![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rays Sign Joe Nelson | Main | Dickey Picks Twins »
4:31pm: Rob Neyer's latest post on ESPN.com discusses what Ramirez' chances are to claim himself a big contract. Neyer doesn't like the odds. His guess is two years for $45MM. He lists the Dodgers as the likely match.
8:55am: Dan Graziano of the Newark Star-Ledger tells us to take the New York Mets off the Manny List. Graziano writes that GM Omar Minaya is having trouble selling Ramirez to ownership, despite how well he would fit in with the team. He adds that despite the Red Sox missing out on Mark Teixeira to the Yankees on Tuesday, Ramirez had a worse day. As Graziano puts it, "Because, honestly, where is he going to go now?"
8:01am: Common sense tells T.J. Simers of the Los Angeles Times that Manny's best -- and possibly only -- option is a contract with the Dodgers. He wonders if the Dodgers and owner Frank McCourt really even want Ramirez to return. Regardless, Simers doesn't see the slugger ending up with a small- or mid-market franchise.
Jesse Spector of the N.Y. Daily News writes the New York Yankees could still sign Manny, even after taking on more than $400MM in payroll in the past week, and have a 2009 payroll less than the 2008 version. His hypothesis hinges on not bringing back left-hander Andy Pettitte and trading Hideki Matsui in particular.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053697d238970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Manny Ramirez Rumors: Wednesday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I thought I read somewhere that the Yankees can't sign anymore type A FA's?????
Posted by: coolbean04 | December 24, 2008 at 08:17 AM
If the Dodgers are Manny's only suitors, why don't they lower their offer? It really sounds like no one else is remotely interested in paying $22.5+ mil a year for his services. The Dodgers might as well take advantage and drop their offer to 2 years/35 mil and see what happens.
Posted by: Prismo | December 24, 2008 at 08:20 AM
"I thought I read somewhere that the Yankees can't sign anymore type A FA's?????"
Not sure on the rules, but I thought teams could sign 5-6 guys max. Burnett, CC, Teix is only three so far...
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 24, 2008 at 08:30 AM
No they can sign 3 plus the number of type A they lost.
Does that matter they didn't offer Abreu arbitration?
Posted by: tinski | December 24, 2008 at 08:35 AM
He'll go to the Yankees. I mean, $hit, they signed Kevin Cash and Mark Teixeira yesterday, why not sign Manny as the final and greatest F You of this decade to the Red Sox, right?
Posted by: Cinco Ocho | December 24, 2008 at 08:36 AM
You can definitely sign as many as you lose in free agency, so Mussina, Abreu at least. Because Marte/Pettitte are their own. If they don't sign Pettitte, then they could do it. I don't think it will happen unless it is on a discount though.
Posted by: Willard69 | December 24, 2008 at 08:36 AM
discount.....meaning not 3 years $75 million. What he should do is, sign for a year, and enter next year when the free agents aren't as available. You know he is going to have another monster year regardless of where he plays.
Posted by: Willard69 | December 24, 2008 at 08:38 AM
I think it only matters if you lose guys that are type A and you offered arb. for them. Didn't Yankees pass up on offering arb. to Mussina and Abreu?
Posted by: coolbean04 | December 24, 2008 at 08:47 AM
I agree with the article, it makes alot of sense, and even though I've never been really high on Matsui, he does still have talent and only 1 year left on his contract so you'd have to think he'd be an appealing player to some teams especially if the yankees are willing to pick up some of his salary. Just do what it takes to get Man-NY in pinstripes. IMO i think he signs with the Yanks around New Years that way the Yankees would have stolen headlines throughout the holidays.
Posted by: money941 | December 24, 2008 at 08:48 AM
this would be a MERRY CHRISTMAS if they sign manny. 2 years 42 mill this wouldnt be bad trade godzilla to the dodgers for maybe pablo ozuna or something like that
Posted by: yanksfan4ever | December 24, 2008 at 08:56 AM
Ahhh Yankees fans have a Merry Christmas. Why not sign Manny in for one in for all.
Posted by: dchillis | December 24, 2008 at 09:02 AM
I wonder how Sterling is going to call Tex's hr's. any guesses?
