Headlines

  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Ryan Braun Wins Appeal, Will Not Be Suspended

By Mike Axisa | February 23, 2012 at 4:09pm CDT

Ryan Braun has won the appeal of his failed banned substance test and will not be suspended for the first 50 games of the season, reports Tom Haudricourt of The Journal Sentinel. The union officially announced the win, saying both parties agreed to the announcement despite what is usually a confidential process. MLB has issued a statement saying it "vehemently disagrees" with the decision.

"It is the first step in restoring my good name and reputation," said Braun in a statement passed along by MLB.com's Adam McCalvy. "We were able to get through this because I am innocent … This is not just about one person, but about all current and future players, and thankfully the process worked."

Haudricourt says the appeal went Braun's way not because of the test result, but because of a technicality with the testing process. CBSSports.com's Jon Heyman and The New York Post's Joel Sherman report that part of Braun's argument was that the sample was not shipped in a timely fashion and that the chain of custody was broken for two days, meaning the sample was left unprotected (Twitter links). Independent arbitrator Shyam Das ruled in favor of the technicality, giving Braun the win by a 2-1 margin.

The reigning NL MVP is the first player to have a suspension successfully overtuned through the appeals process.

Share 112 Retweet 603 Send via email0

Milwaukee Brewers Ryan Braun

AL East Notes: Red Sox, Rays, Rivera, Vizquel
Main
West Links: Isringhausen, Giants, D’Backs, Dodgers
View Comments (465)
Post a Comment

465 Comments

  1. Mickey Koke

    13 years ago

    How?

    Reply
    • Lastings

      13 years ago

      Consider it collateral for losing Fielder (even though this sounds like BS)…

      Reply
    • Lastings

      13 years ago

      Consider it collateral for losing Fielder (even though this sounds like BS)…

      Reply
    • BlueCatuli

      13 years ago

      Because what he took was obviously not used to enhance his performance.

      Reply
      • notsureifsrs

        13 years ago

        a ruling based on a procedural technicality doesn’t sound like an ‘obvious’ result to me

        Reply
        • TheHotCorner 2

          13 years ago

           That was my thought.  I wish they would say a little more as to just what the “technicality” was.

          Reply
          • Bob George

            13 years ago

             
            Story says technicality was the sample wasn’t shipped to the lab quickly and Braun’s people argued it could have been tampered with. It’s ridiculous since Braun’s people admitted he was taking a drug that increased testosterone and didn’t get permission from Brewers or MLB, so he is a cheater.

            Reply
            • elscorchot

              13 years ago

              i know.  i think people only read the headlines. 

              Reply
              • notsureifsrs

                13 years ago

                information has been added to this post about 5 times since it first posted

                Reply
              • Ken Roucka

                13 years ago

                Correct. People see “not guilty” and think “innocent”. Two different things.

                Reply
      • Mickey Koke

        13 years ago

         Brewers fan? Joking.

        Reply
      • Colin Ziolkowski

        13 years ago

         Who knows who’s sample it was. After taking the test it was put in the guys fridge for 2 days before he sent it in. That was plenty of time to be tampered with. The guy was innocent and deserves to be aquitted!!

        Reply
        • Mike Kulhavy

          13 years ago

          cuz the tamper proof seals that were attached to the bottle and signed by Braun had magically been removed and replaced after the tampering…right!

          Reply
    • formerdraftpick 2

      13 years ago

      Maybe he smoked it but didn’t inhale.

      Reply
      • Mickey Koke

        13 years ago

         I like cigars.

        Reply
        • BK

          13 years ago

          Braun was in a VERY tough situation.  If he truly didn’t use performance enchaining drugs, the track record of athletes who fought the faulty science of the test is ZERO.  So he then had to decide if he wanted to go and try to attempt what has been tried and failed in all past instances or find a novel way to crack a hole in the test to clear his name.  

          The fact that he got off on a technicality says almost nothing about what actually happened, but instead the strategy he and his legal team saw most effective in clearing his name.

          MLB now has a much bigger problem in having to be hyper vigilant with all tests going forward as there is now a precedent to over turn conviction.

          -An Angels Fan

          Reply
          • jammin502

            13 years ago

            Yes, now the players can not only cheat the game, but also cheat the system!

            Reply
          • Mickey Koke

            13 years ago

             Yeah, a situation he put himself in by cheating the game.

            Reply
          • Darrel K

            13 years ago

             It’s more simple than that. The tester’s who do the sampling can’t keep samples at their house because labs are down for the weekend. MLB will need to fund a lab that covers 24/7 or they don’t test on Fridays.

            Reply
          • Houli

            13 years ago

             Yep, not a Brewers fan at all, but think of it like this…You are arrested on suspicion of murder. You didn’t do it, but can’t prove it. BUT the arresting officer didn’t read you your Miranda rights.

            Would you use THAT info and get off on a technicality or risk going to jail forever by trying to prove your innocence? I think it’s pretty clear. 

            Reply
      • inleylandwetrust

        13 years ago

        Quit coughing and inhale!

        Reply
    • formerdraftpick 2

      13 years ago

      Maybe he smoked it but didn’t inhale.

      Reply
  2. Tony

    13 years ago

    what so he didnt use performance enhancing drugs? Awesome so happy he proved MLB wrong.

    Reply
    • casorgreener

      13 years ago

      He didn’t prove anybody wrong.  Read the article, the problem was with the “technicality of the sampling process” anyone thinking he is innocent is just a homer.  I guarantee they wouldn’t extend the same courtesy to someone they didn’t like.

      Reply
      • Giorgi Almonte

        13 years ago

        like Manny?

        Reply
        • Adam

          13 years ago

          Manny was at the end of the road and didn’t just win the MVP.  Also Selig wanted Braun to be the poster boy for the “clean” league.  It is pretty ridiculous.

          Reply
          • Giorgi Almonte

            13 years ago

            I know man, I just meant this:
            Amen_Ra: “I guarantee they wouldn’t extend the same courtesy to someone they didn’t like.”

            Giorgi Almonte: “like Manny?” 
            No you get it?

            Reply
          • Hoosier_Oriole

            13 years ago

            Excuse me, Bud Selig “IS” MLB. He disagrees with the finding.

            Reply
      • toddcoffeytime

        13 years ago

        Braun’s lawyers challenged the chain of custody of the sample, meaning that it could have been mishandled during/before the testing process.  That does not mean Braun is guilty and just simply got away with it, it’s possible the test was a bogus positive from the start (not unlikely given he was found to have more than twice the amount of testosterone in his than any previous test in the history of testing).

        I do not say this to single you or anyone out, but as the public really doesn’t know ANY details on this appeal/process of appeal…everybody needs to step off the moral high horse and at least attempt to give the 3rd party the benefit of the doubt in their decision.

        Reply
        • Adam

          13 years ago

          No one comes out looking good in this case.  Braun will always be looked at differently.  The testing policy looks terrible.  This is extremely bad for baseball.

          Reply
          • toddcoffeytime

            13 years ago

            Agreed, in the end its not good for anybody involved, but people immediately labeling Braun a cheater who got away with it is the biggest tragedy of the whole process

            Reply
            • Adam

              13 years ago

              I think the break down in the system is the tragedy.  Testosterone doesn’t manifest itself.  So unless the handler juiced it, which I seriously doubt he is a cheater that got off because of a technicality.  He didn’t contest the positive he contested the system.

              Reply
              • toddcoffeytime

                13 years ago

                I’m not sure you realize exactly how big of a mistake screwing up the chain of custody is in the sampling process.  If it cannot be properly verified to have traveled through the proper channels, its not really a test at all, its saying that “a sample was taken, possibly mishandled, and came back positive.”  

                Given the results of the test (again, TWICE the amount of testosterone ever found in a test), the smart money is on it having been mishandled.

                Reply
              • casorgreener

                13 years ago

                Coffey is clearly a BRaun fan

                Reply
                • toddcoffeytime

                  13 years ago

                  Only when Todd Coffey pitched for the Brewers, friendo.

                  Reply
                  • Adam

                    13 years ago

                    Hahaha.  How can someone be only a Todd Coffey Fan?  Are you his wife or kid?  Middle relievers rarely get a cult following.

                    Reply
                    • tapehead4

                      13 years ago

                      Speak for yourself.

                      – Tapehead4, President of the Ramiro Mendoza Fan Club

                      Reply
                      • toddcoffeytime

                        13 years ago

                        Have you ever seen Todd coffey sprint to the mound from the bullpen?  That’s all you’d need to hop on the fan club, I assure you.  When he (I?) was a Brewer, they started a “Coffey Time” promotion with   Starbucks and timed his (my?) sprints, used to put up some preeeeetty nice times.

                        Reply
        • casorgreener

          13 years ago

          Whatever dude. So you think someone slipped some testosterone in his cup while nobody was looking.  Hey Barry is innocent too, I’m not on a moral high horse because I don;’t give a damn about steroids but don’t sit here nd play the “We don’t know” card

          Reply
          • toddcoffeytime

            13 years ago

            I would say the very definition of a moral high horse is holding a position desperately without any sort of  fact or detail to support it other than personal morality–which appears to be exactly what you’re doing.  

            I never said I think someone slipped some testosterone in his cup, I said that we don’t really know anything, so hold all that hatred and vitriol inside until we have some actual facts.

            Reply
            • Daniel Stern

              13 years ago

               well phrased Todd Coffey.  Bonus points for your name

              Reply
            • casorgreener

              13 years ago

              Hatred and vitriol? Please show me where!

              I said he is guilty, that is not hatred at all.  You are a fan so you are making excuses knowing full well were this an athlete you despised you would feel different. You speak all the legalese you want, but you know deep down inside he is guilty.  

              Reply
              • patrick

                13 years ago

                you and i have different definitions of guilty…guilt usually involves some type of punishment

                Reply
              • Anthony Marenna

                13 years ago

                Innocent until proven guilty.

                Reply
          • toddcoffeytime

            13 years ago

            I would say the very definition of a moral high horse is holding a position desperately without any sort of  fact or detail to support it other than personal morality–which appears to be exactly what you’re doing.  

            I never said I think someone slipped some testosterone in his cup, I said that we don’t really know anything, so hold all that hatred and vitriol inside until we have some actual facts.

