Headlines

  • Cody Bellinger Has Hairline Fracture In Left Leg
  • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings
  • MLB To Experiment With New DH Rule, Mound Distance During 2021 Atlantic League Season
  • Astros, Martin Maldonado Finalizing One-Year Extension
  • James Paxton To Undergo Season-Ending Surgery
  • 2021 Trade Deadline Will Be July 30
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Indians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • Last 100 Comments
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Poll: Which Big Winter Meetings Signing Was The Best?

By charliewilmoth | December 10, 2016 at 2:50pm CDT

The Winter Meetings saw a pair of high-profile trades, but also four free agent signings in excess of $60MM. Of the four teams to open their checkbooks, which made the best move?

Aroldis Chapman, five years, $86MM, Yankees. The Yankees brought back their former closer to rejoin Dellin Betances to form perhaps the best setup/closer tandems in baseball. There’s no questioning Chapman’s dominance, and a lefty with three-digit heat and a 15.5 K/9 is a unique asset indeed. But the Yankees also gave Chapman an opt-out after three years, one that presumably won’t require him to forgo his $11MM signing bonus. And they gave him a no-trade clause through the first three seasons as well, plus a limited no-trade through the last two. As Mike Axisa of River Ave Blues pointed out after the deal, it’s possible the opt-out will arrive just as the Yankees have assembled their best team in years. Then there’s also Chapman’s troubling personal history.

Dexter Fowler, five years, $82.5MM, Cardinals. The Cardinals filled their center field vacancy with Fowler, who batted .276/.393/.447 last season with the Cubs. In so doing, the Cardinals also avoided a trade market that’s been ugly for buyers, as the Nationals’ trade for Adam Eaton perhaps demonstrated. The Cards are buying Fowler’s age-31 through -35 seasons, years in which an athletic player might well remain productive. They did give up the 19th overall pick in the draft with the signing, though, and even the Cardinals have characterized the dollar figure required to land Fowler as “over the top.”

Ian Desmond, five years, $70MM, Rockies. In what was surely the most surprising of the four signings, the Rockies landed a veteran leader who reinvented himself as an outfielder in an excellent comeback season in Texas. Desmond’s defensive flexibility will give the Rockies options as they build their team for the years ahead, and his 20-homer offense should benefit from Coors Field. The Rockies did, however, give up the first protected pick of the draft — No. 11 overall — to make the signing, costing the team eight-figure value not already included in the contract. And the team didn’t look like a contender in 2016 and might or might not be one in 2017, raising questions about whether now was the right time for them to pursue this kind of veteran talent.

Mark Melancon, four years, $62MM, Giants. The Giants were expected to pursue a closer, and they dodged higher-dollar targets like Chapman or Kenley Jansen (and the loss of a draft pick Jansen would require) to sign the 31-year-old Melancon. Melancon’s results in the last four seasons are indisputably terrific — the highest ERA he’s had in that time has been 2.23. He also has terrific control (with a 1.5 BB/9 last season) and routinely posts great ground-ball numbers (54.2% last year). He doesn’t have a typical profile for a dominant closer, however, with only modest velocity (91.8 MPH average fastball velocity last year, down about a mile from 2013) and a strikeout rate that’s only a bit more than half of Chapman’s. Long-term reliever contracts have historically been dicey propositions, and it remains to be seen if Melancon can dodge the trends. Melancon’s deal also contains considerable value not included in the $62MM total in the form of a no-trade clause and an opt-out after the first two years.

What do you think? Which team’s new contract is the best of the four?


Share 0 Retweet 9 Send via email0

MLBTR Originals MLBTR Polls

Central Notes: Burton, Moncada, Brewers
Main
Cafardo’s Latest: Ortiz, Buchholz, Pomeranz, Papelbon, Haren, Preller
111 comments
newest oldest

Comments

  1. a1544

    4 years ago

    Chapman

    Like
    Reply
  2. dodgers4life357

    4 years ago

    Chapman

    Like
    Reply
  3. smelliott00

    4 years ago

    I have it as a tie between Melancon and Fowler. It’s hard for me to side with a guy who won’t play every day, but the impact that he will have on that SF team is extraordinary. Fowler, on the other hand, will add another steady on base guy as well as add an influx of athleticism and energy to a somewhat aging roster. In Fowler’s case, too, I think the Cardinals may go add someone else now that their main need is filled.

