![]() |
|
|
| |
« Royals Trade Mark Teahen To White Sox | Main | Angels Sign GM Tony Reagins To Extension »
FRIDAY: The Mets officially declined Putz's option, according to Adam Rubin of the New York Daily News. Rubin adds that the Mets exercised an option to pay Mike Pelfrey $500K in 2010, after which he'll be arbitration-eligible.
THURSDAY: According to Bart Hubbuch of The New York Post, the Mets have informed reliever J.J. Putz that they will not pick up his $9.1MM option for 2010, instead paying him a $1MM buyout. Hubbuch says the club cited health concerns when breaking the news to Putz.
The 32-year-old righthander appeared in just 29 games for the Mets before going down with an elbow injury that eventually required surgery. Putz's velocity was down all year, and his walk rate has jumped nearly four walks per nine innings pitched in the last two seasons.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Good start..now hopefully they sign Calero and a couple of other guys to strengthen the BP
Posted by: PhukdaPhils | November 05, 2009 at 01:50 PM
Well, the didn't putz around, did they? (cue drum fill).
Posted by: brady | November 05, 2009 at 01:58 PM
haha
Posted by: PhukdaPhils | November 05, 2009 at 02:01 PM
If the Tigers dont swoop in and pick this guy up on a cheap post-injury/hometown deal I will be very disappointed. He's gotta be better than Zumaya...
Posted by: Pat Metzger | November 05, 2009 at 02:03 PM
"Well, the didn't putz around, did they? (cue drum fill)."
imagine the sound of the lonely cricket.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | November 05, 2009 at 02:05 PM
If he's not expensive, I can see him being a very good signing for a lot of teams. Who could be interested? Phillies, Tigers, Braves, Angels all seem like suitors.
Posted by: worldchamps08 | November 05, 2009 at 02:08 PM
But... but... I thought he was supposed to be a big part of the "now dominant" Mets bullpen. I thought throwing a shitload of money and tons of prospects away to acquire relievers was a winning strategy?
First it was Beltran and Delgado, then it was Santana, and this year it was K-Rod and Putz. I can't wait to see what player(s) Mets fans are celebrating about the Mets overpaying for this offseason. My guess is Matt Holliday.
Posted by: Adam H. | November 05, 2009 at 02:12 PM
Adam, the Mets didn't sign Delgado, they traded for him. As for Santana, I don't think he was overpaid, K-Rod is a different story.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | November 05, 2009 at 02:15 PM
Been hearing talk that the Mets may be interested in Joel Zumaya. Think the Tigers are willing to trade him for the right price? When healthy he can be a big arm outta this Mets bullpen who throws gas. Being in a big stadium like Citi Field could benefit him as well. The right moves need to be made for the Mets to be competitive next season. With their counterparts getting all the glory, the Mets certainly have their backs up against the wall. If they make the right type of moves (Hudson, X-man Zumaya, Lackey) they should be in good shape!
Posted by: SouvenirCityBaby | November 05, 2009 at 02:16 PM
Mets got K-Rod for 3/36 didnt' they? Isn't that half of what he was expecting last year and wasn't everyone sayin that Minaya got lucky the economy was so bad?
Posted by: PhukdaPhils | November 05, 2009 at 02:18 PM
I think this would be a great pickup for the Phillies if they could sign this guy. If he comes back to form he would be great insurance if Lidge's struggles continue and if not im sure he can at least be an average reliever for them.
Posted by: redsox22 | November 05, 2009 at 02:20 PM
If the San Diego Padres do 2 of the following things next year, I will be a happy camper.
1. Sign J.J. Putz
2. Sign Rich Hill
3. Sign Daniel Cabrera
4. Trade Adrian Gonzalez
Posted by: sandiegoredsox | November 05, 2009 at 02:20 PM
I hope they go after Nady again to man 1st base. Then he and Murphy can split time at 1st which would give them both plenty of ABs while keeping them both healthy
Posted by: PhukdaPhils | November 05, 2009 at 02:20 PM
The Tigers need him, he is from Michigan, sounds like a fit.
Posted by: Rob M. | November 05, 2009 at 02:29 PM
"If the San Diego Padres do 2 of the following things next year, I will be a happy camper.
1. Sign J.J. Putz
2. Sign Rich Hill
3. Sign Daniel Cabrera
4. Trade Adrian Gonzalez"
If your a Padres fan why would you want Daniel Cabrera? There is no way he will be able to help out a ball club next year, this guy is going to need to spend some time working on his mechanics and his control in the minors.
Posted by: redsox22 | November 05, 2009 at 02:31 PM
I realize they traded for Delgado. The point is still the same. The Mets overpay, whether through trades or free agency, for big names that are destined to underachieve, and yet every year the fans fall for it all over again.
Posted by: Adam H. | November 05, 2009 at 02:36 PM
Mets Positions of Need
* C *
* 1B *
* 2B *
* OF *
* Rotation *
* Pen *
My top 5 Candidates (via In-House, Trade, FA)
Catcher: Napoli, Barajas, Santos, Varitkek, Soto
First Base: Nady, Delgado, Atkins, Murphy, Johnson
Second Base: Hudson, Lopez, Castillo,
Outfield: Bay, Hart, Cameron, Pagan Ankiel,(great Corner OF arms if Ankiel gets signed w/ Frenchy in RF )
Rotation: Lackey, Lackey, Lackey, Lackey, Lackey
Bullpen: Valverde, Calero, Cordero, Feliciano, Parnell
Posted by: FreeSide | November 05, 2009 at 02:37 PM
Putz hasn't been right since Josh Hamilton knocked one out of the park the first week of '08 against him. He is definitely a health concern and this was a no-brainer for the Mets.
