Headlines

  • Reds Finalize Deal To Acquire Will Benson From Guardians
  • Mets Option Brett Baty, Mark Vientos
  • Cardinals To Select Jordan Walker
  • Luke Voit Opts Out Of Minor League Deal With The Brewers
  • Mets Sign Dylan Bundy To Minor League Deal
  • Cardinals Sign Miles Mikolas To Two-Year Extension
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2022-23 MLB Free Agent List
    • Top 50 Free Agents
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2023
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Arbitration Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Giants, Carlos Correa Agree To 13-Year Deal

By Anthony Franco | December 13, 2022 at 11:59pm CDT

The Giants have landed the star player they’d been seeking. San Francisco is reportedly in agreement with Carlos Correa on a 13-year, $350MM contract. The deal doesn’t contain any opt-out provisions but the Boras Corporation client will receive a full no-trade clause.

It’ll be the third team in as many years for Correa, who turned 28 in September. The longtime Astro hit free agency last winter. Generally regarded as the top player in that offseason’s class, he didn’t find the long-term megadeal he’d sought after declining a qualifying offer from Houston.

After the lockout, Correa pivoted to a shorter-term gamble on himself, inking a three-year guarantee with the Twins that paid him the largest per-year salary ($35.1MM) for a free agent position player in MLB history. That deal allowed Correa to opt out and retest the market this winter, and he was ineligible for another QO thanks to the CBA’s prohibition on a player receiving the offer multiple times in his career.

Correa’s 2022 campaign got off to a slower than expected start. He hit .243/.309/.324 in April, presumably dealing with some lingering effects of his late signing and cold early-season weather that took a toll on his power output. In the first week of May, Correa dealt with a scare when he was struck on the right hand on a check swing. Initial x-rays indicated he may have fractured his right middle finger, but follow-up testing revealed he suffered only a bruise. He still landed on the injured list but returned after a minimal stint. Aside from a brief stay on the COVID-19 list a few weeks later, Correa stayed healthy the rest of the way.

After returning from the finger bruise, Correa was one of the sport’s best players. He hit .299/.376/.488 in 487 plate appearances from mid-May onwards. Among 133 qualified hitters over that stretch, he ranked 14th in on-base percentage and 23rd in slugging. That excellent finish brought his season line up to .291/.366/.467 in 136 games. Correa’s overall offensive productivity was 40 percentage points above league average, by measure of wRC+. That’s right in line with the levels he’d established late in his time in Houston. Correa stumbled in the abbreviated 2020 campaign but had respective wRC+ tallies 42 and 33 points above average in 2019 and ’21.

Over the past four seasons, the former first overall pick has tallied just under 1800 plate appearances. He’s hit .281/.359/.481 with a strong 10.6% walk rate and a lower than average 20.4% strikeout percentage. Correa has posted a hard contact rate north of 42% in each of the past four seasons, well above the 35-36% league marks. Broadly speaking, there’s nothing to nitpick with his offensive ability. He makes contact, has strong plate discipline and has topped 20 home runs in six of the seven 162-game seasons of his career. Correa has unsurprisingly been better against left-handers than righties, but he’s been excellent against pitchers of either handedness. He owns a .291/.386/.482 career mark against southpaws, while he’s hit .274/.346/.477 against same-handed arms.

Correa had some injury issues earlier in his career, missing time in 2018 with back discomfort and fracturing a rib in 2019. He’s only twice topped 600 plate appearances in a season, but the aforementioned finger contusion is the only non-virus ailment that has sent him to the IL within the past three seasons. With his recent health and the strong finish to his 2022 campaign, his camp made the easy call to opt out of the final two years and $70.2MM on his Twins deal.

For the second straight winter, he was the top free agent option in a loaded shortstop class. Even with Trea Turner, Xander Bogaerts and Dansby Swanson hitting the open market, Correa was the best available shortstop. Aaron Judge was the market’s top free agent overall on the heels of an MVP-winning, 62-homer season, but one can argue Correa was the best long-term bet available.

In addition to his strong offensive track record, the two-time All-Star is typically one of the sport’s most valuable defenders. Defensive Runs Saved has pegged him as an above-average shortstop in every season of his career. Altogether, DRS has pegged him as 70 runs better than par in more than 7600 innings. Statcast hasn’t been as bullish, but it also generally rates him as a plus gloveman. Statcast has pegged Correa as 17 runs above average since it began tracking defense in 2016, including plus grades each year from 2018-21.

Correa’s defense marks were particularly excellent during his final season in Houston, when he rated as +20 runs by DRS and +9 runs at Statcast. He secured his first career Gold Glove award in the process. This year’s reviews weren’t so impressive. DRS still considered him a net positive at three runs above average, but that was the lowest mark of his career. Statcast pegged him two runs below par, his first below-average showing by that metric since 2017.

Defensive metrics can vary on an annual basis, and it doesn’t seem San Francisco’s concerned with this past season’s mid-tier showing. Correa boasts a plus arm and has generally been very sure-handed. There may be some trepidation about how his 6’4″, 220 pound frame will hold up into his mid-late 30’s, particularly since he’s only an average runner. With his hands and arm strength, however, the Giants can at least project above-average glovework for the next few seasons.

San Francisco has four-time Gold Glove winner Brandon Crawford under contract for another year. They didn’t enter the offseason needing shortstop help necessarily, but their infield around Crawford had its share of question marks. San Francisco re-signed Wilmer Flores to a two-year guarantee to add a productive righty bat to the mix at first, second or third base. Tommy La Stella is under contract for another season but hasn’t played well since landing in San Francisco. J.D. Davis and David Villar are on hand as corner options, while Thairo Estrada can cover the middle infield and adds a solid righty bat.

There are a lot of moving pieces available for skipper Gabe Kapler, but adding Correa figures to solidify the left side of the infield with an everyday pair. Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle wrote last month the team planned to move Crawford to the hot corner if they were to sign Correa. Crawford has never played an inning outside of shortstop in the majors, but he figures to handle the less demanding position well.

While shortstop itself may not have been a priority for president of baseball operations Farhan Zaidi and his front office, adding impact talent certainly was. The Giants made no secret of their desire to land Judge. When he returned to the Bronx, the club pivoted to Correa — the clear top hitter remaining. He’ll now become the highlight acquisition of the offseason, joining outfielder Mitch Haniger and pitchers Sean Manaea and Ross Stripling as players brought in to try to rebound from an 81-81 campaign.

Doing so requires one of the largest investments in major league history. The $350MM guarantee checks in as the fourth-largest ever. It’s the second-biggest free agent deal of all-time, just narrowly below the $360MM deal that Judge inked a week ago. Correa becomes the second free agent to land a 13-year contract, matching the record length secured by Bryce Harper with the Phillies over the 2018-19 offseason. The deal runs through the 2035 campaign, what will be Correa’s age-40 season.

That kind of lengthy megadeal has become en vogue this offseason. Turner and Bogaerts signed 11-year deals with the Phillies and Padres, respectively, taking them each through their own age-40 seasons. Judge inked a nine-year deal that paid him through age 39. MLBTR had predicted Correa for a nine-year, $288MM contract at the start of the offseason. As with Turner and Bogaerts, those deals lasted longer than anticipated, with each correspondingly securing a greater guarantee than expected.

That has involved a bit of a tradeoff with regards to annual salary, however. Correa’s deal comes with an average annual value around $26.92MM, a mark that’s outside the top 25 in MLB history. That’s well lower than the $32MM per-year salary MLBTR had projected, with the Puerto Rico native electing to sacrifice some money on an annual basis to secure a larger total sum. Doing so could very well position him to spend the remainder of his career in the Bay Area.

From a team perspective, spreading the guarantee over a longer term adds more future downside but has the more immediate benefit of reducing the club’s luxury tax hit. A team’s CBT commitments are based on deals’ average annual values, and the $26.92MM mark is more manageable in that regard.

That’s now relevant for the Giants, whose payroll has spiked dramatically. The specific financial breakdown isn’t yet clear, but an evenly distributed salary would push the Giants 2023 payroll around $190MM, as projected by Roster Resource. Their luxury tax figure is about $206MM, $27MM below the base threshold. San Francisco’s spending is well above the $150-155MM range of the past few seasons, but it’s still shy of their $200MM franchise-record Opening Day mark from 2018.

The Giants could keep pushing forward as they jostle for position atop a stacked NL West with the Dodgers and Padres. The bullpen is still a question mark, and San Francisco could look into upgrades at first base and/or center field. The Giants remained involved in the bidding for ace Carlos Rodón as of this afternoon as well, although signing both Correa and the top remaining free agent starting pitcher may push beyond their financial comfort level.

As for Correa’s now-former team, they’ll be left to regroup having missed out on their top target of the winter. Minnesota offered a 10-year deal worth $285MM, tweets Jon Heyman of the New York Post. That came with a higher annual salary than the offer Correa actually accepted, but the Twins were apparently reluctant to commit deep into his 30’s. They’re now facing an uncertain shortstop situation, with Kyle Farmer and Royce Lewis looking like the top internal options.

Minnesota has already had some discussions with Swanson this offseason, keeping tabs on him as a fallback possibility to Correa. The organization should have a decent amount of financial flexibility and could now pivot more strongly after Swanson if they’re determined to address shortstop. They’ve also been linked to Rodón at various points and could try to allocate their spending capacity to a top-of-the-rotation arm. The Twins surely aren’t done in any event, although that’ll be little consolation for the front office and fanbase for the moment. Because Correa was ineligible for the qualifying offer, they don’t receive any compensation for his departure.

It’s the latest massive move in an offseason that has gained plenty of steam since the calendar flipped to December. Correa joins an increasingly loaded division and, more generally, a very competitive National League. In the process, he becomes the new face of the Giants — a role the club hopes he’ll effectively hold well into the next decade.

Jeff Passan of ESPN first reported Correa and the Giants had agreed to a 13-year, $350MM contract. Jon Heyman of the New York Post reported the deal didn’t include any opt-out provisions but contained a full no-trade clause.

Image courtesy of USA Today Sports.

Share 0 Retweet 28 Send via email0

Minnesota Twins Newsstand San Francisco Giants Transactions Carlos Correa

Latest On Carlos Rodon’s Market
Main
The Opener: Correa Fallout, Thor, MLBTR Chat
View Comments (919)

Comments

  1. Isaac Allen

    3 months ago

    Holy Toledo. Giants broke the bank.

    Reply
    • Tcsbaseball

      3 months ago

      I’m sure I’ll get attacked for this but I don’t even think he’s worth half of that contract

      Reply
      • RyanD44

        3 months ago

        I just don’t get it. He’s good, but he’s not a premier player. He struggles to stay healthy, he’s never hit 30 homers or driven in 100. He doesn’t run. Is 20 HR and 80 RBI worth $27m a year for 13 years?

        Reply
        • falconsball1993

          3 months ago

          RBI is dependent on lineup and spot in batting order. Dumb stat for predicting skill. He doesn’t run bc no one runs.

          Though I agree it’s a hugely overpaid contract

        • RyanD44

          3 months ago

          So does it make it even worse than he’s spent 2/3 of his career hitting 3rd and 4th and he still hasn’t even driven in 100?

        • DTD/ATL1313

          3 months ago

          He played on some offensive juggernauts…poor excuse

        • falconsball1993

          3 months ago

          On the Astros? Yes lol. He didn’t bat 3rd or 4th. And when he did, his batted ball rates would’ve easily surpassed 30/100 had he had a full season in that spot.

        • Codeeg

          3 months ago

          He’s 30% better than a league average hitter and probably 40% better than a SS. He fields fine for now and can move down to third and then first/DH if he still is hitting.

        • bigdaddyt

          3 months ago

          Bo is gonna be so ungodly expensive for the jays considering he’s better (just not defensively)

        • falconsball1993

          3 months ago

          Check his OPS+. He’s routinely a much better (25-40%) better hitter than the rest of the league.

        • RyanD44

          3 months ago

          Go look at his career splits. He’s played almost 600 out of 888 games hitting 3rd or 4th.

          And the fact that he can’t make it through the whole season isn’t a good defending point for him.

        • falconsball1993

          3 months ago

          And he still had an OPS+ north of 125 despite being hurt. I think you’re overthinking this. They signed for longer years and less money to stay under tax. Last years are sunk cost anyways.

        • falconsball1993

          3 months ago

          After returning from the finger bruise, Correa was one of the sport’s best players. He hit .299/.376/.488 in 487 plate appearances from mid-May onwards. Among 133 qualified hitters over that stretch, he ranked 14th in on-base percentage and 23rd in slugging. That excellent finish brought his season line up to .291/.366/.467 in 136 games.

        • youngliam

          3 months ago

          tbh in 7years this contract will look cheap lol

        • IndianRye

          3 months ago

          Jose’s done both babbyy

        • worthington

          3 months ago

          It is nowadays.

        • Pickle_Britches

          3 months ago

          What has Turner beat him in last few years other than runs or steals? Sup with WAR and age?

        • jjd002

          3 months ago

          He has the 6th highest wRC+ of all time (for shortstops), ahead of Seager who got $350 million.

        • jjd002

          3 months ago

          Bo is not better than Correa. What you guys smoking in Canada?

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          You are correct. You don’t get it. There are a large number of intelligent baseball people on this board that could explain it to you, but your haterade is strong, so why bother.

        • FrankRoo

          3 months ago

          Not really. Hitting with runners on or RISP is a skill some players and hitting approaches thrive at. Compare Correa to someone like Pujols and you see the difference. For some reason Pujols not only slugged more w/ higher avg, but also did this while getting pitched around at the same time (more BB with RISP with less PAs vs bases empty).

          Correa is the opposite. Slugs less with RISP, but does strike out less as well vs bases empty, possibly due to approach in those situations trying to put the ball in play.

          Each hitter is different and their approaches and skills do make a difference when it comes to driving in rubns. The “RBIs don’t matter anymore” line is getting a bit old when we have so much data available and these hitters have had more than enough career ABs to see their trends.

        • Hego Damask

          3 months ago

          He isn’t worth that money. Thats the Giants being so desperate to sign a big name that they overpaid for Correa. Anyone see what the Twins offered him?

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Ryan, It doesn’t matter where you bat in the order, it matters how many people were on base when you came to the plate. Look at the RBI leaders and without fail it’s the guys that had the most guys on base.

          But you know what? You won’t understand that either.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Bo is better? Delusional much?

        • FrankRoo

          3 months ago

          If I’m paying a player based on what he can do every day (rate stats like OPS+), but don’t get that every game then am I overpaying? Sure feels like it. If Correa plays 75% of games a player is expected to play during a season shouldn’t he cost 25% less?

