Headlines

  • Rays Owner Stuart Sternberg In “Advanced” Talks To Sell Team
  • Rafael Devers To Start Work At First Base With Giants
  • Giants Acquire Rafael Devers
  • Shohei Ohtani To Make Dodgers Pitching Debut On Monday
  • Roki Sasaki No Longer Throwing; No Timetable For Return
  • Nationals To Promote Brady House
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Latest On Ian Desmond

By Steve Adams | January 27, 2016 at 4:34pm CDT

Marc Topkin of the Tampa Bay Times recently wrote that Ian Desmond’s lingering presence on the free-agent market continues to increase the possibility of a deal between Desmond and the Rays, and today, Topkin explored that topic on a much more in-depth scale.

Per Topkin, Desmond — a Sarasota, Fla. native — has indicated that he would like to play for the Rays. There are a number of other factors working in favor of a match between the two sides, Topkin notes, including the fact that Desmond shares the same agency as Rays skipper Kevin Cash and is close friends with Rays right fielder Steven Souza (from the pair’s days together with the Nationals). However, the Rays are loath to surrender the No. 13 overall pick in order to sign him, considering the importance of the draft to the cost-conscious club. SB Nation’s Chris Cotillo recently tweeted the same sentiment; the Rays have some interest in Desmond but consider the draft pick forfeiture a “huge obstacle” to an earnest pursuit.

Adding Desmond to the fold would shift Brad Miller from receiving the lion’s share of playing time at shortstop into a utility role, though he was deployed in a similar capacity over the past few years in Seattle. Beyond the draft pick and Desmond’s fit on the roster, the length of the deal represents an issue as well. Desmond would likely need to be amenable to a short-term deal — either one year (perhaps with an option) or two years — in order to make a signing realistic, per Topkin. It’s not clear whether Desmond’s asking price has dropped to that point or if he’s still seeking a multi-year deal, however. Alternatively, Desmond’s camp could seek a contract similar to the three-year contract with a one-year opt-out that Yoenis Cespedes just signed with the Mets (of course, at a considerably lower annual rate than Cespedes’ $25MM mark). The contract structure, as Jeff and I discussed on the MLBTR Podcast a few weeks back, makes sense for a number of remaining free agents as a modernized version of the traditional one-year “pillow” deal.

Desmond is just one of four remaining free agents to have rejected a one-year, $15.8MM qualifying offer that still remains on the market. While the Nationals are the lone team that would not need to sacrifice an existing draft pick to sign Desmond (though they’d be forfeiting the right to add an additional pick should he sign elsewhere), James Wagner of the Washington Post writes that there won’t be a reunion between the two parties. Desmond and the Nats haven’t had any form of contract negotiations this offseason, and the additions of Daniel Murphy and Stephen Drew have likely solidified the team’s group of middle infielders, especially with Trea Turner and Wilmer Difo rising through the minor league ranks.

Coming off a season that saw him bat just .233/.290/.384, Desmond’s stock is undeniably weaker than many anticipated prior to the 2015 campaign, although the second half of the season did see him rebound to a more Desmond-esque .261/.331/.446 batting line. Detractors question Desmond’s glove at shortstop — he had a bout of extreme error proneness early in 2015 — and his rising strikeout rate, while those who remain high on his abilities can point to the fact that he’s batted a collective .264/.317/.443 and averaged 22 homers and 20 steals per season since 2012. Jeff recently polled MLBTR readers on whether Desmond or fellow qualifying-offer-hampered free agent Howie Kendrick would earn more, and Desmond won the voting decisively.

In addition to the Rays, some speculative landing spots for Desmonds (from my point of view) include the White Sox, Rockies, D-backs, Braves, Twins, Tigers and Indians (a move to third base or second base would be required for some of those fits), though not all of those clubs are an ideal fit, and a number of them seem reluctant to part with their top unprotected pick. MLBTR’s Tim Dierkes recently explored some of those clubs and other potential fits in an edition of the MLBTR Newsletter (for which you can sign up here).

