Headlines

  • Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base
  • Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton
  • Cubs To Promote Cade Horton
  • Mariners Claim Leody Taveras
  • Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach
  • A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Dodgers Prioritizing Cole Hamels In Search For Pitching

By Steve Adams | July 28, 2015 at 4:29pm CDT

The Dodgers are prioritizing Cole Hamels in their search for rotation upgrades, tweets Joel Sherman of the New York Post. Los Angeles “wants to exhaust” the option of acquiring Hamels before moving onto a “Plan B” like Yovani Gallardo. Per Sherman, the Dodgers continue to insist that they will not part with top prospects Corey Seager and Julio Urias, however.

Refusal to move either Seager or Urias will certainly work against the Dodgers, who face steep competition in the market for Hamels. The Giants are said to be making a “strong push,” and the Astros are also pushing for the Philadelphia ace. The Rangers have been discussing prospects with the Phillies recently, and the Diamondbacks have emerged as somewhat of a surprise candidate in the Hamels sweepstakes as well. The Cubs are said to merely be “on the periphery” of the Hamels market.

The Phillies have asked that teams make their best offers for Hamels by tomorrow, per ESPN’s Jayson Stark, and his previously scheduled Thursday start has been pushed back to Friday — after the trade deadline — so as not to risk an injury and to potentially make him immediately available to start for an acquiring team. Over the weekend, Stark characterized the Dodgers as one of the favorites for Hamels.

Share 40 Retweet 85 Send via email0

Los Angeles Dodgers Newsstand Philadelphia Phillies Texas Rangers Cole Hamels Corey Seager Julio Urias Yovani Gallardo

Royals GM Dayton Moore Talks Zobrist Trade
Main
Jenrry Mejia Suspended 162 Games For Second Failed PED Test
View Comments (143)
Post a Comment

143 Comments

  1. Brixton

    10 years ago

    With ~7 different teams still showing interest, you’d need De Leon and Holmes as the meat of the package if you’re not going to move Urias or Seager.

    Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      10 years ago

      De Leon, Holmes and Lee should get it done. But if I were the Phillies, I would prefer Alex Guerrero plus De Leon. Guerrero has implied that if a few million is added to his contract, he will waive the provision making him a free agent if he is traded. De Leon and Guerrero for Hamels is win-win if the Phillies do not throw in any cash.

      Reply
      • Brixton

        10 years ago

        Lee doesn’t interest me anymore. He really hasn’t been that good for 2 years. Plus the Phillies would want position players as the back end of the package.

        Reply
        • slider32

          10 years ago

          The Phillies won’t want Lee, he just looked terrible agains’t the Mets.

          Reply
      • philanova

        10 years ago

        If that’s the best offer we get, so be it. But I would like to get some hitters in this deal, hence why the Rangers make a ton of sense, even if Gallo and Mazzara are off the table.

        Reply
      • tommyl

        10 years ago

        I’d offer DeLeon, Holmes, Guerrero and another top prospect of their choice not named Seager or Urias.

        Reply
        • Brixton

          10 years ago

          De Leon, Holmes, Austin Barnes and Alex Guerrero? Phillies accept that in half a second.

          Reply
          • tommyl

            10 years ago

            Done. Where do we sign?

            Reply
            • Brixton

              10 years ago

              You call Friedman, I’ll call Amaro

              Reply
              • tommyl

                10 years ago

                Friedman on line 2.

                Reply
            • danpartridge

              10 years ago

              Yeah, that’s a mighty haul.

              Reply
              • slider32

                10 years ago

                That’s a good deal!

                Reply
          • treday

            10 years ago

            I’ve been saying that for sometime, but the new FO is pretty high on Barnes. I’d say its more likely that they try to include Schebler or Sweeney.

            Reply
            • tommyl

              10 years ago

              Barnes is good but he’s still a backup to Grandal.

              Reply
            • BlueSkyLA

              10 years ago

              Trading Barnes is a big risk. He’s all the Dodgers have as depth at that position.

              Reply
              • tommyl

                10 years ago

                I think you give up depth of a second string catcher for three years of Hamels, if that’s what it’s going to take to seal the deal. You can replenish the depth and have AJ in a pinch..

                Reply
          • Lokey

            10 years ago

            Assuming something is worked out prior to the trade to ensure Guerrero stays long term….sure

            Reply
          • double

            10 years ago

            The Phillies don’t need a DH and Guerrero can’t play anywhere defensively.

            Reply
            • Brixton

              10 years ago

              Phillies have all terrible defensive outfielders.
              Revere: 0.1 dWAR
              Odubel: -0.3 dWAR
              Frenchy: -1.0 dWAR
              Cody Asche: -1.2 dWAR
              Dom Brown: 0.1 dWAR

              If he can hit, he’ll play.

