Headlines

  • Cardinals Sign Miles Mikolas To Two-Year Extension
  • Keston Hiura Will Not Make Brewers’ Roster
  • Rhys Hoskins Diagnosed With Torn ACL, Will Undergo Surgery
  • Jed Lowrie Announces Retirement
  • Jose Altuve To Miss About Two Months Due To Thumb Surgery
  • Rockies Sign Jurickson Profar
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • Top 50 Free Agents
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2023
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Arbitration Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Rangers Acquire Austin Jackson, Cory Gearrin; Could Trade Jackson

By Connor Byrne | July 8, 2018 at 12:47pm CDT

12:47pm: Jackson may never even play for the Rangers, per Gerry Fraley of the Dallas Morning News. General manager Jon Daniels told the outfielder “to hold off on reporting,” Fraley writes. It seems they’ll try to trade him.

12:05pm: The Rangers have acquired outfielder Austin Jackson, reliever Cory Gearrin and right-hander Jason Bahr from the Giants in exchange for a player to be named later or cash considerations, according to Texas’ executive vice president of communications, John Blake. To clear room on their 40-man roster, the Rangers moved relievers Matt Bush and Tony Barnette to the 60-day disabled list. Meanwhile, the Giants will select both outfielder Steven Duggar and righty Ray Black from Triple-A, John Shea of the San Francisco Chronicle tweets.

This trade amounts to a cost-cutting move for the Giants, who were narrowly under the $197MM competitive-balance tax threshold entering Sunday. Now, with the Rangers taking on the salaries of both Jackson and Gearrin (per Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic), the Giants are seemingly in better position to make some moves around the July 31 non-waiver trade deadline as they try to hang in the NL West race.

San Francisco added Jackson on a two-year, $6MM free-agent contract last winter on the heels of a season in which the veteran was a key role player for the Indians. The 31-year-old Jackson has gone backward this season, though, as he took 165 plate appearances with the Giants and hit just .242/.309/.295 with no home runs, 14 unintentional walks and 59 strikeouts. He’ll now attempt to revive his season in his native Texas.

The Giants tried to get rid of Gearrin via outright waivers last month, but no one claimed him. The 32-year-old’s on an affordable $1.675MM salary in his penultimate season of team control, though he has seen his ERA increase from 1.99 in 2017 to 4.20 in 2018. Overall this year, Gearrin has tossed 30 innings and managed 9.3 K/9 against 3.9 BB/9.

Along with helping the Giants get out from under the salaries of Jackson and Gearrin, the out-of-contention Rangers also added Bahr – who ranked as San Francisco’s 27th-best prospect at MLB.com. Bahr, 23, joined the Giants just last year as a fifth-round pick. He has since pitched solely at the Single-A level, including 84 2/3 innings of 2.55 ERA ball this season.

With the Jackson experiment having failed for the Giants, they’ll introduce the well-regarded Duggar to their outfield mix. The 24-year-old Duggar, a 2015 third-round pick and MLB.com’s third-ranked Giants prospect, owns a .272/.354/.421 line in 356 Triple-A plate appearances this season. He’ll join a San Francisco outfield that hasn’t gotten average or better offensive production from anyone but Andrew McCutchen, Gorkys Hernandez and Austin Slater this year.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.

Share 0 Retweet 9 Send via email0

Newsstand San Francisco Giants Texas Rangers Transactions Austin Jackson Cory Gearrin Matt Bush Ray Black Steven Duggar Tony Barnette

7 Teams Have Made Offers For Manny Machado
Main
Minor MLB Transactions: 7/8/18
View Comments (111)

Comments

  1. sportsman69

    5 years ago

    What’s the motive from the Giants standpoint? More moves to come maybe?

    Reply
    • BlueSkyLA

      5 years ago

      It must be cash not the PTBNL. Trying to clear some payroll space to make a deadline move.

      Reply
    • JDGoat

      5 years ago

      Get rid of dead roster spots

      Reply
    • Gobbysteiner

      5 years ago

      Lol pretty sure they improve with this trade. Jackson and Gearrin both have minus WAR and they’re atrocious. If nothing else Duggar has gold glove defense and some speed. And ray black has strikeout numbers that are off of the charts and throws a 100 basically every pitch. Giants get rid of two bad players, free up salary space, and get an infusion of young talent. Jackson and Gearrin get fresh starts and the rangers get a nice prospect. Win win for everyone involved.

