MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Lowe Rejected Offer, Wants $16MM Per Year | Main | Odds & Ends: Rockies, Iguchi, Indians »

Manny Ramirez Rumors: Saturday

10:11pm: Ray Ratto of the San Francisco Chronicle writes that the Giants want to wait until the corner outfield market is "more precisely defined" before pursuing Manny. He adds that the Giants are unlikely to enter a bidding war so they need more financial flexibility than usual from Boras.

10:45am: Buster Olney adds that rival executives have "major doubts" about the Giants' willingness to spend enough to sign Manny, especially in the midst of a recession. Olney points out that trading Randy Winn or Aaron Rowand to clear payroll would likely yield very little in the current market.

9:13am: Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle carefully summarizes the Giants' interest in Manny Ramirez to kick off the day's Manny rumors.

Schulman reminds us that the Giants have talked with Scott Boras about Manny and writes that this is "not another case of Boras just trying to drum up another suitor."

That said, their interest is far from "an all-out assault on Ramirez in a bid to get him." They're simply intrigued.

Like any team at this point in the year, the Giants are apparently considering other free agents and "trying to make trades." In other words, they're interested, but they have other options.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536adefb5970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Manny Ramirez Rumors: Saturday:

Comments

Pretty much, if the Giants can get Manny Ramirez without hampering the payroll and ability to make necessary improvements/spend on the draft going forward, they should go for it.

With two other big, bad contracts on the books for quite a bit of time, that could be the dealbreaker.

They put up with Barroid, I'm sure they can handle Ramirez. The Giants definitely need a slugger and Manny could get them in a pennent race.

genuine interest? I think 29 teams in this league have interest in manny. It doesn't sound like Manny will be one of those FA bargains this winter. This is looking like it might be more to drive up the price. I still think the Yankees get him let minute

I'm sure every team would be interested in Manny at the "right price". The problem is, what is the "right price", meaning at what price will Manny not be "bad Manny" and is that price equivalent to what each team thinks Manny and his baggage is worth?

The Giants can trade Aaron Rowand to the Yankees. They should have signed him as a FA anyway.

GiantThinker:

While i do agree that Aaron Rowand would be a good CF stop gate until Austin Jackson is ready... i don't think the Yankees would be willing to trade for Aaron Rowand because they already have a logjam of outfielder in (Johnny Damon, Hideki Matsui, Nick Swisher, Xavier Nady, Melky Cabrera, and Brett Gardner) and even if they are successful in moving one or two of them, i dont think they would want to take in another outfielder...

I agree with Olney. This off-season there has been too much lying from people within the business.

The cubs should be trading for Randy Winn, as opposed to signing Milton Bradley. Then, they could have kept their team leader in Mark DeRosa.

I wish the mets would trade for them they have alot of young talent below AA and we could use a gritty player like him not only that i heard he is a club house guy and hate to say it the Mets need some 1 who could be a leader in the clubhouse. Sinc ealot of you guys on this post are Giant fans can you tell me what you have heard about rowand as a leader, when he was on the phillies keith hernandez and Ron Darling said if the mats had him we would go to the WS because he is the exact type of player the mets are missing.Or something along those lines.

i would love to see ramirez back in an indians uniform for the remainder of his career, however it would never happen given the economic crisis in baseball and the indians in particular.

rolling - i disagree. i actually think rowand is a move the yankees WOULD make.

As a Red Sox fan all I can say is good luck to whoever signs Manny! He broke our hearts and proved he wasn't about a passion to play baseball, he was about securing his next big contract. I hope the market continues to flatline for him and Scott Boras!

i agree wth Cyekim....this is why there's little interest in Manny.

this is also why the Giants rumors are way overstated. they went through many years of Bonds in the clubhouse and are not interested in a repeat performance anytime soon.

manny will ultimately end up a dodger. they deserve each other ;-)

TDS

in all your posts you compare Manny to Bonds why?

