Headlines

  • Bruce Meyer Elected MLBPA Executive Director
  • Spencer Schwellenbach, Hurston Waldrep To Undergo Elbow Surgery
  • Tony Clark Steps Down As MLBPA Executive Director
  • Padres, Walker Buehler Agree To Minor League Deal
  • Padres Sign Germán Márquez
  • Padres Sign Griffin Canning
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Athletics
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Tony Clark Steps Down As MLBPA Executive Director

By Steve Adams | February 17, 2026 at 11:59pm CDT

The Major League Baseball Players Association officially announced that executive director Tony Clark has resigned. Clark did not provide a statement in the press release. He had held the role since 2013.

According to multiple reports, Clark resigned after an internal investigation revealed he had an “inappropriate” relationship with his sister-in-law, who was hired to work for the player’s union back in 2023. Evan Drellich, Ken Rosenthal and Andy McCullough of The Athletic and Jeff Passan and Don Van Natta Jr. of ESPN each suggest that deputy director Bruce Meyer is most likely choice to take over. The Athletic notes that Meyer recently helped Tarik Skubal in his arbitration case where he defeated the Tigers and has been working the phones today to firm up his support among the players.

The union met this afternoon but did not vote on the matter. Chris Bassitt, a member of the eight-player executive subcommittee, told The Athletic they didn’t want to rush and wanted to take time to update the union’s 1200 members. Bassitt suggested everything would be wrapped up in 24 hours or so, with a vote on Meyer reportedly expected tomorrow. Angels lefty Brent Suter, another member of the subcommittee, told The Athletic’s Sam Blum that the union had an interim director in mind and was not planning to commence an external search at this time. “We’re going to have an interim [director] and keep everything as stable as we can this year,” says Suter.

The 53-year-old Clark and the union had been under investigation since last summer due to purported improprieties regarding the usage of licensing money. Specifically, Clark has previously been alleged to have given himself equity in OneTeam Partners — a joint venture between the MLBPA and NFLPA — and failed to have sufficiently disclosed the level of resources being dedicated to Players Way, an MLBPA-owned youth baseball initiative that is under federal investigation. The union hired a law firm to conduct an internal investigation in response to those allegations. That internal probe reportedly uncovered messages between Clark and his sister-in-law, which led the union to seek his resignation.

Clark had been scheduled to begin a tour of spring visits to the game’s 30 teams just this morning, but the first of those meetings (with the Guardians) was abruptly canceled. The timing of the move is of particular note. Major League Baseball’s current collective bargaining agreement expires in just over nine months. The last wave of collective bargaining talks between the Clark-led union and the Rob Manfred-led league/owners collective was contentious enough to result in a 99-day offseason lockout and transaction freeze.

An even more vitriolic battle is expected by many this time around, with several owners publicly digging in their heels regarding their belief that the sport needs to adopt a salary cap. Any sort of cap — even if accompanied by a salary floor — has been a nonstarter for every previous iteration of the players association; Clark has made no secret of his adamant anti-cap stance at virtually every given opportunity, and Meyer has been in lockstep with that mentality as the union’s lead negotiator and No. 2 executive.

Evan Drellich, Ken Rosenthal and Andy McCullough of The Athletic first reported that Clark was resigning. Jeff Passan of ESPN first reported the “inappropriate relationship.”

Share Repost Send via email

Collective Bargaining Agreement Collective Bargaining Issues MLBPA Newsstand Bruce Meyer Tony Clark

Dodgers Notes: Second Base, Edman, Hernández
Main
The Opener: MLBPA, Free Agents, Braves
View Comments (537)
Post a Comment

537 Comments

  1. longjuansilvers

    2 days ago

    Wow

    9
    Reply
    • Sweeper

      2 days ago

      Time for the Scherzer takeover of the MLBPA

      14
      Reply
      • tonyinsingapore

        2 days ago

        I’d go with Suter…

        3
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          2 days ago

          tony – I’d go with Pedro Martinez, he would settle things with a dance-off.

          8
          Reply
      • GarryHarris

        2 days ago

        There’s Denny McLain too. He’s done a pretty good job on retirement fund management.

        5
        Reply
        • Stormintazz

          21 hours ago

          Mic drop!!!!! Well done !!!!

          2
          Reply
        • robw5555

          20 hours ago

          Many yrs ago I ran some baseball card shows with a friend. We had Denny Mclain make his first show appearance as he got out of jail the first time? 1987. We had some big names signing at the show as well. We got TV coverage of it and other media. The crazy part is that Mclain was one of the nicest guys you would ever meet. Yrs later we saw what he did with Lou Boudreaus (HOF) son and the pension fund. I was just cleaning out my office as we were scaling things down after many yrs in business and I find the ball he inscribed for me. Sad story with Mclain for sure. Bad choices in life.

          1
          Reply
        • SonnySteele

          19 hours ago

          Denny had a pretty good AM radio show in Detroit in the 80s, too.

          Reply
        • Stormintazz

          18 hours ago

          McLain was married to Boudreau daughter too.

          1
          Reply
      • mlb fan

        2 days ago

        “Scherzer takeover”…That’s the main probem woth MLBPA actually. The MLBPA is primarily run for the benefit of the top 2-3% of Scott Boras clients.

        A guy who represents only the top 2-3% of players shoyld not have such outsized influence on any “player’s union”.

        23
        Reply
        • Kermit The Frog

          2 days ago

          The main problem with the MLBPA is they keep sending jocks in to negotiate with legal sharks. Would any player let Tony Clark or Scherzer negotiate a personal contract for them? Hell no.

          27
          Reply
        • bigdaddyt

          2 days ago

          The old Alan Eagleson from the NHL

          Reply
        • shaft

          1 day ago

          I think that role is just a facade. People are finally waking up to the fact that there’s corruption everywhere. Clarks job was to go along with whatever the PTB wanted. I have no idea what he was making but I’m sure he was well paid.

          5
          Reply
        • ChadsizeChad

          22 hours ago

          I had to hire a shark to deal with sharks in my business ….

          Underrated comment 🤝👌

          2
          Reply
        • CleaverGreene

          21 hours ago

          The Jocks don’t negotiate. Even Clark didn’t negotiate.alone..

          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          20 hours ago

          @Kermit Unions have teams set up for negotiating and they to have “legel sharks”. The player reps and sub committees handle representing members on day to day basis and establish a framework for their.goals in what the membership as a whole would like to achieve in the collective bargaining process.

          2
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          20 hours ago

          Clark’s pay seemed to have coincidentally spiked just as Fanatics agreed to annually found Players Way.

          I know Clark has the right to due process, but this does not look good at all for him. The address for Players Way is a mailbox in a Florida strip mall. Then having both a sister-in-law and a daughter employe(d) through this program is definitely a red flag.

          This is not a problem that is isolated to unions. Whenever there are part-time boards where are people are compensated and/or obscure non profits trouble seems to ensue. Even if these thinks are started with the best of intentions once $ starts piling up in accounts the temptation of greed to often wins in the end.

          4
          Reply
        • robw5555

          20 hours ago

          Scherzer would be a puppet for Boras. It would be his inside man. That would be the dream for Boras. Scherzer is also a payroll bandit.

          2
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          18 hours ago

          CleaverGreene
          The Jocks don’t negotiate. Even Clark didn’t negotiate.alone..
          =====================
          I’ve known a few of these guys. The rank-and-file respect others from the rank-and-file more than they respect the lawyers. There was one guy coming back to the bar after a brawl with blood still dripping. He didn’t clean it up because he wanted other guys to see the blood. The dude was kind of an idiot, but everyone loved him.

          1
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          17 hours ago

          The rank and file dont pick the top positions for MLBPA. The reps the rank and file pick are the ones who select the top positions.

          It seems that Sutter is the favorite to be selected next. From sound of it he has led their bargaining in the last contract and leading Skubal’s recent arbitration case and Id assume quite a few other things.

          Even with Sutter though, he wont be the end all be all of bargaining. He leads the team doing so and tries to focus bargaining on the objectives they choose leading upto the negotiations. The contractual language is left to people who are well versed in doing so and ultimately is reviewed by lawyers prior to it being finalized. It is in no way some crude process done by “jocks” as the original narrative and others are trying to portray.

          2
          Reply
        • Balls_tothwwall

          13 hours ago

          Wait was he sleeping with his sister in law?

          1
          Reply
        • Tigers3232

          13 hours ago

          @Balls She seems to have been given a large role in that organization. The details are limited that I’ve seen. She seems to be a key focus and Im assuming it was a sizeable sum. I doubt it had anything to do with sleeping with her, it seems like she was just the family member given the key role at play. She was not the only family member involved as his daughter was paid from this organization at some point as well.

          Reply
        • VegasSDfan

          11 hours ago

          Lol, is that considered incest? I believe it is.

          Reply
      • loota.414

        21 hours ago

        I was thinking Clayton Kershaw, but he probably wants to enjoy being a dad

        Reply
    • Big whiffa

      2 days ago

      He saw the train a comin and got off the tracks 😂

      20
      Reply
      • Player Formly known as Logjammer D'Baggagecling

        2 days ago

        “Mr. Parkman, you’re a great ballplayer and I just like to say, your standing on the tracks and the train’s coming through, butthead” -Rube Baker

        15
        Reply
      • Balls_tothwwall

        13 hours ago

        No he was banging his sister in law and got caught lol big difference

        Reply
    • nukeg

      2 days ago

      They’re still going to be ugly, but I think this can only help CBA negotiations. Wrong guy in the wrong role.

      10
      Reply
      • EndinStealth

        2 days ago

        I dont think it changes anything at all. All the legal and main negotiators all still there. Clark wasn’t making decisions unilaterally.

        4
        Reply
    • Sean P

      2 days ago

      Good maybe the next guy won’t prioritize what’s on the clubhouse lunch menu and what kind of post game candy is available in the locker room in the next CBA and will instead fight for the players. Owners have been taking advantage of these fools for so long.

      7
      Reply
      • ReggieBars

        2 days ago

        They weren’t taking advantage back when Marvin Miller was in charge. Miller kicked the owners’ butts with regularity.

        8
        Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          2 days ago

          Players owe everything that have today too him

          8
          Reply
        • BaseballGuy1

          2 days ago

          And there has never been another Marvin Miller, unfortunately. Clark was a poor choice in 2013 and has done the MLBPA a disservice.

          14
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          1 day ago

          Donald Ferris still around to give guidance.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          1 day ago

          *I hate auto correct. Fehr.

          9
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 day ago

          dewey – Would have been funny if you had been posting about Buehler when the auto-correct happened. LOL

          3
          Reply
        • kcmark

          1 day ago

          Marvin Miller belongs in the HOF.

          3
          Reply
        • EndinStealth

          20 hours ago

          That’s Curt Flood’s honor.

          1
          Reply
    • GASoxFan

      2 days ago

      A union boss doing something improper? Shocking, that *never* happens, like ever.

      12
      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 day ago

        GaSox – While I agree, it seems like doing it with your sis-in-law is uncharted territory. LOL

        4
        Reply
        • GASoxFan

          1 day ago

          Fever – the question is what sort of sister in law…. could either be a brother’s wife, or, a wife’s sister. One is worse than the other.

          Of course it worked for Hunter B. so who am I to judge.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 day ago

          GaSox – Excellent point as always!

          2
          Reply
        • Sean P

          1 day ago

          Wife’s sister would absolutely be worse

          Reply
        • fleewolfe

          1 day ago

          Eh brother is blood def worse pissing off your blood if its sisters wife he’s just following in Marty Brodeurs s footsteps

          1
          Reply
      • gbs42

        1 day ago

        GASoxFan,

        Almost as shocking as what sports team owners do.

        1
        Reply
      • MotorCityJack

        1 day ago

        ALL LABOR UNIONS ARE CORRUPT!!
        THEY HIKE WAGES SO HIGH THAT THE COMPANIES THAT THEIR MEMBERSHIP WORK FOR EVENTUALLY GO BANKRUPT BECAUSE OF THEIR EXCESSIVE GREED!! LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED TO GM AND CHRYSLER IN 2008!!
        THE LAST CONTRACT THE UAW NEGOTIATED WAS SO PUNITIVE TO THE BIG 3 THAT THEY STARTED LAYING OFF WORKERS WITHIN A MONTH OF AGREEING TO A CONTRACT AFTER A VERY NASTY SEVERAL MONTH STRIKE.
        THIS SCENARIO DEFINITELY APPLIES TO BASEBALL IN THE UPCOMING ROUND OF LABOR TALKS. THIS SPORT IS SLOWLY COMMITTING SUICIDE BY SIGNING THESE UNSUSTAINABLE CONTRACTS. TV REVENUE IS NOT AS HIGH AS IT USED TO BE, IT HAS BECOME A ISSUE OF HAVES AND HAVE NOTS.
        THE MLBA HAS TO COME TO THEIR SENSES AND PROTECT THE FUTURE OF MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL. ENOUGH DAMAGE HAS BEEN DONE!!
        $50 MIL A YEAR FOR A TOP PLAYER IS RIDICULOUS FOR A BALL PLAYER!!
        THIS INSANITY NEEDS TO STOP.

        3
        Reply
        • gbs42

          21 hours ago

          Jack,

          First of all, no one is forcing owners to sign players to these contracts.

          Second, why is $50M/yr ridiculous for a ball player? Are franchise values averaging around $2.6B ridiculous?

          Third, STOP YELLING!

          6
          Reply
        • O'sSayCanYouSee

          20 hours ago

          MotorCity — Name of companys that went bankrupt because of a Union?

          Some of oldest companies in this country are Unionized…and you think it’s in spite of the Unions, not because of them???

          UPS is over 120 years old, they existed before combustion engines, and have been Unionized since the very beginning. It is the Worlds largest package handler.

          Please support your claim of Company’s going bankrupt because of Union workers pay.

          ((Fingers crossed that you point to the Big 2 and the 2008 finical crisis, and thus mix up which class of corruption bankrupted legacy American companies))

          3
          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          15 hours ago

          MLB is an “Entertainment industry”.
          Actors get paid an huge amount of money also.
          And, people just accept that as a “given”.

          Also, for the majority of ballplayers their active, big money producing careers are short lived.
          Most “age out” quickly in 5, 10 or 15 years.
          And, a career ending injury(ies) can happen at any time for ballplayers.
          So, because of the dynamics of a vibrant capitalistic, entertainment economy, ballplayers and their agents attempt to capture the pay of a normal 30-40 year career in 5 years, 10 years or 15 years.

          The majority in owners with a pulse are making big bucks on these MLB franchise including the increased value/appeciation of the franchises.

          The Padres are for sale.
          Ownership is looking for 3B+.
          They paid 800M purchase price in 2012 for the Padres.
          If they get 2B+ or 3B+ then that is a fantastic return on their money not counting all the tax writeoffs for losing revenue years and profits for profitable years.

          There is a financial ceiling on MLB and its franchises.
          We just haven’t seen it yet.
          But, we, very likely, will find that ceiling in the future
          because revenues and costs cannot go up indefinitely.
          WHAT GOES UP MUST COME DOWN.

          1
          Reply
    • Bucket Number Six

      1 day ago

      I’m glad my wife doesn’t have a sister, because she would have been hot, too.

      3
      Reply
      • crise

        1 day ago

        OTOH it could have been someone that only your brother could have married. Yikes.

        Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        1 day ago

        Bucket – There’s HVAC companies out there that can fix any type of air conditioning issue.

        6
        Reply
    • PessimisticRedleg

      1 day ago

      I always got a weird vibe from him. And no, no … it was not just because of the weird beard.

      1
      Reply
  2. hllywdjff

    2 days ago

    He’s getting out before all hell breaks loose in the offseason he doesn’t want to be the bad guy let the new guy handle it!!

    40
    Reply
    • Lloyd Emerson

      2 days ago

      The new guy better be a labor lawyer and not a former player.

      57
      Reply
      • dannysbigboi

        2 days ago

        Haha you’re right about that. Watch it be CC Sabathia or Joe Mauer.

        5
        Reply
        • crise

          2 days ago

          Mauer’s no genius, but he’s smarter than taking that job.

          14
          Reply
      • Bart Harley Jarvis

        2 days ago

        And also not have a Santa beard.

        7
        Reply
        • differentbears

          1 day ago

          Mentioning his other job or the Santa beard at all is why nobody watches AOL Blast.

          4
          Reply
        • Bart Harley Jarvis

          1 day ago

          Agreed. The MLBPA Executive Director‘s job is kind of a cosmic gumbo, and it almost moves to the beat of jazz.

          2
          Reply
        • differentbears

          1 day ago

          Tony Clark and Marvin Miller used to joke about that in the meetings.

          1
          Reply
        • burnt_reynolds

          1 day ago

          Unprofessional bullsh*t

          3
          Reply
        • Bart Harley Jarvis

          1 day ago

          If Leonardo DiCaprio was here, would you ask him about CBAs around the corner?

          1
          Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        2 days ago

        The “New guy” or “New Girl” will, most likely, be a seasoned, successful lawyer/legal negotiator.

