Each offseason, the Dodgers are mentioned as at least a speculative favorite for seemingly every top-tier free agent. They’re willing to pursue elite players even in the absence of a true positional need, and they annually sport one of the league’s highest payrolls. This winter should be no exception, with headlines eventually linking the Dodgers to the best free agent shortstops, including their own impending free agent Trea Turner, and top-of-the-market starting pitching.
Los Angeles doesn’t just pursue established superstars in the Freddie Freeman mold, though. President of baseball operations Andrew Friedman, general manager Brandon Gomes and the rest of the front office also leverage their payroll flexibility in another way. While it’s not as visible or exciting, the Dodgers roll the dice on plenty of mid-tier free agents. They signed nine players to major league deals last offseason alone, seven of whom inked a one-year guarantee. It was a blend of high-upside players who carried injury or performance risks with more stable, lower-variance veterans to round out the roster.
Tyler Anderson seemed to fall into the latter bucket. He’s been a durable back-of-the-rotation arm for much of his career. Anderson lost chunks of the 2017 and ’19 seasons with left knee issues, but he started a full slate of 32 games in 2018 and hasn’t gone on the injured list at any point in the past three years. That kind of reliability appealed to a Dodgers team that opened the season with Dustin May on the IL, Clayton Kershaw coming off a season-ending arm issue and Andrew Heaney (another lower-tier free agent pickup) seeking a rebound after a dismal 2021 campaign.
Reliable as he was in taking the ball every fifth day, Anderson didn’t look like a potential impact arm. He’d only once posted an ERA below 4.00 in a season, and that was in his 2016 rookie campaign. The southpaw had the tough task of pitching his home games at Coors Field for his first four years, but he also had mixed results in a 2021 season split between two more pitcher-friendly settings. Anderson played the year with the Pirates and Mariners, combining for a 4.53 ERA over 167 innings. A nine-run clunker during his third-to-last start of the season inflated that number, but he carried an ERA hovering around 4.00 for much of the season.
Featuring a fastball that averages under 91 MPH, Anderson looked the part of a back-end arm who throws strikes and keeps teams in a ballgame for five innings. That netted him an $8MM guarantee from L.A. in Spring Training. That would’ve been a generally worthwhile investment if Anderson had merely replicated his 2021 numbers over another full season. Instead, he’s posted easily the best showing of his career to date.
Through 26 appearances, the former first-round pick has worked 154 2/3 innings of 2.73 ERA ball. He’s neither striking batters out nor generating ground-balls at a particularly robust clip, with his respective 19% and 39.7% rates each checking in below the league averages. Yet Anderson has improved upon the aspect of his game in which he’d already been most effective: getting opponents to offer at pitcher’s pitches.
Despite not having eye-popping raw stuff, Anderson has always been adept at inducing chases on pitches outside the strike zone. Opponents went after 37.2% of offerings he threw outside the zone last season, well above the 31.5% league average for starters. He’s pushed that already impressive rate further, getting hitters to chase a personal-high 38.9% of pitches this year.
That ability to get hitters to swing at bad pitches drives two key aspects of Anderson’s success. It’s helped him avoid free passes, with this season’s 4.9% walk rate among the best in the game. Anderson has always been adept at pounding the strike zone, and his combination of plenty of pitches within the zone and ability to get hitters to swing at would-be balls keeps him frequently in advantageous counts. It’s also worked to avoid especially damaging contact, with opponents having a hard time squaring him up. Anderson ranks among the league’s top starters in suppressing hard contact, thus far allowing him to avoid home run issues that have plagued him in the past.
The Dodgers have already received more than they could’ve expected from a reasonably low-cost acquisition. He could have a hard time cracking a playoff rotation that’ll certainly feature Julio Urías, Kershaw, May and (if healthy) Tony Gonsolin, but he’s likely to be on the mound for some high-leverage innings this October in some capacity. Anderson also looks to have set himself up for a better payday on his return trip to the open market, although how robust the interest will be depends on how much teams buy into his ability to sustain this year’s elite results.