Bonds never quit on the Giants and he never played half@ss like Manny did in Boston

its a fair point. they were different that way.

but both were/are distractions to the team off the playing field.

just think about how much time/energy the Giants had to expend dealing with Bonds. think about the negative press the team had to deal with. think about how many free agents "didn't" want to play with the Giants because of his antics in the club house.

hank aaron, willie mays and a host of other great players understood their responsibilities to the team didn't end when the game did.

in my opinion, the Giants are looking very carefully at the "character" of any player they bring into the organization now.

they will not allow another Bonds situation on this team anytime soon.

regardless of price, I think they know that Manny is another possible bad situation.

Boston knows this....and frankly I think most GMs do to.


imagine

Come Home Manny.

MANNYWOOOOOOOD!!!

Bleacher Bum:

Any Giants fan who watched them play over the past 10 years or so wouldn't have said that.

Bonds played half-ass all the time.

Never hustling to first base after hitting a ground ball or pop up.

Standing at home plate admiring a fly ball, starting his home run trot then seeing the ball bounce off the outfield wall and only ending up on first base.

Ring any bells?

I think whoever gets Manny between the Giants and Dodgers the other team will counter by getting Adam Dunn or Pat Burrell

Ive been watching the Giants my whole life and been to games at Candlestick and AT&T

ok maybe he played half ass sumtimes but he never Quit and he played alot of games every year till he got hurt

Bonds is better at his job than Manny is though.

They both can't field, but Bonds is the better masher.

he didnt play half-ass in the World Series or postseason nor did he when he hit 73 homers back in 2001

manny was a world series mvp.

he never hit 73 home runs, but i mean.. do we really need to get into this?

If the Giants were to acquire they wouldn't be moving Randy Winn. It would be important to keep plus defenders in the outfield to make up for Manny's defensive woes.

I think the Yankees would strongly consider Rowand. Austin Jackson is not yet ready, and I personally do not think he will be the great CF Yankees fans expect. Rowand would provide them stability, and I believe the Giants would consider ridding themselves of Rowand's contract for financial flexibility.

Just because the Giants didn't surround Bonds with the appropriate talent needed to win a WS doesn't mean s.hit. Stop with the WS MVP argument. It takes a team to win a WS.

I wonder if Manny Ramirez will still be in baseball at the age of 43, let alone actually productive. For your information, he's 36 right now, turns 37 in May.

They're both bad defenders, but Manny is MUCH WORSE defensively than Bonds. Since the Giants are an NL team...

Manny:
2005:-22.6
2006:-19.5
2007:-18.3
2008:-4.8

Bonds:
2004:2.9
2005:1.4
2006:-1.3
2007:-4.7

Rowand and Winn both have great gloves. As much as I'd like to get Manny I dont think we have the $$$. We already spent about $25 mill this off season. We'd have to justify spending another $25 mil. We already have a log jam in the outfield and signing Manny would give us a hole defensively in our solid outfield of Lewis, Rowand, Winn. Thats three outfielders who can all play CF. No doubt we can free up money this year to get him. But im worried once we have to keep our young guys we wont have the money.

Ned is in a can't lose position.
Dodgers pared down to $65MM for this season, wow. Hacksaw's on XM175 right now tripping on McCourt saying that he's running the team into the ground, actually he's 3-4 yrs late with that assessment; Ned is actually (cough cough) acting like a good GM right now. If the payroll stays reasonably close to what it is now before Boras makes up Manny's mind for him, he'll be looked upon as a (cough cough) genius for not jumping any guns. If Manny leaves, it all falls back into McCourts lap as a MAJOR screw up.

I'd love to trade Rowand to the Yanks for a bag of balls.

Move Randy back to CF, Fred to RF and then we could offer Manny a contract.

the Yankees have 50 outfielders so stop bein greedy Rowand can be a Met they have a bag of balls 2.

