![]() |
|
|
| |
« Don't Expect Phillies to Pick Up a Bat | Main | Cubs May Not Need Hitter After All »
News comes from Tom Gage of the Detroit News that the Tigers are benching Magglio Ordonez indefinitely.
Ordonez hasn't been terrible with the average or plate discipline, but his power has disappeared. His season line is .273/.347/.343 entering Thursday's game, and with two home runs all year, he simply hasn't been a middle-of-the-order hitter.
Between Ordonez's benching and the news that Carlos Guillen may not return this season, the Tigers are facing a power deficit. While they are in first place now, it is hard to imagine they will stay there all season without adding some offense.
Keep in mind, Ordonez receives $18MM in 2010 if he gets 135 starts or 540 plate appearances in 2009, or 270 starts or 1,080 plate appearances in 2008-2009 combined. Considering he had 144 starts and 623 plate appearances in 2008, that means his benchmarks are actually 126 starts or 457 plate appearances in 2009.
Consider that Ordonez is already at 57 starts, 242 plate appearances in 2009, and figure "indefinitely" will mean "most of the time" for the remainder of the season.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I doubt he gets benched if not for that vesting option.
Posted by: Yewnork | June 18, 2009 at 07:16 PM
I'd guess we see a grievance soon.
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 18, 2009 at 07:21 PM
"I doubt he gets benched if not for that vesting option."
I don't think they can pull that off. By my count, option vests with 235 more plate appearances. If he averaged 4 per game, that's roughly 60 more games... no way the Tigers can justify benching Mags for 40 games and win a grievance unless something truly drastic happens.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | June 18, 2009 at 07:25 PM
I know the power is gone, but a guy batting .273 in the majors isn't horrible enough to bench. At worst, he should either be moved up or moved down in the order. Batting 2nd or 7th wouldn't be bad.
Posted by: parrothead8 | June 18, 2009 at 07:28 PM
They'd better hope that whoever replaces him does better because that is the only way they have a shot at not losing the impending grievance.
Posted by: was385 | June 18, 2009 at 07:30 PM
I have a question for you wizards. What happens if the Tigers cut him, and a grievance is filed and Maggs wins his grievance?
Posted by: allstarlineup | June 18, 2009 at 07:34 PM
He's got a .690 OPS and plays bad defense out of a corner OF spot.
If he wasn't a veteran, he'd be getting sent down to AAA right about now (well, exceptions granted to Delmon Young and Francoeur).
Posted by: melonis rex | June 18, 2009 at 07:36 PM
"I have a question for you wizards. What happens if the Tigers cut him, and a grievance is filed and Maggs wins his grievance?"
The Tigers will owe him $18M... or more likely they'd settle with the players union.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | June 18, 2009 at 07:38 PM
I don't see how there's a legitimate grievance here. This year he's been nowhere near the player they expected when they signed the deal. Why should they be obligated to play him so his option can vest? If he wanted a guaranteed 2010 deal, he should have held out for that in the contract negotiation. This isn't bad faith (like benching a guy in the last week of the season 1 AB short of the vesting number, and letting pitchers pinch-hit instead of him). It's just a team being rational.
Posted by: ColonelTom | June 18, 2009 at 07:49 PM
thank you
Posted by: allstarlineup | June 18, 2009 at 07:49 PM
'Consider that Ordonez is already at 57 starts, 242 plate appearances in 2009, and figure "indefinitely" will mean "most of the time" for the remainder of the season.''
To me, this sounds like an incomplete sentence oor worded strange. How i read it, it seems that there should be something else after for the remainder of the season.
I would be suprised if he is benched all season, espically since they were winning. One of the few times there is a vet who has OK numbers being benched, espically if there isnt another player knocking on the door.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | June 18, 2009 at 07:52 PM
This guy needs to be released. He needs to go back to the White Sox who may be Quentin-less for quite some time and can at least try and get his power back on track. If he still fails in Chicago, he can at least retire on the team that made his career.
Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | June 18, 2009 at 08:28 PM
THANK GOD the braves didn't trade for him. He would make Jeff Francoeur look like Hank Aaron this season with those numbers..