I do think the Mets should consider bringing him back at a contract about a 1/4 of what he was going to get, but nothing more. He is a really good pitcher when he's healthy - you just don't know if it's going to happen.
I like the Detroit connection as well, since he is an Ann Arbor grad and the fact that Detroit needs some bullpen arms.
Posted by: MattyMets | November 05, 2009 at 02:37 PM
With the exception of Putz, who was hurt and doing great up until he started feeling pain, how have any of them really underachieved?
Posted by: jaydh2 | November 05, 2009 at 02:38 PM
"If the San Diego Padres do 2 of the following things next year, I will be a happy camper.
1. Sign J.J. Putz
2. Sign Rich Hill
3. Sign Daniel Cabrera
4. Trade Adrian Gonzalez"
Any players the O's release is not someone you want on your team... trust an O's fan who had to deal with the insane walk ratio and worst pitching in the majors for many years you dont want those guys.
Posted by: BleedOrange | November 05, 2009 at 02:39 PM
I think Putz will be going to Atlanta considering Atlanta has already signed one BP arm in Proctor. Not too mention I feel Putz will be a nice cheap option for them. It will be interesting to see where Putz goes, I'm sure he can find a team sooner rather then later.
Posted by: Whalersfan | November 05, 2009 at 02:44 PM
Exactly, jaydh2, the big names the Mets acquire actually have not underachieved, for the most parts. It's other reasons they lose. Carlos Beltran is regarded as the best all-around CF in the game, Carlos Delgado almost won an MVP in 2008, and had a few pretty good years with the Mets. Santana has been great since being traded to the Mets, and K-Rod was good while the Mets were in it (notice when the Mets fell out of it, his numbers went down). The big names are not why the Mets lose. It's that they don't know how to build around the big names. Just big names aren't enough, and the Mets don't seem to understand that.
Posted by: metzfan22 | November 05, 2009 at 02:44 PM
Putz is very interesting. Real curious to see how the market turns out for him.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 05, 2009 at 02:49 PM
How exactly did the Mets overpay for Carlos Delgado? They traded Mike Jacobs (sucks), Yusmeiro Petit (sucks) and Grant Psomas (never made it) for Delgado. The Mets got two monster seasons out of Delgado. Sure, he got hurt last year, but for the most part they got their money's worth out of Delgado.
Posted by: JK47 | November 05, 2009 at 02:55 PM
i can understand turning down the option but if i was a team looking for bullpen help i would jump all over putz. i basically watched every mets game in the beginning of the year and there were a few games where putz actually was feeling good and he was absolutly filthy. injuries ruined his season but if he is healthy hes one of the best. basically a rich harden in the bullpen
Posted by: Timmy B | November 05, 2009 at 02:57 PM
I realize they traded for Delgado. The point is still the same. The Mets overpay, whether through trades or free agency, for big names that are destined to underachieve, and yet every year the fans fall for it all over again.
Posted by: Adam H. | November 05, 2009 at 02:36 PM
You think Beltran and Johan UNDERachieved? what planet are you living on, bro? KRod they got for half price, as stated earlier. And Delgado gave them pop at first base for a while, something Mets fans found out how valuable that was this past season.
Posted by: East Coast Bias | November 05, 2009 at 02:59 PM
and on the mets players thing beltran has been worth more than every penny. the delgado trade was a steal and k-rod was the best closer in the league in the 1st half of the season other than broxton. after castillo dropped the pop up in yankee stadium is where he struggled. and obviously if you have the money and your bullpen blows over 20 save opportunities the season before you are gona upgrade your bullpen. dont bash the mets now bc it didnt work out as expected. everyone in the begining of the season said it was the best 1-2 punch in baseball
Posted by: Timmy B | November 05, 2009 at 03:01 PM
The Braves need to scoop him up asap, that's exactly the kind of player they need and cheaper than Wagner I'm sure.
Posted by: insomniac | November 05, 2009 at 03:07 PM
Sorry, but not even Petco can fix Daniel Cabrera. I got to watch him live in Reno when he was with the Triple-A affiliate of Arizona, and it wasn't pretty. I was worried for my kids' safety in the stands.
Posted by: vtadave | November 05, 2009 at 03:09 PM
He is hurt and had surgery. It is a no brainer declining his option, but he should be able to get a low base incentive laiden deal somewhere if he is healthy
Posted by: Martin | November 05, 2009 at 03:14 PM
i have a pretty reasonable solution to what the mets should do this offseason:
Sign Bay or Holliday (preferably holliday)
Sign Brandon Lyon or Kiko Calero
Trade Fernando Martinez, Brad Holt, Jeryus Familia and another prospect for a very good #2(Give me some possiblities who they can trade for with those prospects)
sign miguel olivo
Posted by: johan is GOD | November 05, 2009 at 03:16 PM
theres no doubt he will get a deal but the real question is will anyone in need of a closer bring him in as a replacement?
Posted by: Timmy B | November 05, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Yet another nice option for the Phils to get that safety net for brad lidge, but question is would these guys be ok not being allowed to close or set-up for the phils. I think so becuz they want to win. but i also think that maybe if they get a nice reliever he should be a lefty (mike gonzalez, billy wagner) so if lidge doesnt scuffle or madson is still elctric setting up, they will have a good guy to get tough lefties out in case romero has trouble getting back.
Posted by: RyanHoward6 | November 05, 2009 at 03:23 PM
@brady
go here:
http://instantrimshot.com/
Posted by: scatterbrian | November 05, 2009 at 03:31 PM
"You think Beltran and Johan UNDERachieved? what planet are you living on, bro? KRod they got for half price, as stated earlier. And Delgado gave them pop at first base for a while, something Mets fans found out how valuable that was this past season."
