Headlines

  • Royals Extend Matt Quatraro
  • Blue Jays Sign Kazuma Okamoto
  • Kona Takahashi To Return To NPB For 2026 Season
  • Astros Sign Tatsuya Imai
  • Yankees Have Reportedly Made Offer To Cody Bellinger
  • Giants To Sign Tyler Mahle
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Red Sox Have Made “Aggressive” Offer To Alex Bregman

By Nick Deeds | January 4, 2026 at 12:16pm CDT

While the Red Sox have spent most of the offseason focused on the trade market to augment their roster, they now appear to be turning their attention towards free agency. ESPN’s Buster Olney reported in an appearance on an episode of the podcast “First Up with Korolnek and Colaiacovo” (audio link courtesy of Foul Territory’s Robbie Hyde) that the Red Sox made an “aggressive” offer to Bregman before speculating that Bregman will ultimately return to Boston.

The market for position players has been fairly quiet since Kyle Schwarber and Pete Alonso signed during the Winter Meetings last month. While third baseman Kazuma Okamoto’s free agency wrapped up yesterday when he signed with the Blue Jays on a four-year deal, Bregman remains the top dog available at the position ahead of Eugenio Suarez, Ramon Urias, and Yoan Moncada. The best overall infield talent available this winter aside from Bo Bichette, Bregman lingered on the free agent market last offseason before signing a three-year, $120MM contract with Boston that included multiple opt outs and significant deferred money. That deal worked out quite well for both sides, as Bregman turned in a 125 wRC+ and 3.5 WAR in 118 games before returning to the open market this winter.

With that said, he’s once again struggled to find a market for the sort of long-term deal he’s been seeking. Boston has been known to have interest in a reunion, but there have been indications that the Red Sox are reluctant to go long-term on him (or any other free agent, for that matter). They’ve kicked the tires on plenty of alternative options this winter, ranging from trades for infield talents like Ketel Marte, Brendan Donovan, and Isaac Paredes to pivoting towards another player like Okamoto or Bichette in free agency. At this point, however, Okamoto is off the market and Marte appears unlikely to be dealt.

Perhaps the dwindling alternatives have led Boston to step up their pursuit of a Bregman reunion, though it should be noted that an “aggressive” offer does not necessarily mean a long-term one. It could certainly be argued that the $40MM average annual value (which dropped to just under $32MM after factoring in deferred money) deal Bregman signed with the Red Sox last year was an “aggressive” offer thanks to the high annual salary and player-friendly opt out structure, and that deal maxed out at just three seasons. So, too, could the Tigers’ best offer to Bregman from last winter be called aggressive, as the six-year, $171.5MM offer topped the winning bid by more than $50MM in terms of total guarantee and was the longest of the final offers Bregman received.

Regardless of what Boston’s offer to Bregman currently looks like, it seems as though market forces may be pushing the two sides back together. As previously mentioned, a few of the Red Sox’s potential alternatives to Bregman have started to come off the market or otherwise become less likely. Meanwhile, Bregman’s own alternatives to Boston could also be dwindling. Just as Okamoto signing in Toronto takes him off the table for the Red Sox, Mitch Bannon of The Athletic reports that the deal makes Bregman signing with the Jays less likely despite mutual interest between the sides prior to Okamoto’s signing. Likewise, there have been connections drawn between Bregman and the Diamondbacks, but that could become less viable for Arizona to pull off financially if a Marte trade is taken off the table.

Even if the Jays and Diamondbacks aren’t the likeliest suitors at this point, other options are still available. The Cubs remain involved in Bregman’s market at least to some extent, though they (like the Red Sox) seem hesitant to commit to long-term deals for most players. The Tigers have seemingly remained on the periphery of Bregman’s market but don’t seem to be an especially aggressive suitor. The Phillies were recently reported to have at least some interest in Bichette and could theoretically fit Bregman as well, though they haven’t been tied to Bregman directly and even the Bichette connection seems to run in contrast with previous reporting suggesting that their room to spend is somewhat limited at this point.

Share Repost Send via email

Boston Red Sox Alex Bregman

Yankees Sign Paul DeJong To Minor League Deal
Main
Tigers Sign Scott Effross To Minor League Contract
View Comments (197)
Post a Comment

197 Comments

  1. O'sSayCanYouSee

    17 hours ago

    An aggressive offer? Was it a passive aggressive offer before?~

    18
    Reply
    • Larry D.

      17 hours ago

      Any thing the Cubs would offer.

      1
      Reply
    • Canuckleball

      17 hours ago

      I figure it was more like:

      “Here’s our offer. Take it, or we’ll have Liam and Finn pay you and your kneecaps a visit!”

      6
      Reply
    • LouWhitakerHOF

      17 hours ago

      “The #RedSox are offering Alex Bregman $160 million for 5 years, with a willingness to continue negotiating intelligently (options and incentives). Currently, it’s the most competitive offer…,” Pepen tweeted. The Sporting News

      8
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        17 hours ago

        I read that yesterday Lou. There is no way they offered $160m over 5 years and the deal is not done. This alleged offer seems more smoke than fire.

        5
        Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          16 hours ago

          They may be haggling about how much $ are deferred.

          7
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          16 hours ago

          All, it must be a huge difference and I still would prefer Bichette if the deal with Bregman is four or more years (assuming Bichette gets signed for six or less). Neither will provide the true power the club needs but Bergman’s leg injury worries me.

          3
          Reply
        • BurnerK

          15 hours ago

          It sounds like sounds like typical Boras cotton eyed Joe sheet.

          2
          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          15 hours ago

          All- I don’t believe the Sox have done too much with deferring money in contracts. That would be interesting if that is how they decide to handle big contracts now. $160 million for 5 years seems like a lot for Bregman and I am a fan of what he brings to the team.

          I do wonder if Bichette would be a better investment. I know both of them have some injury questions.

          You have a preference?

          3
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          15 hours ago

          Dewey- I agree with you….if that was the offer in Friday, hes signing that deal. I dint believe those are the parameters.
          I think whatever offer they made, the one that Olney not Pepan heard, is probably the one that Boras is shopping around.