Posted by: bravesfansc | June 18, 2009 at 08:35 PM
How? Francoeur is much worse than Maggs
Compare the two lines
Maggs: .273/.347/.343/.690
Frenchy: .250/.281/.342/.623
out of all RF's in baseball (24 total)
Maggs is 11th in avg, Frenchy 20th
Maggs is 16th in obp, Frenchy 23rd
Maggs is 21st in OPS, Frenchy 22nd
(coming from a braves fan here)
say what you want about how bad Maggs is but outside of Brian Giles, Jeff Francoeur is the worst RF again for the 2nd consecutive season. Now taking salary into consideration, I wouldnt want either player
Posted by: csg | June 18, 2009 at 08:44 PM
Hey Howard Megdal are you related to Warner Madrigal?
Posted by: Tigers/Reds fan | June 18, 2009 at 08:49 PM
"Hey Howard Megdal are you related to Warner Madrigal?"
Yes. And he decided to tweak his name when he got off the boat... he's now a very rare breed of Dominican Jew.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | June 18, 2009 at 08:55 PM
Sorry if I completely missed something but how is there only 24 RFers? Platoons that limit full time starters?
Posted by: Boomer | June 18, 2009 at 08:56 PM
csg,
You're completely leaving aside defense though, where Frenchy has always been better than Ordonez. Add that into the equation and there isn't really a whole lot separating the two. Magglio has been worth .1 WAR, while Frenchy has been worth -.3, so its pretty close.
Posted by: nixa37 | June 18, 2009 at 09:00 PM
Well, this is a point that I think a player could actually win a grievance if he misses out on his option. I honestly don't think his numbers justify being benched indefintely. I'd love to see the Braves jump on this right now if he is a cheap acquisition now. I'd have to believe Wren could get the Tigers to eat a good biot of salary just so they wouldn't have to drop him.
Posted by: GoldenGlove002 | June 18, 2009 at 09:06 PM
OOOOO!! EEEE!! OOOOO!! MAAAAAGGLIOOOOOO!
OOOOO! EEEE! OOOO! MAAAAGGGLLIIOOO!
I miss Mags on the Sox.
Posted by: SoxWin | June 18, 2009 at 09:25 PM
Put it like this: The Tigers don't want to pay Ordonez $ 33 million for the next two seasons, with an $ 18 million and a $ 15 million option, so they won't play him. As poorly as Ordonez has been, NONE of the other options at any level in the organization are any better. Tonight's replacement, Raburn, has a .601 OPS with no homers and 2 RBI vs right handed pitching. At least Ordonez had a respectable .350 OBP, even if his power is gone.
The Tigers need an outfielder from outside the organization in the worst way imaginable.
Posted by: Tigerdog | June 18, 2009 at 09:26 PM
There's no way in the world the Braves would take him on, let his option vest, and pay him any portion of that 18 million next year. He'd be a marginal upgrade over our current options, but he comes with a huge price tag and I'd be worried if he was still in the starting lineup come next year.
Posted by: nixa37 | June 18, 2009 at 09:31 PM
This guy needs to be released. He needs to go back to the White Sox who may be Quentin-less for quite some time and can at least try and get his power back on track. If he still fails in Chicago, he can at least retire on the team that made his career.
Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | June 18, 2009 at 08:28 PM
Not likely...Ozzie seems like the kind of guy that holds a grudge. I seem to remember those two not being a great match the first time around...
Posted by: 86 Mets | June 18, 2009 at 09:45 PM
Melonis is right. If he wasn't a vet or if his name wasn't Magglio he would cut or demoted. It's that simple.
He is arguably the worst RF'er in the game right now. No way he wins a grievance case. The team doesn't have to show that he is the worst player in the game or that he is even the worst player on the team. Instead, they have to show that they acted in good faith. Hard to prove they acted in bad faith when they bench a RF'er who can't field, can't run, and has a SLG % lower than Chone Figgins.
Posted by: bjsguess | June 18, 2009 at 09:58 PM
If Maggs is 16th in OBP, should 17 on down be benched as well? Hmmmm....
Posted by: Rangerfan | June 18, 2009 at 09:58 PM
At least the Tigers have the balls to do what needed to be done. Look at Franceour stinkin it up year and after year and still keeping his job. The young players keep there jobs because there cheap and have 'upside'.
Posted by: optionn | June 18, 2009 at 10:13 PM
"If Maggs is 16th in OBP, should 17 on down be benched as well? Hmmmm...."
