Headlines

  • Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez
  • Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff
  • Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Bobby Jenks Passes Away
  • Braves Release Alex Verdugo
  • Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

John Angelos Hopes Orioles’ Payroll Can Return To Top Half Of League

By Simon Hampton | January 21, 2023 at 8:49am CDT

The Orioles have been mired in a lengthy rebuild for a number of years now, but as the team shows signs of a return to competitiveness there come the inevitable questions about how far a team is willing to bump payroll to maximize their window.

In 2022, the team’s opening day payroll was the lowest in all of baseball, the fourth straight year it ranked in the bottom five in the league, according to Cot’s Baseball. Of course, Baltimore was deep in a rebuild during that time and not focused on adding significant contracts. Yet as the team returns to relevance on the heels of an 83-79 2022 season, O’s fans would rightfully hope the team would be prepared to bump payroll to supplement their exciting young core.

“I’d love to be sitting in New York with $300 million payrolls. You’ve got to build it like any small, medium or large business. It’s cyclical, and then you hope that you can continue to feed that cycle, and I think we will be able to [return to the top half of the league],” Orioles CEO and chairman John Angelos said on 105.7 The Fan (via the Baltimore Sun).

History would suggest that the Orioles will do just that. Between 2011-18 the team regularly sat in the middle-to-upper part of the league in terms of payroll, a period in which the team made three playoff appearances out of the competitive AL East. That saw Opening Day payroll rise as high as $164MM in 2017, around four times as high as their Opening Day figure last season.

The team certainly has room to add payroll, yet it’s been a largely quiet winter for Baltimore. They’ve signed veteran starter Kyle Gibson to a one-year, $10MM deal, infielder Adam Frazier for $8MM and reliever Mychal Givens for $5MM. Those modest additions leave them on track for a 2023 payroll of $63MM, according to Fangraphs, that would have it on track to be the second lowest in baseball, per Cot’s.

Orioles fans would have every right to be a bit frustrated by that. GM Mike Elias says the team is still pursuing upgrades and would like to add another starter, according to the Baltimore Sun.

“We had some very close opportunities where it just went in a different direction,” Elias said. “We’ve been talking to everybody, there’s nothing imminent as of this afternoon, but that changes with sort of one text, one phone call sometimes. We really like our team. We see areas where we can get better, and we’re trying to pursue those players, but there’s competition out there.”

With the free agent market largely thinned out, it does appear that the trade market would be Baltimore’s avenue to any upgrades. The Orioles have one of the top farm systems in all of baseball, including eight players on Baseball America’s recently released Top 100 list, so do have a number of prospects that could be used to get a deal done. Of course, a number of those players will be viewed as long term building blocks in Baltimore, but the team could tap into their prospect wealth to put themselves in a better position to compete in 2023.

Share 0 Retweet 8 Send via email0

Baltimore Orioles John Angelos Mike Elias

Twins, Marlins Swap Luis Arraez For Pablo Lopez In Four-Player Trade
Main
Rockies Sign Harold Castro To Minor League Deal
View Comments (130)
Post a Comment

130 Comments

  1. hiflew

    2 years ago

    Since he is the one that signs the checks, I don’t think hope is necessary…just a pen.

    19
    Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      2 years ago

      Coincidentally, this statement comes after all the decent FAs are off the board …..

      17
      Reply
      • EasternLeagueVeteran

        2 years ago

        Oh-tan-i

        4
        Reply
        • mt in baltimore

          2 years ago

          Keep it real man. This isn’t Fantasy Baseball.

          2
          Reply
        • mt in baltimore

          2 years ago

          Brilliantly stated

          Reply
      • rondon

        2 years ago

        And listening to this guy ‘poor mouth’ is eye rolling. With so much young talent ready to take the next step, now is when he should’ve added a couple of premiere FAs.

        4
        Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        2 years ago

        Clip – It does make one wonder why they didn’t spend this offseason, considering they have a ton of payroll flexibility and they had a darn good season last year with a core of young talent that’s still intact.

        6
        Reply
        • clade

          2 years ago

          Spend on who? Players aren’t team agnostic items being auctioned off to the highest bidder. Why the hell would anyone turn down offers from New York, Philly, LA, etc to come play in effing Baltimore for anything less then a massive overpay? There’s a scarce amount of good free agents and every big market, big budget playoff team from 2022 was in on them. That’s why the O’s didn’t sign anyone. Jameson Taillon for example. It took $19 mil a year for him to sign in Philly. He’s like a 4 starter. What would his number have been for Baltimore? $22 mil a year? Is that a good idea for the Orioles? O’s need to keep investing in their farm and spend money to retain their young talent first before overpaying mediocre free agents – who won’t actually want to come here once the team is winning again consistently anyway

          13
          Reply
        • clade

          2 years ago

          *until the team

          1
          Reply
        • titanic struggle

          2 years ago

          clade… I 100% agree with that. This was not the year to go out and overpay for talent that “might” help. Get your young core in place, sign them to team AND player friendly deals, and then go shopping for a couple of FA you KNOW will help the team. I’m hoping the Reds follow this path in a few years!

