![]() |
|
|
| |
« Peavy Trade Unlikely This Winter | Main | Rafael Furcal Rumors: Monday »
10:14pm: Wolf told MLB.com's Marty Noble tonight that the Mets have shown "some interest." Noble says the Yankees, Orioles, Dodgers, Braves, and Giants are also "thought to have interest."
7:58am: According to Anthony McCarron of the New York Daily News, the Mets have checked the bullpen off their list and will now look to upgrade the rotation. It seems that Oliver Perez and Randy Wolf are the top targets, with the pricey Derek Lowe a less likely possibility. McCarron notes that the Mets have a strong relationship with Wolf's agent Arn Tellem, who brokered the Francisco Rodriguez contract.
With A.J. Burnett off the board, perhaps the market for Lowe will heat up this week. The free agent starting pitching options remain strong - look at what was available on this date a year ago.
Offensively, McCarron doesn't see much more than an Alex Cora addition on the horizon for the Mets.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053666d1e4970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mets Considering Randy Wolf, Oliver Perez:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Randy Wolf sounds like a good add. What about Adam Dunn to fill the LF spot. Having Dunn would also allow the Mets to trade Delgado if necessary
Posted by: bsalamon | December 15, 2008 at 08:11 AM
so the market for Derek Lowe is now WHO???
I think someone's going to get him for a 3 year deal and maybe an option. His price per may come down as well. I'd love to see the Phils get him and Moyer and then leave Happ at AAA with Carrasco.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 15, 2008 at 08:36 AM
Could be Minaya working the market again, I mean, he was interested in everybody and their mother who could close before K-Rod's price came down. Minaya could be trying to do the same with Lowe now.
I like Perez as a fallback, and Wolf isn't a terrible 3rd option, I just hope it never comes down to that.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | December 15, 2008 at 08:48 AM
The Mets are just pretending to not be interested in Lowe to get the price down. Most of the big market teams look to be backing off him...
Yanks-CC/AJ
Phils-Signed Ibanez/ should get discount with Moyer
Red Sox-just wanted to keep him off the Yankees
If the Mets don't offer him a huge contract then who will? Possibly the Angels if they lose out on Tex but other then that, nobody with money. So that would leave the Mets to bid against teams like the Astros, Braves, Brewers... they could have the highest bid from that group and still not even sniff Lowe's asking price.
Posted by: spieldogg | December 15, 2008 at 08:58 AM
''why would the mets invest in starting pitching
their formula has been fine lately
don't mess with success''
Pedro Martinez and Oliver Perez are both free agents, which means that they need two starters, or one free agent starter and the other rotation spot filled by Jon Niese. They don't have enough starters in their system to fill in behind Santana, Maine, and Pelfrey.
I'm fine with Randy Wolf at a cheaper price than Oliver Perez. Anyone but Jon Garland for $10 million is okay.
Posted by: MattyMets | December 15, 2008 at 09:17 AM
These are the two pitchers I've been wanting all the while. Ollie being a leftie and a big-gamer and Wolf being a Mets killer can't pitch against us anymore. Good fifth starter
Posted by: RIPShea | December 15, 2008 at 10:21 AM
Unless the Red Sox emerge as a big bidder for Lowe, I would expect him to end up in New York or Philly now.
At this point the Mets could really use him, considering they fixed up their bullpen for cheaping than expected, and have a hole in the rotation. If they could go into opening day with Santana, Lowe, Pelfrey, Maine and Niese, I would expect the Mets to feel really good about their chances.
If they don't land Lowe, which could mean him landing in Philly (uh oh..) then they would simply HAVE to retain Ollie.
I just don't see how the Mets can go into next season with Santana, Pelfrey, Maine, Wolf and Niese as their rotation.
Pelfrey sucked in the majors up until last season, although it's likely that his improvements in 2008 were legitimate. Maine is coming off surguery, Wolf isn't exactly known for his durability, and Niese is a rookie.
The only guy in that rotation where you KNOW what you're getting from him is Santana, and that's no good for a WS contender.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 15, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Ollie has has his moments but deep down, I think he is much to inconsistent, wild at times, and can blow up in a matter of moments. Generally a fly ball pitcher, somebody who gets ground balls and is generally consistent would help this rotation much more --> Lowe. I like Lowe in big spots also, he is old, but a shorter commitment around 3 years opposed to 4-5 for Perez would allow future . I think its the best move and then plug in somebody like a Wolf if he can be had for a cheap price/Pedro on incentive based deal/Niece as the 5th starter with depth behind it.