        • Jobba11

          3 months ago

          He was a 140 and 134 OPS+ last 2 seasons WAR of 5 and I think 7 in 2021 and
          Thats a very good MLB player

        • paddyo875

          3 months ago

          Not a premiere player? I guess if you simply look at two counting stat lines only, you can conclude that.

          But to better evaluate any position player and where they stand, look at stats like triple slash line and OPS+ and also DRS and OAA. Is a career SLG of .479 top tier for SS? It likely is for SS in most eras of MLB.

          Those counting stats are great accomplishments of course. But they also represent other factors like strength of the rest of the team and batting order.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          He also had a top 3 rWAR and top 4 bWAR at SS during his career. Ryan isn’t overthinking this, he simple doesn’t have any baseball knowledge. He literally has no clue what makes a player good.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Already does. $26.9 million AAV is cheap for a guy of his level of play.

        • Jobba11

          3 months ago

          The “just not defensively” is a pretty big deal when your talking SS
          Also what metric tells you Bo is better ? His OPS+ and WAR has been lower both of the last 2 seasons
          I say this as a Jays fan . You are significantly overvaluing your hometown player who I love btw

        • Blue Baron

          3 months ago

          @Hego Damask: Actually, you are wrong. He is worth it by definition, because any good, service, or thing for sale is worth what the highest bidder in the market is willing to pay. It’s basic economics and the very definition of market price.

        • BondsAway

          3 months ago

          You guys don’t get it. Unless you’re smarter than every GM in baseball, Correa is an elite SS. He gets on base, had high OPS, & is hard to strike out. Above average defender with a cannon for an arm. Great leader, smart, & a clutch player. Worth every dime!!!

        • Fink Ployed

          3 months ago

          falconsball, you’re right that RBI are dependent on lineup and batting order. But he “doesn’t run bc no one runs”?

          Since 2017, Trea Turner has stolen 168 bases.

          Correa has stolen six.

          If no one runs, Turner must walk REALLY FAST.

        • Fink Ployed

          3 months ago

          “He didn’t bat 3rd or 4th”

          Like they say, falconsball, you’re entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

          As an Astro, Correa had 1,009 AB batting cleanup and 899 AB batting third, combining for 68% of his AB.

        • Kruk's Left Nut

          3 months ago

          I’m not sure Bo is better. Offensively he is certainly comparable. Defensively, Bo feel off a cliff this year. I like Bo a hell of a lot more than Correa, but Correa currently seems to be the more rounded of the two.

        • youngliam

          3 months ago

          He probably isn’t worth that money today but the Giants need an attractive core or else they can kiss any big free agent they want goodbye over the next few years.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Seager got $325 million

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          What percentage of baserunners did the hitter drive in? That is the only thing I want to know. Not batting average or slg% with RISP. Not any of the so-called clutch stats. Tell us what they actually produced with men on base.

          Pujols was a 1B, not an elite defensive SS. Apples to oranges.

          Let’s compare Correa to his peers at the percentage of baserunners driven in. An apples-to-apples comparison. No particular order here.

          Correa – 16.6%
          Lindor – 15.6%
          Turner – 17.0%
          Seager – 16.4%
          Bogaerts – 15.9%
          Swanson – 15.6%

          Pretty close.

          RBI as a stat is completely and utterly useless in measuring individual player performance. It is completely without context. It’s like saying there are more traffic accidents in Los Angeles than Milwaukee, without taking about how many accidents per capita in each of those cities.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Where he batted in the order is completely irrelevant. What percentage of baserunners he drove in as compared to other SS is what matters. I answered that above.

        • cuban363566

          3 months ago

          Websoulsurfer, maybe you could research some stats before spouting off. For his career, with RISP he has a career tOPS+ of 97. Seems to me that he would have higher rbi #s if he actually produced in those situations

        • Fink Ployed

          3 months ago

          What’s the time frame, websoulsurfer?

        • Fink Ployed

          3 months ago

          There are different contributing factors in different RBI scenarios.

          For example, if a runner is on third base and he scores on a lazy sac fly well short of the warning track because the outfielder has a weak arm and the runner is a burner, that’s not the same as a slower runner scoring all the way from first base when the batter hits a wallbanger to the deepest part of the park and splits the defenders.

          The RBI in the first case was substantially dependent on the runner’s speed and the fielder’s weak arm, while the RBI in the second case was more a function of the quality of contact on the part of the batter.

        • JerseyShoreScore

          3 months ago

          Pros: Correa is a great defender at shortstop, but the Giants are solid defensively there. Seems to be a leader and positive clubhouse guy.

          Cons: Career Numbers somewhat limited:

          1 Season of 150 games played.
          1 Season of 100 runs scored (On great teams in a great ballpark)
          0 Seasons of 100 RBIs
          1 Season of 25 HRs
          1 Stolen Base since 2019
          2 Seasons over .280 Batting Average.

          So, yes he is a good player, but he received superstar dollars and years…

        • Baseball_dude

          3 months ago

          You’re right, RBIs are dependent on the lineup and batting order.. that being said, He played for the Astros who had a good lineup in front and behind him and he never had a 100 RBI season. Unfortunately nowadays this is an average contract for decent/good players (not great players)

        • WAR overrated... shows how bad is the replacement? Assigned by?

          3 months ago

          Dumb assumption to disregard RBI importance. RBI is more dependent on focus and mindset when there are teammates on base, if you ever play baseball and are not a blind fanatics of WAR and replacement meaning. He is selfish player and batter, that’s a fact. Just check his average with men on base and in scoring position. The giant will regret it just like the Cubs did with Jason Heyward. Ups.. is an outfielder vs CC a SS HOF candidate based on WAR with incredible defense and super human power and unique War advance metric number out of this world and should be a first time HOF member. Ups HOF doesn’t matter. Duh! Nevertheless CC should be compared with B. Harper. Duh!

        • JrodFunk5

          3 months ago

          14th/23rd over a limited stretch is not elite.

        • Robert

          3 months ago

          Trea Turner runs. And he’ll likely be running more in ‘23.

          Correa is massively overrated.

        • TheMan 3

          3 months ago

          This contract for a player not considered elite means by next year, someone will break the $1 billion dollar contract and soon thereafter fans won’t have the disposable money to spend at a baseball game on a recurring basis

        • Lars MacDonald

          3 months ago

          But, he’ll be 35 and there will still be 6 years to go on the contract.
          The Giants better hope he ages gracefully.

        • 123redsox

          3 months ago

          @falconsball1993 Correa has hit out of 3 or 4 hole in 60.8% of his plate appearances in the majors. That would be a combined total 2,319 plate appearances out of 3813 plate appearances in his career

        • Mystery Team

          3 months ago

          Let’s play Sesame Street’s Which One Of These Things Is Not Like The Other. Here we go: Mike Trout – Bryce Harper – Aaron Judge – Trea Turner – Manny Machado – Carlos Correa. You guessed it boys and girls it’s Carlos Correa who’s out of place those other players are elite offensive players while Carlos is eeehhhh pretty good I guess.

        • put it in the books

          3 months ago

          RBI is not a dumb stat. If you a premier player like him playing in a top spot in the lineup like he does and is in a good offensively batting order which he always is and you still don’t drive in 100 runs then it’s a pretty meaningful stat.

        • falkensmaze

          3 months ago

          Boras.

        • RockinRobin

          3 months ago

          If Baseball Reference is accurate, 61% of his games started he batted 3rd or 4th.

          If you take his 4th batter position (273 games) with 42 HRs and 182 RBI, for a 150 game season that would equal 23HRs and 100 RBIs. So, not really a 30 HR guy….barely 100 RBI.

        • Ra

          3 months ago

          RBIs are dependent to an extent similar to Runs scored are dependent – partially Hit 30 homers, your runs scored are also 30 RBIs.

          The best hitters translate into having the most RBIs, not just because of most chances.

        • Ra

          3 months ago

          Well said, FrankRoo. Bravo!

        • Ra

          3 months ago

          RBIs are mostly dependent on good hitting. Divide RBIs by chances and you’ll find the batterswith the highest percentage are most often slotted from 2 to 4 in the batting order.

        • Ma4170

          3 months ago

          You buy fully into that narrative? He’s always played on a premiere team. His rbi are lower because he doesn’t get as many XBH with men on base.

        • The Natural

          3 months ago

          And there a bunch of stuff about your own psyche that you dont understand. Lighten up

        • brat922

          3 months ago

          The Giants are very particular about the players on their team. They want decent guys who are team players, great examples and he is a very big leader in clubhouses as well as helping others in the field during games. He wanted a team he could help move on the standings and make a difference for. It isn’t all about stats, though that is a big part of considering a new Giant.

        • angelscamp

          3 months ago

          Glad he is out of the American League. Hello sunny California, goodbye snowy Minnesota.

        • WampumWalloper

          3 months ago

          @websoulsurfer, not necessarily true, not all runner in scoring position at bats are the same. Who was the opposing pitcher and what was the skill of the defenders in those at bats? One batter might have had a much higher rate of pitching changes to create tougher matchups than others. How fast or good of baserunners were those on base? How well did the defense keep their leads down? What base were those runners on and how many out were there? There are so many variables. Just looking at success % or tOPS+ will not give a clear answer. It’s why the lineups of the Rays vary so much, analytics and a great lineup algorithm can win games.

        • debubba

          3 months ago

          He is 42 when that contract expires. Ouch. All of these long-term deals clubs are making is incredible.

        • Sid Bream Speed Demon

          3 months ago

          Bo is better……lol, OK. Not true even a little bit. Younger, yes. Better, in your Molson-soaked dreams.

        • Jaysfansince92

          3 months ago

          Bichette is comparable offensively but Correa is definitely better defensively therefore better overall.

          There is an arguement that could be made that Bichette is slightly more valuable offensively if you believe hits are better than walks, but still not enough to make up for the defense.

        • Jaysfansince92

          3 months ago

          285/10

        • Jaysfansince92

          3 months ago

          Just out of curiosity where did you find the numbers for that? I would be interested in looking at that for a few players.

        • Moonlight Graham

          3 months ago

          I like Bo a lot. I don’t think he’s better offensively. They’re probably comparable, with a speed edge to Bo and a plate-discipline edge to Correa.

          But defense is a big part of Correa’s value. A guy who can play that kind of defense and hit at a high level is what the Giants are paying for. Bo has his shortcomings with the glove.

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          RyanD44: You’re absolutely spot on. His metrics are great, but the counting stats are average. When healthy his hit totals, doubles, and homeruns align with any other solid but unspectacular player. His walk totals are ok. He’s as likely to strikeout over 100 times per year as anyone else. He’s a good, complimentary, hitter that can improve most lineups. However, people act like he’ll carry the Giants the way Judge would have. It ain’t happening.

          In my opinion, superstar players have both. Look at Trout, Ohtani, Judge, Freeman, Goldschmidt, even Tatis and Lindor…good metrics and big numbers on counting stats. Many modern fans quickly write off the counting stats but that only serves to torpedo their own argument. That’s why, when someone presents a counting stats position, they write it off and say the person who made it “doesn’t know anything about baseball”. In reality it shows that their argument is weak and that they can’t defend it well.

        • Shoguneye

          3 months ago

          Smoking the best!

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          Proves my point, really. Give an actual counter point.

        • kcmap

          3 months ago

          …and they say cheaters never prosper. This one did.

        • avenger65

          3 months ago

          Yeah, the health thing bothers me too. He was injured in 2019 and since then he has played three seasons and has been one of the best SS in bb. I’m also worried because, when he was nine, he fell off his bike and bruised his knee. When, oh when, will he ever recover from that, if ever.

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          His health wasn’t the crux of my point.

        • bag o ballz

          3 months ago

          yeah I looked it up yesterday and over a 13 year span the average salary for a player has just under doubled – by the end of the contract if that trend holds up the actual value of the 27mm AAV will be equal to around 14-15mm in today’s dollars which isn’t horrible

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          He also routinely has average amounts of hits, home runs, and doubles.

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          GM’s make plenty of mistakes. They aren’t infallible individually or as a collective. Arguing that “everyone agrees he is elite” proves nothing.

        • rememberthecoop

          3 months ago

          Teams like his leadership. The Twins said he completely changed their clubhouse dynamics. And prior to 2022 he was generally regarded as the best defensive shortstop, a premier position on the diamond. And he has that star power that tells the team we want to win. That’s what he brings. Like him or hate him for cheating, there’s a reason why he was in demand

        • dpsmith22

          3 months ago

          Imo Jose is a superior player. Brings so much more offensively.

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          “You are correct. You don’t get it. There are a large number of intelligent baseball people on this board that could explain it to you, but your haterade is strong, so why bother.”
          – Websoulsurfer

          Perfect example of what I’m talking about. The “other side” is “too hateful” to illicit a counter argument, so they are just dismissed with the suggestion that the “other side” is also unintelligent.

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          I agree that he has value. But this narrative that he’s a superstar on par with Trout, Judge, Ohtani, etc. holds no water.

        • Hammerin' Hank

          3 months ago

          Hitting with runners on base or RISP is not a repeatable skill. These numbers fluctuate greatly from year to year among all players.

        • Hammerin' Hank

          3 months ago

          RBIs are a fun stat and are great for fantasy baseball. But they don’t really tell you that much about a hitter’s ability. Generally speaking, they tell you more about how many guys were on base when he was hitting.

        • Hammerin' Hank

          3 months ago

          He never had 100 RBIs mainly because he rarely played a full season. That’s more an indication of his lack of ability to stay healthy than his lack of ability to drive in runs.

        • LLGiants64

          3 months ago

          In 8 years this contract will look like the Giants worst nightmare.

        • Hammerin' Hank

          3 months ago

          No. RBIs are more dependent on how many men are on base in front of a hitter than they are on his focus and mindset. And the second half of your post is nothing but incomprehensible gibberish, typical of advanced-metric haters like yourself.

        • bleedinblue 2

          3 months ago

          Assuming he is still a productive player in 7 years. He is under contract eith full no-trade clause until he is 41 years-old. Well past normal prime years. I predict the contract will eventually be a burden pn the Goants.

        • Hammerin' Hank

          3 months ago

          Running is overrated. I play fantasy baseball, and that’s the only form of baseball in which stolen bases mean very much. It’s better for Trea to stay at first and let Harper, Schwarber, and Hoskins knock him in when they hit one over the fence. Teams have learned this over the years. The lessons of Bill James have finally taken hold.

        • Hammerin' Hank

          3 months ago

          He doesn’t drive in 100 runs because he’s missed so many games over the years. So if you want to ding him for the injuries go right ahead. It’s justified. But it’s also the main reason for his sometimes-low counting stats. Logic, people.

        • Hammerin' Hank

          3 months ago

          No, they’re more dependent on opportunities, but go on believing what your local broadcasters have taught you through the years if it makes you happy.