Perhaps if baseball wasn't about more than OBP? Except it is.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | June 18, 2009 at 10:14 PM
"I don't see how there's a legitimate grievance here. This year he's been nowhere near the player they expected when they signed the deal. Why should they be obligated to play him so his option can vest? If he wanted a guaranteed 2010 deal, he should have held out for that in the contract negotiation. This isn't bad faith (like benching a guy in the last week of the season 1 AB short of the vesting number, and letting pitchers pinch-hit instead of him). It's just a team being rational."
as a player he certainly has a beef .270 isnt enough to warrant a benching and its obvious the tigers are beating around the bush not 2 pay him his 18 mill.
u can say well then he shouldnt have signed the contract but on a real note if he didnt tigers fans know they probaly wouldnt have one the WS
me personally for every contract like this with options based on AB's there should also be clause 2 keep classless orginaztions from pulling bs like this.
maybe something stating the player cant be benched indefinetly unless hitting below .210 25 games into the season
Posted by: theguy9 | June 18, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Yeah, except of course that Francoeur hasn't been sticking it up year after year. From 2005-2007 he posted WARs of 3.0, 1.0, and 3.6, which made him an above average player over that period of time. Obviously Francoeur was terrible last season, posting a WAR of -1.3, and while he hasn't been quite as bad this year, he's still been below replacement level with a WAR of -0.3. Still, given his age and past performance, I don't think its impossible that Jeff could get back above replacement level, and the Braves are going to give him a little more time to see if he can. Yeah, if he's still struggling this bad at the plate a month from now, the Braves need to start considering doing something with him, but to act like he should have been let go a long time ago shows some ignorance of Francoeur's 2005-2007 performance.
Posted by: nixa37 | June 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM
This is an actual case of a guy needing to perform in order to get paid. I wonder who they will make a run at when the deadline approaches. I still haven't heard anything on the Matt Holliday front.
Posted by: yanks09 | June 18, 2009 at 10:53 PM
Obviously that should say sticking instead of sticking in the 1st sentence.
Posted by: nixa37 | June 18, 2009 at 10:53 PM
theguy9.....its an $18 mil option and he isn't playing like a $5 mil player I think the Tigers have every right to bench him. They are getting the same kind of production they can get from a minor leaguer with much better defense. Its an insult to call the Tigers classless. They are in one of the worst economic cities in the world and still dishing out more money than 90% of the money hungry teams in baseball. They actually care about their fans unlike the Marlins and Nationals and like minded teams in baseball.
Posted by: yanks09 | June 18, 2009 at 10:57 PM
i can't possibly imagine what the reason is for his loss of power.
Posted by: bs | June 18, 2009 at 11:01 PM
theguy9 - you don't get it.
The only thing Maggs has going for him is his BA. Quite possibly the most useless statistic available. Let's run down his current status:
On Base skills - LA right now for a RF. Doesn't help or hurt his case.
SLG - His current 343 SLG% is 2nd worst to Giles (who should also be benched/released).
Overall OPS - 3rd worst in baseball behind the every disappointing Francouer and Brian Giles.
Fielding - one of the worst in baseball.
Baserunning - one of the worst in baseball.
His OPS is currently 200 points UNDER his career AVERAGE. This isn't just a blip.
To summarize, Maggs can't hit for ANY power, is unable to run the bases, can't field, and is currently ranked in the bottom 3 for all RF'ers in baseball in most important statistical categories. I'm struggling to see how benching him is a classless move or how this will trigger a legitimate grievance.
Posted by: bjsguess | June 18, 2009 at 11:20 PM
theguy9 - you don't get it.
The only thing Maggs has going for him is his BA. Quite possibly the most useless statistic available. Let's run down his current status:
On Base skills - LA right now for a RF. Doesn't help or hurt his case.
SLG - His current 343 SLG% is 2nd worst to Giles (who should also be benched/released).
Overall OPS - 3rd worst in baseball behind the every disappointing Francouer and Brian Giles.
Fielding - one of the worst in baseball.
Baserunning - one of the worst in baseball.
His OPS is currently 200 points UNDER his career AVERAGE. This isn't just a blip.
To summarize, Maggs can't hit for ANY power, is unable to run the bases, can't field, and is currently ranked in the bottom 3 for all RF'ers in baseball in most important statistical categories. I'm struggling to see how benching him is a classless move or how this will trigger a legitimate grievance.
