The Blue Jays’ early signings of Dylan Cease and KBO returnee Cody Ponce have deepened a rotation that already included Trey Yesavage, Kevin Gausman, Shane Bieber and Jose Berrios. Lefty Eric Lauer and righty Yariel Rodriguez give Toronto a pair of quality swing options, too, and the Jays still have Bowden Francis and former top prospect Ricky Tiedemann (who should be recovered from 2024 Tommy John surgery) in the upper minors as well.
The magnitude of Ponce’s three-year, $30MM contract presumably puts him squarely into the rotation. Barring a move to a six-man rotation or a spring injury, Toronto will have more starters than rotation places available. Injuries can turn a “surplus” into a deficiency pretty quickly, particularly when it comes to pitchers, but the Jays are willing to trade Berrios, Mitch Bannon of The Athletic reports.
It’s easy to frame this as the Jays adding enough depth that they’re now willing to deal Berrios. That’d be the charitable (to Berrios) way of shaping things. The other and perhaps more likely angle is simply that Toronto wasn’t enamored with Berrios continuing as its fourth starter and has acted decisively with a pair of additions pushing the veteran righty down the depth chart.
Berrios, 32 next May, has been an iron man for the Jays and Twins throughout his big league tenure. He’s started at least 30 games every year since 2018, with the exception of the shortened 2020 season, when he started a full slate of 12 games. No pitcher has started more games (234) or totaled more innings (1367 1/3) than Berrios in that span of eight years.
Along the way, Berrios has generally been an above-average starter. He’s logged a 3.94 ERA, set down 22.6% of his opponents on strikes and only walked 6.8% of the batters he’s faced. Few starters have been this reliable for this long.
Be that as it may, Berrios’ more recent seasons have seen him trend in the wrong direction. After punching out 23.7% of his opponents from 2018-23, he’s dropped to 19.6% over the past two seasons. Add in a 19.8% strikeout rate in 2022, and Berrios has now been under 20% in that regard in three of the past four years. League average in that time has been about 22.5%. Berrios has spent much of his career working with plus command, but this past season’s 8% walk rate — while still slightly better than the 8.4% league average — was up considerably from the 6.3% mark he posted across four prior seasons.
The worrying trends don’t stop there. Berrios’ 93 mph average four-seamer in 2025 was the lowest of his career, while the 92.2 mph average on his sinker was his second-lowest (leading only the 92.1 mph he averaged back in 2019). He also surrendered the highest average exit velocity (90.3 mph) and barrel rate (11.3%) of his career. His opponents’ 42.5% hard-hit rate was the second-highest mark in his MLB run. Berrios has only yielded a hard-hit rate north of 40% in three of his 10 major league seasons. All three have come within the past four years. Unsurprisingly, given the dips in velocity, command and whiffs, Berrios has become more homer-prone; after surrendering an average of 1.17 homers per nine frames from 2017-23, he’s up to 1.43 since Opening Day 2024.
None of this necessarily makes Berrios a bad pitcher. He’s an ultra-durable source of reliable, if unspectacular innings. However, coming off a down season that ended with what was incredibly the first IL stint of his big league career (elbow inflammation), would Berrios match the remaining three years and $66MM on his contract? He’d be hard-pressed to do so — certainly once factoring in the opt-out provision he has following the 2026 campaign and the escalators that could push his remaining guarantee from $66MM to $70MM.
Currently, Berrios is guaranteed $24MM in both 2027 and 2028. Both figures would rise by $1MM if the right-hander pitches a combined 300 innings in 2025-26 and another $1MM if he gets to a combined 350 innings. With 166 frames under his belt in 2025, he’d only need 134 innings in 2026 to secure an additional $2MM and a tougher but plausible 184 innings to tack on yet another $1MM per season. Given his durability, it’s likely that Berrios will at least be promised at least $50MM over two seasons when weighing his opt-out opportunity next winter — and possibly two years and $52MM.
All of that coalesces to make Berrios a difficult player to trade. He’ll pitch next year at 32, so it’s hardly out of the question that he rediscovers some of his waning ability to miss bats and/or limit walks and boosts his profile a bit. In that instance, however, Berrios might very well opt out of the two years left on his contract beyond the 2026 season. On the other hand, if the veteran righty continues to see his strikeouts dip and/or see his walks creep further north, he could be more of an innings-eating fifth starter who’s trending down and owed $24-26MM in both his age-33 and age-34 campaigns.