When you have the highest payroll in the league for years on end, and consistently fail to come in first, or even get a WC spot, you must inevitably come to the conclusion that someone is underperforming. Santana won 13 last year. Beltran has averaged .281 with 25 HRs. KRod is paid $12M+ per, not exactly half-priced, unless good, but not great, closers are now getting $24M+. Delgado has averaged 26 per for the Mets, with bad defense.
They're not bad players, but hardly worth the combined ~$65M they get paid. At some point you need to kick back to examine who's coming up short.
Posted by: Joey B | November 05, 2009 at 03:38 PM
harang for castillo, the reds might have to throw in a prospect bbut both have up in coming contract years so the mets need a a starter and he can be number two and would be pitching in a pitcher's park.. castillo might be able to play short for the reds.. ?
Posted by: kwhizz2011 | November 05, 2009 at 03:53 PM
Joey, and from 2006-2008 the mets won the most games in the NL.
Posted by: jaydh2 | November 05, 2009 at 04:00 PM
from my post before, what pitcher do you think the mets can get for a package of f-mart, brad holt, jeryus familia and another prospect?
Posted by: johan is GOD | November 05, 2009 at 04:09 PM
If the Mariners were to sign Putz on a one year deal at say...4M + incentives, they will basically have directly gotten:
Franklin Guitierrez
Mike Carp
Jason Vargas
Endy Chavez
Garrett Olson
Makeil Cleto
and indirectly gotten:
Ian Snell
Jack Wilson
(Via Ronnie Cedeno deal, who came via Aaron Heilman deal)
for Luis Valbueno.
That would be ridiculous. I suppose that's one way to offset Bavasi's awful Eric Bedard for Adam Jones + Farm Deal.
For Luis
Posted by: TheAntiRecruiter | November 05, 2009 at 04:13 PM
Mets should sign Matt Holliday, John Lackey, and Chone Figgins. If they do that, I think they are contenders again. They need an arm like Lackey to back up Santana. That is a very tough one-two punch and putting Holliday and Figgins into a lineup with Beltran, Delgado, Reyes, and Wright, right there you have 6 stars out of an 8 person lineup. Catcher is a much more difficult position to fill, but that's generally the case. Francoeur and Castillo would be fine sharing the final spot.
Posted by: TonyYanksFan | November 05, 2009 at 04:51 PM
Great.. JJ Putz.. we didnt really lose any1 anyhow..
Mets wish list!
- Acquire a Top-tier pitcher thru either Fa( lackey) or thru trade( Zambrano.. only if the cubs take Beltran and Castillo).
- Sign Jason Marquis to fill the rotation.
- Signs Orlando Hudson if we can trade Castillo
- Trade for Adrian Gonzalez
* bye bye F. Mart, R. Delgado, Niese & Parnell.
- Acquire Bullpen Help; Hopefully Rafael Soriano & maybe Marte from NYY
Posted by: jOSKO4 | November 05, 2009 at 05:02 PM
none of that will happen....
Posted by: jaydh2 | November 05, 2009 at 05:05 PM
Santana won 13 last year. Beltran has averaged .281 with 25 HRs. KRod is paid $12M+ per, not exactly half-priced, unless good, but not great, closers are now getting $24M+. Delgado has averaged 26 per for the Mets, with bad defense. - Joey
Santana is still considered one of the three best pitchers in the league (with Timmeh and Doc). He shut down early because of injury, hence the 13 wins.
Beltran is a five tool player. Plus, .281 with 25HRs are good. But don't forget his speed, and most importantly, his glove! I'd say worth every penny.
I take the half price thing back. What I meant is that Mets got him at a discount. He's still one of the best closers in the game. Had the team stayed healthy, and gave him save opportunities, his performance would have resembled the previous years with the Angels. It's a bunch of hypotheticals, I know, so we'll see how he pans out for the rest of his contract.
Delgado, again, totally a steal. Yes, defensive liability at times, but his big bat more than makes up for it in a lineup lacking in pop.
I think you have to give the Mets a mulligan for last season. In general, the fans of the team still has high faith in Johan, Beltran, and K-Rod.
Posted by: East Coast Bias | November 05, 2009 at 05:30 PM
If the Braves want to waste $9 mil on a reliever they should just stick with Soriano. No way, the Putz is worth anywhere near that much. 3 or 4 maybe.
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 05, 2009 at 05:38 PM
''- Acquire a Top-tier pitcher thru either Fa( lackey) or thru trade( Zambrano.. only if the cubs take Beltran and Castillo).''
Carlos Zambrano for Carlos Beltran, AND we're dumping our starting second baseman as well? Man, no wonder Mets fans get called every name in the book on this website. Who in their right mind would do that?!?!?!?
Posted by: MattyMets | November 05, 2009 at 05:54 PM
Joey B is exactly the kind of stooge fan who represents the way most of the Met fan base probably feels, which speaks to the intelligence level of a lot of baseball fans. Instead of blaming the 15 crappy players surrounding Beltran, Wright, Delgado, Reyes, Johan, etc, or blaming the people who constructed the team, they blame the 5 or 6 superstars on the team, who carried the team and earned every penny of their contracts? Does that 'B' stand for Benigno? Are you Joe Benigno?
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 05, 2009 at 07:00 PM
Actually, most the people on this site are know-it-alls who play monday morning quaterbacks. The worst GM in baseball has more skill at his trade than all of us put together. Even the talking heads on sports news are full of it, if they were skilled enough to be a GM they would be. Omar Minaya is a smart guy who took some gambles; nothing ventured nothing gained. you win some and lose some. I think our team on paper looked like one of the best in MLB going into this season, but we got hit hard with injuries, and players not playing up to their abilities; In all cases (except Perez) you can't account for that. So suggest trades, speculate all you want, but when you insist that players or managers "suck" or don't know what they're doing and that you have all the answers you're only displaying your own ignorance.