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          It is a repeatable skill. That’s why there are guys with massive career rbi totals.

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          Lay off the Labatts bigdaddy. Bo is ok, but even the Jays were talking of moving him off SS. He is not that good.

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          Cuban, Web got this one right. What matters is the % of baserunners driven in compared to other SS. Obviously Correa is near the top of that list.

          tOPS is relative to the players OPS, not the league or other SS so that stat is actually saying he was really good at hitting with RISP since he was 30% better than the league at hitting overall.

          Seems to me that you need to learn what the stats mean before spouting off.

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          Because he is a superstar player.

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          Wrong answer RA. RBI correlate most directly with number of baserunners, not skill as a hitter. BRS tells the real story. Take a look at Baseball Reference sometime.

          You should have plenty of time to research since you are an Egyptian god.

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          He’s talking about over a career, not a single game. All those variables even out over time.

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          40. Since you are obviously guessing, take off your shoes and use your toes to help you count.

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          Cobb, You had a cogent point? I didn’t see one.

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          For a SS? You don’t really pay much attention to baseball, do you?

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          40. He turns 41 the month after the regular season ends.

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          BaseballIsLife: I made several. Still waiting for yours. As I said, most of the “advanced metrics only” zealots leave things at “you’re not intelligent enough to have this explained to you” or “your argument is weak” without actually providing a counter point.

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          Cobb, what was cogent about anything you said?

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          dpsmith22 — Great player, but how does that diminish Correa. Would love to have them both.

        • WAR overrated... shows how bad is the replacement? Assigned by?

          3 months ago

          That % numbers are really irrelevant indeed. Percent just make the real numbers blur or diluted. Should show your source and number of games. More games played more probability to fail, percentage wise. You only take those metrics in favor of the cheater CC. Do you work for his agent? Full disclosure is required.

        • Dock_Elvis

          3 months ago

          Better hope not because that means inflation is well outpacing salaries. That won’t bode well for mlb marketing itself.

        • Dock_Elvis

          3 months ago

          FrankRoo. Not if in that 75% of games he 40% more valuable than other players.

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          Baseball: all of it.

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          Hammerin’ Hank — But that will change this year with the new rules and bases., a return to the the more complete game of baseball.

        • Ma4170

          3 months ago

          It’s funny we’re even debating it because there’s a measurement called RE24, which is better than OBI%. It takes into account actual baseball context. For example, if someone hits a HR w runner on 1st and 2 outs, they get more credit bc chances of driving in those runs are low. But runner on 1st 0 out and hit into DP adversely impacts it. So it accounts for opportunity and context.
          From 2020-22, freeman leads all MLB w 140.71. Judge is second w 128.74. Trea turner 11th w 78.28. Seager 19th. Correa is 27th w 53.16. So no, it’s not just lack of opportunity. It’s pretty simple, if you hit more XBH in those situations, you’ll drive in more runs. He doesn’t, at least not enough to be considered an upper echelon run producer like judge, who he was compared to in the thread.

        • tad2b13

          3 months ago

          Ma4170, The problem there is it still comes down to luck, if that system is based on when a guy gets his hits. Like a guy can who hits .250 can pick the situation when he gets that 1 hit out of 4 ABs? What about a guy that goes 4 for 5, but doesn’t figure in the scoring and hits an at ‘im ball with RISP in his last AB? Is he less valuable than the guy that went 1 for 5, but hit a HR with 2 outs?

          Between 2 guys that go 1 for 4, the one that got his hit with 2 outs and runners on is more valuable than the guy that led off an inning with a hit. One guy is more valuable because of when he got his hit. I just don’t believe that a guy can choose when he gets his hits. To my knowledge hitters are trying to get a hit in every AB.

          And DPs are scored negatively when they aren’t always a sign of bad hitters. The top 10 career leaders in GiDP are all in the HoF, except for Pujols, and Cabrera, who will be, and Julio Franco who ranks 10th. Guys who hit into a lot of DPs are RHHs, not blazing fast, who hit the ball hard, and hit in the order with a lot of runners on. Guys who hit a lot of HRs also hit into a lot of DPs.

        • Ra

          3 months ago

          Hank Aaron, Barry Bonds, Ted Williams and Babe Ruth would all like to have a word with you about how their RBIs mean nothing with regards to their values as hitters.

        • tad2b13

          3 months ago

          None of those players need the RBI stat to affirm their greatness. Their overall ranking in career OPS+, and WAR are better testaments than RBI.

          Good players will, of course, have a lot of RBI. But Pujols has more RBI than Ruth. ARod and Cap Anson have more than Bonds. Them plus Gehrig, Musial, Cobb, Jimmie Foxx, Eddie Murray, Willie Mays, Mel Ott, Miggy, and Yaz all have more RBI than Ted Williams

          So which do you think is more informative regarding Williams. His #2 ranking in OPS+, his ranking 11th in WAR, or his 16th rank in RBI? RBI has some value, but it’s not nearly as good an indication of value as some other stats.

        • Ma4170

          3 months ago

          Yes, from how I understand the stat at least, it’s based on opportunities. So even if you have way fewer opportunities, your RE24 can be high if you capitalize on them. It’s basically a measure of how many runs did you drive in based on the situations you faced. You have guys with not a lot of AB with runners on that have higher RE24, so it’s a good measure. I mean, I can look at Correa’s number of AB with men on compared to big RBI guys and see that his % of RBI with men on is much lower than guys who get 100 RBI regularly, but that takes out some of the context you’re mentioning. Problem is, he could get a walk or a single w/ a runner on 2nd and not get the run in, where big run producers are more likely to put up the 2b or HR.

        • tad2b13

          3 months ago

          Okay, I see what you mean. I’ll have to look into that .I am always a little wary of any stat that suggests a clutch element, which I don’t believe in.

        • Ra

          3 months ago

          RBIs are interdependent: skill + opportunity. Crappy batters can get opportunities and still have poor RBI totals. The best hitters will have high RBIs even when taken out of the 2 – 4 holes.

          Runs scored are also interdependent, and still a reflection of batting skill as well as baserunning skill.

          Always funny explaining RBIs to people who have never had 2 RBIs in their lives.

        • Ra

          3 months ago

          Yet the greatest hitters lead in RBIs because they were great hitters first and got the opportunities second. There is a reason why they were availed those opportunities – because their skill dictated they earned the opportunities to compile their tallies.

        • Ra

          3 months ago

          I am skeptical about “clutch” also, at least to a degree.

      • cobby

        3 months ago

        I’m a Dodger fan. He’s worth it.

        Reply
        • halloffamernobodycares

          3 months ago

          that settles that

        • Samuel

          3 months ago

          After leading the Twins to the WS last year, I expect he’ll do the same for the Giants.

      • rols1026

        3 months ago

        Yeah you’ll definitely get attacked for that. Cause that’s a terrible opinion. He’s worth way more than $26 mil per year for the next handful of seasons, then he should be average for a few and they’ll deal with a few bad years on the back end. This is much better than the contracts for both Turner and Bogaerts. Correa is a better hitter than both and only 28.

        Reply
      • tombenton

        3 months ago

        That’s nuts, he’s good but NOT that good.

        Reply
        • BondsAway

          3 months ago

          Whose better?

      • MannyBeingMVP

        3 months ago

        Correa is clearly worth half that contract, maybe 75% of it. But the Yankees must feel a lot better about what they paid for Judge and the Phillies for Trea.

        Reply
        • rols1026

          3 months ago

          Well Correa is making less per year than Trea, is 2 years younger, is a much better hitter and a much better defender. So no, the Phillies are not looking good with that Turner contract. This deal is much better.

        • MannyBeingMVP

          3 months ago

          Turner $300 million/11 years
          Correa $350 million/13 years
          Correa is 15 months younger

          Without commenting on who is better now, I think NEITHER Turner not Correa will be elite at age 40.

          Phillies paid roughly $280 million for 8 good years ($35/yr) and $20 million for 3 poor years. ($7/y)

          Giants paid $280 million for 8 good years ($35/yr) and $70 million for 5 poor years ($14/yr)

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          The haterade with this bunch is strong. So strong that it blots out reality of player performance and value from their vision.

          2016-2022
          34.8 WAR
          29.4 WAR
          29.4 WAR

          2020-2022
          14.3 WAR
          14.2 WAR
          12.1 WAR

          $350 million
          $300 million
          $280 million

          That these numbers line up so well is no accident. It’s the reality of the player’s value.

        • MannyBeingMVP

          3 months ago

          14 months and 22 days younger
          Turner 6/30/1993
          Correa 9/22/1994

        • ForeverGiantsFan

          3 months ago

          He better than Judge. Just not in 2022.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          2 years in terms of age for the season. Correa is entering his age 28 season. Turner is entering his age 30 season.

        • MM.MM

          3 months ago

          So he’ll really post the same in that albatross SF lineup!?

        • WampumWalloper

          3 months ago

          Elite at age 40…..at SS……Honus Wagner did put up 5.6 WAR at age 41 but it’s been a century since a SS put up an elite season over 40 so there is a pretty good chance neither Turner or Correa will be elite at that age.

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          MM.MM — You underrate that “albatross lineup.”

        • Ma4170

          3 months ago

          Where did you get those numbers, carloscorrea.com? 2020-22 turner war is 15.9, bogaerts 12, Correa 11.7 per fangraphs, and Correa’s is driven up most by defense out of the three, which war overvalues, even if some might disagree there.

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          No one that understands the stats uses fWAR for position players in the age of the shift. fWAR uses UZR for its defense calculations and UZR doesn’t take the shift into account. Just the zone the player is supposed to be in.

          Use the Baseball Reference version for position players. Its more accurate.

        • MM.MM

          3 months ago

          Either way, health isnt on his side.

        • Ma4170

          3 months ago

          Again, placing way too much value on defense, which is subjective anyway as you see the variance between OAA, DRS and UZR.
          Correa is the third best of those three last three years by every measure I’ve seen, and certainly not any better.

        • Ma4170

          3 months ago

          Correa isn’t a better hitter than trea by any measure

        • tad2b13

          3 months ago

          WampumWalloper, None of the teams that signed them think Turner, Bogaerts, or Correa to be elite at age 40. That’s not the reason why they gave those players deals that long.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Correa just signed the 4th largest contract in MLB history. Regardless of what any fan thinks about his value to a team, that is what he is worth.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          I don’t think anyone expects Correa to be at SS at age 40. If he is still there at age 35 it will be a huge win for the Giants.

          There are 41 guys that have still hit above league average wRC+ and OPS+ during their age 40 season. https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=300&type=8&season=2022&month=0&season1=1871&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=40,40&filter=&players=0&startdate=1871-01-01&enddate=2022-12-31&sort=18,d&page=1_50 With the universal DH, if Correa can do that it would also be a huge win for the Giants.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          There is a reason this site links to Baseball Reference for player stats. Use their WAR.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Defensive metrics are not subjective. But I can see why someone who doesn’t understand the stats would certainly try to say that.

          UZR doesn’t take into account shifts, just a zone in which a certain % of plays are made in by players at that position. In the age of the extreme shifts it’s pretty useless.

          DRS does take into account the shift. People input things like the pitch speed, exit velocity, launch angle, time from when the ball is hit to the catch/miss, distance covered by the player, player sprint speed, and several other factors into formula to determine the value of each play. That formula also takes into account plays where the fielder does not get the out but does prevent extra bases.

          OAA is also a person doing the same thing with more accuracy on positioning and distance traveled to make the catch. It does not take into account bases saved, just runs prevented directly on the play being graded.

          Those are the differences. Both are valid. Both require around 3 full seasons of information to make an accurate measure of a player’s performance on defense.

          Correa has been the best in DRS and the 4th best in OAA and inarguably better on defense than the other 3 major FA this offseason.. He is arguably the best SS in MLB on defense.

        • Ma4170

          3 months ago

          And there’s still subjectivity because the stats are based on what somebody can be expected to do normally over time. Yet on a certain play where a fielder might be expected to based on past performance, they may not because of a bad jump, delayed read, slight slip on first step, not as much on the throw, etc. So there are assumptions embedded in all of it based on experience, but none of those are 100%, just correlations. None of these are absolutes or even predictive. To my original point, the amount defense influences WAR and value is overstated. It can be pretty obvious at times too in comparing certain players.

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          websoulsurfer — Thanks. The name that surprised me there was Brian Downing.

      • websoulsurfer

        3 months ago

        Not attacked. Ignored. Pitied maybe. No reason to attack those that have a baseball intelligence deficit.

        Reply
      • LordD99

        3 months ago

        He’s more than worth a $27MM AAV. A 13-year deal though? I guess all these teams are prepared to cut the players the last four or five years.

        Reply
        • ForeverGiantsFan

          3 months ago

          It’s about trying to minimize your luxury tax payment.

      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        3 months ago

        He’s not. I honestly think everyone got overpaid this winter. I’m not even sure deGrom has even pitched 30 games in a season. He’s injured so much, can’t keep track

        Judge got overpaid. No way he repeats what he did this year in the next 9 years.

        Trea Turner was overpaid

        Even as a Cubs fan Jameson Whiskey Taillon got overpaid and I like that signing for the cubs.

        Now Correa overpaid.

        It’s getting ridiculous what teams are willing to pay ML players but they refused to give Minor league players a raise. Some of those players in Low A probably have to work a 9-5 in the off season just to make ends meet.

        Reply
        • BondsAway

          3 months ago

          People don’t pay hundreds of dollars to go watch minor league games. TV & internet aren’t paying billions for the rights to show minor league games. The money is given to the players that bring in the revenue. Better off paying the players than to go in the owners pockets

        • tad2b13

          3 months ago

          In a market economy it’s impossible for everyone to be overpaid.

        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          3 months ago

          That’s not the point, though. The minor league players deserve better pay. And at this point 5 years from now minor league games will charge $50 a ticket. I’m not saying those should get 5mil dollars a year but something that at least pays the cost of living

        • rct

          3 months ago

          “And at this point 5 years from now minor league games will charge $50 a ticket.”

          No, they won’t because at that point, no one will go to the games. Tickets are priced based on what people will pay in order to maximize dollars. It doesn’t have anything to do with the salaries.

        • stymeedone

          3 months ago

          My job doesn’t have an off season. Teachers get one and they sometimes need to get a second job, too. Do you stand up for them as well?

        • BaseballisLife

          3 months ago

          That’s a logical fallacy. If you were in the top 5 at whatever is you do in the world, especially in a field with so few own jobs, you would make Correa level income.

        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          3 months ago

          They definitely will. Spring training games are $50+ and even more when the cubs came here every year for 2 games.

