Headlines

  • Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency
  • Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain
  • White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor
  • Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony
  • Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence
  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Poll: Who Will Be The Last Qualifying Offer Free Agent To Sign?

By Mark Polishuk | February 7, 2016 at 1:13pm CDT

The 2015-16 offseason may be remembered as the qualifying offer’s watershed.  A record 20 qualifying offers were issued in November, and for the first time in the four years since the QO system was instituted, three players (Brett Anderson, Colby Rasmus, Matt Wieters) actually accepted the one-year offer rather than test free agency.

As we approach Spring Training, I suspect at least some of the other 17 players may be wishing they had also taken that one-year, $15.8MM deal.  (Howie Kendrick and Hisashi Iwakuma come to mind.)  The qualifying offer also may have impacted a couple of names in the upper tier of the free agent market, though Chris Davis and Justin Upton did end up landing huge multi-year contracts in the end.

The three players still facing uncertainty, however, are Ian Desmond, Dexter Fowler and Yovani Gallardo.  It looks as if this trio will join Kendrick, Nelson Cruz, Kendrys Morales, Stephen Drew, Ervin Santana and others on the list of players whose markets were drastically affected by the QO, perhaps to the point of them eventually accepting a contract that would’ve seemed like a major bargain only a few months ago.  At this point in the offseason, no team has been willing to meet the asking price and/or give up the first round draft pick necessary to sign any of three players.

While none of the trio have signed, there have been plenty of rumors surrounding each player.  A recap…

Gallardo: The Orioles, Rockies and Astros have been the clubs most recently linked to the righty, with the Blue Jays, Royals and Rangers also reportedly interested at earlier points in the offseason.  We can probably cross off Kansas City and Houston in the wake of their signings of Ian Kennedy and Doug Fister, while Toronto likely doesn’t have the payroll space.

The O’s are very hesitant to give up their first-rounder (the 14th overall pick) to sign Gallardo.  Colorado’s first-rounder is protected so they would only have to give up a second-round pick, though GM Jeff Bridich has downplayed his team’s interest.  The Rangers, of course, are the only team that can sign Gallardo without having to surrender a pick, though they may also be tapped out payroll-wise and they already have several rotation options on hand, albeit with question marks.

Fowler: The Cubs (his former team), White Sox and Rangers have all been rumored to be monitoring the outfielder’s market, with teams like the Indians, Angels, Giants and Cardinals also mentioned as speculative fits.  In our last MLBTR poll, readers had the two Chicago teams as the clear favorites in predicting Fowler’s landing spot.  In my view, the White Sox seem like the best fit for Fowler since thanks to their protected first-rounder, the only pick they’d have to surrender is the bonus compensation selection they received from Jeff Samardzija signing with the Giants.  The Sox heavily value their draft picks, however, and their low-rated farm system needs reinforcements.

Re-signing Fowler makes some sense for the Cubs but it would create an awkward time-share between Fowler, Jorge Soler and Kyle Schwarber (Jason Heyward, obviously, would play every day in either right or center field).  I wonder if the Rangers’ interest in Fowler could be tied to Gallardo’s situation; if Gallardo signs elsewhere and Texas gets a compensation pick, the team could then be more willing to give up its first-rounder (the 20th overall pick) to bring Fowler into the fold.

Desmond: The former National’s situation is at once both seemingly the most muddled yet possibly the most flexible of the trio.  If reports of Desmond’s ability and willingness to play elsewhere than shortstop are still accurate, then his market could be opened up to teams looking for help at second, third or even the outfield.  In a recent edition of the MLBTR Newsletter, Tim Dierkes speculated that Desmond could be a good candidate for a contract with an opt-out after the first year, or perhaps even a flat one-year “pillow contract” to minimize the risk for teams uninterested in giving up a draft pick for a player coming off a tough season.

Dierkes cited the A’s, Braves, White Sox and Tigers as a few of the teams who could be fits for Desmond, with the Rockies also a maybe depending on Jose Reyes’ situation.  The Rays have also been mentioned as a dark horse candidate to sign Desmond on a semi-hometown deal, though given how Tampa is so reliant on developing young talent, it would be a big surprise to see them give up their first-rounder, the 13th overall pick of June’s draft.

