Headlines

  • Cubs To Sign Alex Bregman
  • Yankees, Cody Bellinger “At An Impasse” In Negotiations
  • Braves Re-Sign Tyler Kinley
  • Rockies Acquire Jake McCarthy From Diamondbacks
  • Max Kepler Receives 80-Game PED Suspension
  • Pirates Sign Ryan O’Hearn
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Details Of Red Sox’ Pursuit Of Alex Bregman

By Nick Deeds | January 11, 2026 at 2:19pm CDT

2:19pm: Cotillo reports that Boston’s offer to Bregman was for five years and $165MM with significant deferrals.

2:09pm: Alex Bregman is headed to Chicago after landing with the Cubs on a five-year, $175MM contract that was first reported last night. That’s a crushing blow for the Red Sox, who were long reported to be prioritizing a reunion with Bregman after he opted out of the final two years and $80MM on his contract with the club back in November. In the aftermath of Bregman’s departure, reports out of Boston are shedding some light on the efforts the Red Sox made to retain their All-Star, and where that offer ultimately fell short.

According to a report from The Boston Globe’s Peter Abraham last night, the Red Sox “did not come close financially and were not willing to give Bregman a full no-trade clause, which the Cubs did.” Today, reporting from Chris Cotillo and Sean McAdam of MassLive confirmed that the Red Sox were unwilling to offer Bregman a no-trade clause and added that the team cited “organizational policy” regarding no-trade protection in doing so. That, McAdam writes, “proved to be a sticking point” for Bregman, who has young children and values stability for them as he heads into his third consecutive year in a new city.

As for the financials, McAdam writes that the five-year offer from Boston was “reasonably competitive,” but added that it fell short of Chicago’s offer financially. Like the Cubs’ offer, which includes $70MM in deferred money, the Red Sox offer also included significant deferrals. Those deferred payments were scheduled out differently, however, as McAdam notes that the Red Sox proposed a payment plan “stretching out decades.” The exact payment details of Chicago’s offer aren’t yet known, McAdam notes that the decades-long payment structure Boston offered widened the gap between the two offers and reduced the value of the Red Sox’ offer further than the already-lower sticker price, relative to the Cubs’ offer.

Exactly how the two offers stack up will be easier to judge once more details come out about Bregman’s contract details in Chicago, but in any case it seems the offer that the Red Sox reportedly considered “aggressive” came up well short of what Cubs president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer and his front office managed to put together. As a result, the Red Sox will have to turn elsewhere in their search for another middle-of-the-order bat for their infield. USA Today’s Bob Nightengale was among the reports to suggest in the aftermath of Bregman’s signing that the other top infielder on the market, shortstop Bo Bichette, could be the player they pivot to. Bichette figures to sign for even more than Bregman, did, however; MLBTR predicted an eight-year, $208MM contract for the infielder at the outset of the offseason.

Some of that, of course, has to do with the contract length. Perhaps an eight-year deal for Bichette, which would run through his age-35 season, would be just as or even more appealing to the Red Sox than signing Bregman through his age-36 season on a five year deal. On the other hand, it’s worth noting that this Red Sox front office has not yet given out a contract longer than three years via free agency. If the team has an aversion to long-term deals more generally, it would be difficult for the Red Sox to outbid rival suitors for Bichette like the Phillies and Yankees that have no qualms about signing free agents to lengthy contracts.

If the Red Sox aren’t willing to splurge on Bichette, the pickings for replacement Bregman become a lot slimmer. Eugenio Suarez offers big power and could be a fit on a shorter-term deal in free agency, but he struggled in the second half last year, will play this year at 34 years old, and is a lackluster defender at the hot corner. Turning to the trade market, Alex Speier of the Boston Globe reportedly shortly before the new year that the Red Sox had narrowed their focus to five infield options: Bregman, Bichette, Ketel Marte, Isaac Paredes, and Brendan Donovan. With Bregman now in Chicago and Marte having been officially taken off the market by Arizona, that leaves Paredes and Donovan as the two primary alternatives to Bichette in that report.

Of the two, Paredes seems to be the better fit. Both are controlled for two seasons after this one, but Paredes is a right-handed hitter who seems likely to cost less in trade than Donovan. While Paredes has been pushed out of the Astros’ nominal starting lineup by the addition of Carlos Correa over the summer, Donovan’s market is known to have many suitors including the Giants, Mariners, and Royals. What’s more, Paredes is a right-handed hitter who primarily plays third base, making him a much cleaner replacement for Bregman than Donovan, a lefty hitter who has played all over the field but primarily plays second base. Paredes is also a marginally better hitter over the last four seasons (124 wRC+ vs 119) coming off a stronger platform season (128 wRC+ vs 119). Paredes (hamstring injury) and Donovan (sports hernia surgery) both ended their seasons with injury complications but are expected to be full-go for Spring Training next month.

Of course, it’s possible the club could look at other options now that their preferred targets have begun to dwindle. The Cubs, themselves, now have a surplus of infield talent after bringing in Bregman displaced Matt Shaw at third base. Adding another unproven youngster to a very young Red Sox roster likely wouldn’t be especially appealing, but Cubs second baseman Nico Hoerner has garnered trade interest this winter and could be more available now that Bregman has freed up Shaw to take over the keystone following a hypothetical Hoerner trade. An elite defender at second base who has also posted strong grades at shortstop in the past, Hoerner is a well-regarded clubhouse presence who could help fill the leadership void created by the loss of Bregman.