Posted by: xplosive | November 05, 2009 at 08:12 PM
This isn't the Braves closer solution but he might end up in Atlanta as an 8th inning guy if he comes cheap. We need to work more on signing a power right handed left field bat.
Posted by: NYBravosFan | November 05, 2009 at 09:22 PM
Did i just read Beltran and Castillo for Carlos Zambrano?
Posted by: SouvenirCityBaby | November 05, 2009 at 09:51 PM
Drugs are bad for you.......
I really don't know where to start. I mean really? This has to be a joke. Why on earth would you want Zambrano for Beltran and Castillo? What makes you think the Yanks will trade Marte? How would u get A-Gonz from SD? So many questions. The Mets have a good core. They should fire their entire training staff and condtioning coaches and def assess their workout regiment, I dunno how so many players wound up getting hurt.
--------------------------
Great.. JJ Putz.. we didnt really lose any1 anyhow..
Mets wish list!
- Acquire a Top-tier pitcher thru either Fa( lackey) or thru trade( Zambrano.. only if the cubs take Beltran and Castillo).
- Sign Jason Marquis to fill the rotation.
- Signs Orlando Hudson if we can trade Castillo
- Trade for Adrian Gonzalez
* bye bye F. Mart, R. Delgado, Niese & Parnell.
- Acquire Bullpen Help; Hopefully Rafael Soriano & maybe Marte from NYY
Posted by: jOSKO4 | November 05, 2009 at 05:02 PM
Posted by: Maddoniz | November 05, 2009 at 11:55 PM
I'm more of a Minaya supporter then most people you will find. Fact is, the team he put together sucked. Rant off topic all you want about how smart Minaya is relative to a regular man, or how great Alex Cora is at baseball compared to the average joe. That doesn't get you anywhere, because they aren't competing with you and I. The Mets, outside of about 6 or 7 players, were a team full of basically sub-replacement level players. Did I suggest that I had all the answers? No. All I said is that blaming Beltran, Delgado, and Santana for the Mets problems is pure idiocy. If you agree, then go ahead, join "Joey B" in his misguided rants about why it is Beltran's fault the Mets surrounded their 5 stars with players that are all below average major league baseball players. If you disagree, like I do, with the idea that it is Beltran's fault the Mets have sucked, then I am not sure what you were even getting at in the first place.
Nobody is playing monday morning quarterback either. Yes, the amount of injuries would have destroyed almost any teams chances, but the fact is, we had Ryan Church in RF to start the year, coming off a concussion, hoping his 150 AB's in 2008 would be the real him. They had Murphy starting in LF (and I loved Murphy, but they went in with no back up plan at all). Luis Castillo at 2B coming off a horrible year. JJ Putz, who I also like, coming off arm surgery, Brian Schneider, who is not an offensive player. They had Alex freakin Cora as the middle infielder backup when they knew he would get lots of playing time for Castillo, and as it turned out, Reyes. There were a ton of wildcards, it ends up the Mets had pretty much all of them go against them. However, as I read somewhere the other day, filling 15 out of you 25 roster spots with serious question marks and hoping for the best probably isn't the greatest strategy.
Would the Mets season have been different if they didn't all get hurt? Probably. Could they have competed for the NL East? I think they could have. But did they also do a terrible job building around their core, wasting those precious years when you got huge production out of Reyes and Wright for almost no money? Damn right they did, and now that Wright and Reyes are starting to get paid like the big guys, they will have to be even smarter about finding good secondary players, because they don't have the luxury of 2 of their top 3 players making a combined couple million anymore.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2009 at 12:55 AM
Man, you really hate Alex Cora. I'm with you on most of that, nrmax88, but keep in mind that the most glaring weakness of the team was the bullpen. And Omar did address that...sort of. But you're right, he missed a lot of other aspects that, as a GM of a major franchise, you just cannot.
Posted by: East Coast Bias | November 06, 2009 at 03:24 AM
I love how every Mets post turns into stupid "ZOMG TRAYD BELTRAN" talk.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 06, 2009 at 08:15 AM
nrmax88. all hindsight. My point, (not at all off topic) where do you (any of us) get off "blaming" anybody? the only question mark is your baseball expertise. The management are privy to all kinds of information about the players we merely speculate on, and after the fact aspouse our infinant wisdom about what should have been done. this site is about trade rumors, I often read your comments rather than comment myself because most the time it's constructive and interesting. maybe it's the Yankee Phillie series or something but the level of discourse on this site has plumited for Mets fans. I think our team has the worst fans in baseball when it comes to loyalty.
Posted by: xplosive | November 06, 2009 at 08:57 AM
I don't get why everyone loves Alex Cora. His so-called clubhouse influence didn't translate into anything this year, so what's the point?
Xplosive, Mets fans are probably the most loyal, especially those who are on this site off a freshly ended season in which our neighbors just won the world series. If we weren't loyal fans, we'd just forget about baseball and pay more attention to basketball and football, but here we are. Also, look at how well Citi Field still sold this season dispite the high ticket prices and the season being over in July. Why don't you try knowing what you're talking about before you talk? Just because we complain about stuff doesn't make us disloyal.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | November 06, 2009 at 09:16 AM
heres a wild trade proposal..(just a thought so dont kill me on this)..The M's have expressed interest in Papelbon..If the sox were able to pry Hernandez from the M's with a package revolved around Paps and Buchholz,the sox could very well use Putz for a year or 2 til Bard takes over as the closer...like I said, dont kill me on this,after all this is a forum for trades right..I think theM's would at least listen..
Posted by: chowdah | November 06, 2009 at 09:39 AM
I agree with xplosive...I'm a diehard Met fan and its not hard to see how loyal/disloyal fans can be to their team. Instead of supporting the players we have, a ton of Met fans (that i've been around) are so pessimistic and front running it gets to be ridiculous.
