2:19pm: Cotillo reports that Boston’s offer to Bregman was for five years and $165MM with significant deferrals.
2:09pm: Alex Bregman is headed to Chicago after landing with the Cubs on a five-year, $175MM contract that was first reported last night. That’s a crushing blow for the Red Sox, who were long reported to be prioritizing a reunion with Bregman after he opted out of the final two years and $80MM on his contract with the club back in November. In the aftermath of Bregman’s departure, reports out of Boston are shedding some light on the efforts the Red Sox made to retain their All-Star, and where that offer ultimately fell short.
According to a report from The Boston Globe’s Peter Abraham last night, the Red Sox “did not come close financially and were not willing to give Bregman a full no-trade clause, which the Cubs did.” Today, reporting from Chris Cotillo and Sean McAdam of MassLive confirmed that the Red Sox were unwilling to offer Bregman a no-trade clause and added that the team cited “organizational policy” regarding no-trade protection in doing so. That, McAdam writes, “proved to be a sticking point” for Bregman, who has young children and values stability for them as he heads into his third consecutive year in a new city.
As for the financials, McAdam writes that the five-year offer from Boston was “reasonably competitive,” but added that it fell short of Chicago’s offer financially. Like the Cubs’ offer, which includes $70MM in deferred money, the Red Sox offer also included significant deferrals. Those deferred payments were scheduled out differently, however, as McAdam notes that the Red Sox proposed a payment plan “stretching out decades.” The exact payment details of Chicago’s offer aren’t yet known, McAdam notes that the decades-long payment structure Boston offered widened the gap between the two offers and reduced the value of the Red Sox’ offer further than the already-lower sticker price, relative to the Cubs’ offer.
Exactly how the two offers stack up will be easier to judge once more details come out about Bregman’s contract details in Chicago, but in any case it seems the offer that the Red Sox reportedly considered “aggressive” came up well short of what Cubs president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer and his front office managed to put together. As a result, the Red Sox will have to turn elsewhere in their search for another middle-of-the-order bat for their infield. USA Today’s Bob Nightengale was among the reports to suggest in the aftermath of Bregman’s signing that the other top infielder on the market, shortstop Bo Bichette, could be the player they pivot to. Bichette figures to sign for even more than Bregman, did, however; MLBTR predicted an eight-year, $208MM contract for the infielder at the outset of the offseason.
Some of that, of course, has to do with the contract length. Perhaps an eight-year deal for Bichette, which would run through his age-35 season, would be just as or even more appealing to the Red Sox than signing Bregman through his age-36 season on a five year deal. On the other hand, it’s worth noting that this Red Sox front office has not yet given out a contract longer than three years via free agency. If the team has an aversion to long-term deals more generally, it would be difficult for the Red Sox to outbid rival suitors for Bichette like the Phillies and Yankees that have no qualms about signing free agents to lengthy contracts.
If the Red Sox aren’t willing to splurge on Bichette, the pickings for replacement Bregman become a lot slimmer. Eugenio Suarez offers big power and could be a fit on a shorter-term deal in free agency, but he struggled in the second half last year, will play this year at 34 years old, and is a lackluster defender at the hot corner. Turning to the trade market, Alex Speier of the Boston Globe reportedly shortly before the new year that the Red Sox had narrowed their focus to five infield options: Bregman, Bichette, Ketel Marte, Isaac Paredes, and Brendan Donovan. With Bregman now in Chicago and Marte having been officially taken off the market by Arizona, that leaves Paredes and Donovan as the two primary alternatives to Bichette in that report.
Of the two, Paredes seems to be the better fit. Both are controlled for two seasons after this one, but Paredes is a right-handed hitter who seems likely to cost less in trade than Donovan. While Paredes has been pushed out of the Astros’ nominal starting lineup by the addition of Carlos Correa over the summer, Donovan’s market is known to have many suitors including the Giants, Mariners, and Royals. What’s more, Paredes is a right-handed hitter who primarily plays third base, making him a much cleaner replacement for Bregman than Donovan, a lefty hitter who has played all over the field but primarily plays second base. Paredes is also a marginally better hitter over the last four seasons (124 wRC+ vs 119) coming off a stronger platform season (128 wRC+ vs 119). Paredes (hamstring injury) and Donovan (sports hernia surgery) both ended their seasons with injury complications but are expected to be full-go for Spring Training next month.
