December 16th: The Mets have now officially announced the Polanco deal.
December 13th: The Mets and free agent infielder Jorge Polanco have agreed to a two-year contract, The Athletic’s Will Sammon reports (multiple links). The deal is worth $40MM, according to ESPN’s Jeff Passan. Polanco is represented by the Octagon Agency.
It’s a big strike for a Mets team that lost Pete Alonso and Edwin Diaz to free agency just within the last week, not to mention last month’s trade that sent another longtime Met in Brandon Nimmo to Texas. New York acquired Marcus Semien in the Nimmo deal, and while Polanco also has a long history of playing second base, Passan writes that the Mets will deploy Polanco primarily as a first baseman and DH. Polanco could also potentially chip in at third base, though it looks as it the Mets view Polanco a piece of the puzzle in replacing Alonso at first base.
The 32-year-old Polanco hit .265/.326/.495 with 26 home runs over 524 plate appearances for the Mariners last season, playing a huge role for a Seattle team that won the AL West and fell just short of reaching the World Series. It was a fine bounce-back performance for Polanco after a down year in 2024, which still resulted in a one-year guarantee to return to the Mariners in 2025. That deal paid Polanco $7.75MM in guaranteed money, and he made enough plate appearances to turn an $8MM mutual option for 2026 into a $6MM player option, and Polanco unsurprisingly rejected that player option to re-enter the market after his much improved platform year.
The 132 wRC+ Polanco posted in 2025 was the highest of his career, and he drastically cut back on his strikeouts after seeing his K% balloon in each of the previous four seasons. While Polanco walked less than usual, his 45.8% hard-hit ball rate was a career best. Overall, the advanced metrics suggest that Polanco’s resurgence in 2025 was legitimate, and if anything, his .269 BABIP indicates that he perhaps deserved even better numbers.
One concern within Polanco’s otherwise strong year was that he made 89 appearances as a designated hitter, after amassing only 45 DH days over his 11 previous big league seasons. Polanco sustained an oblique injury early in the 2025 season that wasn’t quite serious enough to merit a trip to the injured list, but the Mariners compensated by using Polanco less frequently in the field, and cut back on the switch-hitter’s usage against left-handed pitching.
While there hasn’t been any concern that Polanco will be similarly limited going forward, the Mets’ plan to use him as a first baseman may also reflect Polanco’s age, his modest defensive numbers as a second or third baseman, and the fact that a stellar fielder like Semien is already in place at the keystone. Throughout his long pro career, Polanco has made exactly one career appearance as a first baseman, and it was just a late-game cameo for a single at-bat in Seattle’s 5-4 loss to the Giants last April 6.
Polanco is an experienced enough infielder that the Mets obviously feel he’ll be able to learn the position in due course. For all of Alonso’s pluses at the plate, he was a poor enough fielder that Polanco will be a defensive upgrade even if he’s just an average first baseman. Because the DH spot is open and because Polanco could also be utilized at third base, this signing also doesn’t necessarily close the door on the Mets’ chances of signing other known targets like Cody Bellinger or even a more first base-specific player like the Cardinals’ Willson Contreras.
Between losing both Alonso and Nimmo, the Mets’ offense has taken a hit by essentially replacing the duo with Polanco and Semien, given how Semien struggled in 2025. Run prevention has been a stated goal for Mets president of operations David Stearns, and upgrading the defense is another way of making the lineup better, even if the team will still need to add some more pop as the offseason develops.
MLB Trade Rumors ranked Polanco 23rd on our list of the offseason’s top 50 free agents, and projected a three-year, $42MM deal for the veteran. Polanco ended up just about matching that dollar figure on a two-year deal, as he opted for the higher average annual value rather than the extra security of the three-plus years he was seeking in his next deal.
The shorter term lines Polanco up for another free agent bid when he’s 34, and some continued production could line him up for another lucrative shorter-term pact. Stearns is known to prefer shorter-term commitments for free agents, so this also aligns with the PBO’s ideal method of roster-building.
The Pirates and Red Sox were known to have interest in Polanco this winter, and the infielder was also drawing a lot of attention from the Mariners about a possible reunion. Adam Jude of the Seattle Times hears from a source that the Mariners’ last offer to Polanco was also a two-year contract, and was “very competitive” price-wise with the Mets’ $40MM offer.
Seattle achieved its top offseason priority of re-signing Josh Naylor, and the team’s plan was then to explore Polanco and Eugenio Suarez as candidates to return. With Polanco now in Queens, the Mariners could turn to Suarez as a DH candidate and part-time third baseman, or explore some other infield options on the free agent or trade fronts. With plenty of internal candidates for third base, the M’s have been primarily looking at second basemen during their infield pursuits this winter.
Inset picture courtesy of Jordan Godfree — Imagn Images


Why? Do they not like Semien or Lindor?
He is mainly a DH bat at this point in his career. Spot starter but not likely relied on to be a primary position player.
That’s a lot of money to be a spot starter
He means he would only spot start on defense, otherwise he’d be the everyday DH.
A Team of middle infielders. Interesting
I am happy and sad to see him sign elsewhere. Sad because I liked the way he cheered for his teammates when he was hurt. He showed up and was a great teammate.
I am happy because I was hoping he would sign with another team and then we go after Bichette. He can be our 2nd bm then Colt can come in and play 3rd. If we don’t resign Crawford to an extension then he can move back to SS until Celesten is ready for SS or 3rd. Differing opinions on if he sticks at SS or is moved to 3rd.
I would like Young to stick at 2nd but I feel Bo will be better than him. Better contact and a better glove. We could trade Young and build up our minor league system. Probably not a ton of value there unless he can spend the first half of the season hitting really good in the minors. Needs to get that bat going to get time in the majors or get traded at the deadline.
Crawford is so important to the team, it’s really hard to see an extension not getting done. I’ve believed he would slide over to second in 2027.
But Marte would make things interesting. He could play second in ’26, then potentially slide into the role Polanco had last season if necessary.
A lot would depend on Williamson and Crawford handling their current respective positions and what Emerson is able to do wherever they use him.
Bo will likely command far too much for Seattle to bid. But they absolutely should be looking for impact.
He had 2.6 bWar in his ‘career year’ last season. It was his best offensive season ever, but he was a lot more valuable in 2019 and 2021 when he was a shortstop and then a second baseman.
Semien 35, Lindor 32, Polanco 32.
Alonso 31, Diaz 31
They had a heck of team 5 years ago.
New version “Field of Dreams”….
The rest of the starters in the field are under 27. Starters are beginning that trend as well with McLean, Tong and Sproat. Not as old as you think.
Thinking Lindor will be traded. Maybe to the Padres?
Padres are cutting payroll why would they take on that contract.
Because Lindor is making a lot less than Mr. Ringworm, and Frankie has said he’d like to play in San Diego repeatedly.
99Captain Judge99 he’s also repeatedly said his name isn’t Frankie
Lindor’s CBT number is $10 million higher
I think you m ow something we don’t. Plus him and Soto, are not good at all. I think the Mets want to make it Soto’s team, hence getting rod of Lindor, Nimmo Alonso n Diaz
Frankie LOL
I don’t think they will trade Lindor, BUT, if they do and Cashman doesn’t do everything to get him……………. I will withhold my annual family Christmas card to him. Yeah, there, I said it.
I dont see a world where Lindor gets traded but if he is, the yankees probably would be a team they dont trade him to.
@clipper
Well they DID just sign Ahmed Rosario, so who needs Lindor??