AND IF MANNY SHOT ROIDS HALF HIS CARRIER THEN GUESS WHAT HE WOULD BE PLAYING BASEBALL TILL HES 43 DONT ACT LIKE BONDS IS SPECIAL CAUSE HE KNEW HOW TO USE A NEEDLE SINCE THAT IS WHAT YOU CAN CREDIT HIS LONGEVITY 2.

"I think whoever gets Manny between the Giants and Dodgers the other team will counter by getting Adam Dunn or Pat Burrell"

As for Giants, you can probably count on Burrell as a possibility, AT&T not that attractive to Dunn, and Boras is just using the Giants to drive up the price on Manny. If the unlikely event of Manny going to SF happens, they would probably talk to Dunn and Abreu, and not Burrell. It's looking more and more like Dunn could wind up in Washington, beings Cubs (his first choice) apparently went with Bradley.

Yeah they said the mets are a sleeper to get Abreau but id rather have rowand threw a trade or even Bradley or Dunn not burell either that or they should do what the dodgers just did with Jones to Castillo and sign Hudson.He said he wanted to play for the mets and hed be the perfect number 2 hitter after reyes n before wright.

"AND IF MANNY SHOT ROIDS HALF HIS CARRIER THEN GUESS WHAT HE WOULD BE PLAYING BASEBALL TILL HES 43 DONT ACT LIKE BONDS IS SPECIAL CAUSE HE KNEW HOW TO USE A NEEDLE SINCE THAT IS WHAT YOU CAN CREDIT HIS LONGEVITY 2."


What the hell. Roids are actually really, really BAD for longevity. Body breaks down. You can't credit Bonds' longevity to his roid use.

Oh. It's C-A-R-E-E-R

Dodgers should really have a lock on Manny now. Yesterday this site posted a link that stated that the dodgers had supposedly offered Manny a 3 yr. $60M contract. They can up it to 3 yrs. $75M without losing nearly any money with the $12M in relief from Jones' contract. It's looking good, Make it so Ned!

"What the hell. Roids are actually really, really BAD for longevity. Body breaks down. You can't credit Bonds' longevity to his roid use."

What about a substance like "HGH" I am not too familiar with human growth hormone but I think that it allows for quicker healing and should prolong a CAREER (good one) at least to some extent. Like I said I am by no means an expert on such matters (perhaps Clemens or Bonds can fill us in!)

If Winn hadn't been on a historically bad offense last year with San Fransisco, his stats would have been even more impressive than they were. If they don't want him, I'm sure the Braves would love to take him off their hands cheap though.

Manny is not going to SF. He;s not going to the Yanks either.

Why do you think Boras wanted to restructure $15 mill off of the Dodgers' '09 payroll.

To get money to re-sign Manny.

I also, along with other Dodger fans on another board, think Lowe is coming back on a 1 yr deal for $14 or $15 mill.

With this restructuring, the Dodger payroll commitment for '09 sits at around $65 mill. Assuming a slight decrease in payroll from '08 ($118 mill) to, say, $110 mill that leaves about $45 mill to spend.

Can you say hello to Manny ($23 mill), Lowe ($15) and Hoffman ($6)?

I really think that Boras wanted to restructure down Andruw's deal enough so the Dodgers could re-sign Lowe since it looks like the Mets only want to $13 mill/yr on Lowe for 3 yrs in a down market. Also, by Lowe going back to L.A., Oliver Perez is set up to go back to NY on a $12 mill/yr, 3yr deal. Not totally what Perez wanted but definitely better than where his market value was headed, which was probably under $10 mill/yr if Lowe went to NY.

It just makes too much sense for Lowe, Perez AND Boras to not be true.

I really think Boras is using Andruw to manipulate the market for his clients.

Andruw gets a fresh start, Manny gets his money, Lowe gets his money for 1 yr and then goes back to the market and Perez gets the big deal he wanted from NY.

yep....manny will be a dodger.

but its not because of the "moves" Boras is making for his clients.

the "market" doesn't want manny....regardless of how little there is available....isn't that obvious to you?

