![]() |
|
|
| |
« Offseason Outlook: New York Mets | Main | Uggla Trade Unlikely? »
Links for Tuesday...
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053588e384970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Odds and Ends: Gillick, Cashman, Burnett:


|
|
Gordon Beckham is basically untouchable? Wouldn't the correct term be "completely untouchable"? Correct me if i'm wrong but by draft rules he can't be traded.
Posted by: Ripwa | October 14, 2008 at 10:09 AM
You're absolutely right, Ripwa. Beckham can't be dealt for a full year after he's signed.
I would imagine the Sox could get a very nice return for Vazquez if they decided to move him.
Posted by: Anticon23 | October 14, 2008 at 10:58 AM
Semantics aside, if he were not draft protected, he would still be too valuable to be traded.
I think most sox fans pray for a Vazquez trade. Richard showed that he could effectively fill in for him, so it's a matter of finding a Contreras replacement.
Posted by: Chunk23 | October 14, 2008 at 11:05 AM
Ripwa- I think Beckham could be dealt as a PTBNL in a deal that happened during the 2009 season, but I might be wrong.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 14, 2008 at 11:40 AM
I would put Alexei Ramirez in that "relatively untouchable" pile as well. Shortstops are a heavily valued commodity, and the Sox don't have a SS coming up. He also has solid speed, something the Sox lineup NEEDS in a desperate way. Alexei is cheap for several years, and there just aren't that many good shortstops in the bigs.
Jenks isn't untouchable, but I wouldn't trade him unless the offer was knock-out. Linebrink has those injuries. The rest of that pen can be hit or miss sometimes.
I don't trade Poreda unless there is a sure-fire quality starting pitcher coming in the deal, and even then, I might not trade him.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 14, 2008 at 11:51 AM
Uggla to the Cubs for Pie!
Posted by: cubs land | October 14, 2008 at 12:02 PM
Cubs Land
may want to change your name to Cubs dream land...I would imagine it would take far more than Pie to get a great bat like Uggla's.
Posted by: Andy Braves Fan | October 14, 2008 at 12:15 PM
Here is your lesson for today. Don't even bother with that Rockies Mailbox thing. Most of it is trash.
Posted by: mkorpal | October 14, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Marlins would want more for Uggla than just Pie, and they wouldn't want Pie anyways they already have Maybin in center.
Really I think it's pointless to discuss moving any of the young guys on the Sox. They have a decent core but most of their guys are getting older, and those are the guys they need to focus on moving.
I really think one of Swisher, Dye, Konerko and Thome has to be moved. Swisher doesn't belong in center, and I think he would hit better if they moved him to a more comforable position in the field. One of those guys has to be moved so Quentin, Dye, Konerko, Swish, and Thome can man right, left, first and DH. Ideally you move Konerko or Thome, but the Sox really need to land a leadoff hitter and those two would definately not land them that.
One idea though: Konerko and some to the Yankees for Johnny Damon. He may not be great in center but the Sox have shown that isn't too important to them, and he'd fit perfectly at the top of the lineup.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 14, 2008 at 12:21 PM
i was joking...i knew some cubs fan would say it so i wanted to beat them to the punch
Posted by: cubs land | October 14, 2008 at 12:23 PM
i would love for the marlins to do that as a phils fan. the white sox are going to have a nice middle infeild with alexi and beckman
Posted by: derman1984 | October 14, 2008 at 12:27 PM
the white sox should seriously think about asking konerko to waive his NTC to try and get some speed/bullpen help. he finished the season pretty hot, but he's historically only a half-season player. by that, i mean he's only productive in one half of the season. problem is, you don't know which half it will be. the middle relief to get to thornton/jenks is awful. i don't count linebrink right now, because he's not totally healthy, though he probably will be by the time spring rolls around. i wonder what the sox could get for konerko? he makes the plays at first that he should make, but he doesn't have much range and might be the slowest player in MLB. thoughts?
oh, and pie alone gets you nothing of value right now. package him with some other useful pieces, then maybe. his stock is nowhere right now. i like uggla, at least offensively, but he's not what the cubs need. i'll take derosa's offense and better glove and try and upgrade center and/or right and shortstop. derosa's coming off a career year going into his walk year. i expect an even bigger year from him in '09.