Posted by: bjsguess | June 18, 2009 at 11:20 PM
'theguy9.....its an $18 mil option and he isn't playing like a $5 mil player I think the Tigers have every right to bench him. They are getting the same kind of production they can get from a minor leaguer with much better defense. Its an insult to call the Tigers classless. They are in one of the worst economic cities in the world and still dishing out more money than 90% of the money hungry teams in baseball. They actually care about their fans unlike the Marlins and Nationals and like minded teams in baseball'
who are you to say who cares about there fans your a yankees fan for god sakes u can sign anyone you like...you rly have no idea
and i call the tigers classless not just cause of this one insident there have been 2-3
Posted by: theguy9 | June 18, 2009 at 11:21 PM
while i agree he isnt playing like a 18 mill player his stats dont justify a benching
Posted by: theguy9 | June 18, 2009 at 11:23 PM
"I'm struggling to see how benching him is a classless move or how this will trigger a legitimate grievance."
The union has filed and won grievances with less and won or settled. Sydney Ponson for example... I'm not saying Mags has a case, just think the Tigers will probably have to settle and cough up some money. Also, I'm not sure how grievances are settled... if it's like arbitration and the union can present similar player cases then they'll probably mention Ortiz was hitting even worse, wasn't benched, and now has over a 1.100 OPS in June.
"I still haven't heard anything on the Matt Holliday front."
I think teams are wary that his power outage isn't just a hitting in Oakland problem. Sure, he hits better on the road, but power numbers aren't significantly different. He'll probably get dealt, but probably not for the windfall Beane thought he might get.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | June 18, 2009 at 11:34 PM
has maggs ever been linked to roids? i mean i hate to say it, but you gotta be thinking it...
Posted by: wright is my boy | June 18, 2009 at 11:34 PM
i hate accusing guys who have been known to be nothing but clean, but could he have been pumping PEDs a few yrs ago, and someone warned him that he would be suspended if he didnt stop? could explain a lot, although i do hate accusing clean guys
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | June 18, 2009 at 11:37 PM
Rule 7(b)(2) of the uniform players contract states:
7.(b) The Club may terminate this contract upon written notice to the
Player (but only after requesting and obtaining waivers of this contract
from all other Major League Clubs) if the Player shall at any time:
(2) fail, in the opinion of the Club’s management, to exhibit sufficient skill or competitive ability to qualify or continue as a member of the Club’s team;
-------------------------
What Ordonez (and Boras and the union) would have to prove in a grievance, is that the club acted in bad faith by releasing him. In other words, that it really wasn't their opinion that he exhibited sufficient skill and ability. The question is NOT what an arbitrator thinks about his ability, but whether the club acted in good faith. If they clearly acted solely for financial reasons and they had no legitimate case for benching or releasing him, there's no grievance. The only way they prove that, IMO, is if Dombrowski comes out and says something really stupid about the reasons for releasing him.
Actually, benching Ordonez is probably a better face saving way of doing things than releasing him.
But let's be clear about this: He's not any worse than anyone in the organization that might replace him. Ryan Raburn, Josh Anderson, Clete Thomas, etc, are farm hands. The Tigers need a bona fide outfielder, badly. And now,
Posted by: Tigerdog | June 19, 2009 at 12:11 AM
The only grievance that should be filed is by the Tigers, for the steroids that Ordonez used to take having inflated his value. Now they are stuck with a very expensive singles hitter.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | June 19, 2009 at 12:33 AM
ummmm I don't remember me mentioning a thing about the Yankees in any of my posts. I am referring to the Tigers investing a good chunk of change into their team year after year even though they are in an economic crisis in Detroit. Teams are preaching they can't spend because of the economic state of the country right now. There is no economy in the country being hit harder than Detroit right now but yet they still spend and put out the best team they can for the fans and the city. That is the opposite of classless. They could just use the economy as an excuse and take their money and run but they don't. Thats what I call a pretty CLASSY organization.
Posted by: yanks09 | June 19, 2009 at 01:43 AM
The Tigers by not dumping Ordonez are acting with class and Boras with his out right acts of greed in each and every contract, or every time he opens his mouth (like announcing his client A-Rod was opting out of his contract during a WS in 2007)continually works with out class and contempt for the game of baseball.
