![]() |
|
|
| |
« Angels Eyeing Backup Shortstops | Main | Vizquel Wants To Play Next Year »
Astros MLB.com beat writer Krysten Oliphant reports that the team has signed veteran outfielder Darin Erstad and right-handed pitcher Brian Moehler to one-year extensions.
Erstad gets a $1.75MM deal plus bonuses and Moehler nets a $2.3MM extension and bonuses; he has an option for 2010. Erstad and Moehler have been a couple of bright spots among Ed Wade's offseason acquisitions.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e554e458748834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Astros Sign Erstad, Moehler To Extensions:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Yikes. Nothing like looking to the future. Welcome to 5th place in '09, Astros.
Posted by: MickS | August 30, 2008 at 09:06 AM
"Yikes. Nothing like looking to the future. Welcome to 5th place in '09, Astros."
Wow! Intelligent response.
I didn't realize that signing a back up OF who has played well when needed and a pitcher that can start or go to the bullpen was an indication of a 5th place finish.
Mick, you must not have any knowledge of the Astros season. Moehler has been an unexpected surprise. He was the last man to make the roster (as a non-roster invitee the past two seasons). Signing him for next year doesn't indicate that he's a lock for the rotation either.
And as far as Erstad is concerned, he is a good insurance plan in case Michael Bourn's struggles continue into next season.
Let's not act like these are Earth shattering deals here.
Posted by: dogscoach | August 30, 2008 at 09:26 AM
Hey, they're in 4th place now, so excuse me for thinking that a strategy for next year that involves re-upping with mediocre re-treads, while the Pirates are investing in youth, might lead to a little slippage in the standings.
Posted by: MickS | August 30, 2008 at 09:35 AM
By the way, how's the 'stros minor league system looking these day?
Posted by: MickS | August 30, 2008 at 09:36 AM
Yes, because the signing of a backup outfielder and an emergency starter (both of whom have exceeded expectations to great extents) is clearly an indication of how the Astros will look next year. Never mind if the Astros sign a player like Sheets. The difference between winning 90 games and winning 70 games next year was signing two role players. Good call.
Posted by: Adam H. | August 30, 2008 at 09:49 AM
What does resigning a bench player and a 5th SP/bullpen arm have to do with the minor league system or how they finish in the standings?
And did you really just mention the Pirates? Finish over .500 before really touting the franchise.
Mick must not know how to fill out a team's roster. Every team has to have some veterans in place on the bench for depth.
Posted by: dogscoach | August 30, 2008 at 10:10 AM
MickS is right. Moehler and Erstrad were players that teams like the Yankees Redsox and Angels were willing to clean out there minor league prospects for. The Astros could have received 6-8 qualaity prospects for these two guys.
This was a great signing IMO. These guys actually could have tested FA and probaly been signed elswhere. Instead we have two low risk veterans signed up for next year, and Moehler is the kind of guy who will start or relieve, and has been very healthy. Erstrad is a former batting title champ and 2 gold glove position player who is on our bench and working with younger players. These are actually the kind of moves that do win champions. The big name signings dont always work out (right Yankee fans?)
Posted by: Astro Fan in NYC | August 30, 2008 at 10:48 AM
For some reason after my 1st paragraph (re: cleaning out the minor leagues) I wrote end of sarcasm and it didnt show up. I was not being serious there.
Posted by: Astro Fan in NYC | August 30, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Moehler's a decent risk, I guess. His peripherals don't match his ERA, though -- expect an ERA in the mid to high 4.00's next year.
But Erstad's a waste. His OPS was over .700 this year in about 270 PAs (which still isn't that great and a smallish sample) but it barely broke .600 the past two years. If your organization doesn't have someone in the farm system who can do that, you're screwed anyway. The money isn't a huge loss, but they should be able to sign someone similar for the league-minimum.
Posted by: Sky | August 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM
Not to put too fine a point on it but I think that the Astros and their fans are competely delusional. They are not even close to competing with the Cubs and Brewers. If there was ever a team that needs to start over, they are it. Next year, they'll be no better and Roy O. and comapny will be one year older, a little less effective and not as valuable in the trade market. This should be a team of 23 year olds building for the future (hence my comment on the sorrt state of the farm system). Instead it's a patchwork of largely unexciting, aging role players trying to eke out a .500 season. I don't dislike the Astros franchise, I just don't understand its thinking.