          3
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          14 hours ago

          Uncle: It’s a good question. I don’t really have a strong preference between Bregman and Bichette. They will both likely be expensive and risky deals. Bichette is younger, but he seems to get hurt a lot. It would be nice to get Bregman on a 3 year deal if that is possible. If their asking prices are too ridiculous, maybe they swing a deal with St. Louis for Arenado who has 2 years/$27M left on his contract, but he is not a great hitter anymore. Looks like this is not an easy situation for the Red Sox to be in.

          foxsports.com/mlb/bo-bichette-player-injuries

          2
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          13 hours ago

          Agreed Sad.

          1
          Reply
        • yeah, sure!

          13 hours ago

          Bregman’s deal with the Red Sox last year had a lot of deferrals. Manny Ramirez, I believe, collects his last deferred payment from the team this year.

          The Devers contract also had $75mm deferred, too.

          1
          Reply
        • Sean P

          13 hours ago

          I’m fine with the extra year (or two). His offensive profile actually makes a fine DH. He can beef up and add some power when he moves off full time 3B.

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          12 hours ago

          Sean, if he tries to “beef up” more likely he tears a calf muscle. Too late given his leg history. Just too risky.

          Reply
      • slapnuts

        13 hours ago

        Pepe’s in a twitter hack

        1
        Reply
      • Web's #2

        11 hours ago

        I was listening to Pepen and it sounded like he was saying (my Spanish is spotty) that the offer was pretty much a done deal and that the Red Sox and Bregman were haggling over some incentives for games played and option years at the end of the deal. Maybe it was that the option year dollar amounts would be based on games played in the last couple of years. Did not quite catch that part.

        If he is back at 3B and with Contreras at 1B, that Boston team would be both tough and deep. An outfield with 4 guys any team would be happy with starting in their OF and an infield anchored by three All Stars and Mayer at 2B.

        3
        Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      17 hours ago

      Did the deal really work “quite well” for the Red Sox?

      They did not win the division or go to the WS. They have to start negotiations all over. They paid $32 million including present value of deferrals for one season of 3.5 WAR.

      General Market: In the 2024/2025 offseason, teams paid around $8 million per WAR in free agency.

      Calculation: 3.5 WAR x $8M/WAR = $28 Million

      Seems to me that Red Sox did “ok” with the deal rather than “quite well”.

      22
      Reply
      • Wilmer the Thrillmer

        17 hours ago

        I also thought $40mil for 3.5 WAR to be pretty meh.

        1
        Reply
        • Astros2017&22Champs

          17 hours ago

          He got hurt. It would of been 5-6 war. He’s prone to soft tissue stuff but he has healthy seasons too

          1
          Reply
        • Payne Train

          16 hours ago

          You need to put asterisk next to 2017

          9
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          15 hours ago

          Astros

          True, but due to the injury, they did not do “quite well”.

          1
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          15 hours ago

          Stros- I imagine youve seen his best years. I can tell you that last year was underwhelming.
          Not anything like a 6 WAR player for the Sox last year in a full season.

          1
          Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        17 hours ago

        I’d prefer Bichette as unless the win immediately, a deal with Bregman is likely to age badly.

        2
        Reply
        • acell10

          16 hours ago

          Bichette is obviously the better play for the Sox which is why its frustrating they haven’t closed the deal for him.

          1
          Reply
        • Poolhalljunkies

          16 hours ago

          To be fair what % of deals over 5 years age well for players 30+?..yet teams sign them every year. imo you sign them to win in the first 3 years understanding the back end is not optimal..or as we have seen recently with the sox..you dont sign them at all..

          2
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          16 hours ago

          Acell, Boston ownership no longer will set the market. They’ve become known to look for the undervalued players and would prefer to overpay short term if they can’t get what they perceive as the right deal. Sometimes the strategy works but more often than not, Boston and their fans end up bridesmaids than the bride or even the maid of honor. While we accept that teams can’t always win, we shouldn’t accept ownership using fans provided profits elsewhere.

          Reply
        • acell10

          15 hours ago

          Dewey: it should be player specific though. I’m totally fine with them being bridesmaids for players north of 30 like bregman, alsono, and Schwarber asking for big bucks. I get why they had a limit on Fried and understood why they didn’t extend themselves. Bichette is a diiffernt situation given his age and skillset.

          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          14 hours ago

          Dewey- If they end up giving Bregman $160 million for 5 years they would be topping some of the bigger deals this offseason (Alonso and Schwarber). At least Bregman can still provide decent defense in the field, but it is more than I expected them to pay out for him.

          If I remember correctly Bichette is not the strongest defender but he has youth and potentially even greater offensive upside. The Bichette rumors with the Sox have not sounded very serious so I don’t know if they are even really interested.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          13 hours ago

          Acell, Bichette is different given his age but Alonso was the one to make the exception for. He’s shown no signs of slowing down and he stays healthy.

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          13 hours ago

          Uncle. Bichette is brutal at short but would go to second or less likely, third. Depending on other offers, I see ownership not getting anyone big. They have no reason to spend beyond their comfort zone given Fenway is a “destination”.

          1
          Reply
        • acell10

          13 hours ago

          Dewey: his own team the mets didn’t make a strong offer to him two years in a row plus he’s a liability at 1B. I’d rather sign the younger player who is the better hitter in Bichette who should be able to transition to 2B vs a 31 year old alonso limited to DH.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          11 hours ago

          Acell, living in NY, I saw a lot of Alonso. While he can’t make that toss to the pitcher covering first, his other first base attributes are fine although not gold glove caliber. You put a defensive second baseman (like Pedey was) out there and you simply train him to not roam towards second and just cover the bag and Alonso would be fine.

          Reply
        • acell10

          11 hours ago

          that’s an optimistic assessment and not for nothing, the Mets traded for that type of 2B and still let him walk.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          10 hours ago

          Acell- the new school highly analytical POBO (GM) doesn’t believe in the value of a slugging first baseman, with Stearns leading the charge.Ridiculous but true. In fact, the Brewers haven’t had a year where the first base position exceed 1 WAR since 2019.
          Stearns made every excuse not to sign a guy who played 162 games, hit 36 HRs and drove in over 129. It’s complete malpractice.

          Reply
        • acell10

          10 hours ago

          Sad: I think Alonso was an overpay by the Os so I’m not mad that the sox passed on him. call it malpratice if you want.

