Headlines

  • Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death
  • Rangers Place Corey Seager On Injured List
  • Cubs Promote Moises Ballesteros
  • Evan Longoria To Sign One-Day Contract, Retire As Member Of Rays
  • Diamondbacks To Promote Jordan Lawlar
  • Rockies Fire Bud Black
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Cards Rumors: Harper, Britton, Miller, Descalso

By Connor Byrne | December 9, 2018 at 9:41am CDT

The Cardinals made a monumental move this week when they acquired superstar first baseman Paul Goldschmidt from the Diamondbacks, but the Redbirds certainly aren’t done yet. Currently mired in their first three-year playoff drought since the late 1990s, the Cardinals are emphasizing the need for immediate improvement, president of baseball operations John Mozeliak revealed after the Goldschmidt trade (via Derrick Goold of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch).

With the Winter Meetings on the verge of beginning, Goold has the latest on where the 2019-minded Cards could attempt to upgrade next:

  • While the Cardinals have been connected to outfielder Bryce Harper, arguably the best free agent available, Goold hears their interest may hinge on the length of his next contract. If Harper’s desired length on his forthcoming deal drops to fewer than 10 years, St. Louis would be more inclined to get seriously involved, Goold indicates.
  • With left-handed relief help high on the Cards’ list, they “remain engaged” on free agents Zach Britton and Andrew Miller, Goold reports. And though Mozeliak has expressed confidence in flamethrower Jordan Hicks’ potential to serve as the Cardinals’ primary closer in 2019, the team could offer the ninth inning to Britton or Miller, Goold writes. Both the 30-year-old Britton and Miller, 33, come with plenty of game-ending experience, having combined for 195 saves. MLBTR’s Tim Dierkes, Steve Adams and Jeff Todd forecast both hurlers to sign three-year deals in the $30MM range.
  • The Cardinals are also seeking a lefty-swinging utility infielder, which could lead to a reunion with ex-Redbird Daniel Descalso. The club has had talks with Descalso’s agent, according to Goold. A third-round pick of the Cardinals in 2007, Descalso played for the team from 2010-14, during which he was part of its most recent World Series winner (2011). The 32-year-old generally hasn’t been much of an offensive threat during his career, but he found another gear last season in Arizona, where he hit far more line drives and fly balls and far fewer grounders. The changes helped Descalso bat an above-average .238/.353/.436 (111 wRC+) with career highs in home runs (13), walk rate (15.1 percent) and isolated power (.198).
Share 0 Retweet 11 Send via email0

St. Louis Cardinals Andrew Miller Bryce Harper Daniel Descalso Zach Britton

At Least 5 Teams Interested In Josh Harrison
Main
Olney’s Latest: Thor, Mets, Dodgers, Astros, Bucs, Indians
View Comments (202)
Post a Comment

202 Comments

  1. c1234

    6 years ago

    As a Cardinals fan I would want them to extend Goldschmidt, Mikolas, Carp, and Ozuna than sign Harper and regret it.

    2
    Reply
    • dray16

      6 years ago

      I can’t imagine any scenario where someone signs Harper and then regrets it.

      2
      Reply
      • anthonyd4412

        6 years ago

        I can. $400m for a guy who met expectations only two seasons in his career?

        9
        Reply
        • RunDMC

          6 years ago

          Jason Heyward did a lot less, and still got $180M with opt outs mostly based on his potential and age with excellent defense as his floor. Will be interesting to see if teams have learned. Yes, Harper is a very different player and circumstance, but teams pay a lot for potential, especially if they already have a MVP.

          1
          Reply
        • nrd1138

          6 years ago

          Did the Cubs win a WS? Was it partially due to Heyward’s last minute speech? If you believe that it was then it was money well spend. Apples and Oranges IMO. Also, Heyward is a leader, Harper is a problem.

          1
          Reply
        • TrueOutcomeFan

          6 years ago

          Only twice?

          1
          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          6 years ago

          Hopefully teams learn from past signings. The Cubs won in spite of Hayward. JD Drew had a huge AB against the Indians in 07. Does that one hit justify his $75m Boras snookered out of the Red Sox then?

          2
          Reply
        • Priggs89

          6 years ago

          You expect him to OPS over 1.000?

          Reply
        • RunDMC

          6 years ago

          LOL. You overvalue “the speech” as much as you undervalue everything else that team put into their season and series. If you value that 1 World Series as $180M then that explains why the Cubs win only 1 WS every century.

          7
          Reply
        • niched

          6 years ago

          And the Jason Hayward signing remains one of the worst ever.

          Reply
        • petrie000

          6 years ago

          The Cubs won a world series with him, so that can never actually be true

          Anybody who’s signed for comparable or more who failed to produce that result is automatically worse simply because there’s undeniable proof Heyward’s contract atleast didn’t hurt the team

          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          It’s not even top 5

          Reply
        • grant schibilia

          6 years ago

          Ask the Angels about the Pujol’s contract, how did that work out?

          1
          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          Pujols contract worse than Heyward’s

          Reply
        • Bill walsh

          6 years ago

          Seriously… they beat Indians because 2 of 3 starters out, carasco and Salazar , bullpen exhausted. Ran out of pitchers, starting Catcher, Gomes out. and 300 hitter Brantley out.
          Cubs win because NL had best starters injured and Cleveland decimated.
          O and they stocked up on AL players , their NL free agents sucked and now their great draft picks are tanking.. see Russell, Contreras, Bote, Schwarburger, Happ and especially Bryant.
          Spent 200 million and on the decline.
          Got lucky, one and done.

          Reply
        • ChiSoxCity

          6 years ago

          So Heyward got paid over $180M to give a speech? Do Cubs not realize how delusional they sound when they repeat nonsense like this? The Cubs won in ‘16 because they were the better team, not because of some epic speech by Jason Heyward.

          3
          Reply
        • wrigleywannabe

          6 years ago

          And everyone talks about how badcthat deal is

          Reply
        • wrigleywannabe

          6 years ago

          Excuses, excuses…they have been good for more than one year. That disproves your nonsense.

          Also, AR was not drafted. He was acquired from Oakland

          Reply
        • wrigleywannabe

          6 years ago

          Missing the point. He was a leader on a very young team. His speech was the culmination of that

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          6 years ago

          The fact that the Cubs won a WS with the Heyward contract, is not proof that it’s not one of the worst contracts in recent history. The only thing it proves is that a terrible contract, just like Zito’s with the Giants, does not prevent a team from winning it all. Despite the outcome for the team, it’s still a terrible contract.

          Reply
        • petrie000

          6 years ago

          If when you compare it head to head against many other contracts of comparable size, that did not result in a team winning anything… You have to be biased to say it’s worse

          Objectivity is a cruel mistress

          Reply
        • MetsYankeesRedSox

          6 years ago

          Since when does Chicago have a baseball team?

          Reply
        • deweybelongsinthehall

          6 years ago

          Petrie, why does there have to be a correlation between their WS win and Hayward signing?

          Reply
        • GeoKaplan

          6 years ago

          Nope. The Angels saw an uptick in attendance with the signing of Pujols, which brought revenue to the team. That case might be made for Miguel Cabrera’s extension as well in Detroit, but certainly can’t be made for Heyward or Chris Davis, three contracts each in total worse than Pujols’.