With that said, his 109 wRC+ last year was a career-high, and his lack of power is unlikely to be especially attractive to a team like the Red Sox that finished middle-of-the-pack in homers last year and expressed an interest in bringing in a big-time slugger like Kyle Schwarber or Pete Alonso earlier this winter in hopes of improving that area of the offense. It’s also an open question as to whether the Cubs would even be especially inclined to deal Hoerner, as an infield of Bregman, Hoerner, Dansby Swanson and Michael Busch would be among the strongest in baseball headed into 2026. What’s more, Hoerner is slated to hit free agency following the 2026 campaign and the Red Sox may prefer to add a player under longer-term control for fear of finding themselves in this same predicament again next year.

Share Repost Send via email

Boston Red Sox Chicago Cubs Alex Bregman

Reds To Sign Pierce Johnson
Main
Reds Sign Garrett Hampson, Josh Staumont, Brandon Leibrandt To Minors Contracts
View Comments (159)
Post a Comment

159 Comments

  1. EndinStealth

    3 hours ago

    Hey Red Sox you like dealing with the Cardinals. Interested in Arenado now? lol

    9
    Reply
    • DirtyWater04

      3 hours ago

      Nope.

      6
      Reply
    • bighiggy

      3 hours ago

      He would probably come very cheap. I bet the cards eat 20 to 25 of his left over 42(5 mil from Rockies too)that would leave him 12 mil over 2. 6 a year for arenado could end up being a steal. Would probably only cost a 25 to 30 ranked organizational prospect

      2
      Reply
      • bighiggy

        3 hours ago

        Or hear me out. They throw in jojo remero with arenado and 25 mil and one of the cards lower ranked prospects for casas?

        2
        Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          3 hours ago

          Regardless of the parameters, I can see the Sox getting Arenado as cost efficiency remains important to Henry in recent years. I don’t know Romero so I can’t comment but instead of cash back, why not Yoshida instead of Casas. One for one. Then Bloom who signed Yoshida can work out another deal involving Yoshida and Donovan.

          2
          Reply
        • Buckner

          2 hours ago

          “Details Of Red Sox’ Pursuit Of Alex Bregman”

          Does NOT matter!

          8
          Reply
        • Devlsh

          2 hours ago

          No one wants Yoshida.

          Even Bloom has to know that was a mistake.

          1
          Reply
      • Chaim Breslow's Purse

        2 hours ago

        I agree, if we get Arenado cheaply, it might be a good gamble if he can split time with Mayer. My gut is to start Mayer at 3b but he is injury prone snd another lefty, so if we got a righty to platoon, it could help. We just have to do something about our exessive outfielders. We need some trade to go down

        Reply
        • FenwayMonster

          16 mins ago

          Arenado can’t hit… Fast forward from his days in Colorado to the last two seasons. Do you think he is going to rebound?

          Reply
      • KnicksFanCavsFan

        2 hours ago

        @big

        I would think the Cards would want more than a 25 to 30 guy unless it’s a guy who they feel is just undervalued but my pop up in top 100 list in w years or so. Why eat that much cash for so little of a reward?

        Reply
        • Devlsh

          1 hour ago

          I actually think the Cardinals would go for that. Not because Arenado doesn’t have some value, but because Stl wants to use his roster spot for players who may eventually be part of the next successful team.

          That said, if I were Boston, I’d go for either Suarez or Paredes.

          Reply
    • Badfinger

      3 hours ago

      What is the obsession with Arenado? The guy is shot.

      16
      Reply
      • EndinStealth

        3 hours ago

        Psst its was a joke

        1
        Reply
      • GASoxFan

        2 hours ago

        As long as StL is desperately trying to find someone, anyone, who is foolish enough to give arenado a 26 man spot, the suggestions will keep on coming

        1
        Reply
    • Mets fan who wants Pete back

      1 hour ago

      Why not? Just curious on your thoughts. If you could get him for cheap, could you not reinvest the money towards a different bat? I haven’t fully thought it all the way through but Eugenio Suarez and Arenado would come out to be similar in dollars at a shorter length and would provide some pop. I’m not a fan of either team. Just wondering your thoughts.

      Reply
    • Tardaddy

      54 mins ago

      You take Hicks then maybe

      Reply
  2. Jim Carter

    3 hours ago

    From a free agency standpoint, the Red Sox put all their eggs in one basket. They’ve accomplished nothing this off season.

    6
    Reply
    • alan.kawadler@verizon.net 2

      3 hours ago

      But they tried, they really really tried there are all the other teams outsmarted them.

      4
      Reply
    • luclusciano

      3 hours ago

      Yankees are on a similar trajectory

      4
      Reply
      • slider32

        2 hours ago

        The difference is the Yanks have Cole returning!

        Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          2 hours ago

          slider32: Are you asking us or telling us?

          Reply
      • sfes

        2 hours ago

        Can’t beat the Mets strange off season. Might be fighting for 3rd place if prospects don’t work out

        Reply
        • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

          25 mins ago

          Sfes- get ready for a lot more of this. Red Sox fans here have been watching a heavily analytics driven rebuild for six years now. A lot of it makes no sense

          Reply
      • nordsfan

        1 hour ago

        Did the Red Sox sign him? No! So who the hell cares if they talked to his representative. The same could be said about half the teams in the league that checked in on him.