His lack of premium velocity or swing-and-miss stuff gives him a thin margin for error. Even modest regression in his ability to induce bad swing decisions could lead to results more akin to a back-of-the-rotation arm than this year’s All-Star form. After all, it’s not as if Anderson’s success has come completely out of the blue. He’d already been above-average at getting batters to chase and make weak contact in seasons where his overall output was roughly league average.
The 32-year-old has made tweaks to his repertoire this year that probably helped push his game forward. He’s taken some speed off his changeup, which is getting more downward depth. Batters are swinging through it more often as a result, and given the alterations to his changeup, it’s probably not a coincidence he’s faring better than ever against right-handed batters. That’s a promising improvement, but like the other gains he’s made this season, it’s a rather subtle one.
Put all the changes together, and Anderson looks as if he’s better now than he has been. Is he a true talent 2.73 ERA pitcher who’ll be an annual All-Star? Probably not. His future level likely falls somewhere in between this year’s outstanding numbers and the pedestrian 4.49 mark he posted from 2020-21. Yet even if Anderson allows around three and a half to four earned runs per nine innings moving forward, he’s a valuable pitcher — particularly if he can continue to stay healthy and take the ball every fifth day.
As MLBTR’s Mark Polishuk noted last month, the Dodgers will have to at least consider the possibility of tagging Anderson with a qualifying offer this offseason. It still seems they’d opt against making an offer that, in recent seasons, has sat in the $18-19MM range, but that it’s even a worthwhile consideration is a testament to his strong year. At the very least, Anderson looks to have pitched his way into the first multi-year contract of his career when he returns to free agency.
Image courtesy of USA Today Sports.
bassmaster
someone’s going to go 3-4/50-60 and it won’t be LA
semut
And he’ll regress back to pre-2022 form
BlueSkies_LA
Anderson has definitely pitched himself into #4 in the playoffs unless May shows really big over the next few weeks.
FarhanFan22
How does LA turn players like Anderson and Heaney into the best versions of themselves? I’m already prepared for Friedman to use the luxury tax space from kimbrel, price, and other expiring contracts to go after someone like deGrom. I just hope Farhan resigns Rodon and signs a free agent SP like Verlander. We need more talent to compete with SD and LA and we don’t have the farm system Arizona has.
giantsphan12
@Farhanfan, agreed on all fronts except that I think Farhan will offer Rodon a nice deal….the question will be whether Rodon wants to stick with our middling group at this point in his career. I also think the Verlander is likely to resign with the ‘Stros. He’s tight with the Astros’ brass. Regarding Anderson, regression is real (just ask every veteran on the Giants). Either way, I think it’s cool to see any older player finally break out. Good for him. I hope he makes bank this FA regardless of who signs him.
Basebombs
Farhan has quite a question ahead as the Giants are in need of talent throughout the organization. Rebuilding over the next two years may be a better option than adding Verlander.
derail76
Arizona doesn’t have the farm system that the Dodgers have either. The Dodgers draft better, scout better, develop better, and invest more into their farm system than any other team in the sport.
dcahen
BS, derail. The Dodgers just spend more, spend more, spend more, & spend more. They don’t have the best scouting, development, or overall farm system; that’s a subjective statement. If they did all that, they wouldn’t need to go out & sign big name free agents to big contracts. But we all know they do. They’re the Yankees but on a different coast.
derail76
It’s not BS though. Look at their rotation. Clayton Kershaw, Julio Urias, Dustin May, and a couple of rookies, with Pepiot, Miller and Grove. Anderson and Heaney were both one year deals, affordable for almost any team in the majors. The Dodgers run out one of the best, if not the best farms systems every year, which gives them the depth to acquire a Manny Machado, a Mookie Betts, a Trea Turner or Max Scherzer. Freddie Freeman is their only, big free agent signing. The Dodgers are in the second largest market, with by far the best TV contract in the game, it would be a problem if the Dodgers weren’t amongst the highest spending teams in the league. Spending money guarantees nothing, just ask the Angels, and possibly the Padres again this year too. You have to spend the money on the right guys, and Betts, Freeman and Trea, are the right guys.