        Oviously, making money above and beyond your agreed or stipulated salary on issues directly affected by your duties, while serving in Union Offices OR while serving in governmental offices, including elected offices, IS A HUGE “No-No” that, very likely, may lead to investigations and potential criminal charges (and in worst case scenarios, for the participants, criminal convictions).

        Not saying Tony Clarke did anything wrong. Let’s wait for the investigation(s) and the litigation process to be completed.

        The optics are very bad with important labor negotiations coming up. If Clarke is found to have done nothing wrong, then the ethics and optics are bad for the Players Union.

        It is best for Clarke to step aside and for the players Union to focus on the players and upcoming Labor negotiations and not to get side tracked by what Tony Clarke did or did not do.

        2
        Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          2 days ago

          Sport – Yeah there’s quite a few people who apparently read the headline and not the article below it. The whole “federal investigation” thing seems to have been missed by them.

          11
          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          2 days ago

          Wondering if this investigation is somehow an attempt to discredit the Players Union and weaken it for upcoming labor negotiations?!

          If yes, then it could backfire on the Owners if the Union hires experienced, professional lawyer/negotiators that take a hard line in negotiations.

          Tony Clarke stepping aside may have removed that obstacle to negotiations.

          1
          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          2 days ago

          Weaken? When’s the last time you paid to see an owner.? Players hold all the cards.

          1
          Reply
        • BaseballGuy1

          2 days ago

          Not at all true.

          3
          Reply
        • bronyaur1

          1 day ago

          Uh, no they don’t.

          3
          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          1 day ago

          There’s no game if they strike.

          Reply
        • loota.414

          21 hours ago

          Can we rename him Tony Clark Griswold?

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          20 hours ago

          Dole – They can’t strike during a lockout, that’s the main reason why owners do the lockout.

          1
          Reply
      • Skip's Fungo

        2 days ago

        Judging from Suter’s comments, it will probably be Bruce Meyer.

        1
        Reply
    • braves25

      2 days ago

      @hllywdjff

      It sounds like he is already the bad guy and that is why he is getting out

      22
      Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        2 days ago

        OR the Owners and their lawyers are trying to frame Clarke and the Players Union as “the bad guys” to try to force a salary cap on the playes and MLB.

        Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          2 days ago

          Players will NEVER agree to salary cap, unless the owners open their books. Something they will never do.

          3
          Reply
        • BaseballGuy1

          2 days ago

          Please… stop the conspiracy theories…. Clark made his own hole. The MLBPA is better off with him out of the way. Get a good labor lawyer negotiator team and prepare for the CBA negotiation.

          4
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          1 day ago

          BaseballGuy – Looks like it was another kind of hole that got him forced out, and I don’t mean doughnut hole.

          4
          Reply
        • bronyaur1

          1 day ago

          If they are, they are apparently doing it with Clark’s full participation.

          1
          Reply
      • Skip's Fungo

        2 days ago

        It sounds like he doesn’t want to be a distraction during the upcoming CBA negotiations.

        We are innocent until proven guilty after being charged with a crime and Clark has not even been charged with a crime.

        1
        Reply
    • rememberthecoop

      2 days ago

      What are you talking about? He’s not getting out – he was told to get out. He’s in trouble. They let him “resign”…

      37
      Reply
      • seamaholic 2

        2 days ago

        This. The financial fraud stuff is real and quite serious. Things like that have a way of undercutting a guy’s legitimacy.

        24
        Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          2 days ago

          If money is his language, the owners have more than the players. Smart move by the players.

          Reply
        • stymeedone

          2 days ago

          What happened to innocent until proven guilty? Fraud accusations are serious, but still just accusations.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          2 days ago

          Dodgers – The players have a lot too, they just can’t access it for another 10+ years because of deferrals.

          3
          Reply
        • My Strawman > Your Strawman

          2 days ago

          That’s for criminal prosecutions and deprivation of liberty. This is about the ability to carry on in a demanding role while defending those charges.

          1
          Reply
        • Another Dodgers Fan

          2 days ago

          Now *that* is how you do a deferral joke ladies and gentlemen!

          1
          Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        2 days ago

        Whomever advised Clarke to take an ownership interest in “One Team, Partners” may have some explaining to do.

        If Clarke was following legal and financial advice and that advice turns out to be wrong, then he may have a decent defense.

        Now, any of the Owners taking an ownership stake and that is legal?!

        I Dunno!
        It seems like a “double standard””.

        It will come out in investigations and litigation.

        However, whatever happens, the timing of the investigation is kind of suspect…that is just happens to be happening right as MLB and MLBPA are entering the most important labor-management negotiatons in decades,.

        What next, the dirty laundry of some of the team owners gets leaked and investigated also?!

        Reply
      • Skip's Fungo

        2 days ago

        The executive committee has not even met, so he wasn’t forced out. He doesn’t want to be a distraction during the upcoming CBA negotiations. We are all innocent until proven guilty after being charged with a crime in the US and Clark has not even been charged with a crime.

        1
        Reply
        • bronyaur1

          1 day ago

          They can do this via email or video conference.

          1
          Reply
    • CKinSTL

      2 days ago

      It is difficult to imagine this is a strategic exit for Clark.

      8
      Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        2 days ago

        It is also difficult to not think that this may have been instigated
        by Ownership just prior to labor negotiations.

        Reply
        • YaySports

          1 day ago

          You’re the only one buying all this crap you’re trying to sell lol

          1
          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          1 day ago

          Not buying anything.

          Just wondering what could be happening behind the scenes here.

          Has all the information come out yet?! NO
          Has the investigation been completed?! NO
          Has anyone been charged with a crime?! NO

          Are crucial labor negotiations about to begin Y?
          Would “sand bagging” Tony Clarke before crucial labor negotiations begin disadvantage the Players Union?! Y
          Does the timing of these revelations appear to be more than just a coincidence?! Y
          Been any pointless investigations by the Federal government targetting political opponents lately? Y

          No conspiracy theories, just stating the known factss.

          1
          Reply
    • Jon M

      2 days ago

      No, as the article said, it sounds like this is because he is under investigation.

      8
      Reply
    • baseballhistory

      2 days ago

      Tony Clark is resigning because is is about to be indited on criminal fraud charges in the Eastern District of New York!!

      1
      Reply
      • retsubllab

        2 days ago

        THIS

        Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        1 day ago

        Speculation.
        Has anyone asked Tony Clarke why he is resigning?!

        Reply
  3. PhantomStrike376

    2 days ago

    I remember being excited when he signed with the Red Sox in ‘02. But he was a huge letdown.

    2
    Reply
    • Fever Pitch Guy

      2 days ago

      Phantom – 14 of his 15 MLB seasons he had an OPS of at least .643

      His one year with the Red Sox? .556 OPS due to shoulder, hip and ribcage injuries.

      2
      Reply
      • Chester Copperpot

        2 days ago

        “…he had an OPS of at least .643”
        HAHAHAHAHA!!

        2
        Reply
    • CravenMoorehead

      2 days ago

      He was even worse for the Yankees but you probably enjoyed watching him contribute to the 3-0 ALCS blown series lead. He was absolutely atrocious filling in for Giambi.

      1
      Reply
      • Fever Pitch Guy

        2 days ago

        Craven – Ironically, Clark came within a couple inches of clinching the AL Pennant ….. thank God for the low right field corner wall in Fenway.

        youtu.be/ORG0mphzrD4?si=fHyzkTy0SBVGPotl

        2
        Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          2 days ago

          Fever, that bounce should live on in Sox lore on a positive side as much as Bucky’s HR is on the negative.

          1
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          2 days ago

          dewey – There were several of those moments in that 2004 ALCS.

          Off the top of my head, the Roberts stolen base where he beat the tag by inches and the Bellhorn homerun that just made it over the wall in Yankee Stadium and the ARod slapped glove etc.. I’ve got the box set, I need to convert it to MP4.

          3
          Reply
        • baseballhistory

          2 days ago

          The Roberts stolen base, with two out in the 9th down by a run, was the most clutch stolen base I have ever seen. Roberts had to go on either the first or second pitch ( couldn’t wait longer with 2 outs), and everyone knew that. Like you said, he made it by two or three inches, with a perfect slide!!

          3
          Reply
        • whyhayzee

          2 days ago

          And at the time all it did was to help keep them from getting swept with a 9 inning loss. But it was sort of the little sliver of hope that then cracked open a little wider with the Mueller single. Mo had already proven to be a choker in the 2001 World Series so it shouldn’t have been a surprise when he blew it twice in 2004. Yes, first ballot Hall of Famer, but unanimous? No.

          Reply
        • PessimisticRedleg

          1 day ago

          If that ball hits a regular MLB wall, the RF grabs it and no way Sierra scores, IMO.

          Reply
    • Mustard Tiger

      1 day ago

      On the Sons of Sam Horn forum Tony Clark’s nickname was “The Corpse.”

      1
      Reply
      • loota.414

        21 hours ago

        Now I think we should call him Tony Clark Griswold

        Reply
  4. Lloyd Emerson

    2 days ago

    Interesting timing.

    7
    Reply
    • Mattimeo09

      2 days ago

      Definitely reeks of ownership meddling. They want a salary cap and know Tony won’t give it to them.
      So Manfred and his goons got rid of Tony

      10
      Reply
      • Joe says...

        2 days ago

        That makes zero sense. MLB has been taking Clark out behind the wood shed the last several CBAs. Why in the world would they want him to step down?

        35
        Reply
        • Mattimeo09

          2 days ago

          I agree that MLB has gotten the better of him, but Clark has said repeatedly that the salary cap is a non-starter. Seems like this is a chance to roll the dice and see if they can find someone who’ll be more accomodating.

          2
          Reply
        • Pike Parker

          2 days ago

          No kidding; you’d think they’d want the PA to hand him a lifetime contract. The improprieties he’s been accused of seem pretty small-potatoes… maybe they’ve just had enough of his incompetence and wanted an excuse to force him to resign.

          2
          Reply
        • Rexhudler86

          2 days ago

          @joe says. That does happen maybe thats why the mlb had favorable deals, because they had dirt on him. Same with politics you vote against your party, you all of a sudden have 5 interns with allegations, a lude photo, and charged with tax fraud.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          2 days ago

          Based on the article, there may be “wrong doing” with an upcoming indictment. Better for the players for him to get out now regardless how this plays out.

          5
          Reply
        • schwender

          2 days ago

          Isn’t it easier to not have to take anyone to the woodshed at all? MLBPA just lost 13 years of institutional knowledge going into a major CBA negotiation, and the players hate Bruce Meyer

          Reply
        • CleaverGreene

          2 days ago

          That’s not true at all. The union got major concessions on ‘tanking’ and incentives for teams to avoid Super 2’s. Also, major increases in base pay and MiL pay.

          2
          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          2 days ago

          Clark has repeatedly said that the salary cap is a nonstarter because it’s a nonstarter for the players he represents. When the MLBPA hires a new executive director, their views on this issue will be exactly the same because the position of the players will not have changed. Same goes for Manfred and MLB. I find it kind of strange to report that “several owners” are digging in their heels on a salary cap, when this has been ownership’s top priority for a decade at least. They want it so they can make more money.

          Bottom line: With or without Clark, with or without Manfred, those battle lines will not move a millimeter.

          8
          Reply
        • 'Tang It

          2 days ago

          You may end up being right, but don’t count on it forever. Every other major sports league has a cap and they are all doing very well. Players opinions on this will turn over as players age out.

          1
          Reply
        • Baseballisthebest

          2 days ago

          Bruce Meyer is the reason for the gains the players made in the last CBA and most of that gain was by the rank and file, not the superstars. The union can afford to lose Clark. They are in deep trouble if they lose Meyer.

          5
          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          2 days ago

          I don’t count on anything forever, but until the facts on the ground change, there is no reason to believe the positions of the two sides will. Comparing MLB to other sports doesn’t really make sense because the financial structure of baseball is different than the others.

          2
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          2 days ago

          Small market teams want the cap. Big Markets don’t want to lose their advantage. The biggest obstacle to the upcoming negotiations is that the owners don’t agree on what they want.

          Reply
        • baseballhistory

          2 days ago

          Did MLB, concoct the fraud charges in NYS? Clark will be very lucky, if he can avoid going to jail!!

          Reply
        • baseballhistory

          2 days ago

          Clark is not a very intelligent man. He isn’t going to out negotiate anyone that is even reasonably competent.

          1
          Reply
        • Avory

          2 days ago

          @Mattimeo09

          Seriously, what is wrong with you?

          Major League Baseball has ZERO to do with the head of the MLBPA. This is purely the players’ call. How you got it into your head that a collective bargaining process can exist with one side having a say-so in who’s in charge on the other side is further demonstration of the erosion in critical thinking that exists among the population today.

          Reply
        • Kermit The Frog

          2 days ago

          It’s not dirt. It’s that it was a high school graduate vs labor lawyers.

          Reply
        • Kermit The Frog

          2 days ago

          How many years are they going to not have a lawyer in charge?

          Reply
        • Kermit The Frog

          2 days ago

          They clawed back a few things, but they lost so much.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          2 days ago

          They all want it because it gives them a larger slice of the revenue pie. We have very little information on the internal discussions between the owners because it is entirely private. But we should know from the results that it’s all about profit. The current structure shifts a tremendous amount of revenue to the small market teams, the owners of which are made profitable with little risk. This is the system the owners have created for themselves.

          Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          Clark hired Meyer and Meyer got huge gains for the players in the current CBA.

          Reply
        • foppert3

          1 day ago

          Disruption. Both sides have been preparing for this battle for years. Manfred just took out the opposition Leader as they were walking up to the battlefield. Great move.

          Reply
        • Web's #2

          1 day ago

          Clark has not been charged for any financial impropriety and The Players Way financials were presented at every executive committee meeting. It would not be out of the ordinary in a case like that one if he were not to be charged.

          Clark was a top student at both Valhalla and Chistian HS in San Diego county. He left college after his junior year to pursue a career in baseball but returned during his playing career to get a business administration degree. Clark is very intelligent.

          During his playing career he was a team union rep and on the executive committee from 1999 through 2008. Players are not going to elect a stupid man to represent them in the union.

          What he is not is an attorney or a trained labor negotiator. Both of those skills are needed to head up a union.

          That you are trying to call him out for things that are patently false says much about your character.

          2
          Reply
        • rondon

          21 hours ago

          They wouldn’t need a salary cap if the luxury tax penalties were severe enough to prevent to richest franchises from blowing past them without a second thought.

          Reply
        • Avory

          15 hours ago

          @rondon

          Just share local TV revenue equally and you wouldn’t need a cap or an overly complicated luxury tax structure.

          Reply
      • MarinerSteve

        2 days ago

        What?? This comment doesn’t make sense.

        3
        Reply
        • NEWycriddler

          2 days ago

          Mariner
          Welcome to MLBTR. 🤣

          3
          Reply
        • aduncaroo44

          2 days ago

          More like welcome to the internet 😆

          Reply
      • seamaholic 2

        2 days ago

        The MLBPA is a separate organization and has nothing to do with MLB.

        1
        Reply
        • Rexhudler86

          2 days ago

          @seamaholic. I get that part, still weird timing. Someone in the pa leaked it to get him out. Heck it could’ve been boras. Came from a player to boras to Heyman.

          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          2 days ago

          seam – I think they are implying MLB led the feds into the investigation. But if they were gonna do that, they would have done it right before or during the lockout ….. not 9 months earlier.

          2
          Reply
      • Bochys Retirement Fund

        2 days ago

        Matti, you let your reflective bias cloud judgement. If you think the MLB would rather have a potential lawyer with deep roots in the legal/labor systems than someone like Tony Clark, you may want to reconsider.

        In fact, look at the internal conflicts between stars and replacement players and how well Clark and Co. has handled that.

        1
        Reply
        • bhambrave

          2 days ago

          Marvin Miller never played baseball. He did alright.

          2
          Reply
        • Halo11Fan

          2 days ago

          Except for the drugs, he was great.

          It took an act of Congress to get drug testing and even then he ripped Fehr for giving into the Government.

          1
          Reply
      • VLP

        2 days ago

        Owners have zero role in determining union leadership lol

        Reply
        • bhambrave

          2 days ago

          He’s implying that the owners came up with or created dirt to get rid of Clark. That’s crazy. They love Clark. He’s responsible for the union being much weaker than it was ten years ago.

          1
          Reply
      • Kermit The Frog

        2 days ago

        They pushed out a jock who’s been trading players rights for meal money so they can fight an attorney instead?

        2
        Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        2 days ago

        Same thing I was thinking.

        Lots of open retaliation against enemies going on now.

        Like the campaign contributions to the WH from the Detroit Oligarch that owns the competing, old Ambassador Bridge from Detroit to Windsor, Ontario, Canada
        that stands to lose 100’s of millions when the competing New Gordie Howe Bridge owned by Canada is opening soon.

        All of a sudden, out of nowhere, there is now interference
        by the Federal government in opening the New Bridge?!