As far as curing the starter situation via free agents, seems the simplest, but I think Omar should maybe look to get creative to fill one or both of these spots.
Posted by: MrMet | December 15, 2008 at 11:29 AM
Frank Wren not inquiring on Derek Lowe is the single biggest mistake he has made this offseason.
Posted by: garriscp | December 15, 2008 at 11:33 AM
If Delgado has appeal to a few teams, I would look to move him for a younger starter that does not cost much, and is generally healthy to give 175+ innings, allowing 12 million cleared this year, a semi young, cheap starter and the appropriate funds for Manual Ramirez. eh eh.
Anybody have teams in mind that would be looking for a 1B/DH with power, at a 12mil clip for one season? Off the top of my head, Tampa, San Fran, Toronto... for a one year commitment, Nick Evans and maybe another prospect, one of these 3 might consider sending an ML ready pitcher the Mets way. Maybe a Jonathen Sanchez on SF, Sonnanstine on TB. Any thoughts?
Posted by: MrMet | December 15, 2008 at 11:37 AM
we should try to get sheets too...his price can be low since hes not that healthy...but when hes healthy hes a sick pitcher
Posted by: ... | December 15, 2008 at 11:42 AM
As I stated on my own blog, starting pitching should be one of the Mets top 3 priorities this off season. I'd prefer Perez or Lowe over Wolf. http://www.ontheblack.com/2008/12/09/top-3-priorities-for-the-mets-this-off-season/
Posted by: kerelcooper | December 15, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Now that the Phillies have signed Moyer/Ibanez, I believe the Mets are going to get Lowe.
Posted by: qqqqqqqq | December 15, 2008 at 02:00 PM
I agree with the above comment.
It appears that the Mets are the favorites for Lowe, which would be a HUGE addition for them.
K-Rod, Putz and Lowe would equal an extremely successful offseason for the Mets.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 15, 2008 at 02:22 PM
Nick Evans and Luis Castillo for Peavy. Sign Lowe with the extra money.
Rotation:
Santana
Peavy
Lowe
Pelfrey
Main
Bullpen:
Beimel
Green
Robertson
Feliciano
Putz
K-Rod
Posted by: johan=cy | December 15, 2008 at 02:43 PM
Thats not even a good joke.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 15, 2008 at 03:03 PM
Nick Evans and Luis Castillo for Peavy? No way. The pads would have to add in Gonzo to get a package like that. Rolls eyes.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 15, 2008 at 03:06 PM
I am sure I speak for everyone, and reality, when I say that the Mets are not getting Peavy.
Anywho, I'm excited about the players we've acquired that are actually excited about coming to New York. Even if he could be somehow coaxed into adding the Mets to his trade list, why would we want someone that doesn't really want to be here even if he is an amazing player?
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | December 15, 2008 at 03:36 PM
krod,putz, lowe or garland would be sucessful but i think the mets should invest in a big hitter and get hudson and get rid of castillo cuz hes a bum and that would be succesful
Posted by: Rec10 | December 15, 2008 at 03:39 PM
"If Delgado has appeal to a few teams, I would look to move him for a younger starter that does not cost much, and is generally healthy to give 175+ innings, allowing 12 million cleared this year, a semi young, cheap starter and the appropriate funds for Manual Ramirez. eh eh.
Anybody have teams in mind that would be looking for a 1B/DH with power, at a 12mil clip for one season? Off the top of my head, Tampa, San Fran, Toronto... for a one year commitment, Nick Evans and maybe another prospect, one of these 3 might consider sending an ML ready pitcher the Mets way. Maybe a Jonathen Sanchez on SF, Sonnanstine on TB. Any thoughts?"
Why are so many Mets fans devaluing Delgado so much? Packaging him with a prospect for Sonnenstine, who would be a number 3 starter at best, would be a waste. Freeing up the money would make room for a possible Manny upgrade, but then there would be just another hole to fill.
