Headlines

  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Phillies Sign Jonathan Papelbon

By Ben Nicholson-Smith | November 14, 2011 at 1:04pm CDT

Jonathan Papelbon's desire to set the market for closers was never a secret — it's now a reality. The Phillies have agreed to sign the 30-year-old to a precedent-setting four-year, $50,000,058 deal that establishes the record for guaranteed money for a reliever.  The Phillies announced the deal today, noting that Papelbon will continue to wear #58.

Papelbon

The contract includes a $13MM option for 2016 that vests with 55 games finished in 2015 or 100 in 2014-15, tweets ESPN's Jayson Stark. The Phillies appeared to have a deal with Ryan Madson earlier this week, but talks fell through and the sides didn't complete the rumored four-year, $44MM deal. Papelbon's agents at ACES stepped in and the Phillies have their closer.

Papelbon posted a 2.94 ERA with 12.2 K/9 and 1.4 BB/9 in 64 1/3 innings for the Red Sox in 2011, saving 31 games. He's a Type A free agent who will cost the Phillies their first round draft pick in 2012, assuming the upcoming collective bargaining agreement doesn't change draft pick compensation for this offseason. Boston will obtain the 31st overall pick in next June's draft unless the Phillies sign an additional Type A free agent with a higher ranking than Papelbon. If the Phillies lose Madson to another team after offering him arbitration, they'll surrender one pick and gain two.

Papelbon is the first of MLBTR's top 50 free agents to sign. Check out MLBTR's Free Agent Tracker for the details. Bryan Grosnick examines the fantasy baseball implications of the move at CloserNews.

Jim Salisbury of CSNPhilly.com first reported the deal and its terms. Jayson Stark of ESPN.com, Jon Heyman of SI.com, Jim Bowden of MLB Network Radio on Sirius XM and others added detail.

Photo courtesy Icon SMI.

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Boston Red Sox Philadelphia Phillies Transactions Jonathan Papelbon

Kimbrel, Hellickson Win Rookie Of The Year Awards
Main
Latest On CBA Talks
View Comments (323)
Post a Comment

323 Comments

  1. FacelessGeneralManager

    14 years ago

    If someone offered me a bet saying the Mets won’t be within three runs of the phils anytime soon. I take it without thinking and bet everything i have. 100000$ the mets beat the phials at least once in their first two series.

    Reply
  2. Mike McLellan

    14 years ago

    and gain BETTER picks for Madson.

    Reply
  3. hscphillyboy

    14 years ago

    Will miss Madson, but I have always thought that he was better suited to be a setup man. Paplebon has a better closer’s attitude…….

    Reply
  4. Phillies_Aces35

    14 years ago

    50 guaranteed.

    They don’t necessarily cancel out because the Phillies can potentially move up in the first round by losing Madson. They could end up with a high 2nd round pick though…

    I don’t think they really care about a first round pick (which isn’t as big of a deal in baseball as in football and basketball, especially since they don’t really draft over 1st round slot… they get their prospects 3-10-lower rounds).

    Reply
  5. JacksTigers

    14 years ago

    I wonder if the Phillies will offer Madson arbitration.

    Reply
    • dylanp5030

      14 years ago

      Why wouldn’t they? Madson wont accept. He would be a setup man and lose value…

      Reply
      • JacksTigers

        14 years ago

        But what if he does? That could cost a ton. Can they afford to take that chance?

        Reply
  6. Beyond_Max_Power

    14 years ago

    Bastardo was the best relief pitcher in baseball for 3/4 of the season until he tired out. Stutes was also very good until he tired.  I am pretty excited about many young arms in the Phillies system, and filling out the pen with a few of them is fine by me.  Many forget Contraras will be back next year after going down mid season.  He was very good in 2010 and 2011 until getting hurt.  

    We have to save money somewhere and the pen is the obvious area they feel they can use their own prospects.  All I know is ticket prices have gone up 7 straight years, and concessions have also increased every year except last year.  At least I feel I am getting my monies worth.I like Papelbon, but I am not crazy about this deal.  too long.

    Reply
    • marcuccio

      14 years ago

      I agree, too long.

      Reply
  7. NomarGarciaparra

    14 years ago

    This certainty hurts…but perhaps not as much as the Papelbon deal could potentially hurt down the road.

    Reply
  8. notsureifsrs

    14 years ago

    it’s not the $10M part, it’s the 4 years with a vesting option part. nuts (as in the place i will punch ben cherington if he turns around and signs madson to a similar deal)

    Reply
    • cyberboo

      14 years ago

      Now that the Red Sox have lost Papalbon, the funny part of it will be when Boston signs Heath Bell for 4 years 10M and lose their first round pick to San Diego.  lol. 

      Reply
    • Slopeboy

      14 years ago

      In my heart, I’m happy as all hell. Still, can’t blame the Sox for letting him go. As much as I respect Papelbon, that’s waayyyy too much money. That vesting part is worse of all.

      Now, here’s something you may be able to help me with. I realize that Papelbon wasn’t giving any home team discount, and was going to test the market. But did Cherington wait too long before making a real offer? Seems to me that instead of making a move during the exclusive period he waited until the FA period opened up. My thinking is that he may have been able to re-sign him for less years had he moved sooner. This is not meant to take a shot at Cherington, just a legit question

      Reply
      • notsureifsrs

        14 years ago

        according to papelbon, the two sides have discussed an extension almost every year of his career. basically the red sox would presenta figure they were comfortable with, papelbon would present the figure he’d be looking for, and both sides would say “alrighty then. nevermind”

        he was explicit about the fact that he understood their side of it, but also that they were never close to being on the same page about a long-term deal

        so theoretically they could have tried to get something done between the end of the season and now, but i expect both camps already knew where the other stood. there wasn’t much to say before papelbon had other offers on the table. he got a great one and he took it

        Reply
  9. Nivarsity

    14 years ago

    Bard has a 3.20 FIP through age 26.  Papelbon had basically the same MLB stats at the same age, even though he didn’t get to the bigs till he was 2 years older. 

    No one is saying Bard is as good as Papelbon.  But if Papelbon is getting this kind of contract, I’d take Bard in a second.

    Reply
    • Dave203

      14 years ago

      Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think anyone should have signed Papelbon to that ridiculous of a deal.  However, that doesn’t make Bard a good 9th inning option.

      The stats only tell half the story since nobody has seen Bard close out games before in big spots.  A lot of that role is mental, which is why I reference the 11 innings down the stretch as a comparison.  I agree it is a small sample of innings, but those 11 innings are far more representative of the stress of the closer role and any of his other innings previously.

      Reply
      • Nivarsity

        14 years ago

        I don’t buy the “ninth inning is unique” meme.  But even if it were the case, 11 IP is not enough to say that Bard doesn’t have the gritty moxie veteranny mojo needed for the 9th.  You admit it’s a small sample, so I don’t see how you can keep arguing otherwise.

        Reply
      • Cora the Destroya

        14 years ago

        So you’re saying that we should never have any new closers because inexperienced guys shouldn’t be given the chance to close?

        Reply
  10. Amish_willy

    14 years ago

    They gave up their 31st pick, will get one in the Supplemental round for Madison, who as the 5th highest ranked type-A will net them the 36th pick in the draft PLUS either a teams first or second round pick. I don’t see that as canceling eachother out.

    Alot of money for Paps, but he’s got probably the best track record of performance & health amongst big league closers not to mention being at a young enough age to survive the deal. At 12m annually, doubt this deal will prevent the Phillies down the road any which way.

    Reply
  11. Phillies_Aces35

    14 years ago

    Yeah me too, fire the man who traded for three ace level pitchers, signed Contreras, Pedro Martinez, Chan Ho-Park, traded for Mayberry, traded for Pence, etc and built a club capable of winning 102 regular season games.

    Let’s fire him because he gave out a bad contract (a market value contract when you look at Soriano).

    Maybe we should rehire Pat Gillick… the man’s the greatest GM of all time, so he never made a bad contract, right? He never signed Geoff Jenkins, Brad Lidge, Adam Eaton, Pedro Feliz, JC Romero…  (just as a note, I love Pat Gillick).

    Reply
    • BoSoxSam

      14 years ago

      Amaro is also currently overpaying Ibanez (although the manager is more at fault there, for continuing to play him at all), just signed Howard to a crippling extension, and then this. I would be worried as a Phils fan.