        Would like to have heard the phone calls from Moroun the Owner of the Old Ambassador Bridge and campaign contributor to the current Adminstration to the WH to try to block the opening of the New Gordie Howe Bridg?!.

        1
        Reply
    • Brew88

      2 days ago

      Like, from an oligarchy in control standpoint?

      2
      Reply
    • crise

      2 days ago

      Everyone has written a thousand things about what the owners are facing in this CBA, but almost no one has considered what the players may need.

      As obvious as the revenue quandary is, remaining issues for them might include gross percentage of revenues to players (like other leagues, especially since now there will almost have to be a real definition of what that is and how it’ll be divided), fighting against a cap, international draft, compensation for allowing teams to use deferred money, expansion plans, and possibly outlawing crappy stadiums like SAC except for limited situations like TAM.

      But Tony may not be on the same page as some young firebrands, especially regarding the revenue cut vs cap/floor. It could be the licensing stuff, or there could be disagreements about how long to stay out vs how hard to avoid missed games. Not sure what’s going to emerge over the next week or so, but better now than any later at all.

      2
      Reply
      • pt57

        2 days ago

        The revenue pct would require the owners to be transparent about their finances. That might be a non-starter fir them.

        Reply
  5. dbrooks22

    2 days ago

    Didn’t have this on my Bingo card for this Spring Training.

    13
    Reply
    • Joe says...

      2 days ago

      Especially after surviving a coup attempt recently.

      6
      Reply
      • ClevelandSteelEngines

        1 day ago

        who was the one(s) attempting the coup?

        Reply
  6. Never Remember

    2 days ago

    Finally. Now get someone who can stand up better to crap owners and salary cap BS.

    16
    Reply
    • Jabronie23

      2 days ago

      Salary cap and floor is the way to go. Players should get higher percentage of revenue than they currently get, but that can be done with a salary cap

      20
      Reply
      • Mattimeo09

        2 days ago

        There are other ways to go to establish parity than by limiting how much a player can earn

        13
        Reply
        • Poolhalljunkies

          2 days ago

          So long as the players collectively get 50% share of the revenue what is the difference how you get there? Works for other sports nfl,NBA etc..currently mlb players are around 42%..give the players thier 50..set spending parameters for teams then let the players union fight amongst themselves how they want to distribute the wealth

          8
          Reply
        • O'sSayCanYouSee

          2 days ago

          Re: ‘other ways to go’.

          Yes, market dilution. NY and LA get the expansion teams. All three teams in LA and NY would still have larger markets than 20+ other teams.

          No salary cap needed. Market caps.

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          2 days ago

          The problem has been, what revenue? You will never get the big market owners to share their local revenue equally and you can’t have a percentage of revenue for each team even if the books were opened as the disparity would be unreal. My idea has been to have a floor and ceiling but then multiply it by a cost of living factor to create a better level field. The cost of living in Kansas for example is far less than Los Angeles. This would also flatten the differences between state taxed and untaxed states. Finally, limit the deferral issue by counting the full amount in the year earned for tax purposes.

          1
          Reply
        • aduncaroo44

          2 days ago

          You want to give the bigger markets a bigger advantage by factoring in cost of living?? How is this even remotely helpful

          2
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          2 days ago

          Please document those numbers. With all but Atlanta’s books being closed, how can anyone know?

          Reply
        • sad tormented neglected mariners fan

          2 days ago

          We want a cap not because of how much players earn but to make sure big revenue teams are on the same playing field as small revenue teams

          Also im not crying if Bryce Harper or Manny Machado loses 10 million a year on their contract

          3
          Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          The Braves and Blue Jays are owned by publicly traded companies.

          1
          Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          You should be crying. The players are the sport.

          100% revenue sharing between the teams solves all of it. Just because one team is located in a media market that grew over the years and others are not lucky enough to be in one, should not hinder player salaries when the revenue of the sport as a whole keeps climbing.

          1
          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          2 days ago

          Not going to happen

          Reply
      • crise

        2 days ago

        A lot, a huge amount, everything, depends on how the owners try to define revenue as they balance the income inequities. If it’s a useful and somewhat open number then yes, a percentage can be the basis for a floor/cap. But a floor or cap is really hard without a better grasp of the cash involved, be it broadcast, ticket sales, expansion fees or luxury tax.

        The money generated by the luxury tax feels huge, and growing, but in the larger scheme it’s not. It was on the order of $350m last year and will go up, but nowhere near $1bn. And $12-15m apiece is not going to move the needle for MLB owners. They will need both a new way to measure revenue and a pile of cash to make good on some franchise valuations that are about to get a kick in the nads..

        I expect a lot more sharing, but I also expect that with new stadiums coming in TAM and LSV there can be expansion to 32 teams, with the lions’ share of the money going to the rich owners getting gutted in the new deal. So NYY and LAD and the rest with the old school deals can divvy up the $3-5bn and then start surrendering a lot more of their income.

        3
        Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          I am pretty sure CBT fines are split between the teams and the players retirement. They don’t automatically go to the non-spending, lower revenue teams.

          I agree on increased revenue sharing. That is the answer.

          1
          Reply
        • Web's #2

          1 day ago

          When the players union made their demand for 100% revenue sharing the first 2 times, they defined revenue as all media (TV/radio/other) contracts, ticket and luxury box/party box sales, sponsorships, concessions, international broadcast rights, streaming broadcast rights including that for other sports, MLBAM, and merchandising.

          MLBAM was spun off to Disney for $960 million, but MLB still receives residuals on it.

          1
          Reply
      • CleaverGreene

        2 days ago

        Can happen w/o a cap also.

        3
        Reply
      • Cincyfan85

        2 days ago

        It doesn’t limit how much the players can earn. It limits how much some teams can spend. It also makes some teams spend more.

        2
        Reply
        • bhambrave

          2 days ago

          It limits how much they can earn. That’s literally what a “cap” is.

          7
          Reply
        • Cincyfan85

          2 days ago

          The average payroll in 2025 was about $189M. If there was a floor of $190M with a cap of $225M, then the players are making more money. It would go up annually based on revenues also.

          1
          Reply
        • bhambrave

          2 days ago

          There’s a floor now for the revenue sharing receivers, and it does nothing. Your plan would limit how much an individual player can make. Why are you so supportive of the owners over the players?

          2
          Reply
        • Cincyfan85

          2 days ago

          There’s no hard floor and no hard cap. Nothing is forcing teams to spend more outside of several years of an extremely low payroll leading to a grievance. It’s laughable. There needs to be a hard floor and cap.

          I’m supportive of the sport of baseball. It’s in MLB’s best interest. This isn’t about owners or players. I’m proposing an NFL or NBA-style system that splits revenues. It’s good for everyone involved unless you’re a fan in LA, NY, or Toronto.

          Reply
        • bhambrave

          2 days ago

          Your proposed floor and cap amounts would drastically reduce the total payroll of baseball. That sounds very pro-owner to me.

          Reply
        • Cincyfan85

          2 days ago

          How does my proposal lower total payroll? Maybe on the Dodgers and Mets. The average payroll was like $189M and I proposed a floor of $190M with a cap of $225M. That’s more money.

          Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          The revenue of the sport was over $13 billion according to Manfred, and I think he is understating it by a large margin.

          Even at $13 billion, your floor and cap would lower the percentage of revenue the players would receive unless all teams spent over $200 million.

          There are 8 teams today that the best estimates are that they have total revenue of under $350 million. That means that if they are forced to spend $190 million, they are well over 50% of their revenue going to player payroll. That is not sustainable.

          In order to have any kind of cap there are few things that have to happen. 100% revenue sharing which would require the league handling all media deals. A guaranteed percentage of revenue going to players which would require open books by the teams.

          Once you have those in place, then you can determine what a fair floor and cap should be. In fact, implementing those things would make a cap unnecessary.

          If we take Manfred’s claims at face value, a $13 billion revenue level and 100% revenue sharing would give each team $433 million in revenue. 50% of that going to the players would be $216.5 million. There is the floor. You would have to use the CBT definitions of payroll because player payroll costs are more than just player salaries.

          You would probably also have to give teams some leeway so as to not force them to sign a player they didn’t have room for on their 26 man roster just to get to the floor. That is why other sports have a range of revenue that has to go to the players. Typically 48-51%.

          With MLB, we also need to keep in mind that the NFL doesn’t have a minor leagues when we make comparisons. Those minor league player salaries would also need to be factored into the team’s floor.

          Reply
        • bhambrave

          2 days ago

          @Cincy: I was wrong. I misspoke. But what you’re saying is that Kyle Tucker can’t make $60M per year. Baseball players have a short career span. I don’t like any system that artificially inhibits their earning power. A cap-and-floor does that.

          Reply
        • bhambrave

          2 days ago

          I’d be ok with a cap and floor if the cap is $2B and the floor is $250M, with both numbers going up 20% per year.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 day ago

          Skip, if all revenue was shared equally, a floor and cap would not be needed assuming the teams are rewarded for success with generous added postseason revenue and higher draft picks. Could ownership institute such a system? Yes. Will they? No. Because the financial system they have is the financial system they want — and we know this because they alone created it.

          Reply
        • foppert3

          1 day ago

          You do know people change their mind as time moves forward ?
          You know, smart enough to recognise that what was once working for us all isn’t working for us anymore. Just because it’s what they wanted previously, doesn’t mean it’s locked in stone now. You think they are that dumb they don’t understand that things have to change/move forward if there is a problem to solve ?

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 day ago

          What problem does ownership need to solve that they actually want to solve?

          Reply
        • foppert3

          1 day ago

          Ha ha. Disparity !! Obviously.
          All the top talent congregating in the top 3 or so teams that can afford all the top talent.

          The “they are all very happy with the status quo because they are all making money” is so weird. I tend to think a fair proportion of them might be going….”This is farked. We aren’t moving forward and the immediate future looks like we have no chance of moving forward. Sh&t needs to change”

          1
          Reply
        • Web's #2

          1 day ago

          A hard cap of $225 million is far too low. Its only about $5-10 million above what the floor would need to be to ensure the players receive around 50% of revenue today.

          The floor needs to be around $215-220 million including minor league player salaries and player benefits/retirement for the players to be receiving 50% of the revenue. That is if revenue does not continue to climb.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 day ago

          This might come as a terrible shock to you, but while baseball is a game to its fans, to its owners, it is a business and they are into it to make money. Weird, but true. And not weird at all.

          Reply
        • foppert3

          1 day ago

          That’s not a shock to me. The shock is the assumption that they are all making money.

          Here’s a shock for you. They just in it for the money alone. If they were, they wouldn’t have invested in a baseball team. They would have invested in the thing that makes the most money for the least amount of work. That’s not baseball.

          1
          Reply
        • foppert3

          1 day ago

          They obviously all want the thrill and kudos that goes with winning. If they didn’t, they aren’t sticking their money in a baseball team.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 day ago

          The weirdest idea is that anyone invests billions in what amounts to a hobby. Baseball is a highly profitable business with 30 owners and it doesn’t work as a business if some of the owners make money from it and others don’t. They all do; the financial system they created together assures it.

          1
          Reply
        • foppert3

          16 hours ago

          Ha ha. Sure. They are all having a great time. It’s all good.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          15 hours ago

          Uh, what?

          Reply
        • foppert3

          15 hours ago

          Sarcasm. Take it slow and you will get there.

          We will see. I’m backing plenty of owners fighting for changes to the financial system.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          14 hours ago

          Sweet. All of the owners are fighting for changes to the financial system. They all want to make more money.

          Take it slow and you will get there.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          13 hours ago

          bhambrave
          Your plan would limit how much an individual player can make. Why are you so supportive of the owners over the players?
          ========================
          You have it exactly backwards. A plan that gives the players a higher gross payroll favors the players, not the owners. I thought that would be obvious.

          Reply
        • foppert3

          12 hours ago

          Ha ha. Yeah mate. None of them want a shot at winning. It’s all just about money. I get it. There’s no convincing you.

          Reply
        • bhambrave

          12 hours ago

          I’m in favor of no cap. Let the players make whatever they can make.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          11 hours ago

          “None of them want a shot at winning.”

          No, not with garbage arguments like this. Keep ’em coming.

          Reply
        • foppert3

          10 hours ago

          Ha ha. I love it ! Possibly garbage. Possibly some truth.
          Who are you trying to kid ? Like any argument is changing your position.

          Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          8 hours ago

          Wow. Seriously? You aren’t even trying to make any sense now. You seem completely unable to accept that baseball is a business run to make a profit for its owners, not expensive hobbies for rich people. So yeah, what I said.

          Reply
      • JoeBrady

        13 hours ago

        Jabronie23
        Players should get higher percentage of revenue than they currently get, but that can be done with a salary cap
        ====================
        Once they accept a %, everything else is noise. Both sides will have a vested interest in deciding whether LAD should be allowed to spend $400M and buy a pennant, or whether more competition will create more revenue.

        Reply
  7. Bob Sacamano 310

    2 days ago

    Doesn’t want to deal with what’s about to come

    1
    Reply
  8. Astros71

    2 days ago

    Interesting. All I can hope is that you won’t regret the new decision and the new director will be able to negotiate a system and we don’t need a lockout.

    3
    Reply
  9. ohyeadam

    2 days ago

    Maybe we will lose games in 27’

    1
    Reply
    • deron867

      2 days ago

      I’d be shocked if we didn’t.

      3
      Reply
      • For Love of the Game

        2 days ago

        I hope you’re both wrong, but I fear you’re right. Both sides are dug in for a fight and are willing to slay the golden goose.

        3
        Reply
      • stymeedone

        2 days ago

        I wouldn’t be surprised if the players pulled a strike before the playoffs. Playoff shares are no longer a huge part of a players earnings. It really kicks the owners in the wallet, though.

        Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          The only way the players can strike is if they choose to play the season without a new CBA.

          If a portion of the season is lost it will be because the owners chose to lockout the players.

          2
          Reply
    • Knowsnotsomuch

      2 days ago

      Ok with me if it gets the darn non competitive league fixed.
      Everyone talks about the players owners, umpires, tv rights, but very little talk of what’s best for us, the paying fans. We in the small markets buy tickets, hats, shirts, etc. etc with very little hope for our noncompetitive teams.

      3
      Reply
  10. batterseye

    2 days ago

    Wasn’t there some suggestion of impropriety on a youth training program (or similar)? I’m posting this before the “More to Come” is provided. But wondering if that might be at the bottom of it. Whatever it is, it’s big news.

    6
    Reply
    • batterseye

      2 days ago

      …financial impropriety, I mean.

      6
      Reply
      • crise

        2 days ago

        Something like a federal investigation into licensing fees enriching the union leaders? Yeah, that’s a thing.

        2
        Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          2 days ago

          How about an investigation into the price gouging
          going on at MLB stadiums for tickets, refreshments, parking you name it that enrich owners also?!

          And investigate TV revenues

          Also, investigate the proliferation of gambling revenues into MLB and if it affects the outcomes of games.

          And, investigate owners revenues/open the books.

          Investigate government/taxpayer subsidies of private businesses
          (MLB and its franchise teams).

          Open up that door and many more investigations could be coming.

          MLB is in danger of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

          2
          Reply
        • Fever Pitch Guy

          14 hours ago

          Sports – It’s called Capitalism.

          The reason prices are so high for tickets, refreshments, parking is because people pay the prices. If they stopped do that, prices would come down.

          I bring my own food and beverages into games, everyone else should do the same.

          I park a 15-minute walk away, prices are much cheaper and sometimes free.

          Reply
  11. SoCalBrave

    2 days ago

    Hopefully they can get someone who doesn’t wanna wait around as a negotiation tactic.

    4
    Reply
  12. Fatty McButterpants

    2 days ago

    I smell a rat!

    1
    Reply
  13. Roadtrip

    2 days ago

    Timing seems odd,

    3
    Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      2 days ago

      He was fired by the players themselves. You suggesting the board (made up of players) is in league with the owners? I swear people are just dumb sometimes.

      7
      Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        2 days ago

        Was this situation instigate by tips from the Owners and their lawyers?!

        Reply
      • Skip's Fungo

        2 days ago

        He was not fired. The executive committee has not even met regarding this.

        Reply
  14. bkbk

    2 days ago

    Nothing to see here, they need an actual lawyer to go into a lockout or theyre going to get pumped. Very standard.

    Reply
    • Skip's Fungo

      2 days ago

      They have a lawyer who is an excellent labor negotiator in Bruce Meyer, the deputy director.

      1
      Reply
  15. SDMadres

    2 days ago

    The MLBPA is better off for it. He was in over his head. Boras Corp should take over

    3
    Reply
    • Irbias

      2 days ago

      That would kill the game for sure. Boras has done more to price fans and families out of MLB ballparks than any other single individual in the history of the game.

      3
      Reply
      • bhambrave

        2 days ago

        I don’t think you understand how ticket and concession prices work.

        7
        Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          I am absolutely sure irbias doesn’t understand.

          4
          Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        2 days ago

        Boras has played the game well within the Rules for his clients.