      Reply
    • sacball

      5 years ago

      Duggar + Black >>>> Jackson + Gearrin

      Reply
      • justinkm19

        5 years ago

        You act like the Rangers traded Duggar and Black. The Giants got a PTBNL. It won’t be anything special.

        Reply
    • Samuel

      5 years ago

      “….. hold off on reporting,”
      —————-
      What an utter joke the MBA / Analytic front offices have made MLB.

      Talk about being treated like cattle. The players have no idea what team they will be playing on from one day to the next…..or in what city. The majority of players are interchangeable. The FO’s are like stock market day traders – going long one day, short the next; playing puts, calls, covered options. etc. It’s impossible for fans to follow this mess. And then there are the daily injuries……

      Fantasy League for real.

      Reply
      • Adam6710

        5 years ago

        huh?

        Reply
      • thatdudetg

        5 years ago

        It’s been like this forever bud. Social media just makes it more noticeable now for the fans. In Jan. 2011 the Angels trades Mike Napoli to the Blue Jays. The Blue Jays GM, AA, never even contacted Napoli.

        Reply
      • JDGoat

        5 years ago

        Lmao you just had a melt down over analytics because the Rangers GM told a crappy player not to report.

        Reply
      • Birdman1182

        5 years ago

        I seriously LOL’d at this, so I have to assume this was sarcasm, if not I might laugh more

        Reply
      • justin-turner overdrive

        5 years ago

        Yeah, it’s not like the players agreed to any of this!!!

        Reply
      • BusterMove

        5 years ago

        Austin Jackson? Is that you?

        Reply
        • Steve Mayne

          5 years ago

          I was actually thinking maybe Austin Jackson’s father was possibly named Samual. Hey .. Samuel Jackson.

          Austin, “Do you know what they call a Quarter Pounder with cheese in Texas?” “It doesn’t matter, cause you ain’t going there!”

      • GoRockies

        5 years ago

        Dude you high or somethin?? This is normal news and your freakin

        Reply
        • whereslou

          5 years ago

          For $6 mill they can treat me like cattle all they want. If you are serious these guys went into this knowing what they were going into. It’s not like it is a surprise to them.

        • Adam6710

          5 years ago

          Exactly. And this is nothing new.

          Cliff Lee, in 2009-10 played for FOUR TEAMS, traded from the Indians to the Phillies at the deadline, traded to the Mariners in the offseason, then to the Rangers again at the deadline. And this is when he was among the top pitchers in the game.

          In 1998 Mike Piazza, who had spent more than 6 seasons with the Dodgers, was traded to the Marlins in July– where he played just 5 games before being shipped to the Mets, whose cap he now wears in Cooperstown.

          Terry Mullholand was traded 6 times during his career, as were Edwin Jackson, Mike Morgan, and Octavio Dotel; Ricky Henderson four times.

          And it’s also not limited to baseball. Over in the NBA, Luke Ridnour was traded four times IN A WEEK. In 2014 Sam Gagner of the Edmonton Oilers was traded TWICE IN 90 MINUTES.

          This is just the nature of playing professional sports.

    • arc89

      5 years ago

      Reduce payroll for a trade. giants are way over tax luxury so good move to get rid of payroll rangers pick up Jason Bahr to take on Giants payroll.

      Reply
      • wreck720

        5 years ago

        They weren’t over the tax at all before this deal.

        Reply
        • arc89

          5 years ago

          Actually they were over the tax line at $203 million this year not under. If you added up the bonuses they will be paying out this year.

        • Supilikethat

          5 years ago

          Evans said they were below last by a couple million week

        • tad2b13

          5 years ago

          None of us here knows exactly what the bottom line is. The CBA has a convoluted formula for determining the luxury tax. All you have to do
          is look at BB Ref, Sportrac, ESPN, Baseball Prospectus, etc. to see they all have different figures for the Giant’s payroll.

          Bonuses are prorated over the length of the contract, and incentives aren’t included. So while the payroll might look to be over $200MM, the actual figure might be less.