      Reply
      • Dylan

        14 years ago

        not really because raul is gone and a free agent

        Reply
      • Phillies_Aces35

        14 years ago

        1. Ibanez’s contract expired… and he got great production out of him in 2009, don’t make the playoffs without him. The price was fine, years, not so much.
        2. the Howard extension was an attempt to beat the market… it didn’t work.

        GM’s make bad decisions. It happens. No reason to call for the head of a GM who built a 102 win team.

        Reply
    • Tyler Karsch

      14 years ago

      Look, i’ll give the man credit, he is fantastic at trading for top notch talent. However, he simply is not good signing free agents. He constantly overpays, and gives too many years. Plus he has given out quite a few beloted extensions. Look he may acquire a lot of talent but the payroll has to stop rising.

      Reply
      • Phillies_Aces35

        14 years ago

        Why? Is it your money? They have the resources. Acquiring talent is his job.

        Reply
        • Tyler Karsch

          14 years ago

          At this rate he is going to run out of resorces.

          Reply
  12. Bustbigdiehappy 2

    14 years ago

    Where can I get a draft pickle?

    Reply
  13. Nivarsity

    14 years ago

    In 31 innings vs. the Red Sox last year, CC Sabathia had a 6.39 ERA.

    I guess the guy just can’t get it done in the clutch.

    Reply
    • Dave203

      14 years ago

      CC was absolutely terrible vs the Sox last year, there’s no arguing that.  Not sure how you got the clutch aspect based upon stats vs one team though…

      Reply
      • Nivarsity

        14 years ago

        You, 5 minutes ago:  “Would you like to ignore the 24 innings he’s throw vs the Yanks
        accumulating a whopping 4.13 ERA?  I’m sure those would fall into
        innings you would like to forget and discount too though…”

        Can’t make this stuff up.

        Reply
        • Dave203

          14 years ago

          Again, I got the comparison vs one team.  Just not sure where you are getting “clutch” from anything I said…

          Read more carefully…

          Reply
          • Nivarsity

            14 years ago

            In the world where clutch is a thing, how on earth are CC’s 5 starts against the Yankees’ bitterest rival NOT clutch? 

            Reply
            • mainesox

              14 years ago

              It’s not convenient, that’s how.

              Reply
  14. slider32

    14 years ago

    Papelbon was the best closer on the market, and a great signing for the Phillies. Cherrington and AA missed the boat on this one. You snooze you lose.

    Reply
    • HerbertAnchovy

      14 years ago

      AA didn’t miss anything. The guy knows his trade. 4 years is too much for Papelbon, or nearly any other reliever, in my opinion.

      As for the Red Sox, Bard has earned his opportunity to close

      Reply
      • slider32

        14 years ago

        That’s why they finished last year with a worse record than the year before. How about all those Jays pitchers pitching in the playoffs.  Dream on with AA.

        Reply
        • Lunchbox45

          14 years ago

          Traded their opening day starter.

          context, use some.

          Reply
      • slider32

        14 years ago

        That’s why they finished last year with a worse record than the year before. How about all those Jays pitchers pitching in the playoffs.  Dream on with AA.

        Reply
    • fishfan4life

      14 years ago

      Great signing? I forgot how many 3+ year deals have worked out for closers not named Mariano Rivera.

      Reply
      • Phillies_Aces35

        14 years ago

        Only takes one.

        Reply
      • Phillies_Aces35

        14 years ago

        Only takes one.

        Reply
    • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

      14 years ago

      why do you keep repeating your damned comments?

      Reply
  15. mainesox

    14 years ago

    Well yeah, actually.  How about the 16 blown saves Rivera has against the Red Sox? That’s only 16 innings right? (correct answer is yes)

    You don’t ignore those innings you just take them in the small sample size context in which they are presented.  You don’t ignore the other 200+ innings of his career because of them.

    Reply
    • Dave203

      14 years ago

      LOL.  You compare 16 blown saves (roughly 16 innings), over a 10 year period to Bard not handling his down the stretch run?  You can try and compare Bard to Mo all you want, it just gets comical…

      Reply
  16. Nick Stephan

    14 years ago

    Man if the Braves had the Phillies payroll we would have one hell of a team.

    Reply
    • biffsniff

      14 years ago

      If only. Maybe we can get Mark Cuban to buy the team from Liberty Media, I heard they could opt out when the CBA expires, which is now. Maybe then the braves could have more payroll flexibility. 

      Reply
    • JohnS

      14 years ago

      You need fans to go to the games to have a high payroll. The only reason the Phils have a payroll this high is because they have sold-out every game in three years. The Braves can’t even sell out World Series games.

      That’s why your payroll will be low, not because you don’t have billionaire owners.

      Reply
      • Nick Stephan

        14 years ago

        Yeah I know, I think the Problem in the stadium location and the fact Atlanta is over 50% African American, and not many African Americans watch baseball. I think the Braves should go for an all black outfield with Heyward + Bourn + Maybe Fowler… That would be a pretty sick defense and offense.

        Reply
        • Nick Stephan

          14 years ago

          and very marketable!

          Reply
  17. mainesox

    14 years ago

    $12.5m/yr for 4-5 years is crazy for his (or any other reliever’s) history.

    Reply
    • JTT11

      14 years ago

      I really dont know how crazy it is to give papelbon that kind of money.  Papelbon has a career Era of 2.31 and adverages 37 saves a year.  His yankee counterpart – MO has a career 2.21 era and 39 saves a year.  MO makes 15 mil a year.  Papelbon made 12mil last year.  (I do not think using the comparison between Mo and Papelbon using the sample size as Papelbons career is unreasonable for this limited purpose)

      If papelbon can maintain a similar production through out the life of the contract, it will be an awesome signing But its a gamble.  think if the phils signed him for 3 years at 12.5 a year; assume papelbon maintains his production and hits free agency at the age of 33 with three more seasons added to his history he hits free agency – do you think he is signing for just 12.4mil? I dont. 

      Reply
      • mainesox

        14 years ago

        It’s not the money it’s the years.  No reliever should get a contract that long, relievers are simply too volatile to give contracts that long to.

        Reply
  18. $4555515

    14 years ago

    he had two blown saves the final series of the reguler season and nearly had a third in that same series look it up

    Reply
    • Tyler Karsch

      14 years ago

      Yup because you should ignore the rest of his season, or his career for that matter, and base your statment off of two outings.

      Reply
  19. notsureifsrs

    14 years ago

    no, it is a magical inning with mysterious magical mystery powers. not that i expect you know what an average leverage index is or what it means, but in 2011:

    paps: 1.69
    bard: 1.69

    bard isn’t as good as papelbon. there are only like 3 relievers that are. that doesn’t make this a disaster, however, and your dramatics are cliche and tiresome. at least be dumb in a funny way

    Reply
    • Dave203

      14 years ago

      Again, comparing stats of a setup man vs a closer is only half the picture.  I’m sure you can rattle off the names as well as I can of all of the setup men who failed as closers.  It’s a totally different amount of pressure when you are the last one they are counting on.

      Reply
  20. Russell Mania

    14 years ago

    The Red Sox get weaker and lose one of the biggest D-bags on the planet.  Win-win.

    Reply
  21. randomkeys

    14 years ago

    Small. Sample. Size.

    Also, Bard was not closing games. “Blown Saves” for middle relievers is about as valuable a stat as wins.

    Also, the highest pressure pitching moment for the Red Sox in 2011 was the ninth inning of the last game of the season, which was against a horrible team (Baltimore), and was lost by… drum roll… JONATHAN PAPELBON.

    Reply
    • mainesox

      14 years ago

      Blown saves for non-closer relievers are even less valuable a stat than wins in my opinion.  Completely pointless.

      Reply
    • Chris

      14 years ago

      i wouldnt neccesarily say baltimore is a horrible team. pitching yeah they have issues there, but their offense has always been good. there was alot of games this past season where baltimore scored 10 or more runs but still lost because their pitching couldnt keep it off the board. so baltimore really isnt that bad. to be honest if they can get a big name pitcher into their rotation and stop trading their bullpen away every year they would be contending right there withthe yankees and sox.

      Reply
  22. fishfan4life

    14 years ago

    Yikes.

