![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rays Looking To Deal Jackson Or Hammel? | Main | Reds DFA Mike Stanton »
Couple of minor notes for this Friday afternoon:
Posted by Joe Pawlikowski.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e55193e9cf8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Odds And Ends: Eaton, Balfour, McAnulty:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Eaton being bounced from the rotation is bad news for the rest of the league. He was fun to beat up on.
Posted by: stellar | March 28, 2008 at 12:36 PM
P Mac needs to show the glove in left field, may be more interesting to see him in left field then R. Branyan or R. Klesko.
Posted by: hitttman | March 28, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Grant Balfour, quite possibly the worst name for a pitcher ever. Homer Bailey is pretty bad, too.
Posted by: Drunk Cubs Fan | March 28, 2008 at 01:41 PM
It's pretty bad when Eaton can't pitch well enough to be the #5 in PHILLY. Yikes.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | March 28, 2008 at 01:46 PM
Grant Balfour sounds like a hockey goalie's name -- one letter off, I guess.
Posted by: Joe Pawlikowski | March 28, 2008 at 01:55 PM
I don't quite understand the Padres route they're taking to fill their outfield. They have a crappy aging right fielder, a crappy aging center fielder who can't stay healthy, and they're filling left field with guys that weren't quite good enough to make their previous teams. They're trotting out guys like Gerut and McAnulty when other teams are practically trying to get rid of guys like Murton. Then they go out and get another guy like the others in Justin Huber. It's like Towers is determined to fill the spot without giving up anything, so he's gonna try practically every option possible before giving something up. Thats not a good way to win arguably the tightest division in baseball, where the Dodgers, Rockies and D-Backs are all arguably better.
And last but least, why the hell did they teach Headley how to play left field, then send him down? He could be arguably the 3rd or 4th best hitter in that lineup right now, and yet he's getting sent down. If the Padres really want to win this year then Headley better be in the lineup by the end of May.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 28, 2008 at 03:57 PM
Well-said, scribble. And you didn't even go into detail about how bad the defense is likely to be, with converted infielders turned outfielders Headley, Hairston and Huber (they do like their "H's") vieing for playing time with two aging OFs who have leg problems. I'm sure Young and Peavy say thanks a lot.
Posted by: Devlsh | March 28, 2008 at 04:12 PM
Nobody is sadder to see Eaton go than the fans of the Braves & Mets. Ahhh such a sad, sad, sorrowful day in my life.
Posted by: ksesxe | March 28, 2008 at 04:29 PM
scribble: best argument, good evidence.
Posted by: hitttman | March 28, 2008 at 04:46 PM
I have no problem with Headley playing poor defense in left field, because I think his offense would be good enough to offset it. Plus he's young enough and talented enough that with a little time he could probably become league average.
I just don't feel like I can say the same about guys like Huber.
And I still can't get over Jody Gerut getting major time for a playoff contender. Thats screwed up. I would love to see the logic in that.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 28, 2008 at 04:49 PM
yes i dont get the padres outfield. most teams fourth or fifth oufielders could start for the padres. also edmonds wll be hurt at some time during the season. as has been said today and ive said a number of times, put headley out there. h is the real deal, regardless of his defense. they need offense something fierce. also that eaton contract had to be one of the worst all time, right up there with the marquis contract. at least marquis can eat innings, eventhough i dont think its a compliment when u r called an innings eater. steve trachsel is an innings eater too.
Posted by: Joelcards | March 28, 2008 at 07:19 PM
You can do worse than the Marquis deal. Marquis can give you 200 innings of 4.40 ERA ball. Thats not worth 3/24, not even close, but its not god awful. Adam Eaton is god awful. At this the Marquis deal isn't like the Darren Dreifort deal or something.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 28, 2008 at 09:30 PM
the cubs were lucky marquis gave them a 4.40 era. his era the year before was 6.02. hes making 16 million over the nexy two years and had to fight for a rotation spot. nuff said.
Posted by: Joelcards | March 28, 2008 at 09:53 PM
come on joelcards you're not being fair. You're gonna point out his one bad year, with St. Louis of course, but his two years before that with the Cards he posted ERA's of 3.71 and 4.13. I'm not saying he's gonna reproduce those numbers, but a 4.40 ERA isn't out of the question.
And who the hell cares that he had to fight for a rotation spot? He should've had to. Who cares how much he's getting paid, I'm glad that the Cubs don't choose who goes into their rotation based on salary.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 28, 2008 at 10:41 PM
i figured u would mention the 2 previous years. i know it was logical to think he would do better than a 6 era but that was the year he was coming off of and thats when the cubs signed him. i dontthink any team was going to offer half what the cubs did. he didnt make one start for us in our 06 world series run. he was total garbage in the second half(sound familiar). a one year 4 million deal would have been appropriate, just not a 3/21 million deal. the cards got lohse for one year 4 million. i bet lohse outperforms marquis this year.