        • hiflew

          5 years ago

          This move allows them to take on a bigger salary instead of just standing pat at the deadline.

  2. ef1t

    5 years ago

    why

    Reply
    • Adios pelota!

      5 years ago

      Money savings to get away from the tax line. Duggar might be ready or maybe blanco. Jackson was pretty bad gearrin was spotty

      Reply
      • ef1t

        5 years ago

        i meant why are the Rangers trading FOR veterans?

        Reply
        • Adios pelota!

          5 years ago

          Oh that’s what you meant, can’t solve that one lol. Giving prospects more time?

        • Mason Carroll

          5 years ago

          They have a slight gap in the outfield. They could use a bench guy and for only 3 million, they get two low level prospects for simply taking on his contract. The Rangers aren’t anywhere near the threshold and after this year they are going to be even further under it.

        • jbigz12

          5 years ago

          It looks like the rangers are buying the pitching prospect Bahr here. Rangers will probably be selling off relievers at the deadline so Gearrin may make a little bit of sense as filler.

        • Gobbysteiner

          5 years ago

          They get one prospect but yea.

        • tsc32

          5 years ago

          They got a solid prospect out of it.

  3. OrioleDan

    5 years ago

    So much for that possible Willie Calhoun call up

    Reply
    • ZacharyPaul

      5 years ago

      Willie Calhoun is not being blocked by Austin Jackson.

      Reply
  4. tigerd7335

    5 years ago

    This is the giantsshedding payroll so that they can make a big splash at the deadline if I were all other NL teams I would be very scared if the Giants made it to the playoffs

    Reply
    • chesteraarthur

      5 years ago

      Why?

      That’s also a decently large if. They’re 4.5 back in their division and have 3 teams ahead of them.

      Reply
      • baseball1600

        5 years ago

        Yea, but they also had a brutal first half schedule. Got most of their games against the D-Backs and Dodgers out their way, played both series against the Cubs, played their interleague series with the Angels (When they were hot) Mariners, got both of their series against Nationals out of the way, got both of their series against the Phillies out the way, and their second half schedule has many games against the Padres, 2 series against Texas, 2 series against NYM, a series against the Pirates, and only 2 series left against the Dodgers. They have a chance, but only if the youth lights a spark similarly to how Mac Williamson and Austin Slater had been doing the first few months.

        Reply
        • lowtalker1

          5 years ago

          No they didn’t
          Their schedule was lax compared to sd

        • jekporkins

          5 years ago

          That makes sense. Compare the Giants versus the who-cares-about-the-Padres?

    • Yankeepride88

      5 years ago

      The Giants are average. Nobody is afraid of that bullpen and the rotation aside from Bumgarner and possibly Cueto is atrocious

      Reply
      • Gobbysteiner

        5 years ago

        Every single pitcher in the giants rotation is better than sonny gray

        Reply
      • tad2b13

        5 years ago

        “…the rotation aside from Bumgarner and possibly Cueto is atrocious”

        You’re obviously talking out of ignorance. If it were still Stratton and Blach you might have a point, but it’s not. Both Andrew Suarez and Dereck Rodriquez have been solid at worse. Young pitchers tend to struggle, but these two have been impressive given their lack of big league experience. A lot of teams would love to have their contributions at the bottom of the rotation.

        Reply
  5. Patrick OKennedy

    5 years ago

    Follow the money. The Giants are $ 1.8 million above the luxury tax threshold, according to Cot’s contracts. AJax makes $ 3 million per season, through 2019. As a third time tax payer, the Giants pay a 50% tax on every dollar they spend from here on out, until they reset the trigger.

    Reply
    • tad2b13

      5 years ago

      MLB doesn’t use Cot’s for computing salaries for the tax. The CBA formula is all that counts, and I’m sure Evans is looking at that.

      Reply
  6. Breezy

    5 years ago

    Unless Texas is getting ready to have a fire sale of their players, and have these guys as depth, I dont get why they’d take on more contracts.

