaken.

          Seriously though I hope you’re right.

          Reply
        • dodgers32

          1 hour ago

          The Jays will have competition from the Phillies and the Yankees, especially if the Mets sign Bellinger. Much respect to the Jays, but once again they lose to the Dodgers.

          1
          Reply
        • Astros_fan_in_Aus

          16 mins ago

          No, just $30M.

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          12 mins ago

          @Kermit

          You and people like you have been saying that for the last 13 years in a row.

          Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        2 hours ago

        Don’t worry. Andrew’s job is done for now.

        1
        Reply
      • vtadave

        2 hours ago

        I am

        1
        Reply
      • yogineely

        2 hours ago

        I’m sure they’ll miss you and your great attitude dearly

        1
        Reply
      • agentx

        2 hours ago

        I don’t believe all the hype around Tucker and Diaz. I’m interested whether either one will meet or exceed expectations.

        Reply
        • WillBaseball

          2 hours ago

          You don’t have to. The guys who won the last two world series just pressed the 60million dollars a year believe button.

          2
          Reply
        • Sadface

          59 mins ago

          probably not, but with their star studded lineup and endless (and oft injured) starting pitching, it may not matter. Here’s hoping some team knocks them out early in the post season or they miss the post season altogether.

          Reply
      • Sadface

        1 hour ago

        maybe Mets sign Bichette and claim that he’s the one they wanted the most anyway.

        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 hour ago

          Gotta believe Bichette is either going back to Toronto or to Philly.

          2
          Reply
    • Whifff

      2 hours ago

      Dodgers are the Harlem Globetrotters. Everyone else is the Washington Generals. But they do need each other. 🤣🤣

      4
      Reply
      • 84LeFlore

        1 hour ago

        Which is why I think all TV money should be split between all teams: you can’t play a game without an opponent.

        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          60 mins ago

          @84LeFlore

          It already is to the tune of 48% of tv revenue.

          1
          Reply
  4. horaceallen

    3 hours ago

    Surprise, surprise

    14
    Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      2 hours ago

      The usual suspects

      6
      Reply
      • LordD99

        2 hours ago

        The only suspect?

        3
        Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      2 hours ago

      Surprise? It was widely reported that it was down to Dodgers, Mets and Jays.

      (Of course, I realize you may have been being ironic, and it went entirely over my head.)

      4
      Reply
      • EatPoo

        2 hours ago

        @Matrac, he was being sarcastic, not ironic. They’re not the same thing.

        9
        Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          2 hours ago

          I was using the term ironic, sarcastically.

          8
          Reply
      • Sadface

        56 mins ago

        So Cohen’s buying power is overrated or Tucker wanted that guaranteed 4th year or possibly he just wanted to play for the Dodgers to begin with or he doesn’t like the Mets or Blue Jays.

        Reply
    • Citizen1

      53 mins ago

      Most voted the dodgers wouldn’t add another big name player apart from skubal trade. I figured the dodgers would sign since it’s win now.

      Reply
  5. angt222

    3 hours ago

    New the Dodgers would sneak in. They were way too quiet in the Tucker sweepstakes.

    9
    Reply
    • sadmarinersfan

      2 hours ago

      They were very widely reported as one of the three finalists for him, definitely not quiet.

      5
      Reply
  6. carternico

    3 hours ago

    Salary Cap now. Enough is enough

    113
    Reply
    • mattv

      3 hours ago

      Or other teams could just start spending more

      40
      Reply
      • TakerDbacks!

        3 hours ago

        im sick of this comment! Its depends on cities. No business just spends if your not making the money. Smaller cities cant compete with LA NYC. Its awful!

        59
        Reply
        • mattv

          2 hours ago

          Yawn. Any owner who wanted to sign Tucker could have done so. the only thing limiting some of these “small market” teams from spending is a willingness to do so.

          14
          Reply
        • Candy Maldonado

          2 hours ago

          That’s fundamentally untrue. Teams do not have anywhere near equitable revenues, and they never will. Yes, teams can and should spend more. No, not every team could ever spend like the Dodgers. There’s no reason to pretend otherwise.

          48
          Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          2 hours ago

          Amazing the large market apologists keep trying to sell that. If every team had a local TV deal to pay their entire payroll, sure they could do that. Not the real world of baseball and it’s screwed up system.

          14
          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          2 hours ago

          “Any owner that wanted to sign Tucker could have done so”

          Not really. “Any owner” could have put the offer on the table but a player of his caliber is going to a team they is competitive and that means had other players of his payroll / caliber which not “any owner” can do.

          Not feasible for “any owner” to put out 400 mil payroll – see the crowd sizes for A’s and Miami for example.

          And the ever present decision of the player coming into play.

          This type of fantasy league comment isn’t realistic in the real world.

          15
          Reply
        • marinersfan1977

          2 hours ago

          all the teams are owned now by Billionaires. Don’t buy a professional sports franchise if you don’t wanna spend and just collect the revenue sharing $$

          11
          Reply
        • rolder

          2 hours ago

          Maybe not every team could shoulder the entire Dodgers payroll, but every team in the league could have paid for Kyle Tucker

          6
          Reply
        • Sadler

          2 hours ago

          It’s not sustainable. Maybe you can afford a $30 beer, but most can’t.

          3
          Reply
        • Candy Maldonado

          2 hours ago

          Yes, but Kyle Tucker has to want to *play* for a franchise that has no more money to spend after dropping $60m AAV on him.

          2
          Reply
        • Sadler

          2 hours ago

          Unchecked, this type of spending will eventually bankrupt the league when nobody can afford to go to a game.

          3
          Reply
        • Wren

          2 hours ago

          thing is it cuts into a lucrative number those owners take home every year. has to be a desire to compete as opposed to just blowing up that bottom line.

          1
          Reply
        • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

          2 hours ago

          I mean yeah but outside of Steinbrenner I think all owners are in baseball for the money

          If I had a net worth of 5 billion and tried deferring 1 billion (which just inflates overtime) on top of all of my taxes and other expenses I would probably go bankrupt

          Reply
        • bazbal

          2 hours ago

          That’s right. It’s just a coincidence that the teams with the highest payrolls all happen to be in the biggest media markets. And it’s just a coincidence that all the skin-flint owners happen to be in the smaller markets. Keep deluding yourself.

          2
          Reply
        • rct

          2 hours ago

          @Sadler: player salaries have literally nothing to do with the price of beer/concessions. Teams like the Dodgers don’t sign Tucker and go, ‘well, better re-price our beer to pay for this contract!!!’.

          Beer/concessions, ticket prices, parking, etc are all about supply and demand. Prices are high because people will pay for it. Period. Teams do research and price things as high as demand allows to maximize profit.

          5
          Reply
        • Michael Can Fart? Oh!

          2 hours ago

          And i’m sick of whining fans of teams that won’t spend. Kavetch at your small market minded owners.

          1
          Reply
        • Jays77

          2 hours ago

          That’s the way it should be, but that’s not reality. The owners are billionaires because they like making money. They own a team to make money. If it runs at a deficit they will either trim the budget (not sign big name guys) and/or charge more to you and me. As salaries skyrocket the ones who pay the price are small market teams who can’t compete and folks luck us who are priced out of spending a day at the park with our family

          Reply
        • jbryant0693

          2 hours ago

          Willingness and revenue. Or maybe just entirely a lack of revenue.

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          2 hours ago

          @Sadler MLB has seen 3 consecutive yrs of growth in ticket sales. All 3 seasons eclipsimg 70M, that is in no way indicative of nobody being able to afford going to a game. It may very well price out some fans, that however has in no way harmed ticket sales.

          3
          Reply
        • That name is already taken

          2 hours ago

          Exactly, Dodgers owners have more than 10 times the money than the 2nd richest owner Steve Cohen. $60 million per year is like us spending 60 cents on something.

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          2 hours ago

          @Wren The billionaires buying these teams are not doing so to operate as a traditional business or a publicly traded company where they need to show profits to appease investors. These franchises are tax havens and assets they can leverage the value on borrowing against the value and iften doing so with rates around 1% that others could not even dream of. These contracts are capital expenditures charged off as depreciating assets further lowering any tax liabilities. They do not want a transparent bottom line they want to show less earnings on paper as that $ capital continues to grow net worth and provide a far better return then the meager 1% they are paying leveraging the ever growing net worth.

          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          1 hour ago

          Taker: every owner is a billionaire. They could all spend more>

          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          1 hour ago

          Then, perhaps< small market owners should move.

          Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          1 hour ago

          @mattv You think Tucker would have wanted to sign with Tampa, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Kansas City….? Naw.

          Reply
        • KnicksFanCavsFan

          1 hour ago

          @mariners

          They’re levels of wealth dude. If Jeff Bezo woke up with Hal Steinbrenner’s money he would slit his wrists. The owner of the Pirates is “only ” worth around $1.2 bil and hi is wealth is attached to the team not other billion dollar businesses. He can’t outspend other team owners.

          Can someone on this site break the economics of baseball again???

          Reply
        • KnicksFanCavsFan

          1 hour ago

          @rolder

          No they can’t. Just use the Pirates as an example.

          Here’s a concise version:

          —

          The Pirates generated approximately $280-300 million in revenue in 2024 with an $87 million payroll. Their operating expenses beyond payroll (stadium operations, minor leagues, scouting, staff) run around $165 million. If they signed Kyle Tucker at $35 million per year, their total expenses would be roughly $287 million—leaving virtually no profit margin. At $60 million per year for Tucker, they’d be operating at a $20+ million annual loss. The Dodgers generate $500+ million in revenue annually, allowing them to spend $240+ million on payroll and still turn a profit. The Pirates literally cannot “afford to sign free agents just like the Dodgers” because their revenue doesn’t support it—it’s basic math, not a choice.

          1
          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 hour ago

          @Knicks

          As long as we’re counting…Dodgers revenue exceeded a Billion in 2024. 2025 isn’t tallied yet but reports say it’s at least 750 mill.

          Reply
        • dodgers32

          1 hour ago

          That’s why the small market teams receive a share of the revenue across the leagues, so they do have the $$$$$$ to spend. The low spending owners bank it rather than spend it.

          Reply
        • Avory

          1 hour ago

          @marinersfan1977

          Of course none of that is remotely true, but if you want to nurse a grudge against your team, that’s your prerogative.

          But the fantasy that owners of a team in Cleveland should spend out of their pockets to keep up with the Dodger owners who don’t have to is one of the most nonsensical, ignorant expectations I’ve ever heard from a sports fan.

          The idea that ANY of these owners pay ballplayers out of their own pockets for your enjoyment is one of the biggest delusions in sport. And the biggest lie of them all is that small market owners pocket a greater % of their revenue than the big market owners do. Yep, you’ve swallowed whole the propaganda from big market owners who don’t want you to use your brain, but instead want you to believe the falsehood that the big markets are “virtuous” spenders while the low revenue markets are profiteers. It’s the same playbook the white collar fraudsters use to distract the ignorant by pointing out the penne ante welfare cheats. And hey, it worked on you, didn’t it?

          1
          Reply
        • 84LeFlore

          59 mins ago

          Exactly. Which is why I think all TV money should be pooled, then split between all teams.

          The amazing Dodgers can’t play any game without an opponent.

          2
          Reply
        • Avory

          57 mins ago

          @dodgers32

          I know you have to persuade yourself this is true in order to feel good about your accomplishments, but the idea that the Dodger owners 1) spend money out of their own pockets for ballplayers or team operations and 2) aren’t “pocketing” profits WAY in excess of small markets in both actual dollar and % of revenue terms is delusional. But you go ahead and keep believing in fairy tales. They always make children feel better.

          Reply
        • Sadface

          53 mins ago

          This heavy spending by the Dodgers will catch up to them in the future. All those deferrals will make it hard to spend at all in about 10 years.

          Reply
        • Sadface

          51 mins ago

          The price of beer has nothing to do with player contracts.

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          51 mins ago

          The deferral money is posted annually starting in year 2 of a contract. And it earns.

          Reply
        • KnicksFanCavsFan

          47 mins ago

          @Dodgers

          Even if the Pirates shocked the world and signed Kyle Tucker at $60M per year, they’d still be hopelessly outmatched by the Dodgers. Pittsburgh would have ONE elite player and $75-85M for the remaining 24 roster spots. Meanwhile, the Dodgers are fielding Ohtani, Betts, Freeman, Snell, Yamamoto, Glasnow – six players each making $25-30M+ with their total payroll approaching $400M. One superstar can’t compete against an entire roster of stars. The structural spending gap makes true competitive balance impossible, no matter how much revenue sharing the Pirates receive.

          Reply
        • bazbal

          46 mins ago

          You can’t be serious. The revenue sharing doesn’t come close to addressing the revenue disparity between the big- and small market teams.

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          42 mins ago

          @Sadface Deferred contracts have to be funded annually as they happen per the CBA. That $ will be paid into an investment where it will accrue at to the future negotiated amount and collected at thay time. It will not impact the future.

          1
          Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          38 mins ago

          Sadler

          “when nobody can afford to go to a game.”

          Wrong. Take a highschool level economics class

          Fans choose to spend billions on MLB. MLB has billions to spend on plays.

          If fans didn’t spend so much, players wouldn’t make so much

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          32 mins ago

          @Bovouac I believe it has to be posted within 2 years of the time it is deferred at the latest . Im sure teams eye the rate and fund at what they believe will be the optimal time.

          I forget the specific rate used but it like other rates it is influenced by things such as the Fed rate . Im sure both the teams and agents have financial people who have an educated prediction of how these rates will likely fluctuate and it weighs in during these negotiations.

          Some of these people who are financially illiterate just continually rant about deferrals on here as though these contracts were just thrown on interest free credit card til later. It is both laughable yet scary that there are so many who cant grasp how interst accrues or know the basics of the time value of $. If some of these people outlive the a tragedy life expectancy cat food sales are going to spike, as thats all they ll have to eat since they are oblivious to the importance of getting $ somewhere so it can compound.

          1
          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          27 mins ago

          No it won’t.

          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          25 mins ago

          Yeah bazbal, like when Mr. Seidler bought the Padres and turned them into a big-spending big-market team.

          Reply
        • Astros_fan_in_Aus

          12 mins ago

          Mattv – You appear to have no idea how a business functions.

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          11 mins ago

          Bazbal Seems to be blissfully ignorant to the fact MLB has foruchnof its history been split between haves and have nots.

          The reasons have varied sometimes rebuilds, cheap owners, owners have have run into financial issues elsewhere and it carried over into how they ran their franchise. This is nothing new.

          He also ignores the fact that these without these large market teams the league as a whole likely would bot exist. Large market teams obviously have larger local fan bases and they have a much larger national appeal. I personally despise the Yankees but I cant deny that them making the playoffs is good for the game as a whole(even better when Tigers bounce them from playoffs).

          Reply
      • Oppo nacho

        2 hours ago

        If everyone spent like the dodgers they wouldn’t have a team full of superstars and Merrill Kelly would’ve gotten 5/150

        5
        Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        2 hours ago

        @matt

        How many teams can afford to sirens over a billion in contracts over a 3 year period?

        7
        Reply
        • Michael Can Fart? Oh!

          2 hours ago

          Blue Jays.

          Reply
      • dos centavos

        2 hours ago

        Why bother?

        Reply
      • DroppedBallFour

        2 hours ago

        Or dodgers can actually pay players without deferrals

        Not many teams can defer a billion dollars and offer players extra income post playing days

        4
        Reply
        • Wutntarnation

          2 hours ago

          I’m on board with banning deferred contracts but not salary caps

          4
          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          2 hours ago

          I’m fine banning or capping deferrals

          Like teams can only defer 10% of the 1st cbt threshold every year

          If the dodgers actually paid Ohtani 10 years 700 mill but could only defer 26 mill a year I doubt fans would care how much they spend.