          4
          Reply
        • hngkngphooey

          2 years ago

          Taillon went to the Cubs not the Phillies, and it was $17 not $19

          3
          Reply
        • egrossen

          2 years ago

          Lol I was about to say the same thing. Oops

          1
          Reply
        • joblo

          2 years ago

          Taillon signed with the Cubs, not the Phillies.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          2 years ago

          clade – You claim all the best free agents went to large market teams.

          Well here’s the market size rankings of teams that just signed Top Twenty free agents:

          13 Blue Jays
          14 Giants (2 free agents)
          15 Astros
          18 Twins
          19 Cardinals
          21 Indians
          26 Padres

          That’s SIX elite free agents signed by mid-market teams and TWO elite free agents signed by small-market teams.

          Stop making excuses for Orioles ownership, if anything they should have been even more motivated to spend because the nearby large-market Nats are in a non-compete stretch right now and the O’s could easily win over fans from the Nats’ territory if Orioles ownership truly wanted to contend now.

          Here’s my sources:

          mlbtraderumors.com/2022/11/mlb-trade-rumors-top-50…

          bleacherreport.com/articles/961412-mlb-power-ranki…

          2
          Reply
      • all in the suit that you wear

        2 years ago

        It looks like the O’s are wasting a full year of Adley Rutschman by not spending. Or are a lot of good players coming up from the minors this year?

        2
        Reply
        • niched

          2 years ago

          Yes a lot of good new players should be coming up from the minors this year – but not so much in the way of pitching

          1
          Reply
      • rememberthecoop

        2 years ago

        Good point Clip.

        2
        Reply
    • birdmansns

      2 years ago

      People have to want to sign there.

      Reply
      • GCB

        2 years ago

        How do you know they won’t sign in Baltimore and it’s not the team owner crying poor like a lot of the teams do with this built in small market bs excuse to not truly compete.These teams are all worth billions and you constantly hear how much money each team gets from these tv contracts etc, yet so many cry poor.It’s ridiculous and fans believing it is even more ridiculous..

        1
        Reply
    • willpatten

      2 years ago

      If only it was as simple as Money = Talent.= Winning.
      Chris Sale? Chris Davis? Stephan Strasburg? Giancarlo Stanton? Bobby Bonilla? Fernando Tatis?
      Shall I keep going?

      3
      Reply
      • GCB

        2 years ago

        Yes it’s not simple,you can’t buy a world series ring but one thing’s for sure the cheap teams prevent their team from at least a chance of being a world series champ.Lot of these owners don’t really try, Some throw their fans a bone every 30 years+ or so,And if they do win,KC for example they suck again for another 30 years or more.

        1
        Reply
  2. PaulyMidwest

    2 years ago

    Surprised he would even talk about the payroll this close to Martin Luther King day..if u don’t get that reference look it up..that guy is an A1 dbag in my book.

    10
    Reply
    • In Seager/Hader We Trust > the 70 MM DH Ohtani

      2 years ago

      What does proximity to MLK day have to do here? It’s a week later.

      2
      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        2 years ago

        Grom – I don’t get the reference either, and I’m usually good at catching that kind of stuff.

        4
        Reply
      • Justinrlstn

        2 years ago

        So Angelos is not known to make himself available that often to field questions from anyone outside of Angelos owned MASN. He did a press conference on MLK day about donation he did and when a reporter used that opportunity to ask him a Orioles question he chewed out the reporter because how dare he ask questions about the Orioles on MLK day.

        15
        Reply
        • PaulyMidwest

          2 years ago

          Exactly.

          Reply
        • User 3594734386

          2 years ago

          He gave a very long and candid radio interview with 105.7 radio personalities about 2 months ago. I was impressed. I’m officially drinking the orange Kool-aid. (105.7 is not the Os flagship station. IE not a part of MASN)

          Also, at the MLK presser, yes, he got hot. BUT, he said he would be available to the media to address their team related questions at another time. Kind of an open ended statement … for sure. Curious to see if he follows through.

          4
          Reply
        • Justinrlstn

          2 years ago

          105.7 although not officially part of the Orioles they still don’t ask him serious questions. They didn’t ask about his outburst, the lease, potentially selling of the franchise or MASN dispute. Just meh. Although I still root for the Orioles, I don’t wear my orange tint glasses when it involves the Angelos family

          3
          Reply
        • User 3594734386

          2 years ago

          Did we hear the same interview? He said two critical things in the 105.7 interview. He will spend money and he will not meddle in Elias’s decision making. The non meddling part is the key which was his dad’s downfall. John is the closest thing we’ve had to a Jerold Hoffberger type ownership since, well, Jerold Hoffberger.

          3
          Reply
        • dodgerfan83

          2 years ago

          He keeps saying they will spend money, and they keep not spending money. I’m not believing it until I actually see them sign a free agent to at least a 3 year deal.

          2
          Reply
        • GCB

          2 years ago

          Well. for your sake and Orioles fans i hope he becomes a great owner.I’m not an Orioles fan but besides rooting for my team i like seeing the whole league competitive.This whole tanking epidemic is really bad for baseball.Your team and mine haven’t won since back to back years in 1983,1984 and it’s even worse for Orioles since they haven’t sniffed World Series since, 🙁

          Reply
    • GCB

      2 years ago

      I don’t know anything about this Orioles owner but i won’t doubt what your saying since you probably know about stuff he’s done & said.I’m not impressed by lot of the MLB Owners who don’t seem to be involved with the game for the right reasons.So many fans in lots of cities should be mad as hell their teams don’t compete or if they do it’s very brief.