        Reply
        • rondon

          6 mins ago

          But he didn’t play for half the teams last season.

          Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      3 hours ago

      Off season ain’t over. Doesn’t sound like Bregman was even their top priority. They can use Mayer at 3B. Or sign Suarez late for a bargain one year deal. I think their priority is another TOR pitcher, either Valdez or a trade for Gore or Peralta, the latter of whom they’d extend.

      That’s assuming they don’t just go with Bichette.

      1
      Reply
    • luckyh

      3 hours ago

      Most of us are taking this loss as a win.

      9
      Reply
      • bronyaur1

        2 hours ago

        I suspect had your team matched it, you’d be screeching, “Winnah! Wicked bettah than Nomah!”

        4
        Reply
    • deweybelongsinthehall

      2 hours ago

      I know you said from a free agency standpoint but trades matter as much in roster construction. If they can swap in a righty bat for Yoshida, Casas and/or Duran, the lineup becomes good. Adding two bats and it becomes very good. I now want Suarez but as the DH. If they were able to invest in Bichette (not likely in my view), the lineup would be set with Mayer at third, Bichette at second. Without Bichette, there remains a hole.

      1
      Reply
      • GASoxFan

        2 hours ago

        Dewey – what the sox *really* need is a SS and to move Story back to 2B to hide his weak arm and range issues.

        Just getting another terrible defender with a bat and sticking him at 2B doesnt fix the massive defensive problem in Boston.

        Had boston had a talented SS, your Bichette argument makes more sense. But they dont, they’ve got Story.

        You have a hole at 3B youre hoping to plug with a kid that had season ending injuries for 4 consecutive seasons. You’ve got a negative defender at SS, who exposes the flaws in the 3B and 2B on either side of him, and makes nearly as many errors as HRs, and thats just what he’s charged with, not ones he got away with.

        Bo or no Bo, theres a gaping hole on the left side of the infield with no solution. That should be addressed first.

        2
        Reply
        • Tardaddy

          52 mins ago

          We have a very talented SS in Mayer

          Reply
        • GASoxFan

          46 mins ago

          Tardaddy – you cant put Mayer at both 3B and SS, not how it works.

          And, Mayer has never made it through a professional season of baseball without a season ending injury. He’s 0-4 between the minors and last season.

          Thats not inspiring

          Reply
    • Chaim Breslow's Purse

      2 hours ago

      Honestly, though, there is arguably more value in trades. We have the pieces to trade. A lot of these are big contracts, some of which are bound to fail

      2
      Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

        2 hours ago

        Purse- any player could fail, whether its a FA or trade. Free agents costs dollars, if they fail, it only costs money. If you naje a trade and give up significant prospects, not only does the player you obtained need to succeed. But you need the players you gave away to not succeed. Tricky situation

        Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      2 hours ago

      “They’ve accomplished nothing this off season.”

      Were you in a coma when they traded for Gray and Contreras?

      8
      Reply
      • Chaim Breslow's Purse

        2 hours ago

        @Jarred I noticed that too, but in his defense, he mentioned they accomplished nothing in the free agent market, specifically from that standpoint. Once I read that I had a different perspective. Gotta read it all in context.

        1
        Reply
      • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

        2 hours ago

        Jarred- Gray was a fantastic move. Contreras doesnt come close to being a good addition without a matching offensive piece, either at 2B or 3B. His stats were similar to Bregman’s with about 60 more AB’s

        Reply
    • Thirdbaseman

      2 hours ago

      I wouldn’t say they accomplished nothing this offseason. From a free agency perspective alone, yes. But via trades they did increase the rotation depth by adding Gray and Oviedo and added a righty 1B in Contreras who should hit well at Fenway.

      Unfortunately for the Red Sox though that’s inadequate to compete in a division that saw the already-awesome Bluejays get better by adding Cease and Okamoto, and the Orioles add not one but two 35+ homer bats to their lineup in Alonso and Ward (plus a quality closer), and Yankees will probably bring Bellinger back (or add Tucker if Bluejays don’t). Heck, just to keep treading water now that Bregman’s gone, the Red Sox absolutely have to add Bichette and would need to overpay to do so because they have no leverage this late in the offseason. If they get outbid by the Phillies on him they are in deep doodoo

      2
      Reply
    • Salzilla

      1 hour ago

      Those two sentences don’t go together. They haven’t done much in FA but the Gray and Contreras trades help a lot.

      Reply
  3. MLB Top 100 Commenter

    3 hours ago

    If the Cubs extend Nico Hoerner, I will increase Hoyer’s grade in my book from C- to B+.

    4
    Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      3 hours ago

      Obviously the plan is to let him go and use Shaw at 2B. Middle infielders who generate a lot of their value defensively don’t age well.

      1
      Reply
      • Alfred E Neuman

        2 hours ago

        seamaholic 2: Davey Concepcion, Mark Belanger, Felix Millan, Bud Harrelson, and a host of others would like a word.