        But, MLB Owners are to blame for the higher prices for everything in MLB baseball also.

        There are plenty of reasons baseball is getting so expensive.

        Same things are happening in NFL and NBA.

        Pay packages and many games not available on your regular TV anymore etc….

        1
        Reply
      • SoCalBrave

        2 days ago

        @Irbias laughable. The owners set the prices and it has nothing to do with player salaries. It’s all dependent on market supply and demand.

        2
        Reply
      • DolemiteisMyname

        2 days ago

        MLB is a helluva a lot more affordable than NFL and the NBA

        2
        Reply
  16. swinging wood

    2 days ago

    Federal indictments must be looming.

    5
    Reply
  17. kevnames42

    2 days ago

    Finally! This guy has been a cancer

    2
    Reply
  18. GiantsFan81

    2 days ago

    Manfred next

    3
    Reply
  19. SandlotBenchWarmer

    2 days ago

    I heard Bryce Harper said he wasn’t elite and he took that personally.

    8
    Reply
  20. Non Roster Invitee

    2 days ago

    Good riddance.

    2
    Reply
  21. americasfirstbaseman

    2 days ago

    Negotiations were pretty contentious during the last CBA, hopefully whoever replaces him can start off on the right foot with MLB so we don’t lose games next year.

    2
    Reply
    • Astros71

      2 days ago

      They should start now.

      6
      Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      2 days ago

      The perventage of revenue earned by players had been dropping the last 2 CBAs so being contentious was needed on the part of the MLBPA.

      Bruce Meyer did a fantastic job in getting the players a higher total of the revenue coming in. There is still work to be done on that front and a change in the labor negotiator at this point would be disastrous.

      4
      Reply
      • stymeedone

        2 days ago

        Don’t know whether your accurate or not. I would just like to be privy to where that info came from, considering the closed books and all.

        Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          Using the revenue figures Manfred has released, the players percentage of total revenue has increased in the current CBA. Its a long way from 50%, but it has increased.

          That depends on if you believe Manfred. Personally, I think he is understating revenue by a lot judging by the figures we see for the Braves and Blue Jays who are owned by publicly traded corporations.

          2
          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          1 day ago

          Manfred’s credibility should be questioned.

          His bungling of negotiations with Oakland officials was very telling. And, he and Fisher constantly “moving the goalposts” and changing the deal when the A’s had, allegedly,. already agreed to a much more lucrative deal for the Oakland SF Bay Water front than they ended up getting in Las Vegas,?!

          That in an of itself, makes me very skeptical of anything that Manfred says.

          1
          Reply
  22. CC Ryder

    2 days ago

    When someone resigns when under investigation for something it makes you go hmmmmm. He never has cared about hurting the game so it’s not like he’s suddenly leaving before a labor dispute and a potential work stoppage.

    3
    Reply
    • SportsFan0000

      1 day ago

      In normal times, that would be a given.

      These days, when officials are fabricating evidence and getting charges thrown out in Court and lashed into by Judges for filing bogus indictments, then It is hard to believe that this action against Clarke is legal and valid unless it is proven in a Court of law.

      2
      Reply
  23. Jelvisdela

    2 days ago

    Clark always acted like he was smarter than everyone, but he directly helped steer this ship into the iceberg.

    I say good riddance, the game will eventually be better for it.

    11
    Reply
    • Skip's Fungo

      2 days ago

      Attendance is going up.
      Viewership is at an all time high.
      Revenue continues to go up.

      What iceberg?

      I think the players will be better off with an actual labor negotiator like Bruce Meyer as the union’s director, but that is a different subject entirely from your comment,

      4
      Reply
      • foppert3

        1 day ago

        The talent disparity iceberg.

        2
        Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        1 day ago

        And, the coming Recession iceberg.
        Entertainment revenues go take the elevator ride down during recessions.

        2
        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          17 hours ago

          SportsFan0000
          And, the coming Recession iceberg.
          ======================
          Have you looked at the GDP numbers recently?

          Reply
        • foppert3

          16 hours ago

          Ha ha. “The Dow is at 50000”

          Keeping the faith. Wow.

          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          15 hours ago

          GDP numbers are not the be all and end all indicators of a coming Recession.

          The best Economists use a “market basket of indicators”
          that tell a different story.

          Investment experts and investors see the “flashing signals” that we may be entering a recession in 2026..

          Don’t get caught on the short end of a potential downturn.

          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          15 hours ago

          Yes, I remember well all the rah, rah, rah guys including
          that Kramer guy on CNBC shouting for everyone to buy stocks in the “booming stock market” before the last
          stock market bloodbath and recession.
          All those fools lost a boatload of money.

          Reply
        • foppert3

          14 hours ago

          Spot on. Your top 1% look to be doing great. Maybe Joe is a part of that. Good for him ! The boy has his back !

          Economies are about jobs. The job numbers that leak through the censors indicate your working class is in some trouble.

          I wonder how baseball is feeling about the A’s. There is a rumor doing the international rounds that Vegas is in all kinds of trouble. The collapse of international tourism and the fact there is a shortage of domestic disposal income is pointing to drama.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          13 hours ago

          SportsFan0000
          GDP numbers are not the be all and end all indicators of a coming Recession.
          =======================
          My view of the economy depends on many factors. But the definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of contraction. We are nowhere close to that. I’d make a modest wager that we hit 4% before we hit a contraction.

          And, imho, I don’t believe in worrying about potential downturns. ‘Potential’ is always out there, and always will be.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          13 hours ago

          “booming stock market” before the last stock market bloodbath and recession. All those fools lost a boatload of money.
          =======================
          Care to tell me when that was? No one that has stayed in the market thru today, has ever lost money. S&P peak during the internet craze was 1,517. It went down, and then it went up to 6,843. S&P peak before the mortgage crisis was ~1,530, now 6,843.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          12 hours ago

          foppert3
          Spot on. Your top 1% look to be doing great. Maybe Joe is a part of that. Good for him ! The boy has his back !
          ======================
          I am nowhere close to the 1%. But I have contributed to my 401k every year. And while the market could tank tomorrow, it’s incredibly well during my lifetime.

          Reply
        • foppert3

          12 hours ago

          Bugger !! I wouldn’t begrudge you the good times.

          Consumer debt is spiralling and people can’t find a job. Trouble.

          Reply
      • Jelvisdela

        1 day ago

        I hope I’m wrong. I’m a huge baseball fan, I just think that Clark has bungled and perhaps even derailed any leverage the players had heading into this season. The jig is up and he might actually wind up serving time from his greed.

        But I completely agree, the players need an actual negotiator handling things. Who knows, if things are actually handled appropriately, we might be able to avoid a work stoppage all together in 2027.

        Reply
    • sheagoodbye

      1 day ago

      Future politician written all over him, scandal and all.

      1
      Reply
  24. Jason Hanselman

    2 days ago

    Long overdue.

    1
    Reply
  25. bigmike0424

    2 days ago

    Someone who would not given into owners.. Baseball doesn’t need salary cap.. Billionaires owner’s can afford paying high prices, they just choose to be cheap and that there own fault.. Can’t take it with you when you died so might as well spend it

    3
    Reply
    • CyBieber

      2 days ago

      Right. So as a fan of a team with a cheap owner, how do I make said cheap owner choose to spend money? There’s cheap owners in literally every sports league, but you notice in way more in the only league without the floor/cap system.

      4
      Reply
      • DirtyWater04

        2 days ago

        The reason you notice is because in baseball you still have a chance to be good without being a major spender, which brings attention to the fact that such teams exist.

        Take a look at the NBA. The New Orleans Pelicans, Charlotte Hornets, Washington Wizards, Memphis Grizzlies, Sacramento Kings, Utah Jazz, and Atlanta Hawks may as well not even exist. Consequential free agents never go there, they rarely draft anybody good, and even when they do those guys manage to force their way out in 3 years anyway. They rarely make the playoffs, and on the rare occasions they do it’s by sneaking in as an 8 seed and getting destroyed in the first round. Their sole reason for existence is to provide a place for the contending teams to dump bad contracts on while they tank for draft picks. BFD.

        But thank goodness there is a cap in place limiting how much the star players can get paid! It’s done such a good job at keeping 90% of the star players from all winding up in LA, New York, Texas, or Miami. (/s)

        7
        Reply
        • TBBC

          2 days ago

          and how have the LA, New York, Texas and Miamis done recently? 2 titles going back to 2014.

          2
          Reply
        • DirtyWater04

          2 days ago

          Lol, And of those 11 titles going back to 2014, 4 of them were won by Golden State, 2 were won by Kahwi Leonard, another 2 were won by the two most dominant franchises in NBA history, and one was won by the best player of the era, Lebron James who barely kept GSW from winning a 5th in that span. That’s your proof of the salary cap creating parity? Just because the few I named didn’t win a bunch of trophies does not mean the big names and the big markets were not the dominant forces of the league.

          Denver and Milwaukee through a miraculous stroke of luck managed to draft the two legitimate generational talents who have been happy to stay with the teams that drafted them rather than setting eyes on a sexier market, and OKC is a product of deliberate tanking. That doesn’t prove the salary cap has elevated anybody amongst the non-traditional NBA powers.

          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          2 days ago

          Who wants to play in those cities you mentioned much less live in them. That’s the reason they bolt

          1
          Reply
        • DirtyWater04

          2 days ago

          So explain to me then how a salary cap is suddenly going to make someone want to live in Milwaukee.

          Reply
        • DirtyWater04

          2 days ago

          I will help you: it won’t. It will do the same to MLB’s small market teams that is has to the NBA’s small market teams, which is to say they will become a permanent underclass that serves as nothing more than a dumping ground for bad contracts so the big boys can free up cap room for the next shiny object they want to pursue to improve their odds at a title. If you think a salary cap will be good for the have-nots of the MLB when it’s been such a clear disaster for the have-nots of the NBA, I really don’t know what to tell you.

          2
          Reply
        • sheagoodbye

          1 day ago

          Several of those franchises have been ruined by terrible owners and are as dysfunctional as they come. The Jazz were good for years before Ainge came in and decided to go for the prolonged tank. The others I’ll give you but it’s not like the Hawks and Grizzlies have been terrible for the most part. Maybe not championship relevant, but they’ve fielded some pretty good teams over the years.

          Which brings me to the issue of why it’s dumb to compare the two sports in general:
          a) before the recent 2nd apron changes the salary cap was more toothless than intimidating; ever since it was implemented there’s been much greater parity in the league
          b) baseball is a much higher variance sport, less driven by star power, and has much bigger rosters so it’s hardly surprising that even without a cap there’s been more parity, nor that the bigger stars tend to go to the bigger markets in the NBA.
          c) look at what’s been happening with the Dodgers and tell us how this is exclusively an NBA issue
          d) Giannis, Jokic, Curry (back when GSW was a dumpster fire of a franchise)…where do these guys and others like them fit in your 90% figure?

          You’re clearly not a basketball fan and it shows by your elementary school knowledge of the current state of the league.

          1
          Reply
      • Skip's Fungo

        2 days ago

        MLB is the only league without 100% revenue sharing and a guaranteed percentage of the sports revenue going to players,

        2
        Reply
      • sheagoodbye

        1 day ago

        Clearly, you just need to click your heels three times while wearing some baseball cleats and say “Show me the money!”. That’ll surely do the trick.

        Reply
    • JudgementDay

      2 days ago

      Baseball is an entertainment business. The billionaires owners can probably afford it, but for how long? If the salaries keep going up, MLB will be down to probably 6 teams. There’s not a lot of teams that can afford 600 million payrolls a year. If salaries go up then everything surrounding that team will increase to pay the off cost of doing business..example food, parking, tickets, etc.Look at Trump’s tariffs for example… an item before tariffs would be 45 dollars then afterwards the same item would be 75 plus to pay off those tariffs to offset the cost.
      It would be a stupid business model to charge the 45 dollars if it’s costing you 75 dollars to get that item.
      There should be a salary cap like every other sport. If a salary cap is done the right way then MLB players will get paid and both sides will be happy. NHL and NFL have salary caps and both are doing just fine where their caps can increase or decrease depending on revenue.
      NBA has a soft cap where teams have to spend 90% of the where their caps cap is set. If MLB can adopt a hybrid system of both or either one, they will be just fine. They really need to get rid of guarantee contracts and deferrals.
      Would the Dodgers spend as much if they couldn’t defer contracts knowing they would have to pay the tax on whatever that tax line is set?
      There shouldn’t be guarantee contracts in MLB. If a player sucks in their third year of a seven year deal then adios. I think that would make more teams spend more knowing if the player sucks after year two then no harm no foul philosophy.

      4
      Reply
      • binx47

        2 days ago

        Holy crap, this is the most anti-labor take in this whole comment section. Players not getting guaranteed deals is wild. If we’re trying to make the owners happy, why don’t we just go back to the reserve clause??

        13
        Reply
        • DirtyWater04

          2 days ago

          Well like it or not, non-guaranteed contracts are probably the biggest part of why the NFL is so competitive. If that’s an unacceptable business model, fine, I understand why someone wouldn’t want that, but then don’t sit there wondering why baseball doesn’t have as much competitive turnover as football. You know why, you just don’t like the answer.

          6
          Reply
        • Little Texas

          2 days ago

          binx47
          Should players contracts be guaranteed, heck no, I’ve worked 50+ years and never was my pay guaranteed, not even in the Marine Corps, and sure he’s supposed a generational player but do you believe Ohtani is worth a $700 million contract for 10 years, not counting taxes yet that’s 70 million a year, now divide that by 162 games is what $4.3 million per game. And he’s got it deferred for 15-20 years drawing interest for the Dodgers, that’s not even Generational money, that a small county’s money.

          4
          Reply
        • pt57

          2 days ago

          You should’ve learned how to hit a 100 mph fastball with spin. Or to throw like that.

          2
          Reply
        • Doug Dueck

          2 days ago

          @Little Texas – You need to move that decimal point over a smidge. the amount per game is 432,000 not 4.3 million. Besides, Ohtani earns interest on the money deferred so the Dodgers are not making any interest off the deferral. The Dodgers prefer to pay the players they have playing for them and winning for them as opposed to the owners worrying about profiting off the players abilities.

          1
          Reply
        • Little Texas

          2 days ago

          @Doug Dueck
          You are correct and I was doing the math in my head, but I still couldn’t see paying anyone that amount to play, so basically 432 by 162 games and that again by 9 innings has Ohtani making per inning more than some states paying minimum wage and the employee makes per year. Makes me wish I played baseball today instead of choosing retirement.

          Reply
        • DirtyWater04

          2 days ago

          That’s what happens when there are 4 million people willing to come watch you perform in-person and another 2 million or so willing to watch on TV every night. It’s not that any one inning or any one play is inherently that valuable. It is all about the scale.

          2
          Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          Little Texas obviously is a shill account for the owners. Trolls like this should be banned.

          Reply
        • This one belongs to the Reds

          17 hours ago

          @binx47 So you have a guaranteed contract? No one outside of sports does.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          12 hours ago

          “Makes me wish I played baseball today instead of choosing retirement.”
          =====================
          So why didn’t you?

          Reply
      • sometimesaccurate

        2 days ago

        Nothing would “make” Jerry Reinsdorf spend more.

        Nothing.

        6
        Reply
      • MuleorAstroMule

        2 days ago

        League does nothing but expand as salaries rise throughout the decades. Apparently the takeaway: The sport is doomed.

        1
        Reply
      • Irbias

        2 days ago

        Your tariff example is interesting. Few people realize that a country like China is willing to eat about 85% of any tariffs imposed because they have no choice. Their supply-based economy demands that they absolutely must be in this market.

        2
        Reply
        • stymeedone

          2 days ago

          They have a choice. Have you not noticed the increased prices?

          1
          Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          Wrong. You are paying the tariffs.

          1
          Reply
        • foppert3

          1 day ago

          Ha ha ha. Educate yourself.
          China doesn’t have to eat anything.

          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          15 hours ago

          The Chinese Real Estate crash was huge.

          Reply
        • foppert3

          11 hours ago

          They are running a 1.5 trillion trade surplus. They aren’t eating tariffs, they are selling their goods to other countries.

          Reply
      • Skip's Fungo

        2 days ago

        judgement day is another shill account for the owners.

        As long as revenue keeps rising, player salaries should keep rising.

        Reply
    • Skeptical

      2 days ago

      You don’t understand how businesses work. It doesn’t matter how much or how little the owner has, it is dependent on the revenue stream.

      If anyone is proposing a hard salary cap, how about a hard profit cap and a hard cap on how much an organization spends to go along with a salary cap? Anything left over after all the caps should be returned to the fans who attend games or subscribe to a streaming service for baseball.

      2
      Reply
  26. Astros71

    2 days ago

    2 pre-arb years, 3 arb years, increase rounds to 24, players automatically recieve 10% of revenue from their merch being sold.

    1
    Reply
    • Just a Bit Outside the Front Row

      2 days ago

      One less year of team control? No thanks. Small market teams already can’t compete with large market payrolls. Now you want to poach their players one year earlier?