          Reply
        • petrie000

          6 years ago

          Look at it this way. If you were to sit down and compile a list of the top 10 worst contracts in history, which do you give more weight to, the ones that actively hampered team success, or the ones that are simply big overpays?

          I’m not going to argue it’s a good contract, but to call it one of the worst in history is a little hyperbolic.

          Where would it honestly rank on a list of ‘worst’? He’s not earning his money, but he’s also not keeping his team from making or winning in the playoffs.

          Reply
        • Shane T

          6 years ago

          Seriously maybe the dumbest thing I have ever read

          Reply
        • JKB 2

          6 years ago

          Oh but the speech turned around game 7 of the world series so it sure was an epic speech. Leadership.

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          6 years ago

          “You have to be biased to say it’s worse”

          I never said it was “worse”. I said it was terrible, and I’ll stand by that. My point was that them winning a WS was not any kind of proof that it wasn’t that bad It’s a specious argument.

          Reply
        • Kane U.

          6 years ago

          “Money we’ll spend”? Okay dude.

          Reply
        • Lance

          6 years ago

          Pujols has produced MUCH better than Heyword. It’s only a bad contract if they don’t produce. Yes, Albert hasn’t put up the numbers in LA he did for STL but he has driven in a lot of runs for the Halos. While he is clearly in decline in his late 30;s (yes, I know the rumors he might actually be older) and is owed a lot more money, LA was gunning for a championship seven years ago. That they didn’t get there was not Albert’s fault anymore than the Cubs WS win had much to do with Heyward, who was an anvil around their necks. Like Cabrera, the Tigers were in the win-now mode when they gave Miggy that deal.

          Reply
        • EndinStealth

          6 years ago

          @Kane, never had a typo in your life?

          Reply
      • bush1

        6 years ago

        You’re kidding right? At that level of contract there’s a much much greater chance for regret than any other feeling. Heck even if he’s a great it still has the potential to be for your team at the level he’d be getting paid.

        5
        Reply
        • bush1

          6 years ago

          *potential to be bad for your team.

          1
          Reply
      • deweybelongsinthehall

        6 years ago

        Most teams I feel will regret it at his terms unless multiple championships are won. Britton I think is healthy and likely the “steal” of the season.

        1
        Reply
        • Samuel

          6 years ago

          dewey;

          The more I watch these crazy long-term contracts, the more baffled I am.

          Yesterday in the NY Post, Joel Sherman did a write-up on them. He found 41 contracts over $60m. Of those he graded out 5 as being advantageous for the team The top one being Max Scherzer and the Nationals. #5 was funny – it was Cespedes to the Mets for 3 years…..but they tore that up for a longer term contract, and Cespedes keeps getting hurt.

          The thing is that these guys get such a disproportionate share of a teams budget that after a year or two, the contract stops teams from making moves that can help them win. It was fashionable to have the originating team pay a part of the players remaining contract to get him off the payroll and onto another team; now we see that teams have to tack on star players or top prospects as well.

          If all the above is not absurd enough – here comes the “opt out” clause. In fact, it’s an insurance policy paid for by the signing team. If the player is going great, he can make himself a free agent again – meaning he’s expecting even more money. But if he gets injured or his game goes south, then he continues to pick up a large contract which limits his team on adding/retaining players if they’re large market clubs; and often totally handcuffs a team if they’re mid or small market….often for years.

          There are maybe a dozen players in MLB today that I would give a 5 year contract to – with the last year being a team option. Trout, Betts, Sale, Lindor, Judge, etc. But giving even them a 10 year contract is nuts.

          As for Harper and Machado – sorry. They’re not truly elite players as those noted above. They may give a team a one or two year high. Then they’ll prove to be a large mistake – the biggest being that if their team has developed multiple quality players, some will have to be let go because the team cannot afford to pay them.

          Reply
        • Tom

          6 years ago

          “Most teams I feel will regret it at his terms unless multiple championships are won.”

          Uh, I think the goal of signing a player like Harper is to make money, not win championships. (That is a distant second.) If signing Harper to $400Mish makes the team that much or more money—increase in ticket sales, merchandise sales, marketing opportunities, TV revenues, etc.—then they won’t regret it. Fans might, but ownership won’t.

          Reply
        • wrigleywannabe

          6 years ago

          Missing the point. He was a leader the best way to make money is to win a WS

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          6 years ago

          “…I think the goal…is to make money, not win championships.”

          There’s no priority of one over the other. When teams sign a player like Harper they’re looking big picture. They’re factoring in the revenue an elite player can generate, just as much as what the player will mean for fielding a winning team. Winning teams generate much more money than losing teams.

          1
          Reply
        • Tom

          6 years ago

          “There’s no priority of one over the other.”

          I’d check with the owner of the team about that, as I’m pretty certain all of them would choose making money over winning.

          And yes while winning can help a club make more money, that is not always the case. The Braves “won” for years, but ended up being unable to draw fans to their stadium, even in the playoffs. Then there’s the Cubs who were terrible for many years, but were still a cash-cow.

          Look at the Angels…they’ve been mediocre for much of this decade, but sell 3M+ tickets per year. Why? People want to see Mike Trout.

          The bottom line is that while winning is a priority, it’s a distant one for ownership as opposed to making money. When the owner of whichever team signs Harper he will likely be looking at the impact the signing will have on his bottom line, and then what he does on the field. Ask any owner what he’s prefer…an increase of 10 wins in a season and stagnant revenue or 10 fewer wins and in increase revenue?

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          6 years ago

          Well, I don’t know how to say this, but you’re wrong. What you’re saying is pure conjecture on your part, and does not agree with the facts.

          First of all, these team owners were rich to start with. They made their money in more reliable ways than owning a sports franchise, and if it was just about money they could continue to do so in ways better than investing in something that comes with the vagaries that sports teams do. Team owners are in it for the glory, and the association to a team, not money.

          It’s like owning a race horse. That’s just pure gambling. Yes you can cash in big, but the risks are enormous. If it was about making money, no rich guy would go anywhere horse racing. As the saying goes, “you can make a small fortune in horse racing. The only thing is you have to start with a large one”.

          Every big signing is an owner decision. They are gambles as well. You bring up the Angels. If Moreno was only about making money why spend big on guys like Pujols and Josh Hamilton, if not a desperate attempt to win? Why would he reduce the cost of concessions, like he once did, to bring more people into the park, trying to create a more fan-supporting atmosphere.

          Daniel Snyder, who owns the Redskins, had a net worth of $2.5B before he bought the team. Today he’s worth $2.2B. Any guy who goes into owning a sports franchise for the purpose of making money is an idiot.

          Reply
      • fasbal1

        6 years ago

        You would be hard pressed to find any long term deals that aren’t a regret by the end. The last years of these deals are always bad.

        Reply
      • arenado28

        6 years ago

        I honestly don’t see Harper as anything other than a fringe Allstar player, most overhyped player there is

        2
        Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          So a ROY, MVP, 184 HR, and career .900 OPS by age 26 is overhyped. Yeah, I see your point.

          2
          Reply
        • wrigleywannabe

          6 years ago

          3 of his 7 years his WAR is below starter level.