Posted by: PhukdaPhils | November 06, 2009 at 10:08 AM
paulio-
let's put aside the fact that what I was stating was my opinion, so "knowing what I'm talking about" is clearly your difficulty.
it's beyond complaining. People want throw out the baby with the bath water. I agree citi field is a travesty for so many reasons, many of which are beyond the scope of baseball. all that said it's a baseball field. The people who call it home, are for better or worse our guys. I know players come and go with time, but Once a player finds a niche and performs to a certain degree, I think they deserve our loyalty; this degree differs from fan to fan, for example I felt loyal to Ryan Church; he might not have been a star, but showed heart and put his neck on the line...I don't feel like Putz endeared himself to our team; he complained and performed poorly. It's a combination of performance and attitude for me. Winning isn't everything; maybe this is web site attracts people who look at the game purely technically and statistically, that's understandable, but it apparently also attracts arrogant hostile Met "fans" who care only about winning and don't like it pointed out to them.
Posted by: xplosive | November 06, 2009 at 02:22 PM
Yeah I see what you're saying Like I definitely don't appreciate the fans who STILL want to dump Castillo for nothing because he dropped ONE pop-up. I think he's either a sell high candidate or a keeper due to his 2009 performance and heart/competitiveness.
I'm totally with you on Ryan Church too. I still root for him as a player. If he wasn't jerked around and taken out of the lineup while batting over .500, he might've built some confidence and been a solid every day player.
Remember though that it's not only Met fans that hang their players out to dry. Remember Yankee fans last offseason? Bobby Abreu and Jason Giambi were emasculated on this site.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | November 06, 2009 at 03:43 PM
Choudah-
Not even close.
Posted by: TheAntiRecruiter | November 06, 2009 at 03:51 PM
Choudah-
Not even close.
Posted by: TheAntiRecruiter | November 06, 2009 at 03:51 PM
I really didnt think so..just throwin it out there...
Posted by: chowdah | November 06, 2009 at 03:54 PM
But obviously there would be about 3 more prospects in the deal thats why I said "revolved around Paps and Buch"...not just those 2..over the summer theo gave a list of 8 prospects and said to pick 5...
Posted by: chowdah | November 06, 2009 at 03:56 PM
Joey B, that's the point. Someone underachieved. BUT IT WASN'T THE BIG NAMES. There are more than 5 players on the Mets. It's the supporting cast that is frequently lacking in depth and talent. Santana has done his job, but starters 2-5 haven't. K-Rod did his job, but the rest of the 'pen didn't. Beltran and Delgado were great, but the pitching staff failed the Mets. You must have not paid one iota of attention to the Mets the past few years, take a look at their roster and payroll, and come to some BS conclusion.
Posted by: metzfan22 | November 06, 2009 at 04:05 PM
"K-Rod did his job, but the rest of the 'pen didn't."
How exactly did K-Rod do his job? He had one of the worst save rates after Lidge, one of the worst ERA's (after Lidge again), and an awful WHIP... so you're satisfied with that performance?
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | November 06, 2009 at 04:14 PM
"If the San Diego Padres do 2 of the following things next year, I will be a happy camper.
1. Sign J.J. Putz
2. Sign Rich Hill
3. Sign Daniel Cabrera
4. Trade Adrian Gonzalez
Posted by: sandiegoredsox | November 05, 2009 at 02:20 PM"
What did the Padres ever do to you?
Posted by: TXHC | November 06, 2009 at 04:15 PM
Trading for a firstbasemen is not the option right now. Murphy is there and has played good Defense. Sign Marquis, Sign Cameron, if Crawford is available sign him. Power doesn't seem to happen at city, so go for speed and gap hitters.
Posted by: nymets86 | November 06, 2009 at 04:19 PM
Ok, for all the Met fans who want to get rid of Beltran, who do you want to play CF? Angel Pagan? Milton Bradley? Roger Cendeno? Lance Johnson??Shane Victorino and his grission???? Beltran is the BEST CF IN BASEBALL. Period. You can't trade him for Carlos freaking Zambrano!!!!! Stoooop this nonsense. I can't take it anymore. Why are we blaming Beltran and Johan Santana who was absolutely dominant until he got hurt when Tim Redding was our 5th starter, Alex Cora our utility man, and Fernando "6-4-3" Tatis our LF at one point?????? It drives me out of my mind.
You want to place blame, then place on the people who assembled the roster. I'm not necessarily a Minaya hater, he does some moves that completely puzzle me sometimes, but undoubtedly he deserves some blame for surrounding the core with a bunch of junk. Stop hating on Beltran, trading him would be absolutely beyond moronic. I wonder if some Mets fans even watch the games, let alone pay attention to the numbers. I'm not huge into Sabermetrics, but come on if you watched 3 innings of Mets baseball last year you could tell how great Beltran is.
Posted by: JoseJoseJoseeee | November 06, 2009 at 04:20 PM
Mets Get:
-Adrian Gonzalez
-David Eckstein (would make a great backup MI replacing Alex Cora)
Padres Get:
-Luis Castillo 2B(Mets would agree to pay 4 of $6 million he is owed)
-Fernando Martinez OF
-Jenry Mejia, RHP
-Reese Havens SS
-Jon Niese SP
-Angel Pagan OF
-PTNBL
C-Santos
1B-Gonzalez
2B-Hudson
3B-Wright
SS-Reyes.Eckstein (in case Reyes isn't 100%)
LF-Ankiel (imagine the arms in the OF!)