      4
      Reply
      • Astros71

        2 days ago

        Read my other comment.

        Reply
        • Just a Bit Outside the Front Row

          2 days ago

          Yes, I hope the players union doesn’t strike either.

          Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          The players cannot strike unless they agreed to play without a new CBA. That will not happen.

          What might happen is the owners will lock the players out as negotiating leverage. That won’t work. Only the owners lost money the last time they tried that and the players are ready for it if they do.

          2
          Reply
        • Astros71

          1 day ago

          Owners have multiple sources of revenue and if they don’t play, they don’t get paid and they don’t get service time. I could see some of the pre-arb players or others than need money play.

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          1 day ago

          Stros, the owners lose roughly 100% of the revenue that comes from MLB if they lock the players out. Even licensing and merchandising money is frozen because of the split with the MLBPA. That is about $13 billion if you believe Manfred.

          At the same time they have to pay for things like stadiums, spring training facilities, debt service, and a myriad of other things that don’t get paused like player salaries. Yes, they save about 42-43% of their expenses from not having to pay for player payroll, but they still lose all of their baseball related revenue and still have 50 percent of their expenses still due and payable.

          The players have been preparing heavily for a lockout since 2018 when Bruce Meyer was hired as the lead negotiator for the union. Since 1994 they have had a strike fund to help the players that needed it the most in the event of a work stoppage and it’s been reported that they have added more than a billion to that through licensing and player contributions in recent years. That is a lot of money set aside to get them through a lockout by the owners.

          Reply
  27. hiflew

    2 days ago

    Can’t blame him. I don’t want to deal with the upcoming labor negotiation and I am not even part of it. He has enough money to just throw away his phone and go relax on a beach for a year or two.while someone else deals with this. I honestly don’t see why any former player would want the job. It just doesn’t seem worth the hassle for anyone with millions in the bank already.

    Reply
  28. Stormintazz

    2 days ago

    As with a lot of unions upper management. An Impropriety of money.

    2
    Reply
  29. SupremeZeus

    2 days ago

    Clark is stepping away to spend more time with his family and the Eastern District of New York. Law of parsimony.

    5
    Reply
    • St.Philly

      2 days ago

      Or maybe spending less time with his family

      2
      Reply
  30. CaseyAbell

    2 days ago

    Clark’s legal problems must be worse than I thought. He did survive the mutiny in 2024 and the enormous split in the union between the (relative) have-nots and haves in 2021. (Union shill Bobby Nightengale calls it a “moderate rift” in the union. Yeah, right. Like there was a “moderate rift” between the U.S. and Japan from 1941 to 1945.)

    But I guess Clark couldn’t survive the Feds. Anyway, the owners will get a new CBA through the same way they did last time, by showering the grunts with money. I look for another 50%+ increase in the minimum salary and at least as big an increase in the early-career performance pool (and maybe the postseason player pool). That’ll get the grunts onboard with anything the owners want. And there are a lot more grunts than elite players, as the union found out to its chagrin in 2021.

    Also, I don’t think that most of the owners are all that interested in a cap-and-floor system. They like the current luxury tax system which has put hundreds of millions of dollars in their pockets. Sure, the wild spenders like the Dodgers and Yankees want a cap to save themselves from spending. But the majority of owners like that sweet luxury tax money. Look for sky-high penalty percentages under the new CBA but no cap-and-floor.

    7
    Reply
    • MuleorAstroMule

      2 days ago

      The players also love the luxury tax money as 50% of it goes to their retirement fund. So a salary cap is doubly bad for the earning power of players.

      2
      Reply
      • Web's #2

        1 day ago

        If given a choice between getting part of the CBT tax after you retire or get paid more now, which would you choose?

        As a whole, the MLBPA is against the CBT entirely. They got other items in negotiations back when it was instituted and Clark failed to see how much it would limit salaries. No one expected teams to treat it as a hard cap, but many have.

        Reply
        • outinleftfield

          1 day ago

          Give me my money!!

          Reply
    • stymeedone

      2 days ago

      Unfortunately, the Dodgers and Yankees are among the teams that don’t want a cap. They don’t want to lose their advantage.

      1
      Reply
      • CaseyAbell

        2 days ago

        Hal Steinbrenner sure sounds like he wants a cap. As usual, the Dodgers are keeping quiet, but after a while even they have to get tired of financing other teams with luxury tax money.

        Reply
      • SportsFan0000

        15 hours ago

        They could be out voted.
        It takes 20+ votes for major proposals to pass MLB Ownership.

        Which `8-10 teams will be voting against it?!

        Dodgers,Mets and ?!?!

        Even many of the larger market teams want changes to the system.

        Reply
    • Skip's Fungo

      2 days ago

      More like US vs Falkland Islands.

      The players didn’t get a 50% increase in minimum salary. They got less than 20%.

      In 2021 the union made its largest gains in 15 years. No chagrin at all. They wanted more, but got huge gains.

      The CBT fines paid do not get split up like that. Take a minute to read up on it.

      Meyer talked about how incredibly low the CBT threshold was in the negotiations for the current CBA. In those negotiations in 2021, the union originally asked for it to start at $270 million which would have put it in line with the increases in MLB revenue. Look for the union to press to have that level as a minimum in the next CBA with lowered penalties.

      MLB may not get to even keep the same CBT without specific penalties to go along with the requirements in the current CBA for teams like the Marlins, Pirates, A’s and Rays that receive revenue sharing to spend that on the MLB payroll. The players are extremely ticked off that those teams and a few others are pocketing that revenue sharing without spending it on player payroll. Just the right to file a grievance is not enough. There has to be specific penalties or a salary floor.

      Small market owners won’t agree to a salary floor unless there is greater revenue sharing.

      2
      Reply
      • outinleftfield

        1 day ago

        Skip, the current CBA started with the 2022 season, not 2021. I agree with the rest for the most part.

        Reply
  31. Salzilla

    2 days ago

    A lot strong feelings on Clark here, but I’d say he’s been a good leader for the MLBPA for the players. Maybe he didn’t play ball well with ownership, but I’d think players would be happy overall about that. Maybe I’m wrong there, I dunno, but I think that’s who’s opinion matters most.

    7
    Reply
    • Stormintazz

      2 days ago

      Clark worked for the players. Commissioner works for the owners. I think Clark has helped the players.

      3
      Reply
      • Skip's Fungo

        2 days ago

        Clark started helping the players when he realized he was not a labor negotiator and hired a really good one in Bruce Meyer. The owners had taken the players to the cleaners in the 2 previous CBAs.

        3
        Reply
        • Stormintazz

          2 days ago

          Owners took players to cleaners? Salaries have gone up every contract term.

          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          2 days ago

          Are you serious?

          1
          Reply
        • Web's #2

          1 day ago

          Storm, Skip is correct. The percentage of player salaries to MLB revenue went down in the two previous CBAs.

          2
          Reply
        • sheagoodbye

          1 day ago

          So has inflation. Saying they’ve gone up is meaningless.

          Reply
        • Stormintazz

          21 hours ago

          AH ok got it.

          Reply
    • Web's #2

      1 day ago

      Sal, they originally elected Clark unanimously. When he faced a vote to oust him in 2024, he won that overwhelmingly. The players liked and supported him for the most part. Even the vote to oust him was brought on by a handful of disgruntled former stars that thought they should have made more money in free agency.

      I don’t think he was effective in his first two CBA negotiations, but I am not a voting member of their union, so my opinion doesn’t count. Most of my adult life has been spent working across the aisle so to speak as an employee of the teams.

      3
      Reply
      • Salzilla

        1 day ago

        Thank you for the insight, Web.

        1
        Reply
  32. Astros71

    2 days ago

    How To Fix Revenue Sharing Problem Without Salary Cap

    1. No deferred money for contracts underneath $250 million, at most, 30% of the contract may be deferred. A team may also not have over 5 deferred contracts on their roster, and a tax for 250% will be charged on luxury tax exceeding teams, 100% for non-revenue sharing recipents, and 50% for revenue sharing recipents.

    2. Make a soft cap of $250 million. Exceeding it will require you forfeit your 3rd pick and 500K from international bonus pool, in addition to a 50% tax and extra 100% for each year exceeded. The second threshold I $275 million, where you will lose your 2nd, 5th, and 4th pick and lose 1M of international bonus pool. You will get taxed 200% and extra 100% for each year exceeded. Exceeding the third threshold of $290 million will forfeit all your international bonus pool and 1st, 2nd, and 5th picks. $300 million means you cannot sign international free agents, loses 1st, 3rd, 5th and 2nd and 4th picks are delayed by 15 slots, and are taxed at 500% and 100% beyond. Picks and money are redistributed.

    3. Make a soft floor of $100 million. You will lose your “special” picks like compensation or PPI if you fall underneath the threshold. If you the 90 million threshold, you lose $2M in international bonus pool as well, special picks, and 3rd and 4th picks after that. You also cannot draft in the Rule 5 phase and your prospects are one year earlier exposed. If you fall beneath the 80 million threshold, it’s all the earlier penalties and taxed 75% for each consecutive year. If you fall beneath the $75 million, all penalties stack, but you lose $5 million of your international bonus pool and cannot give out bonuses worth more than 100K. You also lose your 1st, 3rd, and 4th round pick and all the special picks. (If you fall beneath any of the floors, you cannot get money in revenue sharing process.

    4. New acquistions cannot in total earn $125 million, players making less than 1M does not count. It’s a hard cap, but if a player signs a superstar but goes over the 125 million mark, both MLB and MLBPA must agree for the player to be a special exception, but cannot make any more adds over 1 million.

    1
    Reply
    • Mikenmn

      2 days ago

      It’s a good thoughtful effort, but in practice basically just squeezes the players–the vast majority of teams would take it, as it would reduce their overall expenditures significantly. There’s one thing that’s interesting. Your aggregate top salary $125M is going to lead to a different kind of market—the top tier players will sign short term contracts.

      5
      Reply
      • Astros71

        2 days ago

        I’m not sure if I made it clear or not, but the amount new players are making in that year cannot exceed 125M, that’s what I mean. So for example if a team adds Skubal next year and he is making 45 million, then that’s 45 out of the 125.

        Reply
    • O'sSayCanYouSee

      2 days ago

      5. Market Dilution. NY and LA get expansion teams, and their markets come back down to…well, all 6 teams would still be top 10 markets. It’d be a big start.

      …never gonna happen, but it does address the issue directly rather than through the approximation of the markets value and creating compensation relative to that appropriate differentation between the markets.

      Oh well.

      Reply
      • stymeedone

        2 days ago

        Do you really think an expansion team in those large markets, with their history, and constant playoff appearances is going to dent the Dodgers or Yankees markets? The Mets have been around for 50+ years and haven’t been able to. Do you believe the expansion team will get a broadcast deal at a comparable amount? Its just not reality.

        2
        Reply
        • O'sSayCanYouSee

          1 day ago

          stymeedone — As a someone who witnessed first hand how a new franchise in a market changes a market, I can say it absolutely does affect the the team already in the market. History be damned.

          People today love the ‘newest’ thing.

          1
          Reply
      • DolemiteisMyname

        2 days ago

        Please stop with adding teams to those markets. You sound like a idiot.

        Reply
        • O'sSayCanYouSee

          1 day ago

          Dolemite — That means a lot coming from you. Thank you sir.

          1
          Reply
    • Irbias

      2 days ago

      How about a provision that allows teams to re-sign their own free agents, with part (or all) of those contracts exempt from the cap. That might ease the current scourge of smaller markets being defacto farm clubs for the larger markets. Its a vicious cycle. Fans watch guys come up and develop, only to have their hearts ripped out.

      2
      Reply
      • Astros71

        2 days ago

        I guess it’s workable, but small market teams get better draft picks than larger ones.

        Reply
      • Skip's Fungo

        2 days ago

        That would only help the big market teams in the current system. The problem is revenue. Teams like the Dodgers and Yankees have 3-4 times the revenue that teams like the Rays and Marlins have. That needs to be fixed or nothing else will help.

        2
        Reply
        • sheagoodbye

          1 day ago

          Perhaps revenue sharing could be changed so that the more smaller market teams spend the more they unlock in revenue sharing? That way there would be incentive to spend more rather than save more.

          (Not that I disagree with your fundamental point).

          1
          Reply
        • Best Screenname Ever

          22 hours ago

          And who has fought tooth and nail against revenue sharing?

          The MLBPA. And he player agents. Skp left that out for some unknown reason, like it’s entirely contrary to his diatribe agains the clubs.

          1
          Reply
    • Skip's Fungo

      2 days ago

      3 steps. The same steps the NFL, NBA, and NHL took

      1 – 100% revenue sharing with all media contracts handled by the league.
      This way the only way an ownership group could make more revenue than another would be to fork over the cash out of their own pockets to build their own ballpark and make money from other events.

      2 – Guaranteed percentage of revenue to the players. 48-51% is what other leagues have in place. It guarantees the league as a whole has to spend.
      2A – Open books with the union. This would be a prerequisite for #2.

      3 – Salary floor per team. One that rises with the revenue increases for the sport. This guarantees that individual teams have to spend. At current revenue levels that salary floor would have to be around $200-210 million to fit a 48-51% guarantee to the players.
      3A? – maybe add spending floors on baseball operations as a whole so some teams like the Rockies and Angels are not allowed to languish in terms of player development spending.

      Those would make a cap unnecessary. Unless an owner wanted to dig into his own pockets for a specific player, the equal revenue streams would limit spending by teams to a level that all teams could match and the floor would make sure that owners could not just pocket the money like Fisher, Sherman, and Nutting do.

      2
      Reply
      • Astros71

        1 day ago

        100% revenue sharing is not going to work. Teams like the Dodgers, Yankees, or Mets will hate this. Other high revenue teams like the Astros, Red Sox, or Cubs will also not like it. The Pirates, Marlins, and Rays are going to pocket the money.

        1
        Reply
        • Web's #2

          1 day ago

          Astros, it takes 23 teams to institute 100% revenue sharing. The Mets are above the average in revenue, but not in the same stratosphere as the Dodgers, Yankees, Cubs and Red Sox. I am not so sure that Cohen would be against it.

          100% revenue sharing would absolutely work but it doesn’t mean the owners will agree to it and because of that there will never be a salary cap and the union will fight hard to raise the CBT threshold and lower the penalties substantially for the 1st and possibly the 2nd level.

          Reply
        • Astros71

          20 hours ago

          Several teams will lose revenue while bums like the Rays or Marlins are going to sell their veterans away and make money that way. So until all the teams each make around the same revenue (which isn’t happening), 100% revenue sharing sucks. Or are you a small market team fan?

          Reply
      • Web's #2

        1 day ago

        Skip, all of those points are items the union has said on multiple occasions that have to happen before they will even discuss a hard cap.

        I think that if MLB was willing to do those things, the union would agree to a hard cap. A cap that was pretty close to the floor which as you have stated would have to be above $200 million. $200 million floor and $240 million hard cap with a clause similar to the NBA that allows teams to resign players they have drafted/signed and developed at salaries that would take them over the hard cap. I can see that working for both sides.

        1
        Reply
    • SportsFan0000

      15 hours ago

      Appreciate all the thought that went into your suggestions.

      The Players and their Unionwould not go for it.
      What is in it for them?!

      Reply
  33. King Floch

    2 days ago

    Scandalous!

    Reply
  34. Turd_Ferguson

    2 days ago

    Uh oh. He knows what’s coming up and doesn’t want to deal with it. How are the players gonna stop the owners trying to stop themselves? Now the union is going to have a new guy in charge? Doesn’t bode well.

    Reply
  35. sorengo99

    2 days ago

    He may be a Tiger, but he’s also a Snake. And not a wartime consigliere.

    2
    Reply
  36. Ben10

    2 days ago

    I never thought that Tony Clark was a good choice, never!

    1
    Reply
    • Skip's Fungo

      2 days ago

      He wasn’t a good choice, but not because of this. He was a bad choice because he didn’t have experience as a labor negotiator. The players took it in the shorts the first two CBAs he was part of. Then they hired Meyer and things started to turn around in this last CBA. Getting rid of Clark will be good. Getting rid of Meyer would be a disaster for the players.

      4
      Reply
  37. Therealeman

    2 days ago

    Players would be smart to seek a one or two year extension of the current pact.

    Reply
    • mrkinsm

      2 days ago

      Why would they be smart to do that? The rate of increase in player salaries goes down at the end of the union agreements – thus you want a new one sooner rather than later. The 1.4% increase in 2025 was a sharp contrast to the 7.2% jump in 2023 and 14.8% in 2022, following a period of declining salaries through 2021.

      3
      Reply
  38. AL B DAMNED

    2 days ago

    Scott Boras is on deck!
    His motto would be:
    What Salary Cap?
    Such
    Approval
    Leaves
    Another
    Rough
    Year

    Cashing
    All
    Players!

    1
    Reply
  39. Slider_withcheese

    2 days ago

    The players should have never unionized.in the first place. They have caused nothing but problems for this great sport. Fans attend games for the festive atmosphere and the stadium experience. We want to feel part of something grand and there are 30 monuments that give us joy summer after summer. The owners built baseball, not the players.

