Tatsuya Imai came off the board this afternoon. He agreed to terms with the Astros on a three-year, $54MM guarantee with opt-outs after the first two seasons. It was both a surprise landing spot and contract, as the NPB right-hander had generally been expected to pull a nine-figure deal that probably would have priced him out of Houston.
The Cubs were among the teams most commonly speculated as a fit for Imai over his 45-day posting window. Sahadev Sharma and Patrick Mooney of The Athletic wrote last month that Chicago was involved but reluctant to make a long-term commitment that valued him as a top-of-the-rotation arm. The rest of the market evidently shared that trepidation.
Mark Feinsand of MLB.com writes that the Cubs appear to have been the top competition to Houston by the end of the signing period. Both Feinsand and Jon Heyman of The New York Post suggest that neither the Yankees nor Mets were heavily involved. The Yankees may be more focused on the lineup — they reportedly have an offer out to Cody Bellinger — while previous reporting has indicated the Mets aren’t eager to make a long-term investment in a free agent starter. Imai apparently was not going to be an exception, as Feinsand writes that the Mets weren’t convinced he’d be a top-of-the-rotation starter.
An upper mid-rotation starter has been the Cubs’ biggest need all offseason. They’ve yet to make any moves in the rotation aside from declining their option on and then retaining Shota Imanaga via the qualifying offer. They’re still lacking a high-end complement to Cade Horton at the top of the staff, at least until Justin Steele returns from April’s elbow surgery.
Imanaga had a terrible final few weeks as his home run rate spiked. Matthew Boyd was excellent in the first half but appeared to wear down as the season went along. His 179 2/3 innings pitched were 101 more than he’d thrown in any MLB season since 2019. Boyd took a 2.34 earned run average into the All-Star Break but allowed a 4.63 mark over his final 12 appearances. His strikeout rate dropped more than four percentage points in the second half. He’s headed into his age-35 season. Jameson Taillon, Colin Rea and Javier Assad profile as back-end or swing options.
The Cubs could still pursue any of Framber Valdez, Ranger Suárez or Zac Gallen if they want to add a starter via free agency. Teams have set significant asking prices in talks involving starting pitching, though the likes of MacKenzie Gore or Kris Bubic remain trade candidates.
RosterResource calculates Chicago’s luxury tax projection around $210MM. That leaves them almost $35MM below the base threshold and $21MM shy of their season-ending mark from 2025. They should have some payroll flexibility. If they don’t like the value on any available starting pitchers, they could potentially turn their attention to the offense as a way to replace some of the production lost from Kyle Tucker (whom they’re not expected to re-sign).
The Cubs have been loosely linked to third basemen, in particular. Reports have tied them to Alex Bregman and Eugenio Suárez, though president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer gave a firm vote of confidence to in-house third baseman Matt Shaw. This evening, Heyman listed the Cubs among a number of teams that have shown some interest in NPB star Kazuma Okamoto. The right-handed hitting corner infielder has until Sunday afternoon to sign.
Okamoto has been also been tied to the Padres, Pirates, Blue Jays, Red Sox and Angels this offseason. Most of those teams make more sense as landing spots than the Cubs, who have Shaw and Michael Busch at the corners. Plugging Okamoto in at designated hitter would block the path to at-bats for young hitters Moisés Ballesteros and Owen Caissie. Okamoto could take at-bats against lefty pitching from Busch but would have a cleaner path to everyday playing time with a team like Pittsburgh (at third base) or San Diego (at first base).

Serious question, do the Cubs have a plan?
Yes. Sell more Marquis subscriptions and pocket the money.
Williams, they have a plan which doesn’t involve spending on long term contracts apparently.
Interesting seems like 2/3rds of mlb has that same plan…which is why the 2027 season is very much in jeopardy
Pool, when the A’s and Pirates are spending, or trying to spend, that argument loses some steam.
There will be an ownerlockout next off-season. Whether it alters the regular season is the unknown.