Will Smith, Walker Buehler, Cody Bellinger, Gavin Lux, Miguel Vargas, Alex Vesia, Caleb Ferguson, from the system.
Justin Turner, Max Muncy, Tyler Anderson, Andrew Heaney, Chis Taylor, Phil Bickford, Yency Almonte, Joey Gallo, Hanser Alberto, etc., etc., all cast offs from other teams that became impact players once they came to the organization.
So please, tell me who drafts scouts, and develops better than the Dodgers do.
.
After seeing Heaney be streaky and have sporadically good showings with the Angels for years, it is quite stunning/impressive to see such a dramatic change. All of a sudden he is keeping balls low and throwing a nasty 2 seamer/slider. Go to the Dodgers and you get a new lease on your career it seems. Impressive stuff.
Shrutefarm
He’s been very mediocre in his last 2 starts
.
He is no ace granted. But he still looks light years better than what we have seen from him with the Halos the past few years.
swedishfish22
I think Anderson’s spot in the postseason rotation. May has been decent in his return from TJ, but I think his stuff could really play up in shorter outings coming out of the bullpen. I could see him being like Urias in 2020 or back when Maeda was on the team and was moved to the bullpen for the postseason
swedishfish22
*Anderson’s spot is secure
BlueSkies_LA
For these playoffs May will probably be in the bullpen, but I wouldn’t be surprised if his future was actually as a closer.
.
BlueSkies, he definitely has the stuff. Have you heard any chatter about them considering such a move? Do you see something like that happening relatively soon or down the line?
BlueSkies_LA
No, I haven’t heard anything. Just watching his performance. His 4-seam and sinker aren’t playing well and he’ll need them to be sharper if he’s going to have a starter’s arsenal. Just a thing to watch IMO.
BlueSkies_LA
He hasn’t really started enough games to be called amazing. His hard stuff has always needed work and it still does. Even Dave Roberts has said as much. So all I’m saying here is pitchers who don’t have at least three quality pitches often end up as relievers. So that’s the thing to watch on May. Tantalizing potential, but not realized yet.
dodgerfan83
May will only be moved to the bullpen, in my opinion, if Gonsolin comes back healthy and shows he can still deal. As of now on the roster, he’s the only starting righthander, and i don’t know that we can go all lefties with our starters. Heaney for sure will get moved to the pen, and i think anderson will piggy back with gonsolin in the playoffs possibly as well.
BlueSkies_LA
With Gonsolin either his arm is good and he’s treated like a regular starter or he isn’t going to pitch at all, and Anderson has shown he’s perfectly capable of pitching what passes for a complete start now. The expected playoff rotation is likely to be Urias, Gonsolin, Kershaw, Anderson. In that order.
giantsphan12
@blueskies,
Man, that’s an enviable playoff rotation!
BlueSkies_LA
Yep it’s pretty darned good if they can keep it together. Three current All Stars and a fourth who should have been.
.
BlueSkies, we need the Cat Man for the playoffs!!!
2400+ AB In MLB
Still no real/legitimate World Series title for Clayton Chokeshaw and the Dodgers since 1988. Clayton Chokeshaw’s only ‘championship’ is a fake one- how fitting.
***
Did I miss when the Dodgers cheated to win a world series and the world stopped counting it as a real title?
2400+ AB In MLB
It’s a phony title and you know it. And I want for you to acknowledge it!
Ry.the.Stunner
I’m not even a Dodgers fan and you are incorrect. Shortened season? Yes. But that didn’t put them at a competitive advantage over the other teams like cheating does. All teams played 60 games. There were even more playoff spots available that allowed two sub-.500 teams to make it in. Everyone was on the same playing field. If anything, they were at a bigger disadvantage over other teams because 2020 saw only intradivision games and the NL West is better than just about every other division minus the AL East.