      Reply
  3. GOAT Closer Esteban Yan

    2 years ago

    Signing Ohtani will do it

    Reply
    • Ducey

      2 years ago

      2 problems:

      1.The O’s are cheap (Ohtani will likely get the biggest contract in history); and,

      2.Ohtani is going to a premiere market, and that ain’t Baltimore

      2
      Reply
    • Arnoldpsufan

      2 years ago

      Yes, he and Trout have how many rings?

      1
      Reply
      • The Fiend

        2 years ago

        Do you think that will be discussed, even once, in his FA negotiations?

        1
        Reply
      • gbs42

        2 years ago

        Arnold, that’s just proof that even two of the best players in baseball need a lot of help to win a title.

        2
        Reply
      • GCB

        2 years ago

        It’s not their fault they can’t do it alone.

        1
        Reply
  4. wald0

    2 years ago

    Am I the only one that thinks doubling the payroll is a significant increase?

    2
    Reply
    • hiflew

      2 years ago

      Depends on where you start from. Oakland doubling its payroll would still leave them in the bottom 5 in the league. Whereas a team in the middle of the pack doubling its payroll would indeed be significant.

      2
      Reply
    • rondon

      2 years ago

      Since it was the lowest in all of baseball at the start of last year and bottom five for the last 4?… I’d say that’s the least he could do.

      Reply
      • wald0

        2 years ago

        we went from $30M last year to $60M this year. double again next year has us at $120M double again has us at the Luxury tax in 2025

        1
        Reply
        • rondon

          2 years ago

          The question is- Will they do it? 120 is middle of the pack.

          1
          Reply
    • GCB

      2 years ago

      Is that what he’s doing? What’s their payroll for this year?

      Reply
  5. LordD99

    2 years ago

    Hopes?

    2
    Reply
  6. LouWhitakerHOF

    2 years ago

    I keep hearing how this is one of the best ran organizations in mlb. But last in payroll in 2022 and bottom 5 the past few years. Sounds like an organization that tanks for top draft choices every year. Don’t they draw fans? No TV revenue money? Why is their spending always near the bottom?

    Reply
    • andyg37

      2 years ago

      It isn’t. Did you miss the part where they were in the middle to upper parts of payroll from 2011-2018?

      4
      Reply
    • O'sSayCanYouSee

      2 years ago

      Not “always”. As the article said “Between 2011-18 the team regularly sat in the middle-to-upper part of the league in terms of payroll,”…

      They did tank for draft spots…they also ran high payrolls. Its not always the same brush.

      3
      Reply
    • chubias

      2 years ago

      Honestly, it’s an embarrassment to MLB since they also control the vast majority of the Washington Nationals TV revenue through the nightmare MASN debacle.

      Reply
      • O'sSayCanYouSee

        2 years ago

        The disputed money is in escrow. Orioles nor Nationals can touch it until a settlement is reached.

        1
        Reply
        • chubias

          2 years ago

          The dispute over MASN is only related to the media rights fees paid. Not MASN’s profits or the fact that the Orioles are entitled to be paid the same media rights fees as the Nationals, but somehow receive disparate treatment for revenue sharing. In other words, the Orioles get the same rights fees as the Nationals when dividing the money that comes in, but then MLB gives additional benefits to Baltimore on account of it’s “small market”. Even if the disputed funds are in escrow, it doesn’t change that the Orioles are entitled to the vast majority of the Nats’ TV revenue through the ownership of MASN which Angelos runs like a slumlord. No investment, terrible production quality. Much like the Orioles themselves. I’m glad that Elias has done well by O’s fans, but it’s absurd that the Orioles are treated like a small market team when MLB has given them a huge boon.

          1
          Reply
        • O'sSayCanYouSee

          2 years ago

          The MASN is SUPPOSED to be unfair on Nationals $$. Not a flaw, it’s designed that way.

          That’s called payment for taking over half of the Orioles fanbase/territory.

          …and fun fact, the Orioles owner Peter Angelos wrote the MASN deal. MLB/Nationals ownership just signed it.

          1
          Reply
        • ba$eba||F@n21

          2 years ago

          If only other people could understand that fact! MASN and the way the entire things was set up and designed was essentially a concession for allowing the Expos to move to DC, which was, at the time and for a long time, Orioles “territory.”

          All parties signed on and now not all parties want to continue fulfilling the obligations since they got what they wanted and settled down in DC.

          1
          Reply
        • chubias

          2 years ago

          Where did anyone say that the MASN deal needed to be fair to the Nationals? My complaint was only that Baltimore claims a big market when it suits them and then pretends like they’re a small market team. Either you own the DC media market or don’t.

          To the extent that the MASN deal is unfair to the Nats, it’s only the Orioles/Angelos refusal to honor the terms and renegotiate in good faith every five years AS REQUIRED BY THE DEAL. The Orioles continue to lose on substance at every turn over a decade of litigation, but the casual Orioles fan still pretends like they’ve been abused somehow by the crooked MLB. The Orioles paid nothing to the Senators when they moved to Baltimore. If MLB wanted some revenge on Angelos, they could simply make the Orioles ineligible for revenue sharing given that they are in a huge media market and unlike every other team in the league are entitled to the media rights of another team.

