TODAY: The team has announced the signing.
YESTERDAY: The Diamondbacks have agreed to a one-year deal with free agent reliever Greg Holland, according to Robert Murray and Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic (via Twitter). The Boras Corporation client secures a $3.25MM guarantee and $3.5MM in possible incentives, per Jon Heyman of MLB Network (Twitter links). Holland still must pass a physical before the contract will be finalized.
Now 33 years of age, Holland is not the same pitcher that once featured as one of the game’s most dominant relievers. Indeed, he last pitched as a true relief ace back in 2014. He blew out his elbow in the ensuing campaign and has never fully regained his velocity.
That’s not to say that Holland hasn’t shown his share of ability in the ensuing seasons. He turned in a successful 2017 campaign for the Rockies, so much so that he received and rejected a qualifying offer from the organization in the following winter. And though things went terribly last year with the Cardinals after a late-spring signing, Holland did rebound later in the season with the Nationals.
It truly was a dramatic turnaround, though it’s hard to pinpoint the root cause for the change. In his 25 frames in St. Louis, Holland surrendered as many earned runs and free passes as he recorded strikeouts (22 apiece). Upon arriving in D.C., Holland contributed 21 1/3 innings over which he posted a 25:10 K/BB ratio and permitted only a pair of earned runs on just nine hits.
Over the course of the season, Holland proved capable of limiting the long ball, as he has long done. And he still generated a strong 13.1% swinging-strike rate. Clearly, the D-Backs won’t anticipate the full-fledged re-emergence of the once-great closer, but they’ve evidently seen enough to believe that Holland can still be a quality, late-inning arm.
The exact plan for Holland’s usage isn’t yet evident, but it would hardly be surprising to see him receive at least a full-blown shot at earning the closer’s gig this spring. Archie Bradley currently profiles as the top ninth-inning option in Arizona, but he has been successful in a more flexible role. Details of Holland’s incentives package aren’t yet known, but could offer a hint as to the expectations of all involved.
Needless to say, the Cardinals did not see a return on the $14MM they invested in Holland last year. It’s tough to imagine the Diamondbacks ending up with a similar sense of regret, given the much lower amount promised. If they end up paying Holland the full $6.75MM contemplated in the contract, it’ll only be because he warranted the opportunities. Beyond that, even if the Snakes prove unable to mount a surprise challenge for the postseason, they ought to have an opportunity to spin off Holland (and his remaining financial obligations) to another team over the summer.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
twinkietime
Maybe he has something left in the tank…
heater
His numbers with the Nationals looked pretty good. At a $3.5mm base, I’d take a flyer!
ZGDC
Maybe a bit on the pricier side for such uncertainty, but still worth a flier imo
TheTrotsky
Not pricey at all, def worth the flier.
iverbure
Definitely pricey for a polarizing player. Holland is perfect example of why you don’t sign RP arms to lengthy contracts. (Insert stupid comment about how owners are making billions below)
TheTrotsky
How is 3.5 million pricey? How is he polarizing?
SFGiants74
It’s a one year contract. How is that lengthy?
socraticgadfly
Per an earlier post here, he may have been another of those players hurt by a late signing last year.
That said, given that his FIP and other stats were off in 2015 from previous years. Then the TJ. Then they were off again in 2017. It was an overpay by the Cards, no doubt. I’d take him back, based on his Nationals second half, at that price, though.
SoxPow
Damn, I was hoping the Sox would get him.
stymeedone
His price was too rich for the Poorsox
Equinsu Ocha
it will cost them more now, they’ll have to trade for him before the summer deadline
baseballdad37
Big deal
xabial
D-backs have agreed to a one-year deal with Greg Holland…
“Salary terms are not yet known.”
Ominous sign for his guarantee…
xabial
$3.5M guarantee??!
I stand corrected, Boras.