Let’s open the debate up to you, the MLBTR audience.  Who do you think will be the last qualifying offer free agent available this offseason?  (MLBTR app users can weigh in here)

Share 9 Retweet 8 Send via email0

MLBTR Polls Dexter Fowler Ian Desmond Yovani Gallardo

AL East Notes: Gallardo, Buchholz, Ortiz, Kendrick
Main
Week In Review: 1/30/16 – 2/6/16
View Comments (39)
Post a Comment

39 Comments

  1. JayceInCase

    9 years ago

    With Michael Brantley’s injury, the Indians currently have zero MLB proven outfielders on the roster. With a three-year OPS matching that of Heyward’s, signing Dexter Fowler should be a no-brainier… But then there’s the attached draft pick. The trade off of nothing more than ‘decent’ players for first round picks helps who? It’s looking like nobody.

    Reply
  2. saratoga72

    9 years ago

    Why wouldn’t these guys just wait until May to sign? The draft pick compensation goes away at that time, right?

    They should not really have a problem staying in shape, and their skills won’t suddenly erode just from missing a few weeks. Teams will need to replace injured players, and they should love the idea of adding a solid veteran without losing their 1st round draft pick.

    What is the harm in holding out until the compensation issue is gone?

    Reply
    • tim815

      9 years ago

      It goes away after the picks are made, in early June,

      Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      9 years ago

      You lose a half season of your career, including the salary that goes with it. Seems like a pretty major disincentive to me.

      Reply
    • Ray Ray

      9 years ago

      Kendrys Morales and Stephen Drew both looked horrible in their half seasons after signing into the season. It’s not so much staying in game shape, it is developing a rapport with teammates and that only happens with experience. That’s one of the main reasons we have Spring Training.

      Plus you also have to factor in the loss of income. Would you rather sign a 1 year/12MM contract now, or a pro-rated version of that in June where you would get 5-6MM for the rest of the year and be thrown right into the fire?

      Additionally, mid and late first round draft picks are so vastly overrated. They only have about a 50% chance of ever making the big leagues and a much smaller chance of being an impact player for even a few years.

      As a Rockies fan, I would love to sign Gallardo to a 4/48MM contract and give up the #38 pick. I wouldn’t be as happy to give up the pick for Fowler or Desmond, but they would still likely provide more overall value to the team than a random #38 pick and on a 1 year deal, you could just QO them again next year and probably recoup the pick.

      Reply
      • davidcoonce74

        9 years ago

        A good point; if you could take present-day Yovani Gallardo, knowing what he is, with the #38 pick in the draft, I think any team would do that. This is why the D-Backs refusal to part with a 2nd round pick for Howie Kendrick is puzzling. Kendrick is WAY more valuable than that pick.

        Reply
    • ryan211

      9 years ago

      The experiences of Stephen Drew and Kendrys Morales might convince them to sign sooner rather than holding out for a mid-season offer. After all, neither one of those two was able to step in and play at a high level, and the current crop of QO-bound free agents might expect teams to be wary of similar mid-season deals.

      Reply
  3. terryg

    9 years ago

    Maybe marginal players will realize they’re not worth as much as they think and they will accept the more than fair QO.

    Reply
  4. Aaron Sapoznik

    9 years ago

    Great poll question!

    The main reason I chose Ian Desmond, hardly a convincing one at that, was because he was the least likely to be re-signed by his former team. Good a reason as any, I suppose. (lol)

    Reply
    • virginiascopist

      9 years ago

      Certainly makes sense, but don’t count out a sign-and-trade; in other words, the Nats sign Desmond, then immediately trade him (with his consent) to a team looking to hang on to their first-round pick. Not saying it’s going to happen, but certainly a possibility.

      Reply
      • seamaholic 2

        9 years ago

        I don’t believe any trade like that has ever happened. It’s technically legal but the league frowns severely on it.

        Reply
      • kbarr888

        9 years ago

        Excellent idea………But the CBA does not allow a “sign-and-trade” deal to be made. A player isn’t eligible to be traded until June 15th (or right around there) when signed as a FA. Traded players can be flipped the same day….as we have seen. Whoever signs them, is stuck with them until mid June at a minimum.

        Reply
        • seamaholic 2

          9 years ago

          No, not true. Everyone can be traded with their permission. Any other kind of arrangement is probably unconstitutional.

          Reply
  5. terryg 2

    9 years ago

    Maybe marginal players will quit over playing their hand and accept the QO. None of these guys had a yr last year worth the almost 16 million dollars of the QO. They made the choice to say no and new what could happen. It’s not the first yr of this.

    Reply
  6. terryg

    9 years ago

    So it’s the teams fault marginal players chose not to except almost 16 million dollars and over play their hand? Non of theDesmond, Gallardo,Fowler trio is worth that much. It’s not nonsense, if they’d have called the teams bluff they’d have 15.8 million dollars and certainty for this season.