    Reply
  23. Slopeboy

    14 years ago

    We’ll see come September if Bard is worthy.

    Reply
    • mainesox

      14 years ago

      So nothing matters until September?

      Reply
      • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

        14 years ago

        well, duh

        Reply
        • Chris

          14 years ago

          obviously lol ask the rays. they were 10 games back going into september and then decided to wake up lol. the sox couldnt run away with the division nor the wild card. now excuse me while i drop chicken and beer off on ipswhich and leave it at the gate.

          Reply
      • Slopeboy

        14 years ago

        I’m not dismissing the season, it’s just that we know September is crunch time. I don’t expect another Sox or even Yankees collapse, but that’s when things get hot and heavy. Will Bard or whom ever closes be up to it? We all knew with Papelbon.

        Reply
        • mainesox

          14 years ago

          Except no reliever is certain from year to year (or game to game for that matter) as Papelbon himself showed in ’10.

          Reply
  24. notsureifsrs

    14 years ago

    your selective blindness shines through. the red sox have been preparing for papelbon’s 2012 departure for like 5 years

    they are worse without a great reliever than they would be with a great reliever on a non-crazy contract. but that wasn’t an option here. and the other option — keeping a great reliever on a crazy contract — would present a worse situation than this one

    most of you are analyzing this based on what it means for 2012. and that’s absolutely hilarious, since you did the EXACT OPPOSITE when crawford signed, and could only talk about the long-term

    selective. blindness.

    Reply
    • Guest 6206

      14 years ago

      Ah…

      Huh? 

      Reply
      • notsureifsrs

        14 years ago

        least surprising woosh ever

        Reply
  25. jjs91

    14 years ago

    Once aardsma did it people just figured anyone could. 

    Reply
  26. Pavilionbum

    14 years ago

    This off-season is insane. Pujols is going to get $1 billion at this point.

    Reply
    • grownice

      14 years ago

       Plus performance incentives.

      Reply
  27. Guest 6207

    14 years ago

     ooooo…somebody has their lederhosen all bunched up. 

    Did I make a comparison to Papelbon? No. Did I reply to a comment made by someone comparing value to their back end bullpen type? Yes. 

    Reply
    • notsureifsrs

      14 years ago

      “$22mm over the next two years is a drop in the bucket compared to these deals”

      that’s what you said. $22M over two years is the exact opposite of a drop in the bucket compared to other 7th inning relievers. it certainly isn’t a drop in the bucket compared to benoit’s deal, which is the one referenced in the comment you replied to

      it’s a drop in the bucket compared to papelbon’s deal, and possibly madson’s. but they are closers, not 7th inning relievers. see?

      actively avoiding reality. you see everything yankee-related in the most positive light possible and everything redsox-related in the most negative. you’re not unusual in that regard i suppose, you’re just unusually obvious about it

      Reply
  28. User 4245925809

    14 years ago

    There is no need to either Maine. Yankee fans will never get over their jealousy of Bard since their own fireballer counter part Chamberlain crashed and burned ever since the experiment as a starter 2 seasons ago.

    Yankee fans have been filled with extreme jealousy ever since of the success Bard has had and never give him any credit, so why expect any now?

    Reply
    • notsureifsrs

      14 years ago

      i doubt that’s it. joba blew up, but they have robertson

      and i don’t even think most yankees fans feel strongly about bard one way or the other. it’s the vocal dimwitted minority that cannot resist any opportunity to flail around saying the same old things

      papelbon signed by red sox for 4/50: “lol another big free agent fail for the red sox, theyll be screwed so bad late in this deal”

      papelbon signed by phillies for 4/50 “LOL SOX ARE SO SCREWED NOW THEY SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIM OMG WHAT IDIOTS THEY COULD AFFORD THAT”

      Reply
      • User 4245925809

        14 years ago

        Oh I get that. My point was that when Chamberlain was tossing 98mph and rocking as a reliever, this place was lit up with (as you wrote) a few NYY fans saying he was like STG and now there is like ZILCHO about him and here, the last few days when Bard is still successful as a reliever, some of these same names hammer him mercilessly about 1 month when he was over worked.

        Agree with you 110% about the looking back again if Boston had given Papelbon that contract also. We also have to remember There are a handful of Red Sox fans here that would be doing this to NY also, so there is a flip side there.

        Reply
      • User 4245925809

        14 years ago

        Oh I get that. My point was that when Chamberlain was tossing 98mph and rocking as a reliever, this place was lit up with (as you wrote) a few NYY fans saying he was like STG and now there is like ZILCHO about him and here, the last few days when Bard is still successful as a reliever, some of these same names hammer him mercilessly about 1 month when he was over worked.

        Agree with you 110% about the looking back again if Boston had given Papelbon that contract also. We also have to remember There are a handful of Red Sox fans here that would be doing this to NY also, so there is a flip side there.

        Reply
        • jjs91

          14 years ago

          He was rocking as a reliever this year as well as last if you adhere to certain stats.

          Reply
      • jjs91

        14 years ago

        If we’re going to say Jenks had a good year in 2010 which i admitted i was wrong about wouldnt the same hold true for Joba? He also was doing well this year before his injury. 

        Reply
        • notsureifsrs

          14 years ago

          good point, he only really had one bad season. i think the narrative there is just different because so much was expected of the guy because of the way he broke into the league and he’s never really been able to reach those sky high expectations

          Reply
      • Chris

        14 years ago

        im a yankees fan and i thought it was smart by boston to go with bard instead of resigning papelbon, i thought last year bard should of been the closer. although im a yankees fan there is some players on the sox i like (bard,lester,bucholtz, youkillis and ellsburry) pedroia is a good 2B but he looks like a penis with a hat on lol sorry. but back to what i was saying, I hate the sox, like im sure all sox fans hate the yankees but no sox fan can actually say there isnt a player on the yankees or who has played for the yankees that they didnt like. real baseball fans like certain players no matter what team they play for. now do you wish they will lose when they play against your team, hell yeah who wouldnt lol. all im sayin is not all yankee fans are idiots and talk trash the whole time.

        Reply
      • Yankees420

        14 years ago

        Amen.

        Reply
      • JTT11

        14 years ago

        As a life long yankee fan…..i can say this….I dont really care about bard.  I dont pull for him in games, but i dont dislike him or hope he fails and those failures haunt him to the point where he becomes a raging alcoholic and is forced to live in a van down by the river.
         It has never a bard vs joba thing. (this was actually the first time ive ever heard of those two being compared. joba/hughes would be more fittingly compared with Lester/Buchholz)  The yankee v sox rivalry isnt based on a player vs player basis.   Yank/sox fans dont compare whose aging catcher was less crappy and then the winner celebrates with exuberant pride.

        I like bard, he has been pretty much a main stay on my fantasy team the last two years.  He is a good pitcher already and he can become alot better.  so im not sure where your comming from….

        Reply
    • MB923

      14 years ago

      Jealousy of Bard? Ummm, what?

      Reply
  29. jjs91

    14 years ago

    and yet valverde numbers weremt great.  

    Reply
  30. Pavilionbum

    14 years ago

    A new evil empire. Buying the top free agents at any price they want just ‘cuz.

    Reply
  31. mainesox

    14 years ago

    Aceves is one option, so is Doubront, so are like a half a dozen free agents, so are a few potential trade candidates…

    Reply
  32. Pavilionbum

    14 years ago

    Bard will have a better season than Papelbon.

    Reply
    • slider32

      14 years ago

      How about last Sept.!

      Reply
  33. mainesox

    14 years ago

    Yeah, Jordan is right, that’s always been what Papelbon has planned.

    Reply
  34. genius.gm.on.mlb.the.show

    14 years ago

    The Phils got their man

    Reply
  35. Phillies_Aces35

    14 years ago

    I’m happy about the Papelbon signing, ultimately, I think this is a better deal for the Phillies than the one given to Madson simply because of the quality of the pitcher.

    I hope Madson finds a good situation though. Seems like a great guy off the field and seemed like he wanted to play for the Phillies again. Really hope Boras can get him on a good team and get him some money.

    Reply
  36. RPK3113

    14 years ago

    It wasn’t really lack of effort. I just have a feeling, based on personality, that he will cash in and run.

    The only thing he did that annoyed me for effort was that he seemed to gradually increase velocity throughout the season, as if he was saving himself for the end.

