Headlines

  • Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base
  • Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton
  • Cubs To Promote Cade Horton
  • Mariners Claim Leody Taveras
  • Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach
  • A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers Re-Sign Teoscar Hernandez

By Anthony Franco | January 3, 2025 at 2:25pm CDT

The Dodgers have brought Teoscar Hernández back on a three-year deal. The Republik Sports client is reportedly guaranteed $66MM, including a $23MM signing bonus. There is $23.5MM in deferred money, while the deal includes a $15MM team option (or a $6.5MM buyout) for the 2028 season. He’ll receive a $10MM salary next season, $7.5MM of which is deferred. Another $8MM of his respective $12MM and $14.5MM salaries for 2026 and ’27 are also deferred. The deferrals reportedly reduce the contract’s net present value to roughly $58.1MM.

Hernández, 32, gets the three-year deal he’d been seeking. The slugger had called returning to the Dodgers a priority after a huge first season with the team. Hernández slashed .272/.339/.501 with 33 homers across 652 plate appearances. He carried that strong production into the postseason, hitting three longballs with a .250/.352/.417 slash over 16 games to help the Dodgers secure their second championship in five years.

This was the ideal outcome for a player on a pillow contract. Hernández had reached free agency last winter on the heels of a middling season in Seattle. He had turned in a .258/.305/.435 slash over 678 plate appearances as a Mariner. As a result, Hernández didn’t find the lucrative long-term offer he’d been seeking. While the Red Sox offered him a two-year deal that would’ve come with a $28MM guarantee, he signed for one season on a deferred $23.5MM salary with the goal of reestablishing his market value.

It couldn’t have worked out much better for either side. Hernández had one of the best seasons of his career. He earned his second All-Star nod and Silver Slugger award while picking up down ballot MVP votes for the third time. Hernández established a new career high in home runs with rate stats that were in line with his best years in Toronto. He was an instrumental part of a championship roster.

The down year in 2023 looks like an anomaly. He’s hardly the only veteran hitter to struggle in Seattle’s extremely pitcher-friendly home park. Hernández has been an impact hitter in each of the other four seasons since his breakout in 2020. Over the past five years, he owns a .274/.328/.493 batting line in nearly 2700 trips to the plate. There’ll be a decent number of strikeouts, but few players hit the ball as hard as he does. Hernández is an annual threat for 30+ doubles and at least 25-30 homers.

Hernández was the only key offensive player whom the Dodgers feared losing in free agency. He’ll return to join Shohei Ohtani, Mookie Betts, Freddie Freeman, Will Smith, Max Muncy, Tommy Edman and Gavin Lux in a loaded offense. The Dodgers added Michael Conforto on a one-year, $17MM contract at the Winter Meetings. No other team rivals the potency of the L.A. lineup.

The Dodgers are taking on some risk from a defensive perspective. Despite plus arm strength and surprisingly strong athleticism, Hernández has never graded as a good defender. That continued this season. Defensive Runs Saved felt he was three runs below par in his 1308 combined innings between the corner outfield spots. Statcast rated him much more harshly, estimating he was 11 runs below average.

Hernández isn’t likely to improve on a contract that runs through age 34. An ideal landing spot would’ve allowed him to move to designated hitter in year two or three. That’s not an option on a team with Ohtani. The Dodgers are moving Betts to shortstop and will have Hernández and Conforto flanking Edman in the outfield. They’ll accept a mediocre defensive unit for the chance to stack with the lineup with good hitters.

Adding Conforto and re-signing Hernández blocks the path to everyday at-bats for youngsters Andy Pages and James Outman. The latter feels like a change of scenery candidate after a disappointing second MLB season. The Dodgers will probably be less inclined to move the 24-year-old Pages, who had a league average .248/.305/.407 showing as a rookie. He still has a minor league option remaining, so they could start him in Triple-A if they don’t want to limit him to fourth outfield work.

Pages doesn’t have anything else to prove in the minors, but the Dodgers have the resources to continue loading up. Other teams figure to at least try to pull him away via trade, though L.A. could prefer to hold him as a replacement for Conforto after next season. Signing Blake Snell and retaining Blake Treinen earlier in the winter leaves the Dodgers without any clear holes on the roster.

At the start of the offseason, MLBTR predicted Hernández would receive a three-year deal at $60MM. He’ll land slightly above that forecast in raw money, though the deferrals will reduce the net present value to a hair below it. A three-year, $66MM deal without deferrals would have come with a $22MM competitive balance tax hit. Hernández’s number ends up around $19.4MM.

Including Hernández, RosterResource calculates the Dodgers’ luxury tax number around $353MM. They’re well beyond the $301MM mark that represents the final tier of penalization. They’re taxed at a 110% rate on the final AAV. Re-signing Hernández will likely cost them upwards of $40MM next year after taxes. The Dodgers have been undeterred by the CBT as they push for a repeat.

Hernández had declined a qualifying offer. Other teams would have needed to forfeit a draft choice to sign him. The Dodgers only relinquish the right to receive a 2025 compensation pick, which would have come after the fourth round. The Blue Jays and Red Sox had also been linked to Hernández this winter. Those clubs (especially Toronto) could turn to Anthony Santander, who stands as the clear top unsigned outfielder. Jurickson Profar is a tier or two below that as the next-best outfield bat.

Yancen Pujols first reported that Hernández and the Dodgers were finalizing a three-year, $66MM deal. Chris Cotillo of MassLive confirmed there was an agreement in place. ESPN’s Jeff Passan first reported the $15MM option for 2028, as well as the signing bonus and the approximate $23MM in deferrals. Fabian Ardaya of The Athletic reported the salary and deferral breakdown. Jon Heyman of the New York Post had the final NPV.

Image courtesy of Imagn.

Share 0 Retweet 0 Send via email0

Los Angeles Dodgers Newsstand Transactions Teoscar Hernandez

Mets Notes: Manaea Contract Details, Alonso
Main
Dodgers Designate Diego Cartaya For Assignment
View Comments (561)
Post a Comment

561 Comments

  1. Misfit0620

    4 months ago

    Let’s go!!!!! Repeat city

    29
    Reply
    • towinagain

      4 months ago

      And the Padres offseason keeps getting worse.

      Hey, Padres ownership, do you want to win?!

      Dodgers ownership is lapping you.

      And don’t give me “they have all the resources to spend bull!@@$!”

      You can make reasonable moves and still, yes, still compete for the division.

      You, Padres ownership, haven’t made one move.

      15
      Reply
      • niel.marshal

        4 months ago

        They choose to give the money they can spent to sign Xander for 280M and extend Manny for 350M. Now they idle

        24
        Reply
        • believeitornot

          4 months ago

          They gave up far too much for juan soto. I knew that they would trade him so why didn’t they?

          3
          Reply
      • antibelt

        4 months ago

        How many 300 million dollar players do you think they can afford? Lol Giants are the ones sitting on their hands.

        16
        Reply
        • Blue Baron

          4 months ago

          antibelt: How is extending Chapman and signing Adames sitting on your hands?

          11
          Reply
      • BigRedMachine

        4 months ago

        I feel the same way about my team so the Mariners and Padres should do a deal.

        11
        Reply
      • NoSaint

        4 months ago

        @towinagain

        If you think the Padres are having a tough off season, have a look at what shape the Jays are in.

        24
        Reply
      • amk1920

        4 months ago

        Maybe the Padres should have not blown their budget on a second 300 million dollar deal for Manny and paying Xander 100 million more than what he is worth. Oh and Yu Darvish until he is 42 because sure

        12
        Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          4 months ago

          Paying Ohtani $68 mil / year for ages 39-48 – a you think paying Yu $14 mil for 39-41 isbad?

          4
          Reply
        • amk1920

          4 months ago

          Those deferrals aren’t counted towards payroll

          5
          Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          yeah but paying ohtani 2 mil/year for his prime, it just world series mode,

          8
          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          4 months ago

          You do realize it’s real money though, right?

          Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          oh really?

          3
          Reply
        • labial

          4 months ago

          Is it?

          4
          Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          for the dodgers it isnt

          1
          Reply
        • Goku the Knowledgable One

          4 months ago

          I feel like this move may inspire Bob Nutting to sign 2 RPs for league minimum instead of one

          7
          Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          2 is better than 1…….. right

          1
          Reply
        • frankiegxiii

          4 months ago

          Ohtani brings in a ship ton of revenue for the Dodgers though.

          5
          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 months ago

          You do realize Ohtani brings $ in. They didn’t just throw it away. Ohtani is excited. And somewhat a big deal in Japan. Xander not a big deal anywhere. No one cares about him. Like Hernandez. Their value is getting deep in playoffs. Ohtani a big deal.

          3
          Reply
        • belowme29

          4 months ago

          Who cares we got Othani in his prime thats all it matters is what he’s doing know. He’s going to get us 3 more titles.

          4
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          4 months ago

          @Long Ohtani will be collecting money already paid to fund deferalls from age 39-48. That is not the Dodgers paying him for those years. Those years are being paid for annually as $ is deferred as outlined in the CBA.

          1
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          4 months ago

          For the Dodgers it’s currently $46M annualy they are paying as outlined in CBA. $2M in salary and $44M annually to fund each years deferral.

          Deferred $ is nothing new and there is nothing nefarious about it. Every team has ability to do it and most have over the past 4 decades since deferalls started happening.

          1
          Reply
        • Mondesi’s Cannon

          4 months ago

          It ain’t our money! And who will care when the Dodgers win a total of 4-5 World Series’s from 2020-2030? Haha.

          1
          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          4 months ago

          You do realize he is worth that real money though, right?

          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          4 months ago

          And the circle is complete because, as the original poster started this, Yu is also worth his salary.

          His suggestion that Yu wasn’t is what started the comparisons to paying money to older players.

          I don’t care how much LA pays Ohtani or when they pay him or how they fund it or how it affects the CBA (or not), or if he is worth it or not worth it.

          Reply
        • Black Ace57

          4 months ago

          It isn’t the same for the Dodgers when they are owned by the Guggenheim investment group. If they owe money to a player 10 years from now deferred their whole business is investment. They can put those dollars into funds and then pay part of what they owe in interest generated from the deferred money. In simple terms, if I owe you $100 bucks in 10 days and I have a special skill that makes the money worth $140 in that time then in a way I’m only paying you $60. It’s BS.

          Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          4 months ago

          Yeah but can you defer league minimum?

          1
          Reply
        • differentbears

          4 months ago

          Holy moly, it’s incredible how often the Ohtani contract has been explained and yet this still persists.

          The Dodgers are setting aside 40+ million a year and investing it. When it’s time to pay Ohtani his 68 million a year for ten years, the money will already be there to pay him. They’re not kicking the can down the road, the money is being set aside now.

          5
          Reply
        • 920falcon

          4 months ago

          The Lerners were deferring before deferring was cool.

          1
          Reply
        • revolver

          4 months ago

          Nobody counts 20 except dodger fans.

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          4 months ago

          @Black Ace The deferred $ and the principal along with interest rate is how it grows.

          It’s in no way a special skill. The Dodgers are lending a $44M annually for nearly 10 years, each and every year of his contract. Investment firms drool to have that type of extra capital for a set term especially 10 years.

          Not sure what stipulations are but just and SP 500 index fund would easily see this money double in 7 tears off its historic return. And if allowed some banks would possibly just pay a 6 or 7% rate ro have the extra capital to lend out as credit. Consumers regularly pay 20% or more on credit cards. So investment firm would b tripling their $ by the time the accrued deferrals are due. MLB rules likely stipulate something similar to the former, but just giving u some examples of how it’s in no way some “special skill”.

          1
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          4 months ago

          @Wade I’m not sure, that’s a good question. It would still be counted against luxury tax in present day value as current league minimum. Just unlikely to see someone being paid league minimum able to afford to defer the $. Unless of course they re an aging vet just hanging on for one of final years.

          Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          4 months ago

          Different the Dodgers are not investing the $44 million. They are required to put it in an escrow account with a guaranteed interest rate.

          Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          4 months ago

          Tigers, it can’t be invested in anything with a variable return. It has to be a guaranteed interest rate. It also is put in an escrow account.

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          4 months ago

          @Baseball When you put $ into an account and it accrues interest, it is called investing.

          1
          Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          i dont think anyone should count 2020-marlins made the postseason

          Reply
        • GOP Lizards

          4 months ago

          Ohtani is an international investment. He will pay for himself. Outside the box thinking by perhaps the smartest ownership team in baseball. It was right there for the taking for Arte, but he has no vision.

          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          4 months ago

          Psych – most reports state that the entire contract idea was all Ohtani and he pitched it to LA.

          Just saying, ownership only gets credit for saying, “ok”.

          Reply
        • GOP Lizards

          4 months ago

          It has to be a dynamic between 2 parties. Halos did not take advantage of this phenomenal player when they had the chance. LA not only has money, but they are smart and execute well.

          Reply
      • belowme29

        4 months ago

        They can still get a good loan with a better interest rate.

        1
        Reply
      • ryrockak

        4 months ago

        Be mad at Preller for giving Xander that outrageous horrible contract. That being said I still think he is a good GM

        3
        Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          4 months ago

          I’d say Peter was behind that contract but that doesn’t mean AJ wouldn’t have done it too.

          2
          Reply
      • roob

        4 months ago

        That takes out the best trade partner for Kuis Robert. I guess he’ll get moved at the trade deadline.

        Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          Kuis.

          1
          Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Padres are broke. Stimulus $ has ran out and credit cards are maxed out.

        2
        Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        4 months ago

        Padres had better hope for Roki, because Dodgers have improved over 2024 roster.

