Headlines

  • Yankees Re-Sign Cody Bellinger
  • Giants To Sign Harrison Bader
  • Is MLB Parity Possible Without A Salary Cap?
  • Guardians Agree To Extension With Jose Ramirez
  • Yu Darvish Contemplating Retirement, Has Not Made Final Decision
  • White Sox To Sign Seranthony Domínguez
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Mets Sign Jorge Polanco

By Mark Polishuk | December 16, 2025 at 4:45pm CDT

December 16th: The Mets have now officially announced the Polanco deal.

December 13th: The Mets and free agent infielder Jorge Polanco have agreed to a two-year contract, The Athletic’s Will Sammon reports (multiple links).  The deal is worth $40MM, according to ESPN’s Jeff Passan.  Polanco is represented by the Octagon Agency.

It’s a big strike for a Mets team that lost Pete Alonso and Edwin Diaz to free agency just within the last week, not to mention last month’s trade that sent another longtime Met in Brandon Nimmo to Texas.  New York acquired Marcus Semien in the Nimmo deal, and while Polanco also has a long history of playing second base, Passan writes that the Mets will deploy Polanco primarily as a first baseman and DH.  Polanco could also potentially chip in at third base, though it looks as it the Mets view Polanco a piece of the puzzle in replacing Alonso at first base.

The 32-year-old Polanco hit .265/.326/.495 with 26 home runs over 524 plate appearances for the Mariners last season, playing a huge role for a Seattle team that won the AL West and fell just short of reaching the World Series.  It was a fine bounce-back performance for Polanco after a down year in 2024, which still resulted in a one-year guarantee to return to the Mariners in 2025.  That deal paid Polanco $7.75MM in guaranteed money, and he made enough plate appearances to turn an $8MM mutual option for 2026 into a $6MM player option, and Polanco unsurprisingly rejected that player option to re-enter the market after his much improved platform year.

The 132 wRC+ Polanco posted in 2025 was the highest of his career, and he drastically cut back on his strikeouts after seeing his K% balloon in each of the previous four seasons.  While Polanco walked less than usual, his 45.8% hard-hit ball rate was a career best.  Overall, the advanced metrics suggest that Polanco’s resurgence in 2025 was legitimate, and if anything, his .269 BABIP indicates that he perhaps deserved even better numbers.

One concern within Polanco’s otherwise strong year was that he made 89 appearances as a designated hitter, after amassing only 45 DH days over his 11 previous big league seasons.  Polanco sustained an oblique injury early in the 2025 season that wasn’t quite serious enough to merit a trip to the injured list, but the Mariners compensated by using Polanco less frequently in the field, and cut back on the switch-hitter’s usage against left-handed pitching.

While there hasn’t been any concern that Polanco will be similarly limited going forward, the Mets’ plan to use him as a first baseman may also reflect Polanco’s age, his modest defensive numbers as a second or third baseman, and the fact that a stellar fielder like Semien is already in place at the keystone.  Throughout his long pro career, Polanco has made exactly one career appearance as a first baseman, and it was just a late-game cameo for a single at-bat in Seattle’s 5-4 loss to the Giants last April 6.

Polanco is an experienced enough infielder that the Mets obviously feel he’ll be able to learn the position in due course.  For all of Alonso’s pluses at the plate, he was a poor enough fielder that Polanco will be a defensive upgrade even if he’s just an average first baseman.  Because the DH spot is open and because Polanco could also be utilized at third base, this signing also doesn’t necessarily close the door on the Mets’ chances of signing other known targets like Cody Bellinger or even a more first base-specific player like the Cardinals’ Willson Contreras.

Between losing both Alonso and Nimmo, the Mets’ offense has taken a hit by essentially replacing the duo with Polanco and Semien, given how Semien struggled in 2025.  Run prevention has been a stated goal for Mets president of operations David Stearns, and upgrading the defense is another way of making the lineup better, even if the team will still need to add some more pop as the offseason develops.

MLB Trade Rumors ranked Polanco 23rd on our list of the offseason’s top 50 free agents, and projected a three-year, $42MM deal for the veteran.  Polanco ended up just about matching that dollar figure on a two-year deal, as he opted for the higher average annual value rather than the extra security of the three-plus years he was seeking in his next deal.

The shorter term lines Polanco up for another free agent bid when he’s 34, and some continued production could line him up for another lucrative shorter-term pact.  Stearns is known to prefer shorter-term commitments for free agents, so this also aligns with the PBO’s ideal method of roster-building.

The Pirates and Red Sox were known to have interest in Polanco this winter, and the infielder was also drawing a lot of attention from the Mariners about a possible reunion.  Adam Jude of the Seattle Times hears from a source that the Mariners’ last offer to Polanco was also a two-year contract, and was “very competitive” price-wise with the Mets’ $40MM offer.

Seattle achieved its top offseason priority of re-signing Josh Naylor, and the team’s plan was then to explore Polanco and Eugenio Suarez as candidates to return.  With Polanco now in Queens, the Mariners could turn to Suarez as a DH candidate and part-time third baseman, or explore some other infield options on the free agent or trade fronts.  With plenty of internal candidates for third base, the M’s have been primarily looking at second basemen during their infield pursuits this winter.

Inset picture courtesy of Jordan Godfree — Imagn Images

Share Repost Send via email

New York Mets Newsstand Transactions Jorge Polanco

Cubs Sign Hoby Milner
Main
Rangers Sign Alexis Diaz
View Comments (363)
Post a Comment

363 Comments

  1. Greentreant

    1 month ago

    Why? Do they not like Semien or Lindor?

    7
    Reply
    • Simm

      1 month ago

      He is mainly a DH bat at this point in his career. Spot starter but not likely relied on to be a primary position player.

      16
      Reply
      • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

        1 month ago

        That’s a lot of money to be a spot starter

        39
        Reply
        • noquarter89

          1 month ago

          He means he would only spot start on defense, otherwise he’d be the everyday DH.

          4
          Reply
        • radhippo

          1 month ago

          A Team of middle infielders. Interesting

          3
          Reply
        • compassrose

          1 month ago

          I am happy and sad to see him sign elsewhere. Sad because I liked the way he cheered for his teammates when he was hurt. He showed up and was a great teammate.

          I am happy because I was hoping he would sign with another team and then we go after Bichette. He can be our 2nd bm then Colt can come in and play 3rd. If we don’t resign Crawford to an extension then he can move back to SS until Celesten is ready for SS or 3rd. Differing opinions on if he sticks at SS or is moved to 3rd.

          I would like Young to stick at 2nd but I feel Bo will be better than him. Better contact and a better glove. We could trade Young and build up our minor league system. Probably not a ton of value there unless he can spend the first half of the season hitting really good in the minors. Needs to get that bat going to get time in the majors or get traded at the deadline.

          2
          Reply
        • Stevil

          1 month ago

          Crawford is so important to the team, it’s really hard to see an extension not getting done. I’ve believed he would slide over to second in 2027.

          But Marte would make things interesting. He could play second in ’26, then potentially slide into the role Polanco had last season if necessary.

          A lot would depend on Williamson and Crawford handling their current respective positions and what Emerson is able to do wherever they use him.

          Bo will likely command far too much for Seattle to bid. But they absolutely should be looking for impact.

          Reply
      • Hammerin' Hank

        1 month ago

        He had 2.6 bWar in his ‘career year’ last season. It was his best offensive season ever, but he was a lot more valuable in 2019 and 2021 when he was a shortstop and then a second baseman.

        1
        Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      1 month ago

      Semien 35, Lindor 32, Polanco 32.

      7
      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        1 month ago

        Alonso 31, Diaz 31

        12
        Reply
      • redmatt

        1 month ago

        They had a heck of team 5 years ago.

        2
        Reply
      • bestone

        1 month ago

        New version “Field of Dreams”….

        2
        Reply
      • padam

        1 month ago

        The rest of the starters in the field are under 27. Starters are beginning that trend as well with McLean, Tong and Sproat. Not as old as you think.

        5
        Reply
    • 99Captain Judge99

      1 month ago

      Thinking Lindor will be traded. Maybe to the Padres?

      1
      Reply
      • dannysbigboi

        1 month ago

        Padres are cutting payroll why would they take on that contract.

        9
        Reply
        • 99Captain Judge99

          1 month ago

          Because Lindor is making a lot less than Mr. Ringworm, and Frankie has said he’d like to play in San Diego repeatedly.

          1
          Reply
        • One time, Cleveland

          1 month ago

          99Captain Judge99 he’s also repeatedly said his name isn’t Frankie

          8
          Reply
        • vtadave

          1 month ago

          Lindor’s CBT number is $10 million higher

          Reply
        • Lemonade24

          1 month ago

          I think you m ow something we don’t. Plus him and Soto, are not good at all. I think the Mets want to make it Soto’s team, hence getting rod of Lindor, Nimmo Alonso n Diaz

          Reply
        • Shadowpartner

          1 month ago

          Frankie LOL

          1
          Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        1 month ago

        I don’t think they will trade Lindor, BUT, if they do and Cashman doesn’t do everything to get him……………. I will withhold my annual family Christmas card to him. Yeah, there, I said it.

        26
        Reply
        • Sourhaze

          1 month ago

          I dont see a world where Lindor gets traded but if he is, the yankees probably would be a team they dont trade him to.

          4
          Reply
        • disadvantage

          1 month ago

          @clipper
          Well they DID just sign Ahmed Rosario, so who needs Lindor??

          3
          Reply
        • dannysbigboi

          1 month ago

          You can say that again.

          Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        1 month ago

        Less than one percent Lindor is traded. Surely not to the Padres who have Tatis, Merrill and Bogaerts. Mets would not want Bogaerts and Padres would not trade Tatis or Merrill.

        Again, no such deal will occur, but if I had to make one up maybe to the Blue Jays for a deal headlined by Yesavage, Santander and Jo Jo Parker?

        5
        Reply
        • niched

          1 month ago

          A trade with the Blue Jays could make sense but why would Toronto trade Yesavage at all?

          4
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 month ago

          Lindor is still an exceptional player. You have to give up something extremely valuable in return.

          Again, I don’t see Lindor or Yesavage going anywhere. But if am going to make up a deal, that is what came to mind.

          6
          Reply
        • bullred

          1 month ago

          And Vladdy and Cease.