You can say that again.
Less than one percent Lindor is traded. Surely not to the Padres who have Tatis, Merrill and Bogaerts. Mets would not want Bogaerts and Padres would not trade Tatis or Merrill.
Again, no such deal will occur, but if I had to make one up maybe to the Blue Jays for a deal headlined by Yesavage, Santander and Jo Jo Parker?
A trade with the Blue Jays could make sense but why would Toronto trade Yesavage at all?
Lindor is still an exceptional player. You have to give up something extremely valuable in return.
Again, I don’t see Lindor or Yesavage going anywhere. But if am going to make up a deal, that is what came to mind.
And Vladdy and Cease.
If Lindor is that exceptional then why would the Mets even consider trading him? As good as he is, that contract is an albatross for a player his teammates don’t seem to care for. Besides, I can’t imagine the Blue Jays trading Yesavage for anyone short of a Shohei Ohtani level star. The Blue Jays don’t need a hitter badly enough to trade one of the best young starters in the league, and they have the money to pay any free agent out there. If they don’t re-sign Bichette and don’t like any free agents to replace him then, yes, a trade is in order. But if the Mets want to unload Lindor, his attitude and his crazy expensive contract, I don’t think they can expect to get a huge amount in return.
And Bryce Harper barely played 1B and never 2B/SS which take far more skill and athleticism. 2B is same sude of IF as 1B. Only issues are 3-6-3 and 3-1 plays which Pete was not great at.
The Jays would never trade Yesavage right now. It just seemed that MLB Top 100 Commenter was throwing names against the wall so I added a few more.
Lindor is a great player and his contract is not an albatross.
I think that I stated that I do NOT believe that the Nets will trade Lindor. The Lindor contract is not an albatross, it is market and has positive value for the next couple years. I also think the Blue Jays will not trade Yesavage, but I do think Yesavage, Santander and Parker would be what it takes. Or the Dodgers trading Teoscar Hernandez, Sheehan, Stone, Morales and Hope.
Polanco is a 1B or DH. Semien is 2B. Lindor at SS. Baty at 3B and Vientos at DH. Maybe they get Tucker for OF?
All of this being said, last year I predicted that the Mets would not make the playoffs due to weak starting pitching. Both Peterson and Holmes exceeded my expectations and they still missed the playoffs.
That’s fair.
I simply responded to the posters who talked about the Padres or Yankees as possible Lindor destinations. I think the only two teams that could make it work are the Blue Jays and Dodgers. I still see value in Lindor’s contract. So I suggested Mets would like Yesavage and Parker and take Santander to offset some of the cost. It is fair but totally unlikely.
Yeah, I probably should not have used the word albatross, but Lindor’s contract is too expensive for a player as good as Yesavage in return. I could see the Blue Jays being interested in Lindor but definitely not at that price when they have other options if they don’t re-sign Bichette — like trading for CJ Abrams for example. I could see the Blue Jays maybe trading Yesavage for a player like Bobby Witt Jr or Gunnar Henderson — neither of whom are getting traded anytime soon — but not an expensive veteran like Lindor. Even then I doubt the Blue Jays would trade Yesavage for a top infielder when he has so much obvious potential and proved himself on the biggest stage.
Resigning Bichette or trading prospects for Abrams seem more likely.
Lindor and Soto are the face of the Mets with all of their free agent and Nimmo departures. No way they trade him.
Polanco can’t play SS anymore, so this move isn’t related to Lindor, but I do think he may be traded.
Polanco is a good addition for a good team like the Mets. He can DH or stand in the OF
@bucs
Polanco is a good addition for a circus show like the Mets. He can DH or stand in the OF
Fixed for you 🙂
Maybe to Seattle?
Looking like Adonis Garcia for RF Soto to Left. Benge/Taylor CF. Vientos/Clifford 1B. Polanco DH
Baty 3B offense. Lots of kids in the pen maybe a Fairbanks Setup and Imai Starting if we are lucky.
Garcia? LOL. They aren’t moving Soto to a different position for Garcia.
First base.
@green
They dont like winning
He DH’d like 80% of the time for the Mariners this year. In 2024 he was their full-time 2B but he blew his knee out.
@Green Why would people comment on articles they have not read? Why?
To play First base I gather?
Maybe McNeil or Vientos to 1st?
I saw someplace that the mets were interested in Bregman. Maybe Vientos is moved in a trade for a starter?
A fifth starter or swingman most likely
Theyre gonna make a trade for a 1st baseman id think. Polanco is a DH
They should sign Michael Toglia. Can get him cheap, maybe even on a minor league deal. He absolutely lit up the Mets stadium when he played there as a Rockie.
DH
We have evolved from gathering to reading
“Throughout his long pro career, Polanco has made exactly one career appearance as a first baseman…”
So, apparently the way to get better defensively at first base is to sign a guy who is not a first baseman.
He played one game there last season. If the Ms thought he was an every day 1B they wouldn’t have traded for Naylor. Incredibly, Polanco AAV is higher than Naylor’s. At this price, or somewhat higher, Mets would be better off with Suarez. .
Still more agile than a polar bear
Polar bears run 25 MPH which is roughly 4.7 MPH faster than Bobby Witt jr or Trea Turner
Thank you cliff the postal guy
Damn imma have to change my name now
@bobby He has played a ton of 3B which also is a corner IF spot. Its not as if they are asking a janitor to be a brain surgeon.
Oh I didnt know he could play 1st. I thought for sure he was SS/2nd
It’s a projection. He’s never played first before in an MLB game.
But he’s not very good defensively anywhere else. He’s a hitter and Mets may be hoping his 1B defense is no worse than Alonso.
Can’t hardly be worse. And he can certainly field a ground ball. Has no range and a poor arm, but that’s no biggee at first.
Tell that to Kodai Senga, comrade.
He was practicing with the Ms just in case Naylor had his baby during the ALDS
Didnt know Polanco did that.
To be able to play SS at the ML level, even poorly, there has to be defensive ability compared to a 1B.
He hasn’t played shortstop at all since a few innings there in 2022.
I’ve watched him in Seattle the past 2 years. He isn’t SS. Not great at 2nd with the injuries. I loved polanco but he is a DH now. But watch out, his numbers dipped a bit when not in the field. He will be missed. Dude was clutch and great in the clubhouse.
I think there is def some clubhouse aspect thinking going on with a bunch of the Mets signings
Trading McNeil?
You are probably correct
I think McNeil takes over Nimmo’s slot in LF
More likely Vientos I’d say. Or both.
If the Mets can sign Valdez or Suarez as a SP, then move a couple extra pieces for more bullpen depth or a CF, I’d call it a modest but successful off-season. If they can sign Tucker, it’s a home run.
Maybe sending Vientos to CWS in a trade for Luis Robert, Jr.
@MorriesWigs Lacking two OFers, even lacking a 4th OFer (Taylor’s probably only a 5th OFer after his 2025 at the plate) and with a 35 yo 2Bman and no one else in the system who can play 2B and had a good AAA season, it doesn’t make a lot of sense to deal McNeil, whose salary means his surplus value is small if it exists at all.
He also has enough of a platoon split to warrant keeping him as a RH bat off the bench.
If the team can pull off 2024 with Lindor and McNeil giving them 110 games as the keystone combination, how bad can the friction be, really?
Trade for a high priced 2B with a few years left on his contract that had a down year and then sign another 2B I don’t get it
As a Brave fan don’t get me wrong I love this but I actually feel bad for the Mets fans.