        3
        Reply
      • VermonsterSD

        4 months ago

        You realize that all the Dodgers have done this off season is trade Bueller for Snell, right? No other moves, no new players, etc. Stop freaking out…….lol

        2
        Reply
        • HHBruin

          4 months ago

          Buehler and Flaherty

          1
          Reply
        • Longtimecoming

          4 months ago

          Buehler and Flaherty you could say.

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          4 months ago

          Vermon

          Snell, Edman and Conforto, and Treinan coming back, if you’re counting

          1
          Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          VermonsterSD
          dont forget the biggest signings the dodgers have made: Conforto and Gallegos

          Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          conforto not coming back, he was never on the team, VermonsterSD was talking about new players

          Reply
      • arty! Believes Jevon Belcher Quit on the Chiefs

        4 months ago

        Run it back isn’t the worst idea for a 93 win team.

        They need to sign an actual 1B for trade for one and could use a LF but bringing back Solano to play 1B and Peralta to play LF also isn’t the worst outcome.

        1
        Reply
      • Baseballisthebest

        4 months ago

        You are a serious wimp Tow. Have you thought of getting professional help?

        2
        Reply
      • norcalblue

        4 months ago

        Don’t despair T, if Pads sign Roki and unload Cease in a deal for Suzuki, this will be a very successful offseason.

        1
        Reply
      • Paleobros

        4 months ago

        Hey now! They signed Jose Espada to a minor league deal.

        Reply
      • VegasSDfan

        4 months ago

        The Padres made smart moves late in the offseason last year. I expect the same this year.
        Tbe dodgers can spend like fools all they want. A team full of veterans tends to under perform.

        1
        Reply
        • DigglinDickers

          4 months ago

          A team full of veterans just won a championship.

          2
          Reply
      • ThatsIT?

        4 months ago

        You’re why the padres should have never made those stupid moves. Fans like you don’t have the intelligence to understand that it was a short term strategy that was only taking place because of a dying owner it was dumb then, and shouldn’t have been done because it confusing simpletons like you. Losing money for fans like you to stupidity criticize them now. Hopefully they operate like the A’s going forward and give you something real to complain about.

        Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          dont have to be mean

          Reply
      • The_M4N

        4 months ago

        @towin, the Friars are making moves now.

        Reply
      • ocladfan

        4 months ago

        What are they going to do when manny’s salary goes up to $39 mil a yr in two years? Maybe the owners open up their purse?

        Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      4 months ago

      Let’s go!!!! Good teams get better and bad teams get worse!!!

      4
      Reply
      • GOP Lizards

        4 months ago

        It’s not just about the money. LA has a smart management team and great farm system.

        8
        Reply
        • Braves Butt-Head

          4 months ago

          Great management great farm system and of course good old Satan helping out where he can the Dodgers can’t miss lol

          1
          Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          4 months ago

          We found the Q follower in the baseball comment section.

          3
          Reply
        • Jake1972

          4 months ago

          I’m a Cubs fan.

          Love,

          Satan

          2
          Reply
        • GOP Lizards

          4 months ago

          You make Beavis and Butt – head look like geniuses. Job well done.

          Reply
        • braveshomer

          4 months ago

          What is Q exactly?…any who good signing by the Dodgers!

          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          4 months ago

          Aptly named, butt head.

          Reply
    • The_M4N

      4 months ago

      @Misfit, “[hopefully] repeat city.” They’ve never done it.

      Reply
      • Misfit0620

        4 months ago

        We’ve got a better chance now with him being back.

        4
        Reply
        • The_M4N

          4 months ago

          Misfit, LAD is definitely the team to beat.

          1
          Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          misfit – why you saying “we” are you on the dodgers?

          2
          Reply
        • cardinalred

          4 months ago

          This is always the dumbest comment in any thread. If misfit bought a ticket, or some merch that found it’s way back to ownership and helped put the product on the field, then why can’t they say “we”? Just don’t get haters hating a fan. Hating the Dodgers in general…yeah, I get that.

          4
          Reply
        • Van Lingle Mungo

          4 months ago

          It is something every fan of a team says because the team represents a city. In this case, Los Angeles. So, while the fans may not be on the team, they are a part of something in the greater scheme of sports. Who is the last acknowledgment by players whenever they get a chance to speak? The fans. “If it weren’t for the fans, we wouldn’t be here.” So, we, the fans, say “We” regarding the team because it is OUR team, and we have an emotional stake. It is ours. Don’t fool yourself; you’ve said “we” when discussing how the Pirates guzzle every last drop from every other baseball team while failing every year. “We just can’t seem to not be on our knees by seasons’ end.”

          6
          Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          Ig thats mb – sorry misfit. I realize I have probably said that about the pirates. But usually me personally I dont say we, even though I am a diehard pittsburgh fan.

          Reply
        • Misfit0620

          4 months ago

          Don’t be that guy especially with a trademarked Pirates pic as your PFP.

          2
          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 months ago

          I forgot how using “we” triggers people. Need to get back to using it. And I can actually use it legitimately. I am obviously smarter than anyone working in these front offices so they would be foolish not to take my advice. Just won’t say we signed Xander. I don’t want any credit for that disaster.

          6
          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          4 months ago

          Energel, you may have missed it but all fans say “we.”

          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          4 months ago

          Cardinal

          I think you’re right about Misfit. It can refer to “We Dodger fans”. Not how I talk, but just not a big deal as colloquialisms go.

          2
          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          4 months ago

          Well said Van.

          1
          Reply
    • Fever Pitch Guy

      4 months ago

      Mis – Not a surprise to most of us, we’ve been saying all along he’s staying.

      Both he and the Red Sox used each other, so all good ;p)

      4
      Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3

        4 months ago

        I’m shocked! All reports (leaked directly from Boston’s front office) were that the Red Sox were in hot pursuit

        2
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          4 months ago

          Sad – Second year in a row too, they use the same playbook every year since 2019!

          Who’s the next top guy the Red Sox will not sign … Bregman, Scott, Burnes or Santander?

          4
          Reply
        • kodion

          4 months ago

          FPG – You got a lot of nerve, implying the Sox are better at not-signing than the Jays!

          1
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3

          4 months ago

          Kodion – I think they’re equally bad at not signing players, these are just better at lying about which players they’re not signing lol

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          4 months ago

          There’s a difference. Boston at one time was THE place to go. Like the end of a commercial…NOT ANY MORE.

          1
          Reply
    • larkraxm

      4 months ago

      It hasn’t happened for 25 years. I’ll take the field!

      2
      Reply
    • smill

      4 months ago

      Next?

      Reply
    • Edub23

      4 months ago

      3 yrs for $66M seems like a solid deal for both sides in this market.
      Gives the Dodgers another big RH bat with Mookie and Will Smith to go along with the big LH bats with Shohei, Freeman and Muncy.
      I’m not sure what the defensive metrics showed in Teoscar, but it looked like he played well in LF, especially in the playoffs.

      1
      Reply
    • i like al conin

      4 months ago

      The system is broken. Dodgers have 3.5 times the payroll as several small market teams.

      1
      Reply
      • Van Lingle Mungo

        4 months ago

        He was available to any other team. It’s nearly January. He signed at a very reasonable price for a team he obviously wanted to play for.

        4
        Reply
        • i like al conin

          4 months ago

          I agree on that, but I’m talking about the wide gap between resources of large and mid/small markets. How can the Rays and others compete with a $107 mil payroll when the Dodgers have no limit? They can’t.

          1
          Reply
        • Van Lingle Mungo

          4 months ago

          If Steinberg can’t make money in Tampa, they could in Nashville, Charlotte, or perhaps Montreal. He could also spend money.

          3
          Reply
        • davep-3

          4 months ago

          Baseball is overdue for salary cap floor. I don’t blame Dodgers. However mlb ratings will continue to hemorrhage viewers if it is Dodgers every year with limited competition. MLB turning into Harlem globetrotters .

          Reply
      • fox471 Dave

        4 months ago

        Perhaps, the billionaire owners of smaller markets should spend some MONEY!

        6
        Reply
    • 17dizzy

      4 months ago

      The Dodgers need to add Nolan Arenado!!!
      He wants to play for the Dodgers if the Cardinals are going to dump him.

      He’s a year younger than Muncy. Has a lot higher career batting average than Muncy. Plus, Arenado Averaged between 25-30+ homers a year — with his 16 from last season being a career low.

      Arenado’s 10 Gold Gloves along with a Platinum makes Arenado the much better defensive player.

      The Dodgers need to take advantage of the Cardinals John Mozeliak and the owners DeWitt’s stupidity.
      John Mozeliak is giving away their best Quality players. Just to dump their best Quality Players and their higher salaries.

      The Cardinals will trade Arenado to the Dodgers for peanuts …. Plus give them $20-$25 million of his contract just so they will take him.

      That seems like a No-Brainer. Adding Arenado strengthens them both offensively and defensively!! Muncy moves to the back-up 3rd & 1st Baseman along with filling in for Othani on days he’s out at DH. Plus —- Muncy could also fill in as a corner outfielder — if needed.

      2
      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Arenado can they rework his contract to defer it? If so I love it.

        1
        Reply
      • cecildawg

        4 months ago

        17dizzy? Arenado is toast. No one really wants him or needs him. Nice enough fellow. Just done.

        Reply
      • energel

        4 months ago

        Why do you only mentoin career stats? everything the past few years have been a decline, and muncy really has not declined, other than injuries

        Reply
    • fox471 Dave

      4 months ago

      Prayers sent .

      Reply
      • 920falcon

        4 months ago

        Ditto.

        Reply
    • good vibes only

      4 months ago

      Don’t let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya

      Reply
    • energel

      4 months ago

      I live in seattle too, agree with everything you said except becoming a dodgers fan

      Reply
    • Show all 105 replies
  2. ef1txx

    4 months ago

    only 63M deferred

    24
    Reply
    • Misfit0620

      4 months ago

      And the lame jokes start

      33
      Reply
      • This one belongs to the Reds

        4 months ago

        Own your team’s shenanigans or deal with it.

        32
        Reply
        • HHBruin

          4 months ago

          what shenanigans?

          12
          Reply
        • cwsOverhaul

          4 months ago

          @Reds: Not to worry. Santander/Boras will exceed Cincy salary comfort zone and they can trade with WSox for Luis Robert.

          3
          Reply
        • stubby66

          4 months ago

          This is the leagues fault they gotta put a rule in where only a percent of money can be deferred of a players money and a percent of your yearly team salary be deferred. No im not a jealous fan but a person that doesn’t want this to eventually hurt the game. I will even go further that it is time to make a rule that teams also need to start paying for a percent of upgrades or new stadiums. People got a right to complain about how much these owners make. The salaries have gotten high enough. I get the owners are making plenty but so are the players.. it’s time that the excess money should be given back to the fan and that is for them to pay for these stadiums that these organization play in.

          5
          Reply
        • choof

          4 months ago

          what shenanigans? the perfectly fair rules your cheap owner can’t/won’t play with?

          8
          Reply
        • TheGr8One

          4 months ago

          Whine whine whine the players can strike and so can the fans. I’ve been in management on multiple levels for 30 years and what I’ve learned is if you want to make your point you hit them in the wallet. No different to baseball. The revenues are paid by you. Don’t come here complaining about the product and then support the product that’s insane.

          4
          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3

          4 months ago

          Stubby- get ready for a long work stoppage before they sign the next CBA because they salary issues are going to expose rifts between owners, and then again between MlB and the PA

          3
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          4 months ago

          @Stubby The league does have rules on deferrals and how they are funded. Ohtani’s deferrals will require $44M annually to accrue to the $68M collection value. That $44M must be funded annually as outlined in CBA.

          So the total against luxury tax the Dodgers are being charged($46M). Is the true # of the present value of his contract the $44M + $2M collected annualy now.

          There is nothing nefarious and it’s not this advantage some people seem to think.

          8
          Reply
        • Rays in the Bay

          4 months ago

          @Reds

          Couldn’t have said it better myself. Yeah it’s within the rules but it counts as salary shenanigans. If Dodgers fans continue to get mad about it we will continue to joke about it

          7
          Reply
        • Oldhalo

          4 months ago

          @ TheGr8One. I agree. A select few teams have gobbled up the majority of the talent. Whether you can afford it or not as an owner is irrelevant, it’s bad for the sport and it isn’t being managed, jeopardizing the integrity of the overall product. So why attend the games at the other 20 or so ball parks… Let it collapse, then sit back and see what happens.

          4
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          4 months ago

          Stubby

          But in this case the signing bonus is as big as the deferred money. This just is not similar to the Ohtani deal.

          1
          Reply
        • cencal

          4 months ago

          Ive been a Dodgers fan since I wee sperm on the swim up the canal and I agree with you.

          Something tied to a percentage of the deal.

          No deferral periods outside 2x the contract length of deals less than 5 years, and 1..5 for more than 5

          Something like this. I should “hurt” sooner than later.

          Saying all that, glad the LA offense is essentially back with a better starting staff.

          2
          Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          4 months ago

          @cws No, it will be more excuses why nothing got done and they go into next year with the same lame outfield group.

          Reply
        • JSC Cubbs

          4 months ago

          Then why do it that way? If it’s not giving you an advantage you wouldn’t reinvent the pay structure for your team.
          Subverting the CBT payments is nefarious. Subverting the CBT is an advantage.
          Subverting the CBT takes money from other teams.

          2
          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          4 months ago

          It does none of those things. The actual value of the contract is lower than the stated value due to when it is being paid out. The player gets paid more than the actual value for allowing the team to pay them later.

          2
          Reply
        • pepenas34

          4 months ago

          If we are going to talk about CBT manipulation with the deferrals, the length of contracts when teams offer players 12-15 years just to lower the annual average. Its the same thing with the difference in deferrals players don’t use a 40 m roster spot.