Yes but the A’s & Pirates seem to be establishing a payroll minimum. The Cubs lost $5 during Covid and Ricketts vows to never ever let something like that happen again.
Trying to and actually doing it are very different things ..sure we heard the pirates offered Schwarber but not enough for him to sign..and the a’s are extending thier own to very team friendly deals
ADF, there’s an argument to be made that A’s, Pirates, and White Sox surprise spending habits this offseason has more to do with revenue receiving teams trying to prove they use the money to improve their teams as a precursor to asking for higher revenue sharing inflows.
Expat,
If you, I, and everyone else here can see it, so can the players union.
Ultimately, they are trying to avoid a spending floor by “showing” it isn’t needed.
ADF, it’s not about a message sent by the revenue receivers to the players… it’s a message sent by the revenue receivers to the revenue *paying* teams. The spending is an attempt to bolster their position in a squabble between owners.
Expat,
So you’re saying that lockout is more about owners vs owners than owners vs players?
@ADF – No, the lockout is definitely about owners vs players, and the topic of salary floors and caps will be discussed. But negotiations between owners and players trigger inter-owner squabbles about how to divvy up the new stuff they’ll get from the new CBA and the new stuff they’ll have to give up. Revenue sharing between teams has been a big point of contention among owners, with some owners saying we can’t compete without a more level playing field and some owners saying, yeah, but when we share our revenues with you, you don’t spend it on players but instead on making yourself more profitable with debt management or facilities upgrades, etc.
So, I’ve been of the opinion that this surprise burst of spending (and spending attempts) by atypical teams like the Pirates and White Sox is a way of them trying to get some plausible deniability to say, look, we’re spending money too… in case a disagreement were to end up in front of an arbitrator or whatever mechanism the owners have in place to work stuff out (I’m in over my head here as far as administrative stuff between owners).
I think revenue-share-receiving teams are gonna be asking for a bigger cut of the pie.
Expat,
They’ll definitely want a bigger piece of the pie. But along with that, I think the other owners and the union will force those teams to spend that money on payroll, along with other incentives to force those teams to compete.
According to available numbers, the Pirates received around $100m in revenue sharing money, and their payroll was $110m. That allowed them to be one of the most profitable tend in the league. Which I’m sure will be a topic of discussion as negotiations move forward.
One off-season of spending won’t be enough to make a difference for those teams who operate similarly.
@ADF I really hope that’s an outcome of future negotiations. I feel bad for the fans of teams like the Pirates- a dedicated fan base, a cool stadium in a fun city- who deserve to see team ownership invest more into the product on the field, rather than a balance sheet over ballgames prioritization.
I just hope they don’t over pay for some that’s on the list now Rather see them getting 2 or 3 decent players than one over priced free agent and be stuck like they did with Heyward
Common sense??? Stop it! This board won’t know what to do.
Saying no to certain free agents suggests a plan much more than saying yes.
To be fair, no one else gave Imai a better deal than Houston. They are in a position to take a flyer on him.
Cubs don’t have anyone signed past 2029 (Suzuki and Swanson). So maybe it’s a longer term plan.
Seiya will become a free agent after the 2026 season.
Only Swanson past 2027 I think.
Yep…the Ricketts plan is to field a competitive(ish) team and then make money hand over fist at arguably the best mlb venue. They don’t care much about division titles, much less championships. The Brewers are playing chess at roster construction while the Ricketts play to cash in on the Wrigley experience…
Been that way with the Cubs as long as I can remember, and I’m old.
Oddly enough, my 74 YO lifelong diehard Cub fan brother says he’s about to look for a new team to follow. Told him welcome to Tigertown. We’ve been trending that way for almost 20 years
They’ll offer a one year deal + options to whoever still on the market in Feb and call that trying.
Yes their plan is to book as many rooms possible at the Not so luxurious Monstrosity Hotel.
Yes they do. Under the directive of ownership don’t spend. Keep under the threshold of the tax.
Not if it means they have to outbid teams like the Yankees.
