Headlines

  • Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base
  • Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton
  • Cubs To Promote Cade Horton
  • Mariners Claim Leody Taveras
  • Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach
  • A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Cubs Have Reportedly Considered Pursuit Of Anthony Rizzo In Free Agency

By Anthony Franco | February 7, 2022 at 11:00pm CDT

The Cubs have had internal discussions about making a run at Anthony Rizzo in free agency, reports Bruce Levine of 670 The Score. Chicago is obviously barred from having contact with Rizzo or his representatives at Sports One Athlete Management during the lockout, but Levine suggests they could put forth a contract offer whenever the transactions freeze is lifted.

The Cubs’ previous efforts at locking Rizzo up for the long term obviously didn’t result in an agreement. During last year’s Spring Training, Chicago made a reported five-year, $70MM offer that the star first baseman turned down. President of baseball operations Jed Hoyer expressed optimism at the time the parties would work something out during the regular season, but a mutually agreeable price point never presented itself.

The North Siders reportedly made a renewed effort at extension talks with both Rizzo and Javier Báez in July, but neither signed and both impending free agents were ultimately shipped off in advance of the July 30 trade deadline. Rizzo landed in the Bronx, with the Yankees sending prospects Kevin Alcantara and Alexander Vizcaino to the Cubs in return. The three-time All-Star spent the final few months of the year with the Yankees before hitting the open market for the first time in his career.

Given that extension discussions between the Cubs and Rizzo’s reps didn’t get across the finish line, a return to Chicago may seem far-fetched. Yet it’s possible Rizzo doesn’t find the kind of contract he apparently sought, at least during last March’s round of talks. Entering the offseason, MLBTR projected he’d receive a three-year, $45MM guarantee, $25MM and two years south of the extension offer he reportedly declined during Spring Training.

That dip in likely earning power reflects both Rizzo’s age (32) and downturn in production over the past two years. After posting a .222/.342/.414 mark during the shortened 2020 season, the lefty hitter put up a .248/.344/.440 line with 22 home runs over 576 plate appearances in 2021. That’s solid production — 12 percentage points above the league average, by measure of wRC+. Yet it falls short of the elite offense he brought during his 2014-19 peak, when he combined for a .284/.388/.513 showing that was 41 points above the league average output (141 wRC+).

Rizzo’s batted ball metrics offer mixed signals on his chances of rediscovering his middle-of-the-order form. On the plus side, last season’s 90.1 MPH average exit velocity matched his personal high, while his 41.1% hard contact rate was a career best. His bat speed still seems intact, but Rizzo has gotten increasingly pull-oriented of late. In each of the past two seasons, he’s hit more than 47% of his batted balls to the right side of the diamond — the two highest single-season marks of his career. Defenses have responded by shifting against him more than ever. Paired with an uptick in pop-ups, that’s contributed to a meager .246 batting average on balls in plays since the start of 2020; during his aforementioned six-year peak, Rizzo sported a much better .295 BABIP.

While the Florida native may no longer be the star he was at his peak, that’s not to say there’s no appeal for possible suitors. In addition to his still-strong exit velocities, Rizzo owns excellent bat-to-ball skills. The former Silver Slugger punched out in just 15.1% of his plate appearances last season. That’s right in line with his career mark and more than seven points lower than last year’s league average. Rizzo also consistently draws a fair amount of walks and while he’s limited to first base, he still rates highly as a defender there. The Cubs are also no doubt familiar with his generally well-regarded clubhouse presence, and he was among the faces of the most successful run of play in more than a century of franchise history.

After trading away many of the most recognizable stars of that run, the Cubs were expected by most to be in for a quiet offseason. Hoyer consistently denied they were embarking on a full rebuild, though, and they’ve already signed Marcus Stroman and Yan Gomes and claimed Wade Miley off waivers from the Reds. The roster still looks short of contention, but reuniting with Rizzo would be a welcome development for much of the fanbase and upgrade an overall lineup that looks lacking. While they’ve already been more active than many anticipated, the Cubs should have financial flexibility to explore further additions. Jason Martinez of Roster Resource projects Chicago’s 2022 player payroll in the $114MM range. It seems unlikely they’ll jump to the $200+MM heights of the franchise’s record expenditures, but there’s plenty of room even before last season’s estimated $147MM season-opening level.