    Like
    Reply
    • nick9797

      4 years ago

      Melancon is a ground ball pitcher who can be 50/50 next season. My vote is he flounders. Ground ball pitchers are just too unpredictable. His last two seasons were good, but just like Grienke falling far from grace last season, I believe that’s what will happen with Melancon

      Like
      Reply
  4. philharmonica

    4 years ago

    How is Desmond above 0%??? Poll must be rigged!

    Like
    Reply
    • andyb

      4 years ago

      If it’s rigged it’s because it claims that 313 people voted for Desmond as the best move.

      Like
      Reply
      • donniebaseball

        4 years ago

        Because they gave up the 11th overall pick. That’s why I chose fowler. Not in love with with that signing either

        Like
        Reply
    • irish0625

      4 years ago

      Russians probably hacked it!

      Like
      Reply
      • thebare

        4 years ago

        Hey Trump can win so can the Padres thank Putin a Padre fan

        Like
        Reply
    • irish0625

      4 years ago

      The Russians must have hacked the poll!

      Like
      Reply
      • Djones246890

        4 years ago

        Fake news!!!! Lol. The mainstream media saying the alternative news is fake is like a pr0stitute calling the Virgin Mary a “ho.”

        Like
        Reply
  5. Grant Robinson

    4 years ago

    They all look like bad deals, but Chapman is the least bad I suppose.

    Like
    Reply
    • johnsilver

      4 years ago

      Chapman just don’t see lasting 5y with such great velocity which is pretty much all he has going for hime, now if he learns to really pitch during this contract? That could change if he dips 4-5mph.

      Fowler is the one I don’t get. not that good with the glove and off and on with the bat, K’s a lot, not good power that will go down more in st looie? People were hammering when JD Drew got 70m 10y ago and Drew was better than this guy, at least Drew could play Defense and not hurt his team.

      St Louis sometimes gets more out of pitchers than other teams, but not position players. I see this guy as a bad deal waiting to happen now.

      Like
      Reply
      • argenys

        4 years ago

        How many pitchers lose 4-5 mph in their early thirties? If your talking into his mid or late thirties ill bite on that but that’s completely BS made out of thin air based on some dark hope you have. And even if he did lose that and is pitching in the upper high 90’s who’s to say he will be ineffective? Because he struggled in the Postseason? There is a difference when you are fatigued throwing that and when you’re OK. You can’t compare a fatigued pitcher to a rested one. And you’re assuming that he will do nothing to change his pitching if that happens. You forget not long ago he was a starter and throws more than just a fastball. But you seem like a typical fairweather fan that doesn’t really know what they’re talking about just projecting what you hope will happen….

        Like
        Reply
        • chesteraarthur

          4 years ago

          “And you’re assuming that he will do nothing to change his pitching if that happens.”

          “now if he learns to really pitch during this contract?”

          What?

          Like
          Reply
        • johnsilver

          4 years ago

          It’s not uncommon at all for primarilly FB throwing (hard) relievers to lose several ticks by age of 30. I thought of Joba chamberlain and daniel bard right off. If think about it, like really did.. Could am sure come up with many moren and both Bard + Chamberlain lost those ticks by 30 or less, as in 4-5mph and were 100mph guys.

          Like
          Reply
        • argenys

          4 years ago

          You’re talking about injured players. Of coarse if he got injured he would lose several ticks….

          Like
          Reply
      • frosttie

        4 years ago

        Can’t beat a leadoff hitter that hits for 400+ OBP career when leading off an inning

        Like
        Reply
      • themed

        4 years ago

        I see just the opposite. Cubs don’t win without him. Just gets better and better.

