The Mets and free agent infielder Jorge Polanco have agreed to a two-year contract, The Athletic’s Will Sammon reports (multiple links). The deal is worth $40MM, according to ESPN’s Jeff Passan. Polanco is represented by the Octagon Agency.
It’s a big strike for a Mets team that lost Pete Alonso and Edwin Diaz to free agency just within the last week, not to mention last month’s trade that sent another longtime Met in Brandon Nimmo to Texas. New York acquired Marcus Semien in the Nimmo deal, and while Polanco also has a long history of playing second base, Passan writes that the Mets will deploy Polanco primarily as a first baseman and DH. Polanco could also potentially chip in at third base, though it looks as it the Mets view Polanco a piece of the puzzle in replacing Alonso at first base.
The 32-year-old Polanco hit .265/.326/.495 with 26 home runs over 524 plate appearances for the Mariners last season, playing a huge role for a Seattle team that won the AL West and fell just short of reaching the World Series. It was a fine bounce-back performance for Polanco after a down year in 2024, which still resulted in a one-year guarantee to return to the Mariners in 2025. That deal paid Polanco $7.75MM in guaranteed money, and he made enough plate appearances to turn an $8MM mutual option for 2026 into a $6MM player option, and Polanco unsurprisingly rejected that player option to re-enter the market after his much improved platform year.
The 132 wRC+ Polanco posted in 2025 was the highest of his career, and he drastically cut back on his strikeouts after seeing his K% balloon in each of the previous four seasons. While Polanco walked less than usual, his 45.8% hard-hit ball rate was a career best. Overall, the advanced metrics suggest that Polanco’s resurgence in 2025 was legitimate, and if anything, his .269 BABIP indicates that he perhaps deserved even better numbers.
One concern within Polanco’s otherwise strong year was that he made 89 appearances as a designated hitter, after amassing only 45 DH days over his 11 previous big league seasons. Polanco sustained an oblique injury early in the 2025 season that wasn’t quite serious enough to merit a trip to the injured list, but the Mariners compensated by using Polanco less frequently in the field, and cut back on the switch-hitter’s usage against left-handed pitching.
While there hasn’t been any concern that Polanco will be similarly limited going forward, the Mets’ plan to use him as a first baseman may also reflect Polanco’s age, his modest defensive numbers as a second or third baseman, and the fact that a stellar fielder like Semien is already in place at the keystone. Throughout his long pro career, Polanco has made exactly one career appearance as a first baseman, and it was just a late-game cameo for a single at-bat in Seattle’s 5-4 loss to the Giants last April 6.
Polanco is an experienced enough infielder that the Mets obviously feel he’ll be able to learn the position in due course. For all of Alonso’s pluses at the plate, he was a poor enough fielder that Polanco will be a defensive upgrade even if he’s just an average first baseman. Because the DH spot is open and because Polanco could also be utilized at third base, this signing also doesn’t necessarily close the door on the Mets’ chances of signing other known targets like Cody Bellinger or even a more first base-specific player like the Cardinals’ Willson Contreras.
Between losing both Alonso and Nimmo, the Mets’ offense has taken a hit by essentially replacing the duo with Polanco and Semien, given how Semien struggled in 2025. Run prevention has been a stated goal for Mets president of operations David Stearns, and upgrading the defense is another way of making the lineup better, even if the team will still need to add some more pop as the offseason develops.
MLB Trade Rumors ranked Polanco 23rd on our list of the offseason’s top 50 free agents, and projected a three-year, $42MM deal for the veteran. Polanco ended up just about matching that dollar figure on a two-year deal, as he opted for the higher average annual value rather than the extra security of the three-plus years he was seeking in his next deal.
The shorter term lines Polanco up for another free agent bid when he’s 34, and some continued production could line him up for another lucrative shorter-term pact. Stearns is known to prefer shorter-term commitments for free agents, so this also aligns with the PBO’s ideal method of roster-building.
