Led by outstanding seasons from Andrew McCutchen, Russell Martin and Josh Harrison, the Pirates made the playoffs for the second straight year in 2014, but the possible departures of Martin and Francisco Liriano cloud their immediate future.
Guaranteed Contracts
- Andrew McCutchen, OF: $38MM through 2017
- Starling Marte, OF: $28.5MM through 2019
- Charlie Morton, SP: $17MM through 2016
- Jose Tabata, OF: $8.75MM through 2016
Arbitration Eligible Players (service time in parentheses; projections via Matt Swartz)
- Gaby Sanchez, 1B (5.025): $2.7MM
- John Axford, RP (4.170): $5.2MM*
- Neil Walker, 2B (4.166): $8.6MM
- Ike Davis, 1B (4.155): $4.4MM
- Mark Melancon, RP (4.098): $7.6MM**
- Travis Snider, OF (4.091): $2MM
- Chris Stewart, C (4.091): $1.3MM
- Pedro Alvarez, 3B (4.085): $5.5MM
- Tony Watson, RP (3.101): $2MM
- Jeanmar Gomez, RP (3.063): $800K*
- Josh Harrison, 3B (3.033): $2.2MM
- Jared Hughes, RP (2.162): $1.1MM
- Vance Worley, SP (2.139): $2.9MM
- Non-tender candidates: Sanchez, Axford, Davis, Gomez
*Axford and Gomez were designated for assignment Saturday.
**Melancon had 33 saves and 14 holds last season, a rare combination that caused Swartz’s model to project Melancon would receive a raise of $5MM to $7.6MM. We think such a large increase is unlikely.
Free Agents
- Russell Martin, Francisco Liriano, Edinson Volquez, Clint Barmes
Despite an unceremonious end to their season with an 8-0 loss to the Giants in the NL Wild Card game, the Pirates have a strong core of players, along with a well regarded farm system. They appear poised to be competitive for years to come. This year’s offseason, however, will likely revolve around their decision regarding Martin, who’s set to depart as a free agent.
Martin’s expiring two-year, $17MM contract was a fantastic deal by any standard, and was easily the best free agent signing of GM Neal Huntington’s career. Martin contributed 9.4 fWAR over the course of the contract and arguably produced even more value than that thanks to his framing and his work with pitchers. The Pirates have gotten unexpectedly strong work from pitchers like Liriano, Edinson Volquez and Mark Melancon in the last two years, and Martin was by all accounts a big reason why.
Now, the Pirates will either have to let Martin go or make the sort of expensive, multi-year commitment he’ll surely receive on the free agent market. The Bucs have indicated they’re willing to “stretch” to keep Martin, but re-signing him would represent a dramatic departure from their usual offseason patterns. And as important as Martin has been to the Pirates, signing him for, say, four years might put them in dangerous territory, given their tight budget and the brutal aging patterns of catchers in their thirties.
There are, however, no comparable options on the free agent market, and the Pirates’ internal replacements to replace Martin, Tony Sanchez and Chris Stewart, represent big downgrades that the Pirates will have to make up elsewhere (even though Stewart is another good framer who had a surprisingly palatable offensive season in 2014). The Pirates have already indicated they will extend Martin a qualifying offer, earning them a draft pick in the likely event that he signs elsewhere.
The Bucs could also lose Liriano and Edinson Volquez, who were key contributors to the team’s 2014 rotation. (They have not indicated they plan to extend a qualifying offer to Liriano, and perhaps they won’t — they didn’t extend one to A.J. Burnett last offseason and likely don’t feel Liriano is as crucial a player as Martin.) The Pirates might feel it makes more sense to replace Liriano and Volquez with buy-low reclamation projects (Justin Masterson or Brett Anderson might make sense, given the Pirates’ love of ground-ball pitchers) rather than paying top dollar for pitchers they’ve already helped improve. Of course, the Bucs’ talents with reclamation pitchers could decrease if Martin leaves.
In any case, the Pirates will need to do something to acquire starting pitching this winter — Charlie Morton and top prospect Jameson Taillon will both be returning from significant injuries, leaving the Pirates with only Gerrit Cole, Vance Worley and the erratic Jeff Locke as sure bets to make their rotation out of spring training.