          1
          Reply
        • niched

          1 month ago

          If Lindor is that exceptional then why would the Mets even consider trading him? As good as he is, that contract is an albatross for a player his teammates don’t seem to care for. Besides, I can’t imagine the Blue Jays trading Yesavage for anyone short of a Shohei Ohtani level star. The Blue Jays don’t need a hitter badly enough to trade one of the best young starters in the league, and they have the money to pay any free agent out there. If they don’t re-sign Bichette and don’t like any free agents to replace him then, yes, a trade is in order. But if the Mets want to unload Lindor, his attitude and his crazy expensive contract, I don’t think they can expect to get a huge amount in return.

          2
          Reply
        • dugmet

          1 month ago

          And Bryce Harper barely played 1B and never 2B/SS which take far more skill and athleticism. 2B is same sude of IF as 1B. Only issues are 3-6-3 and 3-1 plays which Pete was not great at.

          1
          Reply
        • bullred

          1 month ago

          The Jays would never trade Yesavage right now. It just seemed that MLB Top 100 Commenter was throwing names against the wall so I added a few more.

          2
          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          1 month ago

          Lindor is a great player and his contract is not an albatross.

          5
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 month ago

          I think that I stated that I do NOT believe that the Nets will trade Lindor. The Lindor contract is not an albatross, it is market and has positive value for the next couple years. I also think the Blue Jays will not trade Yesavage, but I do think Yesavage, Santander and Parker would be what it takes. Or the Dodgers trading Teoscar Hernandez, Sheehan, Stone, Morales and Hope.

          Polanco is a 1B or DH. Semien is 2B. Lindor at SS. Baty at 3B and Vientos at DH. Maybe they get Tucker for OF?

          All of this being said, last year I predicted that the Mets would not make the playoffs due to weak starting pitching. Both Peterson and Holmes exceeded my expectations and they still missed the playoffs.

          1
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 month ago

          That’s fair.

          I simply responded to the posters who talked about the Padres or Yankees as possible Lindor destinations. I think the only two teams that could make it work are the Blue Jays and Dodgers. I still see value in Lindor’s contract. So I suggested Mets would like Yesavage and Parker and take Santander to offset some of the cost. It is fair but totally unlikely.

          1
          Reply
        • niched

          1 month ago

          Yeah, I probably should not have used the word albatross, but Lindor’s contract is too expensive for a player as good as Yesavage in return. I could see the Blue Jays being interested in Lindor but definitely not at that price when they have other options if they don’t re-sign Bichette — like trading for CJ Abrams for example. I could see the Blue Jays maybe trading Yesavage for a player like Bobby Witt Jr or Gunnar Henderson — neither of whom are getting traded anytime soon — but not an expensive veteran like Lindor. Even then I doubt the Blue Jays would trade Yesavage for a top infielder when he has so much obvious potential and proved himself on the biggest stage.

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          1 month ago

          Resigning Bichette or trading prospects for Abrams seem more likely.

          1
          Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        1 month ago

        Lindor and Soto are the face of the Mets with all of their free agent and Nimmo departures. No way they trade him.

        6
        Reply
      • VonPurpleHayes

        1 month ago

        Polanco can’t play SS anymore, so this move isn’t related to Lindor, but I do think he may be traded.

        1
        Reply
        • bucsfan0004

          1 month ago

          Polanco is a good addition for a good team like the Mets. He can DH or stand in the OF

          Reply
        • chandlerbing

          1 month ago

          @bucs
          Polanco is a good addition for a circus show like the Mets. He can DH or stand in the OF

          Fixed for you 🙂

          Reply
      • C Us Sink

        1 month ago

        Maybe to Seattle?

        Reply
    • ChrisMonte

      1 month ago

      Looking like Adonis Garcia for RF Soto to Left. Benge/Taylor CF. Vientos/Clifford 1B. Polanco DH
      Baty 3B offense. Lots of kids in the pen maybe a Fairbanks Setup and Imai Starting if we are lucky.

      Reply
      • Monix

        1 month ago

        Garcia? LOL. They aren’t moving Soto to a different position for Garcia.

        Reply
    • dugmet

      1 month ago

      First base.

      Reply
    • chandlerbing

      1 month ago

      @green
      They dont like winning

      Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      1 month ago

      He DH’d like 80% of the time for the Mariners this year. In 2024 he was their full-time 2B but he blew his knee out.

      Reply
    • Tigers3232

      1 month ago

      @Green Why would people comment on articles they have not read? Why?

      2
      Reply
  2. 10centBeerNight

    1 month ago

    To play First base I gather?

    5
    Reply
    • Kyle 12

      1 month ago

      Maybe McNeil or Vientos to 1st?

      1
      Reply
      • mitchladd

        1 month ago

        I saw someplace that the mets were interested in Bregman. Maybe Vientos is moved in a trade for a starter?

        2
        Reply
        • stymeedone

          1 month ago

          A fifth starter or swingman most likely

          1
          Reply
    • LaFleur

      1 month ago

      Theyre gonna make a trade for a 1st baseman id think. Polanco is a DH

      3
      Reply
      • hiflew

        1 month ago

        They should sign Michael Toglia. Can get him cheap, maybe even on a minor league deal. He absolutely lit up the Mets stadium when he played there as a Rockie.

        1
        Reply
    • simonkiller

      1 month ago

      DH

      Reply
    • RonTingley

      1 month ago

      We have evolved from gathering to reading

      3
      Reply
    • yobulldoggie

      1 month ago

      “Throughout his long pro career, Polanco has made exactly one career appearance as a first baseman…”

      So, apparently the way to get better defensively at first base is to sign a guy who is not a first baseman.

      14
      Reply
    • Bronxlou

      1 month ago

      He played one game there last season. If the Ms thought he was an every day 1B they wouldn’t have traded for Naylor. Incredibly, Polanco AAV is higher than Naylor’s. At this price, or somewhat higher, Mets would be better off with Suarez. .

      3
      Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      1 month ago

      Still more agile than a polar bear

      3
      Reply
      • LaFleur

        1 month ago

        Polar bears run 25 MPH which is roughly 4.7 MPH faster than Bobby Witt jr or Trea Turner

        2
        Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        1 month ago

        Thank you cliff the postal guy

        Reply
      • LaFleur

        1 month ago

        Damn imma have to change my name now

        Reply
    • Tigers3232

      1 month ago

      @bobby He has played a ton of 3B which also is a corner IF spot. Its not as if they are asking a janitor to be a brain surgeon.

      Reply
  3. Greentreant

    1 month ago

    Oh I didnt know he could play 1st. I thought for sure he was SS/2nd

    2
    Reply
    • WCSoxFan

      1 month ago

      It’s a projection. He’s never played first before in an MLB game.

      But he’s not very good defensively anywhere else. He’s a hitter and Mets may be hoping his 1B defense is no worse than Alonso.

      2
      Reply
      • Seamaholic

        1 month ago

        Can’t hardly be worse. And he can certainly field a ground ball. Has no range and a poor arm, but that’s no biggee at first.

        3
        Reply
        • JackStrawb

          1 month ago

          Tell that to Kodai Senga, comrade.

          5
          Reply
      • Jrod44

        1 month ago

        He was practicing with the Ms just in case Naylor had his baby during the ALDS

        1
        Reply
        • C Us Sink

          1 month ago

          Didnt know Polanco did that.

          Reply
      • stymeedone

        1 month ago

        To be able to play SS at the ML level, even poorly, there has to be defensive ability compared to a 1B.

        3
        Reply
    • Hammerin' Hank

      1 month ago

      He hasn’t played shortstop at all since a few innings there in 2022.

      Reply
    • Dive_4_it_Dorn

      1 month ago

      I’ve watched him in Seattle the past 2 years. He isn’t SS. Not great at 2nd with the injuries. I loved polanco but he is a DH now. But watch out, his numbers dipped a bit when not in the field. He will be missed. Dude was clutch and great in the clubhouse.

      Reply
      • gbakedgbaked

        1 month ago

        I think there is def some clubhouse aspect thinking going on with a bunch of the Mets signings

        Reply
  4. MorriesWigs

    1 month ago

    Trading McNeil?

    Reply
    • Greentreant

      1 month ago

      You are probably correct

      Reply
    • ohyeadam

      1 month ago

      I think McNeil takes over Nimmo’s slot in LF

      4
      Reply
    • Seamaholic

      1 month ago

      More likely Vientos I’d say. Or both.

      If the Mets can sign Valdez or Suarez as a SP, then move a couple extra pieces for more bullpen depth or a CF, I’d call it a modest but successful off-season. If they can sign Tucker, it’s a home run.

      1
      Reply
      • angt222

        1 month ago

        Maybe sending Vientos to CWS in a trade for Luis Robert, Jr.

        2
        Reply
    • JackStrawb

      1 month ago

      @MorriesWigs Lacking two OFers, even lacking a 4th OFer (Taylor’s probably only a 5th OFer after his 2025 at the plate) and with a 35 yo 2Bman and no one else in the system who can play 2B and had a good AAA season, it doesn’t make a lot of sense to deal McNeil, whose salary means his surplus value is small if it exists at all.

      He also has enough of a platoon split to warrant keeping him as a RH bat off the bench.

      If the team can pull off 2024 with Lindor and McNeil giving them 110 games as the keystone combination, how bad can the friction be, really?

      2
      Reply
  5. steelerbravenation

    1 month ago

    Trade for a high priced 2B with a few years left on his contract that had a down year and then sign another 2B I don’t get it
    As a Brave fan don’t get me wrong I love this but I actually feel bad for the Mets fans.

    18
    Reply
    • BatMet

      1 month ago

      He will be the DH most likely. Only played about 330 innings in the field last year

      3
      Reply
    • MeowMeow

      1 month ago

      Jorge Polanco isn’t really a 2B at this point. Can play there in a pinch but his defense profile has him solidly in 1B/DH territory now.

      8
      Reply
    • solaris602

      1 month ago

      I’m hearing he’ll primarily play 1B. Polanco had a great platform year, but he’ll have to do better than that for Mets fans to accept this UTIL journeyman Stearns picked up at Walgreens because he knew he couldn’t go home empty handed.

      8
      Reply
      • Monix

        1 month ago

        Polanco carried Seattle to the ALCS while the Mets losers like Nimmo and Alonso were home watching as usual. Cry more.

        10
        Reply
        • JackStrawb

          1 month ago

          @Monix People are also looking at Alonso’s 2025 as if it’s real, when it hangs entirely on an absurdly lucky first five weeks.