Posted by: dchillis | December 24, 2008 at 09:04 AM
sorry last post was off topic.
Posted by: dchillis | December 24, 2008 at 09:04 AM
If the Dodgers are Manny's only suitors, why don't they lower their offer? It really sounds like no one else is remotely interested in paying $22.5+ mil a year for his services. The Dodgers might as well take advantage and drop their offer to 2 years/35 mil and see what happens.
Posted by: Prismo | December 24, 2008 at 08:20 AM
See, then that would make Manny unhappy.
And you know how he plays when he's unhappy...
Posted by: strikethree | December 24, 2008 at 09:07 AM
I generally like Manny, but he brought this current situation on himself.
He's a great hitter but if I were a GM, I would be very hesitant to sign Manny because of his recent antics.. Some of these go beyond "Manny being Manny"...
Posted by: GoTribe | December 24, 2008 at 09:07 AM
Angels won't pursue Manny, oh yeah who needs a guy that can hit 40+ hr and 120ish rbi hell those guys are a dime a dozen.
Posted by: dchillis | December 24, 2008 at 09:10 AM
matsui will not be traded. he has full no trade which he will not waive because he considers trading an insult.
Posted by: revigik | December 24, 2008 at 09:11 AM
Trade Nick Swisher for infield prospects. Move Damon in LF, Gardner in Cf, and Nady in Rf. With Matsui DH'ing and leave the infield as it is now.
Posted by: YankeeFan4life | December 24, 2008 at 09:25 AM
maybe he will retire, god that would just make my christmas...
Posted by: 04Forever | December 24, 2008 at 09:25 AM
Good luck trading Matsui off, unless the Yankees are picking up at least 1/2 of his 13 million due in 2009. Regardless of whether or not he can hit *when* healthy, he is now a liability in the field with his permanently damaged knees and every team is well aware of that, which pretty much limits him to an AL team only. Damon? Same boat and his chronically bad back now.. better be prepared to pick up close to 1/2 of his salary also, or take on another garbage contract like Marquis from Chicago which needs a LH bat and Marquis can eat some innings as a #5 for NY (and have a horrific ERA) which basically, means the Yankees would probably be get ripped off in a bad pitching contract trade for available pitchers in that scenario.
I see the yankees as pretty much stuck with those 2, unless they just eat the contracts since Nady is the only OF they have with any trade value, yet he is the only 1 that can be can be counted on to stay healthy and produce as well.
Not intended to hammer those 2 guys, they are just so far past primes and injury prone with bulging contracts that see them as virtually untradeable unless they give them away.
Swisher just seems to me like the only trade option that they have in the entire mix if they insist on doing this mini salary dump and he is the perfect 4th OF/1B backup that they have and can pretty much also be counted on to stay healthy.
They should probably just stay put and grind teeth eating both Damon and matsui's contract and hope for the best.
Posted by: johns | December 24, 2008 at 09:26 AM
But johns, any team should be HONORED just to be considered as the Yankees' trading partner!
I kid, I kid.
For all the Yankee fans' yearning to be rid of Matsui's contract, it's just not going to happen. Whether he's riding pine for $13MM or having some adventures in the outfield, he's in pinstripes for the year.
Posted by: peterherman | December 24, 2008 at 09:32 AM
Manny will get paid. It might not be a deal of the 3yr/$75MM variety he was looking for but he'll get more money than his two option years were worth in Boston.
I think someone in the NL West sign him as a quick fix for their poor offense.
My guess:
Giants, 3 years @ 65MM
Posted by: UtleyFan | December 24, 2008 at 09:38 AM
I see the Yankees doing it just for spite, but frankly, I'm a little unsure why so many obvious clubs like the Angels and Mets are making a point of steering clear of him.
He's a great hitter who has great numbers and is now the prime FA on the market. This is a great time to use the 'lack of interest' to sign Manny for 3 years in the 20-22 mill range. He's going to instantly boost the power of any potential contender.
Honestly, I don't think he'll go to the Yankees, after seeing them sign Tex, anything is possible.
