Headlines

  • Blue Jays Continuing To Pursue Kyle Tucker
  • Angels Sign Kirby Yates
  • Dodgers, Braves Among Teams To Show Interest In Freddy Peralta
  • Join The Beta Test For The New Trade Rumors iPhone App
  • Athletics Sign Tyler Soderstrom To Seven-Year Extension
  • Giants Sign Tyler Mahle
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers, Braves Among Teams To Show Interest In Freddy Peralta

By Steve Adams | January 5, 2026 at 11:54pm CDT

Though the Brewers have continually downplayed the possibility of actually trading him, ace right-hander Freddy Peralta continues to draw a wide array of interest. Ken Rosenthal and Will Sammon of The Athletic include the Dodgers and Braves among a list of teams to inquire with the Brewers, joining a group of previously reported clubs that includes the Yankees, Mets and Red Sox. All of those clubs are still believed to have interest in the righty.

Peralta’s appeal is obvious. He’s a durable 29-year-old righty with a 3.30 ERA over his past five seasons, including a career-low 2.70 earned run average this past season (albeit with rate stats and fielding-independent marks that suggest it’s more reasonable to expect a low-3.00s ERA than another sub-3.00 mark). Peralta averages nearly 95 mph on his heater, misses bats at a high level, has only slightly worse-than-average command and, crucially, is earning just $8MM next season. That’s his final year before free agency, but even as a one-year rental, a team surrendering young talent to acquire Peralta would know that he’ll likely net a 2027 draft pick, as he’s a virtual lock to receive and reject a qualifying offer.

For luxury-paying clubs, Peralta’s modest salary is particularly enticing. That’s all the truer for teams like the Yankees, Mets and Dodgers, who figure to be in the top penalty tier for at least a third consecutive season. Those clubs are effectively paying double for any subsequent additions to the payroll. The Dodgers are already in the top tax bracket and thus would pay a 110% tax on any new additions to the payroll. The two New York clubs are just shy of the top tax bracket, but even while sitting in the third penalty tier, they’d be subject to a 95% tax. And both are close enough to the fourth-tier threshold that Peralta would put them right up against it or push them over.

For the Braves and Red Sox, the penalties would be far less severe. Atlanta didn’t pay the tax at all last year and is currently in the first penalty tier. They’d receive only a 20% ($1.6MM) slap on the wrist for adding Peralta’s salary to the ledger. The Red Sox would be crossing the tax line for just the second straight season, as they were under the threshold in 2024. They’re currently about $3MM shy of the tax cutoff, per RosterResource. As a second-time offender they’d pay a 30% tax on the first $20MM by which they exceed the limit. For Peralta, that’d be only a hair over $1.5MM.

In terms of roster fit, it’s pretty easy to see how Peralta would fit onto any of the listed clubs. Atlanta currently has Chris Sale, Spencer Strider, Spencer Schwellenbach, Reynaldo Lopez and Hurston Waldrep lined up as its likely top five. Each of Sale, Strider, Schwellenbach and Lopez missed time with injuries in 2025. Lopez started only one game. Sale missed more than two months with fractures in his ribcage. Schwellenbach’s season ended in late June when he suffered a fracture in his right elbow. Strider posted a 4.45 ERA in his first season back from UCL surgery. Waldrep was impressive as a rookie but tossed only 56 1/3 innings in the majors.

The Dodgers certainly don’t “need” more starting pitching, but the old “no such thing as too much pitching” adage applies to veritably any club. Adding Peralta would be about further deepening the club’s October options. Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Blake Snell, Shohei Ohtani, Tyler Glasnow, Roki Sasaki, Emmet Sheehan and Justin Wrobleski give the Dodgers an embarrassment of riches, and high-upside younger arms like River Ryan, Gavin Stone and Kyle Hurt are all on the mend from 2024 surgeries. Top prospect Jackson Ferris isn’t far from MLB readiness. It’s a deep group, but the Dodgers probably don’t want to simply presume that all of their more established arms will be healthy for the postseason. Bringing in another top-tier arm to join the group would further bolster their choices as they pursue an elusive threepeat.

The Yankees have yet to make an addition to the big league roster, beyond re-signing Ryan Yarbrough on a cheap one-year deal and selecting righty Cade Winquest from the Cardinals in the Rule 5 Draft. With Carlos Rodon, Gerrit Cole and Clarke Schmidt all ticketed to open the season on the injured list, they could use some rotation help. The Mets, meanwhile, have subtracted more big names than they’ve added this winter. President of baseball ops David Stearns knows Peralta well from his Milwaukee days. The current Mets rotation is heavily reliant on rebounds from Kodai Senga and Sean Manaea as well as notable steps forward from prospects like Jonah Tong and Brandon Sproat. The Red Sox have added Sonny Gray and Johan Oviedo to what was already a pretty deep mix, but Peralta would be a clearer No. 2 option behind ace Garrett Crochet than Gray or right-hander Brayan Bello.

Other teams have surely shown interest in Peralta. Earlier in the offseason, it was reported that the Astros had looked into him, but they’ve since added Mike Burrows in a trade and Tatsuya Imai in free agency. The Orioles have shown interest as well, though Baltimore acquired Shane Baz and re-signed Zach Eflin, at least reducing some urgency. (Peralta would still be a notable and needed upgrade to the top end of the staff.) The Athletic’s report notes that some lower-payroll clubs are also looking into Peralta, given that his $8MM price point is affordable for any team.

Broadly speaking, it stands to reason that any 2026 postseason hopeful in the sport has probably at least gauged the asking price on Peralta. Rosenthal and Sammon suggest that a major league-ready starting pitcher is very likely to be a starting point in any talks regarding Peralta. Milwaukee won an MLB-best 97 games in 2025 and is seen as a favorite in the NL Central as a result. The Brewers know they could also get a compensatory pick in the 2027 draft if and when Peralta departs via free agency. They’re a revenue sharing recipient who doesn’t pay the luxury tax, so that pick would come at the end of the first round. That establishes a pretty reasonable base line that needs to be exceeded in any trade talks, and targeting MLB-ready help for a win-now club is only natural.

A Peralta trade shouldn’t be seen as likely. Milwaukee brass has publicly downplayed the possibility, but the Brewers will never fully close themselves off to trades of any notable stars as they approach free agency. Milwaukee traded Corbin Burnes, Devin Williams and Josh Hader near the end of their original windows of club control, after all. However, the Brewers also held onto Willy Adames for the 2024 season, knowing he’d likely reject a qualifying offer and depart via free agency, which is precisely how things played out. Keeping Peralta would give Milwaukee a deep and talented rotation, as he’d be joined by Brandon Woodruff, Jacob Misiorowski, Quinn Priester and Chad Patrick, with depth options including Logan Henderson, Tobias Myers and former top prospect Robert Gasser, who’ll be returning from Tommy John surgery.

Share Repost Send via email

Atlanta Braves Boston Red Sox Los Angeles Dodgers Milwaukee Brewers New York Mets New York Yankees Newsstand Freddy Peralta

Astros Haven’t Discussed Extension With Manager Joe Espada, GM Dana Brown
Main
The Opener: Giants, DFA Resolutions, MLBTR Chat
View Comments (212)
Post a Comment

212 Comments

  1. SD_SF_DET

    2 days ago

    And he’ll immediately go on the dodgers’ IL until Oct 1

    16
    Reply
    • SalaryCapMyth

      2 days ago

      He’s started 95 games in the last 3 years.

      6
      Reply
      • chiefnocahoma1

        1 day ago

        I believe you’ve missed the point, sir.

        16
        Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          14 hours ago

          I believe he got the point, Chief. He just ignored it.

          1
          Reply
    • 99Captain Judge99

      2 days ago

      Yes please Dodgers or Braves, please trade for Freddy Peralta! 🙏

      3
      Reply
      • SalaryCapMyth

        2 days ago

        Ive seen you post your lack of interest in Peralta before. What are you seeing that turns you off?