JPR
You need to get over this. A season was shortened for everyone and LA won the WA. Calling it tarnished or cheap just makes you sound cranky and jealous.
Balk
So you think it’s fair to say that a shortened season is comparable to a 162 game season? You think that all the teams that won a World Series title after grinding through injuries, fatigue, ups and downs through a 162 game season are good with that or it’s comparable? Not a chance! I’m not at all saying the dodgers wouldn’t of won it all, they may have. But one thing is certain, we will never know.
FarhanFan22
that doesn’t make sense balk, I hate the doyers too but if the giants won in 2020 we wouldn’t say it wasn’t legitimate. Every team had the same circumstances
dodgerfan83
Its a real title. The fact that the dodgers had to win an extra round, and played no home games actually makes it more legitimate, despite the fact it was a shortened season. Good luck trying to sell anyone that the dodgers weren’t going to make the playoffs that year. I have yet to see a legitimate arguement (saying it was a 60 game season is dumb) as to why it shouldn’t be considered legit.
taran7
It cracks me up when people whine that it wasn’t legit. If whatever team you root for won it, I’m sure it would be golden with you. And I want you to acknowledge it!
Zerbs63
Not to mention they had to win more playoff games than in any other playoff series ever
fred-3
Nah, the real choker is Verlander. 0-5 in the World Series with a near 6 ERA
AverageCommenter
It’s real. The season counts, the trophy counts. MLB didn’t control the Pandemic.
gravel
It’s frustrating when your favorite team doesn’t win. It’s childish when your favorite team doesn’t win and your only play is “that doesn’t count.”
iBleeedBlue
Had your team won though……
giantsphan12
@2400, (and Balk) come on man…get some class! Do I think it’s harder to win a WS in a full season (for ANY team)….I do. But every team played the same shortened schedule that year. To say that the season of 2020, was not legit is lowbrow. The Dodgers were that season’s best team, and they won the series. They outplayed every other team that year, shortened or not. Someone had to the 2020 WS winner. It is, and will alway be, the Dodgers. Leave the oh-so-great Kershaw alone….and yes, I am a Giants fan.
2400+ AB In MLB
Clayton Chokeshaw with his 4.19 playoffs ERA over a huge sample size. Laughable.
Balk
To all of you people who don’t like my comment, I personally don’t care. Call me whatever you want. The fact still doesn’t change it was a shortened season. It’s not the same as winning a full 162 game season. I don’t care if it was the Giants who won I would say the same thing. Once again I’m not taking away of how good the Dodgers are or were, I believe it takes away from all the teams that grind through 162 games and win out. The longer post season means nothing and just shows how abnormal that season was. It’s ok to agree to disagree
***
I mean, it’s more legitimate than not even winning your division then lucking your way into some postseason magic at the right time, thus invalidating 162 games of regular season nonsense.
I don’t recognize teams that recognize fake wild card world series titles.
Balk
@*** that’s where you are behind the times buddy. But that’s your right to not recognize wild card teams. As it’s my right to not recognize a 60 game season. SMH. Lol
***
If you dont even need to win your division during the regular season and still be crowned champion, who cares about the regular season, whether it’s 60 or 162 games. The postseason is all that matters and they made the 2020 postseason harder than any other postseason in history. Not gave out participation trophies like wild card teams to let them feel like the regular season meant something. It’s funny to see these clowns try and rationalize participation trophies for a regular season that they even admit doesnt matter since they couldnt even be good enough to win a division with a bunch of bad teams in it.
Balk
The difference is that every team before them had to grind out 162. There will never be a 60 game season probably as long as you live, which puts 2020 in a category all by itself. Which puts the format of 2020 playoffs in its own category. Which makes 2020 an irregular World Series. You can agree or disagree, but the history books will reflect it being a 60 game season. Period. Not the same!
Dodger Dogg
So much bitterness…Guess the Dodgers have owned your team for quite some time. Better keep the Kleenex stocked up.
