Headlines

  • Royals Release Hunter Dozier
  • Yankees Release Aaron Hicks
  • Brewers Sign Julio Teheran To Major League Deal
  • Red Sox Move Corey Kluber To Bullpen
  • Athletics Reach Tentative Stadium Funding Deal With Nevada Lawmakers
  • NPB Watch: May Edition
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2023-24 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Arbitration Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Cardinals Sign Ruben Tejada

By charliewilmoth | March 19, 2016 at 9:47am CDT

The Cardinals have announced that they’ve signed shortstop Ruben Tejada to a one-year, big-league contract. Tejada will receive $1.5MM, Jon Heyman tweets. MLB.com’s Jenifer Langosch was first to report that a deal was imminent (Twitter links). Tejada is a client of the Legacy Agency.

Feb 26, 2016; Port St. Lucie, FL, USA; New York Mets shortstop Ruben Tejada (11) is seen during spring training work out drills at Tradition Field. Mandatory Credit: Steve Mitchell-USA TODAY Sports

The Mets released Tejada earlier this week. He reportedly rejected a minor-league deal with the Yankees in hopes of finding a big-league deal with another team, and it appears he’s found one. Jhonny Peralta is out ten to 12 weeks after having thumb surgery, which had left the Cardinals without a legitimate starting shortstop — Jedd Gyorko, Greg Garcia and Aledmys Diaz topped the team’s list of internal options.

Tejada now looks like the Cardinals’ presumptive starter at the position until Peralta returns. Tejada’s sudden appearance on the free agent market at this late date provided the Cardinals with the opportunity to acquire something resembling a proven shortstop, albeit one with some drawbacks. The 26-year-old batted a reasonable .261/.338/.350 with New York last season and generally does a good job reaching base, thanks to a good batting eye. He has little power, however and has yet to have a truly strong offensive season, with a .696 OPS as a 21-year-old rating as his finest season at the plate. Metrics rate his defense as about average over the course of his career, though both DRS and UZR were down on his work in 2015. He also irked the Mets at times with his lack of physical conditioning.

Nonetheless, given Tejada’s experience and his ability to keep his head above water as a big-league shortstop, it’s not surprising that the Cardinals pursued him. He can become a free agent after the season due to a clause in his arbitration agreement with the Mets that awarded him an extra day of service time. (I previously wrote, incorrectly, that there was a possibility the Cardinals could take him through arbitration next winter.)

Tejada and the Mets avoided arbitration by agreeing to a $3MM deal last offseason, although the Mets’ plans changed when they acquired middle infielders Neil Walker and Asdrubal Cabrera, and they ultimately owed Tejada only $491K of that $3MM contract after they decided to release him. The Mets’ $3MM deal will therefore have no particular impact on his deal with the Cardinals.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.

Share 145 Retweet 17 Send via email0

Newsstand St. Louis Cardinals Transactions Ruben Tejada

Injury Notes: Meadows, Lorenzen, Kopech, Boesch
Main
Latest On Bronson Arroyo
View Comments (46)

Comments

  1. Thor-DarkKnight-CaptainAmerica-16

    7 years ago

    Good luck to you Ruben. Play well, earn your spot.

    Reply
  2. apitts87

    7 years ago

    MLBTR could have had this article prewritten and ready to publish. It’s a natural fit, and makes infinitely more sense than trading a prospect for a stopgap.

    Reply
  3. robertj53086

    7 years ago

    I’d rather try Diaz at short…..

    Reply
  4. bigpapi4ever

    7 years ago

    Not a bad move for th Cards but IMO they would have been better off trading for Deven Marrero, more upside .

    Reply
    • Brixton

      7 years ago

      Trading for 6 years of a defender like Marrero wouldn’t be free. Tejada is gonna cost them pocket change. Less than 2.5M.

      Reply
    • stymeedone

      7 years ago

      Marrero’s bat doesn’t look like its much more than Tejada’s, plus they don’t have to give up a prospect. Not enough difference between the two. Aviles could possibly be excess on the Tigers. They may have been able to purchase him. Again, though, he’s basically the same player. It will be interesting who becomes available as the spring wraps up, to see if the Cards could have done better.

      Reply
    • stl_cards16

      7 years ago

      All glove-no bat SS’s are a dime a dozen. No reason to give up anything for another Pete Kozma.

      Reply
      • spudchukar

        7 years ago

        Tejada isn’t a “no bat” infielder. If he hits against the rest of the league, like he does against St. Louis, the Cards would be thrilled. He is a tough out.

        Reply
        • sn33

          7 years ago

          I hope you are joking. Career .653 ops in close to 2200 plate appearances. Not exactly a small sample. He is the definition of a not bad infielder.

        • sn33

          7 years ago

          No bat* is what I was trying to put.

        • apitts87

          7 years ago

          stl_cards16 was talking about Marrero.

