The Giants are known to be looking for upgrades at second base. Earlier this week, they were reported as one of the frontrunners for Brendan Donovan of the Cardinals and were also connected to Ketel Marte of the Diamondbacks. Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle reports that they have checked in on Nico Hoerner of the Cubs. She also lists Brandon Lowe of the Rays as one of their targets.
It’s an understandable target for the Giants. Most of their playing time at the keystone went to Tyler Fitzgerald, Casey Schmitt and Christian Koss in 2025. All three of those guys had underwhelming seasons at the plate. Schmitt was the closest the league average offensively but with the weakest defensive grades.
Free agency doesn’t offer huge upgrades over that group. Bo Bichette is out there and reportedly willing to play second, but the Giants have downplayed their desire to sign another long-term deal this winter. Ha-Seong Kim, Jorge Polanco and Gleyber Torres are all off the board. Utility types like Ramón Urías, Willi Castro and Isiah Kiner-Falefa don’t move the needle much over the in-house options.
On the trade market, Marte has been in plenty of rumors but it’s still unclear if the Diamondbacks will move him. Even if they decide to pull the trigger, it would be a surprise to see him sent to their division rivals in San Francisco. Donovan is widely expected to move since he is on a rebuilding club and two years from free agency, but the asking price should be huge. Since he can play all over the diamond, he can fit on many clubs and the demand is widespread. Though the Giants are apparently one of the finalists, half the teams in the league have shown in interest.
Hoerner and Lowe have very similar contractual situations. Both players are only signed through 2026 and would therefore be rentals. Lowe will make a $11.5MM salary next year and Hoerner $12MM.
But they have opposite profiles and their team situations are very different. Lowe is injury prone, doesn’t run well and isn’t a great defender. His strikeout and walk profile has been poor in each of the past two years. However, he’s a clear source of power. He has hit 21 home runs four separate times, including a 31-homer season in 2025. It’s common for the Rays to trade away players as they get more expensive and closer to free agency. Blake Snell, Tyler Glasnow and Tommy Pham are some of the many examples.
Hoerner, however, does not have huge power. He has never hit more than ten home runs in a season. However, he’s better than Lowe in basically every other aspect. He hasn’t been on the injured list in years. He’s one of the faster guys in the game and is generally good for 30ish steals a year. He’s one of the toughest guys in the game to strike out. He’s a good enough defender to play shortstop. The only reason he’s at second is because the Cubs have Dansby Swanson.
The Cubs shouldn’t be especially motivated to move him. He is affordable and has been good for about four to five wins above replacement per year, according to FanGraphs. He has reportedly drawn trade interest but the Cubs should be able to set a high asking price since he’s valuable to them as well. His salary isn’t onerous and the Cubs don’t appear to have any kind of payroll crunch.
It’s at least possible to imagine a scenario where the Cubs think about it. As mentioned, Hoerner is an impending free agent. The Cubs could extend him again but he also could get more interest elsewhere. Looking at next year’s free agent class, Hoerner could potentially market himself as the best available shortstop. His competition would be J.P. Crawford and Kim. Crawford is a decent player but his glovework has been poor in recent years and he’ll be going into his age-32 season in 2027. Kim could bounce back from an injury-marred 2025 but he has a similar profile to Hoerner and is a year older. Kim will be 31 in 2027. Hoerner will turn 30 in May of that year.
Perhaps Hoerner expects to get paid big shortstop bucks next winter and the Cubs don’t see a path to keeping him with Swanson signed through 2029. They have been connected to free agent third basemen Alex Bregman and Eugenio Suárez. In that scenario, perhaps Matt Shaw becomes available on the trade market or he could move to second with Hoerner traded. Shaw mostly played third in the majors this year but has second base experience. He got six big league innings at the keystone in 2025 and has close to 300 minor league innings there in his career.
Trading Hoerner and moving to Shaw to second would be a defensive downgrade. That’s not really a knock on Shaw, who graded out well at third this year, just a reflection of Hoerner being arguably the best defensive second baseman in the game today. But adding a big bat like Bregman or Suárez could make up for the Cubs losing Kyle Tucker to free agency. Whether that upgrades the club in 2026 would be debatable but it would certainly help in the long run if the Cubs don’t expect to retain Hoerner beyond 2026.
It’s unknown whether the Cubs have any interest in such a scenario. It also doesn’t seem like the Giants are primarily focused on second base. Slusser writes that pitching and the outfield are the club’s current priorities. Since Donovan can also play the outfield, the Giants probably have him above Hoerner on their target list. With the number of moving pieces in the second base trade market, perhaps someone needs to blink and knock over the first domino. If the Cardinals pull the trigger on Donovan, for instance, teams could then pivot to the other options.
Photo courtesy of Sergio Estrada, Imagn Images

Sign em all!
Go show interest somewhere else. Nico needs to stay on the North side.
