The 2025-26 offseason hasn’t been exceptionally slow overall to this point, with 30 of MLBTR’s Top 50 free agents already signed in addition to plenty of significant trades. With that said, however, things have been unusually quiet at the top of the class. Outside of an early strike by the Blue Jays to land Dylan Cease back in November, the only free agents in MLBTR’s Top 10 who have signed are Kyle Schwarber, who was always expected to re-up with the Phillies in relatively short order, and the NPB duo of Munetaka Murakami and Tatsuya Imai, both of whom had firm deadlines to sign a contract due to the rules of the posting process. The rest of the offseason’s top free agents are still out there, and while plenty of attention has been paid to the four best hitters available—Kyle Tucker, Bo Bichette, Alex Bregman, and Cody Bellinger—less fanfare has been made about the two best pitchers available.
With Cease and Imai off the market, the only two pitchers from MLBTR’s top 10 still available are lefties Framber Valdez and Ranger Suarez. Both are on the shortlist of the most talented lefty starters in the game at the moment, with solid track records of success in both the regular season and postseason. Both players took some time to get their careers into full swing; each became a full-time starter at age-26, though Valdez reached that point during the shortened 2020 season so he didn’t receive a full slate of starts until the following year. Suarez also received a half-season of starts before getting a full workload, as he joined the Phillies’ rotation on a permanent basis in August of 2021 with 12 starts down the stretch and never looked back. Since joining their respective rotations full time, each has proven to be a reliable front-end arm.
In terms of overall track record, Valdez has the edge. Valdez has an extra year as a starter under his belt, but even by that metric, volume is a clear separator. His 153 games started since joining the Astros’ rotation aren’t too far ahead of the 116 starts Suarez has made when factoring that extra year, but Valdez’s 973 innings of work utterly dwarf Suarez’s 654 frames. Things are much closer in terms of results on the field, but Valdez still has the edge with a 3.23 ERA and 3.38 FIP to Suarez’s 3.39 ERA and 3.45 FIP. Suarez’s 22.2% strikeout rate, 7.4% walk rate, and 51.3% ground ball rate are all solid. But Valdez’s has the edge in terms of punchouts and grounders, with only slightly more free passes: 23.8% strikeout rate, 8.0% walk rate, and 61.5% ground ball rate.
That combination of volume and results may paint the picture that Valdez is clearly the superior arm, but there’s more factors to consider. Suarez and Valdez enjoyed virtually identical platform seasons, with a 3.59 ERA and 3.57 FIP for Suarez to Valdez’s 3.66 ERA and 3.37 FIP. The pair’s strikeout rate was also mostly the same, (23.3% for Valdez and 23.2% for Suarez), but Suarez took a big step forward in terms of walk rate and issued free passes at just a 5.8% clip to Valdez’s 8.5%.
That ability to cut down walks is certainly attractive, and it’s fair to argue that Suarez is trending upward while Valdez could be starting to show some signs of decline. That’s especially relevant given the age gap between the two; Suarez is two years younger than Valdez, entering free agency at age-30 as opposed to age-32. MLBTR projected both pitchers for five-year deals back in November. Using those predictions, Suarez would be paid through age-34 while Valdez would be on the books through age-36 on an identical contract. Suarez would also be cheaper, at least according to MLBTR, with a $115MM prediction for Suarez compared to a $150MM prediction for Valdez.
In addition, Suarez’s postseason resume is nearly spotless, with a career 1.48 ERA in the playoffs. By contrast, Valdez has a 4.34 postseason ERA. That comes in double the innings (85 frames against Suarez’s 42 2/3 innings of work), but the elder lefty’s work in recent years has been particularly lackluster; he’s posted an 8.27 ERA in his last four playoff starts. A strong postseason resume isn’t typically a major factor in the sort of nine-figure deals Valdez and Suarez are seeking, but it could easily serve as a tiebreaker for some clubs between two pitchers this similar. Another soft factor that could play a role in differentiating the two is an incident last season where Astros catcher Cesar Salazar was struck by a pitch from Valdez in a cross-up situation. Speculation arose at the time that the pitch was intentional on Valdez’s part, though both players declared it an accident afterwards.
