Headlines

  • Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez
  • Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff
  • Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Bobby Jenks Passes Away
  • Braves Release Alex Verdugo
  • Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Jesse Chavez Wins Arbitration Hearing With Blue Jays

By Mark Polishuk | February 6, 2016 at 11:35am CDT

Right-hander Jesse Chavez will earn $4MM in 2016 after winning his arbitration hearing with the Blue Jays.  The news was reported in a tweet from Chavez’s representatives at the Sosnick Cobbe Karon agency.

There was a fairly modest gap between the two sides, as the Jays had countered with a $3.6MM offer.  As a “file-and-trial” team, the Jays’ policy is to go to a hearing with any player that doesn’t reach agreement on a new contract before the arbitration filing deadline.  (The exception would be if the team and player are discussing a multi-year extension, such as is the case with Toronto and Josh Donaldson before the AL MVP’s hearing on February 15.)

Matt Swartz predicted Chavez to land an even bigger salary of $4.7MM in his arbitration projections for MLBTR, though the $4MM number still represents a nice bump for Chavez over his $2.15MM salary he earned in 2015.  This was Chavez’s third and final year of arbitration eligibility and he’s slated to hit free agency next winter.

Thus far, players who have gone to hearings this offseason are a perfect 3-for-3, as Chavez joins the Reds’ J.J. Hoover and the Rays’ Drew Smyly as players ruled worthy of their higher salaries.  The Blue Jays, meanwhile, have lost two of three arbitration hearings over the last two winters, losing to Chavez and Danny Valencia while winning last year’s hearing with Donaldson.

Chavez, 32, is entering his second stint as a Blue Jay after being acquired from the A’s in a deal for Liam Hendriks in November.  Chavez will compete for the fifth spot in the Jays’ rotation, though he could essentially fill Hendriks’ old job as the long man in Toronto’s bullpen.  In three-plus years in Oakland, Chavez posted a 3.98 ERA, 8.2 K/9 and 2.80 K/BB rate in 363 2/3 innings (split between 47 starts and 54 relief appearances).

Share 20 Retweet 6 Send via email0

Toronto Blue Jays Transactions Jesse Chavez

AL Central Notes: White Sox, Uribe, Urshela, Freese, Rosario
Main
Blue Jays Designate Chad Jenkins For Assignment
View Comments (21)
Post a Comment

21 Comments

  1. jb226

    9 years ago

    Worth nothing, in my opinion: The cost, compared to the Jays’ filing numbers, for settling with Chavez AND Donaldson at the midpoints would have been $450,000.

    The cost of losing this single arbitration case is $400,000.

    I hope that potential $50,000 they might save if they win on Donaldson is worth it to them to have taken their MVP and a guy they just acquired through the arbitration process.

    “File and trial” is a poor way of going about your business.

    Reply
    • jb226

      9 years ago

      That should be worth NOTING above.

      Reply
    • TCaron19

      9 years ago

      They went to the trial with Donaldson last year, not that big of a deal besides maybe Donaldson won’t agree to the middle

      Reply
    • Steve Adams

      9 years ago

      It’s not about the short-term cost savings. It’s about managing the arbitration market because all future cases are built on comparables and will use present-day cases as points of reference. If every team just conceded and “paid the player what he wanted,” as fans often say the team should, the arbitration market would skyrocket in short order. The Jays are just one of many teams that go file

      Reply
      • jb226

        9 years ago

        Nowhere did I suggest a team should “pay the player what he wants.” We’re talking about a CUMULATIVE difference of less than a half million dollars, assuming they can get a settlement at the midpoint, which the vast majority of settlements do. There are times when bringing in a third party to resolve an unresolvable dispute is absolutely the way to go. These cases are not them.

        Second, I don’t see how managing the arbitration market is a relevant concern. We’re not talking about an arbitration award, we’re talking about pre-arbitration settlements. And as I pointed out, they have already done nearly as much harm to this “arbitration market” by losing this single case as they would have settling both at the midpoint regardless of what comps an arbitrator chooses to look at. And they’ve got the MVP coming up.

        Add to that the cost of the arbitration process itself (teams have people dedicated to doing exactly this), the PR issues for the team, especially with a new and already unpopular president at its helm and potential damage to the relationship with players you ostensibly want to keep enough that you’re trying to work a long-term deal, and all I see is a team cutting off its nose to spite its face — and having no choice but to do so by policy. Surely the people helming major league teams are intelligent enough AT LEAST to consider each case on its own merits.

        Reply
        • Steve Adams

          9 years ago

          My intent wasn’t to put words in your mouth, but to refer to a common refrain fans take when referencing hearings. Apologies for not making that clear — I obviously know that you, specifically, did not say that.

          Managing the arb market is exactly what is relevant to the team here, though. The very basis of a file

          Reply
      • tuner49

        9 years ago

        All the talk about teams having a “responsibility” to each other is PR spin BS. That only works if everybody was on the same page.The “file and trial” system is just a gamble of losing twice as much leverage in future years by not just agreeing on a midpoint or close to it. The ironic thing about it is that the arbitration process uses comparables of all similar players in the league. File and Trial would only work for a team if all teams used it and over half of the cases were won by the teams..
        I would argue that the best way for teams to “manage” the process is to meet with the agents and try to come to an agreement. Only then go to trial if something can not be worked out.