    Reply
    • tad2b13

      5 years ago

      Apparently Texas really likes Jason Bahr. He’s put up good numbers in the minors. One scouting report said “Very efficient, ideal mechanics and mentality for a starter role; low-effort, repeatable, very relaxed mechanics with a three-quarters release and some plane to the plate from height.” And also “…he certainly has the command and stuff to feasibly settle in as a back-end rotation arm at ceiling. .. Jason Bahr gives the Giants a nice, high-floor pitching prospect with some room to really actualize his talent.

      Reply
  7. Fire Jon Daniels

    5 years ago

    Why is a team more than 20 games back in their division trading for veteran players? Unless Jon just wants another body due to a pending Choo trade maybe. I’m at a loss.

    Reply
    • JDGoat

      5 years ago

      They bought Bahr from San Fran

      Reply
    • tsc32

      5 years ago

      They’re adding a prospect. Not hard to see.

      Reply
  8. lonestardodger

    5 years ago

    Cost-cutting for the Giants to prepare for a deadline addition. Rangers preparing for potential trades of Diekman, maybe Kela and Choo

    Reply
  9. em650r

    5 years ago

    Did this to stay under the cap space and still going to tank this season

    Reply
  10. willthethrill

    5 years ago

    I’m all for this trade, except for getting rid of Jason Bahr. The guy can pitch.

    Reply
    • SFGiants4ever

      5 years ago

      He’s one of the few pitchers they have (had) in the minors with starting potential, I would have rather them given up Beede honestly. Obviously the Rangers had to want Bahr.

      Reply
      • tad2b13

        5 years ago

        Texas (and every other team) isn’t trading for Beede. His trade value is zero. Unless he suddenly rejuvenates his career he won’t be in the game much longer.

        Reply
    • hiflew

      5 years ago

      So you are all for the trade except for the only reason the Rangers did it?

      Reply
  11. baseball1600

    5 years ago

    Wonderful trade by the Giants. They replaced both by calling up young high-ceiling prospects Steven Duggar and Ray Black. Saving cash for a possible deadline acquisition as well.

    Reply
    • BusterMove

      5 years ago

      I love it.

      Reply
    • velorum

      5 years ago

      Black isn’t young though, he’s 28

      Reply
      • Gobbysteiner

        5 years ago

        Jeez only pro sports where 28 is considered old.

        Reply
      • richternyr35

        5 years ago

        For a power pitcher like him, 28 isn’t old

        Reply
  12. biffpocoroba

    5 years ago

    This was all about getting their hands on Bahr. The Giants had to toss him in for the Rangers to take on the other dead contracts. Bahr will be a Rangers’ starter within 1-2 years.

    Reply
  13. Lefty_Orioles_Fan

    5 years ago

    What the HE double hockey sticks kind of trade was this?
    Why in the world would the Rangers want to do this trade?
    They are caput for this year and they are taking on money!
    SMH

    Reply
    • thatdudetg

      5 years ago

      You must not understand how baseball works.

      Let me break it down.

      The Rangers FO bought a potential #2 or #3 starter by the year 2020 in Bahr by taking on the contracts of Jackson (who looks like is about to be flopped again), and Gearrin, who is going to fill the space of the soon to be traded Diekman and/or Kela.

      Reply
      • Lefty_Orioles_Fan

        5 years ago

        Flopped? Flopped.? We are talking about being Flopped?
        Is Jackson going to be flopped lower than Whale Sch…. wait, I can’t say that here. Flopped, I will give you flopped. I love when people are so didactic to me and ……SMH

        Reply
        • southi

          5 years ago

          He probably meant “flipped”, but spell check adjusted it to flopped. Or he could have just hit the “o” instead of the “I” since the keys are adjacent on a keyboard. It was no big deal.

        • Gobbysteiner

          5 years ago

          Are you alright? Did you hit your head or something?

        • tad2b13

          5 years ago

          You do realize the ‘o’ and ‘i’ keys are right next to each other right? Why get so bent out of shape over a simple typo? SMH

  14. SFGiants4ever

    5 years ago

    It sucks that the Giants had to give up on a high potential guy to get rid if Gearran and Jackson’s contracts.

    Reply
    • whatareyoutalkingabout

      5 years ago

      27th ranked prospect

      Reply
      • tad2b13

        5 years ago

        Which means nothing.