It’s looking more and more like Hoyer isn’t signing any big free agents with the CBA looming so it’s probably going to be reclamation projects going forward.
Hoyer is a joke. They outspend the rest of the division by plenty yet usually come up short.
Sign Eugenio Suarez.
Thank god the bears are a good team cause this cubs team ain’t going anywhere
Lol cubs
This post seems like it’s just twisting the knife.
For the love of God can the names Gore and Bubic be stricken from mouths til after the offseason.
Jed on his way to coming up empty. No way they will outbid others for a Valdez or Suarez who want even more than imai. Another Jed and rickets offseason of failure coming.
A. Doesnt help Ricketts is cheap
B. I think the Cubs know there is going to be a strike next year and probably a long one if a Salary Cap isnt put into place.
If there is a work stoppage over not implementing a salary cap it will be a lockout from the owners, not a strike from the players. Players don’t want a salary cap.
Big market owners don’t want a cap either. If the owners don’t come to an agreement, how do they negotiate with the players?
A salary cap is not going to be put into place, and it is a lockout, not a strike. The difference is important, junior and others, so please choose your terminology more carefully.
As to the substance of your comment, yes, the Cubs think there will not be a 2027 season–they might be right–and for some reason have decided to punt on the 2026 season too.
Its neither a lockout nor a strike. It would be a lockout if the owners make a move after this season. It would be a strike if the players make a move before the playoffs.
There isn’t gonna be a cap, no matter how much some of you want it. The players are going to keep making their ever-escalating salaries. Deal with it.
I doubt htere will be a cap. But if there was an upper cap, the union would demand a minimum cap.
Every Cubs story starts with they had an interest and ends with the guy signing elsewhere
Sure does seem that way.
If the Cubs off season plan is to “check in” on certain free agents, then they’re having a fantastic off season.
“Hey Chicago whaddya say, the Cubs are checkin in today.”
Hoyer is definitely leading the league in “check-ins” that don’t result in contracts.
Cubs had relievers start multiple playoff games, but they don’t want to add a good for a starter or 2? There’s being cheap then there’s what Ricketts is doing
Cubs were over 0.500 in 9 of last 11 seasons, made the playoffs in 2025 and won a playoff series, their payroll ranked 10th. Some people are hard to please…
@Assumes: Yes. Such people are called fans. They want maximum effort from players and management alike, and they want maximum results.
The idea that the Cubs are good enough is dumbfounding. They are not.
Agreed Alan. 11th in payroll, 3rd in revenue (according to some sources) isn’t good enough when you lose the division to a small market team capable of developing their own players. Cubs player development is not strong enough to be so cheap on FAs.
I don’t care what contracts are on the books, the team on the field needs to compete for a championship every season. Paying Imanaga and Dansby @ $50M next season is on Jed.
@Alan! Hmmm you seem to be uber demanding and hard to satisfy IMO, but may you have a wonderful 2026! May your Cubs win the WS and then you can pause six days before b*tching and b*tching and b*tching some more!
Assumes,
If over .500 is your barometer for success, I’m not sure what to tell you.
Tell me you are super demanding and I’ll be satisfied
Assumes,
I expect my team to make winning moves in order to win a world series. I don’t need to demand, my team does those things. On many levels.
So does Milwaukee. So did the Cubs for a short period. There no reason any fan shouldn’t have expectations for their team.
Unless you own a casino, over .500 isn’t a winning expectation.
I think you are framing demands as expectations to be frank, fans are demanding this and expecting that and it’s just a sport just a game you want to get excessively wound up about what a team owner or gm does than take getting called out for being overly demanding honestly
Assumes… Come on.. We’re not talking about a small or mid market team. We’re talking about a large market franchise that has done nothing but increase in value by billions since Ricketts bought em. He’s making money hand over fist but continues to spend like a Black Friday Walmart shopper. The fanbase deserves an owner that will wisely spend whatever it takes to be a serious contender every year- Not use his lap dog GM, Hoyer, to make one ‘blue spot on a blue wall’ move after another.