            Reply
          • JunkyardDawg1

            13 years ago

            Hey, dude.  If you really are a dude.  Did you know that all of us dudes have testosterone in our system?  Where did it come from?  It’s a hormone we all have.  The better question would be be how could it go from 20 x the norm back to normal when they tested him again.  You might want to think a little harder about what we have here, dude.

            Reply
            • pastlives

              13 years ago

              people still make fun of others for using the word ‘dude’? are you like 60

              Reply
            • casorgreener

              13 years ago

              A separate source familiar with Braun’s sample said that his elevated testosterone ratio was not unusual when compared to athletes from other sports who have failed drug tests and served suspensions.

              Reply
        • 0vercast

          13 years ago

          Great post!

          “That does not mean Braun is guilty and just simply got away with it, it’s possible the test was a bogus positive from the start (not unlikely given he was found to have more than twice the amount of testosterone in his than any previous test in the history of testing).”

          Reply
          • Hoosier_Oriole

            13 years ago

            When this incident was “leaked” did Braun not say (through his lawyers) he had taken something (medicine, etc?) which gave a false positive? I believe he did, but then obviously during the investigation his lawyers decided to go the “chain of custody” route, found a hole, and drove through it. Looks like Braun’s lawyer money was well invested.

            Reply
            • JunkyardDawg1

              13 years ago

              No, he didn’t!!

              There are unsubstantiated and probably defamatory rumors out there all over the place, and some of them are just plain nasty.

              Reply
              • Hoosier_Oriole

                13 years ago

                I believe you are wrong. There were comments made that he had some kind of condition that he was taking medicine for which resulted in a positive test result. Trust me, I wish to defame no one, but IMO Ryan escaped because his lawyers found a hole. It might have been a legal hole, but a hole nonetheless. If I lie, why were the results not challenged, just the handling of the sample? If someone tainted this sample, they hit the jackpot. 750 MLB players and they taint the sample of the MVP. I have some ocean front property in Arizona I’ll sell you cheap. Just my opinion. Go O’s!

                Reply
                • JunkyardDawg1

                  13 years ago

                  No you’re wrong.  He just confirmed today that there was no medical condition.  You’ve been listening to the wrong sources.  He also confirmed today that the courier knew who’s sample it was, and for two days, including half a day on Monday he had it.  Supposedly, it was in a “cool place in his basement”.  Why did Braun not challenge the result?  Because it would have been exceedingly difficult to prove a negative.  How could he prove it was not his sample?  The easiest way to attack the case was to challenge chain of custody.  As an attorney who deals with similar issues, I can tell you if it was my client, I would have told MLB they had a loser case from the beginning. This was just sloppy, and who knows what happened with the sample.  I don’t think there’s anyway MLB could have won this, due to their failure to follow the agreed upon procedure.  If it was a criminal case, the case case would have been thrown out before it even got to trial. MLB knew this and leaked the result, which tells me they felt they had to attack him publicly instead of winning the right way.

                  Reply
        • Colin Ziolkowski

          13 years ago

           Everyone knows by the size of Barry Bonds head that Braun did not have the most testi in his sample. The guys numbers have been consistant unlike Barry who never hit 40 hr before he hit 73. Braun is INNOCENT!!!!!!

          Reply
        • casorgreener

          13 years ago

          A separate source familiar with Braun’s sample said that his elevated testosterone ratio was not unusual when compared to athletes from other sports who have failed drug tests and served suspensions.

          Reply
  3. Jamie Sayer

    13 years ago

    Wow. That’s all I can say. I’m glad, I never thought he’d be a person to use steroids. 

    Reply
    • laffingrass

      13 years ago

      But he did, and got away with it.  Did you even read the article?

      Reply
      • oleosmirf

        13 years ago

        And you know this for a fact, how?

        Sure its possible he was guilty and got a lucky break but its also possible that his results were tampered with either intentionally or unintentionally…

        Reasonable doubt…

        Reply
        • Todd Smith

          13 years ago

          Based on the failed drug test, I would guess.

          …but hey, I guess it’s possible the Fed Ex guy happened to open up a random package, find a urine sample, inject it with testosterone and then repackage it back up…

          …and someday, OJ will find the “real” killers.

          Reply
          • Daniel Stern

            13 years ago

             Wasn’t he caught for a protein not a steroid?  Anywho, if there was conclusive evidence he would not be getting off.

            Reply
            • michael hughes

              13 years ago

              No, that’s not true, exactly. There is conclusive evidence that his urine sample did not pass the test, he is getting off because of the possibility that the sample was tampered with somewhere along the way, which is extraordinarily unlikely. Any reasonable person can see what happened here, but the arbitration panel let him off because there was a flaw in technical handling details. Do you think someone spiked his test at some point, really? I’d say the public has all the evidence it needs.

              Reply
              • randomkeys

                13 years ago

                The public has all the evidence it needs to… what?

                See, this is exactly why it’s not up to “the public” to decide something like this. Because “the public” believes it has all the evidence it needs based on hearsay and assumption, having never attended a hearing or even spoken with any single person involved in the case.
                If the story we’ve been given here is accurate, the panel made the right choice, even if “the public” assumes Braun is guilty (which is way more fun than assuming he’s innocent, of course).

                In normal legal proceedings, any tiny sliver of doubt is enough to acquit an “obviously” guilty person. The burden of proof is NOT on the defendant (in this case, Braun), but rather on the plaintiff (in this case, MLB, or whoever chose to use the evidence of the tainted sample to indict Braun). The burden of proof is on the plaintiff to demonstrate WITHOUT A REASONABLE DOUBT (to use legal terminology) that Braun is guilty. If there is a chance something else could have happened (like this technicality of a delayed shipment) — Braun cannot be found guilty.MLB and arbitration probably doesn’t work exactly the same way as the judicial system, but it’s a reasonable parallel.

                Reply
                • michael hughes

                  13 years ago

                  Perhaps, as a legal scholar, you’ll realize that I did not say that the panel should have ruled in favor of the MLB? Also, your caps indicate a degree of confidence, that, maybe, you should not have. Demonstrating guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is not a unilateral standard for justice, judgements, courts, or even courts in the United States, much less arbitration panels. That burden of proof is reserved for criminal trials, both civil trials, and arbitration hearings have different burdens. In fact, there is no one standard of burden of proof for arbitration hearings. 
                  I won’t even bother responding to the first part, because you are so far off base (to use baseball terminology) that it would be useless. If you’d really like, then I will explain, but otherwise I’m not wasting my time. Finally, try not to demean and obliquely slander people by insinuating that they completely lack dignity and are only condemning someone because, you know, it’s sooo amusing.

                  Reply
                  • randomkeys

                    13 years ago

                    And yet no answer to my opening question: the public has all the evidence it needs to… what?

                    Reply
                    • michael hughes

                      13 years ago

                      I’m sorry I thought it was clear. Obviously,  the public has no authority in sentencing Braun to anything. However, public opinion can be a powerful force and I think the public can use what they know about the case to make up their own minds about his innocence or his guilt. It would be wonderful to be able to get all the facts, but we do know some very important ones and Braun always has the ability to clear anything thing up that he is willing to. 
                      Knowing what we know, his urine failed a test, initially Braun’s team reported a false positive due to medication, eventually Braun won his appeal but not because of the earlier stated reason, the reason for the victory did not indicate that the panel had evidence that disproved the tests results only suggested that the tests was not properly handled, Braun still has not told the public what specifically would have caused an error in the test, and against procedure Rob Manfred issued a statement that he “vehemently disagreed” with the decision, until we get more information that contradicts the strong case that he used some kind of PED we can at least doubt his innocence, and I do.

                      Reply
                      • randomkeys

                        13 years ago

                        I totally doubt his innocence. I also doubt his guilt.

                        The only evidence anyone ever needed to come to their own personal conclusion was the first headline that came out months ago, that Braun had failed a test. As far as the public cares, that’s it. No one was waiting to be given a reasonable conclusion — people were only waiting to be told either a) you were right, he’s guilty, or b) surprise, he weaseled out of it somehow.

                        I’m just not a fan of the public making the determination of guilt. They have all the evidence they need to satisfy their thirst for blame, but nowhere near enough to actually come to a 100% definite conclusion.

                        Nor, to be fair, does the arbitration panel or Bud Selig, or anyone.

                        But when one relies on assumptions and opinions to reach conclusions, the result is a witch hunt. The suspected steroid users (a group headlined by the likes of Bonds and Clemens) were convicted in the eye of the public before much else had ever happened, regardless of how right or wrong anyone might be.

                        The thing that troubles me about the public “conviction” of people like this is the general sentiment that we (the fans) have somehow been wronged, and therefore these players deserve to be convicted, and therefore we deserve to feel better when they are. That part of the last 15+ years of baseball has left me with a sour taste.

                        And in other news, I hate the way this site threads replies. Anyone know how to change the look?

                        Reply
                        • michael hughes

                          13 years ago

                          I’m Actually with you on a lot of things, and I’d explain them but I think the sites formating would cut me off or stretch it out forever.

                          Reply
                    • Todd Smith

                      13 years ago

                      Call him a cheater.  

                      It’s called the court of public opinion.  Its the same reason everybody calls Barry Bonds a cheater, even though he never served a suspension.

                      Reply
              • Daniel Stern

                13 years ago

                Have to hand it to him for fighting it, opposed to someone like Manny…It does not matter if I think someone spiked his urine.  Considering how his urine was mishandled, everything is up in the air.  Fortunately (or unfortunately) if it was that open & shut Braun would be suspended.  

                Reply
                • michael hughes

                  13 years ago

                  Fair enough. It comes down to the MLB making an unacceptable mistake in their testing process that opened the door for doubt that never should have been there. Still, the ruling doesn’t exactly “clear his name” but MLB can’t make those kinds of errors and not expect the arbitrators to consider them in their judgement.

                  Reply
                  • Daniel Stern

                    13 years ago

                    Good point

                    Reply
          • Ryan McGregor

            13 years ago

            isn’t it possible it’s an ex-girlfriend? or maybe someone from his past that he owes money to or something?

            also, its possible that just by going missing, something actually could have happened to the sample. maybe because it was left unrefrigerated for too long an amount of time, the urine sample warmed to a temperature where if its tested it appears there is more testosterone than would ever be found in a normal human body. maybe the negligence truly is the reason for the false positive, the truth is we’ll never know about braun for sure, but at the same time, there was absolutely not enough to go on to convict and hang him for being a user. reasonable doubt is a powerful concept. lives hang in its balance sometimes.