        Reply
        • SFGiants4ever

          5 years ago

          I said high potential, not high ranked, and if you look at Bahr (who was drafted last year and hence why he isn’t above some of the others on the Giants list for the current top 30 prospects) he is a better pitcher then almost all the Giants pitching prospects ranked above him.

    • whatareyoutalkingabout

      5 years ago

      A 27th ranked prospect

      Reply
      • glassml

        5 years ago

        Which means nothing

        Reply
  15. 22gigantes

    5 years ago

    Let the fire sale begin.

    Reply
    • BusterMove

      5 years ago

      Not even close to a fire sale. Quite the opposite. Getting rid of dead salary so they can add pieces without going over luxury tax.

      Reply
    • JoeyPankake

      5 years ago

      You get prospects back in a fire sale, you don’t give them away to get teams to take on contracts. Come on, brah.

      Reply
  16. yaketymac

    5 years ago

    And of course Bochy immediately benched Austin Slater.

    Dude just refuses to play him on any kind of consistent basis

    Reply
    • kingcong95

      5 years ago

      This was all about getting time for Duggar. But perhaps it could’ve waited until September b/c he still swings at everything.

      Reply
      • yaketymac

        5 years ago

        The way the Giants are run is truly insane. Now Duggar will play, Slater will continue to sit, so Bochy can ruin both players.

        Reply
        • mrnatewalter

          5 years ago

          Between Hernandez, Slater, and Duggar, there are plenty of innings to go around.

  17. realgone2

    5 years ago

    Doesn’t seem like Jackson will even play for the Rangers.

    Reply
    • Matt Galvin

      5 years ago

      So he could be Traded again.

      Reply
    • Solaris601

      5 years ago

      I’m trying to figure out who would want him. He’d have to be a throw-in on a trade where both sides need to even out the money.

      Reply
  18. andrew farelli

    5 years ago

    Bahr has pitched just as good in 3 starts in A+ this year.

    Reply
    • Solaris601

      5 years ago

      Bahr was definitely the motivation for TEX to take 2 bad (though not exorbitant) contracts. This is basically what CLE will have to do to get rid of Kipnis. The receiving team assumes the bad contract but also gets a high end prospect.

      Reply
  19. imgman09

    5 years ago

    Lost in everything is the Giants need another left hand bat for a possible platoon in CF Duggar is a stud CF and like it or not Jackson hit 288 against lefties but struck out to much,we got him to be a bench player not a Star, he needs a change in scenery,he will do well somewhere else.Hey we have some cap space win win!! Not going to get bent over a A pitcher

    Reply
    • william032

      5 years ago

      Duggar is a lefty.

      Reply
  20. geejohnny

    5 years ago

    He’s being regifted….but who really needs an overpriced bench bat? Isn’t Bourjos still out there?

    Reply
  21. justin-turner overdrive

    5 years ago

    “Hold off on reporting, guy with a -1.3 WAR” lol

    Reply
  22. Solaris601

    5 years ago

    Too bad the Giants couldn’t get TEX to take Hunter Pence and his remaining contract.

    Reply
    • madmanTX

      5 years ago

      That would have been weird for me since I saw Pence in the minors at Round Rock before the Astros called him up and then maybe the Rangers would acquire him and send him back to Round Rock. Glad it hasn’t happened.

      Reply
  23. Jimmy Johnson’s Ghost

    5 years ago

    It’s sad that a team with a minor league system as bad as SF has to basically sell any of their prospects, no matter their ranking. Jackson was just signed and now your dumping him? Way to do your homework! Maybe now package Joey Bart (1st round pick) and Jeff (Gasoline) Samardzija to Baltimore for a ball bucket and a pitching machine. And why is an ownership group with so much $ so concerned with the luxury tax? Stop acting like the Rays and start being a Big Boy. Cut Jackson and Gearrin and keep your prospects! The Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers etc. aren’t concerned with the tax, they are concerned with winning now. The Giants just talk about it…

    Reply
    • johnrealtime

      5 years ago

      It is not about the cost this year. It is about the fact that if you go over the luxury tax threshold in consecutive years you get penalized even more. While getting charged 20% for going slightly over this year isn’t that big of a deal, if they go over again next year they would be charged 30% extra for each dollar over (and 50% in the third year).