          2
          Reply
        • terry g

          2 hours ago

          Others can use deferrals, too and have.

          1
          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          2 hours ago

          Others literally can’t afford to defer billions of dollars

          You think pirates athletics Rockies or even orioles diamondbacks royals could defer a billion dollars and pay it off? No

          7
          Reply
        • thecheddahbob

          2 hours ago

          I’ve always been anti salary cap. But this is getting out of hand

          2
          Reply
        • Stingray16

          2 hours ago

          Lockout coming, better enjoy this season. Salary cap and floor are both needed.

          8
          Reply
        • neoncactus

          2 hours ago

          Other teams can afford to defer a lot of money. Dodgers aren’t just kicking the can down the road. They are putting that money in an escrow account which is earning money from the market and the Dodgers will most likely receive more from that investment than they put in. Any other owner would benefit in the same way. Each owner certainly has a good team of financial advisors.

          Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          2 hours ago

          Others teams literally cannot defer a billion dollars. You have to have the money to put into the account. You can’t put an IOU into the account. You think there’s plenty of teams with 102 million dollars lying around they can put into an escrow account every year? Yeah maybe they should check their dryers and couch cushions and car seats.

          Dodgers have actually deferred more than some teams payrolls and 60-80 percent of other teams payrolls

          I like how people are like those teams are cheap why can’t you come up with 102 million dollars to defer anyone can do this!?!?!?!?!

          Bottom teams like Athletics Rockies Guardians Rays certainly couldn’t

          Even teams that do spend Mariners Dbackd Royals Orioles would struggle to an extent

          So no other teams cannot there’s maybe 5-10 who could but that’s about it

          1
          Reply
      • Candy Maldonado

        2 hours ago

        Yes, they can start spending. Plenty of teams don’t spend enough. But we’re all being silly if we’re going to pretend that market size doesn’t play a *massive* role in how much a team can spend. No franchise owned by rich people is going to operate at a loss just to compete, or even eat away at most of their profit.

        Personally I think the “some rich guy owns each team” business model needs to go away entirely in favor of some sort of player-and-league owned model with regional franchise managers, but obviously the billionaires like their ATMs too much.

        1
        Reply
      • boblowlaw2

        2 hours ago

        No they can’t. MLB won’t allow it. Two years ago the Padres spent slightly more than they are now and MLB said they were out of their debt to server ratio. Sure teams can spend more, but they can’t spend anywhere near that level because they don’t make hundreds of millions from TV

        5
        Reply
      • Tigers in Oakland

        2 hours ago

        So then cut the TV revenue from LA js

        1
        Reply
      • cards81

        2 hours ago

        lol not all teams have the Dodgers market…I don’t understand how people don’t see this

        3
        Reply
      • seth

        2 hours ago

        Most teams got screwed on their current tv deals. FYI, the dodgers aren’t most teams.

        Reply
      • atomicfront

        44 mins ago

        Yeah just give us the Dodgers $330 million TV contract and we will spend.

        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          40 mins ago

          @Atomic

          OMG. Do you pay even a little attention to what’s happening right in front of you? For the umpteenth time. 48% of all TV revenue is shared among all the teams eligible for revenue sharing.

          Reply
      • aggee10

        39 mins ago

        You can’t be this simple…..

        Reply
    • Gbfl23

      3 hours ago

      Salary floor. The problem is that almost half the owners don’t care. The dodgers owners do care

      13
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        2 hours ago

        Floor is a bigger problem than a cap right now and it’s probably impossible to put them in the same collective bargaining deal

        A cap-floor system sounds awesome down the road but it can’t be put in all at once

        2
        Reply
        • thefridge99

          2 hours ago

          Why? That’s exactly what the PA would demand if they somehow agree to a cap

          Reply
      • backstage1

        2 hours ago

        Nonsense. The problem is the Dodgers have $300 million more in TV revenue than the average team.

        9
        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          7 mins ago

          @backstage

          Maybe have someone read the comments directly above yours to you.

          Reply
      • Fowlerrc

        2 hours ago

        I don’t disagree, but what’s the solution? They’re not gonna force crappy owners to sell their teams, as much as I’d love to see it happen. I totally understand that the players will never accept a salary cap, too. But something has to be done for the integrity of the game. Having the Mets and Dodgers with $350 million payrolls and the Marlins, A’s, Pirates, Rays etc all having $100 million payrolls just isn’t good for the sport. It’s not good for the fans. I’m not suggesting I have any good solutions either, but nobody is paying me to have good ideas. Something needs to be done. Either at the bottom or the top or both. Because this is getting out of control.

        2
        Reply
        • drprofkevin

          2 hours ago

          If Major League Baseball, higher-revenue teams contribute a portion of their local revenues into a shared revenue-sharing pool, functioning like an escrow account. These funds are redistributed to lower-revenue teams to promote competitive balance and support payroll and player development. In practice, this system allows smaller-market teams to better retain homegrown players as they approach free agency rather than losing them solely due to financial constraints. As a simple way to remember it, big-market teams tithe into the MLB collection plate so smaller-market teams can afford to keep the players they actually developed.

          1
          Reply
      • Led Hoyer

        2 hours ago

        At this point a floor will accomplish nothing. How high can you possibly raise a salary floor to compete with a 500 million dollar roster. I am starting to think the Dodgers are just a front to clean money for a drug cartel. This is insane.

        Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      2 hours ago

      Seriously. Salary cap should be 250 million with no deferrals, or deferrals should count against the cap

      4
      Reply
      • terry g

        2 hours ago

        no cap.

        Reply
      • dezpoo

        2 hours ago

        With how much teams get in revenue sharing (not just salary tax but also media), I think 350M might be the min cap.

        MLB should just fix their media revenue sharing to mimic the NFL in regard to TV rights, etc.

        Reply
    • mkeving

      2 hours ago

      That doesn’t help parity in other sports. mLb hadn’t had a repeat champ until this year since 2001. NFL, NBA has had several. MLB gets low payroll teams in the playoffs every year. Salary cap would hurt the players, help the owners.

      4
      Reply
      • terry g

        2 hours ago

        The sports are not the same. The NFL and NBA don’t really have parity either.

        1
        Reply
        • DroppedBallFour

          2 hours ago

          That’s false. NFL in a 14 team playoff field the NFL averages 5-7 teams that didn’t make the playoffs the previous year

          1
          Reply
        • mkeving

          2 hours ago

          That’s what I’m saying, the NBA and NFL aren’t pillars of parity either. The salary cap won’t fix parity.

          Parity also doesn’t equal a healthy league and high viewership. Juggernaut teams like the Dodgers increase viewership and attendance. People either are stoked to watch them or want to hate-watch.

          Reply
        • Sadler

          2 hours ago

          You listen to too much Colin Cowherd.

          1
          Reply
    • Drunkpirate

      2 hours ago

      Dodgers hater here, and this signing does not change my opinion.

      Why does everyone look only at LAD? How much did the Mets spend last year? Oh, right, a crapton…and they didn’t make the playoffs.

      Point is, you can’t just buy a winning team. It takes the right players, the right culture, the right coach, etc.

      I applaud the team I hate for continuing to spend a good chunk of what comes in every year. Most owners cannot say that.

      14
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        2 hours ago

        To be fair the Mets are the Mets and most teams arent that dysfunctional

        However, making the playoffs with 300 million spent is a lot easier than making the playoffs with a third of that payroll

        Reply
        • Drunkpirate

          2 hours ago

          “To be fair, the Mets are the Mets and most teams aren’t that dysfunctional” is moving the goal post so much that it isn’t even in the damn stadium anymore.

          Fact is, Dodgers spent a lot of money last year to build a team. The Mets spent a lot of money last year to build a team. One of them made the playoffs and won the WS by the skin of their teeth. The other missed the playoffs.

          And while I agree that it is likely the higher payroll the more likely you are to make the playoffs, it isn’t a given, as proven by the Mets…and the Dodgers themselves before these last two seasons.

          A salary cap would do to baseball what it has done to every other sport…make the owners richer and prevent them from having to fork over too much of their hard earned money…by convincing fans that it’s the only way to make it a competitive playing field.

          What a joke that would be.

          3
          Reply
        • funkmasta198

          2 hours ago

          It’s already a joke now

          2
          Reply
      • dugdog83

        2 hours ago

        The Mets suck tho

        Reply
        • metsgolf

          1 hour ago

          Are you three years old?

          Reply
      • DroppedBallFour

        2 hours ago

        How much money have the Mets deferred? How about Phillies?

        See problem isn’t spending

        Problem is deferring so much money lowers the cbt tax hit

        If the dodgers paid Ohtani 10 years 700 mill like the Mets paid Soto with no deferrals and had to be taxed at a 70 aav i doubt people would care as much

        But deferrals and using future value lowers the aav of an agreed to contract no matter how you slice it

        No deferrals has a higher aav than deferrals

        So instead of being taxed at 70 mill a year Dodgers can sign Ohtani and other guys using deferral and be taxed at 70 mill .

        That’s the problem fans have issue with

        Using deferrals to create room to sign other players which Ohtani is on record saying he agreed to such an arrangement for that very reason so dodgers could afford others is the main issue fans have.

        Again if dodgers were capped on deferrals and had to pay players like regular contracts nobody would care if their payroll was 500-600 mill cause they are being penalized by the cbt at those rates. But deferrals lowers the aav which lowers the cbt penalties.

        1
        Reply
        • Drunkpirate

          2 hours ago

          That is a fair point. Deferrals are a problem.

          Reply
        • Therealeman

          2 hours ago

          I don’t think the Phillies defer. They have some really long and dubious contracts though.

          Reply
        • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

          27 mins ago

          Lots of teams defer salary, you just don’t hear about it. Blue Jays have been deferring salary for their free agents. Nats have a few contracts deferred from the days they were winning titles. Reds are still paying Griffey Jr., Bobby Bonilla Day is still a thing even though he quit playing 25 years ago, etc. Hell, the Angels just restructured Rendon’s contract and will be hit with deferrals.

          It’s actually more common than you think, but since LA is LA, they do it to such an extreme level because that market prints money, they win a lot, and everybody wants to play there.

          1
          Reply
        • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

          27 mins ago

          Not of every team is already doing it too.

          Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        2 hours ago

        @Drunk

        Thank you for a bit of sanity.

        Reply
      • fox471 Dave

        1 hour ago

        Excellent analysis., Drunkpirate.

        Reply
      • NewOrleansSaintsFan

        1 hour ago

        So how do you know Tucker is the RIGHT PLAYER, THE RIGHT CULTURE? That team don’t need coaches or manager. It can be on autopilot and players make the decisions

        Reply
    • DarrenDreifortsContract

      2 hours ago

      A salary cap would force small market owners to spend more money. They aren’t voting for a salary cap.

      Reply
    • sadmarinersfan

      2 hours ago

      Salary cap would only benefit the cheapskate owners while hurting the players. You’d see players earning potential drastically drop from what they are worth, as well as shortening players careers by many years. It’s not fair to punish teams for trying to win, when every team has the same opportunities to sign players . It’s not the dodgers or any teams fault that 2/3rds of the leagues owners aren’t willing to spend the money that they have. So many teams focused on how they can make a profit while spending as minimal as possible, rather than trying to win and profiting off team success

      Reply
      • seth

        2 hours ago

        Or, hear me out, the cheapskate Rays, Royals, Pirates…etc, start offering these kind of contracts, then the big market teams laugh and offer Tucker 4 years $400 million.

        Reply
        • mlb1225

          2 hours ago

          No one is disagreeing that any of those teams could spend more. There’s zero reason any team has a 2026 payroll below $150 million, maybe minus teams who had to play in minor league stadiums last year. But even then, there’s no reason any team should have a sub-$125-$130 million payroll.

          But teams like that can only have one mega contract at a time. The Dodgers make insane revenue and their majority owner is the CEO of a enormous investment firm worth over $300 billion. See my comment below. If the Pirates (as well as the Royals) wanted to spend like the Dodgers did in 2025, they would have had to spend just about 130% of their 2024 revenue. The Rays would have had to spend just about 140% of their 2024 revenue to match the Dodgers’ 2025 payroll. It’s probably a lot higher once you factor in operations costs, employee salaries, and other general expenditures all team pay just to keep the operation running.

          Reply
    • dugdog83

      2 hours ago

      It’s the Dodgers ruining the game dude, the Mets suck

      2
      Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      2 hours ago

      This is how we get a strike and lose out on games. I don’t even care how much stupid money gets spent by these bazillion dollar corporations who own sportsball teams. Still gonna watch these mf’s every summer.

      Reply
      • ChuckyNJ

        2 hours ago

        Would be a lockout, not a strike.

        Reply
    • mlb1225

      2 hours ago

      We need both a cap and a floor. Nearly all teams could totally spend more, but barely any teams can’t even come close to the Dodgers. They have more money tied into 2027 commitments right now, before Tucker, than 11 teams made in total revenue in 2024. The Dodgers’ overall had a payroll in 2025 just over $417 million, which was more than what 20 teams made in revenue alone in 2024. That’s not even factoring in operations costs for the Dodgers, such as how much every non-player employee, from the general manager down to what the ushers are making.

      In no way would I ever defend owners like John Fisher or Bob Nutting. They’re the reason baseball needs a salary floor if they’re not gonna force them out. But Nutting would have had to spend just under 130% of the Pirates’ 2024 revenue to match the Dodgers’ 2025 payroll, and Fisher would have had to spend about 160% of the revenue the A’s made in 2024.

      9
      Reply
      • mlb1225

        42 mins ago

        Also keep in mind, no owner can invest into their team like the Dodgers’ owners can. Mark Walter is majority owner of the Dodgers. He is the controlling partner of Guggenheim Baseball Management, which is part of Guggeheim Partners, an investment firm Walter is a co-founder and CEO of.

        Guggenheim Partners is worth $330 billion.

        At that point, it isn’t even about an owner’s willingness to spend and their desire to win. Owners of even big market teams are bidding with pennies compared to the Dodgers.

        Reply
    • seth

      2 hours ago

      Mets don’t know how to spend their money. Even the Yankees had a limit to offering Soto money.

      1
      Reply
    • Brettlez

      2 hours ago

      Nah, salary floor is more important. All salary cap will do is make teams cheaper and billionaires richer.

      2
      Reply
    • neoncactus

      2 hours ago

      Carter, salary cap won’t work. What’s the cap? Certainly not under $200 million and more likely closer to the luxury tax line. Only 9 teams spent over $200 million last year.

      Another idea would be to pool the local TV revenue and distribute it equally to the teams. But I’m pretty sure the Dodgers, Yankees, and other teams losing money in that deal would want assurances that the money goes directly to payroll. Basically take current payrolls and shared revenue would be added to those and those teams would be required to spend more.

      The reality is there are a lot of owners – A’s, Marlins, Pirates, and Rockies come to mind – that don’t really care about fielding a competitive team. A salary cap, and likely even local TV revenue sharing, isn’t going to change that.

      Reply
  7. rothlaj

    3 hours ago

    Seems like they set us all up for this surprising news!

    1
    Reply
    • Jean Matrac

      2 hours ago

      This is not at all surprising news. The only surprise was Tucker going for the short term/high AAV.

      Reply
  8. horaceallen

    3 hours ago

    Wow, collect ‘em all I guess

    3
    Reply
  9. GiantsFan81

    3 hours ago

    ..of course they are signing him 🙄🙄

    4
    Reply
  10. Dustyslambchops23

    3 hours ago

    Boring.