          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          4 months ago

          Wasting your time, tigers. Along with many others, I have explained deferrals more than once.

          2
          Reply
        • 920falcon

          4 months ago

          And you did it well.

          Reply
        • ThatsIT?

          4 months ago

          Nobody wants to play in Cincinnati. That won’t change with a salary cap simpleton.

          Reply
        • octavian8

          4 months ago

          Disagree that no one wants to play in Cincy. Home town players like Pete Rose, Dave Parker, Barry Larkin, etc. Some people like a slightly slower lifestyle and if you want to experience something bigger you always take a short flight to that city. Taxes are much cheaper also. So diss Cincy, Pittsburgh or Minnesota all you want but realize some of us choose to live there.

          Reply
        • youngliam

          4 months ago

          Deferred money needs to count against the luxury cap while the player is on the team, this is just ridiculous at this point.

          Reply
        • Orioles Legend Andy Van Slyke

          4 months ago

          “I’ve learned is if you want to make your point you hit them in the wallet. No different to baseball. The revenues are paid by you. Don’t come here complaining about the product and then support the product that’s insane.”

          The Expos fans who stopped attending after the ’97 season made their point so clear that they no longer have a team.

          Reply
        • NYG4246

          4 months ago

          I 1000% agree teams should pay for their stadiums it’s terrible how they essentially put their respective cities in hand coughs for tax dollars.

          Idk about the deferrals though, it’s not that new it just became an issue bc LA really gave ohtani a landmark deferral contract. If that’s what they want to do Im ok with it. If I’m ohtani though I’d be watching my back in retirement – billion dollar corporations have the means to make people go away so they won’t have to pay up.

          Reply
      • Begamin

        4 months ago

        23MM of it is deferred btw

        8
        Reply
        • mlbdodgerfan2015

          4 months ago

          And $23mm signing bonus.

          1
          Reply
        • bucsfan0004

          4 months ago

          If $23M is upfront in the form of a signing bonus, and $23M is deferred, that leaves about $7M/year in actual yearly salary for the state of CA to tax.

          Reply
      • Rking

        4 months ago

        Turns out a lot is deferred though. Great deal for Dodgers.

        1
        Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          4 months ago

          And for Teoscar. Neither he nor any member of his family will ever go hungry.

          Reply
      • The_M4N

        4 months ago

        @Misfit, but it’s it really a lame joke?

        4
        Reply
      • DugoutJester

        4 months ago

        But was he wrong? 23m signing bonus, 23m deferred. Damn near close. *shrugs*

        Reply
        • roob

          4 months ago

          Who cares what’s deferred? This is ridiculous. Every team has the same rules.

          2
          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          4 months ago

          Did I stumble into the challenged section of MLBTR? Every team can do the same thing. Good lord!

          1
          Reply
      • yanksfan2010

        4 months ago

        23 million has been deferred. So, his joke was not far off.

        8
        Reply
        • CALgoldenBears

          4 months ago

          $23.5 million in deferred money.

          Reply
      • GOP Lizards

        4 months ago

        You must have low expectations if you want to participate in social media.

        1
        Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          4 months ago

          You should lower your expectations if you want to participate in life now.

          Reply
      • energel

        4 months ago

        and the lame “comebacks” start

        Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      4 months ago

      Not far off. $23 bonus and $23 deferred. That only leaves $20 over 3 years. Interesting.

      Reply
      • marcfrombrooklyn

        4 months ago

        I wonder if all these large (relative to the annual salaries) signing bonuses are a hedge by the players against a work stoppage when the CBA expires.

        Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3

          4 months ago

          I think the answer is both yes and no. It’ll be nice to have a pile of cash under your mattress during the next lockout. But also it’s a guaranteed paycheck long long after retirement.
          Remember the Mets are still paying Bobby Bonilla every year

          Reply
      • Tigers3232

        4 months ago

        @Wade Plus the $ to fund the deferred portions each of those years.

        Reply
    • Salzilla

      4 months ago

      I get such a kick outta how the Dodgers deferrels get under so many people’s skin.

      18
      Reply
      • receo

        4 months ago

        The meltdowns are glorious!

        5
        Reply
        • Phyguy0880

          4 months ago

          A practice in schadenfreude isn’t exactly an endorsement of your own character.

          Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Deferred $ is awesome. Why would you want a higher luxury tax number? They got the city and tv deal. Might as well take advantage of the payroll advantage. If you smaller city fans get upset and stop watching they might change things. But no one cares if you are unhappy as long as they keep getting your $.

        4
        Reply
        • Rays in the Bay

          4 months ago

          We normal people have already given up. It’s only rich white people from past generations who can attend games… Or companies who give free tickets to workers. I don’t give MLB any of my money and don’t really watch. But the league doesn’t care as long as the Dodgers, Yankees, Mets, Red Sox exist. They will always bring in lots of money and revenue. The other teams are just fodder to showcase the talent on the richer teams.

          1
          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          4 months ago

          “Rich white people?”

          2
          Reply
        • Fred McGriff HR

          4 months ago

          @ Rays in the Bay

          “It’s only rich white people from past generations who can attend games… ” “I don’t give MLB any of my money and don’t really watch.”

          ——————————
          How do you know who is in attendance if you don’t really watch, and what makes you ‘think’ “it’s only rich white people”..
          I can see though that you’ve been well indoctrinated.

          1
          Reply
        • Hammerin' Hank

          4 months ago

          The other teams have been fodder to showcase the rich team’s talent for as long as they’ve been playing baseball. Take a look at the yearly American League standings during the Yankees’ dynasty from 1921 to 1964. Teams like the Washington Senators and St. Louis Browns were cannon fodder for the Yanks. And the other five teams also experienced long stretches of ineptitude, including the Boston Red Sox. During the 1950’s the Kansas City A’s were pretty much a Yankees farm team, funneling all their good players to New York. Why do you all act like this is a new problem, when it’s simply history repeating itself?

          Reply
    • Lanidrac

      4 months ago

      Man, even the Dodgers are going to need to significantly cut payroll for current players once they have to start paying off all this deferred salary.

      Although, the Dodgers cutting payroll means they’ll probably still be spending within the top 3rd of MLB teams on current rosters.

      Reply
      • VegasMoved

        4 months ago

        The Dodgers are already paying those deferred salaries into escrow. They have no financial obligation once the deals expire.

        1
        Reply
        • bucsfan0004

          4 months ago

          Yes. For Ohtani the Dodgers set aside $46M, they pay him $2M, and put the other $44M in a T-bill or something paying 4.5% apr. After 10yrs, the $44M deferred is now $68M, and he gets paid the rest. The Dodgers don’t suddenly have a $68M yearly bill due starting 10yrs from now. Its all paid and over with and on to the next superstar

          2
          Reply
    • VegasMoved

      4 months ago

      Only off by 40 million.

      Reply
    • Show all 54 replies
  3. dodgerblue58

    4 months ago

    Finally
    Thank you

    6
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      They deferred signing him until after Christmas but got it done.

      2
      Reply
  4. thenorthstarofnija

    4 months ago

    About time!

    2
    Reply
  5. bjhaas1977

    4 months ago

    Seems like a low salary.

    3
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      It’s fair. At his age and talent would you want to lose a draft pick? Can’t go all in.

      Reply
    • fox471 Dave

      4 months ago

      Bjhaas – Yeah, how does one live on $7,000,000 a year, with $23,000,000 in the bank and another $23,000,000 coming in the future. Should we start a Go Fund me charity?

      2
      Reply
  6. wmurphy24

    4 months ago

    Takin’ care of business over there

    1
    Reply
  7. Canuckleball

    4 months ago

    Now the bidding intensifies for Santander.

    11
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      Nah. Same boat at Hernandez. Lil younger but not a good enough player or big enough star to want to pay max value and lose a draft pick. They will bid but not intensely.

      Even worse because LA has the $ and wouldn’t have received a high draft pick. Baltimore like with Burnes would very much like to not spend $ and receive their draft pick.

      1
      Reply
  8. 92jays

    4 months ago

    Way to go bluejays

    13
    Reply
    • bestone

      4 months ago

      Yeah…I think I’m done. I’ve gotta find a new team to follow

      1
      Reply
      • WadeBoggsWildRide

        4 months ago

        Just don’t try the Reds.

        1
        Reply
      • friesTO

        4 months ago

        Followed Dodger Blue and was rewarded with a WS, so can recommend. When Biggio got traded over I followed watching and listening to the team since Teo was there already so I knew a couple on the team. Highs and lows with Biggio then he was out and Kiermeier was in.

        Dodgers went through so many players though it was a wonder they kept up in their division. They had a leash but it was short.

        Anyway good to have a few teams to follow doesn’t have to be this one. I’ll also be adding the Pirates to see how IKF and Horwitz are doing. Cheers

        Reply
    • Canuck2

      4 months ago

      Atkins will come up empty handed then hopefully lose his job

      Reply
      • bestone

        4 months ago

        He seems to have no ability to attract any free agents. His trades are terrible…and cant seem to retain any players (or extend them).
        The farm teams suck. And his draft selections never pan out.
        What does he do?
        Maybe he has some compromising photos of his boss or something….

        Reply
      • friesTO

        4 months ago

        it’s been 9 years, why would it matter now? Shapiro and Atkins are tied together they come as a set to destroy franchises. They do great for stadiums but not for teams

        Reply
  9. Terry B

    4 months ago

    Running it back! Tanner Scott next!

    8
    Reply
    • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

      4 months ago

      God please no they’ve spent enough money

      3
      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        I hope they get em all

        1
        Reply
      • JackStrawb

        4 months ago

        Making Steve Cohen look a mite cheap.

        Reply
    • g0blue

      4 months ago

      Hear, hear!!

      1
      Reply
  10. This one belongs to the Reds

    4 months ago

    To the shock of NO ONE.

    5
    Reply
  11. Tokyo

    4 months ago

    Looks like we got the band back together.

    6
    Reply
    • differentbears

      4 months ago

      Except for Number 21, Buetane. *sniffle*

      3
      Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        4 months ago

        Rays

        I paid only $99 for MLB.com to watch non-local games for almost a full season. That does not require legacy wealth or privilege.

        2
        Reply
    • JackStrawb

      4 months ago

      Probably not what a collection of antiques like the Dodgers should be doing if they want to add to the big trophy collection.

      1
      Reply
  12. BurnerK

    4 months ago

    Good for him! Finally and well deserved.

    3
    Reply
  13. ❤️ MuteButton

    4 months ago

    This team is stacked!
    and handing out STACK$

    3
    Reply
  14. twozero6ix

    4 months ago

    No one wants to be overpaid in Toronto, Boston or SF.. mine as well run it back

    Reply
    • Joemo

      4 months ago

      Boston ownership did this to themselves. I have no sympathy for that cheap ownership group.

      2
      Reply
      • ClevelandSteelEngines

        4 months ago

        They did it to you, they knew this whole time it was another bluff.

        2
        Reply
    • all in the suit that you wear

      4 months ago

      Some teams refuse to overpay. Overpaying can come back to haunt you.

      1
      Reply
      • GASoxFan

        4 months ago

        And some teams often refuse to just plain pay, because, ‘baseball players are expensive’ and ‘you can’t expect to compete for a world series every year.’

        So, its so much easier to pocket the cash and not spend it for years on end. At least then you can fund non-baseball related ventures with it right? Just drop some misleading soundbites around ticket renewal deadlines and run with it!

        1
        Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          GA: Good to see you. You have been missing for a while.

          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          Yessir suit. Been a rough few months.

          Still following the moves, and, can’t say I agree with the direction things have taken with the crochet trade, but, *if* he stays healthy, *if* he’s the real deal, and, *if* they get an extension done it may turn out alright.

          Most of my energy has been spent just hanging on around here, but, decided to take a little time tonight on the boards to decompress and do something i always enjoyed.

          Hope you’ve had a great holiday season so far

          Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          4 months ago

          Hope things turn around for you if they haven’t already.

          2
          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          Good to see you hanging in there and hope you are enjoying the holidays. I’m not crazy about the Crochet trade, but we will see how it goes. I think it could turn out to be anywhere from a great trade to a disaster.

          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          Suit: what’s your take these days on Breslow’s negotiating ability?

          Looking at the body of work over the last 12 months I’m starting to feel like he tends to give in or give up a bit much for what he gets over most of his transactions?

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          I can’t tell about Breslow’s negotiating for sure because the price for pitching has gone through the roof.

          Reply
        • JackStrawb

          4 months ago

          If he couldn’t anticipate or at least see it happening in front of him, he’s not much of a GM.

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          What are you talking about, Jack? Breslow has paid the higher prices for pitching in the trade for Crochet and in the signings of Buehler and Sandoval. I am saying that I do not have a feel for fair prices in the new pitching market.

          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          I’m actually perfectly fine with the strategy with Buehler and Sandoval. I don’t mind paying an excess AAV on extremely short deals when it’s purely cash involved and no QO penalties.

          It’s the decisions when you’re talking the cost for grissom, or the cost for crochet, or take your pick from last deadline like the Garcia trade, etc etc that concern me. It just feels like he gives in to another team’s ask a little too willingly perhaps

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          GA: Agreed. I am really only concerned about the Crochet trade so far. I think the main point of the Sale trade was to dump salary. I think they arrived at Grissom being part of the return after they settled on how much money the Red Sox would eat.

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          GA: To explain further about the Crochet trade, I am not worried about losing Meidroth or Gonzalez, but I am not sure if one or two top five prospects need to be traded (Teel and Montgomery).

          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          Suit: the piece of the crochet trade that sticks in my craw is Teel.