The majority of you aren't going to agree, but I see Omar acquiring Manny without dealing Delgado....upping payroll to just under the luxury tax. The Mets are in must-win mode, and I think the Wilpons will pull out the stops.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | December 15, 2008 at 03:49 PM
I don't know much about the guy, but Garland's numbers don't seem like they've ever been impressive. Am I missing something? Someone please let me know.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | December 15, 2008 at 03:52 PM
Getting rid of Luis and signing Hudson would ruin everything good Omar has done this off season. It's called learning from your mistakes. Hudson can come on a two year deal... other wise good luck wherever you land Orlando. Garland is the worst idea in the world. Paulio, you aren't missing anything. Jon Garland is not good, he never has been good, and he will never be good. He will eat innings with fringe stuff and put up a mid 4's-5 era. Eventually, he will turn into the Steve Trachsel we got to see in NY. Ugh. On a one year deal for Garland, sure, why not, although he still stinks. On a 3/4 year deal for him..... gag.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 15, 2008 at 03:59 PM
I agree with you on Delgado. Why in the world are you looking to dump a 12 million dollar 1B who was god like in the second half, is only committed for one year, and is playing for his last contract? So we can have Dan Murphy at 1B? Really? I love Dan Murphy, but he is not going anywhere. Let Delgado leave before we try to replace him with Murphy. I hope you are right about Man-Ram. I don't care at all what anybody else says, he can rake, and he would be perfect in LF for the Mets. Uninformed and ignorant people will call him a cancer, ignoring the fact he has won everywhere he has ever played. Sign me up.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 15, 2008 at 04:02 PM
garland has played inthe al most of his career an era of 4 is good when he comes to a nl team.
he also pitchs a lot of innings
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 15, 2008 at 04:11 PM
i am not worried about the offense, i think minaya should sign derek lowe and uehara or takahashi.
after that if jeff wilpon wants to give minaya another 25 million why not.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 15, 2008 at 04:15 PM
daniel murphys hitting skills are GREAT.
his whole minor league year he batted above 300 and in the afl.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 15, 2008 at 04:18 PM
Yeah...the whole "clubhouse cancer" thing is a lot of parroting. No one seems to want to discuss Manny's side of the Bosox story. Think about it. He DID help them win 2 Rings. Something might have happened in Boston where he couldn't take it anymore. Everyone seemed to love him in LA. Also, let's not forget how the Bosox organization demonized Pedro Martinez, and he was nothing but a joy to be around (without mentioning his poor pitching performances for the Mets) Either way, the fact is that Manny puts up consistently inhuman numbers no matter where he plays. I say give him a unique contract i.e. two years with two vesting options.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | December 15, 2008 at 04:39 PM
Manny and NY.. I can't think of a more toxic mix. L.A. is by far the best fit for him. L.A. loves him and being a somewhat whacked out place it really neutralizes all that dysfunctional tendencies that Manny possesses . No doubt about it.. Manny is one of the premier hitters of this generation, and none is better in the clutch. but he would be a disaster in a NY clubhouse.
Posted by: Keith Barber | December 15, 2008 at 04:58 PM
Manny played in Boston for 8 years and grew up in NY. Something tells me he can handle it. Beast... I am in no way trying to put down Daniel Murphy. I LOVEEEEEEE that man. I just don't think you trade Delgado right now and replace him with Murphy. Next year, sure, but not right now. I love Murphy though and he needs to get lots of AB's this year.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 15, 2008 at 06:32 PM
Why are so many Mets fans devaluing Delgado so much? Packaging him with a prospect for Sonnenstine, who would be a number 3 starter at best, would be a waste. Freeing up the money would make room for a possible Manny upgrade, but then there would be just another hole to fill.
I am not devaluing Delgado, but he is another year older and yes only signed for one season. My thoughts are trade him while he has value to another team and if it means acquiring Sonnastine to be a 4/5 starter cheap and under team control for a while.. I am all for it. That would avoid the signing of a guy like Garland in addition to Lowe... Sooo instead of Garland for 10 million and Delgado for 12... 22 million or so to ManRam and he is a much better hitter than Delgado in the middle of that lineup. Delgado is good but cman, seriously, the opportunity to see the best righty hitter in the game behind the kid Wright, and Beltran behind him. We get a younger pitcher under control, and there is no extra hole because Murphy slots in a more natural position at 1B instead of OF. I know it may be fantasy world, but I think that is a clutch GM move and sets the team up much better for the future in doing so. Manny for a couple years, and get something for Delgado, a pitcher who could help down the road for cheap.
Posted by: MrMet | December 15, 2008 at 07:06 PM
Omar will be forever be loved in new york for a move that would set up this.
Startin 5
Santana
Lowe
Pelfrey
Maine
Sonnastine
Niese would start at AAA would be brought up in case of injury
Reyes
Murphy
Wright
Manny
Beltran
Church
Schiender
Castillo
1-7 are very solid
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 15, 2008 at 08:55 PM
What kind of prospect are we talking about with Delgado.