Find a new team maybe? I dunno, you Cubs “fans” are over the top IMO.
twinstrivia.com/2025/04/05/mlb-teams-revenue-versu…
Here ya go! Cheer for the Mets! They spent 90% of their revenue on payroll in 2025 and missed the playoffs, but you’d be happy!!! LOL
Ahhh, bless your scurvy little heart…
Winning teams make winning moves. Which has nothing to do with payroll in many cases. You can spend money and never win. Ask Angels fans.
“Winning teams make winning moves.” That about sums about the logic here lol
I’m glad you agree.
And what percentage of revenue taken in actually goes back to the on field product? The Cubs are in the very bottom in MLB. Money hoarding duplicitous snakes.
been in the playoffs 6 out of the last 11 seasons….you Cubs fans are too much…stop the belly aching
Aloha Folks, time will tell if this was a mistake by the Cubs FO. Imai would not have cost a draft pick or international bonus money, just the fee to the Seibu Lions. I wish Tatsuya all the best and success this year.
Jed, what’s your plan? Trade away Nico and the farm for an arm? Then pay for Alex or Bo? I thought the plan was for beefing up all the pitching. BP looking good but with Steele out til June/July, how are you going to strengthen the rotation? I hope for the best. Mahalo
Hopefully, they have another FA starting pitcher in mind.
My guess is Gallen, when that false report of his signing came out, I was like, yep, this is a total Jed Hoyer move.
Doesn’t appear the Cubs were really even in on Imai, Gallen was probably just waiting for him to sign to see if he can do better than the Cubs’ lowball offer.
Aloha MLBT100, I sure hope so. I would be okay with Gallen. He is a bit of a risk but is not far removed from some very good seasons. He will cost a draft pick. But I hope if they can sign him, that puts an end to Alex at 3B and Shaw moved into a utility situation. I really hope with the remaining starters available, one is signed. Mahalo
Happy New Year’s to you kgcubs!
I am open to Gallen, Giolito and even another lefty like Ranger. Or a budget FA like Quintana.
Nothing would be worse than trading prospects like Caissie, Alcantara, Wiggins or Ballesteros for Alcantara, Cabrera or Gore.
MLBT100, Shinnen Omedetou Gozaimasu, Happy New Year to you!
A friend of mine brought up Giolito! He had a good season with Boston. No QO attached to him, he’s definitely an option, Ranger too.
I’m with you about the farm system. It’s thin on top talent and the FO shouldn’t drain it. But my concern is that Jed can’t let go of bregman playing 3B and if ownership has told him he has to stay under the CBT for budgeting, then watch him trade away just to get a cheap controllable arm so he can sign alex. So I hope it’s Gallen, Giolito, Ranger a free agent starter. Mahalo!
Hopefully the Cubs DON’T have another FA SP in mind. They are all bad bets and have warts IMO. They are all regression candidates. Take LH’s out of the equation right away, Not needed. The best plan now would be trade for one. Can’t trade Nico this year, Reasons are obvious. Nico’s replacement is Shaw. Shaw’s replacement isn’t ready or would cost a fortune. No thanks. Wish we had a guy to play 3B. Oh wait we did 2 of them. Where did they go? None of your options are better than Taillion which is the goal right? The way to go now is trade. Ryan, Alcantara, Cabrera, Be prepared to pay. As long as it isn’t Wiggins or Caissie be my guest. Cubs need another LH starter like I need roids. None of your FA pitchers are better bets than Assad, Brown or Wicks IMO.
Aloha Uncle, Happy New Year!
I hear you. I was just agreeing with MLB100 that instead of trading away more talent, there are still options in free agency for a starter. Especially in Gallen or Giolito. I’m concerned that Jed only wants bregman and with a restraint on the budget will do whatever it takes to get Alex. I’m with about the fact that Jed traded away two 3B’s for a rental and created this situation. I really want the younger players to get a chance now, thus was hoping they’d sign Imai. Well, it happen. Watch, Tatsuya have a good first season here. Take care now. Mahalo!