              Reply
              • double

                10 years ago

                His OPS in June was .551 and in July it’s .125. That’s a .125 OBP plus slugging. One the pitchers saw him they neutralized his hitting and being as bad as all the bad fielders on the Phillies doesn’t make his inability to field more palatable.

                Reply
              • slider32

                10 years ago

                Ok, how about Puig and Holmes for Hamels!

                Reply
          • Bob M.

            10 years ago

            I think that would get it done.

            Reply
        • slider32

          10 years ago

          That would seem to get it done!

          Reply
      • dbeattie

        10 years ago

        Best off packaging Sweeney in there somewhere he’s a top 10 2b prospect but is blocked in LA

        Reply
        • danpartridge

          10 years ago

          2b is open for the Dodgers next year–though the may try to re-sign Kendrick. Or are you thinking Olivero will be there?

          Reply
          • treday

            10 years ago

            Olivera will most likely be there, though there has been some chatter that the FO has really liked the performance and clubhouse presence of Kendrick, and they could even try to re-sign him. Personally I don’t think that makes much sense, but who am I to judge.

            Reply
            • BlueSkyLA

              10 years ago

              Day and day out, Howie Kendrick is one of the best players in the game. Hard to ague with the idea of keeping him on the roster after this year.

              Reply
              • willi

                10 years ago

                Money and Age , look else where before goes off the Cliff !

                Reply
            • danpartridge

              10 years ago

              That creates something of an infield roster crunch, what with the way Turner has been playing. I guess that’s a good problem to have, though. Too many good options. We’ll see.

              Reply
              • dbeattie

                10 years ago

                I think I saw that Turner is a FA this year. Not sure though. I know Mattingly has said recently that he still feels that Turner is a 3/4 day a week type player. If that’s the case they could resign Howie put olivera at 3rd and use Turner as a super utility type player. Just a thought

                Reply
    • Show all 29 replies
  2. philanova

    10 years ago

    So they are prioritizing Hamels but won’t trade top prospects hmmm

    Reply
    • fred-3

      10 years ago

      Blue Jays got Tulo w/o trading Norris or Stroman

      Reply
      • Brixton

        10 years ago

        Hoffman is almost just as higher regarded as Norris and Stroman..

        Reply
        • fred-3

          10 years ago

          Debatable on Norris. Stroman is a better prospect than Hoffman.

          Reply
          • justinept

            10 years ago

            But none of the three are on the level or Urias or Seager… So what are we really arguing here?

            Reply
            • cookiemonster

              10 years ago

              baez was offered. he is on the level of seager for sure. just preferences. seager has lower ceiling, higher floor. baez has highest ceiling of anyone offered. unless urias is involved.

              Reply
              • cookiemonster

                10 years ago

                5 downvotes and no counter argument… sigh…

                Reply
              • Cam

                10 years ago

                I don’t believe Baez has a higher upside that Seager.

                Reply
                • cookiemonster

                  10 years ago

                  more power from short has more upside.

                  Reply
              • dbeattie

                10 years ago

                You do realise that as high as his upside is Baez is essentially allergic to making contact against ML pitching

                Reply
                • cookiemonster

                  10 years ago

                  based on results as a 21 y.o?

                  Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        10 years ago

        Tulo gets injured more than Hamels.

        Reply
        • Bleed_Orange

          10 years ago

          and Tulo is owed 94 million into 2021

          Reply
          • fred-3

            10 years ago

            Hamels is owed a lot of money as well

            Reply
    • johansantana17

      10 years ago

      They want trade either of the top 5 prospects in the game, which no other team will either. The Cubs won’t trade Russell or Bryant, the Astros won’t trade Correa, the Rangers won’t trade Gallo, the Nats won’t trade Giolito. The Dodgers will however trade a top 25 prospect (deLeon), who is just as good as the headliner that any other team is offering.

      Reply
      • mdbaseball05

        10 years ago

        The difference is that they are staples for those teams for years to come. Russell and Bryant are already in the infield now as is Correa, Gallo will replace Beltre and Giolito will replace Zimmermann and Fister. Seager will be the long term guy at SS, but why not consider Urias in a trade?

        That trade gives you Kershaw and Hamels for sure in the rotation, and if you re-sign Greinke (they have the money), you’re looking at the best top 3 in the game. Now is their window, so why not go for it.

        Reply
        • cookiemonster

          10 years ago

          because urias is likely to be ready for the bigs as a teenager. the 4 pitchers who debuted as teens in the 2000’s were dylan bundy, madison bumgarner, edwin jackson and felix hernandez. so yeah its worth hanging on to, hes about as unlikely to bust as anyone.