          There is not an alternate chip C prospect in the system coming up, and, FA doesn’t have anything particularly young and attainable on the horizon. You had a switch hitting impact bat at a premium position with a shortage of quality around the league, and, chi already had a C prospect in the wings anyways…. I’d have rather given up Mayer than Teel even, just from a replacability standpoint. I really think montgomery, meidroth, Gonzalez, and another prospect outside the top 5 should’ve gotten it done regardless. Teel should’ve been untouchable.

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          Teel looks like a good hitter. He is small for a catcher at 190 lbs. I wonder if they have doubts about him sticking as an every day catcher. I went to see the Sea Dogs last year and I saw someone in catcher’s gear warming up the pitcher in the outfield. I couldn’t see the name or number on the back of his jersey. I was wondering where the catcher was and why they had a little guy warming up the pitcher. It looked like smaller middle infielder and looked odd. Turns out it was Teel warming up the pitcher.

          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          4 months ago

          Varitek was 6’2″ 200#…

          Teel at his younger age is 6’1″ 190#…

          Personally, don’t think the size will be an issue.

          Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          Baseball Reference has Varitek at 230 lbs. I posted these in the Crochet trade article when I first speculated that Teel might be viewed as small for a catcher:

          Teel is 6’0″ and 190 lbs. Christian Vazquez is 5’9″ and 205 lbs. Adley Rutschman is 6’2″ and 230 lbs. Jose Trevino is 5’10” and 215 lbs. Buster Posey was 6’1″ and 213 lbs. Pudge Rodriguez was 5’9″ and 205 lbs. Jason Varitek was 6’2″ and 230 lbs. Carlton Fisk was 6’3″ and 200 lbs.

          Reply
      • JackStrawb

        4 months ago

        Pffft. If you’re not willing to overpay for a FA, you’ll always come in fourth on the bidding.

        Reply
        • all in the suit that you wear

          4 months ago

          No kidding, Jack. If you don’t overpay when others are overpaying, you won’t win the bidding. Your comment has nothing to do with my comment which was overpaying can come back to haunt you.

          Reply
    • Show all 21 replies
  15. jaysmooth2121

    4 months ago

    This team is loaded !

    1
    Reply
  16. sad tormented neglected mariners fan

    4 months ago

    The Los Angeles deferrals strike again with the 23 million

    11
    Reply
    • g0blue

      4 months ago

      but also 23m bonus! Any team who believes in their product going forward can do the same!

      6
      Reply
  17. showmebb

    4 months ago

    Thought the Dodgers were going to move on?I’m sure I’ve read that here.

    3
    Reply
    • Wren

      4 months ago

      all part of the game and this is a rumor site but if you don’t think they had back up plans to back up plans you don’t follow the team.

      1
      Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      They would have if need be. But the new what his market was. They have a lil experience in signing free agents. They knew he would come crawling back.

      Reply
  18. Goetta

    4 months ago

    Plain and simple, baseball is lawless and out of control. Big markets buy championships while 90% of the league operates as a farm system for the factory. It’s a tarnished game because of money. Playing field is not equal.

    22
    Reply
    • Gmen777

      4 months ago

      Players union will never let a salary cap be implemented even with a salary floor unfortunately

      4
      Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        4 months ago

        Gmen: agree but because owners will not truly open their books.

        2
        Reply
      • phenomenalajs

        4 months ago

        I could see them agreeing to a $400M cap and a $100M floor while leaving the penalty tiers in place. It’s the smaller market teams that may balk at the floor.

        1
        Reply
        • cecildawg

          4 months ago

          I vote for you.

          Reply
        • cecildawg

          4 months ago

          I’d vote for you.

          Reply
        • cecildawg

          4 months ago

          I vote for you. (3rd time(?)

          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          4 months ago

          Democrat?

          1
          Reply
        • JackStrawb

          4 months ago

          There’s yet to be a study showing salary floors accomplish anything at all except raise salaries a bit.

          Were the A’s going to go anywhere in the last three seasons if they’d had to add a $20m AAV 3-win corner OFer?

          Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          4 months ago

          fox471-Hahahaha! He did vote 3 times. Was he also seen around any old folks homes?

          1
          Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Yep if you can get a top 5 gm and top 5 player development you can make playoffs somewhat regularly, anything can happen in a 3 5 game series and maybe even a 7 game series.

        Royals are only small market to win it all and small markets are still spending the same as they did in 2015 while everyone else is spending 200m even 230 250 300 but it’s still theoretically possible.

        1
        Reply
      • Rays in the Bay

        4 months ago

        A cap and floor are desperately needed, but the damage is done. Aside from that, the owners won’t allow a floor and the players won’t allow a cap. An impasse of two big groups with oversized egos and no compromise.

        2
        Reply
    • Begamin

      4 months ago

      we had the royals, cubs, rangers, astros, nationals, cardinals, giants win the WS within the last 10-15 years or so. what are we complaining about? something needs to be done about deferrals but something also needs to be done about billionaires refusing to invest in their team. wompwomp

      6
      Reply
      • TheGr8One

        4 months ago

        Nothing needs to be done about deferrals the dodgers are mortgaging the future for the now. There will be a time they are paying close to 100 million a year for players they don’t have anymore. And they’re right to do it cause what they bank with the two more rings they win at minimum will pay for those years. They’re choice. Nothing need change.

        5
        Reply
        • Simm

          4 months ago

          Thegr8one- you do realize that they have to put the deferred money into an account? They put it into an account that gains interest. So by the time they pay the deferred money it’s already been paid and made more money.

          They are dodging luxury tax and gaining interest on the deferred money at the same time. There is no finding the money at the end.

          7
          Reply
        • bluesteele

          4 months ago

          They aren’t mortgaging the future! Deferral are about investments today that pay for a future contract. Money in hand, makes money. $500M making 10% a year in the market today pays for itself. That’s the genius behind it. It has nothing to do with leveraging the future.

          2
          Reply
        • Diggydugler

          4 months ago

          You dont understand deferrals. They are not mortgaging the future, the money is paid upfront each year into escrow, there is zero downside to the team to defer. The issue is most teams cant get players to defer because most teams cant get the players period.

          Reply
        • TheGr8One

          4 months ago

          You say i don’t understand deferrals that’s silly you don’t understand the luxury tax. Doesn’t matter if it “makes” them money it’s still 100 million dollar tax hit for zero players. By then 40 million dollar contracts will be the norm and they still need to field a team. That will put them behind the field.

          1
          Reply
        • TheGr8One

          4 months ago

          You don’t understand the luxury tax. 100 million dollars for zero players it’s still a tax hit. Start your team from scratch while 100 million behind everyone else they are absolutely mortgaging the future.

          Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3

          4 months ago

          Yes, you’re right, mortgaging some of the future, for one glorious 10yr run.

          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          4 months ago

          They pay for it now. At today’s value. And because they pay for it now there is no tax consideration. It’s literally a zero-sum game. Future definitely not being mortgaged

          1
          Reply
        • TheGr8One

          4 months ago

          It’s not a zero sum game you’re talking only in cash. Luxury tax for these contracts are still on the books. These people will be retired and count against the tax. How is that not behind the 8 ball?

          Reply
        • Simm

          4 months ago

          Great- that’s not true. They are taking the tax hit today but at a reduced rate because of future value. They won’t be paying a tax on Ohtani in 10 years.

          Reply
        • TheGr8One

          4 months ago

          Yea exactly that’s what they are doing. It will be a glorious run and it will die and then it will hurt. It’s their call to do this others are choosing not to.

          Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          4 months ago

          Luxury tax is paid for at the time due to actual value of the contracts when they are signed. When the playing careers of these players is finished the taxes are 100% paid.
          The money is set aside now, the taxes are paid as they come due as calculated by MLB and MLBPA. There is nothing hanging over the team when the contracts are completed.

          1
          Reply
        • Simm

          4 months ago

          No not at all. You act like on 10 years from now they have to start finding the money to pay Ohtani.

          10 years from now Ohtani will have zero lux tax hits and the money he is owed has already been set aside on an interest baring account. So by the time the dodgers pay it, it cost even less.

          There is no mortgaging the future happening. The money is already be paid deposited today.

          Reply
        • Simm

          4 months ago

          Dropped- exactly

          Reply
        • JerseyShoreScore

          4 months ago

          Fortunately, the Dodgers are generating enough revenue to offset any future obligations. Ohtani revenue alone is going to hit over a billion PRIOR to paying any deferments..

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          4 months ago

          @TheGr8One MLB has rules on how These deferalls are funded. The $ needed to accrue to the value at collection has to be funded annually as the deferalls are taking place. So These deferalls are being funded now. The players collect later. Teams are not just putting kicking the can down the road on paying these.

          Reply
        • pepenas34

          4 months ago

          Dodgers are being lux tax today and for the first 10 years 46MM, there won’t be lux tax for the years 11-20.
          The opposite would be, Why if Ohtani is been paid 2MM is been taxed 46MM?

          Reply
        • fox471 Dave

          4 months ago

          Not to mention what Ohtani generates for the organization. Dodgers will be fine.

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          4 months ago

          @TheGr8 They do not count against luxury tax when collecting deferred money. The principal needed to fund deferral is counted each year along with signing bonus divided amongst playing years of the contract.

          A good example would be Snell’s CBA hit last year which can b found on FanGraphs. The amount paid the cost to fund the little bit of deferral and entire signing bonus all fell on last season. He opted out of 2nd year so the one season became lone year of his contract.

          Reply
      • Goetta

        4 months ago

        Rangers, Astros, Cubs, Nationals and Giants are not small market teams so point not valid. Just look at their payrolls compared to the rest of the league when they won. Show me where the Brewers, Reds, Pittsburgh, Tampa, Oakland, Minnesota…. And so on and so on have won anything. They haven’t. Blame ownership, fine. But the way the rules are skewed for big markets to continually reach the playoffs is obvious.

        5
        Reply
    • barrelup

      4 months ago

      Fair amount of different teams have won championships in the past 25 years. Higher than the capped leagues even with the (still) most exclusive playoff system.

      2
      Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      4 months ago

      Cry us a river commies.

      1
      Reply
    • Johnny Devil

      4 months ago

      The starters are hardly scary and the defense is brutal. Repeat bwaaaa bwaaaa bwaaaa bwaaaa bwaaaa bwaaaa

      Reply
      • taran7

        4 months ago

        Hmmm somehow they won the Series with that defense and those starters

        Reply
    • belowme29

      4 months ago

      Go cry to your teams owner. Every owner in baseball has money and they don’t want to spend.

      1
      Reply
    • differentbears

      4 months ago

      MLB has had more “different” teams win the title than the NBA or NFL since 2001. I think it’s 16 different teams, out of 30 total.

      2
      Reply
      • WadeBoggsWildRide

        4 months ago

        differentbears- Commies don’t understand actual outcomes or facts. It just feels unfair when their teams lose so it has to mean the system is unfair. Baseball has more parity than any other sport. In the NBA and NFL is is not uncommon for a team to win or lose 80% of their games. That is lopsided as hell. In baseball a team that wins 60% is very good.

        1
        Reply
    • unpaidobserver

      4 months ago

      Have to think however that the luxury tax tiers have actually prevented teams from spending all their money on terrible players.

      I hate the inequity in the game but contracts more often go sour than work out and them not working out gets worse the bigger the contract.

      Reply
    • Show all 40 replies
  19. Candlestoked

    4 months ago

    May the entire organization and its fans spend an eternity writhing in a flaming, decaying pit of fecal horror!

    8
    Reply
    • Niekro floater

      4 months ago

      Just a game, dude.

      3
      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        We are willing to sign up for that. Just as long as the fecal horror is deferred!

        3
        Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      You already are Stoked. You already are.

      1
      Reply
    • energel

      4 months ago

      I wouldnt go that far, but it really is annoying

      Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        4 months ago

        Be happy energel. Dodgers won’t get their hands on Skenes for another 5 years yet.

        4
        Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          why do people not think Pirates wont extend him… Pirates are big on extensions

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          4 months ago

          relax dude. just joshing. Skenes is terrific. enjoy him.

          (but he does come from Fullerton CA) wink wink.

          1
          Reply
        • energel

          4 months ago

          also not trying to be rude or mad, sorry if it came off that way, just very passionate for the buccos and skenes.
          and oh yeah I’ll enjoy him

          1
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 months ago

          Does he have Boras as his agent?

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          4 months ago

          Not Boras. Rafa Nieves is Teo’s agent.

          Reply
        • Rays in the Bay

          4 months ago

          @energel

          We’ll see. Pirates are like the Rays. Extend him, give him no supporting cast, fail to meet expectations, and then traded (or let walk in FA). Unfortunately it’s the fate for all small market teams

          1
          Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          4 months ago

          They can’t afford that extension.

          Reply
        • rmullig2

          4 months ago

          I think Livvy would rather be in LA than Pittsburgh.

          Reply
    • belowme29

      4 months ago

      May God cure your mind and soul. Sad to see people talk this way if it’s only a game for human kind to be entertained. God bless you

      2
      Reply
      • JackStrawb

        4 months ago

        May God cure your blathering ego?

        Cheers,

        1
        Reply
    • cecildawg

      4 months ago

      A giants fan, lol. At least you had Willie,

      Reply
      • JackStrawb

        4 months ago

        And Juan. And Willie. Orlando, Felipe, Matty, Jesus…

        1
        Reply
    • cecildawg

      4 months ago

      Yikes. Kinda side ways yout.

      Reply
    • Rays in the Bay

      4 months ago

      Hahaha!!