          1
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          10 hours ago

          Acell- the Mets are in some weird sort of transition. If they didnt want to pay, ok fine, the Sox missed their opportunity which was after the 2024 season and getting him on the cheap for less years.
          You can feed me metrics all day and night, if you can’t find a place for that amount of offense youre too busy reading spreadsheets to actually watch the games.
          Not every person is the same. Youre saying there’s no way this 31yo professional athlete, with no history of repetitive injuries, can’t perform at a high level for three more years?

          Reply
        • acell10

          9 hours ago

          Sad: I am skeptical of Alonso’s ability to continue to perform at that level and justify his contract given his age and lack of defensive ability. that money would be better suited signing someone like Bichette. Also if the sox “missed their chance” in 2024 so did every team in the majors.

          If Alonso signed for 3 years you’d have a point. He signed for five so that changes things.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          9 hours ago

          Acell- imagine this scenario….Alonso performs at a high level for the next two years (assuming there’s ball in 2027). And, during the next two years the Orioles win a world series. Do you honestly think they give a damn what his stats are in 2028 and 2030? The answer is no, they dont. If the Blue Jays win Wll they care about Dylan Cease, swing starter, in 2032?
          Look at G. Stanton, the Yankees continue to absorb that contract and those deflated stats year after year. Is that preventing them from signing other players? If they can do it, can’t the Sox?

          Reply
        • acell10

          8 hours ago

          Sad: Imagine this scenario….Alonso tunrs into Chris Davis 2.0, his production drops off a cliff and the Os win nothing. Your scenario and the one I laid out are equally as likely.

          Reply
      • TenYearsGone

        16 hours ago

        I think that the Sox also lost their second highest pick in the 2025 draft, plus $500,000.00 in draft pool money

        2
        Reply
        • acell10

          15 hours ago

          the got a lot back when they acquired a competitive balance pick in the first round. something they could easily do again.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          14 hours ago

          Ten – Boras played Breslow like a fiddle. If they sign Bregman for 5 more years it looks even sillier.
          Last year the Tigers offered 6yrs/$171m.
          Everyone in the F.O. was high-fiving each other thinking they were so smart to get Bregman on a low years high AAV contract.
          Well, if they sign this deal, thats 6yrs/$200mm, not so smart to pay $29m more than the next highest bidder, is it?!?!?!

          1
          Reply
        • Poolhalljunkies

          14 hours ago

          Is that you john henry?..if not sure sounds like he should hire you to protect his money

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          13 hours ago

          Poolhall- just the opposite, i want to spend more….for 5yrs and $150 i can’t believe we didnt sign Alonso or Schwarber.
          Id much rather have Suarez and another SP now than Bregman for 5yrs

          2
          Reply
        • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

          13 hours ago

          Sad- I don’t know that I have heard any rumors about the Sox being interested in Suarez, which I don’t understand. I agree 5 years for Bregman seems like too much.

          I would not be surprised to see another trade happen. Unless there is not enough interest it makes no sense not to move an outfielder in a trade for pitching.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          12 hours ago

          Uncle – if we did get Suarez we’d have about a 1/3 of the Venezuelan WBC team LOL….
          I have only seen that the Sox would be the fall-back’s fall-back for him. But, i’d be more interested in him 2/$46m than 5yrs of Bregman.

          Reply
      • rolder

        15 hours ago

        acting like 3.5WAR is disappointing.
        How many 3B do you think had a higher WAR last year?
        Did Devers have a higher or lower WAR last year?

        1
        Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          14 hours ago

          Rolder- WAR is a measurement, but its not the be all end all of what a player brings to the table.
          Devers absolutely destroys the Yankees. Ask Gerit Cole about it….dont think that Bregman’s higher WAR strike fear in the heart of opposing pitchers

          Reply
        • rolder

          13 hours ago

          OP used WAR. Curious, what available 3B or 2B should the Red Sox target that strike fear into the heart of opposing pitchers? Or should they be fine contending with what they have?

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          12 hours ago

          Rolder- I think Suarez’s 49 dingers is pretty fearsome….

          Reply
        • rolder

          11 hours ago

          SadSox – I hope if get your wish he can sustain that kind of power.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          11 hours ago

          Rolder- how far is he gonna fall in a season and playing at Fenway instead of in Seattle?

          Reply
        • rolder

          11 hours ago

          Sadsox – Dunno, guess that is the risk the FO has to assess. The sub .300OBP will be tough to eat if the power falls too much

          Reply
        • kingken67

          11 hours ago

          Devers had a higher WAR last year. Combined between Boston and SF his WAR was 4.1. In fact Devers was at or above 3.5 WAR every year from 2021 on. So no, Bregman’s 3.5 WAR was nothing all that special.

          Reply
        • rolder

          11 hours ago

          I was looking at FG WAR. But Bref WAR from ’21-’25- Bregman 19.2……Devers 19.4. – So they both have impressive WAR or they both have middling WAR

          1
          Reply
        • hitman32

          10 hours ago

          King…except that Devers was a “cancer” for the team when it comes to being a “team player”& his not willing to help. What makes Bregman a special player is that he does help younger players by encouraging them & he definitely is head over heels a much better defender than Devers has ever dreamt of being.

          1
          Reply
        • Poolhalljunkies

          9 hours ago

          I feel like Devers should have some war deducted for not being a team player and having a crappy attitude

          2
          Reply
        • acell10

          9 hours ago

          hitman: it’s nice that Bregman was a great leader but lets not overrate that either and his leadership skills don’t justify overpaying a 32 year old player that is clearly declining. Also Contreras is considered a great leader and mentor too so whatever leadership void lost by Bregman should be filed by Contraras.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          9 hours ago

          Pool hall- can’t believe that Devers is still front of mind for everyone, but how come he was a great teammate, always smiling, and ultimate Red Sox until the front office and Cora lied to him and then embarrassed him, then he wasnt?

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          7 hours ago

          Red Sox should get Ketel Marte for Tolle and a second player, Early, Casas or Campbell.

          1
          Reply
      • yeah, sure!

        13 hours ago

        They didn’t win the division or WS, but improved over the previous season, even with losing their biggest slugger midseason.

        Bregman provided some needed leadership to a very young team. The dollar value is very much just ok, but his contribution as a teammate was pretty important last year. I think that’s enough to be “quite well” for some.