          Reply
        • johansantana17

          10 years ago

          > Russell and Bryant are already in the infield now as is Correa, Gallo will replace Beltre and Giolito will replace Zimmermann and Fister. Seager will be the long term guy at SS, but why not consider Urias in a trade?

          That trade gives you Kershaw and Hamels for sure in the rotation, and if you re-sign Greinke (they have the money), you’re looking at the best top 3 in the game. Now is their window, so why not go for it.

          0 | Reply

          cookiemonster21 minutes 43 seconds ago
          because urias is likely to be ready for the bigs as a teenager. the 4 pitchers who debuted as teens in the 2000’s were dylan bundy, madison bumgarner, edwin jackson and felix hernandez. so yeah its worth hanging on to, hes about as unlikely to bust as anyone.

          1 | Reply

          MannyBeingMVP52 minutes 51 seconds ago
          Alex Guerrero could be the wild card if he agrees to waive his provision making him a free agent at the end of the season if he is traded.

          2 | Reply
          Brixton
          Brixton49 minutes 48 seconds ago
          What position does Guerrero even play? Phillies have the infield covered.

          -1 | Reply

          double28 minutes 21 seconds ago
          DH

          0 | Reply

          Draven Moss19 minutes 42 seconds ago
          Are you trying to be funny, or do you not realize that the Phillies play in the NL where the DH doesn’t exist?

          2 | Reply

          dodgerskingsfan8 minutes 26 seconds ago
          he can play the OF LF or RF… either one, but he is a RH bat with power… very rare to find on the trade market…

          0 | Reply

          TommyL41 minutes 18 seconds ago
          If any other team had Seager and Urias they wouldn’t offer them either.

          2 | Reply

          justinept39 minutes 44 seconds ago
          They’ve likely offered De Leon. who is ranked 20th on the most recent BA list. Why should the Dodgers offer the number 1 ranked prospect in Seager, or the number 4 ranked prospect in Urias, when no one is offering anything remotely similar to that? The Rangers aren’t even offering Mazara, and he’s only ranked 34th.

          And Urias and Seager aren’t staples for years to come for LA? Your logic is flawed

          Reply
          • stymeedone

            10 years ago

            The reason you do offer Urias, IS BECAUSE NO ONE IS OFFERING ANYTHING REMOTELY SIMILAR TO THAT. Offering what everyone else is, means that Philly will choose one that may not be the Dodgers offer. Offering more makes you the trade recipient.

            Reply
            • BlueSkyLA

              10 years ago

              …and leads everyone to say “they overpaid.”

              Reply
      • Bob M.

        10 years ago

        De Leon, I think can be matched by most teams. Comes down to preference. I know the Phillies covet a catcher and Alfaro and Susac fit that. The Astros have the ability to give a glut of high level prospects that no other team can offer.

        Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      10 years ago

      Alex Guerrero could be the wild card if he agrees to waive his provision making him a free agent at the end of the season if he is traded.

      Reply
      • Brixton

        10 years ago

        What position does Guerrero even play? Phillies have the infield covered.

        Reply
        • double

          10 years ago

          DH

          Reply
          • Draven Moss

            10 years ago

            Are you trying to be funny, or do you not realize that the Phillies play in the NL where the DH doesn’t exist?

            Reply
        • dodgerskingsfan

          10 years ago

          he can play the OF LF or RF… either one, but he is a RH bat with power… very rare to find on the trade market…

          Reply
          • double

            10 years ago

            He’s never played an inning in RF, either here or in Cuba, and he’s really awful in LF. His last home run is two months ago. He’s 10 for 61 since then. I don’t see how he’s either a LF, RF, or power hitter.

            Reply
            • BlueSkyLA

              10 years ago

              He’s so far down the depth chart he gets hardly any playing time with the Dodgers. He played SS in Cuba and has done an adequate job defensively in his time at 3B for the Dodgers. His future is probably on the infield. He needs to move onto somewhere else where he’s given a chance to play every day, get more ABs. It’s tough to play when you don’t play, said a great man.

              Reply
            • Cam

              10 years ago

              That is absolutely the best example of why his numbers have slipped – he’s had 60 AB’s in the last two months. Guy can’t get playing time – but he mashes with regular time.

              Reply
              • double

                10 years ago

                Actually playing well as a reserve and spot starter is what gets players a starting role. That’s how Turner got one. Looking over Guerrero’s playing time he appears to have had his best starts the day after he doesn’t start. When he plays consecutive, or 3-4 in a row, he hasn’t been as good in the subsequent games. His numbers are better in games he enters as a sub compared to starting. So regular playing time appears to hurt his numbers.

                I don’t think the Dodgers agree that he can play third. He hasn’t started a game there since May 24 and he played his first innings there in two months on Sunday. Mattingly won’t use him at third.