          Of course, the fans are the real losers in the situation. MASN is poorly run, there’s no legal streaming option, and the Orioles have mostly pocketed the increased revenue. The Orioles attendance in the early days of the Nats remained similar years before. The attendance bombed because they weren’t relevant for a decade while the payroll stagnated.

          Reply
        • O'sSayCanYouSee

          2 years ago

          The deal said every 5 years, the Nationals would get an increase of revanue based on escalating persentags (5-10%, 10-15%, etc).

          At the very first negotiating window, the Nationals wanted a % larger than contractually allowed. Orioles said, read your contract, Nationals said see you in court.

          Very first opportunity, Nationals tried to get out of MASN terms. Talk about Bad Faith. First opportunity, Nats sue.

          Orioles then refuse to negotiate any of the rest of the 5 year periods, until the initial period can be settled. (After all, if the first rate increase is settled in the Nationals favor…all the other persentags will increase as well. So the money is in escrow until resolved).

          And yes, MLB has acted time and again in the Nationals favor….which is exactly why the Binding Arbitration was vacated, because, according to the Judges opinion, MLB/arbitration panal was biased against the Orioles.

          Wanna know how many times a mutual agreed to Bidding Arbitration agreement is broken? It’s a 1 in 100 chance.

          Federal judge’s opinion that MLB was biased against Orioles.

          Facts.

          {Mic drop}

          Reply
        • chubias

          2 years ago

          I didn’t realize we had gotten to the just making stuff up phase of the discussion. The MASN contract has an escalation clause for the level of the Nats ownership in that trash heap, but that’s not the point at issue.

          The MASN contract does not contain a cap on the rights fees increase. If it did, this matter would have long since been concluded. The Orioles only victory in this dispute has been complaining that the Nats used a law firm that MLB also used. Then the Orioles claimed that the process they designated, the Revenue Sharing Committee, was biased against them, because the Nats hired, not surprisingly, a law firm that had many dealings with this kind of dispute. Nevermind, that the same corrupt process was how the Orioles won the rights in the first place. The Courts agreed on that the process was bad, but not the result. The trial court awarded over $100M. Given that the Orioles offered around $35M per year and the MLB said $60M was appropriate, that’s a difference of $25M times 4 years.

          So for whatever joy it brings your heart that a judge said MLB was biased against the Orioles (not the actual legal standard), the same court arrived at largely the same number.

          And none of that has anything to do with the Orioles continually crying poorhouse while controlling the media rights to the 9th largest market in the country in addition to their own 28th largest market.

          The MASN deal was a mistake for MLB, but having made it, the League ought to expect more from the team in terms of actually developing a business rather than the rent-seeking shakedown that we have all watched the last 15 years.

          Reply
    • Ra

      2 years ago

      You probably are hearing that they are one of the best run organizations.

      You seem unaware that when the bottom fell out in 2018, the former GM gutted the MLB roster via trades. When the new GM took over in 2019, they focused on building the talent pool at the minor league level through the Rule 4 draft and international signings. They have begun to reap the rewards of that rebuild.

      5
      Reply
      • User 3594734386

        2 years ago

        Ugh, the MASN deal. Very amateur hour here, but can one owner own both teams? The two teams are two different entities, each with there own budget, but under one bigger umbrella budget that dictates spending based on revenues brought in from all it’s business holdings. So year in year out, when the MA$N money is received by each team it goes in to the umbrella budget and then the owner/Bd of directors/trustees decide how it’s distributed back in to all it’s holdings.

        Reply
        • Ra

          2 years ago

          The DC team was placed there by MLB as punishment against Angelos because he refused to participate in the league’s attempt to bust the MLBPA union. MLB privately and unethically lent money to the DC team to soothe DC owner Lerner’s complaints about the deal. The Nats used the law firm Proskauer Rose – which had represented MLB on 74 separate engagements through 2015! – to gain an illicit advantage over the arbitration process. MLB knew that it could recover the $25 million if the arbitration panel issued an award in the Nationals’ favor settling telecast rights high enough to cover the amount it gave the team.
          MLB has conspired against Baltimore at every turn of this corrupt debacle. Eff MLB and the Nats, even if Angelos is no saint.

          4
          Reply
        • O'sSayCanYouSee

          2 years ago

          @ Ra,

          You right on it, and I’m right there with you.

          The origin part is a little off– MLB is stuard of Expos/Nationals. DC wants a team. MLB needs Peter Angelos to allow it, and Peter puts the deal on the table that he would sign. Reports at the time said MLB decided not negotiate the MASN deal, fearing the timeline of a protracted battle w/ Angelos.

          Angelos got more than a pound of flesh in the MASN deal. Because he’s a boss.

          I think the MLBPA (a decade before MASN) thing had nothing to do MASN.

          But loosing the All-Star game, that was MLB being a #@&!*.

          2
          Reply
        • Ra

          2 years ago

          You may want to look a little deeper into the machinations of what went on in Montreal and the horsetrading that led to MLB’s placement of the team in DC. MLB didn’t need Angelos to agree to placing the team there. The Orioles only controlled the TV market, which of course has become the prime plum in recent decades. But they still could have placed the team in DC to sabotage the Orioles either way.