The Cubs would surely like to get another look at Frank Schwindel to see if his excellent showing as a 29-year-old rookie (.326/.371/.591 in 259 plate appearances) is the start of a late-career breakout. It’s widely expected the next collective bargaining agreement will include a universal designated hitter, though, likely leaving at-bats for both Schwindel and a possible outside addition to the first base/DH mix.

None of that is to say that the Cubs signing Rizzo is inevitable, or even especially likely. Front offices discuss possible moves that don’t ultimately come to fruition on a regular basis. And while reported interest in Rizzo has been fairly quiet this offseason, a couple more potential suitors have emerged.

Yankees general manager Brian Cashman expressed a desire to keep the 32-year-old in the fold back in November. With Freddie Freeman still unsigned, the Braves have looked into the possibility of pivoting to Rizzo. Freeman signing and a Matt Olson trade may be the catalysts necessary kickstart the respective free agent and trade markets for first basemen, which have yet to get going in earnest. Whenever that happens, perhaps the Cubs will embark on another effort to have Rizzo on the North Side for 2022 and beyond.

Share 0 Retweet 16 Send via email0

Chicago Cubs Newsstand Anthony Rizzo

Pablo Sandoval Signs With Mexican League’s Acereros De Monclova
Main
Major League Baseball Job Openings
View Comments (115)
Post a Comment

115 Comments

  1. Lloyd Emerson

    3 years ago

    They gotta have somebody to market on their lame Marquee channel… People aren’t tuning in for Ryan Dempster.

    8
    Reply
    • lambeau gang

      3 years ago

      No, they’re tuning in for Wade Miley and Alec Mills.

      Reply
      • Putmeincoach12

        3 years ago

        Is there a laugh button on here?

        1
        Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        3 years ago

        Miley Cyrus and Alec Baldwin. Maybe. Others. Not so much

        Reply
  2. uncle1sock

    3 years ago

    Hoyer said their extension offer was fair and at/above market value prior to the trade. We’ll see

    2
    Reply
    • Rsox

      3 years ago

      In hindsight it was probably an overpay and most likely no way he gets close to what was originally offered. Perhaps a two or three year deal but he’s not getting $70 million

      8
      Reply
    • CalcetinesBlancos

      3 years ago

      It clearly was. It was a more than fair deal and he’s an idiot for refusing it.

      9
      Reply
      • johnrealtime

        3 years ago

        Based on what? Mlbtr’s projections?

        Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        3 years ago

        That does not make him an ‘idiot”. It just means that he read the market wrong and he did not have the big year that he needed to change the numbers.

        He might get the 3 years $45 million MLBTR guessed. I am a Cubs fan. If I were the Cubs, even though they will not make the playoffs, I would make free agent Rizzo a “QO equivalent” offer of $18.4 million for one year. Having another former star in the locker room Hendricks, Contreras and the new guys would be in the Cubs budget but they seem like the wrong club to sign him for three years. If the Braves or Yankees want to go three years, then I would still have a day to welcome him back at Wrigley.

        4
        Reply
        • Ogie Oglethorpe

          3 years ago

          Manny, when Rizzo signed that 7 year contract in 2014, he took guaranteed money that was in excess of what he would received in arbitration. But the risk was would the last 3 years of the contract be equivalent to what he would have received if he truly became a free agent at that age. Obviously, it wasn’t. He gambled and lost. The thing he did not count was his skills deteriorating at 31.

          1
          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          3 years ago

          He should have. 31 is when decline hits hard very often. Rizzo seemed to have the same misconception that most fans have: that decline starts in the mid to late thirties. It’s much earlier.

          4
          Reply
        • The_Voice_Of_REASON

          3 years ago

          Right, most fans are delusional about the prime phase. The prime phase is typically over by the end of the age 28 season, yet many many people still think it lasts until 32 or something ridiculous like that. And all bets are off at 30+. Even if a player is still good/great at 30+, the production could fall off a cliff any given year at that point.

          2
          Reply
        • Dogbone

          3 years ago

          Manny – Bingo, I think your suggestion is exactly what the Cubs should do. It’s very fair to both sides. $18.5 is definitely more than Rizzo gets on average from anyone. And I really don’t think he’d get 3 guaranteed years from anyone at a solid AAV.
          And considering how little Ricketts has spent on payroll, this wouldn’t break him, and might even buy himself a little good will. Just so they don’t trade – or take any AB’s away from Frank Schwindel. Frankie IS the man!