    Reply
  37. mainesox

    14 years ago

    I compared sample sizes, it doesn’t matter who’s innings they are.  16 innings aren’t really any more or less substantial than 11 innings.

    Reply
    • Dave203

      14 years ago

      It’s a big difference.   You compared 16 innings out of a 10-year period while I was looking at 11 innings where Bard was in a particularly stressful position in a single season.

      Reply
      • mainesox

        14 years ago

        No, there’s zero difference.  Both are an extremely small sample size and are in no way indicative of the talent of the pitcher.

        Reply
        • Dave203

          14 years ago

          Right… OK…

          Reply
          • mainesox

            14 years ago

            Glad we finally agree…

            Reply
          • mainesox

            14 years ago

            Glad we finally agree…

            Reply
          • Cora the Destroya

            14 years ago

            Did I happen to mention that Bard is not yet officially our closer and that we can buy two to three relievers for the money we missed out on Papelbon?

            Reply
            • Dave203

              14 years ago

              You did… further done in the the thread but feel free to mention it again.  Problem is, those others that you are getting for 3-5 million a piece are not going to help you close games.  Who are you paying 3-5 million to close?

              Reply
              • Lunchbox45

                14 years ago

                the world is flat.

                Reply
                • mainesox

                  14 years ago

                  the holocaust never happened.

                  Reply
              • Cora the Destroya

                14 years ago

                You don’t know that for a fact.  And we still do have Daniel Bard.

                Reply
    • Daniel Stern

      14 years ago

      You should be comparing games not just innings.  16 innings in 16 close late games is different; 16 innings isolated just as innings means middle relievers can be considered the best relievers

      Reply
      • mainesox

        14 years ago

        What?

        Reply
        • Daniel Stern

          14 years ago

          you’re entire argument is invalid, as any reliever cannot be validated who is better by innings pitched whatever the sample size, only starters can used innings pitched.  For example, a set-up or middle reliever generally enters a game with runners on base or pitches 1+ inning whereas a closer “generally” pitches at most 1 inning with the bases empty but a completely different psychology.  So for you to be using innings pitched to determine if Daniel Bard can handle the job is invalid. 

          I think he will be a great closer but just a heads up that your logic in this argument is completely wrong.  Holler with questions, and please don’t reply with some he said/she said banter – you are better than that.  Please correct me if I’m wrong

          Reply
          • mainesox

            14 years ago

            Nobody was talking about how many innings a guy pitches in a game, so I still don’t know what you’re trying to say. 

            I was simply trying to demonstrate that the 11 inning sample size he was trying to use to judge Bard on, is far too small to draw any conclusions from.

            Reply
            • Daniel Stern

              14 years ago

              We agree about Bard & 11 innings being too small – my point is that you cannot compare Bard’s ANY amount of innings to Mariano because of the situations they were used in.  Relievers enter in volatile situations, inconsistent to compare reliever to reliever unless you are comparing two closers which Bard was not.  Alas, we will save that for another time…

              Reply
              • mainesox

                14 years ago

                I didn’t, I compared sample sizes.  That’s it.

                And you most certainly can compare Bard to Rivera; Bard isn’t as good, no one is, but you absolutely can compare them.  The fact that one is a set-up guy and one is a closer might mean you look at things like leverage index to see if one is in in higher stress situations and whatnot, but really, it’s not a bad idea to do that with all relievers anyway.

                Reply
  38. Phillies_Aces35

    14 years ago

    The Phillies didn’t think Ryan Madson could be the closer in spring training… he got the job because Contreras got hurt.

    They used Contreras out of Spring Training over Madson.

    Reply
  39. Dave203

    14 years ago

    I see nothing about it as “clutch”.  That is everyday life in the AL East — he plays the Sox 5-6 times a year.  Its routine and last year, he looked bad 3 of the 5 times.  I don’t see that as clutch though.

    Now pitching on 3 days rest for the playoffs to win a WS, yes… that would be clutch…

    Reply
  40. IHateJoeBuck

    14 years ago

    I didn’t realize Papelbon had lips.

    Reply
  41. rsoxbob

    14 years ago

    The closer spot is the most over-rated in baseball. The difference between Papelbon and Bard in terms of quality for those 60 innings, is small IMO. Madson will command much higher dollars than a bullpen slot is worth, so I’d stay away from him. Possibly Bell or Nathan as an 8th inning guy would be OK. I might even bring back Wheeler on short money to join Jenks, Rich Hill, Morales and Weiland (who was fairly tough the first time through the order), etc. in the bullpen. 8-figure-per-year contracts are justified to fill the RF spot and 1-2 rotation spots, not a reliever spot. And to all the “but it”s the Red Sox, money is no object, blah blah blah” posters, you’re forgetting that this is a business, and owners have an obligation to be smart with their resources at the same time as they are trying to build a winning team.

    Reply
    • Dave203

      14 years ago

      Closing games is the most crucial aspect of baseball.  What good does it do you to have aces pitch 6-7 shutout innings only to have your pen blow the game?  I think you underestimate the importance of have a setup man and a closer.

      Sure baseball is a business, but you don’t spend 160+ million to miss the playoffs.

      Reply
      • rsoxbob

        14 years ago

        We’ll just have to disagree on the idea that “closing games is the most crucial aspect of baseball”. I think it’s way down the list. Getting someone to “pitch 6-7 shutout innings”,  is much more important, and getting 1-2 SP to do that is where Red Sox resources need to focus, along with getting Beltran or Cuddyear to improve RF production. I predict Bard will be approximately as dependable in the closer role as Papelbon was. The key will be getting a strong 8th-inning guy, and I believe there are many candidates for less than half the money Pap or Madsen command.

        Reply
      • Tyler Karsch

        14 years ago

        One would think the most important aspect would be having the ace to pitch those 6-7 innings.

        Reply
      • Stephen Schmidt

        14 years ago

        Is this Omar Minaya?

        Reply
  42. Guest 6205

    14 years ago

    I fail to see how Madson is a closer or at least in the same sentence as Papelbon? He had a break out season. And if we’re going to compare, that’s what Soriano was/is in theory. So sure while the Yanks are overpaying for the “7th inning” having that depth, which appears to be at market or below could be beneficial over the life of the contract. If Mo goes down for a few weeks hypothetically, they have a closer (along with several other options) available. That $11mm for this season isn’t looking so bad at the moment. I am not comparing Soriano to Papelbon, because even I’ll admit, Papelbon is one of a select 3 or 4 that have had his consistency as a closer in the last 5-6 years.

    Reply
    • notsureifsrs

      14 years ago

      if you’re not comparing him to papelbon, his deal looks awful (because he’s extremely overpaid)

      if you are comparing him to papelbon, his deal looks awful (because he pitches in the 7th)

      dunno what else to tell you

      Reply
    • notsureifsrs

      14 years ago

      if you’re not comparing him to papelbon, his deal looks awful (because he’s extremely overpaid)

      if you are comparing him to papelbon, his deal looks awful (because he pitches in the 7th)

      dunno what else to tell you

      Reply
  43. Phillies_Aces35

    14 years ago

    I think the Boston Red Sox starting pitching staff is at fault for their collapse… I mean you can’t win with what they were giving them…

    Papelbon blew one game. Daniel Bard blew a few big games. Beckett got shelled in Baltimore. Lester got shelled in New York.

    For a team to collapse, it has to be an entire effort… no one guy is the reason.

    Reply
    • mainesox

      14 years ago

      Agreed, take it a step further too; if the starters hadn’t sucked for all of September relievers like Bard and Pap wouldn’t have been overworked, likely would have been more effective, and wouldn’t have been needed in those situations even if they did still suck.

      Reply
      • rayking

        14 years ago

        So true. I don’t understand why Papelbon is getting scapegoated for the collapse, I would place most of the blame on the starters. Sure, this Phils contract is an overpay, but a lot of people are using revisionist history to act like it’s the worst contract ever.

        Reply
        • mainesox

          14 years ago

          The problem with the Papelbon contract is the years.  It’s not a good idea to give any reliever a contract that long, regardless of how much they make per year.