Share 15 Retweet 9 Send via email0

Tampa Bay Rays Washington Nationals Ian Desmond

Mets Designate Darrell Ceciliani For Assignment
Main
Francisco Cervelli Open To Extension With Pirates
View Comments (37)
Post a Comment

37 Comments

  1. lonestardodger

    9 years ago

    I like Desmond to the Rockies. He can sign a one year deal and fill in as a replacement for Reyes if Reyes gets suspended or is unproductive, plus the Rockies could give him a qo and replace this year’s pick with one in 2017.

    Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      9 years ago

      Doesn’t seem like much of a point, does there? Unless on a one-year deal. The Rockies have a top 100-type SS prospect who will be up mid-season in Trevor Story. And a solid defensive one in Christian Adames on top of that. They’re going to be bad this year, might as well let Story and Adames roll. And of course Reyes later, unless they cut him.

      Reply
    • virginiascopist

      9 years ago

      I agree the Rockies could be an excellent fit. If he has a good first half, they could even try to flip him at the trade deadline.

      Reply
      • plyons

        9 years ago

        As a Rockies fan, I love that idea. Unfortunately, the Rox don’t have a track record for such dealings. Two seasons ago (2014), COL had a deal in place for Eduardo Rodriguez (in exchange for Jorge de la Rosa). Ownership canceled the deal as the Monforts value loyalty over success.
        Going back to the 2014 deadline, the Rox could have also dealt the newly signed and very productive Justin Morneau. They held onto him, paid him millions last season for little production and got nothing for what should have been a quality flip.

        Reply
      • lonestardodger

        9 years ago

        Exactly

        Reply
    • kidaplus

      9 years ago

      If he signed a one year deal the White Sox would probably make the most sense as they poss could contend with him added to the line-up.. Hitters park in the top half of a solid line-up and they currently have Tyler Saladino slotted in unless TIm Anderson makes the big jump this spring. Makes sense for both parties in that case unless the Sox see Anderson making it this year,

      If he goes to colorado and outperforms at home vs the road he could just find himself back in the same spot next year whether thats fair or not. If the rockies are looking at a season where they’re going to be moving their outfiled, not sure what spending $$ on Desmond for a single season where theyre under construction gets them.

      Reply
  2. docmilo5

    9 years ago

    Miller put up a better OPS last year, is cheaper and doesn’t cost a draft pick. Desmond should have taken the QO.

    Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      9 years ago

      This. I have no idea why this is even a thing for the Rays. Unless they plan on making Desmond a LF. Frankly, with the risk of moving positions, I’d rather stick with Jennings.

      Reply
  3. kylelohse

    9 years ago

    What would the Rays do with Loney if they signed Desmond? If they had anyone to trade him to, they would have done it already. I don’t see them cutting him loose and eating the entire $9 millon+ contact that he has this year.

    Reply
    • stymeedone

      9 years ago

      I don’t think they would be planning on playing Looney at SS or Desmond at 1B, so they could play them both.

      Reply
      • kylelohse

        9 years ago

        Of course Loney won’t be playing SS, but Miller would and he would have to shift somewhere else including 1B. They already have Pearce and Morrison for 1B and DH, so Loney would be the likely choice to lose a roster spot.

        Reply
        • mmhitch

          9 years ago

          god the rays are loaded with complete trash

          Reply
  4. tuna411

    9 years ago

    Why, Why, Why do teams consider the opt out?

    It 100 % benefits the player, 0% benefits the team.

    You want to play in city A, then sign. Otherwise, get a job at burger king…

    Reply
    • stymeedone

      9 years ago

      They consider it because it might determine whether the player signs with you or your competition.

      Reply
      • Steve Adams

        9 years ago

        Right — in many cases, they’re the cost of getting the deal done.

        Plus, I don’t hear anyone complaining about how club options solely favor the team, but that’s clearly the case. Club options are more or less pure downside for a player, but I don’t hear anyone going to war over the ridiculously cheap options on Chris Archer’s contract.

        Reply
        • mmhitch

          9 years ago

          What does and option have to do with an opt-out?

          Reply
        • JoeyPankake

          9 years ago

          An opt-out is a player option.