      While I don’t particular care if the owner of a team that I root for has to pay some extra money, I would rather that money go toward player salary’s and not toward paying a luxury tax.. It’s basically like paying credit card interest as opposed to avoiding having to pay interest so that you have more money to spend elsewhere

      Reply
      • Jimmy Johnson’s Ghost

        5 years ago

        If are are trying to win this year, next or even next,Luxury Tax be damned. The Giants window is closing fast and I’m tried of the doublespeak. You gotta spend to win or burn it down, trade for prospects and get under the tax. But don’t talk winning and make these weak moves because of the Luxury Tax. These owners are BILLIONAIRES, stop crying, go big or go home.

        Reply
        • arc89

          5 years ago

          Problem with the Giants is they need to do a big rebuild but afraid the fans would stop coming if they do a rebuild. The team is very old and the farm system is weak. They have enough to stay close to .500 but must hope for the rest of the teams in the NL West to choke.

        • johnrealtime

          5 years ago

          There are few owners out there that are just going to spend whatever and not care at all. In reality, most have a specific budget that the GM and president are working under. While this is a reality, I would prefer that the GM and president of the team that I root for would be smarter with that budget. Stay under the luxury tax this year when you are unlikely to win, exceed it in future years when you really have a chance (similar to what the Yankees have been trying to do). I feel like you and I are talking about two different things.

          But anyway, I really feel the Giants window closed already and they likely need to do a full rebuild. Just throwing more money at the situation is likely going to cause them to dig a deeper hole

      • tad2b13

        5 years ago

        “While getting charged 20% for going slightly over this year…”

        You got it wrong. This is the 4th consecutive year they’ve been over, so they’re already in the 50% bracket. Staying below the threshold this year, and having the percentage rate reset will save the Giants. And if they spend big in free-agency this off-season, like it appears they will, then the savings will probably be tens of millions

        Reply
        • johnrealtime

          5 years ago

          Good call, I don’t follow the GIants typically so I wasn’t aware of the luxury tax situation. Even more reason for them to get under the tax this year

    • m34josh

      5 years ago

      The Dodgers and Yankees are both trying to stay below the cap too

      Reply
    • tad2b13

      5 years ago

      “The Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers etc. aren’t concerned with the tax,…”

      Wrong. All those teams, except the Red Sox, have made efforts to get below the threshold so the percentage rate will rest back to 20%. And the only reason the Sox aren’t concerned is they got below the threshold last season, so their penalty for this season is only 20%. NYYs, Dodgers, and Giants will all pay a 50% penalty if they’re over this season, and so far all three appear to be below.

      Reply
    • tad2b13

      5 years ago

      BTW the Yankees have paid out $319.6MM in taxes and the Dodgers have paid out $149.7MM. If you don’t think they care about that think again.

      Reply
    • iverbure

      5 years ago

      The Yankees and dodgers are concerned about the tax… it’s why they’re under 197 mil.

      Reply
    • SFGiants4ever

      5 years ago

      The thing people always forget or don’t know is that it is more then just money, yes ownership seems to have lots of money so many fans don’t care about them having to spend it. The money aside, teams that consecutively go over the tax threshold start to be assessed other penalties, they lose draft picks and international signing money. When you’re the Giants and you want to add more prospects to your system you can’t be losing your picks and the bonus money to sign them.

      Reply
    • imgman09

      5 years ago

      Yup we were in dissolution in 10’12’14’ too,haha

      Reply
  24. Jimmy Johnson’s Ghost

    5 years ago

    I agree with you 100% on the widow being closed. This roster is old and they are soon going to throw 150-200M at Mad Bum. A complete rebuild is inevitable. This roster is old across the board with no mixture of youth. They’d be smart to get something for Posey, Crawford and Bumgarner while they still have value, but would rather try to keep the yard packed and sell the fan base on the illusion of another title. With their combination of a poor minor league system and old nucleus 5 years this team will be unwatchable.

    Reply
    • mrnatewalter

      5 years ago

      Duggar- 24
      Slater- 25
      Hanson- 25
      Moronta- 25
      Rodriguez- 26
      Suarez- 25

      All of those guys (with the exception of Duggar, who hasn’t played much in the majors) have looked very promising. All are 26 and younger.