How do MLBTR readers view the two lefties, and which would you rather have over the next five years? Are Valdez’s superior volume and results enough to overcome Suarez’s advantages in age and postseason performance? Have your say in the poll below:

Give me Ranger
I voted Ranger just so I don’t have to see him carve up the Braves anymore….plus he’s really good lol
The Rangers should sign Ranger Suarez. It’s definitely more fitting.
Remind me which one throws at his teammates again?
Even though the teammate said that’s not what happened?
Ya, because the teammate is an actual good teammate and didn’t wanna throw Framber under the bus. If you’ve watched it, pretty damn obvious what happened lol. Valdez will get way less than his numbers show he’s worth. Because from the optics of that who would want him unless on a bargain, which someone will get.
Give me Suarez
You must believe in Santa
But it is what happened. We all saw it plain as day.
shhhh Carlos. None of this fact stuff. They want to hate and make incendiary comments even when the players themselves say it never happened.
Of course the player says it didn’t happen, what would he have to gain by saying it did? As a rookie I’m pretty sure the Astros wanted him to downplay it, so he did. I have eyes, Valdez’s reaction tells that he meant to do it and had no remorse for it. Only gonna cost him about 100 million. Your team can have him
Every former MLB player I have seen talk about it said it was intentional.
@Web- Don’t be obtuse. If Salazar, a journeyman catcher, says it happened the way it actually happened, he would be admonished for throwing his teammate under the bus, then likely never get another contract in MLB.
A backup minor league catcher hanging in the majors by a thread is not going to challenge Framber Valdez intentions. Will never happen. We all know he crossed him up to drill him and perhaps that is hurting his FA status…
Impossible to answer without knowing the contract terms.
kalki
No it’s not
Which one do you think is going to be better over the next 5 years?
That’s assuming they sign 5 year deals. I think Valdez gets a max of 3 years. Both guys are intriguing. Valdez has more upside but might have character issues. He’s more of a horse which is what the Yanks need right now
Suarez is a craftier pitcher who doesn’t rely on power but if he gets in trouble doesn’t have the big swing and miss stuff you’d like an ace to have.
Unless you read all of the assumption parameter and then the facts and combine them as a GM would have to do and say, which of these 2 do you want on those factors!
5 / 115 for Suarez
5/ 150 for Valdez
It’s all in the post for you before asking you to play the game.
Of course, actual offers and terms will come out later but the question is based on the info provided.
Framber
Framber’s a dbag.
9 out of 10 catchers pick Ranger
The 10th catcher will just threaten him to try it.
Also Ranger has a post-season era of 1.48 over 43 innings, Framber has a post-season era of 4.34 over 85 innings.
I saw Framber a couple times in the second half and wasn’t impressed. I believe Ranger Suarez will be the more successful and productive pitcher going forward.
Oh no. A random poster wasn’t impressed! Alert mlb GM’s!
He had a bad second half for some reason. Outside of that he’s really steady and never hurt.
I don’t care about the thing with Framber and the catcher (too many people convinced they know what happened there, and we will never know for sure), but I do care that he’s more than a year and a half older than Suarez.
Whats this, a sensible comment??? hmm 🤔 Lol, I think MeowMeow is the most levelheaded commentor I’ve ever seen in here. Koodoos!
Don’t worry I have my share of hyperbolic and snarky comments too xD
The other side of the age coin though is that Framber has been much more durable.
Kam – that could just mean he’s that much closer to breaking down with more wear and tear on the ol elbow
Could be. Especially at his age. But I think there might be something to some of the durable guys that is real. Suarez hasn’t been totally sidelined, but has missed time in all of his seasons. I don’t know if that would worry me all that much. As a fan, it’s all speculation as we aren’t privy to the physicals. The one thing that doesn’t really worry me from a performance perspective but does make me wonder about health is the velo drop.