          Reply
        • gbs42

          3 years ago

          If players are most productive in their 20s, they should get paid more in their 20s. Seems like something worth fighting for with the new CBA.

          1
          Reply
      • stan lee the manly

        3 years ago

        There were plenty of rumors last year that Rizzo can’t stand Hoyer, so it may not have anything at all to do with the money.

        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          3 years ago

          Rizzo can’t stand Hoyer, so it may not have anything at all to do with the money.
          =========================================
          It has almost everything to do with money. Hoyer offered more money to Rizzo, Bryant and Baez than they will make on the open market. While nothing should’ve been said by either side, Rizzo was blaming Hoyer for allowing him, Bryant and Baez to leave, even though all three players would’ve made more money had they taken Hoyer’s offer.

          1
          Reply
        • Rsox

          3 years ago

          I’m sure many players can’t stand some GM’s or assistants but at the end of the day they play for the money, not the guy making phone calls in the office

          Reply
        • stan lee the manly

          3 years ago

          Unless it’s important to them that they don’t. Fans tend to treat players like commodities that can be bought or sold and they completely forget that they are people too. It is incredibly common for people to turn down a job offer because they don’t want to work for the boss or they don’t agree with leaderships vision.

          1
          Reply
    • CleaverGreene

      3 years ago

      It appears it was more than fair.. I’m a Met fan so unbiased. Rizzo would be an excellent move even w/Schwindel. Stroman is an excellent signing.

      Reply
  3. mike156

    3 years ago

    Rizzo was ordinary on the Yankees, and he’s been ordinary the last couple of years. Maybe he signs a nice contract, but it’s also possible he gets one year at closer to $10. Yankees overpaid for him.

    8
    Reply
    • Yankee-4-Lifer 75

      3 years ago

      I totally disagree. Rizzo gets close to $15 million a year for 2 or 3 years. I think a reunion with the Cubs would be perfect for both parties. The Yankees gave up a lot for him, because they didn’t have to pay any of the remainder of his contract last season.

      11
      Reply
      • VegasSDfan

        3 years ago

        I wouldn’t suggest that anyone signs Rizzo. For longer than 2 years. It’s the end for him after his 2022 year. 10-12 million per year for 2 years not a year or dollar more.

        Reply
    • johnrealtime

      3 years ago

      1 year 10 million? And you got 3 upvotes?

      2
      Reply
      • Cosmo2

        3 years ago

        Decent first baseman, which is all Rizzo is, are a dime a dozen.

        3
        Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        3 years ago

        Lol. It actually say one year 10 dollars not $10mil.

        2
        Reply
  4. bradthebluefish

    3 years ago

    Why go back for a rebuild? I’d go elsewhere.

    2
    Reply
    • CalcetinesBlancos

      3 years ago

      Because literally nobody else cares about him.

      8
      Reply
      • Lloyd Emerson

        3 years ago

        You are actually basically totally and literally wrong.

        9
        Reply
    • Cosmo2

      3 years ago

      Because he’s not that good, not in high demand and the Cubs might not be that bad next year.

      5
      Reply
      • CleaverGreene

        3 years ago

        They shouldn’t be bad at all. Rizzo and a few pitchers and they are competitive until July. I don’t see any Grade A++ teams in that division.

        Reply
  5. midway_monster85

    3 years ago

    I’d rather take Hosmer off the Padres hands and bring back a prospect or two

    3
    Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      3 years ago

      Hosmer hits better,the downside is his defense is below average.

      Reply
      • Hello, Newman

        3 years ago

        Hosmer hits better than Rizzo??

        Ohh, you just happen to be a Pad fan too.
        lol, California dreamin

        2
        Reply
      • JoeBrady

        3 years ago

        VegasSDfan
        Hosmer hits better,
        ================================
        I’m curious to see what you base this on.

        Reply
      • Cosmo2

        3 years ago

        First base defense doesn’t move the needle, it’s not important enough. But Rizzo is a much better hitter than Hosmer.