                Reply
                • BlueSkyLA

                  10 years ago

                  Nothing about his play suggests that he can’t play 3B. He is behind Turner and Callaspo on the depth chart. Before the trade for Callaspo he was behind Turner and Uribe. Some are good at playing cold but nobody who isn’t hurt somehow actually benefits from not playing regularly.

                  Reply
    • tommyl

      10 years ago

      If any other team had Seager and Urias they wouldn’t offer them either.

      Reply
    • justinept

      10 years ago

      They’ve likely offered De Leon. who is ranked 20th on the most recent BA list. Why should the Dodgers offer the number 1 ranked prospect in Seager, or the number 4 ranked prospect in Urias, when no one is offering anything remotely similar to that? The Rangers aren’t even offering Mazara, and he’s only ranked 34th.

      Reply
      • BlueSkyLA

        10 years ago

        Bingo. You win a cookie.

        Reply
      • Bob M.

        10 years ago

        The Phillies need more than just one guy. The system is extremely shallow. While De Leon may be the highest ranked player, the Rangers and Astros have the ability to offer multiple top 100 to top 200 position players who are already in double A.

        Reply
    • Show all 34 replies
  3. snazzypants

    10 years ago

    I’m still hoping the Dodgers will cave in and offer Urias.

    Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      10 years ago

      Phillies would be better off with Alex Guerrero and De Leon. Guerrero can play serviceable 2B, 3B or LF. If Guerrero agrees to waive his provision becoming a free agent at the end of the season upon a trade, in exchange for a few million dollars, then the Phillies have a 20 hrs. a year guy plus a top pitching prospect.

      Reply
    • danpartridge

      10 years ago

      Don’t blame you. Any team would be lucky to bag that kid.

      Reply
    • Sign all the Cubans

      10 years ago

      Ain’t gonna happen. I doubt the Dodgers would even do that deal 1:1 (Hamels straight up for Urias). And the Phillies probably wouldn’t, either.

      Reply
  4. johansantana17

    10 years ago

    Nobody else is offering a prospect at the level of Seager/Urias, so how exactly will that “certainly work against them”? The Giants don’t have anyone even close to that good. The Rangers are refusing to trade Gallo or Mazara. And there’s no way the Astros are trading Correa.

    Reply
    • Brixton

      10 years ago

      Because the Dodgers aren’t offering Urias or Seager either. The Rangers and Astros farm systems have more depth and more potential pieces than the Dodgers.

      Reply
      • Sign all the Cubans

        10 years ago

        Hamels has a no-trade clause and Houston is one of the teams listed as a no-go. Sure, money could change that, but there’s a reason he doesn’t want to go there.

        It’s the only leverage Hamels will have for the next 3+ years, so it’s questionable as to whether or not he’d agree to it.

        Reply
        • slider32

          10 years ago

          I see Hamels going to either the Yanks, Cubs, or Dodgers.

          Reply
    • philanova

      10 years ago

      The Rangers have some very good position prospects below Gallo and Mazzara

      Reply
    • hojostache

      10 years ago

      A team may get fixated on a guy and also under-value the other guys, so if they can’t get the #1, the rest looks even worse.

      Reply
    • Bob M.

      10 years ago

      Note Susac is a big league ready catcher. I can count on one hand right now, every day catchers under full team control who can hit and defend. Realmuto, Plawecki, Swihart… ummmm scarcity is what is making the catching position so valuable. Susac can headline a deal, even prior to hitting this season at the big league level he was a top 50 prospect.

      Reply
      • bigturtlemachine

        10 years ago

        Would the Giants give Susac up for Mike Leake? A guy who twice has dominated the Cardinals this season, has very good numbers and is a strong hitter for a pitcher has value as a No. 3 guy for a contender, even as a rental.

        Reply
  5. hittingnull

    10 years ago

    If I were the dodgers GM, I’d just keep all major prospects and just get a middle tier type of pitcher with bullpen pieces. In the offseason there’s so many free agent pitchers that they can just sign three of them if they really wanted. Dodgers have the money. No real reason to give up top prospects.

    Reply
    • mlbdodgerfan2015

      10 years ago

      I agree. Not a fan of dangling prospects here and there, burning your farm system. Take Gallardo and a cheaper bullpen arm. My guess is that Hamels is a smokescreen. Dodgers front office need to appear as if they’re trying really hard to get Hamels but won’t burn the farm system. Most fans won’t be happy, but so be it. Colletti would have given pretty much whatever the Phillies wanted and a good chunk of Hamels’ salary. Remember when he bid against himself and took all the bad contracts from the Red Sox and gave away prospects?

      Reply
      • BlueSkyLA

        10 years ago

        Colletti bad. Are we done yet? Really, take a look at all those great prospects he gave away to the Red Sox. So many impact players who made a real contribution. Not. Oh, and sending Gordon away. That was such a brilliant move made by the new guys.