        5
        Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          2 days ago

          *Salary- Only one season, then he’s leaving. Afraid of the Brewers after Devin Williams also. Who’s your favorite team?

          4
          Reply
        • sandytolan

          2 days ago

          Salary? Freddy’s is bargain basement for 2026 – $8m

          8
          Reply
        • SalaryCapMyth

          1 day ago

          Im a Braves fan. Okay, sure. Ive already mentioned my concern over the Braves trading for an inflated cost of a one year rental. I made the mistake of assuming you saw something in his performance. If you had I would have been open to it but I entirely agree with your concern and it bothers me as well.

          5
          Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          1 day ago

          @Salary- Yeah well right now at least the Braves aren’t crying poverty. You are playing in a really tough division. I find Atlanta competitive, and they will be ready to play this season. These one year contracts are crazy. If the player has a bad season then they aren’t coming back, and if they have a great season, they aren’t coming back either.

          6
          Reply
        • SalaryCapMyth

          1 day ago

          Yep. Thats the draw back of one year contracts. Very little commitment could also mean a complete loss of what you invested that could have gone elsewhere. The Braves have one with Kim.

          Would you prefer Valdez then? Hopefully Cole comes back and doesnt need to much strengthening. That would make a pretty nasty rotation even with a Cole that isnt 100. Or are you more interested in Tucker or Bellinger?

          2
          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          17 hours ago

          For Brewers he is 8 mil. For everyone else he is 8 mil plus some likely high prospect capital. If you have excess make the trade for sure but it’s still part of the equation.

          2
          Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          16 hours ago

          @Salary- a great question. I think you are ok with either. I think Tucker is the better player. I just think Bellinger fits the Yankees better. The problem is Yanks are offering 5 years, when Boras wants 6 years. I feel Belli wants to comeback here though. Do you like the Braves as a playoff team this year? I hope Atlanta makes the playoffs. I blasted you guys for signing Kim for $20 million for 1 year, but he’s solid though, and he’s not goin hurt you out there. I don’t like the Mets or the Phillies. Acuna, Albies, Strider and others on the team, I really enjoy watching them play. I wish you, and the Braves a happy and healthy 2026. Yeah Cole will be back probably early to late June. I don’t want Valdez. I guess I would trade for Cabrera.

          2
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          16 hours ago

          It’s all relative to the cost and I’ve yet to see the parameters of any actual offer. I can’t see Boston paying the expected cost after the trades already made unless they see an opportunity to extend him immediately, which is unlikely.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          16 hours ago

          The Yankees are interesting in that they need to stay close and then hope their returning starters play well. If though Judge gets hurt, they could be under .500 before the staff returns and gels.

          2
          Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          15 hours ago

          @dewey- if Judge missed the whole season, then yeah no playoffs for the Yankees.

          2
          Reply
        • horaceallen

          15 hours ago

          @sandytolan, Captain was referring to the handle of who he was responding to, not saying salary was a concern.

          1
          Reply
        • SalaryCapMyth

          13 hours ago

          Im concerned about the Braves rotation. They had a lot injuries and we have more than one that might not be at his best right away. It might be a problem signing just one pitcher is going to solve. We also need some bounce back in the line up. I would like to think Albies bat will but he’s another season removed from that. Bounce back will be the name of the game. Anthopoulos was never going to sign enough free agents to change that. Fortunately I dont think its unreasonable for that to happen.

          Im really going to enjoy watching the Yankees rotation and especially Fried. I dont care that he took a more lucrative contract than the Braves were going to give him. Im still a fan. Its also fun to see what Xbox numbers Judge puts up every season. And how about Schlitter. Damn good first showing. You guys have a lot of starters, right? Im thinking Warren becomes a back up and stashed in the minors?

          2
          Reply
        • Kenny22

          6 hours ago

          What? You don’t want another JD Drew for Wainwright?

          Reply
        • Kenny22

          6 hours ago

          You’ve got JR Ritchie, I wouldn’t belabour the point too much that you need another starter. Though given Aa’s propensity for being a moron (ie losing Dansby and Freddie) there’s no telling how he’s furtively planting bombs that could go off unexpectedly at any time. Time will tell. I don’t bother myself with the Bravos since he screwed them over.

          Reply
    • LouWhitakerHOF

      2 days ago

      47 days away from the first spring training game…..

      8
      Reply
    • AgeeHarrelsonJones

      11 hours ago

      Can I reply

      Reply
  2. C5793l

    2 days ago

    See you later Peralta it was fun while it lasted

    1
    Reply
  3. Acoss1331

    2 days ago

    I don’t think the Brewers are trading Peralta, but then again they tend to make moves to win now and to be competitive in the future.

    11
    Reply
    • Oppo nacho

      2 days ago

      They’re pretty good at it too

      19
      Reply
      • nocryinginbaseball

        1 day ago

        I think the Brewers, and then second Tampa do the best with developing their players with a low payroll. They do an amazing job with the amount of money that they have. Just my thoughts as a Dodgers fan.

        7
        Reply
        • stpofsd

          1 day ago

          Cleveland and the A’s have success too although they tend to have greater cycles, ie 5 year runs competing for playoffs, 3 years rebuilding. rinse and repeat

          1
          Reply
        • Bud Selig Fan

          18 hours ago

          @stpofsd.

          Exactly, the Brewers are the only small-market team that has gone 9 years and counting, contending each and every year without a rebuild/reset.

          And this was accomplished while rebuilding their worst in baseball infrastructure left to Stearns/Arnold when they took over in 2015.

          What this team has accomplished is unprecedented in this game since revenue disparity has separated the league into large-mid and small-market teams.

          1
          Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          17 hours ago

          Cleveland does a pretty good job too with duct tape. 🙂

          Milwaukee in particular highlights Krall’s failures. The Brewers, Rays and Cleveland know how to build a roster with limited resources that will be competitive.

          Reply
        • JimOToole

          14 hours ago

          As a Dodgers fan, you ought to be aware that the link to the Brewers, Rays and Dodgers is Andrew Friedman. Matt Arnold came to Milwaukee after spending nine years in the Rays’ front office as Friedman’s protege. The Brewers have mastered the Tampa Bay model, but of course Friedman now has the luxury of buying whatever he wants.

          1
          Reply
        • einsteinhood

          10 hours ago

          Brewers fan here, and I would STRONGLY disagree with the claim that the Brewers had the “worst in baseball infrastructure” when Stearns came in in 2015.

          Things had definitely run their course under Melvin and it was time for him to step aside, but he had actually spent the last 5 years trying to figure out what they were doing wrong with pitching identification and development and by the time he handed over the reigns they already had Jimmy Nelson (2nd round 2010) and Brandon Woodruff (11th round 2014) in the pipeline and his staff was the one that would uncover Burnes in the 2016 4th round the next year.

          Point is, they had already turned the ship pretty well around on the pitching side at that point, just just wouldn’t become obvious for a few more years. Obviously then the investment ownership made in the famed pitching lab then helps them take the next step down the road and all of that, so there is credit to be given all around.

          But there is more Doug Melvin DNA left in this organization to this date than most Brewers fans realize.

          Reply
        • einsteinhood

          10 hours ago

          A lot of it comes down to being willing to make tough choices and let guys go a little earlier than everyone would like: Hader, Burnes, Williams, certainly now Peralta. That’s a big part of how you keep the pipeline stocked and the big league team full of young, cost controlled talent. The Brewers do hold onto their guys a bit longer than the Guards or the Rays generally, but they still do (mostly) deal them ahead of time.

          2
          Reply
        • einsteinhood

          9 hours ago

          David Stearns cut his teeth in the Cleveland org, which is really the foutainhead of front office talent in MLB going back further than Tampa or the Brewers, who come along later.

          It’s amazing how many top flight executives were at one point in Cleveland.

          2
          Reply
        • Bud Selig Fan

          7 hours ago

          @einsteinhood.

          Analytics department was behind most organizations. The international department was the worst in baseball. Amateur draft department was also terrible under the late Bruce Seid.