Texeira had a dozen or more interested teams and they bid the price up to the moon....

manny can't by a bid...

why....simple. he's a problem and the GMs know that....

yep....manny will be a dodger....and the folks in boston (and around the league) will tip a class and enjoy a chuckle on your behalf....

Why would Lowe sign a 1 year deal for 15 mil when he is going to get more than 3 years at 13 mil? Also, his stock won't be any higher than it will be this year as he can't pitch much better than he did the 2nd half of last season. And, you also have to consider that he has made it pretty clear he doesn't like being in L.A. much. However, I'd be all for the Dodgers giving him 3 years at around 16 mil a year, but it looks like that won't be happening.

Derek Lowe will not be a Dodger I guarantee it I think he will be a Met or a Phillie

I do think Oliver Perez will be a dodger given the fact that they are desperate for starting pitching and I believe Perez is from Southern California

I don't think Perez or Sheets will be Dodgers as they don't want to lose the 17th pick as well as hand out a huge contract to a couple players that are pretty big question marks. They'll land a Pettitte/Wolf/Garland.

first of all, according to the SF writers, there's very little chance the Giants will sign Manny. Secondly, all the work that Boras and the Dodgers did on Andruw Jones' contract puts LA in the driver's seat for Manny. Lowe? I agree that he wanted out of LA, and wants to be on the east coast (near family?). The Dodgers are not interested in losing draft picks, so Pettitte, Wolf, or Garland all make more sense. Hoffman, though, is still a possibility, as long as he and Towers don't kiss and make up in SD, now that the ownership looks to change.

I've been watching baseball since 1989, and I can't remember if Barry Bonds was a good defender early in his career. Was he?

Barry Bonds was a tremendous defender

he is an 8-time Gold Gove winner

people always forget about his 8 gold gloves

Scott Boras makes me want to puke.

Bonds also had one of the strongest arms in the game too...he was just like his Godfather Willie Mays...and his dad too.

Barry's dad, Bobby Bonds, was about the most complete player I ever saw play.

It was a total shame he had his problems with alcohol during a time when really nothing was done to help people with additions.

But Bobby Bonds was even better than his son...he simply drank himself out of the game. At least he got to see his son have the success he has had.

I am a big Dodger fan and have always watched both Bonds with a great amount of awe.

I was extremely lucky that I was able to go with a buddy to SF for the last series of the season in Bonds' final season with the Pirates before signing with the Giants. We scored two seats from a parking lot attendant for face value...in the second row right behind home plate!! Ya have to remember that at the time, the Giants, were, well, lets just say the current team could have kicked their rear ends all over the field 80% of the time...anyway, Barry had the fastest bat speed of any player I ever watched play. And it was all in his hands and wrists...funny thing was he was not a big muscular guy. He was certainly fit and time and strong just was in no way the specimen he was at the end of his career...plus there was the whole melon head thing. ;)

And while we know he cheated, he already had the gawd given talent...and always did. The "additives" simply gave him that tiny bit extra to really push him over the top the last 5+ years he played. Melon head and all... ;)

"Scott Boras makes me want to puke."

So now we are looking down on people for being great at their profession?

Comments like yours make me want to puke.

"I've been watching baseball since 1989, and I can't remember if Barry Bonds was a good defender early in his career. Was he?"

Yes. He was a very good defender (for a corner OF). He was a good defender throughout his career; his defense didn't really start declining until his late 30s (was +11.7 in LF as late as 2003).

grumpy3b

finally, you are the first dodger fan on this website that acknowledges what kind of talent Barry Bonds had
most other dodger fans say he was only good cause of steroids blah blah blah
people dont realize even without roids he was the ultimate 5 tool player
he had over 500 stolen bases
8 gold glove titles
without roids he still probably would have hit 600 homeruns
even into his 40's Barry still had that quick bat speed
nobody in the game could see the ball better than him
as for Bobby Bonds I unfortunately was not old enough to see Bobby in his prime but my dad has great stories about when he used to go watch him at Candlestick
my dad has an autographed baseball of Bobby Bonds and keeps it in a nice case
im gonna stop cause post gettin kind of long but grumpy3b thank you for teaching your fellow dodger fans a little something about the Bonds Legacy