          His numbers are grestly influenced by one mega year.

          2
          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          His presence in the lineup makes others around him better. People tend to forget the importance of his presence and what it means to a team. It’s that type of “fear” in the lineup the Cards sorely have needed the last 3 years.

          Reply
      • Michael Chaney

        6 years ago

        I can’t imagine any scenario where someone signs Harper and doesn’t regret it.

        He’s a very good player and he’s young enough that he can still get better, but there’s no way he’ll be worth his contract.

        2
        Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          I can. The team that signs him wins a WS.

          Reply
    • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

      6 years ago

      I wouldn’t want to keep ozuna. Hes a cheater. The prove is his numbers tripled in less than 2 seasons. He one of the biggest known cheaters in all of baseball. Lamar Bonds. That’s a red flag right there. The main reason why it’s a red flag is he reigned after one year. He knew he helped his hitters with his supply he used when he played.

      1
      Reply
      • jleve618

        6 years ago

        That’s the dumbest thing I ever heard.

        7
        Reply
        • EndinStealth

          6 years ago

          I have to agree and I’ve read some dumb stuff on here.

          3
          Reply
      • Cat Mando

        6 years ago

        ThatBallwasBryzzoed….if “He one of the biggest known cheaters in all of baseball” then surely you have proof, right? For it to be “known” there must be proof. Care to share?

        3
        Reply
      • fieldsj2

        6 years ago

        That’s some pretty serious accusations to throw around. Known cheater? Do you have any kind of proof or sources? I guess anyone who’s had Bonds as a hitting coach is a cheat. I’m not a Cards fan at all, but I take issue with someone that obviously is talking out of their a$$..

        2
        Reply
      • themed

        6 years ago

        What a bunch of hot air talking about Ozuna. Ridiculous

        1
        Reply
    • RJY707499

      6 years ago

      Pass on resigning Carpenter(too old), we get a good compensation pick if we lose Goldschmidt, Ozuna needs to show he can hit more than just singles, and Mikolas needs to show he wasn’t a fluke.

      1
      Reply
      • fasbal1

        6 years ago

        Carpenter will be lucky to still be in STL by the end of this contract.

        Reply
    • tombenton

      6 years ago

      I agree

      Reply
    • tombenton

      6 years ago

      Agreed

      Reply
      • Cardinals17

        6 years ago

        I agree that they shouldn’t resign Carpenter for 2020. However, I don’t see anyone wanting him in trade unless it’s the Giants to get rid of Longoria’s contract.

        Reply
    • petrie000

      6 years ago

      Not paying what it takes for the best players is also something most teams regret

      If you want the good years out of star players, you just have to accept you may be stuck paying for their decline as well. The only other option is not getting them in the first place.

      1
      Reply
    • Art poli

      6 years ago

      Couldn’t agree more with c1234 they need to sign these players to extensions instead of trading for rentals

      Reply
    • wwaoc

      6 years ago

      Ozuna can’t throw just another bad move by MO … he knew he had a bad shoulder when he gave away 2 of the Birds to 5 prospects… Let’s see if his throwing will improve before we try to extend him. I don’t think it will. NO HARPER PERIOD>

      Reply
    • Show all 60 replies
  2. ChiSox_Fan

    6 years ago

    Cards should go after White Sox’ Yolmer Sanchez.

    I would hate to see him go, but perhaps the Cards have some great prospect(s) to trade.

    1
    Reply
    • nrd1138

      6 years ago

      Yolmer is not going to get the Sox back any great prospects. I love him, but he is not an every day starter, more like a super ute who is good in the clubhouse.

      1
      Reply
      • ChiSox_Fan

        6 years ago

        And that’s what the Cards are looking for.

        He is cheap, switch hitter, good bat, and plays multiple IF positions

        Reply
  3. Dotnet22

    6 years ago

    Sign Harper, Britton, Descalso, Pena for Backup C. Trade JMart and Gyorko. Trade Fowler for whatever you can get for him by eating his salary and call it an offseason.

    Reply
    • makaio6

      6 years ago

      Fowler has a no trade clause. Makes it tougher.

      Reply
      • c1234

        6 years ago

        If he has a shot at everyday OF he would be okay with it

        Reply
        • EndinStealth

          6 years ago

          Where does he have a legit shot at starting? AAA?

          Reply
        • StlCardsfan4life

          6 years ago

          Maybe if he got his head out of his ass and actually tried to be a good ball player again. Hes a bum! How much damn money does he make?! Last year Should be his last as a Cardinal. Hes lazy and irresponsible, not a person you want on your team! But wait! He said hes gonna try hard again this year! Ha! Find some way to get rid of him and find someone to play right field and hit in 2 hole and then oniell is 4th outfielder. Oniell looks to be another grichuk btw and we already went down that road before but for a 4th outfielder its ok

          Reply
    • thor would look better in red

      6 years ago

      keep Fowler. great fourth outfielder. ozuna is no garrentee neither is bader. and when ozuna leaves next year you still have Fowler to take his place. I am confused by all of these fans thinking that fowler is worth anything in a trade. if you want to eat the whole contract just for a minir leaguer who will never make the big leagues whats the point? leave him on the team and give him a chance to find it again.

      1
      Reply
      • batty

        6 years ago

        Great 4th OFers can play CF well. That isn’t Fowler.

        Reply
      • stan lee the manly

        6 years ago

        The problem would be that having Fowler could A) prevent them from getting a better outfielder or B) blocking O’Neill’s playing time and preventing him from becoming a better outfielder. Unless they sign Harper, I’m ok with letting him try to bounce back, but his leash needs to be very short.

        Reply
    • fieldsj2

      6 years ago

      That’s a whole lot of money for a mid market team to be throwing around. I guess it’s ok to dream though.

      Reply
    • GoldenArm

      6 years ago

      Harper doesn’t like to sweat, because it messes with his hair. Since he’s ugly, he takes pride in flipping his hair as often as he can, even coming out of the can after a successful dump. SO, he ain’t gonna sign with St. Louis. He would take a discount to sign with the Yankees, because WAY MORE LUCRATIVE ENDORSEMENT DEALS IN THE BIG APPLE. Even Philly, with the Bandbox he can launch in, would sign him before the Cards, who won’t go 10 years. Philly might go 12/400 million…they have the cash and need to make a splash.

      2
      Reply
      • headhawks

        6 years ago

        Endorsement deals crack my Arzzz up. First of all. The dude is going to rake $320-400 MILLON. He doesn’t need any endorsement crap that he could earn in a mid or small market…. get real people.
        Secondly, If you good enough and attractive and have a personality you can get endorsements any freaking where you are playing.

        Reply
  4. troll

    6 years ago

    no need to revisit descalso

    2
    Reply
    • srmocardsfan

      6 years ago

      I totally agree. way better options out there.

      2
      Reply
      • EndinStealth

        6 years ago

        There are a couple better options for a lefty middle infielder that bats left, but Des has become a much better hitter than when he was here before.

        Reply
  5. rocknwell

    6 years ago

    Smart to not really get serious unless Harper’s terms come down. Like I said before, it seems the teams are all waiting for another team to tip their hand, or waiting for Harper to blink. Everyone knows the asking price is very steep.