      Reply
  20. Big whiffa

    4 months ago

    That’s light contract ! Less than 15 mil per over 3 years with some deferred money. How’s there not a dozen teams in in this guy for that cost ?? Yet he gets no buzz

    Seems like LA and NYC are only two cities that can afford MLB free agents. Smh

    4
    Reply
    • wvsteve

      4 months ago

      He wanted to be a Dodger. Plain and simple.

      5
      Reply
      • PierceIn

        4 months ago

        “He wanted to be a Dodger. Plain and simple.”

        Exactly right. All the whining about deferrals/’buying rings’/etc. overlooks the dirty little secret that’s right out in the open:

        Players want to play there.

        In fact, some of them want to play there (or remain there) so much the Dodgers actually get a price break.

        2
        Reply
    • TigersLoveCinnamon

      4 months ago

      Where are you getting 15 million per? 3/66 is 22, even if you include the fourth year at 15 is still 4/81 which is still 20.25

      4
      Reply
      • Big whiffa

        4 months ago

        23 mil deferred. So 3/43 is all he got over life of contract with 23 up front. So less than 7 mil per if u take out signing bonus

        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          4 months ago

          the signing bonus is amortized over the length of the contract

          Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Other teams didn’t want to give up draft pick for a good not great not young player.

        Reply
        • TigersLoveCinnamon

          4 months ago

          @dream He wasn’t issued a QO

          2
          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 months ago

          @TigersLoveCinnamon the fake news strikes again then. Or Mandela effect. In my timeline it was reported he got a QO

          1
          Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          4 months ago

          Your timeline jives with mine Dream

          1
          Reply
        • TigersLoveCinnamon

          4 months ago

          Okay I’m dumb, you got me

          1
          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 months ago

          @TigersLoveCinnamon Impressive honesty. Well done. I would have played I’m from a different multiverse card.

          1
          Reply
    • bluesteele

      4 months ago

      Nope. Go look at owner profits last year. LA and NY are the only ones spending what they make. If you want to shake your head, go see what Boston pocketed instead of investing on players!! Even the smallest markets aren’t hurting.

      4
      Reply
      • wvsteve

        4 months ago

        Where do you see what each team profited?

        1
        Reply
        • Simm

          4 months ago

          In his dreams

          2
          Reply
        • bluesteele

          4 months ago

          Does no one know facts on here?? Last year MLB teams made an average of 378M in revenue. The Boston Red Sox made 500M in 2023 and spent less than 200M in 2024. You want to blame LA for spending their money or Boston for pocketing it???

          5
          Reply
        • bluesteele

          4 months ago

          Research is hard for ya huh @Simm? Lol. I love uneducated people who post.

          Reply
        • PutPeteinthehall

          4 months ago

          Would you believe they have expenses other than player payroll?

          1
          Reply
        • bluesteele

          4 months ago

          Yeah, I think we all understand the definition of profit! Would you like me to do all the research for you? Do a simple google search on owner profits and payroll boys. I use the Red Sox because it’s an obvious money grab. One little search on the WWW will show you I’m right. OR you can just add dumb comments and think you’re smart.

          Reply
        • Simm

          4 months ago

          Only two teams have open books. So any of this is speculation.

          The gap between the haves and have nots is massive.

          3
          Reply
        • TheGr8One

          4 months ago

          So they invested 40% of their revenue back into the business? I can find you tons of businesses below that

          1
          Reply
        • Oldhalo

          4 months ago

          @bluesteele out of curiosity, what is your source on the RSox, what is debt owed and what were profits? That paints a better picture than Revenue alone and profit would be more useful information if we’re drawing comparisons.

          1
          Reply
        • Simm

          4 months ago

          Nobody knows the Red Sox profits. People just like to report rev that Forbes or some place guessed at.

          3
          Reply
      • stymeedone

        4 months ago

        MLB team books are not public, except for Atlanta. Whose speculation are you looking at? Would you care to reveal your source?

        2
        Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          4 months ago

          More large market apologists just making s*** up.

          Reply
    • Show all 24 replies
  21. CTS4

    4 months ago

    Hey Lousy GM shapiro …WAKE UP !!

    2
    Reply
  22. Rsox

    4 months ago

    Will the Sox pivot to Santander or sit on their hands? Stay tuned…

    Reply
    • Joemo

      4 months ago

      Oh I think the major off-season moves are done for the Sox.

      The lineup really needs a RHB in the middle of the order and this was the obvious answer and they whiffed yet again.

      Reply
      • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

        4 months ago

        I hope not. If they want to be competitive they need to get another bat. I would also like to see one more piece added to the bullpen.

        Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        1 sox doesn’t need outfielders, the other really doesn’t either but they are rebuilding anyways.

        Reply
    • all in the suit that you wear

      4 months ago

      I doubt the Red Sox are adding an outfielder until they unload Yoshida’s 3 years/$54M remaining contract. They might not add Bregman until they unload that. They apparently won’t just eat his salary.

      1
      Reply
      • roob

        4 months ago

        Red Sox are loaded with outfielders. I think they’re gonna have a great year. I like their moves.

        2
        Reply
      • Uncle Pedro’s Dancing Kittens

        4 months ago

        I still think there is someone willing to take a shot with Yoshida, probably need to sweeten the pot with either money or a prospect or take back a bad contract. I certainly hope they are not done with making moves.

        1
        Reply
  23. kgcubs

    4 months ago

    Aloha folks, crazy that on a smaller contract of this size with a team that rakes in the revenue, they’d need Teoscar to defer 1/3 of this contract. I’m amazed he went for this. Mahalo

    3
    Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      4 months ago

      It’s a loophole mechanism for teams to reduce AAV for luxury tax purposes. They’re also giving him a $23M signing bonus so I don’t think Teo has any personal net losses as a result of the deferrals. I’d imagine that other teams offered more but guess he likes the Dodgers.

      5
      Reply
      • kgcubs

        4 months ago

        Aloha Yankees, I hear you and understand it’s a loophole. I wonder in the next CBA agreement if this will be dealt with. I’m pretty sure no one thought a player given a $700mil deal would have 97% of it deferred. I’ve said to folks maybe a hard line of up to 15% deferred for no more than 5yrs. I didn’t have an issue with the size of the deal but you as the signing team must assume all the responsibilities of lost draft picks, paying the luxury tax to the league, etc. This loophole allows the team to “escape” some of those penalties and no says anything out of the MLB headquarters. So go ahead and sign Shohei, Snell and Teoscar but adhear to the rules as intended and accept the consequences. If LA couldn’t get around this, I wonder if they sign all these folks? Just a question. Take care now and have a Happy New year! Mahalo

        1
        Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          4 months ago

          Aloha KC! You too! I’m sure it will be addressed but this is a team owners’ problem. 2024 MLB salaries totaled close to $6B and Forbes estimates that MLB had $11.6B in revenues in 2023. I’m not sure what the solution is but players don’t want their share of the pie to shrink while league revenues continue to rise.

          2
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 months ago

          Please. Revenue and profit are different. Everyone is quick to point out revenue, but expenses are seldom mentioned. Player salaries are but one part. Did you know expenses continue to rise, also. Grocery stores have a much higher revenue than MLB, but after expenses are around 3% for profit. Not trying to make a comparison, just saying large revenues don’t automatically mean large profit.

          1
          Reply
        • YankeesBleacherCreature

          4 months ago

          Most people are aware of what net income is.

          1
          Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Teo is fine. He seen all the offers. Took the most appealing. Would you really want to give him 22m a year and lose draft pick? So 22m a year deferred in LA was probably the best offer or close enough to play where you are comfortable and have the best odds to win.

        Reply
      • BlueSkies_LA

        4 months ago

        Here we go again, and again, and again. No, it is not a “loophole.” In fact, if you read the CBA (and some of us actually have), deferred salaries are treated as loans to the team, which are required to pay the player a set fixed interest annually. You’d think that anyone who has ever paid or been paid interest would immediately understand this concept… but no. And no, this doesn’t need to be “fixed” in the CBA. Both the players and the teams like having this option. No team is forced to offer a deferral and no player is forced to take one. They both do it as a matter of financial self-interest.

        2
        Reply
  24. mad1

    4 months ago

    1 billion in deferrals

    Reply
    • bluesteele

      4 months ago

      I hope so. That’s the smart business way to do it.

      Reply
  25. TheGr8One

    4 months ago

    More dodger deferrals lose your minds fans of teams that aren’t doing the same but could.

    3
    Reply
  26. GMoney28

    4 months ago

    66 M for an aging DH w/ platoon and K issues. Woof

    1
    Reply
    • DarrenDreifortsContract

      4 months ago

      When you’re giving players 700 million. You’re not really worried about 66 million lol.

      2
      Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      @Gmoney
      hahahahahahahah

      love to know what squad you pull for.

      2
      Reply
    • taran7

      4 months ago

      He doesn’t platoon, got many, many clutch hits for LA, including post season, was a joy in the clubhouse, and in one year surpassed Mookie as my favorite Dodger.

      2
      Reply
    • JackStrawb

      4 months ago

      Who just put up a 4.3 WAR season and by NPV is probably getting less than a 20m AAV.

      Aw, are you crying?

      1
      Reply
  27. Skruf

    4 months ago

    AMEN!!!

    Reply
  28. Niekro floater

    4 months ago

    Fu#k Yea ! Now Roki… Go Dodgers !

    2
    Reply
    • boostreet

      4 months ago

      Omg, I actually forgot that they’re going to get him too. To the victors….

      Reply
  29. Bivouac-Sal

    4 months ago

    HOO F-IN RAY!

    Reply
  30. jimij

    4 months ago

    Reds sit idle, watching the best outfielders disappear, this team needs a solid bat in outfield and someone with proven home runs, soon the bottom will drop, it’s over, this team has only a few years to succeed with the young guys

    1
    Reply
    • boostreet

      4 months ago

      So many Reds fans in the comments. Reds are not in this league; this is not about the Reds. Just because they grew some talent doesn’t mean there will suddenly be money for FA’s (or that free agents would choose Ohio over LA).

      Reply
      • WadeBoggsWildRide

        4 months ago

        Reds fans have it pretty rough. I would take Ohio over CA. One of the last free states.

        2
        Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      Yeah. We are discussing the real teams still. Once NY LA get all the best players we can pivot to the reds and talk about the scraps they picked up.

      Reply
      • Johnny Devil

        4 months ago

        A dream gm in your own mind please self mute and save us all from your ridiculous and shallow minded thoughts on the trivial tidbits you spit out as relevant to the ongoing conversation. They,in fact, are amusing but really embarrassing to your parents.

        Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 months ago

          Amusing is enough for me

          1
          Reply
        • Johnny Devil

          4 months ago

          Also liking your own comment is self amusing also.

          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 months ago

          Put 100k in escrow and I will live stream taking it to 2. Oh that’s right you’re a broke loser.

          Reply
        • Johnny Devil

          4 months ago

          Your frustration is showing. I will debate you anytime.

          1
          Reply
      • WadeBoggsWildRide

        4 months ago

        Hahaha! What about the Pirates what kind of scraps will they end up with?

        1
        Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 months ago

          It’s getting bad. Back in the good ole days these richer teams were dum dums. They would have given Alonso 200m and Walker 100m. Pirates would have gotten Goldy Santana. It’s a good thing they can somewhat develop pitching now. Because the days of getting #4 starters like Anderson Quintana Velazquez for 3m are over. Cohen will give em 20m.

          Pirates traded trash and got a all star platoon at 1b in Horowitz. Maybe they do he same for outfield. Or Winker is more valuable to Pittsburgh than anyone else so maybe they splurge on him. Profar that would really be a splurge so won’t bet on that. At worse I hope they sign 2 of the 4 remaining weak platoon all stars. Jack Suwinski was a platoon all star before hitting coach messed him up. So they could have a all star platoon if they can #GetJackBack They should have signed Tauchman. Maybe get Hayes.

          1
          Reply
  31. DarrenDreifortsContract

    4 months ago

    The rich get richer! Welcome home Uncle Teo!

    162-0 begins now!

    3
    Reply
  32. Cap & Crunch

    4 months ago

    Mookie is really going to be the Ss vs all righties, its been in the picture frame the whole time, but really setting in today

    Should be fun for us to watch how this transition goes, an adventure of sorts

    Reply
    • belowme29

      4 months ago

      Next on the dodgers MENU. Arrenado, Kike, and Tanner Scott. Let’s Go Dodgers

      Reply
      • DroppedThirdStrike

        4 months ago

        Scott is a low percentage ‘maybe’.
        Kike is a ‘no’.
        Arenado is a ‘hell no’.

        Reply
        • WadeBoggsWildRide

          4 months ago

          I really hope they get Kike. All he needed was glasses. Even if they don’t need him.

          Reply
  33. Jordan 5

    4 months ago

    One more Hernandez to go

    1
    Reply
    • Wren

      4 months ago

      hope they figure a way to keep him around too. I think he made a speech in SD that turned it around. just speculation on my part but it seemed like that happened

      Reply
  34. YankeesBleacherCreature

    4 months ago

    This is lower than I expected for his AAV after the deferrals.

    Reply
  35. johncoltrane

    4 months ago

    LA deferrals with a steal of a deal

    Reply
  36. DarrenDreifortsContract

    4 months ago

    I’m really surprised he came back. He must not have had many offers and obviously no one wanting to give him a 4 year deal.

    But I’m glad he’s back.

    2
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      Just not worth losing draft pick for. Limited his earnings.

      Reply
  37. Mickey Solis

    4 months ago

    The most sickening and predictable news of the day. This loser knows he’s nothing without the purchased superstars around him. All that BS about being far apart on a deal was smoke for fans to believe that someone other than these scumbags were going to get him. He was almost going to come crawling back to daddy. I’m sure he led these other teams on like a c***tease so the moneybags would throw a few extra dollars his way. Shut this stupid league down now before we have to see 6 straight World Series titles by these greedy pigs.