He will be the DH most likely. Only played about 330 innings in the field last year
Jorge Polanco isn’t really a 2B at this point. Can play there in a pinch but his defense profile has him solidly in 1B/DH territory now.
I’m hearing he’ll primarily play 1B. Polanco had a great platform year, but he’ll have to do better than that for Mets fans to accept this UTIL journeyman Stearns picked up at Walgreens because he knew he couldn’t go home empty handed.
Polanco carried Seattle to the ALCS while the Mets losers like Nimmo and Alonso were home watching as usual. Cry more.
@Monix People are also looking at Alonso’s 2025 as if it’s real, when it hangs entirely on an absurdly lucky first five weeks.
The chance that Polanco will outhit Alonso, when Polanco’s 2025 OPS+ was better than Alonso’s in 2023, 2024, and five months of 2025, has to be 25-35%, and if he doesn’t outhit him it’s likely to be close.
He’s done defensively.
In a vacuum this is underwhelming. If they sign Tucker it is understandable.
In a vacuum it SUCKS
Polanco was a better hitter than Alonso last year.
Better hitter than Alonso? No
Alonso was better by every measure… WRC+, OPS, OPS+, etc.
Don’t post while inebriated, please.
Polanco was great for the M’s last year. He just became your 3rd best hitter
Then we’re in trouble. Hopefully we sign Tucker.
Hes playing 1B.
“Trade for a high priced 2B with a few years left on his contract that had a down year”
I guess we’re just ignoring that they dumped a high priced OF who is declining, may be worth less than Semien going forward, and has five years left on his deal? The deal was just as much about dumping Nimmo’s contract as it was about getting Semien. imo, the trade was a good one for the Mets if you ignore sentimentality.
I’m sort of with you on the Polanco part, unless the plan is to DH him full time. But they already have players who could fit that role. I’m not necessarily against it, just find it a touch curious.
It’s hard as a Met fan at this point to see the logic behind this strategy unless getting the salary cap number down is one of the primary drivers. In the end, we’ve replaced Alonso, Nimmo, Diaz w/ Polanco, Semien, Williams. That’s a noticeable downgrade IMO.
@Ma4170: “Alonso, Nimmo, Diaz w/ Polanco, Semien, Williams. That’s a noticeable downgrade IMO.”
I don’t think it’s as big a downgrade as people seem to think.
Alonso to Polanco is certainly a downgrade, but by WAR, it’s maybe a 1 WAR downgrade. And they’re not locked into a 5 year deal that could age poorly. 2026 savings alone is $10 million.
Nimmo to Semien is a wash, imo, production-wise. Maybe a slight upgrade if you look solely at WAR. Semien in a ‘down’ year put up a higher WAR than Nimmo did in either 2024 or 2025. And financially, you won’t have to pay Nimmo for five more years. Would you rather have Nimmo at 5/$100 million or Semien at 3/$72 million? I know which one I would take.
Diaz to Williams is maybe a slight downgrade but nothing major. Williams had six years of a 231 ERA+, 1.023 WHIP, and 14.6 K/9 in Milwaukee before last year’s disaster for the Yanks. Let’s not forget Diaz’s disaster of a first year in Queens, and his 2021, and his 2024. Williams is also cheaper.
I’m being optimistic here, but I don’t think the Mets are doing as poorly as everyone seems to think. Also still time left in the offseason.
WAR is only useful in a vacuum IMO. Lineups need certain amounts of different types of hitters, replacing nimmo with semien goes from a solid if unspectacular bat to an empty one. Fine in a vacuum because semien is much better on D. However if you had a team full of semien types you’d have a punchless lineup that pitchers can easily carve thru so how much value will that defense have? The value of alonso is being a proven, tested, true middle of the order threat to pair with soto, polanco 2 years ago was pathetic at the plate, making it possible last season was an outlier.
Starting the offseason with 3 downgrades, and not even cheap ones, after missing the playoffs is a reason for the fan base to be upset.
Sorinotsori – Yeah I have a few problems with War too. A DH or 1b can put up 30hr + 100 rbi’s and get a 0.9 War and 2b puts up the same thing and gets 7 War. There is defensive value that should be accounted for but not to the extremes that it is.
Don’t feel bad for them..muahahaha
Borther your gaves overpaid severely for 35 year old Suarez.
Devin williams is a much better reliever and younger. No diaz sure, but better than suarez
A precursor to a trade, perhaps?
I didn’t know he could pitch. Mets still need an ace. Go get Skubal or Skenes.
the mets don’t have the depth of players to even come close to trading for Skenes
They have a top 3 farm system, yes they do
They have the #1 farm system in baseball sillyman. They can trade for anyone they want. That doesn’t mean I trust Sterns’ choices, but the depth of players and ability to take on contracts is elite.
They def do not have the #1 farm. LA, Tigers, Brewers are all better.
Thats a poorly formed opinion. Mets have the top-rated farm ststem by ESPN in August and Baseball America gad them at #9 at the same time. They traded a couple of mid level prodoects but McLean, Sproat, Tong, Benge, and Williams sre all top 100-level prospect candidates. And there is Elian Pena. Last years top international prospect.
ReyDay,
Kermit is correct.
The Mets have the #1 farm system in baseball according to ESPN.
espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/46070464/2025-mlb-prospect…
How is that a poorly formed opinion when you just kind of validated they weren’t #1 after the season ended? Detroit has 2 top 10 guys + Bryce Rainer. LA has Ferris, Morales, Freeland, Quintero, Hope and De Paula all in top 100. Brewers Jesus Made, Luis Pena, Cooper Pratt, Quero, + Logan Henderson still has his prospect eligibility.
That’s from August look at updated ones bud. Or look at my newest comment
Wealthiest owner and #1 farm — what’s the excuse this year?
Im a mets fan, in what world, planet, universe do the mets have the #1 farm system in baseball?
ReyDay,
Granted, ESPN’s #1 ranking is from August.
To be even more accurate August 26th, so objectively it’s definitely towards the end of the season.
And that date was at the very early stages of Nolan McLean’s meteoric rise where he dominated several playoff-bound teams.
So while the Mets farm may not be rated #1 by every source, to have a very recent #1 ranking by an industry leader towards the very end of the season says a lot about the strength of the Mets’ farm.
ESPN just ranked them #1 and the consensus has been that the Mets farm system was a top performer in 2025 and made the biggest strides. Most other outlets don’t rank them until spring.
RUNDMC
“Wealthiest owner and #1 farm — what’s the excuse this year?”
There is no excuse. Either you understand the process and it makes sense or you dont understand the process and you’re confused.
You saw cohen try to throw money at it, it doesn’t work long-term
The alternative has already produced a top farm system in 2 years.
It’s known the Mets have a strong farm. And farm strength isnt just about top 100s, it’s about quality depth, and the mets have a lot of it even after dealing baez gilbert etc at the deadline. They do have 4-5 top 100s depending on the publication, and others like clifford ewing santucci pena who are close.
@Chris MLB.com ranked them #7 on August 13th. They have a good farm but we can use our eyes here LA def has the better system and Brewers.
They have a strong farm system just not #1 that was my point. I would put my net worth when the new rankings come out they aren’t #1. We can use our eyes and see LA and Brewers have the top impact talent coupled with depth.
Fair enough, but they do have the prospects to get a top arm
Depending on whose doing the ranking of prospects the Mets have anywhere from 5-7 top 100 prospects. On most lists they have 4 top 50 prospects.