    Reply
  6. rocknwell

    6 years ago

    Also, why don’t teams front load contracts? Players don’t get better with age, they get worse. Why not, if you have the money now, put most of it up front so you are paying for the (potentially) good output up front and don’t hamstring the teams financial resources down the road?

    Reply
    • rocknwell

      6 years ago

      That would also make an albatross contract less of an albatross and more likely to get off the books in a trade later in the contract.

      Reply
    • jtmorgan

      6 years ago

      Time value of money. A contract that is front loaded is worth a lot more than one that is backloaded. Also teams also usually are trying to add a player and stay within a budget. They know free agent deals are going to be bad at the end. No amount of front loading will really change that. You can always pay down some of the contract at the end that works the same as front loading except you might be able to get out of more money than you could’ve if it was front loaded.

      2
      Reply
    • nashvillecardsfan

      6 years ago

      It’s a fair question, but it’s all about money value today vs tomorrow. It’s the reason why Bobby Bonilla would have been better off getting $6 million 30 years ago as opposed to the $20. million he’s been payed in deferred money. Owners always have investments which can provide ordinarily healthy returns.

      Reply
      • GeoKaplan

        6 years ago

        As I recall the Bonilla contract, his deferred money was at interest, so the $6M he was owed in 2000 will bring him about $30M in installments over 25 years. While he might have been able to quintuple the $6M in 35 years from his release to final payout, this was a sure thing.

        By contrast, the deferred money for Nationals players is without interest.

        Reply
    • reflect

      6 years ago

      Money is more valuable today than tomorrow. So unless teams get a discount for front loading, it would be a poor financial decision to do so.

      Reply
      • nashvillecardsfan

        6 years ago

        Right, the only caveat to this would be if front loading affected them positively regarding the luxury tax.

        Reply
        • Blue_Painted_Dreams_LA

          6 years ago

          The luxury tax is based off of AAV. So front loading has no barring on luxury tax.

          1
          Reply
    • justacubsfan

      6 years ago

      Because it doesn’t work like that. Cap is the AVG of contract. So even if Harper received a 10 yr 300 MM contract with 250MM for first 5 years then 50MM for last 5, it would still be 30MM against cap for life of it.

      2
      Reply
      • nashvillecardsfan

        6 years ago

        Ah that makes sense. I wasn’t thinking about that.

        Reply
    • brandons-3

      6 years ago

      I’ve asked and gotten a few responses:

      1. The player whose underperforming and declining later in the contract is less likely to get cut as teams don’t typically cut tens of millions of dollars as a loss.

      2. Heads of baseball operations know it’s far more likely they’ll be in that job for the next 2-3 years than the next 5-7. Front loading the contract allows for more space to continue to add. Usually when you signs these big deals, you’re wanting to win immediately. If that doesn’t happen you won’t be there when it becomes an albatross anyways.

      3. Just simply what they can afford in their budget. Teams always have more payroll flexibility in future years so it’s easier to agree to a nine-figure deal with the money owed in years they don’t have a lot of commitments yet. It gives them cost-certainty going into that year.

      Reply
    • Vickers

      6 years ago

      Harper’s contract will be long, front loaded AND have opt outs to maximize his AAV. Even if he has to lower the overall length of his contract, he’ll still be a $40mm player until he’s ~30.

      Reply
    • petrie000

      6 years ago

      Teams tend not to like it because it limits their ability to put good players around the new acquisition, when statistically those are the most productive years of the contract

      Players don’t like it because if they’re cheap late in their career it negatively impact their job security and their control over where they play

      In a vacuum it makes sense, in the larger context there are some very real downsides to it

      1
      Reply
    • barkinghumans77

      6 years ago

      Cardinals front loaded Jhonny Peralta’s contract a few years back.

      Reply
  7. javier 3

    6 years ago

    I want them to sign Andrew Miller, Brad Boxberger for bullpen. Martin Maldonado or Rene Rivera for backup catcher. And Daniel Descalso, Derek Dietrich or Yangervis Solarte as utility lefty off the bench.

    Reply
    • batty

      6 years ago

      Lots of pitches on Miller’s arm and a mounting injury list.

      Dietrich is horrible defensively and that is the main attribute a utilityman should have.

      Reply
  8. StlSwifty

    6 years ago

    Britton or Miller? What do you think cards fans? And why?

    Reply
    • nashvillecardsfan

      6 years ago

      Britton would cost less. I also feel he’s more likely to rebound and less likely to get injured.

      Reply
  9. Triteon

    6 years ago

    Just say no to Descalso.

    Reply
    • Vedder80

      6 years ago

      Why? It is a bench spot. Does anyone really expect a superstar to hold down the 25th spot on the roster?

      Reply
      • spudchukar

        6 years ago

        I say no cause they don’t have room for him. Let’s say they only carry 12 pitchers which is conservative cause they often carry 13. 2 catchers, Goldy, Wong, DeJong, and Carp. Plus Ozuna, Bader, and a lefty right fielder (Fowler for now.) That makes 21 guys. Gyroko to platoon with Carp, Munoz similarly with Wong and O’Neill in right as a right hitting option. That leaves one spot left. Martinez, a different RF than Fowler or 13th pitcher probably more viable.

        1
        Reply
        • troll

          6 years ago

          fowler is a switch hitter

          Reply
        • cards81

          6 years ago

          O’Neill won’t be up…he is worthless sitting the bench…he will be in Triple A for when Fowler gets hurt or doesn’t produce

          Reply
  10. nashvillecardsfan

    6 years ago

    We don’t need Miller. We have Brett Cecil!

    Reply
  11. ScottRolen

    6 years ago

    “Currently mired in their first three-year playoff drought ”

    Wow! Three years.

    The Phillies have been out of the playoffs for seven years and have stunk the whole time. The Cardinals get an extra draft pick for being a small market team while the Phillies own the fourth largest market in MLB, the largest single team market in the game.

    Reply
    • ABCD

      6 years ago

      The Cardinals get an extra pick because they technically meet the definition, but in reality, they are not a small market team.

      Reply
      • Dotnet22

        6 years ago

        Tell me how you define reality. The definition is based on the population of the market they play in. I’ve seen you crying about this point on this site multiple times. Get over it.

        Reply
        • petrie000

          6 years ago

          I mean, if a ‘small market’ team is chasing the likes of Harper, it raises the very logical question of why they need compensation anyways…

          Reply
        • zpgreen

          6 years ago

          Population and amount of money ownership has are different things…

          Reply
        • ScottRolen

          6 years ago

          Not really. There are some differences. Atlanta and Boston have equivalent market sizes. The Braves also have a geographical reach like the Cardinals. However, Boston does have more money as its market is per capita more wealthy.

          That said if you believe the payrolls of the Red Sox and Braves are even within striking distance of reflecting that difference you are lost. If John Henry owned the Braves and Liberty Media owned the Red Sox the difference would be somewhat reduced, but flipped with the Braves as the big spender and Henry does not have great personal wealth in comparison to a lot of other owners.

          Reply
        • zpgreen

          6 years ago

          If your argument is that the average person in Boston has more money than the average person in Atlanta, therefore the Red Sox spend more money than the Braves, you missed the point and I’m not sure how that can even possibly be logically connected.