        Reply
        • midway_monster85

          3 years ago

          It’s not about who’s better it’s about filling a roster spot. The Cubs likely won’t be very good the next few years. If the Padres are willing to cough up a prospect or two as a salary dump that would be the best move the Cubs could make for the future of your team

          Reply
        • johnrealtime

          3 years ago

          60 million dollars is a hell of a lot of money for a prospect or two

          2
          Reply
        • midway_monster85

          3 years ago

          Their payroll is less than half of what it was when they were a contender that 60 mil will just go into the owners pockets. Not to mention Rizzo would probably cost 50 mil so yeah I’d rather take the prospects and hope for a better future because of it.

          Reply
  6. jessaumodesto

    3 years ago

    Man could You imagine how good they would be if he was on the Cubs?

    2
    Reply
  7. junkyard

    3 years ago

    We’re getting the band back together. We’ve on a mission from God. It’s dark and we’re wearing sunglasses. Schwarbryzzo!

    8
    Reply
  8. muskie73

    3 years ago

    FWIW Steamer projects 2022 wRC+ of 122 for Anthony Rizzo and 114 for Kris Bryant. ZiPS projects 2022 OPS+ of 123 for Rizzo and 119 for Bryant.

    Steamer projects 2022 WAR of 2.5 in 138 games for Rizzo and 2.7 in 139 games for Bryant. ZiPS projects 2022 WAR 2.7 in 552 plate appearances for Rizzo and a 2022 WAR of 3.1 in 590 plate appearances for Bryant.

    MLB Trade Rumors projects a three-year, $45 million contract for Rizzo and a six-year, $160 million contract for Bryant, who is two-year-a-half years younger than Rizzo,

    Would a team be better off giving Rizzo an AAV of $15 million through his age 34 season or giving Bryant an AAV of $26+ million through his age 35 season?

    5
    Reply
    • Deadguy

      3 years ago

      I like Rizzo over Bryant, but Bryant can play Outfield and 3rd, Rizzo plays only first or DH, DH is a waste of his glove though. Bryant wins in the accolades category as well, that’s what your paying for as a part of the “great bargin” Bryant has slightly more bargaining power than Rizzo

      1
      Reply
    • Cosmo2

      3 years ago

      Neither. This just shows how incredibly overrated Bryant is. His ability to fake it in left or right field adds little value at all.

      3
      Reply
      • The_Voice_Of_REASON

        3 years ago

        Right. ‘Plays multiple positions’. Just doesn’t play them well. His skill set in that area is completely overrated. In fact, he has only had 1 single season of being good in the field- and it wasn’t remotely great. Just fairly good. And given his age, it’s in line to be a terrible signing. Will most likely average around 2-3 WAR for the next 3 years.

        3
        Reply
        • The_Voice_Of_REASON

          3 years ago

          The age and the recent production trajectory. Not just the age.

          Reply
    • JoeBrady

      3 years ago

      I agree in principle. I’d prefer Bryant over Rizzo as a player. And I think $45M/3 for Rizzo is ballpark okay. But $160M/6 for a guy that misses time every year, is a lot higher than I’d be willing to go. Including prorating the 2020 season, Bryant has averaged 122 games over the past four years, never exceeding 147.

      Reply
  9. Deadguy

    3 years ago

    Cubs may end up winning out big time here? Prospects and Rizzo comes back for less than 50 Million? Boom

    5
    Reply
    • Led Hoyer

      3 years ago

      Honestly, quite a coup. Alcantara is pushing top 100 prospect status. If NL gets the dh a Rizzo/Schwindel combo could be quite good.

      1
      Reply
  10. brucenewton

    3 years ago

    He won’t get 5/70 for sure. Sure- handed defender but he doesn’t have much range anymore. Looked heavy last year.

    1
    Reply
  11. Jimbob 57

    3 years ago

    Only bring back Rizzo if you can’t make a deal for Hosmer & prospects including Campasano sign Bryant & Story then sign 2or3 relievers and let’s play ball

    Reply
  12. User 3663041837

    3 years ago

    2 year deal with a mutual option for a 3rd year is all I see him getting from any team.

    2
    Reply
  13. Wilmer the Thrillmer

    3 years ago

    A win win for Rizzo and the Cubs would be 2/30 with a 3rd year option. At least he would top the AAV of the 5/70 contract offer.

    I think 2/25 or maybe 3/35 on the open market would be his max at this point. If he gets 3/45 for instance I would be very, very surprised when Belt just signed for 1/18.