The Bucs’ corner infield positions will also need tweaking, thanks mostly to Pedro Alvarez’s throwing issues at third base last year. Harrison, who before this season had looked like little more than a spare infielder, had a shocking borderline-MVP-caliber campaign in 2014. He replaced Alvarez at third base down the stretch and will probably continue as the Pirates’ third baseman next year. The lefty-hitting Alvarez is a likely a first baseman going forward, with the Bucs either trading or non-tendering lefty Ike Davis. The Pirates could also consider trading Alvarez, but he’s not eligible for free agency until after 2016, so they could again gamble on his raw power, even though he produced -0.2 fWAR last season. The Bucs will also have to decide whether to keep righty Gaby Sanchez, who is arbitration eligible for the third time and who hit just .229/.293/.385 in 2014. If Sanchez returns, he will presumably continue in a platoon role.
Neil Walker and Jordy Mercer are set to man the middle infield, but the Bucs will need a utility infielder, and it wouldn’t be a surprise if they re-signed Clint Barmes to a one-year deal, like they did last offseason. Barmes doesn’t hit well, but his strong defense makes him a good fit for the Pirates’ grounder-heavy pitching staff. The newly acquired Justin Sellers, could also fill that role, but given his weak bat, the Pirates seem likely to try to sneak him through waivers at some point.
In the outfield, the Pirates have superstar Andrew McCutchen in center and emerging star Starling Marte in left, both of them signed long-term to team-friendly extensions. Gregory Polanco, who will likely supplant Travis Snider as the starter in right field in 2015, also has superstar upside, although he struggled in his rookie season. Snider quietly had a strong 2014, hitting .264/.338/.438, and he’ll probably continue on as the Pirates’ fourth outfielder and top pinch-hitting option.
The Pirates’ bullpen wasn’t a strength in 2014, but the Bucs control most of their relief talent and aren’t likely to make a big addition. Melancon and Tony Watson should return as closer and set-up man, respectively, and huge righty John Holdzkom improbably emerged from independent baseball to become another late-inning option. Jared Hughes, Justin Wilson and Stolmy Pimentel are also set to return.
Fans have long criticized the Pirates for failing to spend, and though the Bucs’ Opening Day payrolls have increased in each of the past four seasons, they’re still way behind the rest of the league. Heavy spending made little sense when the Pirates were perennial doormats, but now that they’re contenders, judicious spending can make a big difference. To cherry-pick one example, the Pirates lost the NL Wild Card game this year; if they had signed Jose Abreu last offseason, they might have won the NL Central and bypassed that game altogether.
This offseason, many fans will treat the team’s decision with Martin as a bellwether of its willingness to spend to keep their team competitive. On one hand, that’s not entirely fair — there are legitimate worries about Martin’s age, and a bad, expensive contract can be a serious problem for even a mid-market team.
On the other hand, replacing Martin’s production will be very difficult if he leaves. The Pirates’ key needs are at catcher and in the starting rotation. If they believe in their ability to fix broken pitchers, it hardly makes sense for them to pay heavily for pitchers who are already at the tops of their games, particularly given how risky multi-year deals for aging pitchers tend to be. Many of the best hitters in a very weak hitting class are either third basemen or outfielders, and the Pirates already have excellent or potentially excellent options at all four of those positions. Meanwhile, there’s no obvious way for the Pirates to replace Martin at catcher with anyone remotely comparable, even in a trade. The top names after Martin on the free agent market are players like Geovany Soto and A.J. Pierzynski.
Another way for the Pirates to upgrade this offseason might be to deal from their deep pool of outfield talent to acquire a younger, cost-controlled starting pitcher. The Mets, who have plenty of promising starting pitching and can use outfield help, might be a good trade partner. The Bucs could also try to deal prospects to a rebuilding team for a pitcher (a ground-ball pitcher like Dallas Keuchel might make sense), but such a trade might be easier in July — teams often aren’t willing to wave the white flag on their seasons before they’ve even begun.
The Pirates’ only significant moves last offseason were to sign Volquez and re-sign Barmes, even though they were coming off their first winning season in two decades and were set to lose a top starting pitcher in Burnett. (They also traded for Davis early in the season.) This winter might not be much different. The Pirates’ acquisitions to address catcher and their rotation will probably be relatively quiet ones. Or, in the case of the catcher position, they might not acquire anyone at all. Travis Sawchik of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review recently made the case for Stewart as a stopgap starting catcher — Stewart isn’t anywhere near Martin’s equal offensively, but he’s good enough at framing and defense to be a passable starter, particularly given the weak catching market. Tony Sanchez could then serve as Stewart’s backup, with prospect Elias Diaz (who is quickly developing a strong defensive reputation of his own) possibly taking over for Stewart in 2016.