It would perfectly suit Ordonez, for his performance, much less his contract that he be dumped right now and I have no doubt that they are being held hostage by Boras and his possible grievance if they were to do so.
The next best thing for the Tigers is to waste a roster spot for this season and to just let him sit in a far corner of the dugout and sit for the remainder of the year. Making it worse is the Tigers have 2 of these horrible performance/contract guys in Ordonez and Willis.
Posted by: johns | June 19, 2009 at 03:52 AM
"but could he have been pumping PEDs a few yrs ago"
Sometimes a major slump is just a slump, it's a problem with the times that people think any slump must be steroids. For example in 2005, Mike Lowell's OPS drops 150 points. Half the sports shows in Florida stated they were convinced he was going off steroids... none of them bothered to mentioned he was a testicular cancer survivor, steroids would likely cause him to relapse. Point being, sometimes a slump is a slump.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | June 19, 2009 at 07:09 AM
The Tigers have every right to bench Mags with those terrible stats. If Big Papi had not busted out a few weeks back, he would probably be benched right now so too bad to Borass for not guaranteeing the contract. The bright dide is that by losing out on 33 million at 5%, Borass loses his 1.6 million cut. HA,HA!
Posted by: RED SOX DYNASTY! | June 19, 2009 at 07:14 AM
The blue jays released frank thomas last year early in the season and he had vesting options based upon at bats.
Posted by: tuna411 | June 19, 2009 at 08:54 AM
No question that the Tigers have been willing to spend money. They had the second highest payroll in 2008, and actually had to pay a luxury tax.
But the methods of spending are very peculiar. NO team in the AL has acquired fewer free agents or spent less on free agents over the past three years than Detroit.
The list of new free agents in three years is Lyon, Everett, Matt Treanor, Jose Mesa, and Francisco Cruceta. That's IT! All one year contracts, in three years. They also extended Todd Jones and Kenny Rogers, for one year apiece.
Dombrowski over paid for Pudge and Magglio when the Tigers were so bad that no player would come to Detroit. Although the vesting clause is based on plate appearances- and there was another escape clause tied to his knee in the first year of the deal, there is no termination clause based on performance. But that clause is already in the uniform players' contract, and there is simply no way in hell that the Tigers are going to let that $ 18 million option vest. So they bench him, even though there isn't a better player to take his place anywhere in the organization.
Spending money is fine, but they need to win. They have a chance to make the post season this year, but they'll need to replace Guillen and Ordonez in the outfield with bona fide major leaugers, and they'll have to go outside the organization to find them. Spend that money they're saving on Ordonez and pick up a few players instead.
Posted by: Tigerdog | June 19, 2009 at 09:44 AM
Wouldn't it be fair to assume those numbers of his DO NOT match up to the contract he is being paid for therefore the Tiger's have a right to bench him?
Anyway $18 mil and then $15 mil for Magglio's next two seasons is an uncomfortable number to think about.
Posted by: OhPityMe | June 19, 2009 at 09:50 AM
The Tigers desperately need a hitter. They should look at either Russell Branyon or Aubry Huff as neither would be too expensive.
Posted by: metfan57 | June 19, 2009 at 09:56 AM
Maggs had killed rally after rally, rolled into 11 GIDPs, pitchers were walking the bases loaded to get to his automatic out. His bat has slowed down so much he can't elevate the ball past the infield, can barely roll the ball past the pitcher (usually to second base: pitch him off speed and he'll roll over and ground to third).
This display was rubbing off on the rest of the team. Suddenly no one else could hit with men on either.
Last night, the first night with Maggs as a declared spectator, the first night with a 24 man roster, the Tigers got two out hits with men on base and scored double their 3 runs per game quota.
Leyland has not been extended beyond this year. He wants to win now. He already persuaded the front office to cut Sheffield.
The Tigers are a better team on the field with Sheffield gone, with Maggs not playing. Simple as that. Try to win 3 games out of 5 with Verlander, Jackson and Porcello. Make the playoffs and see how the Yanks or the Red Sox like facing this pitching in a short series.
Posted by: pmc765 | June 19, 2009 at 10:03 AM
They should just trade Maggs to the Mets for something cheap
Posted by: MetsGMDiaz | June 19, 2009 at 01:21 PM