        3
        Reply
        • rolder

          13 hours ago

          Fair take. Bregman is underrated. Not because he should be considered a superstar but because he is not as middling as many claim.

          2
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          12 hours ago

          Sure!- I have to tell you, the Sox publicity machine worked overtime on that “leadership” angle….yes, he bought a couple of rookies some suits, and he seemed to take to Roman Anthony. But, when he was struggling in August and September the players all talked about Story as team leader.
          A “glue” player is a good thing to have, but, not at this price.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          12 hours ago

          Rolder – if hes not a superstar, then he shouldn’t get superstar money.
          I’d like him much better at 4/$108m. But, Boras has Breslow on the hook and is doing the slow reel-in

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          11 hours ago

          Yeah, don’t forget Story was healthy and as much of a leader as Bregman was.

          Reply
      • WCSoxFan

        12 hours ago

        @MLB Top

        Not sure what projection system you’re using here (your statement doesn’t mean anything without this context) but teams pay far more per year for short term contracts than long term contracts and pay less for players in their mid 30s due to a faster expected regression of ability.

        The Red Sox were quite happy with the deal for Bregman in hindsight as 3.5 WAR for 31.4mil from a single player on the open market for a single season is quite good. The risk associated with longer deals would reduce the $/WAR expectation.

        2
        Reply
      • Web's #2

        8 hours ago

        A point of bWAR in the free agent market was worth just a bit more than $10 million in the 2024-2025 offseason. $3.5 WAR x $10 million = $35 million according to Baseball Reference list of 2024 free agents.

        If you used that article by Paraball as your source, realize that they did their calculation on December 26th. Long before Bregman, Burnes, Alonso, and most free agents signed. Nor did they include guarantees such as option years and buy outs in the contract amounts and for all players with deferrals they used CBT AAV instead of how much the player would earn in 2025. For players that signed split or MiLB contracts, they only used the minor league portion of the deal, not what the player made in the majors. They also used the 2024 WAR figures for players that didn’t sign a contract or play in 2025.

        If you use fWAR it was $9,918,770 per fWAR.

        The Red Sox increased ticket sales from 2024 to 2025 by 1439 per game or a 4.4% increase. That is one heck of a lot of money considering prices at Fenway. I think average ticket price is around $96 dollars and that doesn’t include drinks and food. At least part of that is attributable to them signing Bregman in February.

        The Red Sox made the playoffs for the first time since 2021.

        I think all in all you could say it worked out quite well for the Red Sox.

        4
        Reply
    • DarkSide830

      16 hours ago

      The infamous submissive offer.

      1
      Reply
  2. Ranger 7

    17 hours ago

    Aggression is never the answer. My Chinese uncle recently found a banana in his mouth.

    4
    Reply
    • Sean P

      13 hours ago

      Favorite post of 2026 thus far.

      Reply
  3. Salzilla

    17 hours ago

    Ok Bregman and Bellinger, y’all got your offers, now take em so these two respective teams can move on with their offseasons. Sox are obviously further along and might be done after Bregman.

    6
    Reply
    • kingken67

      15 hours ago

      I hope Breslow was smart enough to put a deadline on that “aggressive” offer. I’d have said “This is our offer and you have until 6pm today to decide on it or we’re moving on to other players. We’re not going to be held hostage. If we work out something elsewhere while you’re ‘deciding’ you may miss out.”

      7
      Reply
      • Salzilla

        14 hours ago

        Honestly wish more GMs would work this way. At some point they need to realize they are in control, not the players.

        Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          13 hours ago

          There was most likely never the reported offer, just more BS to try to generate interest.

          1
          Reply
        • Salzilla

          13 hours ago

          I believe.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          13 hours ago

          I’d bet real money that this is exactly how they work. No one makes an offer that’s open indefinitely.

          1
          Reply
  4. PandaMan

    17 hours ago

    I think he goes back to Boston in the end. Both sides like each other and they’ll settle on a contract eventually. My guess is 4-5 years with an aav around 30-35 million.

    Reply
    • Frenchredsox

      13 hours ago

      If he liked Boston so much he wouldn’t have opted out. No he like the money and money alone. Do I blame him for that ? As a person , no it’s his right to maximise his pay day, as a fan there is a thing called loyalty and team spirit -of which he has shown neither concerning the Sox.

      2
      Reply
  5. Another Dodgers Fan

    17 hours ago

    Why is Breslow yelling his offer at my agent? So aggressive.

    4
    Reply
    • GaryRedSoxxWarriors

      17 hours ago

      The agent, Scott Boras, is hard of hearing this time of year.

      8
      Reply
  6. Joemo

    17 hours ago

    I hope it’s not over 30MM AAV, regardless of length. And if he gets a better deal elsewhere, so be it.

    6
    Reply
    • Pedro Martinez’s Mango Tree

      17 hours ago

      Don’t start crying when they miss the playoffs annually again

      2
      Reply
      • Joemo

        17 hours ago

        Having all that money tied up in an aging Bregman isn’t going to help them become playoff favorites. The resources are better spent elsewhere.

        They had Bregman last year, were favorites to win the AL pennant, limped into the wild card and got embarrassed by the Yankees.

        4
        Reply
        • Pedro Martinez’s Mango Tree

          16 hours ago

          They were not favorites to win the AL pennant last year

          2
          Reply
        • Joemo

          16 hours ago

          Yes, yes they were. By many industry experts.

          mlb.com/news/2025-mlb-predictions-world-series-cha…

          cbssports.com/mlb/news/2025-mlb-standings-predicti…

          espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/44389786/mlb-2025-predicti…

          And the list goes on and on and on.

          4
          Reply
        • baseballguru

          16 hours ago

          We tore the Yankees apart all year of 3 game set with the injuries that Boston endured this year is just baseball. A fully healthy Red Sox squad the way they intended will rip apart New York just like last year. Just like the last 21 years. We own New York for the foreseeable future. Not that everyone else doesn’t also…

          4
          Reply
        • Pedro Martinez’s Mango Tree

          16 hours ago

          And the Yankees were fully healthy all year, too, huh?

          Reply
        • Pedro Martinez’s Mango Tree

          16 hours ago

          Gee you mean to tell me that people who make their money when you lose yours were telling you a team with a paper-thin pitching staff were going to the World Series?? How about that?!