With Stewart at catcher, the Pirates would then likely focus their offseason spending on their large group of arbitration-eligible players. They could also continue to try to negotiate a long-term deal with Polanco, who despite a somewhat disappointing rookie season is a prime extension candidate, given his outstanding tools and control of the strike zone. Harrison and Walker might also be extension candidates, albeit less likely ones.
Pirates fans won’t be happy about losing Martin. At this point, though, it’s unwise to ever bet on the Bucs being serious players in free agency. They’ve now had two straight winning seasons, and they set a PNC Park attendance record in 2014, but they’ve shown no indication of the willingness (or perhaps ability) to raise their payroll out of the lowest third of MLB teams, even for a season or two.
There are ways for the Pirates to make significant additions this offseason even without a huge payroll increase. One might be to non-tender or trade Davis, Gaby Sanchez and Alvarez, and go with rookie Andrew Lambo at first base. The Pirates could then use the savings (along with the $7.5MM they’ll have coming off the books now that they’re out from under their portion of Wandy Rodriguez’s salary) to make a splash elsewhere. But that possibility seems remote, given that it’s unclear which big names the Bucs might pursue, other than Martin. It’s more likely that they’ll have another relatively quiet winter.
wvkeeper
What are the chances we might see the Pirates trade Neil Walker this off-season?
charliewilmoth
Remote, I think. They’re trying to contend next year, and they’d not only be dealing an effective player, they’d be opening an infield position (either second or third) for which they don’t have an obvious starter (assuming we think Alvarez isn’t really a third baseman at this point).
Melvin Mendoza, Jr.
Harrison?
charliewilmoth
That’s why I said “second or third.” If they move Harrison to second, they have an opening at third. I highly doubt they really see Alvarez as the answer there.
Smrtbusnisman04
Not to mention that he grew up in Pittsburgh and is regarded as a local favorite.
charliewilmoth
Honestly, I doubt Neal Huntington cares much about that.
Smrtbusnisman04
I’m just saying it would be unpopular, especially if you’re the Pirates trying to establish brand loyalty.
M.Kit
none?
joew
I would say that the chances should be greater than they actually are. Mercer and Walker both. They are by far gold glovers up the middle but they make most plays they should make and are solid at it. they can be effective in the line up. You also got to look at what other options available for the price.
my opinion, don’t rule it out but might be hard to find an option that will do just as well.
Christopher A. Otto
I think that losing both Liriano and Volquez would be a bigger loss than losing Martin. …. That’s a LOT of quality starts to replace. And I’m not sure they can count on Worley for 30 QS next year.
oldoak33
The best in the game can’t be counted on for 30 QS.
Christopher A. Otto
I misspoke. Didn’t really intend to cite the statistic. I guess what I’d say is that I don’t think you can just assume that Worley’s success will continue and that you can count on him to be in the rotation from April through September. He’s had an up and down career.
Smrtbusnisman04
I expect the Pirates will have Taillion spend the first two months in the minors so they should prioritize bringing back Liriano or Volquez (if not both) in addition to another pitcher. Nick Kingham could be another option by the midseason point.
I would also like to see them add another bullpen arm as Watson and Melancon have both had high inning totals the past few years.
oh Hal
I think its pretty unlikely they resign Martin. He’s in the proverbial catbird seat. I also don’t see an MVP level season from Harrison again. Worley was also a big contributor. Maybe that’s Searage and he can repeat.
I think teams will be wary of Liriano and Volquez. It would be a big plus if they get one of those guys back. The loss of their contributions is large. Maybe Searage can Dave Duncan a couple more guys, but even Duncan didn’t always succeed.
Is an .800 OPS LF with plus defense a “star”? I guess that’s fair. Despite prospect evaluators loving Polanco’s tools, I think becoming a “superstar” is unlikely.
They had a lot of things go great last season, balanced by some critical injuries. They still seem like fringey contenders to me.
pitnick
He did say “emerging star.” And OPS can be deceptive given how the offensive environment has changed. His wRC+ (which adjusts for park, league and era) was 132 this year, good for 17th in the NL (among qualified batters), essentially tied with Matt Holliday and Carlos Gomez.
Bob Bunker
When I look at the Pirates I see them absolutely stacked at OF with McCutchen, Marte, Polanco, Josh Bell, Austin Meadows, Travis Snider, and Harold Ramirez. They also have two great infielders in Harrison and Walker. Lastly, they have enviable pitching depth long term with Cole, Glasnow, Kingham, and Taillion.