          Stearns convinced Attanasio to invest the savings from the 2 low payroll years (‘16 & ‘17) into the Maryvale refurbishment, including SOTA pitching lab, and SOTA Dominican Academy, along with other investments and upgrades to the infrastructure.

          Reply
        • einsteinhood

          5 hours ago

          The international department was clearly in bad shape. They tried to do a different sort of thing there in the late 00’s, and it didn’t work and it took them a lot of time to dig out, for sure.

          Melvin was an early adopter of analyitics and the Brewers were ahead of the curve on a lot of stuff in the 00’s, but by 2015 had fallen behind and needed a jump forward.

          You’re talking to maybe the foremost Bruce Seid defender out there and I think people GROSSLY underrate his record in the draft. Man never had a top 10 pick in 6 years at the helm and wasn’t working with big budgets, but did draft:
          Khris Davis (7-2009)
          Scooter Gennett (16-2009)
          Caleb Thielbar (18-2009)
          Mike Fiers (22-2009)
          Jimmy Nelson (2-2010)
          Tyler Thornburg (3-2010)
          Carlos Rodon (16-2011) unsigned
          Mitch Haniger (1-2012)
          Tyrone Taylor (2-2012)
          Brent Suter (3-2012)
          Devin Williams (2-2013)
          Brandon Woodruff (11-2014)

          It’s a bit light on top flight talent because they missed so often in the first round, but that’s actually quite a bit of productive MLB talent for someone who was supposedly terrible at his job.

          Stearns did do a fabulous job upgrading the organization when he was given the chance to do that. But as you point out, that was an investment made when they cut payroll from where it was before, which wasn’t really an option that Doug Melvin was given until the very end there. And when he was, he did a good job on his part of the tear down before Stearns picked up the ball and ran further with it. But Melvin did bring in Knebel, Will Smith, Jeffress, Hader, Houser, Santana, Phillips, Hernan Perez, all towards the end of his tenure and they were very important in coming years.

          Anyways, yeah, Stearns was great. But he wasn’t starting at ground zero. A big part of why the Brewers turned it around so fast under Stearns was the sneaky amount of talent that was left for him by Melvin.

          Reply
    • kripes-brewers

      2 days ago

      They went through so many pitchers due to injuries last season, as most teams did, that it forced them to bring up fellas who weren’t quite ready, and make some savvy trades to bring in some innings eaters. They got a bit lucky with Priester, but I’d think they’d be wary of thinning out the high end depth before spring training- unless of course the return was nothing short of tremendous…

      6
      Reply
      • Hammerin' Hank

        2 days ago

        They sent Logan Henderson back down after he had pitched really well. Patrick had a nice rookie season. Misiorowski flashed his superstar potential, although he struggled a bit late in the season. I’d say that they were all ready for the big leagues.

        7
        Reply
        • JimOToole

          14 hours ago

          The Brewers also have Tobias Myers and lefty Robert Gasser and eventually will have veteran lefty Jordan Montgomery. Chris Hook is MLB’s pre-eminent pitching coach and knows how to develop pitchers.

          Reply
    • BlueSkies_LA

      1 day ago

      Agree. Even the article in reporting the interest of other teams admits the unlikelihood of Peralta being traded. This rumor probably belongs in the “not impossible” category.

      4
      Reply
      • BannedMarlinsFanBase

        6 hours ago

        It belongs in the slow news clickbait pile. Tomorrow, they will come up with another name since they did Edward Cabrera yesterday, Peralta today. Maybe back to Skubal tomorrow? Who else can they come up with?

        Reply
    • splinkysf

      23 hours ago

      He’s a guaranteed trade. No way he starts the season with MIL. That’d be negligence.

      1
      Reply
      • BlueSkies_LA

        13 hours ago

        I agree, the Brewers fielding their best possible rotation is total negligence.

        2
        Reply
      • pepenas34

        9 hours ago

        Negligence was to give Woodruff a QO when you know you can’t afford him, now he has taken all their budget and probably more, that’s why they are thinking in selling when their window is open.

        2
        Reply
        • einsteinhood

          8 hours ago

          This is an really bizzare notion to me. The Brewers absolutely can “afford” Woodruff’s salary this year. They don’t need to shed payroll and if they do end up trading away Peralta’s 8 million dollars you can bet that they’ll be adding more than that back elsewhere before the end of camp as well.

          If they deal Peralta it’s because they feel the return on offer for him is worth more to them over the next half decade plus than what he is worth to them just this year, period.

          Reply
        • pepenas34

          8 hours ago

          That’s fair only if they don’t believe in 2026 as contenders chances.

          Reply
    • bucsfan0004

      20 hours ago

      Trade Woodruff and keep Peralta

      Reply
      • cheesemanforever

        19 hours ago

        $8M for a workhorse vs $22M for somebody with injury history? Nope.

        1
        Reply
      • Outfieldflyrule??

        18 hours ago

        Brewers will get so much more back in a trade for Peralta than Woodruff.

        2
        Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          13 hours ago

          Ofr

          “Brewers will get so much more back in a trade for Peralta than Woodruff.”

          Amazing how many people don’t seem to understand this obvious fact.

          BTV’S trade values
          Woodruff $8 million
          Peralta $25 million

          Reverse engineering it, using cheeseman’s salary numbers

          Woodruff is expected to provide $30 ($22+$8) million of on-field value
          Peralta is expected to provide $33 ($8+$25) million of on-field value

          Pretty even

          Thus, if the team is going to trade one guy, it makes more sense to trade Peralta. They’ll get nearly the same production on the field and get back $17 million more in trade.

          1
          Reply
        • einsteinhood

          9 hours ago

          Exactly.

          People who get worried about the salary thing with Woodruff are kinda missing the point: they need to spend money on someone, and it might as well be a guy who at his best is a stud like Woodruff, injury risk accepted.

          Peralta’s ceiling is quite a bit lower than Woodruff’s and he’s kind of an inning eater who doesn’t actually eat innings all that well.

          It’s time for him to go and bring back some more young talent they control for the next half decade plus.

          Reply
      • Salzilla

        18 hours ago

        Can’t trade Woodruff as he accepted the QO until June.

        4
        Reply
  4. oldgfan

    2 days ago

    Face it fellas. The trade market has stalled.
    Keep pounding the articles though, maybe it will awaken. We all hope so. The minor league signings are not that entertaining.

    4
    Reply
    • The Raven

      2 days ago

      I have to say, this is an unfair comment. It’s not as if the writers for this site can make transactions happen. This site complies the social media feeds of journalists. They can either go dark and wait for major transactions to happen, or keep the casual viewer in the loop.

      20
      Reply
      • JuanUribeJazzHands

        2 days ago

        Well, they can go quiet or post articles and drive traffic to the site

        1
        Reply
      • oldgfan

        2 days ago

        Not trying to fault anyone, just yelling at the clouds like old men do.

        9
        Reply
        • kripes-brewers

          2 days ago

          I hear ya. It’s nice that they throw Brewers fans an article once a week anyway. When they want to drive traffic they just do an article about the large market clubs, lol. But they keep us engaged anyway, until that big trade finally breaks!

          4
          Reply
        • Simm

          22 hours ago

          This kinda was an article about large market clubs.

          Peralta and the dodgers don’t make any sense.

          1
          Reply
        • 9timeworldchamps

          13 hours ago

          I agree. The cost would not make sense for the Dodgers especially since they already have Snell, Yama, Roki, Glasnow, Ohtani, as a potential 5 and Wrobleski, Sheehan, Ryan and Stone as options for a 6 man rotation.

          Reply
  5. Digdugler

    2 days ago

    I am pretty sure every team is interested in every other team’s best players.

    6
    Reply
    • Heels On The Field

      2 days ago

      You think the Pirates are trying to convince the Mets to trade them Soto?

      2
      Reply
      • notagiantsfan

        2 days ago

        I do, But I also believe it’s not going well.

        5
        Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          2 days ago

          I heard Arson Judge is available?

          3
          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          2 days ago

          For a package built around Nick Castellanos, lol.