      • ForeverGiantsFan

        3 months ago

        He’s as good as Judge and we were going to pay him 40 million a year. He a bargain! It’s a good signing and is a step towards making the Giants a playoff contender.

        Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          3 months ago

          I didn’t say it was a bad signing, just that everyone has been overpaid this winter. Correa compared to the many others. Is definitely a bargain in today’s baseball money figures.

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          You can’t be serious. Judge just hit 62 homeruns in a single season. It takes Correa 3 years to hit that many.

        • claude raymond

          3 months ago

          Wagner, they are 2 different players. Silly to simply use HRs only to compare them. How many fielding chances and assists does a right fielder get a game? How many double plays does he turn? Clearly, judge is the better offensive player but someone like you that mocks posters for their poor statistical knowledge just failed on your response to ForeverGiant.
          Here’s a take worse than yours: Forevers point mentioned that $27 mill was a bargain for SF. Judge is making $40 mill, about 50% more than Correa. So Judge is 50% better? Remember how my post started regarding how little a rightfielders D influences the game. 50% better?

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          It wasn’t my idea to compare them. It was said that Correa is as good as Judge. I pointed out that is ridiculous, which it is. I didn’t mock anyone either. I’m simply pointing out the flaw in an argument.

        • claude raymond

          3 months ago

          Your response to Forever was lame. And your HE STARTED IT is equally lame. Your reasoning used HR totals. Forevers opinion didn’t mention HRs. He simply said 27 million is a bargain when compared to 40 for Judge. You criticize posters all the time for their inability to defend points made. And you’re no different

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          And the best you got is calling me “lame” lol. I don’t criticize the poster. I criticize the lack of engagement on the argument. For example, you calling my points “lame”. Meanwhile other posters saying that fans of counting stats are “not intelligent enough” to be debated.

          Forever said “he’s as good as Judge AND we were going to pay him 40 million”. Those are two separate statements within one sentence. Therefore, it’s perfectly valid for me to disagree with Forever that Correa is as good as Judge. It is also perfectly valid for me to bring up a point of analysis (homeruns) that shows that Judge is the better player. I can bring up others, it’s just that’s the one I went with.

          I genuinely don’t know why you seem to be so mad when the extent of my criticism of Forever was to say “you can’t be serious”. I see people write way nastier things on here than that.

        • ForeverGiantsFan

          3 months ago

          I think Correa playing Shortstop really well and being an excellent hitter is unusual for the position. He also younger than Judge that is why I believe he’s is a more valuable player than Judge. Judge had an amazing 2022 season and I hope he continues to have success (he’s great for baseball).

      • BudgetBall

        3 months ago

        Buyers remorse likely begins in 1-3 years. These contracts are at best moronic; at worst criminally insane. Good luck with that, though.

        Reply
      • TrumboJumbo

        3 months ago

        Tcs, 6 more thumbs up and I’m pretty sure you’re gonna glitch out the matrix…

        Reply
      • stymeedone

        3 months ago

        While he got more years than Detroit offered, it seems they set his yearly worth, rather than Minnesota’s deal. Its still more than I’d want my favorite team to be burdened with. I don’t care if he can be moved to other positions, he’s being paid an amount to play SS. Move him, and its a burden.

        Reply
      • The Natural

        3 months ago

        I agree and this begs the question: these shortstops are getting contracts to their age 40 season and beyond; what does Swanson receive?

        Reply
        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          I think Swanson gets 8 for 176. 22 million per year. At least that’s the most I’d give him in the context of this bloated market. I think if he plays in a hitters park like Boston or Chicago he has a chance to age pretty well.

      • Oldhalo

        3 months ago

        He’s definetly good enough for the annual rate but I can tell you from first hand experience with my team that these long term deals hurt later and do impact organizational decision making. 13 years at SS is scary for a player that is very dependent on their legs.

        Reply
    • Surly_03

      3 months ago

      Only $26.9M per year.

      Reply
      • Codeeg

        3 months ago

        Years 9-13 are pretty much deferred salary rather than actual expectation he’ll contribute

        Reply
      • Samuel

        3 months ago

        The two most desperate teams going into this offseason were the Rangers and Giants.

        The desperate teams do things like this every year….and Scott Boras often does business with them.

        They often get better. But from where they’re coming from……

        Reply
    • ruff kuntry

      3 months ago

      13 years and a full no trade clause for a guy entering his 28 age season? Good luck with that Giants LOL

      Reply
      • VonPurpleHayes

        3 months ago

        Everyone loves to hate on these longterm deals, but it’s the new norm. 27aav is the key here. Could end up being a bargain with the way contracts continue to inflate. Guys will be getting 30 a year left and right next few seasons. If you want a superstar FA, this is the cost.

        Reply
      • RamMac14

        3 months ago

        If you haven’t noticed so far the new trend on these deals is longer years for lower AAV. The point is they know he won’t be worth it on the end years but are willing to pay the extra years for the lower AAV for the years that count

        Reply
        • RyanD44

          3 months ago

          MLB should cap deals at 10 years. This 13 year stuff is getting stupid.

        • mlbdodgerfan2015

          3 months ago

          True, but you can’t have too many of these dead-weight deals towards the end or else you’re stuck with a bunch of old less productive overpaid players you have to pay. Only way to get out of those is to eat at least half of the contract and provide prospects in return.

        • Kapler's Coconut Oil

          3 months ago

          @Ryan I say we let players become free agents sooner, so they actually play for the duration of a 13 year deal!

        • VonPurpleHayes

          3 months ago

          The players union would never allow that. Think of it as deferred money for a retired superstar. It’s good for the game to get these franchise players. It’s safe to buy a Giants Correa jersey.

        • Blue Baron

          3 months ago

          @RyanD44: MLB should cap deals at 10 years? By what authority? First, any such proviso would need to be collectively bargained between MLB and the MLBPA. Second, even if the union would agree to such a thing (which they wouldn’t), why? Nobody is forcing owners against their will to offer contracts like this. If they didn’t think it was good business, they wouldn’t make the offers.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Why do you think it’s getting stupid Ryan? Can you explain your reasoning in a coherent way?

          To the teams it makes perfect sense. What do you know that the billionaire owners, Ivy league educated GMs, and data scientists in the FO on these teams don’t know?

        • MannyBeingMVP

          3 months ago

          RyanD

          They don’t need to cap deals at ten years. They just need to calculate the luxury tax based on contract’s full dollars divided by and over only first ten years if contract is over ten years. But that will be a hard sell to the player’s union without raising the tax thresholds.

        • BondsAway

          3 months ago

          Do people understand how free enterprise works. The reason the contracts are so large is because we, the fans, fork out thousands of dollars to watch these guys do things that aren’t normal. And TV & internet pays billions for the right to show these games that we, the fans, want to watch. Would you rather the owners keep the money

        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          3 months ago

          10 years guaranteed with club options anything past it. And buyouts too.

          Never gonna happen.

        • tad2b13

          3 months ago

          There is a CBA that has to be agreed to by both owners and players. What’s stupid is even bothering to suggest something that would never be agreed to.

        • stymeedone

          3 months ago

          @ soul surfer
          I’d be guessing basic accounting, and common sense. The player will be with the team longer than the ivy league educated GMs and data scientists in the FO will be. These signings only guarantee that they should keep their resume handy for when the back end of these deals arrive.

        • stymeedone

          3 months ago

          They wouldn’t “keep” the money. They would spread it out to make the whole team stronger. Basic Accounting: Payroll is a percentage of revenue. Fiscally responsible businesses will calculate what works for them. If that turns out to be $200MM, and 27MM goes to one player of the 40, less gets allocated to every one else. The example team is currently the White Sox. They spent too much on the bullpen, and have a bad backend on the Grandal contract. They let Abreu walk, and are shopping their closer, because they don’t have the resources to address the other needs on the field.

      • websoulsurfer

        3 months ago

        No luck needed. They are going into it knowing that with a $26.9 million AAV that he will provide a large amount of surplus value in the 1st 4-5 years, break even on 3-4 years and the last 3-4 years they will take it on the chin.

        Once you realize that teams don’t care about any individual year, that they only care about the totality of the value given over the life of the contract, its easy to understand the value to the team.

        Now they need to fill in around him on offense.

        Reply
      • ForeverGiantsFan

        3 months ago

        The Giants are thrilled with the signing and so are their fans.

        Reply
        • Unclemike1526

          3 months ago

          So were the Cubs with Jason Heyward. It can change fast ForeverGiants.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          How many good years did Heyward have before the Cubs signed him to that deal?

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          Cubs signing Heyward was a bad contract from the beginning.

    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      3 months ago

      Bridesmaid no mo!

      Reply
    • CaptainJudge99

      3 months ago

      Holy Snikes! What took so long?

      Reply
      • gfan

        3 months ago

        13 years.

        Reply
      • gfan

        3 months ago

        Platoon Davis & Wade at First.
        Platoon Craw & Villar at Third.

        Reply
        • Ernie Riles

          3 months ago

          Flores and Wade -1B
          Craw and Davis – 3B

        • claude raymond

          3 months ago

          I feel there will be 2 platoons. DH (pederson davis) and CF/RF (Slater Wade) Flores is first basemen 5 days/week. Crawford is 3rd 5 days a week. Bart Estrada Correa Yazand Haniger start regularly (Bart 100 starts) My 2 cents anyway

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          gfan — It hasn’t been talked about much, but Craw wouldn’t be bad at second because of his range which—with the new NO SHIFT rules—could be a real plus. It also allows Estrada to be full utility (including the OF).

          On the other hand Craw’s arm would work well at 3B.

          And yet on another hand (!), I’m really hoping Villar is an everyday player against RH and LH pitchers at 3B

          I think Flores/Wade Jr. share 1B (with a bit of JD tossed in)..

          DH is Joc and JD. I’m expecting Gabe’s call any minute to go over it with me.

    • el hefe 45

      3 months ago

      Insane

      Reply
    • Pete'sView

      3 months ago

      Hallelujah! The off season is saved, the Giants have improved. All’s right with the world. Way to go Farhan and Pete!

      Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        3 months ago

        Pete: Wanted to congratulate you, man. I know you’ve been waiting for a big signing. That’s a huge step forward for SF. Now it’s filling holes and there are still quite a few decent players on the market. I’m happy for you, man.

        Perhaps Zaidi will see how fun this is and start going crazy!

        Reply
        • Unclemike1526

          3 months ago

          If anybody really thinks this makes the Giants NL Championship contenders is seriously deluding themselves. He’s a nice player but they still have a lot of major holes and a couple of rotation pieces go down and You’re looking at a 75 win team. I’ll be the first to admit I’m not an expert on the Giants farm system, But if they had anything interesting enough to bring up they wouldn’t of needed Correa or Judge would they? I don’t even think it makes them any better than 3rd in the West.

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          Clip — Thanks. I think most Giant fans would agree with me that it would have been grim had he not signed with SF. I think this team as now constructed will be a lot more competitive with a solid #3 hitter in the order. And 4, 5 & 6 look pretty good too (Pederson, Haniger & Villar). Question will be who leads off. Was hoping for Nimmo, but as we know, ya can’t win em’ all.

          Do Yanks sign Rodon or do Giants surprise everyone and do it? Fun off season.

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          Unclemike1526 — I think you’ll be surprised. If Villar pans out the way he’s looked so far, the Giants will have a dangerous lineup. AS dangerous as SD? Probably not, but at least SF is on its way.

          Depending how the Dodger prospects play (since LA apparently wants to get them on the ML roster), I think SF could be better than the Dodgers. Not something I would have said the past few years. But at least the Giants will be more competitive.

    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      Not at all. $26.9 million AAV. A bargain for a player of Correa’s quality.

      Reply
    • iverbure

      3 months ago

      The clear cut winners of this offseason is any team that avoided giving any free agent a 7 year plus deal. Most of those contracts turn out to colossal failures mlb now on mlb network digs into those kind of deals and just about all of them turn out ugly.

      Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        3 months ago

        “ clear cut winners of this offseason is any team that avoided giving any free agent a 7 year plus deal”

        Haha- this is so true.

        Reply
      • Jacob Cook

        3 months ago

        Fun fact: Correa has batted roughly twice as many at-bats in his career with no men on base then at bats with men in scoring position.

        His stats with RISP: .277/.364/.455
        (.818 ops) in 924 ABs

        His stats with bases empty: .273/.346/.479
        (.825 ops) in 1774 ABs

        So no, it’s not that he isn’t capable of having 100 RBI season(s). It’s just injuries and a general lack of men being in scoring position for him that’s prevented that from happening.

        Reply
        • Ma4170

          3 months ago

          No it’s that he’s not elite in driving runners in, and people are trying to talk like he’s an elite player. Arguably correas best year was 2021, and second most rbi he had. He had 158ab w RISP and 252ab w men on base. He had 66 and 75 rbi respectively in each scenario. SLG around 480. Good to very good.
          For comparison, Alonso last year had 160 and 292ab in those situations w 96 and 116 rbi. SLG at 675 and 575. Judge had 104 and 234ab for 68 and 90rbi. Less ab and more rbi. SLG 721 and 641. Those are elite run producers. Rbi aren’t irrelevant and all about opportunity only. Extra base hits w men on produce more rbi. That simple.

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          Ma4170 — But you wouldn’t argue that Correa isn’t a great building block for any team, would you? (Even at these ridiculous prices.)

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          He is 21.3% above league average over his career at driving in baserunners.

          Don’t try to compare 1B to SS. It does not compute. Different expectations. Most teams put their worst fielding player with the biggest bat at 1B. Can’t do anything else on defense?, you can still be a 1B as long as you can hit for power and catch a ball thrown to you. It’s not the same for a SS. They are expected to perform at a high level on defense.

          Compare hitting SS to SS. How did he perform vs how other SS performed.

      • BondsAway

        3 months ago

        Bryce Harper’s 13 year contract is working pretty good for Philly. They’ve already made that back & then some because of what Bryce brings

        Reply
        • iverbure

          3 months ago

          The Bryce Harper would just had TJ? Do you people conveniently leave facts or just forgot them. Harpers arm or lack of arm going forward might limit him to 1b or DH role sooner rather than later. To suggest it’s working out good for Philly now to ignore the totally obvious huge injury risks going forward and it’s not even half over.

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          iverbure — Even if that’s true, Harper at DH or 1B is a force in their lineup. These contracts are absurd, but that is the current marketplace, and while I’m not a Phillies fan, I think they did just fine, under the circumstances, with Harper’s contract.

    • Unclemike1526

      3 months ago

      OK this is just getting silly. Kudos to the Cubs for not playing in this extremely stupid money throwing contest. They promised to spend but to do it rationally. There is nothing RATIONAL about any of these SS contracts so far. You have to wonder how much of these deals will have to be paid down to even dream of moving any of these guys. The League already stepped in to stop one of these deals. At 13 years it’s an obvious attempt to skirt the Luxury Tax. Anybody know why the Giants Tax is 209 while everyone else is 233? Guess I have to do some research.