            Reply
            • Todd Smith

              13 years ago

              Is it possible that an ex girlfriend broke into a Fed Ex sorting facility over a weekend, found his urine sample and injected it with testosterone?  Sure, I guess it’s possible.

              Is it a more likely possibility than Ryan Braun taking a banned substance and weaseling out of it?  Not really.

              Reply
      • Jamie Sayer

        13 years ago

         Actually, when I read it all it said was his appeal was accepted. Sorry more information was added afterwards and I didn’t come back and read it again and again till all the information was added.

        Reply
      • Daniel Stern

        13 years ago

         Never proven he used steroids.

        Reply
  4. carpengui

    13 years ago

    Wow.

    Reply
    • Timothy J. Franklin Williams

      13 years ago

      Judge must of had Braun on his fantasy team.

      Reply
  5. PBABowler27

    13 years ago

    No way..

    Reply
  6. UnbaisedSoxFan

    13 years ago

    Suprising! I didn’t think that would happen.

    Reply
  7. ObamaDinoKiller

    13 years ago

    wow

    Reply
  8. rich13

    13 years ago

    What. the. hell.

    Reply
  9. Matt Mitchell

    13 years ago

    Awesome!

    Reply
  10. Matt Weaver

    13 years ago

    Definitely didn’t see that coming.

    Reply
  11. LD

    13 years ago

    true?

    Reply
  12. dorsey56

    13 years ago

    Now let’s test Bautista and let HIM slide too!

    Reply
    • Cora the Destroya

      13 years ago

      Or Pujols by that logic.

      Reply
      • dorsey56

        13 years ago

        No..Pujols’ arms ALWAYS has been the same, as his carrer. But Mr. Bautista? It’s like Gonzo with the DiamondBacks. Give me a break!?

        Reply
        • Jon Yeh

          13 years ago

           Bautista’s been tested LOTS, do your research please.

          Reply
          • Giorgi Almonte

            13 years ago

            exactly!

            Reply
          • toddcoffeytime

            13 years ago

            And Braun has passed over 25 tests in his career, according to him.

            Reply
        • Ted

          13 years ago

          So Bautista’s arms did change? He looks no different now than he did 3 years ago, except with a different swing. Again, you’ll notice that he magically became awesome in Sept of ’09 — do you think steroids work that fast, or maybe a change in mechanics had something to do with it?

          Reply
        • Lunchbox45

          13 years ago

           so ridiculous

          bautista is not big at all.

          he must have some really high tech steroids that make you hit HR’s, have a good eye at the plate and contribute no physical changes.

          Reply
    • mypoorbuccos

      13 years ago

       For what ought to be, but sadly won’t be the last time regarding Joey Bats:

       He. Changed. His. Swing. Mechanics.

      All he’s done since then is be one of if not the best hitters in the game.

      Reply
  13. Jeff 30

    13 years ago

    Well I want him in fantasy now.  Think he might have a chip on his shoulder?

    Reply
    • tinman135

      13 years ago

       Maybe, but I doubt he has as good a season as he did last year.  Pitchers are going to be more likely not to give him something to hit without Fielder in the lineup as well.

      Reply
      • thebigbangdito

        13 years ago

        yup exactly.  (had braun last year in fantasy and led me to win championship.. not sure if he’ll be on my team again unless i can get him later rounds.)

        Reply
      • 101andcounting

        13 years ago

        They did add Aramis Ramirez, though, and Corey Hart just keeps getting better.

        Reply
        • tinman135

          13 years ago

          But if you know baseball, you can not compare Fielder to either Ramirez or Hart.

          Reply
          • 101andcounting

            13 years ago

            Obviously – Fielder’s on track to be a Hall-of-Famer if he can continue at this pace (and I hope he does), while Hart and Ramirez are just good players. However, that doesn’t mean they don’t offer protection for Braun.

            Reply
            • Derrick Zimmerman

              13 years ago

              A cubs fan speaking rationally! Thank you!

              Reply
              • 101andcounting

                13 years ago

                I try. I’m a rational, non-biased baseball fan first and an obnoxious Cardinal-hating Cubs homer second.

                Reply
                • mypoorbuccos

                  13 years ago

                   In that case your handle ought to be “One and counting.”

                  Reply
          • sourbob

            13 years ago

            There ought to be a special place we can banish people who say pointlessly condescending stuff like “if you know baseball…”

            Reply
            • tinman135

              13 years ago

               It’s not condescending, it’s just facts.  If you pay attention to BASEBALL and not just your team, you can’t compare Fielder to Ramirez or Hart.  I could be a Cardinals homer and say that David Freese is the best 3B to ever play the game, but that would be completely false.

              Reply
              • sourbob

                13 years ago

                Just because a person has a good point doesn’t mean he can’t phrase it in a way that makes him sound like a total a__hat.

                Reply
  14. Chris Kelly

    13 years ago

    Whoo 😀

    Reply
  15. K-Hopp

    13 years ago

    I can believe in baseball again!

    Reply
    • redsx968

      13 years ago

      No you can’t

      Reply
  16. PhreshPhillies

    13 years ago

    Keith Olbermann reported that he indeed LOST his appeal… Who to believe?

    Reply
    • carpengui

      13 years ago

       Jim Bowden and Casey Stern are reporting (XM/MLB channel) that while there are some conflicting reports (AP reporting ‘fail’), there are a number of outlets now claiming he has won the appeal… many more than the single contrary report.

      Reply
    • carpengui

      13 years ago

       “There was a problem in the testing process itself.”  Arbitrators voted 2-1 in favor of Braun.  (XM Radio/Jim Bowden reporting).

      MLB has felt the need to publicly disagree with the decision (and has released a statement to that effect).  Interesting.

      Reply
      • PhreshPhillies

        13 years ago

        Very interesting. Thanks for sharing that.

        Reply
        • carpengui

          13 years ago

          One thing to add:  For those claiming a Selig conspiracy, this statement from the MLB office will still keep a shroud of suspicion over Braun – possibly for the rest of his career.  They could have taken this defeat on the high road… but instead they opted to claim that their process is still all good, which effectively attempts to convict Braun through public opinion.

          None of this should ever have been made public.

          Reply
    • theguy17

      13 years ago

      Why would anyone believe anything that Keith Olbermann says?

      Reply
  17. Kenny Powers

    13 years ago

    Awesomely written and informative!

    Reply
  18. jljr222

    13 years ago

    NL Central just got even closer. Congrats to him and hope he and the rest of the baseball world can put this behind them.

    Reply
  19. JimS

    13 years ago

    Wow!

    Reply
  20. Steve Smith

    13 years ago

    No way he would ever be suspended because (1) Bud Selig is is a Brewers fan and  (2) Ryan Braun is white….Maybe not (2) but definately (1).

    Reply
    • Wek

      13 years ago

      I’ll give you #1 but #2 is ridiculous. You might as well add that both of them have jewish heritage.

      Reply
    • Mike Wunder

      13 years ago

      You are an obvious hater…

      Reply
  21. StevenStCroix

    13 years ago

    What a joke

    Reply
  22. flharfh

    13 years ago

    Suck it ESPN.

    Reply
  23. NYCTrancefan

    13 years ago

    So the question becomes how did he test positive and raises questions about MLB’s testing standards if they do such an about face on this.

    Certainly reflects poorly on those who raise questions about other players who may have tested positive as well.

    MLB has to certainly give an explanation of how they came to this conclusion when other guys have not had such a fortune of seeing a test result overturned.

    Reply
  24. start_wearing_purple

    13 years ago

    Surprising… but I still want to know what happened.

    Reply
    • TheHotCorner 2

      13 years ago

       Me too.  Until we hear the full story it is hard to accept it either way just yet.  So I will be interested to see what the explanation is.

      Reply
  25. Steve_in_MA

    13 years ago

    I gotta here the splaining of this one.  It has never happened before, to my knowledge, and Braun did not have advance medical permission.  I’m certainly willing to believe he’s innocent.  I just wanna know for sure that MLB isn’t whitewashing this because of all the potential lost money, damaged reputation of both Braun and the League, as well as the severe disadvantage Milwaukee would suffer.

    Reply
    • toddcoffeytime

      13 years ago

      Apparently it has happened before in MiLB, with another Brewer’s farmhand, Brendan Katin.  Jimmy Rollins also claimed to have knowledge of an MLB player successfully appealing a failed drug test.  Just sayin.

      Reply
      • Steve_in_MA

        13 years ago

        I guess maybe I could or should have qualified the statement further, like, it has never happened before in the examination of many thousands of major sport pro athletes (MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL, Tennis, Golf, Bicycling, Olympics, Cribbage, etc.).  I can’t speak authoritatively on the MILB.  Rollins, I am sure, is either misquoted or mistaken, because I am Ten Thousand Percent sure that no MLB player has ever won a PED appeal. 

        I recently heard a radio interview with the doctor who developed these tests and chairs the organization that does these tests for the IOC, MLB and NFL.  He unequivocally stated that no player in any major sport has ever won an appeal against a positive test result.  He would know, since he’s the expert who testifies about the science of the test at each of these appeals.  According to him, the only ground that has ever excused a positive test was advance medical permission, which does not necessitate an appeal.

        From the rudimentary information that has been put out so far, it appears that Braun did not establish his “actual innocence,” but rather, implemented the O.J. Simpson defense, i.e., doubt as to the validity of the test result based on questionable chain of custody.  It works for me, since I’m one of those “innocent until proven guilty” kind of guys.  But I’m sure that a very large segment of the population is not going to agree, just as they did not in O.J.’s case.

        Reply
        • toddcoffeytime

          13 years ago

          You really can’t be sure that an MLB player has never won a PED appeal, as if they did and the correct process is followed, nobody would ever know.  Confidentiality is exactly that.  As for the doctor, again, he would be breaking the law and his oath in stating any player’s name who successfully appealed a test, as the entire process is supposedly confidential.