        Like
        Reply
        • chesteraarthur

          4 years ago

          And you think the cards are going to win with him?

          Like
          Reply
        • themed

          4 years ago

          Yes much better with him. Exactly what they needed.

          Like
          Reply
        • Joe Shlabotnik

          4 years ago

          Such wishful thinking.

          Like
          Reply
      • chesteraarthur

        4 years ago

        comparing a contract from 10 years ago to one today is just stupid.

        Like
        Reply
  6. AddisonStreet

    4 years ago

    Love Dexter, but thats way too much money for way too long for what he does. Chapman will probably bring the most value.

    Like
    Reply
    • themed

      4 years ago

      Heyward?

      Like
      Reply
      • chesteraarthur

        4 years ago

        He signed last year, champ.

        Like
        Reply
        • themed

          4 years ago

          Yes thinking he makes twice as much but only half as good as Fowler.

          Like
          Reply
  7. Fred

    4 years ago

    Good chance all of these deals turn bad. tbh, I like Rich Hill’s the best.

    Like
    Reply
  8. YankeesFan805

    4 years ago

    Hands down Chapman but there are still a lot of big name guys out on the open market who may get cheaper deals

    Like
    Reply
  9. joshua.barron1

    4 years ago

    Desmond is the best signing! LOL

    Like
    Reply
    • astrosfan4life

      4 years ago

      Going to Coors Field he will offer more in value than Fowler will playing anywhere. Desmond is a career .270ish hitter who averages 20+ HR. His biggest downfall is his inability to get on base at a good, consistent rate. Conversely, Fowler is pretty much average all around for an OFer, except he gets on base at a pretty good clip. Neither are going to win a Gold Glove, so I will take the guy producing runs over the guy getting on base slightly more and hoping someone else will drive him in.

      Thats my opinion but ultimately, I feel that they are all going to be bad contracts before any of them reach maturity.

      Like
      Reply
  10. csamson11

    4 years ago

    Koji Uehara

    Like
    Reply
  11. BB_dont_R

    4 years ago

    Desmond. Watch him have a best season ever in Coors. Gives the Rockies a ton of depth in case someone gets hurt in infield.

    Like
    Reply
    • astrosfan4life

      4 years ago

      I definitely think he has the best chance to have the best value over the course of the deal versus everyone else, as long as he stays in Colorado.

      Like
      Reply
    • JKB

      4 years ago

      I agree. Its Desmond

      Like
      Reply
      • markmc1235

        4 years ago

        I voted for Desmond as well. That’s way to much for Fowler imo.

        Like
        Reply
  12. Dannydeman

    4 years ago

    All those signings appear pretty bad. Chapman at what 17 million a year for three years if he is really good, and if he isn’t dominant after a year or two the yankees are stuck at 17 mil a year for a no longer effective reliver? Either he opts out before the yankees are in full swing and takes his extra 11 million to go with it or he falls off in year 2 or 3 and stays around to help clog the payroll

    Like
    Reply
  13. andyb

    4 years ago

    Cardinals and Giants moves are the best improvement of needs by teams, but I think Fowler is more likely to be worth his contract than Melancon is, so Fowler gets my votes.

    Like
    Reply
    • CUBSOXCESSFUL

      4 years ago

      Must be from Chicago stuffing the ballet box here. lol

      Like
      Reply
  14. stryk3istrukuout

    4 years ago

    I think the Giants need Melancon the most. Bullpen woes were their glaring weakness last year. While Chapman bolsters the Yankees bullpen quite clearly, I feel they had/have bigger needs. Desmond should put up some good numbers in Coors, but as well, a lot of players can hit in Coors especially at a lesser price. If they trade Blackmon or CarGo for other needs, it is possibly a better trade in time. As for the Cardinals, I don’t fully understand as they expressed a need for defense. I do see that the other options are largely mid-contract and would cause a hefty loss of prospects. They apparently weren’t big on Carlos Gomez. I personally loved the thought of Jarrod Dyson as the price would be substantially less, he provides elite speed, and great defense. As long as the offense clicks, Fowler is fine, but he still does miss about 25 games a year on average on top of everything and I worry he was a bit overvalued because of the Cubs juggernaut offense. For the prices, none of the trades were particularly bad. I would say it’s between the Giants and Cards. Though I’m not big on Fowler, they filled a clear need and one that will play every day (unlikeva closer).