      Reply
      • Unclemike1526

        3 months ago

        Fact is the Cubs already have a pretty good SS. Then let’s think about it. They have Kevin Made about to start AA. He’s not a fantastic SS but he’s solid and if he progresses could be up soon. Then we have Hernandez, Now this is tricky. Cubs signed him young and unfortunately will probably just start at A ball Myrtle Beach or maybe High A South Bend. He’s now 20. But, And this is where it gets tricky, He’s missed 2 years development because of Covid. So now he’s maturing and could progress rapidly also as are a lot of prospects all through baseball. Howard is a wild card because of a serious hip injury. So for them to sign somebody for 10-13 years would just be stupid when help is not far away. If they could teach Madrigal how to stretch before games and he could stay healthy, The up the middle defense would be just fine with Gomes, Hoerner, Madrigal and Bellinger. Save the money and extend the good players they have now like the Braves do and draft well and keep the winning formula. All these teams will regret these deals sooner or later, The only question is how soon? One torn ACL and their range might be affected. What Then? Food for thought.

        Reply
    • Lyman Bostock

      3 months ago

      Career .836 ops isn’t anything to shell out 350 mil for.
      But the fact that he’s only 28 and has a career almost 40 WAR … that speaks for itself. He pretty much pencils in 5 more wins for you, each year he plays.I’d bet he can continue this pace for 6 years tops. Now you have another 7 on top of that? I think the giants made a huge mistake. When he’s 35 and you still have 6 years to go, his glove better stay elite because when that .836 ops becomes >.800 it’s only going to be his defense and base running that carry him. If they still exist by then.
      I’m glad it wasn’t my tram that did this. Then again, we already did do this … with Lindor lol.

      Reply
      • Unclemike1526

        3 months ago

        It’s typical rich guy syndrome. They didn’t get to spend any money on their favorite toys last year. So your buddy goes out and buys a bigger yacht than yours. So you go out and buy a bigger yacht than his. And he buys a bigger one than yours, So where does it end? It ends when the Yacht’s collide and you realize how stupid it was.

        Reply
        • Yankee Clipper

          3 months ago

          Mike, you’re right. That’s precisely why in a year or two, this is a self-correcting problem.

        • jjd002

          3 months ago

          It won’t change. I thought ARod’s first contract with Texas would be an outlier, but that was 22 years ago. Star players get long term contracts and very few of them work out.

    • #1WhiteSoxFan

      3 months ago

      Cubs swing and miss again!

      Reply
      • Unclemike1526

        3 months ago

        Cool. For a team that traded for AJ Pollock you’ve got stone ones pal.

        Reply
        • mike127

          3 months ago

          More like—Cubs swing and miss again than Twins lose their best player. Typical Sox fan– more worried about the Cubs than the teams in their own division that they actually compete against.

          Pretty sure if the scenario of the Cubs and Indians playing each other in the last week of the season and the White Sox are one game ahead or behind the Indians—the Sox fan would be extremely happy if the Cubs got swept.

    • Finatic

      3 months ago

      still 4th place! rest of team stinks..

      Reply
    • ohyeadam

      3 months ago

      If you’ve got a kid with real talent. Go into baseball. Careers are long and the money is 100% guaranteed

      Reply
    • CaptainJudge99

      3 months ago

      Holy Toledo. The Giants can have this taint for the next 13 years. I’m keeping my talents in NY.

      Reply
    • Giants78

      3 months ago

      Farhan dumpster diving again.

      Reply
      • Pete'sView

        3 months ago

        Giants78 — “Dumpster diving?” You are so wrong in this case.

        Reply
        • tad2b13

          3 months ago

          Pete, I think that was sarcasm.

        • Pete'sView

          3 months ago

          Okay, I didn’t read it that way. But I’ll go with your interpretation.

  2. Balk

    3 months ago

    Wow

    Reply
    • Balk

      3 months ago

      Welcome to the off-season Giants.

      Reply
  3. windycitykid89

    3 months ago

    Wow…

    Reply
  4. Winslow Leach

    3 months ago

    Omg omg omg oh nooooooo

    Reply
  5. Jimbo_Jones

    3 months ago

    Opt out every other year?

    Reply
    • rct

      3 months ago

      Every other game.

      Reply
  6. EliMorganFanClub

    3 months ago

    Woah! Dodgers fans are really gonna hate him now

    Reply
    • Neon Cop

      3 months ago

      They’ll boo him after begging him to come to LA. Dumb fanbase!

      Reply
      • MannyBeingMVP

        3 months ago

        Correa is talented but most of Dodger fan-base did not want him. Going to SF will be great for the rivalry.

        Reply
      • puigpower

        3 months ago

        Is there a way to mute this assclown permanently? I have to mute him in every thread and it’s getting annoying.

        Reply
        • mike127

          3 months ago

          puig—-every troll I have muted has gone away permanently—and it makes for a much easier read on the board.

      • tstats

        3 months ago

        As a dodger fan who wanted correa, I have looked past that pet of his past. I will now be booing him for being a Giant and for not being a dodger

        Reply
        • jjd002

          3 months ago

          Honestly no Dodger fans should boo him or any Astro player if they cheer on Betts.

        • Neon Cop

          3 months ago

          Facts!

        • tstats

          3 months ago

          I cheer Betts as a dodger knowing what happened in 2018. A lot do dodger fans don’t move on. We got our ring eventually and it comes with the same nuance as 2017 and (to an oddly lesser extent because MLB loves Boston) 2018

        • case

          3 months ago

          Technically they should boo Betts about half as loud, relative to what the two organizations did.

        • jjd002

          3 months ago

          Boston was doing the exact same stuff Houston was, but nobody in their right mind would admit it like Houston did, after the way they got treated. They found a fall guy in Boston and nobody talked.

      • ateam043

        3 months ago

        You are on some good stuff, nobody here in LA wanted him.

        Reply
        • Neon Cop

          3 months ago

          Guess you don’t browse the internet much. Dodger fans were pleading for him all over Twitter, FB, etc.

  7. cheeryvladdy

    3 months ago

    Happy for Giants fans, can imagine how frustrated they were after missing out on Judge. Always great to add a real superstar to your team.

    Reply
    • ruff kuntry

      3 months ago

      He’s an all star caliber player, but I wouldn’t quite classify him as a “superstar”

      Reply
      • pc01

        3 months ago

        You would be wrong.

        Reply
      • rols1026

        3 months ago

        He’s one of the best players in the league. Doesn’t matter what you call him

        Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        3 months ago

        When you are a top 3 SS in the game like Correa, you are a superstar.

        Reply
    • Giantshavetherings 2

      3 months ago

      I was relieved when they missed out on Judge. I’m OK with this one as the AAV is so much lower. This is as much a marketing deal as it is a baseball deal. I’d be willing to bet my next month’s rent it was driven by ownership more than Farhan.

      Aside from this one, they don’t have any money committed past 2025 right now, so even with the large price tag it is still very affordable. But even for ’23 theyvare still ~22mil below the tax.

      Reply
  8. 13Morgs13

    3 months ago

    Turner>Correa

    Reply
    • cbraves

      3 months ago

      completely agree.

      Reply
    • Balk

      3 months ago

      Nah

      Reply
    • GMoney2850

      3 months ago

      Correa is better at everything lmao

      Reply
      • Balk

        3 months ago

        Well…except speed but yes he is up to this point

        Reply
    • Kapler's Coconut Oil

      3 months ago

      Offensively you have a great argument, but defensively not even close. Giants need the defense as much as they need the offense.

      Reply
      • DeGrom Texas Ranger

        3 months ago

        I think Bref greatly overvalued defense. I would divide defensive runs saved by 2 and reevaluate.

        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Baseball Reference’ rWAR and Fangraphs fWAR value defense the same.

          rWAR uses DRS for the defensive portion.. fWAR uses UZR.

          DRS accounts for shifts. UZR is strictly based on zone and does not account for shifts.

          Which one do you think would be more accurate?

          A run saved is as valuable as a run scored.

        • tad2b13

          3 months ago

          Agree. I haven’t bothered to look at UZR because it hasn’t accounted for shifts, a huge part of the game recently. Maybe with the limits to the shift starting next season, it might be more germane going forward. But for recent stats I don’t think it’s nearly as reliable as DRS and OAA.

        • fivepoundbass

          3 months ago

          @tad What does this have to do with the GD Germans??

        • DeGrom Texas Ranger

          3 months ago

          I would say this for most sites, though. Defense is partially based on the shift, which the Rays used before everyone. Also, defense isn’t contagious like offense. A guy who doesn’t get out extends the inning and gives more PAs to other hitters, gives more RBI opportunities, and allows more runs to score.

    • cainer18

      3 months ago

      Correa is younger, a better defender, strikes out less, walks more, and has a much more consistent offensive track record. Trea Turner has more speed and has played a few other positions, but he’s bounced around to 2B and CF in the past because of his less-than stellar glove at short.

      Turner is great and all, but how good is he going to be when he can’t run, can’t field, and those strikeouts creep up? At least Correa has the defense to age more gracefully at a premium defensive position, and his ability to hit for contact and draw walks should ease his decline a bit more.

      Both contracts are massive and have plenty of opportunity to become ugly, but Correa definitely deserves to ink the bigger deal

      Reply
      • HarrytheK0880

        3 months ago

        I’ll take Turner, if only for the bad taste Correa left in my mouth with the way he handled the trash can scandal, and let me be clear, not the cheating itself, but his and Bregman’s attitude after they were caught. Oh yeah, I am massively biased as well.

        Reply
        • cainer18

          3 months ago

          I’ve lightened up on the Astros scandal and the responses of players like Correa and Bregman. The Red Sox and Yankees got slaps on the wrist for cheating attempts in recent years. The trash can saga is on another level, but let’s not pretend that every team is pushing the envelope and trying to outsmart the system in any way they can.

          The Braves aren’t far removed from an international signing scandal, and people hop on that AJ Preller bandwagon even though he got suspended for a shady trade.

          Less than a year after the sticky substance ban, players are clearly using some substances again and it’s no big deal. And who knows how many players are still taking PEDs and just not getting caught.

          MLB is messing with baseballs and possibly selectively choosing when to use dead balls — all while getting more in bed with sports betting (talk about conflict of interest).

          All that is to say that I can understand how a player can see so much cheating & rule bending and think “I’m getting flak because we got caught, but so many others are cutting corners around the league. I might as well lean into the criticism to fire myself up rather than beg for forgiveness.”

          Correa has often come across as a tool, and as a Giants fan a certainly have mixed feelings about him as a person. At least he’s not weighed down by something that’s actually villainous, like a domestic violence scandal for example. I don’t need my team’s players to be nice, just good at baseball and someone who doesn’t beat up family lol.

          Correa’s reactions to the media and fans reminds me a bit of Bonds’ antagonism back in the day. He seemed to use the boos as fuel to give him an edge during games.

          Anyway, thanks for coming to my TED Talk on being a Giants fan coping with signing an asshat to a 13-year deal lol

        • jjd002

          3 months ago

          You guys are going to love Correa. I’d get tired of apologizing for the same thing hundreds of times, all the while knowing most of the league was breaking the same rules.

        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          3 months ago

          You guys will love Correa. Leader in the clubhouse, leader on the field. He cares about winning & he loves the game. Correa is also very smart, understands analytics, but also knows when to go with your baseball gut instincts. Now the task ahead is to put some more quality dudes around him…Giants are close, but I think they need two or three more pieces. Happy for you Giants fans!

        • WarrenSpahn

          3 months ago

          Correa is a big effing cheater…

        • Scottn59c

          3 months ago

          I don’t understand why this guy is all but getting a free pass for being one of the most outspoken cheaters of the Asterisks’ invalid championship. Giants think THIS is who the fans want to come out to see?

          I gotta be honest, I didn’t want this guy on my team period, let alone until 13 years from now.

    • rols1026

      3 months ago

      You clearly have never checked either players statcast page…. This is a terrible opinion

      Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      3 months ago

      Neither at that money. But if forced I will take the younger better glove.

      Reply
      • MoTownTigers

        3 months ago

        People can say what they want, but it’s the teams who have the discipline to stay away from these ridiculous contracts will be the ones in better shape in the future. Just as the economy is not sustainable with massive debt at all levels baseball will feel it, and the average age of 55 doesn’t help. Also, how often do these deals actually work out?
        Fans will tap out at some point with wage stagnation, inflation, and higher taxes. America is living in fantasy land and it’s all going to come crashing down. The estimated American debt on all levels is about $66T and growing, that’s 200k per person!
        Just like buying houses, the market isn’t guaranteed to go up with the possibility of declining attendance, less revenue, and less personal income, contracts will go down making these long term contracts even more of an albatross. No one knows what things will look like in 5 to 10 yrs, but if you take a deeper look at things, it’s not far fetched to think baseball could experience a recession or depression. Furthermore, these contracts can impede or block younger, talented, cheaper players who are key in developing a core and winning championships.

        Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          3 months ago

          Okay Mr. Gloom & Doom…appreciate your economic diatribe on the US financial system. But it all just sounds like bitterness and salty tears and shaking your fist at the sky. And I’m not even a Giants fan, just glad CC is out of the American League.

    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      2016-2022
      34.8 WAR
      29.4 WAR
      29.4 WAR

      2020-2022
      14.3 WAR
      14.2 WAR
      12.1 WAR

      $350 million
      $300 million
      $280 million

      The $$$ line up with the performance

      Reply
  9. kyzr

    3 months ago

    Wow!

    Reply
  10. dodgerfan

    3 months ago

    Finally got a FA pick right

    Reply
  11. shark stitches

    3 months ago

    This offseason is crazy.

    Reply
  12. Braves Butt-Head

    3 months ago

    Dansby to the Dodgers

    Reply
    • cbraves

      3 months ago

      I think he will come back to the Braves now. It’s between the Braves or the Cubs.

      Reply
      • Mets6986??

        3 months ago

        Not a shot. They are couple years short and about 7mil aav to low.

        Reply
      • Selah Rick 2

        3 months ago

        Braves were out at 6 years. It’s up to 10 now.

        Reply
      • Pete'sView

        3 months ago

        I’d guess Dansby to Cubs.

        Reply
      • Unclemike1526

        3 months ago

        With what’s about to happen to Swanson’s market, I highly doubt Jed and Carter even participate any more. It’s not even about the money anymore. It’s the years that are stupid. I doubt the Cubs even make an offer.

        Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      Cubs or Twins.