Of course, it’s possible the club could look at other options now that their preferred targets have begun to dwindle. The Cubs, themselves, now have a surplus of infield talent after bringing in Bregman displaced Matt Shaw at third base. Adding another unproven youngster to a very young Red Sox roster likely wouldn’t be especially appealing, but Cubs second baseman Nico Hoerner has garnered trade interest this winter and could be more available now that Bregman has freed up Shaw to take over the keystone following a hypothetical Hoerner trade. An elite defender at second base who has also posted strong grades at shortstop in the past, Hoerner is a well-regarded clubhouse presence who could help fill the leadership void created by the loss of Bregman.
With that said, his 109 wRC+ last year was a career-high, and his lack of power is unlikely to be especially attractive to a team like the Red Sox that finished middle-of-the-pack in homers last year and expressed an interest in bringing in a big-time slugger like Kyle Schwarber or Pete Alonso earlier this winter in hopes of improving that area of the offense. It’s also an open question as to whether the Cubs would even be especially inclined to deal Hoerner, as an infield of Bregman, Hoerner, Dansby Swanson and Michael Busch would be among the strongest in baseball headed into 2026. What’s more, Hoerner is slated to hit free agency following the 2026 campaign and the Red Sox may prefer to add a player under longer-term control for fear of finding themselves in this same predicament again next year.

Hey Red Sox you like dealing with the Cardinals. Interested in Arenado now? lol
Nope.
He would probably come very cheap. I bet the cards eat 20 to 25 of his left over 42(5 mil from Rockies too)that would leave him 12 mil over 2. 6 a year for arenado could end up being a steal. Would probably only cost a 25 to 30 ranked organizational prospect
Or hear me out. They throw in jojo remero with arenado and 25 mil and one of the cards lower ranked prospects for casas?
Regardless of the parameters, I can see the Sox getting Arenado as cost efficiency remains important to Henry in recent years. I don’t know Romero so I can’t comment but instead of cash back, why not Yoshida instead of Casas. One for one. Then Bloom who signed Yoshida can work out another deal involving Yoshida and Donovan.
“Details Of Red Sox’ Pursuit Of Alex Bregman”
Does NOT matter!
No one wants Yoshida.
Even Bloom has to know that was a mistake.
I agree, if we get Arenado cheaply, it might be a good gamble if he can split time with Mayer. My gut is to start Mayer at 3b but he is injury prone snd another lefty, so if we got a righty to platoon, it could help. We just have to do something about our exessive outfielders. We need some trade to go down
Arenado can’t hit… Fast forward from his days in Colorado to the last two seasons. Do you think he is going to rebound?
@big
I would think the Cards would want more than a 25 to 30 guy unless it’s a guy who they feel is just undervalued but my pop up in top 100 list in w years or so. Why eat that much cash for so little of a reward?
I actually think the Cardinals would go for that. Not because Arenado doesn’t have some value, but because Stl wants to use his roster spot for players who may eventually be part of the next successful team.
That said, if I were Boston, I’d go for either Suarez or Paredes.
What is the obsession with Arenado? The guy is shot.
Psst its was a joke
As long as StL is desperately trying to find someone, anyone, who is foolish enough to give arenado a 26 man spot, the suggestions will keep on coming
Why not? Just curious on your thoughts. If you could get him for cheap, could you not reinvest the money towards a different bat? I haven’t fully thought it all the way through but Eugenio Suarez and Arenado would come out to be similar in dollars at a shorter length and would provide some pop. I’m not a fan of either team. Just wondering your thoughts.
You take Hicks then maybe
From a free agency standpoint, the Red Sox put all their eggs in one basket. They’ve accomplished nothing this off season.
But they tried, they really really tried there are all the other teams outsmarted them.
Yankees are on a similar trajectory
The difference is the Yanks have Cole returning!
slider32: Are you asking us or telling us?
Can’t beat the Mets strange off season. Might be fighting for 3rd place if prospects don’t work out
Sfes- get ready for a lot more of this. Red Sox fans here have been watching a heavily analytics driven rebuild for six years now. A lot of it makes no sense
Did the Red Sox sign him? No! So who the hell cares if they talked to his representative. The same could be said about half the teams in the league that checked in on him.