          Reply
    • LouWhitakerHOF

      2 years ago

      I appreciate your feedback. Thanks.

      1
      Reply
    • holecamels35

      2 years ago

      I think they can be good soon because of some of their prospects, but a lot of last season was a fluke. It’s not often you see starting pitchers cut their ERA’s from 8 to under 4, I am exaggerating just a ;bit but that’s pretty much what happened with many of their guys, and they don’t have amazing stuff either. At a certain point you have to move forward with what you have and end the rebuild, GM is lucky that ownership is giving him such a long leash to tank excessively.

      Reply
      • GCB

        2 years ago

        Do you think enlarging Lf played any role in pitchers era?Just curious.

        Reply
        • Ra

          2 years ago

          Orioles’ road ERAs:
          2021 5.69
          2022 4.24

          It’s obviously not just about the wall

          1
          Reply
      • Ra

        2 years ago

        They didn’t “tank” last year. Nearly made the playoffs.

        You got it backwards: ownership is fortunate that Mike and Sig are staying.

        Reply
    • GCB

      2 years ago

      Sounds like Cheap,Cheap Cheap to me.

      Reply
      • Ra

        2 years ago

        So many people do not know that the Orioles payroll was $167 Million in 2017.

        What is the sense in wasting millions on free agents during a teardown and rebuild? To lose 100 games instead of 105?

        Reply
  7. Domingo111

    2 years ago

    I don’t expect the Os having a payroll like the dodgers or Mets but they should definitely have a payroll in the 15-20th range in mlb (120-150 mil last year).the Os had a 160 mil payroll in 2016 so they definitely should be able to get back at least to 140 or so long term, maybe not 2023 but in 3-4 years when some of the young guys hit arbitration

    1
    Reply
  8. Justinrlstn

    2 years ago

    I’m surprised the Orioles don’t sign Bauer. They can pay him league minimum, he does well they can trade him away and if he acts up they can straight up cut him

    5
    Reply
    • Ra

      2 years ago

      Domingo, your expectation is probable. Ownership and front office both anticipate payroll rising as the team’s top talent enters arbitration. Despite the limited free agent signings this year, it is likely there will be more spending on that front in the upcoming years.

      Reply
    • Ra

      2 years ago

      Not sure Bauer would sign with the Orioles. But he would be a better match for the Yanks. I’d rather the young, inexperienced Orioles not have to worry about the circus Bauer would create. Let him blend into the NY cesspool.

      5
      Reply
    • Jeffrey R. Kosnett

      2 years ago

      Be a media and PR disaster. And he isn’t that great to begin with, and now he hasn’t pitched for 2 years.

      3
      Reply
  9. gorav114

    2 years ago

    The Os have so far executed the rebuild perfectly. The next step is increasing payroll and supplementing the roster with quality free agents and signing the good players to extensions. It’s still 1 season early. By next season I expect them to be in full go mode

    8
    Reply
    • Astros2017&22Champs

      2 years ago

      Agreed. Everyone in 2022 wants things today. The Orioles play in the toughest division in baseball. Mike elias knows when he’s going to start his contention window. They have so many kids to bring up this year that the fans won’t be upset if they struggle to make the wild card. Another strong draft in June and the Orioles are going to shove for the rest of the 2020’s.

      8
      Reply
    • nitnontu

      2 years ago

      Yes, GoRav, rushing the rebuild can backfire. Just look at what happened to the Tigers and Marlins last year. Spending too much too fast on players coming off good platform seasons but have otherwise had inconsistent careers can set your team way back!

      3
      Reply
      • GCB

        2 years ago

        How have the Tigers rushed the rebuild it’s 7 or 8 years my team has been rebuilding so far.The way it’s going it might be 10 years,

        Reply
    • User 3594734386

      2 years ago

      Yes, “1 season early”, but not by design. FO can’t get too crazy pursuing SP outside of the club, whether by FA or trade, until they see what they have in Hall and Rodriguez. Both were supposed to be up in 22 but injuries got in the way. Hall saw some time, Rodriquez none. Interested to see what transpires with them early season and how it will impact the 8/2 trade deadline.

      3
      Reply
      • gorav114

        2 years ago

        I also think Elias was not prepared for how expensive free agency was going to be this off season. I really believe he wanted to bring in a 2nd tier starter but found the market to be too pricey. Still a shot at Wacha

        2
        Reply
        • User 3594734386

          2 years ago

          Yes, pricey and probably still so. Agree about Wacha. The longer he’s out their the better the chance he can be signed to a one-year? Personally, can’t see Elias offering a multi year.

          1
          Reply
        • GCB

          2 years ago

          I’d be a little leary of Wacha.Is his 2022 season a reflection of his talent or some mediocre years prior,

          Reply
  10. RunDMC

    2 years ago

    When was the last time a $300M team won a WS?

    Just develop a few of your top picks you get EVERY. YEAR. and you won’t need that $300M to keep your job.

    Reply
    • toptimrubies

      2 years ago

      Never, because there hasn’t ever been a team with a $300M payroll.

      5
      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        2 years ago

        top – Not until this year, as the Mets sit at $329M right now.