"What about a substance like "HGH" I am not too familiar with human growth hormone but I think that it allows for quicker healing and should prolong a CAREER (good one) at least to some extent. Like I said I am by no means an expert on such matters (perhaps Clemens or Bonds can fill us in!)"
Posted by: cutmeibleedblue | January 03, 2009 at 06:09 PM


Or maybe we could ask Eric Gagne or Paul LoDuca to fill us in.

"grumpy3b

finally, you are the first dodger fan on this website that acknowledges what kind of talent Barry Bonds had"
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | January 04, 2009 at 03:22 AM

Okay, untrue you're just too busy trying to insult LA fans too read praise given..

661dodgerblue

I have not once insulted a dodger fan here
at a giants-dodger game thats a whole other story

not once have I heard any dodger fan here say without roids Bonds would still put up Hall of Fame type numbers (which he would have)

please correct me if im wrong


Or maybe we could ask Eric Gagne or Paul LoDuca to fill us in.


Posted by: WillieMaysField | January 04, 2009 at 03:32 AM

awww...why u gotta go and bring those 2 up? LOL

interesting posts bleacher bum SF and grumpy3b

you learn something new everyday...

Lowe would take a 1yr deal for $15 mill because the market for starting pitchers in '10 could be bad, especially if Lackey and Webb sign extensions. So if the economy is healthier at that point, then he could score a bigger deal.

OR...

Lowe may sign a 3 yr/$45 mill deal with the Dodgers, especially if Manny re-signs.

One of Lowe's biggest gripes was lack of run support but with Manny around for 3 yrs, it may persuade him to come back to LA, especially if no one bids higher. I mean its not like he didn't have success with the Dodgers.


Actually, I just checked the '10 free agents and Webb has a pretty cheap team option ($8.5 mill) that is sure to be exercised.

In fact, the other good starters like Beckett and Cliff Lee also have reasonable team options that figure to get exercised.

Lackey is a lock to be extended so you are looking at virtually NO ONE being better than Lowe in the '10 market.

THAT is why he would take a 1 yr deal.

The more I look into it, the more I am convinced that the Dodgers are the "mystery team" in the mix and very well could be Boras' fall back option if Lowe doesn't get the contract offer he wants.

Randy Winn likely going nowhere. Too many corner outfielders in the market right now. There is no market for him regardless of trade size imo. Aaron Rowand as others mentioned could be a trade candidate for the Yankee's. Do they need him, No. Play two years for the Yanks in center 09/10 Jackson in 11 perhaps. Move Rowand to LF last two years of the contract/let him double with Jeter in 11 since by then his contract will be out. He is now entering year 2 of a 5 yr $60mm contract. Not terrible, but probably too much for SF as many have said, (archiving) that SF signed Rowand with little need for him too. Look's like one of those signing that makes sense (based on player) but no sense for the organization.

How about Kennedy, Horne, Matsui and $3mm for Rowand or something to that extent. Sf takes about $50mm off the books overall, adds $10mm with Matsui. Gets a pt LF with a proven bat (lets face it, as much as he is a question mark, he is a proven 280avg 20hr 20d, 100rbi player) He then becomes that added bat DH void. How much can Matsui possible resign for? $3 for $24mm at the most? That's the price for one year Manny.

I mean if you're gonna consider Manny - this should make some sense as well. You get some pitching prospects and SF and Matsui have always had mutual interest it sounds.

For some reason Matsui just makes sense in SF. I'll push this until it's a dead possibility...And SF would not be unloading Sanchez which I am sure they prefer not to do, but listening.

Yankee outfield if this happened:

09- Damon LF, Rowand CF, Swisher RF with Gardner rotating. Trade Nady while value is high, package Melky somewhere. Those two together with maybe a lower level arm should yield the mid infield prospect we seek.