CF-Beltran
RF-Francouer
Posted by: SouvenirCityBaby | November 06, 2009 at 04:23 PM
"nrmax88. all hindsight. My point, (not at all off topic) where do you (any of us) get off "blaming" anybody? the only question mark is your baseball expertise. The management are privy to all kinds of information about the players we merely speculate on, and after the fact aspouse our infinant wisdom about what should have been done. this site is about trade rumors, I often read your comments rather than comment myself because most the time it's constructive and interesting. maybe it's the Yankee Phillie series or something but the level of discourse on this site has plumited for Mets fans. I think our team has the worst fans in baseball when it comes to loyalty."
It isn't hindsight. Not even a little bit. This was all common knowledge when the season started. I don't understand how you can question my loyalty to the Mets, without even knowing me, because I try to objectively look at the team and what is wrong with it. Do you not want us to discuss baseball here, because we are not GM's? News flash, the point of this blog is for us to discuss baseball.
Where do any of us get off blaming anybody? What kind of insanely moronic question is that? We are fans, of course we will look at what went wrong when for the third straight year they fail to make the playoffs despite WS aspirations and the highest payroll in the league.
I also agree with the fact that our fans are totally stupid, and have no loyalty. You want to know what illustrates that the most? When these disloyal idiots start to blame Carlos Beltran, Jose Reyes, and David Wright for the Mets awfulness instead of the other (this is for you xplosive)...... absolutely amazing baseball players like Cora, Franceour, Santos, Jeremy Reed, (you know, guys who suck. I can't say they suck because xplosive will rant for 10 minutes about how they are all better baseball players then we will ever be, which, again, means nothing, because they are horrible when you compare them to the men they compete against) that is what shows disloyalty. Just sticking with your team, hoping for the best, and acting like everything is peachie doesn't mean you are loyal. I have watched every Met game for pretty much 5 years now(thank you tivo). Been a fan since I was old enough to understand the game, I really couldn't care less what you think about my loyalty.
Fact is, the Mets front office has screwed them, by not taking advantage of having Wright and Reyes controlled for nothing all this time. It is like having two supertstars who don't even count against the payroll, they were making peanuts.
The main thing I don't understand though is the way you are acting as if the Mets were some sure thing world series contender this year, like this was common knowledge. You keep going back to that point over and over. It wasn't. Maybe Matt Cerrone and his team of monkeys told you this, I don't know, but there were Met fans everywhere questioning the roster construction of this team well before the first pitch was ever thrown in spring training. Just because you thought they would be great doesn't mean you were right, and it doesn't mean that anybody who thinks the Mets can be put together better, or anybody who says Alex Cora sucks (HE SUCKS!!!!) isn't a loyal Met fan. It just means we can look at things objectively.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2009 at 04:29 PM
Also, I would like to add that REAL Met fans are loyal. They have to be. That is why we keep watching the team suck to the high Heavens every single year. We stick around year after year. A lot of the real stupid fans are either young children or guys who hopped on the bandwagon in 2006 when they ran away with the division. Worst thing about that year were the tool bags coming out of the woodwork posing as Met fans.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2009 at 04:32 PM
"Murphy is there and has played good Defense."
Yes because defense is the one ultimate tool a first baseman must have. I can't believe I have to say this again, as a first baseman Murphy is the worst regular in baseball. If the Mets want to improve, get a real first baseman.
The Mets had a lot of failures last year and it can't only be blamed on injuries. The pitching staff was an overall disaster after Santana, there was a massive lack of power, Wright had a disappointing year (yes, disappointing is a word to use when your slugging third baseman goes from 30+ HR power to 10). Right now the Mets do have enough to trade for the right pieces but they have to be smart about it but I don't see Minaya as being able to do that. He gets blinded by a single problem and forgets that there are several. Last offseason Minaya focused mostly on the pen because it let the Mets down in the stretch, he didn't do much about the rotation despite everyone in baseball knew they needed a starter. Simply put, Minaya's talent as a GM is basically coming from having a big checkbook, not looking for the right players.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | November 06, 2009 at 04:35 PM
" Instead of supporting the players we have, a ton of Met fans (that i've been around) are so pessimistic and front running it gets to be ridiculous. "
What is with this idea that being loyal = shutting up and being happy with the crap players on the team, and the awful product on the field? If you want good players, it means you aren't loyal?
So if you come home and some dude is going at it with your wife, in your bed, are you just going to let it slide? I mean, just be loyal to your wife anyway, who cares about the fact that she is boning some other dude right? Instead of being happy with what you had you are going to be all pessimistic and comlain, just because your wife is cheating on you in your house?
That's what you sound like.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2009 at 04:35 PM
Jose..... it bewilders me that for what seemed like a few solid months we didn't agree on anything. Now it seems like you are among a handful of other Met fans who can be counted on for something logical.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2009 at 04:39 PM
As a mets fan, the most important factor this offseason has gotta be the hiring of better scouts and player development. if the front office overreacts to the scrutiny they will digg us deeper into a very huge hole with no young talent to stock our farm system with and be able to afford a midseason trade or something of that matter. Front office has to take more chances on expensive talent that falls to them in the draft and these young international players. Matt holliday or john lackey can only help for so long this is a very important offseason for the entire franchise in terms of changing the culture of the way the mets operate.
Posted by: Jspencer8 | November 06, 2009 at 04:56 PM
Well, actually the one positive thing going on in the last couple of years has been the development of their previously non-existent farm system. That really couldn't be further from the problem. Their scouts and development team have done a good job. What they really need is a financially savvy man who can find bargains. We need a guy who is fiscally responsible, and again, doesn't spend 2 million on Alex Cora. The Mets farm is actually improving each year, each month really, as their short season young guys start to graduate up to AA and AAA.
I agree that the Mets need to spend more money in the draft, but that has nothing to do with their scouting team, that is just more Wilpons being cheap/not wanting to disturb the "slotting system" that Bud Selig has "suggested".