        1
        Reply
      • Steinbrenner2728

        49 mins ago

        seamaholic 2’s obsession with being a contrarian should be a case study

        Reply
      • rondon

        1 min ago

        That’s not obvious at all. He was virtually the mvp of that team last season. They extended him once. They may do it again. He loves Chicago and they love him.

        1
        Reply
    • Blah blah blah

      3 hours ago

      Nobody cares about your book. You’re not qualified to assess the performance of people who know more than you do.

      6
      Reply
      • vtadave

        2 hours ago

        And are not qualified to assess whether others are qualified.

        5
        Reply
      • Alfred E Neuman

        2 hours ago

        Blah blah blah: You, however, are qualified to be a troll. You’re doing a fine job of it.

        1
        Reply
        • AssumesFactNotInEvidence

          2 hours ago

          AEN – Why do you trolls always call other folks trolls? kettle, pot, black jack and all that…

          Triple B – I gotta agree wiffya, the self anointed top 100 guy? who cares about his book and ‘tude? glad you pointed it out!

          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          1 hour ago

          AssumesFactNotInEvidence: Who made you the arbiter of who’s a troll and who isn’t?

          Talk about pot meeting kettle.

          Reply
        • AssumesFactNotInEvidence

          1 hour ago

          So you can call blah blah blah a troll but get your knickers in a wad when it’s mentioned you might be a troll yourself. What’s good the goose is good for the Alfred gander…grab a snickers and do your best to calm down if possible

          Reply
        • Alfred E Neuman

          36 mins ago

          AssumesFactNotInEvidence: Alternatively, you might STFU. Never a terrible idea.

          Reply
        • AssumesFactNotInEvidence

          19 mins ago

          Excellent top tier troll reply! You’re doing a fine job!

          Reply
    • Saintg4life

      2 hours ago

      I really like his bat—dude hit .300 almost the entire season & when the Cubs needed a key hit to drive in a run, it seemed like he always came through.
      Would hate to see him go.

      Reply
  4. x_jesp

    3 hours ago

    Get rid of the owner John Henry!

    9
    Reply
  5. Big Red Machine

    3 hours ago

    Speaks to just how much of an overpay this was for the Cubs

    6
    Reply
    • I Like Big Bunts

      3 hours ago

      Speaks to just how much of a numbskull you are

      9
      Reply
      • bronyaur1

        2 hours ago

        Exactly.

        1
        Reply
    • thefallensoldier

      3 hours ago

      The red sox offered 10 mil less lmao

      Reply
      • Big Red Machine

        3 hours ago

        Deferred decades. Look up what “present value of a contract” means. There was much more than a $10M diff.

        3
        Reply
        • thefallensoldier

          2 hours ago

          Cope, the cubs deferred as well. Respect for standing on your dumb comment tho

          3
          Reply
        • Big Red Machine

          2 hours ago

          As a Reds fan, I’m thrilled the Cubs over paid by a huge margin for an aging 3 time all-star. Not a lot to cope about.

          2
          Reply
        • CC Ryder

          2 hours ago

          As a Reds fan aren’t you tired of seeing other teams in the Division do more?

          1
          Reply
        • Big Red Machine

          2 hours ago

          Brother, we are in the NL Central – the Reds have done way more than the Cardinals and Brewers this offseason, and have done more than the Pirates since the beginning of time. Maybe if we were in the NL West I’d be more upset.

          1
          Reply
        • I Like Big Bunts

          1 hour ago

          Every Reds signing this season is an “overpay” because it won’t make a difference.

          Reply
    • corey

      3 hours ago

      Not as an overpay Ticker would have costed.

      2
      Reply
    • playhard9

      21 mins ago

      Big get for the Cubs for the next couple seasons, but will be a heavy weight as he gets older. No way he is worth that much the last three years when his bat slows and injuries mount. Nice to see the Red Sox lose a bidding war. They usually win those.

      Reply
      • olmtiant

        20 mins ago

        Since when???

        Reply
  6. Thec’s

    3 hours ago

    The Red Sox is not going to sign a top notch FA! We are going to stink this year! Fire Breslow and please John Henry sell the team

    5
    Reply
    • Frenchredsox

      3 hours ago

      No problem – now just ask your bank for the money to do it. You do realise that every Baseball team is business ? That means neither money grows on trees and employees (baseball players) are paid to their value.Why luxury tax exists.and revenue sharing so it’s a competitive sport which creates enjoyment and excitement- rather than one team winning 10 WS in a row .

      1
      Reply
    • Ebouch25

      24 mins ago

      This is less about Breslow and more about ownership. I believe Henry will be one of the stakeholders for a cap and you can’t spend big and also say MLB needs a cap. They probably went into this off-season knowing full well they weren’t going to spend.

      Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      11 mins ago

      Thec’s – Brealow has been pretty much outclassed by his peers, and Boras used him like a cheap date. Moreover, roster construction and having a plan to maximize the Crochet/Anthony years seems to be missing.
      This year, $31m for Contreras and Gray, with massive holes still to be filled.
      These trades, and no FA signings, isn’t smart, or cute, or funny, or whatever the heck its supposed to be.
      Starting the off season with a stacked farm system, and almost $60m to spend i wouldnt believe you if in October you told me on Jan 11th this is where we’d be.

      Reply
  7. DirtyWater04

    3 hours ago

    Classic tightwad Red Sox. Nothing of any surprise in any of these reports.