Nico is the type of hitter the Cubs lineup needs to keep. Trading Shaw for something that would help, is fine with me. But the Cubs do need to sign another good RH Bat.
And also . . . IMHO, I’d try to get Happ to accept a trade, foregoing his NTC. Then try to package Happ and Shaw for a solid 3B. I wouldn’t care if that was a proven 3B or a young guy on the rise. I’d even include another ‘sweetener’ to the deal if the player they received in return, was a stud.
2025 WAR
Nico Hoerner 6.2
Eugenio Suarez 3.6
Alex Bregman 3.5
Cubs need to keep Hoerner and ideally extend him
Not all “WAR” is created the same.
please no
Hoops site is glitching again
Thanks for the intel. We’ll get on that!
If I had a dollar for every time the Giants showed interest in a player and did nothing. 😏
you wouldn’t be able to buy much. 20 bucks a year or so isn’t a lot
I’d take half that and buy a six pack
@drilliams Sounds like my mating behavior!
At least they’re interested, the reds only wanted schwarber
Why would the Cubs move Hoerner if they want to stay competitive?
Same thing with Alec Bohm on the Phillies. Is this site developing a “stupid move” for every team they can repeat over and over again for clicks?
Kingdome Mariners, Did you read the article. It says why. If Nico is going to be looking for big SS money as a FA, they can maximize his value by trading him now, since the return should be much better than any comp pick.
Hoerner had 2015 WAR of 6.2.
Cubs should want Bryce Eldridge AND Robbie Ray to deal Hoerner. SF should then laugh and hang up the phone. And since they don’t need Eldridge they would likely flip him.
Cubs are likely to add a one year guy, not subtract.
Seriously, the Cubs would love to acquire Logan Webb, but Hoerner does not move the meter on Webb. Hoerner is over 6 WAR, the cost should be extraordinary.
Yes I read the article and still feel that it would hurt the Cubs to trade him this year. I believe he makes the Cubs better in 2026. What are you doing? Coming on here and looking to give people crap? It is my opinion that it would hurt the Cubs to trade him in 2026. Happy Holidays. Be better. Be Nicer.
Calm down. I’m not looking to give anyone crap. But your post asking why they’d trade him was stated clearly in the article. I’m just posting my opinion as you are.
I agree, trading Nico would make the 2026 team weaker. But trading him now for a big return could make them better in the long run. They’re losing Tucker, and perhaps they think a 2026 WS is out of reach, and a retool, aiming for 2027, could be a reasonable strategy.
It makes no sense for the Cubs to trade Nico if they are hoping to contend next season.
Hoerner is a complete ballplayer. They should extend him rather than flirt with paying older Bregman a fortune for his twilight (already got my titles) years. Pretty backwards thinking if they go that route and move a maybe okay Shaw to 2B.
You mean they should try and extend him. It’s not entirely up to the Cubs, As written in the article there are good reasons for them to maximize his value on a big return. No one knows if Nico is looking for big SS money as a FA, but if he is then maybe they should trade him.
Right-he’s probably worth in the ballpark of what they paid Swanson a few years ago. Less power but better hitter. It’s on them to assess if he is worth it for their budget.
What are the Giants willing to give up? Buster Posey for Jed?
Ownership is the greater issue.
What prospects/suspects does SF have?
Beyond Eldridge, not much.
The Giants haven’t utilized the run game much in the recent past. A Hoerner trade would perhaps signal a willingness to steal bases.
Hey Giants, we have Jeff McNeil for you lol
the giants’ backup infielder is better than mcneil already
Never going to happen. Jed actually values D and he will more likely extend his 2B
How is Hoerner an upgrade over Schmitt? Sure, Hoerner’s OPS+ for 2025 was about 13 points higher than Schmitt but Hoerner’s career OPS+ isn’t much different than Schmitt in 2025. Seems like a waste of prospects to trade for a guy with a marginal upgrade. Giants should focus more on pitching than piddling increases at 2nd base.
Perhaps check their war differences
I could not disagree more. Nico would be a big upgrade. Compare their Statcast pages:
Nico baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/nico-hoerner-…
Schmitt baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/casey-schmitt…
Giants and probably 27 other teams have shown interest in Nico Hoerner. That’s just every day due diligence. (and the Cubs are probably doing the same in reverse)
Question is—have they shown interest in trading Logan Webb as part of a deal for him?????
Nico, even in the final year of his deal, is probably the asset that could bring back an immediate need and impact player. Not suggesting that he moves, but a definite sell high position for him right now.
A team isn’t interested in trading a player and another team has shown no interest in acquiring the player. I get a site needs to churn articles, but that is next level wheel spinning.
Tyler Fitzgerald’s versatility and pop and speed are useful tools. If they want to move on from him, I’m sure there’s takers.
Hoerner isn’t going anywhere