Posted by: MickS | August 30, 2008 at 12:46 PM
the Astros signing Erstad to be a role player on the bench is fine with me ... because it gives them insurance in case bourn doesnt show any improvement..also because its better than having to trade away a prospect for a role hitter like the phillies just did for matt stairs (fabio castro for matt stairs) but i have to say that the money on brian mohler could have been spent else where and it probably was a waste to resign him due to the fact he is unlikely to have another great season like the one he is having... he will be 38 next year... and quite frankly there were better emergency starting options that could have been had on the cheap and 2.3 million for mohler plus an option for '10 isnt a great signing IMO...
Posted by: BaseballFanatic40 | August 30, 2008 at 01:27 PM
The Astros aren't in a bad situation as everyone thinks. They'll be older but experience counts during playoff runs. In my opinion they're getting two off-season signings out of the way in order to focus more time and effort on the SP market. Moehler and Erstad are role players who the young guys look up to and fill in when needed. Every single MLB team has these type of players on their team. As for their chances next year, they'll have more Post Season experience on their squad than the Brewers, Pirates, or Reds (Erstad, Tejada, Berkman, Blum, Oswalt, Brocail, Backe, Valverde). Of those Backe, Oswalt, Berkman, Blum and Erstad have actually been to a World Series. That's a lot more than the Cubs have. Say what you want about the Astros, but they'll be more prepared for next year than 1/2 the teams in the NL Central. The Cubs, Red Sox, Yankees would have been all over Erstad if he reached Free Agency. How about this, let's name the last 3 current Pittsburgh Pirates who have done something in the past 15 years, Aramis Ramirez, no wait he's with the Cubs now. Jason Bay, that's right, he's with the Red Sox. Barry Bonds, oh yeah, they let him go a while back.
Posted by: Guild Of Calamitous Intent | August 30, 2008 at 01:30 PM
and yes the Pirates are investing in Youth, so they can trade them to other teams once they show promise. I'd take the Astros Ownership, player development, and minor leaguers over the Pirates any day.
Posted by: Guild Of Calamitous Intent | August 30, 2008 at 01:47 PM
Spoken like a true "homer". According to almost every professional evaluator of talent, the Astros farm system is the worst in baseball.
Posted by: MickS | August 30, 2008 at 02:14 PM
"According to almost every professional evaluator of talent, the Astros farm system is the worst in baseball."
That's based on prior to this season's draft. At the beginning of next season, they'll probably move a little bit more towards the middle of the pack. Jordan Lyles and Jason Castro helped improve this farm system. They also have some decent talent in Brian Bogusevic, Bud Norris, Jordan Parraz, Chris Johnson and James Van Ostrand. Their problem is that there AAA team is basically a wasteland of washed up ex major leaguers and journeyman minor leaguers. They only have 2 or 3 guys there that anyone could consider a prospect (Johnson and Gervacio), and they have JR Towles who's hitting over .300 and OPSing somewhere near .900 as a catcher.
Posted by: Darin | August 30, 2008 at 02:59 PM
The astros had the best farm system in 01/02.... Then they went to the playoffs/ world series but after 06 purpura( the ex gm) destroyed the farmsystem. Traded away talent( willy t, buccholz for Jason jennings) signed woody williams... Kept chris Burke, morgan ensberg, and Jason lane... Didnt sign draft picks... So yeah the farmsystem is a mess right now.... Wade has said it will take time... Wade is known for drafting and signing his picks and some of them we fear unless your a Philly fan( Howard, utley, rollins , hamels.)
Signing moehler and erstad to me was a good move.... Erstad is a gold glove OF and 1st baseman.... And moehler has been our consistent pitcher since he was given the chance to pitch in the rotation....really if wade gets wolf to stay. Then the stros will be after 1 fa pitcher to put behind oswalt....
Rotation could be
Oswalt
sheets/garland(any other fa)
wandy
moehler
wolf/paulino
.... No it isn't a over powering rotation but not all over powering rotation works( mariners, tigers,yanks)
Darin-you forgot to put paulino .... If he
ever stays healthy...since he is AAA
Posted by: elcaballofan4eva | August 30, 2008 at 03:29 PM
I guess the faithful (you guys) and the outside observer (me) aren't seeing eye to eye. Oh well, that's baseball. From what I've read, the 'stros '08 draft was middle of the pack while both the Cubs and Pirates had a top 10 draft, not withstanding the Pirates current difficulties with Alvarez but being offset somewhat by having cashed in Bay, Nady and Marte). Given the current state of the Astros farm system, that means they may be falling even farther behind. You may make fun of the Pirates today (and, by the way, I'm not a Pirates fan) but, with the current trajectory, I'm guessing the Pirates will have the upper hand in about 2 to 3 years. My perspective is that Oswalt and Berkman should have been traded this year for quality prospects (what's the old adage about it being better to trade a player a year too soon rather than a year too late?). I must say that I'm impressed by Astro fans optimism though I believe it is mis-guided. Anyway, good luck!