          3
          Reply
        • Steinbrenner2728

          1 day ago

          @99Captain Judge99 I’ve never seen anyone as obsessed in rehashing the same joke as “statman” with his ‘A’s fans – both of them!’ comments.

          You must be the guy behind spoof accounts trolling Giants articles. That’s pretty sad if true.

          2
          Reply
      • pt57

        23 hours ago

        Oneil Cruz for Soto and $700 million.

        Reply
        • BannedMarlinsFanBase

          6 hours ago

          Can the Marlins trade Calvin Faucher for Shohei? I figure if the rule of thumb is when the “writers” come up with these clickbait articles, trade suggestions need to involve a person’s favorite team getting a star for a player they want to trade away from their team, it makes sense for the Marlins to trade Faucher for Shohei. Heck, should I even throw in the always popular, it makes sense for the Dodgers to do it because some made up excuse that I can’t think of at the moment?

          Reply
  6. southi

    2 days ago

    I’d hate to see the acquisition cost in terms of talent going back to the Brewers, but I would love to see him in the Braves rotation this season.

    2
    Reply
    • bigalcathey

      2 days ago

      I would too, but Braves farm is thin of premium talent.

      4
      Reply
    • SalaryCapMyth

      2 days ago

      Peralta is a rental so it shouldnt be to terrible. Still, I share your concern. With the graduation of Swallenbauch and Waldrep and the fizzle of Smith the Braves pipeline needs to time. Unless it costs Swallenbauch or Waldrupp as centerpieces. That might be worse. They may struggle this season as they bounce back from injury but I would rather see if they can develop and fulfill there prospect rating.

      We’ll see. Rentals dont usually carry to large a price but Peralta isnt just a good bo.2. He’s also really durable and the Dodgers have greater prospect capital to spend.

      2
      Reply
      • RunDMC

        2 days ago

        Schwell isn’t going anywhere…and I imagine Waldrep, as well. I get that they don’t have highly-ranked arms like some other clubs (NYM), but other teams notice their development and scouting. Was Schwell ever in top-100? Strider? (Not a pitcher, fwiw), but William Contreras? Drake was never in any top-50…and he beat out MIL’s wunderkind SP for RoY. ATL’s farm consistently outperforms their ranking if measuring impact to ML rosters. Sure, holes in some areas (OF, in particular), but that’s like all teams.

        6
        Reply
      • nocryinginbaseball

        1 day ago

        Yeah LA has has pitching prospects to trade

        Reply
    • Outfieldflyrule??

      1 day ago

      I’m thinking Waldrep, Nacho and Hackenburg or something similar is what the Brewers are asking for. Better sign Peralta long term to give up Waldrep.

      Reply
      • braves25

        1 day ago

        @Outfield….

        It may not even take Waldrep. Nacho, Hackenburg and Fuentes might get it done.

        I definitely wouldn’t include Caminiti or Ritchie. I hope Atlanta holds onto Murphy too. I think he is going to surprise a lot of people like Ritchie has. Murphy is a year behind Ritchie’s development due to when their tommy john surgeries took place.

        1
        Reply
        • ReddVencher

          1 day ago

          Nacho, Hackenberg, and Fuentes aren’t getting Peralta.

          4
          Reply
        • braves25

          1 day ago

          @Redd

          You are probably right, but I also thought it would take more than it did to sign Imai.

          What do you think it would take to get Peralta?

          Reply
        • Outfieldflyrule??

          1 day ago

          If the Braves could possibly get Peralta by only trading Nacho, Hackenburg and Fuentes that deal would have already happened.

          2
          Reply
        • Astros71

          1 day ago

          No way Braves should trade Hurtson Waldrep.

          3
          Reply
        • ReddVencher

          1 day ago

          The Burnes package is the minimum threshold in this market. 2 MLB ready top 100 prospects/MLB equivalents and a comp A pick. You’re likely Waldrep and Ritchie as the front and another piece at a minimum. The Braves don’t have the comp pick, so I don’t know what a good equivalent for the Brewers would be.

          3
          Reply
        • Fowlerrc

          1 day ago

          I’m less convinced. Looked great for 10 games to end the season and his minor league numbers are much less pretty. Making him untouchable would be putting a lot of faith in a mid-season adjustment and a small sample size. I’m not saying they should just give Waldrep away, but if he was the missing piece to get Peralta, and don’t necessarily think AA would immediately hang up the phone. The Braves could also include Elder, Ritchie, Murphy, Fuentes, Hackenberg or Caminiti. I don’t think any of them should be truly untouchable. Caminiti’s upside is sky high, but he’s not making his debut until probably 2028. A lot can happen in 2 years.

          Reply
        • Fowlerrc

          1 day ago

          I disagree that’s the minimum. I think the returns in trades have gotten more and more underwhelming recently. It might take that much. But I could see something Waldrep or Ritchie being the main piece along with elder or Fuentes and throw in a Hayden Harris relief arm.

          Reply
        • NyyfaninLAA land

          22 hours ago

          Those 3 don’t get it done.
          Fuentes has 200 minors innings in 4 years and didn’t pitch above low A until this season. Got pushed because of system pitching injuries and did well this season, but is burning his 2nd option this year. Just not close enough for the Brewers. Hackenburg is meh, and Nacho has 1 option left and IF isn’t their problem. Gonna take 1 of the top prospect pitchers (Fuentes is that but likely not the right one.

          1
          Reply
        • braves25

          18 hours ago

          @Redd

          With all due respect, the Burnes package is not the minimum. First Burnes came with a CY Young attached to his name. 2nd he was a pitcher that was pitching 190+ innings a year. 3rd his era was consistently under 3. Lastly until 2025 Peralta was a consistent 2.5 WAR or lower pitcher while Burnes was a consistent 3.5 or higher WAR.

          The Burnes package is at best the MAXIMUM threshold. I don’t even really think that is even realistic for Peralta.

          Don’t get me wrong, Peralta is an extremely good pitcher. However, is his 2025 season a true outlier or is it the level of pitcher he has become. I think you have to realistically look somewhere in between.

          So yes, my offer might be a light, but what you are expecting is extremely high in my opinion.

          2
          Reply
        • sandytolan

          16 hours ago

          Whatever teams think is reasonable may not matter. The Brewers aren’t incentivized to trade Freddy given 1) if they hold him they’ll have a top 2 or 3 rotation in the NL; 2) They already have the comp pick for Freddy so whatever a team offers is going to have to be so much more than that; 3) Their farm is one of MLB’s best so they no longer NEED to trade their pending FAs; 4), Freddy is a huge positive influence and clubhouse leader, especially with the other Latin American players, and 5) the return will need to include an established or MLB-ready proven slugger, in addition to whoever else is on the table. In short, it’ll likely be an overpay or he’ll just stay with the Brew Crew for one more year. They’d happily just hold onto him. So, all in all, win-win for the Crew.

          Reply
        • Ma4170

          12 hours ago

          yes, and when the burnes trade happened, ortiz was 63rd in MLB top 100, but not projected to be a big bat, and Hall was no longer on top 100 lists. The return for Peralta will be lighter than most think imo.

          1
          Reply
        • einsteinhood

          9 hours ago

          You’re missing the money. The fact that Peralta (8M) costs half of what Burnes did (15.6) in his rental year matters A LOT in terms of return. Trades are done based on surplus value (projected value above the salary being paid) and Peralta is going to have more of that than Burnes did because of the salary.

          The other thing, and this is somewhat speculative, is that Peralta has expressed a want to extend beyone this contract, something that was NEVER in the cards for Burnes after he hired Boras. So there is at least some chance that part of what the Brewers can offer in trade for Peralta is also an exclusive negotatiing window. Not sure what that might actually be worth in terms of return, but I suspect it’s more than nothing.

          1
          Reply
  7. Astros71

    2 days ago

    I would keep him, give him a QO, and take the compensation pick. It’s likely going to be in the first compensation round right after the PPI. It’s going to be in the 2027 draft so who knows, things might change.