    Like
    Reply
    • themed

      4 years ago

      I’m big on Fowler

      Like
      Reply
      • stryk3istrukuout

        4 years ago

        Contain yourself

        Like
        Reply
  15. Eck

    4 years ago

    After watching the special the other night on the Cubs’ World Series victory, I find very troubling that the Cubs made no effort to resign Chapman. Probably has to do with game 7. The biggest moment ever and he came up small with what could’ve been the biggest blown save in World Series history, if the Cubs lost.

    Like
    Reply
    • bballblk

      4 years ago

      No, it was because they felt that they could find better trades and free agents over the next 5-6 years for their closer job than was worth Chapman or Jansen’s record contracts this year.

      Like
      Reply
  16. CUBSOXCESSFUL

    4 years ago

    I believe I had read previously on MLB Trade Rumors that Dexter Fowler was also given a no-trade clause in his contract which isn’t mentioned in this poll article. If that’s the case, it should be factored into the equation of who’s new contract is the best.

    Like
    Reply
  17. Lance

    4 years ago

    No team filled a glaring need like the Giants did with Melancon. He can instantly make SF 6-10 games better next year. Fowler is second among those four. STL needed a spark and some better defense. Desmond will be a good fantasy pick in Coors but he won’t make them a contender by himself. Chapman is great but the Yanks were mediocre with him this year. They need a lot more pieces.

    Like
    Reply
    • baseballnamescanbehard

      4 years ago

      “He can instantly make SF 6-10 games better next year.”

      Really? 6-10 games better?

      I don’t think Melancon is as good as other do. He misses a lot of bats, as noted in his h/ip, but his k/ip ratio is too low for an elite closer.

      Like
      Reply
  18. ripperlv

    4 years ago

    Melancon pitches almost as good as the other guys for 70 innings/year and $20 million cheaper. Best value

    Like
    Reply
    • argenys

      4 years ago

      he is not almost as good look at sabermetrics like WAR, he is three years older meaning he is more likely to decline in his contract as he will be 2 years older by the end of both of their contracts and the difference is actually 1.7 million a year which is the way teams and fans looks at it.

      Like
      Reply
  19. Bank On It

    4 years ago

    Fowler

    Like
    Reply
  20. argenys

    4 years ago

    Let me get this straight Melancon at 15.5/yr is a better signing that Chapman at 17.2/yr? You guys realize that’s a difference of only 1.7 million a year for a pitcher who is 3 years younger is signed through to 2 years younger and is on another level in terms of talent and sabermetric value? LOL @ random baseball fans.

    Like
    Reply
    • Dannydeman

      4 years ago

      Yes it’s a two million dollar difference and shorter risk period. Also melancon knows how to pitch without just relying on his fastball so if it loses velocity it won’t be as much as a catastrophe as it will be for chapman. However the reason the signing is better is cuz he filled a much bigger need for the giants than chapman does for the yankees. The giants blew 30 saves last year and are trying to compete for a World Series the next few years. The yankees signed a top closer at a record contract for years that they are not expected to compete for the World Series. Further more they had bigger areas of need with cheaper solutions

      Like
      Reply
      • astrosfan4life

        4 years ago

        You are spot on in regards to Melancon over Chapman. WHEN Chapman loses velocity, his ERA and WHIP will skyrocket. Melancon can actually pitch, he’s not just a thrower who relies on 103 mph heat. But fans who understand the difference don’t need to quote sabermetrics and try to belittle other people and call them “random baseball fans.”