Oh, I was also going to say that I think the biggest loser in the Tex sweeps was the Angels. He would have been a luxury for the Sox, but the Angels really gelled with him in there. I was a little surprised they didn't do more to keep him. Maybe they know something we don't.
Posted by: Bloody Sock | December 24, 2008 at 09:39 AM
Utleyfan: I could see the Giants too.
Posted by: Bloody Sock | December 24, 2008 at 09:40 AM
Tim,
You should post a survey to see where every thinks Manny will go.
I'm guessing either Philadelphia, Tampa Bay or Texas.
Posted by: striker | December 24, 2008 at 09:42 AM
Very upset here that Omar Minaya can't influence the FO to pursue Manny =/
Anyway the Yankees should definitely pursue this guy because come playoff time this guy is the best their is and will almost" guarantee" them a World Series. If it means bringing back Manny to his hometown to play for the Yankees there should be no complications at all in letting Pettitte go and salary dumping Matsui. Because in reality they are replacing Pettitte with a likely #5 tandem of Phil Hughes an Alfredo Aceves which is perfectly fine...and they are letting Matsui go, upgrading at DH by acquiring Manny...
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 24, 2008 at 09:42 AM
I think they should keep Nick Swisher and not trade him. This guy has a lot of upside and was a great player for Oakland.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 24, 2008 at 09:45 AM
Manny being Manny in San Fran??? I can see it
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 24, 2008 at 09:47 AM
UNBELIEVABLE THE METS NEED TO SIGN MANNY WHENEVER THEY HAVE A CHANCE TO STAY EVEN MORE COMPETITIVE IN THIS LEAGUE THEY SHOULD HOP ON IT.. METS HIGHER MANAGEMENT.. ARE STUCK UP AND IM A DIE HARD MET FAN.. JERRY MANUEL CAN ABSOLUTELY HANDLE MANNY.. I WANT MANNY AS A MET
Posted by: Chevonne | December 24, 2008 at 09:59 AM
The following teams would be interested in Matsui at DH:
Anaheim
Oakland
Seattle
Tampa
Texas
All of those teams express an interest in upgrading their DH spot this winter.
With guys like Manny, Giambi, Dunn and Bradley. After that Matsui would definitely be a viable option for those teams.
It was mentioned that Matsui has a no trade clause. Yes that's true. I could see him waiving it to go to any of the West Coast teams mentioned especially Seattle.
I too wouldn't trust him in the outfield anymore despite have 2 brand new knees.
If any team would trust him though it would be the Giants or at the very least of possible the Dodgers.
So while there are alot of Corner OF/DH types still available as free agents, There are more teams with a want than players left, so to say that Matsui is untradeable is completely not true.
Posted by: Pat Kelly | December 24, 2008 at 10:04 AM
As a Yankees Fan, I see this log-jam as a chance to do what we've been talking about: getting younger.
I'm a big fan of both Matsui and Damon, and would certainly consider retaining one of them after 2009 if they have good years. I am less of a fan of Xavier Nady, whom despite his under-dog Paul O'Neill type of situation, I'm not going to say he's going to keep up that kind of production down the road.
I personally would like to see BOTH Nady and Nick Swisher packaged together for a younger outfielder, preferably a center fielder, but I'd be just fine with a corner outfielder. Now, my inner-fanboy wants to say Grady Sizemore. That a package of Nady, Swisher, Austin Jackson, and an additional pitching prospect could bring the best center fielder in baseball to the Bronx at the young age of 26 years old.
But I'd be more than happy to see a young outfielder from a offense-weak team come over. The Reds come to mind with their weak offense yet strong pitching, the Royals could be one of those teams that need a couple bats to go with that Grinke-Bannister-Meche front three, the Angels lost out on Teixeira and don't like Manny, they might be somebody that would entertain getting Swisher and Nady. How about Kemp from the Dodgers?
I'm just throwing ideas out there. But I like that this gives the Yankees a chance to make a move like this, and it's not a need-to-do situation, because it's not like they can't put Swisher in LF with Damon in CF to ease the jam, putting Melky/Gardner on the bench with the other at AAA.