Essentially, any team trading for Berrios would probably do so with the hope that he’d rebound closer to his 2021-23 form — at which point he’d likely opt out. But to acquire him, they’d also have to take on the downside of Berrios maintaining his recent status quo or even slipping further, thus making that $48-52MM owed to him in 2027-28 wholly unappealing.
It’d be a surprise if the Jays were to find an interested team that was willing to both take on the entirety of Berrios’ remaining contract (to say nothing of doing so and surrendering young talent). In all likelihood, the Jays would need to include at least some cash or take back another contract of some note at a different position. That said, starting pitching is always in demand, and there are always teams looking for creative ways to swap weighty contracts that might better fit their current roster or payroll objectives.
One other fascinating wrinkle to consider: Berrios ended the 2025 season with 9.044 years of major league service time. That places him 128 days shy of 10 years. With MLB Opening Day set for March 25 and the trade deadline set to fall on Friday, July 31, Berrios would reach 10 years of service the day before next summer’s deadline. At that point, he’d acquire 10-and-5 rights — 10 years of MLB service, including the past five with the same team — thereby granting him full veto power over any trade scenarios. Currently, Berrios can block trades to a slate of eight teams.
Toronto can still carry Berrios into the 2026 season and enjoy the depth he provides. In all likelihood, injuries are going to thin out the top end of the current rotation options. That’s just reality for any big league club in today’s game. But the Jays have viable rotation alternatives, and the looming realization of Berrios’ 10-and-5 rights mean that trading him next winter will be even more complicated if he chooses to forgo his opt-out. There’d also be quite a bit of pressure to try to push a deal across the finish line in late July in the event that the Jays are intent on dealing him this summer.
It’s a complicated scenario, to say the least. Berrios’ contract is underwater but not an albatross. He’s a durable source of steady innings but no longer a borderline All-Star. The Jays can try to trade him this winter or during the season, but they’ll have not only the “clock” of the trade deadline but also the artificial clock of Berrios’ forthcoming full no-trade rights. Moving Berrios now would free up some more space for a run at re-signing Bo Bichette or trying to lure Kyle Tucker to Toronto, though the Jays would probably need to take on some other costs in order to get a deal done. It all makes for a fascinating thread to follow ahead of next week’s Winter Meetings, where convoluted trade packages and high-profile changes of scenery are the norm.

One word. Braves.
Two words: Cereal flakes
Three Words: Braves Cereal flakes
five words: three words: braves cereal flakes
Yep, has AA written all over it…..
‘AA written all over it’ came about when he signed Cole Hamels & Josh Donaldson to lucrative 1 year deals with a lot of upside….now AA all over it just sounds like toilet paper wrapping a turd before it gets flushed
They can’t afford him.
Yes we can 24M is not to steep for us I’d want him or Ranger Suarez. The projections have Suarez around 23-25M so I think we could turn up the couch cushions and find the money.
Also probably the jays would eat a .little of his salary
We? Us? That team is way too cheap to pay 24M to a SP.
No, that contract is wayyyy too expensive for the Braves
Trade him to the Tigers. He can play with his Brother in Law Javier Baez.
Baez would be on the short list of players the Tigers would want to trade away, though, isn’t he?
Not sure tbh. I think he has a full no trade clause. Jose for Javier and cash would be interesting. Baez can play just about anywhere on defense and play it well so if the Jays let Bo walk, Baez could fill in just about anywhere. I don’t think that happens through.
Edit:
Baez can block a trade to 10 teams.
I don’t know, this sounds like something Hoyer would kick the tires on. Just my two cents.
I still think he is an above average pitcher worth trading for if you get a good deal from the Jays
the Jays would be happy to accept a used, heavily, Aston Martin
the car
for Jose
I would do that deal in half a second if I was the other team
Will they take Yoshida, Hicks, and Sandoval?
Literally dont need anyone for him. The idea would be to use the money on Bo, so if those guys suck and dont cost anything, sure.
They cost a lot… that’s why they’re being offered.
There are a lot of ways a trade can be made. Bad contracts swap, toss in a prospect (or couple), eat salary… None look good for a decent return and his opt out only complicates it further. If he’s a capable #5, roll with him in ’26 then re-evaluate when he decides his opt-out. I’m still not convinced that Beiber isn’t 100%.
they’d probably have to restructure the contract to guarantee the years and then pay down a decent chunk to trade him
then you could get an 18 year old with tons of question marks in return…
@Mike_t
Restructuring Berrios’s contract to remove the uncertainty of his opt out is do-able. The undoubtedly means Berrios would want more money to do it. At a minimum his bonuses would become guaranteed and then add onto that. An 18 yr old with question marks would be on the high side. More likely would be the 29 yr old in AA.