    1
    Reply
    • MuleorAstroMule

      2 days ago

      Yes they could still be earning peanuts and being controlled like cattle. Now they’re only multi-millionaires after a few years in the game. Terrible thing, those unions.

      It’s amazing that the highest paid and most successful industries like Hollywood and professional sports employ unions from basically top to bottom and yet people’s main takeaway from these money-printing machines is that unions are bad.

      5
      Reply
    • MrPeanutHead

      2 days ago

      Why don’t the owners play the games too then?

      3
      Reply
    • DolemiteisMyname

      2 days ago

      There’s no MLB without the players. No pays to see a owner. Quit trying so hard to get a thumbs up.

      3
      Reply
    • Cam

      2 days ago

      I’ve never seen an owner get a hit or strike a guy out.

      Reply
    • SportsFan0000

      15 hours ago

      Unionization gave players the salaries and benefits determined by the market and revenues produced by their skilled efforts.

      Without their recognized talents, MLB would be a “Beer League”baseball league.

      Reply
  40. Mikenmn

    2 days ago

    Ultimately, it doesn’t change the shape of the upcoming CBA negotiation because the issues remain the same. You might benefit from a
    fresh start, but we are talking about many billions of dollars, and MLBPA isn’t going to hire someone without knowledge of the game.

    4
    Reply
  41. NoKluReds

    2 days ago

    Sounds like he plans on going into politics soon….where the real money is. Book ‘im Dano!

    1
    Reply
  42. Little Texas

    2 days ago

    It’s funny to see post nowadays of cheap owners when teams are spending $400 million, five current teams over 300 million and 9 teams over $200 million, you have a few owners not spending like the others but some teams don’t have the television streaming revenue and marketing.
    MLB should work harder on getting television services for every team . One that pays teams substantially, Texas is a prime example of this, starting their own RSN due to the downfall of cable rights and streaming taking the forefront everywhere now. Texas has been said to be a large market team, NOT TRUE. Football is the larger market in Texas. We are fortunate enough to have an owner that has been spending recently but is now cutting back and possibly getting ready for a cap and floor.
    Baseball needs to be on even ground for every team when it comes to spending and the only way is a floor and a cap. Players making the enormous figures that are being seen today is ridiculous and has hurt the game $700 million for 10 years really.

    1
    Reply
    • mrkinsm

      2 days ago

      At no point in history has, every team in baseball been on equal footing as far as spending – for the entire 150 year history of the game. Why should present day be any different?

      5
      Reply
      • Little Texas

        2 days ago

        Because some of the teams that still exist today and the market didn’t grow for them. Oakland is a prime example of market and ownership.

        Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          Oakland is in the 9th biggest media market. The Bay Area is huge. What is small will be their next market in Las Vegas. You may want to quit commenting if you don’t know basic things like that.

          4
          Reply
        • seamaholic 2

          2 days ago

          They only had access to a small portion of that market in Oakland.

          1
          Reply
        • Little Texas

          2 days ago

          Skip’s Fungo
          Oakland may be the 9th biggest media market but that’s media that has nothing to do with Baseball, big difference, if that’s the case why wouldn’t that 9th largest Baseball media market not fund a new stadium where the sewer floods the dugouts and clubhouses as well, that’s right because it’s NOT a baseball media market.

          1
          Reply
        • Little Texas

          2 days ago

          seamaholic 2
          You are correct sir, California may be the largest market,Specifically Los Angeles and SF , The A’s moving to Vegas to a smaller stadium with more luxury suites is the way to go now and more profitable, our Rangers just did that, smaller seat capacity but more luxury boxes and we haven’t seen a significant drop in attendance. I couldn’t get the one person to understand that just because it’s a big media market doesn’t mean it’s a baseball media market, big difference.

          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          2 days ago

          Oakland and SF Bay Area are larger richer and than most MLB markets
          It has an economy larger than many countries and most States.

          Would love to see the Feds Investigate how Selig, Manfred, the SF Giants and the A’s Fisher, allegedlly, ran the Oakland A’s into the ground financially to make the A’s ecomically “non viable financially” and to relocate the team to a much smaller, economically poorer TV and revenue market Las Vegas.

          And what was/is the role of gambling interests and its growing influence on MBL and revenues on that/those decision(s)?!

          Former MLB Commissioner, Judge and Attorney Kenesaw Mountain Landis must be rolling over in his grave as baseball embraces gambling interests and encourages kids and grandkids of America to get hooked on betting on baseball.

          2
          Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          They had access to 100% of the media market. They were seen on TVs in every area of that market. It why they had a TV deal of over $70 million annually.

          Nothing kept the A’s from drawing fans from all around the Bay Area other than Fisher.

          2
          Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          What are you talking about. ALL of the disparity in revenue and spending is because of media contracts. Are you really that dense? Or are you just a shill account?

          The Bay Area is a great baseball media market and that is why the A’s were getting paid such a large TV contract. 10th largest in MLB. They moved to Sacramento to try to keep at least part of that media contract.

          Why would the taxpayers be required to fund a stadium for billionaire owners?

          Just so you know, California, Alameda County, and the city of Oakland had approved $665 million in funding for the stadium there. Fisher backed out because he could not get financing to do the rest. He backed out of two other stadium deals after taxpayer funding had been approved. They even gave him partial ownership in the land that the Coliseum sits on because he was going to build there.

          You are either the most uninformed person I have ever read or you are a shill for the owners.

          4
          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          2 days ago

          I got reason why. The A’s ballpark was a dump. Nothing says yuck more than raw sewage in your dugout.

          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          1 day ago

          They had access to the entire market.
          All 2 team markets share their territories 50%/50% in other cities like LA, NYC, Chicago etc…

          But Commissioners Selg and Manfred would not reestablish the A’s valid claim to get back their 50% market share of Santa Clara County/Silicon Valley that the A’s former Ower (Walter Haas of Levis) LOANED to the SF Giants to help SAVE THE SF GIANTS FOR THE SF BAY AREA. Out of State Ownership group had purchased the SF Giants and loaded the moving vans for Tampa Bay.

          After the SF Giants built their new stadium in SF instead of Santa Clara County/Silicon Valley, 50 miles away former A’s Owner Walter Haas Jr. said, and Former Commissioner Bud Selig confirmed in an interview that the SF Giants were supposed to give the A’s back their 50% of the Santa Clara County territory.

          The SF Giants reneged on the deal and blocked the A’s from building a new stadium in that area that would have made the A’s economically viable in the SF Bay Area.

          Gutless Commissioners Selig and Manfred could have called for an Ownership Vote to give the A’s back their 50% share of that territory and let the A’s build their New Stadium in Santa Clara County/Silicon Valley and the A’s stadium problems would have been solved decades ago.

          Ironically, the SF 49ers eventually built their New Levis Football stadium in Santa Clara County/Silicon Valley, but Selig, Manfred and Ownership refused to let the A’s become economically viable in the SF Bay Area in Santa Clara County/Silicon Valley.
          The SF Giants also stabbed the A’s in their backs and would be the Tampa Giants today if they had not been helped/bailed out by former Oakland A’s Ownership.

          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          1 day ago

          Selg and Manfred blocked the A’s from moving to San Jose or elsewhere in Santa Clara County Silicon Valley.
          SF Giants were supposed to give the A’s back the 50% of their territory in Santa Clara County that former A’s Owner Walter Haas Jr had loaned the Giants to help save them for the SF Bay Area and block the SF Giants from moving to Tampa,.

          Selig, Manfred and the Giants reneged on that deal.

          So SF Bay Area became only major 2 MLB team market that did not have a 50/50 territory split
          (Not LA, Not Chicago, Not NYC).

          1
          Reply
        • Web's #2

          1 day ago

          Which was caused by Fisher not doing the ballpark maintenance he agreed to in his lease.

          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          1 day ago

          Warriors Owner Joe Lacob had a “standing offer” to buy the A’s and /or Partner with Fisher and build a brand new A’s stadium. Fisher, Selig and Manfred refused to facilitate the deal and poured over a billion dollars in revenue sharing into the A’s and waived a 400M relo fees to LV?!

          Reggie Jackson tried to buy the A’s a few decades ago.
          He was in a group with Bill Gates, Paul Allen & McCaw Celluar Owners. Selig said he would make it happen
          Selig lied and burned Reggie.

          Many other SF Bay Area billionaires offered buy the A’s and build them a New privately funded baseball stadium.

          Sabotaged by Selig, Manfred and Fisher.

          2
          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          1 day ago

          Selig, Manfred, SF Giants and Fisher SABOTAGED multiple viable efforts to get the A’s a New Baseball Stadium and/or New A’s Ownership in SF Bay Area.

          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          1 day ago

          Winning cures all. No matter the size of your market.

          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          1 day ago

          @Sorts-What do you mean by share their territories?

          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          1 day ago

          I thought the Giants blocked A’s from moving to San Jose. Claiming San Jose was their market.

          Reply
        • DolemiteisMyname

          1 day ago

          Walter Haas did not loan money to the Giants. He gave them exclusive rights to all of the Bay Area to find a permeant home..Manfred was not Commissioner of MLB at that time. It was Bud Selig. and Selig only.

          Reply
        • SportsFan0000

          14 hours ago

          I NEVER SAID THAT WALTER HAAS JR “LOANED THE GIANTS MONEY}?!?! RE READ MY POSTS.

          Walter Haas Jr (Levis) former Owner of the Oakland A’s did many things to help SAVE THE SF GIANTS AND BLOCK THEIR MOVE TO TAMPA:

          1) Successfully worked with LA Dodgers Owner Walter O’ Malley to line up the MLB votes to block the Giants move to Tampa

          2) Successfully helped line up New, well funded Ownership for the Giants in the SF Bay Area (Peter McGowan of Safeway Supemarkets)

          3) “Loaned” the Giants the A’s 50% of their SHARED Santa Clara County Silicon Valley territory with the understanding that the the Giants would return the A’s their 50% of the Santa Clara Count Silicon Valley territory ONCE THE GIANT S BUILT THEIR NEW STADIUM IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY.
          Giants could not get their Santa Clara County Silicon Valley Stadium built since they tried to get the taxpayers there to pay for their new stadium. Taxpayers in Santa Clara County rejected the Giants deal at the ballot box.

          4) Giants ended up building their new stadium in downtown SF with private funds since multiple ballot initiatives trying to make the taxpayers fund their new stadium failedi in SF Bay Area
          5) WHOLE REASON A’s and Haas LOANED GIANTS 50% of their Santa Clara County territory NEVER CAME TO PASS.
          Giants stadium was built with private funds 50 miles away in SF/NOT BUILD IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY.

          Bud Selig admitted in interviews and discussions with Walter Haas Jr former A’s Owner, that Walter Haas Jr. at all times, expected the Giants to return to the A’s their loan of their 50% Santa Clara County/San Jose territory.

          Selig and Manfred ARE BOTH TO BLAME.
          Either or Both could have CALLED AN OWNERSHIP VOTE DURING THEIRE TIME AS MLB COMMISSISONER TO RETURN TO THE A’s their 50% Ownership of the Santa Clara County/Silicon Valley territory to the A’s.

          ISSUES NOT RESOLVED BY the OUTGOING MLB COMMISSIONER LAND SQUARELY IN IN THE IN BOX OF THE NEW Commissioner (Manfred) FOR ACTION: (Labor Issues, Proposed Rule Changes, Expansion Franchises, Relocation of Franchise, Territory Disputes, Revenue Sharing subsides, Relocation Fees and much more).MANFRED DROPPED THE BALL ON THE RETURN OF THE LOAN OF THE A’s 50% of The Santa Clara County /Silicon Valley Territory from the Giants to the A’s, and in the process cost MLB revenue sharing and relocation of the A’ MLB revenues, perhaps, over 1 billion dollars.
          Manfred as Incoming MLB Commissioner had the Office and Power to get the Giants to Return the 50% of the Santa Clara County/Silicon Valley

          Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      2 days ago

      The only way for the teams to be on even footing in spending is for there to be 100% revenue sharing like in every other major sport in the US.

      3
      Reply
  43. Rsox

    2 days ago

    It means he’s guilty and quitting before it’s made public.

    Now if only Manfred would resign then maybe we could have two competent people handling the CBA negotiations instead of two buffoons (now one) like last time

    4
    Reply
  44. Ol’ Uncle Charlie

    2 days ago

    1. Open up the books, ownership
    2. 50/50 split between players/owners. Up from current share of 43% for players.
    3. Owners agree to a floor, putting pressure on players to agree to a cap
    4. Improve revenue sharing between clubs
    5. Play ball

    6
    Reply
    • DolemiteisMyname

      2 days ago

      MLBPLA will never agree to cap. And the owners will share their revenues.

      2
      Reply
      • Ol’ Uncle Charlie

        2 days ago

        @Dolemite — That has certainly been the MLBPA position and everyone has their heels dug in…but if there’s no cap, we’re almost certainly looking at a strike.

        If the owners go 50/50, open up the books, and establish a salary floor, the MLBPA is going to look REALLY bad. Ownership has a legacy of screwing players, but if ownerships make the right steps, I think this can get done.

        This isn’t 1994 and baseball took an incredibly serious hit after that strike. Another strike of that sort will have the kind of ramifications that will have dire consequences for the future of the game.

        People have a lot more to spend their time and money on and baseball simply isn’t a priority for many people like it was thirty years ago.

        Something has to give.

        1
        Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          2 days ago

          Revenue, attendance, and viewership are all up.

          2
          Reply
        • billy09

          1 day ago

          So what happens to the Dodgers and Yankees with their own RSNs? The Yankees give up 50% of their total profits including the YES network? What is the incentive for a team like LA or NY to lose 50% of their money? And what is the new cap going to be? what is Hal Steinbrenner going to save on payroll each year to make up for the 50% lost income?

          Reply
      • Skip's Fungo

        2 days ago

        Ol Charlie didn’t mention a cap. He mentioned a floor.

        2
        Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      2 days ago

      Owners have long agreed to a floor. They proposed it last time. The players oppose a floor.

      Reply
      • Ol’ Uncle Charlie

        2 days ago

        The floor is AMONG the things needed.

        Openi the books and split revenue 50/50 (like so many other sports leagues) and this thing has a chance.

        Everybody literally has to meet in the middle.

        4
        Reply
      • Skip's Fungo

        1 day ago

        The owners offered a $100 million floor, but only if a $180 million cap was instituted. The bottom line is the owners didn’t offer a viable floor.

        The players insisted something be put in the current CBA about the teams spending the revenue sharing money they receive on player payroll. The owners refused to have an actual penalty attached to that rule. Once again, the owners blocked a real floor.

        Now the owners are talking about a $160 million floor and a $240 million hard cap in the next CBA. They players will never agree to that and this is why. Using the $13 billion MLB revenue from Manfred’s statements, every team would have to have to be required to have a payroll over $200 million to even match the percentage of revenue going to players currently. To get to 50% the FLOOR would have to be $216.5 million.

        I would venture a guess that all of the teams receiving revenue sharing do not have the revenue to have a $216.5 million player payroll. To get to the point where that is possible, there would have to be 100% revenue sharing between the teams.

        2
        Reply
      • Web's #2

        1 day ago

        As usual, you are wrong on this Seam. The owners proposed a ridiculously low floor that was tied to an even more ridiculous cap. The players rejected both because it would have severely lowered their portion of the total revenue.

        It’s not the players job to create financial parity in the game, that is on the owners. One hundred percent revenue sharing and its done.

        1
        Reply
        • BlueSkies_LA

          1 day ago

          Not quite done. Financial incentives need to be attached to success instead of failure. This means more revenue set aside for teams reaching the postseason, and higher draft picks, etc. for better finishes instead of worse. Then, maybe, it is done.

          Reply
    • DolemiteisMyname

      1 day ago

      Uncle-The owners will not open their books. The MLBPA has asked the owners in so many words. Show us you’re losing money. Then maybe we can talk about a soft cap.
      You and I know the owners will not going open their books. They’re making money hand over fist with their National and Local TV /Radio Contracts.Especially Teams like the Dodgers,Yankees,Red Sox. and Toronto.
      The value of these teams grows every year.
      One thing I wish Manfred and The owners stop doing is tinkering with the product. Example the runner on 2nd base at the start of extra innings.

      Reply
      • NashvilleJeff

        1 day ago

        The Braves books are open. Publicly traded.

        Reply
  45. Captainmike1

    2 days ago

    Something going on behind the scenes

    Reply
  46. Enjoy sack lunch

    2 days ago

    I’ll take the job. Potato salad!

    Reply
    • Red Sox in Maine

      19 hours ago

      I had to look that up to remember where I heard that before. Classic

      1
      Reply
  47. hyraxwithaflamethrower

    2 days ago

    I can’t figure out why they’re not negotiating now. If so many people expect contentious negotiations and hot-button issues, but neither side wants a stoppage that hurts them both, start going back and forth with proposals and counters now. Start with easy (or what should be easy) wins, like trading draft picks, and work up to deferred salaries and a cap/floor. But for the love of baseball, start now.