Ignorant Son-of-a-b
I don’t see how Dodger fans can be satisfied with a 2020 World Series Banner. The entire season is an asterisk. There was nothing normal about it. Asterisk Asterisk Asterisk. And if my team won that year I would feel the exact same way. Not Legitimate. Do it over 162 games under regular conditions. 2020 was a novelty exercise to lift people’s spirits because of the pandemic. I don’t think any of it should count, including the stats.
2400+ AB In MLB
Would have been better off with no season at all than the mess that was the 2020 ‘season’.
Dodger Dogg
Your foot’s in your mouth…Your handle fits you well. HAHA!
Balk
@ Doyerdog…No one is crying boy. I’ll be on the look out for your next FULL season title. Been waiting since 88’.
Dodger Dogg
Balk Bartman, shouldn’t you be more concerned about your own division? haven’t the Cardinals OWNED you guys for the past decade?
I was there at Dodger Stadium when Justin Turner hit that walk-off bomb off of Lackey. What a sweet game that was!
Balk
@Doyerdog…although I like the cardinal’s, along with the Padres and Doyers, I’ve always watched the Giants growing up, so your assumption is wrong. My issue with the 2020 season isn’t to take away how good the Doyers are and were, every team has a rebuild coming, Doyers will be there eventually also. I just won’t let a watered down season be the same as a full 162 game season in my mind. It’s NOT the same. You’ll see, the history books will always say 2020, 60 game championship winners are the Doyers.
Dodger Dogg
My mistake, I thought you were that Cubs fan who was shoveling hogwash.
Well now, Giants fan, coulda woulda shoulda doesn’t negate the FACT that the Dodgers are the 2020 World Series Champions. If it was so easy why didn’t SF go all the way?
Now that you want to talk hypotheticals – if the Dodgers weren’t owned by Frank McCrook while SF had their run, there’s a damn good chance they wouldn’t have made it to even one World Series.
I, for one, enjoy the LA/SF rivalry. No matter how good or bad the teams are their games are entertaining. I miss the Mad Bum vs Kershaw matchups. I also like how chapped Giants fans like yourself get. Your team had a good run but are still chapped that the Dodgers are so good. HA! SF will always be the little brother in the NL West.
Balk
No bro, don’t let the current winning streak mess up your judgment. New York Giants and since then, the Giants have always been the bigger brother. Giants have 8 rings, Doyers 5 plus a 60 game season ring. Since moving to California Dodgers have done better, but not by much. I don’t think I’m chapped about the Dodgers winning at all! I love Kershaw, one of my favorite pitchers to ever watch play the game. Liked Gonzo also. Never cared for Belli or Muncy, always thought they were hanging by a thread. But 88’ ring was probably the best ws I ever watched as a kid.
Dodger Dogg
Chapped is as chapped does.
NL West division titles:
Dodgers 20 (counting this year), 9th title in the last 10 years.
Giants 9
That trend will continue for some time. The Padres are much more competitive than the Giants and will be the biggest threat to wrestle the title from LA in the next few years. Dodgers owners know how to run the team from top to bottom. Their minor league system will be strong for years to come. There’s a great mix of veterans and stellar youth on this team.
SF won’t get near another NL West title for years. The good news is that you can still reminisce.
Balk
See…that’s the kid in you. Counting titles like they mean something. Championships are what counts. Finishing the race is what counts. It speaks volumes when you can always be at the top of your division and have nothing to show for it but a flag. Cmon man. I’ve been around baseball for a long time. Giants, even before moving out west were always considered as the big brother team. Your teams recent success is always great, but will always be followed by failure, just like the Giants, every team has to rebuild, that’s why baseball is so great. You never know what’s going to happen, it’s a game of inches. The Giants put together a team of misfits and won 107 games, so to say they won’t be competitive and challenge even the padres much less the dodgers is not a very good analysis.
Dodger Dogg
You sound like someone who is a bandwagon Giants fan from a decade ago, or maybe even not really a Giants fan at all. Just someone who talks a lot of shop and just has a beef with the Dodgers.