    Reply
  7. The Oregonian

    9 years ago

    Except it’s not nonsense, without it there wouldn’t be any parity in the game and teams like the Pirates and Royals would never make it to the postseason.

    Reply
    • thebare

      9 years ago

      Then it should be a crap shoot like a 3rd rounder sacrifice for free agent next one say gets a 4th round pick

      Reply
  8. kiermaier

    9 years ago

    dexter fowler will be the last player with a QQ to sign since not too many teams need an outfielder

    Reply
  9. ilikebaseball 2

    9 years ago

    I think the Sox farm system is tough to compare to most since for most of Kenny Williams tenure they seemed to focus on high floor college players, these guys rarely spend much time in the minors and it seems to be a knock against a system that regularly produces major league talent.

    Reply
    • Cachhubguy

      9 years ago

      If you would have said high floor pitchers, I might agree. But besides Sale and now Rodon (unproven), who are these major league players they have been regularly getting to the majors?

      Reply
  10. Sky14

    9 years ago

    I think the QO system would work better if a minimum was also placed on the years of the offer to get draft pick compensation. It could work in two ways, either the QO would be a deal of three years at $16 million AAV(actually the average of top salaries as it is now), or the offer could remain the same but players signing one year deals would be exempt from a QO. It would limit the field of players who have the stigma of a QO to those who are truly elite talents, as those are the most likely to bypass a larger deal/unlikely to accept a one year deal. Not perfect but either scenario would be an improvement.

    Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      9 years ago

      You could also eliminate the penalty portion of the QO, and keep the bonus draft pick portion. A radical idea I’ve seen floated is for teams losing a qualified free agent and who pick in the top 10, to get an extra pick not after the first round, but BEFORE the first round. Would also help with “tanking.” The criteria for being a qualified free agent would have to be very stringent, so it doesn’t happen very often.

      Reply
      • statyllus

        9 years ago

        The total player contract “market” for the 2015-16 off season included the 137 free agent MLB players as well as the Top 60 amatuer players and even international players. They all competed for MLB team contract dollars. If FAs and the agents are still looking at the FA market as discreet and separate they are making a big mistake Free agency is channel for player acquisition among many and the teams have finite resources to spend.

        Reply
    • statyllus

      9 years ago

      I don’t think the QO actually “hurt” players like Fowler and Kendricks. They are players with strengthens but also significant weaknesses, They were offered nearly $16M to play baseball for a year. They were not going to get that AAV in a multi-year contract. They and their agents misread the market. There is more of an emphasis on “younger and longer” and “older and shorter”. Some players like Colby Rasmus and Matt.Weider made the correct call. They correctly evaluated their demand. What the QOs did is “complicate” the decision that some players had to make. When complexity is injected into any decision the risk usually goes up and so does the consequences of making the wrong decision Greed cannot be a player/agents’sole strategy.

      Reply
  11. seamaholic 2

    9 years ago

    The QO system doesn’t work as intended (at least it doesn’t help that much with parity, although it does keep a lid on some salaries, which was probably also one of the goals). But the idea of “steal from the rich to give to the poor” as you call it, is very important. I would do it differently, by vastly increasing the penalty for going over the luxury cap, including a team losing draft picks and international pool money. But something needs to be in there, or fans of small-market teams would really begin to lose interest and you wouldn’t have a whole lot left to enjoy, even if you’re a fan of one of “the rich.”

    Reply
  12. Overbrook

    9 years ago

    The Sox “low rated” farm system had enough prospects to get Samardzija and Frazier, and not touch their best prospects. While I wouldn’t have made either trade, they have been churning out prospects.
    I wouldn’t give up a pick for Fowler…he’s basically an averageish player and not worth that.

    Reply
    • rickcwik

      9 years ago

      I don’t really diagree with any of that. My thing is the White Sox (and I am a White Sox fan) need to either do a total rebuild like the Cubs, or continue to trade away their farm system and get players to win now while Sale and Abreu are in their prime. Right now they are stuck in this “purgatory” of being average without a true gameplan in mind.

      Reply
      • Ray Ray

        9 years ago

        Why does it have to be one extreme or the other? Why can’t you build a good farm system without gutting the major league roster to do so? It is possible to build up your minor league system while still trying to compete at the big league level, despite what many would have you believe.

        Reply
        • ourgiants25

          9 years ago

          Heh (sigh)… With all the attention being paid to the QO I’d like to point out it isn’t the problem some have made it out to be.

          First, there are plenty of non-QO FA that are struggling to get jobs like Juan Uribe, Austin Jackson, David Freese, Marlon Byrd, Jimmy Rollins, and Tyler Clippard. All those players are decent, and as good as players that have signed like Asdrubal Cabrera. In fact, take a look at all the current FA still available, and you can argue there is a playoff team to be built solely from players still available!