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | October 14, 2008 at 12:32 PM
listen: Pie sucks i was being sarcastic. Nobody wants Pie he is a never gonna be..he can not hit worth anything. BUT i think the cubs need a upgrade at SS or 2B. Put the RIOT at 2b and get a SS lead off hitter and put DeRosa in RF or LF.
Posted by: cubs land | October 14, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Rosenthal needs to relax on the BoSox and white players. Maybe the BoSox see white players as less confratational/problematic. Maybe he should write about Minaya and the Mets signing latino players instead...
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Has anyone read Rosenthal's article on the Sox being "too caucasian?" He mentions in the article that it might hurt their chances at certain free agents. Boston has assembled the best team they could with hopes of competing. And I remember a couple of years ago when Houston had a completely African American-free roster. No one made a big deal out of it then. Why now?
I am not a racist by any means. I agree with Terry Francona when he said that the team's objectives are color blind.
I just wanna know why Rosenthal would be trying to stir this up now, as we're down 2-1 to the Rays.
Posted by: bamabosoxfan | October 14, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Uggla is not a stellar defender but Id be willing to trade Theriot and Marshall for him. Then sign Furcal, move Fukudome to CF and plant DeRosa in RF.
This still wouldnt fix their need for a left handed power bat. I beleive Uggla hits right handed...
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 01:03 PM
bamabosoxfan:
Read my previous post on this. I completely agree with you. Rosenthal is stirring the pot. He really needs to address the Mets colapse the past 2 years and how their team chemistry sucks along with a bunch of latin players.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 01:05 PM
I did some research. Is it just me or Minaya trying to put together the all-Latin team? I mean i know they have Wright and other player that they DEVELOPED, and have traded for Schneider and Church but this is overwhelming. And dont tell me they have a great scout team in latin america....every team does!
Of Latin decent on the 40 man roster:
Tony Armas
Luis Ayala
Ambiorix Burgos
Pedro Feliciano
Nelson Figueroa
Orlando Hernandez
Pedro Martinez
Carlos Muniz
Oliver Perez
Ricardo Rincon
Duaner Sanchez
Jason Vargas
Robinson Cancel
Ramon Castro
Johan Santana
Gustavo Molina
Luis Castillo
Carlos Delgado
Ramon Martinez
Argenis Reyes
Jose Reyes
Moises Alou
Carlos Beltran
Endy Chavez
Angel Pagan
Fernando Tatis
Thats 25 of 40 players from a Latin decent. And thats just the 40 man roster....amazing. If Ozzie was available, you know he be their next manager.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 01:25 PM
RED SOX DYNASTY!-
Please never comment again...
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | October 14, 2008 at 01:28 PM
RED SOX DYNASTY!
Comments like that should be grounds for losing voting privileges.
Posted by: Chunk23 | October 14, 2008 at 01:35 PM
Maybe Ken is right. Lets put Lugo back in SS. Can't have rookie Jed Lowrie "whiting" up the team.
On second thought, Ken's an idiot.
Posted by: SierraM | October 14, 2008 at 01:40 PM
clarknaddison is on the right track. But I like DeRosa as our 2B for another year. He doesn't hit well enough to be much of a RF upgrade.
I'd like to see us sign Burrell, deal Derrek lee, and get a guy like Eckstein to back up Theriot.
Sad to say, Fontenot should be dealt for his own sake, and I want Pie gone as soon as possible.
Posted by: Michael M | October 14, 2008 at 01:43 PM
Michael,
Furcal would bump Soriano down in the order where he should be. Id rather sign Ibanez over Burrell, we need a left handed power bat. Im fine for trading Lee only if we sign Texeria.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 01:46 PM
I wouldnt get too upset about Rosenthal's article. 9 times out of 10 stories like these are written to drive readers, viewership, audience, etc to the website. If it can generate even just a modest amount of controversy, the article will get picked up and disseminated by the syndicates (AP, Reuters) and drive more traffic. Nothing more, nothing less. You (shamefully) see these things in every media outlet.