          Reply
        • mmhitch

          9 years ago

          Huh? An opt-out terminates the contract. A player or team option extends the life of the contract at a determined salary

          Reply
        • therealryan

          9 years ago

          Do you really not see the similarities in Cespedes having a 3/$75 contact with an opt out after year one or Cespedes having a 1/$27.5 with a 2 year player option at 2/$47.5? Are you really that confused or just stuck in semantics? Either way, the final result is the same.

          Reply
        • JoeyPankake

          9 years ago

          A team option terminates the contract if it is not picked up. One can even say the team opted out of the remainder of the contract. It’s the exact same thing as a player opting out of his predetermined salary.

          Reply
  5. mryan2

    9 years ago

    I think that the Phillies should move in on Desmond, if he is willing and they feel he can play second. With Crawford on the way up to take over short, Desmond will bring some life to a bland lineup and is just young enough to still be as productive in the next couple years when this team may be able to compete. Next years FA class seems lacking. So maybe make a push now.

    Reply
    • Steve Adams

      9 years ago

      Was going to list the Phillies and Brewers, but sacrificing a pick didn’t make tons of sense to me for a team in their position. But, if he has a huge year in Philly on a one-year deal or something, and the team makes a QO to net a better pick than the second-rounder they forfeited to sign him in the first place (or gets something notable in return come July), there’s some sense to it.

      I don’t know that I think they should be in on him at three years or anything, but I can see the merits of a short-term deal, and if you’re Desmond, hitting at Citizens Bank has to hold some appeal if you’re looking at rebuilding value.

      Reply
  6. stymeedone

    9 years ago

    Listing Detroit here is just grasping at straws.

    Reply
    • Steve Adams

      9 years ago

      I don’t really think so. Nick Castellanos has 313 games in the Majors and has been considerably below replacement level. If Desmond’s looking at a short-term deal and the Tigers thing he can handle third base from a defensive standpoint, he’d be a reasonable upgrade.

      Castellanos made strides defensively in 2015, but he was still a poor fielder with a below-average bat.

      Reply
  7. tramlou

    9 years ago

    They were talking about Desmond (along with Gallardo) on the MLB network this afternoon and it was as if they felt sorry for these guys because of the QO’s that are attached to them and how it’s not fair that quality players are still on the market this late in the offseason.

    I get the overall premise that their market is stalled likely in part because of the QO, but nobody made these guys to reject the $15M QO – if their agents advised such and they followed their direction then it was complete misread on the market given how many quality players were available this offseason in both FA and via trade.

    Add in that Desmond has already turned down a 7 yr/$107 M contract back in 2014 and it’s hard to feel sorry for some of these guys; them and their agents gambled on a larger payday and lost.

    I really don’t see a multi-year deal for Desmond,- maybe Gallardo given teams will always pay for pitching but even if Desmond settles for the 1 year pillow contract, is he really going to get that huge payday next winter?

    Reply
  8. Aoe3

    9 years ago

    Don’t do it Tampa! Save your draft pick and cash for future needs.. You just never know whats going to happen in a season.. Just because hes one of the last free agents available, and has some connections with the Rays, doesn’t mean you should sign him..

    An aging short stop on turf? no thanks.. Not to mention theres the turf to play at Toronto as well.

    Reply
    • virginiascopist

      9 years ago

      If it’s just the draft pick stopping the Rays (not saying that’s the only reason, but merely if it were), they could negotiate a sign and trade with the Nats, if Desmond consents. The Nats sign Desmond for an agreed-upon price, then immediately trade him to the Rays for, most likely a prospect valued somewhere in between the first-round pick (#13 or #14, I think) the Rays would be saving and the compensation-round pick (around #31) the Nats would be sacrificing. It’s a way around the QO penalty, and I stand to be corrected, but I don’t believe it’s illegal as long as the player agrees.

      Reply
      • McGlynn

        9 years ago

        I don’t think they can trade a player they signed during the previous off season until half way through the regular season. I may be mistaken though

        Reply
        • virginiascopist

          9 years ago

          Normally, that is true, but I am fairly certain that as long as the player consents to the “sign and trade,” then it is allowable.