          The chance that Polanco will outhit Alonso, when Polanco’s 2025 OPS+ was better than Alonso’s in 2023, 2024, and five months of 2025, has to be 25-35%, and if he doesn’t outhit him it’s likely to be close.

          5
          Reply
    • myaccount2

      1 month ago

      He’s done defensively.

      2
      Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      1 month ago

      In a vacuum this is underwhelming. If they sign Tucker it is understandable.

      2
      Reply
      • WCSoxFan

        1 month ago

        In a vacuum it SUCKS

        9
        Reply
        • Seamaholic

          1 month ago

          Polanco was a better hitter than Alonso last year.

          1
          Reply
        • Ma4170

          1 month ago

          Better hitter than Alonso? No
          Alonso was better by every measure… WRC+, OPS, OPS+, etc.

          7
          Reply
        • Joel from NY

          1 month ago

          Don’t post while inebriated, please.

          Reply
        • Dive_4_it_Dorn

          1 month ago

          Polanco was great for the M’s last year. He just became your 3rd best hitter

          Reply
        • Joel from NY

          1 month ago

          Then we’re in trouble. Hopefully we sign Tucker.

          Reply
    • dugmet

      1 month ago

      Hes playing 1B.

      4
      Reply
    • rct

      1 month ago

      “Trade for a high priced 2B with a few years left on his contract that had a down year”

      I guess we’re just ignoring that they dumped a high priced OF who is declining, may be worth less than Semien going forward, and has five years left on his deal? The deal was just as much about dumping Nimmo’s contract as it was about getting Semien. imo, the trade was a good one for the Mets if you ignore sentimentality.

      I’m sort of with you on the Polanco part, unless the plan is to DH him full time. But they already have players who could fit that role. I’m not necessarily against it, just find it a touch curious.

      3
      Reply
      • Ma4170

        1 month ago

        It’s hard as a Met fan at this point to see the logic behind this strategy unless getting the salary cap number down is one of the primary drivers. In the end, we’ve replaced Alonso, Nimmo, Diaz w/ Polanco, Semien, Williams. That’s a noticeable downgrade IMO.

        3
        Reply
        • rct

          1 month ago

          @Ma4170: “Alonso, Nimmo, Diaz w/ Polanco, Semien, Williams. That’s a noticeable downgrade IMO.”

          I don’t think it’s as big a downgrade as people seem to think.

          Alonso to Polanco is certainly a downgrade, but by WAR, it’s maybe a 1 WAR downgrade. And they’re not locked into a 5 year deal that could age poorly. 2026 savings alone is $10 million.

          Nimmo to Semien is a wash, imo, production-wise. Maybe a slight upgrade if you look solely at WAR. Semien in a ‘down’ year put up a higher WAR than Nimmo did in either 2024 or 2025. And financially, you won’t have to pay Nimmo for five more years. Would you rather have Nimmo at 5/$100 million or Semien at 3/$72 million? I know which one I would take.

          Diaz to Williams is maybe a slight downgrade but nothing major. Williams had six years of a 231 ERA+, 1.023 WHIP, and 14.6 K/9 in Milwaukee before last year’s disaster for the Yanks. Let’s not forget Diaz’s disaster of a first year in Queens, and his 2021, and his 2024. Williams is also cheaper.

          I’m being optimistic here, but I don’t think the Mets are doing as poorly as everyone seems to think. Also still time left in the offseason.

          5
          Reply
        • Sorinotsori

          1 month ago

          WAR is only useful in a vacuum IMO. Lineups need certain amounts of different types of hitters, replacing nimmo with semien goes from a solid if unspectacular bat to an empty one. Fine in a vacuum because semien is much better on D. However if you had a team full of semien types you’d have a punchless lineup that pitchers can easily carve thru so how much value will that defense have? The value of alonso is being a proven, tested, true middle of the order threat to pair with soto, polanco 2 years ago was pathetic at the plate, making it possible last season was an outlier.

          Starting the offseason with 3 downgrades, and not even cheap ones, after missing the playoffs is a reason for the fan base to be upset.

          1
          Reply
        • bullred

          1 month ago

          Sorinotsori – Yeah I have a few problems with War too. A DH or 1b can put up 30hr + 100 rbi’s and get a 0.9 War and 2b puts up the same thing and gets 7 War. There is defensive value that should be accounted for but not to the extremes that it is.

          2
          Reply
    • DavRozNYY

      1 month ago

      Don’t feel bad for them..muahahaha

      1
      Reply
    • Sourhaze

      1 month ago

      Borther your gaves overpaid severely for 35 year old Suarez.

      Devin williams is a much better reliever and younger. No diaz sure, but better than suarez

      1
      Reply
  6. Zheff F

    1 month ago

    A precursor to a trade, perhaps?

    2
    Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      1 month ago

      I didn’t know he could pitch. Mets still need an ace. Go get Skubal or Skenes.

      1
      Reply
      • TheMan 3

        1 month ago

        the mets don’t have the depth of players to even come close to trading for Skenes

        3
        Reply
        • MetsSchmets!

          1 month ago

          They have a top 3 farm system, yes they do

          5
          Reply
        • Kermit The Frog

          1 month ago

          They have the #1 farm system in baseball sillyman. They can trade for anyone they want. That doesn’t mean I trust Sterns’ choices, but the depth of players and ability to take on contracts is elite.

          5
          Reply
        • ReyDay

          1 month ago

          They def do not have the #1 farm. LA, Tigers, Brewers are all better.

          2
          Reply
        • dugmet

          1 month ago

          Thats a poorly formed opinion. Mets have the top-rated farm ststem by ESPN in August and Baseball America gad them at #9 at the same time. They traded a couple of mid level prodoects but McLean, Sproat, Tong, Benge, and Williams sre all top 100-level prospect candidates. And there is Elian Pena. Last years top international prospect.

          4
          Reply
        • Krlnd

          1 month ago

          ReyDay,

          Kermit is correct.

          The Mets have the #1 farm system in baseball according to ESPN.

          espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/46070464/2025-mlb-prospect…

          4
          Reply
        • ReyDay

          1 month ago

          How is that a poorly formed opinion when you just kind of validated they weren’t #1 after the season ended? Detroit has 2 top 10 guys + Bryce Rainer. LA has Ferris, Morales, Freeland, Quintero, Hope and De Paula all in top 100. Brewers Jesus Made, Luis Pena, Cooper Pratt, Quero, + Logan Henderson still has his prospect eligibility.

          3
          Reply
        • ReyDay

          1 month ago

          That’s from August look at updated ones bud. Or look at my newest comment

          Reply
        • RunDMC

          1 month ago

          Wealthiest owner and #1 farm — what’s the excuse this year?

          1
          Reply
        • Sourhaze

          1 month ago

          Im a mets fan, in what world, planet, universe do the mets have the #1 farm system in baseball?

          Reply
        • Krlnd

          1 month ago

          ReyDay,

          Granted, ESPN’s #1 ranking is from August.

          To be even more accurate August 26th, so objectively it’s definitely towards the end of the season.

          And that date was at the very early stages of Nolan McLean’s meteoric rise where he dominated several playoff-bound teams.

          So while the Mets farm may not be rated #1 by every source, to have a very recent #1 ranking by an industry leader towards the very end of the season says a lot about the strength of the Mets’ farm.

          2
          Reply
        • Chris G.

          1 month ago

          ESPN just ranked them #1 and the consensus has been that the Mets farm system was a top performer in 2025 and made the biggest strides. Most other outlets don’t rank them until spring.

          Reply
        • MetsSchmets!

          1 month ago

          RUNDMC

          “Wealthiest owner and #1 farm — what’s the excuse this year?”

          There is no excuse. Either you understand the process and it makes sense or you dont understand the process and you’re confused.

          You saw cohen try to throw money at it, it doesn’t work long-term

          The alternative has already produced a top farm system in 2 years.

          3
          Reply
        • Ma4170

          1 month ago

          It’s known the Mets have a strong farm. And farm strength isnt just about top 100s, it’s about quality depth, and the mets have a lot of it even after dealing baez gilbert etc at the deadline. They do have 4-5 top 100s depending on the publication, and others like clifford ewing santucci pena who are close.

          Reply
        • ReyDay

          1 month ago

          @Chris MLB.com ranked them #7 on August 13th. They have a good farm but we can use our eyes here LA def has the better system and Brewers.

          Reply
        • ReyDay

          1 month ago

          They have a strong farm system just not #1 that was my point. I would put my net worth when the new rankings come out they aren’t #1. We can use our eyes and see LA and Brewers have the top impact talent coupled with depth.

          Reply
        • Ma4170

          1 month ago

          Fair enough, but they do have the prospects to get a top arm

          1
          Reply
        • CleaverGreene

          1 month ago

          Depending on whose doing the ranking of prospects the Mets have anywhere from 5-7 top 100 prospects. On most lists they have 4 top 50 prospects.

          Reply
        • Kermit The Frog

          1 month ago

          Is it a poorly formed opinion because you don’t agree with it? In the end, it’s all subjective and whatever the individual GMs think of each system is what actually matters.

          Reply
        • Kermit The Frog

          1 month ago

          Guys develop and it just happens. Being able to sign international free agents help.

          Reply
  7. mogulguru

    1 month ago

    These days he is Dh with 2b capabilities.

    Reply
  8. holecamels35

    1 month ago

    Boo!
    Another “almost” Pittsburgh Pirate.

    6
    Reply
    • alwaysgo4two

      1 month ago

      Glad they didn’t sign him. A definite overpay at $20 mil a year. Is Brandon Lowe next now?

      7
      Reply
      • holecamels35

        1 month ago

        They have to get Lowe. One year deal so Rays won’t want a ton. I feel like a 10-20 rated prospect and a fringe major league guy (Bart, Yorke, Gonzales) has to get it done.

        Projections had Polanco around 14-15M a year at most so considering the Mets had to pay that, he probably wanted 25M from the Bucs. Pass.

        1
        Reply
      • rct

        1 month ago

        If you’re a Pirates fan, I don’t think you should be glad you didn’t sign him. The AAV is high, but that happens with short contracts. More importantly, his OPS+ last year was 134. Spencer Horwitz led the Pirates with a 118 OPS+ last year and no other Pirate, regardless of sample size, had an OPS+ over 99. They desperately need offense.