    And I get the argument that there are a lot of players on the MLBPA committee, but there are also labor lawyers doing, or who could be doing, a lot of the actual negotiations. Let them hammer stuff out and present to the players on the committee. It’s not easy to do that in-season, but it beats missing a whole year with no pay for anyone.

    4
    Reply
    • DolemiteisMyname

      1 day ago

      They always wait until the current contract ends before moving tory to work on a new one

      Reply
      • hyraxwithaflamethrower

        22 hours ago

        Just because that’s what they always do doesn’t make it the smart thing to do.

        Reply
    • sheagoodbye

      1 day ago

      Because they want the big stuff done at the last minute so they can attempt to leverage time and lost profits to “win”, any they will need all the leverage they can get with the current gulf between the two sides . Who blinks first?

      Just look at all of the posturing and nonsense during the last CBA negotiations. Months of what felt like very little progress, so much so that to many folks the season itself looked to be in jeopardy. But once those numbers went into the red for a long enough period of time, the rest fell into place in short order.

      One thing I can say for sure is neither party will be thinking about the fans in all of this. We’re just along for the bumpy ride. And, frankly, I can’t blame them too much as it’s their direct money at stake, not ours.

      Reply
      • hyraxwithaflamethrower

        22 hours ago

        But it is the fans that provide that money. After the canceled WS in ’94, attendance numbers went down for years. Both players and owners failed to make as much as they could have. It is in both parties’ best interests to not miss any time. When many fans and some pundits believe the entire season is at risk, O don’t understand how that can in any way not be a priority.

        Reply
  48. Austinmac

    2 days ago

    The players are fools if they hire a temporary guy at this critical time. Hire a top flight labor negotiator.

    2
    Reply
    • Baseballisthebest

      2 days ago

      They have the best labor negotiator in Meyer.

      3
      Reply
  49. mrkinsm

    2 days ago

    I hope Brent Suter and his pals change their minds, it’s incomprehensible borderline criminal not to do an outside search, even just to see who is available to fill that job.

    1
    Reply
    • Skip's Fungo

      2 days ago

      What would be borderline criminal would be changing the negotiating team at this late stage. Meyer has to stay and making an actual labor negotiator the director would make the most sense.

      4
      Reply
  50. leftykoufax

    2 days ago

    Some people can lie, steal and cheat, yet wake up and look at themselves in the mirror.
    Good Riddance from all the kids you scammed..

    2
    Reply
    • Mech986TRtt

      2 days ago

      I / We can say the same for Nutting of PIT, Pohland of MIN, Fisher of ATH, Castellini of CIN, Monforts of COL, Sherman of KC, Moreno (he does spend but never actually builds a competitive team), Sherman of MIA (who even recruited Jeter and then Jeter left when they decided to remain losers and profiteers, Kim Ng subsequently left the following year), all have near monopolies for baseball in their regions and yet rarely field competitive teams, increase fan bases or attendances, or give their fans any hope or keep HG players to root for.

      Illitch of DET is given slight credit for spending more this year to max Skubal, at same time is booed for not paying close to what he was worth, or extending him.

      I give credit to Brewers Attanasio for having a competitive MIL team on a very tight budget but losing some respect for spending little in this offseason while losing some key players. Dolan of CLE is an HM.

      1
      Reply
    • Skip's Fungo

      1 day ago

      Wow Lefty. You really have no idea what the situation even is, do you? There are not even allegations that kids were scammed. The only allegations are that Players Way, which is funded by players, was really just a way to pay Clark and other former players that were part of the union money outside of their contracts with the MLBPA.

      2
      Reply
  51. C Us Sink

    2 days ago

    Salary Cap time…

    1
    Reply
  52. Baseballisthebest

    2 days ago

    If the union loses Bruce Meyer they are up a creek without a paddle.

    3
    Reply
  53. This one belongs to the Reds

    2 days ago

    Surprised this did not happen sooner with the investigation. Not a good look for the union.

    Reply
  54. Provost

    2 days ago

    I find it odd that the union didn’t prepare a backup plan to Clark. Or maybe they did but managed to keep it quiet…we will know soon…

    2
    Reply
  55. Another Dodgers Fan

    2 days ago

    Stepping away from his current position temporarily so he can represent the players association as interim Director, we present Scott Boras!!!

    1
    Reply
  56. bhambrave

    2 days ago

    Allow teams to trade draft picks. The small market teams with a pending FA stud could get a lot more than one draft pick if they traded him and supercharge their rebuild.

    2
    Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      2 days ago

      This is essentially already the case because
      teams can trade recently drafted minor leaguers.

      Reply
      • bhambrave

        2 days ago

        Not even close.

        3
        Reply
      • DolemiteisMyname

        1 day ago

        I think he means if team X has the #1 pic.in the upcoming draft. they can trade it. And let someone else pick the player. Not players they already have in thier system..

        1
        Reply
  57. Halo11Fan

    2 days ago

    Uh Oh……

    A new kingpin is going to be a hardliner, will not back down and will absolutely force the lockout to continue well into the season.

    If baseball resumes prior to mid-season, I’ll consider ourselves lucky.

    1
    Reply
  58. Little Texas

    2 days ago

    I see comments stating ownership should open up the books, why
    Other jobs don’t open the books for its employees, people are hired and payed to perform a job,baseball is no different. Yes ownership should make loads of money,they own the business. Players are demanding too much, how many jobs can you qualify for lifetime retirement benefits and insurance like baseball players after 10 years of MLB service . Wow 10 years and vested.

    3
    Reply
    • SportsFan0000

      1 day ago

      Sports careers are short..

      Reply
  59. GarryHarris

    2 days ago

    Players have agents, a union and are allowed to collude with other players where teams can’t talk to one another about almost everything.

    2
    Reply
    • DolemiteisMyname

      1 day ago

      What can’t they the owners not talk about to each other?

      Reply
  60. 66TheNumberOfTheBest

    2 days ago

    All this time I thought Tony Clark was just incompetent and in over his head…turns out he was corrupt.

    Sorry for underestimating you, Tony.

    8
    Reply
  61. DolemiteisMyname

    2 days ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised if #47 gets involved

    Reply
    • Ol’ Uncle Charlie

      2 days ago

      Yeah, he’s such a good negotiator 🙄…let’s not make have a bad situation get a heck of a lot worse 🙏

      3
      Reply
    • SportsFan0000

      1 day ago

      He will stick his nose in your home remodelliong job if you write his committee a check.

      1
      Reply
  62. THEY LIVE!!!

    2 days ago

    I thought he might have been named as one of Jeffery Epstein’s co-conspirators.
    😳

    Reply
    • swinging wood

      1 day ago

      You don’t get in trouble for that in the United States. Just every other country.

      2
      Reply
  63. AmericanRedneck

    2 days ago

    This bodes well for no stoppage of work for the league.

    Reply
  64. Best Screenname Ever

    2 days ago

    Not a word from Drelich and Rosenthal about this corruption for the last several months. Imagine being so one-sided in your coverage of MLBPA/MLB relations that you never mention that the side you always support is being investigated by the feds because it’s crooked.

    Get ready for some more one-sided pro-MLBPA coverage in December from Drelich and Rosenthal. Featuring all the news that Scott Boras thinks fit to print.

    3
    Reply
    • Skip's Fungo

      2 days ago

      Wow. That is an incredibly inane comment. The Athletic is owned by the New York Times. All they care about is clicks and subscriptions, not anything Boras says unless it leads to more clicks and subscriptions,

      3
      Reply
  65. Skip's Fungo

    2 days ago

    From Suter’s comments it looks like Bruce Meyer is staying and may even be the interim director. That is a good thing. After being taken to the cleaners by the owners in the first 2 CBA’s that Clark was a part of, Meyer made huge inroads for the players and brought the minor league players into the union in the current CBA. He is an exceptional labor negotiator.

    6
    Reply
  66. mlb fan

    2 days ago

    A corrupt labor “union”, run primarily for the benefit of the Scherzers, Verlanders, Sotos and a very, very shady lawyer in Scott Boras.

    2
    Reply
    • Jdt8312

      2 days ago

      Yeah, because the MLB owners are such swell guys….gimme a break.

      4
      Reply
      • mlb fan

        1 day ago

        “Such swell guys”… Nice deflection, Tony. Corruption is ok, as long as you’re not the only one doing it, right?

        As long as there are apologists for corruption, there will always be corruption.

        2
        Reply
        • Skip's Fungo

          1 day ago

          MLB fan, you are an apologist for corruption then.

          Clark resigned because he was boinking his sister-in-law. The only persons that affected was his brother and his wife.

          2
          Reply
        • foppert3

          1 day ago

          Yeah. His daughters are loving it.

          2
          Reply
        • Jdt8312

          19 hours ago

          Tony Clark needed to fired. He resigned over an affair with his sister in law. He’s still being investigated for questionable financial decisions regarding reporting of funds to a youth baseball organization run by MLBPA. But the owners are an even more shady group. A bunch of billionaires claiming poverty, but won’t lift a finger to promote the sport in their markets, but will take money out of the pockets of the real money earners, and the fans of those teams, and not spend it on the team, and it’s payroll. Yeah…there’s no corruption there.

          Reply
    • SportsFan0000

      1 day ago

      Says who?!

      Boras is an excellent negotiator who does his job and gets the best deal he can for his clients.

      Reply
  67. foppert3

    2 days ago

    Ha ha. Bobby is the man. Problem gone. Just like Bauer. You take him on, you got to keep your nose very very clean.

    Reply
  68. Kermit The Frog

    2 days ago

    I think it’s fair to ask why he was head of the MLBPA to begin with.

    He’s a high school graduate with no legal experience going up against the most experienced labor attorneys in the country. It’s malpractice to represent yourself, yet this is what the players have been doing for years.

    6
    Reply
    • St.Philly

      2 days ago

      It’s not like they don’t have legal staff

      3
      Reply
  69. Attystephenadams

    2 days ago

    You want a cap owners? Sure thing. Open your books and have revenue sharing of the broadcast rights like the NFL., and then we can talk about a sharing of total revenues with the players. That would be fair, right?

    3
    Reply
  70. Shadowpartner

    2 days ago

    This guy is going to be indicted. Felony charges on the way.

    4
    Reply
  71. foppert3

    2 days ago

    It’s a ridiculous notion I know, but the players need to think about changing the culture. The extent of the baseball us v them is no good for anyone. It’s farked up. Counterproductive BS. No one is getting hurt if they tone it down. Younger dudes need to step up and change it up.

    Reply
    • Web's #2

      1 day ago

      All players get hurt if they “tone it down”.

      Reply
      • foppert3

        1 day ago

        I’m sure they will cope. Pretty sure a tone adjustment will still see some seriously fine living in their future. You never know, it might even be appreciated to the point where it helps. Fancy that ! People being respectful and considerate and being rewarded. Crazy stuff.

        Their egos might hurt a bit but that’s what happens when you grow up. You don’t care about your ego so much.

        Reply
  72. Stormintazz

    2 days ago

    Wonder what would happen if Back loaded contracts were stopped? No teams can use them anymore. Would contracts go down or length only?

    Reply
    • Seamaholic

      2 days ago

      They’re not that common. Wouldn’t have much effect.

      Reply
      • phantomofdb

        17 hours ago

        Uhh…the Dodgers alone have 10 players with deferred contracts. Ohtani, Betts, Snell, Freeman, Smith, Tucker, Edman, Hernandez, Scott, Diaz. Nobody else has that many… yet… but Dodgers are proving that it buys championships. Stopping backloaded contracts would have a humongous effect on the game.

        Reply
  73. Seamaholic

    2 days ago

    So apparently he was boinking his sister-in-law, who also worked for him. Classy. But that’s the immediate reason for the firing, which was very much a firing not a resignation.

    4
    Reply
    • PhilsJustPhils

      2 days ago

      Tony! Toni! Toné!——>

      2
      Reply
      • slowcurve

        1 day ago

        Hello, fellow old person!

        1
        Reply
    • Skip's Fungo

      1 day ago

      Facts seem to escape you. The article said that the executive committee, the only people that can fire him, have not met. He was not fired.

      2
      Reply
      • seamaholic 2

        1 day ago

        Of course he was fired. They haven’t “met” but they talked and one of them called him and said games up, you want to “resign” today or we fire you tomorrow? Don’t be so naive.

        3
        Reply
  74. cencal

    2 days ago

    A shady union leader???

    No way.

    5
    Reply
  75. Charles B

    2 days ago

    How are they going to replace a 6 foot 8 switch hitter?

    2
    Reply
  76. SandlotBenchWarmer

    2 days ago

    Don’t know why everyone is so up in arms about this. They’re both adult

    erers.

    2
    Reply
    • Lefty_Orioles_Fan

      2 days ago

      Money and Greed…. Wine Women and Song
      Combine all that.. if anything it is poor example!!

      2
      Reply
  77. Texian44

    2 days ago

    After reading the article and the comments, I know less than before I started.

    1
    Reply
  78. tigers24fan

    2 days ago

    Dude had a relationship with his Sister-law gross

    2
    Reply
    • This one belongs to the Reds

      17 hours ago

      Yeah, he definitely failed the dumb a$$ test twice from the looks of it.

      Reply
  79. CaseyAbell

    2 days ago

    Sister-in-law?? Oh man, this is getting to be fun. SOAP OPERA!!

    4
    Reply
  80. Rsox

    2 days ago

    The plot sickens…

    6
    Reply
  81. Cam

    2 days ago

    Let’s normalize firing and prosecuting instead of resignations.

    2
    Reply
  82. baseballguru

    2 days ago

    So TC scammed on his brothers wife⁉️ Nasty for both him & her. I think comp has been insane for players. You can raise floors & CBT penalty levels. But the guys in the top 5% is crazy. 3/4 of a billion for a .260 BA & meh defender is crazy. No player outside of Ohtani even approaches the final contract value wise. The fans need More affordable tickets. There needs to be a salary cap.

    3
    Reply
    • Bucket Number Six

      1 day ago

      Was it the brother’s wife? Or the wife’s sister?

      4
      Reply
      • Jerry Hairston Jr's Toupee

        1 day ago

        Great soap opera nonetheless….

        Reply
  83. slowcurve

    1 day ago

    Guess I’ll be watching a bunch of tennis in 2027, cuz we ain’t getting a season.

    2
    Reply
  84. ClevelandSteelEngines

    1 day ago

    A whistle-blower is the source of these allegations. I wonder who now owes a favor? Very intriguing internal and external political fight. There seems to be more than two sides. Obviously there is the league office camp and player’s union; however, the player’s union may not be so united with potentially two factions. Whomever takes over Clark’s role will be very interesting. There is a lot riding on upcoming negotiations for fans, particularly related to baseball’s future.

    Reply
  85. SuperDuper

    1 day ago

    Wow, this is huge.

    1
    Reply
  86. Jerry Hairston Jr's Toupee

    1 day ago

    Tony’s been a bad boy. Allegedly….

    Reply
  87. Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

    1 day ago

    Well, I guess we ought to find some new distractions for 2027. Maybe we all get really into Indy Ball leagues?

    Reply
    • Web's #2

      1 day ago

      If the owners lockout the players, that will be the only baseball in the summer after college and high school ball is over.

      Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      1 day ago

      I’m relocating to I dunno and getting season tickets for Banana Ball.

      Reply
  88. Mrbarky

    1 day ago

    Wonderful handling of the pre 1980 guys who got screwed on pension benefits.Many of these guys walked the picket lines and paid union dues.They are offering these guys max pensions of $718.00 per 43 days of service.Todays pension of 43 days of service of $6875.00.Clarks union partner Som guys missed by a day.Steve Rogers another former player who works for the union at 500k a yr plus his mlb pension stated that sometimes guys fall through the cracks.Rogers has no heart as some of these guys hit hard times after their mlb careers.

    1
    Reply
  89. Damasosburntjersey

    1 day ago

    He’s an ex player. How does this happen? How does playing baseball 8/9 months a year for 20+ years qualify you for a job like this? It seemed shady from the start. Instead of a figure head they need a leader. A realistic leader trained in labour law, not stuck on a line in the sand that is no longer a viable business plan. This union is obviously split. They let MILB into the union and thought owners wouldn’t care. Clark should never have let that happen. He did and the owners now likely have the hammer. A salary cap looks good to the guys at the bottom who will never push the ceiling. Until this sports spending has rules the players can agree to and a floor the owners agree on both sides are spinning their wheels.
    I am assuming baseball 2027 doesn’t start until June if at all.

    1
    Reply
    • Web's #2

      1 day ago

      Clark was a long-time union player rep, executive committee member as a player, and then union employee and deputy director under Weiner, when he was unanimously elected to be the executive director. That was how he was placed in the position. The players, the people that make up the union, felt he was the best choice at that time.

      To me, he did not seem to have the qualifications to negotiate a labor agreement and that was born out in the first two CBA negotiations he was part of. That was why he was forced to hire Bruce Meyer as chief negotiator.