      Reply
  13. A’sfaninWales

    3 months ago

    13 year contract?
    What could go wrong?

    Reply
    • CJML

      3 months ago

      My thoughts. The length of these contracts are absolutely absurd.

      Reply
    • goob

      3 months ago

      An AAV of $26.9M, which by the early 2030’s will be the equivalent of $14M or so in todays dollars. And the CBT levels will be in the $300M to $400M range.

      It’s unlikely to be much of a hinderance – even if he’s in a wheelchair by then… 🙂

      Reply
      • CJML

        3 months ago

        Maybe. It seems like the giants have been waiting for their current herd of aging veterans to cycle out for at least 3 years. This guy is going to seem like an bad case of herpes by year 8. And the fans will be like crap we have him for 5 more years. I am seriously very interested to se how all these insanely long contracts play out. Stanton’s already looks horrible and he has to have a 6-7 years left?

        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Stanton was a 1 dimensional player destined for DH before the trade was made to the Yankees. Correa is an elite defensive shortstop as well as one of the best hitting SS in MLB.

          If Correa moves to 2B or 3B in his mid 30s and spends the last 3-4 years at DH then this is still a good deal. Correa’s defensive ability is what makes this contract age better than someone like Stanton.

        • Fink Ployed

          3 months ago

          Actually, websoulsurfer, Stanton was the NL MVP the year before the Yankees traded for him, and he started 149 games in right field where he was credited with 11 DRS and came in fifth in the Fielding Bible voting for best right fielder.

          He got injured as a Yankee. That’s what consigned him primarily to DHing.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          What part of destined did you not understand? Body size and his speed or lack thereof said future DH in all caps and with a bullet.

          11 DRS for a RF is good. It was 6th best for a RF that season. Tied with Nick Markakis. Same level of defense would not be league average for a CF.

          He was MLVP because he hit 59 home runs, a .631 SLG, 169 OPS+, and 1.007 OPS. He was a monster at the plate.

          Voting? Like the voting for GG? Exactly. Worth nothing.

        • Fink Ployed

          3 months ago

          In 2017, his last year as a Marlin, Giancarlo had a sprint speed of 27.8, same as Kevin Pillar and faster than Harper, Reddick, Soler and Jackie Bradley Jr., all of whom continued to play the outfield for years.

          His sprint speed was also faster than Correa’s.

          https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/leaderboard/sprint_speed?min_season=2017&max_season=2017&position=&team=&min=10

          Judge’s body size means he can’t play the outfield either . . . oh, wait . . . he had a faster sprint speed than Mookie Betts in 2017 and he won the Fielding Bible award for the best right fielder in 2021.

          Sometimes it’s better to simply admit when you’re wrong.

    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      Nothing. The 13 years lowers the AAV to the point this is a great deal.

      Reply
  14. Edp007

    3 months ago

    Salaries are just the tipping point. Players deserve every penny.
    All of them.

    Reply
    • casorgreener

      3 months ago

      I’d disagree but. I don’t blame them for taking the money.

      Reply
      • Catuli Carl

        3 months ago

        Sorry replied to wrong thread

        Reply
    • Catuli Carl

      3 months ago

      Lol for playing a game? You’re insane.

      Reply
      • Mets6986??

        3 months ago

        Lot more to it then playing a game. Most spend more time training then any of us work.

        Reply
        • Mattimeo09

          3 months ago

          Very good point

        • williemaysfield

          3 months ago

          I don’t think most fans understand how much work these athletes put in to their body’s and skills. It’s way more than playing a game. Countless hours in the gym, field, and cage.

        • MannyBeingMVP

          3 months ago

          Same for ICU nurses, special education teachers and single parents.

          I have no problem with salaries being set by the market, but getting paid to train for baseball is a luxury and a privilege compared to the hard work and stress in many lesser paid professions. in a perfect world, minor leaguers would get a little bigger share of the money kept by owners and major leaguers, but I realize how complicated it is.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          You are right about that. Most train 6-8 hours a day during the offseason. In spring training, the time commitment increases. During the season they show up at the ballpark for a night game before 11am and leave after 11pm, 27 games per month from April to September.

        • MoTownTigers

          3 months ago

          Right, they’re training 40/50 hrs a week. Got it.
          And if they are, which would wear down your body, they would be making $10,000 hr to work out. Sounds deserved to me.

        • Yankee Clipper

          3 months ago

          The question you need to ask is: If they make so much money and it’s so undeserved, why do you keep paying toward it?

          The only true correction is if fans stop contributing time, money, resources. Otherwise, it’s just banging your head against the wall.

        • Catuli Carl

          3 months ago

          First of all, no they don’t. Second, I don’t care how much time you spend practicing for the game you play. It doesn’t make you deserving of hundreds of millions of dollars for playing a game.

        • Catuli Carl

          3 months ago

          Yep. Like I said.

        • Mets6986??

          3 months ago

          Single parents is not a job. It’s a life choice. ICU nurses make up to 200k a year. Not sure why you used them as an example.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          What part of offseason did you not understand? Training doesn’t mean 100% physical activity or 100% effort. Training also includes time in the film room, on the trainers table, and talking with coaches. You don’t understand that because you have never done it.

        • Oppo Taco

          3 months ago

          I’m splitting hairs, but I know a lot of single moms who did not “choose” to be single.

        • Mets6986??

          3 months ago

          They chose to be a parent. I’m not trying to disrespect single parents. Many are great parents and hard working people. My point is they don’t deserve to be paid more then anyone else because they are a single parent.

      • aragon

        3 months ago

        why should owners make so much more investing in a game?

        Reply
        • hiflew

          3 months ago

          Because they are taking the real risk, Without players, owners would just invest in a different business and would still be rich. Without owners, most players are high school educated with no real job skills and very few would be millionaires. Which do you think is really more important for the whole puzzle?

        • Classicfinder

          3 months ago

          What risk do they take exactly? Crappy teams do not ever sell for less.

        • rols1026

          3 months ago

          Ummmm did you already forget 2020??

        • aragon

          3 months ago

          have you heard how much the angels are selling for? possibly $3 billion! and arte made so much profit during his tenure. that’ from $184 million to $3 billion in 20 years!

        • IndianRye

          3 months ago

          Ummm because that’s the whole point of investment…. *Face palm*

        • MannyBeingMVP

          3 months ago

          No, it is a monopoly, so there is no risk of losing money. Poorer owners may need to cash out their investment is events like a pandemic diminish cash flow, but no risk of losing money.

        • hiflew

          3 months ago

          Any investment is risky. I will admit there is not much risk, but teams have lost money in the past. There is absolutely no business in the history of the world that constantly expands revenue. At some point the bubble will burst and THEN you will see the risk come into play. Could be natural disaster. Could be a war. Could be fan revolt. Could be people just stop watching baseball so much. Could be anything. But there is still risk.

        • MannyBeingMVP

          3 months ago

          Hiflew

          That’s fair. Very low risk of losing money, very good likelihood that equity will increase, actual profits and cash-flow kept in shadows despite monopoly

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Crappy teams make a higher percentage of profit. If he opened his books, I guarantee that Nutting is making a higher percentage of net profit than Liberty Media.

      • cainer18

        3 months ago

        That’s so obtuse, it’s more than just a game. It a multi-billion dollar entertainment business.

        Should the owners just pocket all the billions without the actual players getting a slice? You take away the players, and you’ve got nothing.

        It’s like wanting the executives at Warner Brothers to pocket every penny of a blockbuster rather than pay the talent who makes the blockbuster a thing to begin with. Either way, the executives get stupid rich. Might as well spread some of that immense profit to the actual creatives and front-line people that make it possible.

        Reply
        • hiflew

          3 months ago

          There are far more “creatives and front line people” than there are companies willing to foot the bill. Just like there are far more athletes willing to play than there are owners willing to pay them.

        • cainer18

          3 months ago

          But we aren’t talking about the massive numbers of players and creatives and front line people in general, we’re talking about the players and creative and front line people who specifically are the best at their craft and are the foundation of a multi-billion dollar product.

          Sure, there are tons of baseball players who would love to get paid to play the game. How many of them are as good at Carlos Correa and have an eight-year track record in the Major Leagues?

          Again, it’s obtuse to say that a specific set of elite performers don’t deserve a hefty pay day because there are so many less talented and accomplished performers.

          Furthermore, if every MLB player walked away, the on field product would suffer and the game’s marketability would crater. Sure, other less-talented players could swoop in and MLB could rebuild, but it would come at a colossal cost. If every owner walked away from their teams, there would be lines of billionaires and ownership groups to swoop in and buy each team. The owners can sit on their hands and watch their franchise values climb each year; it doesn’t matter if there are substantially fewer people with the capital to buy an MLB franchise — they’re still easier to replace than the top-line players themselves.

          Long story short, I’d rather have everyone involved get rich, not just the owners. And if the owners are willing to shell out $350M to a single player, I’m willing to bet they feel confident that investment won’t get in the way of their personal profit. Otherwise, no one would sign these contracts in the first place.

      • websoulsurfer

        3 months ago

        For providing entertainment. Do you complain about how much your favorite band or musician made or your favorite actor? Baseball is no different.

        MLB made $11 billion last year according to Manfred and it’s guaranteed to go up for at least the next 5 years. Players didn’t make close to half of that in 2022. They all deserve raises.

        Reply
    • LASTSON86

      3 months ago

      No one deserves $100 plus million for being good at a kids game. Let’s try that one again

      Reply
      • differentbears

        3 months ago

        So the owners should get even more money instead of the players who provide the show?

        Reply
      • VonPurpleHayes

        3 months ago

        You can watch kids play baseball for free. It’s not pretty. There’s nothing “kids game” about the most talented players in the world putting on a show. There’s so much money in baseball, and the athletes should get a huge chunk of it. Sure it would be nice if the best teachers in the world made millions too, but people don’t spend the big bucks to watch them teach.

        Reply
        • rct

          3 months ago

          @Von: “You can watch kids play baseball for free. It’s not pretty.”

          LMAO, Von.

        • aragon

          3 months ago

          it was so much fun watching my portly kid play. he was not very good. but he had fun playing and i had so much fun.

        • tad2b13

          3 months ago

          “You can watch kids play baseball for free. It’s not pretty.”

          Agree, it’s not pretty, but sometimes it can be fun, and often very funny. I wouldn’t pay MLB ticket, and concession prices to watch them though.

        • VonPurpleHayes

          3 months ago

          It’s definitely fun, especially when it’s your kid. But the idea that these elite athletes are playing a kid’s game is false. These guys are elite, and dedicate their lives to the craft.

      • aragon

        3 months ago

        why is it a kids game when it is a professional sports? kids playing the game don’t get paid but professional players should get as much as the owners are willing to pay.

        Reply
      • marinersblue96

        3 months ago

        Owners aren’t going broke. Most of these owners will pocket $1billion at least when they sell and they don’t lose money during the season, the Braves had $568 million in revenue in 2021 and likely will be over $600 million when they report for 2022(So nice they have to report their revenue being a publicly traded ownership).

        Reply
      • cadagan

        3 months ago

        Its a business. If it were truly a game (in the sense that you make it sound) no one would get paid.
        They are pros. How do college coaches get paid? Children play games. If you are an adult you usually have to work. Get paid.

        If your child lays the golden egg. (Does something special) you tell them to take the money vs others. Every single time.

        Reply
        • aragon

          3 months ago

          it is a bis making money off players’ talents. yeah, it is a business so you have to invest money in products you sell!

      • YourDreamGM

        3 months ago

        People deserve whatever someone is willing to pay them. Obviously they would work for pennies on the dollar. But if owners want to pay more to win more or make more money good for them. I’m not telling a billionaire how to spend their money.

        Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        3 months ago

        Every entertainer deserves to be paid based on the level of skill they have at providing that entertainment.

        The Rock made $70 million last year, and no one questions that. For making believe?

        These athletes put more time into perfecting and performing their craft than any of us do our job. The business they are the product of made $11 billion or more last season. Those athletes deserve every penny they get and more.

        Reply
  15. kyzr

    3 months ago

    Woah!

    Reply
    • disadvantage

      3 months ago

      My thoughts exactly! Woah!

      Reply
      • C Yards Jeff

        3 months ago

        Woah to me too, but not to player agents. Owners are accepting these contracts because agents know they can get them.

        Reply
  16. RyanD44

    3 months ago

    He’s never hit 30 home runs.
    He’s never had 100 RBI.
    He’s going to a pitcher-friendly park.

    I don’t understand.

    Reply
    • Balk

      3 months ago

      It’s a pretty neutral park now.

      Reply
    • Didlz

      3 months ago

      I don’t understand what 30 home runs and 100 rbi’s have to do with his signing?

      Reply
      • Catuli Carl

        3 months ago

        They are pretty standard benchmarks that the best hitters surpass routinely.

        Reply
        • falconsball1993

          3 months ago

          They also depend on team and batting order, not skill.

        • RyanD44

          3 months ago

          Correa has hit 3rd and 4th for 2/3 of his career and he was in one of the most potent lineups for all but one season… I think he was well equipped to drive in 100.

        • Mets6986??

          3 months ago

          HR depend on team and batting order? That’s a first.

        • takeitback

          3 months ago

          This isn’t true. With the Astros he actually hit 6th some.

        • RyanD44

          3 months ago

          590/888 career games he has hit 3rd or 4th

        • bigjonliljon

          3 months ago

          Especially with the trash can help

        • falconsball1993

          3 months ago

          Yes. Depending on who is in front or behind you, you will see different pitching patterns. More breaking balls, off speed, etc.

        • rct

          3 months ago

          @Catuli Carl: “They are pretty standard benchmarks that the best hitters surpass routinely.”

          Only seven players in all of baseball did it last year, and two of them (Arenado and Tucker) barely squeaked by with 30 HR.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          They have not been considered standard benchmarks by anyone working in the game in a couple decades. They are pretty useless stats in understanding player performance and value. Even on offense. They are not park adjusted.

          RBi is dependent on what other players do, not your how well an individual player performs. The guys that have the most RBI are always the guys that had the most baserunners, but the guys that drive in the highest percentage of baserunners are usually not the guys that had the most baserunners.

        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          3 months ago

          That is such a tired line. Every team Correa has been on has been stacked, except Twins last year. Those Astros teams he was on were Top 10 in batting, runs scored, RBI, Carlos probably shoulda cashed some more in, but it was likely do to his injuries/missing time that he never knocked in 100. I wish there was a stat like “clutch” that could encapsulate this tendency better.

      • Catuli Carl

        3 months ago

        Lol for playing a game? You’re insane.