          1
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          15 hours ago

          Most predictions are wrong. Only about 3% of sports bettors are profitable over time.

          4
          Reply
        • william-2

          14 hours ago

          Having the Red Sox be favorites for a pennant last year was some drunks delusion. I picked them to be about 2 to maybe 4 games over .500 and possibly still 4th place. They over performed for that rotation and middling top heavy lineup with not much power. A couple of teams did bad enough for them to get third and Toronto did slightly better than expected in season. The Yankees and Toronto were better teams going into the season and were throughout the season. I did not expect the o’s lineup to perform poorly and it had to take another step up to make up for an average rotation. The O’s wasted last year during that off season.

          1
          Reply
        • Sean P

          13 hours ago

          Vegas establishes the favorites. Not writers.

          3
          Reply
        • Web's #2

          8 hours ago

          The Red Sox are a playoff favorite at 87.5 wins O/U without Bregman. He would make them more of one.

          1
          Reply
        • william-2

          3 hours ago

          This season. We were talking about last season with that crazy prediction.

          The Red Sox have two major moves left in them if they are going in. They still have the trade option we all anticipated for a pitcher on the table and a major signing. I think they may also add a lefty reliever at some point if that trade doesn’t happen. They have to be looking at at least 1 or both young pitchers as viable relief options with Harrison being starting depth.

          Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

        14 hours ago

        Pedro – not sure if you mean that Bregman was the reason they made the playoffs.

        Crochet is the difference between making the playoffs, or not making the playoffs. Lets not overreach on what Bregman brought to the team last year

        Reply
  7. BaseballBrian

    17 hours ago

    Settle down. Beavis. Uh huh huh huh.

    1
    Reply
  8. Goose

    17 hours ago

    Red Sox made an ‘aggressive offer’? I wonder which team he is signing with by the end of the day.

    When I saw Toronto sign Kazuma Okamoto for a very friendly contract I knew the are going with Mayer. They don’t want to spend any money.

    Something is seriously not right in baseball right now. Red Sox and Yankees are acting like the Rays. Blue Jays and Dodgers are acting like big market teams usually act.

    4
    Reply
    • GaryRedSoxxWarriors

      17 hours ago

      Going with Mayer? Yeah at second base.

      4
      Reply
      • stymeedone

        17 hours ago

        What to do with Campbell then? They signed him long term.

        2
        Reply
        • GaryRedSoxxWarriors

          16 hours ago

          They’ll probably have to trade Campbell. Hopefully when his bat comes alive, his value will be back.

          There’s really no room on the Red Sox roster right now, and also for the foreseeable future.

          It didn’t work out for him in AAA at first base and I think he’s taking reps in the outfield in the minors. But hopefully they can find a taker for that bat.

          2
          Reply
        • baseballguru

          16 hours ago

          OF or trade…team friendly deal.

          2
          Reply
        • MuleorAstroMule

          14 hours ago

          No team is gambling $60M on a positionless player who the Red Sox don’t even believe in.

          Reply
        • william-2

          14 hours ago

          Campbell is going to be a mess by the time they are done with him. They already have him working his 4th position and are only asking him to change his swing, and approach. Not sure if they will give him a new name also for the guy they are creating. Not saying it won’t work, but this is a lot to ask for a guy that should have been working on becoming better at fielding HIS OWN position, and working on plate discipline and any holes pitchers discovered. Generally you want to make a guy good at what he does, not mediocre at a few things.

          1
          Reply
  9. Lefty_Orioles_Fan

    17 hours ago

    Yeah….but have they made him an offer he can’t refuse?

    3
    Reply
    • GaryRedSoxxWarriors

      17 hours ago

      I guess not yet. This is probably the exact same deal he took last year. Three years 120 with opt outs.

      What he probably wants is that Tigers offer that’s $50 million more.

      2
      Reply
      • Another Dodgers Fan

        17 hours ago

        Apparently the offer is 5/$160m

        3
        Reply
        • Astros71

          17 hours ago

          Why is it not in the article?

          1
          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          17 hours ago

          It was tweeted by Pepen in the sporting news

          2
          Reply
        • acell10

          16 hours ago

          Pepin isn’t a reliable source

          3
          Reply
        • spooky

          16 hours ago

          Exactly why it isn’t quoted, it came from a non reliable source. The sporting news hasn’t been relevant in years. Just a click bait site that used to be a great magazine

          5
          Reply
        • baseballguru

          16 hours ago

          It’s amazing how many people cannot read

          1
          Reply
        • 'Tang It

          15 hours ago

          That would be horrible for Boston. And if they offer that and say they didn’t want to go long term for Alonso, they are just morons.

          1
          Reply
  10. ClevelandSteelEngines

    17 hours ago

    This rumor has been around all week and finally gets posted? And after the Okamoto signing, too.

    Reply
  11. CardsnWolves

    17 hours ago

    Could this be Boston’s last attempt to move the needle w Bregman, and if it falls short, they have a deal with the Cardinals that involves Arenado and Donovan set to go?

    1
    Reply
    • Astros71

      17 hours ago

      I think Arenado goes to the Angels, and Paredes is the backup plan for the Red Sox last I heard, not Donovan.

      2
      Reply
      • Bruin1012

        15 hours ago

        The Astros want to much for Paredes. I think Boston has moved on from him unless Houston comes off its reported asking price of one of Early or Tolle. Only way Early or Tolle go is if Ketel Marte is coming to Boston not Paredes.

        3
        Reply
        • acell10

          15 hours ago

          and the sox aren’t trading either of those two for Marte eiter.

          Reply
        • 'Tang It

          15 hours ago

          I would do Tolle straight up for paredes

          Reply
        • acell10

          14 hours ago

          I would not trade Tolle for Paredes.

          4
          Reply
        • 'Tang It

          14 hours ago

          I definitely would paredes fills a need and is still pretty young. Tolle is bound for a bullpen role in my opinion.

          Reply
        • Pedro Martinez’s Mango Tree

          3 hours ago

          They’ll need a closer when Chapman is done

          Reply
  12. brinxsoxcelts

    17 hours ago

    Any over 3 Years Guaranteed would be ridiculous

    3
    Reply
    • Astros71

      17 hours ago

      Looking back at it, Bregman probably should’ve accepted the 6 year, 156 million from the Astros.