    15
    Reply
  11. BetterMuppet:JUDGEorKERMIT?

    3 hours ago

    Well…..break a leg I guess

    4
    Reply
  12. TakerDbacks!

    3 hours ago

    See its disgusting

    6
    Reply
    • Therealeman

      2 hours ago

      I’m not even sure an all star team of the best players from the remaining 29 franchises could beat the Dodgers in a seven game playoff series.

      2
      Reply
      • fox471 Dave

        1 hour ago

        The Blue Jays came within two outs of doing so, realman .

        2
        Reply
    • bucsfan0004

      2 hours ago

      Who cares? Guy never hit more than 30HRs hitting in a small ballpark. Enjoy the .820 OPS LA

      2
      Reply
      • AndyPagesBaserunningClinic

        2 hours ago

        @bucs,

        You’re right. Should have kept Conforto and the Dodgers wouldn’t have needed Tucker.

        2
        Reply
      • Hammerin' Hank

        20 mins ago

        With a career OPS of .865 and a stellar OPS+ of 140 he’ll do just fine, thank you.

        1
        Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      2 hours ago

      Hahahahahahah

      1
      Reply
  13. Payne Train

    3 hours ago

    I hate this for baseball !!!

    33
    Reply
    • fox471 Dave

      1 hour ago

      Why?

      2
      Reply
  14. octavian8

    3 hours ago

    Wow

    Reply
  15. htbnm57

    3 hours ago

    Limitless money wins again

    16
    Reply
  16. Hate Jerry

    3 hours ago

    Now I want a lockout in 27. Cap and a floor

    40
    Reply
    • Spencer O'Gara

      3 hours ago

      I’d settle for an official edict that says LAD wins at MLB and the league just drops to 29 teams. lol.

      Obviously sarcasm.

      3
      Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      2 hours ago

      100 min. 250 max hard cap, which deferrals count against the cap

      8
      Reply
    • terry g

      2 hours ago

      no cap no floor.

      3
      Reply
    • Chicago Expat

      2 hours ago

      Are you wanting to lock the owners out? Because they’re the ones doing the spending (or not).

      1
      Reply
      • rhandome

        2 hours ago

        The owners collectively would absolutely vote for a salary cap

        Reply
        • Chicago Expat

          2 hours ago

          The owners don’t collectively want or do anything. Each owners wants to make as much money as they can for themselves and not share it with anyone else… including other team owners.

          1
          Reply
        • rhandome

          2 hours ago

          @Chicago Expat

          The owners are pushing for a salary cap in the next CBA. This is widely known. Not sure if I can post links here, but:

          amny.com/sports/mlb-lockout-rob-manfred-looming-1-…

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 hour ago

          @rhandome

          Of course they would. And it will never happen.

          1
          Reply
        • Chicago Expat

          1 hour ago

          Yes, the owners would like to limit the money they pay the players so they have more for themselves. This is not a new goal, and they’re certainly not doing it for the health of the game. And none of that changes the fact that the players nor their union are somehow at fault for the Dodgers spending big money, so I’m not sure why you would aim your disgust at them, when this is an owner-vs-owner issue.

          Look, there doesn’t have to be a salary cap, and the owners sure as hell don’t have to lock the players out. If everyone thinks it’s not fair that some teams have a ton of money to spend on players and others don’t, then all that has to happen is that owners get in a room and agree to pool all of their revenues and spread those revenues out equally to all the teams. It’s that simple. Then all teams will have the same amount of money to spend this year, next year, and all the years that follow.

          But the owners don’t want to admit that, so they call for a salary cap, as if it were the players forcing owners to pay them these amounts.

          This whole thing isn’t a labor issue. It’s a greed issue, and it’s entirely a battle between team owners.

          4
          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 hour ago

          @Chi Expat

          Well said.

          1
          Reply
      • Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

        2 hours ago

        The small market owners who don’t have RSN deals may vote to lock everything out until the Dodgers give everyone their RSN money.

        Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          17 mins ago

          Well they ain’t gettin’ it.

          Reply
  17. LA All Day

    3 hours ago

    LET’S GOOOO!!!! We did it!!!! Welcome to LA, Tucker! Welcoming you with open arms

    10
    Reply
    • dcftw

      2 hours ago

      We did it? Is this guy serious?

      23
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        2 hours ago

        If I was an LA fan I would be happy that the team is so stacked it is going to change the collective bargaining agreement

        This is just like warriors and Kevin Durant in 2016

        4
        Reply
    • himyojimbo

      2 hours ago

      same people that screamed he was a cheater too …right?

      2
      Reply
      • Chin Muzak

        2 hours ago

        Tucker was not with the 2017 Astros

        7
        Reply
      • LA All Day

        2 hours ago

        I only say that about the 2017 team. I never had anything against Tucker, always respected him as a player

        Reply
      • mynameispepe

        2 hours ago

        I mean Mookie Betts acknowledged the 2018 RS were cheating, and they certainly don’t care, so…

        4
        Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          12 mins ago

          Yep, they all cheat. But fans on message boards and comments sections need a scapegoat to pour their wrath upon so the Astros had to be it.

          Reply
    • NewOrleansSaintsFan

      1 hour ago

      WE?

      Reply
    • Hammerin' Hank

      16 mins ago

      Go Dodgers and Kyle!!!!!!!!!!

      Reply
  18. Joe It All

    3 hours ago

    Hahahaha.. I’m sorry but at this point I have to laugh. I’m by no means a Dodgers fan either but does this really surprise any of us?

    8
    Reply
  19. Tyler McDuffie

    3 hours ago

    TUCKER IS LIKE WHAT THEIR 6TH OR 7TH BEST HITTER? THAT’S INSANE.

    3
    Reply
    • Payne Train

      2 hours ago

      SIX SEVEN

      14
      Reply
      • Joe It All

        2 hours ago

        Tay Kinney approves your message.

        Reply
    • Hammerin' Hank

      6 mins ago

      With Freeman and Mookie starting to decline some, I would say he’s their second best hitter behind Ohtani. In what world is he 6th or 7th, lol? He’s better than Will Smith and Muncy, and way better than a declining Teoscar.

      Reply
  20. TakerDbacks!

    3 hours ago

    if your not a dodger fan I told you its disgusting for baseball. They are ruining baseball and MLB is to blame!

    20
    Reply
    • Joe It All

      3 hours ago

      They aren’t ruining baseball. If you want to blame anybody, blame all the top free agents signing there. They have other options but they’re the ones choosing the easiest path to a ring.

      3
      Reply
      • TakerDbacks!

        2 hours ago

        Well my friend why wouldn’t they if the dodgers give them what they want cause they can!! Thats why its bad for baseball. Every free agent will just want to go there. Your a dodger fan and not seeing it from other prospectives.

        1
        Reply
        • Joe It All

          2 hours ago

          I’m a Reds fan not a Dodgers fan. I just choose not to let it bother me like a lot of you all do. You can have all the talent in the world and it doesn’t guarantee anything. They still have to play the game.

          5
          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          1 hour ago

          The Dodgers have always had money, except when the crook McCourt had the team. But it took them 32 years to win a World Series after 1988. So they win one in 2020, which probably 25% of you said didn’t count and lose in 2021, 22, and 23. But the Dodgers are ruining baseball? Actually,
          The Red Sox and Astros came closer to ruining baseball. Oh, and the Dodgers put more butts in the seats every year, whether they win or lose the WS.

          4
          Reply
        • oldgfan

          1 hour ago

          Joe, it actually makes it better when you beat a team with all that talent.
          That’s why baseball is great. Anything can happen on any day. I got 10gs that they don’t go undefeated, ever.

          3
          Reply
      • dugdog83

        2 hours ago

        Get in touch with reality

        Reply
      • Fowlerrc

        2 hours ago

        I don’t blame the Dodgers for having bottomless pockets and acting within the rules to dominate the sport. But what’s happening is pretty objectively bad for the game. Blame whoever you want. Analytics, tv contracts, cheap owners who don’t care about winning, corporate greed, it doesn’t matter who you point the finger at, the long term lack of competitiveness with half the teams is making the game much less fun. I don’t know what the answer is, but denying that it’s a problem is ridiculous

        10
        Reply
      • Hammerin' Hank

        4 mins ago

        They’re mostly choosing money, not an easy path to a ring.

        Reply
    • kcmowhoa

      3 hours ago

      Any team could’ve offered him more money or more years. The Dodgers just consistently are more willing

      2
      Reply
      • Simm

        2 hours ago

        That’s not true

        8
        Reply
        • kcmowhoa

          1 hour ago

          Lmao yes it is. Any team could afford the base 2 years 100+ million before the opt out. Every org is an ownership group of millionaires or even billionaires. Just because other owners would rather suppress wages than compete doesn’t change that

          1
          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          1 hour ago

          Yeah Simm, it is true.

          1
          Reply
      • cards81

        2 hours ago

        You really need to stop believing this…the Dodgers are a big market that can sustain spending tons of money…not many teams can do that…the Mets rumored to offer him 50 mil a year lol Tucker just wants a ring

        8
        Reply
        • Simm

          2 hours ago

          No he wanted 60 million

          1
          Reply
        • cards81

          2 hours ago

          Yes 60 mil is nice but that still doesn’t take away that other teams can’t do this…it’s just stupid at this point…when the Dodgers win the next 4 World Series maybe things will change

          Reply
        • seth

          2 hours ago

          I’m waiting for the dislike button. Goa has nothing to do with him wanting a ring.

          1
          Reply
        • kcmowhoa

          1 hour ago

          What team couldn’t do this? I’m a Royals fan and we just gave Bobby Witt 200 million two years ago. What world are you living in?

          2
          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          2 mins ago

          No cards81, he wants the most money. $60 million is more than $50. These players care way less about rings than you guys do.

          Reply
  21. DigglinDickers

    3 hours ago

    I’m here for the comments.

    9
    Reply
    • NoSaint

      2 hours ago

      #DigglinDickers

      This is the comments section? I’m looking for the arguments room.

      Reply
  22. DepressedDodgerFan

    3 hours ago

    HATE US CUZ THEY AINT US

    9
    Reply
    • noquarter89

      2 hours ago

      Yes I do hate the fact that my team can’t support a $400M payroll.

      3
      Reply
    • ChrisP 2

      2 hours ago

      We don’t hate you cuz we ain’t you 🙄.

      We hate you because you are you 😂

      2
      Reply
  23. noquarter89

    3 hours ago

    This is unsustainable.

    11
    Reply
    • differentbears

      2 hours ago

      Your name is no quarter. This is literally no quarter being given.

      Reply
    • terry g

      2 hours ago

      Why?

      Reply
      • noquarter89

        2 hours ago

        Cause how long is there gonna be any interest left in the league if the same team can just buy the championship every year?

        5
        Reply
        • hiflew

          2 hours ago

          It lasted quite a while for the Yankees from the 20s through the 60s. This is not new for baseball, just a different team doing the buying.

          Reply
        • kcmowhoa

          1 hour ago

          We just watched the best World Series in forever. And it had the highest ratings in 30 years. Stop whining

          2
          Reply
      • Sadler

        2 hours ago

        Because when it costs $1000 for a family of four to go to a game, nobody will go.

        Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          1 hour ago

          Revenue and viewership are at an all time high

          1
          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 hour ago

          More than 4 million people paid to get into Dodger Stadium last season.

          Reply
        • kcmowhoa

          59 mins ago

          Whose fault is that? The owners set prices and are making money hand over foot even on loser teams.

          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          56 mins ago

          I took my two grandsons and one of their girlfriends to a game last year. Had loge seats, nothing too special but nice. With parking, four seats, and a few hot dogs and sodas $680.
          The place was packed.

          2
          Reply
  24. mkeving

    3 hours ago

    Woe!

    Reply
  25. Baseballisthebest

    3 hours ago

    One more right in the contest.

    Reply
  26. Ryan W

    3 hours ago

    Wow what a competitor

    8
    Reply
  27. sixpence

    3 hours ago

    Strike incoming 2027.

    18
    Reply
    • 920falcon

      2 hours ago

      Lockout.

      5
      Reply
      • hiflew

        2 hours ago

        Semantics. The 1994 strike was also a lockout, but everyone still called it a strike. The truth never matters, just how people choose to remember it.

        Reply
  28. brocnessmonster

    3 hours ago

    oh is that right?

    2
    Reply
  29. sad tormented neglected mariners fan

    3 hours ago

    I’m going to start getting prepared for no baseball in 2027 now

    18
    Reply
    • DRS(comprehensive)>OAA(range only)

      2 hours ago

      Doesn’t matter to mariner fans if there’s a season because you guys never win a chip anyway

      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        2 hours ago

        That’s with 90% of the league for 2026

        I actually believe my mariners, the blue jays, and a team like the Red Sox or cubs are the only teams that are a threat to LA

        Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      2 hours ago

      That Mariners fan must not live close to a minor league ballpark. The Yankees have their Double-A farm team in the town where I live.

      Reply
  30. Captain_Bigelow

    3 hours ago

    Hilarious

    2
    Reply
  31. Rowsdower

    3 hours ago

    How much is deferred?

    1
    Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      2 hours ago

      Let me guess, half?

      Reply
      • VegasMoved

        1 hour ago

        12.5%. You were close.

        Reply
  32. AndyPagesBaserunningClinic

    3 hours ago

    The Dodgers are ruining baseball.

    There needs to be a salary cap.

    How much is deferred?

    Have I covered them all?

    13
    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      2 hours ago

      @Andy

      You forgot thre-peat

      2
      Reply
    • BobNutting

      1 hour ago

      Yeah let’s hope for The Big One, seriously.

      Reply
  33. NZ Braves Fan

    3 hours ago

    This is why there will be a lockout, the Dodgers have ruined the game with that BS Ohtani contract.

    18
    Reply
    • ❤️ MuteButton

      2 hours ago

      Agree, but I believe the Soto contract was even worse

      1
      Reply
      • kevnames42

        2 hours ago

        It wasn’t worse, ohtanis was because of the insane deferrals and all the deferrals the dodgers have done

        1
        Reply
  34. Seattle Blues

    3 hours ago

    Salary cap please.

    20
    Reply
    • ❤️ MuteButton

      2 hours ago

      MLB is the only major sports league without one.

      5
      Reply
      • td272

        2 hours ago

        And it’s worked well in the other leagues – they’re thriving. Hard to understand why baseball fans can’t grasp this.

        2
        Reply
        • misteredsox

          1 hour ago

          Oh, it’s 0% the fans.

          Reply
        • td272

          53 mins ago

          Just reading the comments here there are a lot who argue against a cap. That’s what I was referring to.

          1
          Reply
  35. aduncaroo44

    3 hours ago

    Gross for baseball

    15
    Reply
  36. DRS(comprehensive)>OAA(range only)

    3 hours ago

    Tarik Skubal coming to LA next

    7
    Reply
    • Motor City Beach Bum

      2 hours ago

      Get ready to overpay if it happens.

      Reply
      • hiflew

        2 hours ago

        Why would they overpay for him this year when they will just buy him next year. It’s not like they will need him in 2026 or anything.

        2
        Reply
      • DRS(comprehensive)>OAA(range only)

        1 hour ago

        Motor city beach
        How many top 100 prospects will it take?
        Sheehan, Hope, Ferris and Emil Morales enough?

        Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      2 hours ago

      At the deadline or next year

      1
      Reply
      • Motor City Beach Bum

        2 hours ago

        LA can overpay any time and it won’t matter to them. They’ll just go sign someone else.