        Reply
        • Astros2017&22Champs

          2 years ago

          Dodgers had it last year lol

          1
          Reply
        • toptimrubies

          2 years ago

          Yes, and you can’t win a WS before games are played.

          3
          Reply
        • GCB

          2 years ago

          And thankfully they didn’t make it to Series,One of the hilites of the postseason.

          Reply
  11. southern lion

    2 years ago

    “Largely quiet”…….epic phrase.

    1
    Reply
  12. User 3595123227

    2 years ago

    He can say whatever he wants to say. This guy has pocketed a fortune the past several years under the guise of a total rebuild putting no quality products on the field until 2022. They have done almost nothing this off season just like I figured back in October. Sticking to the plan and having faith in what they are doing. Ok sounds great. Keep telling the fans to have patience and they will spend when the time comes. I’d like to see the Orioles do well for the fans sake but these owners aren’t about that. It’s the bottom line that matters and don’t think otherwise.

    3
    Reply
    • pohle

      2 years ago

      the bottom line is more than just results at the major league level, as their farm has done nothing but produce shiny prospects while the major league team and coaching staff rounds into form around homegrown stars(ruschtmann, we will see much more of their other top prospects next year), and successfully reclaimed depth pieces(mateo, most of their pitching staff). but everyone in that building knows that they need to be patient about adding to the team. give the team this season as opportunity for these young guys and wherever you find depth, deal from it to add pitching, and more geniunely supplement the next competitive roster next offseason when it begins to take more of a shape than just adley

      2
      Reply
      • Ra

        2 years ago

        I upvoted but Gunnar is a bigger impact player than Adley. Plus they already promoted Stowers and GROD will start the year in the rotation. There is already a lot more than “just Adley.”

        1
        Reply
      • User 3595123227

        2 years ago

        I agree giving prospects the chance they deserve is a great idea but you totally missed my point. This team will never be the successful franchise some fans believe it will be mostly because the owners won’t spend the necessary cash to make it happen. Ever. They will probably sell this franchise in the foreseeable future.

        Reply
        • Ra

          2 years ago

          The owners spent $164 Million on payroll in 2017. That was at the end of the franchise’s success as MLB’s winningest team from 2012 through 2016. History does not support your contention that they will not increase payroll again to return the team to being a successful franchise. Hell, they have enough talent right now to reach the playoffs and a ton more top talent knocking on the door.

          “Ever” is an awfully long time. And not something to count on.

          But it is true that the team could be sold. Though I would not bet on “probably.”

          1
          Reply
        • User 3595123227

          2 years ago

          Whenever I bring up Orioles management/ownership someone always mentions 2012-2017. I never mentioned those years. They are gone. That won’t happen again until a major change is made at the top. I’m talking about now. All the talk earlier this off-season from Orioles fans was about upgrading. Even the GM mentioned they would add this winter. I said they wouldn’t and they won’t for the foreseeable future. Maybe some little transactions here and there or a middle of the pack free agent signing. I’m saying don’t hold your breath waiting for them to do anything of note. Yeah waiting on the kids to develop is a good idea but it should be balanced with quality major leaguers and a sustainable decent product on the field. Major investment won’t happen.

          1
          Reply
        • O'sSayCanYouSee

          2 years ago

          @ retired/

          Who should the Orioles have acquired in free agency?

          The Tigers spent a bunch last off-season. Put vets w/ their young core, as your suggesting…

          Reply
        • User 3595123227

          2 years ago

          There isn’t one specific player. I thought I made this clear but I guess I wasn’t clear enough. Once again I will say these guys are not going to spend money on this team. They have raked in millions the past several years and it will be difficult for them to start spending like they should. They probably are going to sell the team in the near future. Pocketing millions isn’t easy to give up.

          Reply
        • O'sSayCanYouSee

          2 years ago

          I guess we shall see then.

          Historically speaking, that has not been true with the Angelos run Orioles.

          Reply
    • GCB

      2 years ago

      Great minds think alike :)It’s great seeing another fan not buying the B.S. lot of owners feed fans who badly want to win.

      1
      Reply
  13. seriouslysteve

    2 years ago

    I kinda hope we try to sign Trevor Bauer. I think with having to pay him league min can keep that payroll low like they like

    3
    Reply
  14. O'sSayCanYouSee

    2 years ago

    Oh good lord. Must be a slow day in MLBTR.

    Next headline will be “Barry Bonds is better than Babe Ruth” (phone lines/comments section now open!!)

    Reply
    • gbs42

      2 years ago

      It is a slow news time. Would you rather read nothing?

      2
      Reply
  15. Brew’88

    2 years ago

    I hope to someday compete, but it’s a cyclical thing, like Haley’s comet

    7
    Reply
    • deron867

      2 years ago

      I almost spit out my coffee with that one.

      2
      Reply
    • graybuffalo

      2 years ago

      My prayer is that Orioles compete some time before Haley’s Comet returns in 2061.