        Reply
        • mlbdodgerfan2015

          10 years ago

          Point is that he not only took on bad contracts that the Red Sox were begging other teams to take. But he also gave away prospects. Yeah, they haven’t panned out so far, but both have Webster and De La Rosa have reached the Majors and could pan out. Yeah, Gordon trade has not been good, but Grandal was good. I didn’t like both trades.

          Reply
          • BlueSkyLA

            10 years ago

            Years later now and some of them could still pan out. I don’t see that as strong argument that the trade was a bad one for the Dodgers. The team was made better. The contracts, I will let the people who write the checks worry about. Bottom line, I am not convinced that this new front office walks on water. They’ve made a lot of moves but none that made the team great. Lest we forget that the mediocre Giants are right on the doorstep.

            Reply
    • Ray Ray

      10 years ago

      I think they might want to win this year as well. I know everyone is supposed to build for this magical future over the rainbow (in which 50% of all prospects will fail completely and another 40-45% will disappoint), but someone is going to win it all in 2015.

      Reply
  6. cquinn4

    10 years ago

    Not giving up Urias OR Seager? Then you’re not getting Cole Hamels. Sheesh the dodgers are so spoiled with their $266 million dollar luxury tax breaking payroll

    Reply
    • dbeattie

      10 years ago

      You’re a muppet. Seager is no.2 overall and urias no.3(?) In baseball. Seager will be the Dodger SS in a month or two. Urias could be in the rotation this year or next and has HUGE upside. Like Felix Hernandez, MadBum type upside. Phillies should take whatever they can get and finally rebuild. If they don’t accept a package of guys like De Leon and Sweeney etc the Phillies are mad

      Reply
      • tac3

        10 years ago

        Ehhh… I disagree. They could go either way. They have a ton of money coming in from the tv deal, and a ton coming off the books. The Phillies are under the lxury tax now, th yo couldgo over for one year without the huge penalty, The phillies in a not so unlikely scenario could trade hamelsto the Rangers or Astros, take their catching prospect, and then go out in the offseason and sign Grienke … Where would the Dodgers be then? Same spot as they are now, very good team but not good enough to win it all. HAMELS puts you guys over the top imo. Meanwhile you take the risk of your prospects not developing, or key pieces getting hurt in future seasons while making your runs, as well as otherteams keep frogging you…. Or You could part with seager or Urias and go for it while the stars are as close to aligning as it’s going to get … Someday the future becomes the present, seems like the dodgers should go for it. At this point TOR might go all in and deal for Hamels …. Poo or get off the pot time

        Reply
      • brandnewsin001

        10 years ago

        I don’t hear anyone adding the other variable into the equation – the Phillies don’t HAVE to trade Hamels right now. Yeah, his stock is to the moon because of the no-no, but Hamels is literally their only true blue chip trade bait. Dodgers don’t want to give up one of the top two? Ok, talk to you in December. Go win a World Series without him. The Phillies hold ALL the power. Not a small market team, player is controlled, franchise has money.

        Reply
    • willi

      10 years ago

      Let the Dodgers overpay for Shields then, people are Arguing about Prospects, that’s all they are Prospects, They Look Pretty until you take off the wrapping !
      Cole Hamels is All-Star, 200 Inns, Playoff pitcher that has a Very attractive Contract compared to upcoming off season free Agent Pitchers!

      Reply
  7. christopher8002

    10 years ago

    How about DeLeon, Holmes, Barnes, Verdugo. …. Maybe that gets Dodgers into the conversation?

    Reply
    • Brixton

      10 years ago

      Can’t speak for Dodger fans, but as a Phillies fan, sold.

      Reply
      • Lokey

        10 years ago

        Agreed

        Reply
      • danpartridge

        10 years ago

        Another huge haul. Seems too steep for the Dodgers, to be honest. But it would get the job done, I’d think.

        Reply
        • Sign all the Cubans

          10 years ago

          I agree…Barnes puts that deal into the “can’t bear the price” territory for the Dodgers. And I doubt they would put Holmes and DeLeon into any deal together.

          Reply
    • snazzypants

      10 years ago

      That’d probably be the best trade offer the Phillies have recieved so far.

      Reply
    • huntnm2001

      10 years ago

      As a dodgers fan if the dodgers offer that and the Phillies don’t take it you move on.

      Reply
    • dbeattie

      10 years ago

      Dodgers are super high on Barnes Verdugo and De Leon. Doubt they’d part with all three in the one deal. Hamels is a luxury for the dodgers

      Reply
      • willi

        10 years ago

        Dodgers will find out how much a Luxury they have when the face the Mets in Playoffs.