I don’t see any takers on that contract without significant money being paid by the jays. He is a near definite opt in candidate. Adding another 50m is way too much.
Think the jays would need to pay down at least 20m to trade him. He will likely remain a jay.
A team like the Mets with Cohen’s pockets makes sense as a trading partner.
They’re clearly in win-now mode. If they attach two interesting prospects a little further out, the Jays can absorb less money.
This whole article under it’s headline is pure speculation.
Not one reference listed.
Did you read the article Mitch Bannon of the Athletic reports!
Mitch Bannon of The Athletic is referenced
To be fair lots of the articles are based on other sports ‘journalists’ speculation.
You don’t say!
They’ll have to cover some of his salary or include a prospect in a multi-player deal to trade him.
Trade him for Devers
The Angels ought to consider trading Anthony Rendon’s $38 Million owed to him this season, a lower level prospect and Jorge Soler, which includes the final $13 million owed to him for this season, to the Blue Jays for Berrios and Anthony Santander.
The Blue Jays end up saving a ton of money by ridding themselves of two big contracts and the Angels agreeing to pay the $67 million deferred salary for Santander. The Blue Jays take on Rendon’s deal allows the Angels to split time in both left field and at DH between Trout and SANTANDER. THE Angels would benefit by adding Berrios’ innings to the rotation. I would love to see if Mike Maddux can fix some of his issues. It’s risky for the Angels, but these are the imaginative deals they ought to explore in order to be more competitive.
The one player perfect for the Angels would be Addison Barger.the Angels really need a left handed third baseman and part-time outfielder.
The Blue Jays can now go out and sign Bo Bichette, Kyle Tucker and another starting pitcher. Move Bo to third base and slot Clement at second,by keeping Gimenez at Shortstop. Who says no?
Ya, that’ll ever happen
Indications are Rendon and the Angels are working on a buyout, so that is moot anyways.
There’s a 0% chance Arte would agree to pay $67 mil in deferrals. He’s been against them in general
Barger is a great fit, but not sure how how he fits into this conversation (or why the Jays would trade him)
If you throw in Trout, the Blue Jays may consider it. /s
The article mentions Berríos’ imminent 10-and-5 status. Does the 5-year part of that rule count years the same way that major league service time is counted, down to the day?
This could matter because the Jays got Berríos from the Twins at the 2021 deadline. If the 5 years count from any point in the season (as opposed to counting any part of a MLB season with the same team, for example), then his status could truly change by the day during trade deadline season.
That’s what the article states…
Joc for Berrios + $25-30M
Arenado for Berrios
Sounds like a fair trade. It would be nice if the Jay’s would toss in a pitching prospect since Berrios is owed around $70 million for 3 years and Arenado is owed around $38 million for 2 years.
Why would St. Louis take back a player owed significant money when they are rebuilding? It only makes sense if Bloom already has a deal pending to flip Berrios (to Boston for example if the Anaya and Sox won’t directly make a deal).
They need a couple of veterans in there staff then they need some money from the Jays or prospects.
So they don’t have to rush their prospects and ruin them! They don’t have enough starting pitchers for the innings they need to fill. So instead of keeping Arenado and signing a pitcher they could trade Arenado and get Berrios and get innings filled by a journeyman starting pitcher.
There is no clock to trade him there is just a clock to not trade him and that is one day before all teams can’t trade anyone. Not a big deal. The 10 and 5 is a bigger deal and teams would just need to watch how he rebounds this season before the deadline and get some bucks from the Jay’s to pay down some of that salary. I can see teams taking a chance if he only cost them 16 mil a year. He allowed 2 or less runs in 16 starts last year and only 5 blowouts of 5 or more runs allowed. As a team you want your starter to give your team a chance to win and Berrios did that. Jay’s need to pay down close to 20 mil in my opinion.
The only thing I can see for Berrios is a straight swap for an infielder to a team that needs pitching depth
I’m absolutely shocked /s.
Dana Brown sleeping? We’re waiting on something. Letting dubi go? We want peace of mind over here.
If I were going to trade Berrios, I’d do it the last week of spring training. Gives time to figure out what your rotation will actually look like (injuries and regressions and question marks like Ponce), lets Berrios prove his health, some contender will be in panic mode after a surprise Tommy John or two, and the supply of sellers is much lower than at the trade deadline so supply and demand works in your favor.
Thank you for the great breakdown, Steve.
There shouldn’t be a comma before “too.”