Nick evans could go
Tampa Gets
Carlos Delgado
Nick Evans
Mets Get
Andy Sonnastine
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 15, 2008 at 08:58 PM
This would require the mets to eat a chunk and maybe 6 mill of Delgados 12 mill.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 15, 2008 at 09:00 PM
beastOftheEast: That rotation and lineup would make me beyond ecstatic.
"This would require the mets to eat a chunk and maybe 6 mill of Delgados 12 mill."
I am not so sure they would have to, the Rays are looking to add a power bat to DH. They would be looking at spending around 10 million a season for any of the options currently out there (Giambi, Bradley, Dunn) and for the money and one season, Delgado could be the best option.
As for the trade with a prospect, Delgado and Evans might not be that far off..
Anyone agree?
Posted by: MrMet | December 15, 2008 at 09:10 PM
Andy had a era around 4 and going to the nl his era will likely dip near pelfreys and john maines numbers.
I think delgados number will be good but not as goods as last years.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 15, 2008 at 09:15 PM
Delgado's numbers might dip, but showed he can hit and with that lineup they have in TB, he could put up 30/110. They are not impossible numbers and when he is hot, carries a team for a month, and might be hitting those catwalks in tampa.
Sonnastine should be a solid 5 in the NL. It could work well for both sides. Someone give me Omar's cell! we need to talk about this.
Posted by: MrMet | December 15, 2008 at 09:19 PM
Seriously this deal would be great.
Carlos at DH, Evans bat can earn him RF or he could backup Lf and Rf and the prospect could just be a throw in.
This is a good deal.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 15, 2008 at 09:25 PM
1. A deal that involves Delgado being packaged with another prospect for Sonnanstine would be rejected by the Rays. The Rays can grab a DH for much less than 12MM + a cheap, team controlled good pitcher. Unless the Mets are giving up one of their top prospects, but then what's the point of making the trade involving Delgado. Make the trade with prospects only then.
2. Signing Manny Ramirez is a great idea. About blocking Daniel Murphy: I think he should get consistent ABs. If he's not given a starting job on the MLB team (platoons count as a starting job btw), he needs to be in AAA getting full time ABs. Personally, I relegate Castillo to the bench and play Murphy at 2B. Castillo sucks at defense. Murphy also sucks at defense, although Murphy's probably a tad worse than Castillo (but this is like the Ibanez v. Burrell defense argument.. Murphy has the vastly superior bat, so he should be full time starter at 2B IMO. Sometimes you just have to eat losses and shove Castillo on the bench.
3. Garland sucks. The Mets shouldn't touch him, as should any other team. He will be a bad signing for whoever signs him at 10MM++ per year. Can we get over that? I'm sketch on Wolf at a 3 year deal as well.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 15, 2008 at 10:25 PM
1.delgado is a better option a dh then giambi and cheaper one then adam dunn of course the mets would pay a chunk of his salary. They are in of a dh. Nick evans is a decent hiiter than can play the outfield. Plus a prospect
Andy isn't david price. Those three are good enough.
Of course if delgado is traded murphy is the best option at first.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 15, 2008 at 10:34 PM
For dunn they will have to commit to 10 plus at 3 years.
Not better than
10 at 1 year
They have a option to resign or release. A great option for a team like the rays.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | December 15, 2008 at 10:40 PM
The Mets have some options here on how to address the rotation, but I do think they need to add at least two more arms. I would try one of two strategies:
1. If you can get Lowe, or someone else who brings a similar cache of durability and effectiveness, then you can fill out by bringing in some competition for Niese. Say, Daniel Cabrera or some fallen-prospect in trade from another organization.
2. Bring in an "innings-eater" and a "high-risk/high-reward" type. I really like the idea of going Garland, Sheets here, even though I wouldn't particularly want one (or anyone similar) without the other (or someone similar). Having both would fill out the Mets rotation quite well though. You don't have to overpay for either guy. Garland is a fine #5, and if Sheets can make anything close to 30 starts, you've gotta love your chances. If Sheets gets hurt, you probably need to bring in another arm unless Niese is dominating AAA, but he'll likely be a more than adequate fill-in for short stints, and if not, you can always bring in another arm during the season. I know it likely won't happen, since they don't seem to be in on Sheets, but I actually really like this option.
Posted by: MEddler | December 15, 2008 at 10:44 PM
Whay aren't the mets looking at rehab projects like Brad Penny and Ben Sheets, rather than oliver perez and especially.. Randy Wolf? Wolf is going to *hurt* his team pretty much whenever he pitches anyway and not sure about how well the ball is going to carry in the new mets stadium, but he could actually be worse next year for them than he previously has been.