    Someone said Bryant has slightly more bargaining power than Rizzo. Is that a joke? Bryant will easily top 150mil.

    3
    Reply
  14. lumber and lighting

    3 years ago

    Is it just me or is Bryants multiple positions and being a RH hitter would be perfect for the Dodgers.Just saying

    1
    Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      3 years ago

      The Dodgers already have a high budget and loads of good prospects. Better to trade for Olsen, shift Muncy to 3B once he is healthy and let Justin Turner shift at that juncture from 3B to DH.

      I see zero chance the Dodgers get Bryant, even Freeman is more likely. The Dodgers already signed Chris Taylor for a slight overpay to keep another guy with multiple position flexibility.

      Reply
    • Cosmo2

      3 years ago

      Bryant doesn’t play multiple positions. He’s a poor fielding third baseman who can occasionally play the corner OF spots. Why does everyone make such a big deal out of that? He’s not very special as a left fielder.

      4
      Reply
      • Capi

        3 years ago

        He’s not poor defensively, he’s just average.

        Reply
      • ChiSox_Fan

        3 years ago

        Correct Cosmo!!

        He is no Leury Garcia!

        1
        Reply
  15. cars

    3 years ago

    I think that if Anthony Rizzo resigned with the Cubs he’s crazy. Why would he sign with a team that is at least 2 probably 3 years from being even competitive.

    1
    Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      3 years ago

      (80%) 1. Money

      (15%) 2. Fans who will appreciate him even though his skills are sloping downward

      (5%) 3. His legacy as a Cub

      4
      Reply
    • Cosmo2

      3 years ago

      Because folks aren’t exactly lining up to sign him at his price. You think he has that many choices?

      1
      Reply
      • Capi

        3 years ago

        According to Rizzo himself, he did have plenty of choices before the lockout.

        1
        Reply
      • Hello, Newman

        3 years ago

        Anthony Rizzo has minimal choices? Lol

        1
        Reply
        • Cosmo2

          3 years ago

          Who is lining up to sign him? He’s a decent hitting first baseman in decline. Lol all you want, but where is the demand? Seriously, name the teams lining up to sign him.

          2
          Reply
        • Hello, Newman

          3 years ago

          So, you’re just going to throw yourself out of the running? Can you imagine if 29 teams, publicly stated, they have not even considered Rizzo? Complete zero due diligence?

          I would be ticked if I was a fan of literally ANY team, that didn’t have open communication w/ a top 25 FA.

          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          3 years ago

          You honestly think every team is supposed to be in on 25 free agents at once? That’s beyond ridiculous. Most teams don’t need a first baseman so they’re out of the running right away. As a fan you expect your team to be in on a player your team doesn’t need? Absurd. He’s just not that valuable of a player and most teams don’t have a need for an expensive, meh hitting first baseman. You want diligence? Here it is: do we need to pay for a new first baseman? If they answer is no, you don’t need Rizzo. Not much diligence necessary. Not that complicated. Most teams don’t need to pay for a decent hitting first baseman and they don’t check in on players they don’t need. My team is out. Mets have no need for Rizzo whatsoever.

          Reply
        • Hello, Newman

          3 years ago

          Absolutely, yes to all the above. You need a complete team. If you can sign Rizzo to a well below value contract, and trade Alonso for an ace you wouldn’t??

          Maybe we should go to the basics, how do you define a valuable player? What is his price tag, you so surely seem to be aware of? How would you expect to know his current asking price, if you as GM, literally will not talk to him?? You don’t think every single GM is looking for any possible edge on their competitors? What if the league goes to universal DH? Yes, every team absolutely needs “decent hitting” even if he is a role player.

          Reply
        • Hello, Newman

          3 years ago

          And, that’s not to say they would or should trade Alonso. My point is successful GM’s needs to look at any and all avenues possible, in order to improve.

          Do you see what the Rays and Braves have been doing? Do you think that’s from being close minded?

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          3 years ago

          Hello, Newman7 hours ago
          I would be ticked if I was a fan of literally ANY team, that didn’t have open communication w/ a top 25 FA.
          =================================
          Why would teams like the RS or the Yankees have any interest in Rizzo? To be interested in Rizzo, you have to have:

          1-An opening at 1st.

          2-No competing openings.

          3-$15M in spending money.