        3
        Reply
    • SandlotBenchWarmer

      1 month ago

      Now that I’m reading he’s a DH mainly I’m not sad. We don’t need to pay a ton for a fairly light hitting DH. Lowe is looking pretty good right now cause we need an upgrade at second.

      1
      Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      1 month ago

      Should we even be surprised that Pittsburgh hasn’t outbid Philadelphia or New York

      2
      Reply
      • SandlotBenchWarmer

        1 month ago

        If the Mets needed to give him $20m a year to come to NY, the Pirates would have had to give him $25m a year with opt outs each year. Less sad we didn’t get him for that outsized of a deal.

        2
        Reply
    • WillieS

      1 month ago

      Yep… Ben the magician is using slight of hand tricks by putting these names out as players “ we are in high pursuit of “ knowing that its the Pham-like 35 plus players that he will sign! Organization deserves to see Skenes walk

      2
      Reply
      • JPR

        1 month ago

        It was all timed to boost season ticket renewals. Now, we’re back to “see who’s available on a one year deal in late January, early February.”, aka, who does no one want after al the real signings are done.

        Reply
        • holecamels35

          1 month ago

          They’ll talk about how much they tried and how tough it is and sell us on password and Suwinski, I sure as hell hope not.

          Reply
  9. mikeyny

    1 month ago

    Polanco has played ALL of 1 game at 1B in his career. This is another confusing move for Stearns. My guess is he’s your everyday DH. Not exactly a monumental move for the Mets.

    11
    Reply
    • WCSoxFan

      1 month ago

      He is credited for 1 game, but he never actually played the position (assuming he pinch hit).

      1
      Reply
    • MrMet62

      1 month ago

      @Stearns- How is this consistent with your stated goal run prevention? You need to go back to Milwaukee.

      2
      Reply
      • Monix

        1 month ago

        It’s called DH genius

        2
        Reply
      • JackStrawb

        1 month ago

        @MrMet62 Polanco rates to be the Mets primary DH since (1) they don’t have one, (2) it’s an excellent spot from which to beef up a modest lineup, and (3) Polanco gets hurt a lot.

        He’s much more valuable as the 134 OPS+ guy (that’s better than Alonso’s numbers in 2020, 2021, 2023, 2024, and also 2025 from May 6th through the end of the year) of 2025 than he is as an average fielding 1Bman who misses 4-8 weeks because he gets hurt playing the field and whose hitting also suffers as a result.

        2
        Reply
    • holecamels35

      1 month ago

      It’s not hard to play 1B if they want him to, Alonso wasn’t a very good defensive 1B anyhow.

      2
      Reply
    • JackStrawb

      1 month ago

      @mikeyny I have no faith at all in Stearns, but in fact it’s a very solid move to shore up DH and 1B with a player putting up a legitimate 134 OPS+ in a pitcher’s park in 2025.

      Polanco has 14,000 innings at 2B, SS, and 3B. If the Mets are going to ask him to play some 1B, they aren’t springing it on him after he signs, and the chance that he’ll be baffled by a 1Bman’s mitt, how to pick grounders, snag line drives, and scoop throws, is zero—as is the chance he won’t be about 10 runs better than Alonso.

      “It’s incredibly hard” for a catcher, not for a lifelong infielder.

      1
      Reply
      • SmdayM'sMay

        1 month ago

        Take it from this M’s fan. You don’t want him anywhere near third unless he’s rounding the bases. His attempt to play there in 25 was ridiculous as I witnessed him bounce the ball on the wrong side of the mound repeatedly.

        His time at 2b was passable but still way below average both via advanced metrics and the eye test. Hopefully first hides his defensive faults but honestly the Mets are paying 20 a year for a DH who’s one step away from an IL stint.

        1
        Reply
    • rct

      1 month ago

      Starling Marte: $20 million a year, primarily a DH

      Polanco: $20 million a year, primarily a DH

      Pretty even swap.

      2
      Reply
    • Hammerin' Hank

      1 month ago

      Yeah, I’m a Stearns supporter but this is not a good signing. He’s an injury-prone guy who just had his best offensive season in his walk year. And he has very little defensive value left in the tank.

      Reply
  10. Kingdome Mariners

    1 month ago

    Wow. Everything we read in Seattle sad the Mariners offered Polanco a two year deal. The Mets must have offered him significant more money and/or a player option for a third year? It seemed like Polanco wanted to stay in Seattle? This hurts. I am sure the Mariners will pivot to Brendan Donovan or Brandon Lowe but trades are not as easy to pull off as signing a free agent. Thank you for what you did in 2025 Jorge, you were clutch.

    4
    Reply
    • Kingdome Mariners

      1 month ago

      Well there you go. It seems that The Mets blew the Mariners offer out of the water. I bet the M’s did not go above $14 million a year?

      2
      Reply
      • C Us Sink

        1 month ago

        Its called overpay. Anything above 14 is too much for a primary DH.

        3
        Reply
        • Boodge106

          1 month ago

          “Anything above 14 is too much for a primary DH.”
          Schwarber: “hold my beer”

          6
          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          1 month ago

          But Schwarber is an elite hitter. Polanco was a very good hitter in his walk year only.

          Reply
        • Boodge106

          1 month ago

          Yes but Polanco can play all over the infield, even if he’s not above average defensively. Schwarber is unplayable outside of DH. Also, Polanco was incredibly clutch in the postseason whereas Schwarber disappeared in the playoffs. And it’s a 2 year deal vs a 5 year deal, so far lower risk

          1
          Reply
        • C Us Sink

          1 month ago

          Case and point. That’ll be even more true when he’s playing beer league softball in a few years. Good for him at least, if a team is willing to spend that. The players union and league need to implement a stop to this deferral nonsense, and start thinking about a salary cap. I know it’ll never happen…

          1
          Reply
        • C Us Sink

          1 month ago

          Is he really “elite”?

          1
          Reply
        • MetsSchmets!

          1 month ago

          He had an wRC+ of 132, good for 24th in the league.
          Higher than Harper, Tatis, Lindor, Witt, Bellinger, Yelich …

          I dk about “elite” exactly but certainly very very good.

          Reply
        • CleaverGreene

          1 month ago

          LOL The Orioles just gave Alonso 155M to be a primary DH.

          1
          Reply
      • Billy Goats

        1 month ago

        Polanco makes sense as a 1B/DH type at this point in his career and became redundant when Naylor signed. Mariners have like 6 guys who could play 2B this year. Meanwhile, the Mets getting a guy short-term allows them to call up their solid next group of prospects sooner.

        2
        Reply
        • C Us Sink

          1 month ago

          I suppose for the Mets 20 per is worth it because of their situation you described, and the fact they’ve whiffed on any other big name so far this winter.

          Reply
        • Billy Goats

          1 month ago

          I stand by my argument that the biggest flaw of Cohen’s Mets is that they don’t trust their impressive development system enough. I see it as less whiffing and more them being smart enough to not try to Out-Dodger the Dodgers (which will never work)

          Reply
        • C Us Sink

          1 month ago

          Agree with you there. Nobody will be able to out do them.

          Reply
        • CleaverGreene

          1 month ago

          Whiffed? They haven’t swung yet. They made no real offer to Alonso and Diaz was a hope you decline offer.

          1
          Reply
      • Hammerin' Hank

        1 month ago

        @BigRed The Mariners should not have gone above that. Good for them.

        1
        Reply
        • Kingdome Mariners

          1 month ago

          I totally agree. Now go get Donovan and Lowe or One or the other and Miguel Andujar as well as a RH RP.

          Reply
    • Kermit The Frog

      1 month ago

      So he’s better than his numbers indicate?

      Reply
      • Zippy the Pinhead

        1 month ago

        Nope.

        1
        Reply
    • marinersblue96

      1 month ago

      I wanted Jorge back in Seattle at a reasonable price, like 2 years $28 million. 2/$40 million is a gross overpay.

      My hope is they pivot to someone like Okamoto who is going to sign in the range of $14-$16 million per. He can play 3rd(M’s need a veteran here, not sure if Williamson will be ready for full time duty, bat wise), backup 1st, and DH. His position flexibility is very attractive to the Seattle.

      4
      Reply
      • MetsSchmets!

        1 month ago

        I think it was a 3yr @ $15M ask and to get him on only 2 years they went to $20M per

        Reply
    • Hammerin' Hank

      1 month ago

      As I always say, these players go for the biggest offer 95% of the time. They don’t have the loyalty you fans do, nor should they.

      Reply
  11. HalosHeavenJJ

    1 month ago

    Nice bat but makes for an interesting infield mix.

    1
    Reply
  12. Simm

    1 month ago

    2 years 40m sounds like a heck of a lot.

    14
    Reply
    • Greentreant

      1 month ago

      Is it that much?

      2
      Reply
      • Simm

        1 month ago

        That’s what’s being reported. To play 1b/dh.

        2
        Reply
    • rsoxbob

      1 month ago

      Yeah, unbelievable, especially since it is a $42MM hit per year!!

      1
      Reply
      • JackStrawb

        1 month ago

        @rsoxbob Nearly everyone gets that wrong. Why take the existing group as immune to tax penalties? Penalties should be attributed as belonging to all players, where taxes are considered as a constant percentage of all salaries.

        2
        Reply
    • C Us Sink

      1 month ago

      See above, overpay. I wish Polanco the best, he was clutch.

      Reply
      • SmdayM'sMay

        1 month ago

        I will readily admit I didn’t see his bounce back coming in 25 and had to eat crow when he wasn’t cut by mid June. But I was worried we’d overpay and spend the majority of his new contract waiting for Divish to provide updates on his rehab in Peoria.

        All in all I think we dodged an aging bullet. Hopefully we can trade for Donovan but if we can’t get the right player I’d prefer we start the year with our young guys at second and third and adress the need during the year, that’s assuming the young guys don’t earn their spots. I can envision a scenario where Young thrives at second and Emerson does the same at third…… maybe a pipe dream but it’s a more realistic scenario than our typical aging scrapheap signings being productive. Remember, we’re less than 12 months from being told Solano was going to do great things in our lineup.

        Reply
        • C Us Sink

          1 month ago

          Ryan Bliss started the season at 2B, for a week or two until he hurt himself for the remainder of the season. Either him or Young would be fine.

          1
          Reply
  13. Candy Maldonado

    1 month ago

    I guess this makes sense if you don’t like the free agent options in the OF (though Bellinger and Tucker are right there) and you want to trade from IF depth to get one instead? Figure one of Vientos, Baty, or McNeil is gone.