    7
    Reply
    • Cap & Crunch

      4 months ago

      Breath

      9
      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Just 6 straight division titles. Someone is bound to win a playoff series against them at some point in 6 years.

        1
        Reply
        • Mickey Solis

          4 months ago

          I hope you’re right but they’re just going to keep buying and buying and other teams will give up

          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 months ago

          @Mickey 6 years is still small sample. They could go 6 for 6. I won’t bet on it. Still though just getting to playoffs as a favorite is huge. You will get your share.

          Reply
    • mkeving

      4 months ago

      What a pathetic baby tantrum you’re throwing here. He’s a grown man that chose where he wants to play and you go ahead and grow up while you’re at it.

      9
      Reply
    • TrillionaireTeamOperator

      4 months ago

      Wow…. Maybe take a break from baseball. Noms if this actually matters and it doesn’t seem like you’re particularly entertained by what’s supposed to just be harmless entertainment when push comes to shove.

      2
      Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      Oh how I LOVE to see Mickey Solis seethe.

      I’d tell you once again to seek professional help but apparently you enjoy your anguish as much as the rest of us enjoy reading your posts.

      5
      Reply
      • Mickey Solis

        4 months ago

        How do you support this team and what they’re doing, seriously? I can understand in 2017, when they mostly built from within. But what they’re doing now is inherently an insane advantage that only a few teams have. They’re not “smarter than everyone else,” maybe only the few teams that can actually spend, and being in LA they also have the advantage of weather and prestige teams can’t match. I just can’t believe as fans you don’t find it to at least take away from their success. Building a super team with unlimited funds isn’t some accomplishment the fans should feel proud of.

        Reply
    • DigglinDickers

      4 months ago

      Will Mickey be able to handle it when LA signs Tanner Scott next?

      4
      Reply
      • DroppedThirdStrike

        4 months ago

        He couldn’t handle it when they extended their utility infielder, so…

        2
        Reply
      • Mickey Solis

        4 months ago

        Scott and Sasaki, I’m glad DraftKings gave me odds on those two. Who else is on your wish list in the future? Hopefully teams will just start handing you players and stop showing up for games.

        Reply
    • DarrenDreifortsContract

      4 months ago

      In the previous 3 seasons before he joined the Dodgers he was averaging over 27 homers and over 95 rbi lol.

      Reply
    • cencal

      4 months ago

      Let the hate flow through you!!

      You don’t know the power of the Dark Side Mickey!!!

      Reply
    • taran7

      4 months ago

      Maybe switch from baseball to bowling, cut back to every other day on the cocaine, toss the tequila and buy some wine.

      3
      Reply
    • fox471 Dave

      4 months ago

      Hey, mickey solis checked in. Missed ya buddy. Only a couple more days and your grammar school’s Christmas vacation is over. Did Santa bring you some cool stuff? Hope so.

      2
      Reply
    • BurnerK

      4 months ago

      As contorted as a flakka dance down the Santa Monica pier.

      Just watch the game and enjoy. Considering the paychecks going around this man is not overpaid.

      Reply
  38. yanks2323

    4 months ago

    More to the deferral pile for the LA Deferrals! Nicely done!

    2
    Reply
  39. In nurse follars

    4 months ago

    Id like to see one division of 32 teams playing a completely balanced schedule where the top 7 teams make the playoffs and the best record gets a bye. That will do away with less than the best record making the playoffs and do away with the division based scheduling disparities. No more bogus regional rivalries or bogus notions of an american or national league. One division of 32.

    1
    Reply
    • Cap & Crunch

      4 months ago

      Indivisible, with liberty and justice for all

      3
      Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      4 months ago

      The reason they have an imbalanced schedule is because of travel time. Otherwise they would only be doing 120 games or something like that.

      2
      Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      Would destroy a dozen tv markets so not happening. Just get rid of both central divisions other than the cubs. Hard to support the product as is. Without the dream of winning the mediocre central and beating your rivals why care.

      Reply
    • rmullig2

      4 months ago

      I’m sure you can set that up in a video game but in real life nobody else wants that.

      2
      Reply
  40. Mercenary.Freddie.Freeman

    4 months ago

    These deferrals are getting out of hand and is quite laughable.

    3
    Reply
  41. mad1

    4 months ago

    Might as well go ahead and defer Burnes 400 million at this point

    1
    Reply
    • l9ydodger

      4 months ago

      @mad1; excellent idea!!

      Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      Not enough k rate for LA or they would!

      Reply
  42. TAKERDBACKS

    4 months ago

    No one but dodger fans care about this team buying everyone and paying them until old age. It’s disgusting and it’s making other teams not spend as much cause some feel there is a budget and what’s the point if this team has 50 all stars

    2
    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      if memory serves the Snakes couldn’t finish ahead of the Friars in ’24.. but I remember an awful lot of crowing from you when the Dbacks made the Series in ’23.

      4
      Reply
      • TAKERDBACKS

        4 months ago

        Guess it doesn’t serve you right at all wrong perspn

        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          4 months ago

          try again in English

          2
          Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      @ takerexpert

      two words:

      Corbin Burnes

      Reply
  43. cards1994

    4 months ago

    Baseball should do away with deferred contracts. If a team is willing to spend, by all means do it but money should not allowed to be deferred.

    5
    Reply
    • O'sSayCanYouSee

      4 months ago

      Nationals won a WS on the back of lots of deferred money. As long as all teams can do it, why not?

      5
      Reply
    • JerseyShoreScore

      4 months ago

      You probably work for the California state government. The only losers with deferrals is the California State Treasury. Players are beating California out of millions in of state revenue, as their rate is 13.3 percent. Ohtani might be saving up to 90 million state taxes.

      5
      Reply
      • O'sSayCanYouSee

        4 months ago

        Jersey — Interesting take, I hadn’t thought about the Tax ramifications. As if states don’t already pay the owners 100s of millions.

        Reply
      • WadeBoggsWildRide

        4 months ago

        Pretty sure CA taxes you for income earned in state regardless of where you live. You can get exemptions based on the taxes you pay where you live so you aren’t “double taxed”. It is pretty lame. Communism is not good.

        Reply
  44. Dash 2

    4 months ago

    Chris Rock once said that rooting for the Yankees to win the World Series is like rooting for Bill Gates to win the lottery. I’d also add that rooting for the Dodgers to win the World Series again is like rooting for Elon Musk to win the lottery.

    8
    Reply
    • g0blue

      4 months ago

      We don’t claim Elon, that fool went to Texas. keep him.

      2
      Reply
      • Wren

        4 months ago

        yeah he’s some fool. please tell us more. actually don’t and keeping your politics to yourself is a virtue. btw you lost.

        1
        Reply
        • g0blue

          4 months ago

          what are you talking about? Live under a rock? Dodgers won it all baby!

          1
          Reply
        • Wren

          4 months ago

          swing and a miss!

          Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      4 months ago

      I would love it if Elon won the lotto. That would be absolutely hilarious.

      Reply
  45. Salzilla

    4 months ago

    Good for Teo! It was a good fit. The Ohtani bromance continues!

    *finally got a 4th one right in the contest lol. I was 3/4 and then a massive slide. Tough rookie year! (For the contest, been commenting for years, following more)

    1
    Reply
  46. TrillionaireTeamOperator

    4 months ago

    Very fair deal for player and team and man the Dodgers with all those deferrals. How do they talk players into it and why aren’t more teams taking this approach!?

    1
    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      4 months ago

      I assume other teams offered more but Teoscar took less + deferrals for ez rings and LA lifestyle and no pressure as he is like the 5th best hitter compared to 1st or 2nd on other teams.

      Reply
      • TrillionaireTeamOperator

        4 months ago

        LA lifestyle ain’t all that and most of these guys generally live elsewhere in the offseason. I do agree he went with a team that gave him better odds at more rings/pistons season berths.

        1
        Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        In my timeline he had a QO. Teams have to factor in that loss if signing him. So offer him less. He isn’t young or great. Even then then they just can’t match the $. He is already comfortable with LA vs a unknown. If he likes winning what better place. And if he hates winning I am sure he still enjoys his share of playoff $. So is he worth 23 24 25 26 million and losing draft picks signing $ luxury tax $. Whatever. Would be like paying him 30 million a year for some teams.

        Reply
  47. g0blue

    4 months ago

    LET’S GO DODGERS! now for the emotional signing, bring Kiké back!

    3
    Reply
    • JackStrawb

      4 months ago

      GET YOUNGER!

      Reply
  48. Wren

    4 months ago

    this is great news! what a team and still other moves out there!

    1
    Reply
  49. mets1977

    4 months ago

    What’s a little more deferred money between friends. Lost count of the total deferrals they have now

    1
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      It might be getting to a point they could just buy another franchise with deferred $. Maybe not Mets but Marlins Pirates or something.

      1
      Reply
  50. TAKERDBACKS

    4 months ago

    I’ll also say as a dodger fan are you really happy if you win? Did you really feel you earned it? Like those teams that have amazing chemistry and build it together from the farm or at least some cheaper free agents that were unexpected signings that did well? Not one fan is Impressed cause it’s expected and a failure if you don’t win. It may not seem like it yet but they are ruining the game and MLB is so far behind NFL and NBA they let it happen. Just unfortunate.

    2
    Reply
    • ernestg1

      4 months ago

      Yes.

      4
      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Are Yankees fans happy with their 27 championships. Yes they are. Same with dodgers. They don’t care about fairness.

        My favorite teams are Pirates Rays. I like a challenge. I am vast minority.

        Reply
    • Wren

      4 months ago

      its a juggernaut for sure but lbh here. anyone could have signed FF or Teo or Shohei and Boston traded Betts to the team. Snell was there for any team as well. team continually grabs other teams leftovers like Muncy and Treinen as well as the entire bp mostly. seems like the team mentality is hitting on all cylinders. as a long time fan its pretty awesome to witness.

      2
      Reply
      • JackStrawb

        4 months ago

        Remember when Cohen was going to do this, but no decent GM would work for him the first three years?

        Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      awwww.

      not happy… ecstatic.

      1
      Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      4 months ago

      Yes I earned it.

      1
      Reply
    • VegasMoved

      4 months ago

      Yes, yes, and yes.

      1
      Reply
    • fox471 Dave

      4 months ago

      Such a sad little puppy, TAKERDBACKS is.

      Reply
  51. WadeBoggsWildRide

    4 months ago

    Can’t wait to see what this contract actually looks like. How many deferred years etc. Teo ended up giving them a discount.

    Reply
    • JackStrawb

      4 months ago

      Teoscar will also be cleaning the pools of the Guggenheim fellows, and is hoping the NPV of the deferred money ends up with him owing the Dodgers.

      Reply
  52. Greenwell

    4 months ago

    Wtf are the red Sox doing with missing out here? Right handed power hitting outfielder to replace oniel. Price seems very reasonable. God dang man! This sucks!

    Reply
    • larkraxm

      4 months ago

      He didn’t want to play for Boston. I’m sure they offered same/similar contract (probably without the deferrals). He just didn’t want to play for them. Sometimes you can offer Juan Soto more money and he still won’t pick Toronto.

      3
      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Hopefully they offered him less. Only way he wasn’t going back to LA is if LA didn’t want him.

        Reply
      • WadeBoggsWildRide

        4 months ago

        No one “picks” Toronto. Toronto picks you. Like herpes.

        2
        Reply
        • JackStrawb

          4 months ago

          Hey, you got George Springer for 6/150m!

          Too soon?

          Reply
    • cwsOverhaul

      4 months ago

      LAD were getting the last look no matter what. Boston or any fanbase can groan at its FO, but do you want to desperately pay for a guy in typical decline years so much that even they say no way we’ll come close?

      2
      Reply
    • belowme29

      4 months ago

      Don’t you think he wants to win another ring. He had an awesome chemistry with the team last year and I’m sure he wants to be part of it for a long time.

      1
      Reply
    • letitbelowenstein

      4 months ago

      “Missed out” on Teoscar and Burnes. Obviously the Soto chase was just a John Henry smokescreen saying “See? We really want to get some high-quality players.” Face it, the Sox are going back to 1965 very soon and fans will start staying away. It isn’t like the Pirates or Rockies. Boston is a big-market area and any team that refuses to improve will suffer for it.

      Reply
  53. energel

    4 months ago

    god i hate the dodgers

    5
    Reply
    • settledownitsjustagame

      4 months ago

      Curious to know: is it because they have ownership that spends money on a product that people want to pay to see? I’m a die hard Cubs fan and I wish the Ricketts would spend like this instead of just knowing fans will fill the ballpark regardless of product on the field.

      4
      Reply
      • energel

        4 months ago

        I wish everyteam would spend a little, so the free agent market is free game, salary cap would be nice, also salary floor as well. dodgers has over 300 million in salary, Pirates still in the 70-90 mil range, and they arnt even last.

        2
        Reply
    • PuttPutt⁰³

      4 months ago

      I feel you.

      MLB is such a joke.

      2
      Reply
      • fox471 Dave

        4 months ago

        And, yet, here you are.

        Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      didja also hate the kids who had dates for the Prom?

      1
      Reply
  54. Bivouac-Sal

    4 months ago

    🙂

    Reply
  55. iknoweverythingesq

    4 months ago

    YES!!!

    Reply
    • energel

      4 months ago

      ugg

      Reply
  56. Baseball_dude

    4 months ago

    Orioles sign Tyler O’Neil for 3 years $50 million, dodgers sign this guy for $66 with deferrals.. lol Os can’t do anything right lol

    2
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      I’ll take Oneil the money and draft picks.