          Reply
  44. notsureifsrs

    14 years ago

    papelbon and bard pitched in equally significant innings in 2011. please present your evidence that despite the data on leverage, the 9th inning is somehow magical

    Reply
    • Dave203

      14 years ago

      If I really need to explain that difference in pressure from the 8th to the 9th inning, then perhaps this discussion is not even worth having.  I’ll let the long list of relievers, who were great before they tried to close, serve as my evidence.  Look them up for yourself, the list is very long…

      Reply
      • mainesox

        14 years ago

        or perhaps you can’t explain the difference?

        Reply
        • Dave203

          14 years ago

          LOL — why of course, that must be it.

          Scroll around, I think I have already argued my case enough.  You don’t like it because you’re a Sox fan who wants to believe Bard can handle the role.  You hope you’re right and I can’t wait to see you proved wrong…

          Reply
          • mainesox

            14 years ago

            No you haven’t, you haven’t said anything substantial.  Your only argument is “Bard sucks because look, 11 innings!” You’ve said nothing with any more substance than that.

            Reply
            • cyberboo

              14 years ago

              The ninth inning is NO different from the seventh or eighth.  Pitchers come in for those innings with the bases loaded, two on, nobody out, facing the heart of the batting order.  The good set up men get out of it without runs scored.  In the ninth, the closer comes in with the bases empty to start the inning.  More times than not, he gives up walks, hits, hits batters, and creates drama for himself.  Closers then have to get out of it on their own and if they fail, they lose the game.  Many closers pad their stats, because they start the ninth against the bottom three hitters on the team, face pinch hitters or in the NL, pitchers.  That is a huge difference from facing the 3 – 4 – 5 hitters with none out and the bases loaded.  

              Reply
          • mainesox

            14 years ago

            No you haven’t, you haven’t said anything substantial.  Your only argument is “Bard sucks because look, 11 innings!” You’ve said nothing with any more substance than that.

            Reply
          • sf55forlife

            14 years ago

            you do realize that pitching in the 8th inning with a 1 run lead is a higher pressure situation than pitching in the 9th inning with a 3 run lead right? 

            Leverage Index, which notsureifsrs posted before (Papelbon 1.69, Bard 1.69) measures this. Both Papelbon and Bard pitched in EXACTLY the same amount of high pressure situations. When Bard entered a game the leverage index was up to 1.71, with Papelbon 1.70. 

            Nearly identical, enough with the Bard can’t handle pressure nonsense. Is he is as good as Papelbon? Hell no, but the difference isn’t as great as you think. And it certainly isn’t worth roughly $12MM. The Red Sox are better off taking that $12MM and applying it to their starting rotation.

            Reply
  45. Phillies_Aces35

    14 years ago

    Brad Lidge in 2008 was perfect… is he an elite closer?

    Reply
  46. Phillies_Aces35

    14 years ago

    Nothing really. They have payroll flexibility beyond this year.

    I don’t think they’ll worry about Hamels/Pence until January.

    Reply
  47. Phillies_Aces35

    14 years ago

    Same, I thought they’d trade closers, then it got leaked so i decided to change it. Oh well, 48 other free agents left.

    Reply
  48. Phillies_Aces35

    14 years ago

    Oh well… There’s two other wild card slots now, they’ll be contending for a while.

    Reply
  49. Dylan

    14 years ago

    i hope the mets sign madson just so we can get the 1st pick in the draft like if u want this for the phils and its not like madson will face the phils cause the mets r that bad

    Reply
  50. Dylan

    14 years ago

    Brad Lidge gave up a home run to albert pujols in the playoffs of 05 or 04 and that ended there season and look how good he did in 08 and he pitched fine for us last year 
    i hope pap puts up a 42-42 and 7-7 in playoffs did that change lidges career nooooooo

    Reply
    • Tyler Karsch

      14 years ago

      My point exactly.

      Reply
    • Tyler Karsch

      14 years ago

      My point exactly.

      Reply
  51. notsureifsrs

    14 years ago

    yes he was

    Reply
    • jjs91

      14 years ago

      Wow my bad, should of looked at those numbers.

      Reply
    • jjs91

      14 years ago

      Wow my bad, should of looked at those numbers.

      Reply
  52. funkytime

    14 years ago

    Just like it was all Manny’s fault before he left, right?

    Reply
  53. funkytime

    14 years ago

    Just like it was all Manny’s fault before he left, right?

    Reply
  54. FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

    14 years ago

    “17th or higher”

    so you can’t be excited for the 18 ~ 30 picks?

    Reply
    • EdinsonPickle

      14 years ago

      Nope; look at my stern face of indifference toward your 18-30 picks.

      Reply
      • rickjimbo

        14 years ago

        the pickle knows

        Reply
      • rickjimbo

        14 years ago

        the pickle knows

        Reply
  55. Mariners4Ever

    14 years ago

    This like many big contracts they have gave out recently ( Howard, Polanco, Ibanez etc), will no doubt hurt the Philles in the long run. Kunckleheads!

    Reply
    • Phillies_Aces35

      14 years ago

      How has Polanco hurt them?

      Reply
      • JST1331

        14 years ago

        I’m with you I think Polanco has been a great asset to the team but I think people say his contract has hurt us because of his injury last year and his poor performance in the playoffs.

        Reply
        • Mariners4Ever

          14 years ago

          Yeah that where i was going at! Sorry thanks JST1331 for clarifying.

          Reply
  56. Dwan

    14 years ago

    Brian Wilson is a goner in two years.  There is no way I would give 4/50 to a closer.

    Reply
  57. Chris

    14 years ago

    phillies must not have watched papelbon the last two years. he is on the decline and starting to blow saves. i would have stuck with madson.  or maybe even signed broxton. broxton would be cheaper and the safer bet. hmmm oh well 

    Reply
  58. Dennis

    14 years ago

     Okay—NOW his arm can fall off.

    Reply
  59. Chris

    14 years ago

    as a yankee fan, i thought it was smart for boston not to resign him. Bard has the pitches to be a succesful closer and he has been pretty much lights out every time he pitches. congrats to boston for not resigning that bum.

    Reply
  60. sf55forlife

    14 years ago

    heath bell is worse?

    Reply
    • Dave203

      14 years ago

      Yes, Heath Bell in Fenway would be worse.  He’s a fly ball pitcher which is terrible when you have an enormous green wall in left, not to mention his K rate fell off a cliff last season.  Moving from the NL West from the AL East is a substantial difference as well.  Lastly, he’s 34!  He’s clearly on his decline vs prime.  Very few closers are effective for long careers.

      Reply
      • sf55forlife

        14 years ago

        i think your definition of substantial is different from mine.

        Reply
        • Daniel Stern

          14 years ago

          ha, good comeback. “What is IS”?

          Reply
          • sf55forlife

            14 years ago

            huh? The value of closers are over blown. The drop off from Papelbon to either Bard or Bell is certainly a decrease in value but not worth 4 years and 50 million dollars.

            Reply
            • Daniel Stern

              14 years ago

              I’m agreeing with you – making fun of NYYSection.  The reference was in play to his semantics and Bill Clinton from the Monica Lewinsky trial but nevermind…

              Reply
      • MmmRocks

        14 years ago

        What’s wrong with a flyball pitcher in Fenway? Fenway’s one of the least friendly home run hitting park in baseball. Are facts painful for you?

        Reply
      • MmmRocks

        14 years ago

        What’s wrong with a flyball pitcher in Fenway? Fenway’s one of the least friendly home run hitting park in baseball. Are facts painful for you?

        Reply
        • mozelpuffski

          14 years ago

          one of the more unfriendly hr in league but one of the highest runs per game and hits. bell doesnt miss lots of bats.

          Reply
          • Daniel Thompson

            14 years ago

            Heath Bell has a K/9 ratio of 9.6 over the past three seasons

            Reply
          • NorthOf49

            14 years ago

            A lot of that is due to it being the home of the Red Sox, whom Heath Bell wouldn’t have to face. Boston led Major League Baseball in road runs scored in 2011 and besides, ballparks are totally independent of hits.

            Reply
  61. Chris

    14 years ago

    ummm if your meaning bard, id pick bard over papelbon anyday. papelbon was a risk as he tends to blow alot of saves, especially these last two seasons. big risk in signing him for that much by philly. plus that signing makes them that much older. Papelbon will maybe get 30 saves if hes lucky.