          As for paragraph 3, I do agree with you there, this does have a tinge of O.J. feel to it in that the public is not going to necessarily agree. 

          Reply
  26. Coollet

    13 years ago

    Didnt Bud Selig own the brewers or something like that? Isnt there a conflict of interest?

    Reply
    • BlueCatuli

      13 years ago

      Selig didn’t make the decision. Three arbiters did.

      Reply
  27. iceman199

    13 years ago

    AP reporting the opposite of the above. Who’s right?

    Reply
  28. iceman199

    13 years ago

    AP reporting the opposite of the above. Who’s right?

    Reply
  29. slider32

    13 years ago

    What a scam, Selig used be with the Brewers it’s fixed. Selig sends Alderson to the Mets last year and the Brewers get K-Rod and make the playoffs. Collusion in baseball, this smells. Kemp should get the MVP. Watch the writers jump on his band wagon, what a joke.

    Reply
    • DbacksAreBeast

      13 years ago

      i couldn’t agree more!

      Reply
    • JacobyWanKenobi

      13 years ago

       From the mind of M. Night Scamalan.

      Reply
      • toddcoffeytime

        13 years ago

        WHAT A TWIST

        Reply
    • tacko

      13 years ago

      Brewers were one of the only teams willing to take on the rest of his salary and deal with his potential option for 2012. 

      Reply
      • slider32

        13 years ago

        Hello!

        Reply
    • TheHotCorner 2

      13 years ago

       Three arbitrators made the decision.  Not Selig.  MLB has issued a statement they completely disagree with the decision.  I still want to hear  what really happened but at least blame the right people for siding with Braun.

      Reply
      • slider32

        13 years ago

        They went to an outside source, Hello! It was all set up. Why do you think it took so long. Most cases are decided in weeks. Selig had the outside source set up.

        Reply
    • Paul Shailor

      13 years ago

       I see white padded walls in your future

      Reply
  30. ryanfea

    13 years ago

    Great news for Braun and even greater news for Baseball fans.

    Reply
    • scott brecht

      13 years ago

      why?  another cheater playing the game?  he won on a technicality, not because he was clean.  

      Reply
      • toddcoffeytime

        13 years ago

        This is exactly why the appeal process is supposed to be confidential–by your reasoning, nobody could EVER succesfully appeal a failed test, clean or not.  You’ve already labeled him as a cheater, yet you do not know any real facts about the situation.  

        If anyone who fails a test is automatically a cheater, why even have an appeal process?

        Reply
  31. Jason Carroll

    13 years ago

    If this was your average player there is no doubt they would have been given a full fledged suspension.  Seems as if the fact that he’s one of MLB’s golden boys he was given some slack. 

    Reply
    • inleylandwetrust

      13 years ago

      It would probably be the opposite actually. They would want to send a message by punishing one of the game’s biggest stars.

      Reply
  32. CyYoungSuppan

    13 years ago

    HAHAHA YES!

    Reply
  33. Sean Smith

    13 years ago

    Im really happy he passed. I have a lot of respect for Ryan Braun and im not even a fan of the Brew Crew.

    Reply
  34. Sean Smith

    13 years ago

    Im really happy he passed. I have a lot of respect for Ryan Braun and im not even a fan of the Brew Crew.

    Reply
  35. Yanks48

    13 years ago

    Braun never seemed the type to juice. I’m glad he won

    Reply
    • slider32

      13 years ago

      What is that type? Any major league player that wants to make millions.

      Reply
      • toddcoffeytime

        13 years ago

        The type generally has a large amount of muscle mass and the propensity for strange injuries, like torn labrums, etc.   Also maybe they are struggling or aging poorly and feel they need the juice to be competitive–that is the “type.”

        Braun is not really any of of those things, he has never once struggled, isn’t particularly muscular, and other than some mysterious back issues has no injury history

        Reply
        • slider32

          13 years ago

          Dream on!

          Reply
          • toddcoffeytime

            13 years ago

            What a well thought out, intelligent, and scathing response.  Glad we had a real discussion about this!

            Reply
  36. Yanks48

    13 years ago

    Braun never seemed the type to juice. I’m glad he won

    Reply
  37. ryanfea

    13 years ago

    You’re wrong.  MLB is stating that they disagree strongly with the ruling.  MLBPA won this case, not the league.

    Reply
    • slider32

      13 years ago

      MLB is passing the buck, it makes Braun and MLB look good.

      Reply
  38. Todd Smith

    13 years ago

    Braun will always be guilty in the court of public opinion.  Getting away with cheating will be his legacy.

    Reply
  39. scott brecht

    13 years ago

    washington post saying he it was upheld.  don’t get too excited

    Reply
  40. scott brecht

    13 years ago

    washington post saying he it was upheld.  don’t get too excited

    Reply
  41. Cora the Destroya

    13 years ago

    So now cheaters get away with it?  Or can we say he’s on the same page with David Ortiz, who got caught a single time and didn’t even know what he took.  The funny part is that Braun knew he failed the test before the public did, yet he didn’t say anything… I can’t just assume, but it seems like there is no definite law to stop or correct MLB drug use.

    Reply
  42. NYCTrancefan

    13 years ago

    The reality is this reflects very poorly on MLB’s drug testing program because

    1) Either an innocent player is liable to falsely be accused of PED usage 

    2) A guilty player got away with PED usage.

    Its 1 or the other

    Doesn’t instill confidence in the MLB drug testing program that is for sure.

    Reply
    • jb226 2

      13 years ago

      There is no such thing as a perfect system, least of all in subjects as complicated as drug testing.  I would say you missed a third option:

      3) The system is not perfect but has an appeals process built in to safeguard the interests of both parties.

      Reply
    • jb226 2

      13 years ago

      There is no such thing as a perfect system, least of all in subjects as complicated as drug testing.  I would say you missed a third option:

      3) The system is not perfect but has an appeals process built in to safeguard the interests of both parties.

      Reply
  43. Dave 32

    13 years ago

    Good for him, but I do really want to know what in the world sets off a false positive for steroids that isn’t steroids and wins your appeal.  

    Reply
    • NYCTrancefan

      13 years ago

       Exactly, leaves you scratching your head.

      Does it mean other guys who were innocent were falsely accused and swept up in the steroid era accusations.

      Reply
    • JacksTigers

      13 years ago

      Nothing. He did steroids. It got overturned because it wasn’t handled right.

      Reply
  44. hoagiebuchanan

    13 years ago

    FLOORED! Wow! Talk about opening a can of worms!

    Reply
  45. yahoo-JJG4CHQWQXZBXNT5JNKLD4QVRM

    13 years ago

    thank god for herpes

    Reply
  46. iceman199

    13 years ago

    AP WRONG!!! Want to lay off any more editors?

    Reply
  47. inleylandwetrust

    13 years ago

    Herpes saves lives

    Reply
  48. tacko

    13 years ago

    Not to be a negative nancy, but Braun didn’t prove that he didn’t take steroids. He only proved that there was either something wrong in his testing process or handling. It probably went along the lines of OJ’s case, in which one of his biggest defenses was that his bloody glove wasn’t handling by investigators properly so couldn’t be used against him

    Just raising some thoughts though. He sounded pretty remorseful without admitting guilt when he received his MVP. 

    Reply
    • carpengui

      13 years ago

      #1.  He was never accused of taking steroids.  The report (which should have been confidential) indicated testosterone, which is not a steroid.
      #2:  It’s not Braun’s burden of proof to prove whether he’s clean.  It’s MLB’s to prove the opposite.  Two arbitrators could not agree that the process (whether handling, testing, …. whatever) was good enough to allow that burden of proof to be met.

      Reply
      • $3513744

        13 years ago

        In the court of public opinion, the burden is definitely on him though.

        Reply
        • carpengui

          13 years ago

          EXACTLY why the whole thing should have been confidential (and was supposed to be).

          Reply
          • $3513744

            13 years ago

            Yep.  But lets say he is innocent, it’d probably be even worse for it to be confidential by letting everyone base their opinions strictly on speculation.

            Reply
            • carpengui

              13 years ago

              My point is that had this been done correctly, nobody would ever have known there was a positive test, an appeal, or anything else.  No news whatever – ergo, no room for … well,… this entire thread.

              Reply
              • $3513744

                13 years ago

                I get what you mean.  I’m more surprised that there aren’t repercussions for it “leaking” like it does.

                Reply
                • toddcoffeytime

                  13 years ago

                  I would think that if these people were identified, Braun’s lawyers would be all over that–sadly i don’t think we’ll ever know who leaked what.

                  Would be nice to see some punishment for it though, agreed.

                  Reply
            • slider32

              13 years ago

              Look at it this way, if the report had remained confidential, there would have been no need for an outside source and Braun would have had a 50  game suspension.

              Reply
              • toddcoffeytime

                13 years ago

                Incorrect.  If it had remained confidential, a 3rd party arbitrator would still have heard the case, and still had the autonomy to come to whatever conclusion they felt was accurate–which they did.

                You could argue that it was even harder for Braun to appeal the test given he had already lost in the court of public opinion.

                Reply
      • tacko

        13 years ago

        He tested positive for more than enough testosterone to indicate performance enhancing drug use. He contested the process of the testing, not the results. 
        If a player tests positive for PEDs, it’s pretty much certain that he took them. If he was in federal court, he wouldn’t have to prove his innocence. But in the eyes of fans and eventually, the HOF voters, he’s going to have a much harder time proving more than the possibility that his testing was handled poorly.

        Reply
        • sourbob

          13 years ago

          He actually tested positive for a preposterously, ridiculously, record-setting amount of testosterone.

          That could indicate PED use. Or a botched test. As long as MLB handled the sample properly, there wouldn’t have been any question about which it was. They did not, so the test results are worthless.

          Reply
      • jpg1200

        13 years ago

        steroids are artificial testosterone, that’s why testosterone levels are the main indicators of steroid use, just ask floyd landis or all the other tour de france guys

        Reply
        • toddcoffeytime

          13 years ago

          No, artificial testosterone doesn’t really add muscle mass like anabolic steroids do–its more related to faster muscle recovery.  Apples and oranges–tour de france guys don’t need muscle mass, just recovery, hence the testosterone and not Barry Bond’s mysterious “cream” and “clear”

          Reply
          • jpg1200

            13 years ago

            Anabolic steroids, technically known as anabolic-androgen steroids (AAS) or colloquially as “steroids” (or even “roids”), are drugs that mimic the effects of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in the body.