      Bringing the minor league players into the MLBPA was long overdue. It took away the owner’s leverage, or as you put it “hammer”, to just say we will just bring up minor leaguers to play if you won’t agree to our demands. It was a brilliant strategic move and was something that had been in the works for a decade.

      A salary cap is never going to happen as long as there is revenue disparity between the MLB teams and an agreement to have financial transparency and a 50/50 split of revenue between the teams and the players. From minor league players to the highest paid superstars, more than 90% of the union is in solidarity on that point.

      In 2022 the owners lost millions each because they locked out the players and had to absorb the costs associated with rescheduled games and spring training. No regular season games were lost, so the players collected 100% of their salaries.

      I am not so sure that the owners are willing to lose billions this time just to try to force the players into positions they are already in solidarity against. The players are also prepared to weather any lockout that extends into the season. While the owners are taking huge losses in revenue while still having to pay for all the expenses other than player salary related to running a team, the players will dip into a fund they have been building up since 2018 to help players that need it meet their obligations.

      Rob Manfred said at the owner’s meeting that MLB revenue increased to over $13 billion in 2025. If the 2027 season is lost to an owner lockout, the teams lose all of that revenue while still having several billion in financial obligations. Some teams may be forced into bankruptcy by that large of a loss.

      Also remember that the minor league players are now part of the union and their CBA also expires at the end of the 2026 season. There would be no major or minor league games.

      1
      Reply
  90. The Gambler

    1 day ago

    It seems since baseball decided to jump in bed promoting online gambling that bad things are starting to happen, dig up Mountain Landis before it all goes to crap

    2
    Reply
  91. Captainmike1

    1 day ago

    He sounds like a corrupt Terrible, awful, rotten, inferior, poor, shoddy, despicable, miserable human

    2
    Reply
  92. Slider_withcheese

    1 day ago

    No wonder the NFL is Americas game. Baseball is dead. It served it purpose, but other sports and other leagues are better anyway

    Reply
    • Jarred Kelenic's Beer Can

      11 hours ago

      The only reason NFL is popular at all is because they’re broadcasting on FOX/CBS/NBC and any idiot with a TV antenna can get those channels for free.

      Reply
  93. Type O Negative

    1 day ago

    David Cone for Prez

    3
    Reply
  94. Web's #2

    1 day ago

    Glad I missed all the speculation about why he resigned. There sure is a lot of unfounded hatred and trolling on this site. Tim, you really need to do more about mediating that, It is what drives many good people away.

    My 2 cents on the Clark resignation.
    Well, closer to 4 cents since it will be a long post.

    #1 – Clark is not charged with any crimes. Until he is both charged and tried, saying he is corrupt is both stupid and un-American. It reveals much about you as a person to claim that about him.

    #2 – He resigned because of an internal investigation about an improper relationship with a union employee. That she was his sister-in-law makes it icky, but not the reason for his resignation. As others have spoken about and written about today, if it was someone unrelated to him an extramarital affair with a union employee would have still led to his resignation or firing.

    #3 – He was not fired or even forced out. As multiple articles point out, the executive committee was not even scheduled a meeting to talk about the findings of the investigation into his affair. They met after he resigned only to discuss his replacement.

    #4 – Clark was ineffective as the executive director of a union. He failed in the first two CBA negotiations to protect the interests of the players. It seemed to me like he felt as a former player and executive board member and an employee of the union for 3 years under Weiner that he knew how to negotiate a labor agreement and he was wrong. It was not until he capitulated to the demands by players on the executive board and brought on Bruce Meyer as the lead negotiator that the players started to make some headway in addressing the inequities between the owners and the players in compensation.

    #5 – His resignation will change none of the points that the players and owners will be negotiating for the next CBA.

    The players will still say no to a cap unless it is preceded by an agreement to 100% revenue sharing, the owners opening their financials to the union, and players getting a guaranteed portion of total revenue of the sport.

    Owners will still refuse to do any of that.

    As has happened in every other CBA negotiation, not just in baseball, there will be incremental changes in the CBA and baseball, a growing and expanding sport, will continue on.

    The only thing that can change that is the owners thinking that they can force the players to agree to unfavorable compromises by being locked out. That won’t happen. Meyer has directed the players to build up a sizable fund to protect the players that would be unable to bear the loss of income in the case of a lockout by the owners and the union is ready. I have heard it described by a union player rep as “large enough to buy our own team”. The owners would lose far more than the players if they try that again.

    That doesn’t mean the union won’t make compromises and it doesn’t mean that owners won’t make compromises. That is the nature of honest negotiations. It just means that a lockout will have the effect of entrenching the union and causing the owners huge losses in revenue. The owners have financial obligations that they will have to deal with even if there is no revenue because part or all of the 2027 season is lost because of a lockout.

    We will see who is appointed executive director tomorrow and I am hoping for the player’s sake that they appoint Meyers at least as an interim director until the current CBA negotiations are completed. The union needs a labor attorney at the helm. Too much is at stake.

    7
    Reply
    • foppert3

      1 day ago

      Ha ha. The latest Pads Fan. Got to give him credit. Reads like he is at least trying not be an arrogant, offensive, know it all fwit on here. Bravo ! Well done sir.

      1
      Reply
      • sheagoodbye

        1 day ago

        Wait, are you suggesting that Clark resigning right before these allegations came to light ISN’T a mere coincidence? The same guy who has acted like an arrogant and egotistical clown in public? What a hateful troll you are /s.

        Maybe Web isn’t wrong that Clark is innocent. But I’d definitely take the betting odds that he is.

        Reply
        • KingCharles911

          1 day ago

          i was at a padre game it was like the 9th inning.. i turned around and said if this mother f******* hits a hr ill pay u 100 bucks, sure enough it was slapped to deep left,.. the guy said no keep your money. so i feel i always owe this mother f@#(@(#@ 100 bucks.

          Reply
    • Captainmike1

      1 day ago

      Only an insider would write a post like that

      1
      Reply
      • outinleftfield

        1 day ago

        Captain, being an insider would mean having more info than fans like us, so that is a good thing right? Web has been on here longer than I have and I have been reading this site religiously for 15 years.

        Reply
    • seamaholic 2

      1 day ago

      Oh for crying out loud, of course he was fired.

      1
      Reply
    • shark stitches

      1 day ago

      I someone leaves this site for unfound hatred and trolling, they’re not good people like they think they are. They’re children who haven’t learned how to ignore it.

      2
      Reply
    • griffey9988

      1 day ago

      tony, why refer to yourself in third person?

      2
      Reply
    • DolemiteisMyname

      1 day ago

      @Web #6 Maybe the MLBPA will ask Manfred to extend the current agreement another year. to give them time to find a replacement. And give the new guy time to look over the agreement and have meetings with the players..

      Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        1 day ago

        @DolemiteisMyname

        Not a chance any extension will happen. MLBPA has a built up a sizeable war chest/strike fund in the event it needs to be used. They’ve done this since before the 1994 strike. There is enough money to hire the best labor negotiators to paying out stadium workers concession crew, and any staff financial hardship due to missed games.

        Bruce Meyer will also likely be their new guy who is intimately familiar with the CBA.

        1
        Reply
      • outinleftfield

        1 day ago

        Dolemite, not a chance.

        Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      1 day ago

      @Web’s #2 Well said.

      Reply
    • outinleftfield

      1 day ago

      Web, you were right, that is a very long and detailed post. A novela almost. I agree with most of it except that Clark wasn’t forced out. He knew he would be fired as soon as the board met, so he resigned instead. It still means he was forced out and rightfully so. Extramarital affairs with employees are almost always grounds for termination.

      1
      Reply
      • YankeesBleacherCreature

        1 day ago

        Good points. See former Astronomer CEO Andy Byron and it was a private company. Clark also represents a ginormous public entertainment platform. MLBPA always calls itself a “family”. If he’s capable of backstabbing his own personal family, then one needs to really question where his priorities are.

        2
        Reply
    • JoeBrady

      18 hours ago

      He failed in the first two CBA negotiations to protect the interests of the players.
      =========================
      1-Did he fail, or did others further up the food chain fail?

      2-Did he fail twice or once. The CBA 10 years ago was awful for the players. The CBA 5 years ago was a huge improvement. As the Skubal contract showed, the union has largely defanged the 6th year of arbitration.

      3-IRT to ‘innocent until proven guilty’, it is the American way. But folks on the inside often know which way this is going to fall before it becomes public.

      Reply
  95. SuperDuper

    1 day ago

    Couldn’t use his dinger for his wife.

    Reply
    • C Us Sink

      17 hours ago

      Swing batter batter swing.

      1
      Reply
  96. KingCharles911

    1 day ago

    He knows the amount of bs he is gonna go through in the next couple years trying to figure out player caps.. ty for your service

    Reply
  97. kreckert

    1 day ago

    If only Manfred would do the same, it’d be a good start.

    I can’t blame him for not wanting to be one of the faces of the upcoming clown show. Because in ten short months we’re going to be treated to a master class in how little the players and owners actually care about the sport. The only thing that they’ll all be able to agree on is that greed is good. Where the hell is Michael Douglas when you need him?

    1
    Reply
    • DolemiteisMyname

      1 day ago

      You’ll have to talk to the owners about that. They pay his salary.

      Reply
    • outinleftfield

      1 day ago

      Manfred already announced his retirement. This CBA will be his last hurrah.

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        18 hours ago

        MLB needs to keep Manfred around until they consolidate 100% of the broadcasting revenue. He can’t do that in one year, and I don’t know if anyone else can do that.

        Reply
  98. CarlosDelgado

    1 day ago

    Tony Clark has been a major laughing stock in my eyes dating back the past 6 or 7 years. Such great news. Let’s get that salary cap going

    2
    Reply
  99. outinleftfield

    1 day ago

    Clark was dipping his wick in his sister-in-law? Just an extramarital affair with an employee is enough to get you fired in most businesses. Add in it being with your sister-in-law and it just got ugly all around, both business and family. As my brother from another mother used to say, no ‘tang worth that kind of grief.

    As a fan of baseball players, I hope that Bruce Meyer is given the job as executive director. not just on an interim basis, but permanently. Once he came on board in 2018 the union galvanized and made some real headway against the owners in clawing back some of the revenue share Clark lost them his first 2 times through CBA negotiations.

    I do find it interesting that right after Clark smacked down a coup attempt by a few disgruntled former star players and Harry Marino that an anonymous whistleblower made a complaint to the Federal Courts.

    I have a lot I would like to say about Harry Marino but I will let you do your own research. Suffice to say he was not the key player in getting the minor leaguers into the MLBPA. Ask the guys at AML, Raul Jacobson, Ty Kelly, Matt Paré, and Bill Fletcher about him.

    1
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      18 hours ago

      I do find it interesting that right after Clark smacked down a coup attempt by a few disgruntled former star players and Harry Marino that an anonymous whistleblower made a complaint to the Federal Courts.
      ==========================
      That’s how these things always start. The problem with doing anything wrong is that, sooner or later, someone always drops a dime on you.

      The entire Drexel/Milken thing started when someone in South America didn’t get a payoff.

      2
      Reply
  100. SammythebullPavano

    1 day ago

    Never though much of Clark in this position.

    Reply
  101. BigA 3

    1 day ago

    MLB the only pro sport without a salary cap. NFL and NBA players are all making a mint with one.

    1
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      18 hours ago

      I’d like to see the numbers, but it feels like the players are shorting themselves by not becoming partners.

      Reply
  102. The Gambler

    24 hours ago

    Out of all the guys who represented the players he was the weakest link

    1
    Reply
  103. Western High School

    22 hours ago

    Let me get this straight..
    “Morality” over “ Money “ ( ongoing Federal investigation ).. caused him to resign.. immediately.
    Ok..
    Got it..

    1
    Reply
  104. Greenwell

    22 hours ago

    Brother’s wife or wife’s sister? I gotta know

    3
    Reply
    • Best Screenname Ever

      22 hours ago

      Exactly. Otherwise this is just another story about another crooked union official. They’re dime a dozen. If the feds hadn’t got involved you’d never have read about it from MLBPA publicists like Drelich and Rosenthal.

      I gotta know is this guy was crazy enough to hook up with his wife’s sister. That’s suicidal. Nothing the feds could ever do to him would match the unlimited fury of a jealous, betrayed sister.

      3
      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        18 hours ago

        Joemo
        I’m also intrrested in the timing.
        =========================
        I’d like to know the money. A lot of people get jobs because of someone you know. Was she a $75k secretary, or was she a $250k admin assistant with no skills?

        1
        Reply
    • Joemo

      20 hours ago

      I’m also intrrested in the timing. Was it relationship and then he got her the job, or job then relationship? I feel like the first one is somehow worse.

      1
      Reply
      • Best Screenname Ever

        14 hours ago

        Or worst of all, job in order to get the relationship.

        1
        Reply
    • WadeBoggsWildRide

      14 hours ago

      Inappropriate relationship doesn’t necessarily mean boinking does it? Maybe it was inappropriate in a business sense?

      If it is boinking that is a whole lot more entertaining!

      Reply
  105. Mikenmn

    21 hours ago

    Clark should go because the MLBPA needs someone undistracted at the negotiating table–that’s enough. On the personal morality stuff–yes, gross, but is there a waking hour that goes by where we don’t learn of something done by someone of influence? We couldn’t write posts on this site fast enough to keep up with all the names.

    1
    Reply
  106. Duke Winston

    21 hours ago

    For the sake of continuity, I think they have to get David Letterman for this.

    1
    Reply
  107. dpsmith22

    20 hours ago

    No, he is getting out because he is a criminal. You resign, no charges will be filled. Ask the former governor of NY, he can tell you exactly how it works.

    1
    Reply
  108. Bobby smac9

    20 hours ago

    Bruce Meyer fits the need for a labor negotiator. Clark was overmatched in his capacity as the Head of players. That alone should have been the reason for his resignation.

    1
    Reply
  109. CarolinaCubsandKush

    20 hours ago

    A criminal degen was in charge of the MLBPA. Good riddance.

    1
    Reply
  110. medic87

    19 hours ago

    Smart, he knew what was coming.

    1
    Reply
  111. Jdt8312

    19 hours ago

    The players need to find someone in the vein of Marvin Miller.

    2
    Reply
  112. MPrck

    19 hours ago

    Tony went full on Omar ?

    1
    Reply
  113. Edd 2

    19 hours ago

    Fellow men…Stop thinking with your d**k. Ruin a career because you cant think with the right head…Just dumb people

    2
    Reply
  114. Quinnap89

    18 hours ago

    A whole new meaning to Players Association

    3
    Reply
  115. BigBopper

    18 hours ago

    Think he was a juicer…..

    1
    Reply
  116. LGM!

    17 hours ago

    Now he can run for Congress!

    3
    Reply
  117. sergefunction

    15 hours ago

    “I’m stepping down to spend more time with my mistress” would have been so epic.

    Missed opportunity.

    4
    Reply
  118. itsmeheyhii

    13 hours ago

    He has decided to spend more time with his family at the North Pole.

    Reply
« Older Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Bruce Meyer Elected MLBPA Executive Director

    Spencer Schwellenbach, Hurston Waldrep To Undergo Elbow Surgery

    Tony Clark Steps Down As MLBPA Executive Director

    Padres, Walker Buehler Agree To Minor League Deal

    Padres Sign Germán Márquez

    Padres Sign Griffin Canning

    Pablo López Diagnosed With UCL Tear

    Brewers Sign Luis Rengifo

    Pirates Sign Marcell Ozuna

    Padres Sign A.J. Preller To Multi-Year Extension

    Diamondbacks Sign Zac Gallen

    Padres, Nick Castellanos Agree To Contract

    Brewers Sign Gary Sánchez

    Dodgers, Max Muncy Agree To Extension

    Orioles Sign Chris Bassitt

    Astros, Blue Jays Swap Jesús Sánchez For Joey Loperfido

    Phillies Release Nick Castellanos

    Yankees Re-Sign Paul Goldschmidt

    Rockies Sign Jose Quintana

    Jackson Holliday To Begin Season On Injured List Following Hamate Surgery

    Recent

    MLB Mailbag: Red Sox, Brewers, Phillies, Braves

    Bruce Meyer Elected MLBPA Executive Director

    Cubs Hire Dixon Machado As Minor League Manager

    Yankees Infield Notes: McMahon, Volpe

    Mariners, Mitch Garver Agree To Minor League Deal

    Poll: Will Masataka Yoshida Make The Red Sox’ Roster?

    Astros Sign CJ Alexander To Minor League Deal

    Brusdar Graterol Won’t Be Ready For Opening Day

    Astros Showing Interest In Michael Conforto

    Blue Jays Claim Ben Cowles

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Every MLB Trade In July
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android iTunes Play Store

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • 2025-26 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Front Office Originals
    • Tim Dierkes' MLB Mailbag
    • 2025-26 Offseason Outlook Series
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2026-27 MLB Free Agent List
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2026
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version