          1
          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          3 years ago

          You’re being absurd. First of all, Rizzo is not a role player, not at that price. Secondly the Mets already have DH candidates. They simply DO NOT need Rizzo. Sign Rizzo then trade Alonso? So you want to spend on free agency to DOWNGRADE at first base? What sense is that? So you then have no choice but to trade your best hitter for a pitcher? Ridiculous. Why not just sign the pitcher and keep Alonso? When has a team ever had such a backwards, convoluted plan? Ridiculous. Rizzo is not that good, he only plays first base, most teams don’t have the need for him. There is due diligence but what you are suggesting, seriously looking into paying players who are downgrades from your current position- is just absurd.

          Reply
        • Hello, Newman

          3 years ago

          Okay, noted.
          Sorry for wasting your time.

          Reply
  16. 48-team MLB

    3 years ago

    The Crystal Ball has already shown Cubs over Athletics in 2028. Stop trying to alter fate.

    Reply
    • stpbaseball

      3 years ago

      such a strange thing to do

      Reply
  17. 30 Parks

    3 years ago

    Question – the “log in” button on MLBTR, anyone else having minor issues with same of late?

    Reply
  18. agrorolm

    3 years ago

    Rizzo was a favorite until he somewhat trashtalked about the Cubs while he was with the Yankees. I think there is only like about 20% chance Cubs make him any offer. If any offer is made, they will not go with a lowball offer, mostly for showing him a little respect for his legacy as a Cub.

    2
    Reply
    • agrorolm

      3 years ago

      In regards trash talked, I would had expect it from Baez to do somethinhg like that, and as far as I know, he didn’t. In the case of Bryant, he showed a lot of respect for the Cubs fans, and I think that he will be back as a Cub, maybe for his last couple of seasons before retirement.

      Reply
      • PutPeteinthehall

        3 years ago

        After he’s released from the last two years of a Heyward type of contract. I expect Bryant will give his new team about the level of production the Cubs got from Heyward.

        Reply
      • CleaverGreene

        3 years ago

        That would be right now.

        Reply
  19. The_Voice_Of_REASON

    3 years ago

    anthony rizzo a shell of his former self- he’s not even good anymore. It’s not worth bringing back a has-been like anthony rizzo for 1-2 WAR. It might- might have been worth having him on the team if he was a Cubs player his entire career. But that of course can’t happen.

    1
    Reply
  20. angt222

    3 years ago

    Out of all of the pending free agents that the Cubs had last season, I felt Rizzo would be the one that they retained/resigned. He was the face of the franchise.

    Reply
    • Hello, Newman

      3 years ago

      Not a Cubs fan, but it would be cool to see Kris Bryant/Baez/Rizzo retire as Cubs. Still time, I suppose. When even the big markets chose not to retain the big franchise player, it takes an element of singularity from the game. It’s neat to see players retire with one team.
      It’s not my money. If I was a cub’s fan, I would want him back.

      1
      Reply
  21. PutPeteinthehall

    3 years ago

    The DH makes it a good signing if for three years or less. No draft pick attached can even give a little more AAV.

    1
    Reply
  22. mike156

    3 years ago

    You used the phrase “star first baseman” but the problem for Rizzo is that you really don’t know what type of player he’s going to be over the next few years, so it’s hard to price it. 12% over league average for a 32 year old takes you to where? A high AAV short-term contract isn’t really justified by expectations. And a longer-term contract–three years or longer, let’s say, can easily become league average to replacement over the term.

    Reply
  23. Fred K. Burke

    3 years ago

    Spend the Ricketts money elsewhere. Just move on from Rizzo. If the Cubs are interested in a reunion attempt to sign relievers Andrew Chafin or Ryan Tepera.

    Reply
    • michael pegarsch

      3 years ago

      The Cubs will pay Rizzo and then say ‘see we spend money’… it’s laughable . This team sucked when the core was still there. A reunion is nothing but pandering to the loyalist bleacher bums who have no problem wasting summers drunk cheering for the lovable losers

      Reply
  24. 66TheNumberOfTheBest

    3 years ago

    Hoyer will stand outside his window with a boombox.