BrewCrew1302
HAHAHAHA another knee slapper by a legend of MLBTR
JJB
I’m giving you and upvote just to deny you the satisfaction of getting 100% downvotes. I broke up your internet no-hitter.
Rbase
Will we see the Cardinals version or the Nationals (/Royals) version? I’m really curious to see what kind of contract he received.
SupremeZeus
The Dbacks version. Playing toss in meaningless games.
ChiSox_Fan
Yawn
RedKing22
I like this signing. Cheap guarantee and if he can play the way he did with Colorado and Washington it’ll be great.
ChiSox_Fan
Yawn!
bucketbrew35
Solid move for the the D-Backs.
xabial
Rather have Shawn Kelley who had a better 2018, took less guaranteed money -albeit Kelley was 2 years older.
Holland performed well as Shawn Kelley’s successor… on the same team! Remind me why Kelley was DFA’d or got less than Holland in FA with team option to boot (?)
jbigz12
Maybe because Holland tossed up a .97 ERA/2.96 FIP on WSN. Has had a much better career and is generally much more durable. And he’s younger. It adds up to me
andrewf
What happened to you? You used to post things that made sense and now you post gibberish.
5TUNT1N
He was dfa because he had to throw pitches in garbage time and gave up a homer if I recall correctly then threw a tantrum and spiked his glove or kicked it or something. Rizzo dfa him because of his poor professionalism. Worked out well for the A’s though!
larry48
D-back bottom feeding on junk pile,
Griffin Design
I don’t understand all of the AZ bashing. They were one of the better teams in the league 4 out of 6 months last year. Yes they lost Corbin and Pollock to FA. Yes they traded away Goldy (whom they were not going to re-sign). But they should be able to count on bounce back seasons from Lamb and Souza – both of them were terrible last season. Also, Robby Ray was only mediocre and they will get Taiwan Walker back at some point. This will be a competitive team, not championship caliber, but not as bad as some people would like to believe.
Jean Matrac
So you’re counting on everyone who had a bad year to bounce back, but also counting on everyone that had good, or average years, to not regress.
sidewinder11
That’s what most teams count on every year. Not everyone has a stockpile of talent like Houston, Boston or NYY that can just count on being in the playoffs no matter what.
Griffin Design
Isn’t that what every team s counting on?
ScottRC
Sigh, so I guess Machado and Harper are NEVER signing anywhere?
dugdog83
I know it’s getting old. I’m actually more shocked Dallas hasn’t signed anywhere yet.
Payne Train
Another example of these players holding out and getting shafted, rightfully so, after they underperform on a one year deal.
This guy should have taken a 3 year deal last year when he had the chance… now instead of making 12-14 mil this year he’s going to make around 4.5 … it’s not safe to bet on yourself anymore in these markets … sign an extension or take a quality offer for multiple years from a team you like .
Phillies2017
On the real, I think his early struggles had to do with a lack of Spring Training.
iverbure
Teams should stay away from all guys who miss spring training.
johnrealtime
Or..just give them more time before bringing them up to the majors. Recreate a spring training in the minors instead of having them there for a few weeks and then bringing them up
fasbal1
Holland refused to go to extended spring training last year with the Cardinals, and as a result he was terrible with them.
Wolf Hoffmann
Dbacks going into full tank mode. They should jettison Grienke and do the re-build right.
larry48
Grienke is untradeable unless D-backs pay more than 60-75 % of his remaining deal. Also Grienke has a large list of no trade teams.
iverbure
It’s comical when people just say things like yeah just trade that player with a no trade and who makes 30 mil+ who is 30 years of age plus. It’s like these people don’t have a clue of the current market. The reason why teams aren’t handing those deals out is nobody is trading for those hideous deals even if the player is still productive because they’re up against the Lux tax.
johnrealtime
Those numbers are hugely off but the Dbacks would have to kick in some money. Certainly not 75+ million dollars. He is definitely worth more than 3 years 30 million
jorge78
Welcome to the new normal.
And labor unrest in 2021.