          Reply
        • beajd27

          9 years ago

          A player can’t be traded before June 15, unless he agrees to the trade. So yes, you are right. There was an article on this scenario earlier in the offseason.

          Reply
  9. restinpeacebraves

    9 years ago

    The Braves? Yeah, no. Not unless they dump Aybar. Also, they could sign Desmond and trade him at the deadline too. Or they could move Aybar to 2B since Peterson sucks, then they could trade both Aybar and Desmond at the deadline. All the Braves want to do is trade and build for some day in the distant future.

    Reply
    • Gogerty

      9 years ago

      Is that whining saying the Braves are not improving? Braves are making the right moves. I agree Desmond would be a great pickup, but do not see the team signing him to a one year deal. Signing him to a one year deal and hoping he rebounds for a trade is great, but losing a draft pick to one of the top two teams in the division hurts.

      Reply
      • restinpeacebraves

        9 years ago

        Who’s whining? I’m calling it like it is. Desmond is not part of the 2018 plans and the Braves front office execs have made it clear their only 2016 goal is to not lose 95 games again. So if they sign Desmond, they’ll do so gambling that he has a bounce-back year so they can trade him at the deadline for more prospects that will help down the road.

        And the Braves’ most valuable draft pick is so high it’s protected, so they’d only be giving up a lower-round pick.

        Reply
      • Jon429

        9 years ago

        If the draft order stands as it does today that lower round pick the Braves would lose is actually #40 overall, so it does kinda hurt. To put that pick into perspective, they picked up Austin Riley at 41 last year and he’s now ranked in the top 10 3rd base prospects in baseball.

        Still I could see them signing Desmond for multiple years, trading Aybar now to recoup the loss of the draft pick and slotting Desmond at short for 2016. After this year they could trade him if his stock increases or move him to 3rd base or left field, depending on how other prospects pan out. Though none of this will probably happen. Outside of releasing Swisher I think the Braves are done making moves before the season starts.

        Reply
      • Gogerty

        9 years ago

        Agreed to an extent. Obviously all draft picks can be essential. Within the division is always rough.

        Reply
  10. restinpeacebraves

    9 years ago

    Wonder how much Desmond regrets turning down that $107 million extension in 2014.

    He’ll never see an offer like that again. Not much a one-year offer can do to boost his value – no team is going to invest long-term in a 31-year-old shortstop.

    Reply
  11. danray13

    9 years ago

    The Rays will not give up their first round pick.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Rays Owner Stuart Sternberg In “Advanced” Talks To Sell Team

    Rafael Devers To Start Work At First Base With Giants

    Giants Acquire Rafael Devers

    Shohei Ohtani To Make Dodgers Pitching Debut On Monday

    Roki Sasaki No Longer Throwing; No Timetable For Return

    Nationals To Promote Brady House

    White Sox, Brewers Swap Aaron Civale, Andrew Vaughn

    Justin Martínez To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Brewers’ Aaron Civale Requests Trade

    Angels To Promote Christian Moore

    Brewers Promote Jacob Misiorowski

    Red Sox Acquire Jorge Alcala

    Jackson Jobe To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Shane McClanahan Pauses Rehab, Seeking Further Opinions On Nerve Issue

    Royals Place Cole Ragans On IL With Rotator Cuff Strain

    Red Sox Promote Roman Anthony

    Craig Kimbrel Elects Free Agency

    Marlins Place Ryan Weathers On 60-Day IL With Lat Strain

    White Sox To Promote Grant Taylor

    Mariners Designate Leody Taveras For Assignment, Outright Casey Lawrence

    Recent

    Rays Owner Stuart Sternberg In “Advanced” Talks To Sell Team

    Latest On Rich Hill, Royals

    MLBTR Podcast: Reacting To The Devers Trade And Aaron Civale

    Phillies Acquire Nolan Hoffman From Rangers

    Athleticwear for the Modern Athlete (Sponsored)

    The Opener: Yankees, Nationals, Verlander, Sheehan

    Rafael Devers To Start Work At First Base With Giants

    A’s Notes: Ginn, Gelof, Fisher

    Brewers Trade Wes Clarke To Astros

    Marlins To Recall Adam Mazur

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version