However, assuming they lose Martin, Liriano, Volquez, and Ike/Gabby they have big short term holes at SP, 1B, and C.
If I’m the Pirates I would resign one of the two SP to a short term deal (3 years max), pick up a reclamation projection like Masterson on a 1 year deal, move Snider to 1B and find him a cheap platoon partner, trade Alvarez for prospects. and then try to deal Bell or Meadows for a cheap young catcher.
GrilledCheese39
I wouldn’t get a long term catcher, Pirates have Reese McGuire for long term, but there is a need for short term which Martin fits perfect. They need to resign him.
pitnick
There’s no way Martin signs a short-term deal though.
GrilledCheese39
Didn’t exactly mean short term, McGuire will be ready around 2018, and a 4 year deal for Martin would line up almost perfectly.
Bob Bunker
McGuire can’t start this year though and if they could get a young player that could start this year then McGuire could easily move to the OF/1B don’t you think. Don’t see Martin coming back on less then a 4 year deal so he would block McGuire just as much and with their limited payroll it doesn’t seem like its in the cards.
S Brooks
If Snider’s 2014 is for real, he wouldn’t need a platoon partner.
Smrtbusnisman04
The 1B position really depends on Pedro Alvarez. I don’t see the Pirates trading him now with his value being so low. His power numbers dipped last year, but he was on pace for a career high in walks. Hopefully, he can relax knowing he no longer has to play 3B.
Bob Bunker
Yeah playing Alvarez at 1B isn’t a bad plan either though that is 5 million of payroll plus the fact they probably won’t keep him past 2015 so it’s trade him now with the extra year of control, trade him in a year with limited leverage and he’d have less value, or non-tender him next year.
joew
Pedro also had less at bats than the year before because he couldn’t get the ball reliably to first and Harrison NEEDED to be on the field. It felt like Pedro saw many more pitches though i cannot back that up with stats. He is becoming more patient and evolving and chases less, but still strikes out a lot. I bet if his was able to get 600 AB again he would’ve had 30+HR and another 170+ strike outs
Rick Eger
We need to keep either Liriano or Voquez, I’d pefer Edison, trading Alverez at this point wouldn’t bring much in return, I think J-Hay will be productive maybe not a superstar but who knows( Jose Bautista anyone? ). It would be great to keep Martin but it ain’t gonna happen. Sooooo we fill in the gap until Diaz arrives.
oldoak33
Liriano has more upside and has pitched well when healthy in 13 and 14. Volquez has made most of his starts in the past three or four years, but doesn’t have the upside that Liriano has. I’d personally try for Liriano, but I think they both walk for stronger offers elsewhere.
Rick Eger
They almost have to re sign one of them.
joew
don’t forget there are other options available in free agency, but I would love to have Liriano back.
Rick Eger
I agree Joe, we need him.
Chris Vinnit
I understand the spending doesn’t = winning issue but my great fear is the Pirates will end up like the Rays. For years people raved about Tampa’s approach and farm and so forth but now it looks like they had a window and that window has slammed shut. I think this is the Pirates “window” and while I agree with why they didn’t want to trade Marte for Price, they really need to make a splash move sooner rather than later. The Lirianos and Volquez’s are nice – and Cole is a really good talent – but they badly need that ace type starter that can push them over the top. And I hope they do what they have to do – be it a trade, be it letting guys like Martin leave so they can spend elsewhere – before Cutch is playing for Detroit and Huntington is GM of the Yankees and all we’re left with is “remember back in the mid-2010s?”
derekbellstutu
Is there a James Shields-like deal that the Bucs can pull off this offseason? I would love to see the Buccos acquire Chris Sale, but I think it would cost too much in terms of prospects. What would it cost to acquire Brett Anderson or Dallas Keuchel? I think those could be some solid adds to the Pirates rotation.
Bob Bunker
Why would the White Sox trade Chris Sale? He is one one of the best value deals in the game, is a perennial Cy Young candidate, and is very young and the team is looking to contend next year and beyond. Makes no sense.
derekbellstutu
I was thinking only about the Pirates in regards to trading for Sale. I know that the White Sox would require most of the Pirates top 5 prospects in exchange for Sale, and rightfully so. That’s too high a price for the Pirates.
With the likelihood of Martin and Liriano leaving and Wandy’s contract coming off the books, the Buccos will have money to spend this offseason. It will be interesting to see how they spend that available cash.
Rick Eger
I agree 100% but this is Pittsburgh we’re talking about…..remember?