I’m a third generation Dodger fan. My grandfather took my pop to Dodger Stadium when it was being built.
Now, go get your shine box…
Balk
How does that make sense? A bandwagon Giants fan from a decade ago? I’m old enough to BE your grandpa kid! I won’t go into the ballparks I’ve been to. But guaranteed I’ve been to many more. I’ve said enough to an immature little one. Deuces
GMoney2850
Tyler Anderson and Andrew Heaney dominant lol. Evan Phillips – DFA’d by Rays – and Yency Almonte – DFA’d by Rockies – both dominant now.
Trayeyeyyyyiyic Thompson, who once put up -1.6 WAR over 150 PA at age 28, now hitting like Ronald Acuña.
And nobody sees anything fishy about this. Wow. Can’t wait for the 30 for 30
MWeller77
Josh Reddick’s burner account ^^^^^
coupofthecentury
Hey, both can be right actually.
Manfred’s playing with the balls
I’d rather watch a 30 for 30 on how the 2021 giants stole signs to go from one of the worst teams to one of the best. A 30 for 30 on how many Padres use ringworm cream would also be interesting.
***
The 30 for 30 should be why the 2022 Padres don’t have an analytics department.
kohlippit
Great article overall but Anderson will definitely start in the playoffs over May who is more suited out of the bullpen and isn’t fully up to tune coming off TJ. Anderson would be far less effective out of the bullpen as well. Bad point there.
Manfred’s playing with the balls
May has pitched 86 and 87 pitches the last two games. I think Anderson and May make the playoff rotation this year. No extra rest days and Gonsolin is hurt right now. Kershaw hasn’t been the healthiest pitcher this year either.
Shrutefarm
That’s fair, but I also think it will depend on which team they’re playing. Plus, there’s got to be a right handed starter, doesn’t there? I mean, unless Gonsolin is geared back up in time for the Dodgers’ first playoff series, it would be all lefties.
Rsox
Playing competitive, meaningful games will do wonders for a players mentality. Also knowing you have a lineup behind you that can fix any mistake is a huge confidence builder. That said, any team would be insane to sign either Heaney or Anderson to multi-year contracts based solely off of this season
BlueSkies_LA
Heaney, maybe because of his repeated heath issues, but Anderson definitely gets 2-3 years from somebody on the strength of this season. Maybe not at huge money, and maybe with performance bonuses, but he gets the years for sure.
dodgerfan83
Heaney is also starting to regress to mean a bit. He’s definitely ot getting more than a 1 year 7-10 mill contract.
neurogame
Tyler Anderson is a blue collar gamer. He’s not flashy, he doesn’t complain, he just does his job and has done it at an elite level this season. I’d like to see him return to the Dodgers but given the amount of cheaper, cost-controlled talent in the minors, another team will give him that multi-year contract.
Shrutefarm
For sure, and I think we see Pepiot get a little bit of a longer look next year. Plus, they’ve got Miller and Stone knocking on the door.
BlueSkies_LA
Easy to imagine, but the Dodgers do like their rotation deep, and they can afford to keep it that way. Also Kershaw is year to year now and I wouldn’t be at all shocked if he hangs it up if he wins another ring this year.
.
At this point he could throw 7 more years and I wouldn’t be surprised. If he feels good, and his arm feels good, a gamer like Kershaw is gonna be hard pressed to hang em up. Tom Brady-esque even perhaps haha
GabrielJames
I think offering him the QO, and him rejecting it are both easy calls. Even if he’s 25% worse, he’s still worth more than an 18m guarantee. I think he’ll definitely get a 3 year deal from someone, and wouldn’t be surprised if he ends up getting something in the 4-60 range. The fact that he isn’t a high velocity pitcher I think works to his benefit, as there’s probably less likelihood of serious regression over the contract.
vaderzim
It’s a shame Heaney got injured this year, he looked dominant early on.
taran7
Testing 123
BenBenBen
I’ve seen this a number of times on MLBTR articles. “Reliable as he was’ is not proper English. Has to be “as reliable as he was.”