        Reply
  8. ssf1234

    10 years ago

    I hold hope as a Giants fan to win the Hamels sweepstakes. I just wish all this “strong push” from the Giants results in Seager or Urias being moved. Lmao

    Reply
    • The Oregonian

      10 years ago

      I’d rather they sign a top arm in the offseason and just be paying money, rather than give money and prospects for Hamels. I would like to see the Dodgers give up a lot to get him though!

      Reply
      • stymeedone

        10 years ago

        Opportunities to win don’t come often. Surrrre, defer to next year. Wait til the off-season to get what could put you over the top, if only you had done it when it mattered.

        Reply
        • dbeattie

          10 years ago

          Hamels isnt the only good pitcher in baseball you know? Why overpay for him, when there are plenty ofother arms available

          Reply
        • willi

          10 years ago

          That’s been the Cardinals Philosophy for Years , Go For the Gusty , Win this Battle and live to fight next battle and possible Win War !

          Reply
    • ssf1234

      10 years ago

      I mean i don’t* hold out hope as a Giants fan. I just fantasize the bums ruim their future a bit. Haha

      Reply
  9. 09zulmarie

    10 years ago

    I think they don’t move none of those prospects and trade puig wat do u think??

    Reply
    • Brixton

      10 years ago

      Phillies would want more than just Puig.

      Reply
      • mlbdodgerfan2015

        10 years ago

        If I were the Dodgers I would not offer Puig. His upside is as high as you can get and you’re selling low here. He needs to mature a little bit as a person and a player. Physically he has everything you’d want for a player.

        Reply
        • danpartridge

          10 years ago

          Agreed. I think Puig’s upside and contract make him really valuable. At this point his numbers don’t look that great, but he hasn’t had a lot of ABs. A short streak would bring him up to his (pretty remarkable to date) career averages.

          Reply
      • Sign all the Cubans

        10 years ago

        Puig for Hamels is actually equivalent value, at least when you factor in age, cost, control, and WAR. I doubt either team could sell a deal like that to their respective fanbases, not that it really matters.

        If I were the GM, I would do that deal straight-up, and I actually like Puig and his upside.

        Reply
    • cookiemonster

      10 years ago

      they have the same amount of control… the phillies want more control to extend their window since its a couple years away anyway.

      Reply
      • danpartridge

        10 years ago

        I think that’s why Holmes and De Leon look like good pieces. Still a few years away. Be ready when the team starts to gel again.

        Reply
    • dbeattie

      10 years ago

      Puig for hamels is a horrible deal for both teams.

      Reply
  10. flyerzfan12

    10 years ago

    Why do Dodgers fans keep including Guerrero in offers? He’s not appealing to a rebuilding team like the Phillies at all. He’s 28 and can opt out if traded. You probably couldn’t have picked a worse team to try and trade him to.

    Reply
    • Brixton

      10 years ago

      Because he said hes willing to sign an extension or something along those lines if he gets traded.
      ot: Phillies get Nick Pivetta for Paps.

      Reply
      • flyerzfan12

        10 years ago

        I heard that too, but I still don’t see him as an attractive target for a rebuilding team.

        I was hoping for Voth, but Pivetta should be solid too.

        Reply
      • BlueSkyLA

        10 years ago

        He is willing to waive his opt-out for the right situation.

        Reply
        • flyerzfan12

          10 years ago

          Would you agree the Phillies wouldn’t be the right situation for him? Or is the right situation for him basically just a team that would guarantee him playing time?

          Reply
          • BlueSkyLA

            10 years ago

            My impression of his idea of the right situation is a regular starting role but I don’t pretend to know whether the Phillies can offer him that. And he seems to believe that he’s worth more money in that situation.

            Reply
            • flyerzfan12

              10 years ago

              Well the Phillies have Cesar Hernandez playing well at 2B right now, plus Utley coming back (assuming he doesn’t get traded at some point). Franco is manning 3B. The Phillies could certainly use an OF bat, they’ve got a bunch of mediocre guys right now. But I think they’d prefer a younger, cheaper prospect in a Hamels trade rather than a 28 year old who wants more money.

              Reply
              • BlueSkyLA

                10 years ago

                More money than they are paying him now, which is $4M a year. That’s at the lower end of utility player dollars these days. So yes, he is likely going to get more from a team that can find him a regular place in the lineup. Whether that team is the Phillies, I have no idea.

                Reply
  11. max l

    10 years ago

    Not a Dodgers fan, but I would give up Urias. Not that the Nats need a top of the rotation pitcher, but let’s say Scherzer and or Zimmermann got hurt and was out for the year I’d give up Giolito for Hamels or Price. Those 2 give you a chance to win right away, and are proven dominant in the majors, while Giolito and Urias are unproven commodities. Just because you dominant minor league hitters doesn’t mean you’ll dominate major league hitters. Both Urias & Giolito look like the real deal, but in 10 years both could be 4th or 5th starters.