Neither?
Watched that replay a half dozen times, and there is no doubt in my mind that Framber deliberately crossed him up. As a retired catcher, that is incredibly offensive. Framber is not the kind of dude that I want on my team, and Ranger is just a terrific kid.
Carver:
Re: red caps
Boston Red Sox, Cincinnati Reds, St. Louis Cardinals, and Washington Nationals as primary red teams, alongside the Texas Rangers, Cleveland Guardians (home cap); the latter two introduced new red caps for 2025.
We are talking baseball here, right?
I think Valdez is the better pitcher. He doesn’t miss starts and he’s good for 180+ innings. But the answer to this question is neither. I don’t want either one for 5 seasons.
Framber might not be a nice guy but he’s way more durable than Ranger, who can’t even throw 150 innings consistently. You pay a guy to make his starts and give you innings. Who cares about his personality?
His future teammates, who wonder if he’s going to try to injure them too
Spoken like a true whiney crybaby Karen.
Everybody who’s been around him says that he’s nice guy. What evidence do you have otherwise?
(And don’t reply with speculation about a singular 5 second incident, because speculation is not evidence.)
Ramos, are these the same teammates who said they DIDN’T bang on trash cans?
Prob Ranger. He’s younger and has a higher career war at this age. I think his stuff will age well. Plus framber is plump and idk.. those guys don’t age well and if there is even a lick of negatively behind is character after purposely crossing up his catcher, I’d take a lesser talent
I always thought of them as like basically an amalgam, hard to separate or distinguish down to their near identical ERA’s, so I hereby dub them Framger. Which one? Flip a coin
I’m going to pick based on first names. I have to pick Ranger.
Despite being an Astros fan, Framber is declining and is also becoming more streaky. Not sure I would call him an ace all the time, when good, he is, when bad, he SUCKS. And those are long stretches too (for the most part).
So Ranger
The answer is Zac Gallen on a shorter, cheaper term ($70mx4)
You do realize he sucked donkeys last year. Take a look at his Savant page and you may change your mind.
Framber stays healthier.
True!
The Dodgers would sign them both just for fun
bWAR over the past five years is basically a push 17.3 vs 17.7, Ranger is younger but more often injured. Tough call! Maybe better teammate or disposition is the deciding factor tbh
Definitely Framber.
As an Oriole, I’ll take Ranger Suarez. I like that he’s thrown fewer innings, I think he’s more likely to stay healthy, and I like that he was able to pitch successfully in the band box in Philly. Plus, he probably comes at a slight discount and I don’t think there is enough difference to justify paying more
He hasn’t ever had a healthy season though
I hear you but he’s averaged 28 starts over the last 4 years. I’ll take 25 solid starts a year these days. It’s a really short list of guys that give you more than that. The Os have enough pitching depth to make that work.
He’s averaged 26 starts over the past four seasons 29, 22, 27, 26, not bad
Don’t estimate Framber’s durability. He’s about as durable as you’ll ever get.
He’s averaged 30.33 starts over the past four seasons 31, 31, 28, 31. 11th best in the league, Ranger’s 104 starts ranks 34th best…
Suarez
9/27/25 Groin
3/23/25 Back
7/24/24 Back
6/1/24 Undisclosed
8/18/23 Hamstring
3/30/23 Elbow
6/30/22 Back
Chronic back injuries and you think he is more likely to stay healthy ?
Valdez
4/8/24 Elbow
7/1/23 Ankle
9/16/21 Hand
3/29/21 Finger
Neither can help the Dodgers this year, so I choose none of the above.
Ranger- a Red Sox fan
Would you rather your pitcher hate your catcher or be gassed in September? Haha
While I may question his character, Valdez has proven over his career to be a better and more durable pitcher than Suarez. Suarez has NEVER even made 30 starts or pitched 160 innings in a single season!
Valdez ranks 2nd in innings pitched over the past four years and Suarez ranks 31st, that’s decent
Yes, 31st is DECENT, but if all other things are equal why would you choose 31st instead of 2nd?