The Pirates and Red Sox were known to have interest in Polanco this winter, and the infielder was also drawing a lot of attention from the Mariners about a possible reunion. Seattle achieved its top offseason priority of re-signing Josh Naylor, and the team’s plan was then to explore Polanco and Eugenio Suarez as candidates to return. With Polanco now in Queens, the Mariners could turn to Suarez as a DH candidate and part-time third baseman, or explore some other infield options on the free agent or trade fronts. With plenty of internal candidates for third base, the M’s have been primarily looking at second basemen during their infield pursuits this winter.
Inset picture courtesy of Jordan Godfree — Imagn Images


Why? Do they not like Semien or Lindor?
He is mainly a DH bat at this point in his career. Spot starter but not likely relied on to be a primary position player.
That’s a lot of money to be a spot starter
He means he would only spot start on defense, otherwise he’d be the everyday DH.
A Team of middle infielders. Interesting
Semien 35, Lindor 32, Polanco 32.
Alonso 31, Diaz 31
They had a heck of team 5 years ago.
New version “Field of Dreams”….
Thinking Lindor will be traded. Maybe to the Padres?
Padres are cutting payroll why would they take on that contract.
I don’t think they will trade Lindor, BUT, if they do and Cashman doesn’t do everything to get him……………. I will withhold my annual family Christmas card to him. Yeah, there, I said it.
Looking like Adonis Garcia for RF Soto to Left. Benge/Taylor CF. Vientos/Clifford 1B. Polanco DH
Baty 3B offense. Lots of kids in the pen maybe a Fairbanks Setup and Imai Starting if we are lucky.
To play First base I gather?
Maybe McNeil or Vientos to 1st?
I saw someplace that the mets were interested in Bregman. Maybe Vientos is moved in a trade for a starter?
Theyre gonna make a trade for a 1st baseman id think. Polanco is a DH
First base and DH the guy has never played first base
DH
We have evolved from gathering to reading
“Throughout his long pro career, Polanco has made exactly one career appearance as a first baseman…”
So, apparently the way to get better defensively at first base is to sign a guy who is not a first baseman.
Oh I didnt know he could play 1st. I thought for sure he was SS/2nd
It’s a projection. He’s never played first before in an MLB game.
But he’s not very good defensively anywhere else. He’s a hitter and Mets may be hoping his 1B defense is no worse than Alonso.
Can’t hardly be worse. And he can certainly field a ground ball. Has no range and a poor arm, but that’s no biggee at first.
Tell that to Kodai Senga, comrade.
Trading McNeil?
You are probably correct
I think McNeil takes over Nimmo’s slot in LF
More likely Vientos I’d say. Or both.
If the Mets can sign Valdez or Suarez as a SP, then move a couple extra pieces for more bullpen depth or a CF, I’d call it a modest but successful off-season. If they can sign Tucker, it’s a home run.
Maybe sending Vientos to CWS in a trade for Luis Robert, Jr.
@MorriesWigs Lacking two OFers, even lacking a 4th OFer (Taylor’s probably only a 5th OFer after his 2025 at the plate) and with a 35 yo 2Bman and no one else in the system who can play 2B and had a good AAA season, it doesn’t make a lot of sense to deal McNeil, whose salary means his surplus value is small if it exists at all.
He also has enough of a platoon split to warrant keeping him as a RH bat off the bench.
If the team can pull off 2024 with Lindor and McNeil giving them 110 games as the keystone combination, how bad can the friction be, really?
Trade for a high priced 2B with a few years left on his contract that had a down year and then sign another 2B I don’t get it
As a Brave fan don’t get me wrong I love this but I actually feel bad for the Mets fans.
He will be the DH most likely. Only played about 330 innings in the field last year
Jorge Polanco isn’t really a 2B at this point. Can play there in a pinch but his defense profile has him solidly in 1B/DH territory now.
I’m hearing he’ll primarily play 1B. Polanco had a great platform year, but he’ll have to do better than that for Mets fans to accept this UTIL journeyman Stearns picked up at Walgreens because he knew he couldn’t go home empty handed.
Polanco carried Seattle to the ALCS while the Mets losers like Nimmo and Alonso were home watching as usual. Cry more.
He’s done defensively.
In a vacuum this is underwhelming. If they sign Tucker it is understandable.