Posted by: Mattchu12 | December 24, 2008 at 10:08 AM
And as far as players most desirable from a list of:
Damon
Nady
Swisher
Matsui
Then Swisher is without a doubt the easiest to trade from the group with the Braves already reported to have been interested before he was moved from the White Sox.
It's funny it kind of reminds me of a few years ago. Aaron Boone got hurt playing basketball so the Yankees quickly signed Mike Lamb to fill in for Thirdbase. We all no what happened next, the Yankees traded Soriano to the Rangers for Alex Rodriguez. Mike Lamb never played an inning for the Yankees.
Could that be what will happen to Nick Swisher? Now his is more versatile than Lamb was and can play the outfield but the Yankees trade for him to play Firstbase and then sign Mark Teixeira. Will Nick Swisher go the way of Mike Lamb on the Yankees? Only time will tell..
Posted by: Pat Kelly | December 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Mattchu12:
Getting Grady Sizemore to play centerfield for the Yankees has been a dream of mine for a few years now. I honestly don't see it happening unless the pick him up when he becomes a free agent but if a trade were to occur. It would start with Phil Hughes and Austin Jackson.
I'm not sure they would have to put Nady and Swisher together. If I had to pick one Swisher is the more attractive of the two simply because of contract consideration.
So what do you think or Indians fans think who I know don't want to think about the idea of it, but just for fun.
Grady Sizemore
for
Phil Hughes, Austin Jackson, Nick Swisher and another pitching prospect such as Kennedy or Betances..
Posted by: Pat Kelly | December 24, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Yeah, I agree with ya Pat. I think it would take Hughes and Jackson, probably Montero too.
I didn't say they HAD to put them together, just that you'd make more teams attracted with both together and you'd get back somebody that hits 25-30 home runs to replace the one you would have kept in the first place.
I'd hate to lose Hughes though. I'd rather give up Kennedy/Betances plus Zach McAllister together, maybe all three if it was Sizemore, but I'm with Cashman about not entertaining offers for Hughes. He's going to be a 1-2 pitcher.
Posted by: Mattchu12 | December 24, 2008 at 10:18 AM
i'd rather get vernon wells in a salary dump for next to nothing.
Posted by: i_spit_hot_fire | December 24, 2008 at 10:21 AM
What the yankees should do is try really hard to trade Matsui then if we do either go after Abreu or Manny and put Swisher in Center because Swisher is a cuccualy a great hitter and fielder just had a crap season last year.
Posted by: alex | December 24, 2008 at 10:32 AM
I think Grady's worth more than that, but that's just me.
Posted by: Kory26 | December 24, 2008 at 11:02 AM
He probably is Kory, and I'm a Yankee Fan, so that should say something.
I'd probably offer Nady, Swisher, Jackson, and Betances with willingness to add another pitching prospect, probably either Ian Kennedy or Zach McAllister.
Posted by: Mattchu12 | December 24, 2008 at 11:09 AM
So the Dodgers offered Manny a 2/$45M plus an option for $15M as a first offer. The Dodgers have now twice extended their 2 year contracts to guarantee a 3rd year. And yet you guys think he'll go to the Giants for $65M? Or will sign a 3 year $20-22M deal that isn't with the Dodgers?
How does that make sense?
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 24, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Just read that there is no limit on the # of Type A's you can sign this offseason because of the number of FAs that filed? Can anyone confirm this?
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 24, 2008 at 11:21 AM
Just indulge me for a second, if you will
Rays trade Wheeler to someone, Bradford and Percival take 7.5 mil off the books next season, Wheeler is 3, thats 10.5 and we are planning to spend around 12 mil
Can they do it? Can the Rays shock the world and sign Manny?
I know, pipe dream but still.....
Posted by: RaysFan | December 24, 2008 at 11:25 AM
hey dodgersbruin:
it doesn't make sense.
frank mccheap must be fuming about how this situation played out. i don't think he ever really wanted to sign manny to begin with. as a dodger fan, i love that he's basically being forced into this deal.
it'll be interesting to see how colletti and mccheap handle this situation. maybe they'll get mrs. mccheap to lament on the state of the economy, again, and not actually make the deal happen.