    4
    Reply
  8. 30 Parks

    3 hours ago

    Red Sox front office is tone deaf.

    2
    Reply
  9. carlos15

    3 hours ago

    No trade clauses shouldn’t that big a deal breaker for an organization. Most often they get waived anyway.

    4
    Reply
    • cubsmatt

      3 hours ago

      This is true, and I also don’t expect Bregman’s contract to be very tradable either by the time you might want to, anyway. So to me the NTC seems almost superfluous here.

      2
      Reply
      • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

        2 hours ago

        They had to do it to get him, and there’s always a chance that the team fizzles while Bregman is still good. If that happened, now they have to ask him where he wants to go instead of just trading him to whoever offers the best return.

        Reply
    • Devlsh

      2 hours ago

      “No trade clauses shouldn’t that big a deal breaker for an organization. Most often they get waived anyway.”

      Tell that to the Cardinals, who couldn’t move Arenado last year because of his NTC.

      1
      Reply
  10. DavRozNYY

    3 hours ago

    Red Sox have good pitching, they’ll still compete for a wild card spot.

    2
    Reply
  11. olmtiant

    3 hours ago

    Well I was partly right… Bregman signed over this weekend just with a team approximately 1000 miles to the west….

    1
    Reply
    • DolemiteisMyname

      3 hours ago

      You said the same this yesterday

      Reply
      • AssumesFactNotInEvidence

        2 hours ago

        It bared repeating obviously…

        Reply
  12. smkelly1970

    3 hours ago

    Good for him, I guess, but the fact is this- if Bregman wanted to stay in Boston, he would’ve honored his contract. The fact that he’s elsewhere should come as no surprise to anyone.

    4
    Reply
  13. Bruin1012

    3 hours ago

    It’s really sad if it mostly came down to not give no trade clause. He wanted to finish his career somewhere and if that was the big difference I’m really pissed with Breslow. I’m sure Bregman wanted that protection after he saw what happened to Devers in Beantown. It’s just sad, I think Bregman was overpaid but that’s the nature of free agency and Bregman fit so well and dropped right into that two slot behind Anthony. Just sad today and I’m confident the Red Sox are not going to sign Bichette.

    1
    Reply
    • Bivouac-Sal

      3 hours ago

      “It’s really sad…”

      “It’s just sad, I think Bregman was overpaid”

      “Just sad today ”

      Please clarify. Are you sad?

      Reply
      • Bruin1012

        3 hours ago

        Those things statements aren’t mutually exclusive but based on your comment I doubt you know what mutually exclusive is. Yea I’m in fighting mood today.

        3
        Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          3 hours ago

          Well you certainly put me in my place. Now I am sad.

          1
          Reply
        • Bruin1012

          3 hours ago

          Bring something to the conversation at least when I used to argue with KD17 he brought something to the conversation. You just brought snark.

          Reply
        • Bivouac-Sal

          2 hours ago

          Much more fun to wade through your excellent prose and wait for your next lightweight insult.

          Reply
    • Frenchredsox

      3 hours ago

      Fact is if he wanted stability he would have honoured the 3 year deal at 40 million. Nope, he preferred to play the field – so not a team player just another individual who cares for $$ rather than loyalty. But that’s a summary of a lot of modern athletes unlike Tek or Dustin …

      3
      Reply
      • Polyglot

        2 hours ago

        @Frenchredsox

        Actually, he did want stability, he asked the Sox more than once during the season to extend him, they continuously denied him even a meeting about an extension.

        The powers that be were content to play the season out and then talk numbers expecting him to honor his 3 year deal, but if you give someone an opt out, this is what’s most likely going to happen.

        They had a chance, but refused to talk, so though he left, he did seemingly want to stay, if the no trade clause was the dealbreaker, that’s sad.

        If the Sox replace him with Bichette or Marte, cool, but any other bat is a massive downgrade imo.

        4
        Reply
      • GASoxFan

        2 hours ago

        French – stability is about more than playing 2 seasons then having uncertainty at an advanced age of where you go next.

        Certainty is doing what Bregman did – ask in season for an extension so he knows where he will be after 2027. Then, if you cant get that, find a team.willing to guarantee where you and your family will be until late, if not the end, of your expected career.

        2
        Reply
  14. ctbronx7

    3 hours ago

    How will the Red Sox react? Will they now overpay for Bichette?

    Reply
  15. thomasg1951

    3 hours ago

    Cubs only had to offer a nickel more.

    1
    Reply
  16. Duffy S. Cliff

    3 hours ago

    If the Cubs don’t want Shaw anymore, we’ll gladly take him!

    Reply
  17. Diggydugler

    3 hours ago

    Reporters probably don’t know deferral structure on deals but I hate how its always reported “significant deferrals”. All that matters is the AAV after deferrals because that is what it costs the team and what will be on the CBT calculation. What was the actual offer in CBT AAV? that would be more helpful.

    Reply
    • bronyaur1

      2 hours ago

      The word is $70 mill or 40% of the contract value is deferred.

      1
      Reply
  18. Straws Varshow

    3 hours ago

    Bregman should have just set Bo’s market, 35 per at 8 or 9 years. 9 seasons puts him right at Bregmans age when his contract is done

    1
    Reply
    • Frenchredsox

      3 hours ago

      Bo’s value is significantly higher due to age (he is in his prime) and his defensive spectrum.Also it would weaken a direct competitor. Bergman to the Cubs means the Sox would only face him in the WS not multiple times a year .