KG Aloha My friend. Happy New Year. Totally agree about the 2 3B for a rental. I think the line up is just fine the way it is. No bat needed just utility guy. Might not be horrible to re sign Castro. The last 2 months he was awful but has been fairly reliable for his career. With Caissie and Ballesteros and Suzuki around CC has options. He can put Caissie in LF, Suzuki in RF and Moises at DH. Still think moving Ballesteros may be best as the now have a ton of LH bats in the system and Ballesteros value might never be higher, Sell high. Jed has his extension, So stick with the young guys may be his new plan. Let’s hope so. Good things my friend for 2026!
Valdez, Gallen, and Ranger are definitely miles ahead of Wicks and Assad. Those two are fifth starters at best. At least Brown has some potential.
We can agree to disagree.
No the goal is not simply better than Taillon. It is to have another starting pitcher in case Horton, Steele or Boyd get injured or Shota has to be removed from the rotation.
Rea and Assad are swingmen types and Brown is strictly a reliever at this point. Wiggins will not be ready this season.
And the way to make the addition is through free agency and not a trade. A trade for a frontline starting pitcher will involve Caissie because the demand for Cubs’ Alcantara and Ballesteros is not enough for one of those to anchor a trade.
Castro would be awful. Awful. Morel could not play 3B. Paredes and Castro could not hit for Cubs. Time to move on.
Castro has been solid everywhere he’s been. Granted he was horrible for the Cubs. I have no reason to believe he won’t return to the form he’s shown his whole career. It wouldn’t be an expensive gamble and if it was I’d just say no and move on. It’s not a big deal either way. Shota has pitched 12 months for the Cubs. 11 have been good to stellar. I have no reason to believe he won’t be just fine in 26. He learned a lot about pitching in Wrigley with the jet stream blowing out. It takes a whole different mind set to pitch there under those conditions where pop ups leave the yard. He has no better resource than Fergie Jenkins who knows more about pitching in Wrigley than anybody on the planet. You have to use different pitches during those times. Hopefully he uses him to his advantage. If not he can moved at the deadline to a more pitcher friendly park. The goal SHOULD BE to find someone who is better than Jamo. He pitched 2 game 3’s and more than stood his ground. Need somebody else who can start 1 or 2. That’s as plain as the nose on Hoyer’s face.
@Uncle: Well, I think some available FA starters are better than Assad, Brown, and Wicks, but I agree with you in principle: overpaying for mediocrity is not the way to go now. The only problem is, Wiggins and Caissie are probably the only prospects the Cubs have that would interest other teams. The Cubs are pretty much stuck where they are–hoping Steele comes back sooner than later and strong, and hoping Ballesteros will replace Tucker’s (the flawed man, not the overhyped myth) offense.
Alan
Hey, today we agree. Keep Caissie and Wiggins.
Add a starter but don’t overpay.
Just add a starter? Then what’s the point exactly? Why bother? Horton-Boyd-Jamo-Imanaga-Rea. Assad, Wicks and Brown make it 8 deep. Steele makes 9 and maybe Wiggins, Conrad or Noland step up. Just getting a guy, and spending 20 million a year just to get a guy is just pitiful thinking. If he’s not better, Just move along. My God.
Brown and Wicks are not starting a game on my universe. Wiggins, Conrad and Noland are not starting a game before August and probably not at all. Pitchers get injured. Maybe Shota bounces back, maybe not. Horton, Steele both injured last year, Boyd cannot do a heavy workload. Rea and Assad can work in relief. No reason for Ricketts to cut payroll other than staying under tax line. There are useful starting pitcher acquisitions that will be $25 million per year and useful ones that will be under $10 million.
Uncle, I hear you, but I think you’re overrating Assad, Brown, and Wicks. And you might be assuming health, too, for players who are unlikely to be healthy all year.
right on.