Posted by: mr.pink | December 24, 2008 at 11:32 AM
"i'd rather get vernon wells in a salary dump for next to nothing."
Agreed. Sizemore is a very good player but he'd be pricy. Wells, while over rated, is already signed to an insane deal only a few teams could afford and can be had for a smaller package.
Posted by: gianthinker | December 24, 2008 at 11:44 AM
It'd still cost the yankees more than next to nothing, but definitely doable if the yanks take all his contract.
On sizemore, I'd start off by asking for Wang&Melky
Sizemore is a pretty complete player.
--on manny
hopefully mrs mccourt feels sorry enought to offer manny a few ballfields with his name on them as part of a deal while he agrees to build x more ballfields from money given in his no doubt ridiculous salary. Then the McCourts will throw some media whorish press conferences with themselves, manny, and underprivileged children in the shot for the mccourt's glory.
Seems that's kind of what they're in this for given her last interview.
Posted by: Garrett | December 24, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Garrett:
wow, are you joking? you would start with Wang & MELKY!?! for Sizemore? you're completely nuts. Sizemore will NEVER be traded, so just stop dreaming.
Posted by: sjdurfey | December 24, 2008 at 01:44 PM
To get Sizemore, the Yankees would have to trade Chamberlain, Hughes, Jackson, Montero, and another prospect. That's such a ridiculous idea Yankees fans have; they seem to think everyone wants their mediocre young players. It's really quite hilarious, when you think about it. Back on topic, the Wilpons need to get over whatever objections they may have to acquiring Manny Ramirez. He puts the Mets on par with the Phillies, and maybe even past them.
Posted by: metsobsessed | December 24, 2008 at 01:57 PM
"Common sense tells T.J. Simers of the Los Angeles Times that Manny's best -- and possibly only -- option is a contract with the Dodgers. He wonders if the Dodgers and owner Frank McCourt really even want Ramirez to return."
Why in the WORLD, would McCourt not want Manny back? He made more money for the Dodgers in merchandise sales than the other Dodgers COMBINED for that season. And you don't want him back?! The guy is guaranteed (even in his "unhappy Manny" years) to give you at least a .300BA, 30+ homers, and 110RBI's.
Do the Dodgers have any other player that can perform that way, while at the same time being a great teacher to the younger hitters (specifically Matt Kemp and his monster power potential), AND bringing in tons of additional revenue from merchandise sales, increased ticket sales, people coming early and staying through the whole game (more food and drink sales), and advertising revenue? NO! Get stinking Manny back. We know there are no other teams overtly interested in him at this time, but I can foresee a few dark-horse teams that could come out of the wood-works and snatch Manny away if McCourt doesn't act soon.
I have loathed the fact that McCourt, and the Dodgers report Ken Kurick or whatever, have used Kevin Brown as an excuse "not to sign players to big deals". WHAT?!?!?! If you are willing to sign a player you know has a torn rotator cuff (Jason Schmidt) to a 3 year $45 million deal, and a centerfielder on the decline (who really was just a homers guy before - Andruw Jones) to a 2 year $36 million deal, you better believe we'll be pissed off if you can't sign Manny to a deal soon because he is "too expensive". That extra $40 million from contracts coming off the books isn't fooling anyone.
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 24, 2008 at 02:20 PM
I'm not a yanks fan lol
and I was joking
and it was the starting point
was better than Austin Jackson, Nick Swisher and another pitching prospect such as Kennedy or Betances.
my point was Melky just to replace Sizemore, the yanks best young mlb level player, then you could talk about which prospects the indians would want from the yanks like Hughes, Jackson, etc.
didn't mean to offend you mr. indians fan. I'm in agreement with you that no trade 4 sizemore would ever occur--except for Billingsley, Kershaw, and Lambo (now you see what team i root for?). and we'll have to throw in andruw jones and the money for his ridiculous salary.
Posted by: Garrett | December 24, 2008 at 02:22 PM
"was better than Phil Hughes, Austin Jackson, Nick Swisher and another pitching prospect such as Kennedy or Betances." that the other guy posted even
Posted by: Garrett | December 24, 2008 at 02:23 PM
Garrett what are your thoughts, as a fellow Dodgers fan, on the whole McCourt's being cheap on giving Manny a contract, yet, as I stated above, willing to give a player of much lesser talent, Jones, a monster deal at $36/2yrs?