    Reply
    • KnicksFanCavsFan

      1 month ago

      @candy

      But all 3 of Lindor, Semein and Plan have only played 2b or SS most of their careers. Maybe they’re going to rotate guys at the dh spot?

      Reply
    • JackStrawb

      1 month ago

      This has little affect on McNeil and none on Baty, who’s the Mets primary 3Bman.

      Reply
      • Candy Maldonado

        1 month ago

        Baty had almost as many starts at 2B as 3B last year, and now that spot seems very much off the table, so yes, pushing him into a more permanent 3B role would have a ripple effect, either on him or Vientos becoming expendable. And considering the Mets’ strong emphasis on having defensive improvements this year, pushing McNeil or Vientos into corner OF roles doesn’t seem like the solution they’re looking for. I include Baty only because ultimately it puts them in a position where either he or Vientos can become a trade chip, and as likely as it is that the Mets would much much rather deal the latter, their fortunes do feel rather entwined one way or the other. Yes, personally I do think Baty is the everyday guy the full year.

        1
        Reply
  14. Robrock30

    1 month ago

    Alonso’s replacement?

    1
    Reply
  15. Al Hirschen

    1 month ago

    Why not Munetaka Murakami

    1
    Reply
  16. amk1920

    1 month ago

    20 mil for Polanco but won’t pay Pete. Nice

    2
    Reply
    • sgord03

      1 month ago

      It’s actually over $100MM and 3 additional years. I think it’s a terrible signing and that he’ll greatly regress even though he performed well in Seattle, but I don’t think it’s apples to apples.

      2
      Reply
  17. Greentreant

    1 month ago

    Mets fans, Well your GM is sticking to his guns about the 2 years. He must really believe in your youth coming up. If it is true, you’ll probably have to endure some head scratching moves but it might be worth it.

    1
    Reply
    • Kermit The Frog

      1 month ago

      Sterns never said he had a 2-3 year limit on years.

      2
      Reply
  18. uvmfiji

    1 month ago

    I smell a .215 season and early contract termination.

    6
    Reply
    • MetsSchmets!

      1 month ago

      See an ENT, he had a 134 OPS+

      4
      Reply
    • JackStrawb

      1 month ago

      A 134 OPS+ in 2025, legit supporting peripherals, and a useful edge vs RHP suggest otherwise.

      3
      Reply
  19. Never Remember

    1 month ago

    What a waste of money. Stearns really is in panic mode

    5
    Reply
    • Kermit The Frog

      1 month ago

      If he was in panic mode, why would he sign this guy?

      Reply
    • MetsSchmets!

      1 month ago

      A panic move is signing a .265/.326/.495 with a 134 OPS+ in a pitchers park?

      2
      Reply
      • Hammerin' Hank

        1 month ago

        OPS+ takes the ballpark into account.

        Reply
  20. Joeypower

    1 month ago

    That’s a Mets move! Why give this guy pete’s money? Unbelievable

    3
    Reply
    • MetsSchmets!

      1 month ago

      $155M is slightly more than $40M

      8
      Reply
    • Kermit The Frog

      1 month ago

      This guy got 150 million dollars?

      1
      Reply
  21. mets1977

    1 month ago

    At this point Christian Walker makes perfect sense for 1B. Trade Manaea and McNeil for Walker and Meyers

    2
    Reply
    • noquarter89

      1 month ago

      As an Astros fan I’ve been pitching this for a while. Though I prefer Senga to Manaea I’d be happy with either. Though we’ll need some cash coming back if it’s Manaea.

      2
      Reply
      • Alfred E Neuman

        1 month ago

        noquarter89: Not if they’re offloading Walker’s contract. But I think the Astros are stuck with him tbh.

        Reply
        • noquarter89

          1 month ago

          We do if we’re also taking McNeil’s contract.

          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          noquarter89: Nobody’s trading for expensive old Walker at this point.

          3
          Reply
      • ShaqFoo

        1 month ago

        Probably not much difference between Walker and Vientos.

        Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          ShaqFoo: Sure there is. Vientos is nine years younger at 26 and a lot cheaper, and he has a lot of his career ahead of him. Walker is expensive, old at 35, and washed up. The Astros are stuck with him.

          1
          Reply
        • phenomenalajs

          1 month ago

          Granted Vientos only had a short time at 1B but I remember the one time he was there he was so error prone that Alonso replaced him for defensive purposes! Alonso has no range but he was a master at scooping the ball at the bag which was the majority of what he needed to do.

          Reply
    • Billy Goats

      1 month ago

      Every other team hates the Astros, but you want to bail them out and eat an awful contract, give up a solid #3 pitcher, and Mcneil for a light hitting center fielder??? Maybe also send them Lindor so you can guarantee them the division???

      Reply
      • Alfred E Neuman

        1 month ago

        Billy Goats: Maybe fans like you hate other teams, but industry professionals don’t.

        2
        Reply
        • Billy Goats

          1 month ago

          Is Christian Walker seen as having anything more than negative value??? In that trade, the Mets would give up a pitcher that they need and Jeff McNeil to get a massively underwater contract for a player that has been made redundant by the Polanco signing…and they get Jake Meyers in return?? That does absolutely nothing positive for the Mets with a lot of negative, while bailing the Astros out.

          1
          Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      1 month ago

      Sign O’Hearn. They may get an outfielder now though.

      Reply
    • MarinerSteve

      1 month ago

      That would be a good trade for the Mets

      Reply
  22. Simm

    1 month ago

    Stearns we need run prevention. Over pays for a guy to play first that has one career game at first.

    Good news is it’s only a two year contract.

    6
    Reply
    • westcasey

      1 month ago

      looks like Mets are in run prevention but by the Mets.

      5
      Reply
  23. Goose

    1 month ago

    I knew he was signing today. The Red Sox said they were interested yesterday.

    2
    Reply
  24. 86mets

    1 month ago

    No No No!!! WTH Stearns!?! You preach “run prevention” then sign a DH to play 1B?? Harvard educated egg head. He bought an education but no good sense. Moron.

    3
    Reply
    • icantstandyous

      1 month ago

      The only way it makes sense is if he is replacing Marte

      Reply
    • Alfred E Neuman

      1 month ago

      86mets: Where did you read that they’re signing Polanco to play 1B? Try to avoid being the pot calling the kettle moron.

      1
      Reply
      • Zippy the Pinhead

        1 month ago

        It’s right there in Passan’s tweet.

        Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          Passan’s just guessing.

          Reply
  25. simonkiller

    1 month ago

    Lolmets

    2
    Reply
  26. Butters

    1 month ago

    Ok, now you’re starting to placate the mob keep it moving.

    Reply
    • RobblyDobs

      1 month ago

      Polanco over Contreras is a strange choice

      3
      Reply
      • budman_63755

        1 month ago

        Especially considering Contreras is earning the same money and was rated one of the top first baseman in MLB last year.
        There was the run prevention🤷‍♂️

        3
        Reply
        • RobblyDobs

          1 month ago

          Contreras is underrated, simple as that. But you’d think the FOs would do their homework even though most fans don’t

          1
          Reply
      • ShaqFoo

        1 month ago

        What are trading for Contreras?

        Reply
        • RobblyDobs

          1 month ago

          guessing whatever makes about 10m surplus value, but I’m not smart enough to say what that means.

          Reply
      • Alfred E Neuman

        1 month ago

        RobblyDobs: How do you know that this precludes a trade for Contreras?

        1
        Reply
  27. bigdaddyhacks

    1 month ago

    Yea I’m not giving polo 20 mil aav. That’s a massive overpay. Thanks for the memories but adios

    4
    Reply
    • Steve(shs22)

      1 month ago

      As a twins fan, at this point I would be in line with Polanco like 2 or 3 years at 7 to 11.75 M aav..20 ? That’s so laughable to me my God I’d rather play baty at 2nd base , the acuna kid or vientoes even. Rather than pay Polly that

      Reply
  28. chandlerbing

    1 month ago

    they’re replacing the best hitter in franchise history with…. jorge polanco? sweet mother of god and all thats holy

    2
    Reply
    • Monix

      1 month ago

      LOL @ thinking Pete was the best hitter in franchise history.

      4
      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        1 month ago

        Adjusted OPS+
        1. Darryl Strawberry 145
        2. John Olerud 142
        3. Mike Piazza 136
        4. Pete Alonso 135
        5. David Wright 133
        6. Carlos Beltrán 129
        Keith Hernandez 129
        8. Bobby Bonilla 128
        9. Michael Conforto 124
        Howard Johnson 124
        Brandon Nimmo 124

        Reply
    • WCSoxFan

      1 month ago

      This seems a bit hyperbolic.

      Olerud 146 wRC+
      Strawberry 143 wRC+
      Piazza 134 wRC+
      Wright 133 wRC+
      Alonso 132 wRC+
      Hernandez 132 wRC+

      Polanco 112 wRC+

      Over the past 5 years the gap narrows to 131 vs 117. Definitely a difference, but it’s the same difference between Alonso and Olerud.

      1
      Reply
  29. Touch 'em all Joe

    1 month ago

    I like Polanco; he was the most clutch hitter in 2025 according to FanGraphs.

    But as a replacement for Alonso? It’s definitely a downgrade offensively. At $20 million/year for Polanco, it leaves me wondering why Cohen Et al. wouldn’t just pay the difference and give Alonso what he wanted. Yes, I understand Pete got more term. But he is still younger than his replacement (and not to mention the fact he is the Polar Bear).

    Puzzling offseason for the Mets, so far.

    5
    Reply
    • MarinerSteve

      1 month ago

      I don’t understand why the Mets let Pete go?
      Any reasons ?

      Reply
      • Touch 'em all Joe

        1 month ago

        Didn’t want to pay him? Not too sure.

        Reply
      • JackStrawb

        1 month ago

        @MarinerSteve Because 5/$155m for Pete Alonso because he had a lucky April, was so absurd as to be ridiculous.

        The only thing that distinguished Alonso’s 2025 from his 2023-2024 decline was his BABIP through May 5th of .371, which he’ll never see again.

        Following that stretch, from May 6th to the end of the season Alonso’s line was .253/311/485, worth 1.3 fWAR in 5 months. Shear away his lucky start to the season and you’ve got a 2025 fully in line with his weak 2023 and 2024 seasons, only with a worse OBP.