            Reply
            • toddcoffeytime

              13 years ago

              Way to hop on Wikipedia. Again, what Braun tested positive for was not anabolic steroids/masking agents as we are accustomed to in MLB.

              Reply
  49. jagst5_PA

    13 years ago

    This is garbage. Ryan Braun is trash. Let it be known that he does in fact have herpes since that was his argument. He should never be allowed in the HOF because of this. Just like Manny, AROD, and Bonds, Braun should never be allowed in.

    Reply
    • FrnchDp

      13 years ago

      although Bonds was never caught, and never admitted to it  ; )

      Reply
      • $3513744

        13 years ago

        Except that he did admit it.

        Reply
    • CyYoungSuppan

      13 years ago

       He should never be allowed in because he has herpes?  Wut?

      Reply
      • $3513744

        13 years ago

        Don’t you know how much STD’s are frowned upon?  

        Reply
    • jpg1200

      13 years ago

      Manny and Braun I’ll agree with because they failed test after MLB outlawed PEDs. Arod failed a test that was experimental and before the MLB had outlawed PEDs, therefore he never broke any MLB rules and should not have to suffer any consequences. Anabolic steroids have exsisted since the early 1900s, it’s likely that some current hall of famers could have used them in their careers, and if not PEDS they were always looking for a way to gain a competitive advantage within the rules of the game (which until 2006 included using PEDs). Bonds is a whole seperate story as it has never been proven that he used PEDs, but as long as he used them before they were outlawed by the league and not after he should still not be punished.

      Reply
      • slider32

        13 years ago

        This is all garbage, let them all in Hall of Fame, half the players that are in took amphetamines.

        Reply
    • BarrelMan

      13 years ago

      Cardinals are trash.

      Reply
      • tinman135

        13 years ago

         Really?  You’re really going to call the Cardinals trash not even a year after they won the World Series and sent the Brewers home while embarrassing them?

        Reply
        • BarrelMan

          13 years ago

          I’m just showing that name-calling answers no questions or solves anything. Any sane Brewers fan respects and envies the Cards, begrudgingly.

          Reply
          • jagst5_PA

            13 years ago

            As a Cardinal fan, I have no respect for the Brewers, especially Braun and Morgan. When Morgan spiked Albert on a play at first, I was so upset at him. These are professional ballplayers, not thugs or hockey players. Greinke is another one, too. He said Carpenter needs to put his money where his mouth is. Carpenter is a big game pitcher and he did great in the postseason and 2011. These Brewers do a lot of trash talking, but they can never back it up.

            Reply
            • BarrelMan

              13 years ago

              I hear what you’re saying, but the opposing team’s fans perceive things in a different light. To us Albert came off as trying to act like a bouncer on the field, and what’s with overblown complaints from the cardinals about pitching inside? Along with complaints about untucking jerseys and the lights at miller park, and on and on. Carpenter even admitted to cursing at morgan, so it’s a matter of chicken and egg. Greinke was encouraged by reporters and was a playoff novice. He was just trying to stick up for the team. Yea, all the morgan haters can get in line. I like that he’s not a pushover when confronted by the cardinals yelling at him. St Louis is a legendary team but i’m sorry, Milwaukee will not roll over for you. Yea we lost but forgive us, we dont have the history of winning you do and it’s new to us. Last time the city won the WS it was hank aaron and the braves. Your cards took it to us in 82. I think somewhere deep down is a morsel of respect for the brewers, and for braun, at least before the current mess.

              Reply
        • BarrelMan

          13 years ago

          I just dont appreciate this knee-jerk reaction that Braun is trash. Yes we all wish this situation would have never occurred because it brings the bad kind of attention to the game. But we will prob never know the full truth so going on a rampage of insults is really a waste of time. Same thing with the accusations of favor of the Crew by Selig. That crap needs to be flushed.

          Reply
          • tinman135

            13 years ago

             I don’t like it either.  I don’t necessarily like the Brewers or certain players (Nyjer Morgan for example, it has nothing to do with what he said about the Cards, it has everything to do with his attitude and his comments after the Brewers advanced to the NLCS screaming “F yeah!” on national television with Fielder’s children right there)  I agree, it brings the wrong kind of attention to the game, it’s players and the fans, but it will always be there.

            Reply
            • BarrelMan

              13 years ago

              I know what you mean. The game will always have people trying to get an edge in some way. This case is actually beneficial long term because it highlights things that need to be fixed. It all starts w the leak to espn in terms of the PR debacle.
              I hear ya on Morgan. He started grating on brewers fans too toward the end of the year. The expletive in question was bad taste but it was in the moment of probably the guy’s greatest career achievement and the microphone picked it up. Morgan is popular due to his enthusiasm and he became a cult hero due to playin hard and taking no guff.

              Reply
    • sourbob

      13 years ago

      Herpes medication was an argument people thought he might make, not one that he did.

      Reply
  50. Josh Mohr

    13 years ago

     HE IS A CHEATER AND A LIAR, period. That WILL BE HIS LEGACY

    Reply
    • John Driscoll

      13 years ago

      Haters gonna hate. Now take your caps lock off.

      Reply
    • toddcoffeytime

      13 years ago

      If you’d like to offer a defense of that position with actual facts instead of caps lock yelling, I’d love to hear it.  Seeing as that is not going to happen, i have to assume you jumped to an uninformed conclusion and THAT WILL BE YOU MLBTR COMMENTING LEGACY

      Reply
  51. GameCast_Freak

    13 years ago

    a positive test is a positive test.

    Reply
    • Ted

      13 years ago

      Suppose you got pulled over while driving, and a Breathalyzer was administered. You hadn’t been drinking at all. The cop tossed the breathalyzer in the back of his car and two days later had the results analyzed. It showed that you blew a .40 (absurdly high, just like Braun’s testosterone was). Would you be ok with them arresting you because “a positive test is a positive test”?

      It isn’t the BEST analogy ever, but there’s a reason MLB has strict protocols to follow when testing a player. If the sample was left unprotected for a few days any number of things could have happened to it. We don’t know, and the burden of proof has to be on MLB to prove that he used, not on Braun to prove that he didn’t.

      Reply
      • belky2

        13 years ago

        Yes, I would be (in theory). How the heck would the breathalyzer read .4 unless it was by me?

        In actuality? I would fight it just like Braun did, would win just like Braun did, and would make up stories about how I’ve never done anything of the sort, like Braun did.

        But I’ll always know in the back of my mind, that fifth of tequila almost got me arrested.

        Reply
      • GameCast_Freak

        13 years ago

        Not to mention the fact that they would have the direct results of said beathalyzer test on hand at the exact time of testing…seriously, comparing an mlb drug test to that of a breathalyzer… please.

        Reply
  52. TimM

    13 years ago

    RB’s gonna be piss tested every week trying to catch him.

    Reply
  53. Ryan Aguirre

    13 years ago

    On a technicality.  That’s not a win, how can he say he got through the process because he is innocent?  I guess I don’t know the ins and outs of what happened but it sounds like he was on PED’s last year to me…

    Reply
    • khaine76

      13 years ago

      Yeah even though he was tested other times last year and they were negative… but what would you know

      Reply
    • Ted

      13 years ago

      The technicality wasn’t something unrelated to the case — it apparently had to do with the sample being left unprotected for several days. How can you know what happened to the sample over that time? There’s no way to prove that it wasn’t tampered with or altered or whatever else. For all we know he IS innocent and the only reason the test was positive is because the testing company can’t follow procedure properly.

      Reply
      • $3513744

        13 years ago

        Which is why sound testing procedures are supposed to be in place.  

        Reply
      • Ryan Aguirre

        13 years ago

        Like I said, I don’t know the ins and outs…  Occam’s Razor seems to apply here though- The guy thought he could beat the test? or somenody with a grudge against Ryan Braun illegally gained access to his urine sample(which I am assuming doesn’t say RYAN BRAUN’s URINE on it) and introduced a banned substance to it to spite him and his evil ways…  And for the record I am not a Braun “hater” I wish there were video tapes of somebody tampering with his specimin but there aren’t.

        Reply
  54. Aiden

    13 years ago

    Kemp should still have won the MVP…

    Reply
  55. Kevin

    13 years ago

    LOL

    Reply
  56. Brit Finnegan

    13 years ago

    Nonsense … was he at a party where everyone was using HGH and he caught a contact high?

    Reply
    • BlueCatuli

      13 years ago

      Good thing it wasn’t HGH.

      Reply
  57. Jamie Sayer

    13 years ago

    Drafted Braun 55th in my league WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    Reply
  58. reghan1

    13 years ago

    i guess cheaters do win.

    Reply
  59. Kevin

    13 years ago

    The MLB drug testing policy is a joke anyway because it is so far behind in testing for what the players are actually using now.  I mean they dont even test for HGH which is probaly the most popular PED out right now.

    Reply
  60. slider32

    13 years ago

    Now that Braun got off it’s time to let all players worthy in the Hall of Fame. Bonds, Sosa, Mc Guire, A-Rod, put them all in. I’m sick of these double standards.

    Reply
    • Jon Stark

      13 years ago

      not sure how that follows…

      Reply
      • $3513744

        13 years ago

        Don’t you remember when all of them tested positive and won their appeals?

        Reply
    • aj7380

      13 years ago

      Guys like Sosa, Mcgwire, Bonds, and even ARod should get into the Hall, due to the technicality that there wasn’t a testing program in place from which to confirm the well-based suspicions of many.

      Reply
      • $3513744

        13 years ago

        Besides at least 3 of the 4 of them admitting to using or just testing positive, there was absolutely no reason to suspect them.

        Reply
        • slider32

          13 years ago

          Many of the HOFers took amphetamines too!

          Reply
  61. sheagoodbye

    13 years ago

    Haters gonna hate and lovers gonna love. 

    How about we actually find out what the technicality was and why MLB “vehemently disagrees” with the decision?

    Reply
    • $3513744

      13 years ago

      Isn’t it better to flame back and forth based on speculation before the facts actually come to surface?