    2
    Reply
  25. The Saber-toothed Superfife

    3 years ago

    I wonder what that genius GM, Al Avila, has planned for today……

    Reply
  26. HEHEHATE

    3 years ago

    Rizzo missed his opportunity for a big deal. He wants freeman money and isn’t half the player anymore. I’ll be shocked if he gets more than a 3/4 for 50-65 and even then i think it’s generous. The Dh will help somewhat, but he’s not hitting 100 by a longshot.

    1
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      3 years ago

      IMO, Rizzo’s issue, and the same with Freeman, is that they think they are a franchise icon (probably rightfully so), and that the team will cave into their demands rather than risk bad publicity.

      Reply
    • The_Voice_Of_REASON

      3 years ago

      anthony rizzo lost any upper hand he (may have) had in terms of the publicity angle when he rejected the contract extension and when he threw shade at the team after the trade. And also to an extent when he became a pathetic shell of the player he used to be.

      Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      3 years ago

      shocked. Shocked!

      Reply
  27. Goose

    3 years ago

    It was mentioned but if the Cubs were smart they would make a deal for Hosmer. They are in rebuild mode. They could get some young prospects back. The contract doesn’t look to be that bad after 2022.

    spotrac.com/mlb/san-diego-padres/eric-hosmer-8531/

    Reply
  28. Cubbiecubster

    3 years ago

    Getting too old with a bad back to boot. He’ll be lucky to get $10-$12 million per. The only ex-Cub reunion that interests me at all, would be Schwarbs as a DH.

    Reply
  29. Cubbiecubster

    3 years ago

    Jed offered more money to Rizzo than he’ll get now. And he offered more money to Javy than he got from Detroit. See ya!

    Reply
    • Deleted Userr

      3 years ago

      Who looks worse: Jed for offering it or Rizzo/Baez for not taking it when it was offered?

      Reply
  30. chrismilwaukee

    3 years ago

    I love Rizzo, but just no.

    1
    Reply
  31. mike127

    3 years ago

    It was fairly well documented in Chicago that in December that Rizzo made the final move out of his place in the city. I know he’s going to have to take the storage/moving van somewhere and I doubt it will be to a place that he just moved from after being comfortable in for 10+ years. This is just normal Levine dribble with no other stories out there. If they weren’t talking to him before the lockout we know for sure that they aren’t talking now.

    1
    Reply
    • Deleted Userr

      3 years ago

      If the Cubs offer the most $ he’s not leaving $ on the table to go elsewhere.

      Reply
  32. bykoric

    3 years ago

    How do you placate a fanbase that is starting to catch onto your schtick of tanking again? Sign their favorite player back. Rizzo ain’t gonna help you win in 2022.

    Either get me Freddie Freeman at 1b or go away.

    Reply
    • 48-team MLB

      3 years ago

      Why would Freeman go to the Cubs? He wants to win more championships and the Cubs won’t be back in the mix until the back half of this decade.

      Reply
      • chrismilwaukee

        3 years ago

        The Cubs will compete this year with a few more moves. I love that people are so anti cub that they’ll forego logic.

        1
        Reply
  33. Cosmo2

    3 years ago

    Looks like Rizzo is as overrated by fans as is Bryant. He’s a first base only decent hitter in decline. Most teams already are getting that value at first base and for those who aren’t, that value isn’t hard to add on the cheap. Who really needs to shell out cash for a first baseman who’s production totals are going to be basically league average?

    2
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      3 years ago

      Cub fans…low bar

      Reply
      • chrismilwaukee

        3 years ago

        How sad that the highlight of your life is to be a Cubs troll. You get your joy (what little there is) from poorly insulting a team and fan base.

        Reply
  34. Cosmo2

    3 years ago

    Everyone is sleeping in the Cubs, declaring them already out of it but they really only traded away players who were exiting their primes. They’re not tanking or whatever you wanna call it.

    1
    Reply
    • 48-team MLB

      3 years ago

      Even if they’re “exiting their primes”, the Cubs still need a lot to get back into contention. They are the fourth best team in that division right now. St. Louis, Milwaukee and Cincinnati are all better on paper.

      Reply
      • Cosmo2

        3 years ago

        Yea they’re not looking great but they could surprise people. I don’t think they’re all that bad right now.

        1
        Reply
      • Franco27

        3 years ago

        But off-season deals are far from over, so hard to judge until all deals are completed.

        1
        Reply
      • Led Hoyer

        3 years ago

        The cubs don’t have long term horrible contracts and plenty of payroll flexibility. You can solve a lot of problems quickly.