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 24, 2008 at 02:41 PM
personally would like to see BOTH Nady and Nick Swisher packaged together for a younger outfielder, preferably a center fielder, but I'd be just fine with a corner outfielder. Now, my inner-fanboy wants to say Grady Sizemore. That a package of Nady, Swisher, Austin Jackson, and an additional pitching prospect could bring the best center fielder in baseball to the Bronx at the young age of 26 years old.
But I'd be more than happy to see a young outfielder from a offense-weak team come over. The Reds come to mind with their weak offense yet strong pitching, the Royals could be one of those teams that need a couple bats to go with that Grinke-Bannister-Meche front three, the Angels lost out on Teixeira and don't like Manny, they might be somebody that would entertain getting Swisher and Nady. How about Kemp from the Dodgers?
I'm just throwing ideas out there. But I like that this gives the Yankees a chance to make a move like this, and it's not a need-to-do situation, because it's not like they can't put Swisher in LF with Damon in CF to ease the jam, putting Melky/Gardner on the bench with the other at AAA.
look, no one really wants matsui. some MAY want swisher. and a few more would like nady. think of what they traded for swisher. betemit and 2 minor leaguers(i think). then the traded a little more for nady, a high prospect, but nothing more, given that they also got marte. there is no way those two would get kemp! the dodgers told the yanks to screw off with cano, and he has a pretty good future. why would we want two outfielders, one starter(nady) and a bench(swisher) for one of our best, young core players. on the same topic, why would the indians trade sizemore, their future, and now, for 2 players on the yanks. i am a fan, but im not an idiot. think before you write.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | December 24, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Ha. The Yankees fans can just keeping dreaming and dreaming and dreaming about getting Matt Kemp, and they never will =D
Posted by: MrBlake14 | December 24, 2008 at 03:09 PM
if im the dodgers here, i give him a final offer of 2 years/ 12 mill...no one wants him so might as well lowball the hell outta him
Posted by: kevinhendrix9 | December 24, 2008 at 03:17 PM
I think the organization/front office is both learning from past mistakes (J.D. Drew/Pierre/Jones/Schmidt) and penny pinching (like all teams not named the yankees) at the same time.
I think a lot of luck (mostly the bad economy) is the main reason the dodgers still have a chance at manny and it still may not work out (angels may change their mind after losing Teixeira or Manny opts to go to a high paying losing team like the Orioles or Nationals). I think the organization has the money (for even more than than the initial offer) but they are playing it patient so as not to get burned. Why jump at a stationary target? To use another analogy, they are slow playing their hand with Boras.
I hope they get Manny, on their terms and not Scott Boras' terms.
There's still a few years before the young players hit their primes, so missing out on Manny may not be the worst thing in the world.
But repeating the same free agent contract mistakes to kill the team's payroll flexibility during the prime years of Martin et al would be pretty sad. I hope we don't see that.
Posted by: Garrett | December 24, 2008 at 03:25 PM
Colleti isn't the greatest GM and the McCourt's aren't the ideal owners, but they seem to be getting a bit better. They aren't the only team balking at the demands of the free agents out there. It's sad that it took signing Jason Schmidt, and the whole J.D. Drew opt-out fiasco which led to the compounded mistake of the knee-jerk signing of Pierre...thank goodness he's not been too knee jerk since then.
Things will get better once the McCourt's have their TV rights. Hopefully the team doesn't make a bunch of the previous yankee mistakes with spending too freely on aging vets that end up clogging up their roster, but those are much cooler mistakes to have than wondering if the McCourt's really do have the cash for a star free agent for a large market team.
Way back when under DePodesta the dodgers got Lowe, Drew, and Kent really late in the offseason and they all turned out to be decent deals (cept for the opt out in drew's contract). So I'm all down for the patient approach to Boras clients.
I think 22.5 a year for 2 years with an option for a 23-24 mil 3'rd year gets it done...just not for 3-6 more weeks.