        Reply
      • rrieders

        9 years ago

        The “responsibility” aspect really only comes into play for contracts avoiding arbitration. A player who wins or loses his hearing is almost never going to be used as a comparison unless the two filing numbers are extremely close (like in Hoover’s case) since the filing number isn’t a true representation of the player’s value.

        Reply
    • terrymesmer

      9 years ago

      Your reasoning is flawed owing to unexamined assumptions. You assume the Jays did not go to the halfway mark, but you do not know that. You assume the players would have taken less than their filing number, but you do not know that.

      So through faulty reasoning, you have created a fictional scenario where the Jays have mismanaged their finances and caused there to be bad blood between the team and the players.

      Your logic is wholly without warrant, and so your criticism is entirely without merit.

      Reply
  2. start_wearing_purple

    9 years ago

    Doesn’t the team typically win these? In the last couple of days I think all have gone in the players favor.

    Reply
    • stl_cards16 2

      9 years ago

      Players 3 – Teams 0 so far this year.

      It’s interesting. Perhaps teams haven’t adjusted their arbitration figures enough with the quickly rising salaries.

      Reply
      • start_wearing_purple

        9 years ago

        I think you might be right.

        Reply
  3. Yogajonny

    9 years ago

    I still don’t understand why Chavez is a Blue Jay. Especially if he is taking Hendricks place in the pen. Less upside than Liam, less club control and literally 10 times more expensive. Acquiring him is the weirdest thing the new FO has done.

    Reply
    • stormie

      9 years ago

      Chavez is a viable rotation option though, so even if he ends up in the bullpen as a long man, he’s still providing valuable depth to the rotation that Hendriks didn’t,

      Reply
      • Yogajonny

        9 years ago

        I suppose so, but my money has Chavez as a relief arm-not the 5th starter. If that’s the case, I would rather have Hendricks back.

        Reply
  4. Michael Macaulay-Birks

    9 years ago

    I think the Blue Jays are in a bit of a pickle, Donaldson to me is a prime extension candidate given his age, and MVP status but can they do that before they give extensions to Joey Bats and encarnacion ?

    Reply
    • Yogajonny

      9 years ago

      It sounds like they’re going to try. For what it’s worth, I’d bet on them extending Donaldson and Bautista. Hopefully the Jays are in contention at deadline and Eddie is with them for another post season run. After that I see them offering him a QO and getting a pick for losing him. If not, a deadline deal to grab a prospect or two from someone needing a power surge. As much as I’d love to see them all Jays long term, I can’t see them keeping everyone.

      Reply
    • pd14athletics

      9 years ago

      I’d lock up Donaldson and then worry about the rest. I’m not knocking EE or Joey Bats, but Donaldson is the priority. He’s the hardest to replace anyways. As an A’s fan we all figured that out the hard way. That Barreto kid had better be a star…

      Reply
      • Yogajonny

        9 years ago

        I agree 100% pd14. It sounds like they are trying to work something out w Donaldson. 2nd priority is Jose and then Eddie in my books. I think Barreto is going to turn out just fine for you guys. Might be a win win trade after all if he turns into a monster down the road.

        Reply
    • jaysfan1994

      9 years ago

      He’s not a prime extension candidate given his prime years are covered under arbitration. Jays fans are so spoiled with Encarnacion and Bautista that they think guys aren’t prone to falling off in their mid 30’s. Meanwhile declines like Victor Martinez happen almost every day.

      Going on a year to year basis with Donaldson is fine unless he’s willing to give the Jays a discount for a guaranteed contract, he should be doing so because it’s never a guarantee he doesn’t decline in the near future.

      Reply
  5. gorav114

    9 years ago

    I really don’t understand the file and trial strategy. I think it creates dissension between the team and player. I think teams should follow the strategy used by the Orioles. They only go to trial when they know they are going to win meaning it’s only when the player is being unrealistic or unreasonable. I think the Os have a perfect record in arbitration over the last decade. They always propose a fair number and are willing to negotiate which has led to getting an agreement just slightly less than half the difference repeatedly. Over the last five years this has saved the team over 5 million bucks and generated an impression to the player that they are better off agreeing than going to arbitration. Probably the only thing the organization is consistently good at.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Rangers Option Josh Jung

    Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

    Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

    Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin

    Yordan Alvarez Shut Down Due To Setback With Hand Injury

    Astros Place Jeremy Peña On Injured List With Fractured Rib

    Tucker Barnhart To Retire

    Tyler Mahle To Be Sidelined Beyond Trade Deadline

    Reds Release Jeimer Candelario

    Dave Parker Passes Away

    Griffin Canning Diagnosed With Ruptured Achilles

    Recent

    Trade Deadline Outlook: Chicago Cubs

    Latest On Rockies’ Expected Deadline Approach

    Kolby Allard Elects Free Agency

    Rangers Re-Sign Billy McKinney To Minor League Deal

    White Sox Outright Vinny Capra

    White Sox Sign Kyle Tyler To Minor League Deal

    Nationals Sign Luis Garcia

    Poll: The Yankees’ Biggest Need At The Deadline

    Yankees Place Mark Leiter Jr. On IL With Fibular Head Stress Fracture

    Rhys Hoskins Expects To Be Out Roughly Six Weeks

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version