But he didn’t play for half the teams last season.
Off season ain’t over. Doesn’t sound like Bregman was even their top priority. They can use Mayer at 3B. Or sign Suarez late for a bargain one year deal. I think their priority is another TOR pitcher, either Valdez or a trade for Gore or Peralta, the latter of whom they’d extend.
That’s assuming they don’t just go with Bichette.
Most of us are taking this loss as a win.
I suspect had your team matched it, you’d be screeching, “Winnah! Wicked bettah than Nomah!”
I know you said from a free agency standpoint but trades matter as much in roster construction. If they can swap in a righty bat for Yoshida, Casas and/or Duran, the lineup becomes good. Adding two bats and it becomes very good. I now want Suarez but as the DH. If they were able to invest in Bichette (not likely in my view), the lineup would be set with Mayer at third, Bichette at second. Without Bichette, there remains a hole.
Dewey – what the sox *really* need is a SS and to move Story back to 2B to hide his weak arm and range issues.
Just getting another terrible defender with a bat and sticking him at 2B doesnt fix the massive defensive problem in Boston.
Had boston had a talented SS, your Bichette argument makes more sense. But they dont, they’ve got Story.
You have a hole at 3B youre hoping to plug with a kid that had season ending injuries for 4 consecutive seasons. You’ve got a negative defender at SS, who exposes the flaws in the 3B and 2B on either side of him, and makes nearly as many errors as HRs, and thats just what he’s charged with, not ones he got away with.
Bo or no Bo, theres a gaping hole on the left side of the infield with no solution. That should be addressed first.
We have a very talented SS in Mayer
Tardaddy – you cant put Mayer at both 3B and SS, not how it works.
And, Mayer has never made it through a professional season of baseball without a season ending injury. He’s 0-4 between the minors and last season.
Thats not inspiring
Honestly, though, there is arguably more value in trades. We have the pieces to trade. A lot of these are big contracts, some of which are bound to fail
Purse- any player could fail, whether its a FA or trade. Free agents costs dollars, if they fail, it only costs money. If you naje a trade and give up significant prospects, not only does the player you obtained need to succeed. But you need the players you gave away to not succeed. Tricky situation
“They’ve accomplished nothing this off season.”
Were you in a coma when they traded for Gray and Contreras?
@Jarred I noticed that too, but in his defense, he mentioned they accomplished nothing in the free agent market, specifically from that standpoint. Once I read that I had a different perspective. Gotta read it all in context.
Jarred- Gray was a fantastic move. Contreras doesnt come close to being a good addition without a matching offensive piece, either at 2B or 3B. His stats were similar to Bregman’s with about 60 more AB’s
I wouldn’t say they accomplished nothing this offseason. From a free agency perspective alone, yes. But via trades they did increase the rotation depth by adding Gray and Oviedo and added a righty 1B in Contreras who should hit well at Fenway.
Unfortunately for the Red Sox though that’s inadequate to compete in a division that saw the already-awesome Bluejays get better by adding Cease and Okamoto, and the Orioles add not one but two 35+ homer bats to their lineup in Alonso and Ward (plus a quality closer), and Yankees will probably bring Bellinger back (or add Tucker if Bluejays don’t). Heck, just to keep treading water now that Bregman’s gone, the Red Sox absolutely have to add Bichette and would need to overpay to do so because they have no leverage this late in the offseason. If they get outbid by the Phillies on him they are in deep doodoo
Those two sentences don’t go together. They haven’t done much in FA but the Gray and Contreras trades help a lot.
If the Cubs extend Nico Hoerner, I will increase Hoyer’s grade in my book from C- to B+.
Obviously the plan is to let him go and use Shaw at 2B. Middle infielders who generate a lot of their value defensively don’t age well.
seamaholic 2: Davey Concepcion, Mark Belanger, Felix Millan, Bud Harrelson, and a host of others would like a word.
seamaholic 2’s obsession with being a contrarian should be a case study
That’s not obvious at all. He was virtually the mvp of that team last season. They extended him once. They may do it again. He loves Chicago and they love him.
Nobody cares about your book. You’re not qualified to assess the performance of people who know more than you do.