      Reply
      • toddcoffeytime

        13 years ago

        LOUD NOISES!  UNINFORMED OPINION!  CAPS LOCK!

        Reply
      • toddcoffeytime

        13 years ago

        LOUD NOISES!  UNINFORMED OPINION!  CAPS LOCK!

        Reply
  62. SoxfanSam

    13 years ago

    Happy days are here again! MVP MVP MVP

    Reply
  63. bigpat

    13 years ago

    I guess Selig still owes the Brewers more favors. Feeling sorry for them because they are such a small market team and couldn’t afford to lose Fielder then Braun for the first 50 games. What a load of horse dung. 

    Reply
    • BarrelMan

      13 years ago

      Dude, you know that’s not true yet you spew it anyway

      Reply
    • Thomas 11

      13 years ago

      Considering MLB vehemently disagrees with the decision, I’d have to say your comment is extremely ill-informed. Read the dang article first.

      Reply
    • slider32

      13 years ago

      You hit the jackpot!

      Reply
  64. pmollan

    13 years ago

    Vindication!

    Reply
  65. ChuckNorris

    13 years ago

    I still think I would have just took the 50 game suspension rather than tell everyone I was on herpes meds.

    Reply
  66. KB 2

    13 years ago

    so he still cheated but because the evidence wasn’t tested in the correct time frame hes a free man.. still sounds like a cheater to me.

    at least he will be the only one getting around this, i’m sure the MLB will fix their policy for future cases

    Reply
  67. Runtime

    13 years ago

    Doesn’t matter. His reputation has been tainted.

    Reply
  68. JP27

    13 years ago

    hmm things are getting fishy

    Reply
  69. Adam

    13 years ago

    I am suprised at how many people think he didn’t use.  He is as innocent as Casey Anthony.

    Reply
    • inleylandwetrust

      13 years ago

      I’m surprised for how little of the situation you actually have knowledge of, that you are so certain he used.

      Reply
      • Adam

        13 years ago

        He tested positive, that is all the evidence anyone really needs.

        Reply
        • inleylandwetrust

          13 years ago

          Not really when the supposed level of testosterone was so astronomically high, yet he somehow didn’t get caught by any prior test; and the sample was left unguarded for 2 days. I’m not claiming Braun is innocent nor am I condemning him, but until more facts come out there is no way you can be so certain one way or the other.

          Reply
  70. thekidfromyesterday

    13 years ago

    Bud Selig strikes again

    Reply
  71. Norberto Paulino™

    13 years ago

    He also doesn’t have herpes anymore!!! Win-Win situation.

    Reply
    • Johnnie

      13 years ago

      You realize people have herpes for life right?

      Reply
      • Norberto Paulino™

        13 years ago

        It was joke about the rumor of what caused the positive test, Valtrex, thanks for being in on the joke.

        Reply
      • Norberto Paulino™

        13 years ago

        It was joke about the rumor of what caused the positive test, Valtrex, thanks for being in on the joke.

        Reply
  72. thegoldenone

    13 years ago

    Says something that MLB still doesn’t agree that he is clean. Doesn’t look cut and dry it was an accident. Seems like the rich guy with the right lawyer that can get out of anything.

    Reply
    • tiger313

      13 years ago

      or MLB thought it had a 100% sure fire testing in place and Braun proved it to be wrong.

      Reply
    • slider32

      13 years ago

      MLB says it doesn’t agree with the testing makes them look better, and Braun gets off.

      Reply
  73. Madman2TX

    13 years ago

    Most. Liberal. Arbitrator. Ever.

    Reply
    • $7562574

      13 years ago

      that wasn’t very polite.

      Reply
  74. thegoldenone

    13 years ago

    Manny is probably thinking damn I had the wrong lawyer or skin color.

    Reply
    • Norberto Paulino™

      13 years ago

       Manny is not Jewish man thats it.

      I wonder what the media is gonna say now…Give him a round of applause???

      Reply
  75. Michael Fellows

    13 years ago

    All you have to do is read it to figure out what went wrong.  The sample was delayed in shipment and there was no one responsible for it for two days; thus the claim is the sample itself cannot be trusted because it may have been tampered with or contaminated.

    Reply
  76. Cachhubguy

    13 years ago

    Braun will wish he got suspended with the hell he is going to catch. Can’t wait until he comes to town.

    Reply
  77. Cachhubguy

    13 years ago

    Let’s see how he hits when 40,000 are chanting cheater, cheater, cheater. MLB agrees.

    Reply
    • slider32

      13 years ago

      I feel sorry for Kemp!

      Reply
    • Runtime

      13 years ago

      P-E-Ds!
      P-E-Ds!

      Reply
  78. tinman135

    13 years ago

    I don’t get it.  I honestly don’t care either way if he wins or loses, but it just doesn’t make sense to me that he denied that it was PED’s (perfectly fine to me, deny away.)  But if he admits to taking herpes medication that isn’t cleared by the league, shouldn’t he still be suspended for not clearing it first?  Not a hater, just curious is all.

    Reply
    • slider32

      13 years ago

      I think Braun had his excuse before he started taking steriods. It’s like the guy who chugs a fifth of JD in front of a cop when being stopped for DUI.

      Reply
  79. Joe Malan

    13 years ago

    So basically, Braun probably was guilty, and the circumstances surrounding the shipment were his ‘out.’

    Reply
  80. Jacob Viets

    13 years ago

    Everybody who’s calling Ryan Braun a cheater and a liar and everything. As an American citizen, he is innocent until proven guilty and he wasn’t proven guilty. But Matt Kemp still should have won MVP!

    Reply
    • Diablo 2

      13 years ago

      Kemp is beast can’t take nothing away and yea i agree Kemp should have won MVP. Hopefully he post the same numbers this year and wins MVP this year.

      Reply
  81. tiger313

    13 years ago

    What people dont get that if the sample wasnt done correctly, or took too much time to get there there are many things that can make the test fail. He passed his second one that he took right away. One time at the doctor, I had my blood taken, they did the test wrong, my potassium came back really high in dangerous levels. Then I retook it the second time and was perfectly fine. Anyone who points fingers better know some theory to back it up, trolls.

    Reply
    • BoSoxSam

      13 years ago

      And how would you know that your potassium levels have anything to do with a steroid test? Not saying you’re wrong, but clearly you’re not exactly a credible expert either, so chill the heck out.

      Reply
      • tiger313

        13 years ago

        Im just saying, do you know how easy it is for a test to be faulty. Especially for 2 days sitting around. That stuff needs to be chilled or processed as fast as possible. I assume you dont work in a hospital. I deal with specimens every day. You only have a certain amount of time when its credible. 2 days is way to long for any test ever.  

        Reply
        • slider32

          13 years ago

          Maybe the test sat for 2 days on purpose. It got him off the hook.

          Reply
        • slider32

          13 years ago

          Maybe the test sat for 2 days on purpose. It got him off the hook.

          Reply
        • tinman135

          13 years ago

           Hell, I once took a drug test for a job, the kind that you put the swab in your mouth or whatever, and it came back that I had THC, Meth, Coke and Opium in my system and I have never done any drugs in my life.  I’ve never even been around someone that does drugs.  Tests are wrong all the time from if they aren’t handled properly, the test is performed incorrectly, etc.  And I’m not even a Brewers fan so this isn’t like I am saying this to back up Braun. 

          Reply
  82. Ryan Nolan

    13 years ago

    Its fact that the test results had more than double any level of a banned substance ever found in an mlb drug test. no one puts together the body of work that Braun has and weasels out of the many many drug tests hes passed to just fail with that big of a margin. I have no doubt his sample was tampered with.

    Reply
    • slider32

      13 years ago

      Selig tampers with the evidence, and Braun gets off.

      Reply
  83. lefty177

    13 years ago

    Over/Under of the amount of comments that are going to be removed? I’m guessing 15

    Reply
  84. TheHitman23

    13 years ago

    Thank you Ryan Braun for not screwing my (as well as many other owners’) fantasy baseball season. I hope he’s ready to go for 2012.

    Reply
  85. Runtime

    13 years ago

    In Toronto, Bautista will be greeted to chants of M-V-P to start the season.
    In Los Angeles, Kemp will be greeting to the same.In Milwaukee, Braun will be greeted to chants of P-E-D.

    Reply
    • Diablo 2

      13 years ago

      Hater

      Reply
    • Adam Moreira

      13 years ago

      On the road, perhaps. But I don’t think at home.

      Reply
  86. TheReturnOfMrBlanks

    13 years ago

    Good man Braun, wonder if it was A-HD or Animal stak? I’m a big fan of both

    Reply
  87. DMB

    13 years ago

    This just in: I peed in a cup two days ago… left it in the fridge…. and it turned into Budweiser.

     

    Reply
  88. Diablo 2

    13 years ago

    I knew you were innocent and now all these people either taking your side or still talking mad smack.

    Reply
    • Runtime

      13 years ago

      Yes, definitely innocent.

      Why else would the MLB say they “vehemently disagrees”

      Reply
      • Diablo 2

        13 years ago

        There will always ALWAYS be people that either hate on a person or disagree on a certain subject. But there are always smart people that see it both ways and decided which one is right or wrong. And Braun is innocent lets go! HAHA SHUT ALL THE HATERS UP WITH THIS BRAUN! WOOO!

        Reply
        • Runtime

          13 years ago

          …I think you need to work on your reading comprehension

          Reply
    • 55saveslives 2

      13 years ago

      he’s not innocent. he just cant be found guilty. theres a difference.

      Reply
  89. Diablo 2

    13 years ago

    I knew you were innocent and now all these people either taking your side or still talking mad smack.

    Reply
  90. Ryan Y.

    13 years ago

    Yeah, And OJ didn’t do it. COME ONNNNNN! 

    Reply
  91. Lefty

    13 years ago

    A couple of comments
    1.) “It is the first step in restoring my good name and reputation,”, how can he do that if he won the appeal on a technicality? Also, even if there was some odd ball handling of the evidence, why would MLB want to taint a test of the current reigning MVP? That would make no sense.

    2.) Maybe this has been asked already, but if Ryan Braun can appeal the failed test, why can’t MLB appeal the ruling?

    This whole thing is ridiculous, if Ryan Braun failed the test, then he failed the test. What can he possible say to contradict that?