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2009 at 05:14 PM
heres a wild trade proposal..(just a thought so dont kill me on this)..The M's have expressed interest in Papelbon..If the sox were able to pry Hernandez from the M's with a package revolved around Paps and Buchholz,the sox could very well use Putz for a year or 2 til Bard takes over as the closer...like I said, dont kill me on this,after all this is a forum for trades right..I think theM's would at least listen..
Posted by: chowdah | November 06, 2009 at 09:39 AM
You know, when i saw this thread, I immediately thought the Sox should try to get him on an incentive deal. He could be another one of Theo's famed reclamation projects (i.e. Wade Miller, Jason Johnson, Brad Penny, John Smoltz) and our conditioning program is something JJ could really benefit from. Sign him to a 1 yr maybe $3.5-4.2M with a $4M club option on a second year, maybe?
Posted by: bosox15 | November 06, 2009 at 05:19 PM
Their farm system does have quite a few budding layers in there. On saturday, Ike Davis will be playing in the Arizona Fall league baseball game. And for everyone that wants Gonzo, you have to include Davis in the deal, and not for nothin so far in the minors hes been looking very good. I hope the Mets make a good choice with their top 10 pick in the draft.
nrmax, I'm not sayin fans shouldn't be critical of the team, because God know I am, but its irritating to see comments from so called fans wanting to trade the best players the Mets have and blaming the lost sseasons on them. And even though I know for a fact that a lot of the Mets player suppporting cast like Frenchy, Cora, Reed, Hernandez etc.. suck balls, when the season starts if they still on the team i just hope they can contribute in some form for the Mets to be successful. Thats all.
Posted by: PhukdaPhils | November 06, 2009 at 05:21 PM
And even though Minaya put together the awful role players..since 2005,hes put together a playoff team every year. Its going to be tough next year but If he can make the right moves in the offseason and acquire goood players, we'll easily be contenders again
Posted by: PhukdaPhils | November 06, 2009 at 05:24 PM
Good move locking up Pelfrey. Now we have our 5th starter in place. Now all we need is 2nd, 3rd, and 4th.
Posted by: bronxboy | November 06, 2009 at 05:32 PM
I personally would be happier with Stokes as our closer rather K-Rod...don't ask its just how much I like Stokes over BB-Rod...trade BB/K-Rod for Carlos Pena?
Posted by: nymets86 | November 06, 2009 at 05:38 PM
I might be in the minimum, but the Mets do not need Holliday or Bay. The way the Stadium is, they need a player who will spread the ball around and not hit for power. Matsui for example will be a perfect fit in City Field, a guy with some speed, but do not care about homers. If a person like Holliday goes into City Field, he will probably be a .260-.270 hitter.
Posted by: Knuffy | November 06, 2009 at 06:33 PM
the red sox need to sign putz. like a 1yr deal,5 million or less.
Posted by: harrison | November 06, 2009 at 06:47 PM
Might be something the Angels should look into, after all our bullpen was pretty bad this year
Posted by: Light Up the Halo | November 06, 2009 at 06:54 PM
wow
Nrmax88 you are a real touch-peice, why can't we keep the discusion about baseball and you can leave your personal sexual experiences out of this.
"What kind of insanely moronic question is that? We are fans, of course we will look at what went wrong when for the third straight year they fail to make the playoffs despite WS aspirations and the highest payroll in the league. "
so money equals victory?
you feel we deserve to win? boohoo!!! sounds like the Yankees are the Team of choice for you Mr. Entitlement. Go ahead make your desperate adhominum arguments from the safety of your keyboard. I'll just skip your whiney know-it-all after the fact comments and read the ones on here that are informed, constructive and intereseting
Posted by: xplosive | November 06, 2009 at 07:12 PM
I hope they go after Nady again to man 1st base. Then he and Murphy can split time at 1st which would give them both plenty of ABs while keeping them both healthy
Posted by: PhukdaPhils | November 05, 2009 at 02:20 PM
i really hope this happens. i mean, murphy and nady have to combine for at least half of ryan howard's offensive production.
Posted by: jrollpatrol2008 | November 06, 2009 at 07:23 PM
Surprising good move Mets. Well, surprising you made the right one that is. Hopefully he now goes to STL (and that they waste a pretty penny) so the Cubs can tee off on him next season.
Posted by: SuzysMan | November 06, 2009 at 07:38 PM
"the red sox need to sign putz. like a 1yr deal,5 million or less."
Don't need, but Theo likes reclamation arms. Especially if they don't resign Saito.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | November 06, 2009 at 07:46 PM
"the red sox need to sign putz. like a 1yr deal,5 million or less."
"Don't need, but Theo likes reclamation arms. Especially if they don't resign Saito."
Thats what i meant. i agree 100%
Posted by: harrison | November 06, 2009 at 07:53 PM
so xplosive, just to cut through all of your BS, where you keep avoiding everything, I will just ask you point blank....
You feel, that for me to be a loyal fan, I must blindly approve of every move the Mets make, every bad player they bring in, and I am not allowed to complain about the blatantly flawed process the Mets use to build their team?
"nrmax, I'm not sayin fans shouldn't be critical of the team, because God know I am, but its irritating to see comments from so called fans wanting to trade the best players the Mets have and blaming the lost sseasons on them. And even though I know for a fact that a lot of the Mets player suppporting cast like Frenchy, Cora, Reed, Hernandez etc.. suck balls, when the season starts if they still on the team i just hope they can contribute in some form for the Mets to be successful. Thats all."