And are not qualified to assess whether others are qualified.
Blah blah blah: You, however, are qualified to be a troll. You’re doing a fine job of it.
AEN – Why do you trolls always call other folks trolls? kettle, pot, black jack and all that…
Triple B – I gotta agree wiffya, the self anointed top 100 guy? who cares about his book and ‘tude? glad you pointed it out!
AssumesFactNotInEvidence: Who made you the arbiter of who’s a troll and who isn’t?
Talk about pot meeting kettle.
So you can call blah blah blah a troll but get your knickers in a wad when it’s mentioned you might be a troll yourself. What’s good the goose is good for the Alfred gander…grab a snickers and do your best to calm down if possible
AssumesFactNotInEvidence: Alternatively, you might STFU. Never a terrible idea.
Excellent top tier troll reply! You’re doing a fine job!
I really like his bat—dude hit .300 almost the entire season & when the Cubs needed a key hit to drive in a run, it seemed like he always came through.
Would hate to see him go.
Get rid of the owner John Henry!
Speaks to just how much of an overpay this was for the Cubs
Speaks to just how much of a numbskull you are
Exactly.
The red sox offered 10 mil less lmao
Deferred decades. Look up what “present value of a contract” means. There was much more than a $10M diff.
Cope, the cubs deferred as well. Respect for standing on your dumb comment tho
As a Reds fan, I’m thrilled the Cubs over paid by a huge margin for an aging 3 time all-star. Not a lot to cope about.
As a Reds fan aren’t you tired of seeing other teams in the Division do more?
Brother, we are in the NL Central – the Reds have done way more than the Cardinals and Brewers this offseason, and have done more than the Pirates since the beginning of time. Maybe if we were in the NL West I’d be more upset.
Every Reds signing this season is an “overpay” because it won’t make a difference.
Not as an overpay Ticker would have costed.
Big get for the Cubs for the next couple seasons, but will be a heavy weight as he gets older. No way he is worth that much the last three years when his bat slows and injuries mount. Nice to see the Red Sox lose a bidding war. They usually win those.
Since when???
The Red Sox is not going to sign a top notch FA! We are going to stink this year! Fire Breslow and please John Henry sell the team
No problem – now just ask your bank for the money to do it. You do realise that every Baseball team is business ? That means neither money grows on trees and employees (baseball players) are paid to their value.Why luxury tax exists.and revenue sharing so it’s a competitive sport which creates enjoyment and excitement- rather than one team winning 10 WS in a row .
This is less about Breslow and more about ownership. I believe Henry will be one of the stakeholders for a cap and you can’t spend big and also say MLB needs a cap. They probably went into this off-season knowing full well they weren’t going to spend.
Thec’s – Brealow has been pretty much outclassed by his peers, and Boras used him like a cheap date. Moreover, roster construction and having a plan to maximize the Crochet/Anthony years seems to be missing.
This year, $31m for Contreras and Gray, with massive holes still to be filled.
These trades, and no FA signings, isn’t smart, or cute, or funny, or whatever the heck its supposed to be.
Starting the off season with a stacked farm system, and almost $60m to spend i wouldnt believe you if in October you told me on Jan 11th this is where we’d be.
Classic tightwad Red Sox. Nothing of any surprise in any of these reports.
Red Sox front office is tone deaf.
No trade clauses shouldn’t that big a deal breaker for an organization. Most often they get waived anyway.
This is true, and I also don’t expect Bregman’s contract to be very tradable either by the time you might want to, anyway. So to me the NTC seems almost superfluous here.
They had to do it to get him, and there’s always a chance that the team fizzles while Bregman is still good. If that happened, now they have to ask him where he wants to go instead of just trading him to whoever offers the best return.
“No trade clauses shouldn’t that big a deal breaker for an organization. Most often they get waived anyway.”
Tell that to the Cardinals, who couldn’t move Arenado last year because of his NTC.
Red Sox have good pitching, they’ll still compete for a wild card spot.
Well I was partly right… Bregman signed over this weekend just with a team approximately 1000 miles to the west….
You said the same this yesterday
It bared repeating obviously…
Good for him, I guess, but the fact is this- if Bregman wanted to stay in Boston, he would’ve honored his contract. The fact that he’s elsewhere should come as no surprise to anyone.