        1
        Reply
        • 48-team MLB

          3 years ago

          I do think they’ll be back in contention by 2025/2026. I just don’t see them doing much in the next three years.

          Reply
  35. Franco27

    3 years ago

    He’s not coming back to the Cubs unless all other options fail. Hard feelings and ego. Personally, I think it would be a mistake for both parties. Move on.

    1
    Reply
  36. michael pegarsch

    3 years ago

    Anyone familiar with Chicago media would take anything Bruce Levine says about the Cubs with a grain of salt

    3
    Reply
  37. SupremeZeus

    3 years ago

    Thomas Wolfe was right.

    Reply
  38. Dumpster Divin Theo

    3 years ago

    Will go where all old dogs go to curl up before they’re put to pasture: Orioles on a 1 yr/8 mill pillow contract. Pillow because it’s a sleepy place: Sammy, Albert, the Dark Knight, etc

    1
    Reply
  39. chrismilwaukee

    3 years ago

    Rizzo would greatly benefit from HGH and steroids. I mean now that people are elected to the hall of fame while using them, why not let players utilize their obvious advantages?

    Reply
    • Franco27

      3 years ago

      Maybe because there are huge health risks with both, and always have been.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

  • Top Stories
  • Recent

Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base

Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton

Cubs To Promote Cade Horton

Mariners Claim Leody Taveras

Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach

A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery

Blue Jays Sign Spencer Turnbull

Blue Jays Sign José Ureña

Ross Stripling Retires

Rangers Place Leody Taveras On Outright Waivers

Triston Casas Likely To Miss Entire 2025 Season Due To Knee Surgery

Orioles Recall Coby Mayo

Dodgers Recall Hyeseong Kim

Triston Casas Suffers “Significant Knee Injury”

Angels Place Mike Trout On 10-Day Injured List

Rangers Option Jake Burger

Tigers Designate Kenta Maeda For Assignment

Reds Option Alexis Diaz

Orioles Move Charlie Morton To Bullpen

Astros To Activate Lance McCullers Jr. This Weekend

Pirates Notes: Shelton, Haddad, Cherington, Nutting, Valdez

The Biggest Trade In Nationals History Looks Better Every Day

Lou Trivino Elects Free Agency

Orioles Outright Walter Pennington

Nationals Release Lucas Sims

Kyle Wright Pulled Off Rehab Stint With Shoulder Fatigue, Continuing To Play Catch

Padres Trade Connor Joe To Reds

Latest On Anthony Rizzo

White Sox To Select Tim Elko

Poll: In-Season Managerial Changes

ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

Latest Rumors & News

Latest Rumors & News

  • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
  • Nolan Arenado Rumors
  • Dylan Cease Rumors
  • Luis Robert Rumors
  • Marcus Stroman Rumors

 

Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

MLBTR Features

MLBTR Features

  • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
  • Front Office Originals
  • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
  • MLBTR Podcast
  • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
  • 2025 Arbitration Projections
  • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
  • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
  • Contract Tracker
  • Transaction Tracker
  • Extension Tracker
  • Agency Database
  • MLBTR On Twitter
  • MLBTR On Facebook
  • Team Facebook Pages
  • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

Rumors By Team

  • Angels Rumors
  • Astros Rumors
  • Athletics Rumors
  • Blue Jays Rumors
  • Braves Rumors
  • Brewers Rumors
  • Cardinals Rumors
  • Cubs Rumors
  • Diamondbacks Rumors
  • Dodgers Rumors
  • Giants Rumors
  • Guardians Rumors
  • Mariners Rumors
  • Marlins Rumors
  • Mets Rumors
  • Nationals Rumors
  • Orioles Rumors
  • Padres Rumors
  • Phillies Rumors
  • Pirates Rumors
  • Rangers Rumors
  • Rays Rumors
  • Red Sox Rumors
  • Reds Rumors
  • Rockies Rumors
  • Royals Rumors
  • Tigers Rumors
  • Twins Rumors
  • White Sox Rumors
  • Yankees Rumors

ad: 160x600_MLB

Navigation

  • Sitemap
  • Archives
  • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

MLBTR INFO

  • Advertise
  • About
  • Commenting Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Connect

  • Contact Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feed

MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

hide arrows scroll to top

Register

Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version