      Also, 5 years down the road, there won’t be a single player under his current contract. That’s a long ways away. Relax.

      Reply
  25. GarryHarris

    5 years ago

    I think there will be more taking on a bad contracts in order to acquire a waned player.

    Reply
  26. iverbure

    5 years ago

    Go back and look at the posts in December and January I made about the Giants. I said they’re going to be in a tough spot come trade deadline because they’re right up against the cap. They’ll blow past the tax if their around the wildcard they said, I laughed. Still lots of people here who have no idea about the tax. Nobody is taking on huge money if they do the prospects aren’t going to be great. Texas fans and in for a ride awakening if Hamels gets traded.

    Reply
  27. statsguru

    5 years ago

    Giants could go from an old team to a young team in a hurry if they trade Pence, Shark, Holland, Sam Dyson and Hunter Strickland (we already have the 100mph speedster coughing up 3 run homers in Ray Black) for whatever prospects they can get. The rotation would be MadBum/Cueto/Pudgeson/Suarez/Ty Blach, with Stratton/Moronta providing long relief and Tony Watson/Will Smith playing LOOGY and one of TonyW/WillS/MarkM closing. The desperation to get under the ‘salary cap’ has one purpose: sign MadBum beginning of next season to a big contract. I’m sure they can handle 30m/season, but a 50% tax on top of that will be a deal breaker.

    Reply
    • 2weeks

      5 years ago

      trading Holland would be stupid

      Reply
  28. WarrenSpahn

    5 years ago

    good move by the Giants to clear out a couple non-performers and give the young guys a chance to play. 2018 is not going to be the Giants’ year however. A big red flag is Buster breaking down. Average spiraling down and no power left. Bum may never be the Bum of the WS era again. The window has closed…

    Reply
  29. 2weeks

    5 years ago

    getting Austin Jackson probably makes choo more tradable

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Cardinals Sign Miles Mikolas To Two-Year Extension

    Keston Hiura Will Not Make Brewers’ Roster

    Rhys Hoskins Diagnosed With Torn ACL, Will Undergo Surgery

    Jed Lowrie Announces Retirement

    Jose Altuve To Miss About Two Months Due To Thumb Surgery

    Rockies Sign Jurickson Profar

    Braves Option Vaughn Grissom, Braden Shewmake

    Jose Altuve Leaves WBC Game After Hit By Pitch

    Edwin Diaz Undergoes Surgery To Repair Patellar Tendon

    Out Of Options 2023

    Cade Cavalli To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Edwin Diaz Helped Off Field With Right Knee Injury

    José Quintana Out Until At Least July Due To Rib Surgery

    Trevor Bauer Signs With NPB’s Yokohama DeNA BayStars

    Craig Stammen “Highly Unlikely” To Pitch Again Following Shoulder Injury

    Diamondbacks, Corbin Carroll Agree To Eight-Year Deal

    Nationals Sign Keibert Ruiz To Eight-Year Extension

    Rockies Showing Interest In Jurickson Profar

    Andrew Painter Diagnosed With UCL Sprain; Ranger Suarez Dealing With Forearm Tightness

    Marlins, Jose Iglesias Agree To Minor League Contract

    Recent

    Mets To Select Tommy Hunter’s Contract

    Reds Release Hunter Strickland

    Angels Release Luis Barrera, Nash Walters; Chris Devenski To Remain In Organization

    Phillies, Aaron Nola End Extension Negotiations Until After The Season

    Marlins Notes: Iglesias, Gurriel, Sanchez, De La Cruz, Cooper

    Luis Severino Suffers Lat Strain, Likely Headed To Injured List

    Giants Notes: Perez, Sabol, Hjelle, Johnson, Haniger, Cobb, Bishop

    Cardinals Sign Miles Mikolas To Two-Year Extension

    Tigers Notes: Lorenzen, Wentz, Vest, Haase, Rogers

    Pirates Have Continued Interest In Extending Bryan Reynolds

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Offseason Outlook Series
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2023
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2023-24 MLB Free Agent List
    • MLB Player Chats
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version