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          6 years ago

          One big reason why the Red Sox are wealthy is that they own Fenway Park outright, and have done so for decades. It’s also why the Giants, with AT&T now paid off, have lots of money. Not sure if the Braves new park was privately financed or not, but if it was, once the debt service is satisfied, they would have a lot more revenue.

          Reply
        • ScottRolen

          6 years ago

          The Dodgers and Cubs own their ballparks. The Yankees don’t.

          Ballpark ownership is a very marginal difference maker. Teams are taxed and the degree of the taxation determines the value of attendance. That was a big deal with the Phillies. They said they could not make enough money with the lease at Veterans Stadium and they got a very friendly negotiation for Citizens Bank Park.

          If John Henry took over the Pirates their fans would soon be overjoyed at the outcome.

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          6 years ago

          So the Cubs, Dodgers, Red Sox, and Giants all own their stadiums, but the revenue generation is marginal? I might point out that 4 of those 5 teams are the highest valued franchises in baseball. The fact that the Yankees don’t own Yankee Stadium would suggest they are the exception, their wealth coming from their geographical advantage. Why are the Giants and Red Sox valued so high when Philadelphia, Dallas, Washington, and Houston are all bigger markets? The Red Sox are the only 9th largest market, and yet they have the 5th highest value of all MLB teams. Look at what these teams have in common.

          Reply
  12. Codeeg

    6 years ago

    If the opt out clauses didn’t exist Harper would be inclined to sign a shorter deal in the hopes to get a bigger deal in about 4/5 years when he’s 30 and can probably still command a 7 year contract.
    Again he’s probably asking for multiple opt out clauses and 10+ years.

    Reply
  13. ScottRolen

    6 years ago

    “If Harper’s desired length on his forthcoming deal drops to fewer than 10 years”

    That’s easy. Raise the AAV that it’s worth it for Harper to bet on himself. Anyone can do that.

    Why do “no trade” and “opt-out” clauses exist? Because the higher AAV or more years do not. Any player can be signed without clauses and for much shorter contracts. Harper would sign a five year deal if the AAV is high enough.

    No one will go there.

    Reply
    • batty

      6 years ago

      What do you consider an AAV that would have Harper & Boras amenable to, say, a 5 year deal with no full NTC or opt outs?

      Reply
      • jlm7552

        6 years ago

        With Harpers age, if someone shoots me 4/200, I don’t think there’s a way to say no to that

        Reply
        • batty

          6 years ago

          While i agree with you, that will be setting a precedent and the other 29 owners will not be happy. Sure, that owner could say, who cares? But it’s wouldn’t just be a hamper for the other 29. That owner will have to consider, perhaps, other stars in his organization.

          Just for fun, let’s say Harper signs that exact deal with the Red Sox. Betts hits FA after the 2020 season. In my opinion, and others i believe, see Betts as a better player than Harper. What are the numbers for Betts for 4 years? 4/250? Higher?

          That’s what is wrong with outrageous AAVs on shorter terms.

          Reply
        • Jean Matrac

          6 years ago

          I don’t think that’s why a team wouldn’t go that far on a high AAV contract of short duration. One owner is not going to be hesitant to do something to help his team even if it made the other 29 owners unhappy. It’s just that $50m per season is way too much to devote to one player. It’s nearly 1/4 of the CBT threshold, which would severely limit the resources needed for the rest of the team. Take the reasons for not front-loading contracts and multiply by 2 for why a team wouldn’t want a $50M AAV, even for as short a time as 4 years.

          Reply
  14. swanhenge

    6 years ago

    Oh man…I can see it already, here it comes again…

    Cards offer Harp 10/325, he signs w the Cubs for 8/300. Haha…cardinals.

    Just kidding. Harper signs w Cubs for 3/140

    …after Cards offer 10/325. Lol

    Reply
    • baseballpun

      6 years ago

      Hopefully.

      Reply
    • kiddhoff

      6 years ago

      Yeah, but I didn’t think the Cubs overpay for GOOD players

      Reply
      • bush1

        6 years ago

        What does that even mean? If you’re referring to a contract like Heyward‘ Athens Cubs signed him for much less than the Cards offered. Sure the Cards lucked out and didn’t get him, but it’s not because they didn’t want him enough to offer more than he signed for. It’s because he didn’t want to play for the Cardinals.

        Reply
  15. greg1

    6 years ago

    I like the idea of front loading a deal now for the Cards. A lot of youngsters with years of team control hit the majors last year, and look to be key pieces for the team in the upcoming years. If 75-80% of a deal for Bryce was paid off in the next five years, while the AAV would still be on their cap, the team would have more dollars to pay a Bader or Reyes as an example.

    The Ozuna comments above are just dumb. Dude was hurt for a majority of last season, and as he got healthier, his numbers jumped. Hopefully 100% this year, and with another big bat protecting him, he’ll have an Ozuna type season again.

    I like Britton over Miller. Miller slipped last year, and with the miles on the arm being a multi-inning reliever and some deep playoff runs, I think the decline of last year was not a blip but the start of an inevitable downturn.

    If the Cards could get anything at all for Cecil, please get rid of him.

    I don’t see Dex having as bad a season as last year, and if the Cards can land a Harper, then I think he makes a quality fourth outfielder, though on an expensive contract for being a 4th.

    A little relief help, and another offensive splash, if the Cards pull off both either by trade or FA, next year is going to be fun.

    Reply
    • nashvillecardsfan

      6 years ago

      I don’t think ANYBODY expects Fowler to be as bad as last year. I’m not even sure that’s possible.

      1
      Reply
  16. nrd1138

    6 years ago

    Cards have no chance then, as I doubt Borass is ever going to concede anything for a client. 10 years or he sits.. Someone will be dumb enough to give him his 10 yrs and obnoxious money along with it. However, like others have said before, unless Harper somehow puts up Trout type numbers for the next 10 years, you are looking at failed expectations and more comparisons to Alfonso Soriano in terms of expectations.

    Reply
    • swanhenge

      6 years ago

      10 years or he sits? I don’t know about that.

      Harp can easily go 2-4 yrs right now for max AAV and then enter FA again around age 28-30. If he’s the poster boy for MLB superstar like he and most pundits say, he could actually come out ahead on two big AAV deals.

      Owners aren’t throwing 10 yr deals anymore.

      Reply
      • Jean Matrac

        6 years ago

        Security is a big issue with players. That’s why they routinely ask for more years than many clubs are comfortable with. It’s why Corbin signed with the Nats. Harper is not signing for 2-4 years if he can get more years. He knows that if he signs for 2 years, and suffers a career-ending injury, he’s screwed.

        There’s a reason why players sign contracts every year that will be bad for teams at the back end. It’s the cost of doing business in a competitive market. Even though they know it will hurt in the end, it’s make the offer, or lose out.

        “Owners aren’t throwing 10 yr deals anymore.”

        The Nats already offered Harper 10 years. If a team lusts after Harper, and they can get him by offering more years than the other teams they will, even if it means going to 12-14 years.

        Reply
  17. callmenate

    6 years ago

    8years 320 million opt out after 5

    Reply
  18. nashvillecardsfan

    6 years ago

    Trade Fowler, Gyorko and J. Martinez and some cash to an AL TEAM. Gyorko and J.Ma have enough surplus value to offset half of Fowler’s dead money. Use the surplus to sign Harper. I know I’m dreaming.