In a vacuum it SUCKS
Polanco was a better hitter than Alonso last year.
Better hitter than Alonso? No
Alonso was better by every measure… WRC+, OPS, OPS+, etc.
Hes playing 1B.
“Trade for a high priced 2B with a few years left on his contract that had a down year”
I guess we’re just ignoring that they dumped a high priced OF who is declining, may be worth less than Semien going forward, and has five years left on his deal? The deal was just as much about dumping Nimmo’s contract as it was about getting Semien. imo, the trade was a good one for the Mets if you ignore sentimentality.
I’m sort of with you on the Polanco part, unless the plan is to DH him full time. But they already have players who could fit that role. I’m not necessarily against it, just find it a touch curious.
A precursor to a trade, perhaps?
I didn’t know he could pitch. Mets still need an ace. Go get Skubal or Skenes.
the mets don’t have the depth of players to even come close to trading for Skenes
They have a top 3 farm system, yes they do
They have the #1 farm system in baseball sillyman. They can trade for anyone they want. That doesn’t mean I trust Sterns’ choices, but the depth of players and ability to take on contracts is elite.
They def do not have the #1 farm. LA, Tigers, Brewers are all better.
Thats a poorly formed opinion. Mets have the top-rated farm ststem by ESPN in August and Baseball America gad them at #9 at the same time. They traded a couple of mid level prodoects but McLean, Sproat, Tong, Benge, and Williams sre all top 100-level prospect candidates. And there is Elian Pena. Last years top international prospect.
ReyDay,
Kermit is correct.
The Mets have the #1 farm system in baseball according to ESPN.
espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/46070464/2025-mlb-prospect…
How is that a poorly formed opinion when you just kind of validated they weren’t #1 after the season ended? Detroit has 2 top 10 guys + Bryce Rainer. LA has Ferris, Morales, Freeland, Quintero, Hope and De Paula all in top 100. Brewers Jesus Made, Luis Pena, Cooper Pratt, Quero, + Logan Henderson still has his prospect eligibility.
That’s from August look at updated ones bud. Or look at my newest comment
These days he is Dh with 2b capabilities.
Boo!
Another “almost” Pittsburgh Pirate.
Glad they didn’t sign him. A definite overpay at $20 mil a year. Is Brandon Lowe next now?
They have to get Lowe. One year deal so Rays won’t want a ton. I feel like a 10-20 rated prospect and a fringe major league guy (Bart, Yorke, Gonzales) has to get it done.
Projections had Polanco around 14-15M a year at most so considering the Mets had to pay that, he probably wanted 25M from the Bucs. Pass.
Now that I’m reading he’s a DH mainly I’m not sad. We don’t need to pay a ton for a fairly light hitting DH. Lowe is looking pretty good right now cause we need an upgrade at second.
Should we even be surprised that Pittsburgh hasn’t outbid Philadelphia or New York
If the Mets needed to give him $20m a year to come to NY, the Pirates would have had to give him $25m a year with opt outs each year. Less sad we didn’t get him for that outsized of a deal.
Yep… Ben the magician is using slight of hand tricks by putting these names out as players “ we are in high pursuit of “ knowing that its the Pham-like 35 plus players that he will sign! Organization deserves to see Skenes walk
Polanco has played ALL of 1 game at 1B in his career. This is another confusing move for Stearns. My guess is he’s your everyday DH. Not exactly a monumental move for the Mets.
He is credited for 1 game, but he never actually played the position (assuming he pinch hit).
@Stearns- How is this consistent with your stated goal run prevention? You need to go back to Milwaukee.
It’s called DH genius
It’s not hard to play 1B if they want him to, Alonso wasn’t a very good defensive 1B anyhow.
Wow. Everything we read in Seattle sad the Mariners offered Polanco a two year deal. The Mets must have offered him significant more money and/or a player option for a third year? It seemed like Polanco wanted to stay in Seattle? This hurts. I am sure the Mariners will pivot to Brendan Donovan or Brandon Lowe but trades are not as easy to pull off as signing a free agent. Thank you for what you did in 2025 Jorge, you were clutch.