    Reply
    • danpartridge

      10 years ago

      I get what you’re saying, here, but giving up a BBA #4 for Hamels seems like too steep a price. If he plays five years and puts up 3 WAR a year, that’s $100 million in value. Big price. I guess we’ll see soon.

      Reply
      • stymeedone

        10 years ago

        if, if, if, …that’s a lot of if’s! I’ll take the sure thing.

        Reply
        • danpartridge

          10 years ago

          That’s one if. And the kid can get those results today. Not much if on Urias or Seager. Same number as a pitcher with almost 2,000 major league innings on his arm.

          Reply
          • cookiemonster

            10 years ago

            plenty of ifs on seager. a lot stem from how long he will stick at short. still floor of a regular.

            Reply
            • danpartridge

              10 years ago

              That’s not an if. Seager won’t stick too long at short, and I was under the impression everyone knew that.

              Reply
              • dbeattie

                10 years ago

                They say he’s about average at SS above average at 3rd hence the push to move him. Given that the Dodgers have olivera and Turner though he’s far more valuable at SS even if The odd ball squeezes through the hole

                Reply
    • flyerzfan12

      10 years ago

      That’s the risk with prospects and why almost every deal you see made that involves trading a big name for prospects almost always favors the team getting the big name.

      No way I’d give up Giolito (or Urias) for a rental like Price even in that scenario.

      Reply
      • stymeedone

        10 years ago

        But what would you give up to win a World Series?

        Reply
        • flyerzfan12

          10 years ago

          Can’t put a price tag on a World Series, but you also can’t guarantee one and that’s why you don’t give up that prospect for a rental, even if it’s David Price. If Price was under control for a few more years, then sure.

          Reply
        • dbeattie

          10 years ago

          Not a guy who could be an ace in the next couple of WS that’sfor sure

          Reply
    • Sign all the Cubans

      10 years ago

      Top 10 prospects bust a lot less in 2015 than they did even 10 years ago. There’s no such thing as a sure thing, but I’d rather have 6 years of cost-controlled Urias starting in his teens, than 3+ years of Hamels going into his mid-30’s.

      Reply
  12. timpa

    10 years ago

    Even if Texas didn’t move Mazara I wouLD much rather a Nick Williams headlined deal than DeLeon headlined package.

    Pitchers bust at a higher rate so a premium position player is a better get. Additionally the Rangers have better farm system depth to aDD onto the deal.

    Reply
  13. jmaa

    10 years ago

    It’s obvious mat tingly and the Dodgers decided to shut down Guerrero and quel his production so he would agree to drop the clause for FA. They can do this because of their unlimited money and insane amount of talent under control. Guerrero can rake and the Dodgers will never win anything with mat tingly at the wheel so it is a mute point.

    Reply
  14. PMerkel

    10 years ago

    Silly me, but I still believe that the Rangers have the pieces that Philly needs. BUT, I don’t have enuf confidence in John Daniels to make this trade happen.

    Reply
  15. Cora the Destroya

    10 years ago

    Dodgers are eager to blow up their farm system for another failed postseason run. Doesn’t surprise me one bit.

    Reply
    • dbeattie

      10 years ago

      Firstly, how about those Red Sox this year? … Just checking.

      Secondly, given that LA got an absolute haul on the international Market and had a solid draft which added to an already deepish system they have guys they can afford to move. Don’t think it qualifies as blowing up the farm to be honest

      Reply
    • tommyl

      10 years ago

      A-Gon blows everyone else in that trade out of the water. Win, Dodgers.

      Reply
  16. danlcat

    10 years ago

    Id say,dodger folk…soas not to have to see AZ,SF or the Yanks,beat u WITH Hamels,its…and this would be ONE phone call… take it(the world series) or leave it…Seager AND either Urias or Pederson. Or Seager/Pederson and Urias,DeLeon,Schebler,Cotton,Holmes,Lee. Añd,it OUGHT be Seager,Pederson/Urias AND two of the others. If it doesn’t start with two of the three Seager,Pederson,Urias… AND two of DeLeon,Cotton,Holmes,Lee,schibler. later. Bye bye with post season Kershaw….one call from the Phils. Ten seconds to answer yes or no. Dodger fans would be CRAZY NOT to do it. Unless,of course yaxwanna watch San Fran,St Lou,kc or yanks AGAIN. Gallardo? Really? Lol. Seager,Pederson, DeLeon,Schebler. If ya want…better yet…give ya galvis,revere,francoeur too. Eat Crawford’s contract for ya. But then,all three Urias,Seager and Pederson. Or leave in the fifth,instead of the sixth. One call. Ten seconds…