      Reply
      • GCB

        2 years ago

        I’m hoping my Tigers rebuild is over by 2061 too.Oh the good old days when we had an owner as passionate as the fans,

        Reply
  16. cwsOverhaul

    2 years ago

    Smart payroll allocation (and timing) is an art form…. and Elias came from Houston who is doing it the best. This will take care of itself, b/c if half the vaunted guys appear to be for real, he’ll pitch to the boss to extend those they are confident will be self-motivated/maintain competitive edge after locking in first fortune. Pitching will be the biggest key if they build on momentum early. They can trade for an elite starter on a non-contending team to kickstart contending in a “deep pockets” division later.

    4
    Reply
  17. Lefty_Orioles_Fan

    2 years ago

    Well, you can’t do that by Suckling the Revenue Sharing until, you can Suckle no more!!!!

    SMH

    Reply
  18. Lucky Strike

    2 years ago

    Last year, Baltimore was 23rd in attendance with 17,543 per game.

    Oakland was last at 9,973. Miami was at 11,203. Minnesota was double at 22,514 in what was the warmest local summers on record.

    Reply
  19. bumpy93

    2 years ago

    I’m a diehard Phillies fan, but with that said- I live in Baltimore. I was rooting for the O’s to make the wildcard. They didn’t obviously, BUT I think the biggest disappointment is they didn’t do anything to really build on that amazing season.

    1
    Reply
    • Yanks4life22

      2 years ago

      I was flabbergasted that they traded Mancini while sitting a a couple games out of the wildcard spot. Who knows when they will get another shot to make a run at the postseason.

      Reply
      • Ra

        2 years ago

        Mancini would be a hindrance to the Orioles progress. They are far better off without him.

        1
        Reply
  20. Skeptical

    2 years ago

    I’m sorry but Angeles has it backwards. The goal is not and should not be to increase payroll. The goal should be to put a more competitive team on the field. If one has to increase payroll to do it, fine, increase payroll. If one can do it without increasing payroll, then it is even better. (Baseball is a business after all.). The goal is to put an entertaining product on the field and be competitive, not to spend money for the sake of spending money.

    Sitting here looking at the three plus feet of snow that has fallen in the last week thinking that in just a little over a month from now, I’ll drive down to spring training games.

    1
    Reply
    • Ra

      2 years ago

      I don’t think that is what John Angelos was communicating regarding payroll. The comment was directly about competitiveness. It would be obtuse to believe that the teams that win do not sign free agents and only win with their own prospects. That’s not how the Astros did it nor is it the approach Tampa takes.

      Reply
    • GCB

      2 years ago

      Glad i don’t live there,No snow since before Christmas here in Ontario Canada.

      Reply
      • Ra

        2 years ago

        Don’t know why you found it necessary to make such a comment.
        Now shall everyone else say we are glad not to be living in Ontario? That would be childish, right?

        Reply
        • GCB

          2 years ago

          I was just trying to make point i hate snow please don’t read something else into my comment jee wizz

          Reply
        • Ra

          2 years ago

          Unfortunately, no snow for us yet this year. Couple of possibilities for snow in the 10-day forecast, but not real snow, just mixed precipitation.

          Reply
  21. slydevil

    2 years ago

    Chris Davis is a free agent!

    Reply
  22. Jim Carter

    2 years ago

    Kinda late in the off-season to add significant talent. Hoping to add payroll sounds as if he has no direct control. This was the time to begin adding, real, long term talent to the youth on the roster. If the team doesn’t take a step forward in the standings, only the most rabid fans will still buy into the plan.

    1
    Reply
  23. solaris602

    2 years ago

    Add a starter? Will that be Bauer or Wacha? Any of the remaining options are just pure crap.

    Reply
    • Ra

      2 years ago

      Good question. I think they will end up signing Wacha.

      Reply
  24. Three Run Homer

    2 years ago

    As for higher payroll, I’ll believe it when I see it. The O’s have a promising young core but lack front-line starting pitching and need another middle-of-the-order bat. This would have been a good offseason to open the checkbook to add a couple of elite pieces to get the team over the hump. Failing that, they could try to lock up some of their best young players like Rustchman to ong-term extensions. Instead they’ve done nothing but be cheap. They are likely to stagnate in 2023 and then that will be the excuse next off-season for doing nothing again. The club will be stuck in an endless self-fulfilling prophecy of mediocrity while the Angelos family continues raking in big profits.

    Reply
    • O'sSayCanYouSee

      2 years ago

      Three Run Homer — I agree about locking up youth, but Adley is represented by Boras. That’s a tall order for a early deal.

      But there are lots of youth on the way, and honestly, Gunner might be the guy to target (seeing how 2023 goes), since he’s younger than Adley.

      Grayson, Holiday, Cowser, and like 6 others all represent early deal type players maybe…

      but they gotta get to MLB first and put in work.

      Reply
  25. Goin' to Sheetz

    2 years ago

    Don’t tell us what you hope. If you won’t sign a marquee free agent, lock up Rutschman and Henderson. Or sell to a minority owner with a transition plan.

    Reply
  26. Homer Heins

    2 years ago

    The smart move is lock up a couple of superstars. I would take a risk on a core group around Adley. He’s a tremendous leader. I would pull him into the plans and get his vibe on the guys he’s played with through the minors.

    Reply
  27. leftykoufax

    2 years ago

    He would love to be sitting on a 300 million payroll?? This is from an owner with the lowest payroll in the league. This ownership is for the birds…

    Reply
  28. Samuel

    2 years ago

    Mr. Elias is doing it correctly and is a pleasure to watch.