If you actually read the article, Ken pretty much downplays every point he makes. I think Rosenthal's just trying to fill his weekly quota.
Posted by: el clash combo | October 14, 2008 at 01:56 PM
RED SOX DYNASTY!-
Wow. Personal insults. You are truly intelligent. Thanks again for posting.
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | October 14, 2008 at 02:04 PM
So Rosenthal writes a dumbheaded article, most people on here rightly pan it and a moron Boston fan tries his best to prove Rosenthal's theory. Stellar work, dummy.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 14, 2008 at 02:14 PM
RED SOX DYNASTY!-
Was the (not too far off though) comment an honest mistake too? Maybe you should change your name to Red Sox Nasty. That way you'd fit right in with your political brethren.
Posted by: MickS | October 14, 2008 at 02:20 PM
Craig at Fishstripes looks at the ridiculous Dan Uggla and Scott Olsen for Yorvit Torrealba and a pitching prospect speculation, which appeared on MLB.com.
lmao too funny if real journalists at mlb.com believe that crap.
Posted by: Fishfan79 | October 14, 2008 at 02:23 PM
I hope the fish trade uggla and olsen thats coming from a phils fan of course.
Posted by: derman1984 | October 14, 2008 at 02:42 PM
"Rosenthal needs to relax on the BoSox and white players. Maybe the BoSox see white players as less confratational/problematic. Maybe he should write about Minaya and the Mets signing latino players instead..."
Seems to me to be an issue about nothing. I can't see any way the the Red Sox are actively trying to prevent non-white players from playing for them. Racism in the past meant staying with your own kind and actively excluding others of a different race. The problem today, at least with MLB doesn't have anything to do with actively excluding non-white races, it has to do with managers and general managers who actively pursue those of their own kind (I'm talking about you Omar Minaya and Dusty Baker). Dusty, Omar and the Red Sox don't seem to exclude anyone based on race but they each do seem to prefer a certain race.
Of course you won't see anything serious written about Omar or Dusty, since they're essentially protected. You'll see tripe like Rosenthal's article though because the Red Sox are prominent and they've sinned in their past. Once a sinner, always a sinner, at least if it sells. They'll never be able to move on if people won't let them.
Really, it's sad that this is even an issue in today's game with the percentage of African-American's being so small. Given an 8.2% population of African-Americans and 25 man rosters each team would be expected to have about 2 black players on it's roster. Some teams will have 3, 4, 6 black players, some teams will have none. It's common sense. The Red Sox are well within tolerance, even though they have only one black player.
Now do that same test with Dusty Bakers teams of the past, or Omar Minaya's teams. If it's not an issue for them it shouldn't be an issue for the Sox either.
Posted by: pageian | October 14, 2008 at 02:52 PM
It seems rosenthal's article did exactly what it was meant to do...
anyway, marlins fans, i thought i read/heard somewhere that jeremy hermida might be available? he's left handed, right?
and a 35-36 waist-size isn't very big.
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | October 14, 2008 at 02:55 PM
The whole thing is ridiculous. The Sox are particularly white, the Rays are particularly black, the Mets are particularly Latin. It's just a matter of distribution. It happens. Who cares?
The Giants are racist against hitters. Isn't that a bigger deal?
Posted by: aap212 | October 14, 2008 at 03:11 PM
Oh oh oh how about this response to Rosenthals article:
Who the fuckk cares?!?!?
Posted by: scribbletone | October 14, 2008 at 03:12 PM
Pagian,
Great post!
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 03:19 PM
Rosenthal seems to be implying that non-white players are much more likely to be clubhouse cancers or, at least, not well behaved teammates, in which case, he's the one being a racist. What a tool!