    Reply
    • Yankees420

      14 years ago

      Papelbon’s blown saves since he became the closer in ’06:

      6, 3, 5, 3, 8, 3 so really 2010 seems more like an outlier.

      I may extremely dislike the guy, but he is effective and has been in every year, except for maybe 2010. 

      And for anyone else reading, I am aware that BS is not indicative of performance or effectiveness. 

      Reply
    • Daniel Stern

      14 years ago

      no one may like Papelbum, but he will get more than 30 saves.  Cmon now

      Reply
  62. Cora the Destroya

    14 years ago

    His stats in 2011 weren’t much different than Papelbon’s.  Also remember Papelbon after 2010?  People wanted him out of Boston, and wanted Bard to take his place.  Now they want the opposite?  Honestly, there is only good in this for Boston fans.  We don’t spend a ton of money and instead can buy two or three relievers for the price of Papelbon.

    Reply
  63. Cora the Destroya

    14 years ago

    Don’t forget about Papelbon in 2010 who went through the same exact thing as a closer, and who RSN wanted to replace with… you guessed it… Bard.

    Reply
  64. Gordon Scott Krier

    14 years ago

    Papelbon for Madson?  Just how good a deal is this?  You pay more for Papelbon and get a reliever who lost it in 2011.   Madson?  How good is he really?  In too many tight situations, Rhino put batters on base and made for true seat squirmers.  Is Papelbon likely to do the same?  Probably.  The outcome may be different.  Rhino usually got out of these jams.  Can the same be said for Papelbon?

    Reply
    • Phillies_Aces35

      14 years ago

      Considering he only blew 1 game in the NINTH inning last year I think the same can be said for him.

      Reply
      • Guest 6204

        14 years ago

        you have to change your name soon

        Reply
  65. AndrewBogatIsBetterThanYou!

    14 years ago

    Yeah, says the Sox fan, they collapse, Papelbon sucks. They win the world series, greates closer in baseball history. Give me a break. This makes me scared of Philly, smart move over Madison

    Reply
    • BoSoxSam

      14 years ago

      Papelbon was great, still is great. There is also still no way in hell I would have been happy with him signing in Boston for 4/50. That deal is what sucks, not the player. It would be like Pujols getting 20/600 this year, it’s just crazy.

      Reply
  66. rayking

    14 years ago

    Clutch hitting is a myth supported by people oblivious to the effects of small sample size and/or brainwashed by Joe Morgan. That being said, overpaying on a closer is equally foolish.

    Reply
  67. Cora the Destroya

    14 years ago

    Papelbon relied on the fastball as his predominant pitch as well, so what’s your point?  By the way, Bard could close, but he’s not our confirmed closer yet.  We could easily get two to three relievers with the money we missed out on getting Papelbon.

    Reply
    • Dave203

      14 years ago

      Papelbon’s fastball actually moved.  Bard’s fastball is quite straight and that is exactly why he doesn’t have good numbers against FB hitting teams like the Yanks, Rangers, Blue Jays, etc.

      Reply
      • Cora the Destroya

        14 years ago

        Papelbon had his troubles in 2010 when everyone wanted him gone to replace with Bard.  Both are great pitchers, but the bottom line is Papelbon is not worth the price he’s asking for.  With nearly identical WHIPs in 2011 and a lower BAA, I’d much rather choose the cheaper route in Bard and save the money for other relievers or another cause.  Smart move in my book and it has been from the start.

        Reply
      • mainesox

        14 years ago

        Bard’s fastball is flat?  Tell Swisher that.

        fangraphs.com/not/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/swish…

        Reply
  68. sf55forlife

    14 years ago

    FALSE! A team with a protected pick could sign him and not lose a draft pick. The Phillies would get a pick at the end of the first round and a comp pick in that situation.

    Reply
  69. eyedessert

    14 years ago

    I give it two years tops until Papelbon turns into Brad Lidge.

    Reply
  70. RedSox69

    14 years ago

    He was all about the money …now he has it…..C-YA

    Reply
  71. sf55forlife

    14 years ago

    better than LOLZ BARRY ZITO

    Reply
    • vonhayesdays

      14 years ago

      thats right up there with one of the worst

      Reply
      • sf55forlife

        14 years ago

        i was referring to your comment.

        Reply
        • vonhayesdays

          14 years ago

          i guess im confused , i was saying zito is right around the worst contract of all time , it remains to be seen on paplebon’s  (spelling)

          ________________________________

          Reply
          • sf55forlife

            14 years ago

            no your joke, it was much more original than just saying referring to Barry Zito. Well done.

            Reply
    • vonhayesdays

      14 years ago

      thats right up there with one of the worst

      Reply
  72. sf55forlife

    14 years ago

    better than LOLZ BARRY ZITO

    Reply
  73. cyberboo

    14 years ago

    Don’t forget that only the bottom fifteen teams don’t have to give up a first rounder.  If Madson signs with one of those that are trying to improve their roster, the Phils get nothing in return.  It would be really funny if Seattle signs him to finish games for King Felix, Vargas, Pineda, etc.  lol  

    Reply
  74. cyberboo

    14 years ago

    Don’t forget that only the bottom fifteen teams don’t have to give up a first rounder.  If Madson signs with one of those that are trying to improve their roster, the Phils get nothing in return.  It would be really funny if Seattle signs him to finish games for King Felix, Vargas, Pineda, etc.  lol  

    Reply
  75. dudemanbro

    14 years ago

    half the phillies team will need walkers by 2014

    Reply
  76. Slopeboy

    14 years ago

    Yeah, he’s terrible in November. He keeps carving the turkey in thin slices!

    Reply
    • coolstorybro222

      14 years ago

      yeah because he has the best  cutter in baseball.

      Reply
  77. Slopeboy

    14 years ago

    Yeah, he’s terrible in November. He keeps carving the turkey in thin slices!

    Reply
  78. cheez13

    14 years ago

    Look how many good closers there are who weren’t even on the radar when they came up. Maybe they were ‘projected’ studs like a Kimbrel but nobody knew what he was going to do for sure but he is a beast. There are closers all over this league making small salaries that do the job for a few years then teams move on to another guy. The closer is important but its one the easiest positions to fill without spending a ton. I would never pay a closer 8 digits not named Rivera…and I would only do that if I was the Yanks. If he hadn’t been with the Yanks for all those years, the smart play would have let him walk and make Robertson your closer for much, much less money. But, its like Jeter, its a lifetime award contract and a PR move..they couldn’t let them walk.

    Not a smart move to sign Paplebon for long term at that number. Madsen should take arbitration so they don’t get the picks and have to pay him 8 mil next year to be a set-up man. Haha. Won’t happen but would be classic.

    Reply
  79. slider32

    14 years ago

    Cherrington first mistake, you snooze you lose!

    Reply
    • Duke15

      14 years ago

      *Amaro/*twentieth

      Reply
    • Duke15

      14 years ago

      *Amaro/*twentieth

      Reply
    • Phillies_Aces35

      14 years ago

      Not his mistake, they have Bard and a market full of guys they could sign to back him up if he fails.

      Reply
    • Phillies_Aces35

      14 years ago

      Not his mistake, they have Bard and a market full of guys they could sign to back him up if he fails.

      Reply
  80. jondogg2010

    14 years ago

    I said it on Facebook, $8MM/yr for Bell and 1st rounder in 2012 > $13MM/ yr for Pap. ‘Nuff said. It’s a business. I feel bad for anyone who’s ‘attached’ to Papelbon as a Sox fan. Move on. It’s baseball.

    Reply
  81. jondogg2010

    14 years ago

    HEATH BELL

    Reply
  82. jondogg2010

    14 years ago

    HEATH BELL

    Reply
  83. Scott Winn

    14 years ago

    Great job Cherrington you puppet. Each of the last two seasons we sign junk to large contracts and now we have a proven commodity that we let go. Forget the money because the sox have plenty but proven players you have to hold on to. The draft picks are also junk, we traded for martinez with our drafted players and let him walk. The sox are now third in importance to Casper the Owner behind nascar and kickball in england. Now they will resign Papi who is 57 in Dominican years. This organization is done.

    Reply
    • start_wearing_purple

      14 years ago

      That folks is the low pitch whine of someone who doesn’t know jack.