        Pete’s in fact a 2 WAR 1Bman who should have been DH-only no later than the start of the 2024 season. That’s a player you might pay 3/$45m.

        We’ll see how it goes, of course, but the Orioles probably overpaid by $100 million.

        The whole business of Alonso’s free agency was thoroughly strange. How was his mediocre, final 549 PA not a major topic of discussion? And even then he needed a better than career average BABIP of .286 just to keep that modest .253/311/485 line standing.

        The Orioles thought they were getting a Kyle Schwarber who can play first base. What they’re probably getting is Dave Kingman’s age 32-36 seasons. Enjoy “Scoopy.”

        1
        Reply
        • Touch 'em all Joe

          1 month ago

          In other words… they didn’t want to pay him what he was asking.

          Reply
  30. This one belongs to the Reds

    1 month ago

    That’s a weird way to spell Alonso…

    …but at least they are trying to add offense.

    1
    Reply
  31. theporcupine

    1 month ago

    This is just plain dumb. While i appreciate outside the box thinking, this doesnt move the needle at all. Its more defensible to just let vientos play first.

    Maybe the mets will just load up the outfield with both bellinger and tucker to compensate for the mess elsewhere.

    Reply
  32. jvent

    1 month ago

    Stearns, you better change that to just DH, I think 2/$40 was a lot for him.

    Reply
  33. Simm

    1 month ago

    Polanco had a good year last season.

    I think he is a perfectly fine DH/spot starter. He is a good addition to any team.

    With that said 2/40 is definitely an overpay.

    3/45 was about is max number. The Mets overpaid to not go to that devilish 3rd year.

    Mets got better today, though it perplexing that they wouldn’t overpay for a guy like Diaz. A weird player to say…okay. We will overpay for you.

    4
    Reply
    • gbakedgbaked

      1 month ago

      Diaz never let the Mets counter. Reports is they would have gone higher

      Diaz just wanted to go to LA

      3
      Reply
    • Jdawginsc

      1 month ago

      They did offer to meet or exceed the Dodgers offer. He was leaving no matter what. He was offended by the firing of Hefner. Note he said 50-50 he was coming back.

      Sort of like Alonso talking about opting out after a last crushing game where he didn’t show up (nor the rest to be fair). That left a really bad taste in my mouth as much as I love Pete. Day after, he changed his profile picture to Florida from Mets.

      They were leaving. Why? We can only guess, but Stearns needs new voices in the locker room. Semien and Polanco are two good ones.

      Vientos and McNeil need to be the next ones to go.

      Reply
  34. Day1Mets

    1 month ago

    Mets are trading for Skubal or an ace. Acuña, Baty, McNeil, Vientos and/or Mauricio are out. Probably Tong or Sproat too. No other reason to sign more Infielders.

    Reply
    • fathead0507

      1 month ago

      None of those hitters get anywhere near Skubal.. all washed out “prospects”

      2
      Reply
      • Day1Mets

        1 month ago

        Hard to say prospects are washed out when none have more than 500 at bats in a season. A major issues with the Mets is giving them consistent playing time. Their Metrics are still highly rated.

        Reply
        • sfes

          1 month ago

          Maclean is a conversation starter in a trade like that and the Mets won’t trade him

          Reply
        • Day1Mets

          1 month ago

          An elite starting pitcher Detroit will lose in a year anyway. You don’t need McLean. Tong or Sprout and 3 other players is enough. If Skubal had more arbitration years, I’d agree with you.

          Reply
        • sfes

          1 month ago

          I agree that in theory would make sense, but a Tigers team with a wide open division coming off a playoff season has to sell this trade to their fans. You definitely can’t run a team based on fan sentiment but I’d be hard pressed to trade the best pitcher in the AL by a mile if my team was in that position anyway. Scott Boras makes that a bit of an issue as well. It’s almost a lose/lose situation PR wise. Then there’s the Mets trading top prospects for a rental that’s about to hit FA anyway for the biggest offer. You could keep your young guys and sign him then

          Reply
        • Day1Mets

          1 month ago

          Completely agree. If I’m the Mets, I only trade for Skubal if it’s a sign and trade, which is a low possibility. Stearns is definitely cooking something up even if it isn’t Skubal. No way we have this many infielders come opening day.

          Reply
        • stymeedone

          1 month ago

          Tigers don’t need IF though. RH power bat, 3B or CF, and lots of pitching. Baty, McNeil, Acuna, Mauricio, and Vientos do nothing to help the Tigers. That’s just flotsam.

          1
          Reply
  35. LeftyNate111

    1 month ago

    If he’s primarily DH replacing Marte, this seems like a good deal. Short term, probably bigger money than other teams were willing to commit. The way a big market should do.

    2
    Reply
  36. Salzilla

    1 month ago

    Odd one and most likely just for DH with occasional 1st(if he can)/2nd. He’s a good bat, though seems a tad pricey for what you get.

    1
    Reply
  37. Steven hempel

    1 month ago

    Jajaja they must really trying to curb their spending long term

    Reply
  38. Say Hey Now Kid

    1 month ago

    I don’t think this move gets Stearns back in anyone’s good graces

    2
    Reply
  39. WashedUpOldTimer

    1 month ago

    Cue the Pirates PR Department to tell fans that like Schwarber and Naylor, they were “in on” Polanco
    That’ll be enough to sell some tickets, right?

    Reply
    • MarinerSteve

      1 month ago

      I am a longtime Buc fan who has moved to Mariner territory 5 years ago. Polanco seemed to me to be a good enough hitter to help the team. But not at 20m a year. Didn’t want to resign him in Seattle however. We can do better things with 15-20m per year

      2
      Reply
      • WashedUpOldTimer

        1 month ago

        Agreed, Steve, and well said. But they have to do better than guys like Tommy Pham and Adam Frazier, too
        It’s nice that they’re leaking out these “we’re gonna spend” pieces. But let’s believe it when we see it

        Reply
  40. icantstandyous

    1 month ago

    After signing Winker Siri and Madrigal last year and never played he decides to do this

    Reply
  41. ShaqFoo

    1 month ago

    Reminiscent of Eduardo Escobar

    1
    Reply
  42. Sensible

    1 month ago

    As an Ms fan, I’m a little relieved. I don’t think Polanco will recreate his career year and he really is quickly becoming a DH only type player. I’m grateful for what he did last year but Ms need someone who can offer a bat & some defensive flexibility.

    3
    Reply
    • MarinerSteve

      1 month ago

      I agree with everything you say Sensible. I too thank Polanco but feel he wasn’t the player I remember from his Twin days, even in 23’. I would like to see us trade for Marte for 2B. What would we have to give the Dbacks in your opinion Sensible?

      Reply
      • Sensible

        1 month ago

        I don’t want the Ms to try for Ketel. I’m not sure there is a good comp for trading for a player like him either, with so many years on his contract still.

        The Ms shouldn’t be subtracting from their MLB roster, or their upper minors.

        Reply
  43. YellowCleats

    1 month ago

    Clearly stearns has orders to get luxury tax reset within next 3 years. Not signing anything long term. Even cohen said there is time left in offseason to build a competitive team; he didn’t say championship team.

    2
    Reply
    • YellowCleats

      1 month ago

      Polanco won’t be a Gold Glove-caliber first baseman, but he should be serviceable to average there, preserving his strong offensive value (switch-hitting power, .821 OPS and 26 HR in 2025) without the defensive drag he’s carried up the middle. The move down the defensive spectrum is a smart one for both him and the Mets

      Reply
  44. Simm

    1 month ago

    Dennis Lin of the athletic just wrote this. Much more details in the article.

    The Padres’ players in the talks include right-hander Nick Pivetta, outfielder Ramón Laureano and relievers Mason Miller, Adrian Morejon and Jeremiah Estrada. San Diego, in turn, is asking the Mets about their young major leaguers and all of their top prospects, both pitchers and position players.

    Lindor and Tatis aren’t being discussed, nor was cronenworth. Also that McLean is viewed as untouchable.

    Makes sense when you consider Stearns is on short term deals. Both Pivetta, Laureano and morejon have one year left before free agency.

    Miller and Estrada both have 4 years left. Could see Estrada being moved. Much harder to see Miller. Though reports have it the Mets did try and trade for him last year. The article states it could involve multiple guys, the blockbuster being rumored Preller is talking about.

    1
    Reply
    • ShaqFoo

      1 month ago

      Mets aren’t dealing any of their top prospects to get back players with 1 control year. Sure Mets could have interest in Estrada or Laureano, but the Mets aren’t dealing any of their elite prospects for them. But it makes sense that the Pads would ask for young arms to replace all the pitching they’re losing… Cease, King & Suarez. Hard to see the Pads try to remain competitive if they deal Pivetta too.

      Reply
      • Simm

        1 month ago

        To be fair you have no idea who the Mets would be willing to deal.

        Outside of McLean who is considered untouchable.

        Look at what the Mariners just traded for a worse pitcher than Estrada alone. Now I don’t expect those two guys to bring back elite prospects.

        Miller for sure would bring back an elite prospect.

        I could see some sort of pivetta for senga deal.

        1
        Reply
        • MarinerSteve

          1 month ago

          Mariners lefty acquired is going to be excellent in a 7-9th inning role.

          1
          Reply
      • icantstandyous

        1 month ago

        Who says? Stearns has done a bunch of questionable moves.

        Reply
    • Rsox

      1 month ago

      The only semi-logical hypothetical trade between the Mets and Padres would be Lindor for Bogaerts, straight up bad contract for bad contract

      Reply
      • Simm

        1 month ago

        Lindor seems to be off the table.

        More steam is smoking around Miller. That would definitely shut up a lot of the Mets fans upset about Diaz.

        1
        Reply
      • ShaqFoo

        1 month ago

        In your dreams, if you are a Pads fan…

        Lindor has lived up to his contract so far… absolutely no regrets on Lindor from the Mets side. Mets love Lindor.

        Reply
        • Rsox

          1 month ago

          The Mets might love Lindor but if there is any truth to the noise about him and Soto not getting along its something that will eventually have to be addressed and that usually means someone has to go

          Reply
  45. Lonniemac

    1 month ago

    This is big overpay. I don’t see the logic in this signing at all.

    2
    Reply
  46. Therealeman

    1 month ago

    If the Nets get a 2024 season out of Vientos they’ll be fairly competitive. The lineup isn’t deep after Lindor, Soto and Polanco. Semien is fairly cooked. I knew last year the rotation was overrated and it was. It’s not overrated now. Vientos is a key lineup wise.