    Reply
    • daved

      6 years ago

      Gyorko and Jose Martinez must go. I can only hope they can talk Fowler into waiving his NTC.

      Reply
      • jlm7552

        6 years ago

        Why does Gyorko have to go? I get the salary constraint, but I think he has more value than ever to the Cards now with Carp moving back to 3b. Who knows how that shoulder will hold up for a whole season throwing across the diamond. Plus, he’s still a solid RH bat to spell 2 inf spots against lhp. Keep him, use him, see where we’re at in July

        Reply
    • batty

      6 years ago

      Which team do you see needing an overpriced corner OFer, an oft injured utilityman and a DH only player? Mind you, it has to be a team that Fowler believes can contend, or he’s not waiving his NT clause.

      1
      Reply
      • daved

        6 years ago

        Tampa can use Jose Martinez. They released Cron.

        Reply
        • batty

          6 years ago

          nashvillecardsfan wants all 3 packaged. That’s the jist of my comment.

          Reply
        • nashvillecardsfan

          6 years ago

          Like I said, I can dream. I do think someone would take a chance on Fowler if they also the 2 pieces I mentioned and cash considerations. As you mentioned, finding a suitor to line up with those specific needs could prove problematic.

          Reply
    • bush1

      6 years ago

      Fowler’s contract is impossible to move unless the Cards eat the vast majority of it to have him possibly perform better for another team. I can’t see them doing that. No one would touch him on his current contract.

      Reply
      • bush1

        6 years ago

        And Gyorko and Martinez don’t offset his contract nearly enough. It’s just not happening.

        Reply
  19. billysbballz

    6 years ago

    Yankee BluePrint from a want-to-be-couch potato GM:

    1- trade for a starter, preferably Bauer. Forget Kluber based on asking price and age!!!
    If Bauer becomes too expensive then look into Robby Ray! If need be add Andujar to acquire Bauer but I wouldn’t offer Florial and Andujar, or for that matter any top 10 prospects with Andujar for Bauer. His contract demands alone may scare teams away.

    2- if Andujar is dealt, sign Machado for third but not if he’s asking for 10 years. 7 years max with 8th year team option.
    I’m not gonna get into the money.

    The fact the Yanks have more money to spend because Corbin signed with the Nats should allow this next big signing!

    3- Sign Bryce Harper to play left!
    He wants to be a Yankee and he fits in great in the stadium. He is below average defensively in center but in left with his athleticism he will be very solid. Stanton cannot play left long term and is more suited for right anyways!

    4- Sign Andrew Miller! Love his leadership and Yankee fans love his mentality. Most Yankee fans want him back! Give him 2 years with a no trade for security.

    5- try and Sign one more relieved such as Ottavino, DRob, or Britton?

    6- Consider signing Heccheverria for one year to play SS until Didi returns and leave Torres at second! Wade can platoon at ss with his left handed bat, high end defense, and speed.

    7- Lastly fill out bench with home grown talent such as Wade, Romine, Frazier, and one lefty bat via free agency? Daniel Murphy bat is perfect! Plus he can play some second and first, maybe occasionally third??? He can DH when Stanton is in the field!

    Charge towards 28!

    Reply
    • baseballpun

      6 years ago

      What better place to talk Yanks than on a “Cardinals Rumors” article.

      4
      Reply
      • billysbballz

        6 years ago

        Cardinals still collect a compensation first round pick for being considered a small market team so any cardinals rumor article to me loses its validity!
        The fact that MLB still allows them to receive an extra pick reveals almost an insider collusion! The cards are one of the reasons baseballs collective bargaining system is broken!

        Reply
        • srechter

          6 years ago

          My god, man, the exclamation points.

          4
          Reply
        • stan lee the manly

          6 years ago

          As I’ve stated to your claim on multiple other pages, the market size is determined by the amount of people living inside the radius that makes up the St. Louis market. The Cardinals have significantly less chances to win over a fan than large markets such as New York and LA because there are so many less people. They should not be penalized because they have proven to be exceptionally adept at building a fanbase and have a large following.

          2
          Reply
        • daved

          6 years ago

          It’s a cow town, small town and sheeple town.

          Reply
        • billysbballz

          6 years ago

          3 of them put you in a straight jacket?

          Reply
        • Dotnet22

          6 years ago

          This

          Reply
    • nashvillecardsfan

      6 years ago

      It was only a matter of time before a post about the Cardinals turned into a post about the Yankees. .

      I’m teasing a little, I understand any article including Harper will bring out all his suitors fans. Only was I see Yankees signing Harper is if they can trade Stanton to the dodgers.

      1
      Reply
    • MrNewYork24

      6 years ago

      Love everything you said, Except for Murphy, There two targets should be Bauer, or Ray. Probally won’t all happen but would be great. I have a funny feeling Philly is gonna offer one of the big two huge money

      Reply
    • StlCardsfan4life

      6 years ago

      Wtf? Isnt there a yankee thread somewhere else for u to post?

      Reply
  20. daved

    6 years ago

    Descalso? Really? While they’re at it, bring the entire worthless bunch back, like Slappy Jay, Craig and Kozma.

    1
    Reply
    • sidewinder11

      6 years ago

      As a DBacks fan, you’d be lucky to have Scals back. He was one of the most clutch hitters in the NL last year, and he has more professional at bats than any bench player I’ve seen in a long time.

      Reply
      • daved

        6 years ago

        So clutch he batted .202 with RISP. Nobody is afraid of Descalso. Go back to bed.

        Reply
    • troll

      6 years ago

      you forgot thurston, greene, reynolds, wiggington and shoemaker

      Reply
    • jlmini10

      6 years ago

      Which left handed utility infielder would you prefer? Is there a better one that’s available? Or do you like to just rip on serviceable former cardinals role players?

      Reply
  21. tombenton

    6 years ago

    If the Cardinals need a left handed bat why not keep Matt Adams, back up first baseman and good power and defense

    Reply
    • daved

      6 years ago

      They need a lefty bat that can play every day.

      Reply
    • themed

      6 years ago

      No to Adams. Yes to Descalso. Plays multiple positions well and much more pop than Garcia. What more do you want out of a utility player. He fits!

      Reply
      • nashvillecardsfan

        6 years ago

        I’d prefer Adams for the power. We already have our super utility guy in Munoz.

        Reply
        • themed

          6 years ago

          Munoz bats right. Cards need a left handed bat off the bench. Why not both?

          1
          Reply
        • nashvillecardsfan

          6 years ago

          Adams has pop. And he’s left handed. My point is with Munoz you don’t need your left handed bench bat to be able to play multiple positions. Why not elect for the guy who can hit them out of the park, and absolutely crushed right handed pitching?

          Reply
        • themed

          6 years ago

          I didn’t see much from Adams but striking out a lot and hitting weak ground balls. No Cardinals and the Matt Adams era is over.

          1
          Reply
        • nashvillecardsfan

          6 years ago

          He had an .8111 OPS vs LHP in 2018. That’s pretty damn good.

          Reply
        • troll

          6 years ago

          just get someone that can hit. too much emphasis on lefty/righty crap.