      1
      Reply
      • Straws Varshow

        2 hours ago

        Which is why i said 8 or 9 years. Bo isn’t getting much more than 35 per if at all

        1
        Reply
  19. Josephblow

    3 hours ago

    Don’t care about the deferred money. Just give the current AAV. None of my concern how much he invests.

    2
    Reply
    • eatonculo

      2 hours ago

      Yeah, but it affects how much the team has to spend each year of the contract. Some fans care about those things.

      Reply
  20. rememberthecoop

    3 hours ago

    That would be just like the Cubs. Take on too much salary than Ricketts likes so he tells Hoyer he can only sign Bregman if he frees up some money. So Hoyer turns around and moves Nico in a salary dump reminiscent of what they did last year, when they gave away Bellinger after trading for Tucker.

    Reply
  21. brocnessmonster

    3 hours ago

    wait… teams other than the Dodgers were allowed to offer deferrals too? facebook comments had me believing otherwise.

    6
    Reply
    • Klink

      1 hour ago

      The Dodgers have already filed a complaint with the league office about this abhorrent violation.

      1
      Reply
      • Another Dodgers Fan

        1 hour ago

        Klink…

        So you didn’t notice other teams were deferring contracts Sgt. Schultz?

        “I see nothing!”

        Couldn’t resist.

        1
        Reply
    • Sad.Sox 3 (Skenes in 2027)

      2 mins ago

      Broc- yes, but dont be a bad organization and tell the player “youll get your last check around 2046”

      Reply
  22. DugoutJester

    3 hours ago

    So in essence Bregman knew he got overpaid, that’s rich.

    Reply
  23. Louie and Nellie

    3 hours ago

    The Red Sox, in spite of themselves, got lucky. Bregman has been going the wrong way for a few years.

    7
    Reply
  24. DolemiteisMyname

    3 hours ago

    Louie-Riiiight. you were most likely doing cart wheels last year when YOUR Red Sox signed him last year.

    1
    Reply
  25. swanhenge

    3 hours ago

    The peripherals of the deal are what killed it. That NTC might sting in about 3-4 years.

    Idk, if 5/165 is actually true, I’m encouraged they went that high. Sounds like there might’ve been some heavy deferral action in there, but they’re at least trying to find ways to make things happen. I hate how that looks like I’m defending the FO. Maybe the 5/165 is wrong (exaggerated), but Cottillo is usually on it.

    What now? Bichette checks all the boxes, but he’s swimming in deeper waters w NYY and PHI. Sox won’t even consider a number for Bichette. It’s looking like they’ll have to go to the well again and send out more prospects for a Donovan/Hoerner…Arenado!

    2
    Reply
    • Thirdbaseman

      2 hours ago

      My gut tells me Sox will pivot to Suarez. He’s a downgrade overall from Bregman but he’s torn the cover off the ball on a small career sample of 40+ at-bats at Fenway, is considered a good clubhouse guy, although aging he never gets injured, and can probably be had on a 2-year deal, less AAV and super less overall $$ commitment than Bichette.

      But honestly anything less than Bichette feels like an abject failure at this point. And it will take a monster deal to land him, for sure

      1
      Reply
      • GASoxFan

        35 mins ago

        This is where you double down, and, dont overreact with a crippling move.

        Thats how you wound up.with the devers problem.

        Bregman didnt work. Did the team screw it up by not engaging in-season? ABSOLUTELY.

        But you dont make a big mistake that has future crippling effects like the kind of contract BO will want.

        You want bichette? No more than 3 years.

        Reply
        • Thirdbaseman

          18 mins ago

          Why no more than 3 years? Bichette is 28 with great contact skills, is a solid athlete who will probably age well. Throwout the one crap season where he played injured (2024) and you’re looking at player who will likely peak over the next 2 years, then start a gradual decline, but with his bat-to-ball skills and body type it will likely be a gradual decline. For Bichette I’d go 6 years, no problem (but it will probably take 8 years to get him). Also will be cheaper AAV than what Breggy got

          Reply
  26. Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

    2 hours ago

    Hey I heard the Pittsburgh Pirates were also interested in signing Alex Bregman!

    Reply
  27. Another Dodgers Fan

    2 hours ago

    How different the Red Sox situation would be currently if they had actually used adult communication skills with Devers.

    Yes I know he’s a man child. But the way they went about the situation was terrible.

    4
    Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      2 hours ago

      I think they’d still be on the hunt for a third baseman because Devers cannot field. At all. That said, maybe keeping him would have convinced them to finally dump Yoshida for whatever they can get and then use the roster spot to find an adequate 3B who at least can, you know, catch the ball.

      3
      Reply
      • Another Dodgers Fan

        2 hours ago

        Agreed.

        They would have his bat this season. Which is really all he brings to the table. But they need some bats.

        Defence? No
        Clubhouse? No
        Intangibles? No
        Bat? Yes

        1
        Reply
        • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

          2 hours ago

          The clubhouse/intangibles stuff wouldn’t be so bad if the Red Sox didn’t jerk him around for 3 months last year before dumping him on SF. That one’s mostly on management. He seems to get along fine with the Giants.