        2
        Reply
    • Anthony maresca

      2 hours ago

      Agree. The $30 million hit adds another $64 million with luxury tax adds to payroll to a whopping $500 million! That would be hilarious to see. Steinbrenner family should sell the franchise for $10-12 billion as it’s not worth owning a franchise with the cost of players salaries getting out of control

      Reply
  37. chandlerbing

    3 hours ago

    And the dodgers strike again
    Shocked that its short term tho

    2
    Reply
  38. Baseballisthebest

    3 hours ago

    Any guesses as to how much? Mets were at 4/200. How much higher were Dodgers?

    1
    Reply
    • Joe It All

      2 hours ago

      They could have been lower. If it’s true people play for the Ring over the money he could have taken less for the easier path to a ring.

      Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      2 hours ago

      4/300?

      Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      2 hours ago

      $60 million a year lol. Its a lot regardless of high taxes in LA.

      Reply
  39. cards99

    3 hours ago

    They were an out away from losing the World Series last year btw… Just sayin’!

    3
    Reply
  40. findingnimmo

    3 hours ago

    No respect for anyone signing with them like this. Easy ring no challenge. No respect. He has every right to do this. But I have every right to wish him nothing but embarrassment and regret on this.

    12
    Reply
  41. bkbk

    3 hours ago

    Good to see the small market teams step up finally

    1
    Reply
  42. Just_A_Guy

    3 hours ago

    Looks like everyone is playing for 2nd place for a 3rd year in a row. Broken sport.

    9
    Reply
    • SDMadres

      24 mins ago

      Did you watch the 2025 world series?

      Reply
      • hiflew

        22 mins ago

        Nope.

        Reply
  43. KnicksFanCavsFan

    3 hours ago

    Ok seriously….. this is getting crazy. I’m a Yankees fan and I get it but this is getting ridiculous. If you aren’t a multi-bilionaire whose money comes from something not related to baseball is going to be tough to sign the amount of talent the Dodgers are collecting. You CAN still compete but the margin for error is thin.

    6
    Reply
    • seth

      2 hours ago

      When a Yankees fan says this Is getting crazy, you know things are out of hand.

      2
      Reply
  44. countryuncle

    3 hours ago

    Let me guess……90% deferred

    9
    Reply
    • Homerfan 2

      2 hours ago

      If I was Tucker I would defer 90% to avoid paying the taxes in California. Tucker lives in Florida so when he gets the deferred money he doesn’t pay state taxes.

      1
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        2 hours ago

        He still pays federal taxes.

        Reply
  45. MetsSchmets!

    3 hours ago

    Lame

    4
    Reply
  46. Joemo

    3 hours ago

    Lol

    Reply
  47. cubbie cole

    3 hours ago

    Why 😢

    Reply
  48. The People's Champ

    2 hours ago

    Wouldn’t be surprised if they announce a Bichette signing some time in the near future as well.

    5
    Reply
    • dcftw

      2 hours ago

      Its like you want a lockout

      1
      Reply
    • drprofkevin

      2 hours ago

      He will be as blue jay!!! Unless Met’s outbid?

      Reply
  49. O'sSayCanYouSee

    2 hours ago

    Yuck

    1
    Reply
  50. Larry D.

    2 hours ago

    Welp,I got ONE right in the FA contest.

    1
    Reply
  51. vaderzim

    2 hours ago

    Yep

    1
    Reply
  52. Pitt1623

    2 hours ago

    This is why baseball is losing market share and interest.

    16
    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      2 hours ago

      @Pitt
      And yet here you are.

      And you ought to check the attendance figures and tv ratings.

      1
      Reply
      • AssumesFactNotInEvidence

        2 hours ago

        Attendance is down 10% compared to the peak year of 2007. National TV contract is down 5% from its peak adjusting for inflation. Dodgers Yankees Cubs and Red Sox are pulling 100-200M a year from their local tv deals…

        1
        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          2 hours ago

          make the stats say what you like. 51 million pairs of eyeballs watched Game 7 this year.

          and 48% of the TV revenue is shared

          Reply
        • foppert3

          51 mins ago

          How many Japan based eyeballs made up that number ? Casual Canadians ?

          Might have to look within that number to get a true indication of how the grass roots is doing.

          1
          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          49 mins ago

          @foppert

          per MLB & Bloomberg:

          27.3 million in the U.S., 11.6 million in Canada, and 12 million in Japan

          Reply
        • foppert3

          37 mins ago

          Ok. All over it. Thanks. Understandably big OS numbers.

          Dodgers are cool. Earned the right. All good.

          That’s not to say it’s good for the game overall. The talent disparity is trending in the wrong direction. So many fans going in with no chance. Not good. Got to reverse it.

          Reply
    • rhandome

      2 hours ago

      100%

      Imagine being, like, a Pirates fan and seeing this crap

      Reply
      • BobNutting

        1 hour ago

        I don’t have to imagine. I’m imploring all non-Dodgers fans to not tune in to or attend games where the Dodgers play your team.

        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          34 mins ago

          Dodgers led MLB in road attendance in 2024 and 2025. So good luck with that.

          Reply
      • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

        19 mins ago

        Bold of you to assume the Pirates would have a chance even if nobody did this.

        Reply
    • vertigo

      2 hours ago

      Wrong – 2025 Dodgers vs. Blue Jays series generated the most recent massive viewership, with its Game 7 becoming the most-watched MLB game globally in 34 years, drawing 51 million combined viewers across U.S., Canada, and Japan.

      3
      Reply
  53. yanks2009

    2 hours ago

    Talking about buying a championship!!

    6
    Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      2 hours ago

      The Yankees did the same as your username implies.

      3
      Reply
  54. bigalcathey

    2 hours ago

    4yrs/220 mil

    Reply
    • bigalcathey

      2 hours ago

      That’s my prediction anyway lol

      Reply
  55. jfive

    2 hours ago

    salary deferrals have to go, and/or salary caps have to come

    3
    Reply
    • DRS(comprehensive)>OAA(range only)

      2 hours ago

      Almost every team does deferrals and a salary cap would just make the dodger owners wealthier. LA already pays for most of the small markets through shared revenue and luxury taxes. A cap just decreases how much the cheap owners would make.

      3
      Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        2 hours ago

        @drs

        no… haha… more than half of the teams don’t do deferred payments to FA. You can’t just make stuff up.

        1
        Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        2 hours ago

        @DRS
        Good luck trying to explain that to the knee jerk responders.

        1
        Reply
        • KnicksFanCavsFan

          2 hours ago

          @ Bivouac

          Nothing to explain because it’s not true.

          Reply
      • kevnames42

        2 hours ago

        Nobody does deferrals like the Dodgers do. That’s the problem. AAV shouldn’t take any deferrals into account and there should be a cap on how much of a contract you can defer

        Reply
        • kevnames42

          2 hours ago

          AAV for luxury tax purposes*

          Reply
  56. mr. sports

    2 hours ago

    well at least we know they’re not buying the 2027 world series

    2
    Reply
  57. sadmarinersfan

    2 hours ago

    I don’t blame the dodgers at all for anything they’re doing, I blame all of the teams that aren’t willing to spend money and try to win. Every team can afford to sign the big guys, but only a select few actually open up their wallets for it. A salary cap would be detrimental to the players and the league. A salary floor is 100% necessary, and is the main factor for the Dodgers signing so many guys

    6
    Reply
    • Ryan W

      2 hours ago

      It’s a partially true argument. Ask what the padres front office thinks.

      Reply
    • MC Tim C

      2 hours ago

      A salary cap would not be detrimental to the players or league. All of the other major professional sports have a cap and they all manage to survive.

      6
      Reply
    • KnicksFanCavsFan

      2 hours ago

      @sad

      How many mlb owners have members worth $20 billion dollars and can afford to not take any money out of the revenue? You think the owner of the Pirates who is worth $1.5 bil and owns the team, a newspaper and a resort can compete? Magic Johnson is one of the “poorest” partners in the Guggenheim Sports Group and HE’S worth more than the Pirates owner(Nuttering?). For him, it’s a mom and pop business. To Mark Walter’s it’s must another revenue stream in addition to the Lakers, Guggenheim Investments, etc. Even Hal Steinbrenner is broke compared to Walters.

      1
      Reply
  58. Motor City Beach Bum

    2 hours ago

    Seriously?

    Reply
  59. Chisox378

    2 hours ago

    He can show Ohtani what a top 7 batter in the game looks like. I was rooting for the jays so much last word series

    Reply
  60. 412_Ryan

    2 hours ago

    The rich get richer :’)

    Reply
  61. DarrenDreifortsContract

    2 hours ago

    We don’t need him. I expect he will be hitting 9th and sharing time in the outfield.

    Reply
    • foppert3

      2 hours ago

      Exactly. That’s the problem.

      Reply
  62. GONEcarlo

    2 hours ago

    Goodbye 2027

    1
    Reply
  63. C5793l

    2 hours ago

    Oh Lord, here we go

    Reply
  64. EuthanizeFlorida

    2 hours ago

    Crabs in a bucket commenters.

    “Make rules to stop this team from succeeding, so my team can maybe succeed by doing what theyve always done. There needs to be a salary cap!” Some of you would take a bullet for billionaires in hopes they spit on you.

    5
    Reply
    • mydogsnameisrayray

      2 hours ago

      you understand clearly.

      Reply
  65. garthvader12

    2 hours ago

    What a shocker. 🙄

    1
    Reply
  66. CarverAndrews

    2 hours ago

    Oh for heaven’s sake.

    Reply
  67. astros4life!

    2 hours ago

    Why? Well, we do see Tucker less.

    Reply
  68. sgord03

    2 hours ago

    Supposedly this guy doesn’t like playing baseball and was always going to sign a short term contract and retire after.

    Reply
    • bucknerkingmansutter

      2 hours ago

      Yeah, being a Cub fan this guy was not all that. Very fragile and absolutely ZERO personality. Good luck with that ridiculous contract.

      Reply
  69. Cheerio

    2 hours ago

    Probably paying him a buck and deferring the rest of the 300 million 38 years down the road.

    1
    Reply
  70. illegitimate son of EK23

    2 hours ago

    It’s getting a bit tiresome at this point. But since the other owners rather line thier pockets….. #thinkblue

    1
    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      2 hours ago

      Mets and Jays are usually in on everyone the same or better $, but most players just choose LA for the “life style” + obviously easiest path

      Reply
  71. Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

    2 hours ago

    Ring Chaser Tucker

    2
    Reply
  72. Steven hempel

    2 hours ago

    Yeah maybe it’s time for 29 other teams fans just to take a break until everyone has the same money to spend

    7
    Reply
  73. lgr34561

    2 hours ago

    What’s the point of watching baseball if you’re not a dodgers fan this year…..

    3
    Reply
    • Chicago Expat

      2 hours ago

      Same as every year… Because you like watching baseball and support your team.

      Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      2 hours ago

      @Igr

      Be sure to let us know how the beach volleyball goes this summer.

      Reply
      • oldgfan

        1 hour ago

        I gotta admit, it’s not a bad watch..

        2
        Reply
        • foppert3

          13 mins ago

          Oh yeah. Do men play it as well ?

          Reply
  74. VonPurpleHayes

    2 hours ago

    Can’t make it up. What a loser.

    4
    Reply
  75. sosaspelledbackwardsisasos

    2 hours ago

    Can’t wait to see how much is deferred…

    Reply
  76. braddy513

    2 hours ago

    This is annoying

    5
    Reply
  77. Tiger22matt

    2 hours ago

    Salary Cap Now

    6
    Reply
  78. Diggydugler

    2 hours ago

    lol

    1
    Reply
  79. peyton161816

    2 hours ago

    4 millions fans through the gates at Dodgers stadium means they can spend money.

    2
    Reply
  80. bummy

    2 hours ago

    Im disgusted, im a nym fan; so i shouldnt be complaining; but this is just getting stupid; I finally have a billionaire owner but why would anyone want to come to nym instead of calif; i hare the lad; screwed bklyn over and still screwing us each and every time; i hate this team, and their fsns can f… off too

    2
    Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      2 hours ago

      Not hard to see “why would anyone want to come to nym”. The answer is in one word … LOLmets.

      Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      2 hours ago

      @ bummy

      well at least you’re enjoying life

      Reply
  81. Dodgers2026

    2 hours ago

    WOW. Even Dodger fans are impressed. Andrew Friedman got his guy. Welcome to Dodger Blue.

    1
    Reply
  82. retsubllab

    2 hours ago

    Hey, remember when the Dodgers won three titles in a row just before the lockout – that changed EVERYTHING. ROBO UMPIRES, ROBO COP, ROBO ICE!!

    2
    Reply
  83. Arnoldpsufan

    2 hours ago

    Do they know that he’s not Japanese?

    3
    Reply
  84. osfandan

    2 hours ago

    Disappointing on multiple levels.

    6
    Reply
  85. Metsfan1 13

    2 hours ago

    10 years for 100 mil a year with 99.5 deferred until 2099

    1
    Reply
  86. Dodgerfan75

    2 hours ago

    As a dodger fan I truly don’t like this signing. We needed to get younger not another guy right at 30. If it’s longer than 4 years I think it was a bad signing.

    1
    Reply
    • VegasMoved

      1 hour ago

      He’s 29, and it is a 4 year deal.

      1
      Reply
    • LATrolleyDodger

      47 mins ago

      High AAV short term with opt outs after 2nd season. He’s in his prime and Dodgers desperately needed someone to plug in at RF. Teo was a huge defensive liability. I get that these players are getting older but they are all experienced, professionals, and buy into the culture. Hard to argue with what Friedman and company have accomplished. 2 back to back championships with high probability to make it 3, a feat rarely accomplished in sports.

      I think the price is ridiculously high for the short term. I’ll concede that and the injuries hampered him. We will see how it plays out. No one is behind the scenes so we can’t really know the details.

      Reply
    • norcalblue

      20 mins ago

      Dear Dodgerfan….seriously?

      Reply
  87. NineChampionships

    2 hours ago

    Called it lol. They going for the threepeat. They know they’re window ain’t that big so they trying to win as many titles as they can before Ohtani, Freeman, Betts, etc. get too close to father time.

    1
    Reply
    • Ryan W

      2 hours ago

      They have enough dollars/farm system to keep the window going for another decade+

      4
      Reply
    • LATrolleyDodger

      41 mins ago

      I mean 5 seasons is a big window. I think that this was meticulously planned and IS meticulously planned. This organization is operating and firing on ALL cylinders. Andrew Friedman and ownership wanted to transform the Dodgers and you see that every year. They are giving back to LA fans. It’s been a decade+ in the making.

      Reply
  88. baseballlover6363

    2 hours ago

    Finally! Maybe the dodgers can compete for a ws within the next few years now.

    Reply
  89. rhandome

    2 hours ago

    I’m at the point where we need a salary cap, no matter what it takes.

    Even if it means breaking the players union.

    7
    Reply
    • EuthanizeFlorida

      2 hours ago

      Bootlicker

      Reply
      • rhandome

        2 hours ago

        @EuthanizeFlorida

        Won;t someone think of the oppressed millionaires? Man shut up

        2
        Reply
        • EuthanizeFlorida

          2 hours ago

          @rhandome

          “Won’t someone protect these billionaires? I need them to take my tax dollars, while I demonize poor people!”

          Keep that mindset, maybe a billionaire will impregnate you

          1
          Reply
    • Chicago Expat

      2 hours ago

      That makes no sense. You want to break the players union because the *owners* spend too much on players? The players union didn’t make the Dodgers sign Tucker… the Dodgers did it all on their own. If you want to break somebody, go after the owners.

      1
      Reply
      • rhandome

        2 hours ago

        The owners want a salary cap. Maybe not the Dodgers owners, but collectively, they are pushing for it.

        Reply
        • Chicago Expat

          2 hours ago

          Some owners want a salary cap, some owners do not, some owners want some teams to spend less, some owners want some teams to spend “more.” This has nothing to do with the players union or the players. It has to do with owners not playing nice with one another. That’s not a reason to punish the players.