It’s really sad if it mostly came down to not give no trade clause. He wanted to finish his career somewhere and if that was the big difference I’m really pissed with Breslow. I’m sure Bregman wanted that protection after he saw what happened to Devers in Beantown. It’s just sad, I think Bregman was overpaid but that’s the nature of free agency and Bregman fit so well and dropped right into that two slot behind Anthony. Just sad today and I’m confident the Red Sox are not going to sign Bichette.
“It’s really sad…”
“It’s just sad, I think Bregman was overpaid”
“Just sad today ”
Please clarify. Are you sad?
Those things statements aren’t mutually exclusive but based on your comment I doubt you know what mutually exclusive is. Yea I’m in fighting mood today.
Well you certainly put me in my place. Now I am sad.
Bring something to the conversation at least when I used to argue with KD17 he brought something to the conversation. You just brought snark.
Much more fun to wade through your excellent prose and wait for your next lightweight insult.
Fact is if he wanted stability he would have honoured the 3 year deal at 40 million. Nope, he preferred to play the field – so not a team player just another individual who cares for $$ rather than loyalty. But that’s a summary of a lot of modern athletes unlike Tek or Dustin …
@Frenchredsox
Actually, he did want stability, he asked the Sox more than once during the season to extend him, they continuously denied him even a meeting about an extension.
The powers that be were content to play the season out and then talk numbers expecting him to honor his 3 year deal, but if you give someone an opt out, this is what’s most likely going to happen.
They had a chance, but refused to talk, so though he left, he did seemingly want to stay, if the no trade clause was the dealbreaker, that’s sad.
If the Sox replace him with Bichette or Marte, cool, but any other bat is a massive downgrade imo.
French – stability is about more than playing 2 seasons then having uncertainty at an advanced age of where you go next.
Certainty is doing what Bregman did – ask in season for an extension so he knows where he will be after 2027. Then, if you cant get that, find a team.willing to guarantee where you and your family will be until late, if not the end, of your expected career.
How will the Red Sox react? Will they now overpay for Bichette?
Cubs only had to offer a nickel more.
If the Cubs don’t want Shaw anymore, we’ll gladly take him!
Reporters probably don’t know deferral structure on deals but I hate how its always reported “significant deferrals”. All that matters is the AAV after deferrals because that is what it costs the team and what will be on the CBT calculation. What was the actual offer in CBT AAV? that would be more helpful.
The word is $70 mill or 40% of the contract value is deferred.
Bregman should have just set Bo’s market, 35 per at 8 or 9 years. 9 seasons puts him right at Bregmans age when his contract is done
Bo’s value is significantly higher due to age (he is in his prime) and his defensive spectrum.Also it would weaken a direct competitor. Bergman to the Cubs means the Sox would only face him in the WS not multiple times a year .
Which is why i said 8 or 9 years. Bo isn’t getting much more than 35 per if at all
Don’t care about the deferred money. Just give the current AAV. None of my concern how much he invests.
Yeah, but it affects how much the team has to spend each year of the contract. Some fans care about those things.
That would be just like the Cubs. Take on too much salary than Ricketts likes so he tells Hoyer he can only sign Bregman if he frees up some money. So Hoyer turns around and moves Nico in a salary dump reminiscent of what they did last year, when they gave away Bellinger after trading for Tucker.
wait… teams other than the Dodgers were allowed to offer deferrals too? facebook comments had me believing otherwise.
The Dodgers have already filed a complaint with the league office about this abhorrent violation.
Klink…
So you didn’t notice other teams were deferring contracts Sgt. Schultz?
“I see nothing!”
Couldn’t resist.
Broc- yes, but dont be a bad organization and tell the player “youll get your last check around 2046”
So in essence Bregman knew he got overpaid, that’s rich.
The Red Sox, in spite of themselves, got lucky. Bregman has been going the wrong way for a few years.
Louie-Riiiight. you were most likely doing cart wheels last year when YOUR Red Sox signed him last year.
The peripherals of the deal are what killed it. That NTC might sting in about 3-4 years.