          1
          Reply
  28. Jean Matrac

    2 hours ago

    “…the Red Sox “did not come close financially and were not willing to give Bregman a full no-trade clause…””

    $10M over 5 years is only $2m per. IMO $2M a year is not a great gap especially if a team really wants to sign someone. The NTC might have been the bigger factor for the Sox for not matching the Cubs offer. Of course, there’s probably other factors we don’t know about.

    3
    Reply
    • bronyaur1

      2 hours ago

      Especially if at the margin the $2 mill/yr is deferred. Pretty much rounding error.

      2
      Reply
    • Another Dodgers Fan

      2 hours ago

      I think the no trade clause is big. When you’re used to winning you don’t want to get shipped to a rebuilding team in your last years.

      1
      Reply
      • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

        2 hours ago

        I think if he were to get traded it’ll because the Cubs are trying to ship him to a contender if they have to start a rebuild during his contract. He just doesn’t want to move unless he has a say in where he wants to go.

        1
        Reply
    • GASoxFan

      2 hours ago

      Word is, the cubs deferred the money our in terms of years, while the redsox deferred it in terms of decades – plural.

      Net present value of say, 60m deferred 8 years is much different than 20 years.

      1
      Reply
  29. Dumpster Divin Theo

    2 hours ago

    The fish that got away

    Reply
  30. Charles B

    2 hours ago

    Boras is gloating. Client got his 200 million and more.

    Reply
  31. Rsox

    2 hours ago

    Out bid by $10 million probably did the Sox a favor. Sometimes the best moves you make are the one’s you don’t.

    I do not expect them to sign Bichette. Trading for Paredes is fine as long as it doesn’t cost Early or Tolle. Suarez on a two-year $60-70 million dollar deal might not be terrible. I mostly expect Campbell at 2B and Mayer at 3B on opening day

    2
    Reply
  32. mike156

    2 hours ago

    Interesting how Bregman’s negotiations played out. He didn’t get exactly what his ask was….the market showed what it would bear, and it’s quite a bit, but not everything. Let’s see how that market deals with Bichette and Bellinger. So far, it’s been fairly stable–no huge bargains (except maybe the Japanese players) and no “how did he get that much?)

    1
    Reply
  33. CaseyAbell

    2 hours ago

    Don’t know the details of the proposed deferrals, but it sounds like the Sox DID come reasonably close to the Cubs offer. I can understand them not wanting to splurge on an aging guy who was hurt for much of 2025.

    1
    Reply
  34. 'Tang It

    2 hours ago

    Bregman the penny pincher

    1
    Reply
  35. BCleveland3381

    2 hours ago

    If you have an organizational policy regarding no trade clauses, you’re gonna miss out on a lot of free agents.

    1
    Reply
  36. Thec’s

    2 hours ago

    Quit buying tickets and watching!

    Reply
  37. JonathanJ

    2 hours ago

    Red Sox should call the Astros and try and trade for Paredes. His swing is perfect for Fenway

    2
    Reply
    • Horace Fury

      1 hour ago

      I’ve been typing Paredes’s name into one comment or another for days, so I rec’d your comment. I think he could be had for Kyle Harrison and one or two lower level prospects. Since Harrison came in the Devers deal, there would be a certain poetic feel to converting his trade value into a 3B.

      Reply
  38. whyhayzee

    2 hours ago

    He wants stability for his kids so he’s moving away from the state that is number one in education. Um, ok.

    Honestly, it’s all about squeezing a few more bucks from an organization.

    Just be honest about it. Yeesh.

    4
    Reply
    • AssumesFactNotInEvidence

      2 hours ago

      He might be able to squeeze in private school tuition…

      2
      Reply
      • whyhayzee

        1 hour ago

        I’ve been in both public and private, there’s good and bad.

        Reply
        • AssumesFactNotInEvidence

          1 hour ago

          So you’re saying there was no guarantee his children would have received a stable, top notch education in MA? Your tying stability into MA’s education rank has got us right here…

          Reply
        • whyhayzee

          13 mins ago

          You’re misunderstanding my whole point. It’s about the money. That’s all. Don’t bring your kids into it. It’s about the money.

          Reply
    • O'sSayCanYouSee

      1 hour ago

      Could be he just wanted his kids to learn how an ‘a’ and ‘r’ have different sounds in American English. Well, ‘most’ spoken American English. 😊

      1
      Reply
  39. MPrck

    2 hours ago

    Thank god the annual Bregman show is over. To the moon Alice, what a hoot. With Fandual gone, I’m wondering how the ole Tigers will be on T.V. this season ? I suppose no news is good news ? If they are not on cable that means I will finally be able to cancel cable so it’ll be interesting how it all plays out.

    Reply
  40. highflyballintorightfield

    2 hours ago

    I am sad that we have been deprived of a multi-decade “Bregman Day” to replace “Bonilla Day.”

    5
    Reply
  41. Ranger 7

    2 hours ago

    Who signed Ricky Bones?

    Reply
  42. mab51357

    1 hour ago

    I honestly don’t think Bregman ever had any intention to play another season in Boston. He needed the Sox only to create a “bidding war” to get as much as possible from the Cubs. Had Boston offered an extension to Bregman before last season was over they’d probably have found out he didn’t want to play in Boston. Bregman is a solid player but 35m per year is an overpay by Chicago.