          Reply
    • shoelaces

      2 hours ago

      breaking up the union is such an insane take.

      1
      Reply
      • rhandome

        2 hours ago

        The alternative is the sport withers and dies. This is not sustainable. I would hope the players union realizes this.

        Reply
        • EuthanizeFlorida

          1 hour ago

          The sport won’t die, you’re so overdramatic. Union-busting doesn’t save businesses only an idiot would come to that conclusion.

          2
          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          1 hour ago

          It will never happen.

          Reply
  90. SweetLou

    2 hours ago

    Imagine calling yourself a champ playing in that lineup. What a joke.

    6
    Reply
  91. 920falcon

    2 hours ago

    They arent doing anything illegal or even unethical… but, come on. They make the George Yankees look like a class of first graders.

    8
    Reply
  92. Qwerky

    2 hours ago

    Thought he’d take a longer deal

    Reply
  93. 412_Ryan

    2 hours ago

    Kyle went from banging on trash cans for a ring to pulling a Kevin Durant for another. Shameless.

    Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      2 hours ago

      Tucker never played for the bang on a can Astros.

      1
      Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        2 hours ago

        @Chucky

        Better not to confuse them with facts.

        Reply
  94. Title-less in Seattle

    2 hours ago

    Its not just because they have limitless funds, but because they’re the only team that TRULY prioritizes winning…🙄

    2
    Reply
  95. Chris G.

    2 hours ago

    Finally the Dodgers make a move. /s

    Reply
  96. dcftw

    2 hours ago

    What’s good for the Dodgers is bad for baseball. Baseball is broken at a tike when it can’t afford to be.

    6
    Reply
  97. Zonedeads

    2 hours ago

    Any player signing with the dodgers is soft and has no competitive bone in them.

    7
    Reply
  98. Moonlight Graham

    2 hours ago

    Well, that’s just…stupid.

    6
    Reply
  99. Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

    2 hours ago

    4/240 million opt out after 2 years. 60kil aav is absolutely insane

    1
    Reply
  100. hamandegger777

    2 hours ago

    Flags fly Forever!!

    Go Dodgers!!

    2
    Reply
  101. backstage1

    2 hours ago

    For all those saying that other teams just need to spend like the Dodgers do, you do not understand TV revenue. The Dodgers generate about $334 million a year. A year. For contrast, the Brewers bring in $35 million. Dodgers overall revenue is $750 mil and that will continue to grow with the way their TV deal is structured. So the Dodgers spent $417 in 2025 plus $169.4 in luxury tax with that extra $300 million covering a big chunk of payroll.

    9
    Reply
    • billy09

      2 hours ago

      This, to me, is an argument against the salary cap. What should the Dodgers do with all that profit?

      2
      Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      2 hours ago

      @backstage1

      At least tell the entire story bud. Or maybe you’re not aware that 48% of all the Dodgers TV revenue, sponsorships, concessions, merchandise, ticket sales, etc go to REVENUE SHARING PAID TO THE HAVE NOT TEAMS.

      Reply
  102. himyojimbo

    2 hours ago

    For a team, and a fan base, that is super pissed that “the astros stole” their WS wins, they sure do love signing former Astros players.

    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      2 hours ago

      Yeah they should be ashamed.

      Tucker wasn’t on the 2017 Astros.

      1
      Reply
    • TigerBacker

      2 hours ago

      Tucker didn’t play for those Astros.

      1
      Reply
  103. SweetLou

    2 hours ago

    Wow is that the biggest overpay in sports?

    3
    Reply
  104. goinshittingcleanup

    2 hours ago

    Can’t wait for Dodgers to be full of pride when their team is the literal only reason a lockout happens.

    4
    Reply
    • BobNutting

      58 mins ago

      I hope part of the lockout is disbanding the Dodgers to restart baseball.

      Reply
  105. Quinnap89

    2 hours ago

    240 for 4 years. I like Tucker but man he’s not worth that

    5
    Reply
  106. sixpence

    2 hours ago

    Holy cow! 60 million per?

    1
    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      2 hours ago

      lets wait for the deferrals. People still think Ohtani makes $70M a year.

      1
      Reply
      • Quinnap89

        2 hours ago

        That’s true….deferrals or not nobody on earth is worth this kind of dough

        Reply
  107. Wrian Washman

    2 hours ago

    Baseball is ruined

    5
    Reply
    • mkeving

      2 hours ago

      Yep just like all the great teams of the past, ruining baseball. Murderers Row, Big Red Machine…ruined.

      2
      Reply
      • Wrian Washman

        2 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s totally the same thing. (Thumbs up)

        4
        Reply
  108. TakerDbacks!

    2 hours ago

    60 mil!!! omg and fans ask why other teams dont do it

    2
    Reply
  109. SteveFinleyEnthusiast

    2 hours ago

    I am in horrific pain

    1
    Reply
  110. Qwerky

    2 hours ago

    60M IS CRAZY

    1
    Reply
  111. southi

    2 hours ago

    WOW, serious dough

    Reply
  112. Redwolves3

    2 hours ago

    LA Deferrals doing whatever they can to better chances for 3-Peat

    LA Deferrals separating themselves from rest of NL

    Tucker gave himself a chance for a World Series Ring

    Reply
    • robw5555

      2 hours ago

      Tucker wants money. Rings? LOL.

      1
      Reply
  113. SteveFinleyEnthusiast

    2 hours ago

    C’mon man

    2
    Reply
  114. Rays in the Bay

    2 hours ago

    Not shocked at all. Maybe I’m de-sensitized to it. Maybe that’s what Manfred wants

    Reply
  115. fathead0507

    2 hours ago

    $60 mil yr is insane .. can’t wait to see what they will offer Acuna in 2yrs

    2
    Reply
    • Gobraves88

      2 hours ago

      Be quiet.

      Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      2 hours ago

      If Acuna can stay on the field for consecutive years he’ll make b a n k.

      1
      Reply
    • robw5555

      2 hours ago

      Skubal may get 500 million from them.

      2
      Reply
  116. BartoloHRball

    2 hours ago

    $60m AAV?!

    Gross.

    Reply
  117. hockeyjohn

    2 hours ago

    MLB is very broken, I am hoping for a long lock out in 2027 that will save the sport

    12
    Reply
    • DanUgglasRing

      50 mins ago

      Trash opinion and I’m a Giants fan.

      1
      Reply
  118. holecamels35

    2 hours ago

    60 million a year? Or another fake contract? Honestly bring on the lockout and a cap. This is getting pathetic at this point.

    7
    Reply
  119. Kubanis427

    2 hours ago

    240 for 4 years is crazy!!! I like that that it is not long term!!!

    2
    Reply
  120. Jaggy

    2 hours ago

    $60 mil a year?? A little too high I hope the team also has opt out options after 1 and 2 years?? I think Bellinger could’ve worked out wonder if they offered him 4 years $120 mil??

    1
    Reply
    • phenomenalajs

      2 hours ago

      The opt-out is for him, not the team.

      Reply
  121. Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

    2 hours ago

    Cohen is gonna panic sign Bellinger to a 10/500 contract now.

    2
    Reply
  122. CC Ryder

    2 hours ago

    And some thought Bregman was overpaid

    2
    Reply
  123. Informed Sportsball Discussion

    2 hours ago

    Getting to where I’m over it.

    1
    Reply
  124. dugmet

    2 hours ago

    Geeeeeezus.

    1
    Reply
  125. Captain_Bigelow

    2 hours ago

    I hope that is a typo. $60m a year for Tucker? Come on. He is decent but not that good.

    2
    Reply
    • Boodge106

      2 hours ago

      As a very disgruntled Mets fan, Tucker is more than “decent.” He is great. But also not worth $60 million AAV.

      1
      Reply
  126. Moff_Nick

    2 hours ago

    I wonder how many teams payrolls are smaller than the Dodgers luxury tax penalty

    Reply
    • bighiggy

      1 hour ago

      There was an article published a couple days ago. 11 or 12 teams payrolls were smaller than the Dodgers luxury tax penalty. I think their payroll plus penalty tax was more than the bottom 8 teams combined

      3
      Reply
  127. TooToughToScuffle

    2 hours ago

    Salary cap and salary floor. No deferrals. Gotta hate this NBAification of Major League Baseball. No superteams!

    3
    Reply
  128. sad tormented neglected mariners fan

    2 hours ago

    Wait what 4 years 240 million sounds absolutely insane Tucker is not worth 10 million more per year than Soto

    3
    Reply
    • Chin Muzak

      2 hours ago

      that’s why Soto was guaranteed 3X what Tucker is.

      Reply
  129. angryyankeesfan1

    2 hours ago

    $60 million AAV is crazy unless there are deferrals, which there probably are. But even then, it’s still crazy. I don’t know if the Blue Jays or Mets are going to turn to Bellinger since the fit on the Jays is tough and the Mets didn’t want to go long-term for Tucker, so why would they for Bellinger? If not him, though, where do they turn?

    2
    Reply
  130. Greenmachinelickitclean

    2 hours ago

    Still pissed about 2017

    1
    Reply
  131. BuckMcDuck

    2 hours ago

    60M a season! Lmao. RIP MLB. Enjoy this last season.

    9
    Reply
  132. Fantomhamst3r

    2 hours ago

    Ok dude is NOT worth $60 mill a year.

    4
    Reply
  133. yukz

    2 hours ago

    60 millions per season? Nobody is worth that much. Nobody!

    2
    Reply
  134. Joemo

    2 hours ago

    59MM yearly deferred.

    Reply
  135. This one belongs to the Reds

    2 hours ago

    I’m sure it is deferred out the wazoo.

    2
    Reply
  136. Chester Copperpot

    2 hours ago

    What a stupid team.

    1
    Reply
  137. brewsingblue82

    2 hours ago

    What?! The Dodgers weren’t even in on the market people said for a long time. That they weren’t looking to sign him to a long term contract. I’m not surprised at all though. Because they dc an offer that crazy money short term. Mets were THIS close. But probably not.

    Reply
    • robw5555

      2 hours ago

      The Dodgers get every Free agent they want. Bichette?

      Reply
  138. mkeving

    2 hours ago

    With the luxury tax on top they’ll be paying $126M/yr for Tucker….yikes

    9
    Reply
    • NineChampionships

      2 hours ago

      That is crazy 😂😂😂.

      That’s more money than my entire A’s payroll and we don’t even have the lowest payroll this year.

      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        2 hours ago

        And people say the A’s and Dodgers are fair together and nothing should be changed

        1
        Reply
        • NineChampionships

          2 hours ago

          What can you do though its not like you can just tell the Dodgers not to spend the money they earn.

          1
          Reply
    • Chester Copperpot

      2 hours ago

      Shows how ineffective that tax actually is.

      1
      Reply
      • DroppedThirdStrike

        1 hour ago

        It’s effective at diverting dollars to small market teams. That’s the point.

        Reply
  139. Piro

    2 hours ago

    I was right

    Reply
  140. Bryzzo2016

    2 hours ago

    60 mil a year… WOW! I wonder what Pittsburgh TOTAL payroll will be next year. Good for Tucker

    Reply
  141. KnicksFanCavsFan

    2 hours ago

    No freaking way should Tucker be baseballs 1st legit $60 mil dollar player. That’s insane!!!!! Who do they think he is? Chelsea Clinton (Chris Tucker voice).

    3
    Reply
  142. Wren

    2 hours ago

    as a Dodger fan i’m stunned. way beyond anything i could have imagined. in a good way. i think. damn

    Reply
  143. kevin mccane

    2 hours ago

    F the Dodgers

    4
    Reply
  144. 2183281

    2 hours ago

    This sucks for baseball.

    7
    Reply
  145. JTizzle23

    2 hours ago

    Bichette is next.

    1
    Reply
  146. hoof hearted

    2 hours ago

    The new evil empire

    5
    Reply
    • LordD99

      2 hours ago

      As a fan of the former Evil Empire, I do not approve this message!

      1
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        2 hours ago

        Somehow eviler empire than The Evil Empire

        1
        Reply
    • For Love of the Game

      2 hours ago

      Where have you been???

      Reply
  147. nacb55

    2 hours ago

    No offense people- but each market has enough people to fill the seats for each game… some teams just don’t invest in their product.
    Not everyone in LA, NY, SF or Chicago care about baseball- not even close. I’d even argue that there are more distractions and places to spend $ on other than games in those markets- so the teams have to compete with other teams in the MLB as well as Theme parks, Broadway, etc.

    Baseball should make the revenue share teams invest all $ on players. And the small market should be compensated to keep/sign their home grown players in some manner like not counting their salaries towards a cap, insuring the investment to pay teams if their long term commitment is a bust or something like that.

    Teams need to be entertaining… that is the industry. mlb should kick teams out who don’t try or force ownership changes.

    1
    Reply
    • robw5555

      2 hours ago

      Baseball is a business. Who are you to say teams dont try? Nobody is ever kicked out.

      1
      Reply
      • nacb55

        19 mins ago

        They should be kicked out… and tell me when the As have tried last?

        Reply
  148. seth

    2 hours ago

    I know baseball doesn’t want a salary cap but this is getting out of hand.

    5
    Reply
  149. Old York

    2 hours ago

    MLB needs to split into Super League, Normal League and the Junior League. The Super League can have the Dodgers and the… Blue Jays and the… uhh?

    The regular league can have the Mets, Astros, Tigers, etc…

    The Junior League can have teams like the Yankees, A’s Marlins, White Sox Rockies, etc.

    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      2 hours ago

      as long as there is relegation

      Reply
      • Old York

        2 hours ago

        @Diggydugler

        Yes, sir. And the team that finishes last in the Junior league has to sell the team.

        Reply
    • robw5555

      2 hours ago

      Several problems with you leagues. The BLue Jays? Super league? The Marlins swept the Mets out of the playoffs in 2025. Yet the Mets are so special? Soto is a guy out for himself.

      1
      Reply
      • Old York

        1 hour ago

        @robw5555

        Who else you putting in the Super League? Philadelphia? LOL!

        Reply
  150. 412_Ryan

    2 hours ago

    Paying a 5 WAR player 60 mil a year is absolute insanity

    4
    Reply
  151. Charles B

    2 hours ago

    This organization has no shame. I guess if the other billionaire owners are going to sit on the sidelines. Sill hard to believe.

    1
    Reply
  152. Tankathon

    2 hours ago

    I think I hate baseball now

    4
    Reply
  153. Dfan

    2 hours ago

    I’d be more excited if they brought Farmer John’s back

    Reply
    • agentx

      2 hours ago

      I’d love to see the Cool-A-Coo back in the lineup, too.

      Reply
  154. Wrian Washman

    2 hours ago

    Waiting for blue skies to defend this crap:
    Shohei Ohtani: $680 million deferred from 2034-2043.
    Mookie Betts: $115 million in salaries deferred from 2033-2044.
    Blake Snell: $66 million deferred from 2035-2046.
    Freddie Freeman: $57 million deferred from 2028-2040.
    Will Smith: $50 million deferred from 2034-2043.
    Tanner Scott: $21 million deferred from 2035-2046.
    Teoscar Hernández: $32 million deferred from 2030-2039.
    Edwin Díaz: Added to the list with payments extending to 2047.

    3
    Reply
    • vertigo

      2 hours ago

      Defend what? Any team can use deferred payments. Stop crying.