But he also just doesn't explain which white players the Red Sox should get rid of to fill his preferred racial quota. Perhaps that'll be in his next article.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | October 14, 2008 at 03:31 PM
Theo got rid of Manny b/c he was a cancer. Not because he was Latin. Minaya will sign Manny b/c hes latin, not because he thinks hes a great guy. Thats Minayas problem, he doesnt realize that chemistry matters...and thats why they will flop again for the next 4 years of his ridiculous extention.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 03:42 PM
Red Sox Dynasty-
Please get a brain. Ok Rosenthals article is terrible. just chill every1
Posted by: ballerwhiteboy | October 14, 2008 at 03:56 PM
I hope President Obama signs into law some sort of ban on useless message board posters. That would be neat.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 14, 2008 at 04:14 PM
How about Uggla and Olsen for Torrealba, Barmes and Franklin Morales?
Posted by: ProgMatinee | October 14, 2008 at 04:20 PM
Not Joe Morgan, why would Obama ban useless board posters when democrats like to pay people for being useless?
Posted by: ProgMatinee | October 14, 2008 at 04:21 PM
Rosenthal goes out of his way to say that the Red Sox are NOT a racist organization. The moves they have made (replacing athletes of color with whites) are all smart business moves. It is irrelevent that the players involved where Latin, Hispanic, White or Asian.
What his article REALLY SAYS is having a primarily white roster MIGHT impact FA signings for the Sox. On this, he is absolutely correct. Plenty of minority players cite the demographics within the clubhouse and community at large when signing with a team. A player like Torii Hunter is active in many African-American community groups. Playing for a team that has a large African-American community was a factor in his decision to come to LA.
Same can be said for Latin American players who feel more comfortable speaking Spanish or Asian players who speak their native languages.
Point is, the article is valid. It's not racist. Players are going to be interested in teams that (1) pay them well (2) provide a great clubhouse atmosphere and (3) have a community they want to live in. For many minorities the last two points are incredibly significant.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 14, 2008 at 04:25 PM
Wow, I did not realize that the mile-high altitude of Denver also affected all sane reasoning and intelligence... Thomas Harding should stick to his roto league, and MLB 2k8 before he makes another pathetic trade rumor like the Uggla and Olsen deal for Torrealba.
Posted by: cgrisib | October 14, 2008 at 04:26 PM
I totally agree with bjsguess, that anyone who took that article as a sign of racism is misinterpreting what Rosenthal is trying to say. He's only talking about how certain races prefer to be with their own kind, and it may have an impact on non-caucasian free agents on a caucasian-dominated team like the Red Sox. Seems pretty logical to me. Just like how a white guy probably wouldn't want to sign if the team consisted of mostly Latin, Black and Asian players. I don't see why anyone would read that article and go, "Damn, Rosenthal hates those racist Red Sox."
The way I read it he simply is trying to make a baseball point, and the racial implications are solely used to reinforce the point he was making.
Now though, how about we talk about some actual baseball? Yes? No?
Posted by: scribbletone | October 14, 2008 at 04:35 PM
bjsguess, I pretty much agree with your interpretation of Rosenthal's article except why bring up racism at all if there weren't some type of implication meant by it? All he had to do was give facts and figures regarding the Red Sox current roster and he could have compared and contrasted it more than he did with other rosters.
Instead what we got was an article saying "they were, but we're not saying they are now, it just looks that way". What exactly was the point? He goes out of his way to say they're not being racist, sort of exonerating them, but he brings up the past.
Maybe it needed to be said to keep them on their toes, keep them honest. I don't think so, I think that the more that people like Rosenthal write irrelevant stuff like that the more angry people get about things that don't affect them.
Posted by: pageian | October 14, 2008 at 04:38 PM
The fact is that race is an issue for a lot of athletes. Boston's history will be something that SOME players will look at when making a decision. When you couple that with their current demographic makeup it COULD serve as an obstacle for FA signings. This shouldn't be considered shocking. This is right out of Sociology 101.
Everyone here that is screaming racism needs to chill out. Athletes aren't color blind. They are just like you and me. Given a choice, you will almost always want to associate with people who align closest to your lifestyle. For some people, ethnic backgrounds are a primary driving force for finding commonality. This is especially true when a language barrier is present.