Posted by: Joelcards | March 28, 2008 at 10:57 PM
Okay obviously I'll agree that the Cubs overpaid for him because its astonishing that any pitcher coming off a 6.06 ERA would even get a 3 year contract, let alone for $21M. Hendry is a moron in that sense because he probably could've gotten him for less.
My argument never had anything to do with him being overpaid, because he definately is, I'm just arguing that its not the worst contract ever, because Marquis isn't freaking terrible, he's just not 3/21 worthy, or really even that close.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 28, 2008 at 11:21 PM
ok we can end this one with that. i know he had some good years before and he was pretty decent for u guys last year. i have personally been to a few marquis games where we got blown out. that idiot owes me money. i just hate marquis, but no it wasnt the worst contract ever. carlos silva might be the worst contract ever. geez.
Posted by: Joelcards | March 28, 2008 at 11:25 PM
Actually let me bring up Darren Dreifort one last time. Thats gotta be the worst conract ever. Hands down.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 28, 2008 at 11:46 PM
yes that was terrible. that one was so terrible u dont even remeber it because he barely pitched. how bout denny naegle? obviously hamptons was aweful but like dreifort, people forget about naegle.
Posted by: Joelcards | March 29, 2008 at 12:06 AM
There is a method behind the madness that is the Padres outfield. One the reason the sent Headley down is so that he can play everyday, he would not get that at the major league level. Second why would you give up something when you could get the same thing for nothing?
Murton is not the answer for the Padres , they know it and they didn't want to give up Cesar Ramos and more to get him, which was the rumored demand of the Cubs for him. (that was a rumor, i have no way to verify, i got that during FriarFest) Now I don't believe that Ramos will be a superstar, but a good young hard throwing righthander for a league avg. outfielder when we have a ton of those already on the club?
Posted by: AirmanSD | March 29, 2008 at 02:41 AM
a league average outfielder in the padres outfield would seem like an upgrade. giles(old and not good anymore), edmonds(see giles), mcnaulty(?), gerut(uh no), and devanon. i think murton could easily start in that outfield and he has the potential to be the best of the bunch. giles and edmonds r washed up. sorry jimmy. edmonds has become a strikeout machine and giles will hit 10 homers if hes lucky.
Posted by: Joelcards | March 29, 2008 at 03:58 AM
Murton could very well be an upgrade, but not much of one.
Hairston played well enough last year with the club to earn a chance to see what he can do with a full year.
Giles is not going to hit for power anymore, we all know that. But he is still a good hitter with a higher OBPs.
Honestly i wasn't thrilled with the move to bring in Edmonds, i would have preferred someone like Wilits to handle center. So we shall see on that one. But Murton doesn't play center anyways.
Mcnaulty and Gerut, well I would have liked to see Headley stay but i agree with the idea of sending him to work on his defense.
And you never mentioned the main problem with the trade for Murton, giving up a good young arm for an avg. player, the Cubs already stole an arm like this from the Padres, his name is.... Jose Ceda...
Posted by: AirmanSD | March 29, 2008 at 04:17 AM
I think the reason that Padre fans don't wanna give up anything for Murton is the exact reason airmansd said, they're scared of another Todd Walker for Jose Ceda situation. But at this point, airman, you have to realize that the Padres need better outfielders to contend with the tightest division in baseball. McAnulty and Gerut don't belong in the majors, especially not receiving major at bats for a legit contender.
At this point Murton would become arguably your best offensive outfielder, considering he'd give you the same OBP as Giles but with more power, Edmonds is always hurt so even though he's still a decent power threat when he's healthy, thats not really an optoin, Hairston could end up being pretty good, but I have a feeling he'll be in center a lot, and at this point I think Murton would be a great addition for the Padres. Maybe this deal will get done in like May when Towers realizes that Giles, Edmonds, Gerut, Huber, Hairston and McAnulty isn't a real contending outfield. Now, they could just bring up Headley and play him everyday like they should, because he'd rake, but I guess they don't have enough confidence in him or something, or they know something we don't. Either way I think Towers has done a crappy job of handling this situation.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 29, 2008 at 09:31 AM
It's been explained very simply and several times why Headley isn't starting the season with the ML club: making the jump from AA to MLB is hard enough, but asking someone to do it while making a position change is too much in the Padres' opinion.
Posted by: gig | March 29, 2008 at 04:31 PM