        And you are absolutely correct that Melancon actually fills a legitimate need in SF whereas Chapman wasn’t needed in NY, he’s simply a luxury.

        Like
        Reply
        • argenys

          4 years ago

          I forgot chapman was’nt a starter not long ago and only throws fastballs and will not be able to get batters out with 99MPH heat(please bring up postseason when he was throwing that fatigued and not as a rested pitcher which makes all the difference in the world) and will be so hard headed he will refuse to use any of his other pitches or adjust at all because he is so proud he will love getting manhandled on the field..

          Like
          Reply
      • argenys

        4 years ago

        shorter risk period? 1 year when melancon is already 3 years and 1 month older so you have chapman signed through an earlier age? WTF. and you’re basing that chapman cant get people out if he falls to a 99MPH range…. like just because he struggled while being fatigued in the postseason at that range that means anything other than a fatigued pitcher struggling….. and he has other pitches and was a starter not long ago. and you honestly believe if he struggles for a few month he won’t alter anything or rely more on other pitches? is he dumb?

        Like
        Reply
      • argenys

        4 years ago

        shorter risk period? 1 year when melancon is already 3 years and 1 month older so you have chapman signed through an earlier age? WTF. and you’re basing that chapman cant get people out if he falls to a 99MPH range…. like just because he struggled while being fatigued in the postseason at that range that means anything other than a fatigued pitcher struggling….. and he has other pitches and was a starter not long ago. and you honestly believe if he struggles for a few month he won’t alter anything or rely more on other pitches? is he that thick?

        Like
        Reply
      • chaffed_nutsack

        4 years ago

        ^^this guy knows what’s up

        Like
        Reply
  21. gmflores27

    4 years ago

    Downer

    Like
    Reply
  22. jaysfan77

    4 years ago

    I voted Melancon as SF blew 30 saves last year, that seems to be money well spent.

    Fowler, wow he cashed in, his numbers even in Coors field weren’t all that eye popping, and he couldn’t even get a contract last year until spring training, what a difference a year makes! I’m glad the Jays didn’t sign him for that much/long, even though they kinda needed a player who offers his type of skills.

    I’m not really sure what Colorado is thinking, obviously they aren’t happy with some current outfielders maybe? The signed him to play first base? Really?

    Chapman, well, the Yankees did need an anchor in the bullpen, I’m not sold on Betances yet myself even though his numbers are fantastic, he throws so many sliders I see him blowing his arm up at some point soon. But 86 milllion for a closer, gee whiz, that’s a lot of dough for 60 innings a year, boy it’s mind boggling the money in baseball nowadays.

    Like
    Reply
  23. bballblk

    4 years ago

    Ian Desmond was the best signing. The Rockies got him for $12.5 million less than the Cardinals did for Fowler over the same timespan, and in my opinion had a better year than Fowler last year:
    Desmond: AVG: .285, HR: 22, SB: 21, OPS .782
    Fowler: AVG: .276, HR: 13, SB: 13, OPS: .840
    And Desmond is more versatile than Fowler as well, as he can play short and 1st

    Like
    Reply
    • stinkfinger

      4 years ago

      I like Desmond a lot, especially playing at Coors, but to forfeit the 11th overall pick for him to play 1st base? I hope this is just the 1st piece COL picks up. Maybe they trade Blackmon, sign a real 1B and stick Desmond in the OF. IDK . I voted Chapman, I think he is a freak of nature and will opt out in 3 yrs anyways. Gives the NYY one of the best 8th-9th inning options, shortens games, with their SPs-they’ll need those guys in the pen quite often.

      Like
      Reply
    • hill

      4 years ago

      Agree 100%

      Like
      Reply
      • tpad

        4 years ago

        I think Desmond is supposed to take on a role similar to Zobrist, probably spending the most time at first base but likely to play all around the field.

        Like
        Reply
  24. 1738hotlinebling

    4 years ago

    Matt Holliday

    Like
    Reply
  25. AngelsintheTroutfield

    4 years ago

    The final poll questions which “contract” is best for the team.