      2
      Reply
      • Wrian Washman

        2 hours ago

        No not any team can defer over 1 billion dollars, clown. This is worst than when Astros fans were going around saying “everybody cheats”. Not every team can hold a 500 million dollar payroll. Not every team owns their own TV deal or live in large market and city like LA. Not every team can operate like this. Can this fanbase possibly find a different phrase to parrot through their echo chamber besides “EvErY oNe CaN dO iT”

        3
        Reply
        • Tigers3232

          45 mins ago

          @Wrian Those deferred values that yoy are posting only have meaning to the players with deferred $ and the franchises. You are not posting the key #s for the argument you are trying to make which is the.present day values.

          Example of one is Ohtani and that is $46M annually. Dodgers paying $2M directly to Ohtani and $44M to fund the deferral. That is the true cost to Dodgers and it will be paid this year. From there that $ will accrue and become a realized gain to Ohtani at the time he collects. At that time it will only be meaningful to him and whoever collects the taxes on those earnings from Ohtani.

          And since Ohtani was the example we might as will address another misconception. If anything of the motivation was to reduce his personal tax burden, then this $ he will collect and claim as earnings here in America as the tax burden in Japan far exceeds what it would be if collected in any state here in America.

          1
          Reply
    • 920falcon

      2 hours ago

      Thanks for this. Adds some context.

      1
      Reply
    • phenomenalajs

      2 hours ago

      What would be amazing would be if MLB eventually does implement some sort of cap, even $500M, and that the deferred salaries count against the cap in those years. The Dodgers would be forced in the next decade to spend less new money than they do now.

      Reply
  155. DolemiteisMyname

    2 hours ago

    Arte Moreno is livid.The Dodgers stole all his thunder After making a 3 way trade and BOOM!! The Dodgers do this…

    1
    Reply
  156. Champs64

    2 hours ago

    Yawn……..

    1
    Reply
  157. Redsforlife

    2 hours ago

    Lol $60 mil a year for Kyle Tucker.

    2
    Reply
  158. terry g

    2 hours ago

    60 M a year for 4 years.

    Reply
  159. Craviduce

    2 hours ago

    Ridiculously stupid that this can continue. Hey, I know it’s within the current rules, but I pray we can get Cap/Floor to the salary situation. The Dodgers aren’t blinking with the current penalties..

    I love baseball but a work stoppage to fix this mess is needed to save baseball.

    Otherwise it’s Dodgers all the time…. No mid market, small market team can ever compete.

    7
    Reply
  160. bestone

    2 hours ago

    But….but….media was reporting seeing him with some Toronto real estate agents….

    2
    Reply
  161. hyraxwithaflamethrower

    2 hours ago

    “Dodgers aren’t ruining baseball.” Yeah, they kind of are. Nobody can really compete with a team of that many stars. It took a miracle run by the Jays to make it close, and I doubt that happens again. When a team gets close, Dodgers just super-overpay for the best FA’s at whatever position.

    And yeah, I’m ticked at the Bob Nutting’s of the baseball world, too, but guys like him are ruining it for their fans. Dodgers are ruining it for everyone but Dodgers fans.

    4
    Reply
  162. beersy

    2 hours ago

    How on Earth is Kyle Tucker worth $60M a year? And the opt outs are a cute addition.

    3
    Reply
    • 920falcon

      2 hours ago

      I was thinking the same thing. Dont know how the contract is structured, but, who is opting out on 60 million.

      1
      Reply
  163. SportsBum

    2 hours ago

    I’m guessing the Dodgers know there will be or are actively trying to get others on board with a salary cap when the CBA is up by spending like this. It’s not just the high payroll, it’s the deferrals too. Not only are fans outside of (mostly just Dodgers fans) the high spending teams getting more annoyed with them, but I imagine a lot of owners are too. It almost seems like they’re desperate to spend now because they know it’s not gonna last.

    Reply
    • robw5555

      2 hours ago

      Dodgers will get Bichette and Skubal and there will be no salary cap.

      Reply
  164. ChrisP 2

    2 hours ago

    Turning the league into a joke. Which is why a cap is needed. Tucker should be ashamed. Loser

    6
    Reply
    • vertigo

      2 hours ago

      Ashamed for making 60m and playing for a World Series Championship team x2? Don’t think so. I’m sure he is quite happy.

      Reply
    • Chin Muzak

      2 hours ago

      I’m sure the 60 million dollar man will be totally ashamed and devastated that ChrisP 2 called him a loser on mlbtr.

      1
      Reply
    • robw5555

      2 hours ago

      You are funnny.

      Reply
  165. Quinnap89

    2 hours ago

    Imagine this…(regardless of how many WS tiles they win during this period) in the mid 2030’s to mid 2040’s they’ll be rolling with a 500 million dollar payroll and having a Bobby Bonilla day for all these guys

    Reply
    • Thanatos7983

      2 hours ago

      Most likely all that money is collecting interest before they start paying all these guys

      2
      Reply
    • robw5555

      2 hours ago

      Another Yankee or Met fan. Oh well. Cohen is blown away by LA. They eat him for lunch.

      Reply
  166. Jump 84

    2 hours ago

    Good for Mr. Tucker. Whole Baseball season is tough and not for all. Playball, gotta love baseball.

    Reply
  167. dartvard

    2 hours ago

    At this point, I’ll take the Sox if the Yanks can’t get it done.

    Reply
  168. 920falcon

    2 hours ago

    Not being critical one way or the other, just an obsevation: the Dodgers pay more in luxury tax penalties than the Yankees and Mets combined. Amazing.

    4
    Reply
  169. Stretch1994

    2 hours ago

    Yawn… next

    Reply
  170. Dubbs

    2 hours ago

    Gay.

    5
    Reply
    • agentx

      2 hours ago

      Congratulations. All of us here in the comments section applaud your decision to come out.

      1
      Reply
  171. Birdie man

    2 hours ago

    F’ing ridiculous

    3
    Reply
  172. Never Remember

    2 hours ago

    Perfect. This is the best spot for him. Good for baseball and for the world

    1
    Reply
  173. Wrian Washman

    2 hours ago

    What a pathetic, disgusting sport this has become.

    5
    Reply
  174. splinkysf

    2 hours ago

    Make it stop

    2
    Reply
  175. ❤️ MuteButton

    2 hours ago

    Lockout? How about fans just boycott this ridiculous spending spree.

    7
    Reply
  176. Well Hung

    2 hours ago

    It probably becomes 40 million a year when deferrals are factored in

    Reply
  177. For Love of the Game

    2 hours ago

    This would cost the Dodgers $120 mill. a seasoned with the luxury tax. Insane!

    1
    Reply
  178. Echopark

    2 hours ago

    Dodgers are not paying Tucker for baseball.
    They are paying Tucker to leave after 4 years of baseball.
    LOL

    5
    Reply
    • Echopark

      2 hours ago

      I humbly submit this comment ^^ for MLB Trade Rumors “2026 comment of the year” award

      1
      Reply
  179. Hank Murphy

    2 hours ago

    Blue Jays better get off their a$$ and sign Bo now.

    Reply
  180. YellowCleats

    2 hours ago

    Might as well give the trophy to the dodgers now. It’s not as fun when it’s not competitive between teams

    1
    Reply
  181. antcell22

    2 hours ago

    Baseball is broken I’m done

    Time for new a new hobby

    9
    Reply
    • vertigo

      2 hours ago

      bye!

      3
      Reply
  182. SteveAdamsEsq

    2 hours ago

    Yet another player to use the Mets to jack up the Dodgers. When will they learn?

    2
    Reply
    • robw5555

      2 hours ago

      The Mets are amatuers. The Dodgers can get any player they want. I think they never wanted Soto. Bichette and Skubal to LA.

      Reply
  183. Astros71

    2 hours ago

    OMG the Dodgers are doing everything. Although Teoscar may be on the block now.

    Reply
    • agentx

      1 hour ago

      Yeah, on the block and possibly headed somewhere like Cincinnati (with significant salary relief) to finally begin the full-time DH phase of his career.

      Reply
  184. Bruce wulff

    2 hours ago

    The heck with any competitive balance! Dodgers all the way for next 10 years plus!

    1
    Reply
    • Bruce wulff

      2 hours ago

      And as the world turns ever so slowly for the rest of baseball and as like the country, the rich get richer and the poor gets even poorer!

      Reply
  185. goastros123

    2 hours ago

    Can the Astros cheat to beat the Dodgers in the world series once more, thus saving MLB?

    1
    Reply
  186. StreakingBlue

    2 hours ago

    The sour grapes from some people. Who wouldn’t want to go to the Dodgers? They are a well ran organization who has the top payroll, but the top farm system. They do this because they have the smartest ownership along with the best front office in baseball.

    2
    Reply
  187. Jroo

    2 hours ago

    The owners wanted this deal done. People will be screaming for a salary cap now.

    1
    Reply
  188. stuart schlotterbeck

    2 hours ago

    Wow, what a surprise. NOT!!!

    Reply
  189. Skylander

    2 hours ago

    The rest of the owners seem perfectly happy collecting their share of the Dodger tax, while the Dodgers build a staggering juggernaut of a team. I’d prefer more parity but can’t blame the Dodgers for investing so heavily into their player personnel. Other owners need to step up.

    4
    Reply
    • MarkieFresh

      1 hour ago

      Jack Dreyer is the poster. Proudly states in interviews he was guided to the Dodgers after going undrafted for their player investment. Geeks out specifically on technology used as collaborative with him as he desires.

      Reply
  190. Shaun's Mom

    2 hours ago

    What a coward

    3
    Reply
  191. jvent

    2 hours ago

    F. U. Tucker
    David Stearns “Wake Up” and sign Bellinger right now, than Suarez, than trade Baty, Sproat, Peterson and Mauricio to Detroit for Skubal. We can still be good IF STEARNS AND COHEN does things for the fans.
    Lindor, Semien, Soto, Suarez, Bellinger, Polanco, Vientos DH, Alvarez and Benge
    Skubal, McLean, Manaea, Holmes, Scott and Tong

    1
    Reply
    • Joel from NY

      2 hours ago

      jvent: I don’t think Bellinger is nearly as good as Tucker and from what’s out there they won’t go past 4 years for anybody. So, I’d be very surprised if that happens. Your deal for Skubal would be laughed at by the Tigers. Me, I don’t want Bader or Austin Hays or another mediocrity. Play the kids and see what shakes out. I’m prepared for the Mets to win 75-80 games this year. It was foolish to let Alonso and Diaz go. My opinion of Stearns has gone way down. btw, please check Suarez’ stats after he was traded.

      1
      Reply
  192. choof

    2 hours ago

    Everybody is complaining but this is awesome. Baseball needs a villain

    1
    Reply
  193. Old York

    2 hours ago

    So, the lineup is looking better. 1 through 5 are all stars but they need to work on that bottom of the lineup. Need an all-star CFer and an all-star 2B man.

    1
    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      2 hours ago

      Bo is still available.

      2
      Reply
  194. CantStop27

    2 hours ago

    Are Dodgers fans booing him still? Lol a former Astro lol first Mookie who cheated with Red Sox in 2018, now Tucker with Astros lol

    Reply
    • VegasMoved

      57 mins ago

      Tucker was not on the 2017 Astros.

      Reply
    • Chin Muzak

      14 mins ago

      go ahead, throw in one more “lol” for good measure.

      Reply
  195. differentbears

    2 hours ago

    lol

    lmao, even.

    The Dodgers love their fans. They want us to be happy.

    1
    Reply
  196. robw5555

    2 hours ago

    When people here were speculating about the Yankees, Mets or Blue Jays, I said one thing. If the Dodgers want him, they have him. If the Dodgers want Bichette. he is theirs. Skubal Dodgers. Skubal gets 500 million from them? Who will win in 2026? Dodgers. They are not finished. The Dodgers didnt want Soto , or he would be there.

    Reply
  197. RichP

    2 hours ago

    Over pay for a third World Series Title.

    3
    Reply
  198. Dean A Bohl

    2 hours ago

    Sad! Glad for him but sad for BB! $60 million a year is unreal!

    1
    Reply
  199. Suitcase Simpson

    2 hours ago

    people were saying 50m is an overpay for a player of his caliber, so why the outrage over a team signing him for even more than that? now he’s dangerous because he’s on the dodgers.

    Reply
  200. Cardsfanatik redux

    2 hours ago

    This just in, Dodgers sign Tucker, All salary deferred until the 2950 season

    Reply
  201. BartoloColonsTightPants

    2 hours ago

    Bring on the lockout. Bye bye baseball.

    3
    Reply
  202. Iacredolo

    2 hours ago

    Baseballs heart loses yet another fragment.
    Say what you want, this is NOT good for the game.
    Some level of competitive balance benefits the sports health overall. Once 15-20 teams fans bases completely drop off the map you will have a hard time getting them back.
    Baseball has already fallen far behind the NBA and NFL, and this kind of stuff further cements it.
    Far and away the biggest competitive imbalance we’ve seen in any of the three major sports in my life time.

    4
    Reply
    • ChuckyNJ

      2 hours ago

      Uhhh, soccer IS a major sport even if you live in Murica.

      Reply
      • foppert3

        1 hour ago

        Differant. European soccer. Multiple concurrently run competitions and relegation/promotion system give every teams fan a reason to bother. Don’t matter if you are a have or a have not and/or where you might be positioned, you got something to fight for. Not so much in baseball.

        Reply
  203. andymeyer

    2 hours ago

    Not surprised one bit. And it’s ridiculous nonsense like this that we are staring at a crippling lockout come 2027. Dodgers have no shame in doing it and it’s ruining the game.

    4
    Reply
  204. Emjay

    2 hours ago

    Dodger fan here. I feel like this is an overspend. Tucker’s good, but not $60M AAV good.

    3
    Reply
  205. zacharydmanprin

    2 hours ago

    Gross overpay X 2 not to mention the salary tax.

    1
    Reply
  206. gorav114

    2 hours ago

    Im just glad its not Toronto

    Reply
  207. Yoyosoxsox

    2 hours ago

    Haha so lame. This is just stupid. Hope he gets injured

    1
    Reply
  208. King Floch

    2 hours ago

    I’m just happy the Jays or Yankees didn’t get him.

    Reply
  209. splinkysf

    2 hours ago

    Gross

    1
    Reply
  210. Roper

    2 hours ago

    Texas Rangers will go down in history as the last team (not named LA Dodgers) to win a world series until like 2035.

    Reply
  211. Dutch Vander Linde

    2 hours ago

    Dodger Boy Manfred made it happen again.

    Reply
  212. 920falcon

    2 hours ago

    Btw, the Lerners in Washington were deferring before deferring was cool.

    1
    Reply
  213. gr81t2

    2 hours ago

    Opt out? Yea, he’s not opting out

    If this contract doesn’t ultimately lead to a MLB salary cap, they’ve just shot themselves in the foot. There is only so much money to go around for sports/entertainment. And people will lose interest when too many players are getting stupid money. Just look at the NBA. Every 9 point 8 rebound guy is making 9 digits. The product sucks. People will eventually lose interest.

    2
    Reply
    • dasit

      2 hours ago

      people are losing interest in the nba because the style of play has become unwatchable. baseball is as fun to watch as ever

      2
      Reply
    • andymeyer

      1 hour ago

      The players are strictly opposed to a cap. What they can try an do is change the rules and parameters of the CBT

      Reply
      • DroppedThirdStrike

        59 mins ago

        And that’s what will happen. Amended CBT thresholds. No lost season, no cap, no floor, no change on deferrals.

        Reply
        • andymeyer

          46 mins ago

          They have to address the deferrals. Length and adjusting how it counts against the CBT
          Example: Ohtani “AAV” is $70 million. He’s only being paid $2 million a year over the life of the contract with 680 million in deferrals. This equates to roughly $46 million a year on the CBT. That’s a loophole they have to close as well

          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          40 mins ago

          It’s not a loophole, it’s a perception gap. The contract is taxed at the net present value. The PA and MLB agree on this. Deferrals are only an issue for fans who don’t understand them.