Idk, if 5/165 is actually true, I’m encouraged they went that high. Sounds like there might’ve been some heavy deferral action in there, but they’re at least trying to find ways to make things happen. I hate how that looks like I’m defending the FO. Maybe the 5/165 is wrong (exaggerated), but Cottillo is usually on it.
What now? Bichette checks all the boxes, but he’s swimming in deeper waters w NYY and PHI. Sox won’t even consider a number for Bichette. It’s looking like they’ll have to go to the well again and send out more prospects for a Donovan/Hoerner…Arenado!
My gut tells me Sox will pivot to Suarez. He’s a downgrade overall from Bregman but he’s torn the cover off the ball on a small career sample of 40+ at-bats at Fenway, is considered a good clubhouse guy, although aging he never gets injured, and can probably be had on a 2-year deal, less AAV and super less overall $$ commitment than Bichette.
But honestly anything less than Bichette feels like an abject failure at this point. And it will take a monster deal to land him, for sure
This is where you double down, and, dont overreact with a crippling move.
Thats how you wound up.with the devers problem.
Bregman didnt work. Did the team screw it up by not engaging in-season? ABSOLUTELY.
But you dont make a big mistake that has future crippling effects like the kind of contract BO will want.
You want bichette? No more than 3 years.
Why no more than 3 years? Bichette is 28 with great contact skills, is a solid athlete who will probably age well. Throwout the one crap season where he played injured (2024) and you’re looking at player who will likely peak over the next 2 years, then start a gradual decline, but with his bat-to-ball skills and body type it will likely be a gradual decline. For Bichette I’d go 6 years, no problem (but it will probably take 8 years to get him). Also will be cheaper AAV than what Breggy got
Hey I heard the Pittsburgh Pirates were also interested in signing Alex Bregman!
How different the Red Sox situation would be currently if they had actually used adult communication skills with Devers.
Yes I know he’s a man child. But the way they went about the situation was terrible.
I think they’d still be on the hunt for a third baseman because Devers cannot field. At all. That said, maybe keeping him would have convinced them to finally dump Yoshida for whatever they can get and then use the roster spot to find an adequate 3B who at least can, you know, catch the ball.
Agreed.
They would have his bat this season. Which is really all he brings to the table. But they need some bats.
Defence? No
Clubhouse? No
Intangibles? No
Bat? Yes
The clubhouse/intangibles stuff wouldn’t be so bad if the Red Sox didn’t jerk him around for 3 months last year before dumping him on SF. That one’s mostly on management. He seems to get along fine with the Giants.
“…the Red Sox “did not come close financially and were not willing to give Bregman a full no-trade clause…””
$10M over 5 years is only $2m per. IMO $2M a year is not a great gap especially if a team really wants to sign someone. The NTC might have been the bigger factor for the Sox for not matching the Cubs offer. Of course, there’s probably other factors we don’t know about.
Especially if at the margin the $2 mill/yr is deferred. Pretty much rounding error.
I think the no trade clause is big. When you’re used to winning you don’t want to get shipped to a rebuilding team in your last years.
I think if he were to get traded it’ll because the Cubs are trying to ship him to a contender if they have to start a rebuild during his contract. He just doesn’t want to move unless he has a say in where he wants to go.
Word is, the cubs deferred the money our in terms of years, while the redsox deferred it in terms of decades – plural.
Net present value of say, 60m deferred 8 years is much different than 20 years.
The fish that got away
Boras is gloating. Client got his 200 million and more.
Out bid by $10 million probably did the Sox a favor. Sometimes the best moves you make are the one’s you don’t.
I do not expect them to sign Bichette. Trading for Paredes is fine as long as it doesn’t cost Early or Tolle. Suarez on a two-year $60-70 million dollar deal might not be terrible. I mostly expect Campbell at 2B and Mayer at 3B on opening day
Interesting how Bregman’s negotiations played out. He didn’t get exactly what his ask was….the market showed what it would bear, and it’s quite a bit, but not everything. Let’s see how that market deals with Bichette and Bellinger. So far, it’s been fairly stable–no huge bargains (except maybe the Japanese players) and no “how did he get that much?)
Don’t know the details of the proposed deferrals, but it sounds like the Sox DID come reasonably close to the Cubs offer. I can understand them not wanting to splurge on an aging guy who was hurt for much of 2025.