10-Gardner LF, Rowand CF, Swisher RF with ??

11-Jeter/Rowand LF, Jackson CF, Swisher RF with Gardner as the extra.

I like Gardner and did a little reading up on him and Girardi has a thing for him too, so I'd say hang on to the guy. He could be the lead off hitter in the near future (post damon) who else would take on that responsibility and for nothing$.

Yankee77

"For some reason Matsui just makes sense in SF. I'll push this until it's a dead possibility"

I think it's already dead. Matsui has played LF a combined 170 games over the past 3 years is coming off back to back knee surgeries and he's a lefty hitter which in our park kills power numbers. We already have 4 lefthand hitting outfielders and Sabean said they weren't interested in 1 year rentals. Plus if we move Rowand, Winn has to play CF and he's a FA after 09 and there's no one to play CF in 2010.

"Bonds also had one of the strongest arms in the game too"

Not true. Bonds never had the greatest arm. I would say in his prime, it was above average at best. Barry Bonds was a good outfielder primarily as a result of his positioning, anticipation, outstanding routes to the ball and his ability to get to the ball and get rid of it immediately.

For the record, the outfield arms that I have been wow'd by over time would be Raul Mondesi, Ichiro and Vladimir Guerrero (in his prime, of course). Keep in mind my frame of reference, as I'm only 30yo.

"Scott Boras makes me want to puke."

So now we are looking down on people for being great at their profession?

Comments like yours make me want to puke.

Posted by: nrmax88 | January 04, 2009 at 02:49 AM

Amen. You can dislike Boras all you want, but he works within the rules he's given and maximizes his clients' return...well, except for that $5M (??) he left on the table for Tex. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure he's not a saint, but how do you think most people get to the top of their profession? By baking cookies for people along the way?

Jason_F,

Since ya never got to seen Barry Bonds play early in his career with the "We Are Family" era Pirates you might wish to check out his assist numbers. And you do not win a GG in the OF w/o a very good arm.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/b/bondsba01.shtml

And if one were to go by the final few years of Willie Mays' career all that would stand out would be seeing him fall down in the Mets outfield running after a routine fly ball. He really was just awful those last couple years. But that does not take away his true greatness.

Bleacher_bum_SF:

Glad to pass on what I know from watching these guys play. Hey, Dodger fan or not, if you don't acknowledge talent, when it's there, is a person really a baseball fan or are simply an "I hate the Dodgers/Giants Fan"...??? There is a big difference I think.

Barry Bonds simply extended his career a few years and yeah he would certainly have been in the 600+ HR range no matter what. I just wish the final few years of his career had not been tainted, but really I ask myself what I might have done in the same position...honestly I cannot say I would have done things any different...well other than being a more people kinda guy, at least I hope I would have been more fan/people oriented. Hard to say since again, he was on such a different level and also had to find a way to keep focus that worked best for him.

BTW, I am the sorta guy who CAN wear my Dodgers hat to an SF game and have a ball with the true SF fans around me talking about the game and teams.

One thing I miss about the rivalry is going to Candlestone for a day game (especially on the weekends) and just sitting back in our seats with an eye on the bleachers, with bets on what inning the fights would start...hehehehe...it was BRUTAL out there in the 70s-early 90s...kinda funny though, even if sad at the same time. ;)

And know there are actually more fans like me than not...lifers grew up with the game and love it win or lose and know, for us, it's simply a game we played as kids.

btw, I got my era's confused...Barry Bonods did NOT play with the "We are Family" era pirates...cripes they guy just seems that old...hehehehe...

"Dodgers pared down to $65MM for this season, wow. Hacksaw's on XM175 right now tripping on McCourt saying that he's running the team into the ground, "

Incorrect.

More money will be spend (i.e. Manny and a SP) and the $65 million doesn't factor in BIG increases for guys like Russell Martin and Andre Ethier in arbitration.

"spent" I should say...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.