Well there you go. It seems that The Mets blew the Mariners offer out of the water. I bet the M’s did not go above $14 million a year?
Its called overpay. Anything above 14 is too much for a primary DH.
“Anything above 14 is too much for a primary DH.”
Schwarber: “hold my beer”
Polanco makes sense as a 1B/DH type at this point in his career and became redundant when Naylor signed. Mariners have like 6 guys who could play 2B this year. Meanwhile, the Mets getting a guy short-term allows them to call up their solid next group of prospects sooner.
I suppose for the Mets 20 per is worth it because of their situation you described, and the fact they’ve whiffed on any other big name so far this winter.
I stand by my argument that the biggest flaw of Cohen’s Mets is that they don’t trust their impressive development system enough. I see it as less whiffing and more them being smart enough to not try to Out-Dodger the Dodgers (which will never work)
So he’s better than his numbers indicate?
Nope.
Nice bat but makes for an interesting infield mix.
2 years 40m sounds like a heck of a lot.
Is it that much?
That’s what’s being reported. To play 1b/dh.
Yeah, unbelievable, especially since it is a $42MM hit per year!!
I guess this makes sense if you don’t like the free agent options in the OF (though Bellinger and Tucker are right there) and you want to trade from IF depth to get one instead? Figure one of Vientos, Baty, or McNeil is gone.
@candy
But all 3 of Lindor, Semein and Plan have only played 2b or SS most of their careers. Maybe they’re going to rotate guys at the dh spot?
Alonso’s replacement?
Why not Munetaka Murakami
20 mil for Polanco but won’t pay Pete. Nice
It’s actually over $100MM and 3 additional years. I think it’s a terrible signing and that he’ll greatly regress even though he performed well in Seattle, but I don’t think it’s apples to apples.
Mets fans, Well your GM is sticking to his guns about the 2 years. He must really believe in your youth coming up. If it is true, you’ll probably have to endure some head scratching moves but it might be worth it.
Sterns never said he had a 2-3 year limit on years.
I smell a .215 season and early contract termination.
See an ENT, he had a 134 OPS+
What a waste of money. Stearns really is in panic mode
If he was in panic mode, why would he sign this guy?
A panic move is signing a .265/.326/.495 with a 134 OPS+ in a pitchers park?
That’s a Mets move! Why give this guy pete’s money? Unbelievable
$155M is slightly more than $40M
This guy got 150 million dollars?
At this point Christian Walker makes perfect sense for 1B. Trade Manaea and McNeil for Walker and Meyers
As an Astros fan I’ve been pitching this for a while. Though I prefer Senga to Manaea I’d be happy with either. Though we’ll need some cash coming back if it’s Manaea.
noquarter89: Not if they’re offloading Walker’s contract. But I think the Astros are stuck with him tbh.
We do if we’re also taking McNeil’s contract.
Probably not much difference between Walker and Vientos.
Every other team hates the Astros, but you want to bail them out and eat an awful contract, give up a solid #3 pitcher, and Mcneil for a light hitting center fielder??? Maybe also send them Lindor so you can guarantee them the division???
Sign O’Hearn. They may get an outfielder now though.
Stearns we need run prevention. Over pays for a guy to play first that has one career game at first.
Good news is it’s only a two year contract.
looks like Mets are in run prevention but by the Mets.
I knew he was signing today. The Red Sox said they were interested yesterday.
No No No!!! WTH Stearns!?! You preach “run prevention” then sign a DH to play 1B?? Harvard educated egg head. He bought an education but no good sense. Moron.
The only way it makes sense is if he is replacing Marte
Lolmets
Ok, now you’re starting to placate the mob keep it moving.
Polanco over Contreras is a strange choice
Especially considering Contreras is earning the same money and was rated one of the top first baseman in MLB last year.
There was the run prevention🤷♂️
Contreras is underrated, simple as that. But you’d think the FOs would do their homework even though most fans don’t
What are trading for Contreras?
guessing whatever makes about 10m surplus value, but I’m not smart enough to say what that means.