Posted by: MickS | August 30, 2008 at 04:14 PM
one if the announcers said that yes the pirates have had the top picks pretty much every year.... And those "top picks" haven't produced well... Maholm, grozelanny and the others that have been hurt..... Trading oswalt and berkman would have been stuid.... Yes they could have traded them for prospects that hasnt had any major league experience.... Berkman has came out and said that the only team he wouldnt mind to be traded too was the rangers.... And they dont have much pitching that they are willing to give up.... And trading away oswalt would be saying trade away big Z when they struggled( 06 the cubs lost 90+ games)...
And yes the astros are in fourth place but this division isn't the "weaker division" by no means.... The astros might stink but they a 7 games better than last year already....
And the pirates keep on trading away their prized players ..
Posted by: elcaballofan4eva | August 30, 2008 at 04:43 PM
Did someone actually say that Erstad and Moehler couldve landed the Astros 6-8 quality prospects? Really?
They're nice players but honestly they're not anything terribly special, and teams likely wouldn't be willing to offer much more than salary relief and one or two solid low level guys.
Posted by: scribbletone | August 30, 2008 at 04:58 PM
MickS,
It might make sense to trade Berkman, Oswalt and other other vets, but their big 3 (Berkman, Oswalt and Lee) all have NTCs granted by previous GMs. Ed Wade has his hands tied a bit and they probably wouldn't get fair return because Berkman and Oswalt have stated that they would accept a trade, but only to a team of their chosing. Lee wouldn't accept a trade unless he got ample compensation, since he took less money to play in Houston to be near his cattle ranch. So what difference would it make to the Astros to trade Oswalt but not Berkman or Lee?
If they could trade all 3 and at least get fair return, then sure they should probably look into it, but as I explained above, that seems a bit impossible. So the only recourse is to sign free agents and hope maybe they can luck out on some of the low risk guys like Erstad and Moehler.
The Astros are 2 starters and either a CF or C away from being quite competitive. btw, they'd be fighting for 1st place right now if they were in the NL West.....and 6 games out of then NL East lead. No one would have thought twice if the D-backs signed a 4th outfielder and a veteran swingman.
Scribbletone,
that guy was joking.
Posted by: Darin | August 30, 2008 at 05:50 PM
All of your perceptions of the Pirates are based on the Dave Littlefield regime. Don't be surprised when things change significantly.
Posted by: MickS | August 30, 2008 at 06:32 PM
I'm not so sure he was joking.
But anyway I agree that the Pirates organization is on he upswing. They've committed to rebuilding with youth and already have a lot of solid pieces. McCutchen, McLouth, the LaRoches, Doumit, Pearce, Moss, Walker and hopefully Alvarez offer a lot of potential.
They don't have nearly as much pitchin with Snell, Gorzelanny, Maholm, Duke, Capps, Lincoln, Moskos and Morris.
Regardless though the new front office has a clear direction and that's something they has been missing for a while.
Posted by: scribbletone | August 30, 2008 at 07:00 PM
scribble,
Read the post directly after the one you're talking about. The guy says he was being sarcastic.
Posted by: Darin | August 30, 2008 at 07:25 PM
The Astros ownership is known as some of the worst in MLB. And their GM is pretty lost.
I agree the Pirates have historically been inept, but Neil Huntington is a Mark Shapiro disciple and will bring the success of the small market Indians to Pittsburgh.
The signings aren't awful, but $5MM could have been better spent. Would I mind Erstad sitting on my bench? No, he's a good fielder. But I'd much rather have something else for that money. Houston doesn't have an unlimited payroll.
Posted by: Sky | August 31, 2008 at 07:37 PM
I am hardcore til I die stors fan but check this link out...
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-briefing19-2008aug19,0,433363.story
the first part is about the best and worst owners/franchises.
Posted by: AstrosCoverage.blogspot.com | September 02, 2008 at 07:22 PM
and yes i said "stors" not stros and i realize i should throw some capitalization and what not in there but o well
Posted by: AstrosCoverage.blogspot.com | September 02, 2008 at 07:22 PM
Houston does have a limited payroll...Ole money bags or "grocery bags" McLane isnt going to shell out much more...tightwad. Erstad is a player i like and Moehler has been about as great as an Astros fan can hope for the last month...20-9 record in August kinda blew me away...the thing is us Stros' fans that are the real fans will sit through bad years to get to the good again...kinda like the pirates with the exception of a "great season" hasn't happened for a long time. OK now your turn to tear my posts to pieces...have fun and dont forget its just my opinion
Posted by: AstrosCoverage.blogspot.com | September 02, 2008 at 07:25 PM