I think it is so funny to see everyone scrambling about to prove how color blind they are when EVERY single study proves the same fact. Most people prefer to associate with people of the same skin color. This isn't an American thing or a Black/White issue. The same situation occurs in virtually every part of the world with every different ethnic makeup. It's a fact of life, whether you believe it applies to you or not.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 14, 2008 at 05:05 PM
Before Foxsports posted the article, Ken Rosenthal did an interview on the Dale and Holly Show (WEEI)...And he did not make a good arguement at all. He said that he didn't believe that there were racial overtones, but that the "caucasian-ness" was merely coincidental. His main goal for the article was to "get people thinking". The funny thing thought, was after the interview, an e-mailer made a rather interesting point. He stated that in May, Rosenthal did an article on Minaya and the Mets. In the article, he states that Boston in a "model organization"...with a mix of young players and old, veterans and rookies, and a good (racially) mix of players. I don't know how to get article archives, so i did not read this article myself. But if true, you have to wonder what is Rosenthal's motivation for this article...and what made him change views about Boston in that 4 month span.
Posted by: Boston Belongs To Me | October 14, 2008 at 05:27 PM
i really do believe that dan uggla and scott olsen could possibly become angels. here me out. the angels have many (good) young infield prospects to use as trading bait. the angels need power because i do believe teixeria will become a yankee. dan uggla, a power slugger. just what the doctor ordered. the angels will need another reliever. with k-rod and oliver leaving. could be very possible. both teams win. marlins will get some good prospects.
Posted by: johnnyholden | October 14, 2008 at 07:01 PM
The Angels would never give up what it would take to land Scott Olsen, and then throw him in the bullpen. I mean come on the guy threw 201 innings this season, and posted a solid 4.20 ERA, and he'll be just 25 next season. That guy is going to have a spot in somebody's rotation next season.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 14, 2008 at 07:17 PM
How about Uggla and Olsen for Torrealba, Barmes and Franklin Morales?
Posted by: ProgMatinee | October 14, 2008 at 04:20 PM
I wouldnt trade olsen for that let alone Uggla too. We dont need torrealba, our catcher is better then him lmao and his horrid contract. Barnes gives us nothing at all.
If Uggla would be going to Colorado Fowler would be coming back and more most likely. Our need is a RF (ith hermida going to LF), and some minor league arms for the future (our rotation is 7 deep for starters atm and 3 possible good young closers)
If we were making a trade with Colorado for just uggla most likely as said starts around fowler, adding a few minor league arms.
Posted by: Fishfan79 | October 14, 2008 at 08:07 PM
i really do believe that dan uggla and scott olsen could possibly become angels. here me out. the angels have many (good) young infield prospects to use as trading bait. the angels need power because i do believe teixeria will become a yankee. dan uggla, a power slugger. just what the doctor ordered. the angels will need another reliever. with k-rod and oliver leaving. could be very possible. both teams win. marlins will get some good prospects.
Posted by: johnnyholden | October 14, 2008 at 07:01 PM
our need for next year is a corner outfielder, we are solid at SS for the next 6 years, we are solid at 2B with coughlan (best 2nd base prospect in the minors atm). That said I am sure we would have an interest in Kendrick back for Uggla move :)
Posted by: Fishfan79 | October 14, 2008 at 08:09 PM
You are pretty mature, Red Sox Dynasty. Wait, whos losing 11-2 in the 7th?
Posted by: ballerwhiteboy | October 14, 2008 at 09:26 PM
Make that 13-2. Ahh, I love the Rays..
Posted by: scribbletone | October 14, 2008 at 09:39 PM
Amazing the teams thinking that Uggla is going to be traded for free, just because the marlins are cutting salary. Olsen may not fetch much this off season, 200 innings pitched or not and be a throw in in a trade (much like Jason Marquis) only Marquis will be with his salary paid by the Cubs.
Would not be surprised at all to see Uggla moved over to 3rd base at some point anyway, he seems he range wise better suited there and his hands are pretty good, plus the power and RBI bat he has are for that position already.