Dunn would be a better sign than Wolf even, find a rehab, or look in spring training, or even catch a castoff whom misses the big dollar boat later on this winter, just hate to see anyone flush big dollars down on a jared washburn imitation.
Posted by: johns | December 15, 2008 at 10:55 PM
No shot Tampa trades Andy for Delgado. One great half doesn't make up for the fact that Delgados bat has been slow as a dog taking a constipated crap for the last 2 years. Also already has a better, younger, cheaper first basemen in Pena who to add to all that....is a good clubhouse presence as opposed to Delgado. Lastly the Rays are not looking to acquire a left handed DH who will never see the light of day from 1b.
Posted by: yanks09 | December 15, 2008 at 11:09 PM
How is Delgado not a "good clubhouse presence'? God, with all the Bradley talk and the Bonds talk, aren't we in the good ol' US of A?
Posted by: jrfukudome | December 15, 2008 at 11:58 PM
Alright yanks09, I would have to respectfully disagree with just about everything you said.
1. The great half you mentioned does not equal slow bat speed, he picked it up and altered his approach, was able to catch up to pitches (38 HRs 2 of the past 3 seasons)
2. Pena is good at 1st, but TB is looking for a power DH. Also on that note you state better than Delgado, debatable. Delgado averages .265 33/106 over the past 3 seasons, compared to Pena, a .251 career hitter with only 2 - 30/100 seasons in his career. As for bat speed, Delgado's may be slowing down, but his K's per season is consistent around 120, while Pena was at 166 last season. Forget bat speed when Pena struck out about 50 times more last year. (BUT DELGADO WOULD DH ANYWAY - he is in addition to Pena, not replacing)
3. Give me one example of Delgado being a negative clubhouse presence? He may not be the glaring leader, but I would not say a bad presence. Below I include potential suitors for their DH, another name floating around is Milton Bradley (a guy who has been a problem most places and would be influencing younger players in TB) A Potential HOF in Delgado playing on that young team could be a great person in the clubhouse.
4. The Rays are not looking for a Lefty DH, then why any of the links to Giambi, Griffey Jr., Garret Anderson, Adam Dunn among others as possibilities? I am pretty sure they are all left handed. Delgado is arguably better than everyone of them, and could be had for a one year/reasonable deal.
Enough said.
Posted by: MrMet | December 16, 2008 at 12:48 AM
Just an FYI to those who think Evans would be of value to TB...they already traded Edwin Jackson for Matt Joyce. Add in Gabe Gross and Fernando Perez and you have a full outfield with two defensive replacements already.
They might, just might, think about Delgado for DH...but I bet NY would have to eat quite a bit of salary for them to want to trade a young pitcher for him.
Posted by: mtzxc | December 16, 2008 at 01:54 AM
Delgado got his wrist fully healthy for the first time in 2 years. That is what happened. You don't just make and adjustment and get your bat speed back, when you are as good as Delgado. He has wrist surgery following 06, wasn't right for most of 07, started heating up in august and september, then got drilled by dontrelle willis and hurt himself again, requiring more surgery. I honestly think it is that simple. His wrists got healthy, he stopped having to overcompensate for his injury, and he began doing what he does, just reacting to the ball. Ask David Ortiz how having bad hands/wrists takes a toll on a big power hitter. Call me a skeptic, but I wouldn't be even remotely surprised by a 900 OPS for Delgado next year. This guy is one of the best hitter of this generation and he has put up some monster numbers. At 37, he could very well have 1 or 2 good years left. He certainly showed that his bat has life in it at the end of last year. We have seen some pretty old guys put up some big numbers, so it isn't the craziest thought. 31 homers gets him to 500, not that that really holds much meaning.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 16, 2008 at 02:54 AM
I meant to say you don't just make a bad adjustment, and lose all your batspeed, make another adjustment, and get it all back. When a guy that good slumps for a whole year and then all the sudden is on fire again, it is usually injury. I would have definitely just thought he was old and finished, but guys that are old and finished don't post a 1000 OPS over a prolonged sample size against major league pitching.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 16, 2008 at 02:55 AM
It is fun reading Mets fans try to sell Delgado off as someone you'd trade young cost-controlled pitching for. Meanwhile there's Giambi, who has been better the last three years, and Dunn, who's better than the both of them. And they wouldn't have to trade players for either of them.
Posted by: Steve Howe's ghost | December 16, 2008 at 04:41 AM
Delgado is not coming to Tampa, unless the Mets pay at least 1/2 of his contract, same with lee of chicago. The league knows both of those guys are making tons of cash and aging vets waiting to crash.