      1
      Reply
  57. mustang

    4 months ago

    I maybe wrong but I don’t think the NY teams have used the “ deferred clause” as much as the Dodgers.
    I’m sure when they do MLB will do something about it.
    lol

    Reply
    • Simm

      4 months ago

      The dodgers are owned by a group that has 20x the money to play with as those NY teams.

      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Poor NY teams.

        Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      4 months ago

      Yankees have a long-held policy not doing them as well as no early extensions. The only exceptions were Robbie Cano, Luis Severino, and Aaron Hicks

      2
      Reply
      • Niekro floater

        4 months ago

        Since the ol man died Yanks prefer counting money to spending it on product. Yea they spend a lil, usually an overpay like Fried, but they’re not loading pinstripes up to be allstar team Dodgers are n they HAVE the money. Funny seeing mighty yanks crying poor. Cashman used up his coupon money.

        Reply
  58. PuttPutt⁰³

    4 months ago

    Real big surprise. Teoscar lands back with the MLB champs.

    Teams that have big money, they should just let those teams have who they want. It’s pretty much already like that.

    I’m so disgusted with Major League Bsseball.

    3
    Reply
    • energel

      4 months ago

      agreed

      Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      4 months ago

      You should quit

      1
      Reply
  59. Smelly_Cobb

    4 months ago

    Doyers are annoyingly aggressive this off-season

    Reply
  60. bravesfan

    4 months ago

    Stinks… dodgers just keep loading up on talent and what’s even more bothersome is that every other team in the league can do exactly what they are doing, perhaps to a lesser degree, but still very similar, and we are all pretending like the big bad dodgers are the only ones that can do it… it’s not true. You can see the financials of even the owners of the A’s…. They have plenty of money and if they would invest in their sports business, they’d be plenty successful. They just choose to be conservative instead of taking a little risk with it. But each and every team has the revenue and means to do what the dodgers are doing

    3
    Reply
    • energel

      4 months ago

      Ohtani’s salary (70$) is more than the Athletics (62$), wdym every team has a chance? MLB needs a salary cap and/or salary floor

      2
      Reply
      • WadeBoggsWildRide

        4 months ago

        Commie

        3
        Reply
  61. nicksc10

    4 months ago

    It’s pretty much LA v NY again. Everybody else is just playing for fun in the regular season.

    1
    Reply
    • Veejh

      4 months ago

      Yankees have won 1 WS since 2009. Dodgers have won 1 WS since 1998. No, 2020 does not count, the COVID season. Unless your team has gone thru the 162 gauntlet, it does not count.. So, they can keep spending, spending, spending, and losing, losing, losing. Keep your head up. MLB is not like other sports.

      2
      Reply
      • DroppedThirdStrike

        4 months ago

        Yes it counts. They all count. If you hoisted hardware at the end of the season, it counts. Period.

        2
        Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 months ago

        Why wouldn’t 2020 count? Were the Dodgers in jeopardy of not making the playoff tournament in a full season? I don’t think so.

        Reply
  62. WestVillageTiger

    4 months ago

    No real surprise and good takes here on Pages and Outman….

    Reply
  63. Niekro floater

    4 months ago

    This is story I been scanning “MLB Trade Rumors” for since Snell signing. Finally. All the Dodger haters, just imagine if your team was so hell bent on fielding best team out there. Gota respect that, they play within the rules. Gonna be fun year @Chavez Ravine. Go Dodgers !

    2
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 months ago

      If you are jealous of what they do just join them. You don’t need antenna on roof anymore. Can watch any team you want. And they are coming to a city near you.

      1
      Reply
  64. SteveFinleyEnthusiast

    4 months ago

    I’m surprised it took this long on the reunion. Really seemed like a great fit for both sides.

    Reply
  65. Pete Cruise

    4 months ago

    Awesome ,another banger off the board for the Jays.

    I hope this speeds up in the new year , so I don’t have to keep wondering if they have a chance on : Santander, Bregman or Burnes.

    Sign already so I don’t have to keep wondering pathetically like jays have a shot.

    Reply
  66. kodion

    4 months ago

    One important detail that applies, specifically to the Dodgers in this case, to spending limitations is that putting hard caps in place jeopardizes MLB’s Anti-trust Exemption.
    The only absolute certainty in baseball is that 100% of owners do not ever want that to come into question.

    3
    Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      4 months ago

      Excellent point. I don’t think many people know about the exemption.

      1
      Reply
  67. padam

    4 months ago

    “No other team rivals the potency of the L.A. lineup.”

    Arizona alone scored more last year than the Dodgers and one can argue they had an off year. Yankees, Mets, Braves, and Orioles I’d say would rival them offensively as well. Writers opinion, but certainly debatable.

    Reply
    • Simm

      4 months ago

      Mets and Yankees../zero chance.

      Healthy Braves team maybe and perhaps the O’s when all is going well.

      Reply
  68. DarkSide830

    4 months ago

    boo

    Reply
  69. rickoppelt

    4 months ago

    They can’t keep getting away with this!

    Reply
  70. swtnes34

    4 months ago

    More deferred money…can I pay for a team on credit too?

    Reply
  71. PrincessYuki

    4 months ago

    Enjoy the strikeouts. The Mariners sure did. The amount he struck out was the same as missing like 70 games.

    1
    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      Yuki,

      Dodgers must have overlooked that. Probably the glare of the championship trophy getting in their eyes.

      1
      Reply
      • letitbelowenstein

        4 months ago

        Or the price tag of the store-bought trophy poked them in the eye.

        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          4 months ago

          @letitbelowlife

          Thought you’d want to watch the trophy presentation and celebration again.

          Enjoy.

          mlb.com/video/dodgers-are-presented-with-the-world…

          Reply
    • fox471 Dave

      4 months ago

      Actually, strikeouts notwithstanding, most of us are enjoying the World Championship. Teoscar was a huge part of that.

      2
      Reply
  72. just_thinkin

    4 months ago

    Dang son.

    Reply
  73. Butter Biscuits

    4 months ago

    Teo simply didn’t want to leave

    Reply
  74. آلي مكبيل_.._.بيتزا بيبيروني آشتون كوتشر

    4 months ago

    Going to be very interesting once they sign Bregman, Pete Alonso, and Santander. Where will they go in the lineup? I “defer” to the Dodgers.

    1
    Reply
  75. Doral Silverthorn

    4 months ago

    The World Champs are better than they were last year on paper.

    1
    Reply
  76. Baseballisthebest

    4 months ago

    Got another one right in the FA contest.

    Reply
  77. fox471 Dave

    4 months ago

    Outstanding signing.

    1
    Reply
  78. DigglinDickers

    4 months ago

    I don’t ever want to see Outman take another at bat for LA again.

    Reply
  79. Rays in the Bay

    4 months ago

    Overpaid. Older players have decreasing numbers (especially after making bank) and he’ll mostly be a DH only player after next year. What will they do with him + Ohtani + Conforto? Conforto/Hernandez are getting older and reaching DH-only phases of their careers. If they take those spots, where does Ohtani fit in the field?

    Just seems like a lot of money for either bench players or depth players that can’t play defense. But if there’s one team that can afford to DFA a player making 22 mil, it’s the Dodgers. Who cares about plebian organizations like the Rays/Pirates/Reds? Seriously.

    Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      4 months ago

      Wonder when Taylor gets the axe?

      Reply
  80. TrillionaireTeamOperator

    4 months ago

    If I am reading this correctly with the signing bonus and deferrals, the present day annual salary for Teoscar Hernandez will be approximately $6.7M per season.

    What the rise of signing bonuse and deferrals really tell me is that these players are getting smarter about lifetime earnings and prefer one time lump sum payments upfront followed by longer term steady year over year income rather than the salaries they used to receive cut and dry per season only to have to be frustrated by the stagnant income and then adjusting to the lack of significant income after their playing days, or feeling frustrated by thw tamped down annual salaries they used to go for straight up.

    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      signing bonuses are counted in AAV for salary purposes. So is a portion of the deferrd bucks.

      1
      Reply
    • Johnny Devil

      4 months ago

      Take a breath.

      Reply
    • SteamyNipsMcCronk

      4 months ago

      Dawg, as a trillionaire team operator you don’t get contracts. Bonuses and deferred funds are counted. Just not the same way. Present value just says that player agents are getting better at getting continuous paydays.

      3
      Reply
      • TrillionaireTeamOperator

        4 months ago

        Dawg I fully get contracts and money I’m simply discussing players’ evolving approach to their career earnings.

        Reply
    • TrillionaireTeamOperator

      4 months ago

      You guys don’t get what my point is at all. I’m not talking about AAV or the luxury tax or any of that.

      I’m talking about how individual players prefer to structure their payment over time- upfront, during their active career and upon retirement.

      That’s all.

      Not judging or overthinking the team’s side of it.

      Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        4 months ago

        Trill…

        Too sane for the room.

        1
        Reply
        • TrillionaireTeamOperator

          4 months ago

          Bivouac-Sal — Respect, homie. Game recognize game.

          1
          Reply
        • TrillionaireTeamOperator

          4 months ago

          Since I can’t reply directly to YBC:

          Of course it’s better to get as much up front as possible, for investment purposes and present value etc, but that’s never how these contracts will work.

          At the same time a lot of players fully admit that they can basically live off their original rookie signing bonus and some of they arbitration salary and the free agency money is often just gravy on top of gravy on top of gravy if they aren’t dispersing it to family and charity.

          And yes of course teams such as the Dodgers love to get creative with salary structures to lower their luxury tax and make annual budgets easier, like when the Nationals were more known for deferral contracts.

          Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        4 months ago

        @Trill People smart with money will always take the lump sum. Reckless spenders will remain broke bc that backpay is going to pay off debt.

        The increase of structured deferrals is a function of teams not wanting to pay higher luxury taxes. Not the players’ choice in most cases.

        Reply
        • DroppedThirdStrike

          4 months ago

          Not even close to correct.

          Reply
        • TrillionaireTeamOperator

          4 months ago

          So then please enlighten me baseball team owner / assistant gm / accountant / Teoscar Hernandez himself.

          Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      4 months ago

      30 or so million in that first year can be invested and you are making $3m a year on interest.

      Reply
  81. Blue Baron

    4 months ago

    I’m just here for the whining of Dodger haters.

    2
    Reply
  82. stugots

    4 months ago

    Teoscar is a poor fielder and sure had good production at the plate. I feel they can get the production from Andy Pages who’s young and better fielder, now got no playing time unless there injuries.

    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      @stu

      Barring more action from Friedman, I see Pages platooning with Conforto.

      Reply
  83. seamaholic 2

    4 months ago

    If Taylor wins the 2B job the Dodgers’ lowest salary for the starting 10 on opening day will be Edman’s $8.3m, the only one under $10m. That won’t change until they need a fifth starting pitcher. I don’t understand how Dodger (and Met and Yankee) fans find it enjoyable to root for teams like that. Just me.

    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      seama…

      Lux will be the 2B not Taylor And Lux makes 1.225 mill

      And as for it being enjoyable to be a Dodger fan…there is nothing better. I suffered through many years –decades–of the Dodgers not winning. And it was still great to be a Dodger fan. Now? It’s f-in FANTASTIC.

      Every fan wants his team to put the best possible team on the field. At bottom, what they earn I couldn’t care less. The more the merrier.

      But you go right on judging.

      7
      Reply
      • mkeving

        4 months ago

        You get to cheer for a team that puts the money back on the field instead of the owner’s pockets. It’s like loving someone who loves you back, just works and feels better.

        5
        Reply
    • Blue Baron

      4 months ago

      seamaholic: I’ve been a Mets fan since my first game in 1968. Rooting for them is a function of loyalty, not payroll.

      3
      Reply
      • seamaholic 2

        4 months ago

        Ok, I guess. Sounds more like a job or a brand than fun, to me.

        Reply
        • Blue Baron

          4 months ago

          seamaholic: Although you know nothing about me or the fun I’ve had as a fan.

          It’s a good idea to be more open-minded and less judgmental.

          3
          Reply
    • VegasMoved

      4 months ago

      Most fans don’t choose their fandom based on how much the lineup is paid.

      2
      Reply
  84. Bivouac-Sal

    4 months ago

    stu

    they didn’t call you before doing this deal?????

    Reply
  85. Jabronie23

    4 months ago

    I get resigning Hernandez (although I think signing Adames and keeping Mookie in the OF would have made more sense), but Conforto makes no sense. Pages is probably better than him and needs to play everyday for his development

    1
    Reply
    • DroppedThirdStrike

      4 months ago

      Pages will play plenty. Every time Betts or Lux are given a day off Edman moves to infield and Pages plays. If Conforto or Hernandez get injured or are given rest he will play. Every time Lux or Conforto are pinch hit for a righty bat he will play. Whenever Roberts decides to overload the lineup with right handed bats he will play.

      Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      jabronie

      2024 stats
      Pages vs lefties: .917 OPS. vs righties ..647
      .520 slug vs lefties. .370 vs righties.

      oddly Conforto had better splits vs lefties than vs righties.

      anyhow I see them in a platoon

      Reply
  86. Golfsucks

    4 months ago

    Man if I was in the players union I would really want to check the Dodgers books.
    The shear volume of their deferrals seems very bizarre to me.
    Why is it that all of the other teams aren’t just doing the same thing as the Dodgers?
    Rogers probably could have offered Ohtani a billion dollars in deferrals to go to Toronto.
    Other teams aren’t even entertaining deferrals even just to get under the tax, but the Dodgers are doing it all of the time and in plain site.
    Makes entirely no sense to me and feels like it is going to implode on itself at any moment.
    Also, worrying is that no other teams are calling the Dodgers out.
    No sympathy for any player if this goes south.