    Desmond is only $14m per yr and doesn’t have no trade or opt out clauses. He wins if you go by what the poll asks.

    Best overall value is probably Melancon or Chapman though. Didn’t surrender picks and both are elite. Just a question of whether or not they can sustain

    Like
    Reply
    • markmc1235

      4 years ago

      I forgot about giving up the 11th pick for Desmond. I’d pick Chapman then because there was no draft pick compensation and he’s younger and obviously a better pitcher than melancon.

      Like
      Reply
  26. Dannydeman

    4 years ago

    All I’m saying is chapman makes no sense for the yankees. They needed a bat or two, if you are trying to start a youth movement you can’t put all that pressure on your line-up not having any veteran boppers to supplement them, and imagine the poor young starters getting 0 run support, instead you sign a 17 mil per closer for the few years you aren’t expected to really need him.

    Like
    Reply
    • LADreamin

      4 years ago

      He sells tickets and bring hype to NY. $17 isn’t a bad expense for marketing, especially since it looks like they’re aiming to be under the salary cap in 2017.

      Like
      Reply
    • dwhitt3

      4 years ago

      They have Gardner, Ellsbury, Headley, Holliday, Castro, an to a lesser extent Gregorius. How many veterans you want?

      Like
      Reply
      • Dannydeman

        4 years ago

        I meant veterans who can help carry an offense when the youth is struggling, and chapman doesn’t really bring enough hype to put many butts in the seats of a 4th place team.

        Like
        Reply
    • argenys

      4 years ago

      where are you plugging in the bat?

      Like
      Reply
  27. terry

    4 years ago

    Since the question is which contract is best for his team, rather than which is the best contract, I have to say Melancon

    Like
    Reply
  28. northofborder

    4 years ago

    Lets poll the biggest disappointment in non signing Edwin or Jose

    Like
    Reply
  29. outstandinginthefield

    4 years ago

    My best guess would be Chapman but of course we won’t know for a couple of seasons from now.

    Like
    Reply
  30. halos101

    4 years ago

    melancon easily

    Like
    Reply
  31. em650r

    4 years ago

    Chapman

    Like
    Reply
  32. James_07

    4 years ago

    Fowler to the Cards

    Like
    Reply
  33. madmanTX

    4 years ago

    Desmond. The rest will end up being bad deals.

    Like
    Reply
  34. SimplyAmazin91

    4 years ago

    Too much money for all these guys especially relievers. It’s kind of hurting the game imho

    Like
    Reply
  35. yclept

    4 years ago

    I had to give it to Fowler – plays a premium position, fills a void the Cardinals actually REALLY needed to fill, and has been an above average MLB player for enough seasons to convince me that he should be able to continue to at least provide a solid OBP over the next few years.

    I know the game has changed – but I still can’t get behind big money deals for short relievers. After all, the regular season strategies are not likely to change – these guys are still 1-inning guys.. Since I think the Giants are closer than the Yankees, I would give an edge to Melancon – he isn’t as good as Chapman, but he may help his team achieve something quicker.

    I can’t really say anything about Desmond – if the goal truly is first base, his value is going to sink. I didn’t even consider him for the top spot.

    Like
    Reply
    • themed

      4 years ago

      Easily Fowler by far the best move

      Like
      Reply
    • baseballnamescanbehard

      4 years ago

      I agree with all of this.

      Like
      Reply
    • calikid13

      4 years ago

      Agreed

      Like
      Reply
  36. Thronson5

    4 years ago

    I hate to say it because I am a Dodgers fan but Melancon has to be the best signing. The Giants have a solid team but would blow the game late because they had no closer. Well..now they do and that’s a bit game changer for them. I really hate even thinking about them getting better lol

    Like
    Reply
  37. cardfan2011

    4 years ago

    I don’t know cuz they’re all overpays; but I’d guess Desmond.

