Dec. 21: The Athletics have officially announced Soria’s two-year contract. Their 40-man roster is up to 38 players.
In addition to salaries of $6.5MM (2019) and $8.5MM (2020), Heyman tweets, Soria can earn $250K apiece upon finishing 35 and 40 games. He’ll also have a one-time, $750K assignment bonus in the event of a trade.
Dec. 20, 11:38pm: Soria’s deal will pay him exactly $15MM over two years, tweets Jon Heyman of Fancred.
11:05pm: USA Today’s Bob Nightengale tweets that the two sides do indeed have an agreement, in principle. Soria’s contract will check in with a total value in the $15-15.5MM range, tweets Jesse Sanchez of MLB.com.
10:51pm: The Athletics are closing in on a two-year contract with free-agent reliever Joakim Soria, reports Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic (Twitter link). The right-hander still has to pass a physical, per Rosenthal, and there are still some final details to be ironed out before the deal comes to fruition. Soria is represented by Oscar Suarez.
The 34-year-old Soria just wrapped up a three-year, $25MM contract with the Royals — a pact which didn’t pan out well in year one of the deal but took a turn for the better in years two and three. This past season, Soria tossed 60 2/3 innings of 3.12 ERA ball between the White Sox and Brewers, averaging 11.1 K/9, 2.4 BB/9 and 0.59 HR/9 along the way.
In many respects, in fact, the 2018 season was one of the best, if not the best of Soria’s impressive big league career. He averaged personal bests in swinging-strike rate (14.4 percent) and opponents’ chase rate (34.3 percent), and his 2.44 FIP and 2.88 SIERA were among the best marks of his 12-year MLB career as well. Perhaps most impressively, the 83.6 mph average exit velocity that Soria allowed to opponents registered as the lowest of any pitcher in baseball (min. 150 batted ball events), per Statcast.
Much of the emphasis for the A’s this offseason has centered around the team’s rotation needs (with good reason), but adding Soria to the mix will give Oakland another quality reliever to join the likes of Blake Treinen, Yusmeiro Petit, Lou Trivino, Fernando Rodney and Ryan Buchter. That’s a solid collection of relievers, which figures to be more important for the A’s than most other clubs, assuming they plan to continue utilizing “the opener” tactic and piecing together the occasional game via “bullpenning.”
While Soria unequivocally improves the pitching staff as a whole, the A’s still have a clear, pressing need for some pitchers who can offer more innings than the aforementioned bunch. Oakland will be without Sean Manaea for the entire 2019 season due to shoulder surgery, while right-handers Jharel Cotton and Daniel Gossett will be on the mend from Tommy John surgery early in the season. The same is true of top pitching prospect A.J. Puk, and another rotation option, Andrew Triggs, will be recovering from thoracic outlet surgery.
At present, the Oakland rotation is a muddled mess, with the likes of Daniel Mengden, Frankie Montas, Paul Blackburn, Chris Bassitt, Aaron Brooks, Tanner Anderson and Grant Holmes among the options from which the organization can choose. The A’s, somewhat unthinkably, managed to win 97 games in a season where their most prominent starters beyond Manaea were Trevor Cahill, Brett Anderson, Edwin Jackson and Mengden. That, however, seems highly unlikely to be a repeatable feat, and the A’s are expected to add some more experienced rotation pieces as the winter progresses.
A two-year commitment to Soria in the $15.5MM range is within reasonable proximity, albeit a bit shy, of the two-year, $18MM contract MLBTR estimated when ranking the game’s top 50 free agents in early November. Among participants in MLBTR’s Free Agent Prediction Contest, just 3.2 percent correctly pegged Soria to land in green and gold this winter.
My prediction of them carrying 15 relievers all season was correct.
It’s getting some serious legs. With no one in AAA that seems ready to step in to begin 2019, its becoming very easy to see the 5th starter being the bullpen. And honestly, its not out of the realm of possibility that our 4th starter is too.
The A’s just keep bolstering their already solid bullpen.
Trienen
Trivino
Rodney
Petit
Pagan
Butcher
Wendelken
Hendricks
Dull
Bassitt
And now Soria
Amazing bullpen!
It is, but some of those guys simply dont belong there. Pagan, Wendelken, and Dull have a lot to prove. Bassitt I think has to be a starter now. But Rodney/Trivino/Soria/Trienen is a hell of a combo. Could use another southpaw though as we’re leaning heavily on Buchter as it stands now.
Yeah, Bassitt for sure will get his starting job again. At least until Puk and Cotton return. I think Gio comes back to Oakland. Buchter will probably only be used as their loogy though.
Pagan was one of the best relievers in the Seattle pen in 2017 and frankly I was surprised to see he was demoted to AAA for the As last yr. If he captures the command he had in 17’ it shouldn’t be too hard to prove he belongs in the As pen.
Pagan definitely showed signs last year and I could definitely see him making a big impact this year. I believe he has the stuff to be a quality reliever.
Update- it’s going to be really hard for Pagan to prove he belongs in the As bullpen! Traded to the Rays in your Profar deal haha
Sortve weird, considering we were just talking about him haha
Rodney is great against lefties
In Billy We Trust
Trust to not win a playoff game ?
After an offseason of losing a rising prospect (Richie Martin), definitely losing one starter (Cahill) and likely at least one more (Fiers), and likely losing Lowrie and Lucroy.. paying for a reliever is at least something. But like the Petit signing last year, its incredibly uninspiring. I get not paying for a SP when Cahill gets 9m and Harvey gets 11m, but a play for someone like Daniel Murphy would have been a great move for a team that could use some left-handed OBP.