          1
          Reply
        • andymeyer

          24 mins ago

          I fully understand them. It allows teams to sign multiple mega deals to soften future spikes. That’s why MLB ma try to limit how deferrals count or cap the length. It’s absolutely going to be on the table for the next CBA. It may not be the loophole, but it is gaming the system

          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          23 mins ago

          Who’s going to insist on it? Not owners and not players.

          1
          Reply
        • andymeyer

          17 mins ago

          It may be an easier concession than a full salary cap proposal which will not happen.
          It’s going to ugly. Even if the owners agree to push for changes in the deferrals, the players have leverage and will want concessions elsewhere.

          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          13 mins ago

          Owners and players like deferrals. It gives flexibility to both, and both sides agree that it’s taxed appropriately.

          It’s literally a non-issue.

          1
          Reply
        • andymeyer

          10 mins ago

          You sure about that? Owners have disliked long term deferrals because it games the system.
          While it may be a more secondary issue come the new CBA negotiations, saying it’s a “non issue” is simply not correct

          Reply
  214. TtheG

    2 hours ago

    Might as we be an AI version 2026 World Series at this point. Soul-less dodgers are ruining the league.

    3
    Reply
  215. Ken Card

    2 hours ago

    Yes, this is shocking. Who would’ve thought the Dodgers? I think the lockout’s gonna be a lot longer than people think…

    Reply
  216. bag o ballz

    2 hours ago

    That is ridiculous

    1
    Reply
  217. CaseyAbell

    2 hours ago

    Will be fun to see the deferrals. Meanwhile, I can hate the Dodgers even more, along with almost everybody else.

    1
    Reply
  218. manfraud

    2 hours ago

    Huge overpay that’s going to really mess up contract negotiations in future seasons. Hard to imagine a lockout not happening

    1
    Reply
  219. stingray23

    2 hours ago

    The Doyers remind me of the Steinbrenner Yankees. Just buy everyone to win championships.

    1
    Reply
    • billysbballz

      2 hours ago

      Sorry pal, what the dodgers are doing is nothing close to what the Yankees did and if you don’t believe me look at the salary disparity then and now.

      Reply
  220. RochesterMetsFan

    2 hours ago

    This is disgusting

    2
    Reply
  221. TigerBacker

    2 hours ago

    Next, Skubal to the Dodgers. This is no fun for anyone but Dodger fans. Meanwhile, the superstars are getting their money while the rest of the players fight over the scraps. Many good free agents who have priced themselves out of jobs or get comparatively low pay just to have a job.

    Reply
    • oldgfan

      1 hour ago

      “Scraps” still equal millions…

      Reply
  222. revolver

    2 hours ago

    Let’s not forget the 66 million the dodgers will have to pay in penalties for each year on top of the 60 million salary.126 million for one player is more than a lot of teams entire roster.

    1
    Reply
  223. yankswang

    2 hours ago

    Dodgers next step is to sign Bo Bichette.
    Baseball died.

    Reply
  224. aragon

    2 hours ago

    Salary cap, baby!

    1
    Reply
  225. retsubllab

    2 hours ago

    I heard the Dodgers are collecting and freezing Tucker’s sperm so that in 2525 they can birth an offspring to pay the deferrals to!!

    Reply
  226. Dojaho

    2 hours ago

    The reason you have to pay $15 for a beer at the park. Salaries have become a damn joke

    1
    Reply
  227. Renotribefan

    2 hours ago

    Am I the only one who WANTS a strike/lockout in 27?

    I’ve been a baseball fan my entire life and watched in 94 when the WS was canceled, but remained a loyal fan throughout. I’ll always love baseball, but MLB is just becoming disgusting to follow anymore. There are a small number of teams that can spend like the Mets, Red Sox, Yankees while NOBODY can spend like the Dodgers.

    Smaller market teams have a choice. Try to be competitive every year like the Indians, Rays, or Brewers and hope that you can get hot in the playoffs or go for it every once in a while and absolutely suck otherwise. Everyone who’s honest and not blinded by fandom knows this is ruining baseball. It’s sad.

    We need a lockout for as long as it takes to get a salary cap and a salary floor. If it takes all of 2027, so be it. If it takes longer, then fine. But something needs to change if baseball wants to survive

    5
    Reply
    • Joel from NY

      2 hours ago

      Interesting. Maybe you’re on to something.

      Reply
    • cwsOverhaul

      1 hour ago

      @Reno: Couldn’t agree more

      Reply
  228. billysbballz

    2 hours ago

    I am a true capitalist. I believe in a free market and despise socialism. I cannot stand salary caps in sports because that ultimately hurts the players and I want to see the players who the fans go to watch make money. Yet these small market teams continue to pocket money and never invest back into their team. Some of the small market owners are wealthier then big market owners but do not have tv contracts so they refuse to invest any money to improve their team. So I am a true believer in a salary cap floor at 200m. But watching the dodgers just bully every team they have to have some salary cap ceiling as well (400m) and if you choose to go over you lose the ability to draft players in the first 6 rounds and lose that money as well and also you should not be able to sign international players until you go back under the 400m cap. I don’t think the tax payments should ever go back to the small market teams who don’t invest that money back into their teams but you need to penalize teams like the dodgers by taking away the ability to have a strong farm system to trade from when they continue to spend way more then every team in baseball.

    Reply
    • Rizzutos's_Canoli

      2 hours ago

      I am a true democratic socialist and despise capitalism run amok. Sounds like you’re promoting some forced equity here, and rightly so. I think there should be a floor and cap and ticket prices regulated accordingly so every income level can afford to go to the ball park and partake in concessions, etc.

      Reply
      • DroppedThirdStrike

        1 hour ago

        None of things will ever happen. Ever.

        Reply
    • foppert3

      1 hour ago

      Dude. It’s a sporting competition. Forget ideology. You do what you have to do to enhance the competition on the field.

      Reply
  229. Anthony maresca

    2 hours ago

    Oh boy Bellinger going to get paid now as I imagine Mets offer Bellinger 4/180 at $45 million avv to get their man. Steinbrenner will not touch that and they must now move on. 4th place here they come!

    Reply
    • Kermit The Frog

      2 hours ago

      They’re definitely getting him or Bichette, I think Bo would be a much better move, tbh.

      Reply
  230. Manti§

    2 hours ago

    Who the Fuxx let Max Muncy in here!

    Reply
  231. Mike Hunter

    2 hours ago

    But this is good for baseball lol. What a joke

    Reply
  232. jeff Horton

    2 hours ago

    He is not worth nearly that much

    1
    Reply
  233. rothlaj

    2 hours ago

    It’s like joining the dark side. Is their owner Emperor Palpatine? Hey Tucker you have no respect now.

    Reply
  234. CentralFan71

    2 hours ago

    This right here is exactly why there won’t be a 2027 season. Absolutely out of control. In 5 years, it is likely the Dodgers will be paying deferrals for players that aren’t playing for them in excess of about 10 teams’ total payrolls. They are just playing with Monopoly money. Pretty ridiculous. And as a Cubs fan, I can tell you there is no way Tucker is worth $50 to $60 million per year (whatever the deferrals take it down to in AAV)

    3
    Reply
    • Kermit The Frog

      2 hours ago

      It’s really nuts to pay this guy this level of salary.

      Reply
  235. dasit

    2 hours ago

    would anyone be shocked if they went ahead and signed bichette next?

    Reply
  236. zappaforprez

    2 hours ago

    MLB is boring

    Reply
  237. DavRozNYY

    2 hours ago

    LOLOL at the Mets

    1
    Reply
  238. Kermit The Frog

    2 hours ago

    Gee, what a shock! (sarcastic).

    Reply
  239. bighiggy

    2 hours ago

    Cards need outfield prospects and young pitchers. Would love to see them move romero and donovan to the Dodgers for a young outfielder and a young pitcher. Would give the Dodgers the option to trade toescar for even more upgrades.

    1
    Reply
  240. BartoloColonsTightPants

    2 hours ago

    Dodgers need to sign Bichette now. Please God make it happen. That’ll be the cherry on top of this news.

    1
    Reply
    • vertigo

      2 hours ago

      All the haters and whiners would have a melt down – be funny to watch.

      Reply
  241. foppert3

    2 hours ago

    Ha ha. That’s a lot of coin.

    Bobby has got some work to do before he rides off into the sunset.

    Reply
  242. AL B DAMNED

    2 hours ago

    The Yankees will always be known as the Evil Empire, the Dodgers should be known as the Evil Enterprise! Both Entirely Evil!
    😈 💰 🤑💲🌟=All Stars at every position!

    Reply
  243. Jose Galvan

    2 hours ago

    This is just STUPID.
    Baseball is a legit JOKE!!!!!
    If I’m an small market team I’ll just play my minor leaguer…

    2
    Reply
    • Edcheffsfungo

      1 hour ago

      Agree. I want the Giants to spend more this offseason but I understand why the owners wouldn’t.

      1
      Reply
      • Jose Galvan

        5 mins ago

        I’m a Mets fan and don’t mean to defend them, but I honestly believe our GM is trying to limit those super crazy contract by no offering more than 3 years to nobody specially pitchers. Soto was an exception and done directly by ownership (which I disagree by the way).

        Reply
  244. Pylon 2

    2 hours ago

    This is why so many other teams have no money. MLB has allowed the Dodgers to make a mockery of a fail payroll system. Welcome to the new Manopoly Looting Billionaires, where competitive balance is preached but some condition apply.

    1
    Reply
  245. longoverdue1977

    2 hours ago

    THIS IS BULL CRAP! MLB needs salary cap.

    2
    Reply
  246. td272

    2 hours ago

    Hard to understand how people who like the sport can’t recognize that a floor and cap would help sustain it. Other major sports with caps are thriving and players are benefitting from that. The massive inequity in resources between MLB teams is absolutely ruining the game.

    2
    Reply
  247. Joel from NY

    2 hours ago

    Stearns has crashed and is currently burning. Rebuild year. Look for 78 wins. Hope that either Benge or Williams or Acuna emerges as a star. Scale back your hopes, Mets fans. Way back.

    1
    Reply
    • Kermit The Frog

      2 hours ago

      Take your meds buddy. Tucker is not worth 55 million a year. Bichette is better and Bellinger might be a better fit, Chill out.

      1
      Reply
  248. Hornysanchez

    2 hours ago

    You play to win the game. Plain and simple. And year in and year out, the Dodgers prove that. Other teams billionaire owners just don’t care as much. And it’s not just tossing out cash lavishly. The Dodgers are built for success from the ground up. From office jobs to A ball. They are all built on success

    1
    Reply
    • dasit

      1 hour ago

      i hope yankee fans understand the truth of this. there’s no crying in baseball and there’s nothing stopping hal from doing the same thing (he can’t compete with la weather but everything else is fair game). congrats to dodger fans

      2
      Reply
  249. Lalo says show me

    2 hours ago

    I like that Tucker has opt outs after’27 and’28
    If he opts out of that salary that would be ballsy

    Reply
  250. bruinlife33

    2 hours ago

    Enjoy your expensive ballpark experience Dodger fans.

    Reply
  251. JohnG40

    2 hours ago

    Can we have the scraps that would have made the team signed Pirates fan

    Reply
  252. Robert-5

    2 hours ago

    So ridiculous, MLB has to step in. $60M per for Kyle Tucker?! Good for him, but this isn’t sustainable for a league when some teams have to run payrolls @ $100M. Just making a mockery of the sport. You can enjoy if you’re a Dodgers fan but this is ridiculous for the league.

    3
    Reply
  253. tastywaves

    2 hours ago

    The dodgers are single handedly going to force a lockout after this season. Well done boys…you must really love this game.

    2
    Reply
  254. CubsIn25

    2 hours ago

    Makes Hoyer’s Bregman deal look genius. He got a 4 WAR player for half the AAV.

    Reply
  255. Probably "Rick hahn"

    2 hours ago

    Congratulations on your world series ring!

    Reply
  256. fox471 Dave

    2 hours ago

    where are the rest of the comments?

    Reply
  257. BartoloColonsTightPants

    2 hours ago

    At this particular time in history I love this thug- like deal. Dodgers dominate the league into NATO-like extinction. Light it all on fire. Bring it. Good times.

    Reply
  258. PapaBear562

    2 hours ago

    Wow. Was hoping the Mariners or Blue Jays would have signed him, ANYONE BUT THE DODGERS!

    Reply
  259. CaseyAbell

    2 hours ago

    Only $30 million deferred? That’s a rookie number for the Dodgers.

    Reply
  260. SFGLifer

    1 hour ago

    waiting for the ‘every team could spend like the dodgers’ guy to chime in with his insight

    1
    Reply
  261. Luke Strong

    1 hour ago

    Most of the country would love it if this becomes a Chris Davis situation and Tucker looks like the guy he was for the second half of the season who was one of the worst players in the league for over a month and looked like he completely forgot how to hit,

    Reply
  262. Bruce wulff

    1 hour ago

    Our hope is ohtani and tucker het hurt soon rather than later while Hernandez, betts and freeman continue to show us their advancing ages.

    1
    Reply
  263. Baseball77

    1 hour ago

    I remember when Nolan Ryan signing for a million dollar deal was big news. Now rookies are close to making that much.

    Reply
  264. Canaryville mike

    1 hour ago

    MLB has turned into a joke. It’s so sad because I use to love baseball. I’m done until there is a salary cap in place.

    Reply
    • 920falcon

      60 mins ago

      You may be gone a long time.

      1
      Reply
  265. BobNutting

    1 hour ago

    Non Dodgers fans gotta boycott games Dodgers play in. Just don’t watch. Don’t go.

    Reply
    • DroppedThirdStrike

      55 mins ago

      Those are the most watched games, with the highest gate returns.

      Reply
  266. 920falcon

    1 hour ago

    Even factoing in the deferrals, the Dodgers kind of bid against themselves, in my opinion. Obviously, we arent privy to what goes on behind the scenes, but I find it hard to believe the Mets would have paid Tucker a higher AAV than Soto. They probably wouod have topped out at 50. Just speculating.

    Reply
  267. LeftyNate111

    1 hour ago

    This honestly is hilarious to me. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Dodgers weren’t in on it until they realized they could get him on a four year deal. Other teams had a chance to get him and nobody really pursued him strongly enough in my opinion.

    1
    Reply
  268. Butters

    1 hour ago

    Let’s not forget the Yankees made the Blackburn signing official today.. isn’t that just as noteworthy? (S)

    Reply
  269. Yanks4life22

    1 hour ago

    I think it’s safe to say professional sports does not need tax payer funded stadiums and tax breaks at this point. Just a hunch that if the employees are making 60 million a year, the owners are making 100’s of millions a year that they don’t need any additional funding. I think these players and owners are going to make it without us at this point no?

    2
    Reply
  270. tuck 2

    1 hour ago

    This is sad time for baseball. The great thing about the Dodgers is they built their teams rather than buy them. Now they have such a huge financial advantage and zero business discipline so half the teams can’t possibly compete.

    Baseball needs a salary cap or the league dies.

    Reply
  271. Mekias0

    1 hour ago

    99% of people who wake up tomorrow and see $240 million and $60 million/yr will either never hear about or else not be able to wrap their minds around the deferrals in the contract. All contracts should probably be converted to today’s dollars so that these “records” can be properly kept track of.

    1
    Reply
    • Chin Muzak

      1 hour ago

      the deferrals have been reported and you’re way off.

      Reply
      • Mekias0

        57 mins ago

        Holy hell, you’re right. $57 million/yr in today’s dollars is crazy for Tucker. Not sure who the Dodgers were bidding against.