        Reply
        • Catuli Carl

          3 months ago

          Sorry, wrong thread

      • RyanD44

        3 months ago

        Look at the best hitters in the game – most have done one or both of those things. Correa hasn’t – mainly because he can’t stay healthy.. but I guess he’s magically going to be healthier as he gets older and towards his age 41 end of contract?

        Reply
        • Kapler's Coconut Oil

          3 months ago

          @Ryan not even the Giants are expecting him to play at that point in the contract and you know it. Years 10-13 are practically deferred money in the expectation he brings them success during the years he plays

      • Otto371

        3 months ago

        Yes you do.

        Reply
    • Dustyslambchops23

      3 months ago

      Agree on your last statement

      Reply
    • VonPurpleHayes

      3 months ago

      He is arguably the best fielder at the most important defensive position in the game. Provides above average offensive production as well.

      Reply
      • Mattimeo09

        3 months ago

        The best fielding SS in MLB? Not even close.
        Maybe the best fielding SS in this free agent class, but that’s out of 4. Big accomplishment. Totally worth 350M

        Reply
        • VonPurpleHayes

          3 months ago

          Yea sorry. I specifically meant of this FA class.

        • jjd002

          3 months ago

          Dude is absolutely top 4, at worst, in all of baseball defensively at SS.

        • MannyBeingMVP

          3 months ago

          In 2022, Rojas, Swanson, Lindor and Bogaerts all had better or same fielding percentage as Correa in same or more innings.

          In 2022, shortstops Seager, Adames, Lindor, Swanson, Bichette and Pena had more of the same home runs as Correa. Trea had one fewer than Correa but 27more SBs.

          In 2022, for WAR, Lindor, Swanson, Turner, Bogaerts, Edman, Adams, Seager, and Bichette all were ahead of Correa.

          If Correa can keep up this pace, he’ll make the Hall of Very Good,

        • VonPurpleHayes

          3 months ago

          And I think the best defender of the 2-way SSs if that makes sense.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          From 2020-2022 Correa provided the best defense from a shortstop in baseball by a large margin according to DRS and was 4th according to OAA. Take it back another season if you want because they didn’t play a full season in 2020 and he was still the best in DRS. So, it’s easy to argue that he was the best.

          Correa is no Andrelton Simmons. No one is. He was in another stratosphere

          I think Lindor was the best the past 3 seasons, but I would not argue very much if someone came to me and said he thought Correa was, because he has been that good. Its close enough that I would say, I can live with that opinion and move on to an argument I could win.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Fielding percentage? Are you going to mention RBI next? Or pitcher wins?

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Von, You were right the first time. He is arguably the best fielding shortstop in MLB.

    • Chipsss

      3 months ago

      28 years old and has already been worth 40 WAR. Looks like to age well

      Reply
    • Pickle_Britches

      3 months ago

      But he’s much better than swansby lol. 733 ops and almost 200ks isn’t what they need. Turner would have been the one to sign but it’s ok Giants will be dog stains for like 5 years

      Reply
    • joepanikatthedisco

      3 months ago

      He’s a plus defender at shortstop. There are plenty of Hall of Fame shortstops who don’t hit for that kind of power.

      Reply
    • toptimrubies

      3 months ago

      Tony Gwynn never came close to either and many people consider him to be one of the greatest hitters ever.

      Reply
      • MannyBeingMVP

        3 months ago

        Gwynn 15 times all-star who after his rookie year hit for batting average between 0.309 and 0.394 every year for 19 years, career on-base 0.388

        Correa 2 times all-star often injured, only one out of 8 seasons over 0.300 average, career on-base 0.366

        Correa games per year 7 full seasons (not counting 2020)
        75, 99, 109, 110, 136, 148, 153, averages around 118 or 119 games per season

        Reply
        • TrumboJumbo

          3 months ago

          And only ONE 3K game EVER!

        • toptimrubies

          3 months ago

          now compare the SLG!

        • TrumboJumbo

          3 months ago

          Hold I’m still counting his Batting Titles!!

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          I love Tony Gwynn more than most. You should see my office sometime. More autographed game used equipment from Tony than anyone should really have in one room.

          26 game used bats of which 4 are framed and on the wall. The rest are in racks along one wall. 4 full uniforms with 8 jerseys, 3 of which are framed and on the wall. A wall with game used caps lining the entire length of the top of it, one for each season he played. Two pairs of cleats sitting on a bookcase. Plus all of his commemorative silver slugger bats displayed in this incredible 8 bat fan that dominates one wall. Plus a few dozen signed baseballs and a dozen or more autographed photos, many of which I took myself. Alicia used to ask me why I bought so much of his stuff and I always told her because it would be such a great investment.

          I am a Tony Gwynn fanatic. My favorite all time player.

          Tony had a 132 lifetime OPS+ which was the same as it was in his 1st 8 seasons.

          Correa has played 8 seasons and has a 129 OPS+.

          Not a big difference.

        • TrumboJumbo

          3 months ago

          Pretty bad a$$ collection!

        • TrumboJumbo

          3 months ago

          His interview with Ted is one of my all time favorites!

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          I cried watching that interview. I cried when he took Ted out on the field during that All Star game celebration. I cried at his last game knowing he was retiring. And I bawled like a baby when he died. I put flowers at his statue in Petco more often than I give my wife flowers.

          Tony was a great player, a fixture on one team and one community for his entire career, and a better man than player. He is missed immensely.

        • TrumboJumbo

          3 months ago

          That is awesome you are a good guy. You are my new pal.

        • Wagner>Cobb

          3 months ago

          OPS+ is not the difference between Correa and Gwynn though.

    • jjd002

      3 months ago

      He has the 6th highest wRC+ of any SS ever. Stop using RBI.

      Reply
      • toptimrubies

        3 months ago

        who, me?

        Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      We get that you don’t understand what makes a player good Ryan. That much is obvious. Ask. Someone will explain it to you.

      Reply
    • Iacredolo

      3 months ago

      Because arbitrary round numbers like 30 home runs and 100 rbis can totally decipher a players value.

      Big brained stuff lol.

      Reply
  17. Milwaukee-2208

    3 months ago

    Trash can gets a contract too?

    Reply
    • Didlz

      3 months ago

      what?

      Reply
      • iknowyouare

        3 months ago

        Come on man

        Reply
        • Didlz

          3 months ago

          Why would a trash can get a contract?

        • 66TheNumberOfTheBest

          3 months ago

          Job security.

        • dirkg

          3 months ago

          Helps the diversity numbers. Trash cans are sorely undervalued and underpaid in the MLB.

  18. jrussell92024

    3 months ago

    Haha – Giants always over pay.

    Reply
    • Balk

      3 months ago

      Was it an overpay for Turner?

      Reply
    • Pete'sView

      3 months ago

      jrussell92024 — Jealous? Everyone is over[paying. Everyone!

      Reply
  19. casorgreener

    3 months ago

    13 years. Jeebus. Bryce Harper ok. Terrible for Correa. Guess it’s the market though

    Reply
  20. 10centBeerNight

    3 months ago

    Bigtime move for SFG. Figured the NYM story was Boras Borasing

    Reply
  21. painterman360

    3 months ago

    Wow! These contracts are getting out of hand

    Reply
  22. GO1962

    3 months ago

    A contract that does not expire until after the 2035 season.

    Reply
  23. clubber_lang84

    3 months ago

    27 AAV for 13 years? Man Swanson is gonna get paid

    Reply
    • Didlz

      3 months ago

      He would do extremely well to get even a third of what Correra got.

      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        3 months ago

        I think he will get at least half. Only way he gets a third os if he does a 1 year opt out. 200 million won’t surprise me at all.

        Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      3 months ago

      What’s Swanson’s market? LA is waiting on ruling. Atlanta won’t over pay. Chicago probably wants him but who is going to bid him up? Or can they be tricked into bidding against themselves? Minn has interest but how much will they spend? Need Yankees to get thirsty for him. Or Colorado to get crazy.

      Reply
      • TrumboJumbo

        3 months ago

        Halo’s ready to scoop him up now!

        Reply
  24. LonnieB

    3 months ago

    So glad this wasn’t the Mets.

    Reply
    • Monix

      3 months ago

      Me too and I’m a Mets fan. I like Correa but that bad back won’t age well.

      Reply
  25. bravesnation nc

    3 months ago

    Insane!!!!!!!!!!!! These deals are out of control

    Reply
  26. rhswanzey

    3 months ago

    What a stupid sport this has turned into. Lol

    Reply
  27. padam

    3 months ago

    Well that happened fast.

    Reply
  28. hit23man

    3 months ago

    13?! Damn. Carlos with the fat bank

    Reply
  29. TrumboJumbo

    3 months ago

    I can’t wait for some of the gem posts I know are coming.

    And here weeee…GO!!!

    Reply
    • VirginiaGiant

      3 months ago

      Yeah all these genius GM’s on here, posting from their Boy Cave

      Reply
  30. MTG

    3 months ago

    When I first read this I though it said Carlos Rodon and was like what the hell. I wonder where they move Crawford, they have JD Davis for 3rd so maybe Crawford plays 2nd?

    Reply
    • GO1962

      3 months ago

      The GIants can use Crawford as Correa’s bat boy.

      Reply
    • VirginiaGiant

      3 months ago

      That’s the plan

      Reply
    • gravel

      3 months ago

      3rd base. Crawford has the arm and defense for it.

      Reply
    • Pete'sView

      3 months ago

      MTG — Actually, I think Villar plays 3B, Correa ss (obviously), Crawford 2b (if he hits). Crawford’s range will really be valuable with the new rules (no shifts).

      Reply
      • claude raymond

        3 months ago

        I believe they’ll platoon Pederson and Davis at DH. Also, Davis does play leftfield. Crawford at 2b kicks out Estrada and they want middle D to improve so I think Estrada stays at 2b. Crawford still has a gun, so I think 3b. Pete, your high on Villar, as am i,but I’m not sure he’s ready.

        Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      Giants already said that if they signed Correa, that Crawford had agreed to play 3B.

      Reply
  31. aragon

    3 months ago

    wow!

    Reply
  32. Tacoshells

    3 months ago

    Holy #####

    Reply
  33. Catuli Carl

    3 months ago

    13 years?! Lol Jed, I don’t blame you.

    Dansby, how does 7 sound?

    Reply
  34. Moneyballer

    3 months ago

    As a twins fan, it hurts!

    Reply
    • ohyeadam

      3 months ago

      It’s okay brother. Elvis and Farmer will do fine

      Reply
  35. Av8torr45

    3 months ago

    13 years? Sheesh

    Reply
  36. Dbacks44

    3 months ago

    Wow! making up for Judge. 13 years. why not sign him to social security comes

    Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      If they thought that MLB would let them sign him to a 20-year deal, they would to lower the AAV.

      Reply
  37. hardawg

    3 months ago

    Wow 13 years! This contract won’t be that great in a handful of years.

    Reply
  38. VonPurpleHayes

    3 months ago

    Nice to see the Giants finally spend.

    Reply
  39. davemlaw

    3 months ago

    The jury is in Farhan, you can stay.

    Reply
    • gravel

      3 months ago

      You should probably keep this behind closed doors boss.

      Reply
  40. TrumboJumbo

    3 months ago

    Do we know if MLB is going to Veto it yet?

    Reply
    • A’sfaninWales

      3 months ago

      Manfred’s finger is hovering over the big red button right now.
      If he didn’t like 14 years, I wonder how he feels about 13.
      I guess Correa is a lot younger than Judge

      Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      3 months ago

      Manfred was sidetracked inserting four different baseballs into all the baseball crates for ‘23.

      Reply
      • TrumboJumbo

        3 months ago

        Clip, next season the “Goldilocks” ball is going to be strapped to a scram jet!

        Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      Why would they even consider nixing it? It takes him from his age 28 season in 2023 to his age 40 season in 2035. Way too many players have played to age 40 for the league to justify not signing off on this deal.

      Reply
      • TrumboJumbo

        3 months ago

        Why do you think they were going to nix the Judge to SD deal?

        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          I don’t think they would have. Little justification for doing so. Judge would have been 45 in the last season of that deal. Correa will be 40 in the last season of his deal. Verlander is 40 and signed to play for at least 2 and possibly 3 years.

  41. bubs13

    3 months ago

    Here come the Giants

    Reply
    • windmill_noise_causes_cancer

      3 months ago

      Where are they going?

      Reply
    • windmill_noise_causes_cancer

      3 months ago

      You’re*

      Reply
  42. Rishi

    3 months ago

    What do you have to say about ownership spending money now Giants fans???

    Reply
    • disadvantage

      3 months ago

      That crowd is suddenly very, very quiet.

      Reply
      • Chipsss

        3 months ago

        I’m not quiet, I’m shocked, but happy. They bucked decades of reputation today, which should help them convince other FAs down the line that they can be trusted. Now, time to push more chips in and get Rodon. This team still needs a lot. But Correa is now in place to be a piece of the foundation and that at least appeases this fan for now. Not spending money would have been unconscionable.

        Reply
        • Rishi

          3 months ago

          Decades of reputation when they had one of the higher payrolls nearly every year. Go try being a Ray’s fan for a week. Seriously.

        • disadvantage

          3 months ago

          @chips – you don’t seem to be part of the problem then. There’s a vocal minority (at least I hope it’s a minority) on here that complains every. single. time. the Giants make a small roster move, conflating it to mean that the Giants will never spend any money ever (ignoring that the team was very bad and that it would’ve made no sense whatsoever to sign a pricey free agent to a mediocre-at-best team). Those are the fans that have been awfully quiet.

  43. skip 2

    3 months ago

    Dam 23 years!

    Reply
    • gravel

      3 months ago

      Need an eye doctor skip 2? https://www.nei.nih.gov/learn-about-eye-health/healthy-vision/finding-eye-doctor

      Reply
  44. dirkg

    3 months ago

    1) Glad he’s not a Met.
    2) Holy sh&t that’s a long contract (yes I know to lower AAV).

    Reply
  45. Maverick12

    3 months ago

    Lifelong Giants fan…this makes me gag. I don’t want this cheater

    and before I get any losers coming at me with Bonds, I never liked him either

    Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      3 months ago

      BIG difference between Bonds and Correa though. And, I’m no Bonds fan either.

      Reply
      • Maverick12

        3 months ago

        Well they are pretty similar if you compare Correa’s big-headeded ego to Bonds’ actual huge noggin…

        Reply
    • VonPurpleHayes

      3 months ago

      Respect. I feel the same way about Correa, and I was worried my team would pick him up. And to be honest, for me it’s less about the cheating, and more about how he handled himself after the cheating. Correa is a superstar talent and will put up some great numbers, but sometimes, the fan in you just doesn’t want to root for a guy.

      Reply
      • jjd002

        3 months ago

        Von, he handled it fine. Eventually you nutjobs need to get over it. It would be annoying to have to apologized hundreds of times for something most of the league was doing.