With Burrell and Dunn still available at 3+ years younger and all more than likely signable for less than 12 million per year and 3 year contracts, why even consider Delgado?
Posted by: johns | December 16, 2008 at 07:13 AM
Omar will be forever be loved in new york for a move that would set up this.
Startin 5
Santana
Lowe
Pelfrey
Maine
Sonnastine
Niese would start at AAA would be brought up in case of injury
Reyes
Murphy
Wright
Manny
Beltran
Church
Schiender
Castillo
1-7 are very solid
BEASTOFTHEEAST,
do you really think the Mets are taking on 40 million in payroll? There is NO way that will happen. Its a nice little fantasy team, but that is all it is.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 16, 2008 at 07:35 AM
"do you really think the Mets are taking on 40 million in payroll? There is NO way that will happen. Its a nice little fantasy team, but that is all it is."
I don't think the Mets will increase payroll THAT much, but I'll bet money that there will be some sort of increase.
"Delgado is not coming to Tampa, unless the Mets pay at least 1/2 of his contract"
That would make the trade totally not worth it for the Mets IMHO. Don't get me wrong, I don't want the trade, but I think it would be just about fair. The Mets get a fairly decent starter and a salary dump, and Tampa gets a decent prospect and a discount DH. It's not going to happen anyway because Delgado is going to start at 1st base this spring. He's earned it.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | December 16, 2008 at 09:42 AM
I'm with you, as usual, nrmax. Wrists are arguably the most important parts of a hitters body. A wrist injuries is a delicate thing and takes a while to fully heal and get back to normal.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | December 16, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Steve Howe's Ghost: "It is fun reading Mets fans try to sell Delgado off as someone you'd trade young cost-controlled pitching for. Meanwhile there's Giambi, who has been better the last three years, and Dunn, who's better than the both of them. And they wouldn't have to trade players for either of them."
The only thing funnier than Met's fans trying to sell delgado is other fans that do not know what they are talking about.
In the past FIVE seasons Giambi topped 100 RBI's once in that Yankee lineup. He has been hurt over that period too, thats a risk and hit .253, .236, .247 the past 3 years, I will give you he is good for a good OBP though.
Dunn hit .234, .264, .236 over the past 3 years while striking out an avg of 175 times a season. He will hit 40 homers, but prob hit .240 and K 180 times, see how long you can watch that without pulling your hair out.
Pat Burrell is a solid player and younger, that is a fair point. He is a righty and if that is what TB needs, than clear choice here. But Delgado has had two seasons (2006 and 2008) with better numbers than Burrell's best season the past 3 years.
nrmax is right about his wrist, and Delgado hit .271 last season with 38/115, the last time Giambi and Burrell hit .271 was 05' and Dunn has never hit .270 in his entire career. Delgado has 30+ doubles each of the past 4 seasons. Between Dunn, Giambi and Burrell, in their past 4 seasons each, they have a combined TWO 30+ doubles seasons.
The other hitters out there may cost less than 12 million, I am not sure what they will go for, but at 12 million for one year, Delgado is better than all of them, pay for what you get. In the posts above it was Delgado, Evans and another prospect (maybe a younger SP) for Sonnanstine, who would be the 5 starter on either team anyway. If the Rays do not want to trade him, then fine, but its not a ridiculous idea.
PhilsWSchamps: Fantasy lineup hardly, the mets seam to be a frontrunner for Lowe. If they ink that deal, slot him in the rotation. The mets are looking to add another SP after him for around 5-10 million, in the proposed lineup, Delgado would be moved (albeit at high value point) for a cheap SP. Save that 12 million (Delgado), plus the 10 million for another starter = Manny. The increase in payroll would be roughly the money they spend anyway.
Posted by: MrMet | December 16, 2008 at 10:35 AM
On a side note for philsWSchamps, your team just won a WS, but you would not know it. All of your posts have a bitter and hater feel to them, why don't you smile a second and remember your team is champs.
Posted by: MrMet | December 16, 2008 at 10:40 AM
Who cares what Dunn's batting average is? He's still creating more runs and more runs per game than Delgado. He's also been on base more often. Would it be better if he was grounding out to second instead of striking out?
Posted by: Steve Howe's ghost | December 16, 2008 at 01:33 PM
who agrees that we should trade castillo for guillen and than get hudson to replace castillo?
Posted by: Rec10 | December 16, 2008 at 06:58 PM