        • apitts87

          7 years ago

          stl_cards16 was talking about Marrero. $1.5 mil for Tejada is a great deal especially when considering that’s instead of trading a prospect.

        • RAB Commenter

          7 years ago

          That’s not far off Didi Gregorious’ career OPS of .683. He’s the next great short stop.

        • GoRav114

          7 years ago

          That’s only because he plays for the Yankees. Just like the Red Sox every single young player they have is going to be a perennial all star. If Didi was the SS for the Brewers or Orioles he would be considered nothing

        • sn33

          7 years ago

          I know I agree with him. I was referring to spudchukar who claimed tejada isn’t a no bat infielder when in fact that’s exactly what he is. Move makes sense for the cardinals no question.

        • spudchukar

          7 years ago

          Tejada has no home run power, but he does have gap power. Relying on old numbers can be misleading. He has learned to be a better hitter, and the Cards know that. Look for him to improve on his 2015 numbers, not regress to days of yore.

        • spudchukar

          7 years ago

          Your error in thinking is believing Tejada is the player he was early in his career, not the guy of 2015. Players learn in this game, and Tejada has learned to be a tough out, and a doubles guy.

      • kingjenrry

        7 years ago

        Tejada’s bat is miles beyond Pete Kozma’s

        Reply
    • mike156

      7 years ago

      Makes no sense from a Cardinal perspective because of a mismatch in perceived value between how Boston values and what it’s worth SL to pay. Peralta will be back. They need a stopgap. That’s what Tejada does well.

      Reply
      • GoRav114

        7 years ago

        Which is why I was surprised the Mets let him go. I know 3.5 million isn’t chump change but it’s not unusual for a playoff contender to have a guy like Tejada that could fill in middle infield for long spells in case of injury or ineffectiveness.

        Reply
        • mike156

          7 years ago

          That’s good point, but the Mets still have financial issues. They probably just didn’t want to spend even that much.

        • metsoptimist

          7 years ago

          Um, they just spent (at least) $27.5 million on Cespedes.

          As to what GoRav said, the Mets have plenty of depth at shortstop.

      • Lance

        7 years ago

        he’s a great stopgap pickup for the money. no reason to give up a prospect for a two-three month player

        Reply
  5. dwilson10

    7 years ago

    Good for him but what happens when Peralta comes back? Would Tejada agree to a platoon role of that’s what the Cardinals decide to do?

    Reply
    • apitts87

      7 years ago

      Either trade one (probably Tejada) at the deadline, serve as a bench option, or if he stinks, get released. He got the big-league deal he wanted, has to realize this is the arrangement. If he wants to force STL to start him over Peralta he’ll have to play well enough to give them no choice.

      Reply
      • apitts87

        7 years ago

        If things go south this season (or Tejada significantly outplays Peralta), I could see them trading Peralta at the deadline, ride it out with Tejada for the remainder of the season, and install the heir apparent Diaz as the starter in 2017.

        Reply
  6. stymeedone

    7 years ago

    Wow. Talk about your “outside the box” thinking. What a surprise!

    As the Cards are about the only team that could offer him a significant amount of playing time, at least temporarily, this was kind of a no brainer. The Cards are really going to miss Peralta’s power though.

    Reply
  7. tim815

    7 years ago

    This is my shocked face.

    Reply
  8. cxcx

    7 years ago

    What happened to that extra day of service time the Mets granted Tejada a couple of weeks ago that would allow him to become a free agent next season, is it non-transferable or something?

    And I’m puzzled by people wondering what’s going to happen when Peralta comes back, if Tejada will demand to start or force a trade or get a platoon role. Ruben is a bench player and he will go to the bench. Unless he stinks more than usual. In that case he will be cut.

    Reply
    • aff10

      7 years ago

      Yeah, he’s ok, worthy of a major-league deal, but he’s certainly not blocking Peralta or anyone for that matter. A player with a career .653 OPS, 85 OPS+, and decent but unspectacular defense isn’t all that exciting. Barring some crazy breakout year, he goes back to the bench, and I assume, as you mentioned, to free agency after the year

      Reply
    • EndinStealth

      7 years ago

      The Mets didn’t award him an extra day MLB did.

      Reply
      • apitts87

        7 years ago

        Not according to the MLBTR’s article on this in February; it was part of the Mets arbitration agreement made in order to avoid litigating a grievance issue.

        Question is pretty significant, not only for Tejada but for STL as it potentially affects his trade value. Is it still included as part of the prorated deal from arbitration? Was the service day awarded immediately? on Opening Day? at the conclusion of the 2016 season? Was it contingent on Tejada being on the 2016 Mets Opening Day roster? Is the potential grievance filed against STL now instead? What if it was awarded and then he’s DFA’d, does he go back to FA after 2017?