I completely agree. The whole reason that I got into this argument was because of a bunch of idiots calling Beltran overpaid. For some reason, xplosive was offended by me sticking up for Beltran. I still don't know what his argument is. I guess he also feels Beltran should be traded, which is ironic because he is the one crying about how we have to support every single player on the Mets, and every move they make, or we aren't "loyal" fans. He also assumes that anybody complaining about the team the Mets built was happy with the team before the season started, as if the preseason 2009 Mets were a team without flaws. That is the main thing I really don't get. How come all of your arguments accuse me of after the fact criticizing, when there are a large group of Met fans very concerned about the construction of the team before a pitch was ever thrown.
And no, xplosive, money obviously does not equal victory. But it would be fair to assume that when you spend the most money in the league, and you have two superstar players on the roster making less then 10 million combined, you should be able to expect the rest of the money to be spent wisely.
I still am not entirely sure what your argument is here. My original sentiment was for the guy to stop foolishly blaming Beltran and Delgado for the Mets struggles, and to instead assign the blame to the people building the team and to the fact that the Mets had a star core of Beltran, Reyes, Wright and Santana, and surrounded these guys with, for the most part, players that don't provide any more value then a replacement level player, and also for the most part, these players were severely overpaid for their sub replacement level production. What part of this do you have a problem with?
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2009 at 08:41 PM
You write quite well, but your reading comprehension leaves something to be desired. You have got multiple arguments going on and they're all crossed up, like I said before I think this world series has lots of Mets fans on here with sand in their vaginas. I haven't contradicted myself once(on this site anyway)
So Frenchy and Cora "suck balls"? that says it all. You win. go ahead get your last word, whatever you need to do to feel vindicated. You are greatest MET fan ever. congratulations!
Posted by: xplosive | November 06, 2009 at 09:39 PM
The quote about Alex Cora sucking balls was from somebody else, not from me, since we are on the subject of reading comprehension. However, you avoided the question again.
Where does approving of the direction the team is heading and loyalty to the team cross eachother paths? I have rooted for the Jets, Mets, Knicks and Rangers, even St Johns basketball forever. I'm loyal. If I wasn't I would have stopped following them a while back, God knows they have caused enough pain.
Again, I am still not quite sure why you picked an argument with me to begin with. My point never was to boast about being the biggest fan. My point was that, while being frustrated, and understandably so, it is foolish to pin the blame of the recent failures down to the few players who really contributed to them in a positive way. The main problem lies in that they are surrounded by replacement level players. Do you not agree?
Also ironic, since you asked me to keep the topic to baseball and stop with the sexual innuendos, I find it fascinating that you accuse Met fans of "having sand in their vaginas", which I in fact don't. I was rooting for the Yankees to win the world series. I even went as far as to say I wanted the Phillies and the Yankees to play. I wanted a ring for A'Rod, and I wanted to see Pedro pitch in the world series.
I don't want a last word, or a "win", I really just want to know what the beef was that you had with my original post. Do you disagree that the Mets problem is in the way the Mets fill the roles of their secondary players, and that the problem is not Reyes, Wright, Beltran, or Santana? The only issue I ever took with anybody in this topic was for assigning blame to the best players, calling them overpaid and basing this on the fact that the team hasn't made the playoffs, which as I have been trying to point out, is through no fault of any of the "core" guys, the blame there lies in the substandard complimentary players, and the front office that brought these guys in the be part of a championship team.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 06, 2009 at 10:45 PM
"heres a wild trade proposal..(just a thought so dont kill me on this)..The M's have expressed interest in Papelbon..If the sox were able to pry Hernandez from the M's with a package revolved around Paps and Buchholz,the sox could very well use Putz for a year or 2 til Bard takes over as the closer...like I said, dont kill me on this,after all this is a forum for trades right..I think theM's would at least listen..
Posted by: chowdah | November 06, 2009 at 09:39 AM"
Where have the Seattle Mariners ever expressed an interest in Jonathan Papelbon?
The Mariners already traded with the Red Sox to acquire a younger, cheaper and equally effective closer in David Aardsma:
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=rel&lg=all&qual=y&type=6&season=2009&month=0
Posted by: thrill55 | November 06, 2009 at 11:59 PM
You know, on the topic of JJ Putz, I don't know if the Mets can afford the PR backlash of releasing a guy after he took in this prestigious award.....
http://www.amazinavenue.com/2009/11/6/1119702/2009-mets-gansta-and-grisson-awards#storyjump
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 07, 2009 at 02:23 AM
"If the Mariners were to sign Putz on a one year deal at say...4M + incentives, they will basically have directly gotten:
Franklin Guitierrez
Mike Carp
Jason Vargas
Endy Chavez
Garrett Olson
Makeil Cleto
and indirectly gotten:
Ian Snell
Jack Wilson
(Via Ronnie Cedeno deal, who came via Aaron Heilman deal)
for Luis Valbueno.
That would be ridiculous. I suppose that's one way to offset Bavasi's awful Eric Bedard for Adam Jones + Farm Deal.
Posted by: TheAntiRecruiter | November 05, 2009 at 04:13 PM "
You omitted from Seattle's haul 22-year-old lefthand-hitting centerfielder Ezequiel Carrera, who led the Southern League in hitting (.331) and on-base percentage (.441) while stealing 27 bases and posting an impressive BB/K ratio of 59/62:
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/C/Ezequiel-Carrera.shtml
Posted by: thrill55 | November 07, 2009 at 06:24 PM
reyes
beltran
bay
a-Gonzalez
wright
franceour
barajas/thole
castillo
santana
wolf
harden
pelfrey
perez
maine
niese
(no particular order)
Posted by: metsfan | November 09, 2009 at 12:02 AM
" even though Minaya put together the awful role players..since 2005,hes put together a playoff team every year."
Nah, that's just an advertising brochure the NYMs sent to the fans telling that the playoffs are now starting on 9/1 instead of 10/. They actually missed the playoffs every year except for one.
Posted by: Joey B | November 09, 2009 at 08:46 AM