      Reply
    • Duke15

      14 years ago

      “Each of the last two seasons we sign junk to large contracts and now we have a proven commodity that we let go”

      Yeah because Carl Crawford, Adrian Gonzalez, and John Lackey weren’t established players when they signed those contracts……right. Let’s save the lucrative deals for the 30 year olds who give us 65 innings a year….. ridiculous.

      Reply
    • Duke15

      14 years ago

      “Each of the last two seasons we sign junk to large contracts and now we have a proven commodity that we let go”

      Yeah because Carl Crawford, Adrian Gonzalez, and John Lackey weren’t established players when they signed those contracts……right. Let’s save the lucrative deals for the 30 year olds who give us 65 innings a year….. ridiculous.

      Reply
  84. Scott Winn

    14 years ago

    Great job Cherrington you puppet. Each of the last two seasons we sign junk to large contracts and now we have a proven commodity that we let go. Forget the money because the sox have plenty but proven players you have to hold on to. The draft picks are also junk, we traded for martinez with our drafted players and let him walk. The sox are now third in importance to Casper the Owner behind nascar and kickball in england. Now they will resign Papi who is 57 in Dominican years. This organization is done.

    Reply
  85. jondogg2010

    14 years ago

    This opens the door for the Sox to sign Heath Bell for 2 reasons: 1. The Red Sox need a proven closer, and I’m sure Bell would love to sign with a winner. Not that SD won’t be, they just aren’t right now and he isn’t getting younger. 2. The Padres can allocate that money elsewhere. Yes, Bell has been with the Padres for years, but it’s time to move on. You also have the bonus of him and Adrian being teammates, and Maybe Bell’s experience helps him with the clubhouse. Just saying, all in all the Sox need to make this happen. I am guessing 3 year, $24 MM gets it done. Less than half of what Pap just got, and I think Bell will perform at 85% of Pap. Better allocation of money imo.

    Reply
    • Duke15

      14 years ago

      I would be ecstatic about 3/$24 for Bell.

      Reply
  86. bravesdude

    14 years ago

    I don’t know , but I like it . The Phillies keep depleting their farm system and their players are getting older and continue to get injured . I would almost be worried more about the Nats or possibly the Marlins(depending on who they sign) for next year than I would the Phils . They may have one more decent year left in them before they have to start somewhat rebuilding .

    Reply
  87. bravesdude

    14 years ago

    I don’t know , but I like it . The Phillies keep depleting their farm system and their players are getting older and continue to get injured . I would almost be worried more about the Nats or possibly the Marlins(depending on who they sign) for next year than I would the Phils . They may have one more decent year left in them before they have to start somewhat rebuilding .

    Reply
  88. MmmRocks

    14 years ago

    The 1-15 picks are protected so it would be impossible for any team to acquire them through draft pick compensation. In other words, your comment makes no sense.

    Reply
    • mainesox

      14 years ago

      Sure it does: if it’s not the 16th or 17th pick it’s worthless… -_-

      Reply
      • soxfan0928

        14 years ago

        Don’t tell any of the potential AL MVP’s that.

        Granderson: 80th overall
        Ellsbury: 23rd overall
        Bautista: 599th overall

        Guess cyberboo is dumb. 

        Reply
  89. MmmRocks

    14 years ago

    The 1-15 picks are protected so it would be impossible for any team to acquire them through draft pick compensation. In other words, your comment makes no sense.

    Reply
  90. MmmRocks

    14 years ago

    Not paying $14 million for a closer will help the Red Sox immediately. 

    Reply
  91. MmmRocks

    14 years ago

    Not paying $14 million for a closer will help the Red Sox immediately. 

    Reply
  92. start_wearing_purple

    14 years ago

    Oh well. Good bye Paps. Enjoy Philly.

    Reply
  93. start_wearing_purple

    14 years ago

    Oh well. Good bye Paps. Enjoy Philly.

    Reply
  94. The_BiRDS

    14 years ago

    poor guy will have to settle for 42 million dollars now…awwwwww i feel so bad for the little guy. How will he ever support his family. You cant even buy a small island for that kind of money.

    Reply
    • Stephen Schmidt

      14 years ago

      Ruin Tomorrow Jr is out of the closer market now, I can’t picture him getting anything close to that now

      Reply
      • Phillies_Aces35

        14 years ago

        The Nationals like him.

        Reply
      • JohnS

        14 years ago

        It’s not my money and who cares about 4 years from now. I want a title now!

        Reply
  95. The_BiRDS

    14 years ago

    poor guy will have to settle for 42 million dollars now…awwwwww i feel so bad for the little guy. How will he ever support his family. You cant even buy a small island for that kind of money.

    Reply
  96. MmmRocks

    14 years ago

    Bard is one of the best relievers in baseball. Take off the pinstriped colored glasses.

    Reply
    • MattD93

      14 years ago

      LMAO The best relievers in baseball? Get your head outta your arse. Bard isn’t even in the top 10. You’re obviously a Red Sox fan. Maybe I inform you what Bards stats were after the All-Star break? Actually, I’ll let you search that up, LOL. 

      Reply
    • MB923

      14 years ago

      9 losses in 2011, the most among any relief pitcher in baseball. And he ranked 34th in total games pitched, so it’s not like he lost many games because he pitched in many. 

      I am not knocking Bard though, I do think he is a great relief pitcher. The question is, can he be a great closer. 

      Reply
  97. MmmRocks

    14 years ago

    Bard is one of the best relievers in baseball. Take off the pinstriped colored glasses.

    Reply
  98. MmmRocks

    14 years ago

    Only a Yankees fan would judge a Red Sox pitcher on 11 innings that best suit his argument.

    Reply
    • MattD93

      14 years ago

      A stupid Yankees fan. Anyways, I’m a Yankees fan and I can tell Bard isn’t a closer… YET. He should be the 8th inning guy. Look at his stats after the All-Star break and that alone should give you some worries. He needs more time to get some of his craft down.

      Reply
    • BoSoxSam

      14 years ago

      Only a Yankees fan, or about 60% of the idiotic Boston fanbase. I’ve seen way too many comments BY Red Sox fans complaining about how bad Bard must be because of September. It’s pretty sad actually.

      Reply
  99. MmmRocks

    14 years ago

    Only a Yankees fan would judge a Red Sox pitcher on 11 innings that best suit his argument.

    Reply
  100. MmmRocks

    14 years ago

    Wow, you don’t catch a whole lot, do you?

    Reply
  101. MmmRocks

    14 years ago

    Wow, you don’t catch a whole lot, do you?

    Reply
  102. coolstorybro222

    14 years ago

    I actually think this is a smart signing by the Phillies because Heath Bell will eventually start going downhill and Paps could stay consistant into his mid 30’s

    Reply
    • mainesox

      14 years ago

      What’s Bell got to do with it though?

      Reply
  103. bmoneyy20

    14 years ago

    marmol to boston?

    Reply
  104. Matt Talbert

    14 years ago

    Heath Bell might argue that.  The closer’s market is nice and deep this year.  Cordero, Broxton (risk/reward – come cheaper) etc.  Come on.   This one of the deepest RP markets in years.

    Reply
  105. Cora the Destroya

    14 years ago

    He handles pressure the same way Papelbon did when he blew his saves, and the same way when Papelbon completes his saves.  Both have had ups and downs, Bard really isn’t as bad as you’re making him be.  Yes, Papelbon has more experience, but he comes at a price tag that isn’t worth it.

    Reply
  106. jjthebrave

    14 years ago

    Anyone who says they aren’t jealous of the Yankees having Mo is a liar.  Kimbrel had one hell of a year but needs 16-17 more like it to match Mo.  That’s called dominace my friend.  In my mind though, Kimbrel will be the saves leader one day.  Please let me dream

    Reply
    • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

      14 years ago

      I don’t think he’ll get the saves record, but I think he’s got a shot at the reliever WAR record.

      Reply
  107. East Coast Bias

    14 years ago

    It’s ok, I think I’m going 0/50.

    Reply
    • EdinsonPickle

      14 years ago

      We’ll be sharing a drink called “Failure to Predict the Destination of the Top 50 Free Agents” but it’s better than drinking alone.

      Reply
  108. JST1331

    14 years ago

    how do you change players uniforms, i’ve been trying to find out how to do it for months.