        Great example of why having a union (and sometimes an agent) is important…This stuff is as complicated as it is confusing.

        http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/02/ruben-tejada-free-agent-2016-mets.html

        Reply
        • EndinStealth

          7 years ago

          Hmm interesting. I didn’t know teams could do that.

        • jnicol81

          7 years ago

          He’ll deliver now that he has the birds on bat across his chest. cards ard best.. 🙂

      • kingjenrry

        7 years ago

        The Mets did. Not the MLB.

        Reply
    • GoRav114

      7 years ago

      I agree, he’s an insurance type player. Not a guy you want starting but more than capable of filling in for several weeks. Kinda why I was surprised the Mets let him go. I could see a team like the Reds needing the 3.5 million more than a veteran backup but any contending team needs a couple of guys they can count on to fill in for injuries or ineffectiveness.

      Reply
  9. cardfan2011

    7 years ago

    Im glad they signed him. He may not be the flashiest, but he can get the job done for the time Peralta is out. Go Cards!

    Reply
  10. Sonny

    7 years ago

    Good sign.

    Reply
  11. Ray Ray

    7 years ago

    And this finally brings to a close the most obvious free agent saga of the year.

    Reply
    • GoRav114

      7 years ago

      You got me thinking…now with this done what is the most intriguing free agent story line? With Morneau out half a season I guess it leaves Tim Lincecum as the most intriguing free agent. I thought he was going to have a showcase but it doesn’t seem to materialize. I would think a lot of teams would take a gamble on Lincecum as a bounce back candidate at least out of the pen. As the season gets closer less and less teams have the space or can afford the gamble. My guess is he will be looking for a major league deal in 4-5 million range. I know a lot of teams would give him a shot but that list of teams will get smaller and smaller as we get near opening day. I could see a scenario where a team gives him a major league contract of 5 million with incentives and a 2nd year option or the max he gets is a minor league deal with an opt out if not on the roster by June.

      Reply
  12. theo2016

    7 years ago

    His obp is less related to his batting eye and more related to him hitting in front of the pitcher.

    Reply
    • spudchukar

      7 years ago

      No. it works both ways. It is tougher to hit with the pitcher next. And I would like to know how many intentional walks Tejada received. My guess is it isn’t many.

      Reply
      • spudchukar

        7 years ago

        The answer is 5.

        Reply
      • kingjenrry

        7 years ago

        Nonsense. He’s batted 1st or 2nd in the order more times than he has batted 8th in the order.

        Reply
        • spudchukar

          7 years ago

          That makes even less sense. If he is hitting early in the order he isn’t getting many IBBs.

  13. metsoptimist

    7 years ago

    I’m in a Mets group on Facebook, and there has been quite the outpouring of affection for Ruben there. I liked him just fine and I wish him well, but I’m rather perplexed at the reactions; I imagine that they’re largely linked to the leg-breaking incident.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.
Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Royals Release Hunter Dozier

    Yankees Release Aaron Hicks

    Brewers Sign Julio Teheran To Major League Deal

    Red Sox Move Corey Kluber To Bullpen

    Athletics Reach Tentative Stadium Funding Deal With Nevada Lawmakers

    NPB Watch: May Edition

    Yankees Designate Aaron Hicks For Assignment

    Cubs Designate Eric Hosmer For Assignment

    Mets Select Gary Sanchez, Place Tim Locastro On 60-Day IL

    Astros To Activate Jose Altuve

    Rays Recall Taj Bradley, Plan To Keep Him In Rotation

    Kumar Rocker To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Anibal Sanchez Announces Retirement

    Willson Contreras To Return To Catching Duties On Monday

    Rockies Place Antonio Senzatela On 15-Day IL Due To Elbow Sprain

    Cubs, Marcus Stroman Had Preliminary Extension Talks

    Drew Rasmussen Shut Down For Two Months With Flexor Strain

    Tyler Mahle To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Marlins To Promote Eury Pérez

    Max Fried Facing Notable Absence Due To Forearm Strain

    Recent

    Royals Notes: Lynch, Yarbrough, Hosmer, Pasquantino

    Royals Release Hunter Dozier

    Injured List Activations: Davies, Whitlock

    Phillies Notes: First Base, Painter, Song, Pache, Alvarado

    Rangers Place Ezequiel Duran On 10-Day Injured List; Travis Jankowski Activated

    Giants Place Thairo Estrada On 10-Day Injured List

    West Notes: Urias, deGrom, Bogaerts

    White Sox Notes: Hendriks, Jimenez, Andrus

    Brewers Designate Alex Claudio For Assignment, Select Andruw Monasterio

    Tigers Acquire Lael Lockhart From Dodgers

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Shohei Ohtani Rumors
    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Go Ad-Free
    • 2023-24 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • MLB Player Chats
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • Feeds by Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrowsFOX Sports Engage Network scroll to top
    Close

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version