Red Sox come and go with mixed races. have been watching BB for 4+ decades and seen both swings and it goes back and forth. Nothing racial at all now and bjsguess said it perfectly above.
The Red Sox now just draft the best athlete now, regardless, not positions they need. It does not matter what race, nor position they play and this system must be working pretty well for the farm system to be in the position it is in and it IS well mixed, with Latinos, African Americans, Asians and Caucasians.
Posted by: johns | October 14, 2008 at 10:02 PM
"Olsen may not fetch much this off season, 200 innings pitched or not and be a throw in in a trade (much like Jason Marquis) only Marquis will be with his salary paid by the Cubs."
Excuse me. Guys like Olsen are heavily valued commodities. A middle of the rotation starter, relatively healthy, who will be cheap (arbitration salary will be relatively low compared to what guys like Garland make in FA), can fetch a decent bounty.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 14, 2008 at 10:47 PM
You are correct melonis rex. Just looked and Olsen only has 3 years of service time now and this will be his 1st time at the arbitration table. Was thinking he had already been to arb. before and may be in the Kevin Gregg 4-5 Million winner range this year.
A Olsen in the 2 +/- million is not bad at all, for like you said, a 3-4 spot innings eater.
Posted by: johns | October 15, 2008 at 12:20 AM
President McCain?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
That's about the funniest thing I've heard all week.
Posted by: stellar | October 15, 2008 at 07:43 AM
Nobody mentions the "Hispanicness" of the Mets! Guess that's ok!
Posted by: 5150bosox | October 15, 2008 at 09:00 AM
I did some research. Is it just me or Minaya trying to put together the all-Latin team? I mean i know they have Wright and other player that they DEVELOPED, and have traded for Schneider and Church but this is overwhelming. And dont tell me they have a great scout team in latin america....every team does!
Of Latin decent on the 40 man roster:
Tony Armas
Luis Ayala
Ambiorix Burgos
Pedro Feliciano
Nelson Figueroa
Orlando Hernandez
Pedro Martinez
Carlos Muniz
Oliver Perez
Ricardo Rincon
Duaner Sanchez
Jason Vargas
Robinson Cancel
Ramon Castro
Johan Santana
Gustavo Molina
Luis Castillo
Carlos Delgado
Ramon Martinez
Argenis Reyes
Jose Reyes
Moises Alou
Carlos Beltran
Endy Chavez
Angel Pagan
Fernando Tatis
Thats 25 of 40 players from a Latin decent. And thats just the 40 man roster....amazing. If Ozzie was available, you know he be their next manager.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 15, 2008 at 09:35 AM
What do you mean that nobody has mentioned it. It is discussed EVERY TIME a Mets post is written about bringing in a Latin player via FA/trade.
Again, the point is who cares? This becomes an advantage for recruiting Latin players in FA. Why would Mets fans be upset about it?
Posted by: bjsguess | October 15, 2008 at 10:54 AM
Red Sox Dynasty, just c'mon man. Just stop. Stop, man. Leave it alone..
Posted by: scribbletone | October 15, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Red Sox Dynasty
Still mad the Red Sox are getting spanked?
Posted by: yankfan1 | October 15, 2008 at 05:34 PM
"The Giants are racist against hitters. Isn't that a bigger deal?"
By far the best post in this thread.
I think there is a legitimate case to bash the rosenthal piece. For those defending it saying he backed away from most of the harsher claims, well then why mention them in the first place and make them the subject of a whole article. He constantly backtracks and contradicts himself (the phillies are ok because their stars are not-white but where is ortiz from again? I am sure dominican guys are totally going to balk at the chance to be ortiz's onlyish dominican buddy if by some miracle the sox could unload lugos contract). Why write a piece and then say everything is my odd speculation that I do not actually believe and then bill it the way it was. Irresponsible at best. Since when do free agents choose clubhouse racial makeup over money and a competitive team?
Posted by: walkoffblast | October 15, 2008 at 11:27 PM