Is it a poorly formed opinion because you don’t agree with it? In the end, it’s all subjective and whatever the individual GMs think of each system is what actually matters.
Guys develop and it just happens. Being able to sign international free agents help.
These days he is Dh with 2b capabilities.
Boo!
Another “almost” Pittsburgh Pirate.
Glad they didn’t sign him. A definite overpay at $20 mil a year. Is Brandon Lowe next now?
They have to get Lowe. One year deal so Rays won’t want a ton. I feel like a 10-20 rated prospect and a fringe major league guy (Bart, Yorke, Gonzales) has to get it done.
Projections had Polanco around 14-15M a year at most so considering the Mets had to pay that, he probably wanted 25M from the Bucs. Pass.
If you’re a Pirates fan, I don’t think you should be glad you didn’t sign him. The AAV is high, but that happens with short contracts. More importantly, his OPS+ last year was 134. Spencer Horwitz led the Pirates with a 118 OPS+ last year and no other Pirate, regardless of sample size, had an OPS+ over 99. They desperately need offense.
Now that I’m reading he’s a DH mainly I’m not sad. We don’t need to pay a ton for a fairly light hitting DH. Lowe is looking pretty good right now cause we need an upgrade at second.
Should we even be surprised that Pittsburgh hasn’t outbid Philadelphia or New York
If the Mets needed to give him $20m a year to come to NY, the Pirates would have had to give him $25m a year with opt outs each year. Less sad we didn’t get him for that outsized of a deal.
Yep… Ben the magician is using slight of hand tricks by putting these names out as players “ we are in high pursuit of “ knowing that its the Pham-like 35 plus players that he will sign! Organization deserves to see Skenes walk
It was all timed to boost season ticket renewals. Now, we’re back to “see who’s available on a one year deal in late January, early February.”, aka, who does no one want after al the real signings are done.
They’ll talk about how much they tried and how tough it is and sell us on password and Suwinski, I sure as hell hope not.
Polanco has played ALL of 1 game at 1B in his career. This is another confusing move for Stearns. My guess is he’s your everyday DH. Not exactly a monumental move for the Mets.
He is credited for 1 game, but he never actually played the position (assuming he pinch hit).
@Stearns- How is this consistent with your stated goal run prevention? You need to go back to Milwaukee.
It’s called DH genius
@MrMet62 Polanco rates to be the Mets primary DH since (1) they don’t have one, (2) it’s an excellent spot from which to beef up a modest lineup, and (3) Polanco gets hurt a lot.
He’s much more valuable as the 134 OPS+ guy (that’s better than Alonso’s numbers in 2020, 2021, 2023, 2024, and also 2025 from May 6th through the end of the year) of 2025 than he is as an average fielding 1Bman who misses 4-8 weeks because he gets hurt playing the field and whose hitting also suffers as a result.
It’s not hard to play 1B if they want him to, Alonso wasn’t a very good defensive 1B anyhow.
@mikeyny I have no faith at all in Stearns, but in fact it’s a very solid move to shore up DH and 1B with a player putting up a legitimate 134 OPS+ in a pitcher’s park in 2025.
Polanco has 14,000 innings at 2B, SS, and 3B. If the Mets are going to ask him to play some 1B, they aren’t springing it on him after he signs, and the chance that he’ll be baffled by a 1Bman’s mitt, how to pick grounders, snag line drives, and scoop throws, is zero—as is the chance he won’t be about 10 runs better than Alonso.
“It’s incredibly hard” for a catcher, not for a lifelong infielder.
Take it from this M’s fan. You don’t want him anywhere near third unless he’s rounding the bases. His attempt to play there in 25 was ridiculous as I witnessed him bounce the ball on the wrong side of the mound repeatedly.
His time at 2b was passable but still way below average both via advanced metrics and the eye test. Hopefully first hides his defensive faults but honestly the Mets are paying 20 a year for a DH who’s one step away from an IL stint.
Starling Marte: $20 million a year, primarily a DH
Polanco: $20 million a year, primarily a DH
Pretty even swap.
Yeah, I’m a Stearns supporter but this is not a good signing. He’s an injury-prone guy who just had his best offensive season in his walk year. And he has very little defensive value left in the tank.
Wow. Everything we read in Seattle sad the Mariners offered Polanco a two year deal. The Mets must have offered him significant more money and/or a player option for a third year? It seemed like Polanco wanted to stay in Seattle? This hurts. I am sure the Mariners will pivot to Brendan Donovan or Brandon Lowe but trades are not as easy to pull off as signing a free agent. Thank you for what you did in 2025 Jorge, you were clutch.
Well there you go. It seems that The Mets blew the Mariners offer out of the water. I bet the M’s did not go above $14 million a year?
Its called overpay. Anything above 14 is too much for a primary DH.
“Anything above 14 is too much for a primary DH.”
Schwarber: “hold my beer”
But Schwarber is an elite hitter. Polanco was a very good hitter in his walk year only.
Yes but Polanco can play all over the infield, even if he’s not above average defensively. Schwarber is unplayable outside of DH. Also, Polanco was incredibly clutch in the postseason whereas Schwarber disappeared in the playoffs. And it’s a 2 year deal vs a 5 year deal, so far lower risk
Case and point. That’ll be even more true when he’s playing beer league softball in a few years. Good for him at least, if a team is willing to spend that. The players union and league need to implement a stop to this deferral nonsense, and start thinking about a salary cap. I know it’ll never happen…
Is he really “elite”?
He had an wRC+ of 132, good for 24th in the league.
Higher than Harper, Tatis, Lindor, Witt, Bellinger, Yelich …
I dk about “elite” exactly but certainly very very good.
LOL The Orioles just gave Alonso 155M to be a primary DH.
Polanco makes sense as a 1B/DH type at this point in his career and became redundant when Naylor signed. Mariners have like 6 guys who could play 2B this year. Meanwhile, the Mets getting a guy short-term allows them to call up their solid next group of prospects sooner.
I suppose for the Mets 20 per is worth it because of their situation you described, and the fact they’ve whiffed on any other big name so far this winter.
I stand by my argument that the biggest flaw of Cohen’s Mets is that they don’t trust their impressive development system enough. I see it as less whiffing and more them being smart enough to not try to Out-Dodger the Dodgers (which will never work)
Agree with you there. Nobody will be able to out do them.
Whiffed? They haven’t swung yet. They made no real offer to Alonso and Diaz was a hope you decline offer.
@BigRed The Mariners should not have gone above that. Good for them.
I totally agree. Now go get Donovan and Lowe or One or the other and Miguel Andujar as well as a RH RP.
So he’s better than his numbers indicate?
Nope.
I wanted Jorge back in Seattle at a reasonable price, like 2 years $28 million. 2/$40 million is a gross overpay.
My hope is they pivot to someone like Okamoto who is going to sign in the range of $14-$16 million per. He can play 3rd(M’s need a veteran here, not sure if Williamson will be ready for full time duty, bat wise), backup 1st, and DH. His position flexibility is very attractive to the Seattle.
I think it was a 3yr @ $15M ask and to get him on only 2 years they went to $20M per
As I always say, these players go for the biggest offer 95% of the time. They don’t have the loyalty you fans do, nor should they.
Nice bat but makes for an interesting infield mix.
2 years 40m sounds like a heck of a lot.
Is it that much?
That’s what’s being reported. To play 1b/dh.
Yeah, unbelievable, especially since it is a $42MM hit per year!!