          Reply
  22. goldenmisfit

    6 years ago

    Anyone who truly believes that Harper only matched expectations twice in his career in Washington does not know what they are talking about. With the exception of one year he had over 30 home runs every year and had an on-base percentage of at least 390 every single season.

    1
    Reply
  23. MetsYankeesRedSox

    6 years ago

    I think both Harper & Machado would be wise to sign a 1 or 2 year contract to build some stock. Harper coming off a substandard year & Manny coming off a season of stupidity.

    Owners are getting smarter on longer term contracts for positional players. Pitching contracts are another thing.

    Reply
    • daved

      6 years ago

      Build some stock? They already have.

      1
      Reply
    • petrie000

      6 years ago

      They get hurt and their ‘stock’ craters, so taking the risk your talking about would be utter lunacy

      Sportswriters care about the respective narratives surrounding the two, GMs only care about production and potential.

      1
      Reply
      • daved

        6 years ago

        Giving a long term contract to a 26 year old is not lunacy. How many Cardinals last year hit 34 HR, drove in 100, walked 130 times and played 159 games? And that was a below average season for Harper. Yes, GMs care about production and potential, and since a player’s PRIME is age 27-32, both Harper and Machado will get paid, and no GM will regret signing them based on their potential. Not at their ages. But keep coming up with the excuses as to why Mo and the other dimwits in the Cards front office keep preferring to sign mid tier free agents and watching them fail, like Leake, Fowler, Cecil etc.

        1
        Reply
        • petrie000

          6 years ago

          My ‘lunacy’ comment was to the idea that either would sign a short deal to ‘build value’

          I’m of the opinion that you shouldn’t care that much about potential albatross situations if if means passing on really good players. Those players get more years than they probably should, but you either play that game or you make due with secondary talents.

          1
          Reply
  24. kiddhoff

    6 years ago

    What about for Harper, a front loaded contract with s player opt after 4 yrs and a team opt after 6yrs?

    Reply
    • petrie000

      6 years ago

      Scott Boras hasn’t even seen this and is already laughing….

      Reply
      • kiddhoff

        6 years ago

        Explain…..

        Reply
        • petrie000

          6 years ago

          The team opt out gaurantees it’s a 6 year deal. Harper can get 8 gauranteed easily, probably closer to 10. Without having to let the team decide if he gets the last half of it or not

          Reply
        • kiddhoff

          6 years ago

          I said front loaded. 12yr/420 mil. HypotheticallyThe 1st 6 years guarantee s Harper $45 mil/yr, $270 mil. The last 6 years are worth $25 mil each. If club opts out, he has pocketed $270 mil in 6 years, and can enter the open market

          Reply
        • petrie000

          6 years ago

          Front loaded only matters if the team in question is paying him the same over those first 6 seasons as another team would over the life of the deal

          Because agents and players read ‘team option’ as ‘end of the contract’.

          1
          Reply
        • kiddhoff

          6 years ago

          I appreciate your explanation, but I’m not sure Boras would ‘laugh’ at that proposal. I’m not really sold on your knowledge. Can you give me some credentials? The team opt would give Harper incentive to perform. Its hypothetical anyway.

          Reply
        • petrie000

          6 years ago

          No, I can’t give you credentials, I can only give you a logical argument. If that’s not enough, than I really can’t help you any further, you’re simply beyond reason.

          If you can come up with a single reason as to why Harper would take less money guaranteed simply to get more up front, the forum is yours, but I kind of assume Boras is smarter than me, and if i can see why it’s a a stupid idea…

          Reply
        • kiddhoff

          6 years ago

          Well, first, Its always more advantageous to get more money up front. Second,its sort of low risk, high reward. Yeah, he has to perform well for 6 years in order to get the $150 mil on the back end of his career. Most teams aren’t going to go into this big of a contract without some type of safeguard. I dont think Boras would laugh at this proposal. I appreciate your being candid. I’ll disagree with you that it’s stupid. And we shall see what happens

          Reply
  25. Jack0207

    6 years ago

    Well if Harper signs for less than 10 years he isn’t making $400 million

    Reply
  26. Bubbafatt

    6 years ago

    For those of you who are anti descalso, the article talks about it but he really is a much better player than he was when he left, you should really look at his stats. Left handed, multiple position bench bat. He checks all the boxes. If you didn’t watch the goldschmidt press conference, descalso is one of his best friends, so bringing him back wouldn’t be the worst move if you truly have designs on resigning goldy. As far as Fowler goes, it’s hard to speculate without knowing where hed waive his no trade clause to, but you could move him if you pay half the salary, and attach a prospect or two, or trade for another bad contract that fits a team need. The giants might be a good match here, with melancon being owed about half of Fowlers remaining money, and will smith having one year of control left. Package a couple of your pitching and or outfield prospects with Fowler and it might get it done, again, if Fowler is willing to waive his not trade clause, and your bullpen is in good shape, although you might have to just eat the rest of the Cecil contract. Trading Martinez and gyorko should be easy to move, because Jose is still pre arb for another year, and gyorko is only making 8 mill after the 5 mill the Padres are sending for him. Id love to see Maldonado signed as the backup catcher. And then ideally sign Michael Brantley to play right field this year, with oneill as your fourth outfielder and when ozuna leaves after this season, Brantley slides over to left and oneill is your right fielder when ozuna leaves. This assuming you can’t get Harper of course. If you can lure the big ticket time, I say throw caution to the wind and go for it. It’s not my money. Here you lineup:

    Carpenter/Brantley
    Goldschmidt
    Ozuna
    Brantley/carpenter
    Dejong
    Molina
    Wong
    Bader

    Bench
    Descalso
    Munoz
    Oneill
    Maldonado

    Ideally I’d like to see Brantley leadoff but if carpenter has to, Brantley in cleanup keeps you three lefties appropriately separated. I think that’s a contending lineup, especially with an expected bounceback from ozuna.

    Reply
    • zpgreen

      6 years ago

      The Cards didn’t get Goldy to bat him second. I doubt they find any deal where it makes sense to trade Fowler. He was great his 1st season of the deal. I think they will give Fowler a shot to earn his position back this coming year. No need to sign Brantley, who can’t seem to stay healthy, to any sort of deal with the current roster they have.

      Reply
  27. Vizionaire

    6 years ago

    i thought cards were the masters of building a championship team from within. or so the cards trolls preached to us angels fans for five years after pujols was signed.

    Reply
    • baseballpun

      6 years ago

      Won the pennant two years later. How are the Angels doing?

      FYI, part of building from within is having a farm that generates prospects that can land a Paul Goldschmidt or Marcell Ozuna.

      1
      Reply
    • barkinghumans77

      6 years ago

      The Cardinals have home grown players at C, 2B, 3B, SS, CF. Not to mention several bench players and the majority of the pitching staff. I’d say that qualifies as building from within.

      1
      Reply
  28. Zachary Hines

    6 years ago

    I say trade Fowler, JMart, Gryko.

    Sign Miller or Britton.

    Sign back up catcher maybe Maldonado

    Sign a Descalso

    Sign a left handed bat for OF.