    Reply
  17. rangersfan

    10 years ago

    sorry to bust everybodys bubbles but the phillies want the rangers prospects and like philanova said we wont give up gallo or mazara and we still would have the best chance bc they want either mazara or alfaro. and we will give them Jorge Alfaro, chi chi Gonzalez and Jake Thompson. and we would have hamels easily

    Reply
  18. rangersfan

    10 years ago

    or instead of jake thompson we give them nick williams one of them with chi chi and alfaro and we will have hamels

    Reply
  19. reggie963

    10 years ago

    The Dodgers need to trade Puig for Hamels and get the deal done with. Puig is a cancer in the clubhouse. He has a great future but will probably bounce around MLB throughout his career as players and management get fed up with his attitude.

    Reply
  20. Paolo

    10 years ago

    The whole point is to win the world series– the Dodgers (and their fans) like other teams (and their fans) always overvalue the prospects and refuse to give them up. Some 18 year old “phenom” that won’t possibly help the club until after Kershaw & Grenke are gone or declining is untouchable? Really? Now is their time– NOW… The Royals overpaid for 3 months of Cueto and it’ll be the Royals and whomever pays what they need to pay for Hamels in the World Series this year. The Dodgers will be watching it all on TV and, but at least they can keep drooling over their prospects that may or may not pan out in 2017 or 2018.

    Reply
  21. ladodgers22

    10 years ago

    It’s not the end of the world if the Dodgers don’t get Hamels. They can just get Price, then resign him next year and sign Cueto or some other ace (or near ace). Ryu will be their #4, and they could use Mccarthy, Anderson, Bolsinger, or even Urias for their 5th pitcher. It’s not like we don’t have money.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

  • Top Stories
  • Recent

Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base

Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton

Cubs To Promote Cade Horton

Mariners Claim Leody Taveras

Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach

A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery

Blue Jays Sign Spencer Turnbull

Blue Jays Sign José Ureña

Ross Stripling Retires

Rangers Place Leody Taveras On Outright Waivers

Triston Casas Likely To Miss Entire 2025 Season Due To Knee Surgery

Orioles Recall Coby Mayo

Dodgers Recall Hyeseong Kim

Triston Casas Suffers “Significant Knee Injury”

Angels Place Mike Trout On 10-Day Injured List

Rangers Option Jake Burger

Tigers Designate Kenta Maeda For Assignment

Reds Option Alexis Diaz

Orioles Move Charlie Morton To Bullpen

Astros To Activate Lance McCullers Jr. This Weekend

The Opener: Horton, Quintana, AL Central

Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base

Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton

Cubs To Promote Cade Horton

Carl Edwards Jr., Matt Foster Sign With Mexican League Teams

Yankees Outright Carlos Carrasco

Royals Sign Trevor Richards To Minor League Deal

Reds To Place Hunter Greene On IL With Groin Strain

Padres Release Andrew Bellatti

Poll: Jacob Wilson’s Hot Start

ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

Latest Rumors & News

Latest Rumors & News

  • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
  • Nolan Arenado Rumors
  • Dylan Cease Rumors
  • Luis Robert Rumors
  • Marcus Stroman Rumors

 

Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

MLBTR Features

MLBTR Features

  • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
  • Front Office Originals
  • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
  • MLBTR Podcast
  • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
  • 2025 Arbitration Projections
  • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
  • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
  • Contract Tracker
  • Transaction Tracker
  • Extension Tracker
  • Agency Database
  • MLBTR On Twitter
  • MLBTR On Facebook
  • Team Facebook Pages
  • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

Rumors By Team

  • Angels Rumors
  • Astros Rumors
  • Athletics Rumors
  • Blue Jays Rumors
  • Braves Rumors
  • Brewers Rumors
  • Cardinals Rumors
  • Cubs Rumors
  • Diamondbacks Rumors
  • Dodgers Rumors
  • Giants Rumors
  • Guardians Rumors
  • Mariners Rumors
  • Marlins Rumors
  • Mets Rumors
  • Nationals Rumors
  • Orioles Rumors
  • Padres Rumors
  • Phillies Rumors
  • Pirates Rumors
  • Rangers Rumors
  • Rays Rumors
  • Red Sox Rumors
  • Reds Rumors
  • Rockies Rumors
  • Royals Rumors
  • Tigers Rumors
  • Twins Rumors
  • White Sox Rumors
  • Yankees Rumors

ad: 160x600_MLB

Navigation

  • Sitemap
  • Archives
  • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

MLBTR INFO

  • Advertise
  • About
  • Commenting Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Connect

  • Contact Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feed

MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

hide arrows scroll to top

Register

Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version