    Like
    Reply
  38. misterkissinger

    4 years ago

    Any other non-contender spends $80 M on a closer and it; “WTF.” The Yankees do it and it’s “genius!”

    Like
    Reply
    • argenys

      4 years ago

      I agree with you but unfortunately we have the context of melancon who is 37 months older only making 1.7 million a year less. Its probably more of a melancon got too much than chapman is a good signing but comparing both of those contracts chapman is clearly better as he is signed through to being 2 years younger than melancon and is starting from a higher production.

      Like
      Reply
      • chesteraarthur

        4 years ago

        Chapman got a full no trade for 3 years, an opt out after 3 (so when the yankees actually look to be good again he can leave if he’s still good or hold out for them to pay him more) and he got an extra year. Why are you only focusing on $$? These other perks have obvious value to the player.

        Like
        Reply
        • argenys

          4 years ago

          So the Yankees won’t be any good in 18-19? care to explain why?

          Like
          Reply
    • Michael Macaulay-Birks

      4 years ago

      Why would a non contender spend $80 million on a closer anyway?

      Like
      Reply
  39. dshires4

    4 years ago

    There should be a “None Of The Above” option since all those deals are terrible.

    Like
    Reply
    • themed

      4 years ago

      Fowler to Cards fantastic if you look what cubs paid to Heyward. Fowler twice as good half as much.

      Like
      Reply
  40. mike156

    4 years ago

    The way this piece was written you could have just easily said “Which Free Agent Signing Was Most Regrettable?”

    Like
    Reply
  41. tommyLA

    4 years ago

    As a Dodgers fan.. Melancon for sure.

    Like
    Reply
  42. Voice of Reason

    4 years ago

    It’s so odd that Fowler leads this poll that you’d almost think the cardinals hacked this system to help the organization out and look better. But, then it’s silly to think that any organization would hack a system to make it look better or give it an unfair advantage.

    Like
    Reply
  43. Txlonghorn1

    4 years ago

    Chapman

    Like
    Reply
  44. GO NEW YORK

    4 years ago

    Chapman definitely.

    Like
    Reply
  45. R.D.

    4 years ago

    I could never vote for a reliever here. Just terrible idea to give long term deals to them imo.

    Desmond is cheaper than Dex and the question is “best deal for the team.”

    Desmond looks to have the most value, as if he puts up one 30/30 season the Rockies are gonna get a massive haul of prospects.

    Like
    Reply
  46. nrd1138

    4 years ago

    Here is the thing about Chapman. The Cubs rode him hard in the playoffs, and we have seen closers who have great seasons previously fall flat on their face the next season becasue they are gassed. Could Chapman be fine? Sure, but I would say that a lot of mileage on an arm during the playoffs combined with a short off season does not bode well.

    Like
    Reply
    • markmc1235

      4 years ago

      You are right about relievers being so up and down. Giving a record breaking 5 year contract to a closer is hard to do for me because of how inconsistent closers have shown to be over the years, but Chapman is just different. I have zero doubt he will be dominate next year and most likely five more year unless he gets hurt. Jenson I feel the same way about too. Those two pitchers are just special.

      Like
      Reply
      • calikid13

        4 years ago

        There’s no such thing as special. Why don’t you research the injury (TJS/nerve inflammation/tears) history likelihood of pitchers that throw like Chapman. What happens if these way overpaid relievers go down for a surgery? $80 Million on a guy that (according to historical trends) will lose effectiveness, high likelihood of injury, and won’t be on the field every day to make an impact. LOL!

        Like
        Reply
  47. gomerhodge71

    4 years ago

    Can I vote for “None of the Above”?

    Like
    Reply
    • frosttie

      4 years ago

      Only a Cubs fan would say that.

      Like
      Reply
  48. Joe Shlabotnik

    4 years ago

    Chapman was definitely the worst. The Yankees are 2 seasons from needing to worry about closing games. They looked so smart up until inking that turd.

    All four suck.