      2
      Reply
  13. LFGMets (Metsin7) #BannedAgain&Again&AgainFireStearns

    17 hours ago

    Bregman is a slightly above average thirdbasemen that stays out a lot. He is on the wrong side of 30. Any team that signs him will regret it within a year. Since he won’t have to play for a new contract, he is going to take it easy. Once a dog always a dog

    1
    Reply
    • rememberthecoop

      17 hours ago

      But he runs the clubhouse so well…

      Reply
    • GhostofThomasHamilton

      14 hours ago

      You’ have a slightly below average baseball mind.

      Reply
  14. Pedro Martinez’s Mango Tree

    17 hours ago

    An “aggressive” offer that hasn’t been accepted multiple days later. Sounds about right…

    Reply
  15. mike156

    17 hours ago

    Bregman is very good, but he’s going to be paid a great deal of money on a &PerWAR ratio. What’s be going to look like in year three–his year Age 34 season? How much will he play in 2027, with a possible lock out? How many years are you buying?

    Reply
  16. cplwhite

    17 hours ago

    Aggressive when dealing with BORAS AND HIS MEDIA simply means
    NOBODY ELSE MADE AN OFFER THIS WEEKEND.

    4
    Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      17 hours ago

      cplwhite made an aggressive post on Mlbtr…

      1
      Reply
  17. Astros2017&22Champs

    17 hours ago

    He’s a tremendous player. Incredible teammate. Boston needs him badly. But im with Boston fans here. Im not going above 5-150 for him

    1
    Reply
    • Therealeman

      17 hours ago

      Incredible? Are you stuck in 2019?

      1
      Reply
    • jimmy_dugans_tears

      15 hours ago

      I would offer 3 years 90 million or 4 years 110

      Reply
  18. The Gambler

    17 hours ago

    Sign Bo Bichette Cubs and move on

    2
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      13 hours ago

      Where would Bo play for the Cubs?

      Reply
  19. Quinnap89

    17 hours ago

    Couple days late on this report. Rare that Olney beats MLBTR….just sign the deal already and stop with this saga. 2 years, same teams interested and no one still willing to over what they offering last year. Everyone knows he’s going back to the Sox, let’s just get on with this

    Reply
  20. Well Hung

    17 hours ago

    4 years 120 million would be best realistic offer, but sometimes people overspend

    1
    Reply
    • Heels On The Field

      14 hours ago

      Then the Pirates should sign Bregman.

      Reply
  21. Therealeman

    17 hours ago

    5 years, $150 million for a declining, injury prone player who put up a pedestrian.273, 16 home runs and 62 RBI last year. Insane overpay. Hasn’t been elite since 2020. The contract will be bad in year one and unforgivable in years 3-5.

    5
    Reply
  22. DirtyWater04

    17 hours ago

    Let me guess, they added a third year and a Dunkins gift card ($11.27 of original $25 balance remaining) to their previous offer?

    Reply
  23. Charles B

    16 hours ago

    I’m surprised Boras didn’t come up with some Christmas poetry: “Boston fans want some Bregnog while they see what’s in their Red Sox on Christmas morning.” What a choad.

    1
    Reply
  24. Simm

    16 hours ago

    Aggressive offer, hasn’t signed. Maybe he doesn’t want to go back there.

    Or the reported aggressive offer isn’t all that aggressive.

    Reply
    • acell10

      16 hours ago

      hopefully the later for the Sox sake.

      2
      Reply
    • 'Tang It

      15 hours ago

      Or maybe him and boras are just delusional hoping someone will pony up

      Reply
      • jimmy_dugans_tears

        14 hours ago

        It wasn’t a high offer but they shot it at him out of a cannon

        1
        Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      12 hours ago

      Simm – imo its a baseline offer that Boras is shopping

      Reply
  25. RickEO

    16 hours ago

    Sign already

    Reply
  26. DavRozNYY

    16 hours ago

    Agree, this slow off season has been so boring.

    Reply
    • Avory

      14 hours ago

      Time to take your ritalin, evidently.

      Reply
      • DavRozNYY

        14 hours ago

        Such a stupid comment

        Reply
        • Avory

          14 hours ago

          You’re absolutely right, it was.

          Reply
  27. stymeedone

    16 hours ago

    The Okamoto signing doesn’t make it less likely that Toronto will sign him. It takes them off the board. Due to the number of large contracts already signed by large market teams, its no longer just market size that determines which teams are interested. Its how much budget remains. It’s not that a team like San Diego isn’t spending. It’s that they already spent to their limit. Atlanta isn’t being cheap. Budget remaining is limited. Same with Milwaukee, Cleveland, and Tampa Bay. Detroit, Sacramento, and Pittsburgh could surprise with some unexpected signings. Colorado might be the only option late for unsigned pitchers.
    As to Bregman, only a few teams were.interested at his asking price/years. That number is dwindling. I expect Cubs and Detroit to be prioritizing pitching first. Seattle can’t afford him unless his price drops. Angels are unlikely to get caught in another Rendon contract. They would want short term.

    3
    Reply
  28. FrankleFarkle

    16 hours ago

    They’re better off without Bregman. He is not worth the money. He’s a very mid to lower mid-tier player who is only going to get worse. He ended the season still hurt. I’d rather them throw an old man or a kid out on third than waste money on a mediocre third baseman. There’s going to be a lockout in 2027. They’re clearly not spending to win it all next year. Just save the freaking money and finish last next year instead of finishing third again. It’s pathetic and it’s stupid.

    Reply
  29. Thec’s

    16 hours ago

    I don’t believe that he was offered 5 years/160 contract by the Sox! If they did he would have been signed. Go after Bo Bichette 4 years younger. This is Breslow trying to take heat off him. He has made two or three trades where he got ripped off! Breslow is a joke and will be fired after this year. No one likes him!

    1
    Reply
    • GaryRedSoxxWarriors

      16 hours ago

      No one? I love him. I think he’s been fantastic.