@rsoxbob Nearly everyone gets that wrong. Why take the existing group as immune to tax penalties? Penalties should be attributed as belonging to all players, where taxes are considered as a constant percentage of all salaries.
See above, overpay. I wish Polanco the best, he was clutch.
I will readily admit I didn’t see his bounce back coming in 25 and had to eat crow when he wasn’t cut by mid June. But I was worried we’d overpay and spend the majority of his new contract waiting for Divish to provide updates on his rehab in Peoria.
All in all I think we dodged an aging bullet. Hopefully we can trade for Donovan but if we can’t get the right player I’d prefer we start the year with our young guys at second and third and adress the need during the year, that’s assuming the young guys don’t earn their spots. I can envision a scenario where Young thrives at second and Emerson does the same at third…… maybe a pipe dream but it’s a more realistic scenario than our typical aging scrapheap signings being productive. Remember, we’re less than 12 months from being told Solano was going to do great things in our lineup.
Ryan Bliss started the season at 2B, for a week or two until he hurt himself for the remainder of the season. Either him or Young would be fine.
I guess this makes sense if you don’t like the free agent options in the OF (though Bellinger and Tucker are right there) and you want to trade from IF depth to get one instead? Figure one of Vientos, Baty, or McNeil is gone.
@candy
But all 3 of Lindor, Semein and Plan have only played 2b or SS most of their careers. Maybe they’re going to rotate guys at the dh spot?
This has little affect on McNeil and none on Baty, who’s the Mets primary 3Bman.
Baty had almost as many starts at 2B as 3B last year, and now that spot seems very much off the table, so yes, pushing him into a more permanent 3B role would have a ripple effect, either on him or Vientos becoming expendable. And considering the Mets’ strong emphasis on having defensive improvements this year, pushing McNeil or Vientos into corner OF roles doesn’t seem like the solution they’re looking for. I include Baty only because ultimately it puts them in a position where either he or Vientos can become a trade chip, and as likely as it is that the Mets would much much rather deal the latter, their fortunes do feel rather entwined one way or the other. Yes, personally I do think Baty is the everyday guy the full year.
Alonso’s replacement?
Why not Munetaka Murakami
20 mil for Polanco but won’t pay Pete. Nice
It’s actually over $100MM and 3 additional years. I think it’s a terrible signing and that he’ll greatly regress even though he performed well in Seattle, but I don’t think it’s apples to apples.
Mets fans, Well your GM is sticking to his guns about the 2 years. He must really believe in your youth coming up. If it is true, you’ll probably have to endure some head scratching moves but it might be worth it.
Sterns never said he had a 2-3 year limit on years.
I smell a .215 season and early contract termination.
See an ENT, he had a 134 OPS+
A 134 OPS+ in 2025, legit supporting peripherals, and a useful edge vs RHP suggest otherwise.
What a waste of money. Stearns really is in panic mode
If he was in panic mode, why would he sign this guy?
A panic move is signing a .265/.326/.495 with a 134 OPS+ in a pitchers park?
OPS+ takes the ballpark into account.
That’s a Mets move! Why give this guy pete’s money? Unbelievable
$155M is slightly more than $40M
This guy got 150 million dollars?
At this point Christian Walker makes perfect sense for 1B. Trade Manaea and McNeil for Walker and Meyers
As an Astros fan I’ve been pitching this for a while. Though I prefer Senga to Manaea I’d be happy with either. Though we’ll need some cash coming back if it’s Manaea.
noquarter89: Not if they’re offloading Walker’s contract. But I think the Astros are stuck with him tbh.
We do if we’re also taking McNeil’s contract.
noquarter89: Nobody’s trading for expensive old Walker at this point.
Probably not much difference between Walker and Vientos.
ShaqFoo: Sure there is. Vientos is nine years younger at 26 and a lot cheaper, and he has a lot of his career ahead of him. Walker is expensive, old at 35, and washed up. The Astros are stuck with him.
Granted Vientos only had a short time at 1B but I remember the one time he was there he was so error prone that Alonso replaced him for defensive purposes! Alonso has no range but he was a master at scooping the ball at the bag which was the majority of what he needed to do.
Every other team hates the Astros, but you want to bail them out and eat an awful contract, give up a solid #3 pitcher, and Mcneil for a light hitting center fielder??? Maybe also send them Lindor so you can guarantee them the division???
Billy Goats: Maybe fans like you hate other teams, but industry professionals don’t.
Is Christian Walker seen as having anything more than negative value??? In that trade, the Mets would give up a pitcher that they need and Jeff McNeil to get a massively underwater contract for a player that has been made redundant by the Polanco signing…and they get Jake Meyers in return?? That does absolutely nothing positive for the Mets with a lot of negative, while bailing the Astros out.
Sign O’Hearn. They may get an outfielder now though.
That would be a good trade for the Mets
Stearns we need run prevention. Over pays for a guy to play first that has one career game at first.
Good news is it’s only a two year contract.
looks like Mets are in run prevention but by the Mets.
I knew he was signing today. The Red Sox said they were interested yesterday.
No No No!!! WTH Stearns!?! You preach “run prevention” then sign a DH to play 1B?? Harvard educated egg head. He bought an education but no good sense. Moron.
The only way it makes sense is if he is replacing Marte
86mets: Where did you read that they’re signing Polanco to play 1B? Try to avoid being the pot calling the kettle moron.
It’s right there in Passan’s tweet.
Passan’s just guessing.
Lolmets
Ok, now you’re starting to placate the mob keep it moving.
Polanco over Contreras is a strange choice
Especially considering Contreras is earning the same money and was rated one of the top first baseman in MLB last year.
There was the run prevention🤷♂️
Contreras is underrated, simple as that. But you’d think the FOs would do their homework even though most fans don’t
What are trading for Contreras?
guessing whatever makes about 10m surplus value, but I’m not smart enough to say what that means.
RobblyDobs: How do you know that this precludes a trade for Contreras?
Yea I’m not giving polo 20 mil aav. That’s a massive overpay. Thanks for the memories but adios
As a twins fan, at this point I would be in line with Polanco like 2 or 3 years at 7 to 11.75 M aav..20 ? That’s so laughable to me my God I’d rather play baty at 2nd base , the acuna kid or vientoes even. Rather than pay Polly that
they’re replacing the best hitter in franchise history with…. jorge polanco? sweet mother of god and all thats holy
LOL @ thinking Pete was the best hitter in franchise history.
Adjusted OPS+
1. Darryl Strawberry 145
2. John Olerud 142
3. Mike Piazza 136
4. Pete Alonso 135
5. David Wright 133
6. Carlos Beltrán 129
Keith Hernandez 129
8. Bobby Bonilla 128
9. Michael Conforto 124
Howard Johnson 124
Brandon Nimmo 124
This seems a bit hyperbolic.
Olerud 146 wRC+
Strawberry 143 wRC+
Piazza 134 wRC+
Wright 133 wRC+
Alonso 132 wRC+
Hernandez 132 wRC+
Polanco 112 wRC+
Over the past 5 years the gap narrows to 131 vs 117. Definitely a difference, but it’s the same difference between Alonso and Olerud.
I like Polanco; he was the most clutch hitter in 2025 according to FanGraphs.
But as a replacement for Alonso? It’s definitely a downgrade offensively. At $20 million/year for Polanco, it leaves me wondering why Cohen Et al. wouldn’t just pay the difference and give Alonso what he wanted. Yes, I understand Pete got more term. But he is still younger than his replacement (and not to mention the fact he is the Polar Bear).
Puzzling offseason for the Mets, so far.