Posted by: Garrett | December 24, 2008 at 03:44 PM
2 years 45 million dollars? Yankees need to jump on Manny if thats the highest he is going to get now. I'm sorry but Manny is the biggest fu*k you to the Red Sox and his bat is unbelievable in the post season. Imagine a 3-4-5 of Teixeira-ARod-and Manny...WOW. Cashman better jump on Manny after the comments Joe Maddon made about them still not being scary or a factor. If they hold on to Matsui and Swisher to just neglect Manny like that it would be a huge mistake. Manny would hit 40 homeruns this year as a Yankee trying to get back at the Sox and next year if he starts turmoil you trade him and get the prospects.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 24, 2008 at 04:42 PM
Ned is probably on christmas vacation.
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | December 24, 2008 at 04:43 PM
I think the bullpen is basically set, wouldn't mind Ohman at all but not much needed to be done there.
However, the hitting still has 1 gaping hole, what I would give for Manny to drop his price a lot and come to a team that he can destroy the Sox with..... (and for once, that means the Rays not Yankees)
Posted by: RaysFan | December 24, 2008 at 04:47 PM
Reds should offer 3/70.
Manny's bat would be perfect for the Reds lineup perfectly easing in between Votto and Bruce.
Reds could do this because its a smart baseball decision, he would sell Jerseys, and theyd WIN.
Honestly if Money is the issue send Arroyo packing. Reds have depth everywhere but outfield. We dont have very many expensive players the next 1-2 seasons.
Unless Nady becomes available, or Delmon Young becomes th e plan, Manny is perfect
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | December 24, 2008 at 04:50 PM
GmblngPtchr20
Agreed. His bat would fit perfectly between Votto and Bruce.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 24, 2008 at 05:28 PM
bringing manny to the yankees would not only make there team better, they would be so much better versus boston. that would then bring back the rivalry between the yanks and the sox. besides he is the most clutch player in the game
Posted by: alex | December 24, 2008 at 05:43 PM
I feel like the Mets have been laying low this whole off season. They already patched up their top need and now it looks like they'll sign Lowe. After that they will give some type of offer to Pedro to compete with Niese for the fifth spot. Then in a week or so jumped on Manny because the Wilpons will loosen up an accept Manny.
Reyes
Church
Wright
Manny
Delgado
Beltran
Castro
Castillo
Pitcher
Posted by: wu-tang haze | December 24, 2008 at 05:44 PM
Garrett:
i wasnt offended, it's just so comical when anyone throws around Sizemore trade suggestions. He is as untouchable as the word can possibly mean.
Posted by: sjdurfey | December 24, 2008 at 05:46 PM
If the Yankees wanted Sizemore it would take
Hughes, Chamberlain, Cano, and Cabrera..
If the Dodgers wanted him..
Kemp, Kershaw, Dewitt, and McDonald..
No way he gets traded until hes got a year left.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | December 24, 2008 at 06:04 PM
GmblngPtchr20, Rolling{Night}Hawk{09}
Manny's bat would fit in between anyone in any lineup..
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | December 24, 2008 at 06:06 PM
they Yankees should keep every player they have, salary be damned. and pay them to sit on the bench. don't trade anyone.
they spent nearly half a billion dollars on 3 players, there's no reason Yankee or Yankee fan should now be talking about getting rid of someone's contract.
Posted by: MrMadison | December 24, 2008 at 06:14 PM
McCheap is excited about the Pirates-style youth movement for his second richest franchise in baseball. Almost as excited as he'll be when he gets his new friends on the city council to back his move to downtown so he and Mrs. McCheap can start their dream development in Chavez Ravine. So no Manny.
(The Andruw Jones deal was no blockbuster; it was a Mariner style mid-level signing)
Posted by: paxterj | December 24, 2008 at 06:29 PM
Its been 48 hrs since Yankees signed a 20+ million dollar a year player, they must be getting the shakes.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 25, 2008 at 09:32 AM
If the Yankees wanted Sizemore it would take
Hughes, Chamberlain, Cano, and Cabrera..
If the Dodgers wanted him..