        Reply
        • Chin Muzak

          43 mins ago

          seemingly the Mets and Blue Jays

          Reply
  272. Alan53

    1 hour ago

    He’ll be happy and do well there. The weather is warm, and he won’t have to be the star. His walks will actually so some good, because he’ll have some great hitters batting behind him to drive him in.

    The article’s description of his season with the Cubs did not capture just how bad it was–for Tucker himself, who felt he should have been more appreciated; for his teammates, who he alienated; for Cubs fans, who he disappointed; and eventually even for Cubs mgmt, which expected an inspiring leader and got an uninspired loner. But time heals all, and we wish him well.

    Reply
  273. DavRozNYY

    1 hour ago

    Outrageous amount of money for a guy that is just pretty good..and already on the decline.

    1
    Reply
  274. Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

    1 hour ago

    The original post has been updated with the deferral info. Far less than I expected.

    $57M AAV is insane. There is no way he will opt out after 2027.

    The 16 teams either still with FanDuel or with MLB for their local TV are going to vote against every potential CBA offer until the Dodgers and other large market teams to share all their TV money.

    Reply
  275. Wilmer the Thrillmer

    1 hour ago

    Insane.

    Reply
  276. M’s is for maybe

    1 hour ago

    Good for him and obviously the Dodgers. But how is this good for the sport?

    I don’t want to cheer for players to be injured but……. Someone stubba toe or dozen.

    2
    Reply
    • SDMadres

      17 mins ago

      Boo this man

      Reply
  277. sports_fan9921

    1 hour ago

    That’s what happens when you lose 3 world series games.

    Reply
  278. Another Dodgers Fan

    1 hour ago

    Dodgers have around $88m coming off their books this off-season. So this signing somewhat fits within last years payroll. Add in world series money and they aren’t having to adjust much.

    This is all about maximizing the Betts/Ohtani window.

    $64m signing bonus. $30m deferred. Opt outs after years 2 and 3.

    Reply
  279. Greentreant

    1 hour ago

    I was thinking that based on the reports, that the Mets would finally land someone. I guess that is not the case with the Dodgers around..

    Reply
    • sports_fan9921

      1 hour ago

      That’s one of the positives from this. Keep the Mets from getting anyone.

      Reply
  280. JoseLind

    1 hour ago

    The Dodgers are run like back in the day you allowed all trades on a video game and the goal was to go 162-0 but you always ended up 161-1.

    2
    Reply
  281. kingsfan1968

    1 hour ago

    Stupid!

    Reply
  282. alstott40

    1 hour ago

    absolutely no reason why 75+% of the league follow the same low spending model of the pirates .. A’s .. rays(ect) .. time for teams like the padres to sell off all their expensive talent .. want to see the dodgers push their payroll over a billion

    Reply
  283. sports_fan9921

    1 hour ago

    I don’t want a floor or a cap. I would like to see 4-6 teams fold.

    2
    Reply
    • jeremyn

      27 mins ago

      how dare they make competition fair… just eliminate the teams that can’t escalate to insanity?

      Reply
  284. 21Clemente21

    1 hour ago

    Stupid Stupid Stupid, Salaries just eent up big $$$$.
    Lockout for sure, thanks greedy Dodgers, for the love of the game, right…..
    Can you imagine all the players demanding to re-negotiate their former deals, 60 million, look out for Judge, Soto, Skenes negotiations, wow $$$

    1
    Reply
  285. misteredsox

    59 mins ago

    Ruining the sport we all loved.

    It’s broken.

    I usually support the players over the owners, but this wrong for baseball. A bunch of Lebron James wannabe asshats.

    1
    Reply
    • Seeds13

      34 mins ago

      The Dodgers spend 75% of their revenue on payroll. The Red Sox spend 40%. Get mad at your own team’s front office.

      1
      Reply
      • misteredsox

        31 mins ago

        If you look up, you’ll see the point there somewhere.

        Reply
    • Erebus

      9 mins ago

      Seriously be mad at the Sox. The dodgers want to win, I wish every team in MLB thought that way. Dodgers deserve all the success that comes their way with moves like this

      1
      Reply
  286. olmtiant

    59 mins ago

    Well maybe this signing will help the Dodgers be competitive…😉

    2
    Reply
  287. norcalblue

    58 mins ago

    and who’s YOUR Daddy Dave Roberts?

    ANDREW FRIEDMAN!!

    Reply
  288. Aussie_dodger

    57 mins ago

    He’s not worth this much
    Seriously

    4
    Reply
  289. Seeds13

    53 mins ago

    The chart that shows every MLB team’s revenue vs. payroll is readily available. A tip of the cap to the Dodgers for investing in the product and not just padding ownerships wallet. Who wouldn’t want to work for a company that spends for quality employees to produce, rather than pinch pennies so the money flows to C-Suites.

    2
    Reply
    • LATrolleyDodger

      21 mins ago

      A lot of people don’t want to see it from that perspective.

      Reply
      • Seeds13

        13 mins ago

        Clearly. I guess baseball is “ruined”, but not for the reasons they claim.

        Reply
  290. mad1

    53 mins ago

    Everyone thank the dodgers for the impending lockout.

    1
    Reply
  291. It’s

    52 mins ago

    This is stupid. No hate toward Tucker at all, but this is bad for the game. This type of spending will ruin the mlb when fans of the other teams loose interest. Learn from the other leagues and cap this stupidity.

    2
    Reply
    • Alan53

      31 mins ago

      @It’s: I think it’s more of a problem that some fans inanely refer to “the mlb” and can’t spell “lose “

      2
      Reply
  292. THEY LIVE!!!

    52 mins ago

    Dodger fan here. What a waste of resources. Hope he can stay on the field.

    Reply
  293. ny papi

    49 mins ago

    Mothertucker….is a very rich woman. Hate those damn dodgers though

    Reply
  294. DanUgglasRing

    49 mins ago

    Literally every single team could have afforded this. The dodgers made the best offer to the player, period. I’m a Giants fan FFS and I see through this ownership group nonsense. They all have the money the just choose not to spend it.

    3
    Reply
  295. Edub23

    48 mins ago

    Dodgers appear to now be looking to also add Bichette

    Reply
  296. west212

    47 mins ago

    Absurd, wrong, and bad for the MLB! The only sport with no cap and no floor. This is very bad for the fans trying to watch or attend games – they are the real losers!!!

    2
    Reply
  297. Cohen's _Wallet

    47 mins ago

    At this rate Juan Soto’s contract will look great.

    Reply
    • DarrenDreifortsContract

      26 mins ago

      No 15 year contract will ever look great.

      Reply
  298. Goku the Knowledgable One

    45 mins ago

    Dodgers are bums.

    1
    Reply
  299. DavRozNYY

    45 mins ago

    Does this mean the Mets will throw buckets of money at Bellinger now?

    Reply
  300. Mustard Tiger

    45 mins ago

    I hate to break it to many of you, but there will never be a salary cap. The players union will never allow it and many teams don’t even want one.

    3
    Reply
    • christopher8002

      28 mins ago

      Probably true. Also true that the owners can afford to skip 2027 more than the players. And will.

      Reply
      • DroppedThirdStrike

        25 mins ago

        Some owners can, none will be willing to if it means giving up their revenue sharing. The lockout is to reallocate revenue sharing more towards small market teams. It has no chance of enacting a cap and they know that.

        Reply
  301. highflyballintorightfield

    43 mins ago

    Dang it, I had him going to the Giants in the contest.

    Reply
  302. Bright Side

    38 mins ago

    So much for parity.

    Reply
  303. LATrolleyDodger

    34 mins ago

    Fellow Dodger fan, enjoy the ride. Even though we are the new “evil empire” I know that this has been in the making for over a decade. When Friedman came over and the ownership group locked in, it was over for everyone else.

    I am happy that there is an inevitable conversation to be had about salary floor, cap, and the issues of deferred money or putting a player on “credit”. I think that there needs to be a sense of parity. It’s crazy to compare the numbers of other organizations. Players Association will not want salary cap and owners don’t want to be “forced” to spend their money. Curious to see how this all plays out.

    Reply
  304. lollar2112

    33 mins ago

    Now een more money sharing revenue goes to those that receive it, and they will play poor saying they can’t afford certain players, because they make more momney by letting teams like the Dodgers sign good players. The more teams like LA spend the more recipients make.

    Reply
  305. seamaholic 2

    30 mins ago

    With deferrals accounted for, this will cost the Dodgers over $100m each year.

    Reply
  306. jeremyn

    30 mins ago

    Someone explain to me.. like i’m a child… how a player a kin to JD Drew is worth more than 3x people like Bonds, Griffey, Pujols, Jeter, etc ever made in a season? We’re in an era where revenue IS DOWN because of TV contracts blowing up… an era where viewership is lowest its been since the 1994 strike… and a guy who slashes 20/80/.280 is getting paid 40-50 million a year?!?!? HOW…. this boggles my mind more than Shin-Soo Choo getting paid more than Lebron James 15 years ago… it makes literally no sense.

    2
    Reply
    • LATrolleyDodger

      23 mins ago

      As a Dodger fan, I’ll concede that. Boggles my mind too. Then again, NBA already boggled mine a long time ago with their salaries. I mean it’s not a BAD thing for ownership to share revenue with players and make sure they get PAID and then some. But it’s bad that they regard players to be worth THAT much. 50 million+ to Tucker is super ballsy and risky. Only glad that there’s opt outs included after 2nd season and it’s only a 4 year deal. He plugs into the outfield that was clearly a deficiency especially when it comes to defense and he’s got good contact.

      Dodgers aren’t hurting for money and it’s not my money. Let’s see how it plays out.

      Reply
      • jeremyn

        18 mins ago

        well as I pointed out in 2012 Shin-Soo Choo was making more than Lebron James… what changed in the NBA is a massive TV contract that kicked in, in 2014… that was nearly doubled 5 years later. MLB has nothing like that.. their revenue is LOWER than the NBA’s and they have twice the roster size.. this makes ZERO sense… it’s like signing an NFL running back to 100 mill a season lol

        Reply
        • Chin Muzak

          7 mins ago

          NBA salaries have a completely different structure but Choo did not make more than James in 2012. 4.9MM for Choo vs 16-17 for James.

          Reply
    • DF 5

      15 mins ago

      Billionaire owners.

      Reply
  307. Rsox

    29 mins ago

    Jays probably dodged a long-term bullet. Mets, i don’t know if this was good or bad for them but now might be the time to jump in on Bellinger

    Reply
  308. hopper15

    27 mins ago

    Now I have no doubt in my mind a hard salary cap is coming.

    Reply
  309. phillyballers

    26 mins ago

    Yea… we’re heading for a lockout lol.

    Freaking A man…. Now the Blue Jays will resign Bichette, Phil’s will just resign JT… and here we go again. Futility.

    Reply
  310. SDMadres

    20 mins ago

    If you owned an entertainment venue wouldn’t you want to put on the best show? Have the best performers? As a baseball fan dont you want to watch the best players play for your team? Commentors emploring people to boycott the Dodgers when they come to your city is just ridiculous. Who doesnt want to watch the best entertainers entertain.

    Reply
  311. Erebus

    18 mins ago

    Wow wasn’t expecting this. Guess Dodgers will get that 3peat. Very impressive signing congrats Dodger fans

    1
    Reply
    • BabyBoyBlueDiamond

      8 mins ago

      Very impressive? No it isn’t. It’s ridiculous and shows a serious flaw in MLB. Extreme actions like the dodgers creates a serious balance problem and because of it, the sport will struggle.

      Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        5 mins ago

        @BabyBoy

        Don’t let the facts stand in the way of your opinions.

        Reply
  312. hiflew

    16 mins ago

    I just saw a story that shows that when luxury taxes are accounted for, Kyle Tucker’s salary ($119 million) will be higher than the entire projected current 2026 payroll of 11 different teams. And please don’t try to give me the tired line that the other teams just need to spend more.

    I guess I will just have to enjoy my final season as a fan because there is no way a strike/lockout is not coming in 2027. And I promised myself when I came back to baseball in 1998 after the 1994 strike that if another game was ever cancelled because of strike, I was done forever. I always keep my word to myself, but I will still enjoy the game until that happens.

    1
    Reply
  313. Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

    15 mins ago

    I don’t really care what the Dodgers do or how much they spend. Not my money, not your money either. All I care about is whether my team will find a way to beat them.

    Reply
    • BabyBoyBlueDiamond

      10 mins ago

      They won’t.

      1
      Reply
      • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

        5 mins ago

        Never say never. Dodgers almost blew it a couple times last fall.

        1
        Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      2 mins ago

      Atta boy Jarred. Good luck to your team whoever they are.

      Reply
  314. THEY LIVE!!!

    13 mins ago

    NEWSFLASH‼️Dodgers buy Greenland for $2 Trillion just so Trump can’t have it. $500 Billion to be deferred for 110 years😳

    Reply
  315. BabyBoyBlueDiamond

    10 mins ago

    Stupid. Just ridiculous. Baseball… this is beyond dumb. There is no balance and because of that, your product sucks.

    Reply
  316. Dumpster Divin Theo

    3 mins ago

    Hey mets hold my beer

    Reply
  317. Bronxlou

    2 mins ago

    With the Dodgers spending like this, it is hard to blame other teams for not spending. Why stretch the budget when the goal, at best. is second best?

    Reply
  318. Brad Scott

    1 min ago

    Even the Dodgers/Tucker contract includes opt-outs after seasons two and three. Why? It’s really a two-season contract, followed by two single-season contracts. Teams should not include opt-outs in any contract.

    If there’s a lockout, don’t blame team owners. The problem is MLBPA’s Tony Clark, who opposes a salary cap, leaving fans to pay more for skyrocketing ticket prices and everything else MLB-related.

    Reply
« Older Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Dodgers To Sign Kyle Tucker

    Rays, Angels, Reds Agree To Three-Team Trade Involving Josh Lowe, Gavin Lux

    Red Sox To Sign Ranger Suárez

    Rockies To Sign Willi Castro To Two-Year Deal

    Rockies Sign Michael Lorenzen

    Latest On Mets’, Blue Jays’ Pursuit Of Kyle Tucker

    Cubs Sign Alex Bregman

    Cardinals Trade Nolan Arenado To Diamondbacks

    Marlins Trade Ryan Weathers To Yankees

    Mets Reportedly Offer Kyle Tucker Short-Term Deal With $50MM AAV; Jays Have Made Long-Term Offer

    Giants Aggressively Pursuing Second Base Upgrade

    Yankees, Cody Bellinger “At An Impasse” In Negotiations

    Braves Re-Sign Tyler Kinley

    Rockies Acquire Jake McCarthy From Diamondbacks

    Max Kepler Receives 80-Game PED Suspension

    Pirates Sign Ryan O’Hearn

    Diamondbacks Will Reportedly Not Trade Ketel Marte

    Tigers, Tarik Skubal Likely Headed To Arbitration Hearing With $13MM Gap In Filing Figures

    Yankees’ Offer To Bellinger Reportedly Above $30MM AAV

    2026 Arbitration Tracker

    Recent

    Dodgers To Sign Kyle Tucker

    Rays, Angels, Reds Agree To Three-Team Trade Involving Josh Lowe, Gavin Lux

    Red Sox To Sign Ranger Suárez

    Mariners Designate Samad Taylor For Assignment

    Mariners Acquire Yosver Zulueta

    Diamondbacks Sign Taylor Clarke

    Cubs Could Use Matt Shaw In Outfield

    Yankees Re-Sign Paul Blackburn

    Takahiro Norimoto To Stay In NPB, Sign With Yomiuri Giants

    Angels, Miguel Castro Agree To Minor League Deal

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android iTunes Play Store

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version