I don’t understand why the Mets let Pete go?
Any reasons ?
Didn’t want to pay him? Not too sure.
@MarinerSteve Because 5/$155m for Pete Alonso because he had a lucky April, was so absurd as to be ridiculous.
The only thing that distinguished Alonso’s 2025 from his 2023-2024 decline was his BABIP through May 5th of .371, which he’ll never see again.
Following that stretch, from May 6th to the end of the season Alonso’s line was .253/311/485, worth 1.3 fWAR in 5 months. Shear away his lucky start to the season and you’ve got a 2025 fully in line with his weak 2023 and 2024 seasons, only with a worse OBP.
Pete’s in fact a 2 WAR 1Bman who should have been DH-only no later than the start of the 2024 season. That’s a player you might pay 3/$45m.
We’ll see how it goes, of course, but the Orioles probably overpaid by $100 million.
The whole business of Alonso’s free agency was thoroughly strange. How was his mediocre, final 549 PA not a major topic of discussion? And even then he needed a better than career average BABIP of .286 just to keep that modest .253/311/485 line standing.
The Orioles thought they were getting a Kyle Schwarber who can play first base. What they’re probably getting is Dave Kingman’s age 32-36 seasons. Enjoy “Scoopy.”
In other words… they didn’t want to pay him what he was asking.
That’s a weird way to spell Alonso…
…but at least they are trying to add offense.
This is just plain dumb. While i appreciate outside the box thinking, this doesnt move the needle at all. Its more defensible to just let vientos play first.
Maybe the mets will just load up the outfield with both bellinger and tucker to compensate for the mess elsewhere.
Stearns, you better change that to just DH, I think 2/$40 was a lot for him.
Polanco had a good year last season.
I think he is a perfectly fine DH/spot starter. He is a good addition to any team.
With that said 2/40 is definitely an overpay.
3/45 was about is max number. The Mets overpaid to not go to that devilish 3rd year.
Mets got better today, though it perplexing that they wouldn’t overpay for a guy like Diaz. A weird player to say…okay. We will overpay for you.
Diaz never let the Mets counter. Reports is they would have gone higher
Diaz just wanted to go to LA
They did offer to meet or exceed the Dodgers offer. He was leaving no matter what. He was offended by the firing of Hefner. Note he said 50-50 he was coming back.
Sort of like Alonso talking about opting out after a last crushing game where he didn’t show up (nor the rest to be fair). That left a really bad taste in my mouth as much as I love Pete. Day after, he changed his profile picture to Florida from Mets.
They were leaving. Why? We can only guess, but Stearns needs new voices in the locker room. Semien and Polanco are two good ones.
Vientos and McNeil need to be the next ones to go.
Mets are trading for Skubal or an ace. Acuña, Baty, McNeil, Vientos and/or Mauricio are out. Probably Tong or Sproat too. No other reason to sign more Infielders.
None of those hitters get anywhere near Skubal.. all washed out “prospects”
Hard to say prospects are washed out when none have more than 500 at bats in a season. A major issues with the Mets is giving them consistent playing time. Their Metrics are still highly rated.
Maclean is a conversation starter in a trade like that and the Mets won’t trade him
An elite starting pitcher Detroit will lose in a year anyway. You don’t need McLean. Tong or Sprout and 3 other players is enough. If Skubal had more arbitration years, I’d agree with you.
I agree that in theory would make sense, but a Tigers team with a wide open division coming off a playoff season has to sell this trade to their fans. You definitely can’t run a team based on fan sentiment but I’d be hard pressed to trade the best pitcher in the AL by a mile if my team was in that position anyway. Scott Boras makes that a bit of an issue as well. It’s almost a lose/lose situation PR wise. Then there’s the Mets trading top prospects for a rental that’s about to hit FA anyway for the biggest offer. You could keep your young guys and sign him then
Completely agree. If I’m the Mets, I only trade for Skubal if it’s a sign and trade, which is a low possibility. Stearns is definitely cooking something up even if it isn’t Skubal. No way we have this many infielders come opening day.
Tigers don’t need IF though. RH power bat, 3B or CF, and lots of pitching. Baty, McNeil, Acuna, Mauricio, and Vientos do nothing to help the Tigers. That’s just flotsam.
If he’s primarily DH replacing Marte, this seems like a good deal. Short term, probably bigger money than other teams were willing to commit. The way a big market should do.
Odd one and most likely just for DH with occasional 1st(if he can)/2nd. He’s a good bat, though seems a tad pricey for what you get.
Jajaja they must really trying to curb their spending long term
I don’t think this move gets Stearns back in anyone’s good graces
Cue the Pirates PR Department to tell fans that like Schwarber and Naylor, they were “in on” Polanco
That’ll be enough to sell some tickets, right?
I am a longtime Buc fan who has moved to Mariner territory 5 years ago. Polanco seemed to me to be a good enough hitter to help the team. But not at 20m a year. Didn’t want to resign him in Seattle however. We can do better things with 15-20m per year
Agreed, Steve, and well said. But they have to do better than guys like Tommy Pham and Adam Frazier, too
It’s nice that they’re leaking out these “we’re gonna spend” pieces. But let’s believe it when we see it
After signing Winker Siri and Madrigal last year and never played he decides to do this
Reminiscent of Eduardo Escobar
As an Ms fan, I’m a little relieved. I don’t think Polanco will recreate his career year and he really is quickly becoming a DH only type player. I’m grateful for what he did last year but Ms need someone who can offer a bat & some defensive flexibility.
I agree with everything you say Sensible. I too thank Polanco but feel he wasn’t the player I remember from his Twin days, even in 23’. I would like to see us trade for Marte for 2B. What would we have to give the Dbacks in your opinion Sensible?
I don’t want the Ms to try for Ketel. I’m not sure there is a good comp for trading for a player like him either, with so many years on his contract still.
The Ms shouldn’t be subtracting from their MLB roster, or their upper minors.
Clearly stearns has orders to get luxury tax reset within next 3 years. Not signing anything long term. Even cohen said there is time left in offseason to build a competitive team; he didn’t say championship team.
Polanco won’t be a Gold Glove-caliber first baseman, but he should be serviceable to average there, preserving his strong offensive value (switch-hitting power, .821 OPS and 26 HR in 2025) without the defensive drag he’s carried up the middle. The move down the defensive spectrum is a smart one for both him and the Mets
Dennis Lin of the athletic just wrote this. Much more details in the article.
The Padres’ players in the talks include right-hander Nick Pivetta, outfielder Ramón Laureano and relievers Mason Miller, Adrian Morejon and Jeremiah Estrada. San Diego, in turn, is asking the Mets about their young major leaguers and all of their top prospects, both pitchers and position players.
Lindor and Tatis aren’t being discussed, nor was cronenworth. Also that McLean is viewed as untouchable.
Makes sense when you consider Stearns is on short term deals. Both Pivetta, Laureano and morejon have one year left before free agency.
Miller and Estrada both have 4 years left. Could see Estrada being moved. Much harder to see Miller. Though reports have it the Mets did try and trade for him last year. The article states it could involve multiple guys, the blockbuster being rumored Preller is talking about.
Mets aren’t dealing any of their top prospects to get back players with 1 control year. Sure Mets could have interest in Estrada or Laureano, but the Mets aren’t dealing any of their elite prospects for them. But it makes sense that the Pads would ask for young arms to replace all the pitching they’re losing… Cease, King & Suarez. Hard to see the Pads try to remain competitive if they deal Pivetta too.