        Reply
        • VonPurpleHayes

          3 months ago

          He definitely did not handle it fine. And it wasn’t about apologies…etc. He immediately went to the defensive and played and interviewed with a chip on his shoulder, cursing out any and all who criticized him or his teammates. The guy got a ring behind a huge scandal. It’s not like there was some great injustice done to him. Just compare Altuve to Correa post scandal.

      • dirkg

        3 months ago

        @VonPurpleHayes, you hit the nail on the head for me as well. I was fortunate to have played the great game of baseball for many years and now have coached it for 10 years. Integrity is part of the game. Baseball fans are a passionate bunch. We care about Pete Rose, Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa, the Curse of the Bambino, etc. It’s what sets baseball apart IMO.

        Many of us (not all, but many) give a sh#t about the Astros and their smug attitudes about cheating out a World Series. Many of us wanted (and still do) to punch Alex Bregman’s smug face and to wipe Carlos Correa’s pencil mustache off. It still pisses me off. And everyone, fans and players, associated with that debacle are going to have to live with that.

        Sure, make your millions boys. Live it up. Glad you’re not on my team. I’m sure you don’t care. But I do…and I know many others do as well.

        Reply
    • Pete'sView

      3 months ago

      Maverick12 — Get over it. It’s only going to ruin the game for you, no one else. Just enjoy.

      Reply
      • Maverick12

        3 months ago

        Sadly it does ruin the game somewhat. I do not enjoy watching cheaters prosper

        Reply
      • Yankee Clipper

        3 months ago

        Pete: I can say this, if he were picked up by the Yankees I would acknowledge his contributions and root for him to do well because of the team, similar to how I rooted for A-Rod, but disliked him (obviously this is before the PED stuff came out).

        I think it’ll be the same with you guys. Bottom of the 9th, Oracle Park, GM5, and Correa hits a walk-off – yeah, every single Giants fan is going nuts over that, even if they don’t like him. And I don’t blame them because we all would too.

        Reply
  46. zeuz1

    3 months ago

    That’s a lot of years to commit to someone who’s 28!

    Reply
    • SeñorTortas

      3 months ago

      Better than Bogaerts though

      Reply
      • Pickle_Britches

        3 months ago

        Dam right I don’t like his away numbers

        Reply
      • websoulsurfer

        3 months ago

        Same as Bogaerts. Their contracts take both through their age 40 seasons.

        Reply
        • SeñorTortas

          3 months ago

          More peak years of Correa. Bogaerts is already in decline, if you look at his underlying stats

    • YourDreamGM

      3 months ago

      Years aren’t a big deal. Free agents are focused on total money security. More years allow you to keep the aav down and beat the competing offers. I wouldn’t have given this contract but the years aren’t what concerns me.

      Reply
  47. Winslow Leach

    3 months ago

    All the Giants fans in here that talked crap about Correa and the Astros are changing their Avatars and Handles, And they will come in here bestowing love upon Correa and the Giants. YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE!!!

    Reply
    • JayRyder

      3 months ago

      I’m one for Sure. Hell yeah we got him Now !!!

      Reply
    • gravel

      3 months ago

      I’ll assume you meant “all the Giants fans in here who.”
      I appreciate the signing.

      Reply
    • Yankee Clipper

      3 months ago

      Look, first, BIG congratulations to Giants fans. Slow offseason but you undoubtedly landed one of the premiere FAs and future of your team. He’s well-liked by younger players (see Jeremy Peña’s interview about Correa’s mentorship) and he’s a true competitor.

      However, I can’t help but wonder if they were bidding against themselves on this, unless MN came forward with a huge offer. There was really nobody else (was the Mets thing true, perhaps?).

      Well, your team wasn’t really much improved yesterday, but regardless of how you feel about Correa (I don’t like him), you can’t deny he will improve your ball club.

      The Dodger-Giants games are going to be awesome! And you guys come to Yankee Stadium the first series too, so you’ll hear our love for him!

      Reply
  48. big boi

    3 months ago

    13 years? Damn. Tbh I’m just glad that the Mets didn’t get him lol

    Reply
  49. willthethrill

    3 months ago

    Wow… didn’t see this one coming.

    Reply
  50. collarboners

    3 months ago

    That’s…quite a contract. But they needed to make a splash and cannon balled into this pool

    Reply
  51. zeuz1

    3 months ago

    That’s a lot of years to commit to someone who’s 28.

    Reply
  52. Jaysfan1981

    3 months ago

    13, 350.

    Vetoed because manipulation?? Seems like a similar structure to the rumored Judge / SD rumors

    Reply
    • cookmeister 2

      3 months ago

      Except he’s 3-4 years younger than judge

      Reply
      • Jaysfan1981

        3 months ago

        Still takes him to over 40 at contracts end, wasn’t that the leagues problem with the Judge hypothetical deal

        Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      If Judge signed the 14-year deal SD offered, he would have been 45 at the end of it. Correa will be 40 in the final season of his. A 40-year-old player just signed a 3-year deal with a $43.3 million AAV. What possible justification would there be for nixing Correa’s deal?

      Reply
      • Jaysfan1981

        3 months ago

        Justification wouldn’t be hard.

        What if Correa is offered something that beats Turners contract by a few million? It’ll depend if someone offered him 10/315 and he turned it down for a few extra years and a little bump to “help” his team sign/extend/trade more players

        Basically circumventing the true meaning and purpose of the cap

        Now if it was an “organic” negotiation where multiple teams had similar offers and a year separated them or a million or two in total monies etc, ok….

        But now what about Bo. Can the Jays say “bet” (kids taught me that) and go 18 over 333 and keep it under 20AAV LOOOOLZ.

        Does BO say no? I dunno a third of a Billion is hard to turn down

        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          There is no cap.

          How do you prove that they are trying to circumvent the CBT threshold when it’s entirely plausible that Correa plays through his age 40 season? You can’t.

          Bo Bichette is 3 years younger than Correa. If the Jays wanted to extend him a 16-year deal, there is nothing MLB could say about it. Its plausible that he can play that long.

      • TrumboJumbo

        3 months ago

        Websoul, so you don’t think the Judge to SD deal should have been vetoed if it came to fruition?

        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          No. There have been players that continued to play though age 44-45. Not many, but enough that an arbitrator for the National Labor Relations Board would have ruled in favor of the union when they brought a grievance for the deal being nixed.

      • PinstripedPride

        3 months ago

        It goes without saying that most players aren’t machines like Verlander is. Does anyone really think that Judge would even contemplate playing on the field when he’s 45?

        Reply
        • TrumboJumbo

          3 months ago

          I don’t feel all warm and fuzzy about Correa on the field at 41 either.

        • Scottn59c

          3 months ago

          He can spend the last couple of seasons in the dugout, banging the trash can.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          Thats great, because his last season of this contract will be his age 40 season.

        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          By then they will be hitting a button and a speaker in the players batting helmet will tell them what the pitch is.

  53. Kewldood69

    3 months ago

    Cheater till the end. Booooooooo!

    Reply
  54. baseballencyclopedia

    3 months ago

    As a Giants fan, not thrilled. We need power hitters. Correa isn’t going to carry an offense, and he’s going to hit for less power in SF. That’s a lot of money for a lot of years to a guy who’s probably not going to earn have of it.

    Reply
    • Pete'sView

      3 months ago

      baseballencyclopedia — He bats third with Joc and Mitch after him. Giants will score some runs. And don’t sleep on Villar.

      Reply
    • claude raymond

      3 months ago

      FYI, in 2021 Haniger hit 39 hrs. Hanigers 2021 flyball spraychart when overlayed on Oracle park added 4 hrs. It favors right handed hitters. Burks Kent Aurilia etc had success. They led NL in HRs in 2021. Everyone needs to stop the “bad hitters park” delusion. The key is having good right handed hitters which has been the problem.

      Reply
      • 5TUNT1N

        3 months ago

        Not to mention the parks dimensions have changed and if MLB picks a live ball it plays loud in that park. It’s no longer the pain in the butt home run park it was.

        Reply
  55. SFBay314

    3 months ago

    Terrible

    Reply
  56. Attystephenadams

    3 months ago

    As a Mets fan, I never believed the Borass rumour that they were interested in him. Glad to see that the Giants were happy to top the Lindor contract for a less talented player. I understand how all the teams are extending the contracts to lower the AAV, but this is a stretch.

    Reply
  57. dopt

    3 months ago

    I bet he is hurt and doesn’t play ~ 5 out of the 13 years or misses 650 games

    Reply
    • VirginiaGiant

      3 months ago

      I’ll bet you post this a 3rd time?

      Reply
  58. DeGrom Texas Ranger

    3 months ago

    Wow! The years are amazing. I assumed it would be like 10 or 11, but 13??? Waiting for Manfred to veto this and see another strike

    Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      This contract goes through Correa’s age 40 season. A 40 year old just signed a $43.3 million AAV deal and MLB okayed it. What possible reason could Manfred give for nixing this deal?

      Reply
      • DeGrom Texas Ranger

        3 months ago

        There was an article about a team offering Judge 14 years 400 million, and he said no. I think it was the Padres. The MLB office would have supposedly rejected that one.

        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          3 months ago

          It was the Padres. It was speculation that the commissioner would have rejected it. If he had rejected it, he would have lost that fight in front of the arbitrator. Instead, Judge decided he wanted to finish his career with the team he started it with. More power to him. Classy move.

        • DeGrom Texas Ranger

          3 months ago

          Yeah. I can’t see the commissioner having any legal authority to tell 2 parties they can’t sign a type of contract that hundreds of thousands and maybe even millions have previously signed. It’s not some illegal gambling contract or anything.

  59. 1bertu

    3 months ago

    Fire Farhan or whoever is the new GM

    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      3 months ago

      Owner made this call.

      Reply
  60. giantwarrioras49ersraiders

    3 months ago

    Thank you

    Reply
  61. WideWorldofSports

    3 months ago

    bad contract

    Reply
  62. dopt

    3 months ago

    I bet he is hurt and doesn’t play ~ 5 out of the 13 years or misses 800 games total

    Reply
  63. jhomeslice

    3 months ago

    I’m surprised Correa didn’t hold out for 14 or 15 years. I mean, what’s he gonna do for money after he’s 42?

    Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      He will have been retired 2 years by then and will be spending his millions. What will you be doing at 42?

      Reply
  64. yetipro

    3 months ago

    So begins the cratering production process

    Reply
  65. duhawk83

    3 months ago

    Great the Cubs missed on another targeted Free Agent. I really don’t like Jed Hoyer.

    Reply
  66. Cleon Jones

    3 months ago

    Correa gets personalalized dugout drum kit, and premier bongos.

    Reply
  67. ArianaGrandSlam

    3 months ago

    MLB is right in the bubble economy. Can’t wait to see it pop.

    Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      Why would it? Revenue is guaranteed to go up for at least the next 5 years.

      Reply
  68. tippin

    3 months ago

    Yikes! That’s..umm..well..I’ll just say it..freaking INSANE..

    Reply
  69. bravesnation nc

    3 months ago

    Giants are still a 3rd place team in the NL West even with Carlos. Multiple holes to fill.

    Reply
    • FletcherFan69

      3 months ago

      Try fourth place

      Reply
  70. greenbaygiants

    3 months ago

    Farhan did a thing!

    Reply
  71. fred-3

    3 months ago

    Bryce Harper gave the Phillies a discount

    Reply
    • VonPurpleHayes

      3 months ago

      Right, but when Harper signed everyone bashed the Phillies like everyone is bashing the Giants now. It’s very possible that this contract looks like a steak in 3 years tims when average players are getting 25M a year.

      Reply
      • VonPurpleHayes

        3 months ago

        lol steal not steak. I must be hungry.

        Reply
  72. Moneyballer

    3 months ago

    He’s getting paid 8 million less next season but he’s locked himself into a ludacris 13 year guarantee with a no trade clause. Clearly this was the deal he always wanted but did not get last year. The giants swinging and missing on Aaron Judge was a huge factor here. Correa literally puts up HALF the offense of Judge yet is being paid as if that weren’t the case. Spend just to spend.

    Reply
    • jjd002

      3 months ago

      But he also plays twice the defense judge does at a much more valuable position. Really tough to compare an OF with a SS when it comes to contracts.

      Reply
    • Chipsss

      3 months ago

      The Yankees didn’t pay judge with the expectation of anything close to his 11 war year. They’ll be happy with 5-7 war, and the Giants will be very happy with 5 war from correa for the next 5 years

      Reply
    • websoulsurfer

      3 months ago

      Which player do you think produced 39.5 WAR? Which do you think produced 37.0 WAR? How about 4.9 per season or 5.3 per season?

      Judge has produced 24% more on offense by OPS+ and wRC+. Not double or even close to double.

      Correa is 3 years younger and getting paid 67.5% of the money Judge is getting paid each year.

      Reply
  73. FletcherFan69

    3 months ago

    I get the feeling he’ll waive that no-trade clause real quick

    Reply
  74. bravegator

    3 months ago

    Your up swanson

    Reply
    • Gwynning

      3 months ago

      I am?

      Reply
  75. SaintChris

    3 months ago

    The Giants should have signed him last off-season for less money & less years.

    These 10+ year deals are ridiculous. What are they banking on? 5 or 6 good years with Correa? Then they’ll be handicapped by his bloated salary and declining play, unable to compete.

    Props to all the well-run teams like the Cardinals that can be competitive, year in and year out, while not falling victim to this idiocy.

    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      3 months ago

      If he wanted less money he wouldn’t have signed 1 year with twins. He wanted that 300 million.

      Reply
    • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

      3 months ago

      Uhhhhh Cardinals signed a part-time catcher for 90million so I wouldn’t be bragging a whole lot. That Contreras contract is going to look like doggy doo by mid-season. Overrated x 100. Cardinals should have figured out something for Sean Murphy.

      Reply
      • SaintChris

        3 months ago

        So…five years for the best available catcher in free agency is way worse than paying Correa to play shortstop into his 40’s?

        How does that even compute in your mind?

        And I’m not even a Cards fan. I just said they were well run.

        Reply
        • Ignorant Son-of-a-b

          3 months ago

          I didn’t say it was worse. It’s just not a smart contract and one that will be regretted. It seems very weird to me that the normally fiscally prudent Mozeliak signed off on it. Not a Cards fan either.

  76. DeGrom Texas Ranger

    3 months ago

    So now the Rangers sign Gallo for 10 years and 75 million with 100 million in incentives for playing time and performance? That seems about right. That soft threshold

    Reply
  77. YankeesBleacherCreature

    3 months ago

    So it’s a $385M/14 contract and Minnesota waived him after one year.

    Reply