Yea I’m not giving polo 20 mil aav. That’s a massive overpay. Thanks for the memories but adios
they’re replacing the best hitter in franchise history with…. jorge polanco? sweet mother of god and all thats holy
LOL @ thinking Pete was the best hitter in franchise history.
This seems a bit hyperbolic.
Olerud 146 wRC+
Strawberry 143 wRC+
Piazza 134 wRC+
Wright 133 wRC+
Alonso 132 wRC+
Hernandez 132 wRC+
Polanco 112 wRC+
Over the past 5 years the gap narrows to 131 vs 117. Definitely a difference, but it’s the same difference between Alonso and Olerud.
Contreras 124-141 wRC+ each of the last 4 years, and a plus defender at 1B.. But nobody bothers to check so sure he’s bad and all.
For 60% the cost of Alonso (without the 5 year commitment) and 10% less than Polanco (same 2 years).
sure it makes sense…
@RobblyDobs
Not sure who/what you’re referring to, but agree that Contreras is likely better than those two, although he will be 34 for most of next season and we don’t know what the trade cost will be. He also has a no trade clause and will likely require a sweetener to waive it (as Gray did).
Contreras is guaranteed 41.5mil for two years with an additional 12.5mil if his 3rd year option is picked up. So that’s 67% of Alonso’s AAV and 4% more than Polanco. Those numbers will likely be a bit higher once/if a trade is agree upon.
Guessing Contreras said no to the Mets?
He’s declared as keen on staying in STL, though maybe Boston appeals. Shame for the Mets its such a good fit on paper.
I like Polanco; he was the most clutch hitter in 2025 according to FanGraphs.
But as a replacement for Alonso? It’s definitely a downgrade offensively. At $20 million/year for Polanco, it leaves me wondering why Cohen Et al. wouldn’t just pay the difference and give Alonso what he wanted. Yes, I understand Pete got more term. But he is still younger than his replacement (and not to mention the fact he is the Polar Bear).
Puzzling offseason for the Mets, so far.
That’s a weird way to spell Alonso…
…but at least they are trying to add offense.
This is just plain dumb. While i appreciate outside the box thinking, this doesnt move the needle at all. Its more defensible to just let vientos play first.
Maybe the mets will just load up the outfield with both bellinger and tucker to compensate for the mess elsewhere.
Stearns, you better change that to just DH, I think 2/$40 was a lot for him.
Polanco had a good year last season.
I think he is a perfectly fine DH/spot starter. He is a good addition to any team.
With that said 2/40 is definitely an overpay.
3/45 was about is max number. The Mets overpaid to not go to that devilish 3rd year.
Mets got better today, though it perplexing that they wouldn’t overpay for a guy like Diaz. A weird player to say…okay. We will overpay for you.
Diaz never let the Mets counter. Reports is they would have gone higher
Diaz just wanted to go to LA
Mets are trading for Skubal or an ace. Acuña, Baty, McNeil, Vientos and/or Mauricio are out. Probably Tong or Sproat too. No other reason to sign more Infielders.
None of those hitters get anywhere near Skubal.. all washed out “prospects”
Hard to say prospects are washed out when none have more than 500 at bats in a season. A major issues with the Mets is giving them consistent playing time. Their Metrics are still highly rated.
If he’s primarily DH replacing Marte, this seems like a good deal. Short term, probably bigger money than other teams were willing to commit. The way a big market should do.
Odd one and most likely just for DH with occasional 1st(if he can)/2nd. He’s a good bat, though seems a tad pricey for what you get.
Jajaja they must really trying to curb their spending long term
I don’t think this move gets Stearns back in anyone’s good graces
Cue the Pirates PR Department to tell fans that like Schwarber and Naylor, they were “in on” Polanco
That’ll be enough to sell some tickets, right?
After signing Winker Siri and Madrigal last year and never played he decides to do this
Reminiscent of Eduardo Escobar
As an Ms fan, I’m a little relieved. I don’t think Polanco will recreate his career year and he really is quickly becoming a DH only type player. I’m grateful for what he did last year but Ms need someone who can offer a bat & some defensive flexibility.
Clearly stearns has orders to get luxury tax reset within next 3 years. Not signing anything long term. Even cohen said there is time left in offseason to build a competitive team; he didn’t say championship team.