    Also when you keep him, the chances of winnings a WS are higher. 🙂

    7
    Reply
    • cwizzy6

      1 day ago

      I think this is the most likely scenario. Maybe a trade at the deadline if things go haywire.

      3
      Reply
      • Astros71

        1 day ago

        If he will reject a QO, you don’t trade him.

        End of story.

        1
        Reply
        • AssumesFactNotInEvidence

          1 day ago

          Sure you might trade him if things go haywire and your team is having a tough season. He could bring quite a bit in return vs one draft pick. Supplemental ending to story

          Reply
    • Sadface

      24 hours ago

      Unfortunately I don’t see the Brewers winning the World Series with or without Peralta.

      Reply
      • BannedMarlinsFanBase

        6 hours ago

        Hmmmm…you’re able to see a perrenial playoff team not win the World Series? You should be playing the lottery or Powerball.

        Reply
        • Sadface

          6 hours ago

          Have not won one yet. Only been to the Championship series 3 times in their history. Only one world series appearance and that was in the AL. So despite having good regular seasons, no success in the playoffs. And that probably (not definitely, but then again the Pirates or Reds could win) will not happen.

          Reply
        • BannedMarlinsFanBase

          6 hours ago

          Hmmm…I wonder if this was the thought about the Angels in 2002, the Nationals in 2019, the Royals in 1985, the Twins in 1987, the Blue Jays in 1992…

          Reply
        • Sadface

          2 hours ago

          Or the Red Sox in 2004, white Sox in 2005, cubs on 2016. I get what you are saying but that does not change the likelihood of a Brewers championship. The likelihood is that Dodgers will win again (not that I want to see that), but hopefully they underperform this year so that there is a different champion. As an MLB fan Mariners or Rays vs Padres or Rockies is the best match up. But the Rockies aren’t suddenly going to become good.

          Reply
  8. Braves20

    2 days ago

    Don’t see the Braves having the trade inventory that would match up with the Brewers, but would love to have him.

    5
    Reply
    • Big whiffa

      2 days ago

      Albies for peralta ? That makes sense right ?

      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        2 days ago

        Think you are kidding, but either way answer is no.

        Brewers would smile when they ask for Caminiti.

        4
        Reply
    • SalaryCapMyth

      2 days ago

      @Whiffa. My immediate, knee-jerk reaction to that was you were being serious. 😂

      The Braves have young pitching prospects, Caminiti and Ritchie that are highly ranked. They also have the recently graduated Swallenbauch and Waldrep who were also highly ranked prospects and have had good introductions to the majors.

      I am, however, a little loathe to trade them. I would rather keep the four of them and hope one or two turn into something significant. Maybe one of the four will even turn out to be an ace. Problem is, Braves fans will have to be patient. They may need some time to bounce back from injury.

      The Dodgers have greater prospect capital and Anthopoulos has already demonstrated he will set a price and not cross it no matter who it is. If the Dodgers want him enough they will get him. They can absorb the prospect capital better.

      5
      Reply
      • SoCalBrave

        1 day ago

        @salary The Brewers want MLB ready talent, so that’s why the Braves don’t match well. Aside from Elder and Albies, I can’t think of anything the Braves would be willing to part ways from their big league team. Like you said JR Ritchie might do it, but it’s hard to see the Braves trade him for 1 year of Peralta.

        1
        Reply
      • Big whiffa

        1 day ago

        I’m being dead serious. I thought peralta was a little much, even in this market, but Ozzie has 2 years of control left so it seems a little heavy on Alt imo.

        Peralta is coming off a career year. Brewers do well replacing pitchers. They struggle finding bats. Ozzie is a good one and fit for the top of their order

        1
        Reply
        • Outfieldflyrule??

          1 day ago

          Whiffa .you over rate Ozzie. He’s no longer a top ten 2B. Gonna take a lot more than Ozzie to get Peralta.

          3
          Reply
        • Big whiffa

          1 day ago

          He’s up and down. Def been down of late. He still makes 7 mil for two seasons. So his contract has a ton of value and players are not always as good as in their best year and bad as their worse

          Reply
      • Sadface

        24 hours ago

        True but they have too much pitching already. Maybe they get him and try to trade one of their other starters. Glasnow,maybe? He never pitches a whole season but for the right team it might be enough.

        Reply
    • Sid Bream Speed Demon

      1 day ago

      Braves have plenty inventory that other teams are interested in, it’s all mainly young pitching and they hate to move it. Minors rankings are dumb though and not how real teams function.

      Reply
    • SalaryCapMyth

      1 day ago

      @Sid. Use whatever prospect ranking system you want then. Every talented player in baseball was a prospect at some point. You can call prospect analysis stupid if you like but does that mean I should just take YOUR word for it instead?

      Since I would say professional baseball analysis is better coming from baseball prospectus or pipeline than you, I guess I will go with what the professionals say.

      Reply
      • YaySports

        1 day ago

        You think places like MLB Pipeline are really professional analysis? lol. They’re hype machines. There’s very little scouting involved.

        4
        Reply
        • Big whiffa

          1 day ago

          Spot on yay ! And some GMs still use em as a resource 😆

          Reply
  9. kingken67

    2 days ago

    There are loads of teams interested in Freddy Peralta. The issue is whether or not Milwaukee is interested in trading him. Until they say they are articles like this are kind of pointless.

    3
    Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      2 days ago

      I assume they are interested only if they get the type of haul that Soto and Cease trades last got. And since Peralta is only one year, that seems unlikely. The Dodgers could offer Sheehan, Ryan, Stone and Ferris. For one year of Peralta or more likely Skubal. That would look like a win-win deal to me. Dodgers have a couple years before their team ages and fades. They should cash all their chips in now. This still leaves the Dodgers Hope and de Paula for 2028. It gives the Brewers or Tigers depth and competitiveness right away.

      1
      Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        2 days ago

        That is a ridiculous overpay for either rental.

        8
        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 day ago

          Yes. Crazy overpay. And yet it works, especially for Skubal. But I agree that it is unlikely to happen.

          2
          Reply
      • Hammerin' Hank

        2 days ago

        I love Peralta, but that’s too much to give for him.

        4
        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 day ago

          I think that it is very reasonable to say that is an overpay. But let’s say the Dodgers could get Skubal for Sheehan, Ryan, Stone and Ferris. The Dodgers have more prospects than they need and I would argue now is the best time to cash them in. Ryan and Stone are coming back from injuries and Ferris is unproven. It will take that type of overpay for the Tigers to move Skubal. Anything less and I would never do it as the Tigers GM.

          1
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 day ago

          Sheehan post season career era 8.18, post season career whip 2.18. It is just 11 innings but he is no Skubal

          1
          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          1 day ago

          Sheehan is solid. But when everyone is healthy I think Gavin Stone is the better pitcher.

          Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          17 hours ago

          MLBT100

          “Sheehan post season career era 8.18, post season career whip 2.18. It is just 11 innings but he is no Skubal”

          I agree with your conclusion, but your evidence is…

          Skubal’s first 2 seasons: 105 ERA-, 122 FIP-, 97 xFIP-

          Sheehan’s: 88 ERA-, 87 FIP-, 94 xFIP-

          Sheehan has, arguably been better than Skubal through their first 2 seasons. Though, I’d say, they were roughly equal. Plus Sheehan is older, coming off injury, etc

          But Skubal didn’t reach the playoffs in his first 2 seasons. He only appeared in the playoffs his last two seasons where he’s been at the top of his game – winning 2 Cy Young award. Not at all a reasonable comparison.

          Plus using an 11 inning sample to compare ERA is just absurd.

          Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          17 hours ago

          ADF

          “I think Gavin Stone is the better pitcher.”

          Based on what?

          Sheehan: 88 ERA-, 87 FIP-, 94 xFIP-
          Stone: 108 ERA-, 105 FIP-, 102 xFIP-

          Reply
      • Salzilla

        18 hours ago

        Skubal and Peralta are not on the same tier in the least. That Dodgers offer for Skubal would make sense. Not for Freddy!