    2
    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      @golfsucks

      “Makes entirely no sense to me”

      that is apparent

      3
      Reply
    • VegasMoved

      4 months ago

      Other teams do deferrals as well, the Dodgers just do them more (with Ohtani really skewing the numbers).

      Reply
  87. Old York

    4 months ago

    I got another one right! Now I have 6 correct picks. On my way to being the champion!

    1
    Reply
  88. Bivouac-Sal

    4 months ago

    watch out York. The haters will come after you next.

    Reply
  89. Best Screenname Ever

    4 months ago

    Good for Teoscar. Nice to see a player who wants to play for a specific team end up there.

    Reply
    • Diggydugler

      4 months ago

      All free agents can go where they want, sometimes they have to take a bit of a discount like I am sure Teoscar did but they arent forced to go to a team they dont want to play for.

      Reply
  90. CCooper8920

    4 months ago

    Rich get richer….eventually, after deferred money

    Reply
  91. DirtyWater04

    4 months ago

    And there it is. Yet another deal the Red Sox could and arguably should have made or topped, and didn’t. Maybe Teoacar wanted to stay in LA all along and if so I get that’s out of our control, but now what? We just let a guy who can play all 3 outfield spots and hit 30 home runs walk to a division rival and aren’t going to replace him at all?

    Reply
  92. Zonedeads

    4 months ago

    Don’t the Dodgers owe him money from his previous deal?

    Reply
  93. DrDick

    4 months ago

    Either the Mets or Dodgers (maybe both) are going to be really pissed off come World Series 2025.

    Reply
    • Cora the Destroya

      4 months ago

      Honestly, Mets don’t even have an ace. I’m not sure they’re a given for a playoff spot, let alone a World Series. We shall see.

      Reply
  94. Jbigz12

    4 months ago

    Fantastic signing for the dollars spent. He fits well there and this contract is well below bloated expectations.

    Santander looks poised to disappoint in his FA deal.

    Reply
    • gorav114

      4 months ago

      Hopefully he still gets enough to get the Os a draft pick!

      Reply
  95. Stieb Cooperstown

    4 months ago

    can’t blame Shitkins on this one – Teo wanted to sign with the Dodgers and took a team friendly deal. maybe the Jays can trade for Outman. oh wait, we have no pieces that the Dodgers would want….

    Reply
  96. Niekro floater

    4 months ago

    Re-signing Teo n adding Snell, Dodgers are better than they were last season. Roki wants to play for winner, sacrificing millions n millions by being posted early to do so, this has gota sweetin the LA sales pitch. Plus he sees how this organization takes care of there own.

    Reply
    • Cora the Destroya

      4 months ago

      I’d be wary of Snell.

      Reply
  97. rmullig2

    4 months ago

    They better be putting away money for these deferrals. Once their TV contract ends after 2038 they will be taking a big time cut in that revenue stream. Cable TV will likely not even exist anymore.

    Reply
  98. Mynameisnoname

    4 months ago

    What’s the O/U on LAD season win total?

    I’m setting it at 108. That may seem aggressive, but with the return of two way Ohtani and the addition of Snell to round out the leagues top rotation, there is no reason they shouldn’t win 2 out of every 3 games.

    Reply
    • Niekro floater

      4 months ago

      Like they do every season. Just keep fighting n winning series. One game @a time. Play the game in front of u.

      Reply
      • jeffreybecker77

        4 months ago

        or, sleepwalk to the playoffs and beat the one or two teams that spent almost as much as them

        Reply
  99. TB Sox NY

    4 months ago

    This contract and the others the Dodgers and other big spenders might make more fans show up for the Rockies,La Angels ,Pirates and Oakland( whatever team name they go by) series.Just to see if they have a shot of taken the divison each year.

    Reply
  100. braddy513

    4 months ago

    Dang, was hoping the Reds would have swooped him on that 3yr 66M. He could have been a nice pairing with Elly at GABP

    1
    Reply
    • braddy513

      4 months ago

      Of course the Reds would have probably had to go with a higher AAV. More like 3yr/72 with opt outs

      Reply
  101. Matthew De Lorge

    4 months ago

    Deferring money should not be allowed to circumvent the cap

    Reply
  102. Bivouac-Sal

    4 months ago

    But then he would have had to play, not to mention live, in Cincinnati.

    Reply
    • runningwithnailclippers

      4 months ago

      Have you ever driven in LA?

      Reply
      • Bivouac-Sal

        4 months ago

        that’s all you got?
        Ever wonder why there are so many people, so many cars, so much money in LA?

        ‘Cause it’s not Cincinnati.

        And for the record I don’t live there. My team does.

        Reply
        • runningwithnailclippers

          4 months ago

          So your logic is basically this: they only live in LA becuase it is not Cincy? That’s impressive.

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          4 months ago

          Since it seems hard for you to understand, ask a friend for a help.

          Reply
  103. norcalblue

    4 months ago

    I have mixed emotions. I like Teo, he’s a great teammate and he contributed mightily to last year’s championship. He was great in the clubhouse on a team that was as united as any you’ll ever see in the MLB. I’m happy for him, he got paid fairly.

    As a Dodgers fan, I think three years was too much. I felt 2 years and $55 million would have been better. He’s 32, I doubt we will see the Teo we saw last year ever again.

    Reply
  104. Bivouac-Sal

    4 months ago

    Mookie is 32. Aaron Judge is 32. Manny Machado is 32. What a decrepit bunch.

    Reply
  105. The Saber-toothed Superfife

    4 months ago

    It behooves me the Detroit Tigers should ever worry about losing a draft pick or a comp draft pick……..
    Have the draft results really been anything to brag about?
    A non-issue that is another excuse = NOT TO SPEND MONEY.

    Reply
  106. Dodgerfan75

    4 months ago

    We are loaded for a repeat

    1
    Reply
    • Cora the Destroya

      4 months ago

      We will see. Money got you 2024, but no guarantee on a repeat

      1
      Reply
      • BlueSkies_LA

        4 months ago

        As the man said, if you want a guarantee, buy a toaster. Baseball doesn’t come with any. In baseball all you can do is try to improve your probability of success — this being a game of probabilities, not guarantees. The Dodgers have done a lot to improve their probability of success. This is all anyone can say without having someone point at them and smirk as if they were maybe a totally silly person. And who’d want that?

        Reply
      • Dodgerfan75

        4 months ago

        Money didn’t win it all in 24. Clutch freeman and good arms won it. This lineup is loaded and the staff is deeper. If the young arms hold up they’ll win 100 games again. If they make it out the division series they’ll be heavy favorites. Solid club up and down with owners who actually want to win. Nothing in baseball is 100% but I’ll take 90% and enjoy the games.

        Reply
        • jeffreybecker77

          4 months ago

          of course dodgers are loaded they acquired all the guys nobody else could afford. at least admit it. they deserve some credit for winning what amounts to a mini-tournament but that’s about it. players would certainly admit they have a huge advantage over almost every team, but fans rarely do. funny stuff.

          Reply
        • Dodgerfan75

          4 months ago

          Every team and their owner can afford to pay what the dodgers paid ohtani. That contract pays for itself. Every team can draft and develop talent. Every team can place an emphasis on team wins not individual honors. You say they deserve some credit? They deserve all the credit. From owners all the way down to the farm. Players want to win and players want to play for an organization that wants to win. That’s why they choose La, it sure isn’t for the taxes, or the cleanliness of the area. Maybe the weather but San Diego’s has better weather. Maybe Florida or Texas for the taxes but again they want to win. Before you pop off again, just think who they’ve lost as well over the years. The dodgers draft well, sign well and develop players well. They also fix players other teams have given up on. They’ve earned the credit.

          Reply
      • Cora the Destroya

        4 months ago

        It’s not like the Dodgers ran away with the division until the end anyway

        Reply
  107. Cora the Destroya

    4 months ago

    Pretty much figured this. The Red Sox being involved was once again fake news

    1
    Reply
  108. Cora the Destroya

    4 months ago

    Dodgers will be in trouble when they have to pay all that deferred money

    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      4 months ago

      Try paying attention. It’s been explained over and over again to those with any middle school reading comprehension. The return on the investment of the deferral money in escrow will have more than paid for the debts when due.

      1
      Reply
      • BlueSkies_LA

        4 months ago

        True, except for the escrow part. Escrow implies that the deferral set-asides are held by a third party. They aren’t, and this is a crucial distinction. The funds can be invested by the team in any liquid asset (or in non-liquid assets with the approval of the player). Financial statements for these deferral accounts are required to be submitted to the commissioner’s office quarterly. It’s all in the CBA.

        Reply
    • fox471 Dave

      4 months ago

      Redsox: OMG! This is not that hard. Deferred money WILL BE THERE, when time comes.

      Reply
      • Cora the Destroya

        4 months ago

        If you say so, but when Mookie and Shohei start to crumble and they’re still paying for them, good luck

        It’s not so much they can’t afford it; it has more to do with paying declining players in their later years who hold up a roster spot

        Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          4 months ago

          The impacts of a player being signed beyond their productive years has nothing to do with whether any part of their salary was deferred. Nothing at all.

          Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          4 months ago

          I apologize. I was looking at it is the total amount of money, not deferred as itself. Sorry for the confusion. Just think the money in general will catch up to the Dodgers.

          I see how I worded it was wrong. I was just thinking of deferred money on top of already big contracts

          Reply
  109. Cora the Destroya

    4 months ago

    There is no guarantee on a WS title

    Reply
  110. Dumpster Divin Theo

    4 months ago

    Having secured baseball contract next destination for Teoscar in LA maybe that thin dude who was Wonka for playing folk singer

    Reply
  111. CFS77

    4 months ago

    Nice repost to kick MLB in the nutz after Kim.

    Reply
  112. geauxbraves

    4 months ago

    I know the Dodgers have deferred a lot of cash and whatever they want to do is up to them. However, they keep this up and when the balance comes due, they are going to end up with a $200M or more payroll for players who aren’t even playing for them anymore

    Reply
  113. 84LeFlore

    4 months ago

    Gosh, I’m glad the Dodgers were able to squeeze out a few more million to sign another free agent!

    They’re like the federal government. Spend and spend and spend and spend and spend and…

    Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      4 months ago

      The Federal Government borrows and borrows and borrows. Then inflates the dollar as a form of hidden taxation. You’ve been taxed an extra 50% over the last 4 years. No legislation, no representation. End the Fed.

      1
      Reply
  114. jeffreybecker77

    4 months ago

    when an nba, nfl or nhl team wins a title it is something to be proud of. someday the mlb can be part of that group again. right now it’s metropolitan NE dollars vs. So. Calif dollars. billionaires trying to buy titles by hoarding superstars. it used to be entertaining for all fans, now just a select few. if only there was a way to make the playing field even for all franchises

    Reply
« Older Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

  • Top Stories
  • Recent

Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base

Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton

Cubs To Promote Cade Horton

Mariners Claim Leody Taveras

Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach

A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery

Blue Jays Sign Spencer Turnbull

Blue Jays Sign José Ureña

Ross Stripling Retires

Rangers Place Leody Taveras On Outright Waivers

Triston Casas Likely To Miss Entire 2025 Season Due To Knee Surgery

Orioles Recall Coby Mayo

Dodgers Recall Hyeseong Kim

Triston Casas Suffers “Significant Knee Injury”

Angels Place Mike Trout On 10-Day Injured List

Rangers Option Jake Burger

Tigers Designate Kenta Maeda For Assignment

Reds Option Alexis Diaz

Orioles Move Charlie Morton To Bullpen

Astros To Activate Lance McCullers Jr. This Weekend

The Biggest Trade In Nationals History Looks Better Every Day

Lou Trivino Elects Free Agency

Orioles Outright Walter Pennington

Nationals Release Lucas Sims

Kyle Wright Pulled Off Rehab Stint With Shoulder Fatigue, Continuing To Play Catch

Padres Trade Connor Joe To Reds

Latest On Anthony Rizzo

White Sox To Select Tim Elko

Poll: In-Season Managerial Changes

Fantasy Baseball: Dealing With Early Anchors

ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

Latest Rumors & News

Latest Rumors & News

  • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
  • Nolan Arenado Rumors
  • Dylan Cease Rumors
  • Luis Robert Rumors
  • Marcus Stroman Rumors

 

Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

MLBTR Features

MLBTR Features

  • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
  • Front Office Originals
  • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
  • MLBTR Podcast
  • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
  • 2025 Arbitration Projections
  • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
  • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
  • Contract Tracker
  • Transaction Tracker
  • Extension Tracker
  • Agency Database
  • MLBTR On Twitter
  • MLBTR On Facebook
  • Team Facebook Pages
  • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

Rumors By Team

  • Angels Rumors
  • Astros Rumors
  • Athletics Rumors
  • Blue Jays Rumors
  • Braves Rumors
  • Brewers Rumors
  • Cardinals Rumors
  • Cubs Rumors
  • Diamondbacks Rumors
  • Dodgers Rumors
  • Giants Rumors
  • Guardians Rumors
  • Mariners Rumors
  • Marlins Rumors
  • Mets Rumors
  • Nationals Rumors
  • Orioles Rumors
  • Padres Rumors
  • Phillies Rumors
  • Pirates Rumors
  • Rangers Rumors
  • Rays Rumors
  • Red Sox Rumors
  • Reds Rumors
  • Rockies Rumors
  • Royals Rumors
  • Tigers Rumors
  • Twins Rumors
  • White Sox Rumors
  • Yankees Rumors

ad: 160x600_MLB

Navigation

  • Sitemap
  • Archives
  • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

MLBTR INFO

  • Advertise
  • About
  • Commenting Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Connect

  • Contact Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feed

MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

hide arrows scroll to top

Register

Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version