    Reply
    • tiger313

      13 years ago

      its not MLB that wanted to taint it if that happened, it could be some sick individual

      Reply
    • sourbob

      13 years ago

      A lot of people seem to be getting hung up on the phrase “got off on a technicality.” This isn’t like where there’s video of a guy robbing a bank, but he gets off because some cop misfiles a form. This is a case where the one thing used to implicate a guy is the result of a scientific test that was performed incorrectly. As such, its results are not reliable.

      Crikey… didn’t anyone take science in school at all?

      Reply
  92. MarinersRoyalsBraves2014

    13 years ago

    You people need to learn how to read, he took a product which contained something on the banned substance list, which has testosterone in it which enhances everything. That’s why it’s  on the list. So he was given a list of products he must avoid, but did so anyway via his herpes medication. There is no way to claim innocence in the matter, whether it was intentional or not. Also MLB is upset at the verdict so it must mean that the players association or some arbitor or someone like that is why he is innocent now, none of those entities have anyhwere near as much credibility as WADA! That’s like the governor of Arizona Jan Brewer telling the Secretary of the UN that he is wrong! Ryan Braun now is the biggest fraud, even more so than Bonds and A-Rod at least they have established themselves. One of two things are going to happen, either he never again puts up results like 2011, or he will eventually test positive again because he had twice the amount EVER RECORDED ON A POSITIVE SAMPLE.

    Reply
    • $22264602

      13 years ago

      He’s clean , move on.

      Reply
      • Sasha

        13 years ago

         He is NOT clean, he is guilty of taking steroids. He got off due to a technicality in that the fact the package wasn’t delivered as it should have been. He is not disputing it was his sample.

        Reply
        • sourbob

          13 years ago

          The way proper scientific testing works is that a sample is collected, a proper chain of custody and proper handling are maintained, and that way, you can be sure that no one tampered with it and that nothing happened to the sample to ruin it and screw up your results. They do this, not because they like rules or because they love paperwork, but because it’s the only way to make sure you can trust your results.

          Since these procedures weren’t followed, we DON’T know his sample wasn’t tampered with, we DON’T know that it wasn’t tainted by poor handling. And what’s more, failure to maintain the most basic processes casts doubt on what else the lab might have done incorrectly.

          The ONLY way to be sure Braun used performance enhancing drugs is to be sure the sample that “proves” this was processed and handled correctly. 

          It’s okay if you have a gut feeling he cheated. But you CAN’T claim it’s a fact, because they botched the testing protocols and NO ONE CAN BE SURE now. If you’re looking to be mad at someone, be mad at the lazy dopes who botched a simple test.

          Reply
          • Inreasonwetrust

            13 years ago

            Tell me more about science sour bob..

            Reply
            • sourbob

              13 years ago

              I recommend 9th grade science class. Straighten you right out.

              Reply
        • sourbob

          13 years ago

          The way proper scientific testing works is that a sample is collected, a proper chain of custody and proper handling are maintained, and that way, you can be sure that no one tampered with it and that nothing happened to the sample to ruin it and screw up your results. They do this, not because they like rules or because they love paperwork, but because it’s the only way to make sure you can trust your results.

          Since these procedures weren’t followed, we DON’T know his sample wasn’t tampered with, we DON’T know that it wasn’t tainted by poor handling. And what’s more, failure to maintain the most basic processes casts doubt on what else the lab might have done incorrectly.

          The ONLY way to be sure Braun used performance enhancing drugs is to be sure the sample that “proves” this was processed and handled correctly. 

          It’s okay if you have a gut feeling he cheated. But you CAN’T claim it’s a fact, because they botched the testing protocols and NO ONE CAN BE SURE now. If you’re looking to be mad at someone, be mad at the lazy people who botched a simple test.

          Reply
        • $22264602

          13 years ago

          If he was guilty , he’d be suspended. Move on.

          Reply
    • slider32

      13 years ago

      Braun would have to be fool to test positive again, he will just stay clean for a while and then move on to the next undetectable drug.

      Reply
  93. slider32

    13 years ago

    Selig used to own Brewers, that’s all you need to know. The whole spin on the MLB network is positive. There all afraid to say anything negitive.

    Reply
    • $22264602

      13 years ago

      We get it you hate Braun and can’t stand the fact he’s clean.

      Reply
      • slider32

        13 years ago

        I acually like Braun as a player, it’s the system that stinks. There are too many double standards. It’s Selig and his connection with the Brewers that smells.

        Reply
        • $22264602

          13 years ago

          Ahh a random conspiracy theory. Very plausible.

          Reply
  94. sourbob

    13 years ago

    If a guy got pulled over for speeding and got off on a “technicality,” because the radar gun hadn’t been properly calibrated that day, I can understand being hostile and thinking a rule breaker caught an unfair break.

    However, if the radar gun claimed the guy was going say, 255 mph, maybe we should give the driver the benefit of the doubt, since a miscalibrated radar gun is, in fact, more plausible than a guy doing 255 down I-90.

    Similarly, if Ryan Braun is accused of having preposterously high, record-setting, never-before-seen levels of testosterone and examination revealed there were potentially serious flaws in the testing process, shouldn’t we give him the benefit of the doubt, since “test administered incorrectly” seems a lot more reasonable than “highest recorded testosterone levels in history of test”?

    Reply
    • inleylandwetrust

      13 years ago

      Hope you have your flame suit on Bobby, the trolls are out in force tonight.

      Reply
      • sourbob

        13 years ago

        No kidding. Although as I’m looking this topic over, much of the trolling seems to be done by one dude.

        Actually, 5% of all of the posts in this entire thread are PO’d rants by the same guy. I think if you just ignore him, the whole thing reads much better.

        Reply
    • slider32

      13 years ago

      More like a guy gets pulled over by a cop and the cop asked for his registration, he says you know you were doing 80. Then all of a sudden, the wind blows the registration out of the cops hand and it blows down the highway. The cop tells the man to drive safely and lets him go.

      Reply
      • sourbob

        13 years ago

        That’s a really failed analogy that speaks more about your feelings about the matter than about any parallels with irregularities in the testing process.

        Reply
    • MrBaseball29

      13 years ago

      You don’t have to even have a radar gun on to pull someone over. They can do it by the trained eye. Nice try tho

      Reply
  95. John S

    13 years ago

    Braun is like the criminal who committed the crime but was released due to a cop failing to read him his Miranda rights.

    Reply
    • sourbob

      13 years ago

      No, he’s not. In the case of the criminal, there is the evidence of his crime and then there is the lack of proper procedure. The two are separate. It’s frustrating because him not being read his rights doesn’t change the evidence, even if it kills the case.

      In Braun’s case, the only piece of evidence against him was collected and handled wrong. Because of this there IS NO evidence.

      Reply
      • slider32

        13 years ago

        Another good reason to hate lawyers.

        Reply
        • sourbob

          13 years ago

          I’m starting to hate the public school system, because reading comprehension and basic understanding of simple scientific principles seems to be at an all-time low.

          Reply
  96. mmiller54

    13 years ago

    Darn I had a plot to take over my new keeper league by drafting him in the 4th round, whereas now he’ll be a 1 or 2 for sure since he’s not suspended. 🙁 sigh

    Reply
    • eyeglass1

      13 years ago

      You don’t think his lack of “juice” may have a negative impact on his totals this year? and no Fielder? 

      Reply
  97. Sasha

    13 years ago

     MVP!!!!! of Cheaters!!!!!!!

    Reply
  98. David C. Ruckman

    13 years ago

    The fact of the matter is we don’t fully understand all the details. So speculate as we might about the process or about Braun’s innocence or guilt, we should take it for what it is – a situation that stinks to high heaven that may never be fully revealed until some years down the road. What stinks most to me is that this process was brought out to the public. Now both Braun and MLB are embarrassed by this and wish to brush it under the carpet when it’s virtually impossible to do so. There’s just too much juice to keep the story going….”no pun intended.”

    Reply
    • Adam Moreira

      13 years ago

      I think that Major League Baseball may have more egg on this than Ryan Braun when all is said and done; it is their fault.

      Reply
  99. GOTIGERS24

    13 years ago

    Congrats Braun!!! You just hate to see a good guy like him getting so much criticism, and to all of you who think Selig fixed this you dont know anything about the game, but you gotta feel for the guy everyone still thinks hes guilty, time to shut the haters up. Go get em Brauny 

    Reply
    • lefty58

      13 years ago

      What do you mean “thinks” he’s guilty?  He got off on a technicality, not based on anything having to do with him not drugging up. So no matter how this is spun, he will always be a drug cheat.

      Reply
  100. eyeglass1

    13 years ago

    I wonder how he will do this year without Fielder and the Steroids backing him up? 

    Reply
  101. Hoosier_Oriole

    13 years ago

    Let me just say this. Chain of custody is extremely important in an incident such as this, and frankly, if MLB did not have the conscience to “hand deliver” this sample to the lab, then they deserve this ruling. This is atrocious behavior involving such a serious matter. If they knew when this incident started that they had a lapse in the Chain they should have thrown out the results, retested Braun immediately, then lived with those results. This casts a pall on every ruling they have had thus far. How can they say they have observed proper measures for all of the other samples? One incident casts a doubt on all of them.

    Reply
    • frogger6

      13 years ago

      They DID retest Braun almost immediately after – but by braun’s request and he was negative. Doesn’t anyone else wonder how he could go from highest level ever to negative in a week?

      Reply
  102. Thomas Jeffrey Hanks

    13 years ago

    Anyone who thinks Ryan Braun is a cheater is an anti-Semite. There I said it. jk. But this is a debate that will never be settled. You either like him or you don’t. With the information we have there’s nothing more to be said.

    Reply
  103. Second Base Coach

    13 years ago

    MLB will now have a lab in every major league city… so as to speed up the process.  You watch!

    Reply
  104. CC 2

    13 years ago

    This is hurtin the reds hopes
    #AnythingsPossible

    Reply
  105. Nv P.

    13 years ago

    No matter how he won. He won. Gotta love america where your innocent until proven guilty or we just dont like u enough to care about the outcome ur guilty in our eyes anyway. Ahhh america..