        2
        Reply
        • JuanUribeJazzHands

          17 hours ago

          “Skubal and Peralta are not on the same tier in the least.”

          Per BTV

          Peralta $25 million trade value
          Skubal $61 million

          The above mentioned Dodger trade package $64 million

          3
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          8 hours ago

          Juan and Salzilla

          Agreed, I would still pull trigger on Sheehan, Stone, Ryan and Ferris for Skubal, but maybe only two of them for Peralta.

          2
          Reply
        • Jswag

          7 hours ago

          Comment Man – Brewers would probably want Farris and one of the other three along with one of your top outfielder prospects. They don’t need four pitchers back.

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          6 hours ago

          Jswag

          You may know the Brewers better than me.

          But I don’t think the Dodgers are trading de Paula or Hope. They have extra pitching depth and prospects to move. Might mean they have to deal with another team.

          1
          Reply
        • Jswag

          4 hours ago

          No buddy, you are probably right. I was thinking De Paula is off limits anyway (and maybe Hope).

          Something like Rushing, Farris, River knowing those top too outfielders would be a one for one trade if lucky.

          Reply
    • BannedMarlinsFanBase

      6 hours ago

      @kingken67

      Exactly my thoughts when I see these articles. As a Marlins fan, we get them regularly.

      Reply
  10. angt222

    2 days ago

    If Dodgers or Red Sox are seriously interested in Peralta, then that’s bad news for the Mets.

    Reply
  11. JuanUribeJazzHands

    2 days ago

    Interesting that the Dodgers are listed

    :pauses for people to yell about injuries:

    They have a pretty full rotation

    Ohtani
    Yamamoto
    Snell
    Glasnow
    Sasaki

    Then
    Sheehan, Ryan and Stone for the 6th spot and depth. Plus Knack, Wrobleski and Casparius for more depth further down the depth chart.

    Adding another reliable starter can’t hurt. But, it’s harder to see where he fits than, say, Skubal.

    Maybe just doing their due diligence

    1
    Reply
    • highflyballintorightfield

      2 days ago

      I don’t see the Dodgers as a good match for the Brewers. Peralta’s not that much better than Sheehan and the Dodgers aren’t trading Sasaki either. The next tranche is either coming off major surgery or a step down in talent, so I don’t think the Brewers will be interested.

      1
      Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      1 day ago

      Don’t forget Bobby Miller. He’s still only 26, and could figure out his location issues. If he does, and the rotation is full, they could make him a long relief bridge to the high leverage guys.

      That would suck for opposing teams. But he’s not there yet.

      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        1 day ago

        Not sure that Bobby Miller has much trade value any more.

        2
        Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          1 day ago

          I don’t want them to trade Bobby Miller. He just needs to get past some of the mental blocks from when he was hit with the 106mph line drive in the head.

          He was coming on as a relief pitcher towards the end of the season. If he puts it together and ends up on the big club it could be an amazing bullpen this year.

          3
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 day ago

          I agree about not trading him right now because it would be the ultimate sell low. Let him get his rhythm back and then trade him when the return will be better. Maybe he can even be a middle reliever at Chavez Ravine.

          3
          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          1 day ago

          I think he would be an amazing middle reliever if he can get right. Keep him stretched out a bit in case he’s needed for a spot start here and there.

          If Tanner Scott can be effective, and Diaz is Diaz, the back end is handled.

          I’m really looking forward to seeing how it all plays out. Friedman has said during a winter meetings interview he has an outfield target in mind, but it’ll be a bit of a wait. Curious on who they have in mind. So here I sit, waiting lol.

          1
          Reply
        • diphthong

          22 hours ago

          Thought Bader would be a solid, if unspectacular, addition to the outfield. Haven’t heard him mentioned in a month. Did I miss him signing somewhere? Seems like there are quite a few teams that would like to go cheaper than Belli or Tucker in the OF.

          Reply
        • Bill M

          18 hours ago

          Bader’s market has been slow. Word is he’s looking for 3 years & no one wants to buy.

          Reply
  12. Skyrider123

    2 days ago

    The Braves would have to give up one of either Richie, Waldrep or AJSS as a starting conversation to get Peralta

    2
    Reply
  13. Troy Percival's iPad

    2 days ago

    Game. Blouses.

    1
    Reply
  14. Dustyslambchops23

    2 days ago

    MLB needs to do something about the offseason, not sure what but something.

    Because a team that has 9 starters isn’t acquiring the ace of its current bigger competitor in the NL.

    But when nothing happens for months, you have articles like this to get attention

    2
    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      2 days ago

      Do you also complain about the weather??

      7
      Reply
      • Dustyslambchops23

        1 day ago

        Weather can’t change, but mlb can make changes? Did I really need to explain that to you. Or you just looking for cool points for being d in the boards?

        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 day ago

          So the off-season exists for your entertainment?

          So silly.

          1
          Reply
        • Dustyslambchops23

          1 day ago

          For the entertainment of fans yes. lol

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 day ago

          Wow. That’s breathtaking.

          2
          Reply
        • Dustyslambchops23

          1 day ago

          It’s a business, if you can’t see how a truncated period for offseason moves would create more urgency, excitement and attention for the sport then I can’t really help you.

          Take your cool guy points and move on.

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 day ago

          Instead of making lame insults try getting with reality. Thinking the off-season business of free agency and trades exists for your entertainment is about as dumb as it gets. Sure we fans follow the action because there is little else to do. But every winter there are moronic takes from people like you who think the action is moving too slowly for their taste. The dealing happens when it happens based on the available talent. Some years there is lots of talent. Some not so much. You propose a “truncated period of moves.” Then what? Weeks of nothing? How dare the front offices take some time off for the holidays. Don’t they realize you are bored?

          3
          Reply
        • Dustyslambchops23

          1 day ago

          Lol you sound like a super happy and successful guy. I’m not reading all that. Feels like you need a win if you’re trying this hard. Have a good 2026, hope things get better for you.

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          1 day ago

          Maybe get someone to read it to you.

          1
          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          1 day ago

          Dusty,

          Weather can change. It just stopped raining here. Ooh and as I type this the sun just came out. Excellent.

          1
          Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      23 hours ago

      I mean I guess they could put deadlines in for free agency and trades like the NFL/NBA does but then you get several weeks of guaranteeing that nothing happens anyway, which is no different from the nothing that happens under the current offseason structure, but hey, at least everyone’s rosters are set a little sooner, right?

      Reply
    • bean54446

      16 hours ago

      The up coming cba is brought things to a stand still in trades and free agency. Owners are scared to commit to any long term a lockout is a real possibility and players union won’t budge on hard cap and want the luxury cap removed gonna be a long winter next year

      Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        15 hours ago

        So scared to sign players..,

        Dylan Cease. 7 years
        Kyle Schwarber. 5 years
        3B Kazuma Okamoto (4-year deal)
        RP Tyler Rogers (3-year deal)
        SP Cody Ponce (3-year deal)

        2
        Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        15 hours ago

        30 of MLBTR’s Top 50 free agents have signed already

        And there have been plenty of trades, albeit with lesser names for the most part.

        As for a cap, ain’t gonna be one.

        3
        Reply
  15. JerseyShoreScore

    2 days ago

    The Dodgers are likely to obtain Peralta in order to deal a SP for an OF upgrade. Perhaps even a three-way deal where LA gets an OF, a contending team gets Peralta or Glasnow, and the Brewers receive controlable talent.

    Reply
    • rocky7

      2 days ago

      Why would any team want the “made off glass” Glasgow with his injury history and that silly contract the Dodgers gave him……that’s a bit no go….

      Reply
      • Popgun13

        1 day ago

        Duran to the Dodgers, Peralta to the Red Sox, and controllable talent to the Brewers from both teams?

        Reply
        • Popgun13

          1 day ago

          More so from the Dodgers (but maybe throw Casas into the deal for the Brewers and maybe force the Dodgers to take Yoshida as part of the deal as well and be with his other Japanese friends in LA)?