    Reply
    • STLBaseballFanSince2020

      6 years ago

      Michael Brantley would be a very good fit IMO

      Reply
  29. Sully

    6 years ago

    Thanks again for buying pujols

    1
    Reply
    • Central Valley

      6 years ago

      Defensive shifts in today’s game of analytics the reason why Harper’s numbers are down?

      If defensive shifts are here to stay, doesn’t that greatly reduce the value of players that cannot adjust? Example, Harper?

      Reply
    • Vizionaire

      6 years ago

      thanks for pujols signing with the angels. cool billion was added to the $2 billion tv deal though the owner seems to just pocket the most.

      Reply
  30. zpgreen

    6 years ago

    Get Harper and his primadonna attitude away from the Cardinals. Yes, he is a great talent with great potential, but he won’t be worth 10 years and $350M or more like Boras and him are asking for. There is already light chatter of his legs breaking down and maybe having to move to 1st base later in his career. Maybe it’s those super tight pants cutting off circulation.

    Reply
  31. goldenmisfit

    6 years ago

    I love when Cardinal fans say they want no part of a player knowing damn well they can’t afford him and he would not want to go there anyway LOL. Even if he did have to move to first base which by the way he has been working on in Washington the past year how can you make that sound like it is a bad thing if he is still putting up homeruns in the mid 30s and nearly 400 on base percentage. Just face it you guys can’t get him so you are kind of like the girl who got dumped but telling everyone you dumped him.

    Reply
    • zpgreen

      6 years ago

      While I agree that he may not want to come to STL, the Cardinals have the money to sign him. The Cardinals front office is smart enough to not waste money like many other organizations do. There are more players than just Harper putting up 30 homers and 400 OBP, and at more valuable positions than 1st base. It’s not like I said Bryce wasn’t great (which I actually verbatim did say), but why would the Cardinals want to hamstring themselves by signing him? Similar to what the Angels did with Pujols and the Tigers did with Cabrera, and the Orioles did with Davis. The list can go on.

      Reply
  32. juicemane

    6 years ago

    Lol Cardinals fans are so delusional, you’re team isn’t that good.

    Look at the first half of 2018. That is your team next year. Padres should win more games than Cardinals next year. Ill see yall at about 78-80 wins. I really think the Padres might top that

    1
    Reply
    • themed

      6 years ago

      You have no clue OJ juice.

      3
      Reply
    • jimbo504 2

      6 years ago

      You are the one who is delusional if you think the Padres are going to outperform the Cardinals. Enjoying that Hosmer contract, are ya?

      1
      Reply
    • baseballpun

      6 years ago

      Let’s have a bet on who wins more games, I’ll take the Cards, you take the Pads, loser has to deactivate his MLBTR account.

      Reply
  33. 619bird

    6 years ago

    The smart people realize while Descalso plays multiple positions. He doesn’t play one particularly well and there’s no way he replicates his production the last 3 seasons playing almost half of his games at Busch 3. Then again this is pretty much a pinch hitting role and maybe they hope he just works counts and doesn’t K as much as he did last season. I think they pretty much don’t want to invest much and he fits the price range they want to go with.

    Reply
    • jimbo504 2

      6 years ago

      I’d be fine with a Descalso reunion. He gives gritty ABs and like you said would likely just be a PH.

      Reply
  34. dawson0701

    6 years ago

    Sign Harper Cards need more talent to get that World Series again

    Reply
  35. Swinging Friars

    6 years ago

    Where is Jose Martinez going?

    Reply
  36. sixfourthree

    6 years ago

    Harper is an improbability at this point now that they have added an impact bat with Goldy. While they might be still able to afford Harper right now they need bandwidth next year to pursue extensions with Goldschmidt, Ozuna, Mikolas and Wacha. Granted they may pursue other options or promote from within but those players are important pieces.

    So realistically we are going to see the Cardinals sign a back up catcher, a left-handed utility infielder and a lefty reliever/closer. Of those positions we should focus on a top notch reliever as that is the greatest area of need. Fowler is not going anywhere but I could see the Cardinals trying to move both Cecil and Jose Martinez to try and upgrade the bullpen even further and free up some playing time for Tyler O’Neill, Adolis Garcia and Lane Thomas.

    Reply
  37. satkins

    6 years ago

    I’d rather see Cards spend $ on a top flight starter. Haven’t had a true stopper in the rotation for a few yrs now.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

  • Top Stories
  • Recent

Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death

Rangers Place Corey Seager On Injured List

Cubs Promote Moises Ballesteros

Evan Longoria To Sign One-Day Contract, Retire As Member Of Rays

Diamondbacks To Promote Jordan Lawlar

Rockies Fire Bud Black

Cubs Promote Cade Horton

Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base

Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton

Mariners Claim Leody Taveras

Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach

A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery

Blue Jays Sign Spencer Turnbull

Blue Jays Sign José Ureña

Ross Stripling Retires

Rangers Place Leody Taveras On Outright Waivers

Triston Casas Likely To Miss Entire 2025 Season Due To Knee Surgery

Orioles Recall Coby Mayo

Dodgers Recall Hyeseong Kim

Triston Casas Suffers “Significant Knee Injury”

MLBTR Podcast: Devers Drama, Managerial Firings, And Jordan Lawlar

Matt Carpenter Announces Retirement

The Opener: Doubleheaders, Pitchers’ Duel, Acuna

Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death

Phillies Sign Seth Beer To Minor League Deal

Guardians Place Ben Lively On Injured List With Flexor Strain

Dodgers Place Roki Sasaki On Injured List

Jordan Luplow Signs With Atlantic League’s High Point Rockers

Dodgers To Activate Clayton Kershaw On Saturday

Yankees Sign Anthony DeSclafani To Minor League Deal

ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

Latest Rumors & News

Latest Rumors & News

  • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
  • Nolan Arenado Rumors
  • Dylan Cease Rumors
  • Luis Robert Rumors
  • Marcus Stroman Rumors

 

Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

MLBTR Features

MLBTR Features

  • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
  • Front Office Originals
  • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
  • MLBTR Podcast
  • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
  • 2025 Arbitration Projections
  • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
  • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
  • Contract Tracker
  • Transaction Tracker
  • Extension Tracker
  • Agency Database
  • MLBTR On Twitter
  • MLBTR On Facebook
  • Team Facebook Pages
  • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

Rumors By Team

  • Angels Rumors
  • Astros Rumors
  • Athletics Rumors
  • Blue Jays Rumors
  • Braves Rumors
  • Brewers Rumors
  • Cardinals Rumors
  • Cubs Rumors
  • Diamondbacks Rumors
  • Dodgers Rumors
  • Giants Rumors
  • Guardians Rumors
  • Mariners Rumors
  • Marlins Rumors
  • Mets Rumors
  • Nationals Rumors
  • Orioles Rumors
  • Padres Rumors
  • Phillies Rumors
  • Pirates Rumors
  • Rangers Rumors
  • Rays Rumors
  • Red Sox Rumors
  • Reds Rumors
  • Rockies Rumors
  • Royals Rumors
  • Tigers Rumors
  • Twins Rumors
  • White Sox Rumors
  • Yankees Rumors

ad: 160x600_MLB

Navigation

  • Sitemap
  • Archives
  • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

MLBTR INFO

  • Advertise
  • About
  • Commenting Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Connect

  • Contact Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feed

MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

hide arrows scroll to top

Register

Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version