    Reply
  106. CFan

    13 years ago

    New name: OJ Braun

    Reply
  107. Win Cor

    13 years ago

    If it’s not air tight. There must be no room for doubt. You can’t convict if there is any doubt. Given that you retest and your clean. Too much stigma with a positive result. The decision was correct.

    Reply
  108. Win Cor

    13 years ago

    If it’s not air tight. There must be no room for doubt. You can’t convict if there is any doubt. Given that you retest and your clean. Too much stigma with a positive result. The decision was correct.

    Reply
  109. CFan

    13 years ago

    New name: OJ Braun

    Reply
  110. CFan

    13 years ago

    See later comment

    Reply
  111. Adam Moreira

    13 years ago

    Hey MLB—the Keystone Kops say hello! MLB needs to do better than this…somewhere, the WADA is laughing its head off.

    Reply
  112. CFan

    13 years ago

    If Braun had admitted it and asked for forgiveness from the fans, I think most of us would have given it if he stayed out of trouble. Now he will be forever known and tarnished as the guy who got off on a technicality. His PR and legal team should be fired for taking such a short-term view. Everyone hates a cheater who gets off.

    Reply
    • SpeedS28

      13 years ago

      Why should he have to admit it if in fact he didn’t do anything wrong?

      Reply
      • CFan

        13 years ago

        Every report is linking this to a technicality not a clean test.

        Reply
        • pmollan

          13 years ago

          A tainted sample through procedural error.  Explains the unheard of levels of testosterone revealed in the tainted sample- levels more than double the highest results previously recorded.

          Reply
          • Amakiir

            13 years ago

            When you say “A tainted sample through procedural error.”

            That sounds like a plausible argument.

            Until you read the next sentence which states the ‘procedural error’ was leaving the sample in a sealed container, in a refrigerator, undisturbed for 48 hours.

            Synthetic testosterone doesn’t magically appear in urine samples left in the refrigerator.

            Reply
            • pmollan

              13 years ago

              His testosterone ratio was 20:1.  Suspicion begins around 4:1.  His test was double that of the highest results ever recorded, and this after his sample goes missing for two days.  Seems fishy to me.
              Furthermore, by the time the sample had reached the lab, the Ph levels had changed. The sample had deteriorated.  

              Reply
              • Amakiir

                13 years ago

                Are you trying to argue that changing the Ph of a urine sample will cause the carbon atoms in the testosterone to change to a different isotope?

                Also, athletes have tested 11:1 testosterone to epitestosterone. Some healthy people register 10:1 ratios at times. The point here is that his testosterone was found to be synthetic.

                Reply
    • pmollan

      13 years ago

      Nice logic.  Guilty until proven innocent, then guilty anyway.

      Reply
      • Amakiir

        13 years ago

        When was he proven innocent?

        Reply
  113. SpeedS28

    13 years ago

    People realize that tests fail all the time right? I bet most people here fail at their job every day. There are people who get tested negative for HIV and actually have it an visa versa. Nothing is perfect. Maybe everyone in this forum should become scientists and create a perfect test and system. 

    Reply
    • CFan

      13 years ago

      I actually have experience with drug testing procedures and have been involved with testing of several thousand people. Other than a couple of poppy seed tests, which can be easily be dealt with, I know of zero false positives. He did it. Just like OJ.

      Reply
  114. SpeedS28

    13 years ago

    when did he ever say he used something? find me this quote please! 

    Reply
  115. SpeedS28

    13 years ago

    when did he ever say he used something? find me this quote please! 

    Reply
  116. SpeedS28

    13 years ago

    still not sure when he said this? where did you find this please!

    Reply
  117. Chris Ayson

    13 years ago

    This a complete joke!! We all know if his skin color would have been darker and his last name Bonds this would have never happened. Then again Bonds never failed a test NOT one!! Braun however did fail a test. 

    Reply
  118. Bradley Sparks

    13 years ago

    I failed a drug test once for eating a poppy seed muffin. Maybe Braun ate a poppy seed muffin…..

    Reply
    • CFan

      13 years ago

      Very clever. I will order the steroids muffin tomorrow morning.

      Reply
  119. Madman2TX

    13 years ago

    MLB Network posting tweets of people claiming Braun was “exonerated”. He wasn’t cleared of all guilt…he got off on a technicality. It’s like any other criminal who showed the Judge that his rights weren’t read properly. In spite of his fans adoration, Braun gets an asterisk from here on out.

    Reply
  120. michael hughes

    13 years ago

    Fair enough, I appreciate the thoughtful response. 
    It really comes down to the MLB making a unacceptable mistake in the course of their testing process, and allowing doubt to slip in where it shouldn’t have been able to. It definitely complicates things, but in a very strict sense it doesn’t “clear his name”.

    Reply
    • CFan

      13 years ago

      My sister once got a speeding ticket and complained about it. I said did you speed? Yes. Then stop complaining.

      Reply
    • Adam Moreira

      13 years ago

      At the end of the day, however, Major League Baseball needs to explain itself. The break in the chain of custody is more disturbing.

      Reply
  121. CFan

    13 years ago

    I highly doubt OJ Braun would ever end up with Hall of Fame credentials, but this will ensure he will never get in. The voters have been appropriately skeptical of guys who never tested positive, so a cheater who gets off has no hope.

    Reply
  122. Bryce Maddox

    13 years ago

    Hmm…this is interesting…I definitely want to hear more, especially about this technicality. I was looking at the schedule yesterday. Games 46-50? Milwaukee @ the Dodgers. Those should be some interesting games…

    Reply
  123. Work at home, $45/h, link

    13 years ago

    The reigning NL MVP is the first player to have a suspension successfully overtuned through the appeals process.

    Reply
  124. Michael

    13 years ago

    Now, we’re right back where we started. Every player who tests positive will come up with some outlandish excuse, half of which will be upheld. We’ve wasted the last 10 years. Just let them cheat….fine. Throw out all the record books, and let the cheaters act like the stat-obsessed babies they are. Williams and DiMaggio must be turning in their graves. Ryan Braun…..you are a cheater!!!!

    Reply
  125. VadaPinson

    13 years ago

    You gotta love the USA>  Getting off on a technicality…..no matter what you did…. is what lawyers look for, and what some people seem to love others doing…which is getting away with it.  Why?  Beacuse they probably wish they could get away with something themselves.

    Braun is guilty but the police forgot to read him his Miranda rights…basically.   This is the definition on getting off on a technicality and MLB continues to drop the ball…just right when it looks like they got a hold of it.

    Was the arbitrator on the Casey Anthony jury by any chance?

    Reply
    • burritolikethesun

      13 years ago

      Berr derrp consider yerself lucky to live in a country where the law is expected be upheld to the letter, derp.

      Reply
  126. lefty58

    13 years ago

    O.J. Braun.

    Reply
  127. pmollan

    13 years ago

    Vindicated!  Suck it haters!

    Reply
    • wood34

      13 years ago

      Vindicated!!???? Are you kiding me??? Look up the definition! He got off on a “technicality”! CHEATER!!!!!

      Reply
  128. JimBaily

    13 years ago

    Canseco, Clemons, McGwire, Palmiero, Braun, Manny, ARod………

    Reply
  129. slider32

    13 years ago

    Braun said today that others were tested on the day he was tested. If Fed X picked all the sample wouldn’t they all be sent to the same place at the same time. In that case , if there was a delay in sending, wouldn’t the other samples be tainted and have the same reading as Braun’s. If the other players sample tested clean, then Braun should have tested clean. If only Braun’s sample was held, then it looks like MLB was trying to cover it up.

    Reply
    • $22264602

      13 years ago

      You need a hobby bro.

      Reply
    • $22264602

      13 years ago

      You need a hobby bro.

      Reply
  130. Rumper

    13 years ago

    As a scientist, I send out samples with COCs regularly.  If I can’t get a sample to the lab within 24 hours, regulators will not accept the results because the contents can degrade and because lawyers can challenge results.  Also, nobody takes samples home to their house and sticks them next to the ketchup.  That’s just nuts.  My point is that this is much more than a technicality.  Its a totally legitamate reason to overturn.  I am hard-core against PEDs but I support Braun 100%.  And I’m a Mets fan, not Brewers.     

    Reply
    • burritolikethesun

      13 years ago

      “Also, nobody takes samples home to their house and sticks them next to the ketchup.”
      Baaahahahahaha. Awesome.

      Reply
  131. slider32

    13 years ago

    I agree with everything you said, it looks like MLB was trying to mess this sample up so Braun could get off, remember Selig used to own the Brewers. There more than meets the eye here. Similar to spy gate in football, and by the way I think there is more steriod use in football than baseball and has been for many years.The NFL steriod testing is a joke compared to baseball. Let’s remember that steriods started in football, congress just got mad at baseball and zero’d in on them.

    Reply
    • D_Lo_13

      13 years ago

      Tell me, how the heck would Selig know the results were positive BEFORE it got to Montreal. People mess up…it happens. Or it’s all a conspiracy, like everything in the United States.

      Reply
  132. Randolph

    13 years ago

    Let’s see how his physique looks at the end of the 2012 season compared to the end of his 2011 season.

    Reply
    • $22264602

      13 years ago

      Lol this is just getting stupid.

      Reply
    • $22264602

      13 years ago

      (null)

      Reply
  133. IHATEMISLEADINGNAMEDWEBSITES

    13 years ago

    This is quite the trade rumor.

    Reply
  134. Allison

    13 years ago

    I’m floored by all the media saying that Braun made a convincing argument and “must be innocent” because he made such valid points and with such grace and eloquence. And….how many months did he have to prepare this crock? I could have memorized Hamlet and performed it like Richard Burton with that much prep time.

    Reply
  135. Nahtan Hgiheal

    13 years ago

    Whether he was at fault or not, it seems that he did piss what was tested. That being said the guy that took it home broke the rules, leaving Braun a huge loophole which he rightfully took advantage of.

    Reply
  136. Ken Roucka

    13 years ago

    ..

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Joc Pederson Suffers Right Hand Fracture

    Recent

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    Brewers Claim Drew Avans

    White Sox Sign Tyler Alexander, Place Jared Shuster On 15-Day IL

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    Diamondbacks Select Kyle Backhus, Designate Aramis Garcia

    Athletics Acquire Austin Wynns

    Julio Rodriguez Helped Off Field Following Apparent Injury

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version