          Reply
  16. Redwolves3

    2 days ago

    Why would LA Deferrals have interest in Peralta?

    1) going to 6-man rotation
    2) have info one of their SP is going to miss time due to injury
    3) planning to trade one of their SP
    4) just rumor & LA Deferrals have no real interest in Peralta

    2
    Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      23 hours ago

      No such thing as too much pitching and at any given moment someone’s 100% for sure getting Tommy John. Dodgers have a billion pitchers, but they don’t win back-to-back world series by not adding a billion more pitchers!

      Reply
  17. chuckyboy1217

    2 days ago

    Ah, so the Dodgers.

    Reply
    • Steinbrenner2728

      1 day ago

      How do you know? Or you just think you’re funny by going “dodgers sign everyone lololol”?

      Reply
  18. 123redsox

    1 day ago

    Duran, Tolle and Sandavol for Peralta. … who says no?

    Reply
    • Roadtrip

      1 day ago

      Boston, most definitely

      Reply
    • Bruin1012

      1 day ago

      Is this a serious question?

      Reply
  19. Tigersin2050

    1 day ago

    Shouldn’t every team be in on him?

    1
    Reply
  20. cplwhite

    1 day ago

    If I was the Brewers im taking 3 top tier prospects from the LAD farm system.

    3
    Reply
    • Wren

      21 hours ago

      yeah cause AF is an easy mark that routinely gets taken advantage of.

      Reply
      • einsteinhood

        6 hours ago

        The Dodgers would definitely be on my short list of teams (along with the NLC clubs) who would have to give up an absolutely insane, blow away all other offers, sort of give to make the deal work with them.

        If the Dodgers or Cubs want Peralta, they get to absolutely give until it hurts. Not that I expect that they would actually do that, but I would certainly charge more for them than for anyone else.

        Reply
  21. Mikenmn

    1 day ago

    Dodgers and Braves doing their occasional Vulcan Mind Meld

    1
    Reply
  22. Another Dodgers Fan

    1 day ago

    Interesting, indeed.

    Reply
  23. cash3w

    1 day ago

    I’m assuming Waldrep and Ritchie are the starting point, plus some. If they can provide a window to sign Peralta to an extension as part of the deal, I could see them going for it. Few other options: sign Bassitt or Gallen (aside from the QO ding) or trade for Mitch Keller on PIT. Those seem more realistic.

    1
    Reply
  24. Dmac13

    1 day ago

    (HAL order Cashman to make the deal) the yankees have a lot of blocked prospects. Send the Brewers Will Warren, (that would leave Gil,schlittler, Elmer rod and Lagrange at 5th starter with Cole, Fried, Rodon, Peralta (when back, not to mention Clarke Schmidt and yarborough) then throw in Cunningham yanks #5 prospect dax kilby #7 (blocked by lombard ) and then give a few more like chase hampton jason Dominguez(when belli is resigned ) the martian would be 4th OF. Would rather see Spencer Jones get those reps (o Cabrera can play all corner outfield spot if needed for depth and the yankees have 3 outfield prospects coming in brando mayea, dillon Lewis and Brendan Jones (those 3 should be ready for 2028 as I don’t think we are going to see baseball next year with labor shortage! Obviously the yankees need to extend him and if they can they can give more if not they give less and attach draft compensation if he walks. Wouldn’t mind seeing megill or a reliver coming to NY as well

    Reply
    • gormanthomasrules

      1 day ago

      Matt Arnold would fart into the phone and then trash you on the GM Group chat that Cashman isn’t invited to.

      3
      Reply
      • einsteinhood

        8 hours ago

        I think he’s probably hit accept on that offer in about 10 seconds, actually, and I’m a Brewers fan.

        Reply
    • Jmergs29

      1 day ago

      Brewers would hang on to Peralta then accept that trash offer

      1
      Reply
      • Dmac13

        1 day ago

        Its jasson Dominguez will warren Cunningham and kilby for Peralta. Yankees could sit back and just offer $ next year and blow the brewers offer away and keep their prospects. Peralta will go to free agency if he doesn’t sign extension before this season starts. Once that happens if he has a good year he is as good as gone.

        Reply
        • Wrian Washman

          1 day ago

          The Yankees probably shouldn’t deal from their immediate depth like Warren who is currently the #3 on this staff for 2 months. The only player on the 26 man up for grabs is Dominguez.

          Reply
        • Dmac13

          1 day ago

          Higher upside next year Peralta or will warren? Id include warren for a #1 or solid #2 as on the yankees that pitcher ends up being #4 with everyone back around may

          Reply
        • einsteinhood

          8 hours ago

          Brewers fan here, and I gotta say I think that’s not a bad offer for 1 year of Freddy.

          Actually, in discussing it with other Brewers fans who know things, I”m pretty sure there’s no way that Cashman would actually give that up to rent him for a year, but if you’ve got his ear please get him to make that offer right away!

          Reply
        • Dmac13

          6 hours ago

          Would love to see Milwaukee add Koenig or megill as well with another young pitcher from NY going back to Milwaukee… someone like chase hampton but I don’t wanna beg lol. Again tho the initial trade would need to have a extension with Peralta worked out prior

          Reply
    • rocky7

      16 hours ago

      Again, there is no trade regardless of the players you mention unless Peralta will sign an extension which it pretty much is guaranteed he won’t….he’s a 1 year rental and teams are being smarter about trading “hauls” for 1 year guys who then sell their services to the highest bidder…..

      1
      Reply
  25. Astros71

    1 day ago

    Your writing is so messed up, I’m not even bothering to read it with detail.

    Looks like Will Warren, Bryce Cunningham, Dax Kilby, Chase Hampton for a high leverage reliever and Peralta.

    Is that not your package?

    Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      1 day ago

      I don’t care where he goes. Stay away from the Yankees!!!I’d give up Gil before Warren anyday and I’m not giving up Kilby at all. Lombard and Kilby are the future middle infield. I still don’t trust Volpe unless Lombard plays 3B. A pitcher not Peralta I’d give up Gil, Hampton, Vivas and Jones

      1
      Reply
      • Dmac13

        1 day ago

        Kirby may end up being a good player but I’d rather resign jazz to play 2b and move volpe to 3rd. And of course theres all the rumors of bo bichette. So if either of those scenarios happen dax isn’t playing in NY for the yankees. And I like will warren but he will never win more than 11 games in a season yes he’s durable but batters figure him out 2-3 times through the order. I don’t think he pitches deep enough where Gil can when fully healthy and again this would be your 6th starter! Maybe 7th when Schmidt comes back.. all assuming they extend Peralta if dealt

        Reply
      • rocky7

        16 hours ago

        Agreed….way too heavy a haul for a 1 year rental…..don’t care what he’s done for the Brewers, can he handle NY?

        1
        Reply
        • Dmac13

          9 hours ago

          That is a great point as not everyone handles NY…

          1
          Reply
    • Astros71

      1 day ago

      I was talking to Dmac13.

      You apparently replied to my comment.

      Reply
  26. Dmac13

    1 day ago

    No its jasson dominguez, will warren, Bryce Cunningham Dax kilby for Peralta and throw in chase hampton for a reliever if Milwaukee is looking to shed a salary in addition with Peralta. Now normally I would say hampton will get you what? But the cubs gave bellinger to the yankees for Cody poteet. So im using hampton as a comparison to poteet this is all assuming the brewers will not resign Peralta and he will end up walking with no return coming to the brewers

    1
    Reply
    • Astros71

      1 day ago

      I wouldn’t do that for Peralta because he has one year of control left. Peralta is good but not that good, for Skubal, yes.