Bregman the penny pincher
If you have an organizational policy regarding no trade clauses, you’re gonna miss out on a lot of free agents.
Quit buying tickets and watching!
Red Sox should call the Astros and try and trade for Paredes. His swing is perfect for Fenway
I’ve been typing Paredes’s name into one comment or another for days, so I rec’d your comment. I think he could be had for Kyle Harrison and one or two lower level prospects. Since Harrison came in the Devers deal, there would be a certain poetic feel to converting his trade value into a 3B.
He wants stability for his kids so he’s moving away from the state that is number one in education. Um, ok.
Honestly, it’s all about squeezing a few more bucks from an organization.
Just be honest about it. Yeesh.
He might be able to squeeze in private school tuition…
I’ve been in both public and private, there’s good and bad.
So you’re saying there was no guarantee his children would have received a stable, top notch education in MA? Your tying stability into MA’s education rank has got us right here…
You’re misunderstanding my whole point. It’s about the money. That’s all. Don’t bring your kids into it. It’s about the money.
Could be he just wanted his kids to learn how an ‘a’ and ‘r’ have different sounds in American English. Well, ‘most’ spoken American English. 😊
Thank god the annual Bregman show is over. To the moon Alice, what a hoot. With Fandual gone, I’m wondering how the ole Tigers will be on T.V. this season ? I suppose no news is good news ? If they are not on cable that means I will finally be able to cancel cable so it’ll be interesting how it all plays out.
I am sad that we have been deprived of a multi-decade “Bregman Day” to replace “Bonilla Day.”
Who signed Ricky Bones?
I honestly don’t think Bregman ever had any intention to play another season in Boston. He needed the Sox only to create a “bidding war” to get as much as possible from the Cubs. Had Boston offered an extension to Bregman before last season was over they’d probably have found out he didn’t want to play in Boston. Bregman is a solid player but 35m per year is an overpay by Chicago.
Yankees need an OF if Bellinger doesn’t come back. Would Boston do Jazz for Duran? I don’t think Jazz stays in New York long term
But there’s so many good jazz clubs in New York …
DJ LeMahieu is available. The Yankees will pay most of his salary this year. He batted (in limited ABs as he was cut) .266; had a 2.5: 1 strikeout to walk ratio; and a plus dWAR. Think he might get a bit geeked at playing against the Yanks? He’s more than enough to hold down the fort until someone from the minors – Mayer – can step up.
My Tigers should sign him so Colt Keith and Spencer Torkelson can get some rest (Keith against lefties).
Bellinger turned down basically the same offer from the Yankees apparently.
Bizarre
The deferred payments need to stop. Its a goddamn joke at this point
Employers should stop 401k matching. It’s a goddamn joke at this point.
Every team is allowed to do it and they’ll keep doing it, whether some random “JLA2131” thinks they’re jokes or not.
As a Sox fan, I am still intrigued with the possibility of Hunter Greene opening the season on our roster. Even before the Bregman signing, I was thinking that adding Ke*Bryan Hayes to Hunter might get the Reds attention. I think that KeBryan’s contract runs from 2026-2029, totaling 30 million + a 6 million dollar buyout on a 12 million dollar club option for 2030. Maybe Hunter +Hayes for Duran/Abeau + Bello/Tolle. Might have to add Casas
Reds aren’t gonna do that. They’re a contender now, albeit barely.
Probably more of a contender than the Red Sox are, at this moment.
((Ducks for cover from Sam Adams bottles thrown from the Green Monster))
Of course the Red Sox announce that they offered 5 years at $165M AFTER the Cubs signing and terms are announced. I call BS.
If the Sox start the season with Mayer at 3rd and Romy at 2nd…..Breslow needs to go. This franchise is getting ridiculous. ANY goodwill they had is GONE until they show they WANT to win. STOP penny pinching & coupon cutting with these free agents. Its embarrassing and we are easily last in the AL East. Rant over.
I feel like it’s more Henry’s fault than Breslow. He’s doing the best he can with the limited budget he’s getting.
First Brasier now Bregman!!! The Cubs like signing all the old Red Sox greats !!! 😉
Well, they gave us Buckner …
Ouch!!! Side note… we gave them Schraldi for Lee Smith I believe and Al Nipper!!!