Polanco won’t be a Gold Glove-caliber first baseman, but he should be serviceable to average there, preserving his strong offensive value (switch-hitting power, .821 OPS and 26 HR in 2025) without the defensive drag he’s carried up the middle. The move down the defensive spectrum is a smart one for both him and the Mets
Dennis Lin of the athletic just wrote this. Much more details in the article.
The Padres’ players in the talks include right-hander Nick Pivetta, outfielder Ramón Laureano and relievers Mason Miller, Adrian Morejon and Jeremiah Estrada. San Diego, in turn, is asking the Mets about their young major leaguers and all of their top prospects, both pitchers and position players.
Lindor and Tatis aren’t being discussed, nor was cronenworth. Also that McLean is viewed as untouchable.
Makes sense when you consider Stearns is on short term deals. Both Pivetta, Laureano and morejon have one year left before free agency.
Miller and Estrada both have 4 years left. Could see Estrada being moved. Much harder to see Miller. Though reports have it the Mets did try and trade for him last year. The article states it could involve multiple guys, the blockbuster being rumored Preller is talking about.
This is big overpay. I don’t see the logic in this signing at all.
If the Nets get a 2024 season out of Vientos they’ll be fairly competitive. The lineup isn’t deep after Lindor, Soto and Polanco. Semien is fairly cooked. I knew last year the rotation was overrated and it was. It’s not overrated now. Vientos is a key lineup wise.
Mets. Yes I know.
like many here i am really fascinated to see how the boy genius assembles a team from scratch using bossman’s big wallet. i bet Mets end up signing a combination of Tucker/Belli/Bo/Bregman/Valdez/Suarez etc. to literally buy a new core
FG projection
114 wRC+, 2.3 fWAR/536
He has 2 runs for positional adjustment. That’s inline with him playing 2B (2.5 per 150 games).
He will lose 15 runs if he moves to 1B (-12.5).
Fangraphs also gives him -2 for his defense at 2B. So, break even on defense.
To break even on defense, he’d have to be a +12.5 defender at 1B. That seems unlikely.
If he’s an average defender at 1B, he’ll be about a 1 WAR player. If he’s +5 at 1B, he’ll be a 1.5 WAR player, etc.
Seems like an overpay, if I did my math right
makes him nearly half as good as Willson Contreras.
Can only figure that Contreras said he wouldn’t waive his no-trade for the Mets.
Mets fans gonna come at me for saying it, but it’s true: This is an upgrade at 1B based on last year’s performance.
DH/1B? So he’s replacing Alfonso?? ooooooo k
Dumpster diving Sandy Alderson?
Let’s see they sign Soto, the last piece of the puzzle for the Mets in 2025. Well, that was not the case when the dust settled. Now they let Alonso walk out the door and sign Polanco to maybe play an occasional first base and DH. They trade for Sieman to play 2B upgrade with these two moves to the talent of 2025 right now, don’t see it, and then lose Diaz, but sign Williams as a replacement. That is what the 2026 Mets looks like, how do Met fans feel so far, has it been a good off season? How would you grade it?
I give them an incomplete, it’s December 14.
Not a bad deal for a transition season..Really it’s just one year with no 2027 season likely. Gives our prospects time to be ready when the team is ready to compete again.
Hope the pressure of playing in NY half the season doesn’t run him over like it has other players. If he can spot start in the field and not be DH only gives Mets options with daily lineup.
That’s your Alonso replacement. Adds some pop. Nowhere near as much as Pete, but far cheaper. Not a bad move.
Well, unless Vientos or Baty were part of a trade, it does seem to close the door on a Willson Contreras trade.
The Mets next move would be to add an OFer or an arm.
As a Twins fan I’m happy for Jorge. As a baseball fan 20m a season seems like an overpay for a primarily DH last season. It’s not my money so whatever I guess.
Monopoly money
I’m going to throw up. Curse you, Jerry Dipoto.
Stearns just made another big mistake. Overpay and Polanco is prime to decline in numbers.
Cronenworth to Seattle for some starting pitching.