    Reply
    • Therealeman

      1 month ago

      Mets. Yes I know.

      Reply
  47. Stieb Cooperstown

    1 month ago

    like many here i am really fascinated to see how the boy genius assembles a team from scratch using bossman’s big wallet. i bet Mets end up signing a combination of Tucker/Belli/Bo/Bregman/Valdez/Suarez etc. to literally buy a new core

    Reply
    • JackStrawb

      1 month ago

      Polanco probably obviates getting both Bellinger and Tucker. Not that the Mets were signing either…

      Reply
  48. JuanUribeJazzHands

    1 month ago

    FG projection

    114 wRC+, 2.3 fWAR/536

    He has 2 runs for positional adjustment. That’s inline with him playing 2B (2.5 per 150 games).

    He will lose 15 runs if he moves to 1B (-12.5).

    Fangraphs also gives him -2 for his defense at 2B. So, break even on defense.

    To break even on defense, he’d have to be a +12.5 defender at 1B. That seems unlikely.

    If he’s an average defender at 1B, he’ll be about a 1 WAR player. If he’s +5 at 1B, he’ll be a 1.5 WAR player, etc.

    Seems like an overpay, if I did my math right

    4
    Reply
    • RobblyDobs

      1 month ago

      makes him nearly half as good as Willson Contreras.

      Can only figure that Contreras said he wouldn’t waive his no-trade for the Mets.

      Reply
      • JuanUribeJazzHands

        1 month ago

        I thought Contreras was the most obvious fit

        Maybe the Cardinals and Mets had wildly different valuations.

        Maybe the Mets really like Polanco

        Maybe this is part of a bigger plan

        Reply
  49. Seamaholic

    1 month ago

    Mets fans gonna come at me for saying it, but it’s true: This is an upgrade at 1B based on last year’s performance.

    1
    Reply
    • JackStrawb

      1 month ago

      @Seamaholic It’s hard to overemphasize how much luck went into Alonso’s 2025 performance. Without that good luck, his 2025 is difficult to distinguish from his 2023-2024 decline.

      Without that, it would be far more clear how absurd the O’s overpay is. Without that, if he just had ordinary luck in 2025, Alonso would have been in line for 3/60m—but if you can’t .get all 30 MLB GMs to do due diligence, what chance do you have with casual fans?

      1
      Reply
  50. Mollysdad

    1 month ago

    DH/1B? So he’s replacing Alfonso?? ooooooo k

    Reply
  51. Enjoy sack lunch

    1 month ago

    Dumpster diving Sandy Alderson?

    1
    Reply
  52. desertdawg

    1 month ago

    Let’s see they sign Soto, the last piece of the puzzle for the Mets in 2025. Well, that was not the case when the dust settled. Now they let Alonso walk out the door and sign Polanco to maybe play an occasional first base and DH. They trade for Sieman to play 2B upgrade with these two moves to the talent of 2025 right now, don’t see it, and then lose Diaz, but sign Williams as a replacement. That is what the 2026 Mets looks like, how do Met fans feel so far, has it been a good off season? How would you grade it?

    1
    Reply
    • whyhayzee

      1 month ago

      I give them an incomplete, it’s December 14.

      3
      Reply
    • JerseyShoreScore

      1 month ago

      The Mets signed Soto, and a year they dump three core players and fill in with spare parts and aging middle infielders in their decline years…

      Reply
  53. mahalkita

    1 month ago

    Not a bad deal for a transition season..Really it’s just one year with no 2027 season likely. Gives our prospects time to be ready when the team is ready to compete again.

    Reply
  54. dlj0527

    1 month ago

    Hope the pressure of playing in NY half the season doesn’t run him over like it has other players. If he can spot start in the field and not be DH only gives Mets options with daily lineup.

    Reply
    • JackStrawb

      1 month ago

      @dlj0527 It would be interesting to see one credible study showing that players do worse in NY than they do after moving to other cities. Just one.

      Given the average age of FAs is older than the MLB average, you’d expect to see FAs, on average, do worse in NY (or any city, really) than they had done with their previous teams simply because of age-related decline—instead, any time a player does worse in NY, the talk radio shrieking inevitably attributes that to NY, as if guys who had been playing in front of screaming crowds since the age of eight were suddenly overwhelmed because.

      1
      Reply
  55. VonPurpleHayes

    1 month ago

    That’s your Alonso replacement. Adds some pop. Nowhere near as much as Pete, but far cheaper. Not a bad move.

    1
    Reply
  56. ShaqFoo

    1 month ago

    Well, unless Vientos or Baty were part of a trade, it does seem to close the door on a Willson Contreras trade.

    The Mets next move would be to add an OFer or an arm.

    Reply
  57. Carl W.

    1 month ago

    As a Twins fan I’m happy for Jorge. As a baseball fan 20m a season seems like an overpay for a primarily DH last season. It’s not my money so whatever I guess.

    Reply
  58. americasfirstbaseman

    1 month ago

    Monopoly money

    Reply
  59. toycannon

    1 month ago

    I’m going to throw up. Curse you, Jerry Dipoto.

    Reply
    • MarinerSteve

      1 month ago

      I disagree toycannon. He’s aging poorly. Can’t field whatsoever. Would have clogged up the DH at bats

      Reply
  60. SuperDuper

    1 month ago

    Stearns just made another big mistake. Overpay and Polanco is prime to decline in numbers.

    2
    Reply
  61. DanFan

    1 month ago

    Cronenworth to Seattle for some starting pitching.

    Reply
    • Kingdome Mariners

      1 month ago

      Certainly not for one of our current starting Five for that bat and contract. No way.

      1
      Reply
    • desertdawg

      1 month ago

      Maybe Seattle is looking to reacquire Marte from the D’Backs.

      Reply
      • Kingdome Mariners

        1 month ago

        Possibly!!!! His contract, though three years longer is cheaper per year than Polanco’s at $15 million but will cost some prospects….

        Reply
        • Zippy the Pinhead

          1 month ago

          The M’s appear to still be fighting for Donovan, but the best starter(s) they’d give up would be Logan Evans and/or Emerson Hancock. None of the 5 current starters, not Sloan, not Anderson, and probably not Cijntje. The fallback might be an infield from among Williamson, Crawford, Young, and Emerson to go with Naylor, which, imo, is awfully risky.

          Reply
  62. RickEO

    1 month ago

    Confusing

    2
    Reply
    • Enrico Pallazzo

      1 month ago

      Makes no sense, especially at that price

      1
      Reply
  63. CaseyAbell

    1 month ago

    Polanco’s big years were 2019 and 2021, both a while ago. Otherwise he’s bounced along as okay but far from outstanding. My guess is that the Mets will get a couple wins above average out of him in his age-32 season…if he stays healthy. That’s a big if with this guy. He’s never played more than 138 games in a season except for, you guessed it, his big years in 2019 and 2021.

    Also, I have no idea how he will play at first. He’s never been much with the glove at any position. Let’s just say that I’m a lot less impressed with this move than MLBTR seems to be. They’re burbling like the Mets just made a massive upgrade. Uh, no.

    1
    Reply
    • CaseyAbell

      1 month ago

      Meant to say a couple wins above replacement level, not a couple wins above average. I don’t think the Mets get anywhere close to a couple wins above average out of this guy. He’s two WAR, if that. I guess that’s a “big strike” to MLBTR.

      1
      Reply
  64. Sourhaze

    1 month ago

    “Run Prevention” = do not want to spend real money on legit players

    1
    Reply
  65. Sorinotsori

    1 month ago

    Oof

    Reply
  66. Jaysfansince92

    1 month ago

    Looks like the Jays don’t have to worry about the Mets signing Bichette now.

    Reply
    • DavRozNYY

      1 month ago

      I think Bichette is staying put.

      1
      Reply
      • Alfred E Neuman

        1 month ago

        DavRozNYY: Bichette is a free agent. That means he has no team to stay put with. He is no longer property of the Blue Jays.

        Reply
        • DavRozNYY

          1 month ago

          Yeah I know that, I just highly doubt he’s leaving Toronto.

          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          He’s already left Toronto by becoming a free agent. He could go back, but I wouldn’t assume he will.

          Reply
    • orangeandblue

      1 month ago

      Ya know Bichette did not mind when asked about playing third base. Mets might trade Baty and Vientos and then sign him or Bregman.

      Reply
      • Jaysfansince92

        1 month ago

        Bichette doesn’t have the arm for third. Considering how much Stearns values defense, I don’t see that happening. They would have been better off signing Alonso. He would have hurt them less defensively at 1st than Bichette would at 3rd.

        Reply
  67. Bill Kane

    1 month ago

    Huge over pay. He was projected at 3 for 42.

    Reply
    • MarinerSteve

      1 month ago

      Which seemed high Bill. He’s not aging well. I am glad Seattle didn’t sign him.

      Reply
  68. smrtbusnisman04a

    1 month ago

    Pirates must not have offered enough money…

    Reply
  69. Mercenary.Freddie.Freeman

    1 month ago

    lol Mets!

    1
    Reply
    • Chris G.

      1 month ago

      ???

      Reply
  70. MarinerSteve

    1 month ago

    Having watched Polanco for 3 seasons he is unable to play 3B whatsoever. He could play a poor 2B. 1B or DH is his only way to get at bats. Mariners were best to pass. They like to rotate people, especially Raleigh into DH to give them a partial day of rest.

    1
    Reply
  71. Rsox

    1 month ago

    Probably wasn’t going to get that in Seattle. I would probably DH Polanco, put Vientos at 1B, Semien at 2B, Lindor at SS, Baty at 3B, McNeil in LF, Soto in RF, and go all in on Bellinger to play CF (or trade for Luis Robert) and call it a lineup

    Reply
  72. SupremeZeus

    1 month ago

    Pete Alonso is not walking through that door. Why don’t you jump on the team and come on in for the big win?

    Reply
  73. Polarbear99

    1 month ago

    LOL STEARNS

    3
    Reply
    • Alfred E Neuman

      1 month ago

      Polarbear99: LOL Troll

      1
      Reply
      • Polarbear99

        1 month ago

        Truth hurts you bud!75 wins Mets lol

        Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          LOL Troll

          1
          Reply
        • Polarbear99

          1 month ago

          LOL Alfred Stearns

          Reply
  74. bseblfevr

    1 month ago

    Darn, the Ms will miss him, but $40 mil for 2 years, I can’t blame him.