    Reply
  109. grownice

    14 years ago

     Jose Bautista’s contract is 5 years 65 million. Its hard not to laugh at the money these closers are getting especially in comparison to arguably the best hitter in the game right now.

    Reply
  110. nestleraisinets

    14 years ago

    when will the papeldance debut in philadelphia?

    Reply
    • Mariners4Ever

      14 years ago

      Against the Mets hopefully!

      Reply
  111. FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

    14 years ago

    He could challenge all he wants. Still nowhere good as Rivera.

    Reply
  112. FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

    14 years ago

    I don’t know why but I thought this was funny

    Reply
  113. FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

    14 years ago

    it’ll be taken by Bard or something

    Reply
  114. FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

    14 years ago

    because that makes totalllll sense for the A’s

    Reply
  115. mozelpuffski

    14 years ago

    i had pipe dreams of seeing him in a jays uni but not at this price… cant blame phillies as they have the need and cash with oswalt madson lidge off the books but is very risky

    Reply
  116. FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

    14 years ago

    It depends. If a bottom 15 team signs him, they’ll get a second round pick

    Reply
  117. YanksFanSince78

    14 years ago

    I absolutely understand the significance of “bang per buck” when it comes to a teams resources vs spending but I will NEVER understand why “fans” of major big money teams would rather have 2 draft picks vs a player that has excelled at an important role, and to say that the role ISN’T an important one negates everything that Paps has done for the Sox. 

    Now, if you simply feel that he won’t be the same player over the next 4 years then that’s a different story. As an example, as much as I love Mo I wouldn’t want the Yanks to go beyond a 1 year deal IF he decided not to retire after 2012. But Paps is a different animal and the Sox have money to burn. 4/$50 mil is not THAT far off from his true market value to say “whew” I’m glad he’s gone IMO.

    Reply
    • mainesox

      14 years ago

      The Red Sox owners have shown a virtual unwillingness to go more than a couple mil beyond the luxury tax threshold, so it’s not like there is an unlimited amount of money for them and the money saved actually will make a difference.  They don’t really have money to burn; they have 2 rotation spots, RF, the remainder of the BP, and at least one bench spot to fill in with ~ $30mm, giving almost half of that to Pap wouldn’t make it very easy.  Add to that the fact that Bard should step in without too much issue, plus the two draft picks, and I think this was probably for the best.

      That doesn’t mean I don’t understand how good Papelbon is, or that I don’t respect what he has done for the Sox and how important he has been, I just recognize that in the Sox particular circumstance it is what was going to (and needed to) happen.

      Reply
  118. JKGocha

    14 years ago

    we will see how sox fair without Papelbon. 2 late round picks doenst mean anything, you can get them for nothing pretty much.

    Reply
  119. MattD93

    14 years ago

    I think you should look at Bards stats after the All-Star break.

    Reply
    • mainesox

      14 years ago

      Still a small sample size, but are you referring to his 1.63 ERA, 2.31 xFIP, 10.11 K/9, 1.91 BB/9, .155 BAA, .77 WHIP, and four total earned runs from July and August combined?  Because if you’re not we’re back to talking about 11 innings in September.

      Reply
  120. Redsoxn8tion

    14 years ago

    I’m just glad Pap is gone. His ego was so inflated for a guy that choked 2 years in a row at the most crucial time we needed him. I’m thankful for his dominating past, but he’s no longer an AL pitcher. They’ve seen all his stuff, so it’s off to the NL he goes.

    Reply
  121. Redsoxn8tion

    14 years ago

    Dude, Bard was our most overworked pitcher all year. When September came around, he was burnt out. Pap didn’t work nearly as many innings as Bard. Bard will be fine as the Sox closer. What are you Yankee fans going to do when Mo retires?? We’ll rag on you guys then.

    Reply
    • MG83

      14 years ago

      David Robertson says hello.

      Reply
      • BoSoxSam

        14 years ago

        David Robertson is Bard from a year ago. Just like it was presumptuous for Sox fans to proclaim Bard the closer-in-waiting last year, it’s likewise too soon for you guys to get hyped up on Robertson. Not saying you’re wrong, just saying give him another year or two first for him to prove he can sustain it.

        Reply
  122. Jim McGrath

    14 years ago

    I’m happy for Pap. He paid his dues and he has been rewarded.
    I have a feeling Doc, Lee and Hamels lobbied for this signing–not that Madson is not a good closer but Pap was the best available and management must have felt the need to go with Pap. The difference in price was marginal. Good luck Phils.

    Reply
  123. Jim McGrath

    14 years ago

    I’m happy for Pap. He paid his dues and he has been rewarded.
    I have a feeling Doc, Lee and Hamels lobbied for this signing–not that Madson is not a good closer but Pap was the best available and management must have felt the need to go with Pap. The difference in price was marginal. Good luck Phils.

    Reply
  124. MB923

    14 years ago

    Not Roy Halladay!

    Reply
  125. DJHomeAlone

    14 years ago

    if bard is so good why did he have 5 blown saves in 7 attempts last season. he may be a good reliever but that doesn’t make him a good closer

    Reply
    • nestleraisinets

      14 years ago

      whoever said that bard is good should be slapped in the face. The guy literally cost the Red Sox season because of blowing games

      Reply
  126. Michael Mulligan

    14 years ago

    lol

    Reply
  127. straightuphonestguy

    14 years ago

    Papelbon and his agent balked at the initial offer of $50,000,000.

    Reply
  128. bayareabeast

    14 years ago

    good for papelbon..bad for philly, which is always good to see

    Reply
  129. jondogg2010

    14 years ago

    $50,000,058? What a schmuck. I never really liked his attitude when he was in Boston, but because he was a great closer it got lost. I honestly as a die hard Sox fan am not unhappy that he chose not to want to return to Boston. I just can’t wait til A-Gon comes up in the bottom of the 9th, tie game, and ends the game with an A-BOMB of Papel-gone.

    Reply
  130. East Coast Bias

    14 years ago

    I wonder what he’s going to do with that extra 58 bucks. Dinner at Applebees anyone?

    Reply
  131. Mario Saavedra

    14 years ago

    The beginning of the end for Ruben Amaro Jr.

    Reply
  132. $1639238

    14 years ago

    If Papelbon gives the Phillies 70 innings, the Phillies will be paying him $178,000 dollars an innings.
    If Halladay goes 230 innings, the Phillies will be paying him $87,000 an inning. 

    Are Papelbon’s outs worth twice as much as Halladay’s?

    Reply
    • Phillies_Aces35

      14 years ago

      Halladay will pitch in 31-33 games
      Papelbon will pitch in 50-80 games.

      Either way Halladay’s deal is below market value so it’s not a great comparison. (WELL below market value).

      Reply
  133. azdsnd

    14 years ago

    Phail complete.

    Reply
  134. bla

    14 years ago

    He gets payed more than Jose Bautista and only plays one inning 2 out of every 3 games.

    Reply
    • Phillies_Aces35

      14 years ago

      Jose Bautista was also coming off 1 good year with questions if he could repeat the performance. If he would have waited and hit the market he could be looking at $100 million dollars right now.

      Reply
  135. EnPutiza

    14 years ago

    I wonder what kind of market there is for Hanrahan in Pit? Effective closer for a fraction of what Papelbon signed for. If I was the Sox, I’d have already called Pit to ask what they want for him.

    Reply
  136. cards2WS

    14 years ago

    That 58 dollars is hilarious. His number is 58 too. That’s just too funny.

    Reply
  137. cards2WS

    14 years ago

    That 58 dollars is hilarious. His number is 58 too. That’s just too funny.

    Reply
  138. Ray 13

    14 years ago

    Don’t worry he blow as many saves a lidge did and the phillies will still suck

    Reply
  139. Karan

    14 years ago

    PapelBLOWN !

    Reply
  140. Spencer Shore

    14 years ago

    Yah right. lets go phillies

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Recent

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Red Sox Designate Robert Stock For Assignment, Select Brian Van Belle

    Trade Rumors Front Office Subscriber Chat Transcript

    Rich Hill Has June 15 Opt-Out In Royals Deal

    AJ Smith-Shawver Undergoes Tommy John Surgery

    Poll: What Will The Rangers Do At The Deadline?

    Mets Select Justin Garza

    Submit Your Questions For This Week’s Episode Of The MLBTR Podcast

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version