      3
      Reply
    • Bruin1012

      16 hours ago

      Since Breslow has taken over the pitching in the system has taken a complete u turn. Arguably the Red Sox since Breslow has taken over have created the deepest starting pitching in baseball. He’s created a pitching factory. It would be incredibly ignorant to get rid of Breslow after this season but thankfully Thec you’re not in charge so next to no chance of that happening.

      6
      Reply
      • 'Tang It

        15 hours ago

        Bloom drafted a lot of that pitching. Just saying. They both suck

        Reply
    • 'Tang It

      15 hours ago

      I don’t like what they’ve done this off season because it’s been underwhelming and it doesn’t move the needle. However, the moves they made were fine in a vacuum. No one’s going to cry over what we gave up.

      Reply
  30. bcjd

    16 hours ago

    Alex Bret,an is the same age now that Bill Mueller was in 2002 when he signed with Boston. Mueller had 13.8 bWAR at at 31 to Bregman’s 43.1. Mueller went on to win the Silver Slugger with the Sox in 2003 and was a key part of the 2004 championship team.

    The Sox can win with Bregman on the roster for the next 3-5 years. But not if that precludes them from going out and signing a #2 starter.

    3
    Reply
    • bcjd

      16 hours ago

      And FWIW, at age 31 Mike Lowell had a 14.3 bWAR, and he won the WS MVP with the Sox the next year.

      3
      Reply
    • yeah, sure!

      13 hours ago

      Which of Valdez or Suarez is it, then?

      I wouldn’t hold my breath for them to sign a free agent starting pitcher to any kind of significant money. They’ve improved their rotation, even if it feels really underwhelming.

      Price, Lackey, and Matsuzaka are the shortlist of major FA starting pitchers the Red Sox have invested in. This organization does not give out big contracts to free agent starting pitchers, trade for & extend them.

      They aren’t going to sign a #2, that person is Sonny Gray. A perfectly cromulent option!

      Reply
  31. 30 Parks

    16 hours ago

    Bregman brings identity & leadership to Boston. His contributions go well beyond the field. Sign Bregman.

    2
    Reply
    • Motor City Beach Bum

      16 hours ago

      Hope they sign him so the Tigers will not be tempted to.

      1
      Reply
  32. baseballguru

    16 hours ago

    Sign Bregman & Bichette let Mayer utility until Story leaves in 28.

    1
    Reply
  33. baseballguru

    16 hours ago

    If they don’t sign Bregman they will sign Bichette but hoping both

    Reply
  34. Poolhalljunkies

    15 hours ago

    Its interesting this was reported by buster olney Friday but doesn’t show up on mlbtr with much more than what Olney described 2 days later.

    Reply
  35. TheFuzzofKing

    15 hours ago

    Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

    Reply
  36. Shadowpartner

    15 hours ago

    Aggressive. Hmmmm. Are they going to fight him and make him sign?

    Reply
  37. Bruin1012

    15 hours ago

    Bregman fits so well imo he’s likely to be a 3 to 5 war player at least for the next 3 seasons. So what if you overpay for a the last two seasons. The Red Sox have so much pitching in the minor leagues and I mean impact pitching they should easily be able to overpay for a couple of years of Bregman. He slides right into that two hole behind Anthony. It’s just the nature of the free agent market he fits well for the next 3 years but you might have to overpay in the last two this what big market should do.

    4
    Reply
    • Avory

      14 hours ago

      Yep, that’s what we small revenue teams rely upon, big markets wasting money on the back end of these ridiculous contracts “because it’s what you have to do.”

      Hilarious. In what other business do you overpay for past performance to begin with but ALSO build in the expectation that the contract will produce nothing in the last couple of years? Dumbest thing I ever heard.

      But please, by all means, keep up the good work. We appreciate it and so do the big time player agents.

      1
      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        13 hours ago

        In what other business do you overpay for past performance to begin with but ALSO build in the expectation that the contract will produce nothing in the last couple of years?
        ==================
        A lot of business buy machinery that they know will be fairly worthless in the final couple of years It’s the reason why you have double-declining depreciation for some items. Some of the biggest contracts in BB are for players that might not be in the league in the last year or two.

        Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          12 hours ago

          Joe – soooooo right. If you win even one world series the last years pay for themselves!!

          Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

        12 hours ago

        Avory- thats why we’re celebrating all those Tampa Rays and Milwaukee Brewers championships, right?!?!
        You must have star players to win championships in any sport

        Reply
        • Avory

          9 hours ago

          @Joe Brady

          Ignorant defense…if the machinery doesn’t work, you have a warranty. You are getting guaranteed production. You have no idea what you’re getting when you sign ballplayers, but yet you’re willing to assume the last few years are dead money AND pay them like they are going to put up numbers they did years ago?

          Puh-leeze, spare me the lesson in economics. You’re just a defender of the right of big market teams to do stupid things because they can, not because it makes any sense.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          9 hours ago

          Avory- you act as if NO free agents signings have ever worked out. Is it a roll of the dice, yes, and its probably 50/50, but every signing isn’t Anthony Rendon.
          You have to have stars to win championships. Thats just the way it is, sorry.
          Andrew Friedman famously said, so.etimea in free agency you have to act irrationally.

          Reply
        • Avory

          8 hours ago

          @Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          Of COURSE we’d get a braindead response like this one from a big market fan who feels it’s his birthright to get players like Skenes one day.

          Rather than consider the embarrassment of teams like the Phillies or Yankees or Mets or Cubs or Padres or Angels who spend hundreds of millions and win championships at an embarrassingly small rate (if at all), you choose to diminish the accomplishments of teams who do amazing things despite incredible institutional disadvantages. But yeah, go ahead, carry water for the right of your team to do run huge payrolls, do stupid things, and still consistently underachieve. Bravo!

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          8 hours ago

          Avery- believe what you want, but EVERY mlb team could easily have a salary floor of $150m+.
          Why do you think owners dont open the books? The Braves, who are required to show their Financials had a total revenue of $663mm. Are they a big market team?

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          8 hours ago

          Avory- why would you possibly care what another team spends.and, why do you resort to name calling?
          If you appreciate your team not spending money, than good for you.

          Reply
        • Avory

          5 hours ago

          @Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          You don’t get it. As a fan of a small market team, I’m THRILLED the big markets stupidly waste their money. It’s the only chance we have to compete in this economic system.