Kemp, Kershaw, Dewitt, and McDonald..
No way he gets traded until hes got a year left.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | December 24, 2008 at 06:04 PM
That is hardly an equal package of talent.
Cano is owed a boatload of cash and if you wanted a better overall second baseman for the same salary a team can just sign Orlando Hudson
Melky Cabrera? Just about any free agent OF is better than him... He is a AAAA player or a 5th OF
Hughes has been disappointing, but has some upside.
Joba has great trade value, but that is about it.
Kemp, how many CFs will put up better numbers them him? and at $500,000 salary?
Kershaw had good numbers in first season despite struggling with command. He was the most highly regarded young pitcher from his class.
McDonald's minor league numbers were on par with Hughes and unlike Hughes, McDonald has looked good in his stint in the Majors.
DeWitt will put up similar numbers to what Cano put up last year for the Yankees and DeWitt has room to grow...
So the Dodgers should give up four valuable pieces in a trade and the Yankees just two?
BTW: The Dodgers would not trade Kemp and Kershaw in the same trade for any player in baseball.
Posted by: MikeClarke | December 25, 2008 at 09:46 AM
I'm loving how tons of people here are saying "The Yanks will NEVER get Manny. The Yanks will NEVER get Sizemore. The Yanks will NEVER get Kemp. Yanks fans can keep dreaming". These are the same exact people who probably said "The Yanks will NEVER get Sabathia. The Yanks will NEVER get Burnett. The Yanks will NEVER get Teixera".
Listen, I'm a Yanks fan and I'll gladly say they probably wont go out and get any of these guys. You might be right. BUT THESE ARE THE NY YANKEES! Obviously anything can happen here. It was all but confirmed that the Red Sox had Teix, but look what happened. And you cant even say that it was all about money, because it was already confirmed that the Nationals offered him more money.
In the case of Manny, there are only 4 options the guy has if he wants both money and the chance for another ring: Dodgers, Angels, Mets, and Yanks. Angels have confirmed that they are not signing him. Omar and the Mets dont look like they will get him cause Front Office doesnt want him. Dodgers pulled their offer for him a while ago, but said they will talk and see what happens. Yanks are still under their budget by atleast another $21M. Anything is possible here.
NEVER SAY NEVER
Posted by: Johnny O | December 25, 2008 at 02:56 PM
I love how the idiot Dodger Fans are calling McCourt cheap. The guy has dished out hundreds of millions on renovations to the stadium and has maintained one of the highest payrolls in the league since he's been the owner.
Posted by: eric23 | December 25, 2008 at 03:46 PM
I agree with johnny O although i do think Omar will try and convince the wilpons to try to give him a 2 year deal around 47 million
Posted by: Metssforever | December 26, 2008 at 11:18 PM
The yankees need to sign manny. Swisher to the braves and matsui to the dodgers. then the lineup would be damon,jeter,rodriguez,manny,teixeria,posada,nady,swisher,cano. sounds like a winner to me
Posted by: murrow105 | December 27, 2008 at 06:03 PM
If all the Yanks have to do to get Manny is outbid McCheap (who is panicked about the public pressure to revisit what he thought would be a token gesture 2 year $45 mil offer), they should just bide their time until after new year's and then offer 2 years at $46 mil (can't offer less than that phantom LA offer for fear of making Manny feel disrespected---and we all know how THAT would play out). That's the minimum needed to save face, and it'll work since Boras will have zero other offers to work with.
Even his Mystery Team is backing off from Manny. LOL.
Posted by: paxterj | December 27, 2008 at 06:53 PM
The yankees need to sign manny. Swisher to the braves and matsui to the dodgers. then the lineup would be damon,jeter,rodriguez,manny,teixeria,posada,nady,swisher,cano. sounds like a winner to me
Posted by: murrow105 | December 27, 2008 at 06:03 PM
didnt you trade swisher to the braves
Posted by: yanksfan4ever | December 28, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Let the yankees get manny too... he will just disrupt an already ego ridden big headed locker room. Oh and also only play half a** once he gets to that manny being manny phase of the season.
Posted by: bosoxfan | December 28, 2008 at 11:19 AM