    Like
    Reply
    • themed

      4 years ago

      No all four very good difference makers. All good signing. A bad signing example would be Jason Heyward for 184 million last year. You could have all 4 for that ridiculous price.

      Like
      Reply
  49. calikid13

    4 years ago

    Let’s answer the question with logic. Chapman/Melancon are way overpriced and could easily lose effectiveness – as most aging relievers do. Desmond will be among a crowded outfield, playing on a team that didn’t need any more offense (Coors field – so easy, a toddler could do it.) and Desmond doesn’t have a fixed defensive position. Fowler. Unlike the overpriced relievers, he will play EVERY DAY and make the biggest impact to the team that signed a player. Cardinals needed a leadoff hitter to move Carpenter back. Fowler is a high OBP player that brings a major impact to the lineup. Grichuk and Piscotty are above average fielders and Fowler can be above average if he plays further back. A major overlooked factor is the veteran leadership that Fowler brings to his new organization – Holliday is gone and Yadi/Wainwright will be soon enough. Compared to the lunatics that decided Heyward was a good signing, Fowler is only half the price and is every bit as valuable (likely more valuable) than Heyward. Logic and intelligence. Can you hack that, people?

    Like
    Reply
  50. schleg

    4 years ago

    Fowler. Solidifies CF and top of the order.

    Like
    Reply
  51. thekid24

    4 years ago

    Desmond or Melancon. Melancon is the best deal in terms of contract breakdown. However, you have to remember that Closers are only used so many times within in a season, some of those times are meaningful and sometimes they’re not. A team is lucky to get 70-80 appearances from their closer in a full season, and with a every-day position player you’re getting 650+ plate appearences, 180+ appearances on the base paths, and a ton of appearances in defensive-value. So it’s tough to say that $62M is the accurate value attached with a top-tier closer, IMO I think it’s way too much. Ian Desmond can absolutely rake and Coors Field is going to inflate his stats even more, so I say Desmond is the best over-all contract out of the four. IMO Fowler is a bit overrated and I think the Cubs & their postseason really added some $Ms onto his market value.

    Like
    Reply
  52. marvelmarv

    4 years ago

    Melancon is the best signing. Terrific control.

    Like
    Reply
  53. Groucho

    4 years ago

    The Rangers. They get a #11 draft pick.

    Like
    Reply
    • Lance

      4 years ago

      i think the rangers fans would rather have Desmond, a guy who can help them now as opposed to a draft pick which are more often bust. The Rangers window is NOW.

      Like
      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Cody Bellinger Has Hairline Fracture In Left Leg

    2021-22 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings

    MLB To Experiment With New DH Rule, Mound Distance During 2021 Atlantic League Season

    Astros, Martin Maldonado Finalizing One-Year Extension

    James Paxton To Undergo Season-Ending Surgery

    2021 Trade Deadline Will Be July 30

    Diamondbacks Sign Josh Reddick To Minor League Deal

    Jonathan Hernandez Undergoes Tommy John Surgery

    Dexter Fowler To Undergo Season-Ending Knee Surgery

    MLB Inspecting “Suspicious Baseballs” From Trevor Bauer’s Latest Start

    Recent

    Latest On Twins’ COVID-19 Situation

    Quick Hits: Odorizzi, Posey, Miggy, Mazara, Rays

    MLBTR Chat Transcript

    Padres Place Dan Altavilla On 10-Day IL, Select Nick Ramirez

    Nationals’ Luis Avilan Suffers UCL Tear

    East Injury Notes: Kiermaier, Harper, Suero, Biggio

    White Sox Outright Nick Williams

    Brewers To Place Christian Yelich On Injured List

    Diamondbacks To Place Tim Locastro On Injured List

    Rangers Activate Willie Calhoun, Brock Holt

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Kris Bryant Rumors
    • Francisco Lindor Rumors
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • 2020-21 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent Tracker
    • 2020-21 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2021-22 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2021
    • 2021 MLB Arbitration Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Indians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version