Hope Soria can earn his money here.
@Cardsfan
No your not first. A true comment is one that reads the article and comments on it not someone who just types “first” just to be annoying
Because “first” is not a post. You learned that at least
Now can we get some starters
Love the bullpen, but Oakland’s only kidding themselves if they think they can win the wildcard again without a starting rotation because Montas, Mengden, and Luzardo isn’t gonna cut it.
sign a guy like gio Gonzalez or yovani gallardo
Gio is dependable. 30+ starts every year. Just what Oakland needs (I wanted the Angels to get him for the same reason).
I expect the Halos to bring in another Gio level guy to help them
Nice pickup by Oakland. Soria is quietly good year after year. Not really looking forward to seeing him a lot this year.
First time posting here, lifelong A’s fan since I was a kid in the 70’s. I wonder in recent years if the A’s have indeed made competitive offers to FA’s and were turned down simply because they don’t want to play in Oakland? Also, I agree with others the starting rotation is my biggest concern as of now. Thanks.
Good for Jack. Glad to see him get paid again.
Old man river…
I’m still mad at Soria for giving up an extra inning homer to Minnesota when he played for the Tigers. That homer proved to be the end of the Tigers’ era of competitive baseball.
Bet this is going to be an action packed weekend for the free agent part of the offseason. Started tonight. Bunch of names came off the board. Wanted the Braves in on him for the 8th inning with Robertson closing. But I realize now Robertson is no going to ATL he is repping himself and insisting on a no trade. The Braves don’t give those under any circumstance.
Good get by the A’s
Paying Soria $15-mil for 2 years but couldn’t give Trevor Cahill $9 mil? Interesting.
A’s have plenty of relievers. Used starting pitcher money for an aging reliever primed for a fall. I guess this is paying for mentorship.
Good signing if a team is set on starting pitching and need bullpen arms. A’s need the opposite.
Cahill was a 5 inning starter who the A’s hope would not get hurt. He is a big gamble with his injurries that always pop up. You got to be happy for CaHill last year he had no team this year making $9 million.
Obviously missing the point. So I’ll spell it out for you….
1. Oakland needed a STARTING PITCHER and not another reliever
2. Soria is getting older and declining. He pitched well in a no-pressure situation in Chicago
3. Oakland has to watch how they spend, always. To splurge on an aging 7th or 8th inning guy is absurd.
4. Adding a 2nd year to a turning-35 year old with that kind of money will be tough to deal if he fades.
5. His fastball continues to decline. Should expect more of the same in 2019
6. Oakland has plenty of arms in the bullpen and since Oakland only has geniuses in the front office we should expect great arms ready to go from AAA.
That money needed to go to a starter whether it was Cahill or not.
You have no clue what you’re taking about… his velocity was the best of his career… “declining”… nice assumption on age alone
So far Soria showing I had a clue.
Cahill hasn’t pitched over 110 innings since 2013. Plus he looked awful when he came back from his last DL stint last year…I’m kind of glad the A’s moved on.. with how promising Dunshee and Howard both looked last year, I wouldn’t be surprised to see them up after the All Star break
After his great month of May he was a 5th starter type of pitcher rarely going over 5 innings of work. Angels will hope he is the first 2 month starter instead of the 5th starter the second half of the season.
(First off please remember I’m English and fell in love with baseball on my first trip to the states 10 yrs ago… thus compared to you guys my knowledge is limited – I do have good points…)
Bit underwhelmed by the A’s action so far – I don’t know what the projected payroll is going to be – $80-$100MM? – but the big pieces – a catcher to replace Lucroy and especially a 2B because the FO doesn’t seem to like Barreto and I can’t see us paying for Lowrie are kind of glaring…
And that just leaves the rotation!!! Cahill has gone, we’ve not made an offer to Fiers (as I understand it) and I really can’t see us catching lightning in a tin can like last season. Personally I’d make an offer to Edwin Jackson (a fly ball pitcher in a pitcher’s park) but can anyone else see Luzardo as a rotation piece come opening day?
I’m fine with an 11 piece bullpen, I’m fine with the opener idea. But to adapt soccer parlance (from 11 to a 25 roster) you need 20 guys to haul the pianos and 5 guys to play them. Not sure where those five guys are coming from.
Have a great Christmas
Peter
Apols – had to edit – typed rooster instead of roster. Kind of like rooster, but never mind…
Ever the innovator (the first to “piggy-back” minor league starters), Billy has apparently bought into the “opener” theology. TB proved it worked last year, tho we should always remember it has more to do with the quality of the pitchers more than anything else.
What could be uncomfortable? No more 4-5 pitchers in an inning. The post-opener HAS to go multiple innings, as do ultimately the “middle” guys.
It looks like the reliever market is down a bit from last year; that Diaz trade is looking progressively more questionable.
That trade was more or less about offsetting Cano’s massive contract
You’re 100% correct, but these reliever contracts are making the whole thing look like an overpay now.
How? 3/30 for familia. 3/25 for Kelly? These are good deals for those guys. Take out the Rockies last offseason and those would be the 2 highest deals signed. Only the Rockies and Giants gave out 3 year contracts for relievers last offseason.
I was hoping Boston would bring him aboard. Good signing for the A’s though.
Apparently whomever wrote this doesn’t seem to think Jesus Luzardo is a rotation option but someone like Grant Holmes, who hasn’t pitched above AA and hasn’t pitched since last spring training is