Nice to see Boras struggling to get teams to outbid themselves…..
Bunselpower
It just kills me that the labor unrest will be caused by a) the top players holding the rest of the market hostage while they try to get what they think they’re worth, and b) the player’s own unwillingness to adapt to changing contracts. The days of 30 year olds getting big deals is over, and rightfully so.
Now, does arbitration/service time need to be amended to fix this? Yes, I think either 2 years minimum/3 years arb or the reverse needs to happen. But, you had a player’s union head that had the same info the owners did and refused to accept that guys were not playing nearly as long when he signed the last deal. They players, through use of PED’s artificially inflated the FA market and the crash is happening now. It sucks but you can blame the last generation for the fact that you miss out on several million, but don’t blame the owners.
iverbure
You forgot to mention the players negotiated for many of the things that have caused a free agent freeze. For example adding on harsher penalties to the Luxury tax teams and moving them down in the draft.
Now the players and agents instead of adapting to the new market they just go to the media with tears in their eyes complaining about the current market and saying it’s not like it used to be.
Again had Harper and or Machado’s agents said our client/s are looking for a 4 year deal at league record AAV more teams in December would have been in on them and the price would have gone up. Coming to the market expecting 8,9,10+ year deals literally took out 26, 27 teams from day one. Terrible negotiation tactic. Looks good on Boras for hot shotting the market for years. Go to the Phillies and ask for the highest AAV deal they can offer at 4 yrs. god forbid one of these guys sign for 10 generations of wealth instead of 30 generations.
ck420
Most of the players that signed late last year and missed spring training had a down year, free agents should take note and start signing and get ready
baseball10183768
Give Joey Krehbiel a shot! Wasting 3.5 million when you can bring up a AAA guy that can do the same thing for 550k
jbigz12
4.24 ERA and 1.5 HR/9 in AAA. I’m going to go out on a limb and say he can’t do what Holland can. The Dbacks don’t exactly have a bunch of studs in the pen so if the kid is any good I’m sure he’ll get his shot
baseball10183768
But he’s got a career 0.00 ERA in the big leagues… guys a stud!
sidewinder11
I’d rather see Sherfy get an extended opportunity. He’s been dynamite in Reno for 2 years and looked good when given a chance in the show.
Solaris601
Every time I see one of these affordable 1-year bounce back signings I think to myself, “I know CLE still has a screaming need in the bullpen, but just like last year they’re doing nothing to address the problem.”
Oxford Karma
Pitching is so fickle. If you told someone 2-3 years ago that Greg Holland would be cheaper than Jesse Chavez and half as valuable as Joaquin Soria, you could have won some cash.
Gordon Lightfoot
Holland will be better prepared this year after going through a traditional Spring Training. Good deal – worth the mild risk.
Hill411
Money spent on a pitcher who may or may not still have MLB stuff or may or may not be a closer seems a poor decision by the D-Backs. The thought process must be that the D-Backs will be ‘in’ most games and need a set-up or solid closer. Looking at the current players abd their bats…the games are not going to be close because the D-Backs will not generate a lot of runs. The money could have been better spent on some mediocre bats and gloves. A maybe on the mound won’t save many games.
jbigz12
Looked pretty good for Washington. Don’t think he’s option A for the closer role but if he is you aren’t going to find a better option for 3 million bucks.
themed
Good sign.
milkman
This is fine. Nothing special.
Johnny Papelseed
I guess the dbacks are truly in rebuild mode…
jonesadoug
Dirty South when are you going to come back home to KC????
bradthebluefish
Wish the Red Sox gave him a similar offer. Their bullpen is talented but thin. And I don’t see there being money for Kimbrel after signing Eovaldi.
Colorado Red
Bet he feels dumb.
Turned down 3/52 last year.
Don’t get too greedy
sidewinder11
Jake Barrett DFA’d in corresponding move
MartinH
he was an unmitigated disaster in St. Louis.