          And even though you don’t have access to the books, you smugly assert that every team could run a $150m MLB payroll. Well, you know what? Even if they COULD, that would mean all the big market teams could run a $700m payroll. All these teams basically budget the same way. They estimate revenue, allocate funds for fixed costs (which are roughly the SAME for all MLB clubs, big or small) then whatever is left over is available for discretionary spending, including MLB payroll that is above and beyond CBA requirements.

          That you actually believe the nonsense that “small markets could compete if they wanted to” is swallowing the big market propaganda that they are “virtuous” spenders and everyone else just “pockets profits.” The idea that the big markets aren’t “pocketing profits” far in excess of what the small markets do is what’s called the Big Lie and big market fans swallow that nonsense whole. Why? Because if you didn’t believe it, you’d realize there’s no explanation for why your team loses so often to teams like the Rays other than your own team’s greed and incompetence.

          Reply
  38. piersall55

    14 hours ago

    Be warned the Sox are doing their best to pre spin the cover story of why Bregman will sign with another team!

    1
    Reply
    • Tardaddy

      14 hours ago

      I for one want him to, sign Suarez instead for 2/50

      Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      12 hours ago

      Piersall- you are so right….
      I can hear it already, “we made an aggressive offer”.

      1
      Reply
  39. Rsox

    14 hours ago

    I miss the days when the biggest free agents signed in December. Now everything gets dragged out til February or March.

    Lets get some contracts signed

    Reply
    • Avory

      8 hours ago

      Aw…so sad the plight of those with attention deficit disorder.

      Reply
  40. tippy457

    14 hours ago

    While I was a huge fan of Bregman last season. How about we sign/trade for someone under the age of 30. Bichette to a 6 year deal, with our young core would be fantastic and help us for multiple years rather than signing someone with 1-2 good seasons left before father time catches up

    2
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      13 hours ago

      Bo’s bat speed is pretty abysmal.

      Reply
  41. Tardaddy

    14 hours ago

    They can sign Suarez 3B and Suarez SP for the same amount it would cost for Bregman

    3
    Reply
    • hitman32

      10 hours ago

      Tardaddy…IMO, I would definitely be all in on signing Ranger Suarez for the RS rotation. As far as defense goes…Bregman is better than Suarez at 3B. Having a good solid pitching staff & a good defense behind the said pitching staff win games, even if the offense is just average or slightly above average!

      1
      Reply
  42. slider32

    13 hours ago

    Free agents are the worst way to build a team, most are over paid, past prime, and injury prone. Trading is the way to go if you need a good player.

    2
    Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      12 hours ago

      Slider- are Gray and Contreras underpaid, pre-prime, and fully healthy?
      The Sox were in a great position to do both heading into the off season, with money under the tax, and a teeming farm system.
      Based on those two criteria, Gray, Contreras and Oviedo is underwhelming. Don’t get me wrong, useful….but underwhelming.

      Reply
  43. Ham Fighter

    13 hours ago

    Aggressive offer
    ‘red Sox ‘ sign the contract or you sleep with the fishes!

    1
    Reply
  44. PNW Optimist

    12 hours ago

    Boston paid $40 million last year for 3.5 WAR. And they’re saying More Please? Hard pass.

    Reply
  45. smkelly1970

    11 hours ago

    aggressive offer based on the offseason thus far:

    1 year- $1

    or if they can somehow rewrite the rules and pay Bregman in prospects, not cash.

    Reply
  46. Fuolovit1

    11 hours ago

    Bregman the best fit
    Roster is ripe to absorb a back end albatross
    5/160. So what. Can’t skewer them for being cheap one day and for spending too much the next

    Superstars get 400M these days. 3 good years of Bregman works for this roster.

    2
    Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      10 hours ago

      Fuolivet – in many respects I agree with you. The Sox roster, budget and farm all allow for a back end albatross to be absorbed, so why the bum’s rush to get Devers (a player in his prime) out the door then turn around and pay Bregman MORE than Devers. Maybe thats why we complain?

      Reply
      • Fuolovit1

        7 hours ago

        Hey Sad. I think most agree they had no intention of trading him. I cannot judge who screwed the pooch more. Devers or Management. I do think near all fans agree as well as Devers and the FO that keeping him became untenable.

        Some are upset with Devers
        Some upset with FO
        And some fans aren’t upset at all with him off the roster.

        1
        Reply
  47. wileycoyote56

    11 hours ago

    Hard to believe he opted out of 80 million for 2 years, doubt he gets over 30 million a year this time . He’s a good player but he’s getting older by the minute, tick tock, he better hope he can pull 6/170 this time. If not he may have listened to Boros too much

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Royals Extend Matt Quatraro

    Blue Jays Sign Kazuma Okamoto

    Kona Takahashi To Return To NPB For 2026 Season

    Astros Sign Tatsuya Imai

    Yankees Have Reportedly Made Offer To Cody Bellinger

    Giants To Sign Tyler Mahle

    Cubs Sign Hunter Harvey

    Angels, Anthony Rendon Restructure Contract; Rendon Will Not Return To Team

    Hazen: Ketel Marte Trade Talks Won’t Last All Offseason

    Angels To Sign Kirby Yates

    Athletics Sign Tyler Soderstrom To Seven-Year Extension

    Orioles Re-Sign Zach Eflin

    Marlins Sign Pete Fairbanks

    Pirates To Sign Ryan O’Hearn

    White Sox Sign Sean Newcomb

    Athletics Acquire Jeff McNeil

    Mets Sign Luke Weaver

    Nationals Sign Foster Griffin

    Padres Sign Sung-Mun Song

    Rangers Re-Sign Chris Martin

    Recent

    Royals Extend Matt Quatraro

    Giants Sign Buddy Kennedy, Caleb Kilian To Minors Contracts

    Giants, Yankees, Mets, Cubs Interested In Edward Cabrera

    Yankees Sign Adam Kloffenstein, Payton Henry To Minors Contracts

    Pirates Interested In Eugenio Suarez

    Angels Sign Donovan Walton To Minors Deal

    Cody Bellinger Rumors: Cubs Interested, Yankees Make Second Contract Offer

    Blue Jays Designate Paxton Schultz For Assignment

    Braves Sign DaShawn Keirsey Jr. To Minors Deal

    Blue Jays Sign Kazuma Okamoto

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version