    Reply
    • mlbnyyfan

      1 hour ago

      Yankees need an OF if Bellinger doesn’t come back. Would Boston do Jazz for Duran? I don’t think Jazz stays in New York long term

      Reply
      • whyhayzee

        12 mins ago

        But there’s so many good jazz clubs in New York …

        Reply
  43. Tim Sullivan

    1 hour ago

    DJ LeMahieu is available. The Yankees will pay most of his salary this year. He batted (in limited ABs as he was cut) .266; had a 2.5: 1 strikeout to walk ratio; and a plus dWAR. Think he might get a bit geeked at playing against the Yanks? He’s more than enough to hold down the fort until someone from the minors – Mayer – can step up.

    My Tigers should sign him so Colt Keith and Spencer Torkelson can get some rest (Keith against lefties).

    Reply
  44. Grr arg grr

    1 hour ago

    Bellinger turned down basically the same offer from the Yankees apparently.

    Bizarre

    Reply
  45. JLA2131

    1 hour ago

    The deferred payments need to stop. Its a goddamn joke at this point

    Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      1 hour ago

      Employers should stop 401k matching. It’s a goddamn joke at this point.

      1
      Reply
    • Steinbrenner2728

      45 mins ago

      Every team is allowed to do it and they’ll keep doing it, whether some random “JLA2131” thinks they’re jokes or not.

      Reply
  46. TenYearsGone

    1 hour ago

    As a Sox fan, I am still intrigued with the possibility of Hunter Greene opening the season on our roster. Even before the Bregman signing, I was thinking that adding Ke*Bryan Hayes to Hunter might get the Reds attention. I think that KeBryan’s contract runs from 2026-2029, totaling 30 million + a 6 million dollar buyout on a 12 million dollar club option for 2030. Maybe Hunter +Hayes for Duran/Abeau + Bello/Tolle. Might have to add Casas

    Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      1 hour ago

      Reds aren’t gonna do that. They’re a contender now, albeit barely.

      Reply
      • O'sSayCanYouSee

        52 mins ago

        Probably more of a contender than the Red Sox are, at this moment.

        ((Ducks for cover from Sam Adams bottles thrown from the Green Monster))

        Reply
  47. df08988

    51 mins ago

    Of course the Red Sox announce that they offered 5 years at $165M AFTER the Cubs signing and terms are announced. I call BS.

    Reply
  48. fenwayfrank

    31 mins ago

    If the Sox start the season with Mayer at 3rd and Romy at 2nd…..Breslow needs to go. This franchise is getting ridiculous. ANY goodwill they had is GONE until they show they WANT to win. STOP penny pinching & coupon cutting with these free agents. Its embarrassing and we are easily last in the AL East. Rant over.

    Reply
    • bemmerson

      9 mins ago

      I feel like it’s more Henry’s fault than Breslow. He’s doing the best he can with the limited budget he’s getting.

      Reply
  49. olmtiant

    21 mins ago

    First Brasier now Bregman!!! The Cubs like signing all the old Red Sox greats !!! 😉

    Reply
    • whyhayzee

      11 mins ago

      Well, they gave us Buckner …

      2
      Reply
      • olmtiant

        6 mins ago

        Ouch!!! Side note… we gave them Schraldi for Lee Smith I believe and Al Nipper!!!

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Cubs To Sign Alex Bregman

    Yankees, Cody Bellinger “At An Impasse” In Negotiations

    Braves Re-Sign Tyler Kinley

    Rockies Acquire Jake McCarthy From Diamondbacks

    Max Kepler Receives 80-Game PED Suspension

    Pirates Sign Ryan O’Hearn

    Diamondbacks Will Reportedly Not Trade Ketel Marte

    Tigers, Tarik Skubal Likely Headed To Arbitration Hearing With $13MM Gap In Filing Figures

    Yankees’ Offer To Bellinger Reportedly Above $30MM AAV

    2026 Arbitration Tracker

    18 Players Exchange Filing Figures

    Phillies To Meet With Bo Bichette

    Cubs Acquire Edward Cabrera

    Rockies To Sign Michael Lorenzen

    Blue Jays Continuing To Pursue Kyle Tucker

    Angels Sign Kirby Yates

    Dodgers, Braves Among Teams To Show Interest In Freddy Peralta

    Join The Beta Test For The New Trade Rumors iPhone App

    Athletics Sign Tyler Soderstrom To Seven-Year Extension

    Giants Sign Tyler Mahle

    Recent

    Marlins Re-Sign Jesus Tinoco To Minor League Contract

    Reds Sign Garrett Hampson, Josh Staumont, Brandon Leibrandt To Minors Contracts

    Details Of Red Sox’ Pursuit Of Alex Bregman

    Reds To Sign Pierce Johnson

    Padres Interested In Adding Starting Pitcher

    GM Mike Hazen Discusses Diamondbacks’ Remaining Offseason Goals

    Cubs To Sign Alex Bregman

    Dodgers To Sign Andy Ibáñez

    Reds Sign Michael Toglia To Minor League Deal

    Yankees, Cody Bellinger “At An Impasse” In Negotiations

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android iTunes Play Store

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version