Did I choose 31st instead of 2nd? I don’t even recall agreeing that all other things were equal.
As a phils fan I love ranger but don’t want him back. He’s never pitched more than 159 innings and that’s just not worth the money. I do believe he’s a better pitcher and being 3 years younger is certainly more valuable.
He is definitely not the “better pitcher”.
I’m surprised they didn’t mention the fact that Framber has had a visit with the Giants in this article.
I want the pitcher that is on the mound as much as possible.
Ranger misses 10 starts a year
False claim. Since become a full-time SP four years ago, he has averaged 26 starts per year.
I like both. But Ill go with Ranger.
Ranger. Less drama.
Framber for durability. The best ability is availability and that is even more important for starting pitchers.
Web
“The best ability is availability and that is even more important for starting pitchers”
How many starting pitchers have the two-time defending champion Dodgers used the last two seasons?
Web, going to step in on this one. There is only one team that has the money to game the system like that and the Dodgers are that team.
So unless the Dodgers are making the choice between these two, your question is academic.
Pretty sure Web is a Padres fan, so to any other team that doesn’t have unlimited resources going with the more durable player makes more sense.
I’m available…
I vote neither.
I love Frambers durability, ability to pitch in small park and high GB rate but id take either. Those contract estimates arent close.
I’d rather make it with a lady.
Jon Heyman said the same thing earlier on MLB Network.
Eugenio
I dont love either choice. Ranger is great in the postseason, but he has some known injury risk. Back problems don’t age well. But Framber had a couple of rough months to end 2025, when he usually finishes strong. I wonder if there is an injury lurking for him? I’d rather not find out.
Surprised the article didnt mention 4 seam velo for Ranger. The only thing giving me pause on him. Absolute nails in October tho
Neither will end up on the Angels because they want more than 3 years, but if I was signing the checks I would take the much more durable player, Valdez.
Astros fans know, some team is going to question the contract when “Bad Framber” shows up. When he’s on, he’s solid, but man…
When healthy I want Ranger but every year he has been unable to post on a consistent basis or was under pitch counts. Valdez is consistent and a ws winner. He’s s very good pitcher but anasshole teammate.
Suarez has had multiple IL stints due to chronic back problems. He is a big risk, and actually not as good as Valdez, but then Valdez is obnoxious and a head case.
Why can’t I have both?
I picked Ranger in the poll but it’s close. I think they are both really good pitchers and Im surprised there hasn’t been a lot of buzz about competitive markets for them. I get why the position players are maybe harder to shoehorn onto some teams so don’t have as wide a market and are lingering, but any mid market and up team should be at least exploring these guys.
I don’t want either for the next 5 years.
Ranger because he hasn’t thrown pitches to fool his Catchers into getting hit with the ball!
Ranger. Stop it. Dude is cool as they come. Never gets rattled. Wish we could keep him.
They are two completely different pitchers Yep I’m choosing Ranger because he is unflappable. Same demeanor winning or losing. Then you have temperamental and emotional Framber, who unravels and turns into a big baby when things don’t go his way. (And blames an outfielder for being out of position)
At 5/115, Suarez is the better choice. Those 2 years of age difference are huge.
Valdez is a head case and Suarez has chronic back problems. I would not sign either of them.
I would easily take Ranger over Valdez. Valdez cheats. Aka Orange face in the 2022 World Series.
Suarez over the last four seasons ranks 34th in starts and 31st in IP. That’s really good for someone with chronic back problems but I suppose it could catch up with him like Eflin’s 2025 season.
Framber will have the stigma of crossing up his catcher due to anger, no matter what everyone thinks, due to the issue last season. True or not teams will have that in the back of their minds when deciding who to sign. Nobody wants to bring someone in that could cause turmoil in the clubhouse, and it might be unfair, but that’s a fact of life. Both are good pitchers and would help any team that signs them.
Valdez is the better pitcher, but do I really want a pitcher with that much (be)wear and tear?
My heart voted Framber and my brain says Ranger.