Isn’t it amazing how Tom Ricketts used to walk the stands talking to fans. Telling everyone how he was going to be so involved and the Old ways of treating Cubs fans like the Tribune and other owners did. He was going to spend money and have a contant winner here. Bringing in the best. Seats have been packed since then . Even during the seasons they lost 100 games. Yet they do just enough to suck you in but never enough to finish the job right.
Your biggest expenditures have been management or front office personnel.Now im not saying go hog wild like the Dodgers but get some solid players nit this bs of has been that we hope have a career year while under a cheap return contract. You want to gamble on 1 or 2 fine but not your entire roster.
As far as I know Ricketts still does that.
Since the Bellinger salary dump , then the deadline, it’s obvious what the plan is.
Cub fans seem really upset today. Can’t blame them. With 2 so-called MLB teams in town, one would think there would be some competition to be the biggest draw, just for bragging rights if nothing else.
Cubs’ management might be cheap, but the White Sox’ ownership has set the bar ridiculously low. Combine that with the Wrigley factor and this is what you end up with. Competitive but mostly profitable.
Cubs payroll right now 210 million and will go up to the Tax. Tigers payroll 180 million and won’t go up. So if the Cubs are cheap the Tigers are………….. fill in the blank.
Actually for a small market team, the Tigers have a nice size payroll. It’s not like they have the big local TV income the Cubs do, so I can understand the Cubs fans issue with the lack of moves in that context.
The Cubs myth of the ” Big Time TV Station” is just that. Myth. If you’ve ever watched Marquee the only thing on it worth watching is the Cubs. I only get it during baseball season. The programming in the winter is worse than some Christian Bible stations. It’s not unusual to see the same commercial 5 times in a row because there are no advertisers. It needs a lot of help before it makes big time money.
So they made bad investments and their hands are tied. Welcome to Rickettsville
Slightly off-topic but why can’t the Cubs develop their own starting pitching? From what I read they have only 1 prospect/suspect that might develop into anything.
They have a few. Just because Callis and his weird friends don’t talk about them doesn’t mean they’re not there. Watch them play before spouting gossip.
No gossip. Wiggins is the only one that I’ve read about.
Exactly
Steele, Horton and Wiggins
Go Cubs Go. 81 days till opening, gotta love baseball. Chicago Cubs will be alright.
Patrick Corbin?
Gallen is the most likely out of the pitchers mentioned but i could see them signing Lucas Giolito as he would not require a multi-year deal. The Cubs have added to the bullpen so it’s not like they haven’t done anything. The lineup is set and maybe a bench player is still to be added
I’m done. No more lies and bs from Tom and Ricketts. Get ready for the great Cubs sell off at the upcoming deadline. Almost half the team is gone after 26 anyway, may as well get it over with. Nico. Suzuki. Happ. Carson. Boyd. Imanaga. Steele.
Hope yall enjoyed your one playoff appearance. The only time Jed put his big boy pants on was to save his job and get Tucker. After his extension, he’s comfortable coming in second on every Free Agent and letting all the talent walk.
Jed is there to sell Ricketts snake oil and duplicity with doubletalk and half truths.
The team is getting blown up soon. Mark it.
Cubs are one of the worst in MLB in allocating revenue taken in to put back into the onfield product.
This is all a shell game. Ricketts only cares about money. Therefore for myself and many I know not another dollar for his kingdom built on sand.
Have the cubs ever even signed in free agency a Boris client?
Yoan Moncada is available. That’s who they sign.
It’s like the Frigging Tribune still owns the Cubs!
If rickets doesn’t wish to compete with his big boy partners, why doesn’t he just go ahead and sell his team before the next work stoppage which will be 2027? Now, that would be perfect timing to get out !!!
If the cubs go ahead and sign bellinger again at this point, it shows hoyer doesn’t have a plan and is panicking going into the convention in a couple weeks having done virtually nothing to replace Tucker; address their starting pitcher; and improve their woeful bench.
Another couple weeks till the convention so the pressure all on Jed to do anything with all that revenue or all those lovey dovey cubs fans may finally turn on him for the best. However, don’t count on it!