    2
    Reply
  75. ExPatNYker

    1 month ago

    Bwahahahaha

    Reply
  76. ExPatNYker

    1 month ago

    This reaction not proaction

    1
    Reply
  77. enc1n0

    1 month ago

    Marte replacement

    Reply
  78. Blue Jay Ray

    1 month ago

    I suspect the reason the Mets are seemingly not interested in committing long term to a first baseman is because they think that could be where Soto ends up.

    1
    Reply
    • orangeandblue

      1 month ago

      They have a guy called Ryan Clifford in triple A who can come up in a year or two. Power hitting left handed first baseman. Might want to loon that up. Soto is going to be a dh by then

      1
      Reply
    • Alfred E Neuman

      1 month ago

      Blue Jay Ray: And because Stearns historically doesn’t like to devote a big piece of payroll to the position.

      Reply
      • Blue Jay Ray

        1 month ago

        I think if term wasn’t their biggest concern, Josh Naylor was a great fit and well worth the AAV. Seattle did well to lock him up early.

        1
        Reply
  79. Sadface

    1 month ago

    So they weren’t willing to meet Alonso’s price but are willing to overpay on Polanco?!!

    3
    Reply
  80. orangeandblue

    1 month ago

    I hope we get Okamoto to play first. Trade away Vientos and McNeil, sign Tucker or Bellinger and get an ace or two and a couple of relievers. If this happens the Mets wil be a playoff team

    1
    Reply
  81. ray1

    1 month ago

    Overpay.

    3
    Reply
  82. Motor City Beach Bum

    1 month ago

    Next panic move by Cohen/Stearns…trading the farm for Skubal! McLean, Tong, Jett and Benge heading to the Motor City 😉

    Reply
    • orangeandblue

      1 month ago

      Lmao no way in the world Stearns does that. McLean is untouchable. The rest is arguable. Tong Jett and maybe Ewing and Clifford gets it done or a mixture of Ewing and Santucci

      Reply
      • Motor City Beach Bum

        1 month ago

        Nothing will get it done unless it is a massive overpay and someone panics and does it. Skubal should be untouchable and he’s not so McLean who has a handful of starts sure isn’t. I don’t see Stearns doing it but Cohen??? I think we will see Skubal staying put.

        Reply
        • padam

          1 month ago

          Maclean won’t be moved any any deal for Skubal when he in fact may be a Skubal himself – with more years of control and helps keep the team under the luxury tax. Tong, Sproat, Jett I can see being moved along with an Acuna or Vientos. Remember, Scooby has one year left. Mets can sit back and wait without giving up the farm.

          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 month ago

          Motor City Beach Bum: Next panic move – signing Kenley Jansen. Oh wait… 🤣

          Reply
        • Motor City Beach Bum

          1 month ago

          Haha. Got me there! Xheers

          Reply
        • Motor City Beach Bum

          1 month ago

          But will Cohen sit back and wait? His history would seem to indicate he might not. Dont get me wrong I dont think Stearns would do it; he’s a smart GM. It’s your owner I’d be worried about! Cheers dude

          Reply
  83. Joel from NY

    1 month ago

    Sorry, it’s nonsensical to refer to this signing as a “big strike”. How’d you come up with that?

    Reply
  84. Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

    1 month ago

    Kinda bummed as a Mariners enjoyer but I’m glad they backed off because I think this is an overpay for someone who’s basically DH-only at this point and can’t get through a season without an IL stint. He’s a good hitter, and excellent in clutch moments but overall I think the Mariners are better off spending their resources on a more well-rounded and healthier player.

    Reply
  85. Alfred E Neuman

    1 month ago

    Mason Miller and Adrian Morejon, anyone?
    sny.tv/articles/mets-padres-engaging-in-trade-talk…

    Reply
  86. Herb G 2

    1 month ago

    Some really foolish comments in this thread. Obviously, the plan is to move Polanco to 1B, replacing Alonso. He may not provide Pete’s pop, but coming off a 26 HR, .821 OPS season, with a career OPS+ of 112. he should provide some protection in the lineup for Soto.

    He wasn’t my first choice. Mine was Kazuma Okamoto, a Japanese RH hitting 1B with a career .882 OPS in NPB. But Polanco may be a safer choice since you never know how his NPB stats will translate to MLB.

    One advantage to signing Polanco is that it takes him off the board for Seattle, who has been looking for a 2B this off season. Now perhaps DiPoto would be open to a trade sending McNeil to the M’s even up for Luis Castillo..

    Reply
  87. 2baggr

    1 month ago

    Okay, now McNeill and Acuna for Kwan

    Reply
  88. sacrifice

    1 month ago

    They may want to move the 2 lousy hitting third baseman to platoon first.

    1
    Reply
  89. Steve(shs22)

    1 month ago

    LoL
    Mets strike again

    Lol mets

    1
    Reply
  90. 2baggr

    1 month ago

    Mets gonna met, for sure. Probably going to go Ty France at 1B and make a bunch of mid tier trades for pitching tbh.

    Reply
  91. longoverdue1977

    1 month ago

    Sad Jorge isn’t coming back to Seattle, but good luck to you in your future playing years. Thank you for the great memories in 2025. Seattle loves you and we will always welcome you.

    Reply
  92. Dodgers2026

    1 month ago

    Good. But Mets need starting pitchers, relief setup or closer, and another RBI / HR power bat. Polanco addresses none of these.

    1
    Reply
  93. Bronxlou

    1 month ago

    How big is the “hit” Mets’ offense has taken?
    2025 bWAR:
    Semien 3.3; Nimmo 2.9
    Polanco 2.6; Alonso 3.4.

    Reply
  94. Jdawginsc

    1 month ago

    I think Polanco is the DH. Not the 1b. He gives the lineup a bit of flexibility. DH, 1b, maybe second or left in a pinch.

    If he hits .750 OPS as a DH, he surpassed the last 3 years at that slot.

    1
    Reply
  95. Edde1968

    1 month ago

    Replacing Alonso with Polanco??? Stearns still thinks he’s with a small market team. Mets fans must be livid with this move.

    Reply
    • SalaryCapMyth

      1 month ago

      Oh, they are. Do you watch YouTube at all?
      Search Giraffneckmark for his reaction channel. His reaction to Alonso signing with Baltimore will be really close to the top.

      Reply
    • JackStrawb

      1 month ago

      @Edde1968 It should go without saying that’s not what this is.

      First, you’re not replacing Alonso, and even if you were you’d be replacing Alonso’s 2026 (and 2027-2030) *projections,* not his lucky 2025 season.

      Also, Polanco’s 2025 134 OPS+ outhits Alonso’s seasonal OPS+ for a majority of his career seasons, and Alonso’s 2025 was extremely lucky. In reality he’s a 2 win DH faking 1B, whose defense is so bad that he injures his own pitchers (and throws at them when they don’t cover the bag. How is he better than Framber in this regard?)—and for this the Orioles paid $155 million.

      Stearns is not a good POBO / GM, but even he knew not to pay Scoopy more than $155m—or anything remotely close to it. By now the Mets are fairly close to the team they were in 2025 (for better or worse) and they’re now solid at two significant roster spots that were open: 2B, and DH.

      What’s left in the main are two of the easier positions on the diamond to fill: 1B, and corner OF.

      Reply
  96. Timothy Frith

    1 month ago

    The Mets have officially signed Jorge Polanco to a 2-year contract worth $40 million. Aftar that, perhaps the Mets will sign Japanese infield phenom Munetaka Murakami to a 14-year contract worth $448 million to replace Pete Alonso at 1st base.

    1
    Reply
  97. Jdawginsc

    1 month ago

    The changes were coming. It was very clear that Stearns and Cohen were breaking up the core.

    I am pretty sure both knew what was happening behind the clubhouse doors culture wise. And I believe Cohen was tired of the contract stuff with Alonso from 2024, after he had rejected the 7 year offer.

    Now taking what they have done so far in the absence of the former players’ connections to the fan base.

    1. Semien’s range allows a bit of leeway for a first baseman. His bat will be fine for what else he offers.
    2. Polanco as a jack of all trades is a good add. Primarily he’ll DH but first and second have coverage. The fact he has accepted it is a plus. I don’t expect him to repeat 2025. I expect he will fill a nice roll.
    3. Devin Williams will bounce back nicely. Will he bring the gravitas of Diaz. Nope. Have some adding to the pen to do there. Would like to see Fairbanks.

    I’d also like to see Okamoto signed. Sort of a hedge on a big addition in left/center, and also coverage at the corners with a good defensive rep.

    Reply
  98. johndietz

    1 month ago

    2 years for 40m??? what a joke

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Yankees Re-Sign Cody Bellinger

    Giants To Sign Harrison Bader

    Is MLB Parity Possible Without A Salary Cap?

    Guardians Agree To Extension With Jose Ramirez

    Yu Darvish Contemplating Retirement, Has Not Made Final Decision

    White Sox To Sign Seranthony Domínguez

    Nationals Rebuffed Interest From Giants In CJ Abrams

    Rangers Acquire MacKenzie Gore

    Brewers Trade Freddy Peralta To Mets

    Angels To Re-Sign Yoan Moncada

    Dodgers Sign Kyle Tucker

    Red Sox Sign Ranger Suárez

    White Sox Trade Luis Robert Jr. To Mets

    Carlos Beltran, Andruw Jones Elected To Hall Of Fame

    Mets Sign Bo Bichette

    Ha-Seong Kim Out Four To Five Months Following Hand Surgery

    Ryan Pressly Announces Retirement

    Phillies To Re-Sign J.T. Realmuto

    Elly De La Cruz Declined Franchise-Record Offer From Reds In 2025

    Twins Sign Victor Caratini

    Recent

    Which Team Will Sign Framber Valdez?

    Cardinals Sign Nelson Velazquez To Minor League Deal

    The Brewers’ Rotation Options After Peralta Trade

    Royals, Hector Neris Agree To Minor League Deal

    Cubs To Sign Gabe Klobosits To Minor League Deal

    Yankees Re-Sign Cody Bellinger

    Twins, Joe Ryan Avoid Arbitration

    Trade Rumors Front Office Subscriber Chat Transcript

    Angels, Nick Sandlin Agree To Minor League Deal

    Braves Claim José Suarez, Designate George Soriano For Assignment

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android iTunes Play Store

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version