      Reply
      • Dmac13

        1 day ago

        Again the yankees would need to be able to negotiate a extension prior. Years ago the red Sox wanted to trade for Schilling and they were granted a 48 hour or 72 hour windows by mlb to negotiate and they were able to work out a deal sort of a back door agreement that mlb allowed to happen. I can’t remember the exacts but due to this the yankees would have to make a better offer. And to the yankees as I said in the large 1st response kilby warren and Dominguez are all sort of blocked for playing time by bellinger (when resigned and Spencer jones) (will warren by trading for Peralta (Cole fried, rodon Peralta, gil schlitter) and dax kilby is blocked by George lombard

        Reply
    • rocky7

      16 hours ago

      Way too heavy a trade haul to Mil. for a 1 year rental….now if he’s willing to sign an extension which guaranteed he won’t……no go for the Yankees….

      Reply
  27. eyeball987

    1 day ago

    A trade like that for the Braves might see Waldrep going the other way.

    1
    Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      1 day ago

      The Yankees need to trade Jones or Dominez in a package for Kwan. Yankees need a lead off hitter. Jones, Gil, and others for Kwan. Forget Bellinger. Go get Kwan.

      Reply
      • Dmac13

        9 hours ago

        Kwan is a nice player but I’d rather bellinger at yankee stadium. To start the year for new york I would see what Caballero can do in the lead off spot. He really has never hit high in a lineup but has hit well in a small sample size in new york and he can run.

        1
        Reply
  28. OleSpaghettiNips

    23 hours ago

    If the Braves trade Ritchie, they are dead to me

    3
    Reply
    • NashvilleJeff

      23 hours ago

      Especially if they trade him (and more) for a pitcher w/one year of control.

      2
      Reply
  29. Marc L

    23 hours ago

    Any superstar who goes to the Dodgers is a coward. How About being the guy that helps the team beat the Dodgers. I’m a huge baseball fan, but I will never watch the Dodgers game unless they’re playing the Phillies, which is my team.

    2
    Reply
    • Steinbrenner2728

      23 hours ago

      Perhaps focusing more on your Phillies instead of the Dodgers is the way to go.

      4
      Reply
    • diphthong

      22 hours ago

      A pity. You missed quite a World Series.

      1
      Reply
    • BannedMarlinsFanBase

      6 hours ago

      If the Dodgers three-peat this year, it will be good for baseball. As a Marlins fan, I’d love to see that image going into the lockout as MLB ownership prepare to do the Dog&Pony Show to pretend they tried to get a Cap&Floor system, but couldn’t. Good luck selling that to the fans of 2/3rds of MLB’s markets after they see the Super Dodgers win a third straight title, and you come away without a Cap&Floor system.

      Again, good for baseball if the Dodgers three-peat.

      Reply
  30. WillisVonGillis

    20 hours ago

    I think this article makes a great case for the Brewers keeping him. Unless they get blown away with an offer.

    1
    Reply
  31. BigV

    17 hours ago

    Show interest has been mentioned

    Reply
  32. Atloriolesfan

    17 hours ago

    I’m amazed that the Orioles are only mentioned in passing. Unless you assume that they are either finished with starters or are going to sign Valdez or Ranger, they should be the Peralta favorite.

    NO CBT PENALTY. Very high QO comp (drove their Burnes strategy. Still plenty of trade assets. Sign Framber. Offer Mayo plus Kremer or Povich and a prospect for Peralta. Rotation of Framber, Peralta, Bradish, Rogers and Baz with plenty of depth. And leave the Yankees and Bosox in the dust. Because they have lost no one relevant to 2026.

    Reply
  33. YellowCleats

    16 hours ago

    Milwaukee should trade Peralta for a massive haul by engineering a trade and signing of extension. Milwaukee will lose Peralta to free agency anyway so they should cash in now and set up their present and future

    1
    Reply
    • Dmac13

      9 hours ago

      I agree Peralta is gone, once the season starts talks will end he will get to free agency unless traded for a minor leaguers at the deadline if the brewers are out. I said earlier Peralta to NYY for will warren, jason Dominguez, dax kilby and Cunningham. That’s a haul in my opinion and the yankees would need a extension in place

      Reply
  34. bean54446

    15 hours ago

    If sterns would actually want to trade he could get Freddy easily but only thing he wants to trade is vientos robbinson and Sanga the brewers want nothing to do with them.

    Reply
  35. JimOToole

    14 hours ago

    The Brewers typically pounce when a potential trade partner runs into a positional overload. Their own overriding need is slugging. So, if the Yankees were to acquire Bo Bichette as primarily a second baseman, I could envision the Brewers trading Peralta for Jazz Chisholm. Chisholm has the versatility and foot speed the Brewers like, and his 30-home run potential would fill an immediate need.

    Reply
    • MRSHOWTIME

      7 hours ago

      It would take more then just Jazz as he also only controlled for a year

      1
      Reply
  36. JimOToole

    13 hours ago

    The Yankees acquire Bo Bichette and trade Jazz Chisholm to a power-hungry Milwaukee team. for Peralta.

    Reply
  37. cheesemanforever

    12 hours ago

    Brewers aren’t going to trade a player with one year of control for another player with one year of control. It’s just not how they have built a sustainable model. Players like Priester and Zerpa (to name two recent examples) are under team control for years.

    1
    Reply
    • einsteinhood

      8 hours ago

      Well, they did get 1 year of Nestor Cortes back for one year of Devin Williams, and I think that was an important part of the return they were seeking to lengthen their rotation depth. Of course, they also got Caleb Durbin, which ended up being the much more critical part of the return.

      They might get back a player on an expiring contract for Peralta, but you can also bet that a younger player(s) with lots of control will also be part of the deal.

      Reply
  38. Logic 101

    11 hours ago

    A point that the article made, maybe a bit too obliquely, was that if the Brewers trade Freddy, they’re losing a year of Freddy AND the end of the first round draft pick they’ll be awarded when he moves on.
    It will take a large haul to cover both of those losses.

    1
    Reply
    • einsteinhood

      8 hours ago

      That was the same sitaution they were in with Burnes and they made that work just fine. And Burnes salary was twice what Peralta is making.

      It will require more in return, but it’s not going to break any deals.

      Reply
  39. BannedMarlinsFanBase

    6 hours ago

    Ahhh, and the clickbait continues…now with Peralta.

    I’ll see if I actually read any of the stupid trade suggestions that people have made that make zero sense for the Brewers.

    Afterall, we know that when “writers” create clickbait to cover a slow news period, that means that the team whose player every mentioned team is “interested in” or “discussing”, is willing to trade that player for pieces that make no sense for them because that team is in the business of making the other team better – not themselves.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Blue Jays Continuing To Pursue Kyle Tucker

    Angels Sign Kirby Yates

    Dodgers, Braves Among Teams To Show Interest In Freddy Peralta

    Join The Beta Test For The New Trade Rumors iPhone App

    Athletics Sign Tyler Soderstrom To Seven-Year Extension

    Giants Sign Tyler Mahle

    Royals Extend Matt Quatraro

    Blue Jays Sign Kazuma Okamoto

    Kona Takahashi To Return To NPB For 2026 Season

    Astros Sign Tatsuya Imai

    Yankees Have Reportedly Made Offer To Cody Bellinger

    Cubs Sign Hunter Harvey

    Angels, Anthony Rendon Restructure Contract; Rendon Will Not Return To Team

    Hazen: Ketel Marte Trade Talks Won’t Last All Offseason

    Orioles Re-Sign Zach Eflin

    Marlins Sign Pete Fairbanks

    Pirates To Sign Ryan O’Hearn

    White Sox Sign Sean Newcomb

    Athletics Acquire Jeff McNeil

    Mets Sign Luke Weaver

    Recent

    The Best Fits For A Ketel Marte Trade

    Astros, Christian Roa Agree To Minor League Deal

    Bregman Rumors: Red Sox, D-Backs, Tigers, Cubs

    Tigers, Dugan Darnell Agree To Minor League Deal

    Blue Jays Continuing To Pursue Kyle Tucker

    Angels Sign Kirby Yates

    Phillies To Sign Tucker Davidson To Minor League Deal

    Giants Designate Justin Dean For Assignment

    Rockies Interested In Veteran Rotation Additions

    Astros Notes: Valdez, CBT, Infield, Brown

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version