To be fair you have no idea who the Mets would be willing to deal.
Outside of McLean who is considered untouchable.
Look at what the Mariners just traded for a worse pitcher than Estrada alone. Now I don’t expect those two guys to bring back elite prospects.
Miller for sure would bring back an elite prospect.
I could see some sort of pivetta for senga deal.
Mariners lefty acquired is going to be excellent in a 7-9th inning role.
Who says? Stearns has done a bunch of questionable moves.
The only semi-logical hypothetical trade between the Mets and Padres would be Lindor for Bogaerts, straight up bad contract for bad contract
Lindor seems to be off the table.
More steam is smoking around Miller. That would definitely shut up a lot of the Mets fans upset about Diaz.
In your dreams, if you are a Pads fan…
Lindor has lived up to his contract so far… absolutely no regrets on Lindor from the Mets side. Mets love Lindor.
The Mets might love Lindor but if there is any truth to the noise about him and Soto not getting along its something that will eventually have to be addressed and that usually means someone has to go
This is big overpay. I don’t see the logic in this signing at all.
If the Nets get a 2024 season out of Vientos they’ll be fairly competitive. The lineup isn’t deep after Lindor, Soto and Polanco. Semien is fairly cooked. I knew last year the rotation was overrated and it was. It’s not overrated now. Vientos is a key lineup wise.
Mets. Yes I know.
like many here i am really fascinated to see how the boy genius assembles a team from scratch using bossman’s big wallet. i bet Mets end up signing a combination of Tucker/Belli/Bo/Bregman/Valdez/Suarez etc. to literally buy a new core
Polanco probably obviates getting both Bellinger and Tucker. Not that the Mets were signing either…
FG projection
114 wRC+, 2.3 fWAR/536
He has 2 runs for positional adjustment. That’s inline with him playing 2B (2.5 per 150 games).
He will lose 15 runs if he moves to 1B (-12.5).
Fangraphs also gives him -2 for his defense at 2B. So, break even on defense.
To break even on defense, he’d have to be a +12.5 defender at 1B. That seems unlikely.
If he’s an average defender at 1B, he’ll be about a 1 WAR player. If he’s +5 at 1B, he’ll be a 1.5 WAR player, etc.
Seems like an overpay, if I did my math right
makes him nearly half as good as Willson Contreras.
Can only figure that Contreras said he wouldn’t waive his no-trade for the Mets.
I thought Contreras was the most obvious fit
Maybe the Cardinals and Mets had wildly different valuations.
Maybe the Mets really like Polanco
Maybe this is part of a bigger plan
Mets fans gonna come at me for saying it, but it’s true: This is an upgrade at 1B based on last year’s performance.
@Seamaholic It’s hard to overemphasize how much luck went into Alonso’s 2025 performance. Without that good luck, his 2025 is difficult to distinguish from his 2023-2024 decline.
Without that, it would be far more clear how absurd the O’s overpay is. Without that, if he just had ordinary luck in 2025, Alonso would have been in line for 3/60m—but if you can’t .get all 30 MLB GMs to do due diligence, what chance do you have with casual fans?
DH/1B? So he’s replacing Alfonso?? ooooooo k
Dumpster diving Sandy Alderson?
Let’s see they sign Soto, the last piece of the puzzle for the Mets in 2025. Well, that was not the case when the dust settled. Now they let Alonso walk out the door and sign Polanco to maybe play an occasional first base and DH. They trade for Sieman to play 2B upgrade with these two moves to the talent of 2025 right now, don’t see it, and then lose Diaz, but sign Williams as a replacement. That is what the 2026 Mets looks like, how do Met fans feel so far, has it been a good off season? How would you grade it?
I give them an incomplete, it’s December 14.
The Mets signed Soto, and a year they dump three core players and fill in with spare parts and aging middle infielders in their decline years…
Not a bad deal for a transition season..Really it’s just one year with no 2027 season likely. Gives our prospects time to be ready when the team is ready to compete again.
Hope the pressure of playing in NY half the season doesn’t run him over like it has other players. If he can spot start in the field and not be DH only gives Mets options with daily lineup.
@dlj0527 It would be interesting to see one credible study showing that players do worse in NY than they do after moving to other cities. Just one.
Given the average age of FAs is older than the MLB average, you’d expect to see FAs, on average, do worse in NY (or any city, really) than they had done with their previous teams simply because of age-related decline—instead, any time a player does worse in NY, the talk radio shrieking inevitably attributes that to NY, as if guys who had been playing in front of screaming crowds since the age of eight were suddenly overwhelmed because.
That’s your Alonso replacement. Adds some pop. Nowhere near as much as Pete, but far cheaper. Not a bad move.
Well, unless Vientos or Baty were part of a trade, it does seem to close the door on a Willson Contreras trade.
The Mets next move would be to add an OFer or an arm.
As a Twins fan I’m happy for Jorge. As a baseball fan 20m a season seems like an overpay for a primarily DH last season. It’s not my money so whatever I guess.
Monopoly money
I’m going to throw up. Curse you, Jerry Dipoto.
I disagree toycannon. He’s aging poorly. Can’t field whatsoever. Would have clogged up the DH at bats
Stearns just made another big mistake. Overpay and Polanco is prime to decline in numbers.
Cronenworth to Seattle for some starting pitching.
Certainly not for one of our current starting Five for that bat and contract. No way.
Maybe Seattle is looking to reacquire Marte from the D’Backs.
Possibly!!!! His contract, though three years longer is cheaper per year than Polanco’s at $15 million but will cost some prospects….
The M’s appear to still be fighting for Donovan, but the best starter(s) they’d give up would be Logan Evans and/or Emerson Hancock. None of the 5 current starters, not Sloan, not Anderson, and probably not Cijntje. The fallback might be an infield from among Williamson, Crawford, Young, and Emerson to go with Naylor, which, imo, is awfully risky.
Confusing
Makes no sense, especially at that price
Polanco’s big years were 2019 and 2021, both a while ago. Otherwise he’s bounced along as okay but far from outstanding. My guess is that the Mets will get a couple wins above average out of him in his age-32 season…if he stays healthy. That’s a big if with this guy. He’s never played more than 138 games in a season except for, you guessed it, his big years in 2019 and 2021.
Also, I have no idea how he will play at first. He’s never been much with the glove at any position. Let’s just say that I’m a lot less impressed with this move than MLBTR seems to be. They’re burbling like the Mets just made a massive upgrade. Uh, no.
Meant to say a couple wins above replacement level, not a couple wins above average. I don’t think the Mets get anywhere close to a couple wins above average out of this guy. He’s two WAR, if that. I guess that’s a “big strike” to MLBTR.
“Run Prevention” = do not want to spend real money on legit players
Oof
Looks like the Jays don’t have to worry about the Mets signing Bichette now.
I think Bichette is staying put.
DavRozNYY: Bichette is a free agent. That means he has no team to stay put with. He is no longer property of the Blue Jays.
Yeah I know that, I just highly doubt he’s leaving Toronto.
He’s already left Toronto by becoming a free agent. He could go back, but I wouldn’t assume he will.
Ya know Bichette did not mind when asked about playing third base. Mets might trade Baty and Vientos and then sign him or Bregman.
Bichette doesn’t have the arm for third. Considering how much Stearns values defense, I don’t see that happening. They would have been better off signing Alonso. He would have hurt them less defensively at 1st than Bichette would at 3rd.
Huge over pay. He was projected at 3 for 42.