          Second, there is a suggestion that the QO wrecked these players FA, yet non-QO players also saw major pay cuts in this market. In addition to the non-QO guys mentioned above, Cespedes was hurt bad by the talent flush market, as was Cueto, as was Kazmir. Yeah, Cueto, for example, had injury concerns, but his physical was sterling unlike Kenta Maeda. There was absolutely no excuse for Cespedes to have had the trouble he had.

          Third, of the 20 players this year to get QO, only 4 have had major issues with it, and of the 54 players overall to receive the QO in its history only 7 have had major issues (Kendrys Morales, Stephen Drew, Ervin Santana, Kendrick, Fowler, Gallardo, and Desmond). While Nelson Cruz is mentioned in the article, he got a very nice deal from the Mariners after a QO from Baltimore, so you can’t count him. Ervin Santana also wasn’t too hurt as he was able to get a deal with the Braves, after they had a loss in the rotation, that was worth the QO, and he used it to establish the value that helped him land his current deal with the Twins. That really leaves 6 players who’ve been really hurt, but there is also a chance Fowler, Gallardo, and/or Desmond still receives a decent deal.

          Fourth, the whole point of the QO should be that some players except the offer. The fact that that just now happened this year, in the programs fourth year, says that either the value of the QO is too low, or some players have rejected the deal and likely cost themselves as a result.

          I don’t see anything wrong with the QO – it divides teams into building by the draft OR building by FA. That’s a system that creates parity as we’ve seen with BOTH the Royals and Mets, the two WS teams, building through their farm systems and not doing much via FA. There are plenty of representatives of the opposite strategy as well notably the 2013 Red Sox. Obviously, if you’re a player and you misjudge your market and turn down the QO you can get burned, but other factors can hurt your market regardless, just ask Cespedes!

          Reply
        • metsoptimist

          9 years ago

          I agree with your first point, but in regards to Cespedes, there are/were concerns about him.

          Reply
  13. stymeedone

    9 years ago

    I see Gallardo as the least likely to give up a draft pick for. His fastball is unimpressive and in decline. Most teams have a minor league pitcher with at least a similar arsenal. Other than being likely to provide more innings, Gallardo offers little upside to the minor league pitcher.

    Reply
  14. gomerhodge71

    9 years ago

    Going with Desmond. I predict Gallardo will sign within a week.

    Reply
  15. statyllus

    9 years ago

    I think Dexter Fowler has the least options. I don’t see the White Sox signing him for reasons large, small and even petty. The Sox have a protected pick but they don’t want to be the “driver” of their cross town rivals getting a comp pick for Fowler. Suppose that pick turns out to be good MLB player? I said it was petty. I think it’s back to the Cibs for Dexter at a huge bargain (begging them to sign him) and a reduced role.

    Reply
    • metsoptimist

      9 years ago

      How do you know what the White Sox think?

      Reply
  16. rickcwik

    9 years ago

    Bring back the reserve clause.

    Reply
  17. Ray Ray

    9 years ago

    They need to change the system a bit but not throw it out completely. I think losing the top 10 protection for picks in exchange for every team getting one “free” QO signing. Meaning you wouldn’t lose your first round pick until you sign a 2nd QO player. Teams can still receive a sandwich round pick for losing a QO guy whether or not another team loses a pick. Perhaps they could also throw in a clause about re-signing your own FA would count as your free signing as well to prevent teams from using the option too much.

    Reply
  18. Ray Ray

    9 years ago

    It’s always good to hear the opinion of Rhodes scholars such as yourself. We appreciate your valuable time.

    Reply
  19. breckdog

    9 years ago

    I think desmond has the most cons of the three. so i picked him. He had a down year coming into this offseason and i believe that hurts him the most. I also think the nationals would rather have the draft pick instead of desmond so i dont see him going back unless there is a steep discount.

    Reply
  20. kingjenrry

    9 years ago

    Desmond should simply have accepted the offer. He sure as heck doesn’t deserve the $16 million he would have gotten, guaranteed.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    The Astros Are (Again) Not Getting Much From A Pricey First Base Signing

    Latest On Dodgers’ Rotation

    Royals Outright Thomas Hatch

    Diamondbacks Place Kendall Graveman On 15-Day IL

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Guardians’ Will Brennan, Andrew Walters Undergo Season-Ending Surgeries

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Nats Notes: Nuñez, Chapparo, Williams

    The Orioles’ Long-Term Catching Situation

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version