    So he got more for the 2023 payroll budget. Maybe $20m? Pretty much a 1/3’rd increase.

    Who do they sign for $20m in today’s environment? Michael Conforto got $18m for 2023 and a players option for another $18m. I like 5 of the Orioles OF’s better than him.

    How about a starting pitcher?….

    Mike Clevinger got $8m plus a $4m buyout after 2023 if the White Sox don’t reup him for 2024 for another $12m. He was hurt all 2022 and pitched lousy in 2021. Sean Manaea and Ross Stripling got 2/$25m. Zach Eflin coming off an injury got 3/$40m. Chris Bassitt would have been nice – he got 3/$63. Taijuan Walker got 4/$72m. Jameson Taillon would have been nice; but he’s 31 years-old and got 4/$68m.

    The O’s are far better off with what they already have.

    As I keep writing – they can save their money for an in-season trade or two where they take on a salary dump for a player(s) having a good season at his/their prorated remaining salary….and I expect that’s exactly what they’ll do.

    1
    Reply
  29. Bohs and Os

    2 years ago

    You left out the part where angelos said we can’t increase payroll until people show up for games… well the people won’t show up for games if you won’t spend money on talent #selltheteam

    Reply
  30. ba$eba||F@n21

    2 years ago

    The O’s weren’t going to make “significant” additions this off-season. That will likely come next offseason as they further identify their infield situation and what upcoming talent will stick or what talent they want to utilize for supplementing the team via trades and then dip into the FA market. Payroll will escalate, and a large amount should be from extensions similar to how Atlanta has been locking up young core players (at least that’s my hope).

    2
    Reply
  31. Thornton Mellon

    2 years ago

    Man my eyes hurt from rolling them so hard at the continual crying for lack of money. The best performers of the Orioles’ organization have to be lawyers and marketing, how else could they constantly convince the gullible that they do the best for the product on the field, not their pockets?
    In 2012-18, let us not forget….
    1. Nelson Cruz was a one year prove it deal. Then he proved it and the Orioles wouldn’t pay him for a 4th year when it was time to negotiate. He hit for 7 more years.
    2. Davis was completely Peter Angelos’ bungling. NO OTHER team was after him, they were competing in a vacuum.
    3. Mark Trumbo? One year deal and they caught his good year.
    4. Ubaldo Jimenez was sold as THE ORIOLES ARE SPENDING ON PITCHING. However, at the time, he was probably the 5th or 6th pitcher available and it wasn’t top dollar. They were taken for a ride. And it was the ONLY time in the period they ponied up for any pitching.
    5. Manny Machado? Home grown, they didn’t pay when it was time to pay. Jonathan Schoop? Home grown, they didn’t pay when it was time to pay. (Prepare for this folks, when its time to pay Adley or Gunnar!!!!)
    6. Other starters were pieced together – as the team has been doing since about 2000 – on one year “prove it”, on the cheap (like out of the Korean league) and as throw-ins in trades. The hope was to get 5 or 6 good innings out of the starters and turn it over to the bullpen. In no year did they ever have a starting squad that a non-orange-colored-goggles fan would call “above average”.
    Those 2012-16 winning times were a team thrown together with a “just good enough” offense, starting pitching that was barely adequate, a top notch bullpen, and Buck Showalter. It was a thin margin – house of cards – from a team building standpoint which fell apart quickly starting in May 2017.
    But I will give them these:
    1. Getting below market longer term deals for Jones and Markakis (2011?) which built that base for the period.
    2. Having an eye for always finding bullpen talent (bullpen talent is cheap, so they probably spent a lot of time and effort on doing so). Kevin Gregg was a huge goggled exception but they still batted over 90% here.
    3. Being able to continually sell the fans that the team was better than it was and that ownership planned to do whatever it could to maintain this. This is a two decade plus snow job.
    Sorry, but until I see the team willing to build upon any success like they had in 2022, I will maintain my sarcastic “I’ll believe it when I see it” stance. That goes back to when Mike Young was the next Eddie Murray, Eric Bell was the next Jim Palmer, and Ken Gerhart was a 30/30 threat.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Rangers Option Josh Jung

    Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

    Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

    Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin

    Yordan Alvarez Shut Down Due To Setback With Hand Injury

    Astros Place Jeremy Peña On Injured List With Fractured Rib

    Tucker Barnhart To Retire

    Tyler Mahle To Be Sidelined Beyond Trade Deadline

    Reds Release Jeimer Candelario

    Dave Parker Passes Away

    Griffin Canning Diagnosed With Ruptured Achilles

    Recent

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Rays Notes: Rasmussen, Boyle, Lowe, Kim

    Nationals Sign Luis Garcia

    Cubs, Tigers Among Teams Interested In Ke’Bryan Hayes

    AL Central Notes: Thomas, Ragans, Lynch, Cobb

    Padres To Activate Yu Darvish On Monday

    Rhys Hoskins Suffers Grade 2 Thumb Sprain, Headed To IL

    Rays Sign Peter Strzelecki To Minor League Contract

    MLB Announces 2025 All-Star Rosters

    Brewers Outright Daz Cameron, Select Anthony Seigler

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version