Which seemed high Bill. He’s not aging well. I am glad Seattle didn’t sign him.
Pirates must not have offered enough money…
lol Mets!
???
Having watched Polanco for 3 seasons he is unable to play 3B whatsoever. He could play a poor 2B. 1B or DH is his only way to get at bats. Mariners were best to pass. They like to rotate people, especially Raleigh into DH to give them a partial day of rest.
Probably wasn’t going to get that in Seattle. I would probably DH Polanco, put Vientos at 1B, Semien at 2B, Lindor at SS, Baty at 3B, McNeil in LF, Soto in RF, and go all in on Bellinger to play CF (or trade for Luis Robert) and call it a lineup
Pete Alonso is not walking through that door. Why don’t you jump on the team and come on in for the big win?
LOL STEARNS
Polarbear99: LOL Troll
Truth hurts you bud!75 wins Mets lol
LOL Troll
LOL Alfred Stearns
Darn, the Ms will miss him, but $40 mil for 2 years, I can’t blame him.
Bwahahahaha
This reaction not proaction
Marte replacement
I suspect the reason the Mets are seemingly not interested in committing long term to a first baseman is because they think that could be where Soto ends up.
They have a guy called Ryan Clifford in triple A who can come up in a year or two. Power hitting left handed first baseman. Might want to loon that up. Soto is going to be a dh by then
Blue Jay Ray: And because Stearns historically doesn’t like to devote a big piece of payroll to the position.
I think if term wasn’t their biggest concern, Josh Naylor was a great fit and well worth the AAV. Seattle did well to lock him up early.
So they weren’t willing to meet Alonso’s price but are willing to overpay on Polanco?!!
I hope we get Okamoto to play first. Trade away Vientos and McNeil, sign Tucker or Bellinger and get an ace or two and a couple of relievers. If this happens the Mets wil be a playoff team
Overpay.
Next panic move by Cohen/Stearns…trading the farm for Skubal! McLean, Tong, Jett and Benge heading to the Motor City 😉
Lmao no way in the world Stearns does that. McLean is untouchable. The rest is arguable. Tong Jett and maybe Ewing and Clifford gets it done or a mixture of Ewing and Santucci
Nothing will get it done unless it is a massive overpay and someone panics and does it. Skubal should be untouchable and he’s not so McLean who has a handful of starts sure isn’t. I don’t see Stearns doing it but Cohen??? I think we will see Skubal staying put.
Maclean won’t be moved any any deal for Skubal when he in fact may be a Skubal himself – with more years of control and helps keep the team under the luxury tax. Tong, Sproat, Jett I can see being moved along with an Acuna or Vientos. Remember, Scooby has one year left. Mets can sit back and wait without giving up the farm.
Motor City Beach Bum: Next panic move – signing Kenley Jansen. Oh wait… 🤣
Haha. Got me there! Xheers
But will Cohen sit back and wait? His history would seem to indicate he might not. Dont get me wrong I dont think Stearns would do it; he’s a smart GM. It’s your owner I’d be worried about! Cheers dude
Sorry, it’s nonsensical to refer to this signing as a “big strike”. How’d you come up with that?
Kinda bummed as a Mariners enjoyer but I’m glad they backed off because I think this is an overpay for someone who’s basically DH-only at this point and can’t get through a season without an IL stint. He’s a good hitter, and excellent in clutch moments but overall I think the Mariners are better off spending their resources on a more well-rounded and healthier player.
Mason Miller and Adrian Morejon, anyone?
sny.tv/articles/mets-padres-engaging-in-trade-talk…
Some really foolish comments in this thread. Obviously, the plan is to move Polanco to 1B, replacing Alonso. He may not provide Pete’s pop, but coming off a 26 HR, .821 OPS season, with a career OPS+ of 112. he should provide some protection in the lineup for Soto.
He wasn’t my first choice. Mine was Kazuma Okamoto, a Japanese RH hitting 1B with a career .882 OPS in NPB. But Polanco may be a safer choice since you never know how his NPB stats will translate to MLB.
One advantage to signing Polanco is that it takes him off the board for Seattle, who has been looking for a 2B this off season. Now perhaps DiPoto would be open to a trade sending McNeil to the M’s even up for Luis Castillo..
Okay, now McNeill and Acuna for Kwan
They may want to move the 2 lousy hitting third baseman to platoon first.
LoL
Mets strike again
Lol mets
Mets gonna met, for sure. Probably going to go Ty France at 1B and make a bunch of mid tier trades for pitching tbh.
Sad Jorge isn’t coming back to Seattle, but good luck to you in your future playing years. Thank you for the great memories in 2025. Seattle loves you and we will always welcome you.
Good. But Mets need starting pitchers, relief setup or closer, and another RBI / HR power bat. Polanco addresses none of these.
How big is the “hit” Mets’ offense has taken?
2025 bWAR:
Semien 3.3; Nimmo 2.9
Polanco 2.6; Alonso 3.4.
I think Polanco is the DH. Not the 1b. He gives the lineup a bit of flexibility. DH, 1b, maybe second or left in a pinch.
If he hits .750 OPS as a DH, he surpassed the last 3 years at that slot.
Replacing Alonso with Polanco??? Stearns still thinks he’s with a small market team. Mets fans must be livid with this move.
Oh, they are. Do you watch YouTube at all?
Search Giraffneckmark for his reaction channel. His reaction to Alonso signing with Baltimore will be really close to the top.
@Edde1968 It should go without saying that’s not what this is.
First, you’re not replacing Alonso, and even if you were you’d be replacing Alonso’s 2026 (and 2027-2030) *projections,* not his lucky 2025 season.
Also, Polanco’s 2025 134 OPS+ outhits Alonso’s seasonal OPS+ for a majority of his career seasons, and Alonso’s 2025 was extremely lucky. In reality he’s a 2 win DH faking 1B, whose defense is so bad that he injures his own pitchers (and throws at them when they don’t cover the bag. How is he better than Framber in this regard?)—and for this the Orioles paid $155 million.
Stearns is not a good POBO / GM, but even he knew not to pay Scoopy more than $155m—or anything remotely close to it. By now the Mets are fairly close to the team they were in 2025 (for better or worse) and they’re now solid at two significant roster spots that were open: 2B, and DH.
What’s left in the main are two of the easier positions on the diamond to fill: 1B, and corner OF.
The Mets have officially signed Jorge Polanco to a 2-year contract worth $40 million. Aftar that, perhaps the Mets will sign Japanese infield phenom Munetaka Murakami to a 14-year contract worth $448 million to replace Pete Alonso at 1st base.
The changes were coming. It was very clear that Stearns and Cohen were breaking up the core.
I am pretty sure both knew what was happening behind the clubhouse doors culture wise. And I believe Cohen was tired of the contract stuff with Alonso from 2024, after he had rejected the 7 year offer.
Now taking what they have done so far in the absence of the former players’ connections to the fan base.
1. Semien’s range allows a bit of leeway for a first baseman. His bat will be fine for what else he offers.
2. Polanco as a jack of all trades is a good add. Primarily he’ll DH but first and second have coverage. The fact he has accepted it is a plus. I don’t expect him to repeat 2025. I expect he will fill a nice roll.
3. Devin Williams will bounce back nicely. Will he bring the gravitas of Diaz. Nope. Have some adding to the pen to do there. Would like to see Fairbanks.
I’d also like to see Okamoto signed. Sort of a hedge on a big addition in left/center, and also coverage at the corners with a good defensive rep.
2 years for 40m??? what a joke